Podcasts about Preference

Dog behaviour specialist Sarah Rutten told 3AW Breakfast hosts Ross and Russel recent research coming out of Italy has further backed up this claim.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

DJ & PK talked about the Utah Jazz and the NBA Draft with The Ringer's Bill Simmons suggesting that Danny Ainge may want Cameron Boozer over other prospects like AJ Dybantsa or Darryn Peterson.

Jon and Gus unpack the difference between conscience issues and personal preferences.

The lottery systems that hunters have been forced into participating in are complex and difficult to understand. The question I ask is whether we should buy into the hype or not. Here to offer a different perspective is JR Dabey from HuntSource. Enjoy!

You didn't decide to open up. You didn't choose to let people in. If you're honest — you were perfectly fine behind your walls.But God had other plans. And somebody's prayer had something to do with it.This episode is for the person who didn't want to be vulnerable but found themselves there anyway. Who didn't ask for their heart to soften but felt it happen. Who didn't prefer the exposure of a life without walls — but needed it more than anything.Because sometimes freedom doesn't come from your preference. It comes from somebody's prayer.

Connect with me here in text… tell me where you are listening. A vision can feel inspiring right up until it asks something from you. We start with Paul in Acts 20:22–24, heading toward Jerusalem with no promises of comfort, only a steady warning of chains and tribulation and still he says, “none of these things move me”, because he wants to finish his race with joy. That tension sets the stage for a deeper question: how do we follow Jesus with endurance when the path is costly and unclear?We tell a real story of how abstract problems become personal when you see faces and names. Malawi is no longer “needs somewhere overseas” but people we've eaten with, prayed with, and grown to love. One well becomes a lifeline for thousands, and then the request comes for a second well, forcing an honest confession: we can't easily say yes with limited resources and we also can't say no. That is where purpose and mission stop being theory and start reshaping priorities, giving, and leadership.From there we define what we call a “bleedable vision” and we draw a hard line between preference and conviction. Preference fades when it gets inconvenient; a surrendered calling stays when it gets resisted, when it costs more than expected, and when nobody claps. We share the long-haul cost of ministry through Celebrate Recovery and ask the questions that matter: What drives your decisions? What have you walked away from too easily? What matters to God that needs to matter to you?If you're hungry for Christian purpose, discipleship, leadership, and a faith that holds under pressure, press play. Subscribe, share this with a friend who needs courage, and leave a review with your answer: what is one “yes” you know you need to give?Support the showwww.Turning180.com

Send us a text and chime in!The City of Cottonwood is seeking applicants to fill one three-term seat on its Planning and Zoning Commission. This volunteer position is appointed by the City Council and serves without pay. All seven commission members must be residents of Cottonwood living within the incorporated city limits. The Commission is responsible for the review of land use proposals, including conditional use permits, zoning, subdivisions, code amendments and other special planning projects, as well as issues pertaining to architectural style, building design/materials, colors, landscaping, signs, etc. Preference will be given to applicants with a design-related background, training or experience, including architecture, landscape...   For the written story, read here >> https://www.signalsaz.com/articles/cottonwood-looks-to-fill-volunteer-commission-seat/ Check out the CAST11.com Website at: https://CAST11.com Follow the CAST11 Podcast Network on Facebook at: https://Facebook.com/CAST11AZFollow Cast11 Instagram at: https://www.instagram.com/cast11_podcast_network

In this episode, Douglas Wilson considers signs of populist unrest in the UK, California, and Alberta, reflects on Molech and idolatry from Stephen's speech in Acts, and reviews Glenn Reynolds's Seductive AI with warnings about deception, dependence, and worship. For more from Doug, subscribe to Canon+: https://canonplus.com/  

The moderate Liberal, who lost his seat last year, said his party was now 'fighting for its existence' – and can't ignore the need to work with One Nation.

This week, Juliet and Jacoby discuss the closing of the oldest continuously operating Red Lobster, wonder how a Philly bagel show has had two explosions this year, and dive into the science of whether grapefruit prolongs a caffeine buzz. For this week's Taste Test, they try Taco Bell and Salt & Straw's Choco Taco successor, the Tacolate. Finally, they close the show by sharing their Personal Food News and reacting to a Listener Food News call.Do you have Personal Food News? We want to hear from you! Leave us a voicemail at 850-783-9136 or email ListenerFoodNews@Gmail.com for a chance to have your news shared on the show.Be sure to check us out on YouTube and TikTok for exclusive clips, new Taste Tests, and more!Hosts: Juliet Litman and David JacobyProducer: Mike WargonMusical Elements: Devon RenaldoShop for Activia near you at www.activia.us.comFind your season at ExperienceGR.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Joe and Hugh Douglas welcome Scott Franzke to discuss the Phillies' series loss and Bryce Harper's batting order preferences. They later debate whether Jalen Hurts can successfully transition to Kellen Moore's new offensive system or if his veteran tendencies will hinder his progress. 01:50 - Harper Batting Order 05:34 - Cristopher Sánchez Analysis 09:12 - Phillies Roster Struggles 14:58 - Kellen Moore Polls 18:23 - Hurts Adaptability Debate 27:45 - Veteran Player Tendencies

If you are the adult child of a U.S. citizen or green card holder, getting married or divorced at the wrong time could seriously affect your immigration case. In this video, we break down a real immigration story of a green card holder who almost lost their path to U.S. citizenship because of a complicated family-based immigration history involving the F2B, F1, and F3 visa categories. Learn how marriage, divorce, a parent's naturalization, and timing can impact your green card process, citizenship eligibility, and even put your status at risk. If you are waiting for a family-based green card, this is important information you should know.

Podceňují rodiče v Česku význam očkování proti záškrtu? Jak výrazně zní v německé straně AfD volání po zrušení takzvaných Benešových dekretů? A jak se do letních dovolenkových plánů Čechů promítá konflikt na Blízkém východě?

Podceňují rodiče v Česku význam očkování proti záškrtu? Jak výrazně zní v německé straně AfD volání po zrušení takzvaných Benešových dekretů? A jak se do letních dovolenkových plánů Čechů promítá konflikt na Blízkém východě?Všechny díly podcastu Hlavní zprávy - rozhovory a komentáře můžete pohodlně poslouchat v mobilní aplikaci mujRozhlas pro Android a iOS nebo na webu mujRozhlas.cz.

What is true worship? Is praise about style, instruments, tradition, or something deeper? In this powerful conversation, Terry Fant and Marshall Allred unpack the difference between worship and praise, why God cares more about the heart than performance, and how praise becomes a weapon against the enemy. Whether you lead worship, preach, serve in church, or simply want a deeper relationship with God, this episode will challenge and encourage you to worship “in spirit and in truth.”

Mae explores the subtle but life-changing difference between living from preference and living from permission. Through reflections on desire, self-expression, and personal power, she examines how easily people unconsciously place their fullness behind external conditions—and what shifts when they stop waiting for permission to become themselves.Mae YoshikawaMae Yoshikawa is the creator of the Kizuki Journaling™, a powerful tool for self-awareness and transformation. A pioneer in wellness and personal development, Mae was the first Japanese woman authorized by the founding school of Ashtanga Yoga in India in 2006. Her work bridges Eastern and Western traditions, shaped by profound life experiences—including the loss of her mother, the sudden passing of her husband, and her ongoing journey as a mother to two sons. Mae's upcoming books share her path of healing and becoming, and her online community, MAE Y, continues to support a growing circle of those on their path of inner growth. She has served as a global ambassador for adidas since 2015.Kizuki Journaling Website: KizukiJournaling.comPersonal Website: https://maey.live/Instagram: ⁠@maeyoshikawa

-Paul Pabst of the Dan Patrick Show tweeted yesterday a question of 2 options of games for a fan to go to next year: LSU at Ole Miss onSeptember 19 th , or the National Championship Game-Some might scoff and say it's always about the title game…but September 19 th is Lane Kiffin's return to Oxford as head coach of LSU,and that scene is going to be unbelievable…what would The Stool choose?Our Sponsors:* Check out Hims: https://hims.com/EARLYBREAKAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

In this special rerun episode of The Poultry Nutrition Blackbelt Podcast, Dr. Birger Svihus from the Norwegian University of Life Sciences breaks down how particle size affects broiler feeding behavior. He shares insights into how birds select feed particles, their preferences for fines, and the implications for feed formulation. Find out how a closer look at pecking patterns could change the way we think about poultry nutrition. Listen now on all major platforms!"The bird is pecking more than once per second. So it's an extremely rapid rate of pecking."Meet the guest: Dr. Birger Svihus earned his Ph.D. in Poultry Nutrition from the Agricultural University of Norway, where he currently serves as a professor at the Norwegian University of Life Sciences. His work focuses on cereal fiber, starch, feed structure, and digestive function in poultry. He's published extensively and leads nutrition research across Europe. Learn more about his approach on The Poultry Nutrition Blackbelt Podcast. Listen now, featuring Dr. Birger Svihus on all major platforms.Liked this one? Don't stop now — Here's what we think you'll love!What you'll learn:(00:00) Highlight(01:18) Introduction(02:29) Particle size impact(03:38) Feeding behavior science(05:58) Beak capacity limits(08:33) Preference for fines(09:42) Size vs. nutrient delivery(11:31) Closing thoughtsThe Poultry Nutrition Blackbelt Podcast is trusted and supported by innovative companies like:* Fortiva* Kemin- Poultry Science Association- Anitox- DietForge

Another post-draft podcast where Sage and Joe dive deeper into the picks, the reviews, schedule preferences and more. The wisdom and fun of Ira and Joe is presented by Bill Currie Ford. Click play above or listen at Apple Podcasts or Podbean.com. Many […] The post Ira Kaufman Talks Draft Aftermath, Eye-Opening Insider Comments, Opening Day Preference, And More appeared first on JoeBucsFan.com.

Most people think they are living by their values when they are actually just living by their preferences, and that confusion is the reason their lives feel inconsistent, scattered, and quietly out of alignment. Preferences are what feel good in the moment, what is comfortable, what is convenient, and what protects you from friction, while values are what you have decided matter regardless of how you feel on any given day. The problem is that when preferences run the show, your discipline collapses the moment something becomes hard, your standards bend the moment something becomes inconvenient, and your identity becomes shaped by mood instead of conviction. In this episode, I am breaking down how to identify which one is actually driving your decisions, why most people unknowingly let preferences masquerade as values, and what it takes to build a life that holds steady whether you feel like showing up or not. If you are tired of starting over, breaking your own promises, and wondering why nothing feels like it is sticking, this is the conversation that will show you exactly where the disconnect is and how to close the gap with clarity and ownership.

Chuck Todd dives into the Supreme Court's latest ruling further hollowing out the Voting Rights Act and walks through what it actually means in practice — including the very real possibility that several Southern states will now try to redistrict, creating a messy political landscape that won't necessarily benefit Republicans in the way they hope. He traces the history back to the 1990s Georgia reapportionment that led to major GOP pickups by packing Black Democratic voters into fewer districts, but warns this round of Southern redistricting will create more swing districts. He uses the moment to make the case for what he sees as the real structural fix to America's representation crisis: uncapping the House of Representatives to allow it to grow with population the way the founders originally intended, with Madison himself arguing the chamber would always need to expand. He argues that a bigger House would lower the barrier for third parties, minimize the outsized impact of the Electoral College, dramatically reduce the incentive to gerrymander — and crucially, this change wouldn't exclusively benefit either party. His framing is simple: stop fighting over the chairs at the table and increase the size of the table itself. He then pivots to what he calls the rise of the "woke right" — citing the second Comey indictment as exhibit A, noting that the right has now embraced exactly the kind of oversensitivity they once accused the left of engaging in, and pointing out it's no accident that Pam Bondi wouldn't bring the Comey case but Todd Blanche will. He flags that the FCC's attacks on Jimmy Kimmel will badly backfire, dismisses the Hegseth congressional hearing as a useless exercise where everyone was just chasing viral moments, and argues that Hegseth himself is suffering from a bad case of "internet brain" — actively politicizing the military while failing to make a coherent case for why the Iran war was ever necessary. He closes with a pointed observation about the entire administration: nobody around Trump believes any criticism of him is ever valid, and they appear to genuinely think voters are stupid enough to never notice. Then, Adam Green — co-founder of the Progressive Change Campaign Committee — joins the Chuck Toddcast to make the case that pragmatic economic populism is the Democratic Party's path back to a durable majority, and to push back hard on the conventional wisdom that "moderate" means "centrist." Green argues the public has lost faith in both political and economic systems and is hungry for candidates who tell a clear story about power — pointing to Maine's Graham Platner, Texas's James Talarico, and New York's Zohran Mamdani as examples of progressives who project authentic energy and pragmatic problem-solving rather than ideological purity. He contends that both major parties have already collapsed reputationally even if they haven't yet collapsed structurally, that Democrats could have passed a $12 minimum wage years ago if they'd been willing to compromise, and that recruiting 77-year-old Janet Mills against Platner is symbolic of everything wrong with Chuck Schumer's approach to the Senate. Green is blunt: if Democrats sweep the midterms but leadership remains unchanged, it actually hurts them in 2028 — a Democratic Senate majority should not be read as a validation of Schumer. They discuss why he Democratic brand is so damaged in red and rural states that independent candidates may be the best path to power in places like Montana and Nebraska, and that having someone like Platner in Senate leadership would dramatically improve Democratic performance in rural America. The conversation digs into the deeper strategic and policy questions facing the party. Green argues Democrats should lead with economic alignment over cultural alignment and that Dems should not put reproductive rights forward as their headline issue if they want to rebuild trust in the heartland. He pushes for progressive lawmakers to assert real leverage against their own leadership, advocates lowering the threshold for discharge petition, and makes the case that getting rid of the filibuster would help Democrats rebuild trust with voters who are tired of seeing nothing get done. Green is open to limited cooperation with Trump if Democrats win both chambers but warns the party shouldn't trim its sails just to get a signature. He explains why the PCC backed Talarico over Crockett , names UAW president Shawn Fain as a potential dark-horse candidate, and floats Stephen Colbert as a genuinely intriguing possibility because performance matters in a media-saturated era. Green argues Talarico, Platner, and Abdul El-Sayed all tell a coherent story about power that voters are hungry to hear, but ultimately, the candidate who runs as a genuine disruptor is the one most likely to win, because the current system is so visibly failing the public. Finally, he answers listeners’ questions in the “Ask Chuck” segment, weighs in on the DNC choosing NOT to release their 2024 autopsy, and reacts to the expansion on the NCAA basketball tournament. Try ShipStation free for 60 days with full access to all features, No credit card needed! Go to https://ShipStation.com and use code TODDCAST for 60 days for free! Thank you Wildgrain for sponsoring. Visit http://wildgrain.com/TODDCAST and use the code "TODDCAST" at checkout to receive $30 off your first box PLUS free Croissants for life! Protect your family with life insurance from Ethos. Get up to $3 million in coverage in as little as 10 minutes at https://ethos.com/chuck. Application times may vary. Rates may vary. Link in bio or go to https://getsoul.com & enter code TODDCAST for 30% off your first order. Timeline: (Timestamps may vary based on advertisements) 00:00 Chuck Todd’s introduction 01:30 Supreme Court further hollows out the Voting Rights Act 03:00 You may see several states in the south try to redistrict 06:00 We have a serious representation issue in congress 07:30 In the 90’s Georgia reapportionment led to major GOP pickups 09:00 Led to more black Dems in congress, but less Dems in congress 10:00 Redistricting won’t be clean for GOP in this political climate 10:30 Redistricting will create more swing districts in the south 12:15 You may see racially charged Dem primaries in new districts 13:45 Uncapping the House of Representatives could solve this issue 14:15 House expanded based on population growth 16:15 Right now the house is not representative of the people 17:45 Multi-member districts also provide better representation 19:00 Bigger house would create less need for gerrymandering 20:00 Expanding house would minimize the impact of electoral college 21:30 Expanded house would lower barrier to entry for third parties 23:00 The house was always meant to be a bit messy 23:30 Madison argued the house was always going to have to expand 25:00 This change wouldn’t exclusively benefit one party 26:00 Don’t fight over the chairs, increase the size of the table 28:00 The “woke right” has emerged, evidenced by Comey indictment 29:30 Right accused the left of the oversensitivity they’re engaged in now 31:00 Attacks by the FCC on Kimmel will backfire and look terrible 33:15 Not an accident that Bondi wouldn’t bring Comey case & Blanche will 34:15 Hegseth’s hearing was useless, everyone wanted a viral moment 35:30 Hegseth is suffering from a bad case of “internet brain” 36:30 Hegseth is doing everything he can to politicize the military 37:15 Hegseth failed to make the case for why the war was necessary 39:00 Nobody in the administration believes that any criticism is valid 40:15 Do they really think the voters are all stupid? 46:30 Adam Green (Progressive Change Committee) joins The Chuck ToddCast 49:00 What does it mean to be a pragmatic progressive? 50:15 The mission is to show economic populism can win in swing races 51:30 Graham Platner is a great storyteller, not a policy wonk 53:00 Several progressive candidates project strong masculine energy 54:30 Balancing incrementalism vs. progress 55:15 Mamdani is showing that you can be both progressive & pragmatic 56:15 Misconception is that “moderate” means centrist 57:00 The progressives are demanding a rebalancing of the power dynamics 57:30 Public doesn’t trust the political and economic system, wants change 58:15 How vulnerable are both parties to collapse at some point? 59:00 Both parties have collapsed reputationally, just not structurally 1:00:45 Dems could have passed $12 minimum wage if they compromised 1:03:00 If Dems sweep midterms but leaders stay the same, it’s bad for 2028 1:03:45 If Dems win the senate, it’s not a validation of Schumer 1:05:00 If Dems elect the non Schumer candidates, he has to go 1:05:45 Schumer was a really good leader… until he wasn’t 1:06:30 Recruiting 77 year old Janet Mills is symbolic of Schumer’s strategy 1:07:15 Sherrod Brown is probably the best Dems can do in Ohio 1:07:45 Iowa is overindexed as a swing state 1:09:30 Michigan having El-Sayed & Slokin would show multiple ways to win 1:10:30 If El-Sayed loses, does that set the progressive movement back? 1:12:00 Are independents the best route to power in Montana & Nebraska? 1:13:00 The Democratic brand is shot in most red & rural states 1:14:15 If Platner was in leadership, Dems would do better in rural states 1:15:30 What matters more to the PCC, economic or cultural alignment? 1:17:15 Democrats shouldn’t put out reproductive rights as their banner issue 1:18:00 Big Dem wins in the past came from economic, not cultural alignment 1:20:15 Jared Golden able to vote against trans sports bill, focused on economics 1:22:30 Want to see progressives assert leverage against their leadership 1:23:30 Proposal to lower the threshold for discharge petitions 1:24:15 Discharge petitions would actually liberate the leadership a bit 1:25:30 When too many items are stuffed into a bill, you don’t get credit for them 1:26:30 Getting rid of the filibuster would help Democrats rebuild trust 1:27:30 Both parties only like the filibuster when they’re out of power 1:29:00 Getting rid of stock trading isn’t as simple as it sounds 1:30:45 Spouses need to be included in stock trading ban 1:31:30 If Dems win both houses, where should they work with Trump? 1:32:45 Dems will be elected to be a check on Trump, but need his signature 1:35:45 Working with Trump requires abandoning the ideas you ran on 1:37:00 Dems shouldn’t trim their sails in order to work with Trump 1:39:30 PCC supported Talarico over Crockett for his bold economic vision 1:42:00 AOC may need to run for president soon, before her “sell by” date 1:42:45 Stephen Colbert could be an intriguing candidate, performance matters 1:44:00 Mamdani takes time every day to tell a story on social media 1:45:15 Shawn Fain could also make a strong candidate 1:46:30 If Talarico wins in Texas, it could put him on the presidential map 1:48:15 Talarico as VP to get his sea legs could be a potential route 1:49:00 McMorrow positioning herself as the “goldilocks” candidate 1:49:45 Being the shake up the system candidate is the way to go 1:50:30 Talarico, Platner & El-Sayed tell a story about power 1:51:15 The current system is failing the public 1:53:15 Preference between Steyer or Porter in California? 1:54:30 AOC raises the most money because people trust her 1:57:30 Ask Chuck 1:57:45 Experienced wildfires, in bad conditions there’s nothing you can do 1:59:00 What do you make of Hegseth purging so many top generals? 2:01:00 Props for “Dynastic” podcast 2:03:00 How do you see the US/Israel dynamic play out post-Trump? 2:06:30 Do you see a path forward for statehood for D.C. & Puerto Rico? 2:10:15 Why don’t interviewers press Lindsey Graham on his post J6 remarks? 2:13:00 Should Democrats be more forceful rhetorically or does that do more harm? 2:17:15 Ken Martin appears on Pod Save to explain why they won’t release ‘24 autopsy 2:18:30 Autopsy could have offended a particular set of donors or supporters 2:19:45 How do you learn lessons from the loss if you don’t share those lessons? 2:20:30 NCAA expanding basketball tournamentSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Adam Green — co-founder of the Progressive Change Campaign Committee — joins the Chuck Toddcast to make the case that pragmatic economic populism is the Democratic Party's path back to a durable majority, and to push back hard on the conventional wisdom that "moderate" means "centrist." Green argues the public has lost faith in both political and economic systems and is hungry for candidates who tell a clear story about power — pointing to Maine's Graham Platner, Texas's James Talarico, and New York's Zohran Mamdani as examples of progressives who project authentic energy and pragmatic problem-solving rather than ideological purity. He contends that both major parties have already collapsed reputationally even if they haven't yet collapsed structurally, that Democrats could have passed a $12 minimum wage years ago if they'd been willing to compromise, and that recruiting 77-year-old Janet Mills against Platner is symbolic of everything wrong with Chuck Schumer's approach to the Senate. Green is blunt: if Democrats sweep the midterms but leadership remains unchanged, it actually hurts them in 2028 — a Democratic Senate majority should not be read as a validation of Schumer. They discuss why he Democratic brand is so damaged in red and rural states that independent candidates may be the best path to power in places like Montana and Nebraska, and that having someone like Platner in Senate leadership would dramatically improve Democratic performance in rural America. The conversation digs into the deeper strategic and policy questions facing the party. Green argues Democrats should lead with economic alignment over cultural alignment and that Dems should not put reproductive rights forward as their headline issue if they want to rebuild trust in the heartland. He pushes for progressive lawmakers to assert real leverage against their own leadership, advocates lowering the threshold for discharge petition, and makes the case that getting rid of the filibuster would help Democrats rebuild trust with voters who are tired of seeing nothing get done. Green is open to limited cooperation with Trump if Democrats win both chambers but warns the party shouldn't trim its sails just to get a signature. He explains why the PCC backed Talarico over Crockett , names UAW president Shawn Fain as a potential dark-horse candidate, and floats Stephen Colbert as a genuinely intriguing possibility because performance matters in a media-saturated era. Green argues Talarico, Platner, and Abdul El-Sayed all tell a coherent story about power that voters are hungry to hear, but ultimately, the candidate who runs as a genuine disruptor is the one most likely to win, because the current system is so visibly failing the public. Thank you Wildgrain for sponsoring. Visit http://wildgrain.com/TODDCAST and use the code "TODDCAST" at checkout to receive $30 off your first box PLUS free Croissants for life! Protect your family with life insurance from Ethos. Get up to $3 million in coverage in as little as 10 minutes at https://ethos.com/chuck. Application times may vary. Rates may vary. Link in bio or go to https://getsoul.com & enter code TODDCAST for 30% off your first order. Timeline: (Timestamps may vary based on advertisements) 00:00 Adam Green (Progressive Change Committee) joins The Chuck ToddCast 02:30 What does it mean to be a pragmatic progressive? 03:45 The mission is to show economic populism can win in swing races 05:00 Graham Platner is a great storyteller, not a policy wonk 06:30 Several progressive candidates project strong masculine energy 08:00 Balancing incrementalism vs. progress 08:45 Mamdani is showing that you can be both progressive & pragmatic 09:45 Misconception is that “moderate” means centrist 10:30 The progressives are demanding a rebalancing of the power dynamics 11:00 Public doesn’t trust the political and economic system, wants change 11:45 How vulnerable are both parties to collapse at some point? 12:30 Both parties have collapsed reputationally, just not structurally 14:15 Dems could have passed $12 minimum wage if they compromised 16:30 If Dems sweep midterms but leaders stay the same, it’s bad for 2028 17:15 If Dems win the senate, it’s not a validation of Schumer 18:30 If Dems elect the non Schumer candidates, he has to go 19:15 Schumer was a really good leader… until he wasn’t 20:00 Recruiting 77 year old Janet Mills is symbolic of Schumer’s strategy 20:45 Sherrod Brown is probably the best Dems can do in Ohio 21:15 Iowa is overindexed as a swing state 23:00 Michigan having El-Sayed & Slokin would show multiple ways to win 24:00 If El-Sayed loses, does that set the progressive movement back? 25:30 Are independents the best route to power in Montana & Nebraska? 26:30 The Democratic brand is shot in most red & rural states 27:45 If Platner was in leadership, Dems would do better in rural states 29:00 What matters more to the PCC, economic or cultural alignment? 30:45 Democrats shouldn’t put out reproductive rights as their banner issue 31:30 Big Dem wins in the past came from economic, not cultural alignment 33:45 Jared Golden able to vote against trans sports bill, focused on economics 36:00 Want to see progressives assert leverage against their leadership 37:00 Proposal to lower the threshold for discharge petitions 37:45 Discharge petitions would actually liberate the leadership a bit 39:00 When too many items are stuffed into a bill, you don’t get credit for them 40:00 Getting rid of the filibuster would help Democrats rebuild trust 41:00 Both parties only like the filibuster when they’re out of power 42:30 Getting rid of stock trading isn’t as simple as it sounds 44:15 Spouses need to be included in stock trading ban 45:00 If Dems win both houses, where should they work with Trump? 46:15 Dems will be elected to be a check on Trump, but need his signature 49:15 Working with Trump requires abandoning the ideas you ran on 50:30 Dems shouldn’t trim their sails in order to work with Trump 53:00 PCC supported Talarico over Crockett for his bold economic vision 55:30 AOC may need to run for president soon, before her “sell by” date 56:15 Stephen Colbert could be an intriguing candidate, performance matters 57:30 Mamdani takes time every day to tell a story on social media 58:45 Shawn Fain could also make a strong candidate 1:00:00 If Talarico wins in Texas, it could put him on the presidential map 1:01:45 Talarico as VP to get his sea legs could be a potential route 1:02:30 McMorrow positioning herself as the “goldilocks” candidate 1:03:15 Being the shake up the system candidate is the way to go 1:04:00 Talarico, Platner & El-Sayed tell a story about power 1:04:45 The current system is failing the public 1:06:45 Preference between Steyer or Porter in California? 1:08:00 AOC raises the most money because people trust herSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

We all say we have a "type" — but where does that type come from? In this episode of The Dildo Whisperer, we explore the difference between personal preference and social prejudice when it comes to attraction. Are we drawn to certain people because of chemistry, comfort, culture, or conditioning? And how can having a rigid type impact who we choose to date — for better or worse? This episode dives into psychology, bias, dating patterns, and how understanding your attraction can lead to healthier relationships. Send the us your sex and relationship questions and maybe you will inspire the next episode of The Dildo Whisperer. We have two ways to reach the show. You can call into our show at 844-695-2766 or you can email us at Askthedw@gmail.com. Follow us on social media @dildowhisperer The Dildo Whisperer is produced by DNR Studios. To subscribe to this show and the rest of the DNR Network of shows including the Cookie Jar Podcast visit: www.dnrstudios.com

Opoziční lidovci se pokouší o restart. S novým lídrem i vizuálním stylem by tradičně konzervativní strana chtěla udělat „tlustou černou čáru“ za chybami z minulosti. Jak chce Jan Grolich z lidovců udělat nejsilnější opoziční sílu?Hostem Ptám se já byl nový předseda KDU-ČSL a jihomoravský hejtman Jan Grolich. Populární jihomoravský hejtman, jednačtyřicetiletý Jan Grolich, který v čele lidovců po dvou letech střídá Marka Výborného, chce stranu víc přiblížit voličům. KDU-ČSL by měla dodat opozici novou energii a styl komunikace, což ale podle Grolicha neznamená opustit tradiční hodnoty.Do vedení si lidovci v pátek na sjezdu v Ostravě zvolili také poslance Benjamina Činčilu, který je nyní prvním místopředsedou. Dalším řadovým místopředsedou se stal poslanec František Talíř, uspěli i dosavadní místopředsedové a poslanci Monika Brzesková a Václav Pláteník.Preference lidovců se dlouhodobě pohybují pod pěti procenty potřebnými pro vstup do  Sněmovny. Strana má poslance díky tomu, že v loňských sněmovních volbách  kandidovala v koalici Spolu. Podle Grolicha, který o své straně začal mluvit jako o „nových lidovcích“ a přizpůsobil tomu i celý vizuál, je potřeba se teď odpoutat od minulosti. A udělat tlustou čáru za moralizováním a poučováním lidí, jak mají žít, i za nízkými ambicemi, které lidovce řadí do role menších partnerů.Jaká rizika jsou na cestě lidovců k úspěchu? A jak se zbavit nálepky strany, která jde za funkce s každým?--Podcast Ptám se já. Rozhovory s lidmi, kteří mají vliv, odpovědnost, informace.Sledujte na Seznam Zprávách, poslouchejte na Podcasty.cz a ve všech podcastových aplikacích.Archiv všech dílů najdete tady. Své postřehy, připomínky nebo tipy nám pište prostřednictvím sociálních sítí pod hashtagem #ptamseja nebo na e-mail: audio@sz.cz.

Hey my wonderful sweet babies, Follow Me:Instagram- fabvictoria94Twitter- VictoriaB_94Snapchat- fabvictoria94TikTok: FabVictoria94Facebook: Victoria BishopFacebook Page- Fabulous Victoria BroadcastsPatreon: Fabulous Victoria PodcastPodcast Name- Fabulous Victoria PodcastYouTube Main Channel: Fabulous VictoriaCashApp: $fabvictoria (optional)Music from Simply Kee Simone, Dessie Style, and Kaysie Amya on YouTube.Email me for business inquiries only:bishopvictoria94@gmail.comTHIS VIDEO IS NOT SPONSORED.

Title: Living a Life Worthy of the Gospel Text: Philippians 1:27–30 1. The Tension of the Gospel We didn't earn it. We didn't qualify for it. But once we receive it—we represent it. Illustration: Wearing a shirt/logo → your behavior changes because of what it represents Key truth: “Worthy” does NOT mean earning the Gospel It means living in a way that reflects its value Supporting Scripture: Ephesians 4:1–5 2. A Life Worthy of the Gospel is Anchored in Unity Philippians 1:27 “Standing firm” = stability under pressure “One spirit, one mind” = deep relational alignment Unity is: Shared mission Mutual submission Choosing “we” over “me” Threats to Unity: Assumptions instead of communication Taking things personally Isolation instead of engagement Preference over purpose Key Challenge: Are you contributing to unity or disconnecting from it? Truth: You cannot live a Gospel-shaped life disconnected from God's people Supporting Scripture: Matthew 20:26–28 3. A Life Worthy of the Gospel is Active, Not Passive Not spectators—participants Not just attending—engaging Questions to ask: Where am I contributing? Where am I spectating? Active faith produces: Relationships Discipleship Accountability Passive faith produces: Shallow transformation Isolation Supporting Scripture: John 13:35 4. A Life Worthy of the Gospel is Marked by Courage Philippians 1:28 Courage flows from identity Identity is found in Christ—not: Personality Politics Career Relationships Key Truth: When you know who you belong to, you don't fear who you're up against Fear = indicator of misplaced identity Supporting Scripture: Isaiah 43:1–2 5. A Life Worthy of the Gospel Embraces Suffering Philippians 1:29–30 “Granted” → suffering is given (like a gift) Hard truth: We share in Christ's suffering, not just His victory Common misunderstanding: Suffering = something is wrongBiblical reality: Suffering = something is being formed Shift the question: Not “Why is this happening?” But “What is God forming in me?” Supporting Scripture: Romans 5:3–5 6. What a Gospel-Shaped Life Looks Like Standing firm in unity Striving together for the mission Living with courage Embracing suffering with purpose 7. The Early Church Example They weren't powerful or influential But they were known for one thing: “See how they love one another.” 8. Final Challenge Are we: Striving side by side? Standing firm under pressure? Living unshaken by fear? Enduring when things get hard? Or… Just attending without being transformed?

You've probably been in a conversation about race that went nowhere. Everyone was careful, no one was honest, and nothing changed. This episode is about why that keeps happening, and how to break through it. We had guest Bayanne Elkhatib MS, LPC-A (the Texas Therapist) on the mic to help us get to the root of what makes these conversations so uncomfortable, what we're really asking when we call something a preference, and where the line between preference and prejudice actually falls. Text to get in touch!Support the showIf you enjoyed this episode, subscribe and share! To help us continue this important work, become a sustainer at    www.empowherhealth.org

Could understanding individual sound preference be the key to improving hearing aid adoption and satisfaction?Bob Traynor, live from WSA headquarters in Copenhagen, speaks with Lise Henningsen, Head of Audiology Evidence & Validation at WSA, about the emerging concept of sound preference—and why it may be a missing piece in hearing care. Drawing on WSA's latest research, they discuss how patients with similar audiograms can have very different reactions to sound processing, and why traditional best practices alone don't always lead to successful outcomes.The conversation explores how clinicians have long observed this variability in practice, often working across multiple brands and sound philosophies to better match patient needs. Henningsen explains how sound preference—though difficult to measure—plays a meaningful role in patient experience, influencing comfort, satisfaction, and long-term device use. WSA is now working to better define and quantify sound preference through ongoing research, including controlled studies with the University of Washington and Vanderbilt University. These efforts aim to better understand how preference affects acclimatization, mood, and overall outcomes—and how simple tools, such as short listening assessments, could help guide more personalized hearing care.To learn more about WSA's sound preference research and clinical implications visit: https://www.wsa.com/soundpreference/Be sure to subscribe to our channel for the latest episodes each week and follow This Week in Hearing on LinkedIn, Instagram and X.- https://x.com/WeekinHearing- https://www.instagram.com/thisweekinhearing/- https://www.linkedin.com/company/this-week-in-hearingVisit us at: https://hearinghealthmatters.org/thisweek/

Introducing the structural intelligence of the Priestess Moon. Most of the time, conflict collapses into polarity: right versus wrong, us versus them, past versus future. When we are trapped in duality, solutions feel circular because each side reinforces the other.

Second Date Update: If that's your preference does that mean you don't like mine? See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Andy and Randy talk about the NBA Play-In rounds beginning tonight, the Hawks finally not being involved in this part of the postseason, and the Hawks accepting whichever seed they end with after resting their players in the final game.

Ta nejlepší věc pro tvůj nervový systém je další člověk. A ta nejhorší ale taky. Už touhle větou se tenhle díl trefuje přesně do místa, kde dnes vztahy skutečně žijeme: mezi touhou po blízkosti a strachem z nejistoty. S Markétou Šetinovou rozebíráme, jak vypadá moderní dating ve světě aplikací, ghostingu, situationshipů a přemíry možností. Proč se tolik lidí cítí randěním vyčerpaně, proč intenzita ještě neznamená kompatibilitu a proč vztah nemusí vždy vzniknout z velké chemie. Někdy se vyplatí dát čas i tomu, co nepřichází jako okamžitá limerence, ale může nést větší stabilitu.Proč dnešní dating podporuje limerenci, nejistotu a intenzivní emoční výkyvy. Proč dating apps často vedou k dating burnout, ghostingu a pocitu nedostatku skutečného connection.Proč nemusí každý dobrý vztah vzniknout z okamžité chemie a proč se někdy vyplatí dát přitažlivosti víc času. Jak přemýšlet o lásce jinak, ne jako o něčem, co se pouze najde, ale co se může budovat. Proč jsou i nemainstreamové vztahy často podobné v tom nejdůležitějším, v potřebě blízkosti, komunikace a porozumění.Proč je ve vztazích čím dál důležitější flexibilita a schopnost adaptace.Parťák dílu:⁠⁠⁠Macromo:⁠⁠⁠⁠Krevní testy jsou objektivní data ohledně vašeho zdraví. Nechte si udělat premium krevní testy na jednom ze 120 odběrových míst a výsledky dostanete pohodlně do Macromo aplikace. Můj nejoblíbenější aspekt je sledování dlouhodobých trendů v průběhu času, tak si objednej premium testy s ⁠⁠⁠⁠Macromo.com⁠⁠⁠⁠ a zadej kod "BWA" ⁠Uplife.cz⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ -Zadej kód "BWA" pro slevu 10% na vybrané zboží na eshopu ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.uplife.cz/brain-we-are/⁠⁠⁠⁠Kam dále?Kup si jeden z našich online kurzů ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Průvodce Mozkem a Myslí⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠, nebo ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Mentální Modely⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ a s kódem "BWA30" je tam SLEVA 30%!Zadej kód "BWA" pro slevu 10% na vybrané zboží na eshopu ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠uplife.cz⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ a ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠herbal-store.cz⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Sledujte Brain We Are na sociálních sítích: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Instagram⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ( ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠www.instagram.com/brain_we_are⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ) nebo⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Facebook ⁠⁠⁠Minutáž:00:00 Úvod a přivítání hosta05:23 Experimentování s AI boyfriendem v aplikaci Replika08:20 Fenomén limerence a tvoření vztahů ve vlastní hlavě11:27 Jak chybějící reálný základ zhoršuje limerenci12:36 Zmatek, nejistota a situace (situationships) v moderním randění14:01 Kdo nese zodpovědnost za komunikaci hranic a exkluzivity17:06 Kdy vytáhnout na rande svá očekávání a nezabít tím náladu20:51 Dating burnout: Proč jsou lidé vyhořelí z randících aplikací21:48 Studie o ghostingu: Láska osudová vs. láska budovaná22:52 Fixní vs. růstový mindset ve vztazích26:01 Preference gap: Rozdíl mezi tím co chceme a s kým reálně končíme27:55 Proč na seznamkách špatně odhadujeme kompatibilitu30:19 Chlubení, peníze a proč ego na prvním rande nefunguje32:11 Co klienti nejčastěji řeší v terapiiPřechod do VIP části- Past sebediagnostiky a vliv psychologie na Instagramu- Zmatek z protichůdných vztahových rad od influencerů- Nekompatibilita a proč nikoho neodepisovat po první chybě- Zamilovávání se do nevhodných lidí a proč dát šanci "hodným"- Bizardní studie o vlivu mužského potu na ženský nervový systém- Jak a proč ukončovat nezdravé vztahy- Kohabitace a sexualita: Co se u dnešních generací reálně změnilo?- Dopaminové hledání, umělé vazby a přesun vztahů do online prostoru

You've probably been in a conversation about race that went nowhere. Everyone was careful, no one was honest, and nothing changed. This episode is about why that keeps happening, and how to break through it. We had guest Bayanne Elkhatib MS, LPC-A (the Texas Therapist) on the mic to help us get to the root of what makes these conversations so uncomfortable, what we're really asking when we call something a preference, and where the line between preference and prejudice actually falls. Text to get in touch!Support the showIf you enjoyed this episode, subscribe and share! To help us continue this important work, become a sustainer at    www.empowherhealth.org

Want to Start or Grow a Successful Business? Schedule a FREE 13-Point Assessment with Clay Clark Today At: www.ThrivetimeShow.com   Join Clay Clark's Thrivetime Show Business Workshop!!! Learn Branding, Marketing, SEO, Sales, Workflow Design, Accounting & More. **Request Tickets & See Testimonials At: www.ThrivetimeShow.com  **Request Tickets Via Text At (918) 851-0102   See the Thousands of Success Stories and Millionaires That Clay Clark Has Helped to Produce HERE: https://www.thrivetimeshow.com/testimonials/ Download A Millionaire's Guide to Become Sustainably Rich: A Step-by-Step Guide to Become a Successful Money-Generating and Time-Freedom Creating Business HERE: www.ThrivetimeShow.com/Millionaire   See Thousands of Case Studies Today HERE: www.thrivetimeshow.com/does-it-work/  

* Jeffs Bagel Run garlic bread bagel blowing up in Bagel Madness * Huge variety of bagels and spreads, family friendly go to spot * Salt bagel with buffalo cream cheese as a standout combo * Bagel boxes at work instantly boost your social ranking * Expansion across Florida with app signup free bagel promo * BDM Appreciation Week tie in with free bagel giveaway * Debate on podcast intros, comfort of routine vs jumping in * Older episodes had heavier reverb and different audio feel * Payphone microphone prop added purely for comedy * BDM Appreciation Party April 11 with family duo theme * Jeff Howell and Casey Howell live music set * Juggling Jacks mother daughter act with poodles and props * Outdoor setup with pinball machines and fundraiser tables * Event is kid friendly but still classic chaotic T and D energy * Tiger Woods crash body cam footage and police interaction * Claim he was talking to the president during arrest * Debate if powerful people still avoid real consequences * Past stories of getting let off vs modern strict procedures * Body cams and social media killing police discretion * Sobriety tests used to build cases not prove innocence * HGN eye test explained as key DUI indicator * DUI outcomes depend heavily on money and legal help * Mo Dewitt sponsorship, VIP perks, and Mini Masters plug * Danger Brains branding, why visuals matter for small business * Bad logos and clip art instantly hurt customer trust * Turnstile as one of the biggest modern hardcore bands * Songs Blackout and Holiday pushing crossover success * Ex guitarist Brady Hebert arrested after violent incident * Drove car into singers father outside family home * Pattern of instability, drugs, and burning bridges * Discussion on how you would dodge an oncoming car * Wild stunt filming stories with near misses and bad decisions * E network dark side docs and Price Is Right allegations * Models pressured on weight, looks, and cosmetic changes * Debate on judging old behavior by modern standards * Bob Barker lawsuits and behind the scenes reputation * Docs can reshape public figures through editing choices * Ellen and Steve Jobs comparisons on workplace behavior * Tyra Banks and reality show treatment parallels * Supermodel nostalgia and cosmetic procedure risks * Artemis mission toilet malfunction and space skepticism * Automation vs manual control in spacecraft debate * Tesla self driving inconsistency discussion * Betting markets as crowd sourced prediction tools * Hot dogs taste better based on context and hunger * Costco and Primrose Lanes as elite hot dog experiences * Sodium and caffeine combo creating fake energy boost * Eating too many hot dogs leading to health scare moment * Preference for thinner dogs and chili slaw mustard combos * Varsity Atlanta and classic regional hot dog nostalgia * Adult Beanie Weenie upgrade and home cooking talk * Living with vegetarians makes solo cooking harder * Optometrist distraction story and outdated eye exams * Volunteers packing merch rewarded with food * Toy trends like Nitos and waiting out hype cycles * Paper towel wiping habit and plumbing consequences * Toilet paper folding vs crumpling debate * Elevator floor numbering confusion and 13th floor jokes * Black Hammock comedy show and Talks with Ross plug * Final push for BDM Appreciation Party attendance ### Social Media [https://tomanddan.com](https://tomanddan.com) [https://twitter.com/tomanddanlive](https://twitter.com/tomanddanlive) [https://facebook.com/amediocretime](https://facebook.com/amediocretime) [https://instagram.com/tomanddanlive](https://instagram.com/tomanddanlive) Where to Find the Show Apple Podcasts: [https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/a-mediocre-time/id334142682](https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/a-mediocre-time/id334142682) Google Podcasts: [https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkLnBvZGJlYW4uY29tL2FtZWRpb2NyZXRpbWUvcG9kY2FzdC54bWw](https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkLnBvZGJlYW4uY29tL2FtZWRpb2NyZXRpbWUvcG9kY2FzdC54bWw) Tom & Dan on Real Radio 104.1 Apple Podcasts: [https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/a-corporate-time/id975258990](https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/a-corporate-time/id975258990) Google Podcasts: [https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkLnBvZGJlYW4uY29tL2Fjb3Jwb3JhdGV0aW1lL3BvZGNhc3QueG1s](https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkLnBvZGJlYW4uY29tL2Fjb3Jwb3JhdGV0aW1lL3BvZGNhc3QueG1s) Exclusive Content [https://tomanddan.com/registration](https://tomanddan.com/registration) Merch [https://tomanddan.myshopify.com/](https://tomanddan.myshopify.com/)  

Episode Summary In this episode, I'm joined by Dr. Daniel Fienup, Dr. Kate Loomis, and Lilian Morales to discuss their recent paper in JABA, Turning the Page: Increasing children's preference for looking at and engaging with books. In this episode, we explore how books can function as powerful reinforcers for young children, especially in early learning and ABA contexts. We discuss how to identify when books are actually reinforcing, how to condition books as reinforcers if they're not already, and practical strategies for incorporating them into teaching and behavior support. Key Topics Covered 1. What Makes Something a Reinforcer? Reinforcers are defined by their effect on behavior—not by intention A book is only a reinforcer if it increases the likelihood of a behavior Preference ≠ reinforcement (must test it) 2. Are Books Naturally Reinforcing? For some children: yes (especially those with strong interest in stories, visuals, or routines) For others: books may be neutral or even aversive Depends on learning history and prior pairing 3. Conditioning Books as Reinforcers Pair books with already-established reinforcers (e.g., attention, snacks, praise) Make reading interactive and engaging (voices, movement, pointing, questions) Start with short durations and build up tolerance/enjoyment Follow the child's lead (let them turn pages, choose books, etc.) 4. Embedding Books into Teaching Use books as part of discrete trial or natural environment teaching Reinforce responses with brief access to a favorite book Incorporate targets into reading (labeling, WH questions, listener responding) Use repeated readings to build fluency and predictability 5. Expanding Reinforcer Repertoires Why it matters: reduces reliance on edibles or screens Books are portable, social, and developmentally beneficial Helps build early literacy and joint attention skills 6. Common Mistakes Assuming all kids like books Using books too long as a reinforcer (loses value) Not rotating or updating book options Ignoring signs of disengagement 7. Practical Tips Keep a small "high-value" book rotation Use novelty strategically Observe what aspects the child enjoys (pictures, repetition, sensory elements) Track what actually increases responding Takeaways Books can absolutely function as reinforcers—but only if conditioned or preferred Pairing and engagement are key to building their value Using books as reinforcers supports both behavior change and language development Resources Tsai and Greer (2006). Conditioned Observation of Books and Accelerated Acquisition of Textual Responding by Preschool Children. Teachers College MA in ABA program. Teachers College Ph.D. in ABA program. Kanazawa et al. (2024). A comparison of parental attention and preferred items during tummy time: A consecutive controlled case series evaluation. D. Ross & R. Douglas Greer (Eds.). (2025). When Text Speaks: Learning to Read and Reading to Learn. Sloan Publishing. The Fred S. Keller School. Comprehensive Application of Behavior Analysis to Schooling (CABAS).

Dr. Stephanie Rimka is a pioneering clinician who authored the book, "Receive: The Dance of Feminine Power." Learn more at https://drrimka.com EPISODE SUMMARY BELOW: 1. Vision for Treatment Islands Ambition to build residential centers on multiple islands Preference to remain near the United States and in jurisdictions allowing gun ownership 2. Challenges with International Patients and Systems Difficulties treating patients from Australia and Canada Systemic obstacles to providing care across borders 3. COVID-19 Era Reflections and Medical Discourse Early preparedness with peptide therapies and supportive protocols -- At the pandemic's onset, certain clinicians organized protocols incorporating peptides (e.g., thymosin alpha-1), nicotine, methylene blue, and adjuncts like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine to support immunity and nutrient delivery, leveraging prior peptide therapy experience. Belief that the pandemic response was misleading and coercive Censorship and platform restrictions -- Recounting bans and throttling on Instagram, TikTok, and Facebook, resorting to coded language (e.g., "cupcake") to avoid content moderation and experiencing extended live bans. 4. Social Media Enforcement and Pharmaceutical Influence Allegation of coordinated reporting by Eli Lilly -- Dr. Rimka says Instagram notified her that Eli Lilly reported her account, coinciding with actions against peers. She speculates that microdosing education threatened sales by reducing dosing volume. Selective enforcement and inconsistent standards -- Frustration is expressed over perceived preferential treatment of similar content by others and retroactive flagging of archived posts, reinforcing a sense of targeted suppression. 5. Regulatory Changes in Peptide Therapy Historical context and global research base Reclassification and access restrictions post-COVID -- Key peptides (e.g., TA1) became difficult to source after regulatory changes limiting compounding pharmacies. Clinicians turned to research-use-only and international sources, creating delays and uncertainty, which Rimka attributes to pharmaceutical efforts to limit widespread peptide use. Shift toward FDA approvals and evolving legal landscape 6. Regulatory Reclassification, Patents, and Natural Substances Peptides are naturally occurring and should not be restricted Pharma patents delivery systems/binders to capture markets 7. Pharma Influence and COVID-19 Coordination Claims Early warnings from contacts in China -- Dr. Rimka cites late-2019 warnings from contacts in Hong Kong/Shanghai who moved to Singapore and ceased WeChat communications, interpreted as signals of impending danger. Pharma's dominant role over government -- Assertions that pharma influences U.S. policy and suspect foul play in COVID-19's origins, drawing parallels to alleged bioweapon narratives involving Lyme disease and alpha-gal syndrome. 8. Intent Behind Global Response to COVID-19 Population control and compliance -- Mass vaccination and public health measures were designed to control and desensitize populations, testing compliance via mandates and social cues. Desensitization to tracking and bio-integrated technologies -- Warn of normalization of biometrics, implanted chips, and digital credentials, eroding autonomy and reshaping identity. 9. Vaccination Schedules, Immune Claims, and Endocrine Concerns Modern immunization schedules are excessive -- The interlocutors argue current infant vaccine schedules are unprecedentedly large compared to past generations. Rejection of autoimmune disease concept Vaccines and environmental endocrine disruptors -- Vaccine components and environmental chemicals (BPA, phthalates, microplastics) may influence sexuality and identity, citing animal studies and extrapolating to human exposures. 10. Nanotechnology, Frequencies, and Neurofeedback Potential for nano-chips/robots to alter physiology -- Dr. Rimka references public claims of nanotechnology capable of modulating cellular function and suggests undisclosed uses may exist, potentially via injections or environmental exposure. Brain manipulation and external frequency influences -- As a neurofeedback practitioner, Dr. Rimka describes modulating brain states via EEG-guided training and hypothesize that external infrastructures (e.g., 5G towers) could emit localized pulses affecting sleep, fatigue, and headaches. 11. Autism, Vaccine Injury, and Institutional Trust Correlation between vaccines and neurotoxicity -- The conversation frames vaccination as a high risk, referencing vaccine injury claims and the existence of a Vaccine Court, attributing neurotoxic effects to schedule components. CDC and FDA as misinformation sources 12. Personal Safety, Loss, and Public Pressure Denial of suicidality and acknowledgment of pressure -- Dr. Rimka confirms she is not suicidal, reflecting on past fears during heightened public controversy and the burden of advocacy when her child was young. Partner's death and suspected vaccine link Practitioner deaths and mentor loss -- A period of suspicious deaths among functional health practitioners, including her mentor, Dr. John Hicks, amplifying her sense of risk in the field. 13. Vaccine Lot Variability and Experimental Control Claims Variable vaccine lots and possible placebos -- Some vaccine lots may have been placebos, implying controlled experimentation and differential risk among recipients. 14. Peptides and Early Pandemic Protocols TA1, nicotine, methylene blue, ivermectin, and hydroxychloroquine -- Dr. Rimka details clinician-driven "stacking" strategies combining TA1 with nicotine and methylene blue, alongside ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, to enhance immune support, nutrient delivery, and reduce dosages during shortages. Public awareness of peptides was limited at the time. 15. Lyme Disease, Alpha-gal, and Non-Vaccine Strategies Lyme and alpha-gal as engineered threats -- Dr. Rimka characterizes Lyme disease as man-made with multiple vectors and views alpha-gal syndrome as unprecedented and possibly engineered, linking observed field anomalies to concerning patterns and anticipated vaccine rollouts. System optimization and aggressive post-bite protocols -- Recommended approaches include immune modulation, readiness with specific products, and rapid "killing and binding" after bites. CellCore Biosciences protocols spanning 10–12 months for chelation and pathogen elimination are endorsed, with guidance to work with trained clinicians. Electromagnetic devices and mitochondrial charge -- Bob Beck protocol devices (e.g., SOTA) and frequency-based tools to raise cellular/mitochondrial charge, positing cellular voltage as a fundamental determinant of recovery capacity. Practical toolkit -- Suggested on-hand items include DMSO, turpentine, ivermectin, silver, specific devices, peptides like TA1, and tinctures for Borrelia and Babesia, with an emphasis on early, aggressive intervention. 16. Public Communication, Professional Constraints, and Promotion Polarizing messaging and informed consent Tension between education and platform policy Credentials, partnerships, and book -- Dr. Rimka discusses her book, "Receive: The Dance of Feminine Power," emphasizing balanced masculine-feminine energies, honoring reception to reduce burnout, and reflections on motherhood and work. She also suggests a peptide stack (Klotho, Follistatin, Cell Factor).

Hour 2 - It sounds like downtown is the preference full 2749 Mon, 30 Mar 2026 18:59:56 +0000 GpFAaYk1Uq4EAjpGZ5S9qWzjKPVSOOgr mlb,kansas city royals,society & culture Cody & Gold mlb,kansas city royals,society & culture Hour 2 - It sounds like downtown is the preference Hosts Cody Tapp & Alex Gold team up for 96.5 The Fan Radio's newest mid-day show "Cody & Gold."  Two born & raised Kansas Citians, Cody & Gold have been through all the highs and lows as a KC sports fan and they know the passion Kansas City has for their sports teams."Cody & Gold" will be a show focused on smart, sports conversation with the best voices from KC and around the country. It will also feature our listeners with your calls, texts & tweets as we want you to be a part of the show, not just a listener.  Cody & Gold, weekdays 10a-2p on 610 Sports Radio.  2024 © 2021 Audacy, Inc. Society & Culture False https://player.amperwavepodcasting.com?fee

When a gay man says he's attracted to masculine men, is that simply preference… or could internalized homophobia be part of the story? In this episode, we unpack one of the most volatile conversations in the gay community. We explore what people actually mean when they say “masculine,” the masc and fem archetypes that shape gay culture, and how social conditioning around masculinity and femininity can influence attraction and identity. Most importantly, we tackle the question at the center of the debate: where is the line between genuine preference and internalized bias? In this episode we discuss: What people really mean when they say “masculine” Masculine and feminine archetypes  How conditioning around masculinity shapes attraction What internalized homophobia can look like in everyday life The difference between preference and hierarchy Where the line may exist between preference and prejudice Join us for a nuanced conversation about masculinity, attraction, and the cultural forces that shape how gay men see themselves and each other. Today's Hosts: Matt Landsiedel Michael DiIorio - Take the 360° Self-Review for Gay Men Reno Johnston Support the Show - viewer and listener support helps us to continue making episodes - CONNECT WITH US - Watch podcast episodes on YouTube Join the Gay Men's Brotherhood Facebook community Get on our email list to get access to our monthly Zoom calls Follow us on Instagram | TikTok Learn more about our community at GayMenGoingDeeper.com - LEARN WITH US - Building Better Relationships online course: Learn how to nurture more meaningful and authentic connections with yourself and others. Healing Your Shame online course: Begin the journey toward greater confidence and self-worth by learning how to recognize and deal with toxic shame. Gay Men Going Deeper Coaching Collection: Lifetime access to BOTH courses + 45 coaching videos and 2 workshop series. Take the Attachment Style Quiz to determine your... Chapters (00:00:00) - Gay Men Going Deep(00:01:00) - Gay Men's Issues With Masculinity(00:03:16) - What is Internalized Homophobia?(00:05:26) - Are You Attracted To Masculine Men?(00:10:26) - Tom Brokaw on Masculinity(00:11:40) - Masculinity and the Gay Community(00:14:31) - On Masculinity and Sexuality(00:17:39) - Gayman's Brotherhood Connection Circles(00:18:29) - Internalized Homophobia(00:23:06) - Gay Men's Brotherhood: Femininity and Gay Life(00:29:44) - Queens Talk About Their Gay Culture(00:32:15) - Outing My Own Phobia(00:36:08) - Gay Men Go Deep Coaching(00:36:50) - Where Is the Line Between Real Sexual Desire and Internalized Homophobia(00:39:58) - I Used To Be Attracted To Performative Masculinity(00:45:24) - Reno On Gay Men's Sexualities(00:49:08) - Blind Dating on Grindr(00:50:14) - A Very Long Goodbye

John Maytham is joined by Andrew Thompson, News24 journalist, who has unpacked this trend through a detailed analysis of Airports Company South Africa data, revealing a fundamental shift in how — and where — travellers are choosing to enter the country. His reporting highlights how improved connectivity, evolving airline strategies, and changing traveller preferences are reshaping South Africa’s tourism map. Presenter John Maytham is an actor and author-turned-talk radio veteran and seasoned journalist. His show serves a round-up of local and international news coupled with the latest in business, sport, traffic and weather. The host’s eclectic interests mean the program often surprises the audience with intriguing book reviews and inspiring interviews profiling artists. A daily highlight is Rapid Fire, just after 5:30pm. CapeTalk fans call in, to stump the presenter with their general knowledge questions. Another firm favourite is the humorous Thursday crossing with award-winning journalist Rebecca Davis, called “Plan B”. Thank you for listening to a podcast from Afternoon Drive with John Maytham Listen live on Primedia+ weekdays from 15:00 and 18:00 (SA Time) to Afternoon Drive with John Maytham broadcast on CapeTalk https://buff.ly/NnFM3Nk For more from the show go to https://buff.ly/BSFy4Cn or find all the catch-up podcasts here https://buff.ly/n8nWt4x Subscribe to the CapeTalk Daily and Weekly Newsletters https://buff.ly/sbvVZD5 Follow us on social media: CapeTalk on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@capetalk CapeTalk on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ CapeTalk on X: https://x.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@CapeTalk567 See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The structural mechanism highlighted in this episode is the shift of government policy from serving as a regulatory guardrail to acting as a direct steering function in technology selection, shifting liability boundaries and procurement decisions onto MSPs and their contracts. Federal agencies, including the FCC and the White House, are no longer just prescribing security outcomes but are increasingly specifying acceptable inputs such as specific routers, AI contract terms, and cloud platforms, converting technology choices into explicit compliance obligations. A consequential development supporting this shift is the FCC's move to ban imports of consumer-grade routers manufactured outside the United States, a policy change that directly impacts not only residential but also business environments such as home offices and smaller hybrid setups. Additionally, the White House's push for a unified national AI governance framework, rather than a patchwork of state-based rules, further codifies what vendors and MSPs must document and justify in both procurement and ongoing service delivery. Contractual requirements—such as the GSA's draft AI clause—are moving compliance from best practice guidance to enforceable terms, influencing which vendors can bid for federal contracts and what they must attest to regarding AI-enabled services. Related stories underscore the tightening of enforcement through procurement and certification gates. The transcript cites the FedRAMP system as an example, where conditional approvals and review backlogs highlight operational challenges and reinforce how authorization is less about technical sufficiency and more about meeting buyer and audit expectations. The trend toward requiring supply chain and AI attestations by default in master service agreements is consolidating vendor choice around those that can produce defensible documentation, while increasing burdens for those unable to do so. For MSPs and IT providers, the practical implications are increased operational complexity and contract risk. Vendor selection now carries liability exposure that extends beyond technical performance to proving decisions in audits, insurance reviews, and contract disputes. Maintaining evidence-ready reports for backup, recovery, and AI governance is no longer optional, as the inability to produce such proof can result in being excluded from regulated verticals. The expected tradeoff is a consolidation of vendors and solutions, weighted toward those who offer prepackaged compliance and attestation capabilities, but with an accompanying risk of over-dependence and concentration. 00:00 Contract Conditions 02:53 Gates, Not Laws 04:34 Compliance Consolidates 07:30 Why Do We Care?  Supported by:  ScalePad  Nerdio 

When food and toys just aren't cutting it for your learning needs, here comes awesomely fun social interactions. But which to choose? Wiggle arms? Tickles? There's got to be a better way! This week friend of the show, Dr. Casey Clay, returns to run down options for using social interaction preference assessments. We'll dive into the development process of some of these tools, look at if types of interactions can be categorized by type, and determine if anyone on the show would work for hugs. This episode is available for 1.0 LEARNING CEU. Articles discussed this episode: Clay, C.J., Samaha, A.L., Bloom, S.E., Bogoev, B.K., & Boyle, M.A. (2013). Assessing preference for social interactions. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 362-371. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.07.028 Morris, S.L. & Vollmer, T.R. (2020). A comparison of methods for assessing preference for social interactions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 53, 918-937. doi: 10.1002/jaba.692 Clay, C.J., Samaha, A.L., & Kogoev, B.K. (2018). Assessing preference for and reinforcing efficacy of components of social interactions in individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Learning and Motivation, 62, 4-14. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2017.03.008   If you're interested in ordering CEs for listening to this episode, click here to go to the store page. You'll need to enter your name, BCBA #, the two episode secret code words, and answers to the knowledge check questions to complete the purchase. Email us at abainsidetrack@gmail.com for further assistance.

Send a textIn this episode of the Concrete Genius Podcast, Sauce Mackenzie opens with a powerful reminder about gratitude, faith, and perspective. In a world filled with anxiety, frustration, and constant pressure, Sauce reflects on why we have to keep faith and stop bleeding on people who never cut us.Then the conversation shifts into a real and honest discussion about interracial dating in the Black community.Is dating outside your race simply a personal preference?Or do some people view it as a form of cultural betrayal?Sauce poses a direct question to Black women: how do you truly feel when you see a successful or attractive Black man dating outside his race? Is there resentment? Is it indifference? Or is it something deeper tied to history, culture, and shared struggle?The episode explores:• The difference between dating preference and disrespect• Why tearing down Black men or Black women after dating outside your race is problematic• The legacy of protecting Black women within Black families• The emotional connections that shape attraction and loyalty in relationshipsLater in the episode, Sauce breaks down Bam Adebayo's 83-point performance and explains why, despite the impressive numbers, it doesn't carry the same weight as Kobe Bryant's legendary 81-point game.From community conversations to basketball debates, this episode blends cultural reflection, sports commentary, and raw honesty the way only Concrete Genius can.

It's time for another Bourbon Community Roundtable, and we're handing the reins over to our Patreon supporters to see what's actually on your minds. We're pulling back the curtain on our chaotic group chat to debate the "Dusty" vs. Modern era and why some single barrel picks just hit different. Ryan is still leading the charge for high-proof heat, while Blake breaks down why balance is the only thing that keeps a brand relevant in a crowded market. We're also digging into the finished whiskey craze and what the latest round of distillery consolidations means for your wallet. At the end of the day, we're looking past the labels to find the soul of the industry. Does a great story still trump a massive marketing budget? We're breaking down the trends, the hype, and the reality of being an enthusiast in 2026. Pour a glass and join the conversation. Show Notes: The art of cocktail creativity: Best unexpected spirit swaps Are finished barrel whiskeys a fleeting trend? Insights on modern bottling techniques and the revival of "Dusty" bottles How distillery consolidation impacts consumer choices High-proof spirits: Preference shifts and cocktail accessibility The journey of craft distilleries and the stories behind their creations The role of storytelling in enriching the bourbon experience Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

https://takingthelandpodcast.comIn this powerful sermon from the Perth Bible Conference, Pastor Greg Mitchell explores the story of Joseph and the coat of many colors in Genesis 37.That coat was more than clothing. It revealed hearts.PREMIUM SUBSCRIPTION for WORLD EVANGELISM:• NO ADS, Early releases, Full-Length Testimony Tuesdays⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠• Subscribe for only $3/month on Supercast⁠: https://taking-the-land.supercast.com/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠• Subscribe for only $3.99/month on Spotify⁠: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/taking-the-land/subscribe• ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Subscribe for only $4.99/month on Apple Podcasts⁠: https://apple.co/4owjo5ZSome responded with faith.Others responded with envy.And Joseph had to learn how to survive the blessing of God.In this message you will learn:• Why personal preferences can blind us to God's will• How envy quietly destroys relationships and ministries• Why the blessing of God often makes you a target• How to walk in grace even when people work against youThe truth is simple but searching: God will sometimes bless someone else first just to reveal what's inside our hearts.If you are pursuing God's calling, this message will challenge you to accept the coat, survive the opposition, and walk in grace.Chapters0:00 The Road Crew and the Reflective Jacket1:07 Joseph and the Coat of Many Colors2:05 The Father's Response3:55 How Preferences Distort Decisions6:25 Missing Powerful Converts9:05 Recognizing God's Favor on People11:55 Choosing People by Preference vs Anointing14:05 The Brother's Response: Envy16:05 “Envy Is Pain at Another's Blessing”18:35 Conflict and Division from Envy21:05 When Blessing Feels Unfair25:40 Envy Assumes Blessing Is Man-Made28:15 Promotion Comes from God30:35 The Danger of Envy in Ministry32:25 Joseph's Response to the Coat34:05 The Coat Makes You a Target36:00 Accept the Coat of God's Calling38:10 Survive the Coat40:10 Learning Grace with Blessing42:05 Altar Call and Prayer43:20 Prayer for Healing and TestimoniesShow NotesALL PROCEEDS GO TO WORLD EVANGELISMLocate a CFM Church near you: https://cfmmap.orgWe need five-star reviews! Tell the world what you think about this podcast at:• Apple Podcasts: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://apple.co/3vy1s5b• Podchaser: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.podchaser.com/podcasts/taking-the-land-cfm-sermon-pod-43369v

Just the latest twist in a post prop 50 California election yearSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Preview for Later Today: John Yoo explains the Founders' preference for a single executive, emphasizing that one commander-in-chief provides the speed and energy necessary to protect the community. (6)1789

Rose friendzoned her situationship

In this episode, we're breaking down how to stop needing approval, and why approval-seeking isn't a personality flaw or a confidence issue. It's an identity and nervous system issue. You can make thoughtful choices, act with integrity, and still be misunderstood. That's not failure. That's part of being human and being perceived. The problem starts when your sense of safety, worth, or direction depends on how other people respond to you. When that happens, disapproval can feel overwhelming. One comment, one reaction, or one opinion can trigger anxiety, self-doubt, or a spiral of overthinking. Not because something is wrong with you, but because your nervous system has learned to look outside of you for safety and validation. In this episode, we talk about: Why needing approval creates anxiety and emotional instability How the nervous system interprets disapproval as danger The difference between helpful feedback, personal preference, and projection Why treating all feedback as truth keeps you stuck How to stop outsourcing your identity to other people The neuroscience behind writing things out for clarity and regulation Practical steps to build self-trust and emotional stability How to tolerate being misunderstood without abandoning yourself Why boundaries are not cold or inauthentic… they are self-respect We also unpack approval-seeking patterns, people-pleasing, and the habit of adjusting yourself to feel safe. And I share the real-time process I'm using to become more grounded, regulated, and anchored in who I am (without numbing out or pretending not to care). This episode is for you if: You struggle with people-pleasing or fear of judgment Criticism or disapproval easily rattles you You over-explain, over-share, or second-guess yourself You want to feel calmer, steadier, and more self-assured You're ready to stop needing approval and start trusting yourself This isn't about becoming immune to other people's opinions. It's about belonging to yourself so your nervous system no longer depends on external validation. New mantra from this episode: Preference is not truth. My links here:https://alliecasazza.com/tpslinks Becoming Her Blueprint