Podcast appearances and mentions of emily owens

This past spring, the CBS action-drama Tracker became an instant hit, emerging as the No. 1 US network series of the season. On this episode, I speak with the tracker himself, Justin Hartley, who was in Toronto last June promoting the series at the CTV upfront. After a career in soaps (Passions; The Young and the Restless) as well as in primetime (Smallville; Emily Owens, MD), Hartley hit the TV jackpot as Kevin Pearson in This Is Us (2016-22). That led to the 47-year-old actor landing the lead as skilled survivalist Colter Shaw who helps others for money in Tracker. In this shorter-than-usual episode, the Illinois native talks about his love of baseball (he enjoyed a Blue Jays game while in Toronto), finding  success later in life, and about what to expect in Season Two. The Vancouver based series is back now on Sunday nights on CBS and CTV.

Oeindrila Dube is the Philip K. Pearson Professor at the University of Chicago's Harris School of Public Policy. http://odube.net In this episode, we discuss Prof. Dube's research on a cognitive behavioral training program for police.   “A Cognitive View of Policing” by Oeindrila Dube, Sandy Jo MacArthur, and Anuj Shah. https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ktomnokei9m85dodec63b/A_Cognitive_View_of_Policing_August11.pdf?rlkey=npv33jc9pd639q9ebq95ljktg&dl=0 Other research we discuss in this episode:  "Thinking, fast and slow? Some field experiments to reduce crime and dropout in Chicago" by Sara B. Heller, Anuj K. Shah, Jonathan Guryan, Jens Ludwig, Sendhil Mullainathan, and Harold A. Pollack. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw033 "Can You Build a Better Cop?" by Emily Owens, David Weisburd, Karen L. Amendola, and Geoffrey P. Alpert.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12337 "The Impacts of Implicit Bias Awareness Training in the NYPD" by Robert E. Worden, Sarah J. McLean, Robin S. Engel, Hannah Cochran, Nicholas Corsaro, Danielle Reynolds, Cynthia J. Najdowski, and Gabrielle T. Isaza.  https://www.nyc.gov/assets/nypd/downloads/pdf/analysis_and_planning/impacts-of-implicit-bias-awareness-training-in-%20the-nypd.pdf "The impact of implicit bias-oriented diversity training on police officers' beliefs, motivations, and actions" by Calvin K. Lai and Jaclyn A. Lisnek. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976221150617 "Does De-escalation Training Work?" by Robin S. Engel, Hannah D. McManus, and Tamara D. Herold.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12467 "Assessing the Impact of De-escalation Training on Police Behavior: Reducing Police Use of Force in the Louisville, KY Metro Police Department" by Robin S. Engel, Nicholas Corsaro, Gabrielle T. Isaza, and Hannah D. McManus. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12574 “Reducing crime and violence: Experimental evidence from cognitive behavioral therapy in Liberia” by Christopher Blattman, Julian C. Jamison, and Margaret Sheridan. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257%2Faer.20150503 "Can Recidivism Be Prevented From Behind Bars? Evidence From a Behavioral Program" by William Arbour. https://github.com/williamarbour/JMP/blob/main/JMP_WilliamArbour_recent.pdf Probable Causation Episode 102: William Arbour https://www.probablecausation.com/podcasts/episode-102-william-arbour "Peer Effects in Police Use of Force" by Justin E. Holz, Roman G. Rivera, and Bocar A. Ba. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/pol.20200227 "The Effect of Field Training Officers on Police Use of Force" by Chandon Adger, Matthew Ross, and CarlyWill Sloan. https://github.com/carlywillsloan/FTO/blob/main/training_220314%20(11).pdf Probable Causation Episode 90: Matthew Ross https://www.probablecausation.com/podcasts/episode-90-matthew-ross

Ben Feigenberg talks about socioeconomic disparities in who police stop for traffic offenses. “Class Disparities and Discrimination in Traffic Stops and Searches” by Ben Feigenberg and Conrad Miller. OTHER RESEARCH WE DISCUSS IN THIS EPISODE: “Would Eliminating Racial Disparities in Motor Vehicle Searches Have Efficiency Costs?” by Ben Feigenberg and Conrad Miller. “Smartphone Data Reveal Neighborhood-Level Racial Disparities in Police Presence” by M. Keith Chen, Katherine L. Christensen, Elicia John, Emily Owens, and Yilin Zhou. “Multitasking, Expectations, and Police Officer Behavior” by James Reeves. [Draft available from author upon request]. “My Taxes are Too Darn High: Why Do Households Protest Their Taxes?” by Brad C. Nathan, Ricardo Perez-Truglia, and Alejandro Zentner.

BE LIKE HER LIVE On WILLI HIGH Interview With Emily Owens by Ralph Barba

Justin Holz talks about peer effects in police use of force. “Peer Effects in Police Use of Force” by Justin E. Holz, Roman G. Rivera, and Bocar A. Ba. *** Probable Causation is part of Doleac Initiatives, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit. If you enjoy the show, please consider making a tax-deductible contribution. Thank you for supporting our work! *** OTHER RESEARCH WE DISCUSS IN THIS EPISODE: “The Effect of Field Training Officers on Police Use of Force” by Chandon Adger, Mathew Ross, and CarlyWill Sloan. Probable Causation Episode 90: Matthew Ross. “Does Race Matter for Police Use of Force? Evidence from 911 Calls” by Mark Hoekstra and CarlyWill Sloan. Probable Causation Episode 38: CarlyWill Sloan. “An Empirical Analysis of Racial Differences in Police Use of Force” by Roland G. Fryer Jr. “An Empirical Analysis of Racial Differences in Police Use of Force: A Comment” by Steven N. Durlauf and James J. Heckman. “Wearing Body Cameras Increases Assaults Against Officers and Does Not Reduce Police Use of Force: Results from a Global Multi-site Experiment” By Barak Ariel, Alex Sutherland, Darren Penstock, Josh Young, Paul Drove, Jayne Sykes, Simon Megicks, and Ryan Henderson. “The “Less-Than-Lethal Weapons Effect”- Introducing TASERs to Routine Operations in England and Wales: A Randomized Controlled Trial” by Barak Ariel, David Lawes, Cristobal Weinborn, Ron Henry, Kevin Chen, and Hagit Brants Sabo. “American Policing and the Danger Imperative” by Michael Sierra-Arevalo. “Racial Profiling and Use of Force in Police Stops: How Local Events Trigger Periods of Increased Discrimination” by Joscha Legewie. “Violence and Risk Preference: Experimental Evidence from Afghanistan” by Michael Callen, Mohammad Isaqzadeh, James D. Long, and Charles Sprenger. “Exposure to Violence Predicts Impulsivity in Time Preferences: Evidence from The Democratic Republic of Congo” by Alex Imas, Michael Kuhn, and Vera Mironova. [Working Paper]. “Violence, Psychological Trauma, and Risk Attitudes: Evidence from Victims of Violence in Colombia” by Andrés Moya. “Impact of Violent Crime on Risk Aversion: Evidence from the Mexican Drug War” by Ryan Brown, Verónica Montalva, Duncan Thomas, and Andrea Velásquez. Probable Causation Episode 42: Andrea Velásquez. “Family Violence and Football: The Effect of Unexpected Emotional Cues on Violence Behavior” by David Card and Gordon B. Dahl. “Frustration, Euphoria, and Violent Crime” by Ignacio Munyo and Martin A. Rossi. “Emotional Judges and Unlucky Juveniles” by Ozkan Eren and Naci Mocan. “Nonfatal Injuries to Law Enforcement Officers: A Rise in Assaults” by Hope M. Tiesman, Melody Gwilliam, Srinivas Konda, Jeff Rojek, and Suzanne Marsh. “Emotional Reactivity and Police Expertise in Use-of-Force Decision-Making” by Vivian Ta, Brian Lande, and Joel Suss. “Do Police Make Too Many Arrests?: The Effect of Enforcement Pullbacks on Crime” by Sungwoo Cho, Felipe Conclaves, and Emily Weisburst. “The Effect of Minority Peers on Future Arrests Quantity and Quality” by Roman Rivera. “Police Officer Assignment and Neighborhood Crime” by Bocar Ba, Patrick Bayer, Nayoung Rim, Roman Rivera, and Modibo Sidibé. “Strengthening Police Oversight: Impacts of Misconduct Investigators on Police Officer Behavior” by Andrew Jordan and Taeho Kim. “Does Black and Blue Matter? An Experimental Investigation of Race and Perceptions of Police, and Legal Compliance” by Mackenzie Alston and Emily Owens. “High-Frequency Location Data Shows that Race Affects the Likelihood of Being Stopped and Fined for Speeding” by Pradhi Aggarwal, Alec Brandon, Ariel Goldszmidt, Justin Holz, John A. List, Ian Muir, Greg Sun, and Thomas Yu.

Matthew Ross talks about how field training officers affect police use of force. “The Effect of Field Training Officers on Police Use of Force” by Chandon Adger, Matthew Ross, and CarlyWill Sloan. *** Probable Causation is part of Doleac Initiatives, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit. If you enjoy the show, please consider making a tax-deductible contribution. Thank you for supporting our work! *** OTHER RESEARCH WE DISCUSS IN THIS EPISODE: “A Few Bad Apples? Racial Bias in Policing” by Felipe Goncalves & Steven Mello. “Does Race Matter for Police Use of Force? Evidence from 911 Calls” by Mark Hoekstra and CarlyWill Sloan. [American Economic Review forthcoming]. “Randomized Controlled Trial of Social Interaction Police Training” by Kyle McLean, Scott E. Wolfe, Jeff Rojek, Geoffrey P. Alpert, and Michael R. Smith. “Is Police Training an Effective Intervention for Addressing Disparities?” by Hunter Johnson, Stephen L. Ross, and Steve Mello. [Available from the authors]. “Can You Build a Better Cop? Experimental Evidence on Supervision, Training, and Policing in the Community” by Emily Owens, David Weisburd, Karen L. Amendola, and Geoffrey P. Alpert. “Learning By Doing in Law Enforcement” by Jeremy West. “The Effect of Minority Peers on Future Arrest Quantity and Quality” by Roman Rivera. “Peer Effects in Police Use of Force” by Justin Holz, Roman Rivera and Bocar Ba. “Whose Help is on the Way? The Importance of Individual Police Officers in Law Enforcement Outcomes” by Emily Weisburst. “A Cognitive View of Police Misconduct” by Oendrila Dube, Sandy Jo MacArthur, and Anuj Shah [Paper available from the authors]. “Proud to Belong: The Impact of Ethics Training on Police Officers” by Donna Harris, Oana Borcan, Danila Serra, Henry Telli, Bruno Schettini, and Stefan Dercon. Episode 73 of Probable Causation: Danila Serra.

Marni, Chris and Dr.Emily use reality tv show, Love is Blind, as a blueprint for the behaviors and habits that should have you running for the hills. The contestants' actions and reactions echo much of the dos and don'ts that we fall into when dating IRL. The trio ponder the signs that could be used as a warning hazard when it comes to jumping into the dating pool. They take a deep dive into the interpersonal interactions that are part and parcel of the reality show and much of the time, our own lives.    Takeaways from this episode:  - Collect your own data before making a snap judgment  - Forgiveness is important  - No one's agreeable round the clock  - His transparency is a good sign  - Does he avoid conflict at all costs?  - Love takes work   Should You Listen to His Friends? [12:18] When his friends tell you he's flaky, should you believe them? Or maybe they've convinced you that he's selfish, should that be a warning sign for you to run for the hills?  It's natural for your instinctive reaction to lean towards believing them. After all, they are his friends. And in some cases, they might be right. But context is everything. Your experience with him should count for something. Collecting data on the person from your own firsthand experience, in the grand scheme of things, should carry more weight than what someone says or doesn't say about your partner. If what they're saying rings true, then that to a certain extent, has been your experience with him. It also depends on what it is that's being said.   Marni brings up Matt and Coleen as an example of this. Matt's character is somewhat aggressive, and he projects onto the person he's dating. And his friends seem to corroborate that by adding that he has big emotions, which is not completely inaccurate in this particular case.  Mark was also completely unforgiving towards Coleen in certain instances, in that he didn't have the ability to hear her out before choosing to react. So, maybe his friends weren't completely off-base. And that's what Coleen's experience with him brought to light.  That being said, ultimately, regardless of whether or not you choose to believe his friends, trust what he's showing you, and do your own digging before dismissing.    Transparency is Key [20:30] A common mistake couples make IRL is lack of transparency. A lot of times, people aren't transparent with their emotions, or their feelings towards certain behaviors coming from their partner. With SK and Raven, he never addressed any of the issues he had within the relationship, even when some of her demands seemed outrageous. SK didn't even make an effort to discuss them.  And that's not dissimilar to what happens on the dating scene. Chris adds that it's borderline selfish. Because when your partner doesn't speak up in an effort to avoid conflict at all cost; they end up hurting you anyway in most cases. For any relationship to work, you need to be honest with each other, even when your lack of transparency is in an effort to protect your partner. Trust that they can handle the truth, and that you can sort it out together, rather than going off and making decisions on your own, on both your behalf. And not being honest about them.  You think you're protecting somebody but you're actually setting them up for a really devastating experience. That's not kind; that's not helping your partner; that's not being supportive.    Sometimes he's not a jerk; he's just oblivious [25:35] Marni points to a scene on Love is Blind that is a perfect example of taking things out of context, where Cole's words are misconstrued by Zanab, and he's accused of commenting negatively on her weight. The scene leaves viewers wondering if Cole was in fact body-shaming Zanab. Upon getting the full picture, it's apparent that Zanab was projecting her own insecurities onto him. Zanab's insecurities run so deep that she almost sees the world through that lens. She's filtering the entire world in such a way that she's only hearing what is kind of resounding with her own fears.   That being said, Cole has also proven over and over again throughout the season that he's oblivious, not just in terms of Zanab's relationship with food and her own body but in general.  In this particular situation, Dr.Emily clarifies that she feels for both of them. On the one hand, Cole is completely unaware of how deep his partner's issues run, and on the other hand, Zanab is so completely drowned by her own insecurities that she may not even realize she's projecting. Both these behaviors can, and do happen with all of us.  It's important to note the difference between when we're self-projecting and when the person has actually done something to offend us. And this confusion usually happens when we're not self-aware.    Make a Connection:  - Visit Our Website  - Subscribe to our Youtube Channel  - Learn How To Attract Your Perfect Equal… Watch Our Latest Training Here!  - Follow Along On Marni and Jeremy's Radical Living Challenge!  - Download A Complimentary Copy Of Our Book — How To Find A Quality Guy Without Going On 200 Dates

Marni, Chris and Dr.Emily, get into the sticky business that is money, especially when it comes to couples. They point out the issues that surface (or don't for some) with the couples on reality TV show, Love is Blind, and ponder what we can learn from them. The situations that arise on the show mimic much of what goes on with us in our own personal lives, and we're forced to take a hard look at our own values surrounding money. When is it the right time to start talking about it? Is a prenup a no-no? Is there a deeper meaning to be gleaned from asking for one? We all wonder about how to broach the topic once things start taking a turn for the serious, but it remains a sensitive subject where we're required to tread carefully.    Takeaways from this episode: When to set a financial plan with your partner Disagreeing isn't the same thing as gaslighting  What's the code of conduct when it comes to talking money? Leave Open-casting in 2022 Instagram isn't a good indicator of who a person is Financial infidelity is a thing   Does a Prenup Undermine the Commitment? [08:03] On Love is Blind, Marni draws our attention to two couples, Nancy and Bartiste, and Brenon and Alexa. Now with the first couple, Nancy is older and more well-established. When discussing money, she speaks of sharing their assets, and Bartiste's reaction is almost like that of the cartoon character whose eyes morph in dollar signs at the mention of money. A little worrying, but okay.  With the second couple, Alexa mentions a prenup, and Brenon is open to the idea. But whether you relate more to the first couple (Bartiste's reaction was a bit of a red flag, though) or the second couple, when it comes to relationships, a financial plan needs to be set in place. At the very least, you need to be in alignment where your values are concerned.  It's about looking at your non-negotiables and the core values you have surrounding money, and then discussing them with your partner. When it comes to prenups, there's no right or wrong route to take. It depends on what you feel more comfortable with. And let's break the taboo around prenups.  Having a prenup isn't saying that the marriage won't work. It's more about talking openly in terms of how you'd like the income and the assets to be split, in a way that makes everyone comfortable. Because that's what'll save you from arguments around finances in the future.    Is He Cheating Financially? [13:26] Hiding your wealth, or not being transparent in terms of your assets when in a relationship is financial infidelity. It's a form of deceit where you've kept a secret in the form of a hidden account, or a credit card, let's say. If you're going to share your life with someone; you're going to have to have these conversations regardless of how uncomfortable they are. And be transparent about them.  You have to be courageous about it.  Let's face it, talking about money isn't always pleasant but if this is the person you choose for yourself, then it's probably a good idea to get insight on their relationship with money. How did they grow up around money? What were their beliefs in relation to that? How did their parents handle the finances? Because all of this comes back as the relationship progresses. The you that's afraid today is going to be different than the you in 10, 20, or 30 years. Marni shares her own personal experience with forming a financial plan with her partner. And she elaborates that while they'd already set up a plan when they'd first started out, fast-forward to 30 years later, where they've built a whole life together, and it's time to revisit that plan. Your initial plan doesn't have to be set in stone. It changes as your relationship evolves, much like everything else.    When Gender Roles Come into Play [20:35] Gender roles are constantly morphing with women gaining more independence financially, and a prominent presence within the working force. So, inevitably that plays a role in the dynamics. How you navigate that, however, is between you and your partner. But it needs to be discussed.  Marni points to Raven who almost seems to expect SK to pay for everything. Even though she hammers on about being an independent woman, she expects SK, who'll be doing grad school in Berkley, to pay for both her apartment in Texas and his apartment in Berkley. She doesn't want to move in with him, but at the same time, she seems to be saying that once they're engaged, he'll have to pay for everything for her. The host and guests agree that her behavior is extreme. You can't really have your cake and eat it. Well, unless you've discussed it with your partner and he's okay with it but it's still a red flag. So…maybe don't do that.  In any case though, it is important to acknowledge that your financial plan will evolve as your relationship does. And there's no one-size fits all because every couple, family, and relationship is different, but you get to choose what works for you, even if it means bringing in a professional to help you sort it out.  These conversations evolve as dating progresses. So, we're talking about communication, negotiation and compromise.   Make a Connection:  - Visit Our Website  - Subscribe to our Youtube Channel  - Learn How To Attract Your Perfect Equal… Watch Our Latest Training Here!  - Follow Along On Marni and Jeremy's Radical Living Challenge!  - Download A Complimentary Copy Of Our Book — How To Find A Quality Guy Without Going On 200 Dates

Danila Serra talks about the effects of a new ethics training program for police officers in Ghana. “Proud to Belong: The Impact of Ethics Training on Police in Ghana” by Donna Harris, Oana Borcan, Danila Serra, Henry Telli, Bruno Schettini, and Stefan Dercon. *** Probable Causation is part of Doleac Initiatives, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit. If you enjoy the show, please consider making a tax-deductible contribution. Thank you for supporting our work! *** OTHER RESEARCH WE DISCUSS IN THIS EPISODE: “Can You Build a Better Cop? Experimental Evidence on Supervision, Training, and Policing in the Community” by Emily Owens, David Weisburd, Karen L. Amendola, and Geoffrey P. Alpert. “Shaping Police Officer Mindsets and Behaviors: Experimental Evidence of Procedural Justice Training” by Rodrigo Canales et al. “The Greater Manchester Police Procedural Justice Training Experiment” by Levin Wheller, Paul Quinton, Alistair Fildes, and Andy Mills. “Can Police Training Reduce Ethnic/Racial Disparities in Stop and Search? Evidence from a Multisite UK Trial” by Joel Miller, Paul Quinton, Banos Alexandrou, and Daniel Packham. “Procedural Justice Training Reduces Police Use of Force and Complaints Against Officers” by George Wood, Tom R. Tyler, and Andrew V. Papachristos. Revised findings for “Procedural Justice Training Reduces Police Use of Force and Complaints Against Officers” by George Wood, Tom R. Tyler, Andrew V. Papachristos et al. “Doing Research with Police Elites in Ghana” by Emmanuel Addo Sowatey and Justice Tankebe. “The Effect of Field Training Officers on Police Use of Force” by Chandon Adger, Matthew Ross, and CarlyWill Sloan.

Marni, Chris Gillis, and newcomer clinical psychologist, Dr. Emily Owens attempt to make heads or tails of the season finale of The Bachelorette 2021. It seems All-American girl Michelle Young has a bad picker. She chose Nayte who struggles with communications over emotionally well-versed Brandon. She may need to Life Check herself.    Key takeaways from this episode:  Make your words and actions match Play the long game when it comes to finding connection What you see is what you get with men Stay committed to your deal breakers   Your Words Don't Match Your Actions Michelle [1:43] Michelle can't go back and have a do-over. She chose Nayte, a guy who has never been in a relationship in his life and doesn't talk about his feelings. But, Marni says, this happens in real life to intelligent, savvy, professional women every day. Dr. Emily notes that Michelle's body language told the story. She obviously has more of an attraction to Nayte. But, this isn't in line with what Michelle said about needing to find someone who loves her more than she loves him. She is probably setting herself up to fail. Brandon and Michelle's hug looked tender, soft, and authentic. The Nayte and Michelle hug didn't give off the same energy. After the rose ceremony, the network tells Nayte he has to move to Minnesota and the couple will receive $200,000 to buy a house. Does the money come with stipulations? Dr. Emily says Michelle may be trying to fit Nayte into a mold that he has professed isn't for him. What you see is what you get with men. The relationship may not last very long.   Brandon the Break Up King  [14:24] Brandon exhibited an emotionally mature communication style when Michelle broke up with him. He truly knows how to communicate his feelings. He said he wanted Michelle to be happy even if it wasn't with him. He had a spiritual point of view. Marni hopes he stays true to being a nice, sweet kid. Chris agreed, saying that for a guy he articulated exceptional wisdom. Even the Twitterverse is poking fun at the discrepancy in Nayte's inability to express himself and Brandon's communication skills.  Ladies, when you are dating, be committed to your deal breakers and make sure you are looking for the right things. Emily says the thing about values is that they are a long-term game. In dating, if you play the short-term game you set yourself up to fail. Over the long term, you will feel more connected if you stay true to your values.  What is your game plan and how can you date to win? Marni thinks Michele may not be emotionally available enough to receive the kind of love Brandon has to offer.    Bachelor 2021 & 2022 [35:43] The barriers to the contestants finding healthy, romantic love for Bachelor 2021 were: Sabotaging perfectly good possibilities.  Wishing, hoping, or believing the right person will show up instead of doing the work Recognizing the short game versus long game contenders.   Make a Connection: Visit Our Website Join Our Dating Den Facebook Community Here! Learn how to attract your perfect equal...watch our latest training here! Interested in working with us? Book a Breakthrough session at DWDVIP Get a Free Coaching Session with Marni on Our Podcast - Sign up Here to Be a Guest On Our Show Download a Complimentary Copy of our Book - How to Find a Quality Guy Without Going on 200 Dates

Yotam Shem-Tov talks about how a restorative justice diversion program for San Francisco youth affected recidivism. “Can Restorative Justice Conferencing Reduce Recidivism? Evidence From the Make-it-Right Program” by Yotam Shem-Tov, Steven Raphael, and Alissa Skog. *** Probable Causation is part of Doleac Initiatives, a 501(c)(3) corporation. If you enjoy the show, please consider making a tax-deductible contribution. Thank you for supporting our work! *** OTHER RESEARCH WE DISCUSS IN THIS EPISODE: “Diversion in the Criminal Justice System” by Michael Mueller-Smith and Kevin T. Schnepel. “The Impact of Felony Diversion in San Francisco” by Elsa Augustine, Johanna Lacoe, Alissa Skog, and Steven Raphael. “Specialization in Criminal Courts: Decision Making, Recidivism, and Re-victimization in Domestic Violence Courts in Tennessee” by Aria Golestani, Emily Owens, and Kerri Raissian. Probable Causation, Episode 59: Kerri Raissian. “Restorative Justice Conferences as an Early Response to Young Offenders” by Edmund F. McGarrell. “Family Group Conferencing and Re-Offending Among First-Time Juvenile Offenders: The Indianapolis Experiment” by Edmun F. McGarrell and Natalie Kroovand Hipple.

Joanna Johnson the co-creator, executive producer and showrunner of Freeform's critically acclaimed series “Good Trouble.” She is also the creator, executive producer and director of Freeform's limited series “Love in the Time of Corona,” the first scripted series shot entirely during the quarantine. Previously Johnson was an executive producer and showrunner on Freeform's groundbreaking series “The Fosters,” which ran for five seasons.Joanna Johnson was born and raised in Phoenix, Arizona. She attended USC Film School and, after graduating, pursued an acting career. Most notably, she played twins Caroline and Karen Spencer on the CBS soap opera “The Bold & the Beautiful.”Johnson's primary focus is on writing, producing and directing. She wrote the independent feature “The Shrink Is In,” starring Courtney Cox and David Arquette, and went on to create and show run the sitcom “Hope & Faith” for ABC, which ran for three seasons. She was co-executive producer on ABC Family's “Make It or Break It,” “Fairly Legal” for USA Cable, and the CW's “Emily Owens, M.D.”Johnson currently resides in Los Angeles with her wife and children.Show notes:

Now playing in Theatre 30 Penny Slots, written and directed by Kim HlavacThe cast will feature Goreti da Silva (Helen), Carole Goldman (Kay), and Marla Cotovsky (Marie), and Amir Abdullah (Masked Gunman). Sound Design is by Hall Cantrell. The Open-Door Playhouse Podcast is recorded at ES Audio Studiosin Glendale, CA. The team behind the mic is Assoc Producer Laree Griffith who manages our website and …all else, and Emily Owens, our publicist who notifies the Universe about our plays. The plays are recorded at ES Audio Services in Glendale, CA, and none of this would be possible with my patient, talented and supportive Sound Engineer Hall Cantrell.Enjoy the play.Support the show (https://fundraising.fracturedatlas.org/open-door-playhouse)

How do we understand experiences of loss politically? And what role have accounts of loss played historically, from slavery through the Movement for Black Lives and the pandemic? Meeting Street host Amanda Anderson speaks with political scientist Juliet Hooker and historian Emily Owens about their teaching project across the humanities and social sciences. We discuss quantitative vs. qualitative frameworks; the significance of public feelings of grief, rage, and exhaustion; and the powerful role that both numbers and art can play in political movements. https://www.brown.edu/academics/humanities/meeting-street-episode7 (Transcript) Support this podcast

Welcome to Open-Door Playhouse.  Support for Open-Door Playhouse comes from listeners like you, your donations help keep our plays on the Radio Stage. A quick announcement about the Patreon campaign we recently launched for the show!If you’re a superfan and interested in supporting the show and getting bonus content - head over to patreon.com/opendoorplayhouse and join a community that is committed to launching new plays, new writers, and new talent. The team behind the mic is Assoc Producer Laree Griffith who manages our website and …all else, and Emily Owens, our publicist who notifies the Universe about our plays.  The plays are recorded at ES Audio Services in Glendale, CA and none of this would be possible with my patient, talented and supportive Sound Engineer Hall Cantrell.Now playing…in Theatre 29 – Simple Lives: ACT 2.Staring Goreti da Silva as Rosalie, Elaine Mello, as Kathleen and Anne Cooper as Anna, Monique Gonsalvas as Beth, Rosney Mauger as John Knight, and Noelle Evangelista as Nurse Patty.Simple lives was written and directed by me, Bernadette Armstrong.Support the show (https://fundraising.fracturedatlas.org/open-door-playhouse)Support the show (https://fundraising.fracturedatlas.org/open-door-playhouse)

Welcome to Open-Door Playhouse.  Support for Open-Door Playhouse comes from listeners like you, your donations help keep our plays on the Radio Stage.  A quick announcement about the Patreon campaign we recently launched for the show! If you’re a superfan and interested in supporting the show and getting bonus content - head over to patreon.com/opendoorplayhouse and join a community that is committed to launching new plays, new writers, and new talent. The team behind the mic is Assoc Producer Laree Griffith who manages our website and …all else, and Emily Owens, our publicist who notifies the Universe about our plays.  The plays are recorded at ES Audio Services in Glendale, CA and none of this would be possible with my patient, talented and supportive Sound Engineer Hall Cantrell.Now playing…in Theatre 28 – Simple Lives. Staring Goreti da Silva as Rosalie, Elaine Mello, as Kathleen and Anne Cooper as Anna, Monique Gonsalvas as Beth, Rosney Mauger as John Knight, and Noelle Evangelista as Nurse Patty. Simple lives was written and directed by me, Bernadette Armstrong.Support the show (https://fundraising.fracturedatlas.org/open-door-playhouse)

On this episode of Sanity, Dr. Jason Duncan and Dr. Emily Owens discuss psychosis and the prodromal stages of psychosis. They cover risk factors for developing psychotic disorders and share information about therapeutic interventions for these individuals. Dr. Owens provides numerous examples differentiating symptoms of prodromal psychosis from normal behavior, and she explains how it is often difficult to parse out psychotic symptoms due to the fact their age of onset is similar to many different mental health disorders. Dr. Owens also provides information about racial disparities in the diagnosing of psychotic disorders. Resources: Learn more about Emily: https://www.cognitivebehaviorassociates.com/dr-emily-owens/ North American Prodromal Longitudinal Study: 8-9 sites of U.S. and Canada to identify prodromal individuals and follow up with them CBT for Prodromal Psychosis North American CBT for Psychosis Society: https://www.nacbtp.org/ SMI Adviser: https://smiadviser.org/ Vienna Beat by Blue Dot Sessions (www.sessions.blue)

Please support these podcasts on Google iTunes and Spotify shared this content with your friends family and followers --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/MessymediaUPodcast/support

After several countries banned alcohol as part of their lockdown measures, we ask if prohibition ever works? Ed Butler reports from South Africa, where a recent ban on alcohol was welcomed by some healthcare professionals and those fighting violence in the country. Harvard economist Jeffrey Miron and University of California criminologist Emily Owens discuss whether limits on alcohol are ever really effective. (Photo: A man takes beers from a fridge inside a liquor shop in Soweto, Johannesburg, on June 1, 2020; Credit: Getty Images)

Lots of people in Washington seem to want more distance from President Trump as his actions have grown even more erratic and his poll numbers have deteriorated. This week, General Mark Milley, the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff apologized for appearing with President Trump in that infamous church photo opp. Mitt Romney got a lot of attention for marching in support of Black Lives Matter. Michael Steele says it was partially political because the senator is unlikely to face retribution from his party or his constituents but it’s an important moral and personal move too. This week, there was a pretty big contrast between President Trump’s calls for “law and order” and Joe Biden’s empathy, and the polls show Biden with a growing lead over the president. It appears Biden is more open and interested in policies further to the left. He might not be a full-blown leftist, but he appears to be open to influence, Christine Emba says. Protests about policing are yielding government action. New York passed ten police reform laws, Minneapolis is moving toward efforts to abolish its police department, though it’s not entirely clear what that would mean or what institutions would be developed to replace it. Democrats in Congress have a suite of proposals and Republicans are working on their own slate. But some activists urge that we abolish or defund the police. What does that mean? Emily Owens says, too often, discussions about policing focus on its impact and benefits, and it’s important to consider the costs of policing — to communities, to the social safety net, and to people’s lives. Plus, America is reopening despite the fact that COVID-19 cases appear to be spiking. President Trump even intends to resume campaign rallies. Are we ready if things get worse? Is the president?

Join our super duper host Galaxy as he goes close and personal with the cool villain Brendon Zub from CW's newest hit show Batwoman.  Brendon Zub is a Canadian actor whose life adventures and diverse skill set have helped him carve out a unique career and emerge as a sought after and versatile actor. This fall Brendon can be seen playing Chuck Dodgson in the highly anticipated CW series "Batwoman" which brings Bruce Wayne's cousin Kate Kane, to the Arrowverse. Born in Vancouver, Brendon's family soon moved to Calgary, Alberta where he grew up as a Pastor's kid, class clown, and sports junkie, channeling most of his energy into becoming a professional baseball player. However, at age 10 his family moved to Hungary as missionaries where his dreams of baseball were quickly replaced with soccer, basketball, and embracing a new culture. Here his love of acting was born while watching old Classic Hollywood era movies on the sole English-speaking channel. But it wasn't until being transferred to an international boarding school in Germany where he began to hone his acting skill with drama class and a lead role in the High school play. Realizing he had a better chance at acting than pro sports, Brendon set his sights on pursuing an acting career. Brendon can be recognized from numerous roles on TV such as ABC's "The Good Doctor", FOX's "Fringe", The CW's "Supernatural", "iZombie", "Emily Owens", "The 100" and "The Flash" and more recently starred in The CW's re-imagination of "Charmed" and A&E's highly anticipated series "Blue Book". He has also starred in various Hallmark movies, most notably "The Christmas Calendar" in which he starred opposite Laura Bell Bundy and received a 2018 Leo Award nomination for Best Lead Actor. Off Camera, Brendon can be found scuba diving off BC's coast, skiing in Whistler, playing hockey, training Brazilian Jiujitsu, or roaming bookstores for the latest in high fantasy. For more amazing episodes go to: www.ComicCon-Radio.com   Follow us on Instagram  @ComicConRadio   Please subscribe to Comic Con Radio Always give us 5 stars.   Please share this episode with the world!   We love you all… Thank you for loving us back!  

Three interviews: historians Linford Fisher, Christy Clark-Pujara and Joanne Melish, and Emily Owens. Dan conducted six interviews on capitalism and slavery at The Dig's recent Slavery's Hinterlands symposium here in Rhode Island. This first of two episodes begins with historian Linford Fisher, who explains that the English settlement of North America was a settler-colonial project that required genocidally dispossessing indigenous people of their lands. What you might not know is that a central tactic for that dispossession, in New England and Virginia alike, was the threat and actual enslavement of native people, including the widespread practice of forcing native youth to labor in English homes. Then historians Christy Clark-Pujara and Joanne Melish, who pick up where Fisher leaves off: slavery wasn't the South's peculiar institution; it was the bedrock of the northern economy. And finally, historian Emily Owens on sexual labor under slavery: what, Owens' work explores, did slavery and freedom mean for women for whom, in brothels or the home, sex was work? On the next episode, Dan has two more interviews looking at the big picture questions of slavery, capitalism, revolution and colonialism, and an interview with a group of public historians who teach about slavery today. Thanks to n+1. To get 25% off a one-year subscription, go to nplusonemag.com/thedig and enter THEDIG at checkout Please support this podcast with your money at Patreon.com/TheDig

Three interviews: historians Linford Fisher, Christy Clark-Pujara and Joanne Melish, and Emily Owens. Dan conducted six interviews on capitalism and slavery at The Dig's recent Slavery's Hinterlands symposium here in Rhode Island. This first of two episodes begins with historian Linford Fisher, who explains that the English settlement of North America was a settler-colonial project that required genocidally dispossessing indigenous people of their lands. What you might not know is that a central tactic for that dispossession, in New England and Virginia alike, was the threat and actual enslavement of native people, including the widespread practice of forcing native youth to labor in English homes. Then historians Christy Clark-Pujara and Joanne Melish, who pick up where Fisher leaves off: slavery wasn't the South's peculiar institution; it was the bedrock of the northern economy. And finally, historian Emily Owens on sexual labor under slavery: what, Owens' work explores, did slavery and freedom mean for women for whom, in brothels or the home, sex was work? On the next episode, Dan has two more interviews looking at the big picture questions of slavery, capitalism, revolution and colonialism, and an interview with a group of public historians who teach about slavery today. Thanks to n+1. To get 25% off a one-year subscription, go to nplusonemag.com/thedig and enter THEDIG at checkout Please support this podcast with your money at Patreon.com/TheDig  

Block Talk- Episode 8 (Emily Owens and Hollis James) by Michael Block

Já começamos narrando os melhores momentos do Big Brother Brasil, emendando com Mulheres Ricas. Para completar, ainda falamos de séries, entre elas: 30 Rock, Once Upon a Time, Parenthood, Revenge, Glee, The Following, Emily Owens, The Office e outras mais.

This week Deeps is a little more mumbly than usual as he podcasts mere hours after having a broken tooth extracted. But he's a trooper and we soldier on to talk about two new series, a returning show and of course all the other usual suspects. I've noticed the Derek Report Adjacent area is really expanding. I can't decide if that's good or not. These timestamps are VERY rough approximations. Hunted (2:00) Emily Owens (9:55) American Horror Story (12:38) The Derek Report (26:45) Revenge (36:05) Nashville (41:30) Dexter (47:00) Homeland (52:40) Spoilers abound - be warned, gentle listener! We have a NEW phone number: 617-858-0733. We also have a NEW email address, because something dumb happened! You can now email us: thebigredpodcast@gmail.com. Sorry for the problems if you've tried to email in the past. Find us on Twitter: @bigredpodcast Visit us at www.bigredpodcast.com or email us: thebigredpodcast@gmail.com Musical score provided by Ernesto Burden, www.ernestoburden.com.