Podcasts about transitive

What is the value of a loyal audience?    This is a big question that many brands ask themselves as they evaluate whether or not to pursue brand storytelling. In this episode, we explore the dollars and cents of customer loyalty, how brand storytelling builds loyalty with an audience, and how the countless decisions in the filmmaking process are opportunities to either build or break trust with a brand's audience.     Takeaways - Brand storytelling helps differentiate a brand and build an engaged and loyal audience. - Building trust through brand storytelling can have a significant impact on a brand's bottom line. - Transitive trust is a powerful tool in brand storytelling, where trust in characters on screen translates to trust in the brand. - Resonating with the audience, choosing appropriate locations, ensuring authenticity, and paying attention to supporting details are crucial in building trust through brand storytelling.   Chapters 00:37 - The Value of Being Different 01:31 - The ROI of Loyalty through Brand Storytelling 03:25 - The Impact of Loyalty on the Bottom Line 04:24 - Transitive Trust in Brand Storytelling 05:49 - Opportunities to Build Trust in Brand Storytelling 06:44 - Resonating with the Audience 07:41 - Choosing Locations that Resonate 08:07 - Authenticity in Brand Storytelling 09:03 - Supporting Details in Brand Storytelling 10:00 - The Importance of Asking the Right Questions   //   These Fireside Chats are short discussions where we'll delve into the heart of storytelling and its pivotal role in today's marketing landscape.  In these short episodes, we'll explore the art of storytelling, and uncover the insights to help you craft narratives that captivate, resonate, and leave a lasting impact on your brand.   //   Curious how your brand's storytelling efforts stack up? Take this 9-question quiz to evaluate the health of your brand storytelling.   This podcast is produced by Port Side Productions. We're a video production outfit that believes stories inspire and move people through the power of emotion. We work with brands and agencies in the outdoor industry to tell stories that help brands engage, inspire, and build brand affinity with their customers. We tell stories from the wild.    

Are we Team Sydney or Team Maria? Tune in to hear our thoughts!

Transitive property tells us Chicago State is better than Purdue, so the 2024 college basketball season is wide open. We discuss potential Cinderellas like Purdue-Fort Wayne and Indiana State, unbeaten James Madison, a redesigned American, and whether depth means title aspirations for the Big 10 or the SEC.

Link to bioRxiv paper: http://biorxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2023.07.27.550739v1?rss=1 Authors: Miconi, T., Kay, K. Abstract: How do we learn structured relations from partial information? A striking instance of animal and human relational learning is transitive inference (learning A greater than B and B greater than C, and inferring A greater than C), which can be quickly and globally rearranged upon learning a new item (learning A greater than B greater than C and D greater than E greater than F, then C greater than D, and inferring B greater than E). Despite multiple modelling proposals, the neural mechanisms of transitive inference and fast reassembly of existing knowledge remain an open question. Here we adopt a meta-learning ("learning-to-learn") approach. We train artificial neural networks, endowed with synaptic plasticity and neuromodulation, to be able to autonomously learn any novel ordered series of arbitrary stimuli, through repeated presentation of stimulus pairs. The resulting learning networks exhibit transitive inference and can quickly assemble separately learned lists after learning their linking pair. We obtain a complete mechanistic understanding of this discovered neural learning algorithm. Surprisingly, this learning involves active cognition: previously seen items are selectively reinstated in working memory, allowing transfer of information and explaining fast reassembly of existing knowledge. The discovered mechanism offers possible suggestions for biological experiments. More generally, this complete elucidation of a cognitive learning behavior illustrates the potential of trained plastic networks as an approach to discovering biologically plausible learning mechanisms. Copy rights belong to original authors. Visit the link for more info Podcast created by Paper Player, LLC

Link to original articleWelcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: When is correlation transitive?, published by Ege Erdil on June 23, 2023 on LessWrong. It's a well-known property of correlation that it's not transitive in general. If X,Y,Z are three real-valued random variables such that ρ(X,Y)>0 and ρ(Y,Z)>0, it doesn't have to be the case that ρ(X,Z)>0. Nevertheless, there are some circumstances under which correlation is transitive. I will focus on two such cases in this post. Primer: correlation as an inner product For what follows, some background knowledge is necessary that we can regard correlations of real-valued random variables with finite second moments as inner products in an appropriate Hilbert space. Specifically, if X,Y are two such random variables with zero mean and unit standard deviation, which is a simplification we can always make as correlation is invariant under translation and scalar multiplication, then we can compute ρ(X,Y)=cov(X,Y)σXσY=E[XY]−E[X]E[Y]=E[XY] The pairing (A,B)E[AB] defines an inner product on the space of random variables with finite second moments where two random variables are considered equivalent if they are equal with probability 1 (almost surely). The properties that we expect out of an inner product are easy to check: the pairing is obviously bilinear and positive definite. Furthermore, it turns out this inner product turns the space of random variables with finite second moments into a Hilbert space: the vector space turns out to be complete under the induced norm ∥X∥=√E[X2]. Roughly speaking, this means that we can take orthogonal projections onto closed subspaces with impunity. Now that we have this framework, we can move on to the main results of this post. Correlation is transitive when the correlations are sufficiently strong I'll first prove the following: Claim 1: If ρ(X,Y)=a and ρ(Y,Z)=b, then ab−√(1−a2)(1−b2)≤ρ(X,Z)≤ab+√(1−a2)(1−b2) Moreover, these bounds are tight: for any a,b, there is a combination X,Y,Z for which we can make either the right or the left inequality into an equality. Proof We can assume X,Y,Z have mean zero and unit variance without loss of generality. Taking orthogonal projections of X,Z onto the one-dimensional subspace spanned by Y, we can write X=aY+√1−a2HXYZ=bY+√1−b2HZY where E[YHXY]=E[YHZY]=0 and the random variables HXY,HZY have mean zero and variance 1. Taking inner products gives E[XZ]=ab+√(1−a2)(1−b2)E[HXYHZY] Using the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for our inner product finishes the proof: |E[HXYHZY]|≤∥HXY∥∥HZY∥=1. For the existence proof, let Y be an arbitrary random variable with mean zero and unit variance and pick HXY,HYZ to be perfectly correlated or perfectly anti-correlated standard Gaussians that are uncorrelated with Y. Interpretation When a,b are large and positive, the lower bound ab−√(1−a2)(1−b2) is also positive, and so we have a guaranteed positive correlation between X and Z. One way to simplify this is to make it single-dimensional by assuming a=b. In this case, the lower bound is 2a2−1. If we want a guaranteed positive correlation between X and Z, this means the correlations ρ(X,Y)=ρ(Y,Z)=a have to satisfy a>1/√2≈0.7. This condition is quite strict, and we might wonder if some transitivity of correlation can be recovered in the absence of such strong correlations between X,Y and Y,Z. It turns out the answer is yes, at least if we assume the random variables are in some sense "generic". Correlation is transitive on the average It turns out that in a suitable sense, when X,Y and Y,Z are positively correlated, there is a tendency for X,Z to also be positively correlated, even though per Claim 1 we can't deduce that they must be positively correlated. The precise version of this claim is as follows: Claim 2: Let X,Y,Z be vectors independently and uniformly distributed on the n-dimensional unit sphere Sn⊂Rn+1, and let −1≤a,b≤1 be two re...

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: When is correlation transitive?, published by Ege Erdil on June 23, 2023 on LessWrong. It's a well-known property of correlation that it's not transitive in general. If X,Y,Z are three real-valued random variables such that ρ(X,Y)>0 and ρ(Y,Z)>0, it doesn't have to be the case that ρ(X,Z)>0. Nevertheless, there are some circumstances under which correlation is transitive. I will focus on two such cases in this post. Primer: correlation as an inner product For what follows, some background knowledge is necessary that we can regard correlations of real-valued random variables with finite second moments as inner products in an appropriate Hilbert space. Specifically, if X,Y are two such random variables with zero mean and unit standard deviation, which is a simplification we can always make as correlation is invariant under translation and scalar multiplication, then we can compute ρ(X,Y)=cov(X,Y)σXσY=E[XY]−E[X]E[Y]=E[XY] The pairing (A,B)E[AB] defines an inner product on the space of random variables with finite second moments where two random variables are considered equivalent if they are equal with probability 1 (almost surely). The properties that we expect out of an inner product are easy to check: the pairing is obviously bilinear and positive definite. Furthermore, it turns out this inner product turns the space of random variables with finite second moments into a Hilbert space: the vector space turns out to be complete under the induced norm ∥X∥=√E[X2]. Roughly speaking, this means that we can take orthogonal projections onto closed subspaces with impunity. Now that we have this framework, we can move on to the main results of this post. Correlation is transitive when the correlations are sufficiently strong I'll first prove the following: Claim 1: If ρ(X,Y)=a and ρ(Y,Z)=b, then ab−√(1−a2)(1−b2)≤ρ(X,Z)≤ab+√(1−a2)(1−b2) Moreover, these bounds are tight: for any a,b, there is a combination X,Y,Z for which we can make either the right or the left inequality into an equality. Proof We can assume X,Y,Z have mean zero and unit variance without loss of generality. Taking orthogonal projections of X,Z onto the one-dimensional subspace spanned by Y, we can write X=aY+√1−a2HXYZ=bY+√1−b2HZY where E[YHXY]=E[YHZY]=0 and the random variables HXY,HZY have mean zero and variance 1. Taking inner products gives E[XZ]=ab+√(1−a2)(1−b2)E[HXYHZY] Using the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for our inner product finishes the proof: |E[HXYHZY]|≤∥HXY∥∥HZY∥=1. For the existence proof, let Y be an arbitrary random variable with mean zero and unit variance and pick HXY,HYZ to be perfectly correlated or perfectly anti-correlated standard Gaussians that are uncorrelated with Y. Interpretation When a,b are large and positive, the lower bound ab−√(1−a2)(1−b2) is also positive, and so we have a guaranteed positive correlation between X and Z. One way to simplify this is to make it single-dimensional by assuming a=b. In this case, the lower bound is 2a2−1. If we want a guaranteed positive correlation between X and Z, this means the correlations ρ(X,Y)=ρ(Y,Z)=a have to satisfy a>1/√2≈0.7. This condition is quite strict, and we might wonder if some transitivity of correlation can be recovered in the absence of such strong correlations between X,Y and Y,Z. It turns out the answer is yes, at least if we assume the random variables are in some sense "generic". Correlation is transitive on the average It turns out that in a suitable sense, when X,Y and Y,Z are positively correlated, there is a tendency for X,Z to also be positively correlated, even though per Claim 1 we can't deduce that they must be positively correlated. The precise version of this claim is as follows: Claim 2: Let X,Y,Z be vectors independently and uniformly distributed on the n-dimensional unit sphere Sn⊂Rn+1, and let −1≤a,b≤1 be two re...

What up party people. Episode 50 coming atcha this week and boy is it spicy. We've got Dizzle Dillman on the for the first part of the show as we banter over the latest gravel drama that went down at Gravel Locos this past weekend. There's controversy, hot takes, and plenty of Bonk Bros smack talk so stick around for that plus the most listener questions we've ever answered at the end.  If you have any feedback or questions for the show hit us up at bonkbrospodcast@gmail.com or give us a shout on the soc meds(@bonkbros @scottmcgilljr @dylanjawnson @adamsaban6 @tylerclouti). ALSO! We've got some new merch that we just launched (https://my-store-e1e3c4.creator-spring.com/listing/hat-7287 | https://my-store-e1e3c4.creator-spring.com/listing/sticker-3974). The sampling's are small to start with but if there's traction early then we'll expand the offerings. Big shout to all of our loyal Patreon supporters as well. Whether it's tossing $3 in the tip jar, $5 for early access to shows, $20 for VIP status or more, we appreciate the support in helping keep the mics on. Alright let's get this Bonk Bros party started.      Patreon: http://patreon.com/patreon_bonkbros   For more Dylan Johnson content: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIf1xvRN8pzyd_VfLgj_dow Intro/ Outro music by AlexGrohl on Pixabay.com: https://pixabay.com/music/id-111445/ 

In today's episode, Jason and Patrick dive deeply with JFrog's Senior Solutions Engineer, Bill Manning. With the conversation tackling the depth and complexity of software supply chains, vulnerabilities and more, Bill deftly offers grounded advice to listeners old and new. 00:00:26 Introductions00:00:40 Bill's plethora of job titles00:09:33 The excitement of learning a language00:15:08 Mechanical keyboards00:21:17 Bill's advice on adapting00:27:55 What a supply chain is00:34:28 Castle analogies00:40:55 Unpacking legalities00:52:11 Log4J00:54:41 What JFrog does01:01:16 What can go wrong01:08:08 Getting started in this space01:14:15 Careers in JFrog01:20:23 FarewellsResources mentioned in this episode:Join the Programming Throwdown Patreon community today: https://www.patreon.com/programmingthrowdown?ty=h Subscribe to the podcast on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@programmingthrowdown4793Links: Bill Manning: Website: https://about.me/billmanning Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/williammanning/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/williammanning JFrog: Website: https://jfrog.com/ Careers: https://join.jfrog.com/ Artifactory: https://jfrog.com/artifactory/ Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/company/jfrog-ltd/ Others: Liquid Software: https://liquidsoftware.com/ SolarWinds hack incident: https://www.wired.com/story/the-untold-story-of-solarwinds-the-boldest-supply-chain-hack-ever/ Transitive dependencies: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transitive_dependency More Throwdown? Check out this prior episode:153: ChatGPT: https://www.programmingthrowdown.com/2023/03/153-chatgpt.htmlIf you've enjoyed this episode, you can listen to more on Programming Throwdown's website: https://www.programmingthrowdown.com/ Reach out to us via email: programmingthrowdown@gmail.com You can also follow Programming Throwdown on Facebook | Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Player.FM | Youtube Join the discussion on our DiscordHelp support Programming Throwdown through our Patreon  ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

DJ (@CardgardenMTG), Corbin (@CHosler), and Jason (@jasonEAlt), breakdown all the latest Magic: The Gathering news about, you guessed it, finance and Commander. 04:00 Minneapolis Command Zone 09:01 Breaking Bulk 20:59 Hot Rosewater Commander Takes 25:30 All About The Benjamins 42:00 MTGstocks Mini Game 45:45 Pick of the week https://linktr.ee/BrainstormBrewery Support our Patreon! www.patreon.com/bsb Need to...

Into the tunnels beneath the Stout Singer... what will our adventurers find? Patreon: patreon.com/MajesticGoose Discord: bit.ly/oneshotdiscord Website: MajesticGoose.com Twitter: @critsandknits Twitch: twitch.tv/MajesticGooseNetwork Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Gallery Conversations: talkPOPc at galerie Jilská 14, PragueArtist and talkPOPc Founder Dr. Dena Shottenkirk speaks w/ Resident Philosopher Dr. Martin Nitsche on the Bridge between Continental and Analytic Philosophy0 - 2:09: Shottenkirk: introduction of talkPOPc's radical reforming of both art and philosophy in order to emphasize the communal role of conversation.2:10 - 3:39: Bridging Analytic and Continental philosophy3:40 - 5:49: the importance of conversation in making this bridge5:50 - 9:38: Shottenkirk asks Martin Nitsche about his book "Methodical Precedence of Intertwining: An Introduction to a Transitive-topological Phenomenology", where Nitsche writes on Husserl's refusal to have a clear divide between the subject and the object. Nitsche explains it is Husserl's argument against Brentano's reliance on Descartes.  Husserl wanted to do a philosophy of holistic experience. 9:39 -10:11: Shottenkirk asks if anyone connects Husserl to William James? Nitsche says Husserl himself did. Shottenkirk notes that the connection is obvious.10:12 - 12:00: Shottenkirk discusses gist perception which gives both objective and subjective information, arguing that the error of empiricism is a model of the object coming to the passive subject.12:05 -12:59: Nitsche talks about using the Merleau-Ponty notion of intertwining where there is no division of subject and object; even though we can speak of us being here and being separate from the world, it is secondary and not the root of perception.13:00 -13:48: Shottenkirk notes that perception has, at its root, the marriage of object and subject. The problem is how we explain experience and perception with these two married things at the beginning. There has to be a fluidity. That is also talkPOPc: a fluidity of things.13:50 -15:21: Nitsche discusses Husserl's notion of phenomenological reduction; it is not solipsistic. It is re-transiting the attention to a new domain, focusing on the intertwining of subject and object; refocusing on the gist. (Here we have a merging of the analytic philosophy notion of gist perception with the continental notion of topological intertwining)15:25 -19:40: The notion of reduction, with Nitsche introducing the notion of orientation - it is in favor of a more layered notion of experience, which is closer to the artist's experience.19:15 - 21:59: Nitsche, by using the example of touch, talks about avoiding the solipsism of orientation: when we touch our finger to our other hand we are not just subject/object. 22:00 - 24:00: Shottenkirk notes that "restriction" is not "elimination". In vision science, semantic/high-level features are strictly different from low-level features. But that view tracks the objects out there, which is a problem. If one doesn't completely divide low-level from high-level, then one can experience those low-level things as not part of a strict object/subject divide. So, when we have the experience of finger going into the hand, it is an experience even though it's not named. The range of things experienced are way larger than the things that are named. Nitsche agrees.24:01 - 28:00: Shottenkirk defines topology in general, with Nitsche then talking about topology in phenomenology. A picture of the world that is transforming. Philosophy is topology. Meaning is that thing that is always being constructed on the fly. 28:10 - 29:53:  Shottenkirk: Let's bring it back to art. Once function that art is the way we understand the world - it provides for those topological transitions: this thing can suddenly mean that thing. I'm doing the same thing, but I'm thinking about it in terms of low-level and high-level features, and the ontological construction of objects. Artists' re-structure reality.Support the show

In this episode of Money Tales, our guest is Dr. Amber Banks. When she was in second grade, Amber switched from a private elementary school to a public one. The private school was predominantly white, and the public school was predominantly black. For Amber, who self-identifies as a black biracial woman, this was a pivotal moment requiring her to navigate two different environments and become a bridge builder between the two. As Amber tells us, it was hard, at times, to feel she was enough in either environment.Amber is the CEO and Founder of the Center for Trust and Transformation, a collective dedicated to the advancement of trust as a foundational building block for racial equity and social justice. She brings over two decades of experience in education and the social sector as an educator, researcher, facilitator, advisor, entrepreneur, and organizer. Through the Center for Trust and Transformation, Amber's work rewrites the narrative on trust to better honor our histories and identities and invites clients to build and repair trust in service of joy, justice, and liberation.Amber completed her undergraduate degree in Journalism at Boston University. She also completed a Ph.D. in Education Leadership, Organizations, and Policy at the University of Washington with a focus on cross-cultural trust, critical race theory, and social network analysis. Amber is a Pahara NextGen Fellow, co-founder of Women of Color in Education, a mom to two beautiful children and a caretaker of many plants. Amber loves to dream of what's possible when we work together from a place of trust and healing.Learn more about Money Tale$ > Subscribe to the podcast Recent episodes See all episodes > Form CRS Form ADV Terms of Use Privacy Rights and Policies

In this episode of Money Tales, our guest is Dr. Amber Banks. When she was in second grade, Amber switched from a private elementary school to a public one. The private school was predominantly white, and the public school was predominantly black. For Amber, who self-identifies as a black biracial woman, this was a pivotal moment requiring her to navigate two different environments and become a bridge builder between the two. As Amber tells us, it was hard, at times, to feel she was enough in either environment. Amber is the CEO and Founder of the Center for Trust and Transformation, a collective dedicated to the advancement of trust as a foundational building block for racial equity and social justice. She brings over two decades of experience in education and the social sector as an educator, researcher, facilitator, advisor, entrepreneur, and organizer. Through the Center for Trust and Transformation, Amber's work rewrites the narrative on trust to better honor our histories and identities and invites clients to build and repair trust in service of joy, justice, and liberation. Amber completed her undergraduate degree in Journalism at Boston University. She also completed a Ph.D. in Education Leadership, Organizations, and Policy at the University of Washington with a focus on cross-cultural trust, critical race theory, and social network analysis. Amber is a Pahara NextGen Fellow, co-founder of Women of Color in Education, a mom to two beautiful children and a caretaker of many plants. Amber loves to dream of what's possible when we work together from a place of trust and healing. See all episodes >

Link to bioRxiv paper: http://biorxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2022.10.10.511448v1?rss=1 Authors: Kay, K., Wei, X.-X., Khajeh, R., Beiran, M., Cueva, C. J., Jensen, G., Ferrera, V. P., Abbott, L. F. Abstract: The ability to make inferences using abstract rules and relations has long been understood to be a hallmark of human intelligence, as evidenced in logic, mathematics, and language. Intriguingly, modern work in animal cognition has established that this ability is evolutionarily widespread, indicating an ancient and possibly foundational role in natural intelligence. Despite this importance, it remains an open question how inference using abstract rules is implemented in the brain - possibly due to a lack of competing hypotheses at the level of collective neural activity and of behavior. Here we report the generation and analysis of a collection of neural networks (NNs) that perform transitive inference (TI), a classical cognitive task that requires inference of a single abstract relation between novel combinations of inputs (if A greater than B and B greater than C, then A greater than C). We found that NNs generated using standard training methods (i) generalize fully (i.e. to all novel combinations of inputs), (ii) generalize when inference requires working memory (WM), a capacity thought to be essential for inference in living subjects, (iii) express multiple emergent behaviors long documented in humans and animals, in addition to novel behaviors not previously studied, and (iv) adopt different solutions that yield alternative predictions for both behavior and collective neural activity. Further, a subset of NNs expressed a "subtractive" solution that was characterized in neural activity space by a simple dynamical pattern (an oscillation) and geometric arrangement (ordered collinearity). Together, these findings show how collective neural activity can accomplish generalization according to an abstract rule, and provide a series of testable hypotheses not previously established in the study of TI. More broadly, these findings suggest new ways to understand how neural systems realize abstract rules and relations. Copy rights belong to original authors. Visit the link for more info Podcast created by PaperPlayer

The Discovery of Transitive Phenomenon in the Radio Emission of the mode-switcher PSR B0943+10 by Svetlana Suleymanova et al. on Monday 10 October B0943+10 is known to switch between two distinct, hours-long modes of radio emission, Bright (B) and Quiet (Q). Up to now the switches in both directions were believed to occur instantly (on the scale of a spin period). We have found a transitive process around the Q-to-B-mode switch, which consists of two additional short-lived modes, each with distinct average profiles and subpulse drift rates. Based on observations at low radio frequencies, we examine the properties of these transitive modes and discuss their implications in the framework of the traditional carousel model of drifting subpulses. arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.04215v1

What is the bigger trap game: Bowling Green or Tulsa? The crew discusses that and more on today's show. Did Ole Miss learn anything about their QB situation at Georgia Tech? How much of Mississippi State's struggles against LSU were self-inflicted? They finish up discussing Bowling Green's transitive property title potential, as well as topics from around the SEC. Make sure to follow Parrish, Michael, and Theo on Twitter. Follow the latest news in our exclusive Ole Miss and

Look y'all, honestly nothing much really happens in this chapter but it is SO PREFERABLE to what's about to happen that we wish it could last forever!!!! Sex changes everything! The whole plot of this whole series hinges on whether or not they bone!! Sex saves lives!! Write to us at twilightphasepodcast@gmail.com and let us know your favorite tropical activity Join the coven at Patreon.com/twilightphasepodcast Check us out at @Twilight_Phase on Twitter and Instagram, Twilightphasepodcast.tumblr.com --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/twilight-phase-podcast/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/twilight-phase-podcast/support

We discuss Stephen Colbert's “insurrection,” and somehow we're still talking about gun control. Meanwhile, eggplants in capes, Obi-Wan spoilers around 20 min, as well as ranting about Paw Patrol, real estate and more. Find us on Twitter @N3rdGa5mInc or check out our link tree; https://linktr.ee/n3rdga5m Opening theme: Vintage Education by Kevin MacLeod Link: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/4589-vintage-education Closing theme: Easy Lemon (30 second) by Kevin MacLeod Link: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/3695-easy-lemon-30-second- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app

You're listening to Lingo Phoenix's word of the day for February 20. Today's word is pepper, spelled p-e-p-p-e-r. The stress mark in this word falls on the first syllable. Pepper (verb) [Transitive]: to add pepper to food Pepper the steak well. Also, “if bullets pepper something, they hit it several times.” Machine gun fire peppered the front of the building. pepper somebody with questions [American English] to ask someone a lot of questions, one after the other Reporters peppered him with questions. To pepper is also to add to something in many places: He peppered his speech with jokes. Interesting Fact: salt-and-pepper (adjective) Salt-and-pepper hair is a mixture of dark hairs and grey or white hairs. George Clooney With your word of the day, I'm Mohammad Golpayegani. Join our Telegram channel @lingophoenix to make sure you never miss an episode of Lingo Phoenix's Word of the Day.

RIP Nosey.   4:40 - Undead Unluck 107 12:29 - Kaiju No. 8 60 21:26 - Edens Zero 188 32:00 - Akane-banashi 10 43:48 - Blue Box 49 60:45 - Mashle: Magic and Muscles 104 68:40 - Black Clover 330 77:50 - Favorite Series and MVP

Christ has come to make every last aspect of your life the object of his eternal, never-ending, always transitive grace.

We are extremely excited to have the one and only Jeff Mattson of Dark Star Orchestra as our guest on No Simple Road this week as part of our lead-up to Skull & Roses Festival. Guitarist and songwriter Jeff Mattson is one of the Jam scene's most lasting voices having taken over Long Island in The Volunteers and The Zen Tricksters then rising to national prominence with The Donna Jean Godchaux Band. Mattson has also played with Phil Lesh & Friends both before and after taking the lead guitar post at Dark Star Orchestra. We sit down with Jeff and get right to it talking about the rigors of returning to the road, playing for parking lots, how he got the gig with Dark Star, the magick of Jerry Garcia and The Grateful Dead, Wooley Mammoths, psychedelic fun, and a whole lot more!SONG AT THE BEGINNING OF THE INTERVIEW: "Bird Song" - Dark Star Orchestra 11/22/17 Penn's Peak -Jim Thorpe, Pa.For more on Jeff: www.jeffmattson.netFor Dark Star Orchestra tour info, news, merch and more head over to: www.darkstarorchestra.netNEW!!! No Simple Road Intro Music Performed and Created By ESCAPERFREE SHIPPING from Shop Tour Bus Use The PROMO CODE: nosimpleroadFor 20% off Sunset Lake CBD PROMO CODE: NSR20 For 25% off Electric Fish Lights PROMO CODE: NSRFOR 10% off your first month of Better Help CLICK HEREFor 20% off Grady's Cold Brew PROMO CODE: NSRFor 10% off your order at Fin and Wheel PROMO CODE: NSR OTHER MUSIC BY AND USED WITH OUR GRATITUDE AND THE PERMISSION OF:ANDREW HENDRYXOUTRO MUSIC BY AND USED WITH OUR GRATITUDE AND THE PERMISSION OF:CHILLDREN OF INDIGONo Simple Road is part of OSIRIS MEDIA. Osiris is creating a community that connects people like you with podcasts and live experiences about artists and topics you love. To stay up to date on what we're up to, visit our site and sign up for our newsletter. Osiris works in partnership with JamBase, which connects music fans with the music they love and empowers them to go see live music!Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/nosimpleroad. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

On this week's journey into chaos, your hosts are Kyle, Matt and Jarred! In this weeks Universe: What if every living and thinking thing in this universe existed under the Transitive Properties. Every time a living creature ingested or absorbed any piece of bodily fluid from another living creature they absorb the last 3 hours of the other beings life. Along the way we answer the hard hitting questions: does a memory get more vivid the more you ingest, can you freeze and preserve memories, can this be used as the ultimate form of eye for an eye imprisonment, will this make sex better or worse, and will predators developing into unstoppable killing machines driven by a constant process of self analysis of their hunting styles. Will our world devolve into chaos as everyone's lives, lies and knowledge are only one touch/lick away or will it be a utopia where every living being becomes highly empathic and lies and deceit become a thing of the past; or will everyone just retreat into the woods and lick animals to feel what that's like? This and much more in this week's Universe! Follow Us @ Website: https://rumrunnaspodcastnetwork.com/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/RumRunnas Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/rumrunnas/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Inferring utility functions from locally non-transitive preferences, published by Jan Hendrik Kirchner on February 10, 2022 on The AI Alignment Forum. As part of the AI Safety Camp, I've been diving a bit deeper into the foundations of expected utility theory and preference learning. In this post, I am making explicit a connection between those two things that (I assume) many people already made implicitly. But I couldn't find a nice exposition of this argument so I wrote it up. Any feedback is of course highly welcome! Preference utilitarianism and the Von-Neumann-Morgenstern theorem. At the risk of sounding drab, I briefly want to revisit some well-trodden territory in the realm of expected utility theory to motivate the rest of this post. When we are thinking about the question of how to align advanced AI with human values, we are confronted with the question of whether we want to capture "How humans act" or "How humans should act". Both approaches have virtue, but if we're being ambitious we probably want to aim for the latter. However, our understanding of "How humans should act" is still rather confused and ready-made solutions to "plug into" an AGI are not available. Rather than tackling the entire problem at once, we might focus on one particularly well-formalized portion of ethics first. A possible answer to the question "How should I act?" comes from preference utilitarianism where we focus on satisfying everyone's preferences (as revealed by their choices). I say that this portion of ethics is well-formalized because, it turns out, if you are being reasonable about your preferences, we can represent them succinctly in a "utility function," u(A)∈R. This utility function has the neat property that for two possible options, L and M, you prefer option M over option L iff u(M)>u(L). This is the famous "von-Neumann-Morgenstern theorem" which sits at the heart of an approach of "doing good better". Now given that the utility function lives in the realm of mathematics, there is a seemingly natural strategy to use it to steer AI. Get everyone's utility functions, combine them into a target function, and then let the AI pick the actions that increase the target function the most. If we have to pick a single number to maximize, there is a case to be made that utility is one of the best single numbers we can hope for. Sounds good. Where is the catch? The futility of computing utility. Let's start by trying to write down a utility function. The proof of the von-Neumann-Morgenstern is constructive, i.e., it doesn't only guarantee the existence of a utility function, it also shows us the way to get there. Here is a step-by-step guide: 1. Write down all the possible elementary outcomes that we might want to know the utility of. Ah. Yeah. That's going to be a problem. "All the things" is a lot of things. We might (and will, in this post) limit ourselves to a toy domain to make some progress, but that will be a poor substitute for the thing we want: all the possible outcomes affecting all existing humans. We might not think of some outcomes because they appear too good to be true. (Or too weird to be thinkable.) We might even want to include those outcomes in particular, as they might be the best option that nobody realized was on the table. But if we can't think of them, we can't write them down. (Perhaps there is a way out. An essential nuance in the first step is writing down "all the possible elementary outcomes." We don't need to consider all the outcomes immediately. We only need to consider a set from which we can construct the more complicated outcomes. We need a basis of the space of possibilities. That's already infinitely easier, and we're always guaranteed to find a basis. Hopefully, we can find a basis of a system that is rich enough to describe all relevant ou...

T&B are back with another episode of The Aftamath. The word of the day is Job.. J O B, JOB!! And Tom Brady finally leaves his job. Also, word is the Dolphins pay good money to lose. Then fire you from your job. We discuss Jimbo Fisher and also use "Aftamath Math", to debunk the Jimbo Phenomenon. T.A.P. IN‼️

Transitive og intransitive verb (01.25) Språkforskarane Anne Dahl og Terje Lohndal dykker ned i verbets mangslungne irrgangar. Ut med språket: Rafael Escobar Løvdahl (24.10) Statsmeteorologen som flytta frå Spania til Sørlandet og snakka nordnorsk! Lytterspørsmål: Ekorn og acorns (49.05) Språkforsker Anne Dahl greier ut om skilnadar og likheter mellom ekorn og acorns. Send dine spørsmål til snakk@nrk.no! Hør episoden i appen NRK Radio

Happy New Year! Sam and Ryan are back from the holidays, talking about transitive dependencies in node and the browser in the context of Ryan's next-s3-upload library. They also discuss a SuspenseAfterInitialRender component, speed vs. testability in services and monoliths, and a thought-provoking tweet from Dan Abramov on tests vs. source code.Topics include:0:00 - Would you want tests or source code11:20 - Suspense, SuspenseAfterInitialRender, unstable_avoidThisFallback19:05 - Value of having a reproducible test suite for a dynamic app22:12 - Speed vs. testability of services vs. monolith26:24 - How to import different versions of dependencies in libraries. Module resolution in node vs. browser.Links:Dan Abramov's tweet on tests vs. source codeA Quick Intro to Suspense in React 18React PR for unstable_avoidThisFallbackHow Serverless Saved Money on My Heating Billnext-s3-upload, Ryan's Next.js package for uploading images

Hello everyone my name is vijay kumar Devireddy and I am glad to have you back on my episode 77 today we're going to discuss about Transitive attacks.Transitive attacks aren't really an actual type of attack but more of a conceptual method.It gets its name from the Transitive Property we learned back in mathematics.Essentially, the Transitive Property says that if A equals B and B equals C,then by all logic, A also equals C.Now, when it comes to Security ,and they talk about the idea of a transitive attack,they're really focusing on the idea of trust.If one network trusts a second network and that second network trusts a third network, then that first network really trusts the third network, and so, if an attacker can get into any one of those three networks,he can then get into the other two as well.This is based on that transitive trust.This is really important in the world of security because whoever you trust,you're also trusting everyone else that they've ever trusted. Whenever you connect your network to somebody else's network using a trust relationship, you're inherently assuming all of the risk of their security posture or the lack of their security posture in addition to your own security posture.Now, often in large enterprise networks, we reuse trust relationships between different domain controllers because this helps us minimize the amount of times that someone has to authenticate over and over for a resource,but, remember, whenever you sacrifice security in order to afford yourself better or quicker operations,there is a risk associated with it.So if your organization wishes to maintain a strong security posture,your systems should not assume trust but instead, should question and re-question every device and network that it wishes to connect to.

In our pilot episode,  Louis mansplains what a podcast can be about. Maxelle learns a new skill, Molly has some misconceptions about Pauly Shore. Everyone's trans. Everyone's hot.No one learns what a podcast is it's a cliffhanger of sorts 

Michael Cera inspired Vampire Weekend. Vampire Weekend inspired Kid Cudi. Kid Cudi inspired Kanye West. Transitive property: Michael Cera inspires Kanye West

Hoskins gives his takeaways from the biggest Week 2 matchups in the NFL. Panthers!?! Big Ben and Matt Ryan are toast. The Bucs are good. The Bills and Cardinals can't be trusted. Warmups: LeBron and Westbrook  in Nas music video.The Clippers latest rumors.JJ Redick retires. Hall of Fame?  Galaxy Brain: The Transitive Property of Football has calculated the Raiders as the best team in the NFL.  Role Players of the Week:Famous athletes from the Met Gala.

Sep 14 Seg 2 - The Transitive Property

Check out Empires of Dirt: https://canonpress.com/products/empires-of-dirt-secularism-radical-islam-and-the-mere-christendom-alternative/ 

Check out Empires of Dirt: https://canonpress.com/products/empires-of-dirt-secularism-radical-islam-and-the-mere-christendom-alternative/ 

We talk with Joel Kemp about his experience introducing Elixir at Spotify. We learn about the concurrency problems he had with the default stack and how that was solved with the BEAM. We talk about the inertia that larger companies have that make introducing any change harder. Joel compares the process to running a marathon and shares some tactics used to help build internal support and interest. Fascinating insight into a well known company and how Elixir is helping internally. Elixir Community News - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCv-QRhbg07E3pe58eQauGibLv0A1fYm8 (https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCv-QRhbg07E3pe58eQauGibLv0A1fYm8) – ElixirWizard's Conference 2021 videos are on YouTube. - https://pragprog.com/titles/lmelixir/testing-elixir/ (https://pragprog.com/titles/lmelixir/testing-elixir/) – Testing Elixir book. 40% off promo code "LMELIXIRCOMPLETE" - https://twitter.com/josevalim/status/1421912595456569351 (https://twitter.com/josevalim/status/1421912595456569351) – Elixir 1.13 gets "mix xref graph" improvements - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transitive_dependency (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transitive_dependency) – Transitive Dependency info - https://twitter.com/josevalim/status/1420810455854067723 (https://twitter.com/josevalim/status/1420810455854067723) – esbuild fixed last technical hurdle for use in Phoenix - https://github.com/josevalim/phxesbuilddemo/commit/0546034f26ac5d58d12867e5843037ce1b2d4dd1 (https://github.com/josevalim/phx_esbuild_demo/commit/0546034f26ac5d58d12867e5843037ce1b2d4dd1) – Jose Valim shows how to switch to esbuild on a project - Oban and Oban Pro updates released improving time scheduling (Oban and Oban Pro updates released improving time scheduling) – https://twitter.com/sorentwo/status/1421169698713088001 - https://elixir-lang.org/blog/2021/07/29/bootstraping-a-multiplayer-server-with-elixir-at-x-plane/ (https://elixir-lang.org/blog/2021/07/29/bootstraping-a-multiplayer-server-with-elixir-at-x-plane/) – Bootstrapping a multiplayer server with Elixir at X-Plane blog post - https://thinkingelixir.com/podcast-episodes/035-x-planes-elixir-mmo-with-tyler-young/ (https://thinkingelixir.com/podcast-episodes/035-x-planes-elixir-mmo-with-tyler-young/) – Our previous interview with Tyler Young about X-Plane and Elixir Do you have some Elixir news to share? Tell us at @ThinkingElixir (https://twitter.com/ThinkingElixir) or email at show@thinkingelixir.com (mailto:show@thinkingelixir.com) Discussion Resources - https://medium.com/elixir-learnings/learnings-using-phoenix-liveview-for-internal-web-applications-38711193ca13 (https://medium.com/elixir-learnings/learnings-using-phoenix-liveview-for-internal-web-applications-38711193ca13) - https://mrjoelkemp.medium.com/jvm-struggles-and-the-beam-4d9c58547410 (https://mrjoelkemp.medium.com/jvm-struggles-and-the-beam-4d9c58547410) - https://www.spotify.com/ (https://www.spotify.com/) - https://www.lifeatspotify.com/ (https://www.lifeatspotify.com/) Guest Information - https://twitter.com/mrjoelkemp (https://twitter.com/mrjoelkemp) – on Twitter - https://github.com/mrjoelkemp (https://github.com/mrjoelkemp) – on Github - https://mrjoelkemp.medium.com/ (https://mrjoelkemp.medium.com/) – Blog Find us online - Message the show - @ThinkingElixir (https://twitter.com/ThinkingElixir) - Email the show - show@thinkingelixir.com (mailto:show@thinkingelixir.com) - Mark Ericksen - @brainlid (https://twitter.com/brainlid) - David Bernheisel - @bernheisel (https://twitter.com/bernheisel) - Cade Ward - @cadebward (https://twitter.com/cadebward)

AWS Morning Brief for the week of July 12, 2021 with Corey Quinn.

Doug Gottlieb explains why the Hawks were able to play better without their star player and what it means that the Bucks couldn't capitalize on a golden opportunity. He shares his thoughts on the Lakers hiring David Fizdale as an assistant head coach and chats with 8-year NFL vet Geoff Schwartz about the quarterback competition in New England. Plus, have the Cowboys already eliminated themselves from the Super Bowl? Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

In episode two, I, Peter Adams, walk you through more in-depth, detailed, and courageous side-by-side comparison of two books whose truths have terrified mortals.Support the show (https://www.buymeacoffee.com/bookgod)

Recorded on May 9, 2021

On the Valentine's Episode, Gay and Vajay discuss sexual awakenings, online dating, and underground sex clubs. 

It's Week 5 of the college football season and just like the Big 12, we've gone completely off the rails. We begin as Carla literally dons her academic hat and offers a proposal that the CnCShow's Stanford Postulate, by way of the Transitive Property of College Football, is now applicable to Mississippi State. (Just listen. It'll kind of make sense. We hope.) And then, Crappy attempts to talk about Cincinnati ... but is affectionately interrupted by his adoring (and hungry) cat, Charlie. So, yeah. Say it with us folks ... we have no idea. AJ brings us the best of the #GroupOfFiveAfterDark, and then we attempt to get serious. Or something. Maybe. Whatever. No. 13 Texas A&M at No. 2 Alabama (3:30 ET, CBS): The Aggies were ... sloppy, at best last weekend against Vandy. Bama is, well, Bama. Can Kellen Mond shake the rust enough to hang with the Tide? No. 7 Auburn at No. 4 Georgia (7:30 ET, ESPN): OK, so we were wrong about Bo Nix and Auburn last week. But we're not sure anyone saw Georgia's early struggles coming. All Crappy knows is that a fleet of QBs is not typically a successful offensive strategy. Texas Tech at Kansas State (3:30 ET, FS1) and No. 18 Oklahoma at Iowa State (7:30 ET, ABC): We added these two Big 12 games because, as Crappy puts it, we just can't look away. Carla would like to see both Texas Tech and KState win the first game, and we're just both really confused by the Sooners and Cyclones. Who needs defense anyway? And so with all of the trainwrecks, postulating, feline distractions, and a now-postponed NFL reference aside ... we hope you enjoy the football this weekend, yinz guys. Cheers.

In this episode I make use of the song 'Take on me' by the 80's Norwegian band a-ha to explain the rule of word order in separable phrasal verbs. *I do not own the rights to this song, and the segment of the song played in this episode is for educational purposes only.* Rule: With separable phrasal verbs, if the direct object is a pronoun ( me, you, I we, etc) it has to go in the middle of the phrasal verb. That is, it has to be separate. TAKE ON- transitive Transitive- take on something. To accept some work or responsibility- Together- “ She is really taking on a lot at work these days. “ “Working mothers take on a lot.” 2. Transitive and Separable- to fight or compete against someone (similar if you imagine it as accepting some work, the work of fighting someone.) Often used for competitive or sporting events. Together- “ The Chicago Bulls will take on the Mets next Saturday.” Separate- “ Our team will take them on!” (less common) Useful links- Stay up to date and follow me on Instagram @english.for.introverts . (I changed my username from what I said in the episode!) Macmillan Dictionary- take on: https://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/take-on Introverted Language Learner private Facebook community: https://form.jotform.com/alyssapoco/facebook-group Espresso English- summary of phrasal verbs! : https://www.espressoenglish.net/phrasal-verbs-in-english/ Youtube- a-ha Take on me video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=djV11Xbc914 Lyrics to 'Take on me': https://genius.com/A-ha-take-on-me-lyrics Separable phrasal verb practice worksheet from Cambridge: https://www.cambridge.org/grammarandbeyond/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/PhrasalVerbsDownloadable.pdf --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/phrasalverbs/support

I've noticed that the people at the very top in business can be absolutely shameless. They do not care at all what people think about them and they're willing to do pretty much anything publicly, despite the judgement that will come their way.Not caring what people think and focusing on the task at hand works great, but most people are completely unwilling to do this. This is what stands between where they are now and where they want to go in life or in business.1. People think anyone different from them is an idiot. For example, this is pretty much how the internet functions.2. In the US, two thirds of adults are overweight. Also, the average annual income is $48,000. If you believe the things that everyone else believes, this is exactly where those beliefs will lead you. 3. People are this way because of their actions. If we believe that going in $200,000 of student debt is the right thing to do for our careers, we will do it. 4. Different results require different actions. If you want different results than average, you must act differently. 5. Taking different actions means you look like an idiot. People think doing this makes you crazy which, related to #1, is because you're different. 6. Success means you look like an idiot. You act and believe differently from almost anyone around you. 7. Most people are unwilling to look stupid. This is because of biological survival mechanisms in our bodies. 8. If most people are unwilling to look stupid, that means most people will never succeed beyond what's average. 9. To succeed, be willing to look stupid. It's a practice. You have to make this decision very single day. The more that you do it, the easier it will get. Do the thing you're so afraid of, and your body will slowly realize that it doesn't need to worry about them. To learn more about being okay with looking stupid, visit https://www.digitalnomad.com/podcast

Maybe it's because their brains were frozen by this week's cold snap, but Carla dives into the transitive properties of college football and finds that Appalachian State really should be top 4 in the CFP rankings at this point, while Crappy decides this is his week for Hot Takes and what will almost certainly work out to be Dumb Picks. It could also be that Crappy was distracted by his Bobcats playing a tight game against Western Michigan while they taped.   Details? They don't see eye to eye on this week's Clemsoning Index, but they agree that Notre Dame needs to be on its toes for a Top 25 matchup against Navy. And that's even before they start in on this week's featured games: Georgia at Auburn (3:30 p.m., CBS) — Is Jake Fromm State Farm really that good?; Minnesota at Iowa (4 p.m., Fox) — Rowing the Boat in Iowa City; and Oklahoma at Baylor (7:30 p.m., ABC) — Defense wins championships, except in the Big 12.   Hitch up your khakis, boys and girls, and get ready for a fun weekend.

Tony East hosts today's episode and talks about the Pacers 126-106 win over the Golden State Warriors and previews tonight's game against the Raptors. #Warriors #raptors #Pacers #basketball #NBA Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices