Podcasts about nifla

Crisis pregnancy centers can provide misinformation about healthcare and perform medical procedures without requiring a licensed doctor. Yes, all of that is legal, thanks to the Supreme Court. If you're not a 5-4 Premium member, you're not hearing every episode! To hear this and other Premium-only episodes, access to our Slack community, and more, join at fivefourpod.com/support.5-4 is presented by Prologue Projects. This episode was produced by Dustin DeSoto. Leon Neyfakh provides editorial support. Our researcher is Jonathan DeBruin, and our website was designed by Peter Murphy. Our artwork is by Teddy Blanks at Chips NY, and our theme song is by Spatial Relations.Follow the show at @fivefourpod on most platforms. On BlueSky, find Peter @notalawyer.bsky.social, Michael @fleerultra.bsky.social, and Rhiannon @aywarhiannon.bsky.social. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Guest host Vanessa Denha-Garmo speaks with Fr. Edward Looney about “Praying with the Church Through Lent.” Anne O'Connor's NIFLA is suing Delaware for targeting pregnancy centers. Gail Buckley-Barringer has our Bible verse of the week.

Guest host Vanessa Denha-Garmo speaks with Fr. Edward Looney about “Praying with the Church Through Lent.” Anne O'Connor's NIFLA is suing Delaware for targeting pregnancy centers. Gail Buckley-Barringer has our Bible verse of the week.

In 2016, Illinois enacted SB 1564, a law that forces pro-life doctors and pregnancy centers to promote abortion, regardless of their ethical or moral views. ADF joined with NIFLA and Kathy Lesnoff, president and CEO of Mosaic Health in Illinois, to push back. Finally, their day in court 6 years later. We hear from Kathy and Kevin Theriot, senior counsel with ADF on the details. We also address the protests supporting Hamas, Mel Gibson speaks on the Armenian cleansing of Armenian Christians by Azerbaijan, and we end with a reality check on America's military might!

Founder and President of the National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA), Thomas Glessner, discussed new legislation passed and signed in two U.S. states - Vermont and Illinois - that negatively affect pro-life pregnancy care centers.  He also related how these laws contrast with the U.S. Supreme Court decision, NIFLA v. Becerra.  You can learn about the organization at nifla.org. 

Founder and President of the National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA), Thomas Glessner, discussed new legislation passed and signed in two U.S. states - Vermont and Illinois - that negatively affect pro-life pregnancy care centers.  He also related how these laws contrast with the U.S. Supreme Court decision, NIFLA v. Becerra.  You can learn about the organization at nifla.org. 

In this episode, we feature remarks from attorney Ann O'Connor with the National Institute for Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA). O'Connor recently presented this lecture at Speakout Illinois' 2023 pro-life conference, and called attention to legislation that is targeting crisis pregnancy centers with the goal being to shut them down. O'Connor is the Vice President of legal affairs at NIFLA, and is a champion of 1st Amendment rights. You can find more information about NIFLA by clicking here.

In this episode, we feature remarks from attorney Ann O'Connor with the National Institute for Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA). O'Connor recently presented this lecture at Speakout Illinois' 2023 pro-life conference, and called attention to legislation that is targeting crisis pregnancy centers with the goal being to shut them down. O'Connor is the Vice President of legal affairs at NIFLA, and is a champion of 1st Amendment rights. You can find more information about NIFLA by clicking here.

Thomas Glessner, Founder and President of the National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA), in a conversation from Washington, DC, shared his observations of the first March for Life since Roe v. Wade was overturned, reviewed NIFLA's victory at the U.S. Supreme Court in a 2018 decision, and commented on the way forward for the pro-life movement. The organization was honored at the National Prayer Service prior to the March for Life. You can learn about the organization at nifla.org. 

Thomas Glessner, Founder and President of the National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA), in a conversation from Washington, DC, shared his observations of the first March for Life since Roe v. Wade was overturned, reviewed NIFLA's victory at the U.S. Supreme Court in a 2018 decision, and commented on the way forward for the pro-life movement. The organization was honored at the National Prayer Service prior to the March for Life. You can learn about the organization at nifla.org. 

Thomas Glessner is the founder and President of the National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA), a public interest law firm founded in 1993. Continuting the effort Choose Life Radio is making concerning the Supreme Court decision to move Roe v Wade back to the individual states, Tom Glessner is very articulate on the laws currently dealing with abortion. His Christian faith is evident in this powerful interview.

In Part 2 of our 2-part series on the misleading practices of Crisis Pregnancy Centers, we delve into another misleading, yet surprisingly underreported, aspect of Crisis Pregnancy Centers (aka CPCs aka "fake clinics). As we covered in Part 1, CPCs masquerade as if they are real health clinics - but because they are not, they're not subject to privacy laws like HIPPA that protect your personal health information. Of course, by design, their clients do not know this. CPCs then use information given to them by clients seeking their services to violate privacy and confidentiality for many reasons, including to use that info to harrass and surveil the client or abortion providers, to create "profiles" of those most likely to see their services in order to fuel their anti-abortion movement efforts, and - most terrifyingly - to potentially use private information clients have given them against them in lawsuits. This latter scenario is something that's becoming more and more possible as states pass super-restrictive and criminalizing abortion laws.  Here to discuss this on the podcast is Kim Clark, senior attorney at Legal Voice and seasoned legal advocate for reproductive rights, health, and justice. No time to listen? Check out Katie's op-ed on this topic or read the transcript of this episode. LINKS: - Transcript (AI-generated!) - Op-ed written by Katie about Crisis Pregnancy Centers (includes more on how the Trump admin and its Supreme Court propped up CPCs): How Your Tax Dollars Fund Fake Women's Health Centers - Must-watch video: Crisis Pregnancy Centers: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO) - Designed to Deceive: A Study of the Crisis Pregnancy Center in 9 states - In February 2022, Gender Justice along with their The Alliance: State Advocates for Women's Rights & Gender Equality partners released an urgent warning about the role the crisis pregnancy center (CPC) industry is poised to play in a post-Roe United States – as a surveillance tool for the anti-abortion movement: The CPC Industry as a Surveillance Tool of the Post-Roe State - Experts Say Crisis Pregnancy Centers Could Spy On And Report Women Seeking An Abortion (Buzzfeed News, January 2022) - More on NIFLA v. Becerra: Supreme Court Sides With California Anti-Abortion Pregnancy Centers (NPR, June 2018) - Supreme Court Backs Anti-Abortion Pregnancy Centers in Free Speech Case (New York Times, June 2018) - Thirty-One Attorneys General Challenge New Title X Restrictions on Women's Reproductive Health Care (Press Release from office of Maryland's Attorney General Brian Frosh, 2019) - States Want to Ban Abortions Beyond Their Borders. Here's What Pro-Choice States Can Do. (New York Times, March 2022) - A World Without Roe: The loss of the fundamental right to reproductive freedom will only lead to more state surveillance and criminalization of pregnant people (Inquest, March 2022) - Additional podcast that may be of interest from Reveal: "A Strike At the Heart of Roe." Across the country, conservative foes of abortion rights have pushed “heartbeat bills” that would ban abortion after about six weeks of pregnancy. Journalist Amy Littlefield and a team of law and journalism students from UC Berkeley investigate how this law went from being dismissed as a fringe idea, even by traditional right-to-life groups, to getting enforced in Texas. 

Crisis pregnancy centers, or “CPCs,” are anti-abortion organizations that target pregnant people with predatory, deceptive marketing. They hide in plain sight by operating under the guise of offering comprehensive reproductive healthcare. Instead, they are religiously-affiliated, anti-abortion, and often unlicensed “medical” centers that, as stated by the California legislature, dissuade pregnant people from abortion through “intentionally deceptive advertising and counseling practices that often confuse, misinform and even intimidate” mostly low-income clients from making informed choices. Eighty-three percent are affiliated with evangelical Christianity, and nearly all are tax-exempt. Their deceptive practices are well documented, and range from including words like “choices” in their names and locating themselves next to abortion clinics to trick pregnant people into walking through their doors, to wearing medical scrubs and having untrained personnel give and interpret ultrasounds even when they are not licensed medical facilities (and operate outside of privacy laws like HIPPA), with potentially dangerous consequences. It is also well-known that in addition to providing dubious and sometimes dangerous "medical" advice that the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has publicly declared is unsupported by science, they lie to patients about how far along their pregnancies are in an effort to prevent clients from seeking abortions. The American Medical Association has declared that they "violate principles of medical ethics." Oh, and your tax dollars fund them!   In Part 1 of a 2-part Femtastic series on Crisis Pregnancy Centers (CPCs), we are joined by Megan Peterson and Erin Maye Quade of Gender Justice,  a legal and policy advocacy org working to advance gender equity through the law. Gender Justice recently contributed to a national report on CPCs titled "Designed to Deceive: A Study of the Crisis Pregnancy Center in 9 states." The report shows that, rather than offer legitimate healthcare and resources, CPCs target pregnant people of color and pregnant people with lower incomes with deceptive marketing; provide few or no real medical services; and systematically mislead clients about services they do provide, potentially resulting in delayed care and unnecessary risks to their clients' health.   Megan and Erin will talk about the intentionally misleading practices CPCs use to market themselves  as real health clinics, and the deceptive "care" they provide in order to dissuade or stop clients from having abortions. We also talk about how your tax dollars fund them and what you can do to stop this.   Look out for Part 2 of this series, where we discuss how CPCs use client data to violate their privacy in very creepy and dangerous ways - and the role that CPCs are poised to play in a post-Roe United States as a surveillance tool for the anti-abortion movement. No time to listen to this episode? Check out Katie's op-ed on this topic or read the transcript of the episode. LINKS: - Transcript (AI-generated!) - Op-ed written by Katie about Crisis Pregnancy Centers (includes more info on their funding): How Your Tax Dollars Fund Fake Women's Health Centers - Must-watch video: Crisis Pregnancy Centers: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO) - Mentioned in the episode: In Virginia, University of Mary Washington fellows conducted an undercover investigation into the local fake clinic that targets students on campus, exposing their disinformation and shaming tactics to help protect and educate vulnerable students. - Designed to Deceive: A Study of the Crisis Pregnancy Center in 9 states - Further info on the dubious practice of "abortion pill reversal" and how the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists says it is "not supported by science" - In the interview, we talk about an investigation in California that revealed some of the lies CPCs tell clients in their care (including when a CPC told a person that her IUD was her "baby"): Unmasking Fake Clinics: An Investigation into California's Crisis Pregnancy Centers (NARAL Pro-Choice California Foundation, 2015) - Check out this map of Crisis Pregnancy Centers in the U.S. - Check out the National Network of Abortion Funds; they can tell you whether a clinic is a real clinic. You should also donate to them, as abortion funds will be tasked with providing even more critical access to abortion care as states pass more restrictive anti-abortion laws (or ban abortion altogether should Roe fall this year). - Abortion Care Network: Independent abortion providers care for the majority of people seeking abortion care in the United States. Founded in 2008, Abortion Care Network (ACN) is the national association for independent community-based, abortion care providers and their allies. They work to ensure the rights of all people to experience respectful, dignified abortion care. Donate to them. - And as a teaser to Part 2 of this series on CPCs: In February 2022, Gender Justice along with their The Alliance: State Advocates for Women's Rights & Gender Equality partners released an urgent warning about the role the crisis pregnancy center (CPC) industry is poised to play in a post-Roe United States – as a surveillance tool for the anti-abortion movement: The CPC Industry as a Surveillance Tool of the Post-Roe State - Why Crisis Pregnancy Centers Are Legal but Unethical (American Medical Association Journal of Ethics, 2018) - Crisis Pregnancy Centers Lie: The Insidious Threat to Reproductive Freedom (Report by NARAL Pro-Choice America, 2015) - More on NIFLA v. Becerra: Supreme Court Sides With California Anti-Abortion Pregnancy Centers (NPR, June 2018) - Supreme Court Backs Anti-Abortion Pregnancy Centers in Free Speech Case (New York Times, June 2018) - Thirty-One Attorneys General Challenge New Title X Restrictions on Women's Reproductive Health Care (Press Release from office of Maryland's Attorney General Brian Frosh, 2019)

Emily Heiden was pregnant, in a panic, and looking for advice. An internet search yielded what she understood to be a secular clinic — one she assumed would discuss her options “without politics or hype,” as the website promised. But she soon discovered that the clinic wasn't what she thought and felt deceived. And she wasn't the only one.California, concerned that too many religious pregnancy centers were misleading vulnerable women, passed a law requiring them to announce that low-cost prenatal care — including abortion — was available directly from the state. But the centers sued, arguing that First Amendment protections prevented them from having to advertise abortion services.This week, we discuss whether a state can compel you to say something you disagree with on moral grounds — from the perspective of the 2018 case NIFLA v. Becerra. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit unprecedented.substack.com

The ProLife Team Podcast | Episode 10 with Thomas Glessner, JD with NIFLA | Thinking about God’s Fingerprints in NIFLA vs Becerra Video Version: https://youtu.be/7D1Mv0Ga5TM Sign up for email notifications when new episodes are published.

As we step into a new year, as well as a new administration in Washington, D.C., we want to join together to discuss this important moment in the pro-life movement. We believe that the 50th anniversary of the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court case which will occur in January of 2023 will mark a significant moment in time for the pro-life movement. We have a powerful opportunity now to begin 2021 discussing the future of the pro-life movement and begin casting a vision for the next three years—what we are calling the “Road to Roe50”.This panel first aired during the ERLC's Evangelicals for Life conference on Thursday, January 28, 2021.This episode was sponsored by The Good Book Company, publisher of Being the Bad Guy by Stephen McAlpine.Guest BiographiesDenise Harle serves as senior counsel for Alliance Defending Freedom. Denise focuses her litigation efforts on defending the First Amendment freedoms of pro-life health care professionals and pregnancy resource centers. She also works to defend pro-life legislation around the nation. Since joining ADF, Harle took the primary role in drafting the briefs to the U.S. Supreme Court in NIFLA v. Becerra, resulting in a free speech victory for California pro-life pregnancy centers.Steven Aden serves as Chief Legal Officer and General Counsel for Americans United for Life. Aden is an experienced litigator, having appeared in court against Planned Parenthood and the abortion industry dozens of times and appointed by the attorneys general of six states to defend pro-life laws securing numerous victories.Resources from the ConversationWatch EFL 2021Join ERLC as we STAND FOR LIFE at ERLC.com/STANDFORLIFEVisit The Good Book Company to check out Being the Bad Guy by Stephen McAlpineSubscribe to ERLC's Policy Newsletter

Our esteemed podcast host Sarah Isgur launched her new Dispatch newsletter called “The Sweep” today, in which she broke down the effectiveness of the new presidential campaigns ads. Conclusion? Biden’s new ads are strategically boring to offset his opponent’s predictable unpredictability, whereas Trump’s play up the anarchy of the radical left. As Sarah reminds us, persuasion ads don’t work. This leaves candidates with two options: 1) Run up their existing base in enthusiasm and support, or 2) Get their opponent’s base not to vote. Justice Roberts trended on Twitter Friday night after joining the four liberal justices in denying a Nevada church’s application for injunctive relief over coronavirus restrictions. Religious liberty lovers sounded the alarm for First Amendment violations. But our podcast hosts are less concerned about this case’s long-term effect on religious liberty case law, given the state’s interest in restricting mass gatherings will soon be subverted to transcendent religious liberty concerns once the pandemic subsides. As David says, “The real enemy is not Justice Roberts, the real enemy is the coronavirus.” Speaking of Supreme Court drama, Josh Hawley told the Washington Post on Sunday that he won’t support any SCOTUS nominee who does not explicitly acknowledge that Roe v. Wade was wrongly decided: on the record, and before they are nominated. Was this ridiculous fanfare to fuel his base? Our hosts have some thoughts. Sarah and David wrap up the podcast with some revisionist history on a Merrick Garland Supreme Court tenure and some parental advice on how to teach your kids risk tolerance and moral courage. Show Notes: -Sarah’s pilot newsletter, The Sweep: “T-Minus 99 Days and Counting …” and Thursday’s French Press, “Dump Trump, but Don’t Burn Down the GOP.” -Friday’s Supreme Court dissents on Nevada church case. -“Sen. Hawley lays down new antiabortion marker for Supreme Court nominees,” Josh Hawley’s recent speech on the failures of the conservative legal movement, and Adrian Vermeule’s case for common-good constitutionalism in the Atlantic. -Supreme Court opinions: NIFLA v. Becerra, Bostock v. Clayton County, Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission , Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey Berru, June Medical Services, United States v. Davis. -The Coddling of the American Mind: How Good Intentions and Bad Ideas Are Setting Up a Generation for Failure by Jonathan Haidt and Greg Lukianoff.

Ch 11 from path of the just part 1(DEm/GD) part 2 (FGEmAm) --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/mayer-aark/support

Today Olivia gives an update about the Coronavirus pandemic in the United States, and measures taken by the Trump administration in response. We delve into the coronavirus relief bill passed by the Senate yesterday, potential upcoming lockdown measures, as well as direct relief to the American people. Finally, we bring to you more CPAC interviews, including Congressional candidate Jason Roberge, the VP of NIFLA, and a representative from Americans for Intelligence Reform. More at rightonpointpodcast.com!

Emily Heiden was pregnant, panicked, and searching for advice. She found a clinic on the internet that promised medical guidance "without politics or hype," yet what she encountered was not what she expected. California lawmakers, concerned about the way religious pregnancy centers marketed their services, later passed a law requiring them to include information about abortions. But the centers sued, arguing that the First Amendment protected them from having to advertise abortion services. This week, we discuss whether a state can compel you to say something you disagree with on moral grounds -- from the perspective of the 2018 case NIFLA v Becerra. If you love Unprecedented, you can support the show and more great podcasts from WAMU by heading to wamu.org/donate

Tom Glessner is founder and President of the National Institute of Family and Life Advocates, also known as NIFLA, which is a public interest law firm committed to providing legal counsel and training for Pregnancy Resource Centers. In 2018, NIFLA had a major victory in the United States Supreme Court that upheld the free speech of pro-life pregnancy centers often targeted by pro-abortion legislation. This year on May 20-23, NIFLA will be hosting their National Legal and Medical Summit in Virginia Beach. CLE and CEU credits are available.

Thomas Glessner is founder and President of the National Institute of Family and Life Advocates, also known as NIFLA, which is a public interest law firm committed to legal counsel and training for Pregnancy Resource Centers. In 2018, NIFLA had a major victory in the United States Supreme Court that upheld the free speech of pro-life pregnancy centers often targeted by pro-abortion legislation.

In its first chance to construe new First Amendment commercial speech doctrine articulated last spring by SCOTUS in 'NIFLA v. Becerra,' an en banc 9th Circuit panel united to block San Francisco's soda advertisement health warning, but split four ways on why the compelled speech was impermissible. Competing amici Wen Fa (Pacific Legal Foundation) and Ted Mermin (Berkeley Law; Public Good Law Center) unpack the ruling and the emerging doctrine.

https://accadandkoka.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/p_sherman_8229-e1540588673683.jpg ()Paul Sherman A recent US Supreme Court decision has struck down the “professional speech doctrine” which was elaborated by lower courts to justify restricting or regulating the activities of anyone offering advice or counsel to another individual.  This decision may have far reaching implications across a number of human activities, including health care. To help us understand this decision and what effects it might have, we have as our guest Mr. Paul Sherman, senior attorney at the Institute for Justice and an expert in constitutional cases protecting the First Amendment, economic liberty, property rights and other individual liberties. GUEST: Paul Sherman.  https://ij.org/staff/psherman/ (Website) and https://twitter.com/PaulMSherman?lang=en (Twitter) LINKS: Paul Sherman. https://harvardlawreview.org/2015/03/occupational-speech-and-the-first-amendment/ (Occupational Speech and the First Amendment). (Free access in Harvard Law Review) Paul Sherman and Robert McNamara. https://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/serials/files/supreme-court-review/2018/9/2018-cato-supreme-court-review-8.pdf (NIFLA v. Becerra: A Seismic Decision Protecting Occupational Speech.) (free access in Cato Supreme Court Review) Parmet WE, Berman ML, and Simth JA.  https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp1809488 (The Supreme Court’s Crisis Pregnancy Center Case — Implications for Health Law).  (Open Access in New England Journal of Medicine) WATCH ON YOUTUBE: https://youtu.be/610oDx4HJRM (Watch the episode) on our YouTube channel. Support this podcast

Our host Dr. Dan Glass in conversation with David H. Clifford (Design School X, Oakland, CA ) and Or Ben Nifla (Ein Gedi High, Hadarom, Israel) talking surviving school, the life saving nature of making and art, helping teachers become toolmakers, and how inequity and oppression are by design. Recorded at the SoundLab, The Brandeis School of San Francisco, October 23, 2018. Engineered and produced by Nicholas Cole-Farrell

In June, 2018, the US Supreme Court ruled in favor of California's crisis pregnancy centers protecting their free speech rights. California law required these pro-life centers to provide abortion referrals to their clients who came in seeking their services. The clinics sued, alleging that the law infringed on their free speech rights, forcing them to provide what their conscience prevented them from doing. Scott and Sean interview Biola political science professor Dr. Scott Waller, who comments on this case and its implications for protecting free speech on other important controversial issues. [Show notes, including a full transcript, are available at www.biola.edu/thinkbiblically]

This month, we welcome back friend-of-the-show Ann Duncan to talk about the 2017-18 Supreme Court season, including Masterpiece Cake Shop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, NIFLA v. Becerra, and Trump v. Hawaii. She helps us understand why this was such a good year for conservatives in terms of the Court's religion cases, and scopes out what soon-to-be Justice Kavanaugh portends for the terms to come. And in One Last Thing, Dan has been spending his summer at the movie house, while Tim has been catching up on Chinese science fiction. Some of the things we discuss in this episode: Ann mentioned Moral Combat by Marie Griffith and this article by Winnifred Sullivan. Here's a case summary of Korematsu v. US, which many (including the dissenting justices) compared to the ruling in Trump v. Hawaii. Dan's OLT was about Deadpool 2 (trailer NSFW) and The Incredibles 2. And Tim's OLT was about The Three Body Problem by Liu Cixin. 0:00-1:05 Introduction 1:05-50:40: Duncan interview 50:45-53:02: Dan's OLT 53:03-55:33: Tim's OLT 55:33-56:38: Credits

Matthew Franck joins Mark to discuss Justice Kennedy’s retirement, “NIFLA v. Becerra,” and the implications of the “Masterpiece Cakeshop” ruling.

In this week's CareCast™, Care Net President and CEO Roland C. Warren and Chief Outreach Officer Vincent DiCaro discuss the implications of the Court's recent ruling in NIFLA v. Becerra and how it protects freedom of speech.

Today we’ll talk with Liz Ditty, author of “God’s Many Voices: Learning to Listen, Expectant To Hear” (Worthy), Family Research Council Senior Fellow Peter Sprigg, on how the US Supreme Court’s recent decision in favor of the free speech rights of California’s pro-life pregnancy care centers (NIFLA v. Becerra) could possibly affect state sexual orientation change therapy prohibitions; another free speech issue the Supreme Court has not yet addressed. And we’ll talk with Patrina Mosley, Family Research Council’s Director of Life, Culture and Women's Advocacy, on women and porn.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Joining the show this week is David Bereit. David is a highly influential figure in the Pro Life movement having started 40 Days for Life. He joins our host Jonathan Saenz to discuss the Supreme Court decision on NIFLA as well as Anthony Kennedy’s resignation and what it means for conservatives.

Devon sits down with the Executive Director of the National Asian Pacific American Women's Forum Sung Yeon Choimorrow, to discuss the impact of NIFLA v. Becerra and the rise of Crisis Pregnancy Centers on women of color.

In this second conversation with Rewire journalists, Anoa chats with legal analysts Jessica Pieklo and Imani Gandi. A meeting of legal minds, the ladies chat about the recent decisions coming down from SCOTUS as well as the announcement of Justice Kennedy's retirement. You can listen to Gandy and Pieklo break down the NIFLA v. Bacerra as well as the Muslim ban decision here https://rewire.news/multimedia/podcast/boom-lawyered-emergency-pod-muslim-ban-cpc-decisions/ Suggested Readings: https://rewire.news/ablc/2018/06/27/justice-kennedy-retires-oh-no/ https://rewire.news/article/2018/07/05/scotus-decision-fake-clinics-abortion-independent-providers-patients/

In this episode: Today we're joined by Lori Windham of Becket Law (@BecketLaw), who helps go behind the curtain of June's First Amendment Supreme Court victories, including protecting the religious free speech of Christian cake bakers and pro-life crisis pregnancy centers. Watch the video version of the show here: https://youtu.be/QtvNHfuVYR8 Learn more about the organizations and influencers discussed in the show at InfluenceWatch.org

SUPREME COURT ROUNDUP: Charles, Tarik, Adam, and Mike discuss the window into the upcoming apocalypse that the end of most recent Supreme Court term opens (including Janus, Trump v. Hawaii, and NIFLA) and then laugh at the world's dumbest smart man, Jordan Peterson, and his silly lawsuit (and suits). 0:00 (Cold open) Jordan Peterson 5:15 Supreme Court: Janus vs. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) 32:30 Trump v, Hawaii (on travel ban; executive order 3) 54:05 National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra SCOTUS case addressing the constitutionality of California's FACT Act, which mandated that crisis pregnancy centers provide certain disclosures about state services. 1:21:05 Lindsy Shepherd and Jordan Peterson vs. Wilfrid Laurier University in Ontario, Canada. Find us on twitter at: Mic Dicta twitter.com/Mic_Dicta Charles twitter.com/Ugarles Tarik twitter.com/muhmentions Adam twitter.com/AllezLesBoulez Mike twitter.com/ancientcarelord Sound engineering courtesy twitter.com/CurtisRemarc

Love Will End Abortion 061 *NIFLA v. Becerra *Supreme Court Vacancy *National Right to Life Convention 2018 *Testimony and interview with Dan Compton

The Christian Outlook – June 30, 2018 Georgene Rice and Jim Campbell, an attorney from the Alliance Defending Freedom, discuss the Supreme Court’s decision on NIFLA v. Becerra. Kate Anderson, also with ADF, explains to Kevin McCullough the Supreme Court’s decision not to take up the case of Baronelle Stutzman, a florist in Washington state. Eric Metaxas and ADF lead attorney Kristen Waggoner talk with Baronelle about the case. Kevin McCullough and Joy Pullmann of the Federalist talk about incivility. Don Kroah talks with Jerry Johnson, president of the National Religious Broadcasters, about Pastor Andrew Brunson, imprisoned in Turkey. Don Kroah talks about Christians targeted in Nigeria. Eric Metaxas turns to Adam Carrington of Hillsdale College to talk about incivility in our increasingly toxic public square and then reflect on the meaning of the 4th of July.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

So much good news from the U.S. Supreme Court this week, from the retirement of Justice Anthony Kennedy to the Janus v AFSCME (American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees) case, which will severely weaken the power of public sector unions, to the NIFLA v. Becerra case, which asserts that the speech of pro-life crisis pregnancy centers is, indeed, protected speech. Justice Kennedy surprised the nation by announcing his retirement at the end of July, giving President Donald Trump another opportunity to continue to restore respect for constitutional principles and historical American values. Perhaps we will see that proverbial …

GUESTS Segment 1 - 3: Matthew Soerens - AuthorTopic: Immigration through a Christian lens Segment 4: Brian Johnston - National Right to life Topic: SCOTUS hands down historic decision in NIFLA vs. BecerraSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

NIFLA is a religiously-affiliated pro-life pregnancy clinic that sought to enjoin the California Reproductive Freedom, Accountability, Comprehensive Care, and Transparency (FACT) Act on constitutional grounds. The Act requires licensed clinics to provide information on publicly funded reproductive health services, including contraception and abortion, and unlicensed clinics to inform patients of their license status. NIFLA claims the Act violates its First Amendment rights to free speech and the free exercise of religion. The District Court denied an injunction, and the Ninth Circuit affirmed the lower court’s decision. On June 26, the Court ruled in a 5-4 decision that NIFLA is likely to succeed on their claim that the FACT Act violates the First Amendment.Featuring: Prof. Michael Moreland, University Professor of Law and Religion & Director of the Eleanor H. McCullen Center for Law, Religion and Public Policy, Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Teleforum calls are open to all dues paying members of the Federalist Society. To become a member, sign up here. As a member, you should receive email announcements of upcoming Teleforum calls which contain the conference call phone number. If you are not receiving those email announcements, please contact us at 202-822-8138.

NIFLA is a religiously-affiliated pro-life pregnancy clinic that sought to enjoin the California Reproductive Freedom, Accountability, Comprehensive Care, and Transparency (FACT) Act on constitutional grounds. The Act requires licensed clinics to provide information on publicly funded reproductive health services, including contraception and abortion, and unlicensed clinics to inform patients of their license status. NIFLA claims the Act violates its First Amendment rights to free speech and the free exercise of religion. The District Court denied an injunction, and the Ninth Circuit affirmed the lower court’s decision. On June 26, the Court ruled in a 5-4 decision that NIFLA is likely to succeed on their claim that the FACT Act violates the First Amendment.Featuring: Prof. Michael Moreland, University Professor of Law and Religion & Director of the Eleanor H. McCullen Center for Law, Religion and Public Policy, Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Teleforum calls are open to all dues paying members of the Federalist Society. To become a member, sign up here. As a member, you should receive email announcements of upcoming Teleforum calls which contain the conference call phone number. If you are not receiving those email announcements, please contact us at 202-822-8138.

Kimberly Robinson from Bloomberg Law joins Elizabeth & Tiffany to break down this week's big decisions (travel ban! Janus! NIFLA! water wars!). They also guess who will be the next Supreme Court justice. Tiffany and Kimberly are in the hot seat for Supreme Trivia - Retirement Edition. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

The Supreme Court has issued its decision in NIFLA v. Becerra. Mary FioRito is an attorney and Cardinal Francis George Visiting Fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center. She joined Dan and Amy with reaction. CNN Senior Economist Stephen Moore joined Dan and Amy to talk about the continuing fight on tariffs. Zachary Wood joined Dan and Amy to talk about his new book UNCENSORED: My Life and Uncomfortable Conversations at the Intersection of Black and White America. Plus, Noah Rothman is the Associate Editor for Commentary Magazine. He joined Dan and Amy to talk about the recent harassment of Trump officials and other RepublicansSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Today we’ll talk with Steven Mosher, author, “Bully of Asia” (Regnery, 2018) on China’s cheating and power-hungry aspirations, A.J. Swoboda, co-author of “Redeeming How We Talk: Discover How Communication Fuels Our Growth, Shapes Our Relationships and Changes Our Lives” (Moody Publishers), Jim Campbell, Senior Counsel with Alliance Defending Freedom about the Supreme Court’s ruling in florist Baronelle Stutzman’s case and NIFLA vs. Becerra, and Larry Gadbaugh, CEO of First Image on the impact of today’s Supreme Court decision.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Welcome back to Counting to 5, a podcast about the United States Supreme Court. In this episode, I review the Court’s six decisions in argued cases from the final week of June 2018. These include, among others, Trump v. Hawaii (President Trump’s travel ban), NIFLA v. Becerra (California’s crisis pregnancy center disclosure requirements), and Janus … Continue reading Episode 056: Livestream — Divided to the End

Happy Anniversary Nanni & Pap! 53 years Supreme Court rules in favor of pro-life crisis pregnancy centers: NIFLA v Becerra ... GUEST Denise Harle (Harlee) serves as legal counsel with AllianceDefending Freedom, where she is a member of theCenter for Life ... In this role, Harle focuses herlitigation efforts on defending the First Amendmentfreedoms of medical and support staff working inpregnancy resource centers, as well as pro-life sidewalk counselors ... She also works todefend pro-life legislation around the nation. **Refusing service to the opposition: Is the Red Hen the same as Masterpiece Cakeshop? Letter from listener Leo Nagorski** Do Something Beautiful: The Story of Everything and a Guide to Finding Your Place In It ... GUEST R. York Moore serves as Nat’l Evangelist for InterVarsity Christian Fellowship USA ... He is the author of “Growing Your Faith by Giving it Away” and “Making All Things New: God’s Dream for Global Justice”… since his conversion, York has shared Jesus with tens of thousands of univ students & is now a speaker & a modern-day abolitionist, working in the areas of evangelism and justice/compassion ministry ... (You were made for a righteous, beautiful community, but some time ago we lost the way. That’s why we never quite feel satisfied. That’s why life’s struggles so often overwhelm us and why sometimes all we manage is to numb the pain of it all. How do we find our way back to that righteous, beautiful community? York tells the story of everything and how to find our place in it). Secular Eating and Daily Bread ... GUEST Dr John Koessler, Chair and Professor, Division of Applied Theology & Church Ministry, Moody Bible Institute ... author of the most recent "The Radical Pursuit of Rest: Escaping the Productivity Trap". Hazy Early Earth: More Affirmation of Creation Day 4 ... GUEST Astronomer and best-selling author Hugh Ross travels the globe speaking on the compatibility of advancing scientific discoveries with the timeless truths of Christianity ... His organization, Reasons to Believe, is dedicated to demonstrating, via a variety of resources and events, that science and biblical faith are allies, not enemies.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Happy Anniversary Nanni & Pap! 53 years Supreme Court rules in favor of pro-life crisis pregnancy centers: NIFLA v Becerra ... GUEST Denise Harle (Harlee) serves as legal counsel with AllianceDefending Freedom, where she is a member of theCenter for Life ... In this role, Harle focuses herlitigation efforts on defending the First Amendmentfreedoms of medical and support staff working inpregnancy resource centers, as well as pro-life sidewalk counselors ... She also works todefend pro-life legislation around the nation. **Refusing service to the opposition: Is the Red Hen the same as Masterpiece Cakeshop? Letter from listener Leo Nagorski** Do Something Beautiful: The Story of Everything and a Guide to Finding Your Place In It ... GUEST R. York Moore serves as Nat’l Evangelist for InterVarsity Christian Fellowship USA ... He is the author of “Growing Your Faith by Giving it Away” and “Making All Things New: God’s Dream for Global Justice”… since his conversion, York has shared Jesus with tens of thousands of univ students & is now a speaker & a modern-day abolitionist, working in the areas of evangelism and justice/compassion ministry ... (You were made for a righteous, beautiful community, but some time ago we lost the way. That’s why we never quite feel satisfied. That’s why life’s struggles so often overwhelm us and why sometimes all we manage is to numb the pain of it all. How do we find our way back to that righteous, beautiful community? York tells the story of everything and how to find our place in it). Secular Eating and Daily Bread ... GUEST Dr John Koessler, Chair and Professor, Division of Applied Theology & Church Ministry, Moody Bible Institute ... author of the most recent "The Radical Pursuit of Rest: Escaping the Productivity Trap". Hazy Early Earth: More Affirmation of Creation Day 4 ... GUEST Astronomer and best-selling author Hugh Ross travels the globe speaking on the compatibility of advancing scientific discoveries with the timeless truths of Christianity ... His organization, Reasons to Believe, is dedicated to demonstrating, via a variety of resources and events, that science and biblical faith are allies, not enemies.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

FACT ACT likley violates the 1st amendment.

Today we’ll talk with Erica Young Reitz, author of “After College: Navigating Transitions, Relationships and Faith” (InterVarsity Press) and The Stream’s Rachel Alexander on the case against former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and why he should be prosecuted. We’ll also talk with Peter Sprigg, Family Research Council Senior Fellow, on the now reversed Delaware proposed policy allowing school children to choose their own gender and race and Patrina Mosley, FRC Director of Life, Culture and Women’s Advocacy, on another pivotal First Amendment case NIFLA v. Becerra.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

On this week’s show, Dahlia Lithwick is joined by Priscilla Smith, director of the Program for the Study of Reproductive Justice at Yale Law School, to unpack the oral arguments in NIFLA v Becerra, the latest case on the calendar that seems to be about one thing but is being argued under the all-encompassing umbrella of speech. Dahlia also speaks with Walter Dellinger, former acting solicitor general, about why President Donald Trump can’t get a lawyer. Spoiler: It’s because he lies. Please let us know what you think of Amicus. Join the discussion of this episode on Facebook. Our email is amicus@slate.com. Podcast production by Sara Burningham. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

On this week’s show, Dahlia Lithwick is joined by Priscilla Smith, director of the Program for the Study of Reproductive Justice at Yale Law School, to unpack the oral arguments in NIFLA v Becerra, the latest case on the calendar that seems to be about one thing but is being argued under the all-encompassing umbrella of speech. Dahlia also speaks with Walter Dellinger, former acting solicitor general, about why President Donald Trump can’t get a lawyer. Spoiler: It’s because he lies. Please let us know what you think of Amicus. Join the discussion of this episode on Facebook. Our email is amicus@slate.com. Podcast production by Sara Burningham. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

It can be hard to have conversations about truth and existence and whatnot, especially with those who are close to us who don't share our views.  We go on location with the good folks who are hanging out at the Supreme Court in Washington, DC, participating in a rally in support of the plaintiffs of NIFLA vs. Becerra. Find information on the case here: https://nifla.org/nifla-vs-becerra/  Come hang out with us at www.fishingwithdynamite.fm.  Want to be a patron? www.patreon.com/fishingwithdynamite

On March 20, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA) v. Becerra. NIFLA is a religiously-affiliated pro-life pregnancy clinic that sought to enjoin the California Reproductive Freedom, Accountability, Comprehensive Care, and Transparency Act on constitutional grounds. The Act requires licensed clinics to provide information on publicly funded reproductive health services, including contraception and abortion, and unlicensed clinics to inform patients of their license status. NIFLA claims the Act violates its First Amendment rights to free speech and the free exercise of religion. The District Court denied an injunction, and the Ninth Circuit affirmed the lower court’s decision.Prof. Michael Moreland of Villanova will join us to give his impressions of the oral argument.Featuring: Prof. Michael Moreland, University Professor of Law and Religion & Director of the Eleanor H. McCullen Center for Law, Religion and Public Policy, Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Teleforum calls are open to all dues paying members of the Federalist Society. To become a member, sign up here. As a member, you should receive email announcements of upcoming Teleforum calls which contain the conference call phone number. If you are not receiving those email announcements, please contact us at 202-822-8138.

On March 20, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA) v. Becerra. NIFLA is a religiously-affiliated pro-life pregnancy clinic that sought to enjoin the California Reproductive Freedom, Accountability, Comprehensive Care, and Transparency Act on constitutional grounds. The Act requires licensed clinics to provide information on publicly funded reproductive health services, including contraception and abortion, and unlicensed clinics to inform patients of their license status. NIFLA claims the Act violates its First Amendment rights to free speech and the free exercise of religion. The District Court denied an injunction, and the Ninth Circuit affirmed the lower court’s decision.Prof. Michael Moreland of Villanova will join us to give his impressions of the oral argument.Featuring: Prof. Michael Moreland, University Professor of Law and Religion & Director of the Eleanor H. McCullen Center for Law, Religion and Public Policy, Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Teleforum calls are open to all dues paying members of the Federalist Society. To become a member, sign up here. As a member, you should receive email announcements of upcoming Teleforum calls which contain the conference call phone number. If you are not receiving those email announcements, please contact us at 202-822-8138.

Kate Anderson from Alliance Defending Freedom joins Matt to discuss the case heard at the Supreme Court this week, NIFVLA v. Becerra. Travis and Jeff join later to discuss the bombings in Austin and the USA's denial to Iranian refugees. Also, Jeff goes to the White House with the Houston Astros! Case resources ADF's case resource page ERLC's case explainer ERLC's amicus brief (PDF) SCOTUSBlog case page Guest bio – Kate Anderson Kate Anderson serves as legal counsel with Alliance Defending Freedom, where she is a key member of the Center for Conscience Initiatives. Anderson obtained her law degree magna cum laude in 2009 from Gonzaga University School of Law, where she served on the Gonzaga Law Review. She also completed the ADF leadership development program to become a Blackstone Fellow. Anderson is admitted to the state bars of Arizona and Washington, the U.S. Supreme Court, and several federal district and appellate courts. Roundtable America shouldn't send endangered religious minority refugees back to Iran – Nina Shea US Puts Scores of Iranian Christians at Risk of Persecution – Christianity Today iTunes | Google Play | Stitcher | Tune in

Today we’ll talk with First Image CEO Larry Gadbaugh, about oral arguments in NIFLA v. Becerra to be heard by SCOTUS tomorrow and Patty Garibay, national executive director and founder of American Heritage Girls USA. We'll also talk with Bill Gibbons, Superintendent of Cornerstone Christian Academy in Vancouver, WA.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Kate Anderson from Alliance Defending Freedom joins Matt to discuss the case heard at the Supreme Court this week, NIFVLA ...

Kate Anderson from Alliance Defending Freedom joins Matt to discuss the case heard at the Supreme Court this week, NIFVLA ...

Jess was inside the courtroom this morning as the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments in NIFLA v. Becerra, which will decide whether a clinic can be required to reveal whether they are a licensed reproductive health-care provider or an unlicensed fake clinic. She talks with Imani about the key arguments, memorable moments, and potential outcomes from the morning's events.

Jess was inside the courtroom this morning as the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments in NIFLA v. Becerra, which will decide whether a clinic can be required to reveal whether they are a licensed reproductive health-care provider or an unlicensed fake clinic. She talks with Imani about the key arguments, memorable moments, and potential outcomes from the morning's events.

When a pregnant person walks into a clinic, should that clinic be forced to reveal whether they are a licensed reproductive health care provider or an unlicensed fake clinic? Imani and Jess break down NIFLA v. Becerra, the Supreme Court case that's about to answer that question.

When a pregnant person walks into a clinic, should that clinic be forced to reveal whether they are a licensed reproductive health care provider or an unlicensed fake clinic? Imani and Jess break down NIFLA v. Becerra, the Supreme Court case that's about to answer that question.

This week I am talking with Jay Hobbs, director of communications for Heartbeat International, about the upcoming SCOTUS case NIFLA v Becerra as well as NARAL's "End the Lies" campaign, which attempts to discredit and demean crisis pregnancy centers.

Join Adam Kinkade and Douglas Duffy Johnson as they sit down with Anthony Catania and Devona Yates about the Government Shutdown and the state of Immigration in America, then they discuss two cases before the Supreme Court, The Infamous Cake Case and NIFLA v Baccerra.

Roland C. Warren and Vincent DiCaro discuss the implications of the Supreme Court's upcoming decision in NIFLA v. Becerra and why this decision could impact abortion providers as well.