Podcasts about education ed

This week on "Off The Cuff," Melanie is joined by Megan, Sarah, and Nalia to discuss the latest updates around the reconciliation process after the Senate HELP Committee released its own portion of the bill this week that could make significant changes to higher education policy. Nalia begins by explaining how the reconciliation process works and what's ahead for Congress. Megan and Sarah then debrief on what changes the Senate seeks to make to the House's bill, which was initially released in April. From there, Sarah walks listeners through the latest verification guidance from the Department of Education (ED), including the questions NASFAA has over the guidance. Lastly, Melanie explains why NASFAA signed onto an amicus brief in support of Harvard University. 

This week on "Off the Cuff," Melanie is joined by Rachel, Hugh, Sarah, and Nalia to dive into how the congressional budgeting process could impact student financial aid. To kick things off, Melanie and Hugh discuss the latest developments in the reconciliation process, where a House committee recently advanced portions of the package that would make some drastic changes to programs housed within the Department of Education (ED). Sarah then provides members with a recap of three deep dive explainers that the policy has been working on to fully analyze the proposal. Rachel and Nalia then walk through more of the dynamics of the reconciliation process and outline how NASFAA members can make their voices heard by contacting their members of Congress. Nalia then catches listeners up on the president's “skinny” budget request, and the team wraps things up with some additional news out of ED concerning staffing hours and the start of a new Negotiated Rulemaking (NegReg) session.

This week on "Off The Cuff," Maria is joined by Jill, Megan, and Nalia to discuss several issues impacting the world of higher education. First, Megan debriefs listeners on this week's news that the Department of Education (ED) will resume the collections process for defaulted federal student loans. Then, Jill discusses the upcoming negotiated rulemaking (NegReg) public hearing on Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) and other topics. Megan also provides a brief update on two lawsuits against ED, including one on the Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) repayment plan, and another from the American Federation of Teachers. From there, Megan highlights two new NASFAA FAQs for members to help navigate the resulting questions and concerns from President Donald Trump's executive order to dissolve ED. Lastly, Nalia runs through the budget appropriations process and what members can expect to see in the next few weeks. 

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, it becomes clear that this initiative is not just another policy blueprint, but a comprehensive and ambitious plan to reshape the very fabric of the U.S. federal government. Conceived by a coalition of conservative scholars, policy experts, and former Trump administration officials, Project 2025 aims to consolidate executive power and implement a slew of radical reforms that could have far-reaching implications for American governance.At its core, Project 2025 is driven by four key pillars designed to create an effective conservative administration. This involves a significant overhaul of the federal civil service system, where merit-based hiring would be replaced by appointments based on loyalty to the administration. This shift is particularly evident in the proposed takeover of key government agencies such as the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Department of Commerce (DOC), and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC)[5].Imagine a scenario where the DOJ, an institution meant to uphold the law impartially, is transformed into a partisan tool. This is exactly what Project 2025 envisions, with the DOJ being tasked to prosecute "anti-white racism" instead of protecting against discrimination across all groups. This proposal is not just a policy change; it represents a fundamental shift in how justice is perceived and administered in the United States.The project also targets other federal agencies for dismantling or significant restructuring. For instance, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Department of Education (ED) are slated for abolition, reflecting a broader disdain for the current bureaucratic structure. The National Institutes of Health (NIH), a cornerstone of medical research, would see its independence curtailed, with specific proposals to defund stem cell research. These changes are not merely administrative; they signify a profound reorientation of national priorities[5].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its economic agenda. The plan advocates for reducing environmental regulations to favor fossil fuels, a move that would likely exacerbate climate change and undermine decades of environmental protection efforts. Additionally, it proposes a flat income tax for individuals and significant tax cuts for corporations, which critics argue would widen the income gap and burden lower-income Americans. Medicare and Medicaid, critical safety nets for millions, would face cuts, further straining the healthcare system[5].The social and cultural implications of Project 2025 are equally profound. The initiative seeks to criminalize pornography and remove legal protections against anti-LGBT discrimination, rolling back hard-won rights for marginalized communities. Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs would be ended, reflecting a broader rejection of progressive social policies. The plan even goes so far as to propose laws supported by the Christian right, including the criminalization of sending and receiving abortion and birth control medications, and eliminating coverage of emergency contraception[5].Immigration policy is another area where Project 2025's vision is starkly different from current practices. The plan recommends the arrest, detention, and mass deportation of illegal immigrants, and even suggests deploying the U.S. Armed Forces for domestic law enforcement. This approach not only raises serious constitutional concerns but also underscores a harsh and punitive stance on immigration[5].The architects of Project 2025 are not mere theorists; many have direct ties to Donald Trump's administration and campaign. Several key contributors worked in Trump's first administration or his 2024 election campaign, and the project's goals align closely with Trump's *Agenda 47* program. Despite Trump's later attempts to distance himself from the plan, his second administration has already begun implementing many of its proposals. Just four days into his second term, nearly two-thirds of Trump's executive actions mirrored or partially mirrored Project 2025's recommendations[5].As I reflect on the scope and ambition of Project 2025, it becomes clear that this is not just a policy initiative but a vision for a fundamentally different America. The project's proponents see it as a necessary corrective to what they perceive as a bloated, inefficient, and overly liberal federal government. However, critics warn that these changes could have devastating consequences for workers, the environment, and marginalized communities.Looking ahead, the implementation of Project 2025 will likely be marked by intense political battles and legal challenges. As the country navigates these changes, it will be crucial to monitor how these policies affect real people and communities. The next few years will be a critical period, as the full impact of Project 2025 becomes clearer and the nation grapples with the implications of such profound governance reforms.In the end, Project 2025 is a testament to the enduring power of ideological vision in shaping public policy. Whether one views it as a necessary revolution or a dangerous overreach, it is undeniable that this initiative has the potential to reshape the very foundations of American governance. As we move forward, it is essential to engage in a nuanced and informed discussion about the future we want to build and the values we wish to uphold.

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, it becomes clear that this initiative is not just another policy blueprint, but a comprehensive and ambitious plan to reshape the very fabric of the U.S. federal government. Conceived by over 400 scholars and policy experts from the conservative movement, Project 2025 is a manifesto that outlines a radical transformation of American governance, aligning closely with the ideological leanings of former President Donald Trump.At its core, Project 2025 aims to consolidate executive power and impose a partisan control over key government agencies. This is evident in the proposal to replace merit-based federal civil service workers with individuals loyal to the administration. Agencies such as the Department of Justice (DOJ), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Department of Commerce (DOC), and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) are targeted for this overhaul, suggesting a profound shift in how these institutions operate and the priorities they will serve[5].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its vision for the dismantling or abolition of certain federal agencies. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Department of Education (ED) are among those slated for significant changes or outright elimination. This move is part of a broader strategy to streamline government, but critics argue it could lead to a loss of critical services and oversight. For instance, dismantling DHS could compromise national security and disaster response efforts, while abolishing the Department of Education could undermine federal support for public schools and higher education[5].The project also delves deeply into economic and environmental policies. It advocates for reducing environmental regulations to favor fossil fuels, a move that could have far-reaching consequences for climate change and public health. Additionally, it proposes reducing taxes on corporations and implementing a flat income tax on individuals, which could exacerbate income inequality. The plan further suggests cutting Medicare and Medicaid, critical healthcare programs for millions of Americans, and reversing many of the policies implemented by President Joe Biden[5].Healthcare is another area where Project 2025's proposals are particularly contentious. The plan recommends making the National Institutes of Health (NIH) less independent and defunding its stem cell research. This could stifle medical innovation and hinder the development of new treatments for various diseases. Moreover, the project proposes enacting laws that criminalize the sending and receiving of abortion and birth control medications, and eliminating coverage of emergency contraception, reflecting a strong alignment with the Christian right's agenda[5].Social and civil rights are also under scrutiny in Project 2025. The initiative suggests removing legal protections against anti-LGBT discrimination and ending diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs. Instead, it proposes that the DOJ should focus on prosecuting anti-white racism, a move that many see as a misguided and divisive approach to addressing racial issues. Furthermore, the project calls for criminalizing pornography, a policy that raises significant questions about free speech and personal freedoms[5].Immigration policy is another critical area where Project 2025's proposals are stark. The plan recommends the arrest, detention, and mass deportation of illegal immigrants, and even suggests deploying the U.S. Armed Forces for domestic law enforcement. This approach is not only controversial but also raises serious concerns about human rights and the rule of law[5].Despite the ambitious and often controversial nature of these proposals, Project 2025 has already begun to influence policy in significant ways. Following Trump's 2024 election victory, several architects and supporters of the project were nominated to positions in his second administration. An analysis by *Time* found that nearly two-thirds of Trump's executive actions in the early days of his second term "mirror or partially mirror" proposals from Project 2025[5].As I reflect on the scope and ambition of Project 2025, it is clear that this initiative represents a seismic shift in American governance. The project's writers and contributors, many of whom worked in Trump's first administration or his 2024 election campaign, have crafted a blueprint that is both detailed and far-reaching. While the stated goals of Project 2025 are to streamline government and align it with conservative values, expert analyses suggest that the potential impacts could be far more complex and multifaceted.Looking ahead, the implementation of Project 2025's proposals will likely be a contentious and ongoing process. As the administration continues to roll out these policies, it will be crucial to monitor their effects on various sectors of American society. The upcoming milestones will include legislative battles, judicial challenges, and public reactions that will shape the ultimate impact of this initiative.In the end, Project 2025 is not just a policy document; it is a vision for a fundamentally different America. Whether this vision aligns with the values and aspirations of the American people remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: the journey ahead will be marked by significant change and profound debate.

On Monday, the Trump administration announced that it will freeze $2.2 billion in grants and $60 million in contracts to Harvard University after the school refused to comply with a list of requirements it said were unlawful. In a joint letter dated April 11, the General Services Administration, Department of Education (ED) and Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) demanded that Harvard adopt its suggested reforms in order to maintain its funding. Among the required changes, the administration ordered Harvard to discontinue DEI programs, regulate specific academic departments, screen international students, and submit to government audits. Harvard rejected the government's terms, calling its demands an invasion of “university freedoms.” Hours later, the Trump administration announced its decision to freeze Harvard's federal funding.Ad-free podcasts are here!Many listeners have been asking for an ad-free version of this podcast that they could subscribe to — and we finally launched it. You can go to ReadTangle.com to sign up!You can read today's podcast⁠ ⁠⁠here⁠⁠⁠, our “Under the Radar” story ⁠here and today's “Have a nice day” story ⁠here⁠.Take the survey: What do you think of Harvard's decision? Let us know!You can subscribe to Tangle by clicking here or drop something in our tip jar by clicking here. Our Executive Editor and Founder is Isaac Saul. Our Executive Producer is Jon Lall.This podcast was written by Isaac Saul and edited and engineered by Jon Lall. Music for the podcast was produced by Diet 75.Our newsletter is edited by Managing Editor Ari Weitzman, Senior Editor Will Kaback, Hunter Casperson, Kendall White, Bailey Saul, and Audrey Moorehead. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode of dotEDU Live, Jon, Sarah, and Mushtaq unpack the sweeping policy shifts affecting higher education, including the executive order to dismantle the Department of Education (ED). They also discuss the legal and financial implications for institutions, potential changes to federal student aid, immigration policies impacting international students, and key congressional budget updates.   Send suggestions, links, and questions to @ACEducation on X or Bluesky or email podcast@acenet.edu. Here are some of the links and references from this week's episode:  Improving Education Outcomes by Empowering Parents, States, and Communities   The White House | March 20, 2025 (Executive Order) ACE President Ted Mitchell: Trump's Order to Dismantle ED is “Political Theater”   ACE | March 21, 2025 Federal Student Loan Site Down Wednesday, a Day After Layoffs Gutted Education Department   The Associated Press | March 13, 2025 Public Health Agencies See Mass Layoffs   Inside Higher Ed | April 2, 2025 Trump Administration Will Review Billions in Funding for Harvard   The New York Times (sub. req.) | March 31, 2025 ACE, Higher Ed Association Urge Changes to Foreign Gift Reporting Bill Passed by House   ACE | March 31, 2025 What We Know About the Detentions of Student Protesters   The New York Times (sub. req.) | March 27, 2025

In this episode of the Impostor Syndrome Files, we talk about behavior-based leadership. Do you feel clear about what your boss or company expects of you? Much of our self-doubt comes from worrying about whether we're doing it right. And the absence of clear leadership and guidance simply perpetuates that anxiety. My guest this week is Dr. Chris Fuzie, a former police officer who started college at the age of 40 studying organizational leadership and now has a Doctor of Education (Ed. D). Chris now owns his own leadership consulting business where he leverages a lot of his experience as a law enforcement officer. Here we talk about the importance of clearly defining the roles of both leader and follower through behaviors that reduce ambiguity and build trust.About My GuestDr. Chris Fuzie is the owner of CMF Leadership Consulting and is currently the Business/HR Manager for a District Attorney's office in California. Chris is a Leaderologist II and Vice President of the National Leaderology Association (NLA) who holds a Doctor of Education (Ed. D), M.A. and B.A. in Organizational Leadership, and has graduate certificates in Human Resources and Criminal Justice Education. Chris is a developer, trainer, consultant for leadership of public, private, profit, and non-profit organizations since 2010. Chris is a graduate of the FBI National Academy and a former National Instructor for the International Association of Chiefs of Police and California P.O.S.T. Courses. Chris is the author of "Because Why... Understanding Behavior in Exigencies." and of "S.C.O.R.E. Performance Counseling: Save the Relationship, Change the Behavior," and his latest book, “Liminal Space: Reshaping Leadership and Followership.” Chris is honorably retired from the Modesto Police Department after 28 years of public service leading such teams as the Homicide Team, the Hostage Negotiations Team, the Street-Level Drug Team and the School Police Officer Team.~Connect with Chris:Websites:https://www.cmfleadership.com/ https://www.scoreperformancecounseling.com/ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-chris-fuzie-ed-d-m-a-ol-vl2-37587934/ X: https://x.com/CMFLeadership~Connect with Kim and The Impostor Syndrome Files:Join the free Impostor Syndrome Challenge:https://www.kimmeninger.com/challengeLearn more about the Leading Humans discussion group:https://www.kimmeninger.com/leadinghumansgroupJoin the Slack channel to learn from, connect with and support other professionals: https://forms.gle/Ts4Vg4Nx4HDnTVUC6Join the Facebook group:https://www.facebook.com/groups/leadinghumansSchedule time to speak with Kim Meninger directly about your questions/challenges: https://bookme.name/ExecCareer/strategy-sessionConnect on LinkedIn:https://www.linkedin.com/in/kimmeninger/Website:https://kimmeninger.com

There's more turmoil surrounding the Department of Education (ED), with recent government layoffs and speculation about the ED's future making headlines. We're here to analyze what's real, what's political theater, and how these changes could impact student loan borrowers in the coming months. We also discuss the potential fallout from IRS and USAID layoffs, the legal and budget reconciliation updates that could shape repayment options, and student loan services that might be at risk. Plus, we'll share some personal reflections on staying sane in all this chaos. Key moments: (00:46) ED shutdown rumors may have been a strategic leak to test public reaction (03:36) PSLF and loan support teams have been gutted, making it harder to get help (07:22) Travis became a meme after a late-night Instagram Live on the ED stop-work order (13:02) Courts, Congress, and the executive branch are creating student loan policy chaos (20:20) Why we're more careful about sharing loopholes — and where to find exclusive insights   Like the show? There are several ways you can help! Follow on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or Amazon Music Leave an honest review on Apple Podcasts  Subscribe to the newsletter Feeling helpless when it comes to your student loans? Try our free student loan calculator Check out our refinancing bonuses we negotiated Book your custom student loan plan Get profession-specific financial planning Do you have a question about student loans? Leave us a voicemail here or email us at help@studentloanplanner.com and we might feature it in an upcoming show!  

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, it becomes clear that this initiative is not just a theoretical blueprint, but a meticulously crafted plan to reshape the very fabric of the U.S. federal government. Born out of a collaboration between conservative extremists, political operatives, and the influential Heritage Foundation, Project 2025 is a 927-page policy manifesto that outlines a radical transformation of American governance.At its core, Project 2025 aims to "destroy the Administrative State," a term that refers to the network of federal agencies and civil service workers that form the backbone of the U.S. government. This goal is to be achieved through a series of sweeping reforms designed to centralize power in the executive branch and replace apolitical civil service workers with partisan loyalists. As Kevin Roberts, a key figure behind the project, put it, "all federal employees should answer to the president," reflecting the project's adherence to a unitary executive theory that seeks to expand presidential control over the government[2][4].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its plan to reclassify tens of thousands of federal civil service workers into a new category known as Schedule F. This classification, first introduced by Trump via executive order in 2020 and later rescinded by Biden, would strip these workers of their civil service protections, making them vulnerable to political dismissal. Russell Vought, who worked on Schedule F during Trump's first term, ominously predicted that Trump's second term would "destroy the administrative state and fire and traumatize federal workers"[2][3].The project's vision for federal agencies is equally transformative. For instance, it proposes the dismantling or abolition of key departments such as the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Department of Education (ED). In the case of DHS, Project 2025 suggests transferring the custody of immigrant children from Health and Human Services (HHS) to DHS, a move that would prioritize enforcement over welfare and potentially worsen the safety and psychological well-being of vulnerable immigrant children[1][2].The Department of State is another target, with Project 2025 advocating for the dismissal of all leadership roles by January 20, 2025, and their replacement with acting leaders who do not require Senate confirmation. Kiron Skinner, who wrote the State Department chapter of Project 2025, has expressed a desire to replace what she sees as too left-wing State Department employees with those more loyal to a conservative president[2].Project 2025 also delves into broader policy objectives that align closely with Trump's agenda. It calls for mass deportations of undocumented immigrants, cuts to Medicare and Medicaid, and the reduction of environmental regulations to favor fossil fuels. The plan also proposes criminalizing pornography, removing legal protections against anti-LGBTQ+ discrimination, and ending diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs. In a stark example of its conservative leanings, the project recommends that the DOJ prosecute anti-white racism instead of protecting marginalized groups[2][5].The implications of these proposals are far-reaching and have sparked significant concern among critics. By centralizing power in the executive branch and undermining civil rights, Project 2025 poses a substantial threat not only to individual rights but also to the foundation of American democracy. As the LULAC (League of United Latin American Citizens) notes, this agenda prioritizes control over fairness, enforcement over welfare, and exclusion over inclusion, foreshadowing a future where the rights of marginalized groups are further compromised[1].Despite Trump's attempts to distance himself from Project 2025, the overlap between the project's goals and his own policy agenda is undeniable. Trump's nomination of several Project 2025 architects and supporters to positions in his administration following his 2024 election victory underscores this connection. As of early 2025, nearly two-thirds of Trump's executive actions have mirrored or partially mirrored proposals from Project 2025[2][5].The reaction from Democrats has been swift and critical. The Biden campaign has seized on Project 2025 as a rallying cry, highlighting its dangers and tying it directly to Trump's policies. "We are in the process of the second American Revolution, which will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be," warned Kevin Roberts, a statement that Democrats have used to illustrate the project's radical and potentially violent underpinnings[5].As we move forward, the implementation of Project 2025's proposals will be a critical milestone. With its 180-day playbook for reforms and a prepared stack of executive orders ready for signing, the project is poised to make significant changes to the federal government. The coming months will reveal whether these plans can be executed without major resistance and what the long-term consequences will be for American governance.In conclusion, Project 2025 represents a seismic shift in how the U.S. government could operate, with far-reaching implications for civil rights, federal agencies, and the balance of power in Washington. As the project continues to unfold, it remains to be seen whether its ambitious and often controversial goals will reshape the nation or face significant opposition. One thing is certain, however: the future of American democracy hangs in the balance.

This week on "Off The Cuff," Beth and Karen are joined by Megan and Jill to discuss multiple updates from the Department of Education (ED). Karen kicks off the episode by debriefing listeners on ED's Dear Colleague Letter (DCL) that directed institutions to cease using race preferences as a factor in admissions, financial aid, hiring, training, and other institutional programming, or be at risk of losing federal funding. Megan then discusses the latest updates with income-driven repayment (IDR) plans, including ED taking down the online application for the Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) program and other income-based plans. From there, Jill unpacks the availability of batch correction functionality for the 2024-25 and 2025-26 FAFSA, and what financial aid professionals can expect. Lastly, the team discusses Linda McMahon's pending confirmation as ED secretary, and the pending executive order from President Donald Trump that could seek to dismantle ED. 

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a initiative spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation, it becomes clear that this is more than just a policy blueprint – it's a comprehensive plan to reshape the very fabric of American governance. This project, designed to guide the next Republican president, has been a topic of both intrigue and controversy, especially given its alignment with many of the policies implemented by President Trump in his second term.At its core, Project 2025 is a 900-plus page policy guide authored by former Trump administration officials and other conservative thinkers. The project is built around four key pillars: a detailed policy guide, a database of potential personnel for the next administration, training programs for these candidates, and a strategic plan for implementing these policies[4].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its ambitious plan to overhaul the executive branch. The project advocates for a significant consolidation of power in the White House, aligning with the unitary executive theory that aims to centralize greater control over the government. This vision includes making all federal employees directly accountable to the president, a move that critics argue would undermine the independence of crucial agencies like the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)[3].The project's authors are clear about their intentions to transform key federal agencies. For instance, Project 2025 proposes dismantling or abolishing agencies such as the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Department of Education (ED), while significantly reforming others. The DOJ, in particular, is targeted for a thorough overhaul, with the project describing it as a "bloated bureaucracy" that has "forfeited the trust" of the American people. The proposed reforms include having the DOJ combat what the project terms "affirmative discrimination" or "anti-white racism," and prosecuting state and local governments, institutions of higher education, and private employers with diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs[3].The impact on social and economic policies is equally profound. Project 2025 calls for rolling back civil rights protections across multiple fronts, including cutting DEI programs and LGBTQ+ rights in healthcare, education, and workplaces. It also proposes limiting access to food assistance, which affects over 40 million people monthly, and eliminating the Head Start early education program that serves more than a million children. Additionally, the project suggests restricting safety nets for farmers, which could disproportionately affect low-income farmers and those without extensive assets[2].In the realm of healthcare, Project 2025's proposals are just as far-reaching. The plan includes pushing more people towards Medicare Advantage and other private options, which critics argue would be worse for patients. It also recommends restricting access to medication abortion and ending coverage of emergency contraception. These changes are part of a broader agenda to reshape healthcare policy in line with conservative principles[2][3].The project's stance on immigration and border security is another critical area. Project 2025 aligns with President Trump's recent executive actions, such as deploying active-duty troops to the southern border to "seal the borders and maintain the sovereignty, territorial integrity and security of the United States." The plan also calls for suspending refugee admissions and shifting resources away from the Refugee Admissions Program to address what it describes as a "collapse" of U.S. border security and immigration enforcement[1][3].Economic policies are also a focal point, with Project 2025 advocating for significant changes in taxation, trade, and regulatory oversight. The plan includes reducing taxes on corporations and capital gains, instituting a flat income tax on individuals, and reversing former President Biden's policies. It also proposes reducing environmental regulations to favor fossil fuels and combining various regulatory agencies to streamline oversight, a move that could have far-reaching implications for economic data collection and business regulation[3].The project's vision for law enforcement is equally contentious. It suggests that the Uniformed Division of the Secret Service should enforce the law outside of the White House and its immediate surroundings, reflecting a broader concern about crime in the District of Columbia. Additionally, Project 2025 promotes the use of capital punishment for "particularly heinous crimes" and advocates for a more lenient approach to small businesses under the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)[3].As I navigate through the detailed proposals of Project 2025, it becomes evident that this initiative is not just a set of policy recommendations but a comprehensive blueprint for reshaping American governance. The project's architects, many of whom have been nominated to positions in Trump's second administration, are clear about their goals: to centralize power, roll back civil rights protections, and implement a conservative agenda across various sectors.Paul Dans, the former director of Project 2025, encapsulates the project's ambition when he describes President Trump's actions as "home runs" that are "in many cases more than we could have even dared hope for."[1]However, these proposals also raise significant concerns about the potential impacts on American society. Critics argue that these changes could devastate working people, small businesses, and the overall health of the economy. The elimination of programs like the Economic Development Administration (EDA) and the Capital Investment Grants (CIG) program, for instance, could undermine federal investments in communities and public transportation, making it harder for Americans to make ends meet[2].As we look ahead, it is clear that Project 2025 will continue to shape the policy landscape of the United States. With many of its proposals already being implemented through executive actions, the next few months will be crucial in determining the full extent of these changes. The Senate's role in confirming key appointments and the public's response to these policies will be pivotal in shaping the future of American governance.In the end, Project 2025 represents a seismic shift in how the federal government operates and the values it upholds. Whether this shift will be seen as a positive transformation or a dangerous consolidation of power remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: the implications will be far-reaching and profound.

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a sweeping initiative aimed at reshaping the federal government of the United States, it becomes clear that this is more than just a policy blueprint – it's a vision for a fundamentally different America. Led by the Heritage Foundation and crafted by former Trump administration officials, Project 2025 is a comprehensive plan that spans four pillars: a policy guide, a database of potential administration personnel, a training program for these candidates, and a playbook for the first 180 days in office[4].At its core, Project 2025 seeks to consolidate executive power, aligning the federal government more closely with conservative principles. One of the most striking aspects of this initiative is its proposal to overhaul the structure and function of various federal agencies. For instance, Project 2025 advocates for the dismantling or abolition of key agencies such as the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Department of Education (ED). This would allow the president to implement the Project 2025 agenda with minimal bureaucratic resistance[3].The project's authors argue that many federal agencies have become bloated and inefficient. For example, they suggest that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is "overtasked, overcompensates for the lack of state and local preparedness and response, and is regularly in deep debt." To address this, Project 2025 proposes reforming FEMA emergency spending to shift the majority of preparedness and response costs to states and localities, with the federal government covering only 25% of the costs for small disasters and up to 75% for truly catastrophic ones[1].This shift in disaster response management is not isolated; it reflects a broader theme of decentralization and reduced federal involvement. Project 2025 also recommends ending preparedness grants for states and localities, arguing that "DHS should not be in the business of handing out federal tax dollars: These grants should be terminated"[1].The impact of such changes would be far-reaching. For instance, the elimination of the Economic Development Administration (EDA) at the Department of Commerce could undermine the federal government's ability to invest in transformative infrastructure projects. The EDA has been instrumental in awarding billions of dollars for key public transportation projects and other community investments, resulting in the creation or saving of 220,000 jobs and generating nearly $20 billion in private investment[2].Another critical area of focus is the restructuring of statistical and regulatory agencies. Project 2025 proposes merging the Bureau of Economic Analysis, the Census Bureau, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics into a single organization, aligning its mission with conservative principles. This move is seen as a way to centralize data collection and analysis under direct presidential control, which critics argue could politicize essential data that businesses and policymakers rely on[3].The project also targets social and economic safety nets. It suggests limiting access to food assistance, which over 40 million people rely on monthly, and eliminating the Head Start early education program that serves over 1 million children. Additionally, it proposes pushing more people towards Medicare Advantage and other private health insurance options, which could affect the healthcare of millions of Americans[2].In the realm of labor and employment, Project 2025 recommends rolling back overtime protections for 4.3 million workers and keeping the overtime exception threshold low to avoid burdening businesses, particularly in rural areas. It also advocates for work requirements for people reliant on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), which issues food stamps, further complicating the lives of those already struggling to make ends meet[2][3].The initiative's stance on law enforcement and justice is equally contentious. Project 2025 views the Department of Justice (DOJ) as a "bloated bureaucracy" that has "forfeited the trust" of the American people. It proposes a thorough reform of the DOJ, with the director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) being personally accountable to the president. The project also suggests combating "affirmative discrimination" or "anti-white racism" by prosecuting state and local governments, institutions of higher education, and private employers with diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs[3].One of the most alarming aspects of Project 2025 is its expansion of presidential powers, based on a controversial interpretation of the unitary executive theory. This vision aims to centralize greater control over the government in the White House, eliminating the independence of agencies like the DOJ, the FBI, and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). As Kevin Roberts, a key figure behind the project, put it, "all federal employees should answer to the president"[3].Despite Trump's public disavowal of Project 2025, the alignment between its proposals and his past policies and campaign promises is striking. Trump has nominated several of the project's architects and supporters to positions in his administration, and analysis has shown that nearly two-thirds of his executive actions mirror or partially mirror proposals from Project 2025[3].As we move forward, the implications of Project 2025 are daunting. The dismantling of federal agencies, the consolidation of executive power, and the rollback of social and economic safety nets could fundamentally alter the fabric of American governance. The project's vision of a more centralized, conservative government raises critical questions about the balance of power, the role of the federal government, and the future of social welfare programs.In the coming months, as the project's proposals begin to take shape, Americans will be watching closely to see how these changes unfold. Will the vision of Project 2025 become the new norm, or will it face significant resistance from Congress, the judiciary, and the public? The answer to this question will determine the course of American governance for years to come.

Dr. Monique Darrisaw-Akil is an experienced educational leader with a demonstrated history of working in the education management industry. She is skilled in Youth-centered programming, college and career planning, developing strategic partnerships with nonprofit organizations, and leadership coaching. Monique is a strong administrative professional with a Doctor of Education (Ed.D.) focused in Organizational Leadership, Management and Policy from Seton Hall University.

As I delved into the intricacies of Project 2025, a sweeping political initiative crafted by the American conservative think tank The Heritage Foundation, I couldn't help but feel a sense of both fascination and trepidation. This project, unveiled in April 2023, is more than just a set of policy recommendations; it is a comprehensive blueprint for a radical overhaul of the federal government and its agencies, should a conservative president take office.At its core, Project 2025 envisions a fundamental transformation of American governance, aligning it closely with conservative principles. One of the most striking aspects is its proposal to dismantle or significantly alter several key federal agencies. For instance, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) would be dismantled, and the Department of Education (ED) would be abolished, with its programs either transferred or terminated. The Department of Justice (DOJ), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Department of Commerce (DOC), Federal Communications Commission (FCC), and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) would all come under direct partisan control, a move that Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts defends as necessary to align these agencies with the president's vision, arguing that "the notion of independent federal agencies or federal employees who don't answer to the president violates the very foundation of our democratic republic"[1].The project's economic reforms are equally ambitious. It advocates for abolishing the Federal Reserve and replacing it with a commodity-backed currency, such as gold, and shifting from an income tax to a consumption tax. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 would be extended, and individual income taxes would be simplified to two flat tax rates: 15% for incomes up to the Social Security Wage Base and 30% above that. However, this simplification would come at a cost, as most deductions, credits, and exclusions would be eliminated, likely increasing taxes for millions of low- and middle-income households[1].In the realm of education, Project 2025 seeks to dramatically reduce the federal government's role, promoting school choice and parental rights over federal standards. The Department of Education would be eliminated, and programs under the Individuals with Disabilities' Education Act (IDEA) would be administered by the Department of Health and Human Services. Federal funding for low-income students would expire, and public funds would be redirected as school vouchers, even for private or religious schools. This shift is part of a broader philosophy that views education as a private rather than a public good[1].The project's stance on climate change and environmental regulations is stark. It proposes eradicating climate change references from all government policies, repealing regulations that curb emissions, and downsizing the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) would be abolished, and states would be prevented from adopting stricter regulations on vehicular emissions. Diana Furchtgott-Roth, the Heritage Foundation's energy and climate director, suggests that the EPA should support the consumption of more natural gas, despite concerns about methane leaks, a potent greenhouse gas[1].Healthcare is another area where Project 2025 seeks significant changes. It aims to reform the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) to promote traditional nuclear family structures. Medicare would be prohibited from negotiating drug prices, and the Medicare Advantage program would be promoted. Federal healthcare providers would be barred from offering gender-affirming care to transgender individuals, and insurance coverage for emergency contraception would be eliminated. Medicaid funding would be cut through various measures, including caps on federal funding and stricter work requirements for beneficiaries[1].The project's vision for law enforcement is equally transformative. The DOJ would be reformed to combat what it terms "affirmative discrimination" or "anti-white racism," and would prosecute state and local governments, institutions of higher education, and private employers with diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs. The FBI would be made personally accountable to the president, and consent decrees between the DOJ and local police departments would be curtailed[1].One of the most contentious aspects of Project 2025 is its relationship with the Trump campaign. Despite initial acknowledgments that the project aligns with Trump's Agenda 47 proposals, the campaign has since sought to distance itself. Trump has denied any direct involvement, stating, "[I] have no idea who is in charge of it," but Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts has contradicted this, saying he personally discussed the project with Trump[1].The latest developments have only added to the controversy. In July 2024, Kevin Roberts sparked outrage by suggesting that the project is part of a "second American Revolution" that would remain bloodless if the left allowed it to be. This statement, coupled with Trump's subsequent attempts to distance himself from the project, has led many political commentators to question the sincerity of these denials. Philip Bump of *The Washington Post* argues that it is impossible to separate Trump's campaign from Project 2025, given the extensive involvement of Trump advisors and the frequent mention of Trump's name in the document[1].As I reflect on the scope and ambition of Project 2025, it becomes clear that this initiative represents a seismic shift in how the federal government could operate. The project's proponents see it as a necessary correction to what they perceive as a liberal bias in government agencies and policies. However, critics argue that these changes would undermine critical protections and services, particularly for vulnerable populations.Looking ahead, the implementation of Project 2025's proposals would depend on the outcome of future elections and the political will of a potential conservative administration. As the project's director, Paul Dans, steps down and Kevin Roberts assumes leadership, the initiative remains a focal point of political debate. Whether Project 2025 becomes a blueprint for governance or a footnote in the history of conservative policy initiatives remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: its impact on American politics will be profound.As we approach the next milestones in this saga, it is crucial to continue monitoring the developments and implications of Project 2025. Will it reshape the federal government in its image, or will it face significant resistance? The answer will depend on the complex interplay of political forces and the will of the American people. For now, Project 2025 stands as a stark reminder of the deep divisions and competing visions that shape the American political landscape.

As I delved into the intricacies of Project 2025, a political initiative crafted by the American conservative think tank The Heritage Foundation, I was struck by the sheer breadth and depth of its proposed changes to the fabric of American governance. Published in April 2023, this project is more than just a policy guide; it is a comprehensive blueprint for a radical overhaul of the federal government, its agencies, and the very principles that guide them.At its core, Project 2025 envisions a federal government that is decidedly more conservative, with sweeping changes to economic and social policies. One of the most striking aspects is the plan to dismantle or significantly alter several key federal agencies. For instance, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) would be dismantled, and the Department of Education (ED) would be abolished, with its programs either transferred or terminated. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) would be made less independent, and it would be prohibited from funding research involving embryonic stem cells[1].The project's authors, many of whom are former Trump administration officials, propose a stark shift in environmental and climate policies. They advocate for the eradication of climate change references from all government documents and the abandonment of strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This includes repealing regulations that curb emissions, downsizing the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and abolishing the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), which they criticize as a main driver of the "climate change alarm industry"[1].The Heritage Foundation's vision extends to the realm of law enforcement, where the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) would undergo significant reforms. The DOJ would be tasked with combating "affirmative discrimination" or "anti-white racism," and it would prosecute state and local governments, institutions of higher education, and private employers with diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) or affirmative action programs. The FBI would be made directly accountable to the president, reflecting a broader theme of centralizing executive power[1].In the area of healthcare, Project 2025 proposes substantial changes, including cuts to Medicare and Medicaid. The plan suggests prohibiting Medicare from negotiating drug prices and promoting the Medicare Advantage program, which consists of private insurance plans. Federal healthcare providers would be barred from offering gender-affirming care to transgender individuals, and insurance coverage for emergency contraception would be eliminated. The project also aims to reform the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) to promote traditional nuclear family structures[1].Education is another sector that would see dramatic changes. The federal government's role in education would be drastically reduced, with the Department of Education's responsibilities devolving to the states. Federal enforcement of civil rights in schools would be curtailed, and programs like the Head Start initiative for low-income families would be eliminated. Public funds for education would be available as school vouchers, even for private or religious schools, reflecting the project's view that education is a private rather than a public good[1].The project's approach to immigration is equally stringent, recommending the arrest, detention, and mass deportation of illegal immigrants living in the U.S. and the deployment of the military for domestic law enforcement. This aligns with a broader theme of enhancing presidential powers, as advocated by Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts, who argues that "the notion of independent federal agencies or federal employees who don't answer to the president violates the very foundation of our democratic republic"[1].One of the most contentious aspects of Project 2025 is its plan to reclassify tens of thousands of federal civil service workers as political appointees, allowing for their replacement with loyalists to a conservative president. This move is part of a larger strategy to reshape the federal workforce according to Trump's ideology, using tools like a personnel database and a questionnaire to screen potential recruits for their adherence to the project's agenda[1].Despite the extensive influence of former Trump administration officials on Project 2025, Trump himself has attempted to distance himself from the initiative. In a social media post, he stated, "I know nothing about Project 2025. I have no idea who is behind it. I disagree with some of the things they're saying and some of the things they're saying are absolutely ridiculous and abysmal."[3]However, the ties between Project 2025 and Trump's policies are undeniable. The project's policy guide includes over 270 proposals that align with Trump's past policies and current campaign promises. This has led critics to view Project 2025 as a de facto blueprint for Trump's second term, despite his public disavowal[3].As I reflect on the scope and ambition of Project 2025, it becomes clear that this initiative represents a fundamental challenge to the current structure and values of American governance. The proposed changes are not merely tweaks to existing policies but a wholesale transformation of the federal government's role in society.Looking ahead, the implementation of Project 2025's proposals will depend on several key milestones. The first 180 days of the next Republican president's term will be crucial, as outlined in the project's playbook. This period will see the execution of many of the proposed actions, including the reorganization of federal agencies, the appointment of new personnel, and the rollout of new policies[3].As the nation approaches these critical decision points, it is essential to consider the potential implications of Project 2025. Will these changes lead to a more efficient and responsive government, or will they undermine the very foundations of American democracy? The answers to these questions will unfold in the coming months and years, but one thing is certain: Project 2025 represents a seismic shift in the political landscape, one that will have far-reaching consequences for the future of American governance.

As I delved into the intricacies of Project 2025, a political initiative crafted by the American conservative think tank The Heritage Foundation, I was struck by the sheer scope and ambition of its proposals. This is not just a policy guide; it is a comprehensive blueprint for a radical restructuring of the U.S. federal government, aligned with a staunchly conservative agenda.At its core, Project 2025 is a 900-page manual titled "Mandate For Leadership," authored by former Trump administration officials and supported by over 100 conservative groups. The project's director, Paul Dans, and associate director, Spencer Chretien, both high-ranking officials in the Trump administration, have been instrumental in shaping this vision. Despite former President Trump's public disavowal of the project, the involvement of his former officials and the alignment with his past policies and campaign promises suggest a deep connection[3].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its call for sweeping changes to federal agencies and their missions. The plan proposes dismantling the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and abolishing the Department of Education (ED), with its programs either transferred or terminated. The Department of Education's responsibilities would be devolved to the states, and federal enforcement of civil rights in schools would be significantly curtailed. For instance, the project rejects the pursuit of racial parity in school discipline indicators, prioritizing student safety over equity[1].The project also envisions a dramatic reduction in the federal government's role in education, elevating school choice and parental rights. This includes allowing states to opt out of federal programs or standards and converting public funds for education into school vouchers that could be used even for private or religious schools. The Head Start program, which provides services to children of low-income families, would be eliminated, and funding for free school meals would be cut. The underlying philosophy here is that education is a private rather than a public good[1].In the realm of healthcare, Project 2025 proposes significant reforms that align with conservative principles. It suggests prohibiting Medicare from negotiating drug prices and promoting the Medicare Advantage program, which consists of private insurance plans. The project also recommends cutting funding for Medicaid through various measures, such as caps on federal funding, limits on lifetime benefits, and stricter work requirements for beneficiaries. Additionally, it advocates for denying gender-affirming care to transgender people and eliminating insurance coverage for the morning-after pill Ella, as required by the Affordable Care Act[1].The project's stance on environmental and climate change policies is equally contentious. It recommends reducing environmental and climate change regulations to favor fossil fuels, reversing a 2009 EPA finding that carbon dioxide emissions are harmful to human health, and preventing the federal government from regulating greenhouse gas emissions. Mandy Gunasekara, a contributor to the project and former EPA chief of staff, acknowledges the reality of human-made climate change but considers it politicized and overstated. The project also seeks to block the expansion of the national electrical grid and stymie the transition to renewable energy, reflecting a strong bias towards fossil fuel interests[1].Project 2025 also outlines a vision for a more centralized executive branch, with the president having greater control over federal agencies. This is based on an expansive interpretation of the unitary executive theory, which aims to centralize greater control over the government in the White House. The plan proposes reclassifying tens of thousands of federal civil service workers as political appointees, allowing for their replacement with loyalists to a conservative president. This move is seen as a "wrecking ball for the administrative state," according to Heritage Foundation plans[1].The implications of these changes are far-reaching. For instance, the Department of Justice (DOJ) would be thoroughly reformed to combat what the project calls "affirmative discrimination" or "anti-white racism," and would be closely overseen by the White House. The project also proposes curtailing legal settlements between the DOJ and local police departments and shifting the FBI's focus away from overlapping responsibilities with other agencies like the DEA[1].In the area of law enforcement, Project 2025 suggests deploying the military for domestic law enforcement and promoting capital punishment with the speedy "finality" of those sentences. It also recommends the arrest, detention, and mass deportation of illegal immigrants living in the U.S., reflecting a hardline stance on immigration[1].The project's approach to media and public discourse is equally telling. It proposes defunding the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, revoking NPR stations' noncommercial status, and forcing them to relocate outside their current FM dial range. Social media companies would be required not to remove "core political viewpoints" from their platforms, and the project entertains the idea of banning TikTok. These measures are part of a broader effort to reshape the media landscape in favor of conservative viewpoints[1].As I navigated through the detailed proposals of Project 2025, it became clear that this initiative is not just about policy changes but about a fundamental shift in the role of the federal government and its relationship with the American people. The project's emphasis on conservative principles and its rejection of many existing federal programs and regulations suggest a profound redefinition of what the government should do and how it should operate.Critics, such as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), argue that Project 2025 threatens to erode democracy by promoting bigotry, injustice, and inequality. The ACLU sees the project as a radical restructuring that opposes abortion and reproductive rights, LGBTQ rights, immigrants' rights, and racial equity[4].Despite the controversy, Project 2025 remains a significant force in the conservative policy landscape. As the 2024 elections approach, it will be interesting to see how these proposals are received by the public and whether they will influence the next presidential administration's policies.In the words of Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts, "The nation is in the process of the second American Revolution, which will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be." This statement encapsulates the project's ambitious and somewhat ominous vision for the future of American governance. As we move forward, it is crucial to monitor the developments and implications of Project 2025, for it represents a potential turning point in the balance of power and the direction of federal policy in the United States[3].

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a political initiative published by the Heritage Foundation in April 2022, it becomes clear that this is more than just a policy blueprint – it is a comprehensive vision for a radical restructuring of the U.S. federal government, aligned closely with conservative principles and the ideology of former President Donald Trump.At its core, Project 2025 is a 900-page manual titled "Mandate For Leadership," crafted by former Trump administration officials and conservative thinkers. Despite Trump's attempts to distance himself from the project, the connections run deep. Kevin Roberts, the president of the Heritage Foundation, who previously worked on Trump's transition team in 2016, has described his organization's role as “institutionalizing Trumpism”[5].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its sweeping proposal to overhaul various federal agencies. The plan calls for dismantling the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and abolishing the Department of Education (ED), with its programs either transferred or terminated. The Department of Justice (DOJ), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Department of Commerce (DOC), Federal Communications Commission (FCC), and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) are all slated for partisan control, a move that raises significant concerns about the politicization of these critical institutions[1].The project also targets the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), proposing to prevent the agency from using what it deems "unrealistic" projections of climate change impacts. For instance, it criticizes the RCP 8.5 emissions scenario, suggesting it has been misused for political purposes. The EPA's research activities would be subjected to closer oversight by political appointees, rather than scientists, and the agency would be barred from conducting any science activity without clear congressional authorization[2].In the realm of healthcare, Project 2025 seeks to cut Medicare and Medicaid, and urges the government to explicitly reject abortion as healthcare. It aims to eliminate coverage of emergency contraception and proposes using the Comstock Act to prosecute those who send and receive contraceptives and abortion pills. This stance is part of a broader agenda that opposes abortion and reproductive rights, reflecting the conservative values of the Heritage Foundation[1].The project's energy and climate policies are equally contentious. It advocates for reducing environmental and climate change regulations to favor fossil fuels, despite climatologists' warnings about the dangers of such policies. For example, Diana Furchtgott-Roth, the Heritage Foundation's energy and climate director, suggests that the EPA should support the consumption of more natural gas, even though this could increase leaks of methane, a potent greenhouse gas[1].Project 2025 also outlines significant changes to science policy. It proposes focusing the Department of Energy on fundamental research that the private sector would not otherwise conduct, while eliminating many of the agency's offices focused on energy technology development and climate change programs. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) would be restructured, combining it with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and the National Technical Information Service, with non-mission-critical research functions either eliminated or moved to other federal agencies[2].The implications of these proposals are far-reaching. By prioritizing fundamental research over practical applications and rolling back climate science initiatives, the project could significantly hinder the U.S.'s ability to address pressing environmental issues. Darrell West of the Brookings Institution argues that the inconsistencies in the plan are designed to attract funding from certain industries or donors that would benefit from these changes[1].In addition to these policy changes, Project 2025 includes plans for administrative reforms. It suggests merging the Bureau of Economic Analysis, the Census Bureau, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics into a single organization, aligning its mission with conservative principles. The project also recommends maximizing the hiring of political appointees in statistical analysis positions, a move that could compromise the impartiality of these agencies[1].The project's vision extends to labor policies as well. It proposes work requirements for people reliant on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and changes to overtime rules that could weaken protections and decrease overtime pay for some workers. It also seeks to abolish the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and shrink the role of the National Labor Relations Board, which protects employees' ability to organize and fight unfair labor practices[1].Despite the ambitious scope of Project 2025, it is not without its critics. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has labeled the initiative as a threat to democracy, arguing that many of its recommendations are outright unconstitutional and erode fundamental rights such as reproductive rights, LGBTQ rights, and racial equity[5].As we look ahead, the implementation of Project 2025's proposals hinges on several key milestones. With Trump's return to office, the project's authors are poised to integrate their work into the new administration's policies. Russell Vought, the founder of the Center for Renewing America, which is on Project 2025's advisory board, has been named policy director of the Republican National Committee platform committee. Vought has confirmed that they are "secretly drafting hundreds of executive orders, regulations, and memos" to lay the groundwork for rapid action on Trump's plans if he wins[1].In conclusion, Project 2025 represents a seismic shift in the way the U.S. federal government could operate, with far-reaching implications for various aspects of American life. As the country navigates these proposed changes, it is crucial to consider both the stated goals and the potential impacts of such a radical overhaul. Whether these policies will come to fruition remains to be seen, but one thing is certain – the next few years will be pivotal in determining the future of American governance.

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a sweeping political initiative crafted by the Heritage Foundation, I am struck by the sheer breadth and ambition of its proposals. Released in April 2022, this blueprint is designed to reshape the fabric of American governance, aligning federal policies and agencies with conservative principles.At its core, Project 2025 envisions a radical overhaul of the federal government. It suggests dismantling or significantly altering several key agencies. For instance, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) would be dismantled, and the Department of Education (ED) would be abolished, with its programs either transferred or terminated[1].The project's authors also propose a significant restructuring of the Department of Justice (DOJ), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Department of Commerce (DOC), Federal Communications Commission (FCC), and Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The FTC, responsible for enforcing antitrust laws, would be abolished, and the role of the National Labor Relations Board, which protects employees' rights to organize, would be significantly reduced[1].One of the most contentious aspects of Project 2025 is its stance on environmental and climate change regulations. The plan advocates for relaxing regulations on the fossil fuel industry, repealing the Inflation Reduction Act, and closing various offices at the Department of Energy focused on clean technology and climate change mitigation. Diana Furchtgott-Roth, the Heritage Foundation's energy and climate director, has suggested that the EPA should support the consumption of more natural gas, despite concerns from climatologists about the potential increase in methane leaks[1].The project also outlines a vision for science policy that prioritizes fundamental research over practical applications. It proposes focusing the Department of Energy on research that the private sector would not otherwise conduct, arguing that many current DOE programs act as subsidies for government-favored resources. The EPA would be restricted from using "unrealistic" climate change impact projections and would require clear congressional authorization for any science activities[2].In the realm of healthcare, Project 2025 seeks to cut Medicare and Medicaid, and it urges the government to explicitly reject abortion as healthcare. It also aims to eliminate coverage of emergency contraception and proposes using the Comstock Act to prosecute those who send and receive contraceptives and abortion pills. This stance is part of a broader effort to align federal policies with conservative social values, including legislation requiring higher pay for working on Sundays and instituting work requirements for those reliant on food stamps[1].The project's approach to governance is deeply intertwined with its vision for a more politicized federal workforce. It calls for the replacement of career officials with politically appointed individuals, selected based on loyalty and policy alignment rather than expertise. This move is criticized for potentially weakening nonpartisan expertise and hampering essential government functions, as seen in past examples like the FEMA response to Hurricane Katrina[4].Project 2025's connections to the Trump campaign are a subject of considerable debate. Despite Trump's attempts to distance himself from the project, many of its authors have ties to his administration. John McEntee, a senior advisor to Project 2025, has stated that they plan to "integrate a lot of our work" with the Trump campaign. Russell Vought, founder of the Center for Renewing America, which is on Project 2025's advisory board, has been named policy director of the Republican National Committee platform committee. Vought has acknowledged that Trump is "very supportive" of their efforts, describing his public distancing as "graduate-level politics"[1].The implications of Project 2025 are far-reaching and multifaceted. If implemented, it could lead to a significant shift in the balance of power within the federal government, with independent agencies brought under tighter White House control. The project's emphasis on political appointees over career officials raises concerns about the politicization of critical government functions, from air traffic control to public health responses[4].As I reflect on the scope and ambition of Project 2025, it becomes clear that this initiative represents a fundamental challenge to the existing structure of American governance. With its sweeping proposals and deep connections to the Trump campaign, it is a blueprint that could reshape the country's policies on everything from energy and healthcare to labor rights and scientific research.Looking ahead, the implementation of Project 2025 will depend on a series of upcoming milestones and decision points. As the project's authors continue to refine their proposals and build support, the broader public and policy experts will be closely watching. The legal and regulatory battles that are likely to ensue will be pivotal in determining the extent to which these changes can be enacted.In the end, Project 2025 stands as a testament to the enduring power of ideological vision in shaping public policy. Whether its proposals are seen as a necessary correction or a dangerous overreach, one thing is certain: the future of American governance hangs in the balance.

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a sweeping initiative crafted by the Heritage Foundation, I am struck by the sheer breadth and ambition of its proposals. This 900-page blueprint, released in April 2022, outlines a radical restructuring of the federal government, aligning it with a staunchly conservative agenda. Despite President Donald Trump's attempts to distance himself from the project, the connections between Project 2025 and his campaign are undeniable.At its core, Project 2025 is a comprehensive plan to reshape American governance, touching on nearly every aspect of federal policy. One of the most striking aspects is its vision for the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). The project proposes politicizing these agencies, empowering the president to use them to target political opponents and enforce a radical agenda. As the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) notes, this could lead to a significant erosion of civil liberties and the rule of law[5].The project's authors also envision drastic changes to various federal agencies. For instance, they recommend dismantling the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and abolishing the Department of Education (ED), transferring or terminating its programs. The Department of Commerce would see significant alterations as well, with the Economic Development Administration (EDA) either abolished or repurposed to assist "rural communities destroyed by the Biden administration's attack on domestic energy production"[1].In the realm of science policy, Project 2025 is equally transformative. It suggests focusing the Department of Energy on fundamental research, rather than technology development and climate change programs. The report argues that many current DOE programs act as subsidies to the private sector for government-favored resources, and proposes eliminating offices focused on energy technology and climate change. This shift is part of a broader strategy to roll back climate science initiatives, including reshaping the U.S. Global Change and Research Program and preventing the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from using "unrealistic" projections of climate change impacts[2].The EPA itself would undergo significant changes, with its research activities subject to closer oversight by political appointees rather than scientists. The project proposes that EPA grants be managed by political appointees and that the public be incentivized to scrutinize the agency's scientific conduct. Diana Furchtgott-Roth, the Heritage Foundation's energy and climate director, has suggested that the EPA support increased consumption of natural gas, despite concerns from climatologists about the potential for increased methane leaks[1].Project 2025 also targets the National Institutes of Health (NIH), aiming to make it less independent and stopping its funding for research involving embryonic stem cells. The National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) would be broken up, with its climate change research activities severely curtailed. Thomas Gilman, who served under Trump as the chief financial officer of the Commerce Department, describes NOAA as "one of the main drivers of the climate change alarm industry"[2].The project's economic policies are just as far-reaching. It proposes instituting tax cuts, though there is disagreement among its writers on the issue of protectionism. Medicare and Medicaid would face significant cuts, and the government would be urged to explicitly reject abortion as healthcare. The project also seeks to eliminate coverage of emergency contraception and use the Comstock Act to prosecute those who send and receive contraceptives and abortion pills[1].In the area of labor and employment, Project 2025 recommends instituting work requirements for those reliant on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and weakening overtime protections. It also suggests legislation requiring Americans to be paid more for working on Sundays, based on the premise that "God ordained the Sabbath as a day of rest"[1].The implications of these proposals are profound. Critics argue that Project 2025 represents a blueprint for an autocratic takeover, compromising the checks and balances of the U.S. system of government. The plan involves purging the civil service, firing independent agency leaders, and conditioning federal funding on political fealty. This could lead to a situation where thousands of political operatives, hand-picked for their loyalty to the president, control key government positions regardless of their qualifications or commitment to constitutional duty[3].The project's approach to technology and media policies is equally concerning. It proposes increasing agency accountability at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) while decreasing wasteful spending and promoting national security and economic prosperity. However, it also suggests that Big Tech companies should fund the Universal Service Fund, currently supported through telephone bills, and that media ownership regulations are outdated and stifle competition[4].As I reflect on the scope of Project 2025, it becomes clear that this initiative is not just a policy blueprint but a vision for a fundamentally different America. The project's authors and supporters see it as a way to "institutionalize Trumpism," as Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts has described it. However, critics like the ACLU warn that it threatens to erode democracy, perpetuate bigotry, and undermine justice and equality[5].Looking ahead, the implementation of Project 2025's proposals hinges on several key milestones. The upcoming presidential term will be crucial, as the project's success depends on a conservative administration willing to enact its recommendations. With Russell Vought, the founder of the Center for Renewing America, now serving as the policy director of the Republican National Committee platform committee, and given the ongoing connections between Project 2025 and the Trump campaign, the stage is set for a potentially transformative period in American governance[1].As the nation approaches these critical decision points, it is imperative to engage in a thorough and informed discussion about the implications of Project 2025. Whether one views this initiative as a necessary correction to current policies or a dangerous erosion of democratic principles, its impact on American life will be profound. As we navigate this complex landscape, it is crucial to remain vigilant and ensure that any changes to our governance system are made with the utmost care and a deep respect for the principles of democracy.

This week on "Off The Cuff," Beth and Karen are joined by Jeremy Singer, the president of  College Board, who earlier this year was hired by the Department of Education (ED) to serve as FAFSA executive advisor for the launch of the 2025-26 FAFSA. During the episode, Jeremy reflects on his tenure at ED, which ended earlier this month, and answers questions from Beth and Karen on the rollout of the 2025-26 form, including beta testing of the new FAFSA. The team also discusses communication from the department to stakeholders on the launch of the 2025-26 FAFSA, and how ED rebuilds trust with the financial aid community. The episode ends with the team looking forward to the 2026-27 FAFSA.

This week on "Off The Cuff," Beth, Jill, Rachel, and Nalia discuss FAFSA updates and how the 2024 election may shape financial aid policy for the next administration. Jill kicks things off by debriefing listeners on several fixes the Department of Education (ED) has made to issues in the 2024-25 and 2025-26 FAFSA cycles. Then, Nalia and Rachel lead a discussion on what a Harris or Trump presidency could mean for financial aid policy. The team also briefly discusses how NASFAA develops its advocacy positions as a nonpartisan organization and how NASFAA advocates on the Hill. The team ends the episode discussing what we're keeping an eye out for in the upcoming 119th Congress. 

This week on "Off the Cuff," David and Hugh discuss multiple updates with the 2024-25 FAFSA, starting off with the latest processing timelines for the 2024-25 paper FAFSA. David then debriefs listeners on how to handle conflicting information related to Institutional Student Information Records (ISIRs). The team also talks about resources from the Department of Education (ED) listing known issues with the 2024-25 FAFSA. David ends the episode by reminding listeners that the new deadline for gainful employment and financial value transparency reporting is January 15, 2025.

This week on "Off the Cuff," Sarah and Hugh discuss 2024-25 changes in documentation requirements related to Jay Treaty students and dig into the background of this guidance within the FSA Handbook. From there, Sarah debriefs listeners on several resources both NASFAA and the Department of Education (ED) have for institutions that were impacted by recent natural disasters. Sarah then explains some timely electronic announcements and Dear Colleague Letters that can help students and schools affected by these recent disasters.  

What if the key to revolutionizing education lies in interdisciplinary learning and real-world problem-solving? In this episode, host Natalie Born is joined by Ed Fidoe, the founder and CEO of the London Interdisciplinary School (LIS), an innovative institution tackling global issues like inequality, sustainability, ethics, and AI through an interdisciplinary curriculum. Ed shares his journey from co-founding a K-12 school focused on project-based learning to creating LIS, the first UK institution in decades with degree-awarding powers from inception. Together, they explore the changing landscape of education, the role of AI in academia, and the importance of developing communication skills. The conversation touches on Ed's belief in solving real-world problems through education and the impact of interdisciplinary expertise on modern challenges. [00:01 - 05:14] From TV Shows to Education: Ed's Journey Belief in possibilities began with acting Launched School 21 to focus on project-based learning Emphasized oracy to improve speaking skills [05:15 - 10:00] Project-Based Learning & Oracy Project-based learning can be powerful when done well Speaking skills are critical but often neglected Over 1,000 UK schools now focus on oracy [10:01 - 16:34] AI in Education at LIS Students must use and explain AI tools like ChatGPT AI improves student creativity and critical thinking Higher expectations for academic work with AI [16:35 - 22:44] Tackling Real-World Problems LIS organizes learning around real-world issues Students work with companies to solve global problems Prepares students for messy, real-life challenges [22:45 - 27:22] The Role of Interactional Expertise Interactional expertise bridges knowledge gaps Middle leaders benefit from understanding multiple fields Developing this expertise is essential for complex problem-solving Quotes:  “If we're preparing students for the world of work, we must have them using the AI tools of the day. Otherwise, we're setting them up to fail.” - Ed Fidoe "You need to show what you value if you want people to actually kind of work on it and commit time to it." - Ed Fidoe Connect with Ed: Website: https://www.lis.ac.uk/team/ed-fidoe LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ed-fidoe?originalSubdomain=uk LEAVE A REVIEW + help someone empower their businesses through collaboration, innovation, and transformation by sharing this episode or clicking here to listen to our previous episodes. Check Natalie's new book, SET IT ON FIRE: The Art of Innovation, available now at setitonfire.co These are proven solutions to advance your leadership and innovation process. Check out our website innovationmeetsleadership.com, or connect with me on Linkedin, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and Youtube. Don't forget to subscribe and leave a 5-star review. Let's go transform something! --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/natalie-born/support

Have you ever wondered how effective leaders seamlessly transition between leading and following? In this episode of The Quiet And Strong Podcast, host David Hall sits down with leadership consultant and author Dr. Chris Fuzie to explore the intriguing concept of "liminal leadership." Listeners will uncover the secrets behind navigating the spaces between leadership and followership, and learn about the importance of behavior-focused leadership over positional power. Chris shares eye-opening insights into the evolution of leadership and followership behaviors, touching on attributes like emotional intelligence, accountability, and commitment.Tune in to hear Chris Fuzie's real-life experiences and groundbreaking theories that challenge traditional views of leadership. If you aspire to be a great leader or understand the dynamics of followership better, this episode is a must-listen.Embrace these insights on your journey to stronger, more effective leadership—and be strong.Episode Link: QuietandStrong.com/189- - -Dr. Chris Fuzie is the owner of CMF Leadership Consulting and is currently the Business/HR Manager for a District Attorney's office in California. Chris is a Leaderologist II and Vice President of the National Leaderology Association who holds a Doctor of Education (Ed. D) and has graduate certificates in Human Resources and Criminal Justice Education. Chris is a developer, trainer, consultant for leadership of public, private, profit, and non-profit organizations since 2010. Chris is the author of "Because Why... Understanding Behavior in Exigencies." and of "S.C.O.R.E. Performance Counseling: Save the Relationship, Change the Behavior," and his latest book, “Liminal Space: Reshaping Leadership and Followership.” Chris is honorably retired from the Modesto Police Department after 28 years of public service leading a variety teams.Connect with Chris:Websites: CMFLeadership.com | ScorePerformanceCounseling.comSocials: LinkedIn | Facebook | X (Twitter- - -Contact the Host of the Quiet and Strong Podcast:David Hall Author, Speaker, Educator, Podcaster quietandstrong.comGobio.link/quietandstrongdavid [at] quietandstrong.com Take the FREE Personality Assessment: Typefinder Personality Assessment Follow David on your favorite social platform: Twitter | Facebook | Instagram | LinkedIn | Youtube Get David's book:Minding Your Time: Time Management, Productivity, and Success, Especially for Introverts You may also like:Quiet & Strong Merchandise

This week on a special edition of “Off the Cuff,” Allie, Beth, and Karen, are joined by 2024-25 NASFAA National Chair Kristi Jovell of Middlebury College and National Chair-Elect Heidi Carl of Purdue University to break down the latest development from the Department of Education (ED) concerning batch corrections and the 2024-25 FAFSA. The team dives into the implications for schools and students, how ED could provide relief to financial aid professionals, and continuing advocacy efforts around gainful employment and financial value transparency reporting requirements.

This week on "Off the Cuff," Karen, Jill, and Hugh discuss the latest news surrounding Gainful Employment (GE) and Financial Value Transparency (FVT) regulations, as well as NASFAA's advocacy campaign to request that Congress take action to require the Department of Education (ED) to delay upcoming institutional reporting requirements. The team then debriefs the Supreme Court's decision to overturn the "Chevron deference" and how it could impact higher education policy. From there, Karen and Jill update listeners on the latest news with the FAFSA – including when batch corrections will be available and new guidance from ED. The team also discusses new legislation in Congress – the FAFSA Deadline Act – and updates with the appropriations process.

Sue Bethanis hosts Charlotte Evans, Principal Solutions Consultant at Coursera. Charlotte advises North American companies on their upskilling and reskilling learning solutions. She worked in Asia for five years in student services, where she also pursued a fellowship through the World Innovation Summit for Education (WISE) Learners' Voice program. Charlotte graduated from Harvard Graduate School of Education (Ed.M.) in 2019 and has continued her passion for international education access through her work at Coursera.Sue and Charlotte discuss the dual role of Gen AI in the world of Learning and Development and: The key elements of a skills-based learning and career development strategy How AI and automation help identify skills gaps and save time Actionable low-tech tools you can start using to foster real connections in your organization

This week on a special episode of "Off The Cuff," Justin, Karen, and Allie are joined by former OTC podcast hosts, Stephen Payne, executive director of external relations at Muhlenberg College, and Megan Coval, interim president of Butler County Community College. Karen kicks off the episode by debriefing listeners on several NASFAA letters. The first letter was sent to the Department of Education (ED) on the 2025-26 FAFSA cycle, and a second letter was  sent to Congressional leaders requesting their assistance in securing a delay until July 2025 of the GE/FVT institutional reporting requirements (5:27-14:02). After the policy team update, the whole group reminisces on the early days of the podcast and share special memories as Justin departs from his role next week. 

We all -- students and teachers alike -- long to belong. Douglas Beam from Global Online Academy joined us to share his insights on the importance of working to build a sense of belonging for students in our schools. He also discussed his doctoral work on gender and sexual minorities in international schools. Douglas has been a teacher and leader in schools in Europe, Asia, and North America and currently works at GOA as the Associate Director of Member School Engagement. He has taught or coordinated programs in elementary, middle, and high school and at the graduate level. As a school leader, he has had several roles, including head of the department, grade level coordinator, IB Middle Years Programme coordinator, and GOA site director. His leadership has focused on collaborative program building, curriculum development, school policy, and pastoral care. Douglas is passionate about making schools where all students feel a sense of belonging. He earned a Doctorate in Education (Ed.D.) from the University of New England, where his dissertation focused on a sense of belonging in international schools for gender and sexual minority students. Douglas lives in Ohio with his husband and their twin boys.Our Guiding Question was, “What does it mean to experience a sense of belonging in an international school environment, and how can we, as teachers, best support our students in developing theirs?” Here are some of the topics covered: A definition of belongingFactors that nurture belongingWays students in elementary, middle, and high school would describe their sense of belonging.How an identity as an international student differs from an identity as a student in a person's home country.The positive and negative “forces” affecting international students as they develop their identities. School leaders and teachers can implement programs and strategies to improve the environments inside as well as outside the classroom to support student well-being in terms of feeling supported and connected to others. And we heard a few highlights from Douglas' dissertation on gender and sexual minorities in our schools. The show was recorded on February 16, 2024. Douglas' Contact Information: LinkedIn Douglas BeamCategories: School Life | TransitionsResources Mentioned in the Episode:Douglas' Doctoral Thesis on Belonging in International Schools The Global Online Academy (GOA) Remember to access our Educators Going Global website for more information or to subscribe to our newsletter!Email us with comments or suggestions at educatorsgoingglobal@gmail.com Follow us on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram or YouTube.Listen on your favorite podcast app: connect from our share page.Music: YouTube. (2022). Acoustic Guitar | Folk | No copyright | 2022❤️. YouTube. Retrieved October 11, 2022, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOEmg_6i7jA.

This week on "Off The Cuff," Justin is joined by Jill and Rachel to discuss this week's announcement from the Department of Education (ED) of a temporary FAFSA filing fix for applicants and contributors without a Social Security number. From there, Rachel debriefs listeners on Education Secretary Miguel Cardona's testimony at a Senate appropriation subcommittee hearing this week. The group also discusses last week's announcement that FSA Chief Operating Officer Richard Cordray is stepping down from his position this summer.   

In Part 2 of this Pulse Check series on leadership, emerging leaders can learn about creating culture and setting vision at our institutions as Dr. Gann shares practical experiences from his own background, discusses strategies for setting culture and talks about how interconnected systems impact our work. Whether you're a new leader or a seasoned pro, this episode will help you in your work to set culture, build trust, and define the strategic vision of your institution. Guest Name: Dr. Matthew GannGuest Social: https://www.linkedin.com/in/matthewgann/Guest Bio: Dr. Matthew Gann is an accomplished leader in education and organizational intelligence, currently serving as the Associate Vice Chancellor for Marketing, Digital Strategy, and Public Relations at the Tennessee Board of Regents (TBR). With a Doctorate in Education (Ed.D.) from Trevecca Nazarene University, his expertise is in enhancing educational outcomes and community engagement through strategic leadership and digital innovation.Prior to his current role, Dr. Gann advanced through several key positions within TBR, including Assistant Vice Chancellor and Chief Marketing Officer, where he directed significant improvements in digital communication and marketing strategies. His earlier tenure as Director of Web Services and Digital Strategy established foundational policies and practices that continue to benefit the institution.Beyond his professional endeavors, Dr. Gann has been a prominent figure in community engagement, serving as President of the Tennessee College Public Relations Association, where he led initiatives to strengthen educational communications across the state. His career also includes impactful roles in the private sector, where he spearheaded marketing and web development initiatives, demonstrating a consistent ability to blend technical skills with strategic oversight. - - - -Connect With Our Co-Hosts:Mallory Willsea https://www.linkedin.com/in/mallorywillsea/https://twitter.com/mallorywillseaSeth Odell https://www.linkedin.com/in/sethodell/https://twitter.com/sethodellAbout The Enrollify Podcast Network:The Higher Ed Pulse is a part of the Enrollify Podcast Network. If you like this podcast, chances are you'll like other Enrollify shows too! Some of our favorites include Generation AI and Confessions of a Higher Education Social Media Manager.Enrollify is made possible by Element451 — the next-generation AI student engagement platform helping institutions create meaningful and personalized interactions with students. Learn more at element451.com. Connect with Us at the Engage Summit:Exciting news — Mallory will be at the 2024 Engage Summit in Raleigh, NC, on June 25 and 26, and we'd love to meet you there! Sessions will focus on cutting-edge AI applications that are reshaping student outreach, enhancing staff productivity, and offering deep insights into ROI. Use the discount code Enrollify50 at checkout, and you can register for just $200! Learn more and register at engage.element451.com — we can't wait to see you there!

This week on "Off The Cuff," Justin, Karen, and Tim discuss this week's news that the Department of Education (ED) identified three issues concerning tax data reported on FAFSA applicant records. The team dives into the details of those identified issues, and what the department is doing next — including the latest update to reprocess all affected records. Tim also provides context on how financial aid professionals are currently feeling amid these challenges. 

This week on “Off the Cuff,” Allie, Karen, and Rachel discuss the latest adjustments to the rollout of the 2024-25 FAFSA, including a miscalculation in the SAI formula. The team covers a number of other possible FAFSA issues and outlines what updates they would like to see from the Department of Education (ED) as the rollout begins to ramp up. Rachel then provides an update on the federal budget cycle, where Congress recently completed its work for the fiscal year 2024, and now turns to the president's budget request containing newly proposed funding levels for ED for fiscal year 2025.

This week on “Off the Cuff” Justin, Karen, Allie, and Tim are back with the latest news on the 2024-25 FAFSA with recent updates from the Department of Education (ED) about the delivery of Institutional Student Information Records (ISIRs). The team dives into recent electronic announcements detailing updates, fixes, and troubleshooting issues impacting users without Social Security numbers, rejected ISIRs, and ongoing issues with EDconnect software. The discussion then turns to recent national reporting that provides more context into the ongoing struggles of the 2024-25 FAFSA launch.

This week on "Off The Cuff," Allie and Karen are joined by Jon Fansmith, the American Council on Education's senior vice president of government relations and national engagement, to discuss an update to the Student Aid Index (SAI) formula from the Department of Education (ED), which allows the Student's Contribution from Income (SCI) to have a negative calculated value with no floor. However, the team also discusses how a continuing resolution (CR) passed by the House would rescind that update. The team also walks through the latest updates around the Bipartisan Workforce Pell Act and the release of 100 system-generated test Institutional Student Information Records (ISIRs).

This week on a special episode of "Off The Cuff," Justin and Karen are joined by Bill DeBaun, the National College Attainment Network's senior director of data and strategic initiatives, to discuss the 2024-25 FAFSA rollout. Bill debriefs listeners on trends found in NCAN's FAFSA Tracker, which tracks completion rates for the 2024-25 FAFSA cycle. Justin and Karen also discuss other news from the week, including the additional release of eight test Institutional Student Information Record (ISIRs) and new guidance from the Department of Education (ED) on how to submit the 2024-25 FAFSA if a contributor doesn't have a Social Security number. The team also talks through this week's announcement that ED began the 60-day comment period for Gainful Employment and Financial Value Transparency reporting requirements.

In this episode of the Aspire to Lead podcast, join host Joshua Stamper as he sits down with special guest Dr. Jerod Phillips to explore "Strategies to Build an Effective Leadership Team." Dr. Phillips shares invaluable insights on various aspects of leadership, including building winning teams, fostering personal growth, combating complacency, and the importance of engagement with state affiliations in school leadership organizations. Don't miss this engaging conversation packed with actionable strategies and inspiring ideas for school leaders at all levels.  In this Episode, we also discuss: Exploring ways to prevent stagnation in school leadership. The importance of continuous learning and development for leaders. And his wonderful podcast, “The Squad Builder” About Dr. Jerod Phillips Dr. Jerod Phillips Sr. is the Principal of David E. Robinson Elementary School (DRE) in Magnolia, DE. He arrived at DRE in February 2023 with a zeal to engage the school community with the vision of being great for kids in all aspects of the school. Prior to arriving at DRE, Dr. Phillips was a Principal and Assistant Principal at the elementary level in Middletown, DE. He has 9 years of school leadership experience. He is passionate about developing positive public relations between the district, school, students, parents and the overall community. As a result of Dr. Phillips' journey from teacher to Principal while being connected, he believes that being a connected educator can help take one's career to unprecedented heights. Dr. Phillips was the Delaware National Outstanding Assistant Principal of the Year for 2021. Dr. Phillips has had one publication in NAESP's Principal Magazine: "Being a Bias-Conscious Leader." Principal, May/June 2022: Rewriting the Role, Volume 101, Issue 5, in addition to being a contributor to several monthly sections of the APs Rising section of the same publication. Dr. Phillips is a podcaster in the education sector, starting with three co-hosts of the podcast, Speaking Educationally in January 2020. Since then, he has recently launched his solo podcast, The Squad Builder Podcast. The podcast focuses on shaking things up in education in the realm of building and maintaining highly effective and successful teams in our schools. He has a B.S. in Finance and Banking from Delaware State University, a M.S. in Educational Leadership from Purdue University, and his Doctor of Education (Ed.D.) in Educational Leadership and Management at Capella University. Dr. Phillips is a proud husband and father of 3 (2 daughters and 1 son). He has teamed up with his wife and kids within the past several years to explore the world of entrepreneurship together, and he is very active in his local church. Follow Dr. Jerod Phillips Twitter (X): https://twitter.com/japhillips0722  Instagram: drjaphillips0722 Facebook: Jerod Phillips Linkedin: Dr. Jerod Phillips Sr. – Are you a superfan of the Aspire podcast? Well, now you can show off your support with the new Aspire swag, featuring tee shirts, hoodies and a variety of drinkware. You can find all your Aspire Swag...

I had a great conversation with my friend, Dr. Jerod Phillips. Dr. Jerod Phillips Sr. is the Principal of David E. Robinson Elementary School (DRE) in Magnolia, DE. He arrived at DRE in February 2023 with a zeal to engage the school community with the vision of being great for kids in all aspects of the school. Prior to arriving at DRE, Dr. Phillips was a Principal and Assistant Principal at the elementary level in Middletown, DE. He has 9 years of school leadership experience. He is passionate about developing positive public relations between the district, school, students, parents, and the overall community. As a result of Dr. Phillips' journey from teacher to Principal, while being connected, he believes that being a connected educator can help take one's career to unprecedented heights. Dr. Phillips was the Delaware National Outstanding Assistant Principal of the Year for 2021. Dr. Phillips has had one publication in NAESP's Principal Magazine: "Being a Bias-Conscious Leader." Principal, May/June 2022: Rewriting the Role, Volume 101, Issue 5, in addition to being a contributor to several monthly sections of the APs Rising section of the same publication. Dr. Phillips is a podcaster in the education sector, starting with three co-hosts of the podcast, Speaking Educationally in January 2020. Since then, he has recently launched his solo podcast, The Squad Builder Podcast. The podcast focuses on shaking things up in education in the realm of building and maintaining highly effective and successful teams in our schools. He has a B.S. in Finance and Banking from Delaware State University, a M.S. in Educational Leadership from Purdue University, and his Doctorate of Education (Ed.D.) in Educational Leadership and Management at Capella University. Dr. Phillips is a proud husband and father of 3 (2 daughters and 1 son). He has teamed up with his wife and kids over the past several years to explore the world of entrepreneurship together, and he is very active in his local church. Connect with him on Twitter(X) @japhillips0722 Subscribe to the Thriveinedu podcast and check out my blog at www.Rdene915.com.

In the wake of the Biden administration's decision to lift the freeze on student loan payments this fall, close to 40% of borrowers overlooked their initial repayment, reveals a report by Politico. A close look at the figures from October 2019 shows that 26% of those due to make a payment fell short of doing so by the middle of November the same year. A more recent snapshot taken in October 2023 reveals that out of the 22 million who were expected to make payments that month, nearly 8.8 million failed to settle their dues by mid-November. Undersecretary of Education, James Kvaal, acknowledges these difficulties in a blog post published on a recent Friday. He expresses understanding for those who may feel muddled or daunted by their options and affirmed the Department's commitment to assisting loan recipients. He writes, 'Despite the fact that a majority of borrowers have made their first payment, a significant number haven't been able to yet. Some of them are simply bewildered by the process and need further clarity on their options. It's crucial for them to know that our paramount focus is to provide support as they venture back into the repayment process.' The Department of Education (ED) has implemented measures aiming at easing this transition. Last June, it announced that should borrowers neglect to pay, they would be neither reported to any credit agencies nor considered as defaulting before September 30, 2024. This leniency policy was brought to light in a blog post shared by the ED.  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This week on "Off The Cuff," Justin and Karen are joined by Jon Fansmith, the American Council on Education's senior vice president of government relations and national engagement, to discuss how Congress avoided a government shutdown and what that means for federal funding for the Office of Federal Student Aid. The team then discusses the upcoming negotiated rulemaking sessions for student debt relief, including the issue paper the Department of Education (ED) released before the October session, and ED's new gainful employment regulations. Justin and Karen also address concerns aid offices have about an influx of borrower defense to repayment claims. 

This week on "Off the Cuff," Justin and Karen are joined by Jon Fansmith, the American Council on Education's senior vice president of government relations, to dig into the latest state of play surrounding the federal budgeting process. The team highlights how Congress' end of September deadline could impact a host of priorities for the Department of Education (ED), including its FAFSA simplification rollout, negotiated rulemaking, and general operations. The group also highlights ED's new repayment plan and discusses some summer news coverage concerning perceptions of investments, and risks associated with higher education.

This episode features Dr. Amy McCormack, the current President at Calumet College of St. Joseph. A Frankfort, Indiana native, Dr. McCormack received her Bachelor of Science (B.S.) in Accounting from Indiana University, her MBA in Finance and Marketing Concentrations from Dominican University, and her Doctor of Education (Ed.D) in Higher Education/Higher Education Administration from University of Pennsylvania. After spending 26 years as the Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration at Dominican University, she was inaugurated as the first female President and 7th President of Calumet College of St. Joseph in 2017. GreatNews.Life and Podcast Host Jenny Craig-Brown have transformed the All About the Girls annual event into a podcast! These monthly episodes feature incredible women giving the audience all the insight about what makes them happy, successful, and motivational. New episodes launch on Sundays to make sure to start your week on a positive note! The All About the Podcast is brought to you by GreatNews.Life

Spotlight on the Workforce Education Ed.D offered on at UGA Griffin

This week on "Off the Cuff," Justin, Jill, and David discuss updated guidance from the Department of Education (ED) about third party servicers. Jill dives into the guidance, including what concerns institutions should have and what it means to be classified as a third party servicer. She also debriefs the listening sessions ED plans to hold in March on incentive compensation. Additionally, David discusses issues that arise when a student is enrolled in multiple programs at the same institution. Maria then shares some recent higher education news, including a new report of institutional endowments and upcoming protests as the Supreme Court prepares to hear oral arguments of President Joe Biden's student loan debt relief program next Tuesday. 

Responder Health is a program designed and managed by Armor Up America that specializes in supporting first responders and their families. First responders endure chronic stress and trauma that has a direct impact on their well-being. Responder Health provides the education, resources, and community they need to live healthy lives. Their team is comprised of current and former first responders and essential workers, with extensive, lived, and learned experiences in the field. Youturn Health's Chief Clinical Officer, Rich Jones, recently had a round table discussion with individuals from this organization who are on a mission to provide the best possible behavioral health services to first responders. They discuss what has not been helpful in the past and the best model for success moving forward. This team is making major strides in supporting the ones who take care of us all!Included in this podcast discussion with Rich Jones are:Sean RileyCo-Executive Director, Armor Up America Founder, Safe Call NowSean started his law enforcement career as San Diego County Deputy Sheriff in 1987 and then relocated to Washington in 1990 and spent over 16 years with the Kirkland Police Department. Sean's many accomplishments include being a member of the International Homicide Investigator's Association, a Homicide and Sexual Assault Detective, a D.A.R.E. Officer, a Gang Officer, and a certified trainer. He is also credited with solving one of the first-ever elder abuse homicide cases in the nation. Recognized as an exciting national keynote speaker and trainer in high demand, Sean travels throughout the United States to share his inspirational story, and cutting-edge training in a non-traditional, interactive format. Riley hits those controversial topics “head-on” that have traditionally been taboo in the first responder population.Safe Call Now® provides public safety employees, all emergency services personnel, and their family members nationwide with a simple and confidential way to ask for help. Staffed by first responders, former first responders, and public safety professionals, Safe Call Now® is a safe and confidential place to turn to get help from individuals who understand the demands of a first responder career.Dr. Jorey Krawczyn Experienced University Instructor with a demonstrated history of working in the higher education industry. Skilled in Law Enforcement Instruction, Expert Witness, Research, Psychological Testing, and Teaching. Strong research professional with a Doctor of Education (Ed.D.) focused in Counseling Psychology from Argosy University Sarasota.Dr. Olivia Johnson Dr. Olivia Johnson is the Founder of the Blue Wall Institute, a former police officer, and a military veteran. She currently conducts research, training, consultation, and needs assessments for law enforcement agencies nationwide regarding health, wellness, and safety both on and off duty. She is a leading subject expert in the field of officer suicide and inoculation efforts to reduce these tragic deaths. Vanessa RileyVanessa Riley is the President and Co-Founder of Armor Up West Virginia and the Director of Family Services for Armor Up America.In her capacity, she provides critical and much-needed services to first responder family members 24/7. Vanessa is also a national keynote speaker and shares her experience of strength and hope around the country.Vanessa walks family members through her experiences of an officer-involved shooting, untreated trauma which led to addiction and domestic violence in her home, and the path to healing and recovery.https://responderhealth.com/https://www.bw-institute.com/

Responder Health is a program designed and managed by Armor Up America that specializes in supporting first responders and their families. First responders endure chronic stress and trauma that has a direct impact on their well-being. Responder Health provides the education, resources, and community they need to live healthy lives. Their team is comprised of current and former first responders and essential workers, with extensive, lived, and learned experiences in the field. Youturn Health's Chief Clinical Officer, Rich Jones, recently had a round table discussion with individuals from this organization who are on a mission to provide the best possible behavioral health services to first responders. They discuss what has not been helpful in the past and the best model for success moving forward. This team is making major strides in supporting the ones who take care of us all!Included in this podcast discussion with Rich Jones are:Sean RileyCo-Executive Director, Armor Up America Founder, Safe Call NowSean started his law enforcement career as San Diego County Deputy Sheriff in 1987 and then relocated to Washington in 1990 and spent over 16 years with the Kirkland Police Department. Sean's many accomplishments include being a member of the International Homicide Investigator's Association, a Homicide and Sexual Assault Detective, a D.A.R.E. Officer, a Gang Officer, and a certified trainer. He is also credited with solving one of the first-ever elder abuse homicide cases in the nation. Recognized as an exciting national keynote speaker and trainer in high demand, Sean travels throughout the United States to share his inspirational story, and cutting-edge training in a non-traditional, interactive format. Riley hits those controversial topics “head-on” that have traditionally been taboo in the first responder population.Safe Call Now® provides public safety employees, all emergency services personnel, and their family members nationwide with a simple and confidential way to ask for help. Staffed by first responders, former first responders, and public safety professionals, Safe Call Now® is a safe and confidential place to turn to get help from individuals who understand the demands of a first responder career.Dr. Jorey Krawczyn Experienced University Instructor with a demonstrated history of working in the higher education industry. Skilled in Law Enforcement Instruction, Expert Witness, Research, Psychological Testing, and Teaching. Strong research professional with a Doctor of Education (Ed.D.) focused in Counseling Psychology from Argosy University Sarasota.Dr. Olivia Johnson Dr. Olivia Johnson is the Founder of the Blue Wall Institute, a former police officer, and a military veteran. She currently conducts research, training, consultation, and needs assessments for law enforcement agencies nationwide regarding health, wellness, and safety both on and off duty. She is a leading subject expert in the field of officer suicide and inoculation efforts to reduce these tragic deaths. Vanessa RileyVanessa Riley is the President and Co-Founder of Armor Up West Virginia and the Director of Family Services for Armor Up America.In her capacity, she provides critical and much-needed services to first responder family members 24/7. Vanessa is also a national keynote speaker and shares her experience of strength and hope around the country.Vanessa walks family members through her experiences of an officer-involved shooting, untreated trauma which led to addiction and domestic violence in her home, and the path to healing and recovery.https://responderhealth.com/

Marnie Stockman is an experienced leader of Customer Success and Sales with a demonstrated history of working in the technology and education industries. Skilled in Customer Success, Coaching, Leadership, and Strategic Sales and Partnerships and Educational Technology. Strong business development professional with a Doctor of Education (Ed.D.) focused in Leadership. Passionate about helping businesses grow Raving Fans! Episode Links:Amazon Book: https://www.amazon.com/Marnie-Stockman/e/B09KCLY2YZ/ref=aufs_dp_fta_dskLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/marniestockman/Web: https://lifecycleinsights.io/Twitter: https://twitter.com/lifecyclemspFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/lifecycleinsightsmspJoey Pinz Conversations Podcast Information: • Website: https://www.joeypinz.com • Link Tree: https://linktr.ee/joeypinz • Music by Tom Izzo: @wahlsinger  https://tomizzomusic.com  Support our podcast:  • Subscribe: https://joeypinzconversations.com/subscribe/ • How much is this podcast worth to you? Consider $5, $10 or $20/mo with Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/joeypinz  • How about a one-time payment?  • What is the episode worth to you? $25/$50/$100/$500 /$1,000/$5,000 with PayPal (one-time): https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/JoePannone Please subscribe/follow to Joey Pinz Discipline Conversations Podcast: • Spotify, Apple, Google, or others.  Please consider rating with 5 stars if you like it. • Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/joey-pinz-discipline-conversations/id1583997438 • Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/69SFwY3XSwcw9qNvElAn10 • Google: https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkcy5idXp6c3Byb3V0LmNvbS8xODI4OTA2LnJzcw • YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/JoeyPinzDisciplineConversations?sub_confirmation=1Please follow on social media: @TheJoeyPinz • Instagram: @TheJoeyPinz https://www.instagram.com/TheJoeyPinz  • Twitter: @TheJoeyPinz  https://twitter.com/TheJoeyPinz • Facebook: @TheJoeyPinz https://www.facebook.com/TheJoeyPinz • TikTok:  @TheJoeyPinz  https://www.tiktok.com/@thejoeypinz • Minds:  @TheJoeyPinz  https://www.minds.com/thejoeypinz • YouTube:  @TheJoeyPinz  https://www.youtube.com/@thejoeypinzFinally,  join our newsletter: https://joeypinzconversations.com/#newsletterSupport the show

In this episode of The Honestly Unfiltered Podcast, Jeni and Ellie sit down with Dr. Lee Phillips, a Psychotherapist & Sex Therapist. Dr. Lee's mission is to crush the myth that people with chronic illnesses and other disabilities are not sexual. His podcast, Sex, and Chronic Illness, features stories from individuals, couples, and other experts on overcoming shame and the sexual limitations caused by illness and disability.Dr. Lee Phillips is in private practice in New York City and McLean, VA, where she specializes in sex and couples therapy. She is a Licensed Clinical Social Worker (LCSW) in Washington, DC, Maryland, Virginia, and New York. She is a Certified Sex Therapist (CST) by the American Association of Sexuality Educators, Counselors, and Therapists (AASECT). Dr. Phillips has been in private practice for more than a decade, treating a diverse group of patients searching for relief from the complications resulting from debilitating and often overlooked combinations of illnesses. She lectures on topics including sexuality, therapy with LGBTQIA+ clients, chronic pain, preventative services, anxiety and stress management, caregiving stress, depression in the elderly, mindfulness and cognitive strategies for chronic pain, reclaiming sexuality for couples with chronic illness, ethical decision making, assessment of mental disorders, sex and couples therapy, consensual non-monogamy, and exploring sexual communication, freedom, and pleasure for gender minorities with chronic illness, pain, and other disabilities. She has published in the Journal of Baccalaureate Social Work, conducting a research study on LGBTQ-Affirmative Teaching at Historically Black Colleges and Universities: Understanding Program Directors Views. She holds a Doctor of Education (Ed.D.) degree in Organizational Leadership with an emphasis in Behavioral Health from Grand Canyon University in Phoenix, AZ. She has been quoted in over 40 media outlets. She is the host of the podcast, Sex and Chronic Illness with Dr. Lee.___________More about Dr. LeeDr. Lee on InstagramDr. Lee on TwitterDr. Lee's Podcast____________We have Podcast Merch! Check Out Our Designs Here!Use coupon code HU2022 for 15% off.Please subscribe so you don't miss an episode, and as always, send in your questions or comments to Jeni@honestlyunfilteredpodcasts.comConnect with us on Social Media: Facebook.com/HonestlyUnfilteredPodcastInstagram.com/TheHonestlyUnfilteredPodcastTwitter.com/iAmJeniThomasCheck out our website and blog at www.honestlyunfilteredpodcasts.comDo you like what you hear? Buy Us a Coffee!This podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Podtrac - https://analytics.podtrac.com/privacy-policy-gdrpChartable - https://chartable.com/privacyPodcorn - https://podcorn.com/privacy