Podcasts about aharon barak

Ils étaient une nouvelle fois des dizaines de milliers : une véritable « marée humaine hier, s'exclame le Monde à Paris, pour le cinquième soir de manifestation contre l'incarcération d'Ekrem Imamoğlu, désigné candidat à la présidentielle de 2028. » Et « ils étaient des millions, hier, à participer à la primaire organisée par le Parti républicain du peuple, principale formation de l'opposition. L'arrestation de la bête noire du président Erdoğan continue de provoquer partout dans le pays des rassemblements, malgré les interdictions et la brutalité des forces de police ».« Erdoğan semble avoir perdu toute mesure avec l'arrestation de son rival, commente le Süddeutsche Zeitung à Munich. Un dirigeant qui fait arrêter son challenger quelques jours avant l'investiture, et qui l'accable par le biais d'une justice complaisante d'une kyrielle d'accusations fallacieuses, doit être assez nerveux. Recep Tayyip Erdoğan craint manifestement tellement le populaire maire d'Istanbul Ekrem İmamoğlu qu'il préfère s'accommoder de manifestations de masse dans tout le pays plutôt que de risquer une compétition loyale dans les urnes. C'est clair comme de l'eau de roche : Erdoğan estime que ses chances de victoire pour la présidentielle sont minces. »La démocratie en périlPour Libération à Paris, « la Turquie bascule bel et bien dans l'autocratie. » Dimanche 23 mars, « le Parti républicain du peuple a (donc) décidé de maintenir la primaire prévue au sein du parti pour désigner son candidat présidentiel. Le parti a appelé tous les citoyens turcs à participer au scrutin et à voter pour l'édile écroué. Il s'agit là d'une élection symbolique et contestataire, tant Ekrem Imamoğlu, outre son incarcération, ne peut plus légalement se présenter à une présidentielle depuis l'invalidation de son diplôme universitaire. »Mais les électeurs se sont pressé aux urnes : une quinzaine de millions. Et « aussi symbolique soit-il, relève Libération, avec plus de 13 millions de voix en faveur de l'édile, ce scrutin a intronisé Ekrem Imamoğlu en leader incontestable de l'opposition au régime de Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, l'érigeant ainsi en martyr d'une démocratie turque en péril. »Israël : une autre « autocratie » ?« Autocratie », c'est le terme qu'utilise également le quotidien suisse Le Temps, mais cette fois à propos d'Israël. « Israël, cet État qui se voulait juif et démocratique depuis 77 ans, est sur le point de devenir une autocratie, s'exclame en effet le journal genevois. En cause, les attaques de Benyamin Netanyahu contre les services de sécurité et la justice. La perspective a mené ce week-end des milliers d'Israéliens à descendre dans les rues du pays, d'Haïfa à Jérusalem et de Tel-Aviv à Beer-Sheva. L'ancien président de la Cour suprême Aharon Barak l'avait dit jeudi soir : “Nous avons franchi de nombreuses lignes rouges“, et il mettait en garde contre une “guerre civile“. Et en quasi vingt ans à la tête du pays, pointe encore Le Temps, le premier ministre en aura transgressé d'innombrables pour rester au pouvoir et échapper à ses juges. Mais Benyamin Netanyahu s'attaque aujourd'hui à deux piliers de l'État : le patron de la sécurité intérieure (le Shin Bet) Ronen Bar, et la procureure générale Gali Baharav-Miara, qu'il veut limoger tous les deux. C'est inédit. »Gaza sous contrôle total israélien ?Toujours à propos d'Israël, « le gouvernement se prépare à occuper la bande de Gaza, à rétablir l'autorité militaire et à contrôler totalement la population palestinienne » : C'est du moins ce qu'affirme Haaretz à Tel Aviv.Pour L'Orient-Le Jour à Beyrouth, c'est clair : « Israël fait sauter le dernier tabou : Gaza sera israélienne ou ne sera pas. Il n'est plus permis de douter des plans de Benyamin Netanyahu. À l'issue de cette guerre, même si le Hamas est totalement vaincu, même si l'enclave est totalement démilitarisée, même si les blocus égyptien et israélien sont maintenus, Gaza sera sous l'autorité directe ou indirecte d'Israël. Ou bien vidée de sa population. Benyamin Netanyahu n'ayant aucune limite, tout dépendra donc de Donald Trump et des pays arabes, relève encore le quotidien libanais. De la capacité et de la volonté du premier de tordre le bras de ses alliés pour qu'ils accueillent les rescapés ou de la capacité et de la volonté des seconds à proposer un plan alternatif acceptable aux yeux d'Israël. Seul compte ici le rapport de force. »

A Corte Internacional de Justiça (CIJ), um dos seis órgãos principais da Organização das Nações Unidas (ONU), decidiu, por 13 votos a 2, que Israel deve “interromper imediatamente a sua ofensiva militar e qualquer outra ação na área de Rafah que possa infligir à população palestina em Gaza uma condição de vida que possa provocar a sua destruição física, no todo ou em parte”, como anunciou o presidente do tribunal, Nawaf Salam.Israel deve garantir que a passagem do Egito para o sul de Gaza permaneça aberta, com a entrada de “serviços básicos e assistência humanitária urgentemente necessários”, e que observadores externos possam monitorar a situação para reportá-la em até um mês à CIJ.Os votos contrários à necessidade da decisão foram dados por Julia Sebutinde, representante de Uganda, e Aharon Barak, ex-presidente da Suprema Corte israelense.Felipe Moura Brasil e Duda Teixeira comentam:Ser Antagonista é fiscalizar o poder. Apoie o jornalismo Vigilante:  https://bit.ly/planosdeassinatura   Acompanhe O Antagonista no canal do WhatsApp.  Boletins diários, conteúdos exclusivos em vídeo e muito mais.   https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va2S...   Ouça O Antagonista | Crusoé quando quiser nos principais aplicativos de podcast.  Leia mais em www.oantagonista.com.br | www.crusoe.com.br 

What did Friday's International Court of Justice ruling mean? Did Israel actually get convicted of carrying out genocide on the Palestinian people in Gaza during its three-month military campaign that began when Hamas attacked Israel on Oct. 7? Why did Israel's own judge on the panel, Aharon Barak, vote against his country in some rulings? And what happens now? While the ICJ didn't tell Israel to stop the war, it also didn't throw out South Africa's genocide charges altogether: they could be something the court looks into down the road. The ruling worries Canadian human rights lawyer Tamara Kronis, who fears it gives Jew haters around Canada even more ammunition to ramp up their public protests and hateful attacks, like the one this past weekend against a synagogue in Fredericton, N.B. Kronis has worked as a prosecutor in The Hague. She wasn't expecting the ICJ to come back with a ruling so soon. South Africa and Israel put forward their oral arguments before the 17 judges only two weeks earlier. Kronis returns to The CJN Daily with an insider's analysis of the ICJ's provisional measures imposed on Israel—and what happens next. What we talked about: Hear Tamara Kronis explain how the UN's International Court of Justice works, and what was at stake for Israel, on The CJN Daily from earlier in January 2024 Read Canada's official reaction to the ICJ ruling in The CJN Watch the taped video showing the ICJ presiding judge read their ruling on imposing provisional measures against Israel Read more about how Fredericton is reacting to the vandalism on the city's only synagogue in The CJN, and donate to help the synagogue carry out repairs and install a security system Credits: The CJN Daily is written and hosted by Ellin Bessner (@ebessner on Twitter). Zachary Kauffman is the producer. Michael Fraiman is the executive producer. Our theme music is by Dov Beck-Levine. Our title sponsor is Metropia. We're a member of The CJN Podcast Network. To subscribe to this podcast, please watch this video. Donate to The CJN and receive a charitable tax receipt by clicking here. Hear why The CJN is important to me.

Estamos de volta. Tempo frio e chuvoso mas a coisa tá mesmo é quente por aqui. Cada semana parece um ano. Bloco 1 - Gaza: em meio a proposta de cessar-fogo apresentada pelo Catar, passamos de 23 mil mortos em Gaza, a crise humanitária aumenta e o receio pela vida dos reféns também. - Hezbollah: Hezbollah faz ataque massivo em retaliação ao ataque israelense que matou o líder do Hamas, Al-Arouri, em Beirute. Israel responde e mata Wissam Tawil, líder do Hezbollah. - Governo libanês tenta controlar a situação. - Ministro da Defesa, Yoav Galant, contraria Netanyahu e mostra planos de administração de Gaza por palestinos. - Jornal saudita traz mais detalhes sobre a preparação do Hamas para o 07/10. Bloco 2 (34:04) - Exército anuncia comissão pra examinar erros no 07.10 e gabinete ministerial faz ataques. - Netanyahu proíbe que o exército destrua assentamentos ilegais onde vivam soldados. - Suprema Corte proíbe Ben Gvir de determinar regras sobre protestos mas polícia proíbe manifestaçoes do campo pró paz em Tel Aviv e Haifa. - 85 deputados assinam petição para o afastamento do deputado Ofer Cassif por ter apoiado o processo da África do Sul contra Israel na Corte Internacional de Justiça. - Conselheira Jurídica do Governo diz que falas de membros do governo sobre Gaza podem ser criminosas e cogita punição. - Governo apresenta orçamento de 2024. Bloco 3 (01:31:22) - Governo dos EUA tem receio de que Netanyahu ataque o Líbano pra se manter no poder. - Blinken vem a Israel mais uma vez e diz que deve haver Estado palestino, ajuda humanitária e que Israel evitar a morte de mais palestinos. - Israel nomeia Aharon Barak para ser juiz na Corte Internacional de Justiça. - Começa o julgamento do processo da África do Sul contra Israel por genocídio. Para quem puder colaborar com o desenvolvimento do nosso projeto para podermos continuar trazendo informação de qualidade, esse é o link par a nossa campanha de financiamento coletivo. No Brasil - ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠apoia.se/doladoesquerdodomuro⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ No exterior - ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠patreon.com/doladoesquerdodomuro⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Nós nas redes: twitter - ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@doladoesquerdo⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ e ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@joaokm⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ instagram - ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@doladoesquerdodomuro⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ youtube - ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@doladoesquerdodomuro⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Episódio #230 do podcast "Do Lado Esquerdo do Muro", com Marcos Gorinstein e João Miragaya.

Welcome to The Times of Israel's Daily Briefing, your 20-minute audio update on what's happening in Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish world. Today is day 97 of the war. Editor David Horovitz joins host Amanda Borschel-Dan on a one-on-one update. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the Hague, Netherlands, opened hearings initiated by South Africa against Israel on charges of “genocide” against Palestinians during the ongoing war in Gaza this morning. Horovitz delves into the allegations and how they avoid any mention of the atrocities commited by Hamas on October 7, which sparked the war against the terror group. The bench comprises 15 permanent judges and the two ad hoc judges from Israel and South Africa. Former Israeli Supreme Court president Aharon Barak is representing Israel, to much blowback in some corners in Israel. South Africa is initially asking the International Court of Justice to order an immediate suspension of Israel's military offensive in the Gaza Strip as the first step in a case that is likely to take years to resolve. Would Israel adhere to such a ruling?  As Horovitz wrote in an oped yesterday, that Secretary of State Antony Blinken "indicated fairly clearly" that the Biden administration's patience with Israel's leadership is running low. What other messages did Blinken impart? For the latest updates, please look at The Times of Israel's ongoing live blog. Discussed articles include: Live blog January 11, 2024 Hague hearing begins as South Africa accuses Israel of ‘genocide' in war with Hamas ‘We should be worried': Israel faces peril at The Hague in Gaza ‘genocide' case Our government and our essential ally, utterly at odds on how to safeguard our future THOSE WE HAVE LOST: Civilians and soldiers killed in Hamas's onslaught on Israel THOSE WE ARE MISSING: The hostages and victims whose fate is still unknown Subscribe to The Times of Israel Daily Briefing on iTunes, Spotify, PlayerFM, Google Play, or wherever you get your podcasts. IMAGE: A statue of the late South African president Nelson Mandela stands in a street as members of the Ramallah-based Al-Kamandjati orchestra rehearse ahead of a ceremony organized to mark a landmark 'genocide' case filed by South Africa against Israel at the International Court of Justice, on January 10, 2024. (Photo by Marco Longari / AFP)See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Första dagen av förhandlingar hos ICJ - vad kom fram och analyser? Protester i Polen efter omgörning av public service. Debatt om ansiktsigenkänning. Kommuner som gör kaffeavdrag. Sven-Göran Eriksson obotligt sjuk i cancer, Intensiv debatt i Irak efter att svensk skjutits ihjäl i Bagdad. Röster från Gaza. Postskandalen i Storbritannien. Lyssna på alla avsnitt i Sveriges Radio Play. Rättelse: I inslaget om processen i FN:s Internationella domstol, ICJ, sägs det felaktigt att Israel skickar fram juristen Aharon Barak att försvara Israels sak i Haag. Det är felaktigt. Rätt är att han tillsätts av Israel som domare i domarpanelen.

Macron stuvar om i Frankrikes regering. Första dagen av förhandlingar hos ICJ. Protester i Polen om public service. Debatt om ansiktsigenkänning. Kommuner som gör kaffeavdrag. Svennis obotligt sjuk i cancer. Lyssna på alla avsnitt i Sveriges Radio Play. Rättelse: I inslaget om processen i FN:s Internationella domstol, ICJ, sägs det felaktigt att Israel skickar fram juristen Aharon Barak att försvara Israels sak i Haag. Det är felaktigt. Rätt är att han tillsätts av Israel som domare i domarpanelen.

Riots, labor strikes, and threats of economic collapse. Israel has experienced one crisis after another in response to the judicial reforms proposed by Prime Minister Netanyahu's coalition. During Episode 18, Pastor Rich Jones and Dr. Matthew Dodd explain the rationale behind Israel's judicial reforms and why there has been such an intense backlash. Thank you for supporting Blessors of Israel. ⁠⁠⁠Donate Online⁠⁠⁠ Subscribe to our ⁠⁠⁠Spotify Channel⁠⁠⁠ Watch on ⁠⁠⁠YouTube⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Subscribe to our ⁠Apple Podcasts⁠ Channel ⁠⁠Facebook⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠Twitter⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠Gettr⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Rumble⁠⁠⁠ Thank you for watching. Please like and share this video. We would love to hear your comments. Those who bless Israel will be blessed (Genesis 12:3). Pastor Rich Jones Pastor Matthew Dodd Dr. Matthew Dodd Rich Jones Blessors of Israel Matthew Dodd Blessors of Israel Blessors of Israel Blessers of Israel Tags: Pastor Rich Jones Pastor Matthew Dodd Rich Jones Dr. Matthew Dodd Rich Jones Blessors of Israel, Rich Jones Blessers of Israel, Matthew Dodd Blessors of Israel, Matthew Dodd Blessers of Israel, Blessers of Israel, Blessors of Israel, Judicial Reform, Benjamin Netanyahu, Aharon Barak, Reasonableness Standard, Knesset, Likud Party, Basic Laws

durée : 00:03:58 - Le monde d'après - par : Jean Marc FOUR - La réforme du système judiciaire voulue par Benyamin Netanyahou continue de polariser la société. Des manifestations tous les week-ends mobilisent des milliers de personnes, partisans et opposants. Un homme cristallise les passions: Aharon Barak, l'ancien président de la Cour suprême.

durée : 00:03:58 - Le monde d'après - par : Jean Marc FOUR - La réforme du système judiciaire voulue par Benyamin Netanyahou continue de polariser la société. Des manifestations tous les week-ends mobilisent des milliers de personnes, partisans et opposants. Un homme cristallise les passions: Aharon Barak, l'ancien président de la Cour suprême.

Welcome to What Matters Now, a weekly podcast exploration into one key issue shaping Israel and the Jewish World — right now. The Knesset reconvened this week and anti-judicial overhaul protestors ramped up their demonstrations with Thursday's nationwide Day of Disruptions. While these protests were going on nationwide, a panel appearing on Israel's Channel 14 talked about the upcoming protest outside former Supreme Court president Aharon Barak's house that night. Barak, the panel agreed, is the puppet master who is pulling all the strings in the anti-judicial overhaul movement. He is to blame for the mess the country is in and only if Barak agrees to the reform, they said, will all protests stop. Even as Fox News captures headlines throughout the world for skewed coverage, Israel's version, Channel 14, is slowly capturing an increasingly larger audience. So, I sat down this week with Zman Yisrael editor Biranit Goren to make sense of Israel's Hebrew-language media map. A three-decade veteran of Israeli journalism, Goren started out as an investigative reporter at the Ha'aretz group, moved on to become the news and magazine editor at Yedioth Aharonot and then editor-in-chief of Ma'ariv's website. Goren also crossed into the tech world, developing and maintaining dozens of media websites -- including The Times of Israel and Zman Israel, where she is also the editor-in-chief since its foundation. Now celebrating four years, Zman Israel, The Times of Israel's sister Hebrew website, covers politics, economy, environment, diplomacy and the rule of law. With a staff of highly experienced journalists, the current affairs website focuses on investigative reporting, exclusive news and in-depth analysis. In our in-depth discussion -- recorded on World Press Freedom Day -- Goren explains the lay of the land in Israel's Hebrew-language media and suggests that all of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's three ongoing court cases are tied to its control. In this week of dueling narratives, we ask veteran journalist Biranit Goren, What Matters Now. What Matters Now podcasts are available for download on iTunes, TuneIn, Pocket Casts, Stitcher, PlayerFM or wherever you get your podcasts. IMAGE: Zman Yisrael editor Biranit Goren at an event celebrating ToI's 10th anniversary, May 1, 2022. (Ariel Jerozolimski)See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Israel is currently in a state of turmoil due to the proposed judicial system reform by the new Netanyahu government. The reforms have caused massive demonstrations from the opposition, leading to reconciliation negotiations between the coalition and opposition at President Herzog's estate. The controversy surrounding the proposed reforms has brought the country's judicial system into the spotlight, making it a relevant topic for discussion. In today's episode, we have the honor of speaking with Dr. Adam Shinar, one of Israel's most prominent young law professors, who is an avid reform opposer. Dr. Shinar is a Senior Lecturer (Associate Professor) at the Harry Radzyner Law School at Reichman University, specializing in constitutional law and theory, comparative constitutional law, and legal theory. His expertise in various topics related to the judicial system reform in Israel makes him an invaluable guest. Dr. Shinar holds an S.J.D. from Harvard Law School, where he also served as the Clark Byse Fellow. He also holds an LL.B. from the Hebrew University in Jerusalem and an LL.M. from Harvard Law School. In addition to his impressive academic background, he has worked as an attorney for several human rights NGOs in Israel and India and clerked for the President of the Israeli Supreme Court, Aharon Barak. Dr. Shinar's research has been presented in leading universities such as Harvard Law School, Yale Law School, the University of Oxford, the University of Cambridge, and the European University Institute, and he has published his work in top-tier journals.

If concerns surrounding judicial reforms are about human rights & civil liberties, why are the weakest sectors of society supporting the reforms while Israel's elites & security agencies oppose them? Yehuda HaKohen is joined by attorney Tehila Gimpel for a deep dive into the backstory of Israel's Basic Laws as a quasi-constitution, on Aharon Barak's "constitutional revolution" of the 1990s, on the contentious judicial reform legislation being advanced by the coalition to check the power of the Supreme Court and on the protests that have rocked Israeli society in reaction to the proposed reforms.

Miriam Herschlag and Noah Efron discuss two topics of incomparable importance and end with an anecdote about something in Israel that made them smile this week. Hear the Extra-Special, Special Extra Segment on Patreon   —Uncivil Disobedience?— Strikes, blocking roads, doxing, boycotts, intimidating demonstrations right outside the doors of legislators and ministers – Where's the line that divides legitimate protest from the other kind? —Barak and a Hard Place— Why is former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Aharon Barak, the most revered and reviled man in Israel? —The Great Zionist That Denounced Zionism— For our most unreasonably generous Patreon supporters, in our extra-special, special extra discussion: What are you supposed to feel when a person who inspired you to become a Zionist renounces and denounces Zionism? All that and the return of Guns N' Roses, the very public coming-out of a religious journalist, and the music of Akiva!

Da settimane a Tel Aviv e in altre città, migliaia di cittadini scendono in piazza per protestare contro la riforma giudiziaria annunciata dal nuovo governo di destra estrema guidato da Benjamin Netanyahu, il governo più a destra della storia israeliana. Riforme che il giudice più stimato di tutta Israele, Aharon Barak, ex presidente della Corte Suprema, ha definito senza mezzi termini un "golpe senza carri armati". Uno dei discorsi più netti e apprezzati dalla piazza anti-Netanyahu è stato quello pronunciato da un'altra esponente del sistema giudiziario, un'altra giudice ex presidente della Corte Suprema, Ayala Procaccia. La sintesi: quando i giudici scendono in campo, è perché la democrazia è a rischio. Il quotidiano israeliano Haaretz, riferimento dell'area di centro-sinistra, ha pubblicato un'inserzione sul New York Times con questo messaggio: “La democrazia può morire anche alla luce del giorno”. La settimana scorsa, Antony Blinken, il segretario di Stato americano in visita in Israele, ha impartito a Netanyahu una vera e propria lezione sull'importanza di una magistratura indipendente e dello Stato di diritto. In questi stessi giorni si sono consumati gli ennesimi massacri che hanno segnato e continuano a segnare il più lungo conflitto del mondo: dieci morti palestinesi a Jenin, sette israeliani a Gerusalemme… Una violenza solo più intensa del solito. Il 2022 è stato l'anno più sanguinoso dal 2005. L'inviato speciale dell'Onu è andato nei dettagli della violenza. “Sono continuati gli scontri, le proteste, gli attacchi, le operazioni israeliane e la violenza dei coloni. Nel 2022, sino a oggi, sono stati uccisi in Cisgiordania e in Israele oltre 150 palestinesi e più di venti israeliani, il più alto numero di vittime in molti anni”. Del nuovo governo e della crisi costituzionale e democratica israeliana, di come questa possa ricadere brutalmente sulla vita dei palestinesi già fortemente segnata dall'occupazione e mettere definitivamente la parole fine alla soluzione Due Stati per Due popoli, a cui ormai non crede quasi più nessuno, e di questa nuova e spaventosa ondata di violenza parliamo con Paola Caridi. Saggista e giornalista, esperta di storia delle relazioni internazionali, Paola Caridi da oltre venti anni si occupa di Medio Oriente e Nord Africa, in particolare di islam politico in Palestina ed Egitto. Musica: A time to cry - Rim Banna

An Atheist? Don't Believe Him! Aharon Barak, the ideological head of Israel's left, was photographed wearing tefillin. Can an Israeli really be an atheist? (Parshat Va'era)

Welcome to The Times of Israel's Daily Briefing, your 15-minute audio update on what's happening in Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish world, from Sunday through Thursday. Editor David Horovitz and investigative reporter Inna Lazareva join host Amanda Borschel-Dan on today's episode. Former Supreme Court head Aharon Barak gave a series of television interviews over the weekend in which he stated unequivocably that he is worried about new Justice Minister Yariv Levin's proposed judicial reforms. What were some of Barak's statements? Three drivers employed by the Prime Minister's Office for roughly 30 years as part of the premier's motorcade were reportedly fired earlier this week, amid reports that Benjamin Netanyahu is clearing house of staff who served in the previous government. However, the drivers are set also to serve as prosecution witnesses in the ongoing trial against Netanyahu. Horovitz connects some dots. A team of Israeli archaeologists from the Universite of Haifa and the Hebrew University has discovered what it claims is the earliest evidence of silver being used as currency in the Levant, dating back more than 3,600 years. The analyzed silver hoards are found in strata that date to 500 years prior to previous estimates. Borschel-Dan gives some context. Finally, Lazereva shares some of the horrors she uncovered during her in-depth investigation into what many Ukrainian women who fled their homes for Israel face when they get here. Discussed articles include: Ex-top judge Barak: ‘Put me before a firing squad' if it'll stop move to tyranny 3 motorcade drivers fired by Netanyahu are witnesses in his corruption trial Netanyahu fires three veteran motorcade drivers who also ferried Bennett and Lapid Newly analyzed 3,600-year-old silver pieces are 1st currency in Levant, study shows Raped, abused, exploited: Ukrainian women seeking refuge in Israel find no haven Subscribe to The Times of Israel Daily Briefing on iTunes, Spotify, PlayerFM, Google Play, or wherever you get your podcasts. ILLUSTRATIVE IMAGE: Women walk past apartment buildings in Mariupol, Ukraine, damaged during heavy fighting, November 4, 2022. (AP Photo/Alexei Alexandrov)See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this Oddcast we continue the dive on Yale's senior year only fraternity, the very secretive Order of Skull, and Bones. We pick up from part one, and discuss more symbolism, influential members, and possible ties. We also look at several other prominent fraternities, and discuss the net worth of their trusts, and their most notable members, and connections as well. Thank you for your continued support, and i look forward to bringing you more content very soon.   See Also: The Oddcast-The Order of Death Pt. 1 Ep. 104 The Order of Death Pt.1 (podbean.com)   Cheers, and Blessings   The Odd Man Out   Help Support The Show, & Get Early, & Extra Content   Odd Man Out Patreon https://www.patreon.com/theoddmanout   Memento Mori “Remember That You Have To Die”   The society was known to its members as the Eulogian Club: eulogia is Greek for “a blessing” and is applied in ecclesiastical usage to the object blessed.   Fleshing Out Skull and Bones P. 192 Bones meanings are held at the tomb which is a two-story building without windows and who's walls on the outside are covered with Ivy. That's where the term Ivy League came from. The tomb is located to the east of the New Haven Green about 100 yards from the federal courthouse the Yale University owns the majority of land in downtown New Haven almost all of the university buildings are interconnected by a series of underground tunnels so visiting Bonesman never need approach the tombs from the street.   Room B, called 322, is the "sanctum sanctorum" of the temple. Its distinguishing feature is a facsimile of the Bones pin, handsomely inlaid in the black marble hearth, just below the mantel, and also inlaid in marble is the motto: "Rari Quippe Boni," in old English text. The motto is said to come from the passage by Juvenal: ["Good men forsooth are scarce: there are hardly as many as there are gates of Thebes or mouths of the rich Nile."--Juvenal, Sat., xiii. 26.]   "The order was incorporated in 1856 under the name “Russell Trust Association.” By special act of the state legislature in 1943, its trustees are exempted from the normal requirement of filing corporate reports with the Connecticut Secretary of State. As of 1978, all business of the Russell Trust was handled by its lone trustee, Brown Brothers Harriman partner John B. Madden Jr. Madden started with Brown Brothers Harriman in 1946, under senior partner Prescott Bush, George Bush's father."   A grandfather clock is presented to each Knight upon initiation and stays with him throughout his life as a memento of what is called "the Bones experience."   Iserbyt- Secret Societies https://youtu.be/cFQD1bAsUlw David Allen Richards Skulls, & Keys-The history of Yale secret societies https://youtu.be/4J4mRqND9aI Ron Rosenbaum-S, & B Peice https://youtu.be/apzwObT0qNM Alexandria Robbins/Secrets Of The Tomb Lecture https://youtu.be/KOKGt9Bl2wM Founded in the fall of 1996 by Rabbi Shmully Hecht, Ben Karp, "Cory Booker" and Michael Alexander as an intellectual salon and Jewish leadership society, the group that started out as a social club for would-be and current leaders of the Yale community has blossomed into an organization recognized the world over, yet with a decidedly secular twist. "There was no question that Eliezer was a Jewish association," says New York Times critic at large Edward Rothstein, a member of the society, "but also no question that along with its elements of religious observance and allusion, the aura was nonsectarian intellectual." http://content.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2057526,00.html Eliezer now called Shabtai Shabtai has deep connections to Israeli political, military, and judicial figures and hosts regular off-the-record meetings and briefings on Israeli developments. Participants, many of whom have also been speakers and guests at Shabtai, include Aharon Barak, Elyakim Rubinstein, Hanan Melcer, Ehud Barak, Yuval Steinitz, Alex Lubotzky, Yoav Gallant, Daniel Taub, Ron Prosor, Danny Dayan, Ido Aharoni, Gideon Meir, and Yaakov Amidror, as well as other individuals like Gilad Shalit. International Jewish leaders meet regularly with Shabtai members to inspire their participation and receive their guidance on critical issues facing global Jewry. These have included Adin Steinsaltz, Ephraim Mirvis, Yanki Tauber, Tzvi Freeman, Emanuel Rackman, Sholom Dovber Lipskar, David Lincoln, James Ponet, Jacob Immanuel Schochet, Yitzchok Kogan, Y.Y. Jacobson, and Faivish Vogel, as well as many others. Videos https://vimeo.com/shabtai https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shabtai_(society) Corey Booker Shabtai Founder https://yaledailynews.com/blog/2019/02/06/shabtai-founder-cory-booker-law-97-to-run-for-president/   See The Books: America's Secret Establishment: An... book by Antony C. Sutton (thriftbooks.com)   Fleshing Out Skull & Bones:... book (thriftbooks.com)   Skulls and Keys: The Hidden History of... book by David Alan Richards (thriftbooks.com)   Alexandra Robbins Books | List of books by author Alexandra Robbins (thriftbooks.com)   Odd Man Out Patreon https://www.patreon.com/theoddmanout         ACR- My Podcasting Family Visit the home of The Oddcast at "Alternate Current Radio, and check out all their other great shows including, Boiler Room, and be sure to subscribe to their Social Media to get updates on all the fantastic talk, and music shows. https://alternatecurrentradio.com/   Check out the ACR video: "Shilling For Sanity" https://youtu.be/TyQv1JL78Eg   Support the show by subscribing, liking, sharing, & donating!     Fringe Radio Network- Radio on the Fringe! http://fringeradionetwork.com/       Patreon-Welcome to The Society Of Cryptic Savants   https://www.bitchute.com/video/C4PQuq0udPvJ       Social Media: _theoddmanout on Twitter, and Instagram       Facebook https://www.facebook.com/theoddcastfttheoddmanout       "A special   Thank You to my Patrons who contributed to this episode. You are very much appreciated."   Their Order Is Not Our Order!

Aharon Barak fue presidente de la Corte Suprema de Israel hasta 2006. Barak sobrevivió el Holocausto luego de ser rescatado a escondidas del gueto de Kovno en un saco de papas. Con su familia, emigró a Palestina en 1947. Barak, quien logró un doctorado y un título en leyes, sirvió como fiscal general de Israel y fue el asesor para las negociaciones de paz con Egipto en los años 1970s. Fue nombrado presidente de la Corte Suprema en 1978 y sirvió como juez por 28 años. Durante este periodo como presidente de la corte, Barak fue crucial en expandir el poder de la corte, especialmente en proteger las libertades civiles e individuales.

On this special episode, Privacy and Information Security practice chair Alysa Hutnik chats with Shana Gillers, TransUnion's Chief Privacy Officer. Alysa and Shana discuss the journey to becoming a chief privacy officer, hot topics, and what it takes to stay on top of your game in privacy today. On this special episode, Privacy and Information Security practice chair Alysa Hutnik chats with Shana Gillers, TransUnion's Chief Privacy Officer. Alysa and Shana discuss the journey to becoming a chief privacy officer, hot topics, and what it takes to stay on top of your game in privacy today. Shana Gillers Shoshana Gillers has served as TransUnion's Chief Privacy Officer since September 2019. In this role Ms. Gillers oversees compliance with privacy laws across TransUnion's global footprint and promotes a culture of responsible data stewardship. Prior to joining TransUnion, Ms. Gillers spent four years at JPMorgan Chase, ultimately serving as Vice President and Assistant General Counsel, Responsible Banking, Data and Privacy. Previously, she served as a federal prosecutor for eight years at the U.S. Attorney's Office in Chicago, and as a litigator for four years at WilmerHale in New York. Ms. Gillers clerked for the Hon. Robert D. Sack on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and for the Hon. Aharon Barak on the Supreme Court of Israel. Ms. Gillers received a B.A. from Columbia University, summa cum laude, and a J.D. from Yale Law School. Alysa Z. Hutnik Alysa chairs Kelley Drye's Privacy and Information Security practice and delivers comprehensive expertise in all areas of privacy, data security and advertising law. Her experience ranges from strategic consumer protection oriented due diligence and compliance counseling to defending clients in FTC and state attorneys general investigations and competitor disputes. Prior to joining the firm, Alysa was a federal clerk for the Honorable Joseph R. Goodwin, United States District Judge, Southern District of West Virginia. Alysa received a B.A. from Haverford College, and a J.D. from the University of Maryland Carey School of Law. Upcoming Webinar - Privacy Priorities for 2022 Kelley Drye's Privacy team will take a deep look at these key recent developments and put them in the context of the FTC's recent challenges and setbacks. Please join us on Thursday, February 24 at 4:00 pm ET for this second installment in Kelley Drye's 2022 practical privacy series. Register here - https://kelleydrye.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_HZFlZkdtTNePmRK51KY9jw Produced by Jeff Scurry

The purposive approach (sometimes referred to as purposivism, purposive construction, purposive interpretation, or the modern principle in construction) is an approach to statutory and constitutional interpretation under which common law courts interpret an enactment (a statute, part of a statute, or a clause of a constitution) within the context of the law's purpose. Purposive interpretation is a derivation of the mischief rule set in Heydon's Case, and intended to replace the mischief rule, the plain meaning rule and the golden rule. Purposive interpretation is used when the courts use extraneous materials from the pre-enactment phase of legislation, including early drafts, hansards, committee reports, and white papers. The purposive interpretation involves a rejection of the exclusionary rule. Israeli jurist Aharon Barak views purposive interpretation as a legal construction that combines elements of the subjective and objective. Barak states that the subjective elements include the intention of the author of the text, whereas the objective elements include the intent of the reasonable author and the legal system's fundamental values. Critics of purposivism argue it fails to separate the powers between the legislator and the judiciary, as it allows more freedom in interpretation by way of extraneous materials in interpreting the law. Historical origins. Plain meaning rule. The plain meaning rule gained popularity during the 18th and 19th centuries as the courts took an increasingly strict view of the words within statutes. Under the plain meaning rule, the words of the statute are given their natural or ordinary meaning. The plain meaning rule of statutory interpretation should be the first rule applied by judges. One of the leading statements of the plain meaning rule was made by Chief Justice Nicholas Conyngham Tindal in the Sussex Peerage case (1844), concerning whether Augustus d'Este succeeded to the titles of his father Prince Augustus Frederick, Duke of Sussex, in particular whether the marriage of his father and mother was valid under the Royal Marriages Act 1772: ... the only rule for the construction of Acts of Parliament is that they should be construed according to the intent of the Parliament which passed the Act. If the words of the statute are in themselves precise and unambiguous, then no more can be necessary than to expound those words in their natural and ordinary sense. The words themselves alone do, in such a case, best declare the intention of the lawgiver. Strict application of the plain meaning rule can sometimes result in "absurd" outcomes. Examples of the plain meaning rule producing absurd outcomes can be seen in the following cases: In Whitely v Chappel (1868) a statute made it an offence "to impersonate any person entitled to vote". The defendant used the vote of a dead man. The statute relating to voting rights required a person to be living in order to be entitled to vote. The plain meaning rule was applied and the defendant was thus acquitted. In R v Harris (1836) the defendant had bitten off his victim's nose. But because the statute made it an offence "to stab cut or wound" the court held that under the plain meaning rule the act of biting did not come within the meaning of stab cut or wound as these words implied an instrument had to be used. The defendant's conviction was overturned. In Fisher v Bell (1961) the Restriction of Offensive Weapons Act 1958 made it an offence to "offer for sale" an offensive weapon. The defendant had a flick knife displayed in his shop window with a price tag on it. Statute made it a criminal offence to "offer" such flick knives for sale. His conviction was overturned as goods on display in shops are not "offers" in the technical sense but an invitation to treat. The court applied the plain meaning rule of statutory interpretation. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/law-school/support

Algunos comentarios respecto a la obra de Aharon Barak

In 1993, Aharon Barak, former chief justice of the Israeli Supreme Court, published an article entitled "Hermeneutics and Constitutional Interpretation" in the Cardozo Law Review. He provided a theory of constitutional interpretation based upon the discretion of judges, contrasting objective and subjective interpretations of constitutional texts.This episode of Lex Phonographica was read by Luce Nguyen. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Aharon Barak was chief justice of the Israeli Supreme Court from 1995 to 2006, and in that role championed what he called a "constitutional revolution." In this wide ranging conversation with California Lawyer editor Martin Lasden, he talks about torture, the death penalty, Arab-Israeli rights, and his own experiences as a Holocaust survivor. Series: "Legally Speaking" [Public Affairs] [Show ID: 23219]

Aharon Barak was chief justice of the Israeli Supreme Court from 1995 to 2006, and in that role championed what he called a "constitutional revolution." In this wide ranging conversation with California Lawyer editor Martin Lasden, he talks about torture, the death penalty, Arab-Israeli rights, and his own experiences as a Holocaust survivor. Series: "Legally Speaking" [Public Affairs] [Show ID: 23219]

Aharon Barak answers a question from Guardian Legal Affairs correspondent Afua Hirsch on the difference between protecting human rights and concerns of governments in power in war. Part 6 of the 2009 Foundation for Law Justice and Society Annual Lecture.

Aharon Barak talks about human rights and the limitations imposed on them that are necessary for society to preserve itself. Part 1 of the 2009 Foundation for Law Justice and Society Annual Lecture.

Aharon Barak discusses the idea of Freedom of Speech and asks whether it is right to limit this freedom to protect against hate speech. Part 2 of the 2009 Foundation for Law Justice and Society Annual Lecture.

Aharon Barak talks about the need for proportionality within human rights law as a means for protecting it against other considerations. Part 3 of the 2009 Foundation for Law Justice and Society Annual Lecture.

Aharon Barak discusses how the political and judicial branches of government balance their sometimes conflicting interests with the rights of the citizens. Part 4 of the 2009 Foundation for Law Justice and Society Annual Lecture.

Aharon Barak talks about the implications for human rights law of Israel barring family reunification between Palestinian and Israeli citizens. Part 5 of the 2009 Foundation for Law Justice and Society Annual Lecture.