Violence conducted with political goals
POPULARITY
40 episodes with Political violence
33 episodes with Political violence
15 episodes with Political violence
22 episodes with Political violence
13 episodes with Political violence
10 episodes with Political violence
15 episodes with Political violence
7 episodes with Political violence
10 episodes with Political violence
23 episodes with Political violence
12 episodes with Political violence
11 episodes with Political violence
7 episodes with Political violence
4 episodes with Political violence
8 episodes with Political violence
6 episodes with Political violence
6 episodes with Political violence
4 episodes with Political violence
4 episodes with Political violence
4 episodes with Political violence
6 episodes with Political violence
8 episodes with Political violence
4 episodes with Political violence
5 episodes with Political violence
5 episodes with Political violence
6 episodes with Political violence
8 episodes with Political violence
8 episodes with Political violence
4 episodes with Political violence
9 episodes with Political violence
11 episodes with Political violence
4 episodes with Political violence
4 episodes with Political violence
4 episodes with Political violence
6 episodes with Political violence
8 episodes with Political violence
4 episodes with Political violence
5 episodes with Political violence
7 episodes with Political violence
5 episodes with Political violence
3 episodes with Political violence
12 episodes with Political violence
3 episodes with Political violence
2 episodes with Political violence
4 episodes with Political violence
3 episodes with Political violence
3 episodes with Political violence
5 episodes with Political violence
8 episodes with Political violence
4 episodes with Political violence
5 episodes with Political violence
3 episodes with Political violence
5 episodes with Political violence
3 episodes with Political violence
Utah prosecutors argued in their bindover memorandum that the evidence presented during Tyler Robinson's five-day preliminary hearing easily established probable cause for him to stand trial on all seven charges connected to the killing of Charlie Kirk. The state pointed to Robinson's alleged admissions to his roommate, Lance Twiggs, and several friends, including messages in which he reportedly acknowledged shooting Kirk, described planning the attack for more than a week and discussed retrieving or concealing the rifle. Prosecutors maintained that those statements were reinforced by surveillance footage allegedly tracking Robinson onto the roof of Utah Valley University's Losee Center, eyewitness testimony and DNA evidence connecting him to the rifle recovered near the campus. The memorandum emphasized that the state was not required to prove Robinson's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt at this stage, only that there was sufficient evidence to reasonably believe he committed the crimes.The state asked Judge Tony Graf Jr. to bind Robinson over for trial on aggravated murder and the remaining charges, which included felony discharge of a firearm, obstruction of justice, witness tampering and committing a violent offense in the presence of a child. Prosecutors also defended the victim-targeting enhancement, arguing that Robinson allegedly selected Kirk because of Kirk's political and religious positions, particularly his views concerning gender and sexuality. According to the state, Robinson's alleged statements showed both an intent to kill and a motive rooted in hostility toward Kirk's beliefs, while his purported efforts to hide the weapon and influence Twiggs supported the additional charges. Calling the matter one of the most straightforward bindover decisions the court was likely to encounter, prosecutors concluded that the combined admissions, forensic evidence, videos and witness accounts supported sending every count to trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
Utah prosecutors argued in their bindover memorandum that the evidence presented during Tyler Robinson's five-day preliminary hearing easily established probable cause for him to stand trial on all seven charges connected to the killing of Charlie Kirk. The state pointed to Robinson's alleged admissions to his roommate, Lance Twiggs, and several friends, including messages in which he reportedly acknowledged shooting Kirk, described planning the attack for more than a week and discussed retrieving or concealing the rifle. Prosecutors maintained that those statements were reinforced by surveillance footage allegedly tracking Robinson onto the roof of Utah Valley University's Losee Center, eyewitness testimony and DNA evidence connecting him to the rifle recovered near the campus. The memorandum emphasized that the state was not required to prove Robinson's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt at this stage, only that there was sufficient evidence to reasonably believe he committed the crimes.The state asked Judge Tony Graf Jr. to bind Robinson over for trial on aggravated murder and the remaining charges, which included felony discharge of a firearm, obstruction of justice, witness tampering and committing a violent offense in the presence of a child. Prosecutors also defended the victim-targeting enhancement, arguing that Robinson allegedly selected Kirk because of Kirk's political and religious positions, particularly his views concerning gender and sexuality. According to the state, Robinson's alleged statements showed both an intent to kill and a motive rooted in hostility toward Kirk's beliefs, while his purported efforts to hide the weapon and influence Twiggs supported the additional charges. Calling the matter one of the most straightforward bindover decisions the court was likely to encounter, prosecutors concluded that the combined admissions, forensic evidence, videos and witness accounts supported sending every count to trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson's request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff's office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk's shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff's office's filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Mondayto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdf
Utah prosecutors argued in their bindover memorandum that the evidence presented during Tyler Robinson's five-day preliminary hearing easily established probable cause for him to stand trial on all seven charges connected to the killing of Charlie Kirk. The state pointed to Robinson's alleged admissions to his roommate, Lance Twiggs, and several friends, including messages in which he reportedly acknowledged shooting Kirk, described planning the attack for more than a week and discussed retrieving or concealing the rifle. Prosecutors maintained that those statements were reinforced by surveillance footage allegedly tracking Robinson onto the roof of Utah Valley University's Losee Center, eyewitness testimony and DNA evidence connecting him to the rifle recovered near the campus. The memorandum emphasized that the state was not required to prove Robinson's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt at this stage, only that there was sufficient evidence to reasonably believe he committed the crimes.The state asked Judge Tony Graf Jr. to bind Robinson over for trial on aggravated murder and the remaining charges, which included felony discharge of a firearm, obstruction of justice, witness tampering and committing a violent offense in the presence of a child. Prosecutors also defended the victim-targeting enhancement, arguing that Robinson allegedly selected Kirk because of Kirk's political and religious positions, particularly his views concerning gender and sexuality. According to the state, Robinson's alleged statements showed both an intent to kill and a motive rooted in hostility toward Kirk's beliefs, while his purported efforts to hide the weapon and influence Twiggs supported the additional charges. Calling the matter one of the most straightforward bindover decisions the court was likely to encounter, prosecutors concluded that the combined admissions, forensic evidence, videos and witness accounts supported sending every count to trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
There's growing concern in Kenya over the rise of gangs allegedly hired to disrupt political and civic events. Who are they and how can their influence be curbed?
The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson's request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff's office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk's shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff's office's filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Mondayto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdf
Utah prosecutors argued in their bindover memorandum that the evidence presented during Tyler Robinson's five-day preliminary hearing easily established probable cause for him to stand trial on all seven charges connected to the killing of Charlie Kirk. The state pointed to Robinson's alleged admissions to his roommate, Lance Twiggs, and several friends, including messages in which he reportedly acknowledged shooting Kirk, described planning the attack for more than a week and discussed retrieving or concealing the rifle. Prosecutors maintained that those statements were reinforced by surveillance footage allegedly tracking Robinson onto the roof of Utah Valley University's Losee Center, eyewitness testimony and DNA evidence connecting him to the rifle recovered near the campus. The memorandum emphasized that the state was not required to prove Robinson's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt at this stage, only that there was sufficient evidence to reasonably believe he committed the crimes.The state asked Judge Tony Graf Jr. to bind Robinson over for trial on aggravated murder and the remaining charges, which included felony discharge of a firearm, obstruction of justice, witness tampering and committing a violent offense in the presence of a child. Prosecutors also defended the victim-targeting enhancement, arguing that Robinson allegedly selected Kirk because of Kirk's political and religious positions, particularly his views concerning gender and sexuality. According to the state, Robinson's alleged statements showed both an intent to kill and a motive rooted in hostility toward Kirk's beliefs, while his purported efforts to hide the weapon and influence Twiggs supported the additional charges. Calling the matter one of the most straightforward bindover decisions the court was likely to encounter, prosecutors concluded that the combined admissions, forensic evidence, videos and witness accounts supported sending every count to trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson's request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff's office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk's shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff's office's filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Mondayto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
Back in the fall, Trump's NSPM-7 redirected the FBI, DOJ, and IRS toward "left-wing political violence," opening the door to labeling domestic groups terrorist organizations — despite three independent datasets (New America, CSIS, even the ADL!) showing right-wing violence outpacing left-wing violence by factors of 9-to-1 or greater. Last week, Rubio's "Ministerial on the Resurgence of Political Terrorism" internationalized this McCarthy reboot. Central to the rhetoric of Rubio and Miller is framing leftist politics as being driven by envy and resentment rather than a response to inequality. Matthew traces this rhetoric, empirically contradicted by relative deprivation research, back through Nietzsche, Scheler, Schoeck, and Rand. Four days after the Ministerial, the State Department's Cuba report named 70+ Americans — from spies to wedding guests — as one undifferentiated network, a scapegoat machine now churning out congressional subpoenas, a federal grand jury, and a widening dragnet. Show Notes NSPM-7, full text — The White House NSPM-7 constitutional analysis — The Conversation New America, "Terrorism in America After 9/11" impact summary CSIS, "Left-Wing Terrorism and Political Violence in the United States" Just Security rebuttal of the CSIS report ADL, "Murder and Extremism in the United States in 2024" Rubio and Miller Ministerial remarks, full transcript Nietzsche, On the Genealogy of Morals (1887), full text Scheler, Ressentiment (1912), full text PDF Schoeck, Envy: A Theory of Social Behaviour — Online Library of Liberty Ayn Rand, "The Age of Envy" — Ayn Rand Institute U.S. Department of State, Cuba: The Capital of 21st Century Communism (July 20, 2026) National Lawyers Guild, "The National Lawyers Guild Reaffirms its Solidarity with Cuba in the Face of Increasing McCarthyite Repression" (July 2026) Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson's request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff's office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk's shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff's office's filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Mondayto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdf
The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson's request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff's office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk's shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff's office's filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Mondayto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
Send us Fan MailDaniel Rosen, the United States Attorney for the District of Minnesota, joined Liz Collin on her podcast. Rosen provided explained more about the indictment of Antifa-related groups that were allegedly behind the threats, the stalking, and the violence that played out in Minnesota earlier this year. Rosen explained why the 95-page indictment against 15 defendants should be "mandatory reading"—especially since it includes details that people are "just not going to learn by looking at some of the typical media outlets reporting on this.”Support the show
The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson's request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff's office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk's shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff's office's filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Mondayto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdf
Terms of Service with Future Caucus Two Minnesota lawmakers, one Democrat and one Republican, on what public service costs and what it took to keep going after tragedy. Terms of Service is a new limited series from Future Caucus and TP&R, hosted by Future Caucus CEO Layla Zaidane. People run for state legislature to serve their communities, then find the fine print. Recorded at Future Summit, this first conversation brings together two young Minnesota representatives, Andy Smith (D) and Isaac Schultz (R), on political violence, pay, staffing, and what it takes not just to serve but to stay. This series is a partnership between Scan Media and Future Caucus. Executive Producers: Future Caucus and Layla Zaidane. Calls to Action ✅ Leave a rating and review: lovethepodcast.com/politicsandreligion ✅ Subscribe on Substack: coreysnathan.substack.com ✅ Watch and subscribe on YouTube: youtube.com/@politicsandreligion Key Takeaways A House split 67 to 67. An evenly divided chamber meant building trust across the aisle before any bill had a chance. Relationships came first, legislation second. Coming together after political violence. The assassination of Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark, and the wounding of a colleague, changed how these two think about safety and each other. Shared grief pulled them closer across party lines. The fine print of serving. Pay that runs about $10,000 below the average worker, little to no staff, and months living out of a hotel away from family. Both still call it worth doing. About Our Guests Rep. Andy Smith (D) represents Rochester, Minnesota, is in his second term, and runs a used bookstore with his wife. Rep. Isaac Schultz (R) represents a rural district, is in his second term, and works as an auctioneer and small business owner. Host Layla Zaidane is president and CEO of Future Caucus. Links and Resources Watch on YouTube: youtube.com/watch?v=Nkbhx-o4FY0 Future Caucus: futurecaucus.org Connect with us Substack: coreysnathan.substack.com YouTube: youtube.com/@politicsandreligion Instagram, Threads, Bluesky, X, Facebook, TikTok, LinkedIn: @coreysnathan Partners Proud to be part of The Democracy Group, a network of podcasts examining what's broken in our democracy and how we can work together to fix it. Clarity, charity, and conviction can live in the same room. Yes, really.
"The president is not supposed to have so much power. It shouldn't make such a difference who actually wields the executive pen." Chris and Joia dive deep into several of the causes behind America's rising political violence, starting with an October 2025 Pew Research survey that asked Americans why they think violence is increasing—offering eight options from "Trump/MAGA rhetoric" to "social media" to "partisan polarization." But Chris and Joia argue these are merely proximate causes that miss fundamental drivers.Throughout, Chris and Joia make clear these aren't just academic distinctions: "If we can find… just the few roots that have to be cut, then we can be much more effective with our own time and efforts in trying to solve this problem."Check out the full conversation to discover the multiple proximate and more fundamental causes they identify.Find Part I here: https://youtu.be/X_eojPaO5Ao
The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson's request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff's office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk's shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff's office's filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Mondayto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson's request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff's office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk's shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff's office's filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Mondayto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson's request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff's office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk's shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff's office's filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Mondayto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson's request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff's office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk's shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff's office's filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Mondayto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdf
The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson's request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff's office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk's shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff's office's filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Mondayto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdf
The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson's request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff's office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk's shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff's office's filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Mondayto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson's request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff's office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk's shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff's office's filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Mondayto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson's request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff's office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk's shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff's office's filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Mondayto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdf
The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson's request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff's office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk's shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff's office's filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Mondayto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Spouting Off with Karen Kataline Hostages, Free Speech, California Politics, and the Battle Over America's Future Karen Kataline guest-hosts The Alan Nathan Show with conversations on Middle East peace, Christian revival, Washington safety, free-speech platforms, California politics, progressive prejudice, political violence, and the competing narratives shaping American life. Spotlight: Corinne Clifford Corinne Clifford is introduced as an independent journalist, White House press corps member, and official spokesperson for SAT123.com. Speaking from Washington, D.C., she discusses covering national news from the White House, the release of hostages, President Trump's schedule, a tribute to Charlie Kirk, and what she describes as a Christian revival taking place in the United States. Guest Spotlight: Jeff Dornik Jeff Dornik is introduced as the founder and CEO of Pickax, a social media platform built around “freedom of speech and freedom of reach.” He also hosts The Jeff Dornik Show and discusses Gavin Newsom, California politics, gun regulation, slavery reparations, Katie Porter, jungle primaries, Steve Hilton, and why he believes California voters are increasingly frustrated with progressive leadership. Guest Spotlight: Leslie Corbly Leslie Corbly is introduced as an author, poet, columnist, attorney, former visiting fellow with the American Institute for Economic Research, and former policy analyst at the Libertas Institute. Her latest book, Progressive Prejudice: Exposing the Devouring Mother, becomes the foundation for a conversation about female predation, motherhood, dependency, abortion, child abuse, relational power, and the subtle prejudices she argues are embedded in progressive politics. Guest Spotlight: Nils Grevilius Nils Grevilius is introduced as a Los Angeles-based private investigator and author known for his past work with the Pinkerton organization and his investigation of the Wonderland Avenue murders. He clarifies that he is no longer with Pinkerton, then discusses political violence, activist networks, media framing, anti-Semitism, the aftermath of COVID-19 mistrust, and his forthcoming book The Last Lawman. Karen Kataline Opens With Free Speech, Hostages, and Live Radio Energy This episode of Spouting Off features Karen Kataline filling in on The Alan Nathan Show on the Main Street Radio Network. After the opening frames Spouting Off around liberty, uncensored ideas, debate, and the freedom to speak one's mind, Karen begins with Alan Nathan's motto about keeping Republicans, Democrats, and government power away from private life, wallets, and First and Second Amendment rights. A live-to-tape guest mix-up leads into Karen's first major topic: the emotional release of hostages after two years and the possibility of a twenty-point peace plan in the Middle East, which she presents as a deeply moving moment even for those outside the Jewish community or outside strong support for Israel. Corinne Clifford on Washington, Revival, Israel, and Public Safety Karen's first interview is with Corinne Clifford, who says she is reporting from Washington, D.C., and covering events at the White House. Corinne describes President Trump returning from Israel, hosting Argentina's leader, and preparing to honor Charlie Kirk with the Presidential Medal of Freedom. She also speaks about what she calls a Christian revival, saying that large numbers of mostly Generation Z Christians gathered at the National Mall, and she frames this as a positive spiritual shift. Karen then asks about Jewish-Christian solidarity and concern over anti-Semitic claims surrounding Charlie Kirk, while Corinne responds that real Christians respect Jewish people and Israel. The segment closes with discussion of safety in Washington, D.C., where Corinne says violence still exists but that the areas around her White House work feel safer. Jeff Dornik on Pickax, Newsom, California, and 2028 Politics After several public-service and sponsor announcements, Karen welcomes Jeff Dornik to discuss his free-speech-oriented platform Pickax and the political future of California. Karen asks whether Gavin Newsom's gun-regulation and slavery-reparations laws are part of a path toward the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination. Jeff argues that Newsom presents himself as moderate while advancing what Jeff sees as far-left policies, especially by positioning himself as the opposite of Donald Trump. The discussion expands to California dissatisfaction, the failed Newsom recall, homelessness, drugs, fires, Palisades fire aftermath, Katie Porter's gubernatorial ambitions, jungle primaries, Steve Hilton, and the Republican field. Jeff closes by directing listeners to Pickax.com. Leslie Corbly on the “Devouring Mother” and Progressive Prejudice Karen's next guest, Leslie Corbly, explains the title of her book Progressive Prejudice: Exposing the Devouring Mother. She defines the “devouring mother” as an archetype of female predation, where a mother uses care of a child as a pretext for narcissistic supply rather than genuine protection. Karen connects this to child beauty pageants, Munchausen syndrome by proxy, and political rhetoric around compassion. Leslie argues that society is more comfortable identifying overt physical harm, often associated with men, than emotional or relational harm, which she says can also be carried out by women. The conversation becomes political as Leslie discusses dependency, motherhood, abortion, children's value, state power, child abuse statistics, and what she sees as progressive insistence on simplistic oppressor-and-oppressed categories. Nils Grevilius on Political Violence, Media Labels, and Public Distrust In the final guest segment, Nils Grevilius joins Karen to discuss political violence, activist networks, and the way media outlets label ideological movements. He argues that groups and movements such as Occupy Wall Street, Black Lives Matter, No Kings, Free Palestine, and anti-ICE protests are connected through what he calls a “Marxist Hydra,” though he acknowledges that some networks and motives remain unclear. Karen brings up claims surrounding Charlie Kirk and Israel, and Nils responds by linking public susceptibility to conspiracy thinking with the distrust and insecurity he believes were intensified during the COVID-19 era. He also argues that some pro-Palestinian left activism is not truly about Palestinians but about power. Nils closes by directing listeners to DetectiveNils on X and mentioning The Last Lawman, expected in June 2026. Public-Service Messages and Program Disclaimers Throughout the hour, the program includes a wide range of public-service announcements and sponsored messages. These include digital organization tips from Senior Planet, human-trafficking awareness through DHS's Blue Campaign, adoption messaging through AdoptUSKids, support for Paralyzed Veterans of America, prescription drug cost guidance, business security advertising, heart-health messaging, outdoor recreation through Discover the Forest, buzzed-driving prevention, RSV prevention information, blood-pressure awareness, career-skills resources, and additional PVA support messaging. The program ends with Main Street Radio Network's standard disclaimer that guest and host opinions do not necessarily reflect the station, management, or advertisers, and that financial information should not be treated as investment advice.
- Mike O'Neill discusses whether the rising threats of violence is impacting court rulings and SCOTUS decisions. - Why do people risk riding bikes naked? - Dueling narratives are causing chaos around Amendment 4 and 5.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson's request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff's office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk's shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff's office's filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Mondayto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
DryCleanerCast a podcast about Espionage, Terrorism & GeoPolitics
For years, according to a New York Times report, Mossad quietly cultivated former Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Holocaust denier who once called for Israel's destruction, as the man it hoped to install in Tehran. The plan collapsed on the opening day of the war, when he lost his nerve in a Mossad safe house. Chris and Matt trace how a run of tactical brilliance curdled into strategic fantasy, then turn to Pickaxe Mountain — the buried nuclear site Trump keeps threatening to strike, but that even America's largest bunker-buster may not reach — and ask whether hitting it ends anything. They also examine how Japan has become a haven for Russian procurement networks supporting its war machine in Ukraine, and the forces driving political violence across the West after the killing of Ann Widdecombe, before closing on the life of the late James Woolsey, Bill Clinton's first CIA director. Subscribe and share to stay ahead in the world of intelligence, global issues, and current affairs. Take our audience survey: https://forms.gle/eFx59XntNtiKzNQa8 Support Secrets and Spies Become a “Friend of the Podcast” on Patreon for £3/$4: https://www.patreon.com/SecretsAndSpies Buy merchandise from our Redbubble shop: https://www.redbubble.com/shop/ap/60934996 Buy us a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/secretsandspies Subscribe to our YouTube page: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDVB23lrHr3KFeXq4VU36dg For more information about the podcast, check out our website: https://secretsandspiespodcast.com Articles discussed in today's episode "‘It becomes inevitable': the toxic mix fuelling deadly political violence around world" by John Henley | The Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/jul/18/inevitable-toxic-mix-fuelling-deadly-political-violence-world "Inside Israel's Secret Operation to Cultivate Ahmadinejad" by Mark Mazzetti, Julian E. Barnes, Farnaz Fassihi & Ronen Bergman | The New York Times: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/13/us/politics/israel-mahmoud-ahmadinejad-iran.html "Israel Thought It Could Spur Rebellion Inside Iran. That Hasn't Happened." by Mark Mazzetti, Julian E. Barnes, Edward Wong & Ronen Bergman | The New York Times: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/22/us/politics/iran-israel-trump-netanyahu-mossad.html "Trump's Threat To Strike Iran's Pickaxe Mountain Bunker's 'Front Door' Underscores Targeting Challenges" by Joseph Trevithick | The War Zone: https://www.twz.com/news-features/trumps-threat-to-strike-irans-pickaxe-mountain-bunkers-front-door-underscores-targeting-challenges "How Putin Turned Japan Into a Den of Spies" by Jane Bradley, Michael Schwirtz & Adam Goldman | The New York Times: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/12/world/asia/russia-spies-japan-war-drones-electronics.html "A Russian Spy, Suddenly Cast Into the Spotlight, Flees Japan" by Michael Schwirtz, Adam Goldman & Jane Bradley | The New York Times: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/23/world/asia/russian-spy-flees-japan.html (published after recording) "James Woolsey, CIA director under Bill Clinton, dies at 84" by Bob Drogin | The Washington Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/obituaries/2026/07/21/james-woolsey-cia-director-under-bill-clinton-dies-84/ Connect with us on social media Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/secretsandspies.bsky.social X/Twitter: https://x.com/SecretsAndSpies Instagram: https://instagram.com/secretsandspies Facebook: https://facebook.com/secretsandspies Spoutible: https://spoutible.com/SecretsAndSpies Follow Chris and Matt on Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/chriscarrfilm.bsky.social https://bsky.app/profile/mattfulton.net Secrets and Spies is produced by Films & Podcasts LTD: https://filmsandpodcasts.co.uk/ Music by Andrew R. Bird Photos by Fatemah Bahrami/Anadolu, Ebrahim Noroozi/AP Secrets and Spies sits at the intersection of intelligence, covert action, real-world espionage, and broader geopolitics in a way that is digestible but serious. Hosted by filmmaker Chris Carr and writer Matt Fulton, each episode examines the very topics that real intelligence officers and analysts consider on a daily basis through the lens of global events and geopolitics, featuring expert insights from former spies, authors, and journalists. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
Friday, July 24, 2026 Today, the DOJ has withdrawn its New York Times subpoenas; the man who shot Melissa Hortman and others in Minnesota has been sentenced to two life terms plus 40 years; oil is back up over $100 a barrel as Houthis attack ships in the Bab al-Mandab; the House passed a war powers resolution but the Senate quickly voted against it; Jim Jordan's committee referred Jack Smith to the Justice Department for criminal perjury charges; a federal judge questioned the difference between Hegseth's testosterone policy and gender affirming care for troops; two officers say Hegseth forced them out after questioning his policies; home foreclosures are up 71% nationwide; Republicans blocked a bill that would stop Trump's Bribe Force One retrofit; plus Allison delivers your Good News. Thank You, Fast Growing Trees Get 20% off your first purchase FastGrowingTrees.com/dailybeans The Trump Epstein Memorial Bookmobile The Daily Beans is proud to partner with Miles Taylor and our friends at DEFIANCE.org For a limited time, members of the Daily Beans community can receive a FREE 3-month full membership to DEFIANCE.org and gain access to one of the fastest-growing pro-democracy movements in America. Join here: https://www.defiance.org/beans Join The Daily Beans and give a gift today to ensure The Trevor Project can continue its crucial work in the face of continued challenges. Donate to The Trevor Project - Daily Beans Podcast Guest: John FugelsangJohn Fugelsang Show Sirius XM Progress 127 Weekdays at 12 AM ET The John Fugelsang Podcast, John Fugelsang|Substack, @johnfugelsang|Bluesky, @JohnFugelsang|TwitterSeparation of Church and Hate by John Fugelsang The Latest Breakdown→ Epstein Survivor Recounts Meeting With Todd Blanche StoriesU.S. Withdraws Subpoenas Issued to New York Times Journalists | NYT Senate fails to advance latest attempt to limit Trump's Iran war powers | CBS News Oil tankers attacked as Iran threatens to turn second trade route into a ‘Gate of Tears' | NBC News Foreclosures on the rise nationwide, data shows | ABC News Former officers say they were forced out after questioning Hegseth's policies | MS NOW Judge questions difference between Hegseth's testosterone policy and transgender care for troops | AP News Man who killed Minnesota lawmaker Melissa Hortman sentenced to life as family describes trauma, loss | CNNGood TroubleBlock Harmful Provisions in the NDAA Defense Budget - (PASSED HOUSE) Check your voter registration and deadlines → Voter Registration Deadlines - Vote.org →Help save Texas from Ken Paxton! →Urge Democrats to Oppose and Stop Trump's Crypto Corruption | Indivisible Guide →Defiance.org/beans →Show up for our Libraries - action.ala.org →Stand With Minnesota →ICE List →iceout.org Good NewsHenry Art The Necessary Conversation - YouTube dana-goldbergs-southwest-funnyfest Oct 9 -Email Dana@DanaGoldberg.com for sponsorship informationTickets for Dana Goldberg: Outrageous - Sep 23 - Den Theater - Chicago →Share your Good News & Good Trouble - The Daily Beans →Beans Talk audio -beans-talk.simplecast.com →Email Dana LGBTQ Owned eating establishments in your area - hello@mswmedia.com Subject: “Dana's Project” Subscribe to the MSW YouTube Channel - MSW Media - YouTube Our Donation Links The Trevor Project - trevorproject.org/beans Blue Wave California - https://secure.actblue.com/donate/msw-bwc Donate to Public Citizen - https://citizen.org/beans/ Donate to It Gets Better / The Daily Beans Fundraiser Pathways to Citizenship link to MATCH Allison's Donationhttps://crm.bloomerang.co/HostedDonation?ApiKey=pub_86ff5236-dd26-11ec-b5ee-066e3d38bc77&WidgetId=6388736 Join Dana and The Daily Beans in support of Human Rights Campaign http://onecau.se/_ekes71National Security Counselors - Donate, ActBlue.com/donate/msw-bwc, WhistleblowerAid.org/beans Dr. Allison Gill - The Breakdown | Allison Gill, Mueller, She Wrote @muellershewrote.com - Bluesky, MSW & The Daily Beans Podcast @muellershewrote - Instagram, MSW Media - YouTube →Federal workers - email AG - fedoath@pm.me Dana Goldberg - Dana is on Patreon! At Dana's Dugout, @dgcomedy - Bluesky, @dgcomedy - IG, Dana Goldberg - Facebook, DanaGoldberg.com More from MSW Media - Shows - MSW Media, Cleanup On Aisle 45 pod, The Breakdown | Allison Gill Reminder - you can see the pod pics if you become a Patron. The good news pics are at the bottom of the show notes of each Patreon episode! That's just one of the perks of subscribing! patreon.com/muellershewrote Listener Survey:http://survey.podtrac.com/start-survey.aspx?pubid=BffJOlI7qQcF&ver=shortFollow the Podcast on Apple:https://apple.co/3XNx7ckWant to support the show and get it ad-free and early?https://patreon.com/thedailybeanshttps://dailybeans.supercast.com/https://apple.co/3UKzKt0 Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
Tyler Robinson's defense asked Judge Tony Graf to immediately prohibit prosecutors and investigators from conducting any additional testing on a bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Charlie Kirk's autopsy until the court resolves the dispute. The defense argued that further forensic work could permanently alter, consume, or destroy the fragment, preventing its experts from independently evaluating its condition and evidentiary value. Robinson's attorneys requested that a defense firearms expert first be allowed to examine and photograph the fragment. As alternatives, they asked that their expert be permitted to observe any additional testing or that the entire process be video-recorded so the defense can later scrutinize exactly what was done.The motion was filed after an ATF examination was unable to conclusively identify the damaged bullet fragment as having been fired from the rifle attributed to Robinson. The result was inconclusive rather than an exclusion, meaning the fragment did not contain enough usable markings to either match it to or rule it out as having come from the rifle. With the FBI reportedly planning additional comparative and lead analysis, the defense maintained that basic fairness and Robinson's right to challenge the prosecution's evidence required preserving the fragment before potentially destructive testing occurred. The motion does not ask the judge to declare the evidence exculpatory; it seeks to ensure that the defense has a meaningful opportunity to inspect and document the evidence before its original condition is changed forever.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tyler-robinson-ballistics-motion.pdf
Tyler Robinson's defense asked Judge Tony Graf to immediately prohibit prosecutors and investigators from conducting any additional testing on a bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Charlie Kirk's autopsy until the court resolves the dispute. The defense argued that further forensic work could permanently alter, consume, or destroy the fragment, preventing its experts from independently evaluating its condition and evidentiary value. Robinson's attorneys requested that a defense firearms expert first be allowed to examine and photograph the fragment. As alternatives, they asked that their expert be permitted to observe any additional testing or that the entire process be video-recorded so the defense can later scrutinize exactly what was done.The motion was filed after an ATF examination was unable to conclusively identify the damaged bullet fragment as having been fired from the rifle attributed to Robinson. The result was inconclusive rather than an exclusion, meaning the fragment did not contain enough usable markings to either match it to or rule it out as having come from the rifle. With the FBI reportedly planning additional comparative and lead analysis, the defense maintained that basic fairness and Robinson's right to challenge the prosecution's evidence required preserving the fragment before potentially destructive testing occurred. The motion does not ask the judge to declare the evidence exculpatory; it seeks to ensure that the defense has a meaningful opportunity to inspect and document the evidence before its original condition is changed forever.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tyler-robinson-ballistics-motion.pdf
The probable-cause affidavit alleges that Tyler Robinson carried out the September 10, 2025 shooting of Charlie Kirk during an event at Utah Valley University. Investigators said campus surveillance tracked a dark-clothed suspect carrying a backpack as he moved toward the Losee Center, climbed onto its roof and took a prone position overlooking the courtyard shortly before Kirk was shot in the neck. The suspect then sprinted across the roof, climbed down and fled toward a wooded area, where investigators recovered a scoped Mauser Model 98 .30-06 bolt-action rifle wrapped in a towel. Engraved ammunition was found with the weapon, and a shoe impression near the rooftop escape point was described as consistent with Converse-style shoes worn by the suspect.The affidavit says the investigation shifted toward Robinson after a family member reported that he had confessed or implied responsibility. Police also placed Robinson's gray Dodge Challenger at the university earlier that morning and said his family confirmed that he had recently discussed Kirk's visit, criticized his views and become increasingly political. Robinson's roommate then showed investigators messages attributed to “Tyler” discussing a rifle left at a drop point, the towel wrapped around it, engraved bullets, the weapon's scope and a change of clothing. Based on the surveillance, recovered rifle, family information and digital messages, the officer concluded there was probable cause to arrest Robinson for aggravated murder, felony discharge of a firearm and obstruction of justice.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:23c7187b-5c27-490e-b52d-3f2640f43091.pdf
The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson's request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff's office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk's shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff's office's filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Mondayto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
The probable-cause affidavit alleges that Tyler Robinson carried out the September 10, 2025 shooting of Charlie Kirk during an event at Utah Valley University. Investigators said campus surveillance tracked a dark-clothed suspect carrying a backpack as he moved toward the Losee Center, climbed onto its roof and took a prone position overlooking the courtyard shortly before Kirk was shot in the neck. The suspect then sprinted across the roof, climbed down and fled toward a wooded area, where investigators recovered a scoped Mauser Model 98 .30-06 bolt-action rifle wrapped in a towel. Engraved ammunition was found with the weapon, and a shoe impression near the rooftop escape point was described as consistent with Converse-style shoes worn by the suspect.The affidavit says the investigation shifted toward Robinson after a family member reported that he had confessed or implied responsibility. Police also placed Robinson's gray Dodge Challenger at the university earlier that morning and said his family confirmed that he had recently discussed Kirk's visit, criticized his views and become increasingly political. Robinson's roommate then showed investigators messages attributed to “Tyler” discussing a rifle left at a drop point, the towel wrapped around it, engraved bullets, the weapon's scope and a change of clothing. Based on the surveillance, recovered rifle, family information and digital messages, the officer concluded there was probable cause to arrest Robinson for aggravated murder, felony discharge of a firearm and obstruction of justice.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:23c7187b-5c27-490e-b52d-3f2640f43091.pdf
Tyler Robinson's defense asked Judge Tony Graf to immediately prohibit prosecutors and investigators from conducting any additional testing on a bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Charlie Kirk's autopsy until the court resolves the dispute. The defense argued that further forensic work could permanently alter, consume, or destroy the fragment, preventing its experts from independently evaluating its condition and evidentiary value. Robinson's attorneys requested that a defense firearms expert first be allowed to examine and photograph the fragment. As alternatives, they asked that their expert be permitted to observe any additional testing or that the entire process be video-recorded so the defense can later scrutinize exactly what was done.The motion was filed after an ATF examination was unable to conclusively identify the damaged bullet fragment as having been fired from the rifle attributed to Robinson. The result was inconclusive rather than an exclusion, meaning the fragment did not contain enough usable markings to either match it to or rule it out as having come from the rifle. With the FBI reportedly planning additional comparative and lead analysis, the defense maintained that basic fairness and Robinson's right to challenge the prosecution's evidence required preserving the fragment before potentially destructive testing occurred. The motion does not ask the judge to declare the evidence exculpatory; it seeks to ensure that the defense has a meaningful opportunity to inspect and document the evidence before its original condition is changed forever.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tyler-robinson-ballistics-motion.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Tyler Robinson's defense asked Judge Tony Graf to immediately prohibit prosecutors and investigators from conducting any additional testing on a bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Charlie Kirk's autopsy until the court resolves the dispute. The defense argued that further forensic work could permanently alter, consume, or destroy the fragment, preventing its experts from independently evaluating its condition and evidentiary value. Robinson's attorneys requested that a defense firearms expert first be allowed to examine and photograph the fragment. As alternatives, they asked that their expert be permitted to observe any additional testing or that the entire process be video-recorded so the defense can later scrutinize exactly what was done.The motion was filed after an ATF examination was unable to conclusively identify the damaged bullet fragment as having been fired from the rifle attributed to Robinson. The result was inconclusive rather than an exclusion, meaning the fragment did not contain enough usable markings to either match it to or rule it out as having come from the rifle. With the FBI reportedly planning additional comparative and lead analysis, the defense maintained that basic fairness and Robinson's right to challenge the prosecution's evidence required preserving the fragment before potentially destructive testing occurred. The motion does not ask the judge to declare the evidence exculpatory; it seeks to ensure that the defense has a meaningful opportunity to inspect and document the evidence before its original condition is changed forever.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tyler-robinson-ballistics-motion.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
After taking some time away to help my family through my dad's open-heart surgery, I'm back with a new episode of Uncommon Sense with Ginny Robinson. Thank you to everyone who reached out and supported my family during this time.Today, I share my opinions on several current events. I discuss why I believe America must remain a sovereign nation and why I have concerns about the growing military relationship between the United States and Israel, including why I believe these actions raise real constitutional and legal questions.I also share my thoughts on the continued loss of American service members in the Iran War and explain why the United States should NOT be involved in another foreign war.Finally, I discuss the assassination of Charlie Kirk and how it is connected to the Epstein files, and why I think Americans deserve greater transparency and accountability from those in power.--https://www.youversion.com/bible-app
This week on Where Are All the Women, Meghan Murphy is joined by New Zealand writer, free speech advocate, and Terf, Ani O'Brien, to discuss politics in New Zealand, Ann Widdecombe's death, political violence on the left, Daniel Ortega, and more.This episode streamed live on YouTube, X, and Substack on Tuesday, July 21. The Same Drugs is on X @thesamedrugs_. Meghan Murphy is on X @meghanemurphy and on Instagram @meghanemilymurphy. Find The Same Drugs merch at Fourthwall. Support this podcast with a donation! Become a subscriber to gain early access to every episode and exclusive access to bonus content. Don't forget to click that "follow" button to ensure you don't miss a single episode!
The alleged confession to Lance Twiggs is among the strongest publicly available pieces of evidence because it is not presented as a vague secondhand rumor or an isolated statement stripped of context. Twiggs told investigators that Robinson sent messages accepting responsibility for Charlie Kirk's killing, then confirmed the admission face-to-face the following day when Twiggs asked whether what he had written was true. According to the recorded interview played during the preliminary hearing, Robinson became emotional, said he wished he had not done it and discussed surrendering to authorities. Prosecutors also presented an alleged handwritten note left for Twiggs and text messages discussing Robinson's motive, the engraved ammunition and his concern about recovering the abandoned rifle. Taken together, those statements allegedly describe conduct before, during and after the shooting in language attributable directly to Robinson rather than merely placing him near the scene.The confession is especially significant because several details reportedly correspond with independently discovered evidence. Robinson's alleged messages referred to the rifle, the engraved rounds and the possibility that his DNA remained on the weapon, while investigators later recovered a rifle and ammunition matching important parts of that account and presented forensic evidence connecting him to those items. Twiggs also reportedly told investigators that Robinson had begun engraving bullets weeks before the killing, providing potential evidence of preparation rather than a spontaneous admission invented after the fact. A confession can always be challenged on authenticity, interpretation or witness credibility, and Twiggs received immunity before cooperating, but the prosecution does not appear to be relying on his word alone. The alleged admission is powerful because it functions as a narrative thread connecting motive, planning, the weapon, the physical evidence, Robinson's movements after the shooting and his eventual surrender.to contact me:bobbycapucci@@protonmail.comsource:Lance Twiggs recalled moment Tyler Robinson allegedly confessed to shooting Charlie Kirk
Restaurant employees in Panguitch, Utah, reported that a quiet man who ate alone at a local steakhouse on the night Charlie Kirk was killed resembled Tyler Robinson. The customer reportedly ordered a medium-rare sirloin with vegetables and a baked potato, and employees later contacted the FBI after seeing photographs of Robinson. Federal agents reportedly interviewed the owner and two servers, but the restaurant did not have surveillance footage clearly identifying the customer or a complete name connected to the payment card. Because Panguitch is more than three hours from Utah Valley University, the possible sighting raised questions about Robinson's movements and the prosecution's timeline.The claim remains unresolved because neither the FBI nor prosecutors have publicly confirmed whether the customer was Robinson. The restaurant owner has also said he was never told whether investigators were able to verify the sighting through payment records or other evidence. While the available information makes it appear unlikely that the steakhouse customer has been conclusively identified as Robinson, the lack of an official answer means the possibility has not been definitively ruled out. For now, the Panguitch sighting remains an unconfirmed lead rather than either a proven alibi or a fully disproven claim.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
The probable-cause affidavit alleges that Tyler Robinson carried out the September 10, 2025 shooting of Charlie Kirk during an event at Utah Valley University. Investigators said campus surveillance tracked a dark-clothed suspect carrying a backpack as he moved toward the Losee Center, climbed onto its roof and took a prone position overlooking the courtyard shortly before Kirk was shot in the neck. The suspect then sprinted across the roof, climbed down and fled toward a wooded area, where investigators recovered a scoped Mauser Model 98 .30-06 bolt-action rifle wrapped in a towel. Engraved ammunition was found with the weapon, and a shoe impression near the rooftop escape point was described as consistent with Converse-style shoes worn by the suspect.The affidavit says the investigation shifted toward Robinson after a family member reported that he had confessed or implied responsibility. Police also placed Robinson's gray Dodge Challenger at the university earlier that morning and said his family confirmed that he had recently discussed Kirk's visit, criticized his views and become increasingly political. Robinson's roommate then showed investigators messages attributed to “Tyler” discussing a rifle left at a drop point, the towel wrapped around it, engraved bullets, the weapon's scope and a change of clothing. Based on the surveillance, recovered rifle, family information and digital messages, the officer concluded there was probable cause to arrest Robinson for aggravated murder, felony discharge of a firearm and obstruction of justice.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:23c7187b-5c27-490e-b52d-3f2640f43091.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
The probable-cause affidavit alleges that Tyler Robinson carried out the September 10, 2025 shooting of Charlie Kirk during an event at Utah Valley University. Investigators said campus surveillance tracked a dark-clothed suspect carrying a backpack as he moved toward the Losee Center, climbed onto its roof and took a prone position overlooking the courtyard shortly before Kirk was shot in the neck. The suspect then sprinted across the roof, climbed down and fled toward a wooded area, where investigators recovered a scoped Mauser Model 98 .30-06 bolt-action rifle wrapped in a towel. Engraved ammunition was found with the weapon, and a shoe impression near the rooftop escape point was described as consistent with Converse-style shoes worn by the suspect.The affidavit says the investigation shifted toward Robinson after a family member reported that he had confessed or implied responsibility. Police also placed Robinson's gray Dodge Challenger at the university earlier that morning and said his family confirmed that he had recently discussed Kirk's visit, criticized his views and become increasingly political. Robinson's roommate then showed investigators messages attributed to “Tyler” discussing a rifle left at a drop point, the towel wrapped around it, engraved bullets, the weapon's scope and a change of clothing. Based on the surveillance, recovered rifle, family information and digital messages, the officer concluded there was probable cause to arrest Robinson for aggravated murder, felony discharge of a firearm and obstruction of justice.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:23c7187b-5c27-490e-b52d-3f2640f43091.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Mike Opelka in for Chris For more coverage on the issues that matter to you, download the WMAL app, visit WMAL.com or tune in live on WMAL-FM 105.9 from 9:00am-12:00pm Monday-Friday To join the conversation, check us out on Twitter @WMAL and @ChrisPlanteShow Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
An attack outside a federal building in Manhattan is raising fresh alarms about political violence in America. Officials say the suspect, who has a history of anti-ICE activity, detonated an incendiary device on Monday. The attack is just the latest example in a growing wave of political violence in recent years. FOX News contributor and retired FBI supervisory special agent James Gagliano breaks down what's driving this spike—and what can be done to curb it. As Britain welcomes its seventh prime minister in just ten years, the ascension of self-styled socialist Andy Burnham marks a dramatic leftward pivot for the country's leadership. The former mayor of Greater Manchester now faces the monumental task of delivering on ambitious nationalization plans while navigating a precarious economy, tax policy debates, and incoming diplomatic pressure from President Trump over energy and military base access. Fox News Senior Correspondent and Searching for Heroes podcast host Benjamin Hall joins to discuss Burnham's agenda, the political landmines awaiting his government, and what this changing of the guard means for the future of U.K.-U.S. relations. PLUS, commentary by FOX News Digital Columnist David Marcus. PHOTO CREDIT: Robert Sullivan via AP Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Buckle up for a high-energy dive into today's biggest political battles!
Hold on tight for an explosive breakdown of today's high-stakes political battles!
Tyler Robinson's father, Matthew Robinson, has continued operating the family's successful stone and marble business in St. George, Utah, while his son awaits trial for the alleged murder of Charlie Kirk. The company reportedly relies on word-of-mouth advertising and longstanding relationships with local contractors, many of whom have continued doing business with the family despite the criminal case. Court records show that Matthew previously faced a lawsuit from his brother and former business partner, Clint Robinson, who accused him of misappropriating roughly $100,000, concealing financial records and exchanging company work for personal favors. The brothers eventually resolved the dispute through a confidential settlement, and Matthew has declined to publicly discuss either the old allegations or his son's case.Although Robinson comes from a family that appears financially comfortable, a judge declared the 23-year-old indigent, meaning Utah taxpayers are funding his capital-murder defense. His attorneys have reportedly requested an additional $2 million for experts and trial preparation, while legal analysts estimate the total cost could eventually exceed $10 million once a lengthy trial and possible appeals are included. Prosecutors presented testimony at the preliminary hearing alleging that Robinson confessed several times to his partner, Lance Twiggs, before surrendering with the assistance of his father and a family friend who had worked in law enforcement. The case has also placed intense scrutiny on Robinson's hometown, where former teachers and residents have expressed shock over the allegations and frustration with the continuing national attention.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
Best Political Speech So Far This Year- White Houses' Stephen Miller on Crushing Leftist Organizations. A Must Listen. Stephen Miller Speaks at Global Summit on Political Violence at Security Summit White House Senior Adviser Stephen Miller delivered remarks during a ministerial meeting on political violence at the U.S. Department of State in Washington, D.C. In his address, Miller discussed the Trump administration's approach to political violence, law enforcement coordination, national security, and international cooperation. He also spoke about intelligence sharing, terrorism prevention, public safety, and the role of government institutions in responding to security threats. The event brought together government officials, law enforcement representatives, and international delegates to discuss transnational security challenges and counterterrorism cooperation. Watch this video at- https://youtu.be/1jMMY1yv9FU?si=sCnNzDfjGF-2_CGn DWS News 7,742 views Jul 16, 2026 #StephenMiller #TrumpAdministration #PoliticalViolence Watch the full address from the Washington Global Security Summit. #StephenMiller #TrumpAdministration #PoliticalViolence #NationalSecurity #WashingtonDC #StateDepartment #Counterterrorism #USPolitics #BreakingNews #Reuters #SecuritySummit #WhiteHouse #Politics #WorldNews #Speech Stephen Miller, Stephen Miller speech, White House, Trump administration, political violence, national security, Washington DC, State Department, Global Security Summit, counterterrorism, law enforcement, public safety, terrorism, international security, Reuters, breaking news, US politics, full speech, Washington conference, latest news, Scott Bessent, Marco Rubio FULL REMARKS: Stephen Miller Speaks at Global Summit on Political Violence at Security Summit | AC1E
It's Casual Friday on The Majority Report On today's program: Donald Trump gave a primetime speech to the nation to complain and spread more lies about the 2020 election. Clearly the plan is to undermine voters' confidence in elections in order to set up some shady hijinks in the coming midterms and beyond. Jamaal Bowman, former middle school principal and former U.S. representative, joins to recap the week. Topics include his forthcoming memoir, midterm elections, AIPAC, ICE, Nolan Wells and more. Here is a link to preorder Jamaal's book. In The Fun Half: Markwayne Mullin holds a press conference to suck up to Trump and cry about networks not broadcasting the president's election denial. Stephen Miller tries to fearmonger about left-wing "terrorism" at an event called the Resurgence of Political Violence. Jesse Watters jokes about troops triple-dipping on testosterone and acting like wild animals and advises the women on base to be careful. Later in the same show, Jessica Tarlov mentions Drop Site News which gives Watters PTSD from Ryan Grim knocked him out at press dinner. All that and more. Tell your Senators to block the NDAA until it is stripped of the proposal to integrate U.S. and Israeli militaries. To connect and organize with your local ICE rapid response team visit ICERRT.com The Congress switchboard number is (202) 224-3121. You can use this number to connect with either the U.S. Senate or the House of Representatives. Follow us on TikTok here: https://www.tiktok.com/@majorityreportfm Check us out on Twitch here: https://www.twitch.tv/themajorityreport Find our Rumble stream here: https://rumble.com/user/majorityreport Check out our alt YouTube channel here: https://www.youtube.com/majorityreportlive Gift a Majority Report subscription here: https://fans.fm/majority/gift Subscribe to the AM Quickie newsletter here: https://am-quickie.ghost.io/ Join the Majority Report Discord! https://majoritydiscord.com/ Get all your MR merch at our store: https://shop.majorityreportradio.com/ Get the free Majority Report App!: https://majority.fm/app Go to https://JustCoffee.coop and use coupon code majority to get 10% off your purchase Check out today's sponsors: ONESKIN: Get 15% off OneSkin with the code MAJORITY at https://www.oneskin.co/majority SUNSET LAKE CBD: Use coupon code "Left Is Best" (all one word) for 20% off of your entire order at SunsetLakeCBD.com. Follow the Majority Report crew on Twitter: @SamSeder @EmmaVigeland @MattLech On Instagram: @MrBryanVokey Check out Matt's show, Left Reckoning, on YouTube, and subscribe on Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/leftreckoning Check out Matt Binder's YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/mattbinder Subscribe to Brandon's show The Discourse on Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/ExpandTheDiscourse Check out Ava Raiza's music here! https://avaraiza.bandcamp.
Thaddeus McCotter reflects on the death of Senator Lindsey Graham and the rising global pattern of political violence, including the murder of a UK MP. He also addresses credible Iranian threats to assassinate the US President, suggesting that decapitation strikes against heads of state have become routine. (13)
© 2020-2026 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
