Podcasts about Metropolitan Police

On a foggy New Year's Eve in 1959, 16‑year‑old Mary Flanagan waved goodbye to her family in West Ham, supposedly heading to a work party at the Tate & Lyle sugar factory and then vanished into the London night. No body, no confirmed sightings, and even her original police files lost to time have left her disappearance frozen in place as Britain's longest‑running missing person case, an open question that has haunted her siblings and the Metropolitan Police for more than six decades.

In August 2010, Gareth Williams, a brilliant Welsh mathematician working for GCHQ and on secondment to MI6, was found dead inside a padlocked sports bag in a London flat linked to the security services. His death quickly became one of Britain's most perplexing unsolved mysteries.An inquest concluded that Gareth's death was unnatural and likely involved a criminal act. Yet a later Metropolitan Police review suggested it was probably a tragic accident. The conflicting conclusions only deepened the mystery.As investigators examined Gareth's final days, reports emerged that his highly sensitive work involved tracking international money laundering networks and monitoring Russian organised crime interests.In this episode of Blood Ties, Geoffrey and Molly Wansell explore the life, secret work and unexplained death of a gifted codebreaker. Was Gareth Williams murdered, or is there another explanation behind this enduring mystery?CREDITS: Presenters: Geoffrey and Molly WansellProducer: Peter Shevlin https://pod60.com/Artwork: George LeighMusic: Dan WansellCONTACT: Twitter: @BloodTies_PodInstagram:@bloodtiespodcastEmail: bloodties.podcast@gmail.com YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@bloodtiespodcastSupport: patreon.com/bloodtiespodcastPlease complete our survey if you have time: http://bit.ly/bloodtiespodcast-survey Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The family of Stephen Ogilvie, the victim of the Belfast stabbing, has called for calm and said they don't want the “terrible tragedy to be used to divide people or fuel hostility.”, as Sudanese national Hadi Alodid was charged with attempted murder, threats to kill an NHS radiographer and possession of a knife. Last night, violence spread across parts of Belfast, with police attacked, properties damaged and communities left on edge after a video of the attack was shared online. Politicians and police have pointed to the role of social media, misinformation and outside agitators. But what is really driving the disorder?On this episode of The Fourcast, Jackie Long explores what's happening in Northern Ireland, why immigration has become such a political flashpoint, and whether far-right voices are helping fuel tensions online.Jackie is joined by Allison Morris, Crime Correspondent at The Irish News, former Metropolitan Police officer Victor Olisa, and Robert Topinka, lecturer and researcher on far-right movements and online radicalisation.

The Epstein files are being framed as more than another royal scandal in Britain; they are being presented as a full institutional crisis hitting the monarchy, Parliament, and the Metropolitan Police all at once. The reporting argues that the newly released U.S. Justice Department documents have accelerated a collapse in public trust, with polling showing support for the monarchy falling below majority levels and approval ratings for senior royals dropping sharply. The deepest royal damage centers on Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, who was reportedly arrested in February 2026 on suspicion of misconduct in public office over questions about whether he forwarded classified government reports to Epstein while serving as a trade envoy. No charges have been brought, but the arrest and open investigation have turned Epstein from a reputational stain on the royal family into a live legal and constitutional problem.The political and policing fallout is described as just as severe. Keir Starmer's government is portrayed as being badly damaged by the Peter Mandelson connection, after Mandelson's Epstein relationship and later document releases reportedly helped fuel a Labour revolt, cabinet resignation pressure, and growing questions about Starmer's judgment. At the same time, the Metropolitan Police is under scrutiny over allegations that officers had proximity to Epstein-linked social circles, that Epstein-connected flights entered and left Britain without meaningful scrutiny, and that a London property tied to Epstein was not pursued more aggressively despite concerns about young women being housed there under coercive conditions. The broader point is that Britain is not dealing with one isolated Epstein-related embarrassment, but a convergence of failures across the Crown, the government, and law enforcement — the very institutions that were supposed to prevent this kind of power-protected abuse from festering in the first place.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Epstein Files Are Tearing Britain's Institutions ApartBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The Epstein files are being framed as more than another royal scandal in Britain; they are being presented as a full institutional crisis hitting the monarchy, Parliament, and the Metropolitan Police all at once. The reporting argues that the newly released U.S. Justice Department documents have accelerated a collapse in public trust, with polling showing support for the monarchy falling below majority levels and approval ratings for senior royals dropping sharply. The deepest royal damage centers on Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, who was reportedly arrested in February 2026 on suspicion of misconduct in public office over questions about whether he forwarded classified government reports to Epstein while serving as a trade envoy. No charges have been brought, but the arrest and open investigation have turned Epstein from a reputational stain on the royal family into a live legal and constitutional problem.The political and policing fallout is described as just as severe. Keir Starmer's government is portrayed as being badly damaged by the Peter Mandelson connection, after Mandelson's Epstein relationship and later document releases reportedly helped fuel a Labour revolt, cabinet resignation pressure, and growing questions about Starmer's judgment. At the same time, the Metropolitan Police is under scrutiny over allegations that officers had proximity to Epstein-linked social circles, that Epstein-connected flights entered and left Britain without meaningful scrutiny, and that a London property tied to Epstein was not pursued more aggressively despite concerns about young women being housed there under coercive conditions. The broader point is that Britain is not dealing with one isolated Epstein-related embarrassment, but a convergence of failures across the Crown, the government, and law enforcement — the very institutions that were supposed to prevent this kind of power-protected abuse from festering in the first place.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Epstein Files Are Tearing Britain's Institutions ApartBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

According to newly surfaced documents and flight records, Jeffrey Epstein continued to traffic women through British airports and even military airfields up until a month before his arrest in July 2019. Analysis of his private jet's movements shows Epstein's aircraft landed at UK airports — including Luton, Stansted, Heathrow and RAF bases like Northolt — more than 60 times, and that he booked commercial and private flights for women into and out of the UK as late as June 2019. Police in multiple regions, including the Metropolitan Police and several county forces, are now investigating whether these flights were part of a trafficking network that used British airports and airfields as transit points for victims. Former Prime Minister Gordon Brown has urged authorities to release flight logs and pursue these allegations, especially around potential trafficking involving both civilian and RAF facilities.The renewed scrutiny has highlighted gaps in earlier law enforcement responses; British police previously declined to open a full investigation despite claims that girls and young women were flown into the UK on Epstein-linked flights. Records also show his jet landed at RAF Northolt as recently as 2015, two years later than previously believed, and investigators are examining dozens of flight logs for possible trafficking evidence. The issue has also intersected with broader political controversy, notably questions about whether former prince Prince Andrew used RAF bases or chartered flights to meet with Epstein, which Andrew has denied. Critics say more urgent and coordinated action is needed to fully understand how Epstein's international movements may have facilitated abuse and human trafficking through British airspace.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jeffrey Epstein trafficked women through British airports until just a month before his 2019 arrest as he took more than 60 flights including many to RAF bases | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

As a wave of safeguarding scandals hits the Married At First Sight (MAFS) shows around the world and the former head of Channel 4 and OFCOM says he would never have commissioned a show this potentially hazardous for participants we ask is this a good moment to call time on the controversial reality series. Former MAFS UK star, Liverpudlian Thomas Hartley returns to Outcast World a different man from the one who last sat in our studio. As Married at First Sight UK brings one of the biggest scandals to TV in years, he gives us the rarest thing in the whole story, the view from inside the format. Back in 2022 he was going viral for his antics on the show's 10th season, but now he says he was out of control at the time and was drunk for most of the recording. He is unsparing about ten years of daily addiction and the queer pain underneath it, but generous about the welfare team who looked after him, and unflinching that the format itself is dangerous and should be redrawn by the very people who have lived it. CONTEXT: A BBC Panorama investigation set out allegations from former contributors that two women were raped by their on-screen husbands during filming, and that a third was subjected to a non-consensual sex act. The men deny the allegations, and the Metropolitan Police have asked anyone affected to come forward. Channel 4 has pulled every episode and a major sponsor has walked, and the regulator is reviewing the broadcaster's own welfare report. Thomas is neither an accuser nor one of the accused, and throughout this conversation he is speaking only about his own experience. Other contributors, and the reporting around the show, have described aspects of the production, including alcohol, differently to Thomas. If anything in this episode affects you. For drugs and alcohol, Talk to Frank, 0300 123 6600. For emotional distress, Samaritans, 116 123, free and round the clock. For sexual violence, the Rape and Sexual Abuse Support Line, 0808 500 2222. Outcast World is an award winning platform for queer politics, sex and culture. Subscribe for the full conversations and the weekly drop. Listen everywhere you get your podcasts and read more at outcastworld.net Follow us on TikTok @thisisoutcastworld #ThomasHartley #MarriedAtFirstSight #MAFS #MAFSUK #OutcastWorld #Sobriety #LiverpoolPride #RealityTV #QueerPodcast #DutyOfCare

Yes, by popular demand you favourite watch girl is back, to share her new adventures and what's been happening since our show last year.Find out how she's been taking a real deep dive into independent watchmaking and her experiences with famed watchmakers like Simon Brette and Ludovic Ballouard.She has also been on a journey into new brands, putting a pin in her beloved IWC, and moving to heavy hitters like A. Lange & Söhne and Audemars Piguet. Hear why the Code 11.59 isn't the gateway to a Royal Oak and how all three of us have all bought deeply into the merits of the Holy Trinity of watchmaking.But that's not the biggest story Emily has to share with us, get an exclusive and in-depth account on how she recovered her beloved Jaeger-LeCoultre Reverso which she thought was lost or stolen. It's a story with plot twists and turns worthy of a Netflix thriller, showing how social media, London's Metropolitan Police (fully clothed!) and the kindness of strangers all conspired to give her story a very happy ending.So buckle up and enjoy the ride as we get another show with your favourite watch girl as she adds more tales to her secret diary.Don't forget to check out the show notes on our website to add a visual experience at:www.chronopassion7.com or at our Instagram @chrono_passion_7.Intro-Outro Music Credit "The Attic Is For Work" By Streamer Music Group - Copyright Free Music

New research shows that strength training twice a week can lengthen your life. Sarah Best and Emma Holmes, who are 49 and 51, will compete at an elite indoor fitness competition, the Hyrox World Championships later this month. Only the top 0.5% of competitors worldwide qualify to compete. They tell Nuala about how they achieved this impressive level of fitness and explain how you can be strong at any age.Lady Brittan is calling on the government to recognise those falsely accused as victims, when a perpetrator is released. This follows the release of Carl Beech who was jailed in part for perverting the course of justice. Beech, whose allegations sparked one of the Metropolitan Police's most high-profile investigations, Operation Midland, was jailed for 18 years in 2019 after his claims of historic child abuse against prominent figures were proven to be false. Now Lady Brittan is among those saying they should have been informed about his release. She explains why she is is a signatory to a letter to the Justice Secretary, alongside some of those falsely accused by Carl Beech. Mother Courage and her Children is Bertolt Brecht's 1939 tale of a wartime profiteer who prefers to see herself as a savvy survivor and devoted mother. Currently on stage at the Globe in London for the first time, Nuala speaks to playwright Anna Jordan who has adapted the story for a modern audience. Why is this story one for retelling now and why does it continue to be performed more than 80 years later around the world?Author Claire Powell joins Nuala to discuss her latest novel All In. It follows a couple on an all-inclusive holiday with their extended family and explores the strain that IVF can place on a relationship. She tells Nuala why she chose the setting of a luxury resort to explore family dynamics. Presenter: Nuala McGovern Producer: Olivia Skinner

The second batch of documents tied to Lord Peter Mandelson's appointment as the UK ambassador to the United States is set to be published, with officials describing it as one of the largest document releases ever laid before Parliament. The files relate to the controversy over Mandelson's appointment, his vetting process, and the fallout from revelations about the extent of his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, which ultimately led to his removal from the ambassadorial post. The release is expected to include a large volume of communications and government material, though some sensitive vetting documents may be withheld or redacted because of an ongoing Metropolitan Police investigation into alleged misconduct in public office. The broader issue is politically damaging for Keir Starmer's government because it raises questions about what officials knew, when they knew it, how Mandelson was cleared for such a high-profile diplomatic role, and whether the government was fully transparent about the risks surrounding his Epstein ties.Newly released Epstein-related files reportedly show another strange layer of his obsession with genetics, DNA, reproduction, and personal legacy, including references to sperm banking, genetic testing, and alleged efforts to preserve or extend his biological footprint even after death. The material fits into a broader pattern already associated with Epstein: his documented fascination with eugenics, transhumanism, elite scientific circles, and the idea of using wealth and access to embed himself inside worlds of medicine, genetics, academia, and power. The new information is unsettling not only because of what it suggests about Epstein's private ambitions, but because it raises more questions about who knew about these interests, who helped facilitate them, whether any institutions enabled him after his conviction, and why so many pieces of his operation remain hidden, redacted, or only partially understood years after his death.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Second batch of Mandelson files to be published on MondayEpstein's dark dream of spreading his DNA may outlive him: new files - Raw Story

The second batch of documents tied to Lord Peter Mandelson's appointment as the UK ambassador to the United States is set to be published, with officials describing it as one of the largest document releases ever laid before Parliament. The files relate to the controversy over Mandelson's appointment, his vetting process, and the fallout from revelations about the extent of his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, which ultimately led to his removal from the ambassadorial post. The release is expected to include a large volume of communications and government material, though some sensitive vetting documents may be withheld or redacted because of an ongoing Metropolitan Police investigation into alleged misconduct in public office. The broader issue is politically damaging for Keir Starmer's government because it raises questions about what officials knew, when they knew it, how Mandelson was cleared for such a high-profile diplomatic role, and whether the government was fully transparent about the risks surrounding his Epstein ties.Newly released Epstein-related files reportedly show another strange layer of his obsession with genetics, DNA, reproduction, and personal legacy, including references to sperm banking, genetic testing, and alleged efforts to preserve or extend his biological footprint even after death. The material fits into a broader pattern already associated with Epstein: his documented fascination with eugenics, transhumanism, elite scientific circles, and the idea of using wealth and access to embed himself inside worlds of medicine, genetics, academia, and power. The new information is unsettling not only because of what it suggests about Epstein's private ambitions, but because it raises more questions about who knew about these interests, who helped facilitate them, whether any institutions enabled him after his conviction, and why so many pieces of his operation remain hidden, redacted, or only partially understood years after his death.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Second batch of Mandelson files to be published on MondayEpstein's dark dream of spreading his DNA may outlive him: new files - Raw StoryBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Women who say they have information about Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor are reportedly reluctant to speak with British police because they do not trust the UK authorities or the British press to treat them properly. Attorney Brad Edwards, who represents many Jeffrey Epstein survivors, told the BBC that multiple clients have information about the former prince but do not want to cooperate with UK investigators, citing two major concerns: the belief that authorities failed to act meaningfully while Epstein was alive, and fear that coming forward would expose them and their families to press harassment. One of Edwards's clients has alleged she was sent to the UK for a sexual encounter with Andrew at Royal Lodge in 2010, making her the second known woman to allege abuse connected to him in Britain after Virginia Giuffre.The situation also raises serious questions about the UK's handling of Epstein-related allegations over the years. Thames Valley Police said it had engaged with the woman's legal team, but her lawyer said she would not communicate with police because of privacy fears. The force has said it could investigate sexual misconduct allegations against Andrew as part of a broader inquiry into alleged misconduct in public office, reportedly linked to claims that he passed sensitive information to Epstein while serving as a UK trade envoy. Attorney Sigrid McCawley, who represented Virginia Giuffre, also told the BBC she did not believe she had received communication from the Metropolitan Police since the DOJ released Epstein files in January, despite representing survivors who may have been trafficked to the UK. Andrew has denied wrongdoing in the past, settled Giuffre's civil case in 2022 without admitting liability, and has not been charged in connection with these allegations.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Epstein survivors lack faith in UK police investigating Andrew, says lawyer

The second batch of documents tied to Lord Peter Mandelson's appointment as the UK ambassador to the United States is set to be published, with officials describing it as one of the largest document releases ever laid before Parliament. The files relate to the controversy over Mandelson's appointment, his vetting process, and the fallout from revelations about the extent of his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, which ultimately led to his removal from the ambassadorial post. The release is expected to include a large volume of communications and government material, though some sensitive vetting documents may be withheld or redacted because of an ongoing Metropolitan Police investigation into alleged misconduct in public office. The broader issue is politically damaging for Keir Starmer's government because it raises questions about what officials knew, when they knew it, how Mandelson was cleared for such a high-profile diplomatic role, and whether the government was fully transparent about the risks surrounding his Epstein ties.Newly released Epstein-related files reportedly show another strange layer of his obsession with genetics, DNA, reproduction, and personal legacy, including references to sperm banking, genetic testing, and alleged efforts to preserve or extend his biological footprint even after death. The material fits into a broader pattern already associated with Epstein: his documented fascination with eugenics, transhumanism, elite scientific circles, and the idea of using wealth and access to embed himself inside worlds of medicine, genetics, academia, and power. The new information is unsettling not only because of what it suggests about Epstein's private ambitions, but because it raises more questions about who knew about these interests, who helped facilitate them, whether any institutions enabled him after his conviction, and why so many pieces of his operation remain hidden, redacted, or only partially understood years after his death.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Second batch of Mandelson files to be published on MondayEpstein's dark dream of spreading his DNA may outlive him: new files - Raw StoryBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Women who say they have information about Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor are reportedly reluctant to speak with British police because they do not trust the UK authorities or the British press to treat them properly. Attorney Brad Edwards, who represents many Jeffrey Epstein survivors, told the BBC that multiple clients have information about the former prince but do not want to cooperate with UK investigators, citing two major concerns: the belief that authorities failed to act meaningfully while Epstein was alive, and fear that coming forward would expose them and their families to press harassment. One of Edwards's clients has alleged she was sent to the UK for a sexual encounter with Andrew at Royal Lodge in 2010, making her the second known woman to allege abuse connected to him in Britain after Virginia Giuffre.The situation also raises serious questions about the UK's handling of Epstein-related allegations over the years. Thames Valley Police said it had engaged with the woman's legal team, but her lawyer said she would not communicate with police because of privacy fears. The force has said it could investigate sexual misconduct allegations against Andrew as part of a broader inquiry into alleged misconduct in public office, reportedly linked to claims that he passed sensitive information to Epstein while serving as a UK trade envoy. Attorney Sigrid McCawley, who represented Virginia Giuffre, also told the BBC she did not believe she had received communication from the Metropolitan Police since the DOJ released Epstein files in January, despite representing survivors who may have been trafficked to the UK. Andrew has denied wrongdoing in the past, settled Giuffre's civil case in 2022 without admitting liability, and has not been charged in connection with these allegations.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Epstein survivors lack faith in UK police investigating Andrew, says lawyerBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Send us Fan MailCan organisations themselves be trustworthy, or is trustworthiness only a quality of individuals? This question matters for how we think about public institutions, businesses, and charities – and about the responsibilities they bear when people rely on them. Philosopher Matt Clark joins me to unpack what trustworthiness means, what kind of control and awareness an organisation would need in order to count as trustworthy, and why values matter in this context. Along the way, we discuss examples such as the Metropolitan Police and sketch what a genuinely trustworthy organisation might look like.Here's what Matt suggested for further reading:Katherine Hawley. 2017. 'Trustworthy Groups & Organisations.' In P. Faulkner & T. W. Simpson (eds.), The Philosophy of Trust (Oxford University Press) https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198732549.003.0014Matt Bennett. 'Trusting Groups.' Philosophical Psychology, 37:1, 196-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2023.2179478C. Thi Nguyen. 2022. 'Trust as an Unquestioning Attitude.' In Tamar Szabó Gendler (ed.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology, Vol. 7 (Oxford University Press) https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192868978.003.0007Hawley expresses scepticism about the possibility of trust in groups, Bennett provides a different argument to Matt's on why trusting groups is acceptable, and Nguyen is referenced by Matt in the podcast as having a different view of trust.Ethics Untangled is produced by IDEA, The Ethics Centre at the University of Leeds.As well as the podcast, Ethics Untangled is also the name for the long-form online presence of IDEA.Bluesky: @ethicsuntangled.bluesky.socialInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/idea_leeds/Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ideacetlLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/idea-ethics-centre/

Women who say they have information about Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor are reportedly reluctant to speak with British police because they do not trust the UK authorities or the British press to treat them properly. Attorney Brad Edwards, who represents many Jeffrey Epstein survivors, told the BBC that multiple clients have information about the former prince but do not want to cooperate with UK investigators, citing two major concerns: the belief that authorities failed to act meaningfully while Epstein was alive, and fear that coming forward would expose them and their families to press harassment. One of Edwards's clients has alleged she was sent to the UK for a sexual encounter with Andrew at Royal Lodge in 2010, making her the second known woman to allege abuse connected to him in Britain after Virginia Giuffre.The situation also raises serious questions about the UK's handling of Epstein-related allegations over the years. Thames Valley Police said it had engaged with the woman's legal team, but her lawyer said she would not communicate with police because of privacy fears. The force has said it could investigate sexual misconduct allegations against Andrew as part of a broader inquiry into alleged misconduct in public office, reportedly linked to claims that he passed sensitive information to Epstein while serving as a UK trade envoy. Attorney Sigrid McCawley, who represented Virginia Giuffre, also told the BBC she did not believe she had received communication from the Metropolitan Police since the DOJ released Epstein files in January, despite representing survivors who may have been trafficked to the UK. Andrew has denied wrongdoing in the past, settled Giuffre's civil case in 2022 without admitting liability, and has not been charged in connection with these allegations.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Epstein survivors lack faith in UK police investigating Andrew, says lawyerBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Police investigating Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor are reportedly seeking the Metropolitan Police files connected to Virginia Giuffre as part of a widening inquiry into alleged sexual misconduct, fraud, corruption, and misconduct in public office. The focus is not only on Giuffre's long-standing allegations that Andrew sexually abused her when she was 17 after she was trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell — claims Andrew has denied — but also on what British authorities knew, what they previously reviewed, and whether earlier decisions by the Met left key material untouched. Giuffre gave a statement to the Met in 2015, later sued Andrew in the United States, and reached a multimillion-pound civil settlement with him in 2022 without any admission of liability. Now, after her death in 2025, investigators are reportedly looking back at those files to determine whether there is evidence that should feed into the current probe.The investigation also appears to be examining Andrew's wider conduct around Epstein, including claims that he used or attempted to use official channels, taxpayer-funded protection officers, or confidential information to protect himself or discredit Giuffre. One major thread involves allegations that Andrew passed Giuffre's personal information to a police protection officer in 2011 while trying to dig up damaging material on her shortly before the infamous photograph of Andrew, Giuffre, and Maxwell became public. The Met previously said it found no basis for further action on that issue, but Thames Valley Police are now reportedly reviewing the broader record, including past police handling, Andrew's former royal protection detail, and evidence emerging from Epstein-related document releases. The significance is obvious: this is no longer just about Andrew's old denials or the civil settlement — it is about whether British law enforcement failed to fully confront the Epstein connection when it mattered most.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Police probing Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor over 'sex offences' will 'seek late accuser Virginia Giuffre's files' | Daily Mail Online

Police investigating Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor are reportedly seeking the Metropolitan Police files connected to Virginia Giuffre as part of a widening inquiry into alleged sexual misconduct, fraud, corruption, and misconduct in public office. The focus is not only on Giuffre's long-standing allegations that Andrew sexually abused her when she was 17 after she was trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell — claims Andrew has denied — but also on what British authorities knew, what they previously reviewed, and whether earlier decisions by the Met left key material untouched. Giuffre gave a statement to the Met in 2015, later sued Andrew in the United States, and reached a multimillion-pound civil settlement with him in 2022 without any admission of liability. Now, after her death in 2025, investigators are reportedly looking back at those files to determine whether there is evidence that should feed into the current probe.The investigation also appears to be examining Andrew's wider conduct around Epstein, including claims that he used or attempted to use official channels, taxpayer-funded protection officers, or confidential information to protect himself or discredit Giuffre. One major thread involves allegations that Andrew passed Giuffre's personal information to a police protection officer in 2011 while trying to dig up damaging material on her shortly before the infamous photograph of Andrew, Giuffre, and Maxwell became public. The Met previously said it found no basis for further action on that issue, but Thames Valley Police are now reportedly reviewing the broader record, including past police handling, Andrew's former royal protection detail, and evidence emerging from Epstein-related document releases. The significance is obvious: this is no longer just about Andrew's old denials or the civil settlement — it is about whether British law enforcement failed to fully confront the Epstein connection when it mattered most.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Police probing Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor over 'sex offences' will 'seek late accuser Virginia Giuffre's files' | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Police investigating Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor are reportedly seeking the Metropolitan Police files connected to Virginia Giuffre as part of a widening inquiry into alleged sexual misconduct, fraud, corruption, and misconduct in public office. The focus is not only on Giuffre's long-standing allegations that Andrew sexually abused her when she was 17 after she was trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell — claims Andrew has denied — but also on what British authorities knew, what they previously reviewed, and whether earlier decisions by the Met left key material untouched. Giuffre gave a statement to the Met in 2015, later sued Andrew in the United States, and reached a multimillion-pound civil settlement with him in 2022 without any admission of liability. Now, after her death in 2025, investigators are reportedly looking back at those files to determine whether there is evidence that should feed into the current probe.The investigation also appears to be examining Andrew's wider conduct around Epstein, including claims that he used or attempted to use official channels, taxpayer-funded protection officers, or confidential information to protect himself or discredit Giuffre. One major thread involves allegations that Andrew passed Giuffre's personal information to a police protection officer in 2011 while trying to dig up damaging material on her shortly before the infamous photograph of Andrew, Giuffre, and Maxwell became public. The Met previously said it found no basis for further action on that issue, but Thames Valley Police are now reportedly reviewing the broader record, including past police handling, Andrew's former royal protection detail, and evidence emerging from Epstein-related document releases. The significance is obvious: this is no longer just about Andrew's old denials or the civil settlement — it is about whether British law enforcement failed to fully confront the Epstein connection when it mattered most.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Police probing Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor over 'sex offences' will 'seek late accuser Virginia Giuffre's files' | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jonathan Benton spent 25 years at London's Metropolitan Police - running undercover operations straight out of "The Wire," investigating homicide and counterterrorism, and ultimately leading international corruption cases that took down politicians laundering hundreds of millions through London.In one of his biggest cases, his Nigerian counterpart was taken to a basement and offered $18 million in cash to shut the investigation down.After leaving the Met, Jonathan advised George Clooney and Brad Pitt's NGO The Sentry on war crimes investigations in South Sudan and the DRC. He now runs iSanctuary, a company pioneering a remarkable legal-tech innovation: serving court orders directly onto the blockchain to freeze and recover stolen crypto.We talk Met Police war stories, the reality of fraud in modern London, how on-chain investigations actually work, and what victims of crypto scams can do today.Learn more: isanctuary.ioThis episode is sponsored by FirstRead — the AI-powered legal assistant that reads, marks up, and chats through contracts right inside your Word document. If you're a founder, builder, or anyone dealing with legal agreements, FirstRead is a game-changer.

Newly surfaced details suggest that **Jeffrey Epstein continued to fly women into the United Kingdom and maintain them in a luxury London flat right up until the day he died in August 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. Flight logs from Epstein's private jet — often called the **“Lolita Express” — indicate he made dozens of trips to the UK, transporting women who would stay at the rented apartment in Kensington. Payments linked to the flat, reportedly exceeding £160,000, were made through entities associated with Epstein, and communications indicate he was arranging rent and schooling for some of the women there, suggesting his network remained operational in Britain until his final months.The revelations have sparked renewed scrutiny from British authorities, with multiple police jurisdictions — including the Metropolitan Police and the National Crime Agency — examining potential sex trafficking activity and use of UK airports as entry points for Epstein's flights. Investigators are also probing whether these arrangements could tie into broader trafficking schemes similar to those documented in the U.S., and UK officials have sought unredacted files from American authorities to deepen their inquiry. The emerging picture suggests a significant European component to Epstein's activities, intensifying pressure on investigators to uncover the full extent of his operations outside American borders.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jeffrey Epstein flew in girls to stay at his London flat up until the day he died | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Surrey Police have opened a criminal investigation into two separate allegations of non-recent child sexual abuse linked to Jeffrey Epstein after women came forward following the release of Epstein-related files by the U.S. Department of Justice in December 2025. The claims date back to the mid-to-late 1980s and from the mid-1990s to 2000, with alleged locations including west Surrey and Berkshire, with the Berkshire allegations understood to relate to the Windsor estate. Surrey Police had previously appealed for witnesses after becoming aware of a redacted report alleging trafficking and sexual assaults involving a minor in Virginia Water between 1994 and 1996. That appeal reportedly prompted several people to come forward, and the force has now moved from review mode into a full investigation handled by child abuse specialists in its public protection team.The investigation is significant because it marks the first British police inquiry into Epstein-related allegations focused on alleged harm against females, rather than only the political or official-conduct questions surrounding Epstein's UK connections. No arrests have been made and no potential suspects have yet been interviewed, but the development places Surrey alongside Thames Valley Police and the Metropolitan Police as part of a widening UK response to Epstein-linked allegations. Multiple forces are also examining whether Epstein-related flights, estates, and official contacts intersected with possible trafficking or abuse in Britain, while UK investigators continue facing the problem of limited access to unredacted U.S. records. The larger picture is that Epstein's British footprint is no longer just a matter of scandal, association, or royal embarrassment; it is increasingly becoming a live criminal-investigative question about what happened on UK soil, who knew, and why it took decades for these allegations to receive this level of attention.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Surrey police launch investigation into UK Epstein abuse allegations | Jeffrey Epstein | The Guardian

Surrey Police have opened a criminal investigation into two separate allegations of non-recent child sexual abuse linked to Jeffrey Epstein after women came forward following the release of Epstein-related files by the U.S. Department of Justice in December 2025. The claims date back to the mid-to-late 1980s and from the mid-1990s to 2000, with alleged locations including west Surrey and Berkshire, with the Berkshire allegations understood to relate to the Windsor estate. Surrey Police had previously appealed for witnesses after becoming aware of a redacted report alleging trafficking and sexual assaults involving a minor in Virginia Water between 1994 and 1996. That appeal reportedly prompted several people to come forward, and the force has now moved from review mode into a full investigation handled by child abuse specialists in its public protection team.The investigation is significant because it marks the first British police inquiry into Epstein-related allegations focused on alleged harm against females, rather than only the political or official-conduct questions surrounding Epstein's UK connections. No arrests have been made and no potential suspects have yet been interviewed, but the development places Surrey alongside Thames Valley Police and the Metropolitan Police as part of a widening UK response to Epstein-linked allegations. Multiple forces are also examining whether Epstein-related flights, estates, and official contacts intersected with possible trafficking or abuse in Britain, while UK investigators continue facing the problem of limited access to unredacted U.S. records. The larger picture is that Epstein's British footprint is no longer just a matter of scandal, association, or royal embarrassment; it is increasingly becoming a live criminal-investigative question about what happened on UK soil, who knew, and why it took decades for these allegations to receive this level of attention.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Surrey police launch investigation into UK Epstein abuse allegations | Jeffrey Epstein | The GuardianBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Surrey Police have opened a criminal investigation into two separate allegations of non-recent child sexual abuse linked to Jeffrey Epstein after women came forward following the release of Epstein-related files by the U.S. Department of Justice in December 2025. The claims date back to the mid-to-late 1980s and from the mid-1990s to 2000, with alleged locations including west Surrey and Berkshire, with the Berkshire allegations understood to relate to the Windsor estate. Surrey Police had previously appealed for witnesses after becoming aware of a redacted report alleging trafficking and sexual assaults involving a minor in Virginia Water between 1994 and 1996. That appeal reportedly prompted several people to come forward, and the force has now moved from review mode into a full investigation handled by child abuse specialists in its public protection team.The investigation is significant because it marks the first British police inquiry into Epstein-related allegations focused on alleged harm against females, rather than only the political or official-conduct questions surrounding Epstein's UK connections. No arrests have been made and no potential suspects have yet been interviewed, but the development places Surrey alongside Thames Valley Police and the Metropolitan Police as part of a widening UK response to Epstein-linked allegations. Multiple forces are also examining whether Epstein-related flights, estates, and official contacts intersected with possible trafficking or abuse in Britain, while UK investigators continue facing the problem of limited access to unredacted U.S. records. The larger picture is that Epstein's British footprint is no longer just a matter of scandal, association, or royal embarrassment; it is increasingly becoming a live criminal-investigative question about what happened on UK soil, who knew, and why it took decades for these allegations to receive this level of attention.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Surrey police launch investigation into UK Epstein abuse allegations | Jeffrey Epstein | The GuardianBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The first lawsuit to block Trump's corrupt scam of a $1.8 billion slush fund and wipe out up to $100 million in family tax liability has been filed by former Metropolitan Police and Capitol Police officers Harry Dunn and Daniel Hodges, arguing that Trump is illegally funding terrorists and insurrectionists with the fund. Popok examines the first suit brought by plaintiffs who proudly declare that they “did not back down on Jan. 6” but “held the line to defend democracy and the rule of law” and “do so once again,” and explains why there are still several more suits to be filed as well. Subscribe:  @LegalAFMTN  Visit https://meidasplus.com for more! Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast Cult Conversations: The Influence Continuum with Dr. Steve Hassan: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show The Ken Harbaugh Show: https://meidasnews.com/tag/the-ken-harbaugh-show Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

New Guest Expert! On this week's Aftermath, Rebecca speaks with author and historian Andrew Cook about the Great Train Robbery of 1963. Having gained exclusive access to thousands of pages of sealed Royal Mail and Metropolitan Police files, Andrew shares some rather surprising new details that have The Alarmist back to the board to reexamine the final verdict. Afterward, Patreon subscribers can hear the post-interview conversation with Fact Checker Faryn Einhorn and Producer Clayton Early. Not part of the Patreon Family yet? Click below and join us!Join our Patreon!Tell us who you think is to blame at http://thealarmistpodcast.comEmail us at thealarmistpodcast@gmail.comFollow us on Instagram @thealarmistpodcastFollow us on TikTok @thealarmistpodcastSupport this show http://supporter.acast.com/alarmist. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Today, its been revealed HS2 could cost up to £102.7bn and trains will be slower than first planned. It has been revealed trains will not start running until between 2036 and 2039, up to six years later than the most recent official target of 2033. As of March 2026, £44.2bn has already been spent on the programme. Adam and Faisal discuss how we have got to this point. And, the Metropolitan Police have confirmed that up to 57 individuals and 20 companies could face criminal charges over the Grenfell Tower fire disaster. They say they will submit evidence files to the Crown Prosecution Service who will then make a final decision on whether to prosecute with any trials unlikely to take place before 2029, ten years after the disaster took place. Adam is joined by correspondent Tom Symonds to discuss why the process has taken so long.You can now listen to Newscast on a smart speaker. If you want to listen, just say "Ask BBC Sounds to play Newscast”. It works on most smart speakers. You can join our Newscast online community here: https://bbc.in/newscastdiscordGet in touch with Newscast by emailing newscast@bbc.co.uk or send us a WhatsApp on +44 0330 123 9480.New episodes released every day. If you're in the UK, for more News and Current Affairs podcasts from the BBC, listen on BBC Sounds: https://bbc.in/4guXgXd Newscast brings you daily analysis of the latest political news stories from the BBC. The presenter was Adam Fleming. It was made by Jack Maclaren with Anna Harris. The social producer was Jem Westgate. The technical producer was Mike Regaard. The assistant editor is Chris Gray. The senior news editor is Sam Bonham.

The Metropolitan Police says it is sending evidence to the Crown Prosecution Service for a decision on criminal charges, in relation to the Grenfell Tower fire, for 57 individuals and 20 companies and organisations. Also: The Transport Secretary says the HS2 high speed rail link may end up costing more than a hundred billion pounds. And three presenters have been chosen to replace Tess Daly and Claudia Winkleman as the hosts of Strictly Come Dancing.

Prince Andrew's downfall has accelerated sharply in the wake of fresh allegations tied to Jeffrey Epstein and the explosive release of Virginia Giuffre's memoir, Nobody's Girl. The book recounts new details about Andrew's alleged sexual encounters with Giuffre while she was being trafficked as a minor by Epstein. These revelations reignited public outrage and renewed scrutiny over Andrew's long-denied relationship with both Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Buckingham Palace has reportedly been forced into damage control, with King Charles III supporting Andrew's decision to give up his “Duke of York” title and remaining royal honors. The palace has publicly stated that the new allegations must be fully investigated, signaling growing institutional distance from Andrew as pressure mounts for full transparency and accountability.Adding to his disgrace, newly surfaced claims allege that Andrew attempted to orchestrate an online smear campaign against Giuffre to salvage his reputation. According to The Guardian's coverage of the memoir, the prince and his aides tried to hire internet trolls to harass Giuffre online and even sought access to her private information, including her Social Security number. Reports indicate that the Metropolitan Police have opened an inquiry into whether Andrew misused his royal security detail or other public resources during this smear campaign. Parliamentarians are also reportedly pushing to strip him of any remaining titles and privileges, as his reputation continues to collapse under the weight of new evidence and public disgust over his conduct.Also...Ian Maxwell, brother of convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell, publicly smeared Virginia Giuffre by labeling her “the real monster” in the Epstein saga, claiming she was the one who “ruined lives.” In a tone dripping with contempt, Maxwell reversed the narrative of survivor and perpetrator, portraying Giuffre not as a victim of child sex trafficking, but as a malicious force responsible for the downfall of others. He claimed that Giuffre had “profited” from her accusations and implied that her allegations lacked credibility—completely ignoring the fact that his sister was convicted in a U.S. federal court, and that Giuffre's testimony and civil suits helped bring global attention to Epstein's trafficking ring.Maxwell's comments weren't just tone-deaf—they were a grotesque display of gaslighting and reputational warfare against a survivor of child abuse. Rather than addressing his sister's crimes or acknowledging the systemic exploitation she helped carry out, Ian Maxwell chose to attack one of the few women courageous enough to confront the monster head-on. His remarks attempted to muddy the moral waters, deflect guilt, and assassinate the character of a woman who endured horrific abuse. In doing so, Ian Maxwell made it clear that his family's legacy of denial and elite entitlement is alive and well—even in disgrace.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Prince Andrew's downfall has accelerated sharply in the wake of fresh allegations tied to Jeffrey Epstein and the explosive release of Virginia Giuffre's memoir, Nobody's Girl. The book recounts new details about Andrew's alleged sexual encounters with Giuffre while she was being trafficked as a minor by Epstein. These revelations reignited public outrage and renewed scrutiny over Andrew's long-denied relationship with both Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Buckingham Palace has reportedly been forced into damage control, with King Charles III supporting Andrew's decision to give up his “Duke of York” title and remaining royal honors. The palace has publicly stated that the new allegations must be fully investigated, signaling growing institutional distance from Andrew as pressure mounts for full transparency and accountability.Adding to his disgrace, newly surfaced claims allege that Andrew attempted to orchestrate an online smear campaign against Giuffre to salvage his reputation. According to The Guardian's coverage of the memoir, the prince and his aides tried to hire internet trolls to harass Giuffre online and even sought access to her private information, including her Social Security number. Reports indicate that the Metropolitan Police have opened an inquiry into whether Andrew misused his royal security detail or other public resources during this smear campaign. Parliamentarians are also reportedly pushing to strip him of any remaining titles and privileges, as his reputation continues to collapse under the weight of new evidence and public disgust over his conduct.Also...Ian Maxwell, brother of convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell, publicly smeared Virginia Giuffre by labeling her “the real monster” in the Epstein saga, claiming she was the one who “ruined lives.” In a tone dripping with contempt, Maxwell reversed the narrative of survivor and perpetrator, portraying Giuffre not as a victim of child sex trafficking, but as a malicious force responsible for the downfall of others. He claimed that Giuffre had “profited” from her accusations and implied that her allegations lacked credibility—completely ignoring the fact that his sister was convicted in a U.S. federal court, and that Giuffre's testimony and civil suits helped bring global attention to Epstein's trafficking ring.Maxwell's comments weren't just tone-deaf—they were a grotesque display of gaslighting and reputational warfare against a survivor of child abuse. Rather than addressing his sister's crimes or acknowledging the systemic exploitation she helped carry out, Ian Maxwell chose to attack one of the few women courageous enough to confront the monster head-on. His remarks attempted to muddy the moral waters, deflect guilt, and assassinate the character of a woman who endured horrific abuse. In doing so, Ian Maxwell made it clear that his family's legacy of denial and elite entitlement is alive and well—even in disgrace.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Metropolitan Police officers arrived in Mill Hill, North London, after reports of gunshots on Rowlands Close. Waiting nearby was a 60-year-old man, who raised his hands and confessed to shooting his former lover. He argued that he just snapped and the killing wasn't premeditated. Did the evidence tell another story?… *** LISTENER CAUTION IS ADVISED *** This episode was researched and written by Eileen Macfarlane.Script editing, additional writing, illustrations and production direction by Rosanna Fitton.Audio editing by Joel Porter at Dot Dot Dot Productions.Narration, additional audio editing and mixing, and script editing by Benjamin Fitton.To get early ad-free access, including Season 1, sign up for They Walk Among PLUS, available from Patreon or Apple Podcasts.More information and episode references can be found on our website https://theywalkamonguspodcast.comSOCIAL MEDIA: https://linktr.ee/TheyWalkAmongUsSupport this show http://supporter.acast.com/theywalkamongus. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Are you questioning more than ever… while friends and family around you seem to question nothing at all?In this week's coffee chat with Brice from @EsotericAtlanta we dive into why so many people appear unable or unwilling to react to things that should concern them — from the rollout of live facial recognition and surveillance technology, to animal vaccination programmes, food supply pressure, digital control, and the deeper conditioning that keeps people passive. Not to mention fuel and food shortages. We also touch on the recent UK court decision allowing the Metropolitan Police's live facial recognition policy to continue after a human rights challenge, and France drafting in the army to support mass cattle vaccination during a lumpy skin disease outbreak. Both stories raise important questions about how quickly large-scale systems can become normalised. This conversation is not about panic. It is about discernment, sovereignty, health, community, and asking better questions before the world changes around us and everyone simply adapts.WATCH PLANET MIND CONTROL: https://www.planetmindcontrol.com/————————————————Work with CatherineIf you'd like deeper support for yourself or the animals in your care, explore Catherine's consultations and courses here:

AI-powered facial recognition technology is expanding rapidly in the UK, particularly in law enforcement and retail. The Metropolitan Police in London has increased its use, scanning over 1.7 million faces. Biometrics watchdogs have raised concerns about the lack of regulation, with calls for new laws to manage police use of the technology. Retailers like Sainsbury's and Sports Direct are using facial recognition to combat shoplifting, leading to incidents of wrongful identification. Public opinion is divided, with concerns about privacy and wrongful accusations. The UK government is considering a new legal framework to address these issues.Learn more on this news by visiting us at: https://greyjournal.net/news/ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Before Gamal 'G' Turawa ever put on a police uniform, he lived a life that would take most people a lifetime to make sense of. Raised by a white foster family in Kent, removed from the only home he knew at just eight years old, and subjected to years of abuse at the hands of his biological father — G's early years were defined by displacement, confusion, and survival. At sixteen, he was tricked onto a plane to Nigeria — a country that was supposed to be part of who he was, but felt entirely foreign. What followed were years of homelessness on the streets of Lagos, witnessing things that would shape him in ways he's only recently begun to fully understand. A remarkable encounter eventually brought him back to British soil. But returning home didn't mean finding peace. What does it mean to spend forty years hiding from yourself? For G, the answer came through 26 years in the Metropolitan Police — years marked by racism, being used as the public face of diversity while privately struggling to belong, and a truth about his sexuality buried so deeply it cost him everything. A breakdown became a breakthrough. And standing on a Pride stage at forty, G finally said the words he'd been afraid to speak his entire life: "I'm proud to be Black. I'm proud to be gay. But more importantly, I'm a human being." In this Full e-Booked Meets two-part conversation, Andrew sits down with G to explore the chapters rarely told — his relationship with his father, the silence around his mother, the years in Nigeria, identity, belonging, and what it took to finally stop letting the world define him. Andrew also reflects on his own journey as an author, and the shared truth that we rarely understand the importance of our own story until we see it reflected in someone else. This is a conversation about survival, courage, and the quiet power of finally owning every part of who you are.

With the terror threat level raised to “severe,” the Metropolitan Police is reviewing whether pro-Palestine marches can go ahead. Where should the line be drawn between public safety and the right to protest?Ed Vaizey unpacks the politics of the day with Alys Denby and Michael Binyon. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Zack Polanski has apologised to the Metropolitan Police for a retweet he made in response to the horrific knife attack on two Jewish men in North London. Plus: King Charles has got on the wrong side of two famous New Yorkers, for May Day – we take a look at the history of the weekend and the workers' movements behind it, Francis Fukuyama weighs in on the rise of China, and Bernie Sanders continues his campaign against AI. With Michael Walker, Michael Mezzatesta, and Joe Ryle.

In 2011, newly surfaced emails suggest that Prince Andrew attempted to use a Metropolitan Police protection officer—assigned to him as part of his royal security detail—to dig up damaging information on Virginia Giuffre, the woman who accused him of sexual abuse linked to Jeffrey Epstein. The email reportedly contained Giuffre's date of birth and U.S. Social Security number and alleged she had a criminal record in the United States. It was sent to a royal press aide, implying coordination to discredit Giuffre before the now-infamous photograph of Andrew with her surfaced. There is no evidence that the officer followed through on the request, and Giuffre's family has confirmed she never had a criminal record. The revelation underscores Andrew's desperation at the time to undermine his accuser rather than face the allegations head-on, revealing a cynical attempt to weaponize his royal privilege and the resources of law enforcement against a survivor.The Metropolitan Police have since announced they are “actively looking into” the claims, which have triggered widespread public disgust and renewed scrutiny over Andrew's use of taxpayer-funded protection. The timing of the revelations—coming shortly after Andrew's forced relinquishment of his Duke of York title and amid continued fallout from his ties to Epstein—paints a picture of a man still trying to manipulate institutions to protect his reputation. The notion that a royal would attempt to enlist the police to smear a victim of alleged trafficking is seen by critics as emblematic of the rot within Britain's elite power structure. For a man who insists he “never met” Virginia Giuffre, his determination to have her investigated says everything about guilt, arrogance, and moral decay behind palace walls.to contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Met Police to look into claims Prince Andrew sought information on accuserBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

A busy Saturday afternoon in Brixton. Market stalls are buzzing, Electric Avenue is filling with shoppers, and a black sports bag is left quietly on the pavement. At first, it was nothing out of the ordinary. Something forgotten and seemingly harmless. People even joked about it, but inside that bag was a nail bomb, ticking down in the middle of one of South London's most crowded communities. Within minutes, curiosity turned to confusion, and confusion turned to chaos. When it detonated, the explosion tore through the market, injuring dozens and leaving lives changed forever. And this wasn't an isolated attack. It was the first in a series of three nail bombings carried out over just three weeks, each one targeting a different community across London.In this episode of British Murders with Stuart Blues, we take a deep dive into the April 1999 London nail bombings and David Copeland's terror campaign. We break down the timeline in forensic detail, from the moment he constructed the first device in his Hampshire bedsit, to the series of split-second decisions made by members of the public who unknowingly handled the bomb. This is a case filled with chilling near-misses, human instinct, and moments that, in hindsight, could have made the outcome even more devastating.We also explore the aftermath of the explosion, the subsequent attacks in Spitalfields and Soho, the severity of the injuries - including the deaths of Andrea Dykes, John Light and Nik Moore - and the emotional accounts from those caught in the blast. Alongside this, we examine the early stages of the investigation, including the challenges faced by the Metropolitan Police, the role of CCTV footage, and the growing realisation that this was part of something far more calculated. This is a story about timing, chance, extreme political views, and the terrifying reality of how an ordinary day can be shattered in seconds, marking the beginning of a campaign designed to spread fear and division across the capital.Exclusive content:Patreon - Ad Free, Early Access, Exclusive EpisodesFollow the show:British Murders with Stuart BluesDisclaimer:The case discussed in this podcast episode is real and represents the worst day in many people's lives. I aim to cover such stories with a victim-focused approach, using information from publicly available sources. While I strive for accuracy, some details may vary depending on the sources used. You can find the sources for each episode on my website. Due to the nature of the content, listener discretion is advised. Thank you for your understanding and support. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The Trump administration is facing criticism for slowing or effectively blocking cooperation with a British investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's network, particularly by restricting access to unredacted U.S. Justice Department files. British authorities, including the Metropolitan Police, have sought these materials as part of ongoing probes into individuals linked to Epstein, but the process has reportedly been delayed and complicated by conditions set by U.S. officials, limiting the flow of key evidence needed to advance cases.The lack of full cooperation has raised concerns that potential prosecutions in the UK could be hindered, especially as investigators examine allegations tied to high-profile figures and possible trafficking activity connected to Epstein's operations in Britain. At the same time, scrutiny is intensifying in the U.S., where internal reviews are underway into how Epstein-related files have been handled and released, further fueling accusations that critical information is being withheld at a moment when international investigations are gaining momentum.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Trump stonewalls British probe into Epstein scandal

The Trump administration is facing criticism for slowing or effectively blocking cooperation with a British investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's network, particularly by restricting access to unredacted U.S. Justice Department files. British authorities, including the Metropolitan Police, have sought these materials as part of ongoing probes into individuals linked to Epstein, but the process has reportedly been delayed and complicated by conditions set by U.S. officials, limiting the flow of key evidence needed to advance cases.The lack of full cooperation has raised concerns that potential prosecutions in the UK could be hindered, especially as investigators examine allegations tied to high-profile figures and possible trafficking activity connected to Epstein's operations in Britain. At the same time, scrutiny is intensifying in the U.S., where internal reviews are underway into how Epstein-related files have been handled and released, further fueling accusations that critical information is being withheld at a moment when international investigations are gaining momentum.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Trump stonewalls British probe into Epstein scandalBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Newly surfaced evidence indicates that Jeffrey Epstein continued operating parts of his network in the United Kingdom even after British authorities declined to pursue a full investigation into him. Records including emails, receipts, and financial documents show that Epstein maintained at least four properties in London—specifically in the affluent Kensington and Chelsea area—where multiple women stayed. At least six of those women have since come forward alleging sexual abuse, with some reportedly brought to the UK from countries like Russia and across Eastern Europe. These arrangements are said to have taken place after the Metropolitan Police were made aware of trafficking allegations, including claims raised by Virginia Giuffre in 2015, but chose not to move forward with a deeper investigation.The revelations suggest that Epstein's activities in London were not isolated or short-lived, but part of a broader, ongoing operation that continued until close to his 2019 arrest. Documents show he remained in contact with women housed in these flats and in some cases funded their education or visas, while also arranging travel across Europe. Critics argue that the failure to act earlier allowed his network to persist in plain sight, raising serious questions about how authorities assessed the available evidence at the time and whether opportunities to disrupt his operations were missed.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Epstein housed alleged victims in London after Met declined to investigate him, reports say | Jeffrey Epstein | The Guardian

The Trump administration is facing criticism for slowing or effectively blocking cooperation with a British investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's network, particularly by restricting access to unredacted U.S. Justice Department files. British authorities, including the Metropolitan Police, have sought these materials as part of ongoing probes into individuals linked to Epstein, but the process has reportedly been delayed and complicated by conditions set by U.S. officials, limiting the flow of key evidence needed to advance cases.The lack of full cooperation has raised concerns that potential prosecutions in the UK could be hindered, especially as investigators examine allegations tied to high-profile figures and possible trafficking activity connected to Epstein's operations in Britain. At the same time, scrutiny is intensifying in the U.S., where internal reviews are underway into how Epstein-related files have been handled and released, further fueling accusations that critical information is being withheld at a moment when international investigations are gaining momentum.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Trump stonewalls British probe into Epstein scandalBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Newly surfaced evidence indicates that Jeffrey Epstein continued operating parts of his network in the United Kingdom even after British authorities declined to pursue a full investigation into him. Records including emails, receipts, and financial documents show that Epstein maintained at least four properties in London—specifically in the affluent Kensington and Chelsea area—where multiple women stayed. At least six of those women have since come forward alleging sexual abuse, with some reportedly brought to the UK from countries like Russia and across Eastern Europe. These arrangements are said to have taken place after the Metropolitan Police were made aware of trafficking allegations, including claims raised by Virginia Giuffre in 2015, but chose not to move forward with a deeper investigation.The revelations suggest that Epstein's activities in London were not isolated or short-lived, but part of a broader, ongoing operation that continued until close to his 2019 arrest. Documents show he remained in contact with women housed in these flats and in some cases funded their education or visas, while also arranging travel across Europe. Critics argue that the failure to act earlier allowed his network to persist in plain sight, raising serious questions about how authorities assessed the available evidence at the time and whether opportunities to disrupt his operations were missed.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Epstein housed alleged victims in London after Met declined to investigate him, reports say | Jeffrey Epstein | The GuardianBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Newly surfaced evidence indicates that Jeffrey Epstein continued operating parts of his network in the United Kingdom even after British authorities declined to pursue a full investigation into him. Records including emails, receipts, and financial documents show that Epstein maintained at least four properties in London—specifically in the affluent Kensington and Chelsea area—where multiple women stayed. At least six of those women have since come forward alleging sexual abuse, with some reportedly brought to the UK from countries like Russia and across Eastern Europe. These arrangements are said to have taken place after the Metropolitan Police were made aware of trafficking allegations, including claims raised by Virginia Giuffre in 2015, but chose not to move forward with a deeper investigation.The revelations suggest that Epstein's activities in London were not isolated or short-lived, but part of a broader, ongoing operation that continued until close to his 2019 arrest. Documents show he remained in contact with women housed in these flats and in some cases funded their education or visas, while also arranging travel across Europe. Critics argue that the failure to act earlier allowed his network to persist in plain sight, raising serious questions about how authorities assessed the available evidence at the time and whether opportunities to disrupt his operations were missed.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Epstein housed alleged victims in London after Met declined to investigate him, reports say | Jeffrey Epstein | The GuardianBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

According to NHS England, every maternity service in England will need to meet new clinical standards set out by the NHS to significantly reduce the number of women who die each year during or after pregnancy. This comes after figures published earlier this year showed a 20% increase in maternal deaths between 2022 to 2024 compared to rates from 2009 to 2011. More than 500,000 babies are born in England every year and to discuss what these announcements mean in practise for pregnant women, Anita Rani is joined by Michael Buchanan, BBC Social Affairs correspondent.At the age of nearly 40, BBC broadcaster Sophie Raworth thought she was too old to start running. She'd done no exercise for decades. But after being invited to take part in The Great North Run and then seeing a friend do the London Marathon, Sophie decided to give it a go. Although it didn't quite initially go to plan, she kept going on a path that would take her around the world, from Sydney to New York and the Sahara Desert, completing 20 marathons and 10 ultra-marathons. She tells Anita about her new book, Running On Air, and reveals how in running, she has discovered an unexpected strength, new confidence and great friendships. The Suzy Lamplugh Trust has published a report spotlighting the link between stalking and homicide to mark National Stalking Awareness week. They say there are huge gaps in recording stalking as a contributing factor to homicide and want to see further research on this. Anita is joined by Saskia Garner, Head of Policy and Campaigns at the Suzy Lamplugh Trust, and Detective Inspector Karen Butler from the Metropolitan Police, who works in the Stalking Threat Assessment Centre.On Monday, Sarah Finch became the European recipient of the Goldman Environmental Prize, for her work against oil drilling in Surrey, with the Weald Action Group. Their long legal battle led to a landmark judgement on fossil fuel emissions. The Goldman Prize, often referred to as the ‘Green Nobel', honours grassroots environmental activists from around the world. For the first time since its inception, all six prizes were won by women. Sarah joins Anita from California where the awards took place.Presenter: Anita Rani Producer: Andrea Kidd

Newly surfaced evidence indicates that Jeffrey Epstein continued operating parts of his network in the United Kingdom even after British authorities declined to pursue a full investigation into him. Records including emails, receipts, and financial documents show that Epstein maintained at least four properties in London—specifically in the affluent Kensington and Chelsea area—where multiple women stayed. At least six of those women have since come forward alleging sexual abuse, with some reportedly brought to the UK from countries like Russia and across Eastern Europe. These arrangements are said to have taken place after the Metropolitan Police were made aware of trafficking allegations, including claims raised by Virginia Giuffre in 2015, but chose not to move forward with a deeper investigation.The revelations suggest that Epstein's activities in London were not isolated or short-lived, but part of a broader, ongoing operation that continued until close to his 2019 arrest. Documents show he remained in contact with women housed in these flats and in some cases funded their education or visas, while also arranging travel across Europe. Critics argue that the failure to act earlier allowed his network to persist in plain sight, raising serious questions about how authorities assessed the available evidence at the time and whether opportunities to disrupt his operations were missed.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Epstein housed alleged victims in London after Met declined to investigate him, reports say | Jeffrey Epstein | The GuardianBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Trump announces a three-week extension to the Israel-Lebanon ceasefire, U.S. forces board two tankers carrying Iranian oil, the ICC confirms that the Philippines' Rodrigo Duterte will stand trial for alleged crimes against humanity, U.S. Navy Chief John Phelan is fired, the private health records of half a million Britons are listed for sale on a Chinese website, the House Oversight Committee remains split on a potential Maxwell pardon, the Trump administration reclassifies medical marijuana as a Schedule III drug, a U.K. court backs the Metropolitan Police's use of live facial recognition technology, Anthropic probes reports of unauthorized access to its Claude Mythos, and Warner Bros shareholders approve Paramount's $111 billion takeover bid. Sources: Verity.News

A gang of experienced criminals set out to pull off what would have been one of the biggest robberies in British history - targeting a priceless diamond exhibition inside London's Millennium Dome. Armed with sledgehammers, a nail gun, and a speedboat for their escape, the plan was bold, fast, and meticulously organised.But what the gang didn't know was that detectives from the Metropolitan Police were already watching their every move. This is the story of the infamous Millennium Dome heist - an audacious plot that came within moments of success before being dramatically foiled.I release episodes of the UK True Crime Podcast every Tuesday and Friday, so please do join me for the next episode on Friday.Buy My New True Crime Content Creators Online Coursehttps://adam-s-site-be58.thinkific.com/products/courses/true-crime-content-creation-courseWatch my YouTube channelhttps://www.youtube.com/@Adam-uktruecrime/videosListen/Watch the True Crime Catch Uphttps://audioalways.lnk.to/TrueCrimeCatchUpFind Our More About Mehttps://uktruecrime.comJoin UK True Crime Facebook Grouphttps://www.facebook.com/groups/UKTrueCrime Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Metropolitan Police—commonly known as Scotland Yard—announced in 2019 that it would not reopen its investigation into Virginia Giuffre's claims that she had been trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and coerced into sex with Prince Andrew in London when she was 17. Senior officials argued that the case was largely centered overseas and therefore outside their jurisdiction, effectively closing the door on UK law enforcement scrutiny. When the matter resurfaced in 2021, Scotland Yard once again dropped the investigation, sparking criticism that the decision looked less like jurisdictional caution and more like deliberate avoidance. These refusals coincided with repeated reports that Prince Andrew had not cooperated with U.S. prosecutors, raising suspicions that British institutions were ensuring the royal remained insulated from serious investigation.Critics argue that this institutional reluctance effectively shielded Prince Andrew from the consequences of his Epstein ties. Former U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman recounted that his team was stonewalled when they tried to reach the Duke of York, further fueling the belief that UK authorities deliberately protected him from accountability. While no charges were ever brought, the optics were damning: Scotland Yard's stance, combined with Andrew's legal evasions, created the appearance of a protective bubble that prioritized the monarchy's image over justice for Epstein's victims.To contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://knewz.com/lust-lies-spies-part-2-how-the-enormous-power-of-the-british-police-force-provided-a-protection-racket-for-prince-andrew-and-covered-up-epstein-maxwells-criminal-ente/

The shocking torture and murder of Shakira Spencer in Ealing, West London, is one of the most disturbing UK true crime cases in recent years. In September 2022, the 35-year-old was found dead in her Hanwell flat after not being seen for weeks. What initially appeared to be a welfare concern quickly unravelled into a horrifying case involving prolonged abuse, coercive control, and extreme violence at the hands of people she trusted.In this episode of British Murders with Stuart Blues, I break down the full case, including the roles of Shaun Pendlebury, Ashana Studholme, and Lisa Richardson, the investigation by the Metropolitan Police, and the disturbing details revealed during the Old Bailey trial. This UK true crime story highlights issues around vulnerability, manipulation, and missed warning signs, and serves as a stark reminder of how dangerous coercive control and abuse can become when left unchecked.Exclusive content:Patreon - Ad Free, Early Access, Exclusive EpisodesFollow the show:British Murders with Stuart BluesDisclaimer:The case discussed in this podcast episode is real and represents the worst day in many people's lives. I aim to cover such stories with a victim-focused approach, using information from publicly available sources. While I strive for accuracy, some details may vary depending on the sources used. You can find the sources for each episode on my website. Due to the nature of the content, listener discretion is advised. Thank you for your understanding and support. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.