Podcasts about transforming america

In a nation whose Constitution purports to speak for "We the People", too many of the stories that powerful Americans tell about law and society include only We the Men. A long line of judges, politicians, and other influential voices have ignored women's struggles for equality or distorted them beyond recognition by wildly exaggerating American progress. Even as sexism continues to warp constitutional law, political decision making, and everyday life, prominent Americans have spent more than a century proclaiming that the United States has already left sex discrimination behind.Professor Jill Elaine Hasday's We the Men: How Forgetting Women's Struggles for Equality Perpetuates Inequality (Oxford University Press, 2025) is the first book to explore how forgetting women's struggles for equality—and forgetting the work America still has to do—perpetuates injustice, promotes complacency, and denies how generations of women have had to come together to fight for reform and against regression. Professor Hasday argues that remembering women's stories more often and more accurately can help the nation advance toward sex equality. These stories highlight the persistence of women's inequality and make clear that real progress has always required women to disrupt the status quo, demand change, and duel with determined opponents.America needs more conflict over women's status rather than less. Conflict has the power to generate forward momentum. Patiently awaiting men's spontaneous enlightenment does not. Transforming America's dominant stories about itself can reorient our understanding of how women's progress takes place, focus our attention on the battles that are still unwon, and fortify our determination to push for a more equal future. This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda's interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/gender-studies

In a nation whose Constitution purports to speak for "We the People", too many of the stories that powerful Americans tell about law and society include only We the Men. A long line of judges, politicians, and other influential voices have ignored women's struggles for equality or distorted them beyond recognition by wildly exaggerating American progress. Even as sexism continues to warp constitutional law, political decision making, and everyday life, prominent Americans have spent more than a century proclaiming that the United States has already left sex discrimination behind.Professor Jill Elaine Hasday's We the Men: How Forgetting Women's Struggles for Equality Perpetuates Inequality (Oxford University Press, 2025) is the first book to explore how forgetting women's struggles for equality—and forgetting the work America still has to do—perpetuates injustice, promotes complacency, and denies how generations of women have had to come together to fight for reform and against regression. Professor Hasday argues that remembering women's stories more often and more accurately can help the nation advance toward sex equality. These stories highlight the persistence of women's inequality and make clear that real progress has always required women to disrupt the status quo, demand change, and duel with determined opponents.America needs more conflict over women's status rather than less. Conflict has the power to generate forward momentum. Patiently awaiting men's spontaneous enlightenment does not. Transforming America's dominant stories about itself can reorient our understanding of how women's progress takes place, focus our attention on the battles that are still unwon, and fortify our determination to push for a more equal future. This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda's interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/american-studies

Is the U.S. about to experience a manufacturing renaissance?

In this episode of CrossPolitic we welcome Scott Walter, president of Capital Research Center and former special assistant to President George W. Bush. Walter discusses his explosive new book "Arabella" which exposes a massive dark money network of leftist billionaires secretly transforming America. This for-profit organization runs nonprofits that take in billions of dollars every election cycle - more than the official Democrat and Republican national machines combined - yet most Americans have never heard of it. Walter reveals how this network, funded by donors like Gates, Zuckerberg, and Soros, operates through hundreds of fake grassroots groups to influence politics while hiding the true source of their funding. This eye-opening discussion reveals the hidden machinery behind much of today's political activism and offers hope for those fighting for transparency and truth. Click here to buy Scott's book Arabella: The Dark Money Network of Leftist Billionaires Secretly Transforming America: https://www.amazon.com/Arabella-Network-Billionaires-Secretly-Transforming-ebook/dp/B0D5ZQ77S8?ref_=ast_author_mpb Fight Laugh Feast 2025 Conference (October 16-18, Nashville) - Register HERE: https://flfnetwork.com

In this episode of CrossPolitic we welcome Scott Walter, president of Capital Research Center and former special assistant to President George W. Bush. Walter discusses his explosive new book "Arabella" which exposes a massive dark money network of leftist billionaires secretly transforming America. This for-profit organization runs nonprofits that take in billions of dollars every election cycle - more than the official Democrat and Republican national machines combined - yet most Americans have never heard of it. Walter reveals how this network, funded by donors like Gates, Zuckerberg, and Soros, operates through hundreds of fake grassroots groups to influence politics while hiding the true source of their funding. This eye-opening discussion reveals the hidden machinery behind much of today's political activism and offers hope for those fighting for transparency and truth. Click here to buy Scott's book Arabella: The Dark Money Network of Leftist Billionaires Secretly Transforming America: https://www.amazon.com/Arabella-Network-Billionaires-Secretly-Transforming-ebook/dp/B0D5ZQ77S8?ref_=ast_author_mpb Fight Laugh Feast 2025 Conference (October 16-18, Nashville) - Register HERE: https://flfnetwork.com

In this episode of CrossPolitic we welcome Scott Walter, president of Capital Research Center and former special assistant to President George W. Bush. Walter discusses his explosive new book "Arabella" which exposes a massive dark money network of leftist billionaires secretly transforming America. This for-profit organization runs nonprofits that take in billions of dollars every election cycle - more than the official Democrat and Republican national machines combined - yet most Americans have never heard of it. Walter reveals how this network, funded by donors like Gates, Zuckerberg, and Soros, operates through hundreds of fake grassroots groups to influence politics while hiding the true source of their funding. This eye-opening discussion reveals the hidden machinery behind much of today's political activism and offers hope for those fighting for transparency and truth. Click here to buy Scott's book Arabella: The Dark Money Network of Leftist Billionaires Secretly Transforming America: https://www.amazon.com/Arabella-Network-Billionaires-Secretly-Transforming-ebook/dp/B0D5ZQ77S8?ref_=ast_author_mpb Fight Laugh Feast 2025 Conference (October 16-18, Nashville) - Register HERE: https://flfnetwork.com

HR2 Scott Walter: The Dark Money Network of Leftist Billionaires Secretly Transforming America 7-24-25 by John Rush

The comfort foods we grew up with don't deserve their bad reputation. From cereal and hamburgers to mac and cheese and fried chicken, America's favorite dishes can actually be part of a balanced diet with some thoughtful modifications.Breakfast becomes a nutritional powerhouse when you add fresh fruit to cereal, use high-protein milk, or mix in fiber-rich options. Even the humble peanut butter and jelly sandwich – which University of Michigan researchers found adds more years to your life than almost any other food – proves that comfort and nutrition can coexist.Those classic hamburgers? They're already a balanced combination of protein, carbs, and fats – the problems come from preparation methods and proportions. By choosing leaner beef, whole grain buns, and generous vegetables, you transform fast food into real nutrition. The same goes for pizza, chili, and spaghetti with meatballs. These aren't inherently "bad" foods; they just need some rebalancing.The air fryer revolution has breathed new life into fried favorites. Chicken coated in cornflakes and air-fried delivers that satisfying crunch without excessive oil. Homemade french fries get crispy exteriors and soft interiors without deep-frying. Even simple swaps like mixing Greek yogurt with mayonnaise in potato salad maintain the creamy texture while improving the nutritional profile.American cuisine doesn't need to be abandoned for health – it just needs thoughtful modifications. Try our tuna mac and peas recipe with protein-enhanced pasta for a quick meal that satisfies comfort food cravings while delivering balanced nutrition. What American classic will you reimagine tonight? Support the showYou can find us on social media here:Rob TiktokRob InstagramLiam TiktokLiam Instagram

3 Radical Approaches Solving Water Scarcity Today, in just one video! More #water insights? Subscribe to my newsletter: https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/6884833968848474112/

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, it becomes clear that this initiative is not just another policy blueprint, but a comprehensive and ambitious plan to reshape the very fabric of the U.S. federal government. Conceived by over 400 scholars and policy experts from the conservative movement, Project 2025 is a manifesto that outlines a radical transformation of American governance, aligning closely with the ideological leanings of former President Donald Trump.At its core, Project 2025 aims to consolidate executive power and impose a partisan control over key government agencies. This is evident in the proposal to replace merit-based federal civil service workers with individuals loyal to the administration. Agencies such as the Department of Justice (DOJ), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Department of Commerce (DOC), and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) are targeted for this overhaul, suggesting a profound shift in how these institutions operate and the priorities they will serve[5].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its vision for the dismantling or abolition of certain federal agencies. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Department of Education (ED) are among those slated for significant changes or outright elimination. This move is part of a broader strategy to streamline government, but critics argue it could lead to a loss of critical services and oversight. For instance, dismantling DHS could compromise national security and disaster response efforts, while abolishing the Department of Education could undermine federal support for public schools and higher education[5].The project also delves deeply into economic and environmental policies. It advocates for reducing environmental regulations to favor fossil fuels, a move that could have far-reaching consequences for climate change and public health. Additionally, it proposes reducing taxes on corporations and implementing a flat income tax on individuals, which could exacerbate income inequality. The plan further suggests cutting Medicare and Medicaid, critical healthcare programs for millions of Americans, and reversing many of the policies implemented by President Joe Biden[5].Healthcare is another area where Project 2025's proposals are particularly contentious. The plan recommends making the National Institutes of Health (NIH) less independent and defunding its stem cell research. This could stifle medical innovation and hinder the development of new treatments for various diseases. Moreover, the project proposes enacting laws that criminalize the sending and receiving of abortion and birth control medications, and eliminating coverage of emergency contraception, reflecting a strong alignment with the Christian right's agenda[5].Social and civil rights are also under scrutiny in Project 2025. The initiative suggests removing legal protections against anti-LGBT discrimination and ending diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs. Instead, it proposes that the DOJ should focus on prosecuting anti-white racism, a move that many see as a misguided and divisive approach to addressing racial issues. Furthermore, the project calls for criminalizing pornography, a policy that raises significant questions about free speech and personal freedoms[5].Immigration policy is another critical area where Project 2025's proposals are stark. The plan recommends the arrest, detention, and mass deportation of illegal immigrants, and even suggests deploying the U.S. Armed Forces for domestic law enforcement. This approach is not only controversial but also raises serious concerns about human rights and the rule of law[5].Despite the ambitious and often controversial nature of these proposals, Project 2025 has already begun to influence policy in significant ways. Following Trump's 2024 election victory, several architects and supporters of the project were nominated to positions in his second administration. An analysis by *Time* found that nearly two-thirds of Trump's executive actions in the early days of his second term "mirror or partially mirror" proposals from Project 2025[5].As I reflect on the scope and ambition of Project 2025, it is clear that this initiative represents a seismic shift in American governance. The project's writers and contributors, many of whom worked in Trump's first administration or his 2024 election campaign, have crafted a blueprint that is both detailed and far-reaching. While the stated goals of Project 2025 are to streamline government and align it with conservative values, expert analyses suggest that the potential impacts could be far more complex and multifaceted.Looking ahead, the implementation of Project 2025's proposals will likely be a contentious and ongoing process. As the administration continues to roll out these policies, it will be crucial to monitor their effects on various sectors of American society. The upcoming milestones will include legislative battles, judicial challenges, and public reactions that will shape the ultimate impact of this initiative.In the end, Project 2025 is not just a policy document; it is a vision for a fundamentally different America. Whether this vision aligns with the values and aspirations of the American people remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: the journey ahead will be marked by significant change and profound debate.

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a comprehensive and contentious initiative spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation, it becomes clear that this is more than just a policy blueprint – it's a vision for a fundamentally transformed American governance.Project 2025 is the culmination of efforts by over 400 scholars and conservative groups, led by former Trump administration officials Paul Dans and Spencer Chretien. This 900-page manifesto outlines a sweeping overhaul of federal policies, aiming to reshape the government in line with conservative principles. The project is structured around four key pillars: a detailed policy guide, a database of potential personnel, a training program for these candidates, and a playbook for actions to be taken within the first 180 days of a new administration[2][4].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its approach to education. The initiative criticizes what it terms "woke propaganda" in public schools and advocates for a significant reduction in the federal government's role in education. This includes closing the Department of Education and transferring its responsibilities to the states. Programs under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) would be administered by the Department of Health and Human Services, and the National Center for Education Statistics would become part of the Census Bureau. The federal government, according to Project 2025, should merely keep statistics, rather than enforcing civil rights in schools or investigating disparate impacts of disciplinary measures on racial or ethnic grounds[1].The project also proposes drastic changes in education funding. It suggests allowing Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to expire, which would remove $18 billion in federal funds for schools in low-income areas. Instead, public funds would be available as school vouchers, even for parents sending their children to private or religious schools. This shift is part of a broader philosophy that views education as a private rather than a public good[1].In the realm of environmental policy, Project 2025's vision is equally radical. It seeks to downsize the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), close the EPA's Office of Environmental Justice and External Civil Rights, and reverse the 2009 EPA finding that carbon dioxide emissions are harmful to human health. This would prevent the federal government from regulating greenhouse gas emissions. The project also advocates for blocking the expansion of the national electrical grid, stymying the transition to renewable energy, and relaxing regulations on the fossil fuel industry. For instance, it suggests removing restrictions on oil drilling imposed by the Bureau of Land Management and promoting Arctic drilling[1].The implications of these environmental policies are far-reaching. Nonpartisan experts warn that without expanding the electrical grid, renewable energy projects will have to slow down. Additionally, the project's stance on climate change mitigation is at odds with many Republicans who acknowledge the importance of addressing climate change. Benji Backer, founder of the American Conservation Coalition, has criticized Project 2025's climate policies as "wrongheaded" and noted a growing consensus among younger Republicans that human activity causes climate change[1].Project 2025 also targets other federal agencies and programs. It proposes reforming the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) by shifting the majority of preparedness and response costs to states and localities. This move is justified by the argument that FEMA is "overtasked" and "overcompensates for the lack of state and local preparedness and response." The project further suggests ending preparedness grants for states and localities, arguing that these grants should be terminated to prevent the Department of Homeland Security from "handing out federal tax dollars"[3].In the area of technology and media, Project 2025's recommendations are equally sweeping. It calls for increasing agency accountability while decreasing wasteful spending at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The project also advocates for promoting national security and economic prosperity by supporting the expansion of 5G networks and satellite technologies like StarLink. Additionally, it suggests that Big Tech companies should contribute to the Universal Service Fund, which is currently funded through telephone bills[4].The project's approach to civil rights and social policies is another contentious area. It proposes rolling back diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs across federal agencies, arguing that these policies can violate federal civil rights laws. Project 2025 also aims to dismantle the DEI apparatus in various agencies and eliminate terms like "DEI," "abortion," and "gender equality" from federal rules and regulations. This stance aligns with Trump's executive order ending all DEI programs within the federal government, which he claimed could shut out Americans "who deserve a shot at the American dream" due to their race or sex[3].Critics of Project 2025, including Democrats and some Republicans, have been vocal about its potential impacts. Vice President Kamala Harris has described the project as a plan to "return America to a dark past," and President Biden has accused Trump of lying about his connections to the initiative, stating that it "should scare every single American"[2].Despite Trump's public disavowal of Project 2025, the initiative's connections to his administration are undeniable. Former high-ranking officials like Ben Carson, John Ratcliffe, and Peter Navarro are listed as authors or contributors to the policy agenda. This close association has led critics to argue that Project 2025 is essentially a blueprint for a second Trump term, one that could endanger democratic institutions and concentrate presidential power[2][4].As the 2024 elections approach, Project 2025 stands as a significant milestone in the debate over the future of American governance. Its proposals, if implemented, would mark a profound shift in federal policies, from education and environmental regulation to technology and civil rights. Whether these changes would be beneficial or detrimental remains a subject of intense debate.In the words of Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts, the nation is "in the process of the second American Revolution," which he hopes will remain bloodless. However, the radical nature of Project 2025's proposals has raised concerns among many that this revolution could come at a steep cost to democratic values and social welfare[2].As we move forward, the fate of Project 2025 will likely be decided in the political arena. Will its vision for a more conservative, decentralized government prevail, or will it face significant resistance from those who see it as a threat to the fabric of American society? The answer will depend on the choices made by voters, policymakers, and the next administration. One thing is certain, however: Project 2025 has set the stage for a critical conversation about the future of America, one that will shape the country's trajectory for years to come.

As I delved into the intricacies of Project 2025, I couldn't help but feel a sense of both fascination and alarm. This sprawling, 900-page policy blueprint, crafted by the Heritage Foundation and a coalition of over 100 conservative groups, is more than just a set of recommendations; it's a comprehensive roadmap for a radical transformation of the American government.At its core, Project 2025 aims to reshape the federal government in a way that consolidates executive power, particularly in favor of a conservative agenda. The project's architects envision a government where key agencies, such as the Department of Justice, the Department of Commerce, and the Federal Trade Commission, are brought under direct presidential control, eliminating their independence[1][3][4].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its plan to replace merit-based federal civil service workers with loyalists to the president. This is achieved through a mechanism known as Schedule F, which allows for the transfer of civil service employees into a category where they lose their protections against political overreach and abuse of power. This move would grant the president and his loyalists unparalleled control over the executive branch, raising serious concerns about the erosion of democratic institutions and civil liberties[2][3][4].The project's scope is vast and far-reaching. For instance, it proposes the dismantling or abolition of several federal agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Education. The Department of State is also targeted, with plans to dismiss its leadership and replace them with acting roles that do not require Senate confirmation. Kiron Skinner, who wrote the State Department chapter, believes most State Department employees are too left-wing and need to be replaced by those more aligned with conservative values[1][2][4].Project 2025's policy objectives are equally ambitious. It advocates for significant tax cuts on corporations and capital gains, the implementation of a flat income tax, and reductions in Medicare and Medicaid. Environmental regulations would be rolled back to favor fossil fuels, and the National Institutes of Health would see its independence diminished, with a halt to its stem cell research funding. The project also proposes criminalizing pornography, removing legal protections against anti-LGBTQ+ discrimination, and ending diversity, equity, and inclusion programs. Instead, the Department of Justice would focus on prosecuting what the project terms "anti-white racism"[1][2][4].The plan's stance on immigration is particularly draconian, calling for the arrest, detention, and mass deportation of illegal immigrants, as well as the deployment of the military for domestic law enforcement. It also suggests enacting laws supported by the Christian right, including criminalizing the sending and receiving of abortion and birth control medications and eliminating coverage of emergency contraception[1].In the realm of media and technology, Project 2025's proposals are equally radical. It recommends defunding the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which supports PBS and NPR, and revoking NPR stations' noncommercial status. This could force these stations to relocate on the FM dial, making way for religious programming. The project also advocates for more media consolidation, allowing local news programs to be converted into national ones. Social media companies would be required to not remove "core political viewpoints" from their platforms, and TikTok would be banned. Furthermore, the Federal Elections Commission would be prevented from countering misinformation or disinformation about election integrity[1][3].The implications of these proposals are profound. Critics argue that Project 2025 represents a blueprint for an autocratic takeover, endangering democratic institutions and civil liberties. The project's emphasis on centralizing power in the White House, based on a controversial interpretation of the unitary executive theory, raises concerns about the potential for abuse of power and the undermining of independent agencies like the FBI and the Federal Communications Commission[1][3][4].Despite Donald Trump's attempts to distance himself from Project 2025, the overlap between his policies and the project's recommendations is undeniable. Trump's recent actions, such as reviewing FEMA's role in disaster response and withdrawing from the World Health Organization, align closely with Project 2025's proposals. The project's authors and contributors, many of whom worked in Trump's last administration or on his election campaign, see their goals as closely aligned with Trump's Agenda 47 program[1][4][5].As we move forward, the potential implementation of Project 2025's policies looms large. With Trump's second term underway, the stage is set for a significant reshaping of American governance. The next few months will be crucial, as the administration begins to enact its policies and face the inevitable pushback from opponents.In the words of Kevin Roberts, president of the Heritage Foundation, "We are in the process of the second American Revolution, which will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be." This statement, made on a conservative podcast, underscores the high stakes and the deep divisions that Project 2025 embodies[4].As I reflect on Project 2025, it becomes clear that this initiative is not just a policy document but a vision for a fundamentally different America. Whether this vision will come to fruition remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: the journey ahead will be marked by intense political battles and profound implications for the future of American democracy.

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a sweeping initiative crafted by the Heritage Foundation, it becomes clear that this is more than just a policy blueprint – it's a vision for a fundamentally transformed American government. Led by former Trump administration officials Paul Dans and Spencer Chretien, this project is designed to guide the next Republican president in implementing a conservative agenda that touches nearly every aspect of federal governance.At its core, Project 2025 is built on four pillars: a comprehensive policy guide, a database of conservative personnel, training programs for these individuals, and a detailed playbook for the first 180 days of the new administration. This structure is meant to ensure that conservatives are not just winning elections, but also have the right people and plans in place to execute their vision from day one[4].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its ambitious plan to reshape the federal bureaucracy. The project advocates for significant cuts to the federal workforce and the elimination of several key agencies, including the Department of Education and the Department of Homeland Security. The Department of Education, for instance, would be abolished, with its programs either transferred or terminated. This move is part of a broader strategy to reduce the federal government's role in education, elevating school choice and parental rights instead. Federal funds for low-income students would be converted into school vouchers, even for those attending private or religious schools, and programs like Head Start would be eliminated[1].The project also targets the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), proposing to place these agencies under direct presidential control. This aligns with the unitary executive theory, which centralizes greater control over the government in the White House. According to Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts, "The notion of independent federal agencies or federal employees who don't answer to the president violates the very foundation of our democratic republic"[1].In the realm of healthcare, Project 2025 suggests drastic reforms. It proposes to cut funding for Medicaid, imposing stricter work requirements and limits on lifetime benefits. The Department of Health and Human Services would be reformed to promote traditional nuclear families, and Medicare would be prohibited from negotiating drug prices. Additionally, federal healthcare providers would be barred from offering gender-affirming care to transgender individuals, and insurance coverage for emergency contraception would be eliminated[1].The project's stance on environmental and climate change policies is equally contentious. It recommends reducing environmental regulations to favor fossil fuels and preventing the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from using certain climate change impact projections. Mandy Gunasekara, former chief of staff at the EPA during the Trump administration, authored the EPA chapter, arguing that the agency's science activities should require clear congressional authorization[5].Project 2025 also delves into law enforcement, proposing a DOJ that would combat what it terms "affirmative discrimination" or "anti-white racism." The Civil Rights Division would prosecute state and local governments, institutions of higher education, and private employers with diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) or affirmative action programs. This approach is based on the argument that such programs violate federal law and come at the expense of other Americans[1].The project's impact on science and research is significant as well. It suggests prioritizing basic research while rolling back climate science initiatives. Academic and technology exchanges with countries like China would be restricted, and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) would be prohibited from funding research involving embryonic stem cells. The NIH would also be made less independent, with easier procedures for firing employees and removing DEI programs[5].Recent developments indicate that these proposals are not mere theoretical exercises. Donald Trump's early executive actions since his return to office have mirrored or partially mirrored several of Project 2025's proposals. For example, Trump revived the Schedule F executive order, which allows certain federal employees to be reclassified as political appointees, making them easier to remove. This move aligns with Project 2025's goal of reducing the independence of the federal workforce and empowering the executive branch[2].Critics argue that these actions and proposals are designed to benefit specific industries or donors, rather than the broader public. Darrell West notes that the inconsistencies in the plan may be intended for fundraising purposes, targeting industries that would benefit from the proposed changes[1].As Project 2025 continues to shape the conservative agenda, its implications for American governance are profound. The centralization of power in the White House, the dismantling of key federal agencies, and the significant cuts to social and environmental programs all point to a future where the federal government's role is dramatically reduced. Whether this vision aligns with the broader interests of the American people remains a subject of intense debate.Looking ahead, the next milestones for Project 2025 will be closely watched. As the 2025 presidential transition approaches, the project's coalition of over 100 conservative groups will continue to grow and influence policy discussions. The training programs and personnel database will be crucial in preparing conservatives for key roles in the new administration. The playbook for the first 180 days will serve as a roadmap for swift and decisive action, aiming to bring about the sweeping changes envisioned by Project 2025.In the end, Project 2025 represents a clear and ambitious vision for conservative governance, one that promises to reshape the very fabric of American government. As this project unfolds, it will be essential to monitor its progress and assess its impact on the nation, ensuring that the changes it brings align with the democratic principles and the diverse needs of the American people.

As I delved into the intricacies of Project 2025, a political initiative crafted by the American conservative think tank The Heritage Foundation, I was struck by the sheer scope and ambition of its proposals. This is not just a policy guide; it is a comprehensive blueprint for a radical restructuring of the U.S. federal government, aligned with a staunchly conservative agenda.At its core, Project 2025 is a 900-page manual titled "Mandate For Leadership," authored by former Trump administration officials and supported by over 100 conservative groups. The project's director, Paul Dans, and associate director, Spencer Chretien, both high-ranking officials in the Trump administration, have been instrumental in shaping this vision. Despite former President Trump's public disavowal of the project, the involvement of his former officials and the alignment with his past policies and campaign promises suggest a deep connection[3].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its call for sweeping changes to federal agencies and their missions. The plan proposes dismantling the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and abolishing the Department of Education (ED), with its programs either transferred or terminated. The Department of Education's responsibilities would be devolved to the states, and federal enforcement of civil rights in schools would be significantly curtailed. For instance, the project rejects the pursuit of racial parity in school discipline indicators, prioritizing student safety over equity[1].The project also envisions a dramatic reduction in the federal government's role in education, elevating school choice and parental rights. This includes allowing states to opt out of federal programs or standards and converting public funds for education into school vouchers that could be used even for private or religious schools. The Head Start program, which provides services to children of low-income families, would be eliminated, and funding for free school meals would be cut. The underlying philosophy here is that education is a private rather than a public good[1].In the realm of healthcare, Project 2025 proposes significant reforms that align with conservative principles. It suggests prohibiting Medicare from negotiating drug prices and promoting the Medicare Advantage program, which consists of private insurance plans. The project also recommends cutting funding for Medicaid through various measures, such as caps on federal funding, limits on lifetime benefits, and stricter work requirements for beneficiaries. Additionally, it advocates for denying gender-affirming care to transgender people and eliminating insurance coverage for the morning-after pill Ella, as required by the Affordable Care Act[1].The project's stance on environmental and climate change policies is equally contentious. It recommends reducing environmental and climate change regulations to favor fossil fuels, reversing a 2009 EPA finding that carbon dioxide emissions are harmful to human health, and preventing the federal government from regulating greenhouse gas emissions. Mandy Gunasekara, a contributor to the project and former EPA chief of staff, acknowledges the reality of human-made climate change but considers it politicized and overstated. The project also seeks to block the expansion of the national electrical grid and stymie the transition to renewable energy, reflecting a strong bias towards fossil fuel interests[1].Project 2025 also outlines a vision for a more centralized executive branch, with the president having greater control over federal agencies. This is based on an expansive interpretation of the unitary executive theory, which aims to centralize greater control over the government in the White House. The plan proposes reclassifying tens of thousands of federal civil service workers as political appointees, allowing for their replacement with loyalists to a conservative president. This move is seen as a "wrecking ball for the administrative state," according to Heritage Foundation plans[1].The implications of these changes are far-reaching. For instance, the Department of Justice (DOJ) would be thoroughly reformed to combat what the project calls "affirmative discrimination" or "anti-white racism," and would be closely overseen by the White House. The project also proposes curtailing legal settlements between the DOJ and local police departments and shifting the FBI's focus away from overlapping responsibilities with other agencies like the DEA[1].In the area of law enforcement, Project 2025 suggests deploying the military for domestic law enforcement and promoting capital punishment with the speedy "finality" of those sentences. It also recommends the arrest, detention, and mass deportation of illegal immigrants living in the U.S., reflecting a hardline stance on immigration[1].The project's approach to media and public discourse is equally telling. It proposes defunding the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, revoking NPR stations' noncommercial status, and forcing them to relocate outside their current FM dial range. Social media companies would be required not to remove "core political viewpoints" from their platforms, and the project entertains the idea of banning TikTok. These measures are part of a broader effort to reshape the media landscape in favor of conservative viewpoints[1].As I navigated through the detailed proposals of Project 2025, it became clear that this initiative is not just about policy changes but about a fundamental shift in the role of the federal government and its relationship with the American people. The project's emphasis on conservative principles and its rejection of many existing federal programs and regulations suggest a profound redefinition of what the government should do and how it should operate.Critics, such as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), argue that Project 2025 threatens to erode democracy by promoting bigotry, injustice, and inequality. The ACLU sees the project as a radical restructuring that opposes abortion and reproductive rights, LGBTQ rights, immigrants' rights, and racial equity[4].Despite the controversy, Project 2025 remains a significant force in the conservative policy landscape. As the 2024 elections approach, it will be interesting to see how these proposals are received by the public and whether they will influence the next presidential administration's policies.In the words of Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts, "The nation is in the process of the second American Revolution, which will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be." This statement encapsulates the project's ambitious and somewhat ominous vision for the future of American governance. As we move forward, it is crucial to monitor the developments and implications of Project 2025, for it represents a potential turning point in the balance of power and the direction of federal policy in the United States[3].

As I delved into the intricacies of Project 2025, a sweeping initiative crafted by the Heritage Foundation, I couldn't help but feel a sense of both fascination and trepidation. This project, unveiled in April 2023, is more than just a policy blueprint; it's a vision for a fundamentally transformed American government, one that aligns closely with the ideological leanings of its conservative architects.At its core, Project 2025 is a four-pillar initiative: a detailed policy guide, a database of potential personnel, a training program for these candidates, and a playbook for the first 180 days of a new administration. Led by former Trump administration officials Paul Dans and Spencer Chretien, this project has drawn significant attention for its ambitious and often controversial proposals.One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its plan to overhaul the federal government's structure and function. The project envisions a drastic reduction in the role of several key agencies. For instance, it proposes dismantling the Department of Homeland Security and abolishing the Department of Education, transferring its programs to the Department of Health and Human Services or terminating them altogether[1][3][4].The Department of Education, in particular, is a focal point. Project 2025 advocates for a significant curtailment of federal involvement in education, promoting school choice and parental rights instead. This would involve eliminating federal programs and standards, allowing states to opt out, and transferring responsibilities such as those under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) to other departments. The federal government's role would be reduced to mere statistics-keeping, with civil rights enforcement in schools being significantly curtailed[1].In the realm of healthcare, Project 2025 suggests profound changes. It recommends reforms to the Department of Health and Human Services to promote traditional nuclear family structures and opposes gender-affirming care for transgender individuals. The project also seeks to limit Medicare's ability to negotiate drug prices, promote private insurance plans through Medicare Advantage, and eliminate insurance coverage for emergency contraception like the morning-after pill Ella[1].The project's stance on law enforcement is equally transformative. It calls for a thorough reform of the Department of Justice (DOJ), criticizing it for being "a bloated bureaucracy" with a "radical liberal agenda." The DOJ would be required to combat what the project terms "affirmative discrimination" or "anti-white racism," and it would be tasked with prosecuting state and local governments, institutions of higher education, and private employers with diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs. The FBI would be made directly accountable to the president, and consent decrees between the DOJ and local police departments would be curtailed[1].Environmental and climate policies are also in the crosshairs. Project 2025 proposes reducing environmental and climate change regulations to favor fossil fuels, preventing the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from using certain climate change impact projections, and requiring congressional authorization for all EPA science activities. The project argues that many current programs "act as subsidies to the private sector for government-favored resources," and it suggests eliminating offices focused on energy technology development and climate change[1][4].The project's vision for the executive branch is one of centralized control, aligning with the unitary executive theory. This would place all federal agencies under direct presidential control, eliminating their independence. As Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts argues, "The notion of independent federal agencies or federal employees who don't answer to the president violates the very foundation of our democratic republic."[1]Personnel changes are another critical component. Project 2025 recommends reclassifying tens of thousands of federal civil service workers as political appointees, allowing for their replacement with individuals loyal to a conservative agenda. This includes using a questionnaire to screen potential recruits for their adherence to the project's ideology, a tactic reminiscent of Trump's efforts to ensure loyalty during his presidency[1][3].The implications of these proposals are far-reaching and have sparked significant debate. Critics argue that such changes would undermine the integrity of federal agencies, erode civil rights protections, and harm vulnerable populations. Darrell West, for example, points out the inconsistencies in the plan, suggesting they are designed to appeal to specific industries or donors who would benefit from these changes[1].Despite the controversy, Project 2025 remains a blueprint that could shape the future of American governance. As we move forward, it is crucial to monitor its development and the reactions it elicits. With the 2025 timeline looming, the next few months will be pivotal in determining whether these proposals become policy.In the words of Kevin Roberts, "The nation is in the process of the second American Revolution, which will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be." Whether this revolution materializes and what form it takes will depend on the political landscape and the will of the American people. As Project 2025 continues to evolve, one thing is clear: its impact on American governance could be profound and lasting.

As Trump's second term approaches, this episode explores the staggering scope of environmental rollbacks planned for his administration. Through Project 2025's detailed blueprint, Trump aims to systematically dismantle decades of environmental protections while installing climate deniers in key positions throughout government.The threats are unprecedented: from targeting environmental nonprofits under anti-terrorism pretexts to relocating the EPA to weaken its effectiveness. His administration's actions could add an estimated 4 billion tons of greenhouse gases - equivalent to the combined emissions of the EU and Japan.Yet resistance continues. State and local governments forge ahead with climate initiatives, environmental lawsuits maintain an 80% success rate, and market forces increasingly favor renewable energy. While federal action may stall, grassroots movements and legal challenges provide paths forward.This final episode in our three-part series examines both the gravity of coming threats and realistic strategies for maintaining environmental progress during Trump's presidency. From protecting scientific research to strengthening state-level action, we explore how to weather this storm while building stronger foundations for future climate action.Episode Links:A Call to Act: A Comprehensive Database of Eco-SolutionsTrumping Trump: Extensive Resources to Fight BackPodcast Episode 

 How Trump Plans to Remake AmericaIn this second of three episodes, we explore how Trump's return to power threatens to fundamentally transform American democracy. His tactics, honed over decades in New York real estate and refined through his business empire, reveal a calculated approach to dismantling democratic institutions.Trump's strategy involves replacing career officials with loyalists, weaponizing federal agencies against opponents, and using bureaucratic warfare to exhaust critics. His plans target key pillars of American democracy.From the courts to intelligence agencies, from education to healthcare, no institution remains untouched by his blueprint for power. Most alarming is his expanded authority to deploy military forces domestically and implement unprecedented surveillance of Americans. These changes, combined with emboldened extremist groups and weakened civil protections, signal a dramatic shift in American governance.The scale of transformation threatens not just policy changes, but the very framework of American democracy. As we examine Trump's comprehensive blueprint for power, one thing becomes clear: even his supporters may be unprepared for the magnitude of changes ahead.[Next episode explores the environmental consequences of Trump's second term.]Episode Links:A Call to Act: A Comprehensive Database of Eco-SolutionsTrumping Trump: Extensive Resources to Fight BackPodcast Episode 

Introduction The unthinkable has happened — Donald Trump has been re-elected president. Despite experiencing the most destructive presidency in history, America chose him again. In this series, we'll explore the enormous impact Trump's presidency will have on America, the world, and the planet.In This First Episode: America stands at a crossroads in 2025. Is American democracy at a tipping point? Does our unique blend of democracy and power make us exceptional, or are we witnessing its decline? Join us to explore this pivotal moment.What Makes America Exceptional? "Make America Great Again" is much more than a campaign slogan. The U.S. became the world's superpower after WWII. Our strength comes from our size, resources, military, economy, and culture. But Trump's "America First" attitude risks destroying our global partnerships.The End of the American Experiment? Trump's win shows Americans are turning away from global leadership. Many have lost hope in the "American Dream" as life gets harder for regular people. Trump preys on anger and division. His policies, like deportations and tariffs, will make America weaker as rivals like China get stronger. The choices we make now will determine if the American Empire survives.Coming Up Next in Part 2: The next episode in the series will examine the institutions that defined American exceptionalism that are now under unprecedented threat from Trump. These span national security, justice, federal agencies, healthcare, environment, trade, energy and the free press. Trump's systematic assault on the heart of democracy could redefine and destabilize the foundational pillars of The United States of America forever.Episode Links:A Call to Act: A Comprehensive Database of Eco-SolutionsTrumping Trump: Rich Resources to Fight BackEpisode Webpage

The headline from this year's World Energy Outlook released by the International Energy Agency says, “The world is on the brink of a new age of electricity.” In the United States, electrification is set to transform the energy landscape, and the nation is expected to see a rapid rise in power demand.  Questions remain over how this demand will be met, and if this means increasing carbon emissions from the power sector. These questions are further complicated by the rise of artificial intelligence and an antiquated and fragmented electric grid. So how do efforts to decarbonize the century-old power system impact both reliability and the cost of electricity? And what does this new era of rising electricity demand mean for domestic manufacturing, AI data centers, and other industries?   This week host Jason Bordoff talks with Cheryl LaFleur and David Hill about the incoming Trump administration, its impact on FERC, and the status of permitting reform measures.   Cheryl is an advisory board member at the Center on Global Energy Policy. Previously, she was one of the longest-serving commissioners on the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission from 2010 to 2019, and served twice as FERC's chair. Since 2019, Cheryl has served on the board of directors of the Independent System Operator of New England (ISO-NE). David is a non-resident fellow at the Center on Global Energy Policy. He served as general counsel of the U.S. Department of Energy during the George W. Bush administration. From 2012 to 2018, he served as executive vice president and general counsel of NRG Energy, Inc.

This is Frank Gaffney with the Secure Freedom Minute. The three Obama-Biden administrations have been set from the get-go on “fundamentally transforming” America. The lame-duck Biden presidency is building on their myriad previous efforts to achieve that goal by subordinating our sovereignty to international entities like the World Health Organization and the United Nations. The necessity for rejecting such stealthy efforts to impose world government was underscored by a recent congressional report that found WHO Director General, Dr. Tedros Ghebreyesus malfeasant did the Chinese Communist Party's bidding in the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontline Dr. Robert Malone estimates that a million Americans needlessly died substantially as a result of his toxic prescriptions. Dr. Malone has rightly called for Tedros' immediate resignation and for U.S. withdrawal from his corrupt and CCP-captured organization. Praise God, President-elect Donald Trump has promised to complete that withdrawal in his second administration. Meantime, Tedros must go. This is Frank Gaffney.

A Harvard pollster says Trump's strategy to connect with voters of all backgrounds and in their environments is not just brilliant, it may well transform the country's political landscape for years to come. Arizona elections officials say it could take 10-13 DAYS to tabulate election results and determine a winner. A veteran political journalist says early voting may give the election to Trump well before November 5.

For more information about the ministry of Evangelist Chris Mikkelson, visit http://www.chrismikkelson.com * Give Online

The “charitable” sector must return to being charitable, NOT political! Sophisticated operatives are trying to manipulate the public. Can you see it? The Arabella network includes a half dozen non-profits that took in over $2.4 billion in the 2020 election cycle. That's $1-billion MORE money than all that was collected by the Republican and Democrat committees combined. Then in 2022 Arabella took in more than $3-billion, more than the DNC & RNC and both parties Senate and House committees! Scott's non-profit organization in Washington DC, the Capital Research Center, first uncovered this ‘deep state' ‘dark money' fraud. Their investigation goes back to 2005. While Bill Gates, George Soros, and Mark Zuckerberg are significant donors into the Arabella network, Scott reports dozens of other millionaires and billionaires that are funding this Arabella network of 501(c)3 and 501(c)4's nationwide. Their intent is to influence elections, the Supreme Court nominations, abortion, women's sports, school discipline, Medicare for All, environmental policies, fake local news outlets, and much more! Over the last 10 years the Left built up a perverse funding mechanism to support and promote Marxist-Leftist candidates and policies. These conspiracies have surfaced and are now in plain view. We cannot wait long for the ‘fix'.Dark Money Network of Leftist Billionaires…Secretly Transforming Americaon the GrassRoots TruthCast with Gene ValentinoORIGINAL MEDIA SOURCE(S):‣ Originally Recorded on September 5, 2024‣ GrassRoots TruthCast: Season 2, Episode 256‣ Image courtesy of: GeneValentino.com➡️ Join the Conversation: https://GeneValentino.com➡️ WMXI Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/NewsRadio981➡️ More WMXI Interviews: https://genevalentino.com/wmxi-interviews/➡️ More GrassRoots TruthCast Episodes: https://genevalentino.com/grassroots-truthcast-with-gene-valentino/➡️ More Broadcasts with Gene as the Guest: https://genevalentino.com/america-beyond-the-noise/ ➡️ More About Gene Valentino: https://genevalentino.com/about-gene-valentino/

In this inspiring episode, Camille Walker talks to Zen Honeycutt, the unstoppable mom behind the groundbreaking nonprofit Moms Across America. Zen shares her incredible journey from a concerned mother struggling with her sons' severe allergies and autism symptoms to a full-fledged activist determined to overhaul America's toxic food supply.You'll hear how a promise to her son sparked Zen's mission to eliminate GMOs and pesticides like glyphosate from our food. Zen rallied thousands of moms to march in Fourth of July parades in 2013, giving birth to her powerful movement to expose the dangers of these food additives through testing and education.The uplifting story of how going organic and GMO-free virtually eliminated Zen's sons' health issues will inspire you. But Zen doesn't stop there - she shares practical tips for going organic on a budget, detoxing from glyphosate, and fighting for transparency and change.Get ready to feel empowered as one unstoppable mama bear!Resources:Moms Across America: https://www.momsacrossamerica.orgZen Honeycutt's Book "Unstoppable": https://www.amazon.com/Unstoppable-Courageous-Huge-Contribution-America/dp/0995806404Glyphosate Testing Information: https://www.momsacrossamerica.org/glyphosate_testingOrganic Food Budgeting Tips: https://www.momsacrossamerica.org/budgeting_for_organicConnect with CamilleFollow Camille on Instagram: www.instagram.com/CamilleWalker.coFollow Call Me CEO on Instagram: www.instagram.com/callmeceopodcast

Scott Walter, author of ARABELLA: The Dark Money Network of Leftist Billionaires Secretly Transforming Americaand president of Capital Research Center. Arabella: The Dark Money Network of Leftist Billionaires Secretly Transforming America

Luis A. Miranda, Jr., founder of the political consulting firm MirRam, founding president of the Hispanic Federation and the author of Relentless: My Story of the Latino Spirit that is Transforming America (Hachette Books, 2024), shares his story of his life and work in NYC politics (and as the father of Lin Manuel).

If you're a regular listener, you've heard the name “Arabella Advisors” before—the management company that sits at the center of a network of left-wing “dark money” advocacy nonprofits. Now, the story of Arabella Advisors, its network, and its influence is told in a volume authored by Capital Research Center's president Scott Walter, imaginatively titled Arabella: […]

If you're a regular listener, you've heard the name “Arabella Advisors” before—the management company that sits at the center of a network of left-wing “dark money” advocacy nonprofits. Now, the story of Arabella Advisors, its network, and its influence is told in a volume authored by Capital Research Center's president Scott Walter, imaginatively titled Arabella: The Dark Money Network of Leftist Billionaires Secretly Transforming America. Scott joins us this week to discuss the book.Links: Arabella BookWritten Testimony on Extreme Environmental Activist GroupsDonors to the Arabella Advisors NetworkShedding Light on Governing for ImpactFollow us on our Socials: Twitter: @capitalresearchInstagram: @capitalresearchcenterFacebook: www.facebook.com/capitalresearchcenterYouTube: @capitalresearchcenter

Rich Raz Razgaitis co-founded FloWater in 2013 with a singular mission to put an end to single-use plastic water bottles. He started his career in Fortune 500 companies, including Johnson and Johnson and Eli Lilly. Since 2002, he has been the CEO or president of several venture-capital-backed startups and privately held turnaround and growth. Top 3 Value Bombs 1. Focusing on your purpose, not just your passion. 2. The key is to address the problem at its source by reducing plastic contamination in the environment and your bodies. 3. Small actions matter in both your business and personal lives. Success or failure often results from a series of decisions, not just one big move. Get a quote about The Complete Transformation of Tap Water - FloWater Website Sponsors HubSpot With HubSpot's customer platform you can spend less time switching between systems, and more time on growing your business. Visit HubSpot.com to learn how HubSpot's customer platform can help you grow your business Thought-Leader Ever thought about giving a TEDx talk Visit Thought-Leader.com/fire to join a free training and learn how to land a TEDx Talk and spread your message to millions BuckedUp Right now you can save 75 percent on BuckedUp's Kickstart Kit. Get a t-shirt, shaker bottle, and 5 stick packs all for just 9.99 dollars. Claim this offer today by texting FireKit to 312345, or go to GetKickstartKit.com/fire

Rich Raz Razgaitis co-founded FloWater in 2013 with a singular mission to put an end to single-use plastic water bottles. He started his career in Fortune 500 companies, including Johnson and Johnson and Eli Lilly. Since 2002, he has been the CEO or president of several venture-capital-backed startups and privately held turnaround and growth. Top 3 Value Bombs 1. Focusing on your purpose, not just your passion. 2. The key is to address the problem at its source by reducing plastic contamination in the environment and your bodies. 3. Small actions matter in both your business and personal lives. Success or failure often results from a series of decisions, not just one big move. Get a quote about The Complete Transformation of Tap Water - FloWater Website Sponsors HubSpot With HubSpot's customer platform you can spend less time switching between systems, and more time on growing your business. Visit HubSpot.com to learn how HubSpot's customer platform can help you grow your business Thought-Leader Ever thought about giving a TEDx talk Visit Thought-Leader.com/fire to join a free training and learn how to land a TEDx Talk and spread your message to millions BuckedUp Right now you can save 75 percent on BuckedUp's Kickstart Kit. Get a t-shirt, shaker bottle, and 5 stick packs all for just 9.99 dollars. Claim this offer today by texting FireKit to 312345, or go to GetKickstartKit.com/fire

  “We have on our website what's called the DOT Navigator. Sounds wonky, but go take a look. It is a wealth of information about all our grant programs, and you can answer a series of questions and it can help point you in the right direction. We also have a team of folks here who are dedicated to technical assistance and capacity building. So,  if you go to our website, you can find a lot of resources and, I would recommend potentially for firms, one nice thing we have is we have a division administration, federal Highways division administration office in all 50 states in the state capitals a great place, I think, to start for local guidance.” Secretary Polly Trottenberg on Electric Ladies Podcast   We are in the midst of a transportation revolution – a transformation of our transportation systems, in the U.S. and across the globe. It's part technology, part addressing climate change because transportation is top source of CO2, and part changing mobility needs. The Inflation Reduction Act & Infrastructure Investment Act provided nearly $1 trillion toward this transportation upgrade. Where are the opportunities? Listen to this exclusive interview with Polly Trottenberg, Deputy Secretary of the U.S. Department of Transportation on Electric Ladies Podcast with host Joan Michelson (live at the DOT offices). You'll hear: How the transportation sector is being transformed – in large part by the smartphone. Where and how the US DOT is spending those hundreds of billions of dollars in new federal funding – and where you can access the opportunities. How to make sure your community gets its voice heard and transportation needs met. Where EV chargers are going in the huge buildout of them across the country. Plus, insightful career advice “Women don't always know what they're good at. I think that they're not actually always encouraged to sort of realize their own value and, you know, all the talents they have…. That is, I think a socialization thing that I still see. So, I give this advice from personal experience, you know more than you think, you have incredible value. Seek out those opportunities, take some risks.” Secretary Polly Trottenberg on Electric Ladies podcast You'll also want to listen to: (some might be recorded under our previous name, Green Connections Radio) Michele Mueller, Manager, Automated, Connected and Electrification, Michigan Dept. of Transportation Julie White, Deputy Secretary of the North Carolina Dept. of Transportation Suzy Deering, (then) Chief Marketing Officer, Ford – on bringing change to a legacy industry as an outsider. Genevieve Cullen, President, Electric Drive Transportation Assn. – on financial benefits for buying EVs in the new legislation, and EVs coming to market soon. Telva McGruder, Chief Diversity, Equity & Inclusion Officer, General Motors (now head of Global Manufacturing Engineering) – on the changing auto workforce and industry. Kristen Siemen, Chief Sustainability Officer, General Motors   Subscribe to our newsletter to receive our podcasts, blog, events and special coaching offers.. Thanks for subscribing on Apple Podcasts or iHeartRadio and leaving us a review! Follow us on Twitter @joanmichelson

The Dark Side of Migration: America's Gotham City Come to Life Unmask the unsettling truth about the impact of migration on America's urban landscapes, with eerie resemblances to Gotham City. This eye-opening video sheds light on the underbelly of immigration, examining its influence on crime, infrastructure, and social dynamics. Brace yourself for a thought-provoking journey into the dark side of America's migration story. #DarkSideOfMigration #AmericanGotham

In this week's episode, Gary Bauer exposes the dark forces that are actively tearing America away from its Judeo-Christian founding and transitioning it into an entirely secular nation under one-party neo-Marxist rule. He also sounds the alarm that many in mainline American churches believe this terrifying movement is none of our business and constitutionally proper. But not all is lost. Bauer speaks of a remnant that has only begun to fight. One of these brave Christians is Eric Metaxas, who has written a book on this subject titled Letter to the American Church. Bauer plays audio clips from a recent interview, where Metaxas explains why he wrote the book to address the cultural and policy battles facing Christians worldwide and specifically, the Church in the United States.

The Voice of a Nation [malcolm at eight] – The problem is we are in an ideological war for absolute power - yet many believe it is just politics as usual. Many can detect the problem, but they wrongly mistake the issues. A Four Point Strategy for Resilience, Freedom, and Our Republic... 1 Seize the Narrative, 2 Proactive & Positive Legislative Agenda, 3 Overhaul National Security, 4 Ensure the Resiliency of our Republic, Constitution, and Freedoms...

This episode is brought to you by Rupa Health, BiOptimizers, Levels, and AlgaeCal.We live in a country that claims to be based on science, goodwill, and policies intended to help people. But these things are often heavily influenced and manipulated by industry, particularly Big Food, Big Pharma, and Big Ag, which have corrupted many institutions, politicians, professional associations, and research entities. Today on The Doctor's Farmacy, I'm excited to talk to Marianne Willamson, candidate for President in 2024 and a good friend of mine, about her vision for how we can change our food system, economy, environment, and public health outcomes for the better.Marianne Williamson is a political activist, author, non-denominational spiritual lecturer and New York Times bestselling author. Her career began in the 1980s when she became deeply involved with HIV/AIDS activism. A long-time champion for the LGBTQ+ community, she founded Project Angel Food to deliver meals to the homebound unable to shop or cook for themselves. To date, the charitable organization has served over 16 million meals. She also founded the LA Center for Living, the Manhattan Center for Living, and cofounded The Peace Alliance.This episode is brought to you by Rupa Health, BiOptimizers, Levels, and AlgaeCal.Access more than 3,000 specialty lab tests with Rupa Health. You can check out a free, live demo with a Q&A or create an account at RupaHealth.com today.Get 10% off Sleep Breakthrough. If you buy two or more you'll get a free bottle of Magnesium Breakthrough. Go to sleepbreakthrough.com/hyman and use the code hyman10.Right now, Levels is offering an additional two free months of their annual membership. Head over to levels.link/HYMAN to learn more.Right now, you can get 10% off AlgaeCal calcium supplements when you go to algaecal.com/markhyman and use coupon code MARKHYMAN.Here are more details from our interview (audio version / Apple Subscriber version):Marianne's view of the most important change needed in America (6:11 / 4:16)The power of political parties (14:21 / 12:00) Why Americans have disengaged from politics (17:08 / 15:37) The root cause of chronic disease in America (19:09 / 18:04)Why Marianne is only running for one term as president (31:09 / 26:55) Transforming America's food system (33:00 / 29:19)Fixing America's broken healthcare system (44:35 / 40:33) Addressing climate issues (51:35 / 47:29) Marianne's hope and vision for the future (1:04:21 / 1:00) Healing our divisive culture war (1:07:44 / 1:03:40) Mentioned in this episodeRumi's Out beyond ideas of wrongdoing and rightdoingLearn more about Marianne's vision at marianne2024.com. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.