Podcasts about public trust doctrine

Send us a textJoin Boozy and the Certified Legal Layman, Alkali, as they once again take the show on the road to Furthemore 2025 in another live recording.In this episode the pair discuss the concept of the Public Trust Doctrine and what that means when two people from New Jersey have their beachfront home subjected to the traffic of lowly peons as North Carolina courts answer the question of whether they can own, in the words of Disney's Pocahontas, whatever land they land on in Nies v. Town of Emerald Isle.Special features:  Dead experts sign affidavits, Trump targets law firms, and a Bigfoot hunter doesn't get alimony.Legal Funhouse Theme by Status Ferret. Check out his stuff here!Support the showSupport Boozy over on Patreon, or maybe watch him at Twitch If you want to support Alkali, you can do that at his Twitch channel or on their Patreon!

Hunting is conservation. That phrase was popularized by David Allen while he was the CEO at the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation. David is a marketing genius. That phrase went viral and hunters continue to use it at every opportunity. There is a lot of truth to those words. For about the last 100 years hunters have been the primary source of conservation funding. The New Mexico Department of Game and Fish is an enterprise agency. The roughly $50 million dollars per year they operate with is not provided by tax dollars or other general fund appropriations. Instead, their budget is a result of dollars spent on hunting and fishing licenses and federally matched dollars generated by an excise tax on firearms, ammunition, and some other fishing and hunting gear. This model has worked historically, but it's not sustainable into the future. Conservation funding must be broadened. The Public Trust Doctrine makes clear that wildlife exists in trust and shall be managed for the benefit of all the residents of the state. Because wildlife belongs equally to all the residents, all the residents should contribute to the financial investment needed to effectively manage that wildlife. Through a variety of strategies, New Mexico's conservation funding is both increasing and becoming more diverse. It's more critical than ever that hunters welcome to the table those co-owners of our wildlife who choose not to hunt. This is happening in a huge way in New Mexico. In this episode, Jesse Deubel facilitates a conversation with members of the New Mexico Conservation Coalition to discuss how they are working together to reform the NM State Game Commission, and support our state wildlife agency by ensuring they have the tools, authority and funding necessary to carry out their mission. By working together we can sustain our hunting and fishing traditions. Enjoy the listen!    For more info: NMWF Website

Georgia has rivers and streams running from the mountain country of the Southern Appalachians to the Gulf of Mexico, totaling about 70,000 total miles of waterways.  Whitewater and flatwater.  Clear water and Black water.  And a long history of publicly accessible rivers and streams.  That access is being debated by the State of Georgia and bills have been proposed that would curtail access for the public.  We talk with Georgia Rivers to learn more about this topic and about the public meeting and comment process.  SPONSORSDenver Area Nissan Dealers@nissanusaOver It Raft Covers@overitraftcoverspromo code, free shipping: riverradius GUESTGeorgia RiversFreedom to FloatJoe Cook PUBLIC MEETINGWednesday, Nov. 13, at 9 a.m. in Newnan Donald W. Nixon Centre for Performing and Visual Arts in Newnan, GA.Email your comments / Georgia ResidentsEmail your comments / Non Georgia Residents  THUMBNAIL IMAGEPic credit, Joe Cook, Georgia RiversFlint River, Georgia, Fall 2024  THE RIVER RADIUSWebsiteInstagramFacebookApple PodcastSpotifyLink Tree

In late August, Russian Riverkeeper and the California Coastkeeper Alliance got what looks like a very significant ruling in their challenge to Sonoma County's well permitting ordinance. The groups say that by allowing excessive and unmonitored groundwater extraction, the County is failing to protect surface flows in creeks and rivers that fish, wildlife, and recreation need. The court agreed, holding that under the Public Trust doctrine, Sonoma County has an affirmative duty to take the public trust into account in the planning and allocation of water resources, and to protect public trust uses whenever feasible,” but that the County failed to do so, overlooking impacts on the public trust, including cumulative effects.In this episode of the EcoNews Report, Friends of the Eel River Conservation Director Scott Greacen and EPIC Executive Director Tom Wheeler talk to three people deeply involved in these questions.• Rue Furch, former Sonoma County planning commissioner and veteran Russian River advocate.• Don McEnhill, the Executive Director of Russian Riverkeeper.• Drev Hunt, Legal Director for California Coastkeeper, and one of the attorneyson the case, with Jaime Neary of Russian Riverkeeper, Daniel Cooper of SycamoreLaw, and Amy Minteer and Michelle Black of Carstens, Black and Minteer LLP.Further reading:• A Landmark Victory for California Waters - California Coastkeeper Alliance • Why You Should Care About the Public Trust Doctrine - Russian Riverkeeper Support the show

In this episode Matt, Heath, and Brian return to the show to continue our conversation regarding the ways in which the North American Model of Wildlife Conservation (NAM) intersects with the way that North American falconers practice their sport.We begin the episode talking about the principle that take of wildlife is allocated by law, which guides proper use of wildlife resources. Brian tells us about the ways in which take of raptors was established and is regulated.  Matt then offers insight into the way in which this principle influences his own falconry, and Heath adds to the conversation by telling us about the ways in which NAFA relies on the principle.We then turn our attention to discussion of the Public Trust Doctrine which reflects the idea that wildlife is owned by the public, and held in trust on their behalf by government for the benefit of current and future generations. Discussion ranges broadly.Historically, the need for management and conservation of wildlife was associated with the effect of market hunting on wildlife species. Inherent to the NAM is the principle that markets for dead wildlife were eliminated and the sale of wildlife was prohibited. Brian tells us how this principle is implemented within federal government regulation. We then talk about "ownership" of wild-caught raptors and commercialization of captive-bred raptors.We close out the episode discussing the principles that wildlife is an international resource and that killing can be sanctioned only for legitimate purpose. Matt imagines another version of himself existing separately in the multiverse and posits a way that killing of species currently protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act might be legitimized. Thanks for listening to the Fat Bird, Ugly Dog Podcast. I hope you enjoy this episode.

This episode of Across The Margin: The Podcast features an interview with Deborah Rowan Wright, an independent researcher, ocean advocate, and marine-policy researcher who writes about marine conservation. She has worked with the UK NGOs Whale & Dolphin Conservation, Friends of the Earth, and Marinet. Her work on marine renewable energy, ocean governance reform, and public-trust law has been published by the International Whaling Commission and the Ecologist, among others. In 2010, her policy document The Ocean Planet formed an integral part of Marinet's Common Fisheries Policy reform campaign, and it won her Friends of the Earth's Communication of the Year Award. The world's oceans face multiple threats: the effects of Climate Change, pollution, overfishing, plastic waste, and more. Confronted with the immensity of these challenges and of the oceans themselves, we might wonder what more can be done to stop their decline and better protect the sea and marine life. Such widespread environmental threats call for a simple but significant shift in reasoning to bring about long-overdue, elemental change in the way we use ocean resources. In Deborah's book, Future Sea, she provides the tools for that shift. Questioning the underlying philosophy of established ocean conservation approaches, Rowan Wright lays out a radical alternative — a bold and far-reaching strategy of 100 percent ocean protection that would put an end to destructive industrial activities, better safeguard marine biodiversity, and enable ocean wildlife to return and thrive along coasts and in seas around the globe. Future Sea is essentially concerned with the solutions and not the problems and it shines a light on existing international laws intended to keep marine environments safe that could underpin this new strategy. Deborah gathers inspiring stories of communities and countries using ocean resources wisely, as well as of successful conservation projects, to build up a cautiously optimistic picture of the future for our oceans. A passionate, sweeping, and personal account, Future Sea not only argues for systemic change in how we manage what we do in the sea but also describes steps that anyone, from children to political leaders (or indeed, any reader of the book), can take toward safeguarding the oceans and their extraordinary wildlife. In this episode host Michael Shields and Deborah Rowan Wright discuss the bevy of threats facing the ocean and the countless reasons why protecting the oceans is so crucial. They consider how the oceans aid in fighting Climate Change, how the Public Trust Doctrine might be employed to help protect our oceans, small solutions we can all do to safeguard our seas, the magnificent sea creatures who call the oceans home that need our protection, and much, much more. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This week we continue the multi-part RESCUE series with a discussion of Earth law, a framework built upon the idea that ecosystems have the right to exist and thrive, and that Nature should be able to defend those rights in court. Can we ratify a collective treaty toward the protection of Nature? RESCUE as an acronym offers a plan for specific action and public participation: Renewal, Environment, Society, Collaboration, Understanding, and Engagement. About World Ocean Radio 5-minute weekly insights dive into ocean science, advocacy and education hosted by Peter Neill, lifelong ocean advocate and maritime expert. Episodes offer perspectives on global ocean issues and viable solutions, and celebrate exemplary projects. Available for syndicated use at no cost by college and community radio stations worldwide.

This is one of the most serious and important episodes we've ever done.  We discuss the Public Trust Doctrine and the North American Model for Wildlife Conservation in the context of transferrable big game tags, an issue that annually hits the Kansas Legislature.  To help us with this discussion we enlist the help of former KDWP Assistant Secretary Mike Miller to talk about the history of transferrable deer tags in Kansas and Thomas Baumeister of the MT, an expert on both the Public Trust Doctrine and the North American Model for Wildlife Conservation.

India Policy Watch: Passing the BurdenInsights on burning policy issues in India— Pranay KotasthaneAs Wilson's Matrix tells us, concentrated benefits (costs) trump diffused costs (benefits) on most occasions. Organising people around diffuse interests is difficult. As a political articulation of these voices is difficult, they are consigned to being a background hum in the cacophony of politics. One such diffused interest group is the future generation. Apart from the common difficulty that all diffuse interest groups face, they face a small, little additional problem — they aren't even in this world to be able to speak for themselves.Hence, it shouldn't come as a surprise that governments and societies shortchange future generations by borrowing more than their means for current consumption and passing this burden to the future generation. India is no exception. Even today, the biggest expenditure item in the union budget is neither defence nor home affairs, but the interest paid by the union government to borrowers on past loans. We are paying for the profligacy of past and current governments. The chart below from this year's budget tells us that roughly a fifth of the government's total expenditure is being spent on interest payments.As we keep living beyond our means, the portion of the future generation's spending on interest payments keeps growing. This is what a real debt trap looks like. Most governments run deficits, and so does India. But the quality of deficits matters. If governments borrow to finance physical and social infrastructure, the burden on future generations is mitigated to the extent that the outputs continue to be available to them. But that's not the case in India. The union government still runs a sizable revenue deficit, meaning that a portion of the borrowing is being used merely to keep the government running today. In other words, we snatch money from future generations to meet the demands of the current generation's citizens. In Studies in Indian Public Finance, Govinda Rao points out that while children in the age group of 0-14 constitute over 35 per cent of the population, investment in the two items that matter most for their capabilities—health and education—continues to be low. This idea of sharing resources across generations is known as intergenerational equity. I prefer to call it intergenerational balance. A $2500 per capita income country with 20 per cent poverty must accord higher priority to improving the life chances of today's citizens. Nevertheless, we must push governments to seek a balance between today's consumption and tomorrow's choices.It is for this reason that state governments reshifting to the Old Pension Scheme is a wilful crime against future Indians. At a time when government employees already have better payscales than the median Indian, committing to an ever-growing pension liability is to rob money from the future for the benefit of a select few. But then, matters of fiscal prudence are not politically savvy. No one ever voted for a government for its fiscal marksmanship. No politician ventures there unless specifically asked. For this reason, it was encouraging that the Prime Minister—at least rhetorically—made a case for intergenerational balance in the Parliament:“You should not put burden on your children.  Borrowing for present day needs leaving the debt burden on future generations is a matter of serious concern...For the economic well being of the nation, states also have to take the path of discipline... Only then states will be able to benefit from development.”There's a lot more the union government could've done and can still do. Criticising state governments on the floor of the parliament won't make the problem disappear. It's important for the union government to explain to state governments the fiscal impact of such profligacy. Aligning their cognitive maps is important. Back in 2003, a coalition government was able to get states to commit to fiscal consolidation. There's no reason why it can't be done now. But it would require collaboration rather than confrontation between the union and the states. There's another area of public policy where thinking about intergenerational balance is crucial: governing the use of natural resources. What rules should govern the rate of extraction or utilisation of a limited natural resource is a question that all governments and societies must resolve. Many States, including the Indian Republic, own forests, rivers, beaches, oceans, and minerals as a trustee, i.e. on behalf of current and future generations. This idea, known as the Public Trust Doctrine (PTD), requires that extraction of the natural resource should go hand in hand with investment in productive assets that can be used by future generations (Hartwick's Rule). Norway's Oil Fund is an oft-cited example of the Public Trust Doctrine in action. Factoring in the opportunity cost incurred by future generations into the current price is a sound mechanism for the sustainable use of natural resources. The main obstacle is often that people might not agree to put any price tag on the natural resource. The resulting logjam harms the intergenerational balance.Global Policy Watch: US Inflation and its DiscontentsGlobal policy issues and their implication for India— RSJOne of the predictions, part of my usual beginning of the year edition, was that in 2023, US inflation would be stickier than most people have forecast, the growth would be stronger in the first half of the year, and employment would remain fairly high - and all of these would mean that Fed would continue to raise rates this year to fight inflation. The slowdown would come later, perhaps in 2024, and it would hurt more than most people imagine. Well, here's the latest inflation news from Reuters:U.S. consumer spending increased by the most in nearly two years in January amid a surge in wage gains, while inflation accelerated, adding to financial market fears that the Federal Reserve could continue raising interest rates into summer.The report from the Commerce Department on Friday was the latest indication that the economy was nowhere near a much-dreaded recession. It joined data earlier this month showing robust job growth in January and the lowest unemployment rate in more than 53 years.“Clearly, tighter monetary policy has yet to fully impact consumers and shows that the Fed has more work to do in slowing down aggregate demand," said Jeffrey Roach, chief economist at LPL Financial in Charlotte, North Carolina. "This report all but insures the Fed will continue on its rate hiking campaign for a lot longer than markets anticipated just a few weeks ago.”The Fed is expected to deliver two additional rate hikes of 25 basis points in March and May. Traders on Friday raised their bets for another increase in June. The U.S. central bank has raised its policy rate by 450 basis points since last March from near zero to a 4.50%-4.75% range.This brings me back to a more specific prediction I have which might currently seem bizarre but isn't outside of the realm of possibility. I suspect we might have the Fed hiking rates all the way to the 6.50%-7.00% range before they declare a win in the war against inflation. Inflation hurts the poor, and no political party likes it. An increase in prices takes wealth away from savers, and it erodes trust in the future for consumers. Price stability, therefore, is the primary role of a central bank. Given that growth hasn't come off despite a 450 bps rise in rates and the blockbuster US employment numbers that came in last month, I don't see what will stop the Fed from turning more hawkish in the coming months.So, what does all of this mean for India? I will suggest the following.Firstly, we can no longer work under the assumption that the Fed rate hike cycle is nearing its end, and we can therefore expect the rates to stabilise in India, too, after one more round of hikes. We must work out a scenario of what it means to live in a world where the US rates are at 7 per cent or more. The impact of it on the Rupee, our forex reserves and our growth if we continue to retain a differential between the two rates are all important factors to bear in mind. At this moment, we seem to have an uneasy and overwhelming consensus on how the macro will pan out. This recent inflation data from the US should make us pause and relook at our premises.Secondly, the two variables that can mar India's decade story are the fiscal deficit - among the highest in the world when you add the union and state numbers - and the current account deficit. It will be useful to stress test scenarios if we have US rates touching 7 per cent. Most global institutional investors have a fine disregard for these two metrics so far as they have built their models with US rates in the 5 per cent range. Lastly, if there's going to be an ‘accident' because of this 7 per cent scenario coming to pass, it won't be in the public market or a particular currency or sector. The banking sector is at the strongest it has ever been worldwide, and there are few asset bubbles in the conventional sectors. Of course, there are pockets of overvalued assets, especially in real estate sectors in Germany (and Western Europe in general), Canada and Australia. But it isn't so large that it will create a domino. The likely accident could be in the private market, like the private equity space or in assets like crypto and private tech valuations. Thankfully, these won't lead to contagion in the usual sense. My sense is it will be useful for most macro models in India to recalibrate their assumptions to higher interest rates for 2023 and stress test the scenarios at 7 per cent and beyond levels. We might be lulled by the growth and employment numbers in the US, but the real pain could unfurl only in 2024 and beyond.PolicyWTF: The Tyranny of Import DutiesThis section looks at egregious public policies. Policies that make you go: WTF, Did that really happen?— Pranay KotasthaneExhibit 1Apple phones are costly. But they are beyond costly in India, not because Tim Cook has it in for India, but because our government wants us to buy “Made in India” phones instead. Imported smartphones attract a 20 per cent basic customs duty. In addition, there's a social welfare surcharge of 10 per cent of the duty rate. Besides this 22 per cent customs duties, all phones attract a GST of 18 per cent (up from 12 per cent). This 18 per cent rate is applied to the phone cost inclusive of the customs duty. The cascading involved in this tax regime would make public finance specialists hopping mad, but then all is fair in love and atmanirbharta.As you would anticipate, these high import duties have opened up a new market for smuggled smartphones, estimated to be in the range of ₹15,000 crores. Apple phones made in India are also not spared. Under the Phased Manufacturing Programme (PMP), the government applies import duties on sub-components as well. The idea is to magically create a local supply chain. But what it ends up doing is increasing the cost of manufacturing in India, making products uncompetitive globally. We have written about this topic on many occasions before. I'll just link them below for now. But hey, not all's lost. Realising that the PMP might be self-destructive, the latest budget has removed the customs duty on the import of certain parts, such as the camera lens. Small mercies. More on this subject:* #185 - No Exports without Imports* #155 - The Problem with Protectionism* #86 - Production Linked IncentivesExhibit 2The Podfather Amit Varma told me (he'd heard it from a friend) the reason behind most DSLR and action cameras' 30-minute video recording limit is…. import duties! Not a work of the Indian government, though. Apparently, the EU passed a rule in the nineties that imported video cameras would be subject to a customs duty, while still-cameras would not. A video camera was defined as one that could capture a continuous video of a length greater than 30 minutes at a high quality. And so, even as still cameras became more powerful, they continue to retain the 30-minute limit. Given that the EU was a big market, camera makers found it convenient to follow this restriction in all geographies. This Hacker News conversation has more information. Apparently, the EU disbanded this import duty in 2018. But the 30-minute restriction seems to have a hysteresis. HomeWorkReading and listening recommendations on public policy matters* [Podcast] In this Puliyabaazi episode, we explore the reasons behind China's technological upgradation. * [Paper] Rahul Basu of the Goa Foundation explains the Public Trust Doctrine in the context of mining in Goa. * [Paper] To understand the evolution of the Public Trust Doctrine, read this paper. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit publicpolicy.substack.com

In this episode Kurt goes over the basics of the Public Trust Doctrine, the North American Model of Wildlife Conservation, and a few other things.  Enjoy!

The Great Salt Lake is like many bodies of water in the west: it's depleted. To fix this, locals are considering how to fix the problem, and the “public trust” legal doctrine has popped up. Micah Safsten argues that treating waterways like public utilities disincentivizes users and creates less conservation.  Video - https://youtu.be/1zATOBXsQK0 Micah Safsten works as communications and outreach coordinator at the Utah Water Research Laboratory. He is also a contributor for Young Voices, where he writes about natural resources policy and water in the west. His views do not necessarily represent those of his employer. Micah Safsten: Proper incentives will save the Great Salt Lake, not the Public Trust Doctrine - https://www.sltrib.com/opinion/commentary/2022/11/03/micah-safsten-proper-incentives/ Join WAL Plus now for commercial-free shows and our complete archives - JoinWALPlus.com ---- This episode is brought to you by Iconic Insurance. Fifteen percent of Americans are left to find health insurance on their own. You might feel overwhelmed, lost, or frustrated, and if that's you, feel in control of your health with Matt Allen's help. Visit www.iconic-insurance.com/libertarians to get started. --- Chris Spangle and Leaders and Legends, LLC edited and produced this podcast. If you're interested in starting a podcast or taking yours to the next level, please contact us at LeadersAndLegends.net. ---- Looking to start a podcast? Download my podcast Podcasting and Platforms now, and check out my recommendations for buying the right equipment. ---- Q Sleep Spray assists in achieving a more restful sleep so you can wake up refreshed. Q SLEEP contains incredible ingredients, including melatonin, 5-HTP, and L-theanine, as well as a proprietary herbal extract, which synergistically promotes restful sleep and helps your mind and body rejuvenate. Buy Now - https://wearelibertarians.com/sleepspray/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Micah Safsten is a writer from Utah. Currently, he works as Communications and Outreach Coordinator at the Utah Water Research Laboratory. He has a passion for natural resources issues, particularly water- a scarce resource in his native state. He hopes that through his writing, he can advocate for better water management policies in the American west. He also has an interest in and has written about Congress and the legislative process. In the past, he has interned at the Utah legislature and Congress. He also worked as a research fellow at the Center for Growth and Opportunity. Micah Safsten: Proper incentives will save the Great Salt Lake, not the Public Trust Doctrine https://www.sltrib.com/opinion/commentary/2022/11/03/micah-safsten-proper-incentives/ https://www.young-voices.com/advocate/micah-safsten/ https://twitter.com/MicahRSafsten Join the private discord & chat during the show! joingml.com   Check out our sponsor BetterHelp! Betterhelp.com/gml   Grow your best beard with Beard Club! BeardClub.com/gml 20% off your first order w/ promo code “gml”    Invest in your future & your human capital today  natescrashcourse.com   Like our intro song? https://www.3pillmorning.com Advertise on our podcast! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode (196) of Leupold's Hunt Talk Radio, Randy has a conversation about protecting wildlife and other public assets from the politicians through grassroots advocacy that is rooted in the Public Trust Doctrine; a principle the courts have applied to affirm that wildlife and other public resources are held in trust for the citizens of the state. With recent efforts to privatize public wildlife resources via the legislative process, Andrew Posewitz and Jeff Herbert have formed a citizens-based organization to protect the public interest in wildlife in Montana.  To see citizen advocacy in action, this is another example no matter where a person lives. Be your own advocate.

In this episode (185) of Leupold's Hunt Talk Radio Randy and Shane Mahoney continue with Part 4 of 5 in their discussion of the North American Wildlife Conservation Model, detailing the next three tenets 1) Public Trust Doctrine, 2) Democratic Allocation of Opportunity, and 3) Allocation by Law. Issues explored start with the Public Trust Doctrine as applied to wildlife policy and allocation.  From there we examine how law is the basis for all wildlife allocation and applied in a democratic manner, discussing ideas of commerce around wildlife, responsibility of Public Trustees, respect for Property Rights, legislation and policy to provide the "greatest good," along with many other interesting tangents.

The second-ever episode of Fresh Tracks Weekly! This week we catch up with the crew and see what's going on in the office. We hear some feel-good news stories from the elk woods and touch on some headlines that may affect you as a hunter. Marcus and Randy dive deep into the Public Trust Doctrine and talk about how trusts work and how Randy's expertise of trusts in the financial world helps him understand those in the wildlife world. If you want to check out the Wildlife Society's technical review of the Public Trust Doctrine you can follow this link: https://wildlife.org/wp-content/uploa... If you want to check out the Kentucky Department of Fish & Wildlife Resources Elk Translocation video follow this link: https://youtu.be/ugV6l4ZAzOA Join Fresh Tracks+ For Early Access - https://www.freshtracks.tv Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

We have another round of Ag in the courtroom with Dr. Roger McEowen from the Washburn School of Law. Several issues have been working their way through the courts that could impact the farm and ranch communities, including the American Rescue Plan and Public Trust Doctrine.  To follow Dr McEowen's blog visit - https://www.washburnlaw.edu/waltr

This week your host Mike McGrady, David Willms, and Nephi Cole break down the current Ammo Shortages, the Value of Non-Resident Hunters and discuss the history of the Public Trust Doctrine.  Want to join in on the conversation? Head on over to our Podcast Listener Group. Other Topics Discussed: Long Beards, Short Beards, Patchy Beards, the ammo supply chain, various influences on the ammo supply chain, nonresident hunting, foodies and hipnecks, a million new hunters, Reversion and Matching Conservation Dollars, Who owns that Elk over there?, Public Trust Doctrine Examples and Artifacts, and a whole lot more.   This podcast is produced by Ben Paige

Listen on Spotify * Apple Podcasts * iHeartRadio * Pandora * Amazon Podcasts Public Trust Doctrine. We’ve talked about it before with other guests, but this ideal is so important we felt it was worth touching on again.  Probably one of the most important aspects of the North American Conservation Model, Public Trust Doctrine is the tenet that seeps into all the other tenets, and holds the model together. We’re not experts, but this was such a big deal we wanted to make sure to keep it at the forefront of our platform. Plus, we talk deer hunting, duck scouting, new t-shirts drop, Charcuterie Chalets, My Cousin Vinny, hanging chads and a whole lot more . . . Go to Patreon and become a friend of the show OFFICIALLY here! Need an auctioneer for your next event?  Mark “Dobe” Dobersch is your guy! Check him out here! E-mail Fletcher with Hallett Insurance to get your quote! Double the “L’s” and Double the “T’s” Check out Two Fish Creative for your software solutions – no problem is too big or too small! Insurance Claim Troubles? Call Harrell Adjusting to make sure you’re getting the most out of your claim! Follow Cast and Blast Florida: Instagram – Twitter – Facebook – Website Want to experience a world class duck hunt or fishing charter? E-mail Travis to book today . . . Connect with the gang on social media: Travis Thompson – @travisthompson – Instagram – Twitter – Facebook Nathan Henderson – @nhenderson77 – Instagram – Twitter – Facebook Emily Thompson – @lovedaloca – Instagram

At only 17 and already published, Gideon is an impressive and unusual guest on the show. Today he discusses his paper with Andrew on the novel idea of geoengineering and the public trust doctrine. Gideon also talks about his organisation Worldward and his plans for the future particularly in climate restoration. Find the paper here https://cclr.lexxion.eu/article/cclr/2020/2/4 and Gideon on twitter @worldwardglobal As usual, please make any suggestions or comments @geoengineering1 or @clare_nomad_geo Thanks and enjoy the show!

Since Jason became a lawyer in 2009, he has participated in nearly 50 jury trials. He has more civil trial experience than any other Oregon lawyer of his generation. Jason works collaboratively with the other trial attorneys to prepare and try major cases. He also works with clients and insurance companies to get cases resolved before trial. Jason is active in the Honest Elections Oregon organization, a movement that supports campaign finance reform in Oregon. Jason's legal experience includes working for the Environmental Law Foundation in Oakland, where he helped draft a strategic plan to protect and expand California's Public Trust Doctrine. As a summer associate at Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins in San Diego, Jason worked extensively on a consumer class action against Capital One credit cards for targeting and defrauding low-income citizens.

On this episode, we feature part one of our in-depth interview with Jim Olson. Jim Olson is the founder and president of FLOW, For Love of Water, a Traverse City based organization empowering communities and leaders to protect the Great Lakes. A celebrated legend in his community, Jim has nearly 40 years of experience as an environmental, water, and public interest law advocate and champion, dedicated to protecting waters and ecosystems in the Great Lakes Basin. In this first installment, Jim breaks down the Public Trust Doctrine, a centuries-old, holistic legal framework at the core of FLOW’s work. Tune in to hear how the Public Trust Doctrine offers a way for citizens to demand action in the courts. /// State of Water is a program of the Michigan-based non-profit organization Title Track, and is powered by the Clean Water Campaign for Michigan. The podcast is made possible through a generous contribution from the Esperance Foundation. /// EPISODE 11: / Jim Olson interviewed by Seth Bernard / Produced, edited and mixed by Dan Rickabus Narrators - Alex Smith, Ben Darcie, Dan Rickabus, Jenny Jones, Rachel Marco-Havens / Music - Mike Savina, Seth Bernard & Dan Rickabus

Since Jason became a lawyer in 2009, he has participated in nearly 50 jury trials. He has more civil trial experience than any other Oregon lawyer of his generation. Jason works collaboratively with the other trial attorneys to prepare and try major cases. He also works with clients and insurance companies to get cases resolved before trial. Jason is active in the Honest Elections Oregon organization, a movement that supports campaign finance reform in Oregon. Jason's legal experience includes working for the Environmental Law Foundation in Oakland, where he helped draft a strategic plan to protect and expand California's Public Trust Doctrine. As a summer associate at Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins in San Diego, Jason worked extensively on a consumer class action against Capital One credit cards for targeting and defrauding low-income citizens.

Pertinent re-play from January 8, 2004 on defining the desirable future (and role of government)   Caroline with great ally, embodying environmental justice, executive director of Science and Environment Health Network, Carolyn Raffensperger, animator of The Precautionary Principle, and today's focus: “The Public Trust Doctrine,” as we engage public discourse in defining the desirable function of government (to protect the commons). www.sehn.org   Support The Visionary Activist Show on Patreon for weekly Chart & Themes ($4/month) and more… *Woof*Woof*Wanna*Play?!?* The post Visionary Activist Show – Archives: ‘The Public Trust Doctrine' appeared first on KPFA.

This week's episode is Part 1 of a two-part series on the North American Model of Wildlife Conservation. The NAM is a series of principles (pillars) which are meant to inform the way we manage wildlife in the U.S. In this episode, Jonah and Mariana discuss the fundamental Public Trust Doctrine, its historical beginnings, the modern challenges it faces, and how it provides the central tenet behind the NAM as its first pillar. Sources & Links: Read the articles in today's news update: Murder of Philippine ranger / Indigenous Pueblo loses land claim And read the Wildlife Society's report on the Public Trust Doctrine: https://wildlife.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/ptd_10-1.pdf WE'D LOVE TO HEAR FROM YOU! Find us on Facebook and Instagram @ Conservation Chronicles. Send us an email at conservationchronicles@gmail.com. And find us on Facebook and Instagram @ Conservation Chronicles. Our show's webpage can be found at conservationchronicles.podbean.com. Theme Song: Epic Cinematic by Scott Holmes / https://scottholmesmusic.com

Carolyn Raffensperger at TEDxMaui Let us be guardians of collective well-being & protectors of protectors. Dark O Moon-Eclipse in Big Mama's sign of Cancer*Radio: Caroline welcomes Carolyn Raffensperger, among the very best effective advocates for Big Mama, composting the #waronlife into nutrient for Public Trust Doctrine (government as protector of common wealth); an environmental lawyer and the executive director of the Science & Environmental Health Network; as well as being a leading expert on the Precautionary Principle (Sane Reverent Common Sense). Science and Environmental Health Network: http://sehn.org/ Visionary Science, Ethics, Law and Action in the Public Interest   Support The Visionary Activist Show on Patreon for weekly Chart & Themes ($4/month) and more… *Woof*Woof*Wanna*Play?!?* The post The Visionary Activist Show – Guardians of Collective Well-Being appeared first on KPFA.

This is Part 2 of a special two-part series on environmental law where the guest from Episode 2, Jim Anderson, interviews Laura for his radio show, Conversations with Jim Anderson, on WUFO 1080AM in Buffalo, NY. In this talk, Laura & Jim discuss the public trust doctrine, the youth climate change lawsuits against the U.S. government, the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, & more. See Episode 10 for Part 1 of this series.

The End of Occupy Radio   That clip you just heard was March 14th, 2012, Occupiers. Left Out became Occupy Radio, and in the four years since, we’ve kept an eye on the corporate takeover of America, and the rise of the police and surveillance states.   Join us for a final retrospective on the time Rivera and I have shared, on this final episode of Occupy Radio.   March 14th, 2012 Episode of Occupy Radio https://occupyeugenemedia.org/mediagroup/2015/03/14/occupy-radio-march-14-2012-3/   Christopher Mitchell Director of Community Broadband networks for the Institute of Local Self Reliance out of Minneapolis, Minnesota Chris is also the host of the podcast Community Broadband Bits   Community Network Map http://www.muninetworks.org/communitymap Institute for Self-Reliance Community Broadband Networks: http://www.muninetworks.org/ Wikipedia Community Broadband: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Municipal_broadband FCC on the verge of killing state laws that harm community broadband: http://arstechnica.com/business/2015/02/fcc-on-verge-of-killing-state-laws-that-harm-municipal-broadband/ Obama calls for an end to 19 state laws that harm community broadband: http://arstechnica.com/business/2015/01/obama-calls-for-end-to-19-state-laws-that-harm-community-broadband/ ISP lobby has already won limit on public broadband in 20 states:http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/02/isp-lobby-has-already-won-limits-on-public-broadband-in-20-states/   Duane Elgin MBA from Wharton College Author of Voluntary Simplicity A proponent of a living universe, and a global awakening mind and the idea that we are just around the corner from massive global communication on the grassroots level. http://duaneelgin.com/ http://duaneelgin.com/about/ Great Transition Stories http://www.greattransitionstories.org/wiki/Duane_Elgin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duane_Elgin YouTube: Duane Elgin – The Living Universe Pt 1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYl96iEya9E 8 Expressions of Simplicity for Healthy Living http://www.huffingtonpost.com/duane-elgin/types-of-simplicity_b_918970.html 6 Corporations that Control Your Perception https://rhymageddon.wordpress.com/2013/12/05/mediabig6/   Mary Wood Law professor, and faculty director of the Environmental Natural Resources Law Center at the University of Oregon School of Law Author of Nature’s Trust: Environmental Law for a New Ecological Age We discussed the doctrine of public trust, and how deeply its roots run in our legal system. We also discussed the Our Children’s Trust court case which has reached one ruling calling for the State of Washington to protect future generations   Discovering a Legal Tool To Curb Climate Change http://www.onthecommons.org/magazine/discovering-legal-tool-curb-climate-change David Bollier's Blog: Mary Wood's Crusade to Reinvigorate the Public Trust Doctrine http://bollier.org/blog/mary-wood%E2%80%99s-crusade-reinvigorate-public-trust-doctrine Huff Post: Nature's Trust Parts 1,2, & 3 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/peter-neill/natures-trust-part-1_b_7018474.html http://www.huffingtonpost.com/peter-neill/natures-trust-part-2_b_7057158.html http://www.huffingtonpost.com/peter-neill/natures-trust-part-3_b_7119072.html Professor Mary Wood at University of Oregon Law School http://law.uoregon.edu/faculty/mwood/   Earth Overshoot: Mathis Wackernagel, Ph.D. is the President of the Global Footprint Network You can find them at www.footprintnetwork.org Mathis Wackernagle joins Occupy Radio this week to talk about Earth Overshoot Day. It's the day each year when the human species uses more resources than the Earth can restore. That day keeps coming earlier and earlier every year. www.overshootday.org www.footprintnetwork.org www.footprintnetwork.org/states (State of the States report). https://www.facebook.com/GlobalFootprintNetwork?fref=ts https://twitter.com/EndOvershoot https://plus.google.com/u/0/+GlobalFootprintNetwork/posts   Jeff Clements Author of the book: Corporations Are Not People Immediately, after the 2010 Citizens United ruling, author Jeff Clements published a series of predictions about the decision's impact. Three year later, his projections have come true. This week on Occupy Radio, we interview Clements about the updates to his book, Corporations Are Not People, and one thing he didn't foresee - the widespread, determined citizen opposition to corporate personhood. http://www.clementsllc.com/home/Welcome.html http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/6411:corporations-are-not-people http://freespeechforpeople.org/Corporationsarenotpeople http://corporationsarenotpeople.com/ http://corporationsarenotpeople.com/author/jeffclements/ http://www.latimes.com/local/political/la-me-pc-supreme-court-citizens-united-20140811-story.html   Philippe Duhamel Community Organizer for strategic nonviolent civil resistance and a contributor to numerous journals and publication on movement-building and nonviolent organizing. Frackers tried to move into Quebec’s St. Lawrence River Valley, and they were chased back out again by an activated populace. But one victory isn’t enough. With a grassroots surveillance system set up throughout the valley, the Anti-Frackers will know as soon as the industry tries to make its return.   Erica Chenoweth Co Author “Why Civil Resistance Works” Assoc Professor at Josef Korbel School of International Studies To be or not to be nonviolent . . . that is the question many of us have dealt with as we work to make change in our communities. Erica Chenoweth, coauthor of the groundbreaking book, Why Civil Resistance Works, joins us on Occupy Radio to give us some empirical facts and evidence of the power of nonviolent methods.   EricaChenoweth.Com http://www.ericachenoweth.com/ The success of nonviolent civil resistance: Erica Chenoweth at TEDxBoulder https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YJSehRlU34w Rational Insurgent http://rationalinsurgent.com/ University of Denver: Joseph Korbel School of International Studies http://www.du.edu/korbel/faculty/chenoweth.html Erica Chenoweth on Political Violence at a glance http://politicalviolenceataglance.org/about/erica-chenoweth/ Erica Chenoweth at Foreign Affairs.com http://www.foreignaffairs.com/author/erica-chenoweth http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erica_Chenoweth https://twitter.com/ericachenoweth Why Civil Resistance Works http://cup.columbia.edu/book/why-civil-resistance-works/9780231156820 Thanks to everyone who has been a part of Occupy Radio. Keep an eye on OccupyRadio.org. We will be making it a fully searchable website full of activist information, based on hundreds of interviews with activists for social, economic, environmental, and legal justice.

Surveyor, instructor, author Kris Kline will join host Curt Sumner for a discussion of his latest projects, including delving into the Public Trust Doctrine. Kris says he is learning from his workshops that a large swath of the country is actually affected by it, and many are presently fighting with various parties over limits of the doctrine.

Professor Gerald Torres, Jane M.G. Foster Professor of Law at Cornell Law School delivers this talk on 'Litigating Climate Change'. Climate change cases are already being handled by the USA courts. The most prominent are the atmospheric trust cases currently being brought by youth and supported by James Hansen and other scientists. These cases are asking the courts to compel Government to take meaningful action to protect the atmosphere for current and future generations. There have also been liability suits suggested – and at least one filed – over the effects of climate change. Professor Torres discusses the range of cases being brought and suggested in the USA, focusing on the atmospheric trust litigation, and the public trust doctrine which underlies it. 30 July 2014

Professor Gerald Torres, Jane M.G. Foster Professor of Law at Cornell Law School delivers this talk on 'Litigating Climate Change'. Climate change cases are already being handled by the USA courts. The most prominent are the atmospheric trust cases currently being brought by youth and supported by James Hansen and other scientists. These cases are asking the courts to compel Government to take meaningful action to protect the atmosphere for current and future generations. There have also been liability suits suggested – and at least one filed – over the effects of climate change. Professor Torres discusses the range of cases being brought and suggested in the USA, focusing on the atmospheric trust litigation, and the public trust doctrine which underlies it. 30 July 2014

Professor Gerald Torres, Jane M.G. Foster Professor of Law at Cornell Law School delivers this talk on 'Litigating Climate Change'. Climate change cases are already being handled by the USA courts. The most prominent are the atmospheric trust cases currently being brought by youth and supported by James Hansen and other scientists. These cases are asking the courts to compel Government to take meaningful action to protect the atmosphere for current and future generations. There have also been liability suits suggested – and at least one filed – over the effects of climate change. Professor Torres discusses the range of cases being brought and suggested in the USA, focusing on the atmospheric trust litigation, and the public trust doctrine which underlies it. 30 July 2014

On February 5, the House of Representatives passed a bill that takes away California's right to divide its dwindling water supply. The bill forces California to take water away from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Bay Delta and give it to Agribusiness in the San Joaquin Valley, voiding a bunch of State and environmental laws in the process. Summary of the Bill HR 3964: "Sacramento- San Joaquin Valley Emergency Water Delivery Act" This is the second time the Republican-controlled House of Representatives has passed this bill. A similar bill was passed during the 112th Congress. TITLE I: Eff The Fish [caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="360"] Water would be diverted away from this delta and given to Big Agriculture in the San Joaquin Valley[/caption] Section 101: Makes sure that water currently dedicated to fish and wildlife is given Central Valley Project contractors by December 31, 2018. Most Central Valley Project contractors are agricultural in the San Joaquin Valley. Section 102: New terms for water contracts: Eliminates a provision that makes sure the EPA approves new contracts for water delivery. Extends the renewal length of existing contracts from 25 years to 40 years and eliminates requirements for environmental reviews Adds a provision that contracts must only charge water customers for the water actually delivered Section 105: Water usage will be prioritized to go towards agricultural, municipal, and industrial purposes Section 107: Private for-profit organizations would be eligible for water storage and delivery contracts paid for with taxpayer money, which is not currently allowed. If by September 30, 2018, the Central Valley doesn't get an additional 800,000 acre-feet of water, all non-mandatory water uses will be cut off until the Central Valley gets their water. Section 108: Rules will revert back to the law as of 1994. [caption id="" align="alignright" width="314"] The delta smelt, the "stupid little fish" the House GOP is pretending is the only species affected by drying up the delta[/caption] Operations of this new water plan "shall proceed without regard to the Endangered Species Act" Prohibits the Federal government and any agency of the State of California from enforcing a State law that restricts water usage for the Central Valley Project or State Water Project (which gives water to Southern California) to protect any species affected by this new water diversion. Prohibits the State of California from enforcing any of their laws that restricts Central Valley "water rights" "under the Public Trust Doctrine. No costs associated with diverting water to Central Valley contractors will be paid by Central Valley contractors "California law is preempted" from restricting the size of a fish allowed to be taken out of the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers or the Sacramento-San Joaquin Rivers Delta. Section 111: Federal agencies can not be forced to change their actions by a National Environmental Protection Act determination. *New to the 113th Congress version* Section 112 & 113: Gives 10 year water contracts to the Oakdale, South San Joaquin, and Calaveras County water districts if it doesn't take water away from the Central Valley *New to the 113th Congress version* Section 114: A pilot program to remove "non-native" bass species from the Stanislaus River. The districts will pay 100% of the costs The government "shall issue" permits for the program under the Endangered Species Act within 180 days; if it's not done in 180 days, the permits "shall be deemed approved" Permitting can be outsourced to "any qualified private contractor' National Environmental Protection Act "shall not apply" to permitting for the program. "Any restriction imposed under California law" on catching fish in the Stanislaus River "is herby void and is preempted" Pilot fish-murdering program will sunset in seven years. TITLE II: Overturns a Court Settlement The Settlement ruled in 2004 that the Bureau of Reclamation illegally dried the San Joaquin River and ruled that they will have to release water from the Friant Dam for the first time in 55 years in order to allow the fish - specifically salmon- in the river to survive. The lawsuit was first filed in 1998 and was one of California's longest running water disputes. It also restores water supplies to farmers near Stockton Section 201: Repeals the settlement and enacts a whole new plan. The new plan "preempts and supersedes any State law" that imposes stricter requirements. Central Valley water contractors are allowed to sue the Federal government if it fails to enact the new plan. Section 211: Repeals a requirement that salmon be reintroduced to the San Joaquin River TITLE III: Payments to Central Valley water contractors Section 301: Federal government has to reimburse water contractors for construction costs already accrued by January 31, 2018; future costs need to be reimbursed by the government within five years. Power revenues can't be used towards construction cost reimbursement TITLE IV: Water Allocations Section 403: Agricultural water contractors in the Central Valley will get 100% of their promised water in Wet - Below Normal years, 75% in a "dry" year, and "50% in a "Critically dry" year Section 404: The Federal government must make sure that the Endangered Species Act and goals of "addressing environmental needs" do not cause any "adverse water supply or fiscal impacts" to Central Valley water contractors. TITLE V: Precedent Section 501: The coordination of water rights "require assertion of Federal supremacy to protect existing water rights", says "these circumstances are unique to California", and therefore "nothing in this Act shall serve as precedent in any other State." Section 502: "Nothing in this Act shall affect in any way the Proclamation of State of Emergency and associated Executive Order issued by Gov. Edmund G. Brown, Jr. on January 17, 2014." Representatives Quoted in This Episode (In Order of Appearance) Rep. Doc Hastings of Washington Rep. Kevin McCarthy of California Rep. Tom McClintock of California Rep. Devin Nunes of California Rep. Mike Thompson of California Rep. Rob Bishop of Utah Rep. John Garamendi of California Rep. Anna Eshoo of California Rep. Jared Huffman of California Rep. Grace Napolitano of California Additional Information Water War Boils Down to Farmers vs. Fisherman by George Skelton, Los Angeles Times, February 19, 2014. Jennifer Briney's appearance on Start Talking and Recording Today with Nick Seuberling YouTube video of Congressional Dish supporter David's 12 year old son, Sam Levin, and his impressive musical talents Music in this Episode Intro and Exit Music: Tired of Being Lied To by David Ippolito (found on Music Alley by mevio) Are You Thristy? by Mighty Men of Faith (found on Music Alley by mevio) Get Out of Our House by David Ippolito (found on Music Alley by mevio)

Caroline with great ally, environmental justice activator, executive director of Science and Environment Health Network (www.sehn.org), Carolyn Raffensperger, animator of The Precautionary Principle, and today's focus, "The Public Trust Doctrine," as we engage public discourse in defining the desirable function of government (to protect the commons). The post The Visionary Activist Show – January 8, 2004 appeared first on KPFA.