Podcasts about American Conservation Coalition

Isaiah Menning, of the American Conservation Coalition, joins Josh to discuss how de-extinction techniques, like the ones recently used to resurrect the dire wolf, should be viewed as a new tool in the conservationist's toolbox.  They should not be feared or fought by conservationists or environmental groups.  Instead, they should be embraced and used to assist species on the endangered list to not only survive but thrive, once again.    Isaiah's article at Real Clear Energy:   De-Extinction Is Conservation | RealClearEnergy   Follow Isaiah on X and at Young Voices:    https://x.com/isaiahmenning?s=21&t=S8JoQpY3m4n6bFrTo8tLrg   https://www.joinyv.org/talent/isaiah-menning   Links:   https://gml.bio.link/   YOUTUBE:   https://bit.ly/3UwsRiv   RUMBLE:   https://rumble.com/c/GML   Check out Martens Minute!   https://martensminute.podbean.com/   Follow Josh Martens on X:   https://twitter.com/joshmartens13   Join the private discord & chat during the show!   joingml.com

Filling in for Kruser is regular fill-in host Dr. Wilfred Reilly and he's got special guest Allie Clough from the American Conservation Coalition on to talk about conservative environmentalism in hour 2. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Chris Barnard is president of the American Conservation Coalition, which has some 75,000 members. He joins Bob to discuss the unfortunate pattern of ceding concern for the environment to the political left, and what the ACC is doing (especially on college campuses) to shatter that stereotype.Mentioned in the Episode and Other Links of Interest:The YouTube version of this interview.Chris Barnard's bio at American Conservation Coalition.The Market Environmentalism Academy.Bob's article showing that Naomi Klein supported the Green New Deal for non-climate reasons.The link for Monetary-Metals.com.Help support the Bob Murphy Show.

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a comprehensive policy initiative crafted by the Heritage Foundation, it becomes clear that this is more than just a set of recommendations – it's a blueprint for a radical transformation of the American government. This 900-page manifesto, designed to guide a potential conservative administration, outlines sweeping reforms that touch every facet of federal governance, from education and environmental policy to media regulation and disaster response.At its core, Project 2025 is about consolidating executive power and reshaping the federal government in a distinctly conservative image. One of the most striking aspects of this plan is its vision for education. The project advocates for the elimination of the Department of Education, transferring its responsibilities to the states and significantly reducing federal involvement in education policy. This includes ending federal funding for programs like Title I, which provides crucial support to schools in low-income areas, and dismantling the Head Start program that serves over a million children from low-income families[1][4][5].Roger Severino, a key figure associated with the project, has argued that Head Start does not provide value, though he has not provided evidence to support this claim. Instead, Project 2025 promotes school vouchers with no strings attached, even for private or religious schools, and cuts to funding for free school meals. This approach reflects a fundamental shift in how education is viewed – from a public good to a private one[1].The project's stance on education is just one part of a broader critique of what it terms "federal government overreach." In the realm of civil rights, Project 2025 proposes significant curtailments. It recommends ending federal investigations into schools for disparate impacts of disciplinary measures on the basis of race or ethnicity and transferring civil rights enforcement responsibilities from the Department of Education to the Department of Justice, where enforcement would be limited to litigation[1].This theme of reducing federal oversight extends to environmental policy as well. Project 2025 seeks to dismantle key components of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), including the Office of Environmental Justice and External Civil Rights. It advocates for reversing the EPA's 2009 finding that carbon dioxide emissions are harmful to human health, thereby preventing the federal government from regulating greenhouse gas emissions. The project also supports increased consumption of natural gas, despite concerns from climatologists about methane leaks, and aims to block the expansion of the national electrical grid and the transition to renewable energy[1].The project's climate policy is particularly contentious, with even some Republican climate advocates disagreeing with its stance. Benji Backer, founder of the American Conservation Coalition, has noted a growing consensus among younger Republicans that human activity causes climate change and has called Project 2025's approach "wrongheaded"[1].In addition to these policy proposals, Project 2025 also outlines a vision for media and technology policies. It suggests increasing agency accountability at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) while reducing what it deems "wasteful spending." The project promotes national security and economic prosperity through measures like expanding 5G connectivity and requiring Big Tech companies to contribute to the Universal Service Fund. However, critics argue that these recommendations could endanger democratic institutions and concentrate presidential power[2].The project's impact on disaster response is another area of concern. It proposes reforming the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) by shifting the majority of preparedness and response costs to states and localities. This includes ending preparedness grants for states and localities, a move that aligns with Trump's recent suggestions to leave disaster response management to the states[3].Project 2025 also delves into the realm of public health and social welfare. It advocates for withdrawing from the World Health Organization, a move Trump has already made and then reversed during his previous administration. The project criticizes the WHO's handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and suggests that the U.S. should be prepared to take drastic measures against international organizations that act contrary to U.S. interests[3].The economic and social implications of these proposals are far-reaching. Project 2025 suggests cutting overtime protections for 4.3 million workers, limiting access to food assistance for over 40 million people, and restricting safety nets for farmers. It also proposes eliminating funding for key public transportation projects and consolidating or eliminating programs like the Economic Development Administration (EDA), which has invested billions in transformative infrastructure projects[5].Critics, including Democrats and some independent experts, have been vocal about the dangers of Project 2025. They argue that its recommendations could dismantle civil liberties, concentrate presidential power, and endanger democratic institutions. James Singer, a spokesperson for the Biden campaign, has likened the project to an attempt to make Trump a "tyrannical king" at the expense of American democracy[4].Despite Trump's public distancing from the project, there is significant overlap between his policies and those outlined in Project 2025. The Heritage Foundation emphasizes that while the project does not speak for any candidate, it is ultimately up to the president to decide which recommendations to implement. This ambiguity has led to a heated political debate, with Democrats using Project 2025 as a rallying cry against Trump's potential second term[4].As the 2025 presidential term approaches, Project 2025 stands as a pivotal document that could shape the future of American governance. Its proposals are not just policy recommendations but a vision for a fundamentally different role of the federal government in American life. Whether these changes will come to fruition remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: Project 2025 represents a seismic shift in the political landscape, one that will be closely watched and fiercely debated in the months to come.

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a comprehensive and contentious initiative spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation, it becomes clear that this is more than just a policy blueprint – it's a vision for a fundamentally transformed American governance.Project 2025 is the culmination of efforts by over 400 scholars and conservative groups, led by former Trump administration officials Paul Dans and Spencer Chretien. This 900-page manifesto outlines a sweeping overhaul of federal policies, aiming to reshape the government in line with conservative principles. The project is structured around four key pillars: a detailed policy guide, a database of potential personnel, a training program for these candidates, and a playbook for actions to be taken within the first 180 days of a new administration[2][4].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its approach to education. The initiative criticizes what it terms "woke propaganda" in public schools and advocates for a significant reduction in the federal government's role in education. This includes closing the Department of Education and transferring its responsibilities to the states. Programs under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) would be administered by the Department of Health and Human Services, and the National Center for Education Statistics would become part of the Census Bureau. The federal government, according to Project 2025, should merely keep statistics, rather than enforcing civil rights in schools or investigating disparate impacts of disciplinary measures on racial or ethnic grounds[1].The project also proposes drastic changes in education funding. It suggests allowing Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to expire, which would remove $18 billion in federal funds for schools in low-income areas. Instead, public funds would be available as school vouchers, even for parents sending their children to private or religious schools. This shift is part of a broader philosophy that views education as a private rather than a public good[1].In the realm of environmental policy, Project 2025's vision is equally radical. It seeks to downsize the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), close the EPA's Office of Environmental Justice and External Civil Rights, and reverse the 2009 EPA finding that carbon dioxide emissions are harmful to human health. This would prevent the federal government from regulating greenhouse gas emissions. The project also advocates for blocking the expansion of the national electrical grid, stymying the transition to renewable energy, and relaxing regulations on the fossil fuel industry. For instance, it suggests removing restrictions on oil drilling imposed by the Bureau of Land Management and promoting Arctic drilling[1].The implications of these environmental policies are far-reaching. Nonpartisan experts warn that without expanding the electrical grid, renewable energy projects will have to slow down. Additionally, the project's stance on climate change mitigation is at odds with many Republicans who acknowledge the importance of addressing climate change. Benji Backer, founder of the American Conservation Coalition, has criticized Project 2025's climate policies as "wrongheaded" and noted a growing consensus among younger Republicans that human activity causes climate change[1].Project 2025 also targets other federal agencies and programs. It proposes reforming the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) by shifting the majority of preparedness and response costs to states and localities. This move is justified by the argument that FEMA is "overtasked" and "overcompensates for the lack of state and local preparedness and response." The project further suggests ending preparedness grants for states and localities, arguing that these grants should be terminated to prevent the Department of Homeland Security from "handing out federal tax dollars"[3].In the area of technology and media, Project 2025's recommendations are equally sweeping. It calls for increasing agency accountability while decreasing wasteful spending at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The project also advocates for promoting national security and economic prosperity by supporting the expansion of 5G networks and satellite technologies like StarLink. Additionally, it suggests that Big Tech companies should contribute to the Universal Service Fund, which is currently funded through telephone bills[4].The project's approach to civil rights and social policies is another contentious area. It proposes rolling back diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs across federal agencies, arguing that these policies can violate federal civil rights laws. Project 2025 also aims to dismantle the DEI apparatus in various agencies and eliminate terms like "DEI," "abortion," and "gender equality" from federal rules and regulations. This stance aligns with Trump's executive order ending all DEI programs within the federal government, which he claimed could shut out Americans "who deserve a shot at the American dream" due to their race or sex[3].Critics of Project 2025, including Democrats and some Republicans, have been vocal about its potential impacts. Vice President Kamala Harris has described the project as a plan to "return America to a dark past," and President Biden has accused Trump of lying about his connections to the initiative, stating that it "should scare every single American"[2].Despite Trump's public disavowal of Project 2025, the initiative's connections to his administration are undeniable. Former high-ranking officials like Ben Carson, John Ratcliffe, and Peter Navarro are listed as authors or contributors to the policy agenda. This close association has led critics to argue that Project 2025 is essentially a blueprint for a second Trump term, one that could endanger democratic institutions and concentrate presidential power[2][4].As the 2024 elections approach, Project 2025 stands as a significant milestone in the debate over the future of American governance. Its proposals, if implemented, would mark a profound shift in federal policies, from education and environmental regulation to technology and civil rights. Whether these changes would be beneficial or detrimental remains a subject of intense debate.In the words of Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts, the nation is "in the process of the second American Revolution," which he hopes will remain bloodless. However, the radical nature of Project 2025's proposals has raised concerns among many that this revolution could come at a steep cost to democratic values and social welfare[2].As we move forward, the fate of Project 2025 will likely be decided in the political arena. Will its vision for a more conservative, decentralized government prevail, or will it face significant resistance from those who see it as a threat to the fabric of American society? The answer will depend on the choices made by voters, policymakers, and the next administration. One thing is certain, however: Project 2025 has set the stage for a critical conversation about the future of America, one that will shape the country's trajectory for years to come.

In this weekend's episode, three segments from this past week's Washington Journal. First, as tax season gets into high gear – a conversation with Nina Olson – who previously served as IRS Taxpayer Advocate.  We discuss DOGE's impact on the functioning of the Internal Revenue Service - and the privacy of taxpayer data. Then, Shai Akabas of the Bipartisan Policy Center discusses the debt limit so-called "X-date" as Congressional Republicans begin their budget reconciliation process.  Finally we talk with Benji Backer – founder of the American Conservation Coalition about his new push to make environmentalism NON-partisan.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

“Politicians, pseudo-experts, and other partisans have led us to believe that there are only two approaches to climate change: doomerism or denial,” writes Benji Backer – but he says both are dead ends. The activist joins US Congresswoman Harriet Hageman – chair of the Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife, and Fisheries – to discuss real climate solutions that Green New Deal supporters tend to ignore. Rep. Harriet Hageman is the U.S. Congresswoman from Wyoming and a litigator with 34 years of experience challenging federal overreach. She serves on the House Natural Resources Committee, chairing the Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife, and Fisheries, and the Judiciary Committee. She co-chairs the Congressional Coal Caucus. Hageman holds a B.A. and law degree from the University of Wyoming. More at https://x.com/RepHageman and https://hageman.house.gov Benji Backer is the Executive Chairman and Founder of the American Conservation Coalition and co-founder of Nature is Nonpartisan. He authored The Conservative Environmentalist (2024). A University of Washington graduate, he's been named to Forbes 30 Under 30 and Grist 50. Backer is a fellow at FREOPP and Arizona State University. Find more at https://x.com/benjibacker and https://benjibacker.com 「 SUPPORT OUR SPONSORS 」 Find out more about the brands that make this show possible and get special discounts on Dr. Drew's favorite products at https://drdrew.com/sponsors  • FATTY15 – The future of essential fatty acids is here! Strengthen your cells against age-related breakdown with Fatty15. Get 15% off a 90-day Starter Kit Subscription at https://drdrew.com/fatty15 • PALEOVALLEY - "Paleovalley has a wide variety of extraordinary products that are both healthful and delicious,” says Dr. Drew. "I am a huge fan of this brand and know you'll love it too!” Get 15% off your first order at https://drdrew.com/paleovalley • THE WELLNESS COMPANY - Counteract harmful spike proteins with TWC's Signature Series Spike Support Formula containing nattokinase and selenium. Learn more about TWC's supplements at https://twc.health/drew 「 MEDICAL NOTE 」 Portions of this program may examine countervailing views on important medical issues. Always consult your physician before making any decisions about your health. 「 ABOUT THE SHOW 」 Ask Dr. Drew is produced by Kaleb Nation (https://kalebnation.com) and Susan Pinsky (https://twitter.com/firstladyoflove). This show is for entertainment and/or informational purposes only, and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode, we delve into the escalating issue of wildfires in the American West, a trend that has been on the rise for several decades. As debates stir around the role of global climate change in intensifying these fires, we invite Danielle Franz, CEO of the American Conservation Coalition, to discuss whether these changes are contributing to the severity of the LA fires. We also discuss whether conservatives should be concerned about the environment and environmental policy. The conversation explores the intersection of environmental action, innovation, and limited government principles.If you would like to interview Richard Nelson, Executive Director of the Commonwealth Policy Center, please email ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠richard@commonwealthpolicy.org⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠.Like and Follow us on Facebook: www.facebook.com/commonwealthpolicyFollow us on X: @CPC4KentuckyFollow us on YouTube: @commonwealthpolicycenterE-Newsletter: https://www.commonwealthpolicycenter.org/mailing-list/

As I delved into the intricacies of Project 2025, I couldn't help but feel a sense of both fascination and alarm. This sprawling initiative, spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation and crafted by a cadre of former Trump administration officials, lays out a vision for a radically reshaped federal government that is as ambitious as it is contentious.At its core, Project 2025 is a 900-page blueprint designed to guide the next conservative presidential administration, with a particular focus on the second term of Donald Trump. The project is built around four key pillars: a comprehensive policy guide, a database of potential personnel, a training program for these candidates, and a detailed playbook for the first 180 days in office[4].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its proposal to consolidate executive power and reshape the federal bureaucracy in the image of conservative ideology. The plan calls for the replacement of merit-based federal civil service workers with individuals loyal to Trump, effectively politicizing key government agencies such as the Department of Justice, the Department of Commerce, and the Federal Trade Commission. This move is part of a broader strategy to centralize control over the government, aligning with the unitary executive theory that advocates for greater presidential control over the executive branch[1].The implications of such a shift are profound. For instance, the Department of Justice, under Project 2025, would be thoroughly reformed to combat what the project terms "affirmative discrimination" or "anti-white racism," and would be tasked with prosecuting state and local governments, institutions of higher education, and private employers with diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs. Gene Hamilton, a former Trump DOJ official, argues that these programs "come at the expense of other Americans—and in nearly all cases violate longstanding federal law"[1].Education is another area where Project 2025 proposes sweeping changes. The plan envisions a significant reduction in the federal government's role in public education, advocating for the closure of the Department of Education and the transfer of education funding and policy to the states. This would include ending federal enforcement of civil rights in schools and allowing public funds to be used as school vouchers for private or religious schools. The National Center for Education Statistics would be merged with the Census Bureau, and programs like Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, which provides $18 billion in federal funds for schools in low-income areas, would be allowed to expire[1][3].The project's stance on education is encapsulated in its criticism of what it calls "woke propaganda" in public schools. It argues that federal overreach has led schools to prioritize "racial parity in school discipline indicators" over student safety. This perspective is reflected in the project's recommendation to end the Head Start program and cut funding for free school meals, with proponents like Roger Severino claiming that such programs do not provide value, though he has not provided evidence to support these claims[1].Environmental policy is another critical area where Project 2025's vision diverges sharply from current trends. The project advocates for the reversal of several key environmental regulations, including the 2009 EPA finding that carbon dioxide emissions are harmful to human health. It proposes preventing the EPA from regulating greenhouse gas emissions and blocking the expansion of the national electrical grid, thereby stymying the transition to renewable energy. Diana Furchtgott-Roth, the Heritage Foundation's energy and climate director, suggests that the EPA should support the consumption of more natural gas, despite concerns from climatologists about the increased leakage of methane, a potent greenhouse gas[1].These environmental proposals have been met with strong criticism from Republican climate advocates. Sarah E. Hunt, president of the Joseph Rainey Center for Public Policy, and U.S. Senator John Curtis have emphasized the importance of supporting good energy and climate policy, contrasting sharply with Project 2025's stance. Benji Backer, founder of the American Conservation Coalition, has noted a growing consensus among younger Republicans that human activity causes climate change, calling Project 2025's climate policy "wrongheaded"[1].The project's approach to law enforcement is equally contentious. It suggests that the Department of Justice has become a "bloated bureaucracy" infatuated with a "radical liberal agenda" and recommends that the DOJ be thoroughly reformed and closely overseen by the White House. The plan also proposes that the director of the FBI be personally accountable to the president, and that legal settlements between the DOJ and local police departments, known as consent decrees, be curtailed[1].In addition to these reforms, Project 2025 advocates for a more aggressive stance on immigration, recommending the arrest, detention, and mass deportation of illegal immigrants, as well as the deployment of the military for domestic law enforcement. It also proposes enacting laws supported by the Christian right, such as criminalizing the sending and receiving of abortion and birth control medications, and eliminating coverage of emergency contraception[1].Despite Trump's public disavowal of Project 2025, the initiative's proposals align closely with his past policies and current campaign promises. In a social media post, Trump claimed, "I know nothing about Project 2025. I have no idea who is behind it. I disagree with some of the things they're saying and some of the things they're saying are absolutely ridiculous and abysmal." However, a line-by-line review by CBS News identified at least 270 proposals in Project 2025 that match Trump's policies[4].The project's impact on American governance could be profound. By centralizing executive power, dismantling federal agencies, and implementing a wide range of conservative policies, Project 2025 aims to reshape the very fabric of the federal government. As Kevin Roberts of the Heritage Foundation put it, "The nation is in the process of the second American Revolution, which will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be." This rhetoric underscores the project's ambition and the potential for significant political and social upheaval[4].As we move forward, it is clear that Project 2025 will remain a contentious and influential force in American politics. With Trump's second term underway, many of the project's architects and supporters have been nominated to key positions in his administration. The coming months will be crucial in determining how many of these proposals are implemented and what their long-term effects will be on the country.In the words of the National Education Association, "The American public is united: The 900+ page blueprint for another Trump presidency... would be disastrous for the nation." Whether this prediction holds true remains to be seen, but one thing is certain – Project 2025 represents a seismic shift in the political landscape, one that will have far-reaching consequences for the future of American governance[3].

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a sprawling initiative crafted by former Trump administration officials and the conservative think tank, The Heritage Foundation, it becomes clear that this is more than just a policy blueprint – it's a vision for a radical restructuring of the U.S. federal government.Project 2025 is encapsulated in a 900-page manual titled "Mandate For Leadership," which outlines a comprehensive plan to reorganize every federal agency to align with conservative principles. This project is not just about policy tweaks; it's about transforming the very fabric of American governance. The Heritage Foundation's President, Kevin Roberts, has described their role as "institutionalizing Trumpism," a notion that underscores the deep connections between this project and the former Trump administration[1][4][5].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its ambition to consolidate executive power. The initiative advocates for placing the entire executive branch under direct presidential control, eliminating the independence of agencies like the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). This centralization is rooted in a controversial interpretation of the unitary executive theory, which aims to give the president unprecedented control over the government. As Kevin Roberts put it, "all federal employees should answer to the president"[2][3].The project's impact on federal agencies is far-reaching. For instance, it proposes merging the Bureau of Economic Analysis, the Census Bureau, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics into a single entity, with a mission aligned with conservative principles. It also recommends abolishing the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which is responsible for enforcing antitrust laws. The National Labor Relations Board, crucial for protecting employees' rights to organize, would see its role significantly diminished[2].In the realm of education, Project 2025 envisions a drastic reduction in the federal government's role. It suggests closing the Department of Education and transferring control over education funding and policy to the states. Federal enforcement of civil rights in schools would be curtailed, and programs like the Individuals with Disabilities' Education Act (IDEA) would be administered by the Department of Health and Human Services. The project also advocates for the expiration of Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, which provides $18 billion in federal funds for schools in low-income areas. Instead, public funds would be available as school vouchers, even for private or religious schools[2].The environment is another area where Project 2025's proposals are particularly contentious. The initiative seeks to downsize the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), close its Office of Environmental Justice and External Civil Rights, and reverse a 2009 EPA finding that carbon dioxide emissions are harmful to human health. This would prevent the federal government from regulating greenhouse gas emissions. The project also supports the expansion of fossil fuel use, including Arctic drilling, and advocates for preventing states from adopting stricter regulations on vehicular emissions. Diana Furchtgott-Roth, Heritage Foundation's energy and climate director, has suggested that the EPA should support the consumption of more natural gas, despite concerns about methane leaks[2].Project 2025's stance on climate change is starkly at odds with the views of many Republicans, including younger conservatives who acknowledge human activity's role in climate change. Benji Backer, founder of the American Conservation Coalition, has called the project's climate policies "wrongheaded," highlighting a growing consensus among younger Republicans that climate action is essential[2].The project's approach to law enforcement is equally transformative. It views the DOJ as a "bloated bureaucracy" that has "forfeited the trust" of the American people, particularly due to its role in investigating alleged Trump-Russia collusion. The DOJ's Civil Rights Division would be reformed to combat what the project terms "affirmative discrimination" or "anti-white racism," and would prosecute state and local governments, institutions of higher education, and private employers with diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs. This shift aligns with the views of former Trump DOJ official Gene Hamilton, who argues that advancing certain segments of society comes at the expense of others and violates federal law[2].In the media and communications sector, Project 2025 proposes significant changes. It suggests defunding the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which funds PBS and NPR, and revoking NPR stations' noncommercial status. This could force NPR to relocate from its current FM dial range, making way for religious programming. The project also advocates for more media consolidation and proposes legislation to prevent social media companies from removing "core political viewpoints" from their platforms[2].The implications of these proposals are profound. If implemented, they would fundamentally alter the balance of power within the federal government, potentially undermining the system of checks and balances that is a cornerstone of American democracy. As the American Progress article notes, Project 2025 "would destroy the U.S. system of checks and balances and create an imperial presidency"[3].Despite Trump's public disavowal of Project 2025, the alignment between his policies and the project's proposals is striking. CBS News analysis has identified over 270 proposals in the project's blueprint that match Trump's past policies and current campaign promises. Paul Dans, the former director of Project 2025, has praised Trump's actions as "home runs" that reflect the initiative's efforts and the readiness of the conservative movement[4][5].As we look ahead, the fate of Project 2025 will likely be decided in the coming months and years. With its comprehensive and far-reaching proposals, this initiative represents a critical juncture in American governance. Whether it succeeds in reshaping the federal government or is met with significant resistance will depend on the political landscape and the will of the American people.In the words of Kevin Roberts, "the nation is in the process of the second American Revolution, which will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be." This statement encapsulates the project's ambition and the stakes involved. As we navigate this complex and contentious terrain, it is clear that Project 2025 is not just a policy initiative – it is a battle for the future of American democracy.

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a sweeping initiative crafted by the Heritage Foundation, I am struck by the sheer breadth and ambition of its proposals. This project, unveiled in April 2023, is more than just a policy guide; it is a comprehensive blueprint for a radical overhaul of American governance, economic policies, and social structures.At its core, Project 2025 is the brainchild of over 400 scholars and policy experts from the conservative movement. It is led by figures such as Paul Dans, former chief of staff at the Office of Personnel Management, and Spencer Chretien, a former special assistant to President Trump. The project's advisory board includes more than 100 conservative groups, lending it significant weight within Republican circles[2][4].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its vision for the federal government's executive branch. The project advocates for a unitary executive theory, which centralizes greater control over the government in the White House. This means eliminating the independence of key agencies like the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). As Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts puts it, "The notion of independent federal agencies or federal employees who don't answer to the president violates the very foundation of our democratic republic"[1].This centralization of power extends to the Department of State, where Project 2025 proposes dismissing all leadership employees by January 20, 2025, and replacing them with "acting" roles that do not require Senate confirmation. Kiron Skinner, who authored the State Department chapter, believes most current employees are too left-wing and should be replaced by those more loyal to a conservative president[1].The project's economic and social policy proposals are equally far-reaching. It calls for significant tax cuts, though its authors are divided on the issue of protectionism. Medicare and Medicaid would face substantial cuts, and the government would be urged to explicitly reject abortion as healthcare. The plan also seeks to eliminate coverage of emergency contraception and to use the Comstock Act to prosecute those who send and receive contraceptives and abortion pills. Additionally, it proposes criminalizing pornography and removing legal protections against discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity[1].Environmental and climate policies are another critical area of focus. Project 2025 recommends repealing the Inflation Reduction Act, which allocated $370 billion for clean technology, and closing key offices at the Department of Energy focused on climate change mitigation. The plan supports Arctic drilling, blocks the expansion of the national electrical grid, and stymies the transition to renewable energy. Mandy Gunasekara, a contributor to the project, acknowledges climate change but considers it politicized and overstated. The report even suggests reversing a 2009 EPA finding that carbon dioxide emissions are harmful to human health, thereby preventing the federal government from regulating greenhouse gas emissions[1].The project's stance on climate change has been met with criticism from within the Republican party itself. Republican climate advocates like Sarah E. Hunt and John Curtis have expressed disagreement with Project 2025's climate policies, emphasizing the importance of supporting good energy and climate policy. Benji Backer of the American Conservation Coalition noted a growing consensus among younger Republicans that human activity causes climate change, calling the project "wrongheaded"[1].In the realm of science policy, Project 2025 prioritizes fundamental research over deployment, arguing that many current Department of Energy programs act as subsidies to the private sector. It proposes eliminating offices focused on energy technology development and climate change programs. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) would be subject to closer oversight by political appointees, and its research activities would require clear congressional authorization. The report also suggests capping indirect research costs for universities and directing more R&D funding towards small businesses[5].The implications of these proposals are profound. By centralizing executive power and dismantling independent agencies, Project 2025 challenges the traditional checks and balances of American governance. The elimination of key environmental and climate regulations could have long-term consequences for public health and the environment. The project's stance on social issues, such as abortion and LGBTQ+ rights, could lead to significant legal and social battles.As we look ahead, it is clear that Project 2025 will be a pivotal document in the upcoming political landscape. With its detailed blueprint for the first 180 days of a new Republican administration, it sets the stage for a potentially transformative period in American politics. Whether these proposals will be implemented in full remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: Project 2025 represents a bold and contentious vision for the future of American governance.As the country approaches the next presidential term, the debate over Project 2025's policies will only intensify. The project's authors and supporters see it as a necessary corrective to what they perceive as a bloated and inefficient federal government. Critics, however, view it as a dangerous erosion of democratic norms and a retreat from critical social and environmental responsibilities.Whatever the outcome, Project 2025 has already sparked a critical national conversation about the role of government, the balance of power, and the future of American society. As we navigate these uncharted waters, it is imperative to engage with the project's proposals thoughtfully, considering both their stated goals and the potential consequences of their implementation. The future of American governance hangs in the balance, and the choices made now will shape the country for generations to come.

Benji Backer, author of ‘The Conservative Environmentalist' and founder of the American Conservation Coalition, joins Robbie to talk about his middle ground political approach to environmentalism - a mantra Blood Origins itself is deeply familiar with. Benji and Robbie have been trying to connect on a podcast for some time, first through Blood Origins' podcast producer Cody McLaughlin and then a second time through a common connection of Toby Lavigne. The two discuss Benji's bird hunting hobby, his big game ambitions, growing up with vegans, what it means to be a conservative environmentalist, and much more. It's a strong narrative discussion between two individuals that passionately believe in a middle ground to pushing a narrative of sustainability forward Do you have a questions we can answer? Send it via DM on IG or through email at info@bloodorigins.com Support our Conservation Club Members! Legacy Land Management: https://definemylegacy.com/  Rowesborg: https://www.instagram.com/rowesborg/  McGhee Insurance: https://www.mcgheeinsurance.com/  See more from Blood Origins: https://bit.ly/BloodOrigins_Subscribe Music: Migration by Ian Post (Winter Solstice), licensed through artlist.io This podcast is brought to you by Bushnell, who believes in providing the highest quality, most reliable & affordable outdoor products on the market. Your performance is their passion. https://www.bushnell.com  This podcast is also brought to you by Silencer Central, who believes in making buying a silencer simple and they handle the paperwork for you. Shop the largest silencer dealer in the world. Get started today! https://www.silencercentral.com  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

It's been a news-filled few weeks — so it's time for a roundup. On this week's episode of Shift Key, Rob and Jesse talk about what Trump's cabinet selections might mean for his climate policy and whether permitting reform could still happen. Then Rob chats with Corey Cantor, senior EV analyst at BloombergNEF, about promising Q3 sales for U.S. automakers, General Motors' turnaround, and how much the Trump administration might dent America's EV uptake. Shift Key is hosted by Robinson Meyer, the founding executive editor of Heatmap, and Jesse Jenkins, a professor of energy systems engineering at Princeton University.Mentioned: Heatmap: Trump's pick for Energy Secretary is a big league fracking executiveChris Wright's 2023 speech to the American Conservation Coalition, a GOP-aligned youth climate groupWhat we know about Trump's “whole of government” approach to energyHeatmap: Trump's OMB Pick Wants to Purge the Government of ‘Climate Fanaticism'California could replace the EV tax credit, but Tesla would be excludedEV sales hit a record high in the U.S. in Q3Jesse's midshift; Rob's upshift.--This episode of Shift Key is sponsored by …Watershed's climate data engine helps companies measure and reduce their emissions, turning the data they already have into an audit-ready carbon footprint backed by the latest climate science. Get the sustainability data you need in weeks, not months. Learn more at watershed.com.As a global leader in PV and ESS solutions, Sungrow invests heavily in research and development, constantly pushing the boundaries of solar and battery inverter technology. Discover why Sungrow is the essential component of the clean energy transition by visiting sungrowpower.com.Intersolar & Energy Storage North America is the premier U.S.-based conference and trade show focused on solar, energy storage, and EV charging infrastructure. To learn more, visit intersolar.us.Music for Shift Key is by Adam Kromelow. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

What’s Trending: Here’s what the media can learn from the windstorm. The Seattle Public Schools Superintendent might be changing his mind on closure plans. A new study found that Wendy’s has the most popular chicken nuggets in Washington. // LongForm: GUEST: Chris Barnard, President of the American Conservation Coalition says the Trump picks for Energy and Interior truly are a dream team. // Laken Riley’s murderer has been sentenced guilty on all counts. An update on the Daniel Penny case.  

With extreme weather and deadly disasters dominating headlines, the issue of climate change is a vital issue in the 2024 election. The majority of Americans believe there is human-caused climate change affecting our lives and fear for future impacts. The issue raises a range of perspectives on how to tackle the problem among the candidates running for higher office. If the majority of us are united on this issue, how do we have better discourse to find productive solutions? In this interview, Benji Backer shares his experience building consensus among conservatives and liberals to make progress on climate change.In this conversation, Benji highlights some of the bipartisan climate legislation that has passed in the United States in recent history. He talks about how the American Conservation Coalition and other partners have led the way to help lawmakers prioritize the environment and climate issues. Benji goes on to discuss where climate change ranks in importance for voters, where people can get useful information about climate politics, and he even talks about how artificial intelligence anxiety is supplanting climate change as a political issue. Benji Backer is President and Founder of the American Conservation Coalition, the largest right-of-center environmental organization in the country. He has been awarded the Fortune 40 Under 40, Forbes 30 Under 30, GreenBiz 30 Under 30, and Grist 50 for his work with the ACC. He serves as a Board member for the Wisconsin Conservative Energy Forum and Mainstream Republicans of Washington. A frequent contributor to multiple national media outlets, Benji is one of the leading youth environmental voices in the country.

Chris Barnard, the president of the American Conservation Coalition, wrote our Pro-Child Politics chapter on "The Environment." Listen to his insights on why "conserving" the environment actually protects human flourishing, while the more new fangled idea of "preserving" the environment leads to more death and destruction. See more from Chris and the ACC at: https://acc.eco/ and https://x.com/ChrisBarnardDL

Many have led us to believe that there are only two approaches to climate change: doomerism or denial. In his new book, “The Conservative Environmentalist: Common Sense Solutions for a Sustainable Future,” Benji Backer offers a fresh approach needed to ensure a sustainable future, and particularly one that works for America. Newt's guest is Benji Backer. He is the President and Founder of the American Conservation Coalition, the largest right-of-center environmental organization in the country.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

(***TIMESTAMPS in description below) ~ Benji Backer is a conservative climate activist (yes, you read that right). Benji is the president and founder of the American Conservation Coalition, a bi-partisan environmental policy lobbying organization. BUY BENJI'S NEW BOOK:  https://www.amazon.com/Conservative-Environmentalist-Common-Solutions-Sustainable-ebook/dp/B0CJ24CZW8  EPISODE LINKS - Julian Dorey PODCAST MERCH: https://juliandorey.myshopify.com/  - Support our Show on PATREON: https://www.patreon.com/JulianDorey   - BUY Guest's Books & Films IN MY AMAZON STORE: https://amzn.to/3RPu952   BENJI LINKS - INSTAGRAM: https://www.instagram.com/benjibacker/?hl=en  - WEBSITE: https://acc.eco/  LEAP BRANDS LINKS - WEBSITE: https://leapbrands.io/  - INSTAGRAM: ​​https://www.instagram.com/leapbrands/  FOLLOW JULIAN DOREY INSTAGRAM (Podcast): https://www.instagram.com/juliandoreypodcast/   INSTAGRAM (Personal): https://www.instagram.com/julianddorey/  X: https://twitter.com/julianddorey JULIAN YT CHANNELS - SUBSCRIBE to Julian Dorey Clips YT: https://www.youtube.com/@juliandoreyclips   - SUBSCRIBE to Julian Dorey Daily YT: https://www.youtube.com/@JulianDoreyDaily   - SUBSCRIBE to Best of JDP: https://www.youtube.com/@bestofJDP   Get $150 Off The Eight Sleep Pod Pro Mattress / Mattress Cover (USING CODE: “JULIANDOREY”): https://eight-sleep.ioym.net/trendifier ***TIMESTAMPS*** 0:00 - Benji working w/ Jared Kushner on Climate; Benji's very confused childhood 6:24 - Benji gets into Republican politics as a kid & then gets into climate somehow 10:19 - Al Gore's “An Inconvenient Truth”; Apocalyptic Cults; Celebrity hypocrisy & Virtue signalling 18:39 - Greta & AOC; Benji's organization & how it started 22:19 - Science of Climate Change; Wisconsin Winter Disasters 27:47 - The biggest Climate Change Threat Nobody talks about 31:37 - Climate Scientists, Politics, & The Industrial Revolution History; Fossil Fuels right now 38:06 - What does Carbon Footprint “mean?”; What's really happening w/ Glaciers & water levels 50:43 - NYC, Boston, & Miami Underwater?; How to RAISE Cities off water 1:00:53 - “Clean Coal” (lmao); Trump & Socioeconomic impact on coal miners; Nuclear Energy 1:06:56 - Bill Gates new Nuclear Project; Why Nuclear Energy is Climate Friendly 1:18:12 - Govs vs Corps; Blackrock 1:26:37 - Political pendulum extremism 1:28:41 - Greta Thunberg; Climate Distractions for Gov Actions 1:38:29 - Coastal vs. Rural Political Divide; Hating on farmers who feed us 1:43:39 - Julian's NYC Businesswoman Story; 1 Party System 1:49:59 - Politics' greatest crime; Phones & the divide; Technology evolving faster than humans 2:00:02 - Rural Americans' interaction w/ nature 2:03:13 - China, India & Russia don't care 2:08:58 - Regulations vs Free Market w/ Climate 2:15:15 - Benji's Jared Kushner Meeting 2:20:12 - Overpopulation vs Underpopulation 2:25:25 - AOC's Extinction Lady Prank Funny Video 2:32:33 - Why Alex Epstein is Wrong about fossil fuels 2:37:02 - The danger of Benji playing both sides; Slave to $$$ 2:42:51 - The Green New Deal 2:49:57 - California's new 2035 Electric Vehicle Law 2:55:16 - Benji's Next Project CREDITS: - Host, Producer, and Editor: Julian Dorey - In-Studio Producer: Alessi Allaman - https://www.instagram.com/allaman.docyou/ Julian Dorey Podcast Episode 225 - Benji Backer Music by Artlist.io

At the RNC Wisconsin - Dan Shafer, Journalist at The Recombobulation Area https://www.therecombobulationarea.news/ - Dough Pagitt, Executive Director of Vote Common Good https://www.votecommongood.com/doug-pagitt/ - Brian Martinez, Eastern Regional Director of American Conservation Coalition https://acc.eco/people/brianmartinez/ Tim Hogan, Executive Editor heartlandsignal.com

Rod Arquette Show Daily Rundown – Friday, July 12, 20244:20 pm: James Phillips, Constitutional Government Initiative Director at BYU's Wheatley Institute joins Rod for a conversation about his piece in the Deseret News about the danger of relying on the Supreme Court to solve problems in America.4:38 pm: Fox News columnist Liz Peek joins Rod to give us her reaction to Joe Biden's performance in yesterday's “big boy” press conference.5:05 pm: Fox News contributor Jason Chaffetz joins the program to give us his reaction to Joe Biden's press conference, as well as discuss his piece on efforts by some Democrats to replace Biden as the party's presidential nominee.6:05 pm: Steven Hayward of Powerline joins the program for a conversation about his piece in which he calls the media lazy and degenerate, all stemming from their coverage, or lack thereof, of the Biden administration.6:20 pm: Mary Thomas, Executive Director of the Hispanic Vote Coalition joins the program to discuss the importance of Hispanic voters in the 2024 election.6:38 pm: We'll listen back to Rod's conversations this week with James Varney of Real Clear Investigations, who spoke with Rod and Greg Hughes about educators working to suppress news about sex-assault cases in American schools, and (at 6:50 pm) with Chris Barnard of the American Conservation Coalition about why he says natural gas is a winner for the climate and economy in America.

Rod Arquette Show Daily Rundown – Monday, July 8, 20244:20 pm: Kirsten Fleming, Features Columnist at the New York Post, joins Rod to discuss her recent piece about how many Democrats are now hopping on the Kamala Harris bandwagon, and why she says Harris is a terrible candidate.4:38 pm: Ashley McCully, a contributor to PJ Media, joins the show for a conversation about her recent piece about how voters seemingly ignore the qualifications of vice-presidential candidates during election seasons.6:05 pm: Robert McGreevy, a reporter with the Daily Caller joins the program for a conversation about how Donald Trump is distancing himself from the Heritage Foundation's Project 2025.6:20 pm: Jared Whitley, a principal for Whitley Political Media joins the show for a conversation about his piece in the Ogden Standard Examiner about how Big Pharma is encouraging Mexican nationals to cross the border and sell their blood plasma.6:38 pm: Chris Barnard, President of the American Conservation Coalition, joins Rod to discuss his piece for the Washington Examiner about how natural gas is a winner for the climate, economy and security in America.

What's Trending: the deputy mayor of Kenmore ripped into Jay Inslee for calling out the cancellation of a low-barrier homeless housing project, the officer who hit pedestrian Jaahnavi Kandula has been officially cleared in court, and mayor Bruce Harrell wants the Supersonics to come back to Seattle to conceal the real problems in the city.  // Longform: Chris Barnard of the American Conservation Coalition gives his thoughts on the hasty rollout of electric vehicles and other climate topics. // Quick Hit: Seattle business owners speak out against recent rash of property crimes.

With so much division, misinformation, and fear-mongering on environmental issues, Americans have found it difficult to weather the contemporary political ecosystem. So what policy solutions are there that can make our natural and political environment sustainable? Stephen Perkins, former VP of Grassroots Strategy at the American Conservation Coalition (now Chief Operating Officer as of this episode's release), shares how bipartisan ideas can focus on the real issues facing our environment and unite people from different ideologies on a greener and more sustainable planet.Learn more about the ACC at acc.eco!Instagram: @acc_nationalX: @acc_nationalSupport the showNEW! Visit georgewashingtoninstitute.org for the one-stop shop of all things Friends & Fellow Citizens and George Washington Institute!JOIN as a Patreon supporter and receive a FREE Friends & Fellow Citizens mug at the $10 membership level or higher!SUBSCRIBE to our e-mail list for the latest news and updates from Friends & Fellow Citizens!NOTE: All views expressed by the host are presented in his personal capacity and do not officially represent the views of any affiliated organizations. All guests on interview episodes are solely those of the interviewees and may or may not reflect the views of the host or Friends & Fellow Citizens.

Join us for a conversation on politics and the environment. Learn how organizations like the American Conservation Coalition are providing a platform for young people around the conservative environmental movement. Our guest, Danielle Butcher Franz, takes us on a journey through the organization's unique approach to climate advocacy and provides insights into how you can become a part of this vital movement.Danielle Butcher Franz serves as CEO of the American Conservation Coalition, where she has played an instrumental role in the organization's vision and strategy. As a founding member of ACC, Danielle has dedicated her career to building bridges between traditional conservative values and environmental advocacy. Danielle's leadership has been recognized by some of the most prestigious organizations in the country. She has been named a Forbes 30 Under 30, a MavPac Future 40, and a Clean Energy News Network 40 Under 40 lister. As an international speaker and frequent guest on national radio and television, Danielle brings her dynamic perspective on culture, conservatism, and environmental policy to audiences around the world. Her writing has been featured in publications including Fox News, The Times, National Review, and Washington Examiner.

*This episode first aired in April 2021 and Chris's title mentioned in the show has changed since.Climate change and environmental protection haven't always been as politicized as they are today. And, unfortunately, in being so, progress on these fronts gets hindered. Chris Barnard is helping to change that. He's the VP of External Affairs of The American Conservation Coalition, a group founded by political conservatives working to transform the narrative of denialism in order to get more voices to the table. We talk about how these issues shouldn't be political, how you can find allies across the political spectrum, and which solutions may satisfy all.HighlightsHow have conservatives, at least stereotypically, come to be labeled as anti-environment or even anti-science?What does Chris think is missing from the current environmental conversation?What kind of work has his organization done to bridge the political divide on climate change and other environmental matters?What YOU Can DoDecide to be pro-environment over pro-X political party.Have healthy discussions with others who may not necessarily share your political views. As long as your end goal is the same regarding protecting the environment, discussion and compromise can move us so much further, together.Have an open mind to solutions you may have disregarded before.Educate yourself. Chris, for example, recommends resources such as the Market Environmentalism Academy.ResourcesAmerican Conservation Coalition websiteACC InstagramACC TwitterACC FacebookWant a free guide to help you become a force for nature? Get it HERE!If you enjoyed this episode, be sure to subscribe, rate, and review it! This helps to boost its visibility. Hit me up on Instagram and Facebook and let me know what actions you have been taking. Adopting just one habit can be a game-changer because imagine if a billion people also adopted that! What difference for the world are you going to make today?

American Conservation Coalition's Danielle Butcher Franz says it's more productive that conservatives are now talking about climate solutions versus debating the problem.

Season seven of the "EcoRight Speaks" is now off and running and we're excited to welcome American Conservation Coalition CEO Danielle Butcher Franz. Danielle is a founding member of ACC, which just celebrated its sixth anniversary and is one of our favorite partners on the EcoRight. Danielle joins host Chelsea Henderson to talk about how ACC is working to change the narrative that's long been dominated by the 'left.' She talks about engaging young conservatives on the environment, building bridges between traditional conservative values and environmental advocacy along with much more. Find out more about ACC online at: https://www.acc.eco

Christopher Barnard (American Conservation Coalition) points out that the wildfire smoke (and fire) from Canada is unrelated to climate change.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

History of Republican EnvironmentalismThe history of Republican environmentalism spans decades. On January 1, 1970, just a few months before the very first Earth Day, President Nixon signed the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) into law. NEPA created a program to review and require government agencies to take into consideration the environmental impacts and consequences of their actions or projects. After the first Earth Day celebration on April 22, 1970, President Nixon signed into law a slew of new environmental programs and agencies, including the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Endangered Species Act. President Ford continued this trend by championing the Safe Drinking Water Act in 1974, designating national parks like Isle Royal, and coordinating with several other countries to protect and expand the Endangered Species Act. All of these environmental policies and actions were passed under Republican administrations. There are many examples of Republican environmentalism throughout America's history, from the initial establishment of national parks under President Theodore Roosevelt to passing amendments to the Clean Air Act under President George H.W. Bush. It is important to recognize this history in order to find common ground across partisan lines when moving to pass climate legislation. This is why many young conservative climate activists believe in a path towards bipartisan climate action.  The American Conservation CoalitionThe American Conservation Coalition (ACC) works to mobilize young people around climate solutions in ways that align with conservative values ––  market-based mechanisms and a limited-government approach –– without attributing partisan labels to their work. The ACC's current climate solution goals include energy innovation, 21st century infrastructure, nature based climate solutions, and a global approach to fighting climate change. In addition to a broad set of goals for a bipartisan approach to climate solutions, the ACC encourages young people to get involved in their local communities to enact climate solutions and lessen climate denial. For example, in the Midwest, the human-wildlife conflict and agriculture are likely more relevant than rising sea levels and wildfires, so ACC advocates for a local focus on those issues rather than the broader spectrum of climate issues that may not have the same local immediacy. ACC and others also promote  bipartisan climate action through events held at college campuses, talking to conservative members of state and local governments, and urgently making clear that climate change must be on the political agenda. Climate change does not discriminate based on political ideologies, and action will benefit from participation  by everyone, from all walks of life and political backgrounds, coming together to find innovative, sustainable and equitable climate solutions. Further reading:American Conservation CoalitionBipartisan Path to Address Climate ChangeYoung Republican Climate MovementAdler, The Conservative Record on Environmental Policy, The New AtlantisYoung Conservatives for Carbon DividendsBruggers, Bucking GOP Elders, Some Young Republicans Embrace a Slower, Gentler Brand of Climate Activism, DeSmogRepublicans for Environmental Protection

Rod Arquette Show Daily Rundown – Wednesday, May 10, 20234:20 pm: Auguste Meyrat, Senior Editor of “The Everyman” blog and a contributor to The Federalist, joins Rod to discuss his recent piece about a federal judge's decision that has forced a Pennsylvania middle school to host an After School Satan Club.4:38 pm: Jane Robbins, attorney and retired senior fellow for the American Principles Project, joins the show to discuss he recent piece in The Federalist about the left's push toward social and legal approval of pedophilia.6:05 pm: Citizen Greg Hughes takes time out of his vacation to join Rod to discuss the political news of the day.6:38 pm: Christopher Barnard, Vice President of External Affairs at the American Conservation Coalition, joins the show to discuss how regulations are getting in the way of expanding the use of nuclear energy in America.

Climate Crisis & Christian Discipleship with Kyle Meyaard-SchaapJoin us as we explore one man's journey from skeptic to environmental advocate through the lens of his faith. But just as he begins to offer solutions, a looming threat interrupts, leaving him and the audience with a question: will the church wake up and stand up to protect God's creation?My special guest is Kyle Meyaard-SchaapIntroducing Kyle Meyaard-Schaap, a devoted advocate for Christian climate action and environmental care. Rev. Kyle Meyaard-Schaap (MY-yurd SKOP) serves as the Vice President of the Evangelical Environmental Network. For the last ten years, he has educated and mobilized Christians around the world to address the climate crisis as an act of discipleship and neighbor-love.Kyle has been named to Midwest Energy Group's 40 Under 40, the American Conservation Coalition's 30 Under 30, and the Grist 50 Fixers cohorts for his work on climate change education and advocacy. In 2020, he was named a Yale Public Voices on the Climate Crisis Fellow. His work has been featured in national and international news outlets such as PBS, NPR, CNN, NBC News, New York Times, Reuters, and U.S. News and World Report. His book, Following Jesus in a Warming World: A Christian Call to Climate Action, was released by InterVarsity Press in February 2023.Kyle is married to Allison and lives in Grand Rapids, Michigan with their two sons.Visit his website at kylemeyaardschaap.com.Follow him on Twitter: @kmeyaardschaap.Caring for creation is a fundamental part of every human being's vocation because that's how God made us. - Kyle MeyaardSchaapIn this episode, you will be able to:Grasp Christian obligations towards environmental stewardship and climate action.Find out the significance of incorporating native plants in the battle against climate change.Expose the hidden causes driving climate change skepticism in political and religious spheres.Discover the potential of generational dialogue in forging Christian action against climate change.Engage in a hopeful pursuit of creative solutions and resolute action for a sustainable future.The resources mentioned in this episode are:Read Kyle's book, Following Jesus in a Warming World: A Christian Call to Climate Action.Promo code: AWORLD23 Listeners can get 30 percent off the ebook and physical book (free shipping) at ivpress.com through 5/19Find unique ways to care for creation and protect the environment, based on your own vocation and interests.Implement practices that bring joy and enhance your experience of creation.Participate in events and initiatives that promote environmental care and protection, such as Indie Creation Fest.Support organizations like the Evangelical Environmental Network that are working towards climate change educationand advocacy.Make sustainable choices in your daily life, such as using reusable bags and water bottles, reducing meat consumption,and conserving energy.Advocate for policies and actions that prioritize the environment and address climate change.Worship as Awe and WonderWorship can be far more than a formalized gathering or ritual. It can be experienced as a profound sense of awe and wonder ineveryday life, especially when we open our hearts and minds to the beauty and intricate connections of the natural world.Immersing ourselves in...

For decades, we've been told that only top-down mandates from the government can organize people to protect the environment, but in many cases, the federal government actually does more harm than good. Matt Kibbe talks with Chris Barnard of the American Conservation Coalition about the ways in which free-market innovation is a superior form of environmental protection. Not only do innovators and entrepreneurs — despite being held back by bureaucratic red tape and anti-nuclear bias — have the tools to produce better and cleaner technology, but free markets also create the conditions in which ordinary people can afford to care about the environment in the first place. It's hard to get people to care about a potential environmental catastrophe in the future if they are struggling to put food on the table today. Building a strong economy and achieving energy independence are two of the best ways to practice responsible ecology.

The Monologue: Amazon workers from Kentucky join Seattle protest. The Interview: Jason Mercier (Washington Policy Center) says we'll likely get an initiative to overturn the ridiculous Supreme Court decision on the capital gains tax.The Monologue: City of Seattle has increased parking fares. The Interview: Andrea Suarez (We Heart Seattle Founder) responds to the new report on the rise of homelessness in WA and she says we're getting an influx of folks from out of state.LongForm: Benji Backer (president of the American Conservation Coalition) responds to Joe Biden promising to help Democrats tear down four hydropower dams in Washington.Quick Hit: Hertz and Lyft are simply incompetentSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The United States has pledged to reduce its reliance on fossil fuels, but Russia's war in Ukraine set off a bonanza for liquefied natural gas, or LNG. Today, we look at how energy companies and the Biden administration are backsliding on promises to move away from oil and gas.   In response to Europe's need for natural gas as it lost access to Russian supplies, America's largest exporter of liquefied natural gas, Cheniere Energy, is expanding its facilities in Corpus Christi, Texas. Reporter Elizabeth Shogren talks with local residents who are organizing to fight the expansion and discovers that many LNG contracts are not with Europe after all.   During the 2020 presidential campaign, Joe Biden promised to end drilling for oil and gas on federal land and offshore waters. And on his first day in office, he froze new drilling leases. But the administration backtracked and instead has increased the number of leases it's offering to oil and gas companies. Host Al Letson gets a report card on Biden's climate policy from two experts who are tracking his environmental record. For many years, prominent Republicans disputed the existence of climate change and fought against environmental policies. That didn't sit well with a young conservative college student, who in 2016 tried to put climate change on his party's agenda. Reveal reporter Jonathan Jones talks with the founder of the American Conservation Coalition and tracks how successful the group has been in getting Republican legislators to address climate change.  Republicans and Democrats may struggle to find common ground on addressing climate change. But for a tiny, predominantly Indigenous community in Alaska, it's already too late. Reporter Emily Schwing went to Chevak to report on the damage from a recent storm and soon discovered a problem with the federal government's response. Many residents don't speak English as their first language, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency is required to translate disaster relief notices into local languages. But FEMA bungled the translations, delaying much-needed aid and sowing distrust.  Support Reveal's journalism at Revealnews.org/donatenow Subscribe to our weekly newsletter to get the scoop on new episodes at Revealnews.org/weekly Connect with us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram 

We planned an episode this week about carbon removal policy in the next Congress. At the time of recording we still don't know which party will control either chamber. Since it looks most likely that the GOP will win at least the House of Representatives, we focused this episode on the prospect for bipartisan CDR policy opportunities. While Joe Biden and the Democrats retain control of the White House, they likely can't pass legislation without Republican votes like they've been able to do for the last two years. All legislation, including the annual budget, must be agreed upon by both parties. The U.S. invested a lot in CDR during the last congress… -Some of that the Democrats passed alone, like increases to the 45Q tax credit included in the Inflation Reduction Act, -but some were done on a bipartisan basis, like the direct investments in CDR found in the Infrastructure bill and CHIPS Act. What can we expect from Federal Government in the next two years? Will divided government bring more or less support for CDR? We have two special guest panelists here to discuss this with us today, Savita Bowman, a Program Manager at Clearpath, and Karly Matthews, the Communications Director at the American Conservation Coalition. Chris Barnard is away at COP27 this week and Radhika Moolgavkar is away. This episode was guest hosted by CRN producer Asa Kamer. On This Episode Savita Bowman Karly Matthews Resources Clearpath American Conservation Coalition Increases to the 45Q tax credit CDR in the Infrastructure bill and CHIPS Act CREST ACT Bipartisan Biochar Bill Growing Climate Solutions Act stalls US Climate Targets Achievable if Congress Flips Connect with Nori Nori Nori's Twitter Join Nori's Discord to hang out with other fans of the podcast and Nori Nori's other podcast Reversing Climate Change Nori's CDR meme twitter account --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/carbonremovalnewsroom/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/carbonremovalnewsroom/support

Progressives generally support regulations that protect the environment. But the permitting process has become so complex that it can take five years and 500 pages of documentation to get a project off the ground. And that red tape is holding up the clean energy projects we need to reverse climate change. Chris Barnard is Policy Director at the American Conservation Coalition and a regular guest on our sister podcast, Carbon Removal Newsroom. On this episode of Reversing Climate Change, Chris joins Ross, Siobhan, and Asa to explain how regulations can prevent us from building climate infrastructure and explore the potential for bipartisan collaboration on permitting reform. Chris discusses how permitting interacts with issues of eminent domain and describes what community engagement looks like in the permitting process. Listen in for Chris's insight on the regulatory barriers to realizing carbon removal at scale and learn how we might streamline the permitting process without weakening environmental standards. Connect with Nori Purchase Nori Carbon Removals Nori's website Nori on Twitter Join Nori's Discord to hang out with other fans of the podcast and Nori Check out our other podcast, Carbon Removal Newsroom Carbon Removal Memes on Twitter Carbon Removal Memes on Instagram Resources American Conservation Coalition Carbon Removal Newsroom Parachute on RCC S3EP27 Inflation Reduction Act Senator Manchin's Permitting Reform Bill National Environmental Policy Act The California Environmental Quality Act' Bootleggers and Baptists Hot Coffee Bureau of Land Management ‘The Top Five Legal Barriers to Carbon Capture and Sequestration in Texas' in Forbes Overton Window Lil Nas X's ‘I Will Avenge U Mr. Van Gogh' Meme --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/reversingclimatechange/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/reversingclimatechange/support

As we work to bring more Republican members of Congress to the table on climate solutions, enrolling more conservative constituents will be key in our advocacy efforts. For guidance on outreach to conservatives on the climate issue, we turn this month to Stephen Perkins and Quill Robinson from the American Conservation Coalition, a nonprofit dedicated to mobilizing young people around environmental action through common-sense, market-based, and limited-government ideals. Stephen is ACC's Vice President of Grassroots Strategy. Before joining ACC, he was a partner in a conservative digital marketing agency. Quill is Vice President of Government Affairs, developing ACC's policy priorities and leading advocacy efforts on Capitol Hill. He has been published in The Hill and The Washington Examiner. Skip ahead to the following section(s): (0:00) Intro & Agenda (1:31) Quill & Stephen's Presentation (15:48) Q&A Discussion (27:59) October Actions & Updates October's Pre-Call video: https://vimeo.com/758113393 The Climate Commitment: https://www.theclimatecommitment.com/ American Conservation Coalition: https://www.acc.eco/ Quill & Stephen's Presentation Slides: https://www.canva.com/design/DAFG-vj88AI/T5uEJemxS9_80Tki06wbRw/view?utm_content=DAFG-vj88AI&utm_campaign=designshare&utm_medium=link&utm_source=viewer CCL Hosts Bipartisan Debate in Utah: https://vimeo.com/758090509 October Action Sheet: https://cclusa.org/actionsheet

The Monologue: Seattle business owners are having to deal with more criminal activity The Interview: Mark Mix (president of the National Right to Work Foundation) on the big labor wins and losses ahead of Labor Day.      The Monologue: Jobs report is out. It's alright.The Interview: Quil Robinson (Vice President of Government Affairs at the American Conservation Coalition) analyzes the huge mess in CA with EV realities LongForm: Vince Cavalerri (WA-01 candidate) reacts to Biden's divisive speech.The Quick Hit: Army recruitment is lagging and possible solutions. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Since gaining the right to vote, 18-21 year olds have never turned out at the same rates as older citizens. Is it a matter of apathy? Access? Or both? In July, Senator Elizabeth Warren along with Representative Nikema Williams filed a bill called the “Youth Voting Rights Act,” in an effort to expand youth access to voting.  The bill would allow 16 and 17-year-olds to pre-register to vote so that they're ready to vote on their 18th birthday, expand voter registration access at public universities and colleges, and require institutions of higher learning to have on-campus polling places. Recently youth voter turnout has actually increased.  In 2018's midterms, we saw historic voter turnout rates among people aged 18-29, and in the 2020 Presidential elections, about half of 18 to 29 year olds voted, an 11% increase from 2016.   We know that in 2020 Gen Z made up 10% of eligible voters in the U.S, and that they are more ethnically and racially diverse than previous generations. They're also on target to be the most educated generation yet. But as we approach the 2022 midterms, what do Gen Z and other young voters want? And how do they assess the state of our politics and democracy? We hear from young callers about what issues are motivating them in the 2022 elections. Then, we hear from 19-year-old Anya Dillard, activist and founder of The Next Gen Come Up, and 23-year-old Benji Backer, founder and president at American Conservation Coalition about how they see the state of voting and the health of our democracy.   

Today's guest is Benji Backer, Founder and President of the American Conservation Coalition (ACC). ACC is focused on building grassroots environmental movement amongst the right-of-center space for climate action, with 150 chapters across the country. Benji is a passionate environmentalist and out to change the minds of people who think conservative and climate change advocate don't belong in the same sentence. In today's episode, we cover: An overview of the American Conservation Coalition and the work they doBenji's background and his passion for the environmentHis transition from conservative activist to climate activist How he reconciles his passions and conservative viewpointsThe two-party system and its shortcomings Increasing polarization in the US Who controls the narrative in Washington vs. who gets bills passedThe Build Back Better Bill The Republican party's shift away from conservation in the early 2000sIssues with the climate narrative leaving people outBenji's views on how to balance self-interest and taking action on climate solutionsThe role of government in addressing the climate crisis Consumer behavior changes The intersection between of climate change and environmental justice in cities and rural communities Benji's key priorities over the next 12-24 months ACC's Climate Commitment plan Who he wants to hear fromEnjoy the show!You can find me on Twitter @jjacobs22 (me), @mcjpod (podcast) or @mcjcollective (company). You can reach us via email at info@mcjcollective.com, where we encourage you to share your feedback on episodes and suggestions for future topics or guests.Episode recorded July 15, 2022.

This week we conclude our series of interviews from the meeting of the American Conservation Coalition, a right-of-center environmental organization and talk to someone you may have never heard of but should – Rep. Bruce Westerman of Arkansas. Westerman used to be the Majority Leader of the Arkansas House and moved up to Washington by winning […]

Host Chelsea Henderson wraps up season four with a 'best of' show featuring interview clips from some of our favorite guests this season (January-June, 2022). Don't miss this season's final episode as you'll hear from previous guests like Congresswoman Nancy Mace, Ambassador Sam Brownback, climate scientist and rock star Dr. Katharine Hayhoe, former EPA administrator William K. Reilly, American Conservation Coalition's Quill Robinson and Indiana Conservative Alliance for Energy's Kacey Crane plus many more.And don't worry, Chelsea will be back with season five starting in mid-late July. Thanks to our #EcoRight community for listening and supporting us!

This week we come to you from the meeting of the American Conservation Coalition, a right-of-center environmental organization and talk to New Hampshire Governor Chris Sununu. Sununu is currently running for his fourth 2-year term as the Executive of the Granite State and we touch on a variety of issues roiling the news cycle: abortion, […]

Nick Loris, of ConservAmerica and the American Conservation Coalition, joined Ernie Brown to talk about the shock you might feel when you get your latest energy bill. Energy is in high demand and prices are going up. What can be done? Who's to blame? See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Monologue: 'Drag your kids to Pride' event in Dallas where children take to the stage to dance with drag queens in thongs sparks fury - but organizers claim the family-friendly show promotes diversity. The Interview: Benji Backer, President of American Conservation Coalition, discusses the first-ever ACC Summit featuring Rantz as the emcee. The Interview: Justin was at home in Woodinville with his 7- and 9-year-old girls when he thought he heard his wife get home downstairs. It turns out it was a burglar. LongForm: Naomi Wolf on her new book, The Bodies of Others: The New Authoritarians, Covid-19 and the War Against the Human.  The Quick Hit: Pike Place construction is frustrating business owners.  The Last Rantz: Wokeness is starting to backfire.  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Monologue: Cassie Sauer is sounding the COVID alarm. The Interview: Quill Robinson (Vice President of Government Affairs at the American Conservation Coalition) analyzes the wholly inadequate Biden plan on energy. The Interview: Jessica Milan Patterson (CA GOP Chairwoman) previews today's big races in CA -- and why they matter nationally. LongForm: Curtis Houck (Newsbusters) previews tomorrow's political theater/Jan 6 commission hearing and explains the faux-controversy at the Washington Post over Dave Weigel's joke RT that landed him a one-month suspension.  The Quick Hit: Seattle CM Teresa Mosqueda politicizes sexual assault victims to stop sweeps.  The Last Rantz: Don't let the left own the environmentalist label. They care less about the environment than they do destroying capitalism.  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Monologue: 'Drag your kids to Pride' event in Dallas where children take to the stage to dance with drag queens in thongs sparks fury - but organizers claim the family-friendly show promotes diversity. The Interview: Benji Backer, President of American Conservation Coalition, discusses the first-ever ACC Summit featuring Rantz as the emcee. The Interview: Justin was at home in Woodinville with his 7- and 9-year-old girls when he thought he heard his wife get home downstairs. It turns out it was a burglar. LongForm: Naomi Wolf on her new book, The Bodies of Others: The New Authoritarians, Covid-19 and the War Against the Human.  The Quick Hit: Pike Place construction is frustrating business owners.  The Last Rantz: Wokeness is starting to backfire.  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Stephen Perkins is the VP of Grassroots Strategy at the American Conservation Coalition. If you've been listening to this podcast for a while you know that we've changed the way we approach our discussions around the environment, and climate change. There may actually be something wrong with removing carbon from the ground and putting in the atmosphere. However, this does not mean that the government has the solutions. In fact, it's a problem that Capitalism and we as individuals can solve without destroying our economy. ACC.eco https://twitter.com/acc_national https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHMAqe31btplatpjt_kGTmA The American Conservation Coalition (ACC) is a 501(c)(4) nonprofit organization dedicated to mobilizing young people around environmental action through common-sense, market-based, and limited-government ideals. ACC was founded in June 2017 by a group of Millennials who saw an ideological gap in the environmental movement preventing necessary bipartisan action. ACC believes economic and environmental success go hand-in-hand, and that everyone should feel empowered to take a seat at the table in discussions concerning conservation, clean energy, sportsmen's rights, agriculture, climate, and much more. ACC seeks to activate young people that are tired of partisan inaction on the grassroots, state, and federal levels -- bringing forth prosperous action on environmental issues that impact us all.  Join the private discord & chat during the show! joingml.com Need someone to talk to? Betterhelp.com/gml Subscribe on Youtube http://www.youtube.com/goodmorningliberty Interested in learning how to Day Trade? Mastermytrades.com Like our intro song? https://www.3pillmorning.com Advertise on our podcast! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The Monologue: Fewer free COVID testing options for the uninsured as BA.2 variant spreads in Washington. //The Interview: Benji Backer (president of American Conservation Coalition) was shocked when he learned Oklahoma cuts carbon emissions at a faster rate than Washington. // The Monologue: Three all-electric buses begin south Seattle service.  //The Interview: Mark Lamb is the lawyer representing the parents group suing Kirkland over the homeless hotel.  // LongForm: Dori Monson and Rantz detail the problem with judges who go easy on criminals.//The Quick Hit: CNN has awful ratings, SHOCKER. //The Last Rantz: If people around you don't support you, your work, or goals… stop expecting them to  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

What's Trending: Pasco women could be facing charges after lying in a viral post about child luring, a hiker was rescued after being stranded in the wilderness for two days with a broken leg, Benji Backer, the president & founder of American Conservation Coalition, testified in front of Congress today about climate change, and Tacoma passes a resolution on cease-fire. Corey Lewandowski talks and talks, and talks without saying anything, Jason Rantz goes on ‘Outnumbered' on FOX.  Silicon Valley actor and Verizon spokesperson says swinging saved his marriage, See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.