Podcasts about discredit

Jeffrey Epstein's network went far beyond trafficking and exploitation—it also included a sophisticated campaign to discredit, intimidate, and obstruct those investigating him. From the mid-2000s through 2019, Epstein and his lawyers waged a relentless public relations and legal offensive designed to undermine victims, stall prosecutors, and silence the press. Court documents and leaked communications reveal that Epstein's inner circle—including Ghislaine Maxwell and his attorneys at firms like Black, Srebnick, Kornspan & Stumpf—used intimidation tactics, private investigators, and smear campaigns to paint accusers as liars or gold diggers. In one series of emails revealed by Bloomberg, Maxwell and Epstein discussed deploying damaging personal rumors to discredit accusers as “unstable” or “untrustworthy,” while threatening defamation suits against media outlets that covered the story. This coordinated effort to manipulate public perception was part of a larger strategy to delegitimize investigations, protect powerful allies, and preserve his social status within elite circles.Epstein also relied on legal obstruction and financial manipulation to blunt scrutiny. He deployed non-disclosure agreements (NDAs), secret settlements, and strategic donations to law enforcement-connected charities to curry favor. Defense teams repeatedly sought to seal or suppress evidence, arguing that revealing details would “prejudice ongoing investigations.” In some cases, Epstein's team even hired former intelligence and law enforcement officials to monitor reporters and intimidate witnesses. His influence extended into the judicial system through his now-infamous 2008 non-prosecution agreement, which effectively shut down a federal probe and silenced dozens of victims. Even after his death, the DOJ and courts have continued to restrict access to key records, citing privacy or “ongoing investigations”—a fact many observers see as a continuation of Epstein's disinformation playbook, protecting those who benefited from his silence.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Prince Andrew's downfall has accelerated sharply in the wake of fresh allegations tied to Jeffrey Epstein and the explosive release of Virginia Giuffre's memoir, Nobody's Girl. The book recounts new details about Andrew's alleged sexual encounters with Giuffre while she was being trafficked as a minor by Epstein. These revelations reignited public outrage and renewed scrutiny over Andrew's long-denied relationship with both Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Buckingham Palace has reportedly been forced into damage control, with King Charles III supporting Andrew's decision to give up his “Duke of York” title and remaining royal honors. The palace has publicly stated that the new allegations must be fully investigated, signaling growing institutional distance from Andrew as pressure mounts for full transparency and accountability.Adding to his disgrace, newly surfaced claims allege that Andrew attempted to orchestrate an online smear campaign against Giuffre to salvage his reputation. According to The Guardian's coverage of the memoir, the prince and his aides tried to hire internet trolls to harass Giuffre online and even sought access to her private information, including her Social Security number. Reports indicate that the Metropolitan Police have opened an inquiry into whether Andrew misused his royal security detail or other public resources during this smear campaign. Parliamentarians are also reportedly pushing to strip him of any remaining titles and privileges, as his reputation continues to collapse under the weight of new evidence and public disgust over his conduct.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsources:Prince Andrew tried to hire 'internet trolls' to 'hassle' his sex accuser Virginia Giuffre, her posthumous memoir reveals | Daily Mail Online

Prince Andrew's downfall has accelerated sharply in the wake of fresh allegations tied to Jeffrey Epstein and the explosive release of Virginia Giuffre's memoir, Nobody's Girl. The book recounts new details about Andrew's alleged sexual encounters with Giuffre while she was being trafficked as a minor by Epstein. These revelations reignited public outrage and renewed scrutiny over Andrew's long-denied relationship with both Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Buckingham Palace has reportedly been forced into damage control, with King Charles III supporting Andrew's decision to give up his “Duke of York” title and remaining royal honors. The palace has publicly stated that the new allegations must be fully investigated, signaling growing institutional distance from Andrew as pressure mounts for full transparency and accountability.Adding to his disgrace, newly surfaced claims allege that Andrew attempted to orchestrate an online smear campaign against Giuffre to salvage his reputation. According to The Guardian's coverage of the memoir, the prince and his aides tried to hire internet trolls to harass Giuffre online and even sought access to her private information, including her Social Security number. Reports indicate that the Metropolitan Police have opened an inquiry into whether Andrew misused his royal security detail or other public resources during this smear campaign. Parliamentarians are also reportedly pushing to strip him of any remaining titles and privileges, as his reputation continues to collapse under the weight of new evidence and public disgust over his conduct.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsources:Prince Andrew tried to hire 'internet trolls' to 'hassle' his sex accuser Virginia Giuffre, her posthumous memoir reveals | Daily Mail Online

Prince Andrew's downfall has accelerated sharply in the wake of fresh allegations tied to Jeffrey Epstein and the explosive release of Virginia Giuffre's memoir, Nobody's Girl. The book recounts new details about Andrew's alleged sexual encounters with Giuffre while she was being trafficked as a minor by Epstein. These revelations reignited public outrage and renewed scrutiny over Andrew's long-denied relationship with both Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Buckingham Palace has reportedly been forced into damage control, with King Charles III supporting Andrew's decision to give up his “Duke of York” title and remaining royal honors. The palace has publicly stated that the new allegations must be fully investigated, signaling growing institutional distance from Andrew as pressure mounts for full transparency and accountability.Adding to his disgrace, newly surfaced claims allege that Andrew attempted to orchestrate an online smear campaign against Giuffre to salvage his reputation. According to The Guardian's coverage of the memoir, the prince and his aides tried to hire internet trolls to harass Giuffre online and even sought access to her private information, including her Social Security number. Reports indicate that the Metropolitan Police have opened an inquiry into whether Andrew misused his royal security detail or other public resources during this smear campaign. Parliamentarians are also reportedly pushing to strip him of any remaining titles and privileges, as his reputation continues to collapse under the weight of new evidence and public disgust over his conduct.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsources:Prince Andrew tried to hire 'internet trolls' to 'hassle' his sex accuser Virginia Giuffre, her posthumous memoir reveals | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Prince Andrew's downfall has accelerated sharply in the wake of fresh allegations tied to Jeffrey Epstein and the explosive release of Virginia Giuffre's memoir, Nobody's Girl. The book recounts new details about Andrew's alleged sexual encounters with Giuffre while she was being trafficked as a minor by Epstein. These revelations reignited public outrage and renewed scrutiny over Andrew's long-denied relationship with both Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Buckingham Palace has reportedly been forced into damage control, with King Charles III supporting Andrew's decision to give up his “Duke of York” title and remaining royal honors. The palace has publicly stated that the new allegations must be fully investigated, signaling growing institutional distance from Andrew as pressure mounts for full transparency and accountability.Adding to his disgrace, newly surfaced claims allege that Andrew attempted to orchestrate an online smear campaign against Giuffre to salvage his reputation. According to The Guardian's coverage of the memoir, the prince and his aides tried to hire internet trolls to harass Giuffre online and even sought access to her private information, including her Social Security number. Reports indicate that the Metropolitan Police have opened an inquiry into whether Andrew misused his royal security detail or other public resources during this smear campaign. Parliamentarians are also reportedly pushing to strip him of any remaining titles and privileges, as his reputation continues to collapse under the weight of new evidence and public disgust over his conduct.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsources:Prince Andrew tried to hire 'internet trolls' to 'hassle' his sex accuser Virginia Giuffre, her posthumous memoir reveals | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Prince Andrew's downfall has accelerated sharply in the wake of fresh allegations tied to Jeffrey Epstein and the explosive release of Virginia Giuffre's memoir, Nobody's Girl. The book recounts new details about Andrew's alleged sexual encounters with Giuffre while she was being trafficked as a minor by Epstein. These revelations reignited public outrage and renewed scrutiny over Andrew's long-denied relationship with both Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Buckingham Palace has reportedly been forced into damage control, with King Charles III supporting Andrew's decision to give up his “Duke of York” title and remaining royal honors. The palace has publicly stated that the new allegations must be fully investigated, signaling growing institutional distance from Andrew as pressure mounts for full transparency and accountability.Adding to his disgrace, newly surfaced claims allege that Andrew attempted to orchestrate an online smear campaign against Giuffre to salvage his reputation. According to The Guardian's coverage of the memoir, the prince and his aides tried to hire internet trolls to harass Giuffre online and even sought access to her private information, including her Social Security number. Reports indicate that the Metropolitan Police have opened an inquiry into whether Andrew misused his royal security detail or other public resources during this smear campaign. Parliamentarians are also reportedly pushing to strip him of any remaining titles and privileges, as his reputation continues to collapse under the weight of new evidence and public disgust over his conduct.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsources:Prince Andrew tried to hire 'internet trolls' to 'hassle' his sex accuser Virginia Giuffre, her posthumous memoir reveals | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Prince Andrew's downfall has accelerated sharply in the wake of fresh allegations tied to Jeffrey Epstein and the explosive release of Virginia Giuffre's memoir, Nobody's Girl. The book recounts new details about Andrew's alleged sexual encounters with Giuffre while she was being trafficked as a minor by Epstein. These revelations reignited public outrage and renewed scrutiny over Andrew's long-denied relationship with both Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Buckingham Palace has reportedly been forced into damage control, with King Charles III supporting Andrew's decision to give up his “Duke of York” title and remaining royal honors. The palace has publicly stated that the new allegations must be fully investigated, signaling growing institutional distance from Andrew as pressure mounts for full transparency and accountability.Adding to his disgrace, newly surfaced claims allege that Andrew attempted to orchestrate an online smear campaign against Giuffre to salvage his reputation. According to The Guardian's coverage of the memoir, the prince and his aides tried to hire internet trolls to harass Giuffre online and even sought access to her private information, including her Social Security number. Reports indicate that the Metropolitan Police have opened an inquiry into whether Andrew misused his royal security detail or other public resources during this smear campaign. Parliamentarians are also reportedly pushing to strip him of any remaining titles and privileges, as his reputation continues to collapse under the weight of new evidence and public disgust over his conduct.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsources:Prince Andrew tried to hire 'internet trolls' to 'hassle' his sex accuser Virginia Giuffre, her posthumous memoir reveals | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Jeffrey Epstein's network went far beyond trafficking and exploitation—it also included a sophisticated campaign to discredit, intimidate, and obstruct those investigating him. From the mid-2000s through 2019, Epstein and his lawyers waged a relentless public relations and legal offensive designed to undermine victims, stall prosecutors, and silence the press. Court documents and leaked communications reveal that Epstein's inner circle—including Ghislaine Maxwell and his attorneys at firms like Black, Srebnick, Kornspan & Stumpf—used intimidation tactics, private investigators, and smear campaigns to paint accusers as liars or gold diggers. In one series of emails revealed by Bloomberg, Maxwell and Epstein discussed deploying damaging personal rumors to discredit accusers as “unstable” or “untrustworthy,” while threatening defamation suits against media outlets that covered the story. This coordinated effort to manipulate public perception was part of a larger strategy to delegitimize investigations, protect powerful allies, and preserve his social status within elite circles.Epstein also relied on legal obstruction and financial manipulation to blunt scrutiny. He deployed non-disclosure agreements (NDAs), secret settlements, and strategic donations to law enforcement-connected charities to curry favor. Defense teams repeatedly sought to seal or suppress evidence, arguing that revealing details would “prejudice ongoing investigations.” In some cases, Epstein's team even hired former intelligence and law enforcement officials to monitor reporters and intimidate witnesses. His influence extended into the judicial system through his now-infamous 2008 non-prosecution agreement, which effectively shut down a federal probe and silenced dozens of victims. Even after his death, the DOJ and courts have continued to restrict access to key records, citing privacy or “ongoing investigations”—a fact many observers see as a continuation of Epstein's disinformation playbook, protecting those who benefited from his silence.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

From its embrace of dubious research about autism, its skepticism over vaccines and its wholesale rejection of the consensus about climate change, the Trump Administration has set off alarm bells within the scientific community. William Brangham spoke with two prominent researchers about "Science Under Siege," their new book chronicling what they argue is a concerted war on science. PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy

From its embrace of dubious research about autism, its skepticism over vaccines and its wholesale rejection of the consensus about climate change, the Trump administration has set off alarm bells within the scientific community. William Brangham spoke with two prominent researchers about "Science Under Siege," their new book chronicling what they argue is a concerted war on science. PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy

Send us a textIn this episode, the boys present another of their popular Dynamite Conspiracies episodes, in which they discuss whether governments have indeed made contact with aliens but are keeping this information from us for our benefit.But what are your thoughts on this topic?Do you agree with Tony and Tayo on this?Or do you have other thoughts?Links used during the show:-https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1FgFtro1Uj/-https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/ufo-videos-us-navy-real-flir1-gimbal-go-fast-uap-a9110306.html-https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-14088515/Police-Canada-wreckage-object-shot-Lake-Huron.html-https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/us/tragedy-strikes-far-right-afd-as-six-candidates-die-ahead-of-german-local-election/articleshow/123681375.cms-https://unitednuclear.com/specials-oneoffs-surplus-c-105/-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OR_7pMBIOZ8Tune in and listen to the discussion. Please share your thoughts on these subjects.Although we greatly prefer effusive praise

Watch more great content from Rich and Gaz at https://ickonic.com/ Just £1.99 for your first month Get your 40% CBD Products at  Use the code :WTAF https://supremecbd.uk/Subscribe to our Youtube Channel to watch the episodes for free:  https://www.youtube.com/@TheWTAFPodcast

NEWS: Lacson denies knowing Discaya couple, says photo aims to discredit him and Blue Ribbon Committee probe | Oct. 2, 2025Subscribe to The Manila Times Channel - https://tmt.ph/YTSubscribe Visit our website at https://www.manilatimes.net Follow us: Facebook - https://tmt.ph/facebook Instagram - https://tmt.ph/instagram Twitter - https://tmt.ph/twitter DailyMotion - https://tmt.ph/dailymotion Subscribe to our Digital Edition - https://tmt.ph/digital Check out our Podcasts: Spotify - https://tmt.ph/spotify Apple Podcasts - https://tmt.ph/applepodcasts Amazon Music - https://tmt.ph/amazonmusic Deezer: https://tmt.ph/deezer Stitcher: https://tmt.ph/stitcherTune In: https://tmt.ph/tunein#TheManilaTimes#KeepUpWithTheTimes Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The Trump administration is trying to discredit the intelligence assessment that concluded Russian President Putin ordered a campaign to interfere in the 2016 election with the intent of helping elect Trump. Contrary to almost all intelligence findings, Trump and his aides allege a conspiracy by the Obama White House. Geoff Bennett discussed more with former CIA analyst Michael Van Landingham. PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders

The Trump administration is trying to discredit the intelligence assessment that concluded Russian President Putin ordered a campaign to interfere in the 2016 election with the intent of helping elect Trump. Contrary to almost all intelligence findings, Trump and his aides allege a conspiracy by the Obama White House. Geoff Bennett discussed more with former CIA analyst Michael Van Landingham. PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders

What's Trending: The latest on the inevitable breakup between Donald Trump & Elon Musk // LONGFORM: Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier // GUEST: Foreign Policy expert Jonathan Schanzer

The queen herself is back by popular demand! Jameela and Abbie sit down to chat self-surveillance, tribalism, the messed up world of tabloid journalism, and why it's so important for women to rally around each other. LINKS Listen to Jameela's podcast 'Wrong Turns' HERE or wherever you get your podcasts Follow Jameela Jamil on IG @jameelajamil Check out @itsalotpod on IG at https://bit.ly/itsalot-instagram . Review the podcast on Apple Podcasts https://bit.ly/ial-review Follow LiSTNR Entertainment on IG @listnrentertainment Follow LiSTNR Entertainment on TikTok @listnrentertainment Get instructions on how to access transcripts on Apple podcasts https://bit.ly/3VQbKXY CREDITS Host: Abbie Chatfield @abbiechatfield Guest: Jameela Jamil @jameelajamilExecutive Producer: Amy Kimball @amy.kimballDigital and Social Producer: Oscar Gordon @oscargordon Social and Video Producer: Justin Hill @jus_hillIt's A Lot Social Media Manager: Julia ToomeyManaging Producer: Sam Cavanagh Find more great podcasts like this at www.listnr.com/See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Karen Read's Defense Cross-Examination Fails to Discredit Heather Maxon As Witness Heather Maxon testified on May 5, 2025, about what she saw on the night of January 29, 2022, stating that she observed a woman and a man in an SUV turning onto Fairview Road after midnight. This sighting is crucial for the prosecution, as it places Karen Read and John O'Keefe at the location where O'Keefe's body was later found, supporting the timeline of events leading to his death and aligning with the prosecution's narrative of Read's involvement. Maxon provided a detailed description of the vehicle and the individuals she saw, which matched the descriptions of Read's SUV and the couple, and her testimony was clear and confident, leaving little room for the defense to challenge her observations. The prosecution used this testimony to solidify their case, emphasizing the spontaneous and credible nature of her account, which adds another layer of evidence placing Read at the scene at the critical time. During cross-examination, the defense attempted to question Maxon's ability to accurately identify the vehicle and its occupants from a distance and in the dark, suggesting potential errors in her observation. However, Maxon stood by her account, stating that the street lighting was sufficient for her to make out the details she described, and she mentioned that she had no reason to pay particular attention to the vehicle at the time, adding to the credibility of her spontaneous observation. The defense's efforts to discredit her testimony appeared unsuccessful, as Maxon's straightforward and consistent recollection strengthened the prosecution's case. #KarenReadTrial #HeatherMaxon #EyewitnessAccount #ProsecutionEvidence #DefenseCross #CourtroomDrama #JohnOKeefe #MurderTrial #WitnessTestimony    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Karen Read's Defense Cross-Examination Fails to Discredit Heather Maxon As Witness Heather Maxon testified on May 5, 2025, about what she saw on the night of January 29, 2022, stating that she observed a woman and a man in an SUV turning onto Fairview Road after midnight. This sighting is crucial for the prosecution, as it places Karen Read and John O'Keefe at the location where O'Keefe's body was later found, supporting the timeline of events leading to his death and aligning with the prosecution's narrative of Read's involvement. Maxon provided a detailed description of the vehicle and the individuals she saw, which matched the descriptions of Read's SUV and the couple, and her testimony was clear and confident, leaving little room for the defense to challenge her observations. The prosecution used this testimony to solidify their case, emphasizing the spontaneous and credible nature of her account, which adds another layer of evidence placing Read at the scene at the critical time. During cross-examination, the defense attempted to question Maxon's ability to accurately identify the vehicle and its occupants from a distance and in the dark, suggesting potential errors in her observation. However, Maxon stood by her account, stating that the street lighting was sufficient for her to make out the details she described, and she mentioned that she had no reason to pay particular attention to the vehicle at the time, adding to the credibility of her spontaneous observation. The defense's efforts to discredit her testimony appeared unsuccessful, as Maxon's straightforward and consistent recollection strengthened the prosecution's case. #KarenReadTrial #HeatherMaxon #EyewitnessAccount #ProsecutionEvidence #DefenseCross #CourtroomDrama #JohnOKeefe #MurderTrial #WitnessTestimony    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Karen Read's Defense Cross-Examination Fails to Discredit Heather Maxon As Witness Heather Maxon testified on May 5, 2025, about what she saw on the night of January 29, 2022, stating that she observed a woman and a man in an SUV turning onto Fairview Road after midnight. This sighting is crucial for the prosecution, as it places Karen Read and John O'Keefe at the location where O'Keefe's body was later found, supporting the timeline of events leading to his death and aligning with the prosecution's narrative of Read's involvement. Maxon provided a detailed description of the vehicle and the individuals she saw, which matched the descriptions of Read's SUV and the couple, and her testimony was clear and confident, leaving little room for the defense to challenge her observations. The prosecution used this testimony to solidify their case, emphasizing the spontaneous and credible nature of her account, which adds another layer of evidence placing Read at the scene at the critical time. During cross-examination, the defense attempted to question Maxon's ability to accurately identify the vehicle and its occupants from a distance and in the dark, suggesting potential errors in her observation. However, Maxon stood by her account, stating that the street lighting was sufficient for her to make out the details she described, and she mentioned that she had no reason to pay particular attention to the vehicle at the time, adding to the credibility of her spontaneous observation. The defense's efforts to discredit her testimony appeared unsuccessful, as Maxon's straightforward and consistent recollection strengthened the prosecution's case. #KarenReadTrial #HeatherMaxon #EyewitnessAccount #ProsecutionEvidence #DefenseCross #CourtroomDrama #JohnOKeefe #MurderTrial #WitnessTestimony    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

What would it happen if I allowed my thoughts about my gender become known to me?Today we meet Dr. Christina Neuwirth and we're talking about the queer book that saved their life: Something That May Shock and Discredit You by Daniel M. Lavery. And Daniel joins us for the conversation!Dr. Christina Neuwirth is a writer, researcher and bookseller based in Edinburgh. Their 2018 novella Amphibian was shortlisted for Scotland's National Book Awards. Their writing has been published in Gutter Magazine and The Skinny. At Lighthouse Bookshop, Christina runs the Bread & Roses Prize for Radical Publishing.Daniel M. Lavery is the “Dear Prudence” advice columnist at Slate, the cofounder of The Toast, and the New York Times bestselling author of Texts From Jane Eyre and The Merry Spinster. In 2024, he published his debut novel Women's Hotel.From a thoughtful analysis of the beauty of William Shatner to a sinister reimagining of HGTV's House Hunters, and featuring figures as varied as Anne of Green Gables, Columbo, and the cast of Mean Girls, Something That May Shock and Discredit You is a hilarious and emotionally exhilarating compendium that combines personal history with cultural history to make you see yourself and those around you entirely anew.Special Limited SeriesThis episode is part of a special limited series of episodes featuring only guests who are owners or staff at LGBTQ bookstores. Airing April-June 2025, these episodes will feature six bookstores across the United States and United Kingdom.Today's guest is a bookseller at Lighthouse Bookshop, a queer-owned and woman-led independent community bookshop. It is an unapologetically activist, intersectional, feminist, antiracist, lgbtq+ community space. In 2020 it was nominated Scotland's Best Independent Bookshop.Connect with Christina and Danielwebsite: christinaneuwirth.comwebsite: danielmlavery.cominstagram: @daniel_m_laveryBecome an Associate Producer!Become an Associate Producer of our podcast through a $20/month sponsorship on Patreon! A professionally recognized credit, you can gain access to Associate Producer meetings to help guide our podcast into the future! Get started today: patreon.com/thisqueerbookCreditsHost/Founder: John Parker (learn more about my name change)Executive Producer: Jim PoundsAssociate Producers: Archie Arnold, K Jason Bryan and David Rephan, Bob Bush, Natalie Cruz, Jonathan Fried, Paul Kaefer, Joe Perazzo, Bill Shay, and Sean SmithPatreon Subscribers: Stephen D., Terry D., Stephen Flamm, Ida Göteburg, Thomas Michna, and Gary Nygaard.Creative and Accounting support provided by: Gordy EricksonQuatrefoil LibraryQuatrefoil has created a curated lending library made up of the books featured on our podcast! If you can't buy these books, then borrow them! Link: https://libbyapp.com/library/quatrefoil/curated-1404336/page-1Join us in helping Lambda Literary raise $20k for The Writers Retreat for Emerging LGBTQ Voices to ensure all writers can attend. Donate here: http://bit.ly/3RjW51aSupport the show

New Diddy Developments & Diddy's Legal Defense Strategy: Delay, Deny, and Discredit?  In this episode, we dive deep into the explosive federal and civil legal battles surrounding music mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs. With a superseding federal indictment now spanning two decades, prosecutors allege Diddy ran his business empire like a criminal operation—complete with sex trafficking, coercion, and blackmail. We break down the charges, the RICO implications, and what prosecutors say was a pattern of abuse that operated behind the scenes of fame and fortune. You'll hear how Diddy's legal team is scrambling to hold back a wave of civil lawsuits while defending against the U.S. government's sweeping criminal case. From their strategy to delay the May trial, to aggressive efforts to discredit accusers and remove high-profile names like Beyoncé and Jay-Z from civil complaints, we unpack the courtroom chess match happening on multiple fronts. This isn't just about legal filings—it's about media narratives, public image, and how both sides are leveraging power in and out of court. Whether you've been following the Diddy case from the beginning or are just catching up, this episode gives you a clear, factual, and in-depth look at one of the most shocking celebrity criminal cases in recent history. Subscribe now for more real-time legal breakdowns, expert commentary, and behind-the-scenes details you won't hear anywhere else. Want to listen to ALL our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In this episode, we dive deep into the explosive federal and civil legal battles surrounding music mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs. With a superseding federal indictment now spanning two decades, prosecutors allege Diddy ran his business empire like a criminal operation—complete with sex trafficking, coercion, and blackmail. We break down the charges, the RICO implications, and what prosecutors say was a pattern of abuse that operated behind the scenes of fame and fortune. You'll hear how Diddy's legal team is scrambling to hold back a wave of civil lawsuits while defending against the U.S. government's sweeping criminal case. From their strategy to delay the May trial, to aggressive efforts to discredit accusers and remove high-profile names like Beyoncé and Jay-Z from civil complaints, we unpack the courtroom chess match happening on multiple fronts. This isn't just about legal filings—it's about media narratives, public image, and how both sides are leveraging power in and out of court. Whether you've been following the Diddy case from the beginning or are just catching up, this episode gives you a clear, factual, and in-depth look at one of the most shocking celebrity criminal cases in recent history. Subscribe now for more real-time legal breakdowns, expert commentary, and behind-the-scenes details you won't hear anywhere else. Want to listen to ALL our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

New Diddy Developments & Diddy's Legal Defense Strategy: Delay, Deny, and Discredit?  In this episode, we dive deep into the explosive federal and civil legal battles surrounding music mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs. With a superseding federal indictment now spanning two decades, prosecutors allege Diddy ran his business empire like a criminal operation—complete with sex trafficking, coercion, and blackmail. We break down the charges, the RICO implications, and what prosecutors say was a pattern of abuse that operated behind the scenes of fame and fortune. You'll hear how Diddy's legal team is scrambling to hold back a wave of civil lawsuits while defending against the U.S. government's sweeping criminal case. From their strategy to delay the May trial, to aggressive efforts to discredit accusers and remove high-profile names like Beyoncé and Jay-Z from civil complaints, we unpack the courtroom chess match happening on multiple fronts. This isn't just about legal filings—it's about media narratives, public image, and how both sides are leveraging power in and out of court. Whether you've been following the Diddy case from the beginning or are just catching up, this episode gives you a clear, factual, and in-depth look at one of the most shocking celebrity criminal cases in recent history. Subscribe now for more real-time legal breakdowns, expert commentary, and behind-the-scenes details you won't hear anywhere else. Want to listen to ALL our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In this look back episode...According to software expert Reichart Von Wolfshield Jeffrey Epstein planned to entice the authorities to raid his house by strategically placing girls who were of age but looked younger at his house in hopes the police would raid the house.After the raid, Epstein planned on claiming that he was being harassed by the authorities so that he would gain sympathy in the eyes of the public.(Commercial at 12:01)to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8181221/Jeffrey-Epstein-tried-lay-trap-deliberately-hiring-women-20s-appeared-younger.htmlBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

First up, Ralph welcomes former FBI agent Mike German to discuss his new book (co-written with Beth Zasloff), Policing White Supremacy: The Enemy Within. Then, Ralph speaks to Dr. Bandy Lee about her psychological analysis of the second Trump presidency. Finally, Ralph talks about Trump's latest Congressional address.Mike German is a fellow with the Liberty and National Security program at the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law School. He has worked at the ACLU and served sixteen years as an FBI special agent. He left the FBI in 2004 after reporting continuing deficiencies in the bureau's counterterrorism operations to Congress. He is the author of Thinking Like a Terrorist, Disrupt, Discredit, and Divide: How the New FBI Damages Our Democracy, and his latest book (co-authored with Beth Zasloff) is Policing White Supremacy: The Enemy Within.It's important to understand that the white supremacist movement is quite fractured and I refer to it in the book as the white supremacist and far right militant movement because it does have a number of different factions that have specific goals that in many cases differ from one another. But as a movement, essentially what they're looking for is a return to a legally-supported racial caste system where white people dominate without question and impunity to act violently towards anyone who would challenge that racial hierarchy.Mike GermanIt's fascinating because I think there's an assumption that many have that these white supremacists or far-right militant groups are Trump supporters, but I don't believe many of them are. They understand that right-wing populism, that those racist (I would have said “dog whistles” of previous administrations, but racist) rhetoric helps promote them and gives them media attention that allows them to recruit and expand their ranks. But they don't support Donald Trump. They don't support the Republican Party.Mike GermanYou have a situation now where these people that led the movement into a ditch on January 6th (and they had to scramble and all go underground and then slowly restore these groups) all of a sudden these people who led them into the ditch come out ofprison and want to be the leaders again.Mike GermanThere comes a time when the flattering of the citizens by rogue criminal politicians has got to be exposed for what it is. First, they flatter the citizenry, then they flummox the citizenry, then they fool the citizenry into supporting them. And the reaction to that has got to be: you'd better start doing your homework, voters, regardless who you vote for. You've got to spend more time on the records of these politicians, not their rhetoric.Ralph NaderDr. Bandy Lee is a medical doctor, a forensic psychiatrist, and a world expert on violence who taught at Yale School of Medicine and Yale Law School for 17 years before joining the Harvard Program in Psychiatry and the Law. She is currently president of the World Mental Health Coalition, an educational organization that assembles mental health experts to collaborate with other disciplines for the betterment of public mental health and public safety. She is the editor of The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump: 37 Psychiatrists and Mental Health Experts Assess a President and Profile of a Nation: Trump's Mind, America's Soul.This is a problem of mental pathology. That is why [Trump] has to place mental health labels on his opponents, why he has to call himself a stable genius, and why he has to take on the most powerful position on the planet (the US presidency). It is to hide his unfitness and his mental pathology. That's what it comes down to.Dr. Bandy Lee[Trump's] been in the public arena and influential positions for a decade now, but we have to address it in mental health terms. His goal is to alter reality and through threats, intimidation and co-optation, he has not only taken over the press and is in the process of buying it out, but he has also subdued…corrupted the Supreme Court and the Congress, and he has figured out that with the speed with which he is wreaking his havoc, by the time courts can respond, the agencies that held our society together will be gutted, closed, and changed forever.Dr. Bandy Lee Get full access to Ralph Nader Radio Hour at www.ralphnaderradiohour.com/subscribe

In this look back episode...According to software expert Reichart Von Wolfshield Jeffrey Epstein planned to entice the authorities to raid his house by strategically placing girls who were of age but looked younger at his house in hopes the police would raid the house.After the raid, Epstein planned on claiming that he was being harassed by the authorities so that he would gain sympathy in the eyes of the public.(Commercial at 12:01)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8181221/Jeffrey-Epstein-tried-lay-trap-deliberately-hiring-women-20s-appeared-younger.htmlBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Hour 4: The Tara Show - “NO Missing Money with Special Guest Curtis Loftis” “The Trials of the LA Fire Department” "Democrats Fail Yet Again” “Dems Attempt to Discredit Trump Cabinet” full 1693 Thu, 16 Jan 2025 15:08:57 +0000 3c0ArSCWouTVAoJLY6JNMCkwSe3ENvT8 news The Tara Show news Hour 4: The Tara Show - “NO Missing Money with Special Guest Curtis Loftis” “The Trials of the LA Fire Department” "Democrats Fail Yet Again” “Dems Attempt to Discredit Trump Cabinet” Tara presides over the Upstate's #1 all news/talk morning show every weekday on News/Talk 989 WORD.Tara's faithful listeners are affectionately known as "Tara-ists" because of their passion and participation in the show. Tara was named 2021 Best News Talk Show and Best overall Personality, AGAIN, by the South Carolina Broadcasters Association! Tara took home the same honors in 2018 and was also named 2016 "Personality of the Year!" In addition, Tara has also won over two dozen state and national journalism awards for column writing, news reporting and investigative reporting while working for three newspapers and writing for a variety of national publications. She won a first place reporting award from the North Carolina Press Association for an investigative series about the weaknesses in Charlotte's overburdened court system, which regularly let murderers off the hook with less than 15 years in prison. Due to her work, that system has been reformed. Tara is also a winner of the prestigious first place Green Eyeshade Award, a national award for column writing from The Society of Professional Journalists. Tara took to the airwaves about 15 years ago to do a radio show heard up and down the coast and fell in love with bypassing her editors to talk straight to the people. Tara hasn't stopped reporting, and still brings her investigative journalism to the show. Tara is a mom, wife and talk radio convert-- and weekday mornings she's live and local on News/Talk 989 WORD. Are you a "Tara-ist"? It's time to get captured!      2024 © 2021 Audacy, Inc. News False https://player.amperwavepodcasting.com?feed-link=https%3A%2F%2F

How did the early Christians know which books to include in the Canon of the New Testament and which to keep out? If today, we don't have the original manuscript copies of the books and letters of the apostles, how do we know that we have what they originally wrote? Are there really 400,000 manuscript…

How did the early Christians know which books to include in the Canon of the New Testament and which to keep out? If today, we don't have the original manuscript copies of the books and letters of the apostles, how do we know that we have what they originally wrote? Are there really 400,000 manuscript variants in the copies of the New Testament that have come down to us? Do these variants affect any cardinal doctrine of the Christian faith? To support this ministry financially, visit: https://www.oneplace.com/donate/701/29

How did the early Christians know which books to include in the Canon of the New Testament and which to keep out? If today, we don't have the original manuscript copies of the books and letters of the apostles, how do we know that we have what they originally wrote? Are there really 400,000 manuscript…

Send us a text

How did the early Christians know which books to include in the Canon of the New Testament and which to keep out? If today, we don't have the original manuscript copies of the books and letters of the apostles, how do we know that we have what they originally wrote? Are there really 400,000 manuscript variants in the copies of the New Testament that have come down to us? Do these variants affect any cardinal doctrine of the Christian faith? To support this ministry financially, visit: https://www.oneplace.com/donate/701/29

How did the early Christians know which books to include in the Canon of the New Testament and which to keep out? If today, we don't have the original manuscript copies of the books and letters of the apostles, how do we know that we have what they originally wrote? Are there really 400,000 manuscript variants in the copies of the New Testament that have come down to us? Do these variants affect any cardinal doctrine of the Christian faith? To support this ministry financially, visit: https://www.oneplace.com/donate/701/29

How did the early Christians know which books to include in the Canon of the New Testament and which to keep out? If today, we don't have the original manuscript copies of the books and letters of the apostles, how do we know that we have what they originally wrote? Are there really 400,000 manuscript…

sanhedrin 24: discredit by “Dafsplaining”: daf yomi made simple

How did the early Christians know which books to include in the Canon of the New Testament and which to keep out? If today, we don't have the original manuscript copies of the books and letters of the apostles, how do we know that we have what they originally wrote? Are there really 400,000 manuscript variants in the copies of the New Testament that have come down to us? Do these variants affect any cardinal doctrine of the Christian faith? To support this ministry financially, visit: https://www.oneplace.com/donate/701/29

How did the early Christians know which books to include in the Canon of the New Testament and which to keep out? If today, we don't have the original manuscript copies of the books and letters of the apostles, how do we know that we have what they originally wrote? Are there really 400,000 manuscript variants in the copies of the New Testament that have come down to us? Do these variants affect any cardinal doctrine of the Christian faith? To support this ministry financially, visit: https://www.oneplace.com/donate/701/29

How did the early Christians know which books to include in the Canon of the New Testament and which to keep out? If today, we don't have the original manuscript copies of the books and letters of the apostles, how do we know that we have what they originally wrote? Are there really 400,000 manuscript…

How did the early Christians know which books to include in the Canon of the New Testament and which to keep out? If today, we don't have the original manuscript copies of the books and letters of the apostles, how do we know that we have what they originally wrote? Are there really 400,000 manuscript variants in the copies of the New Testament that have come down to us? Do these variants affect any cardinal doctrine of the Christian faith? To support this ministry financially, visit: https://www.oneplace.com/donate/701/29

How did the early Christians know which books to include in the Canon of the New Testament and which to keep out? If today, we don't have the original manuscript copies of the books and letters of the apostles, how do we know that we have what they originally wrote? Are there really 400,000 manuscript variants in the copies of the New Testament that have come down to us? Do these variants affect any cardinal doctrine of the Christian faith? To support this ministry financially, visit: https://www.oneplace.com/donate/701/29

In this episode of the Cold-Case Christianity Broadcast, J. Warner examines alleged “contradictions” in the eyewitness New Testament accounts. Do variations between witness accounts automatically discredit their reliability? J. Warner provides two examples from the Gospel Resurrection accounts to illustrate the manner in which eyewitness accounts are typically reconciled.

In this look back episode...According to software expert Reichart Von Wolfshield Jeffrey Epstein planned to entice the authorities to raid his house by strategically placing girls who were of age but looked younger at his house in hopes the police would raid the house.After the raid, Epstein planned on claiming that he was being harassed by the authorities so that he would gain sympathy in the eyes of the public.(Commercial at 12:01)to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8181221/Jeffrey-Epstein-tried-lay-trap-deliberately-hiring-women-20s-appeared-younger.htmlBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

On “Food Talk with Dani Nierenberg,” Dani speaks with author and journalist Carey Gillam. They discuss a recent investigation that reveals how agrochemical industry leaders are downplaying the risks of pesticides and working to discredit journalists, scientists, and others who have been critical of pesticides or genetically modified organisms (GMOs). The conversation dives into the shocking findings that a team of journalists uncovered, the harms caused by exposure to pesticides and herbicides, and the policies that are — or aren't — in place to protect people from them. While you're listening, subscribe, rate, and review the show; it would mean the world to us to have your feedback. You can listen to “Food Talk with Dani Nierenberg” wherever you consume your podcasts.

Russia's leader just dropped the ultimate troll of Kamala Harris.  Vladimir Putin just endorsed the current Vice-President, claiming her engaging laugh is "infectious."  We call it a cackle, but what is Putin up too? Also, if your looking for the definitive guide as to how to argue with a Harris supporter this is it.  The best way is to use her own words against her.  Kamala Harris put's her own radicalisms on display.  We have the audio the main stream media refuses to play. Also, The Save Act, is a must.  It will stop illegals from voting in our elections.  Will The Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson do the right thing and tie it the upcoming spending bills forcing the Democrats hand? And Reparations are back in the news, what California Democrats did to protect Gov. Gavin Newsome and Kamala Harris.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

“Dems still Trying to Discredit Trump” “Tara The Most Decorated Gymnast of all Time” “The Failure of the Secret Service” “The FBI Lies about Trump's Assassination Attempt”

New Evidence in the Case of the Trump Assassination, The Fake Liberal Media's Attempts to discredit Republicans, Kamala Harris's Entitlement and her Twisted Marxist Views and The Blatant Racism Expressed by White Liberal American Women

Chris and Rob debate whether there were people trying to discredit Nikola Jokic as a player when the Denver Nuggets fell down 0-2 to the Minnesota Timberwolves and quickly discuss where Jokic ranks amongst Rob's all-time top-10 in NBA history. Plus, NBA champion and FOX Sports Radio NBA analyst Antonio Daniels swings by to discuss the narrative surrounding Jokic, whether the Timberwolves have what it takes to come back from being 3-2 against Denver and much more!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

If the former president chooses to testify in his New York criminal hush money trial, prosecutors want to use his recent legal run-ins against him to discredit him to the jury. CNN's Kara Scannell, former federal prosecutor Jeffrey Toobin and jury consultant Jill Huntley Taylor discuss the new development with Anderson. Plus, a hacking  group with ties to the Russian government is suspected of carrying out a cyberattack on a water facility in Texas. That's according to experts with a U.S. cybersecurity firm. Ed Lavandera has the story. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices