POPULARITY
Categories
On a new edition of Weekend Conversations on the Elevate Podcast, host Robert Glazer and producer Mick Sloan discuss the recent protest of Jonathan Haidt's commencement address at New York University. Robert and Mick discuss the students' objections, how they missed the actual purpose of Haidt's speech, and why it is flawed to evaluate a message based on our opinion of the messenger, rather than the merits of what they are saying. Thank you to the sponsors of The Elevate Podcast Shopify: shopify.com/elevate Framer: framer.com/elevate Indeed: indeed.com/elevate Ethos Life: ethos.com/elevate Keeper Security: keepersecurity.com/ELEVATE Fora Travel: foratravel.com/elevate Northwest Registered Agent: northwestregisteredagent.com/elevate Whatnot: Search "Whatnot" in the app store to download Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Towards the end of last year, Australia did something no other country had ever tried: it banned social media for kids under 16. And a bunch of others are following with similar laws, first Denmark, then France, then Indonesia and Austria. All in, there are now more than 25 countries that have either implemented, or are actively considering, social media bans for kids. It seems like Canada is moving there as well. In April, the Liberal party adopted a non-binding motion to restrict young people's access to both social media and AI chatbots. All over the world, you can hear parents breathing a sigh of relief. They've spent the last decade watching their kids become hooked on their devices, and now we're doing something about it. It looks like we're finally going to get our kids back. But researchers like Candice Odgers are skeptical. Odgers is a psychology professor at UC Irvine who's been studying the digital lives of young people for almost 20 years now, long before anyone was worried about what social media was doing to their brains. She says there isn't really any research to suggest these bans will work. But her argument goes even deeper than that: she says the idea that smartphones have caused a youth mental health crisis just isn't supported by the evidence. So as governments all over the world start to kick kids off social media, and maybe even AI chatbots as well, Candice Odgers thinks we're making a serious mistake. And I want to know if she's right. Mentioned The Anxious Generation, by Jonathan Haidt (Penguin Press, 2024). Australia's under-16 social media ban — the Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Act 2024, in effect 10 December 2025 — eSafety Commissioner. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, “Social Media and Adolescent Health” (2024). Hunt Allcott et al., “The Effects of School Phone Bans: National Evidence from Lockable Pouches,” NBER (2026) — near-zero effects on test scores, attendance, and bullying. The University of Manchester #BeeWell study finding no link between social media/gaming use and later anxiety or depression, Journal of Public Health (2026). “The Kids Are All Right,” Scientific American (2026) — young people doing better than prior generations on many metrics. The Stanford-led evaluation of Australia's ban (Stanford Social Media Lab with the eSafety Commission), finding most teens stayed on the platforms — The Conversation. The early-1980s Pac-Man moral panic (Surgeon General C. Everett Koop's 1982 warning; municipal moves to restrict arcades) — Freethink. Section 230 of the US Communications Decency Act (47 U.S.C. § 230) — Cornell Legal Information Institute Canada's Gen(Z)AI youth assembly on AI (~100 young Canadians aged 17–23), Centre for Media, Technology and Democracy, findings presented in Ottawa. Machines Like Us is hosted by Taylor Owen, produced by Paradigms, and distributed by The Globe and Mail. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
Catherine Price is an award-winning health and science journalist, speaker, and #1 New York Times bestselling author best known for her work on screen/life balance and phone addiction. She's the founder of Screen/Life Balance® and has written several major books including How to Break Up With Your Phone®, The Power of Fun, Vitamania, and The Amazing Generation (co-authored with Jonathan Haidt). She also writes the Substack newsletter "How to Feel Alive" and her TED talk on fun has surpassed 5 million views. Her work has been featured in outlets like NPR, The New York Times, Good Morning America, CNN, The Today Show, TIME Magazine, and The Wall Street Journal, among many others. Today on the show we discuss: how social media apps are engineered to keep us hooked, why your phone can feel so hard to put down even when it's hurting your life, how dopamine triggers like novelty, likes, comments, streaks, and endless scrolling hijack attention, why Snapchat may be especially dangerous for kids, how excessive phone use impacts anxiety, focus, sleep, relationships, and real-life connection, and the simple steps Catherine Price recommends to break the cycle and build a healthier relationship with your phone. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Have a comment? Send us a text! (We read all of them but can't reply). Email us: Will@faithfulpoliticspodcast.comWhat happens when feelings become the test of truth?Robert P. George joins Faithful Politics to talk about what he calls “the age of feeling,” a moment where many people treat personal emotion as the final word on what is true. George argues that this does not lead to tolerance. It often makes disagreement feel like a personal attack, which shuts down honest conversation and creates real problems for democracy. The conversation moves through faith, reason, truth, tribalism, intellectual humility, and the challenge of disagreeing with your own side. Will brings in Jonathan Haidt's work on intuition and political identity, while Josh and George work through harder questions around same-sex marriage, gender, Obergefell, Loving v. Virginia, and the deeper moral assumptions underneath those debates.At its core, this episode is about whether Americans can still disagree seriously without turning each other into enemies. George's answer is that truth-seeking requires more than strong opinions. It requires reasons, evidence, humility, and the courage to listen when your tribe says one thing and your conscience says another.website: robertpgeorge.comGuest BioRobert P. George is the McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence at Princeton University and Director of the James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions. He is a legal scholar, political philosopher, and public intellectual whose work focuses on natural law, constitutionalism, religious liberty, conscience, civil discourse, and moral reasoning in public life. He is the author of several books, including Conscience and Its Enemies, Making Men Moral, Seeking Truth and Speaking Truth, and Truth Matters, co-authored with Cornel West. Support the show
Every child wants friendship, freedom, and fun. The question is where they'll find it. Catherine Price returns to The 1000 Hours Outside Podcast to talk about her new book The Amazing Generation, written with Jonathan Haidt, and why more young people are starting to question the role screens play in their lives. In this conversation, Catherine explains how tech companies compete for our attention, why so many older teens say they wish they had spent less time online, and what happens when children are given the tools to think for themselves. They discuss real friendship versus digital connection, the growing rebellion against constant screen use, the importance of boredom, hobbies, and outdoor play, and one powerful question every family should ask: If you had three extra hours every day, what would you do with them? This episode will leave you thinking differently about technology, childhood, and the person you're becoming. Links: Catherine Price: https://catherineprice.comThe Amazing Generation: https://www.amazinggeneration.comFamily Guide: https://catherineprice.com/family Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
G.K. Chesterton once observed that after learning to do a great many clever things, the next great task would be learning not to do them. That line, from an early essay on Queen Victoria, has taken on new force as American schools reverse decades of tech-first policies—test scores and students' mental health alike in decline. In this episode, Joe and Grettelyn trace the screen crisis back to first principles, exploring how Chesterton's warnings against educational fads, his conviction that machines make us like machines, and his insistence that a thing worth doing is worth doing badly all speak directly to what Jonathan Haidt's data is now confirming. In This Episode: The G.K. Chesterton quote from Varied Types that frames the whole conversation—and why his intuition about educational tinkering was more than a hunch How the Chesterton Schools Network's longstanding tech-light philosophy has been vindicated by over 15 years of data, a UNESCO report, and the Fortune magazine story that started this episode What Chesterton's insight about machines making us like machines explains about the neuroscience of distraction—and why phone-free classrooms alone aren't enough Why G.K. Chesterton's principle that a thing worth doing is worth doing badly is the most important counter-argument to AI in education and the arts Practical steps for parents: building social pacts with other families, the case for delaying smartphones, and the Chesterton Schools Network as a proven alternative Chapters: 00:00: Welcome and Introduction 01:15: The Chesterton Schools Network's Tech-Light Philosophy 03:38: G.K. Chesterton on Learning Not to Do Clever Things 05:42: Jonathan Haidt and the Books Behind the Movement 09:06: UNESCO's Findings on Technology and Learning 13:35: How Devices Short-Circuit Attention and Memory 19:47: Embodied Learning—Handwriting, Doodling, and What Screens Miss 28:21: Schools Reversing Course: The Fortune Magazine Story 35:11: A Thing Worth Doing Badly: Chesterton vs. AI 44:13: Practical Steps for Parents and a Path Forward Resources Mentioned: Varied Types — G.K. Chesterton The Anxious Generation — Jonathan Haidt The Coddling of the American Mind — Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt Anxious Generation Action Resources Chesterton Schools Network FOLLOW US: Instagram Facebook X SUPPORT: Donate Shop Produced by Saint Kolbe Studios
Humans aren't just social — we're ultrasocial, wired like bees and ants for deep connection. So what happens when smartphones take over childhood, tablets replace textbooks and AI companies infiltrate our kids' lives? Social psychologist Jonathan Haidt lays out three principles of technoskepticism — and explains why, two years after sounding the alarm in “The Anxious Generation,” he's more concerned (and hopeful) than ever before. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Let's cut the crap: this isn't just about screen time. It's about attention—yours, your kids', and who (or what) is stealing it. In this brutally honest (and slightly uncomfortable) conversation, Nicole sits down with Catherine Price—award-winning journalist, author of How to Break Up with Your Phone, and co-author of The Amazing Generation—to unpack what screens are actually doing to our brains, our kids, and our relationships. We're talking about: Why “screen time” is the wrong conversation—and what you should be focusing on instead How constant scrolling is literally rewiring attention spans (for you and your kids) The real cost of distraction: missed memories, weaker relationships, and a life half-lived Why your kids don't need another app—they need your actual presence The difference between useful tech and attention-sucking garbage How to delay smartphones and social media without turning your house into a war zone What kids really notice about your phone habits (hint: everything) Practical ways to reset boundaries—even if you feel like you've already screwed it up This episode isn't about perfection. It's about awareness, intention, and making better choices—starting now. Because every time you pick up your phone, you're choosing what (and who) gets your attention. Thank you to our sponsors! Visit Upwork.com right now and post your job for free! Families are better when they're working together… go to myskylight.com/WOMANSWORK for $30 off your Skylight Calendar. Become a Fora Advisor today at Foratravel.com/woman Connect with Catherine: Substack: https://substack.com/@catherineprice Website: https://catherineprice.com/ Book: The Amazing Generation, co-authored with Jonathan Haidt. https://www.amazon.com/Amazing-Generation-Guide-Freedom-Screen-Filled/dp/B0F87C5F9G Book: How to Break Up With Your Phone https://www.amazon.com/How-Break-Up-Your-Phone/dp/039958112X IG: https://www.instagram.com/catherinepriceofficial/ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@catherinepriceofficial LI: http://linkedin.com/in/catherinepriceofficial Related Podcast Episodes The Good Mother Myth with Nancy Reddy | 274 FACTS About Raising Emotionally Intelligent Kids with Alyssa Blask Campbell M.Ed | 345 How To Listen with Emily Kasriel | 321 Share the Love: If you found this episode insightful, please share it with a friend, tag us on social media, and leave a review on your favorite podcast platform!
Gen Zer's have lived their lives online, and they're burned out. Freya India is the author of the Substack GIRLS, where she writes about the challenges girls and young women face in the modern world, and a staff writer for Jonathan Haidt's newsletter, After Babel. She joins guest host Courtney Collins to discuss the pressure to build personal “brands,” how even childhood has been commodified and the many ways mental health is suffering. Her book is “GIRLS®: Generation Z and the Commodification of Everything.” Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices
Haidt has earned the right to be heard. He cares about his kids, and yours too. His recent comments deserve more attention. This post (and podcast episode) briefly explores the threat of silicon valley doing another experiment on your kids, to their detriment. Will we live with eyes wide shut, or open?
Patrick opens with a story about art critics mistaking Monet for AI slop, sparking questions about authenticity in a tech-soaked world. He follows twisted threads connecting digital surveillance in China to new digital IDs in the UK, then tosses in stories of hysterical climate predictions, AI anxieties, and the social decay linked to endless scrolling. Children and families become the focus as Patrick unpacks warnings from experts, connecting smartphones, plummeting fertility, and a relentless tide of content that threatens innocence. What happens when you post a real Monet and say it’s AI? The comments are amazing. - https://x.com/SHL0MS/status/2054280631807316329 (00:42) Audio: 2016. Guy McPherson (a climate change expert, scientist, and professor from the University of Arizona) says that there will not be any humans on the planet by 2026 due to the effects of climate change - https://x.com/mazemoore/status/2055376238345076837?s=46 (06:01) Audio: King Charles announces new UK digital ID - My ministers will also proceed with the introduction of digital ID that will modernize how citizens interact with public services. - https://x.com/OliLondonTV/status/2054542004219232295?s=20 (09:59) Audio: Zach Galifianakis on AI – It’s a biblical biting the apple - https://x.com/Zigmanfreud/status/2051691184477913346?s=20 (23:31) Audio: TikTok is the fentanyl of social media. With Jonathan Haidt –https://x.com/newstart_2024/status/2054654456701100040?s=20 (27:30) Audio: 4 norms to pull kids out of the anxiety spiral we’ve created - Jonathan Haidt on the Daily Show - https://x.com/newstart_2024/status/2055349160514081005?s=46 (31:22) The rise of smart phones, and the decline infertility - https://x.com/lugaricano/status/2055778470878449892 Audio: Giving your kid a smart phone - This is exactly what you are doing when you give your child unsupervised access to the internet (A phone not only gives your child access to the world, it gives the world access to your child) – https://x.com/Miss_Snuffy/status/2045051230838558930?s=46 (39:56) Mike - In the book of Revelation, Jesus talks about Nicolaitans. Who is the Synagogue of Satan? (44:21)
Kids and teens are experiencing less independence than in the past — whether due to screen time, parents' fears of letting them roam freely, or other factors. It's a problem. But why? And what can be done? In this episode, host Dr. Delaney Ruston discusses this important topic with journalist Lenore Skenazy, who was labeled "America's Worst Mom" after letting her 9-year-old take the New York City subway home alone. Skenazy has spent years sounding the alarm on the harms of decreased youth autonomy, including co-founding Let Grow with psychologists Jonathan Haidt and Peter Gray. This episode explores the factors contributing to decreased independence and offers tools for parents and schools to combat this trend. It also examines the role of technology and tracking devices in this context, addressing both their benefits and potential pitfalls. This episode is intended for adult and teen audiences. Featured Expert Lenore Skenazy Books Free Range Kids by Lenore Skenazy Research References Mott Poll Report: Promoting children's Independence: What parents say vs do Media violence, physical aggression, and relational aggression in school age children: a short-term longitudinal study. (Aggressive Behavior) Additional Resources Lenore Skenazy's blog LetGrow.Org Time Code 00:00 Introduction 00:20 The Decline of Children's Autonomy 01:02 Challenges in Encouraging Independence 01:22 Parental Concerns and Media Influence 02:00 Exploring Solutions with Lenore Skenazy 02:39 Lenore's Controversial Parenting Decision 08:21 The Birth of Free Range Kids Movement 10:07 Statistics and Parental Fears 18:05 Let Grow Initiative and School Programs 22:34 Technology's Role in Children's Independence 32:44 Conclusion and Resources
Shouting down speakers, UCLA free speech, heckling, AI, doxxing, cancel culture, and more! Timestamps: 00:00 Intro 02:40 Get your tickets to Soapbox now! 06:30 Congratulations to Will on 20 years at FIRE 07:31 How is FIRE responding to shouting down speakers? 11:33 Will FIRE include viewpoint diversity in our College Free Speech Rankings? 13:48 What is FIRE's response to UCLA Law students protesting a DHS speaker? 17:07 NYU's commencement speaker Jonathan Haidt 21:20 Is walking out on a controversial speaker protected free speech? 23:28 Is FIRE involved in Texas State University professor Tom Alter's case? 25:50 What is the scholar to attorney ratio at FIRE? 27:47 Has cancel culture on college campuses changed since Trump 2.0? 32:00 What is FIRE's stance on doxxing? 37:02 FIRE volunteer opportunities 37:33 Can the government regulate AI? 42:01 Is talk therapy speech or medical treatment? (Chiles v. Salazar) 46:02 What are the most pressing threats to online expression? 51:30 Special thanks to the Middlebury College Democrats and Republicans 53:45 What are the most challenging aspects of FIRE's work with technology and free speech? 57:10 Does accepting government money protect or restrict speech? 01:00:25 Is FIRE a reactive organization and what solutions do we offer? 01:01:41 Outro Joining us: Nico Perrino, executive vice president Alisha Glennon, chief operating officer Greg Lukianoff, president & chief executive officer Will Creeley, legal director Become a paid subscriber today to receive invitations to future live webinars. If you became a FIRE Member through a donation to FIRE at fire.org and would like access to Substack's paid subscriber podcast feed, please email sotospeak@fire.org. If you already are a paid subscriber and would like to listen to this episode via Apple Podcasts, click on the "Apple Podcasts" icon at the top right of this page!
Christina Hello, everyone, I'm Christina Darnell, the managing editor of MinistryWatch. Welcome to the MinistryWatch podcast. In today's extra episode, I talk with Warren Smith about some news items that are slightly (even significantly) outside of our normal charity and philanthropy “beat.” So, Warren, what's up first? Warren Christian colleges are facing a federal challenge. Emily Belz is reporting for Christianity Today that a new Department of Education regulation “could crater” the programs of Christian colleges. Belz writes, “The regulation would label a bachelor's or master's program a “failure” if its graduates do not earn more than their peers without the degree. Students in these ‘failing' programs would be ineligible for federal financial aid.” Christina Why should Christian colleges be held to a lower standard than other colleges? Warren They shouldn't, but the Christian colleges are saying that this is not an apples-to-apples comparison. The graduates of engineering or accounting programs at Christian colleges should be compared to engineering and mathematics graduates of secular schools. But religious and theological studies students are not going into these fields for the money, and they don't have true analogs in secular schools. The new regulation essentially punishes students for their commitment to a ministry career. The Coalition of Christian Colleges and Universities and the Association for Biblical Higher Education are fighting the new rules. Christina On May 4, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito said the abortion inducing drug mifepristone – used in nearly two-thirds of U.S. abortions – can continue to be prescribed via telehealth, dispensed at retail pharmacies, and delivered to patients in the mail. Warren This is a huge setback for the pro-life cause. The Dispatch has provided a helpful “explainer” of what is going on now, especially at the states. Bottom line: thirteen states ban abortion entirely, but with telemedicine, abortions continue in those states. To see the status in all fifty states, click here. Christina Speaking of abortion, Ryan Burge injects some data into the conversation. Warren He has some graphs showing that support for abortion has gone up over the past 50 years, even among evangelicals. In some cases, support has gone up significantly. But that rise masks an important fact. From about 1997 until about 2007, support for abortion went down. Burge does not track the number of actual abortions, but they went down too. Christina So, what happened in 2007? Warren The iPhone. Facebook. Twitter. Correlation does not mean causality. But lots of social theorists from Jean Twenge to Jonathan Haidt have suggested that around 2007 is when we stopped talking to each other, and we retreated into our digital foxholes and started lobbing mortars at those in other foxholes. We used to persuade in the public square. Now, we pummel. The public square has become the scene of a cage fight. Whatever you think of my theory, I do suggest you check out Ryan Burge's data, which you can find here. Christina Colorado Springs has long been the mecca for Christian ministries, but in recent years there are signs that the city is losing its appeal. Warren The latest sign is the announcement that the pro-life organization Save The Storks is moving from The Springs to Dallas. The organization said in a statement that the move was “strategic,” to “centralize operations and expand support for women nationwide.” Christina They're not the first to leave. Warren CauseIQ estimates that about 20 ministries have moved or shut down in Colorado Springs in the past five years. In 2020, the Christian and Missionary Alliance national headquarters left Colorado Springs and moved to Columbus, Ohio, to be nearer the majority of its churches. Colorado Springs is still home to Focus on the Family, Compassion International, The Navigators, Young Life, and other major ministries, but as the city does not have a major airport, and – with traffic – downtown Colorado Springs can be two hours from the Denver airport. Christina We normally don't report about ourselves, but we have a few updates this week. Warren I was recently on Christianity Today's podcast The Bulletin. It was my second appearance in as many months. If you do not subscribe to The Bulletin, you can listen here. I also wanted to let you know that MinistryWatch has won recognition for our work from the Evangelical Press Association. Tony Mator, Kim Roberts, and I won awards at the annual meeting in Nashville. I also wanted to mention that we may need to re-name the MinistryWatch 1000 database. As of this week, we now have 1500 ministries in the database, representing more than $55 billion in annual revenue. Thanks to Kim Roberts, Rod Pitzer, Rob Martin, Stephen duBarry for their contributions to growing our database. Christina In fact, you and I are both in Nashville this week for the EPA conference. You'll be on the road next week, too. Warren Readers in Dallas, Colorado Springs, and Denver. I will also be in Dallas next week, and I will be holding a lunch for readers. I will be Knoxville later in May. I will be speaking at Summit Ministries in Manitou Springs in June, so I will be doing reader lunches in Denver and Colorado Springs during that trip. Let me know if you would like to join us. My email is wsmith@ministrywatch.com. Christina That brings to a close this EXTRA episode of the podcast. The producer for today's program is Jeff McIntosh. I'm Christina Darnell, along with Warren Smith. Until next time, may God bless you.
Peter Savodnik joins us to talk about Nicholas Kristof's column alleging abuse of Palestinian prisoners, including the most extreme dog-rape allegation, and how pro-Israel people should respond when the reporting is weak but the underlying issue may still deserve investigation. We talk about the difference between bad journalism and false accusations, the danger of reflexively circling the wagons, Ben-Gvir and the Israeli prison system, antisemitism, double standards against Israel, whether Jews are being pushed back into history, JD Vance, Marco Rubio, Gavin Newsom, Jonathan Haidt, Twitter addiction, and the general collapse of everyone's sanity online. Peter Savodnik reported for The New York Times Magazine, The Atlantic, The Guardian, GQ, Wired and other venues from the former Soviet Union, the Middle East, Asia and across the United States. His book, The Interloper: Lee Harvey Oswald Inside the Soviet Union, was published in 2013 by Basic Books. He is now a senior editor at The Free Press and based in Los Angeles. https://x.com/petersavodnik Chapters: 00:00 Intro and Peter Savodnik joins 01:16 Nick Kristof's Israel prison-abuse column 06:15 Olmert, Benny Morris, Haviv Rettig Gur, and what may actually be true 10:00 Double standards, bad reporting, and how Israel should respond 15:56 The dog-rape allegation and the danger of reflexive denial 22:22 Why Israel may need its own serious investigation 24:23 Circling the wagons vs. demanding proof 28:17 What real reporting would require 34:03 Retractions, antisemitism, and “emptying our pockets” for every accusation 38:27 Are Jews and Israel entering a more dangerous historical moment? 49:11 JD Vance, Rubio, Trump, and the future of the Republican Party 57:18 Gavin Newsom, 2028, and the Democrats 59:26 Jonathan Haidt, NYU, wokeness, and phone addiction 01:04:13 Twitter fights, the new Comedy Cellar room and final thoughts
Peter Savodnik joins us to talk about Nicholas Kristof's column alleging abuse of Palestinian prisoners, including the most extreme dog-rape allegation, and how pro-Israel people should respond when the reporting is weak but the underlying issue may still deserve investigation. We talk about the difference between bad journalism and false accusations, the danger of reflexively circling the wagons, Ben-Gvir and the Israeli prison system, antisemitism, double standards against Israel, whether Jews are being pushed back into history, JD Vance, Marco Rubio, Gavin Newsom, Jonathan Haidt, Twitter addiction, and the general collapse of everyone's sanity online. Peter Savodnik reported for The New York Times Magazine, The Atlantic, The Guardian, GQ, Wired and other venues from the former Soviet Union, the Middle East, Asia and across the United States. His book, The Interloper: Lee Harvey Oswald Inside the Soviet Union, was published in 2013 by Basic Books. He is now a senior editor at The Free Press and based in Los Angeles. https://x.com/petersavodnik Chapters: 00:00 Intro and Peter Savodnik joins 01:16 Nick Kristof's Israel prison-abuse column 06:15 Olmert, Benny Morris, Haviv Rettig Gur, and what may actually be true 10:00 Double standards, bad reporting, and how Israel should respond 15:56 The dog-rape allegation and the danger of reflexive denial 22:22 Why Israel may need its own serious investigation 24:23 Circling the wagons vs. demanding proof 28:17 What real reporting would require 34:03 Retractions, antisemitism, and “emptying our pockets” for every accusation 38:27 Are Jews and Israel entering a more dangerous historical moment? 49:11 JD Vance, Rubio, Trump, and the future of the Republican Party 57:18 Gavin Newsom, 2028, and the Democrats 59:26 Jonathan Haidt, NYU, wokeness, and phone addiction 01:04:13 Twitter fights, the new Comedy Cellar room and final thoughts
The Mystery of Richard Simmons on ABC, Spencer Pratt v. TMZ, Thomas Markle's GoFundMe for a house, Rich Beato destroys the New York Times, Michael Jackson defenders hate us, pooping in school, and a Tic Tac took Marc out. Marc vs a Tic Tac. The Tic Tac was victorious. Why can't doctors tell us how much a service costs? Michael Jackson molested the Cascio family and his defenders have infiltrated out YouTube page. Don't forget to subscribe. DoorDash driver Olivia Henderson lied about a sexual assault and shared a TikTok of her naked customer, yet somehow she's the victim. Can Spencer Pratt actually win the election for LA Mayor? He's getting slammed for living in a hotel instead of his Airstream. Kevin Hart and Tony Hinchcliffe are in trouble for a George Floyd joke. Katt Williams killed it at the roast. There is a GoFundMe worth donating to… ‘Help Thomas Reunite with Family'. Meghan Markle is apparently out-earning Prince Harry. Chris Brown and Usher are going on tour. Pitchfork recently ripped Chris Brown's new album to the point that he wants to beat up the writer like he's Rihanna. Goop is moving to AI and firing employees. NYU students are not fans of Jonathan Haidt. Diane Sawyer has a new special out on The Mystery of Richard Simmons. Rosie O'Donnell ruined the show. Did you ever poop in middle school? Rick Beato takes on the New York Times' 30 Greatest Living American Songwriters list. Sydney Sweeney's huge boobs dominated the latest episode of Euphoria. Alex Murdaugh's double murder convictions are overturned thanks to some dope clerk. Merch is for sale! Buy it. Or don't. But do. If you'd like to help support the show… consider subscribing to our YouTube Channel, Facebook, Instagram and Twitter (Drew Lane, Marc Fellhauer, Trudi Daniels, Jim Bentley, BranDon, and Roberto).
https://youtu.be/d566d0YSwq8 Recorded on April 8th, 2026 PetroNerds is honored to be hosted by John Papola in episode 156 of the PetroNerds podcast. In this crossover podcast, PetroNerds CEO and energy economist Trisha Curtis joins John Papola on Dad Saves America in Austin, Texas, for a deep-dive conversation on the oil and natural gas industry, the global energy market, American energy dominance, and how geopolitical shocks — Iran and the Strait of Hormuz — affect prices at the pump. Trisha breaks down the numbers behind global oil and gas demand, including why the world produces and consumes roughly 100 million barrels of oil per day, why the United States is the largest crude oil producer in the world, and why America's energy position has reshaped global markets. Trisha frames oil as central to transportation and explains that when global production and consumption become unbalanced, prices move; she also notes that the U.S. is the world's largest crude oil producer by a wide margin. Trisha explains why oil and gas remain central to modern life, how fracking transformed U.S. energy production, what policymakers get wrong about renewables and subsidies, and why energy security is inseparable from economic growth, national security, and global power. Energy is not just another sector of the economy. It is the foundation for transportation, manufacturing, electricity, national security, and the modern standard of living. This episode is a practical energy primer for anyone who wants to understand why oil and gas still matter, why energy abundance is a strategic advantage, and why utopian thinking cannot replace physics, infrastructure, markets, or security. The views expressed in this episode are Trisha Curtis' own and do not reflect the views of the Department of Energy or the United States Government. John Papola has hosted many experts in the studio, including Jonathan Haidt, Dr. Drew, Michael Shellenberger, Bret Weinstein, Vivek Ramaswamy, and Adam Carolla. Topics covered: Oil and gas in everyday life Global oil demand and the 100-million-barrel-per-day market The relationship between GDP growth and energy consumption Why coal still matters Natural gas safety and infrastructure Energy density and transportation costs Food production, fertilizer, and ethanol The reality behind “drill baby drill” Fracing and the shale revolution California's oil policy Renewables, physics, and grid reliability Oil subsidies, inflation, and consumer prices Competition and monopoly claims in oil Iran, China, and the Strait of Hormuz Middle East stability and energy security Why utopian energy policy fails in the real world Learn more about PetroNerds:https://petronerds.com/ Watch PetroNerds on YouTube:https://youtube.com/@petronerds633 Follow Trisha Curtis on LinkedIn:https://www.linkedin.com/in/trisha-curtis-petronerds/ Follow Trisha Curtis on X:https://x.com/TrishaJCoffee?s=20 Dad Saves America YouTube Episode Page: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNFGie73VwM Dad Saves America episode page: https://www.dadsavesamerica.com/p/iran-china-and-the-war-for-oil-dominance Visit Dad Saves America:https://www.dadsavesamerica.com/
George Barna of the Cultural Research Center starts to open this year's American Worldview Inventory with the startling reality that only 4% of Americans have an integrated Christian worldview. How do you know if you're worldview does intergrate the Bible into every area of your life? Social media expert Chris Martin, author of "The Wolf In Their Pockets," responds to a recent article from Jonathan Haidt's After Babel blog talking about how just taking cellphones away from kids is not enough. There needs to be ways for children to connect with each other for activities. He also reflects on David's trust in God to handle his persecuter Saul. The Reconnect with Carmen and all Faith Radio are made possible by your support. Give now: Click here
C'est un épisode tiré de ma newsletter (abonnez-vous) que je n'avais pas prévu de faire. J'ai vu passer une info entre la story d'un anniversaire et une recette de cuisine : 62 millions de visites en un mois pour un site qui enseigne à droguer et violer des femmes. J'ai été choqué, j'ai partagé, et j'ai continué ma journée mais c'était impossible.En qualité d'homme, me taire sur ce sujet ferait de moi un complice. Alors j'ai passé plusieurs semaines à lire des études, écouter des podcasts, regarder des documentaires. Plus d'une vingtaine de sources académiques publiées entre 2021 et 2025, bell hooks, Scott Galloway, Niobe Way, Olivia Gazalé, le rapport 2025 du Haut Conseil à l'Égalité, le podcast "Des mecs solides" d'Arte Radio.Dans cet épisode, je parle du chemin, plus court qu'on ne le croit, entre un garçon de 18 ans seul et sans boussole, et une communauté qui lui enseigne la haine. J'ai questionné ce que ça dit du monde qu'on a construit : on a transformé la condition féminine en quelques décennies sans jamais proposer aux hommes une nouvelle façon d'être des hommes. J'y parle aussi des algorithmes qui exposent un ado à du contenu masculiniste en 9 minutes. De l'amitié masculine qu'on n'a jamais appris à construire. De Marvin, 18 ans, qui s'en est sorti. Et de ce qu'on pourrait faire autrement.Ce n'est pas un épisode pour justifier quoi que ce soit. C'est un épisode pour comprendre, parce que sans comprendre, on ne changera rien.Citations marquantes« La personne la plus dangereuse du monde, c'est un jeune homme seul et sans le sou. Or la société n'en a jamais autant produit. » — Scott Galloway« Les hommes ne sont pas en crise, mais ils font des crises, jusqu'au point de tuer des femmes. » — Francis Dupuis-Déry« On ne peut pas guérir dans l'isolement. Une culture de la guérison qui donne aux hommes les moyens de changer est en train de naître. » — bell hooks« C'est pas de ta faute, c'est la faute des femmes, des féministes, des woke. Une simplification pour répondre à une souffrance qui est, elle, réelle. » — Pauline Ferrari« En réalité, les hommes souffrent et toute la culture leur dit : s'il vous plaît, ne nous confiez pas ce que vous ressentez. » — bell hooksBig Ideas1. On a changé le monde sans changer les représentations masculines La condition féminine a évolué en quelques décennies, une révolution sans précédent historique. Mais les imaginaires masculins, eux, n'ont pas bougé. Des millions d'hommes se retrouvent sans carte pour naviguer cette réalité. Olivia Gazalé le met en perspective : toutes les crises de la virilité se ressemblent, sauf celle-ci — parce que cette fois, les règles du jeu ont vraiment changé. Timestamp estimé : ~10:002. Le corps comme seul territoire de contrôle restant Quand l'économie, l'école et les relations affectives paraissent hors de portée, le corps reste le seul endroit où on peut mesurer des progrès. Le fitness explose chez les jeunes hommes — 19 % des 15-24 ans en France pratiquent la musculation, deux fois la moyenne nationale. Guillaume Valet appelle ça le "capitalisme des vulnérabilités" : vendre de la certitude à des gens qui n'en ont plus. Timestamp estimé : ~20:003. Les algorithmes exposent un ado au contenu masculiniste en 9 minutes Des chercheuses de Dublin l'ont mesuré précisément : 9 minutes sur TikTok, 17 sur YouTube. Et après 2-3 heures de visionnage, 76 à 78 % des recommandations sont masculinistes. Un adolescent français passe en moyenne 4 heures par jour devant un écran. Il n'a pas besoin de chercher ces contenus. Ils le trouvent. Timestamp estimé : ~35:004. L'incel n'est pas né de la haine, mais de la solitude Le terme vient d'une femme, Alana, qui voulait créer un espace bienveillant pour ceux qui peinent à trouver une relation. Le forum a changé de main et de ton. Aujourd'hui l'idéologie incel transforme la frustration en conviction, la conviction en ressentiment, le ressentiment en désignation d'un ennemi. La "blackpill" est son moteur : un déterminisme brutal présenté comme vérité scientifique. Timestamp estimé : ~42:005. La vraie crise, c'est l'amitié masculine Niobe Way a suivi des cohortes de garçons pendant huit ans. Ce qu'elle observe est systématique : à 11-12 ans, les garçons ont des amitiés émotionnellement profondes. En grandissant, ils apprennent que ça "fait fille" ou "gay". Ils s'autocensurent, et se retrouvent très seuls sans pouvoir le formuler. Ce vide-là, les algorithmes et les influenceurs masculinistes l'ont repéré en premiers. Timestamp estimé : ~27:006. Des sorties existent, et elles passent par la connexion Marvin, 18 ans, s'en est sorti par deux chemins : une première histoire amoureuse qui l'a mis face à ses propres émotions, et une amie fille qui n'a jamais coupé le lien. Pas de déconstruction idéologique, pas de formation. Du lien. Toutes les recherches convergent : la sortie passe par la santé mentale, des modèles issus de la communauté elle-même, et la normalisation des amitiés masculines. Timestamp estimé : ~58:00Questions posées dans l'épisodeQuelle est ma responsabilité en tant qu'homme face à un phénomène comme celui-là ? Me taire, est-ce être complice ?Comment expliquer qu'on a transformé la condition féminine en quelques décennies sans proposer aux hommes une nouvelle façon d'être des hommes ?Pourquoi le corps est-il devenu le premier territoire de reconstruction identitaire pour les jeunes hommes ?Comment un algorithme peut-il radicaliser un adolescent en moins de 10 minutes sans qu'il l'ait cherché ?D'où vient le mot "incel" et comment est-il passé d'un espace bienveillant à une idéologie de la haine ?Quel est le chemin concret qui mène de la solitude à la violence ?Pourquoi les jeunes hommes les plus exposés au masculinisme reconnaissent-ils en même temps la difficulté d'être une femme ?Est-ce que comprendre cette radicalisation revient à la justifier ?Quels sont les modèles d'une masculinité réinventée aujourd'hui — dans la culture populaire, les films, les séries ?Comment sort-on de l'idéologie incel, et qu'est-ce qui fait vraiment basculer quelqu'un ?Références citées dans l'épisodeLivresbell hooks, La volonté de changer : les hommes, la masculinité et l'amour (2004) — cité comme fondation théorique sur la socialisation masculine et l'engourdissement affectifOlivia Gazalé, Le mythe de la virilité — mise en perspective historique des crises de la masculinitéScott Galloway, Notes on Being a Man (nov. 2025, NYT bestseller) — analyse macrosociale du décrochage masculinRichard Reeves, Of Boys and Men (2022) — décrochage scolaire et économique des hommesJonathan Haidt, The Anxious Generation (2024) — impact des réseaux sociaux sur la génération ZNiobe Way, Deep Secrets: Boys' Friendships and the Crisis of Connection — évolution des amitiés masculinesGuillaume Valet, La fabrique du muscle — capitalisme des vulnérabilités et fitnessFrancis Dupuis-Déry, La crise de la masculinité — politique et genreDavid Deida, The Way of the Superior Man — mentionné comme symptôme d'une tendance masculiniste dans l'entourage de GregÉtudes académiquesRodríguez et al. (2025), Deciphering the incels, Aggression and Violent BehaviorCostello et al. (2025), The Dual Pathways Hypothesis of Incel Harm, Archives of Sexual BehaviorRegehr, C., In(cel)doctrination — progression en 5 étapes vers la radicalisationMoskalenko et al., Incel Ideology, Radicalization and Mental Health (274 entretiens)Solea & Sugiura (2023), Mainstreaming the Blackpill: Understanding the Incel Community on TikTok, European Journal on Criminal Policy and ResearchMurnen et al. (2002), méta-analyse sur masculinité hostile et agression sexuelle, Sex RolesSummerell et al. (2025), masculinité et violences conjugales, Aggression and Violent BehaviorÉtude de l'Université de Dublin sur les algorithmes (comptes fictifs d'ados sur TikTok et YouTube)Podcasts & médiasDes mecs solides, Louie Média / Arte Radio (2025) — témoignages de Jules, Marvin, TristanThe Huberman Lab (interview de Scott Galloway, 2026)Documentaire sur Bertrand CantatJohann Chapoulot (historien) dans une story Instagram sur "la banalité du mal"Pauline Ferrari, journaliste spécialisée masculinisme depuis 7 ansCNN investigation sur "l'académie du viol mondiale" (avril 2026)Franceinfo, Campion J. (23 avril 2026) sur les réseaux d'hommes pratiquant les viols conjugaux sous sédatifInstitutions & rapportsHaut Conseil à l'Égalité entre les femmes et les hommes, Rapport 2025Pew Research Center — données sur le soutien émotionnel dans les relationsChercheurs citésAudrey Voal (sociologue, CEET) — distinction masculinité / virilitéCarol Gilligan (psychologue) — "rupture de la voix" dès 4-5 ans chez les garçonsMichael Stora (psychanalyste) — musculation comme antidépresseurKevin Ditter (sociologue français) — amitiés face-à-face vs côte-à-côteDylan Vegara & Angelica Ferrara — concept de "mankeeping"Caitlin Regehr — ethnographie incel, progression en 5 tempsSophia Moskalenko (Georgia State University)Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.
We know that young women are increasingly unhappy — with high rates of depression and anxiety — and our guest on the program this week says there's good reason for that. In her new book, she argues that girlhood has dramatically changed in the Internet era and that young women have been transformed from people into products.Freya India is a British writer and commentator, and a staff writer at Jonathan Haidt's newsletter After Babel. Her new book is GIRLS: Generation Z and the Commodification of Everything. You can find Tara Henley on Twitter at @TaraRHenley, and on Substack at tarahenley.substack.com
Catherine Price returns to the podcast to talk about one of the biggest challenges facing parents today: how to help kids build a healthier relationship with screens. Drawing from her new book, The Amazing Generation (co-authored with Jonathan Haidt), this conversation explores how to move from power struggles and fear-based messaging to approaches that build insight, agency, and real buy-in from kids themselves. Together, we explore: Why simply telling kids to "get off screens" often backfires. What kids are actually getting from screens (and what they're missing). How to explain to kids that tech companies are designed to capture attention in a way that makes them feel empowered. Why "real world" experiences are critical for development and how screens can crowd them out. Practical ways to support connection and independence without defaulting to smartphones. How to have conversations about screens that don't lead to shutdown or conflict. Simple shifts that can help your child become more aware, reflective, and intentional with technology. Why building a full, engaging life offline naturally reduces screen time. This conversation is about more than just screen time. It's about helping kids develop the awareness, confidence, and agency to make choices that align with the kind of life they actually want to live, and how we, as parents, can support that process. LEARN MORE ABOUT MY GUEST:
As tech and AI transform productivity and free us from rote work, will humanity finally crack happiness? Maybe not, warns Jonathan Haidt. This social psychologist, NYU professor and bestselling author of The Anxious Generation has spent years studying the links between happiness, technology, and societal change. Unless key steps are taken, he says, the technologies transforming work and communication could pull humans further from a sense of meaning, connection and purpose, taking happiness even further from our grasps. To progress on any big challenge ahead will depend on restoring focus, trust, and purpose. Haidt warns that AI and social media may be weakening all three—making intentional leadership more critical than ever. He shares research-backed insights that can help us better understand a fragmented, distracted world and the urgent challenge this brings to leaders running teams in a changing AI era. Key Takeaways: Where happiness really comes from - and what people often misunderstand Understanding the attention crisis and what's contributing to it How AI and digital habits fragment attention and decision-making and undermine trust Simple practices and approaches to reclaim focus, connect with others and lead meaningful change more effectively This interview was recorded in January 2026 at the Annual Meeting in Davos, Switzerland. About this episode: Read here - Transcript: https://www.weforum.org/podcasts/meet-the-leader/episodes/jonathan-haidt-happiness-focus-habits-ai Watch here - YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bXp43TMMAI About this guest: https://jonathanhaidt.com/Books and initiatives referenced in this episode: The Anxious Generation https://www.anxiousgeneration.com/ The Righteous Mind https://righteousmind.com/The Happiness Hypothesis https://www.happinesshypothesis.com/ The Constructive Dialogue Institute www. constructivedialogue.org Related episodes: Nick Thompson, The Atlantic: Why one CEO sets 'non -goals' - and what ultramarathons taught him about focus and mental toughness Watch here - YouTube: https://youtu.be/Xh9PLsyptgAListen here - Spotify: https://tinyurl.com/bdbrspj7 Read here - Listen: https://tinyurl.com/mtdhe37w IRC's David Miliband: How leaders can meet the moment in an increasingly disordered world Watch here - YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABadygYvsZ0&t=16s Listen here - Spotify: https://tinyurl.com/42hzpvvmRead here - Transcript: https://tinyurl.com/3vk4723b What most people get wrong about progress: Harvard psychologist Steven Pinker Watch here - YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y2IJjZs4E7A Listen here - Spotify: https://tinyurl.com/4r69a5pr Read here - Transcript:: https://tinyurl.com/3smrwev9 Radio Davos - The Anxious Generation: how phone-free schools can reverse a mental health pandemic Watch here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b8s6Rw9rAqs&t=7s
People joke about bubble-wrapped children, but it's almost that bad. We've become obsessed with eliminating risk. But there's a cost. In this episode, we crack open a Lost Rhino stout and dig into the growing culture of safetyism: how it started with reasonable child-proofing, morphed into stranger danger hysteria, and ultimately produced a generation of emotionally fragile young adults.Jonathan Haidt and Greg Lukianoff addressed this question in The Coddling of the American Mind, namely, the unintended consequences of overprotective parenting, and how smartphones turbocharged the demand for emotional "safety." Along the way, we ask the questions nobody wants to ask — like whether COVID lockdowns were the ultimate safetyism stress test, and whether removing all risk from childhood is actually more dangerous than the risks themselves.As Thomas Sowell reminds us: there are no solutions, only trade-offs. So grab a beer, take off the helmet, and let's talk about it.Topics covered:* Growing up in the 70s & 80s vs. today* Haidt & Lukianoff's Coddling of the American Mind* Stranger danger, 24-hour news, and moral panic* Smartphones, social media, and emotional fragility* Campus speech restrictions and trigger warnings* COVID, safetyism, and government overreach* Why some danger is essential to raising resilient kids
Freya is the author of the Substack GIRLS, where she writes about the challenges girls and young women face in the modern world. She's also a staff writer for Jonathan Haidt's newsletter, After Babel. She has contributed to publications including The New Statesman, The Spectator, and The Free Press. Today, we are going to be discussing her debut book, GIRLS, Generation Z and the commodification of everything, which will be out in the US in May. Her book serves as both an account of her upbringing in the digital age, as well as an inside look for parents and caring adults about what adolescence online is like right now.
I invite you into a vulnerable, uplifting, and heart-to-heart “honorable closure” with my dear friend, Ingrid Gavshon, documentary filmmaker, executive coach, and one of the sparks behind my growth journey. In this milestone conversation, we reflect on over 30 episodes of Circle of Hope, the launch of my next adventure: writing a book on meaningful connection and personal growth, and the wisdom, joy, and challenge of closing one chapter so another can begin.I share what this podcast has taught me about authentic relationships, leadership, and the beauty of pausing for real reflection as we grow. And in true Circle of Hope spirit, we go deep, exploring resilience, purpose-driven living, and the crucial difference between being in a relationship and talking about the relationship.Watch This If:You want actionable inspiration for navigating life transitions with hope and resilience.You're seeking more authentic leadership at work, at home, or within yourself.You crave personal growth conversations that connect head, heart, and humor.You value emotional intelligence and want to deepen the quality of your conversations.Episode Highlights (with Timestamps):00:00 – Why “Circle of Hope” and the power of purpose-driven podcasting04:08 – Creating your circle of influencers & redefining mentorship07:44 – My surprising biggest lesson: why talking about relationships amplifies their value10:41 – How to expand your leadership range & let go of DIY mentality23:59 – Overcoming isolation: the role band, family, and community played35:25 – Actionable tips for reconnecting with family when trust is low1:12:48 – My “sports team” metaphor for hope and resilience in polarized times What You'll Learn:How to start honest conversations about your relationships that foster deeper connection and trustWhy thriving requires both self-awareness and the courage to ask for supportPractical tips for communicating with emotional intelligence and leading with authenticity, especially during changeResourcesBook: The Wisdom Hunter by Randall ArthurBook: A Course in MiraclesBook: Nonviolent Communication by Marshall RosenbergBook: The Cult of Trump by Steven HassanBook: The Righteous Mind by Jonathan Haidt (this was “the book about morality”)Book: Infinite Games by James P. CarseThe Berkeley Executive Coaching InstituteUnity Church (spiritual community)5 Calls Contact Information:Guest Host: Ingrid Gavshon LinkedInFacebookCircle of Hope Episode: YouTubeSpotify Host: Valerie Hope● Website: https://www.valeriehope.com● Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/valeriehope/● LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/valeriehope/● Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ValerieVHope● YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ConnecttoJoyProduction Support: Lucy Hope - Podcast Editing, Copy, and Publishing. #ConnectToJoyPodcasts #CircleOfHopePodcast #MeaningfulConnection #HopeAndResilience #PersonalGrowthConversations #AuthenticLeadership
Kaindlstorfer, Günter www.deutschlandfunk.de, Andruck - Das Magazin für Politische Literatur
This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit andrewsullivan.substack.comGreg is a lawyer, journalist, and author. He's the president of FIRE — the best free-speech group out there. His books include The Coddling of the American Mind (written with Jonathan Haidt), The Canceling of the American Mind (written with Rikki Schlott), and War On Words (written with Nadine Strossen). You can find him on Substack at The Eternally Radical Idea.For two clips of our convo — on whether Biden or Trump has been worse on free speech, and how to decrease wokeness on campus — head to our YouTube page.Other topics: his Russian dad's 100th birthday the day we taped; how he fled the Soviets as an orphan and came to America speaking 7 languages; his British mom coming over as a nanny; growing up among immigrants in Danbury as both a football player and nerd; studying 1st Amendment law at Stanford; the wane of gifted-and-talented programs (which Greg once taught); the declining support for free speech; family breakdown and protecting kids from bad speech; the perils of social media; race wars on X; censorship against porn and age-restriction laws; where Greg disagrees with Jon Haidt; free speech as a form of bullying; Nick Fuentes; how banning people from X increases groupthink; Jon Rauch; sex changes for kids; gay promiscuity; Covid censorship; AI worries; the killing of Charlie Kirk; the infamous Larry Bushart case; the Ozturk case; Rubio's anti-speech crusade against immigrants; Israel and BDS; antisemitism on campus; heckling vs shout-downs; viewpoint diversity; the FCC and Carr; jawboning and merger threats; the Ellisons; Trump threatening law firms; “hate” crimes; mass arrests in UK over speech; the Varsity Blues cheating scandal; and South Park.Browse the Dishcast archive for an episode you might enjoy. Coming up: Tom Junod on his dad and masculinity, Jerusalem Demsas on the state of the left, Tiffany Jenkins on privacy in a liberal democracy, Adrian Wooldridge on “the lost genius of liberalism,” HW Brands on the life of George Washington, Ben Rhodes on Iran, Harvey Mansfield on modernity, John Gray on Trump's new world, and Robby George on everything. Please send any guest recs, dissents, and other comments to dish@andrewsullivan.com.
221 episodes. One question that started it all: is brainy really the new sexy? In this milestone retrospective, Ben revisits the full arc of The Deductionist podcast. What began as a question about intelligence versus the performance of intelligence has grown into one of the most scientifically grounded behaviour and deduction shows available anywhere. This episode is the case file review. The debrief before the next chapter. Covered in this episode: How the show's central thesis formed around Jonathan Haidt's research on moral reasoning and post hoc rationalisation. Why most people are bad at observation, and why that has nothing to do with intelligence. The inference cycle, and the difference between a guess and a genuine deduction. Memory as an engineering problem, from Nelson Cowan's working memory research to the method of loci documented by Cicero. Why the popular mythology around body language is almost entirely wrong, and what Bella DePaulo's meta analysis actually showed. The Nicola Bulley case as a live study in how online communities reason under uncertainty. The emotional recession, Gallup's global data, and what Sherry Turkle's research on the flight from conversation tells us about where we are headed. Antonio Damasio's somatic marker hypothesis and why suppressing emotion does not make you more rational. What 221 episodes has actually taught about the unified nature of the deductionist skill set. 221b is coming. Subscribe for weekly episodes applying the Sherlock Holmes method to real human behaviour. Podcast available on all major platforms. Subscribe for weekly episodes applying the Sherlock Holmes method to real human behaviour. Podcast available on all major platforms. Subscribe so you never miss an episode. Access the free tier or go deeper with exclusive paid challenges:https://www.omniscient-insights.com/axiomhttps://www.omniscient-insights.com/community-home MERCH -- https://the-deductionist.myspreadshop.co.uk/allE-SCAPE GAME -- https://www.youtube.com/@thedeductionistteamEverything else you need -- https://linktr.ee/bencardall Music provided by https://robertjohncollinsmusic.com/` #criticalthinking #sherlockholmes #reasoning
Cet épisode solo est un développément de ma newsletter à laquelle vous pouvez vous abonner ici!Depuis vingt ans, la Silicon Valley nous vend la même promesse : une vie fluide, sans résistance, où tout est à portée de clic. Et on a dit oui. Collectivement, sans jamais vraiment en discuter. Le café en dosette plutôt que le café moulu. La playlist algorithmique plutôt que les morceaux glanés un à un. La livraison en deux heures plutôt que la sortie en ville. Individuellement, chaque choix semblait raisonnable.Dans cet épisode, j'explore ce que cette idéologie du "frictionless" nous a réellement coûté, au-delà de l'addiction aux écrans et de la perte d'emplois : une vie qui glisse sans s'accrocher nulle part, une capacité à raisonner qui s'atrophie, un monde commun qui disparaît, et une génération entière structurellement fragile face aux vraies tempêtes.J'interroge les travaux de Matthew Crawford sur la résistance productive, de Tim Wu sur la commodité comme idéologie dominante, d'Hannah Arendt sur le monde commun, de Jonathan Haidt sur la santé mentale des adolescents depuis l'arrivée des smartphones, de Pablo Servigne sur le "réseau des tempêtes" comme seule vraie résilience, et d'Hartmut Rosa sur la résonance. Je m'appuie aussi sur Viktor Frankl, Harry Frankfurt, Sherry Turkle et Cal Newport.Ce n'est pas un texte technophobe. Je commande sur Amazon, je prends des Uber, j'utilise Claude Cowork tous les jours. Mais je me demande, honnêtement, ce qu'on a accepté de sacrifier sans jamais en discuter collectivement. Et si le vrai futur, ce n'était pas un futur sans friction, mais un futur dans lequel on utilise les outils pour monter le niveau d'exigence, pas pour le faire descendre.CITATIONS MARQUANTES1. "La commodité, dans sa version la plus avancée, ne supprime pas juste la contrainte. Elle supprime aussi l'expérience."2. "Une vie dans laquelle il n'y a aucune friction est une vie dans laquelle nous mourons dans le même état que celui dans lequel nous sommes nés. Il ne s'est strictement rien passé." (Michael Dandrieux)3. "On a remplacé le raisonnement par l'accumulation de contenus et de données. Et ces deux choses ne sont pas du tout équivalentes."4. "Des livrables plus beaux, des décisions moins bonnes." (dirigeant d'un cabinet de conseil en stratégie)5. "La démocratie est un effort. Pas seulement un effort de l'intelligence rationnelle. Un effort de confiance aussi. D'aimer son prochain qu'on ne connaît pas." (Edward Snowden, via Flore Vasseur)IDÉES CENTRALES1. La friction n'est pas un bug, c'est ce qui nous constitue Timestamp estimé : 06:30 – 14:30 Matthew Crawford le formule mieux que quiconque : l'engagement avec la résistance du monde réel est précisément ce qui nous constitue comme humains. Quand vous apprenez un instrument, la difficulté des cordes, les fausses notes, la coordination des doigts, c'est ce qui crée la compétence. Et avec la compétence : la fierté, la dignité, le sens. Une application qui jouerait à votre place vous donnerait le son mais pas la musique. Le résultat sans le chemin. Et sans ce chemin, vous avez perdu l'essentiel. La Silicon Valley a fondé son modèle entier sur l'idée inverse : le chemin est le problème, le résultat est tout ce qui compte. C'est une erreur anthropologique majeure.Pourquoi c'est important : Cette inversion du rapport à la difficulté n'est pas anodine. Elle redéfinit ce qu'on entend par compétence, par satisfaction, par vie accomplie.2. Le monde commun est en train d'être démantelé, et c'est une catastrophe démocratique Timestamp estimé : 17:30 – 26:00 Hannah Arendt avait conceptualisé le "monde commun" comme l'espace partagé où se construit la politique, l'humanité, la rencontre avec l'Autre. Ce que la Silicon Valley a systématiquement attaqué, pas par malveillance mais par logique économique, c'est exactement cet espace : chaque moment dans le monde commun est un moment non monétisé. Résultat : des "fantômes collectifs" qui occupent le même espace physique mais vivent dans des réalités informationnelles complètement différentes. Et une démocratie qui continue à s'animer mais qui a perdu sa fonction : elle produit du bruit, pas de la délibération.Pourquoi c'est important : La montée des autocraties, le repli tribal, l'incapacité à cohabiter avec la différence : ce n'est pas qu'un problème politique. C'est un problème d'espace. On a supprimé les lieux où on apprenait à vivre avec ceux qui ne pensaient pas comme nous.3. Déléguer la pensée, c'est perdre la capacité d'apprendre de ses erreurs Timestamp estimé : 26:00 – 37:30 Les grands modèles de langage prédisent sans comprendre pourquoi. Ils corrèlent sans expliquer. Et quand on utilise un outil qui prédit sans expliquer, on obtient des réponses dont on ne peut pas évaluer la validité si on n'a pas cheminé sur le sujet. L'effet de contentement fait le reste : le résultat a l'air assez bon pour qu'on ne dépense pas l'énergie cognitive à voir si on serait arrivé à autre chose par soi-même. Des livrables plus beaux, des décisions moins bonnes.Pourquoi c'est important : La question n'est pas "est-ce que l'IA va remplacer les journalistes ?" La vraie question : est-ce qu'une société dans laquelle pas suffisamment de personnes ne s'entraînent à évaluer un argument est encore capable de se gouverner elle-même ?4. Une génération protégée de l'inconfort mineur devient catastrophiquement fragile face à l'inconfort majeur Timestamp estimé : 37:30 – 46:30 Jonathan Haidt montre comment la corrélation entre smartphones et dégradation de la santé mentale des adolescents depuis 2012 est réelle et préoccupante. La thèse intuitive de Greg : si on protège quelqu'un de tout inconfort mineur, on lui retire les occasions de développer la capacité à gérer les inconvénients majeurs. Pablo Servigne ajoute la dimension collective : la résilience, ce n'est pas une infrastructure, c'est du lien. Et ce que la Silicon Valley a vendu, ce sont des substituts de lien : larges et superficiels plutôt qu'étroits et profonds.Pourquoi c'est important : La logique frictionless crée ses propres victimes : elle optimise pour les conditions normales et rend les gens catastrophiquement fragiles face aux conditions anormales.5. La discipline de la résistance comme réponse systémique, pas individuelle Timestamp estimé : 01:03:00 – 01:08:00 Greg refuse le solutionnisme individuel. Il ne propose pas une liste de hacks. Il propose un concept : choisir consciemment de ne pas déléguer certaines choses précises, pas toutes, pas par idéologie, mais parce qu'elles vous construisent. Ce qu'Hartmut Rosa appelle la résonance : ces moments où quelque chose dans le monde vous touche vraiment, vous transforme, vous répond. La résonance ne se commande pas. Elle surgit dans la lenteur, l'attention, le contact vrai avec quelque chose qui résiste.Pourquoi c'est important : Le futur dont Greg parle n'est pas nostalgique et pas technophobe. Il utilise les outils pour monter le niveau d'exigence, pas pour le faire descendre. C'est une position nuancée dans un débat qui ne l'est généralement pas.QUESTIONS STRUCTURANTES THÉMATIQUES(Newsletter solo : pas d'invité. Voici les questions que le texte soulève et auxquelles il répond, utilisables comme fil éditorial ou comme amorces de discussion.)1. En quoi la promesse d'une vie "sans friction" est-elle devenue une idéologie, et pas seulement une amélioration technique ?2. Qu'est-ce qu'on a vraiment perdu en supprimant les petites résistances du quotidien, au-delà de l'inconfort évident ?3. Pourquoi la difficulté est-elle constitutive de la compétence, de la fierté et du sens, selon Matthew Crawford ?4. Comment la logique économique des plateformes explique-t-elle l'attaque systématique sur le "monde commun" d'Arendt, sans qu'il y ait besoin d'invoquer une théorie du complot ?5. Quelle différence y a-t-il entre raisonner et générer, et pourquoi cette distinction est-elle cruciale pour comprendre ce que l'IA fait à notre capacité de décision ?6. Comment l'atrophie de l'esprit critique, accélérée par les outils IA, peut-elle devenir un problème démocratique, pas seulement individuel ?7. En quoi une génération numériquement protégée de l'inconfort mineur devient-elle structurellement vulnérable face aux crises majeures ?8. Quelle est la différence entre une technologie qui augmente les capacités humaines et une technologie qui les remplace ? Comment faire la distinction dans ses propres usages ?9. Qu'est-ce que le concept de "résonance" de Hartmut Rosa apporte au débat sur la relation à la technologie, au-delà du débat sur l'addiction aux écrans ?10. Que signifie concrètement "une discipline de la résistance", et pourquoi ce n'est pas la même chose qu'un retour en arrière ou un rejet de la technologie ?RÉFÉRENCES CITÉESPhilosophes et penseursMatthew Crawford, philosophe américain entre philosophie et mécanique moto. Livre cité : "The World Beyond Your Head". Thèse : l'engagement avec la résistance du monde réel constitue l'humain. Bloc 4, ~08:00Tim Wu, professeur à Columbia. Livre cité : "Les marchands de l'attention". Concept : la commodité comme valeur suprême ayant remplacé la liberté et l'individualité. Bloc 5, ~11:30Hannah Arendt, philosophe. Concept cité : le "monde commun", espace public partagé nécessaire à la démocratie et à la rencontre avec l'Autre. Bloc 7, ~19:00Harry Frankfurt, philosophe américain. Distinction : le mensonge vs le "bullshit". L'IA comme infrastructure industrielle pour le bullshit. Bloc 10, ~35:00Viktor Frankl, psychiatre, fondateur de la logothérapie, survivant des camps de concentration. Thèse : les humains supportent n'importe quelle difficulté si elle a un sens, et s'effondrent face au confort vide de sens. Bloc 15, ~59:00Hartmut Rosa, sociologue allemand. Concept cité : la "résonance", ces moments où quelque chose dans le monde nous touche et nous transforme. Livre sous-jacent : "Résonance". Bloc 16, ~01:03:30Sociologues et psychologuesMichael Dandrieux, sociologue, ami de Greg. Citation : "Une vie sans friction est une vie dans laquelle nous mourons dans le même état que celui dans lequel nous sommes nés." Bloc 6, ~16:00Jonathan Haidt, psychologue américain. Thèse : corrélation entre l'arrivée des smartphones (2012) et la dégradation de la santé mentale des adolescents, en particulier les filles. Bloc 11, ~38:00Sherry Turkle, professeure au MIT. Livre cité : "Ensemble mais chacun seul". Thèse : on peut être hyperconnecté et ne jamais vraiment rencontrer personne. Bloc 8, ~24:30Cal Newport, auteur. Formule citée : "La capacité de produire quelque chose de valeur est proportionnelle à la capacité de se concentrer sur des choses difficiles." Bloc 9, ~29:30Pablo Servigne, chercheur sur les effondrements, invité de Vlan!. Concept cité : le "réseau des tempêtes" comme seule vraie résilience. La résilience, c'est du lien, pas une infrastructure. Bloc 11, ~41:00Invités de Vlan! citésKim Chapiron, réalisateur, ancien invité de Vlan!. Observation : depuis 2001, aucune superproduction hollywoodienne sans un musulman armé présenté comme terroriste. Bloc 10, ~32:00Flore Vasseur, réalisatrice de "Meeting Snowden", ancienne invitée de Vlan!. Citation d'Edward Snowden extraite du film : "La démocratie est un effort." Bloc 15, ~01:00:00Sociologue de la ville (non nommé), ancien invité de Vlan!. Observation : plus une ville est grande, plus elle rend seul. Bloc 8, ~25:30Études et donnéesÉtude dans le métro canadien : des passagers forcés à parler à des inconnus pendant 3 semaines étaient significativement plus heureux que ceux qui ne l'étaient pas. Bloc 7, ~18:30Rapport d'Universciences cité : 76% des Français pensent avoir un bon esprit critique, mais 40% refusent de parler avec des personnes ayant un avis opposé. Bloc 10, ~33:00Plateformes et dirigeantsReed Hastings (CEO Netflix), citation paraphrasée : "Mon plus grand concurrent, c'est votre sommeil." Bloc 7, ~22:00Outils technologiques mentionnés par GregClaude Cowork, Amazon, Uber, Dropbox, Google Maps, Deliveroo, Uber Eats, Netflix, ChatGPT, Instagram, Tinder, Duolingo, Khan Academy.TIMESTAMPS CLÉS00:00 - Intro : je déteste la discipline, mais j'ai peur qu'on me vole ma vie Greg installe la tension centrale : son aversion à la contrainte vs sa lucidité sur ce qu'on accepte de sacrifier sans s'en rendre compte. L'expression "c'est pratique" comme porte d'entrée d'une idéologie.01:30 - La voiture à 10 cm du sol La métaphore fondatrice. Une voiture de sport surélevée de quelques centimètres ne roule pas, le moteur tourne en vain. Sans friction entre les pneus et le sol, aucun mouvement. C'est exactement ce que la Silicon Valley nous a vendu depuis 20 ans.04:00 - Google Maps décide de ton chemin. Netflix de ce que tu regardes. Tinder de ta vie. L'inventaire de la délégation totale. Chaque décision existentielle progressivement confiée à une plateforme. Et la question posée : confondons-nous facilité et progrès ?06:30 - L'anecdote du frigo vide à Lisbonne Greg rentre chez lui, frigo vide, premier réflexe : app, Uber Eats, Netflix. Il réalise ce qu'il rate : les conversations avec les commerçants, les rencontres fortuites, les surprises de la rue. "Ces petites collisions ponctuent la réalité et lui donnent de la texture."09:00 - Matthew Crawford : la friction n'est pas un bug, c'est ce qui vous constitue comme humain Introduction du philosophe qui travaille entre la philosophie et la mécanique moto. Son idée centrale : la résistance du monde réel est ce qui nous fait humains. Exemple de l'apprentissage d'un instrument de musique : sans la difficulté des cordes et des fausses notes, on a le son mais pas la musique.11:30 - Tim Wu : la commodité est devenue une idéologie, plus prégnante que n'importe quelle position politique Professeur à Columbia, auteur des "Marchands de l'attention". La commodité a remplacé la liberté et l'individualité. Et on y est arrivé micro-décision par micro-décision, sans jamais voter pour.14:30 - La journée où il ne s'est rien passé Le sentiment de regarder ses journées et de réaliser que rien n'a résisté. Rien n'a laissé de trace. Michael Dandrieux, sociologue : une vie sans friction, c'est mourir dans le même état qu'on est né.17:30 - L'étude du métro canadien et Hannah Arendt Des passagers forcés à parler à des inconnus pendant 3 semaines sont les plus heureux. Arendt et le "monde commun" : l'espace partagé sans lequel la démocratie ne tient pas. Ce que la Silicon Valley a attaqué, par logique économique pure : chaque moment dans le monde commun est un moment non monétisé.23:00 - "Les fantômes collectifs" et Sherry Turkle Des gens qui occupent le même espace physique mais vivent dans des réalités informationnelles parallèles. Turkle : "Nous sommes ensemble mais chacun seul." Et le paradoxe : plus on est connecté, moins on rencontre l'Autre qui dérange.26:00 - L'IA rend les présentations plus belles et les décisions moins bonnes Un dirigeant de cabinet de conseil stratégique. La distinction entre raisonner et générer. L'effet de contentement. Cal Newport : la valeur est proportionnelle à la capacité de se concentrer sur des choses difficiles.31:30 - L'esprit critique sous perfusion 76% des Français pensent avoir un bon esprit critique, 40% refusent de parler à qui pense différemment. L'IA comme la plus grande expérience d'atrophie collective de l'esprit critique. Harry Frankfurt : l'IA comme infrastructure industrielle pour le bullshit.37:30 - Jonathan Haidt et la génération fragile Depuis 2012 et l'arrivée des smartphones : hausse spectaculaire de l'anxiété et de la dépression chez les adolescents. Protéger de l'inconfort mineur, c'est retirer les occasions de développer la capacité à gérer l'inconfort majeur.41:00 - Pablo Servigne et le réseau des tempêtes La résilience n'est pas une infrastructure. C'est du lien. Des liens denses, réels, entre des gens qui se connaissent vraiment. Ce que la Silicon Valley a vendu : des substituts de lien, larges et superficiels, qui ne tiennent pas quand la vraie tempête arrive.46:30 - La question inconfortable : pouvez-vous rester seul deux heures sans écran ? Pas en retraite de méditation. Juste un dimanche après-midi ordinaire. Le silence dans la salle, c'est la réponse. L'idéologie frictionless a détruit notre capacité à supporter notre propre compagnie.52:00 - Duolingo, Khan Academy : la friction productive comme modèle alternatif Des technologies qui construisent des capacités plutôt que de s'y substituer. L'intelligence conative comme test ultime : est-ce que cet outil libère ma puissance d'agir ou crée une béquille ?57:00 - Ce que la Silicon Valley n'a pas compris La paresse intellectuelle n'est pas californienne ("Panem et circenses" date de 2000 ans). Ce qui est nouveau : l'échelle et la sophistication. Viktor Frankl : les humains supportent n'importe quelle difficulté si elle a un sens.01:03:00 - La discipline de la résistance et Hartmut Rosa Pas une liste de hacks. Un principe : choisir consciemment de ne pas déléguer certaines choses parce qu'elles vous construisent. Rosa et la résonance : elle surgit dans la lenteur et le contact vrai avec ce qui résiste. Le futur qu'on n'a pas encore construit. Suggestion d'épisode à écouter : [SOLO] Qu'est-ce qu'une bonne vie et autres questions métaphysiques de rentrée (https://audmns.com/DHiQJnu)Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.
Jonathan Haidt's book The Anxious Generation hit shelves in March 2024, arguing that smartphones and social media broke teen mental health starting around 2012. Two years later, the book is either treated as gospel or dismissed as moral panic. Neither framing is quite right. This episode cuts through the noise and walks you through what we actually know in 2026. Haidt's case rests on a striking inflection point. Around 2012, teen depression, anxiety, and self-harm rates spiked across the US, UK, Canada, Australia, and parts of Europe. His argument is that the timing lines up too neatly with smartphones going mainstream and Instagram landing in every teenager's pocket. His critics push back hard. Candice Odgers at Duke published a widely cited Nature review arguing the causal evidence falls short. Andrew Przybylski and Amy Orben at Oxford have shown that the measurable effect of social media on well-being is surprisingly small. They argue the 2012 timing could reflect other forces, from the lingering economic hangover of 2008 to shifts in how teens self-report mental health. The tiebreaker neither camp had in 2024 is now starting to arrive. The Netherlands banned phones in secondary schools in early 2024. The UK issued national guidance. Florida, Indiana, and other US states rolled out classroom restrictions. Australia banned social media for kids under sixteen. The early data shows modest but real improvements in focus, social interaction, and reported mood. Not a slam dunk for Haidt, but not a win for his critics either. The practical takeaway is less about winning the academic debate and more about how to act under uncertainty. When a restriction is low-cost, reversible, and aligned with what common sense already suggests, you don't need settled science to move. Phones out of bedrooms. Delayed social media. Protected sleep. These aren't extreme. They're what normal looked like fifteen years ago. Haidt's argument rests on a sharp 2012 inflection point in teen mental health across multiple countries Critics including Odgers, Przybylski, and Orben argue the effect sizes in correlational studies are very small Neither side had strong causal evidence when the debate peaked in 2024 The 2024 to 2026 wave of school phone bans is delivering the natural experiments that correlational studies couldn't Early ban data shows modest but real improvements in mood, focus, and social interaction Under genuine uncertainty, low-cost reversible precautions are the rational move Subscribe to The Healthier Tech Podcast wherever you get your podcasts for more honest conversations about technology, attention, and what a healthier relationship with our devices actually looks like. This episode is brought to you by Shield Your Body, a global leader in EMF protection and digital wellness. Because real wellness means protecting your body, not just optimizing it. If you found this episode eye-opening, leave a review, share it with someone tech-curious, and don't forget to subscribe to Shield Your Body on YouTube for more insights on living healthier with technology.
The Screen Time Struggle: When Screens Hijack Childhood with Christopher T. Willard & Hunter Clarke-Fields Screens are everywhere—and they're changing childhood in ways we're only beginning to understand. In this powerful live-recorded conversation, Hunter Clarke-Fields sits down with psychologist and mindfulness expert Christopher T. Willard to unpack the real impact of screen time on kids (and adults). From rising loneliness and declining social skills to dopamine-driven design and digital addiction, this episode explores how technology is reshaping development—and what we can do about it. You'll hear practical, non-shaming strategies for creating healthier screen habits at home, along with a deeper look at why awareness—not perfection—is the key to change. In This Episode, You'll Learn: Why today's devices are intentionally designed to keep us hooked—and how that affects your brain The link between smartphones, loneliness, and declining social skills in kids What screens are replacing in childhood (and why it matters) How overprotecting kids in real life—and underprotecting them online—creates risk Why “no smartphones before high school” is gaining traction The most sensitive years for social development—and how screens interfere How to talk to kids about social media without shame or blame Simple, doable ways to reduce screen time as a family Why modeling your own screen habits matters more than you think The Bigger Picture Drawing on ideas from The Anxious Generation by Jonathan Haidt, this conversation explores the shift from a play-based childhood to a phone-based childhood—and the consequences for mental health, attention, and connection. Key insight: Kids don't develop social and emotional skills through screens.They develop them through real life—through play, boredom, conflict, and connection. Screen Time Guidelines (and What to Consider) Current recommendations suggest: 0–18 months: Avoid screens (except video chatting) 18–24 months: Limited, high-quality content with a caregiver 2–5 years: ~1 hour/day (more flexibility on weekends) 6+ years: Consistent limits that don't interfere with sleep, movement, or relationships But as discussed in this episode, guidelines alone aren't enough.How screens are used—and what they replace—matters just as much as how much. Practical Strategies from This Episode Create device-free times (meals, car rides, certain days) Keep phones and devices out of bedrooms at night Try the “Nickel Jar” experiment to build awareness of unconscious phone use Watch documentaries together and teach kids how social media works Consider simpler phones (like flip phones) for younger kids Prioritize real-world play, independence, and face-to-face interaction About Our Guest Christopher T. Willard, PsyD Clinical psychologist, author of 20+ books, and faculty at Harvard Medical School, Chris is an international speaker who has taught mindfulness and resilience in over 40 countries. His work focuses on helping children and adults build emotional strength in an increasingly distracted world. About Your Host Hunter Clarke-Fields #1 bestselling author of Raising Good Humans, mindfulness teacher, and creator of the Mindful Parenting Course, Hunter has been helping parents raise kind, confident kids for over 20 years. Keywords mindful parenting, screen time, digital addiction, child development, parenting strategies, social media impact, emotional intelligence, parenting tips, digital wellbeing, kids and technology, smartphone guidelines, family habits, mindful technology use, parenting podcast ABOUT HUNTER CLARKE-FIELDS: Hunter Clarke-Fields is the host Mindful Parenting Podcast (Top 0.5% podcast ), global speaker, number 1 bestselling author of “Raising Good Humans” and “Raising Good Humans Every Day,” Mindfulness Meditation teacher and creator of the Mindful Parenting Course and Teacher Training. Find more podcasts, Hunter's books, blog posts, free resources, and more at MindfulMamaMentor.com. Discover your Unique-To-You Podcast Playlist at mindfulmamamentor.com/quiz/ We love the sponsors that make this show possible! You can always find all the special deals and codes for all our current sponsors on our website: /mindfulmamamentor.com/mindful-mama-podcast-sponsors/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Are we living in a "Truman Show" world?
️ En este episodio de La teoría de la mente hablamos de una de las ideas más útiles para entender por qué tantas conversaciones sobre política terminan mal: no solemos discutir solo con argumentos, sino con intuiciones morales distintas. Y ahí es donde entra Jonathan Haidt, psicólogo social y profesor en la Stern School of Business de la Universidad de Nueva York, conocido por su trabajo sobre psicología moral y por su libro The Righteous Mind, centrado en por qué personas aparentemente razonables acaban tan divididas por la política y la religión. La idea central de este episodio es sencilla, pero cambia mucho la manera de mirar el conflicto: quizá no discutimos mal porque nos falten datos, sino porque cada uno siente primero y justifica después. En la investigación de Haidt, el juicio moral no aparece solo como un proceso racional y frío, sino como algo muy influido por emociones e intuiciones rápidas; su llamado Social Intuitionist Model sostiene precisamente eso. Desde ahí entramos en la teoría que hace especialmente interesante este episodio: la Moral Foundations Theory, desarrollada principalmente por Jonathan Haidt y Jesse Graham para explicar por qué, incluso en culturas muy distintas, la moral suele organizarse alrededor de ciertos ejes recurrentes. Entre ellos aparecen dimensiones como el cuidado, la justicia, la lealtad al grupo, la autoridad y la pureza o santidad. Y aquí viene lo fascinante: cuando una persona habla de política, muchas veces cree que está defendiendo hechos, pero en realidad también está defendiendo una sensibilidad moral. Hay quien reacciona sobre todo ante el daño y la injusticia. Otros son especialmente sensibles a la traición, al desorden, a la falta de respeto o a la degradación de ciertos valores. Por eso dos personas pueden escuchar el mismo tema —inmigración, impuestos, educación, feminismo, nación, religión, orden social— y sentir que están viendo mundos completamente diferentes. En este episodio exploramos justamente eso: los sabores de la moral. Esa metáfora ayuda a entender que no todos percibimos lo político del mismo modo. Igual que no todo el mundo saborea igual lo dulce, lo amargo o lo picante, tampoco todo el mundo reacciona igual ante los dilemas morales. Lo que para unos es compasión, para otros puede ser ingenuidad. Lo que para unos es orden, para otros puede ser control. Lo que para unos es libertad, para otros puede ser amenaza. Y así empieza el bucle eterno de muchas discusiones. Por eso discutir de política con algunas personas parece llevar siempre al mismo sitio: no porque sean tontas, malas o irracionales sin más, sino porque están priorizando valores morales distintos y, además, suelen racionalizar después lo que ya sintieron primero. En ese punto, la conversación deja de ser una búsqueda compartida de verdad y se convierte en un choque de intuiciones, identidades y lealtades. Este episodio no pretende decir que todas las posturas sean iguales ni que la verdad no importe. Lo que intenta es algo más útil: entender mejor por qué la polarización se vuelve tan pegajosa, por qué cuesta tanto escuchar y por qué muchas veces no basta con “dar datos” para cambiar una opinión política. A veces no estás hablando con una idea: estás hablando con un sistema moral entero. ✨ Si te interesan la psicología moral, la polarización política, el sesgo de confirmación, la identidad ideológica, las discusiones imposibles o autores como Jonathan Haidt, este episodio te va a dar un mapa muy potente para pensar mejor y discutir un poco menos a ciegas. Si quieres profundizar más en psicología, ansiedad, relaciones, pensamiento y herramientas para entenderte mejor a ti mismo y a los demás, te invitamos a entrar en nuestra comunidad El mapa de la ansiedad. 5 títulos alternativos 4 ideas de Jonathan Haidt que van a ayudarte a entender por qué nadie se pone de acuerdo en política Llevas años discutiendo de política mal y seguramente no es por falta de datos Esta forma de entender la moral puede cambiar tus conversaciones para siempre 5 cosas que nunca entendiste del todo sobre las discusiones políticas Por qué discutir con algunas personas sobre política siempre acaba igual 25 keywords Jonathan Haidt, sabores de la moral, psicología moral, moral foundations theory, teoría de los fundamentos morales, discusiones políticas, polarización política, por qué discutimos de política, intuiciones morales, sesgo de confirmación, identidad política, The Righteous Mind, Jonathan Haidt podcast, psicología social, política y emociones, debate político, tribalismo político, moral y política, pensamiento crítico, ideología y moral, por qué nadie cambia de opinión, conversaciones difíciles, la teoría de la mente, salud mental, polarización social 6 hashtags #JonathanHaidt, #PsicologiaMoral, #PolarizacionPolitica, #LaTeoriaDeLaMente, #DebatePolitico, #FundamentosMorales Enlaces Nuestra escuela de ansiedad: www.escuelaansiedad.com Nuestro nuevo libro: www.elmapadelaansiedad.com Visita nuestra página web: http://www.amadag.com Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Asociacion.Agorafobia/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/amadag.psico/ Youtube Amadag TV: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC22fPGPhEhgiXCM7PGl68rw Comunidad en Skool - El mapa de la ansiedad: https://www.skool.com/elmapadelaansiedad
What if it's not just ADHD getting worse, but the world your child is growing up in? In this week's episode of The Soaring Child podcast, Dana Kay sits down with licensed therapist Logan McIlwain to unpack what's really happening to kids' brains in today's digital world. From constant notifications to endless scrolling, today's children are growing up in an environment of nonstop stimulation, and for kids with ADHD, that impact can be intense. You'll hear why screens don't create ADHD but can absolutely amplify symptoms like inattention, emotional dysregulation, and impulsivity. Logan breaks down what's happening in the brain with dopamine, why kids struggle to "just turn it off," and how devices can quietly become a child's primary coping tool. Together, they also tackle one of the biggest challenges parents face today: setting boundaries without triggering meltdowns. If taking the phone away feels like a full nervous system explosion in your home, this episode will help you understand why and what to do instead. Most importantly, you'll walk away with practical, realistic strategies you can start using right away. From creating consistent guardrails to helping your child build real-life regulation skills, this conversation is about supporting your child in the digital age. LINKS MENTIONED IN THE SHOW https://loganlcsw.com The Anxious Generation by Dr. Jonathan Haidt: https://amzn.to/41vDzba The Explosive Child by Dr. Ross Greene: https://amzn.to/4taYzAj KEY TAKEAWAYS [00:01] Modern childhood overstimulation explained [02:10] Screens amplify ADHD symptoms [06:10] Environment vs diagnosis debate [09:32] Difference between distraction and ADHD [13:03] Dopamine and addictive screen loops [14:48] Loss of boredom tolerance [17:01] Screens as emotional coping tools [19:15] Importance of consistent boundaries [22:10] How to reset screen habits [25:34] Monitoring apps and content [29:43] Externalizing executive function [31:10] Small changes reduce nervous system overload MEMORABLE MOMENTS "When did childhood get so loud?" "There is absolutely no way my brain could have handled this much input." "Phones don't create true ADHD, but they absolutely create ADHD-like symptoms." "It's like this slot machine effect." "Our kids in this generation don't know how to be bored at all." "These devices have become their emotional regulation tools." "You can exercise your boundary muscle over and over again." "Don't ask a struggling brain to do everything internally." "We handed our children these tiny slot machines." DANA KAY RESOURCES
In a culture chasing independence and instant gratification, Pastors Josh and Jenaye point families back to God's design—intentional connection and lasting influence. Through “common sense parenting,” rooted in Proverbs 2:7, they challenge parents to move away from both extremes of over-control and disengagement, offering the wisdom needed to raise kids who know God's voice over simply achieving success.Tech: Gabb Wireless, Bark Technologies, Common Sense Media, Plugged In, Vid AngelSubscriptions: Angel Studios, Minno Kids, Amazon Prime addition of Wonder (christian/cleaner television) Social Media accounts: Birds & Bees, Nurtured First, Safe Social Network, wait until 8th, Protect Young eyes, OUR Rescue, Defend young minds, intentional parents Books: Parenting by Paul David Tripp, The Anxious Generation by Jonathan Haidt, Raising Mentally Strong Kids by Daniel Amen and Charles Fay, Raising Passionate Jesus Followers by Phil & Diane Comer10 Safe Search Engine Options for Kidshttps://www.gigabitiq.com/10-safe-kids-search-engines-for-parents-to-trust/#:~:text=Kiddle%20is%20a%20vibrant%20kids,giving%20parents%20peace%20of%20mind.Best Parental Control Apps to manage screen time & keep kids safer https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbes-personal-shopper/article/best-parental-control-app/@waituntil8th@NurturedFirst@birds_bees@safesocialnetwork @freetheanxiousgeneration@jonathanhaidt@betterscreentime@intentional_parents
QUOTES FOR REFLECTION“Socially prescribed perfectionism is closely related to anxiety; people who suffer from anxiety are more prone to it. Being a perfectionist also increases your anxiety because you fear the shame of public failure from everything you do.”~Jonathan Haidt, social psychologist at NYU, in his book The Anxious Generation “It is the struggle of the natural man for self-justification. He finds it only in comparing himself with others, in condemning and judging others. Self-justification and judging others go together, as justification by grace and serving others go together.”~Dietrich Bonhoeffer (1906-1945), pastor-theologian executed by the Nazis “They all therefore were glorified and magnified, not through themselves or their own works or the righteous doing which they wrought, but through His will. And so we, having been called through His will in Christ Jesus, are not justified through ourselves or through our own wisdom or understanding or piety or works which we wrought in holiness of heart, but through faith, whereby the Almighty God justified all men that have been from the beginning….”~Clement of Rome, early church leader, in a letter written to Corinth in c. A.D. 96 “For ‘Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness.' In like manner we also are justified by faith in God: for ‘the just shall live by faith.' Now ‘not by the law is the promise to Abraham, but by faith' for Abraham was justified by faith: and ‘for a righteous man the law is not made.' In like manner we also are justified not by the law, but by faith….”~Irenaeus of Lyon (c.125-c.202) in his Demonstration of the Apostolic Preaching “When someone believes in him who justifies the ungodly, that faith is credited as justice to the believer, as David too declares that person blessed whom God has accepted and endowed with righteousness, independently of any righteous actions. What righteousness is this? The righteousness of faith, preceded by no good works, but with good works as its consequence.”~Augustine (354-430), North African bishop, in his Exposition of the Psalms “The righteousness of God is not that by which God is righteous but that with which he clothes man when he justifies the ungodly”~Augustine (4354-430) in his A Treatise on the Spirit and the Letter “Lord Jesus, You are my righteousness, I am your sin. You took on you what was mine; yet set on me what was yours. You became what you were not, that I might become what I was not.”~Martin Luther, (1483-1546), German reformerSERMON PASSAGERomans 4:1-25 (NIV) 1 What then shall we say that Abraham, our forefather according to the flesh, discovered in this matter? 2 If, in fact, Abraham was justified by works, he had something to boast about—but not before God. 3 What does Scripture say? “Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness.” 4 Now to the one who works, wages are not credited as a gift but as an obligation. 5 However, to the one who does not work but trusts God who justifies the ungodly, their faith is credited as righteousness. 6 David says the same thing when he speaks of the blessedness of the one to whom God credits righteousness apart from works: 7 “Blessed are those whose transgressions are forgiven, whose sins are covered. 8 Blessed is the one whose sin the Lord will never count against them.” 9 Is this blessedness only for the circumcised, or also for the uncircumcised? We have been saying that Abraham's faith was credited to him as righteousness. 10 Under what circumstances was it credited? Was it after he was circumcised, or before? It was not after, but before! 11 And he received circumcision as a sign, a seal of the righteousness that he had by faith while he was still uncircumcised. So then, he is the father of all who believe but have not been circumcised, in order that righteousness might be credited to them. 12 And he is then also the father of the circumcised who not only are circumcised but who also follow in the footsteps of the faith that our father Abraham had before he was circumcised. 13 It was not through the law that Abraham and his offspring received the promise that he would be heir of the world, but through the righteousness that comes by faith. 14 For if those who depend on the law are heirs, faith means nothing and the promise is worthless, 15 because the law brings wrath. And where there is no law there is no transgression. 16 Therefore, the promise comes by faith, so that it may be by grace and may be guaranteed to all Abraham's offspring—not only to those who are of the law but also to those who have the faith of Abraham. He is the father of us all. 17 As it is written: “I have made you a father of many nations.” He is our father in the sight of God, in whom he believed—the God who gives life to the dead and calls into being things that were not. 18 Against all hope, Abraham in hope believed and so became the father of many nations, just as it had been said to him, “So shall your offspring be.” 19 Without weakening in his faith, he faced the fact that his body was as good as dead—since he was about a hundred years old—and that Sarah's womb was also dead. 20 Yet he did not waver through unbelief regarding the promise of God, but was strengthened in his faith and gave glory to God, 21 being fully persuaded that God had power to do what he had promised. 22 This is why “it was credited to him as righteousness.” 23 The words “it was credited to him” were written not for him alone, 24 but also for us, to whom God will credit righteousness—for us who believe in him who raised Jesus our Lord from the dead. 25 He was delivered over to death for our sins and was raised to life for our justification.
The world around kids' access to technology is changing at lightning speed – from bell-to-bell school phone bans to the re-emergence of the landline to governmental social media limits for those under 16. No one has been more at the center of these shifts than social psychologist Jonathan Haidt. He joins us along with his The Amazing Generation co-author Catherine Price for a lively conversation about different approaches to navigating tech. Spoiler alert: we don't always agree! Show Notes: Watch the full episode on Youtube! Join the LESS AWKWARD MEMBERSHIP HUB Go to Quince.com/AWKWARD for free shipping on your order and three hundred and sixty-five -day returns. Download the FREE Playbook for Getting Your Kid to Talk Order our book This Is So Awkward Check out all our speaking and curriculum at www.lessawkward.com and our super comfy products at www.myoomla.com To bring us to your school or community email operations@lessawkward.com To submit listener questions email podcast@lessawkward.com Produced by Peoples Media Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
"Attack" dogs aren't born. They are conditioned. Men don't become men just because they reach a certain age. Based on a conversation from Jordan Peterson and Jonathan Haidt the author of "The Anxious Generation" we make some observations about about the conditions required to reach the condition of being a man.Life lived is life learned. Every experience has facts, concepts and applications. These arestories from the eclectic life of Lonnie Jones, Licensed ProfessionalCounselor, Minister, SWAT Team Chaplain, Outdoor Enthusiast, Quixotic Jedi andholder of an honorary doctorate from the University of Adversity. To Support this podcast projectplease send gifts via Venmo @Lonnie-Jones-19 or use Cash App$Lonniejones3006. Please follow us and share. Want lonnie to speak at yourevent? Contact: lonjones@bellsouth.net Check out YouTube for thelive eye view while the episode was being recorded. Also look for archived lessons, Skits, and videosshowing/explaining some of the rope stuff we talk about. YouTube.com/@LonnieJones Visit www.lonniejones.org to find links tooriginal art, swag, 550guys and the following books:"Cognitive SpiritualDevelopment: A Christ Centered Approach to Spiritual Self Esteem";"Grappling With Life. Controlling Your Inside Space";"Pedagogue" The Youth Ministry Book by Lonnie Jones; "If I Werea Mouse" a children's story written and illustrated by Lonnie Jones;"The Selfish Rill, a story about a decision" A fantasy parableby Lonnie Jones. T-shirts, stickers, prints and other art at www.teespring.com/stores/lonnie-jones-art https://lonnie-jones-art.creator-spring.com/listing/buy-podcast-swag?products=46 #www.worldchristian.org#tkminc2001@twlakes.net #www.hcu.edu #hpcitizensfoundation.orgFaulkner.edu/kgst graduateenrollment@faulkner.edu
If you feel like your attention span has shrunk, you're not imagining it. According to social psychologist Jonathan Haidt, our phones and social platforms have fundamentally reshaped childhood, work, and our ability to focus. In his bestselling book The Anxious Generation, Jon argues that the rise of smartphones and social media triggered what he calls the “great rewiring of childhood.” But the consequences extend far beyond kids. In this episode of Hello Monday, Jessi talks with Jon about what constant connectivity is doing to our minds,how we got here, and why reclaiming our attention may be one of the most important challenges of our time. Jon and Jess discuss: How smartphones reshaped adolescent development Why social media use is linked strongly to rising anxiety and depression among young people How tech platforms are intentionally designed to capture and fragment our attention Why today's digital tools isolate people Practical steps families, workplaces, and individuals can take to reclaim focus and develop healthier tech habits Why restoring unstructured play, independence, and boredom is critical for healthy development At its core, this conversation asks a simple question: What happens when an entire society loses control of its attention, and how do we get it back? Find Jon's new book for kids, The Amazing Generation: Your Guide to Fun and Freedom in a Screen-Filled World, here. Follow Jonathan Haidt and Jessi Hempel on LinkedIn.
In this episode, we delve into the insights shared by Dr. Kathy, focusing on the concerning trends highlighted by author Jonathan Haidt in his book, "Anxious Generation." Haidt discusses the alarming increase in high school seniors who feel their lives are useless, with the percentage doubling since 2010. We explore the impact of storytelling on youth, emphasizing the moral order present in narratives from previous generations and how this contrasts with the current environment. Additionally, we highlight the importance of nurturing creativity in children through resources like Creating a Masterpiece, which offers guided art projects that inspire and awaken their creative potential. Tune in to learn more about these critical issues facing today's youth and the tools available to support their emotional well being.
This Bonus post is a cross-over episode from the What Really Matters Podcast. In this episode I’m sharing research by Dr. Jonathan Haidt that demonstrates the ripple effects transmitted from each and every act of kindness. When other people see us being kind it changes them. And this moment in time–when people are feeling overwhelmed,… Continue reading Ep. 541 [BONUS] Kindness is Contagious and We Need it Now More Than Ever (from What Really Matters Podcast)
On Wednesday, a California jury found Meta and YouTube each liable for harming the well-being of a young user who had sued the two companies. The plaintiff argued that the products had negatively impacted her mental health. This verdict follows a similar decision made by a jury in New Mexico earlier this week. Both decisions are part of a massive shift in how Americans are thinking about social media. New polling from Edison Research at SSRS – a major data and research firm – found that 57% of Americans ages 18 and older would support a social media ban for anyone under 16. But civil liberties groups, like the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, are crying foul, arguing that curtailing speech and content on social media is curtailing speech, period. Jonathan Haidt, a social psychologist at New York University's Stern School of Business and author of "The Anxious Generation," joins the show to discuss what stronger regulations on young people could mean for all social media users.And in headlines, a Democrat flips the Florida state legislative seat in the district that contains Mar-a-Lago, new polling shows that a majority of Americans think that the U.S. military has gone too far in attacking Iran, and a report says the White House turned down Elon Musk's offer to pay TSA agents.Show Notes: Check out Jonathan's book – www.anxiousgeneration.com/book Call Congress – 202-224-3121 Subscribe to the What A Day Newsletter – https://tinyurl.com/y4y2e9jy What A Day – YouTube – https://www.youtube.com/@whatadaypodcast Follow us on Instagram – https://www.instagram.com/crookedmedia/ For a transcript of this episode, please visit crooked.com/whataday
The Cathy Heller Podcast: A Podcast for Soulful Entrepreneurs
What are smartphones and social media really doing to our kids' mental health, and how can we help them reshape their childhood in this digital age? Jonathan Haidt, social psychologist and bestselling author of The Anxious Generation is spearheading a movement to empower kids and parents to regain their attention, and reclaim their sense of play and freedom away from the screens. He shares how families can restore real-world connection and fun, what structures and tools can help us all avoid the digital dopamine addiction, and why you should make time to celebrate and honor your own Shabbat.- Watch the full replay of Cathy's Aries Masterclass cathyheller.com/workshop- Get your copies of The Anxious Generation and The Amazing Generation at https://www.anxiousgeneration.com/- Let Grow Movement https://letgrow.org/- Follow Jonathan Haidt on Instagram @jonathanhaidt - Deep Focus by Cal Newport - Stolen Focus by Johann Hari
Enjoy a short preview of our latest full-length Book Club episode. Want to hear the whole thing and get 2.0 CEs for FREE? Subscribe to our Patreon today at the premium $10+ levels for that plus other bonuses! I don't want to sound like an old grump here, but kids these days with their devices and social medias are in trouble. What's that, you say? There's a whole book that not only agrees with that sentiment, but also has data to prove that the worsening outcomes of the world's youth are likely causal to the rise of social media and constant access to phones? Yes, it's Jonathan Haidt's "The Anxious Generation" and for our Spring Book Club, we've read it and are ready to discuss these eye-opening findings at with our regular crew. Fortunately, there's a lot more here than just evidence of the decline of play-based childhoods since the '80s and the significant rise of depression and anxiety in young adults since the 2010s. We've also got some ideas (some from the book and some from us) as to what we can do to turn this trend around. Rob and Diana put their youngest kid into a tall tower. That's not recommended by Haidt, but one can never be too careful! The full episode is available for 2.0 LEARNING CEUs. Patrons at the $10 and up level, as part of your subscription, you'll be able to earn these CEs for no charge! Subscribe to our Patreon today! Content discussed in this episode: Haidt, J., (2024). The anxious generation: How the great rewiring of childhood is causing an epidemic of mental illness. Penguin Press.
In the book “The Anxious Generation,” Jonathan Haidt, a social psychologist at New York University, argues that social-media platforms are detrimental to youths' well-being, and that society needs to treat them as literally addictive. It has spent nearly a hundred weeks on the New York Times best-seller list, and has helped galvanize a movement seeking limits to social media in legislatures, in school districts, and in the courts. David Remnick speaks with Haidt about an Australian law to verify the age of social-media users, the first of its kind in the world, and about lawsuits in California that are aiming to pin liability for harms on social-media companies themselves. Further reading: “World Happiness Report 2026,” featuring a contribution from Jonathan Haidt and other researchers “Mountains of Evidence,” by Jonathan Haidt Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices
In the book “The Anxious Generation,” Jonathan Haidt, a social psychologist at New York University, argues that social-media platforms are detrimental to youths' well-being, and that society needs to treat them as literally addictive. It has spent nearly a hundred weeks on the New York Times best-seller list, and has helped galvanize a movement seeking limits to social media in legislatures, in school districts, and in the courts. David Remnick speaks with Haidt about an Australian law to verify the age of social-media users, the first of its kind in the world, and about lawsuits in California that are aiming to pin liability for harms on social-media companies themselves. Further reading: “World Happiness Report 2026,” featuring a contribution from Jonathan Haidt and other researchers “Mountains of Evidence,” by Jonathan Haidt New episodes of The New Yorker Radio Hour drop every Tuesday and Friday. Join host David Remnick as he discusses the latest in politics, news, and current events in conversation with political leaders, newsmakers, innovators, New Yorker staff writers, authors, actors, and musicians.
Patrick Bet-David and Scott Galloway debate why young men are shifting politically and whether culture, parenting, or technology is driving rising anxiety. They discuss role models, Jonathan Haidt's research, social media's impact, and why many boys feel lost in modern society.
Is tech rewiring childhood or exposing what's already broken? Jonathan Haidt, Catherine Price, and a Gen Z advocate debate social media bans, attention and what “fun” looks like off-screen. Guests include social psychologist Jonathan Haidt, youth online safety activist Maximilian Milovidov and author Catherine Price.TED Radio Hour+ subscribers now get access to bonus episodes, with more ideas from TED speakers and a behind the scenes look with our producers. A Plus subscription also lets you listen to regular episodes (like this one!) without sponsors. Sign-up at plus.npr.org/ted.Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoicesNPR Privacy Policy
Bill Maher and his guests answer viewer questions after the show. (Originally aired 2/13/26) Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices