Podcasts about despite trump

In this wide-ranging episode, the host celebrates Hollywood's unexpected return to form, spotlighting the massive success of F1: The Movie. With no woke messaging, no forced diversity quotas, and a classic story of redemption and self-determination, Brad Pitt's latest hit proves audiences still crave straightforward, inspiring entertainment. The film has already grossed nearly $300 million worldwide and boasts a rare 97% audience rating, confirming that Hollywood's decline is self-inflicted—and reversible when politics are left at the door. But the optimism stops there. The host pivots to the “big, beautiful bill” passed under Trump—an eye-watering spending package that includes crucial immigration enforcement but explodes the deficit to historic highs. Despite Trump's team promising that 3% growth will pay the bill, the episode argues that this is a razor's-edge bet that could backfire spectacularly. With a bond market already wobbling and most new jobs government-funded, the risk to the dollar and the economy is enormous. This episode is both a celebration of cultural sanity—a film that simply entertains—and a sobering look at fiscal brinkmanship in Washington that could define America's future.

Houston, long seen as the beating heart of the U.S. oil industry, is now grappling with a commercial real estate crisis. Office vacancies have surged to nearly 28%, driven by massive energy sector consolidation and changing workplace dynamics. Despite Trump's calls to ramp up drilling, oil companies are becoming leaner, shedding jobs—and office space—in the process. This script explores how a wave of corporate mergers, surging insurance costs, outdated buildings, and Houston's sprawling development model are leaving once-prized office towers empty. Investors, take note: Houston's energy-fueled boom may be shifting to a more space-efficient era. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Despite Trump’s assertions, the state of play between Israel and Iran remains unclear. We’re joined by Arash Azizi, Tara Kangarlou and Tom Nichols to consider the possible consequences of the past 12 days.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This Day in Legal History: Military Selective Service ActOn June 24, 1948, President Harry S. Truman signed the Military Selective Service Act into law, establishing a peacetime draft system in the United States. The legislation came amid rising tensions with the Soviet Union, as the early Cold War stoked fears about the need for a ready and scalable military force. This marked the first time the United States instituted a draft during peacetime, following the expiration of the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, which had been enacted during World War II. The new law required all male U.S. citizens and male immigrants between the ages of 18 and 25 to register with the Selective Service System.The Act granted the president authority to induct men into military service, with deferments available for education, occupation, or family hardship, though these often resulted in significant disparities in who actually served. Implementation began swiftly, with the first draft lottery since World War II conducted in 1948. This system remained in effect throughout the Korean War and into the Vietnam era, evolving with amendments but continuing to shape the composition of the U.S. armed forces.The 1948 Act also laid the groundwork for future national service debates, setting precedents for conscientious objector status and administrative appeals. Critics of the draft pointed to inequities and civil liberties concerns, while proponents argued it was essential for national defense and preparedness. Although the draft was suspended in 1973, the Selective Service System persists today, requiring registration for all male citizens and immigrants, preserving the infrastructure in case of future need. The 1948 legislation signified a turning point in American military policy, marking a transition from a wartime to a sustained peacetime defense posture.The Supreme Court on Monday sided with the Trump administration, allowing it to resume deporting migrants to third countries without first giving them a chance to explain potential harm they could face there. This decision lifts a lower court injunction requiring due process protections like notice and a hearing before such removals, a move that drew a forceful dissent from the Court's liberal justices. Justice Sonia Sotomayor called the action a “gross abuse” of power, criticizing the Court for enabling potentially dangerous deportations while legal challenges are ongoing.The underlying policy targets migrants—often with criminal records—whose home countries won't accept them back, prompting the administration to seek deportations to other nations. A class action lawsuit challenged the policy, arguing that such deportations without procedural safeguards likely violate the Constitution's due process clause. Judge Brian Murphy had previously blocked removals to places like South Sudan, citing risks including armed conflict and political instability.Despite Murphy's order, the administration continued efforts to deport individuals to countries such as South Sudan and El Salvador, allegedly in defiance of judicial rulings. The administration maintains the policy is lawful and necessary to manage migrant removals. Immigrant advocates say the Court's decision endangers vulnerable individuals and weakens judicial oversight. The ruling reflects ongoing legal tensions surrounding Trump immigration strategies, many of which have now returned to the courts since his return to office.Supreme Court lifts limits on Trump deporting migrants to countries not their own | ReutersFederal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell is set to begin congressional testimony this week amid political pressure from President Trump to cut interest rates. However, a recent Supreme Court ruling makes clear that Powell, and other Fed governors, cannot be removed over policy disagreements. This means Trump is unlikely to replace Powell before his term as chair ends in May 2026, and he may only get to appoint one additional Fed board member during his current term.Some in Trump's circle have floated the idea of naming a successor now to act as a “shadow” chair, but experts warn that would confuse markets and undermine both the nominee's credibility and the Fed's stability. The Fed's governance structure—with long, staggered terms and a mix of governors and independent regional bank presidents—limits any one president's influence.Despite Trump's calls for immediate rate cuts, Fed officials remain cautious, waiting for more clarity on the economic impact of tariffs and global instability, such as rising tensions with Iran. Interest rate decisions this year have been unanimous, including from Trump-appointed governors. With only two upcoming vacancies, the makeup of the Fed is largely locked in, reinforcing the central bank's independence even in a volatile political climate.Powell is staying at the Fed, with Trump appointments possibly limited | ReutersA federal judge has blocked President Trump's attempt to bar international students from studying at Harvard University, issuing a preliminary injunction that halts the administration's latest move in its ongoing campaign against the Ivy League institution. U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs ruled that the administration's actions likely violated Harvard's First Amendment rights by retaliating against the school for resisting demands to alter its admissions and curriculum practices.Trump had issued a proclamation citing national security concerns, suspending entry of foreign nationals to study at Harvard for six months and directing Secretary of State Marco Rubio to consider revoking current student visas. Judge Burroughs rejected these justifications, stating the government's effort appeared driven by opposition to Harvard's perceived liberal stance, and warned it posed a threat to core democratic freedoms.This ruling extends an earlier order blocking similar measures and comes as Harvard fights back through two separate lawsuits—one to protect $2.5 billion in frozen funding, and another to safeguard its ability to host international students. Nearly 6,800 foreign students attend Harvard, representing about 27% of the student body. Homeland Security had previously attempted to strip the university's certification to enroll foreign students, also without presenting substantive evidence.Accusations from the administration included claims of antisemitism and ties to China, which Harvard disputes. The court's decision allows Harvard to continue welcoming international students while litigation continues, underscoring judicial resistance to executive overreach into higher education autonomy.US judge blocks Trump plan to close Harvard's doors to international students | ReutersIn my column for Bloomberg this week, I argue that the Tackling Predatory Litigation Funding Act, which proposes a 41% tax on litigation finance profits, is more about political optics than sound policy. While the bill claims to combat foreign influence and protect American businesses, it fails on both fronts. It doesn't differentiate between foreign and domestic investors and ignores how economic costs are actually distributed—those costs won't be eaten by funders but passed down to plaintiffs and, ultimately, to defendants via higher settlements. This is basic economics, not a national security fix.We've seen this before with contingent-fee arrangements, where higher costs didn't dampen litigation but merely increased settlement demands. The proposed tax would similarly inflate litigation costs without reducing the flow of capital into the system. It won't stop litigation or foreign investment—it'll just make lawsuits more expensive for everyone involved, including the very corporations the bill purports to protect.The real issue, if one believes foreign interference is a genuine threat, is disclosure—not taxation. Congress could require transparency in litigation finance arrangements instead of disguising a foreign policy concern as a tax policy. By pitching a punitive tax as a protective measure, lawmakers are undermining both tax integrity and judicial credibility. This bill won't fix the problem it pretends to solve; it just sends a message that certain markets are politically disfavored and fair game for symbolic taxation.Litigation Funding Tax Proposal Solves Nothing Besides Optics This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

CE Immigration Raids on Farms Will Resume Despite Trump's Take on Ag Labor

Despite Trump‘s campaign promises and despite DOGE‘s so-called reputation of cutting government waste, the new administration is spending money faster than the supposed spendthrift Biden administration. This is Machiavellianism at its best.Original article: https://mises.org/mises-wire/trump-doge-and-machiavellians

Despite Trump‘s campaign promises and despite DOGE‘s so-called reputation of cutting government waste, the new administration is spending money faster than the supposed spendthrift Biden administration. This is Machiavellianism at its best.Original article: https://mises.org/mises-wire/trump-doge-and-machiavellians

As climate change increasingly burdens Milwaukee's aging housing stock, the city's Environmental Collaboration Office, or ECO, is working to connect homeowners with energy-saving resources and build new net-zero housing.

As climate change increasingly burdens Milwaukee's aging housing stock, the city's Environmental Collaboration Office, or ECO, is working to connect homeowners with energy-saving resources and build new net-zero housing.

In this explosive double segment, Tara explores two political firestorms reshaping the 2026 landscape. First, she breaks down a bombshell poll showing South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham in serious trouble ahead of the GOP primary. Despite Trump's endorsement, Graham is polling at just 43%, with challenger Mark Lynch gaining steam and 28% of voters still undecided. Campaign strategist Noel Fritsch joins to discuss why Graham's own base is turning on him—and how Lynch's outsider status and $5M war chest could signal a historic upset. Then, Tara exposes shocking revelations about who's really been running the Biden White House. Drawing from Jake Tapper's new book and firsthand reporting, she unpacks claims that unelected aides—not Senate-confirmed officials—have made sweeping economic decisions behind closed doors. From "crackhead economics" to Elon Musk's disillusionment with the GOP's spending spree, Tara connects the dots between broken promises, bloated bills, and why voters across the spectrum may stay home in protest. Two parties. One fed-up nation. The 2026 reckoning may be closer than we think.

Why the FBI Remains Broken Despite Trump, Patel & Bongino Steve Friend returns to expose how the National Strategy for Countering Domestic Terrorism became the federal government's playbook for targeting ordinary Americans. Nick Giordano and Friend break down the disturbing lack of reform inside the FBI, even with President Trump, Kash Patel, and Dan Bongino now in charge. Has the unelected bureaucracy grown more powerful than the presidency? They revisit the post-9/11 surveillance state, connect it to today's abuses, and reveal how trading liberty for the illusion of safety has placed the Republic in danger. Episode Highlights: How the National Strategy weaponized the FBI against parents, Catholics, and political dissenters Why real FBI reform has stalled despite new leadership under Trump, Kash Patel, and Dan Bongino The connection between post-9/11 security expansions and today's domestic surveillance state  

At the beginning of April, US President Donald Trump made the announcement of his much-threatened 25% tariffs on Canadian imports.Later in April, the rest of the world felt the brunt of Trump's desire for tariffs, with the EU and Ireland being hit with a 20% tariff on imports to the US.Despite Trump's dialing back for the sake of negotiations, is it time now to forge new relationships and for Ireland and Canada businesses to join forces in a more meaningful way?Joining Kieran in Toronto to discuss is Gemma Healy Murphy, Partner, Litigation & Dispute Resolution Lawyer at McMillan LLP in Toronto and Craig Sowman, Partner and Co-Head of Restructuring & Insolvency at Addleshaw Goddard Ireland.

BUY CAST BREW COFFEE TO SUPPORT THE SHOW - https://castbrew.com/ Become A Member And Protect Our Work at http://www.timcast.com Host: Tim Pool @Timcast (everywhere) Guest: Ryan Girdusky @RyanGirdusky (X) My Second Channel - https://www.youtube.com/timcastnews Podcast Channel - https://www.youtube.com/TimcastIRL

Tariffs taking off. Shelves emptying. Recession clouds forming. President Trump's trade war could turn your finances upside down with the stroke of a pen. Will manufacturing return to American soil? Can your portfolio survive 60% tariffs on Chinese imports? Is retailing facing a retail-iation? We're dissecting the market madness on this week's podcast. It's information you can't afford to miss. So grab your favorite beverage, tune in, and prepare for insights. It could save your savings. For all the latest financial strategies during these turbulent times, subscribe to the Money Talks News newsletter and YouTube channel today. Your wallet will thank you! And to stay ahead of the curve, subscribe to the Money Talks News newsletter and YouTube channel now. Your future self will thank you! Make new friends! Join the MTN Facebook Retirement Group Click to watch: Title with URL link insert Add "Money Talks News: The Podcast" to your favorite player! MTN | Youtube MTN | Apple Podcasts MTN | Spotify Love growing your wealth? You'll enjoy these courses. Take our course The Only Retirement Guide You'll Ever Need Take our course Money Made Simple Become a member: https://www.moneytalksnews.com/members/See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In the first 100 days of his second term, President Trump issued more than 100 executive orders aimed at changing policy through executive authority alone. But has this flurry of orders led to meaningful change? Despite Trump's sweeping executive actions — ranging from imposing global tariffs and targeting major law firms to declaring an emergency at the southern border and attempting to end birthright citizenship — judges appointed from both parties are pushing back. Already, 46 challenges to executive orders are pending in court, with no clear victories for the administration in any of them. Listen to a recording of a conversation with our experts as they discuss what these three months have made clear about this administration's priorities, how the courts are responding, and what might lie ahead.Speakers: Elizabeth Goitein, Senior Director of the Brennan Center's Liberty and National Security ProgramMichael Waldman, President and CEO of the Brennan CenterMax Boot, Jeane J. Kirkpatrick Senior Fellow for National Security Studies, Council on Foreign RelationsAndrew Rudalevige, Thomas Brackett Reed Professor of Government at Bowdoin CollegeAnd moderator Kareem Crayton, the Brennan Center's Vice President for Washington DCIf you enjoy this program, please give us a boost by liking, subscribing, and sharing with your friends. If you're listening on Apple Podcasts, please give us a 5-star rating. Recorded on April 30, 2025.Keep up with the Brennan Center's work by subscribing to our weekly newsletter, The Briefing: https://brennancenter.org/briefing

Despite Trump vowing to cut government spending, hiring Elon Musk and taking chainsaw to federal agencies, your taxpayer dollars are flying out the door faster than ever. Trump's administration has spent about $220 billion more in his first 100 days compared to the same time period last year. According to a CBS analysis, Trump's government is now spending more, day to day, than was spent in nine of the last 10 years. We will look at the details with presidential historian and political analyst John Rothmann.Eco-journalist Belinda Waymouth returns with another attempt to save the world. Join us for, “It's the Planet, Stupid!”The Mark Thompson Show 4/30/25Patreon subscribers are the backbone of the show! If you'd like to help, here's our Patreon Link:https://www.patreon.com/themarkthompsonshowMaybe you're more into PayPal.  https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=PVBS3R7KJXV24And you'll find everything on our website: https://www.themarkthompsonshow.com

Day 1,162.Today, as Russian troops intensify offensive operations in several oblasts – Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson – we talk about the latest conversations amongst the coalition of the willing, where the tone is decidedly pessimistic. Then we do a deeper dive into the latest positions of China, Turkey, and Syria in relation to the war. Contributors:Adélie Pojzman-Pontay (Narrative Podcast Producer) @Adeliepjz on X.Francis Dearnley (Executive Editor for Audio). @FrancisDearnley on X.Sophia Yan (Senior Foreign Correspondent). @sophia_yan on X.Content Referenced:SIGN UP TO THE NEW ‘UKRAINE: THE LATEST' WEEKLY NEWSLETTER:https://secure.telegraph.co.uk/customer/secure/newsletter/ukraine/ Each week, Dom Nicholls and Francis Dearnley answer your questions, provide recommended reading, and give exclusive analysis and behind-the-scenes insights – plus maps of the frontlines and diagrams of weapons to complement our daily reporting.It's free for everyone, including non-subscribers.Sophia Yan's Podcasts on China - https://www.telegraph.co.uk/how-to-become-a-dictator-podcast/Europe ‘would struggle to put 25,000 troops on the ground in Ukraine' (The Times):https://www.thetimes.com/uk/defence/article/europe-uk-peacekeeping-troops-ukraine-6tp2cfgg5 Europe fears Trump preparing to walk away from Ukraine talks (Financial Times):https://www.ft.com/content/2f7af030-7466-4c10-9c7c-a7ceaa03a70a Russia intensifies offensive operations in 3 regions, pushes toward Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, Ukraine's military says (Kyiv Independent):https://kyivindependent.com/russia-intensifies-offensive-operations-in-3-regions-pushes-toward-dnipropetrovsk-oblast-ukraines-military-says/?mc_cid=063ac27037&mc_eid=08d0680a95 Putin Renames Volgograd Airport ‘Stalingrad' to Honor WWII Battle (Moscow Times):https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2025/04/30/putin-renames-volgograd-airport-stalingrad-to-honor-wwii-battle-a88920 ‘Do you want to show strength here?': Russia's ads recruiting Chinese mercenaries (The Guardian):https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/apr/10/russia-social-media-ads-videos-recruiting-china-mercenaries Video About Chinese Soldiers Fighting for Russia:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=syKWPralGKQ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Don't say we weren't warned. Project 2025, the 2022 Heritage Foundation's 900-page policy blueprint, unambiguously plotted out the strategy of the second Trump administration. As Atlantic staff writer David A. Graham makes clear in his refreshingly brief The Project, the Heritage Foundation document is an verbose summary of Trump 2.0's ambition to reshape government by strengthening executive power, promote traditional family structures, eliminate climate regulations, attack DEI initiatives, restructure the civil service and (gasp) outlaw pornography. Graham sees this project as both radical in its methods yet traditional in its values, produced by isolationists intent on resurrecting their fantasy of small town America. Five Point Takeaway* Project 2025 was created by former Trump administration officials under the Heritage Foundation to provide a comprehensive policy agenda and staffing strategy for a second Republican presidency.* Despite Trump publicly distancing himself from the project during his campaign, many of its policies are now being implemented, particularly through executive orders and civil service reforms.* The project emphasizes traditional Christian values, binary gender definitions, nuclear families, and aims to use government power to promote these views through various policies and incentives.* On climate, the project seeks to eliminate climate research, end climate-related regulations, and promote fossil fuel extraction, prioritizing economic growth over environmental concerns.* Graham believes Democrats could learn from the project's systematic, forward-thinking approach rather than remaining reactive, as Republicans are reshaping government in ways that may be difficult to reverse.Keen On America is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit keenon.substack.com/subscribe

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, it becomes clear that this initiative is not just another policy blueprint, but a comprehensive and ambitious plan to reshape the very fabric of the U.S. federal government. Conceived by a coalition of conservative scholars, policy experts, and former Trump administration officials, Project 2025 aims to consolidate executive power and implement a slew of radical reforms that could have far-reaching implications for American governance.At its core, Project 2025 is driven by four key pillars designed to create an effective conservative administration. This involves a significant overhaul of the federal civil service system, where merit-based hiring would be replaced by appointments based on loyalty to the administration. This shift is particularly evident in the proposed takeover of key government agencies such as the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Department of Commerce (DOC), and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC)[5].Imagine a scenario where the DOJ, an institution meant to uphold the law impartially, is transformed into a partisan tool. This is exactly what Project 2025 envisions, with the DOJ being tasked to prosecute "anti-white racism" instead of protecting against discrimination across all groups. This proposal is not just a policy change; it represents a fundamental shift in how justice is perceived and administered in the United States.The project also targets other federal agencies for dismantling or significant restructuring. For instance, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Department of Education (ED) are slated for abolition, reflecting a broader disdain for the current bureaucratic structure. The National Institutes of Health (NIH), a cornerstone of medical research, would see its independence curtailed, with specific proposals to defund stem cell research. These changes are not merely administrative; they signify a profound reorientation of national priorities[5].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its economic agenda. The plan advocates for reducing environmental regulations to favor fossil fuels, a move that would likely exacerbate climate change and undermine decades of environmental protection efforts. Additionally, it proposes a flat income tax for individuals and significant tax cuts for corporations, which critics argue would widen the income gap and burden lower-income Americans. Medicare and Medicaid, critical safety nets for millions, would face cuts, further straining the healthcare system[5].The social and cultural implications of Project 2025 are equally profound. The initiative seeks to criminalize pornography and remove legal protections against anti-LGBT discrimination, rolling back hard-won rights for marginalized communities. Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs would be ended, reflecting a broader rejection of progressive social policies. The plan even goes so far as to propose laws supported by the Christian right, including the criminalization of sending and receiving abortion and birth control medications, and eliminating coverage of emergency contraception[5].Immigration policy is another area where Project 2025's vision is starkly different from current practices. The plan recommends the arrest, detention, and mass deportation of illegal immigrants, and even suggests deploying the U.S. Armed Forces for domestic law enforcement. This approach not only raises serious constitutional concerns but also underscores a harsh and punitive stance on immigration[5].The architects of Project 2025 are not mere theorists; many have direct ties to Donald Trump's administration and campaign. Several key contributors worked in Trump's first administration or his 2024 election campaign, and the project's goals align closely with Trump's *Agenda 47* program. Despite Trump's later attempts to distance himself from the plan, his second administration has already begun implementing many of its proposals. Just four days into his second term, nearly two-thirds of Trump's executive actions mirrored or partially mirrored Project 2025's recommendations[5].As I reflect on the scope and ambition of Project 2025, it becomes clear that this is not just a policy initiative but a vision for a fundamentally different America. The project's proponents see it as a necessary corrective to what they perceive as a bloated, inefficient, and overly liberal federal government. However, critics warn that these changes could have devastating consequences for workers, the environment, and marginalized communities.Looking ahead, the implementation of Project 2025 will likely be marked by intense political battles and legal challenges. As the country navigates these changes, it will be crucial to monitor how these policies affect real people and communities. The next few years will be a critical period, as the full impact of Project 2025 becomes clearer and the nation grapples with the implications of such profound governance reforms.In the end, Project 2025 is a testament to the enduring power of ideological vision in shaping public policy. Whether one views it as a necessary revolution or a dangerous overreach, it is undeniable that this initiative has the potential to reshape the very foundations of American governance. As we move forward, it is essential to engage in a nuanced and informed discussion about the future we want to build and the values we wish to uphold.

AP correspondent Julie Walker reports a toll on Manhattan drivers remains in effect, despite Trump's Easter Sunday deadline.

Dan Rasmussen returns to talk about how to invest during this global paradigm shift. Rasmussen shares how the post-2008 investment environment has shifted, with international markets now outperforming, volatility spiking, and the dollar weakening. He critiques the AI investment narrative, challenges in AI profitability, the misalignment between AI hype and real-world economic value, and the implications of rising geopolitical and market uncertainty.  We discuss... Dan Rasmussen runs the hedge fund Verdad, focusing on microcap value, credit, and market-neutral strategies. His new book, The Humble Investor, compiles insights from a decade of writing research notes. How the post-2008 market was defined by low volatility, strong U.S. equity performance, and growth stock dominance. In 2025, international markets have started outperforming U.S. equities, signaling a potential regime shift. As AI skepticism grows, tech giants have seen declining returns due to increased capital intensity. The profitability of AI investments remains unclear, with few killer applications and unsustainable infrastructure costs. Chipmakers like Nvidia require enormous customer spending just to justify current valuations. The long-term viability of AI, citing high operational costs and uncertain end-user benefits. Rising market volatility, potentially driven by politics and the dollar, is pushing investors toward safer, lower-volatility assets. Despite years of underperformance, international investing may be entering a comeback phase. Google is testing a shift from a pay-per-click to a pay-per-lead ad model in select zip codes. ChatGPT is becoming a preferred tool for research due to speed, accuracy, and reduced noise compared to Google. The uncertainty around AI profitability makes current tech valuations speculative and potentially risky. Potential large-scale layoffs in government and academia could ripple through the broader economy. Shifting public-sector workers to private-sector roles is uncertain and may not offset job losses. Despite Trump's influence, AI is seen as a more dominant force for markets than political shifts. Japan is highlighted as a promising international market due to undervalued stocks with fortress balance sheets. Gold has become a favored allocation, with some portfolios holding as much as 35% due to recent strong performance. Today's Panelists: Megan Gorman | The Wealth Intersection Douglas Heagren | Pro College Planners Kirk Chisholm | Innovative Wealth Follow on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/moneytreepodcast Follow LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/money-tree-investing-podcast Follow on Twitter/X: https://x.com/MTIPodcast For more information, visit the show notes at https://moneytreepodcast.com/global-paradigm-shift-dan-rasmussen-704

14 Apr 2025. Al Ansari Exchange is expanding — we speak to CEO Rashid Al Ansari about their $200 million deal in Bahrain. Despite Trump’s partial U-turn on tariffs, bond yields are still climbing — NYU Abu Dhabi’s Barthelemy Bonadio explains why. Plus, market strategist Jessica Amir joins us to analyse Trump’s decision to spare smartphones and computers in the latest round of trade war tactics.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

If your head has been spinning since Donald Trump walked into the White House Rose Garden  and declared “Liberation Day” last Wednesday, we don't blame you. And not just because it was nauseating watching the stock market or your 401(k) crash down, but because it wasn't clear what exactly we were looking at.  As our guest today, economic historian and Free Press columnist Niall Ferguson, wrote in our pages last week:  "Depending on your worldview, you probably think Trump's tariff blitz is one of two things. Either a committed protectionist is trying to Make America Great Again by killing “globalism,” ending “forever wars,” and bringing manufacturing jobs back to the United States. Let's call this Project Minecraft. Alternatively, an unhinged demagogue is crashing both the world economy and the liberal international order, mainly to the advantage of authoritarian regimes…But here is what is actually happening: The American empire that came into existence after the failed autarky and isolationism of the 1930s is being broken up after 80 years. Despite Trump's imperial impulses—wanting to annex Greenland, calling for Canada to become the 51st state—he is engaged right now in a kind of wild decolonization project." Whether or not you agree with Niall's conclusion, there's no question that the real story here is not about the particular tariff rate for Cambodia or Taiwan; rather, it's fundamentally about reordering America's place in the world.  Over the past decade, there's been an intense debate over what role America should play on the world stage, in geopolitics, in trade, and in technology. Trump has made a very clear set of decisions on that question. And that's the case whether or not most Americans understand the consequences. So what are the consequences when the U.S. acts unilaterally to upend the global trading system? What is the outcome when the U.S. weaponizes its own economic power? What happens when the world order, as we know it, is upended? Will these actions embolden our adversaries, or weaken them? Will this ultimately make us poorer, or better off? Has the American empire reached its end? And, was this inevitable or self-inflicted?  One note: While Bari and Niall were recording this conversation, Trump announced a 90-day pause on the reciprocal tariffs. Notably, there's no pause on the tariffs for China. In fact, it went up to 125 percent. But the point remains. And the face-off between America and China has only heated up. What does that mean? Is the twenty-first century destined to be ours, or China's? All these questions and more with Free Press columnist Niall Ferguson. If you liked what you heard from Honestly, the best way to support us is to go to TheFP.com and become a Free Press subscriber today. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

AP correspondent Josh Funk reports that egg prices remain surprisingly high, and it's drawing attention from regulators.

AP correspondent Haya Panjwani reports on a new record in egg prices.

Professor Jane Kirtley of the Silha Center for the Study of Media Ethics and Law joins Adam and Jordana.

Putin is ramping up attacks on Ukraine, defying Trump as a Putin insider gives OutFront exclusive insight into Putin's game. Plus, new reporting on Trump's legal strategy as he takes on federal judges.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Jason and Matt sit down with independent journalist and commentator James Li, known for his sharp analysis and objective take on current events. James has built a dedicated following by cutting through political narratives and exposing the bipartisan corruption that keeps the establishment in power. His work focuses on media manipulation, government overreach, and the illusions that keep people trapped in the left-right paradigm. We kick things off with the Epstein files—the long-promised, yet still-unreleased bombshell that MAGA diehards swore would bring down the establishment. Despite Trump's years in office and continued influence, the files remain buried. Why is that? Who benefits from keeping them hidden? And why do so many still believe the myth that their political savior will one day deliver "justice"? From there, we shift focus to Trump's own ties to Epstein, dissecting the reality behind their relationship and how the duopoly blinds its followers to the crimes of their own side. While the left obsesses over Trump's scandals, the right conveniently ignores the ones that implicate their own idols. Then, we get into Trump's latest campaign of censorship—an effort supposedly aimed at "stopping antisemitism" but one that will undoubtedly be weaponized against the very people currently cheering it on. The same crowd that once decried cancel culture and government control over speech is now applauding the expansion of the censorship regime. We break down how this strategy plays directly into the hands of the establishment. James leaves us on a high note, answering our white pill question on how people can break free from the mental control of the duopoly and reclaim their ability to think critically. Join us for an enlightening conversation that delves into the intersection of politics, media, and freedom, as we explore the challenges and opportunities facing independent thinkers in today's complex information landscape. If you're tired of the partisan nonsense and ready for an honest, unfiltered look at what's really going on, this episode is for you. (Length: 1:03:11) Follow James on X: https://mobile.x.com/5149jamesli Follow James on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/5149jamesli Follow James on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@5149jamesli Follow James on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@5149JamesLi Follow James' Work on Breaking Points: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTjb7ZxT5zm41wz7arT2Z8to_S_VI2VP0

GUEST: Anders Puck Nielsen - YouTuber and military analyst. Today I'm speaking with Anders Puck Nielsen, military analyst and influential YouTuber based in Denmark. He specialises in naval warfare and strategy; in today's video we are going to be talking about the Ukrainian withdrawal from Kursk, the state of NATO and repetition of Kremlin narratives coming from the White House and Trump's inner circle. ----------LINKS:https://www.youtube.com/@anderspuck https://twitter.com/anderspuckhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/anderspucknielsen/https://apnielsen.info/en/frontpage/----------SUPPORT THE CHANNEL:https://www.buymeacoffee.com/siliconcurtainhttps://www.patreon.com/siliconcurtain----------TRUSTED CHARITIES ON THE GROUND:Save Ukrainehttps://www.saveukraineua.org/Superhumans - Hospital for war traumashttps://superhumans.com/en/UNBROKEN - Treatment. Prosthesis. Rehabilitation for Ukrainians in Ukrainehttps://unbroken.org.ua/Come Back Alivehttps://savelife.in.ua/en/Chefs For Ukraine - World Central Kitchenhttps://wck.org/relief/activation-chefs-for-ukraineUNITED24 - An initiative of President Zelenskyyhttps://u24.gov.ua/Serhiy Prytula Charity Foundationhttps://prytulafoundation.orgNGO “Herojam Slava”https://heroiamslava.org/kharpp - Reconstruction project supporting communities in Kharkiv and Przemyślhttps://kharpp.com/NOR DOG Animal Rescuehttps://www.nor-dog.org/home/----------PLATFORMS:Twitter: https://twitter.com/CurtainSiliconInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/siliconcurtain/Podcast: https://open.spotify.com/show/4thRZj6NO7y93zG11JMtqmLinkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/finkjonathan/Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/siliconcurtain----------Welcome to the Silicon Curtain podcast. Please like and subscribe if you like the content we produce. It will really help to increase the popularity of our content in YouTube's algorithm. Our material is now being made available on popular podcasting platforms as well, such as Spotify and Apple Podcasts.

At a recent Crain's event, Illinois university leaders showed a united front as President Donald Trump's threats to crack down on higher education loom. Crain's education reporter Brandon Dupré discusses with Amy Guth.Plus: Sterling Bay moving Fulton Market HQ; in remarks to teachers union, Gov. Pritzker lashes out at Trump's education cuts; according to census data, the Chicago metro area and Cook County are growing again; plans for Lakeview hotel focused on LGBTQ+ community move forward.

Despite Trump administration officials touting their moves to boost oil and gas, the head of one of America's largest utilities said renewable projects remain more attractive because of a shortage of natural gas turbines. POLITICO Energy Editor Matt Daily breaks down the somewhat contradictory messages coming out of CERAWeek, if there's anything Trump can do to solve this problem and what this means for America's energy outlook. Plus, former Nuclear Regulatory Commission Chair Chris Hanson emphasized the importance of the agency's independence following a recent executive order from President Donald Trump. Nirmal Mulaikal is the co-host and producer of POLITICO Energy.  Annie Rees is the managing producer for audio at POLITICO. Gloria Gonzalez is the deputy energy editor for POLITICO.  Matt Daily is the energy editor for POLITICO. For more news on energy and the environment, subscribe to Power Switch, our free evening newsletter: https://www.politico.com/power-switch And for even deeper coverage and analysis, read our Morning Energy newsletter by subscribing to POLITICO Pro: https://subscriber.politicopro.com/newsletter-archive/morning-energy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

US President Trump signed amendments to the Canada & Mexico tariffs; however, this failed to lift risk sentimentFed's Waller says he does not see the case for a March cut and the median view of two 2025 cuts "remains reasonable"; Bostic said they need to be patientUS futures attempted to recover off the Wall St. pressure but failed to make much ground into Payrolls, European futures point to a weak openDXY pressured and below 104.00, EUR above 1.08; ECB officials see an April showdown on whether to cut or not with the odds reportedly growingBunds attempt to nurse some downside but remain sub-129.00, USTs firmed with yields softer across the curveLooking ahead, highlights include UK Halifax House Prices, German Industrial Orders, French Trade Balance, EZ Employment (Final), US NFP, Canadian Jobs, Chinese Trade Balance, White House Crypto Summit, Speakers including Fed's Powell, Bostic, Bowman, Williams, Kugler & ECB's LagardeRead the full report covering Equities, Forex, Fixed Income, Commodites and more on Newsquawk

MRKT Matrix - Friday, February 28th S&P 500 trades higher Friday following a brief intraday sell-off on Trump-Zelenskyy spat (CNBC) Zelenskyy leaves White House after Ukraine talks collapse (CNBC) Trump's Tariff Onslaught Is Coming Faster Than His Team Can Carry It Out (WSJ) Fed's Favored Inflation Gauge Rises at Mild Pace, Spending Falls (Bloomberg) Analysts Making Larger Cuts Than Average to EPS Estimates for S&P 500 Companies for Q1 (FactSet) Bitcoin Down 25% From All-Time High as Crypto Rout Worsens (Bloomberg) Tumbling Tesla Shares Leave Investors Bracing for More Losses (Bloomberg) Here are the other stocks forming the ‘death cross' following Microsoft this week (CNBC) Google announces layoffs in its HR, cloud units as part of ongoing cost cuts (CNBC) State Street, Apollo's Private Credit ETF Raises SEC Concern (Bloomberg) --- Subscribe to our newsletter: https://riskreversalmedia.beehiiv.com/subscribe MRKT Matrix by RiskReversal Media is a daily AI powered podcast bringing you the top stories moving financial markets Story curation by RiskReversal, scripts by Perplexity Pro, voice by ElevenLabs

UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves wants to boost commerce with the US, its biggest single-country trading partner, even as President Donald Trump threatens widespread trade tariffs.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

John Maytham is joined by Steven Boykey Sidley, professor of practice at JBS, University of Johannesburg, columnist-at-large for Daily Maverick, and partner at Bridge Capital, to explore how Donald Trump’s leadership and rhetoric on climate change could impact the solar industry. Despite Trump’s dismissal of climate concerns as a “giant hoax,” solar energy is on track to dominate global energy markets.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

As we navigate the complex landscape of Donald Trump's court trials, let's dive straight into the latest developments. Just a few weeks ago, on January 10, 2025, President Trump was sentenced to an unconditional discharge in the New York case involving falsifying business records. This case, which began on April 15, 2024, saw Trump found guilty of 34 felony counts by a Manhattan jury on May 30, 2024[3].Before the sentencing, Trump had sought to halt the proceedings, arguing that preparing for a criminal sentencing while preparing to lead the country as President imposed an "intolerable, unconstitutional burden" on him. He filed an appeal to the Supreme Court, citing the justices' decision in *Trump v. United States* and arguing for presidential immunity. However, Justice Juan Merchan rejected Trump's plea, emphasizing that all that remained was the imposition of sentence and that Trump could appear virtually to alleviate his concerns[1].Despite Trump's efforts to delay the sentencing, Justice Merchan proceeded with the original schedule. Trump was ultimately sentenced to an unconditional discharge, meaning he would not face any serious punishment, but the fact of his conviction would remain on record[3].In other cases, Trump faced indictments in the Southern District of Florida and Washington, D.C. The Florida case, which charged Trump and his aides with retaining national defense information and obstruction of justice, was dismissed by Judge Aileen Cannon due to the improper appointment and funding of Special Counsel Jack Smith. The Justice Department later dismissed the appeal against Trump and his co-defendants[3].The Washington, D.C. case, which involved charges of obstructing an official proceeding and conspiracy, was also dismissed by Judge Chutkan after the Supreme Court remanded the case back to the district court[3].As of today, February 23, 2025, these developments mark significant milestones in the ongoing saga of Trump's legal battles. The unconditional discharge in the New York case and the dismissals in the Florida and D.C. cases underscore the complex and often contentious nature of these proceedings.

The White House is insisting it is Trump, not Elon Musk, overseeing efforts to upend the United States government. But, that is not what Trump and Musk have said. So, who is in charge? Plus, Trump parrots Putin, falsely claiming Ukraine started the war with Russia.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

AP Washington correspondent Sagar Meghani reports on the Trump administration's false claims about tens of millions of dead people getting Social Security checks.

As we navigate the complex landscape of Donald Trump's legal battles, a recent development has taken center stage. Just a few weeks ago, on January 10, 2025, President Trump was sentenced in the New York case to an unconditional discharge by Justice Juan Merchan. This sentencing came after a Manhattan jury found Trump guilty of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in May 2024[3].However, before the sentencing, Trump made a last-minute appeal to the Supreme Court, asking the justices to halt the criminal sentencing scheduled for January 10. In a 40-page filing, Trump argued that preparing for a criminal sentencing while preparing to lead the country as President imposed an "intolerable, unconstitutional burden" on him. He cited the Supreme Court's decision in *Trump v. United States*, arguing that the criminal proceedings in state court should be put on hold while his claims of presidential immunity are addressed[1].Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who handles emergency appeals from New York, directed prosecutors to respond to Trump's request by January 9. Despite Trump's efforts, his request was ultimately denied, and the sentencing proceeded as scheduled.The New York case revolves around Trump's reimbursement of adult film star Stormy Daniels in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election. Trump was found guilty of falsifying business records to hide these reimbursements. The judge in the case, Juan Merchan, had previously indicated that he did not intend to sentence Trump to jail time, opting instead for an unconditional discharge[1].This development marks a significant chapter in Trump's ongoing legal battles, which include cases in the Southern District of Florida, Washington, D.C., and Fulton County, Georgia. The legal landscape continues to evolve, with Trump's legal team navigating multiple fronts in his defense[3].As we reflect on these recent events, it becomes clear that the legal challenges facing President Trump are far from over. The unconditional discharge in the New York case may have brought a measure of closure to one chapter, but the broader narrative of Trump's legal trials remains very much in progress.

AP Washington correspondent Sagar Meghani reports on Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell's reassurance about bank accounts amid a Trump move to shutter a key consumer financial regulatory agency.

Here's a narrative script on the recent court trials involving Donald Trump:As we stand today, February 10, 2025, the legal landscape surrounding Donald Trump continues to unfold with unprecedented twists and turns. Just a few weeks ago, on January 8, Trump made a dramatic appeal to the Supreme Court, seeking to halt his criminal sentencing scheduled for January 10 in his New York hush money case. Trump, who was found guilty of 34 counts of falsifying business records to hide reimbursements made to adult film star Stormy Daniels, argued that preparing for sentencing while preparing to lead the country as President imposed an "intolerable, unconstitutional burden" on him[1].Trump's legal team, led by John Sauer, his intended nominee for solicitor general, urged the court to put the proceedings on hold to allow him to appeal. They cited the Supreme Court's decision in *Trump v. United States*, which they argued granted Trump presidential immunity that should be addressed before any further criminal proceedings. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who handles emergency appeals from New York, directed prosecutors to respond to Trump's request by January 9.Despite Trump's efforts, the sentencing proceeded as scheduled, with Judge Juan Merchan granting Trump an "unconditional discharge," meaning Trump would not face any serious punishment but the fact of his conviction would remain. This decision, however, may not be the final word. Trump's legal team has been pointing to the *Trump v. United States* decision, which could potentially lead to the reversal of his New York conviction.According to Will Thomas, assistant professor of business law at the University of Michigan's Ross School of Business, the Supreme Court's decision in *Trump v. United States* has created a new constitutional framework that could reshape Trump's ongoing state prosecutions in New York and Georgia. The high court's ruling that evidence related to a president's "official acts" cannot be admitted in subsequent criminal cases unless prosecutors clear a high legal threshold could be crucial in Trump's appeal[3].The stage is set for Trump to challenge his New York conviction, with the Supreme Court likely to have the last word. Trump has already sought to skip to the end, asking the Supreme Court to take his case now, a request that was declined but with four conservative justices signaling their readiness to take up the issue sooner rather than later. As the legal battle continues, one thing is clear: Donald Trump's presidency is marked by unprecedented legal entanglements that will continue to cast a shadow over his term in office.

Here's a narrative script on the recent court trials involving Donald Trump:Donald Trump, the President-elect of the United States, has been at the center of a high-profile court case in New York. On January 10, 2025, Trump was sentenced to an unconditional discharge in his hush money case. This means that while he won't face any serious punishment, the fact of his conviction remains.The case revolves around Trump's falsification of business records to hide reimbursements made to adult film star Stormy Daniels in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election. Trump was found guilty of 34 counts of falsifying business records in May. The judge in the case, Juan Merchan, had indicated that he did not intend to sentence Trump to jail time, opting instead for an unconditional discharge.However, Trump sought to halt the sentencing process, arguing that as President-elect, he should be granted immunity from criminal proceedings. Trump's legal team filed an emergency appeal with the Supreme Court, asking the justices to intervene and put the sentencing on hold. In a 40-page filing, Trump argued that preparing for a criminal sentencing while preparing to lead the country as President imposed an "intolerable, unconstitutional burden" on him.Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who handles emergency appeals from New York, directed prosecutors to respond to Trump's request by January 10. Trump's appeal cited the Supreme Court's decision in *Trump v. United States*, arguing that the criminal proceedings in state court should be put on hold while his claims of presidential immunity are addressed.Despite Trump's efforts, the sentencing proceeded as scheduled on January 10, 2025. Trump's legal team also sought emergency relief from the New York Court of Appeals, the state's highest court, but their request was denied.In another legal development, a federal court recently considered a case involving Trump's executive orders on federal funding. The court found that the states are likely to succeed on the merits of some of their claims, including allegations that Trump's actions violated the separation of powers and the Spending Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The court issued a temporary restraining order, citing the potential disruption to health, education, and other public services due to the pause in federal funding.These recent court cases highlight the ongoing legal challenges facing Donald Trump as he prepares to take office as President of the United States.

Today on Mea Culpa, I'm joined by Pamela Hemphill, known as “MAGA Granny,” who attended the January 6th riot, served 60 days in prison, and is now finishing probation. Despite Trump's mass pardons for Jan 6 rioters, Pam has been outspoken in rejecting his clemency, arguing it dishonors the Capitol Police and undermines accountability. We discuss the dangers of rewriting history, the radicalization of Trump's supporters, and the role of media in spreading propaganda. Pam also shares her journey of breaking free from MAGA disinformation and her frustration with Congress for failing to stand up to Trump's authoritarian agenda. Thanks to our sponsor: L-Nutra: Just visit https://ProlonLife.com/MEACULPA to claim your 15% discount and your bonus gift. Subscribe to Michael's NEW Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@TheMichaelCohenShow Join us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/PoliticalBeatdown Add the Mea Culpa podcast feed: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/mea-culpa-with-michael-cohen Add the Political Beatdown podcast feed: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/political-beatdown Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

It's been a whirlwind few days for Donald Trump, the first criminal president in U.S. history. On January 20, Trump returned to office despite being convicted of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in a New York trial court. The case stems from his efforts to illegally influence the 2016 presidential election by hiding reimbursements made to adult film star Stormy Daniels.The trial court granted Trump an "unconditional discharge," meaning he won't face imprisonment, probation, or a fine. However, the conviction remains on his record, making him the first and only criminal elected to the presidency. Trump's legal team has been working to overturn the conviction, pointing to the landmark Supreme Court decision in Trump v. United States, which could potentially lead to the reversal of his New York conviction.In Trump v. United States, the Supreme Court established a new constitutional rule that evidence related to a president's "official acts" cannot be admitted in subsequent criminal cases unless prosecutors clear a high legal threshold. Trump's team argues that the trial court failed to follow this new framework, which could render the conviction invalid.Before his sentencing, Trump asked the Supreme Court to intervene and block the proceedings, claiming that the charges were politically motivated and that he was entitled to presidential immunity. However, New York prosecutors urged the justices to allow the sentencing to go ahead as scheduled, emphasizing that Trump's conviction rests on conduct for which he is not entitled to immunity.The prosecutors argued that Trump can attend the sentencing hearing by video to minimize any burden and that he can appeal after being sentenced. They also dismissed Trump's suggestion that he cannot be sentenced because he is the president-elect, stating that no judicial decision or guidance from the Department of Justice has ever recognized that the unique temporary immunity of the sitting president extends to the president-elect.Despite Trump's efforts to have the Supreme Court intervene, the justices declined his request. However, four conservative justices – Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Thomas – publicly noted their disagreement with this decision, signaling that they may be ready to take up the issue of Trump's conviction sooner rather than later.As the case heads to the New York Court of Appeals, Trump's legal team is likely to continue arguing that the Supreme Court's decision in Trump v. United States requires the conviction to be erased. The Supreme Court's eventual involvement seems inevitable, and the outcome could have significant implications for Trump's presidency and the institution of the presidency as a whole.

William Lee discusses the Fed “entering the Trump regime” with the FOMC meeting beginning tomorrow. Despite Trump's calls for lower rates, he expects the Fed not to move this week because of the inflation data we've seen recently. He also points to extreme weather disasters in California and Florida that will cause “huge shocks” to the construction industry and supply chains. ======== Schwab Network ======== Empowering every investor and trader, every market day. Subscribe to the Market Minute newsletter - https://schwabnetwork.com/subscribe Download the iOS app - https://apps.apple.com/us/app/schwab-network/id1460719185 Download the Amazon Fire Tv App - https://www.amazon.com/TD-Ameritrade-Network/dp/B07KRD76C7 Watch on Sling - https://watch.sling.com/1/asset/191928615bd8d47686f94682aefaa007/watch Watch on Vizio - https://www.vizio.com/en/watchfreeplus-explore Watch on DistroTV - https://www.distro.tv/live/schwab-network/ Follow us on X – https://twitter.com/schwabnetwork Follow us on Facebook – https://www.facebook.com/schwabnetwork Follow us on LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/company/schwab-network/ About Schwab Network - https://schwabnetwork.com/about

Mikkel Thorup of Expat Money discusses the work he does in helping people expatriate to greener pastures and why even with Trump back in power people continue to double down on Plan B and second passports and residencies. He comments on the viability of Kevin O'Leary and Trump's proposed North American Union, encroaching globalism and technocracy. the expat services space, the process of expatriating, jurisdictions he's a fan of, cost of living and investing abroad, and more! Watch on BitChute / Brighteon / Rokfin / Rumble / Substack Geopolitics & Empire · Mikkel Thorup: People Continue to Double Down on Plan B Despite Trump 2.0 #508 *Support Geopolitics & Empire! Become a Member https://geopoliticsandempire.substack.com Donate https://geopoliticsandempire.com/donations Consult https://geopoliticsandempire.com/consultation **Visit Our Affiliates & Sponsors! Above Phone https://abovephone.com/?above=geopolitics easyDNS (use code GEOPOLITICS for 15% off!) https://easydns.com Escape The Technocracy course (15% discount using link) https://escapethetechnocracy.com/geopolitics PassVult https://passvult.com Sociatates Civis (CitizenHR, CitizenIT, CitizenPL) https://societates-civis.com Wise Wolf Gold https://www.wolfpack.gold/?ref=geopolitics Websites Expat Money https://expatmoney.com Expat Money Conference https://expatmoney.com/conference Expat Money Show https://expatmoneyshow.com Expat Money Summit https://expatmoneysummit.com About Mikkel Thorup Mikkel Thorup is the world's most sought-after expat consultant. He focuses on helping high-net-worth private clients to legally mitigate tax liabilities, obtain a second residency and citizenship, and assemble a portfolio of foreign investments, including international real estate, timber plantations, agricultural land and other hard-money tangible assets. Mikkel is the Founder and CEO at Expat Money®, a private consulting firm started in 2017. He hosts the popular weekly podcast, the Expat Money Show, and is a multiple #1-Best Selling author, including the definitive expat book: Expat Secrets - How To Pay Zero Taxes, Live Overseas And Make Giant Piles Of Money, and his second book: Expats Guide On Moving To Mexico. A world traveller since his teens, Mikkel Thorup has learned his craft in three unique and unconventional ways; first, by living it himself, continuously pushing the boundaries and testing new ideas around the globe; next, from diligent and intense study consuming over 2000 books and courses on the subject; and finally, by apprenticing and learning directly from the world's top legal experts in his field. Mikkel has dedicated himself for over two decades to building this mountain of knowledge, one that is not constrained by languages, cultures, or borders. He now works one-on-one with private clients utilizing this combination of hard-won experience and in-depth knowledge and has helped hundreds of people to secure their new lives abroad. *Podcast intro music is from the song "The Queens Jig" by "Musicke & Mirth" from their album "Music for Two Lyra Viols": http://musicke-mirth.de/en/recordings.html (available on iTunes or Amazon)

Mikkel Thorup of Expat Money discusses the work he does in helping people expatriate to greener pastures and why even with Trump back in power people continue to double down on Plan B and second passports and residencies. He comments on the viability of Kevin O'Leary and Trump's proposed North American Union, encroaching globalism and technocracy. the expat services space, the process of expatriating, jurisdictions he's a fan of, cost of living and investing abroad, and more! Watch on BitChute / Brighteon / Rokfin / Rumble / Substack Geopolitics & Empire · Mikkel Thorup: People Continue to Double Down on Plan B Despite Trump 2.0 #508 *Support Geopolitics & Empire! Become a Member https://geopoliticsandempire.substack.com Donate https://geopoliticsandempire.com/donations Consult https://geopoliticsandempire.com/consultation **Visit Our Affiliates & Sponsors! Above Phone https://abovephone.com/?above=geopolitics easyDNS (use code GEOPOLITICS for 15% off!) https://easydns.com Escape The Technocracy course (15% discount using link) https://escapethetechnocracy.com/geopolitics PassVult https://passvult.com Sociatates Civis (CitizenHR, CitizenIT, CitizenPL) https://societates-civis.com Wise Wolf Gold https://www.wolfpack.gold/?ref=geopolitics Websites Expat Money https://expatmoney.com Expat Money Conference https://expatmoney.com/conference Expat Money Show https://expatmoneyshow.com Expat Money Summit https://expatmoneysummit.com About Mikkel Thorup Mikkel Thorup is the world's most sought-after expat consultant. He focuses on helping high-net-worth private clients to legally mitigate tax liabilities, obtain a second residency and citizenship, and assemble a portfolio of foreign investments, including international real estate, timber plantations, agricultural land and other hard-money tangible assets. Mikkel is the Founder and CEO at Expat Money®, a private consulting firm started in 2017. He hosts the popular weekly podcast, the Expat Money Show, and is a multiple #1-Best Selling author, including the definitive expat book: Expat Secrets - How To Pay Zero Taxes, Live Overseas And Make Giant Piles Of Money, and his second book: Expats Guide On Moving To Mexico. A world traveller since his teens, Mikkel Thorup has learned his craft in three unique and unconventional ways; first, by living it himself, continuously pushing the boundaries and testing new ideas around the globe; next, from diligent and intense study consuming over 2000 books and courses on the subject; and finally, by apprenticing and learning directly from the world's top legal experts in his field. Mikkel has dedicated himself for over two decades to building this mountain of knowledge, one that is not constrained by languages, cultures, or borders. He now works one-on-one with private clients utilizing this combination of hard-won experience and in-depth knowledge and has helped hundreds of people to secure their new lives abroad. *Podcast intro music is from the song "The Queens Jig" by "Musicke & Mirth" from their album "Music for Two Lyra Viols": http://musicke-mirth.de/en/recordings.html (available on iTunes or Amazon)

12 - Just how bad is the response from LA and California's government? Dom goes in on their officials 1205 - Mayor Karen Bass is putting on a disasterclass. 1210 - Side question - All time way of speaking 1215 - Journalist Bill O'Reilly joins us today. Where did he develop his speaking cadence? What is next for Trump as he takes office in less than two weeks? How is he handling the transition and what are Trump's expectations for himself? Despite Trump's flaws, Bill does have faith Trump can do well given his determination. Where is H-1B on the list of priorities? Any new books coming soon? 1220 - Jim Kelly stops in for some impressions as we give our side question answers. 1240 - How did Nixon become President twice despite being a very awkward guy? 1250 - A California resident wonders why the local government is playing “Russian Roulette” with their lives? 1 - Girls' High is facing a lawsuit from a former student over racial discrimination. Dom beaks down the case and whether or not it has any standing. 105 - Will LA and California change their tune politically after this disaster? A LA news anchor gets humbled. 110 - Your calls. 120 - Why didn't George W. Bush or Karen Pence shake Trump's hand at Jimmy Carter's funeral? Breaking down funeral body language by former Presidents. 135 - Lip readers weigh in on what Trump and Obama are discussing at Jimmy Carter's funeral. 140 - Does the NFL have a CTE problem? Former Pro Bowler Tight End Steve Wycheck's brain autopsy found that he had Stage 3 CTE. 150 - Your time. Your calls on the side question and the day's top stories. 2 - Former Nixon and Trump advisor Roger Stone joins The Dom Giordano Program. What are the titles of his works? What was Richard Nixon like behind the scenes and how was he able to ascend to the highest office in the world despite being awkward? What were some of his hidden talents? How would Roger get Richard to open up? What makes Trump so successful and is it comparable to Nixon? What RINOs is Roger targeting? Roger gives his fashion and style tips. 210 - Money Melody! 215 - Winner? 225 - Discussing Pennsylvania lawmakers voting for and against the Laken Riley Act. 250 - Lightning Round!

12 - Just how bad is the response from LA and California's government? Dom goes in ontheir officials 1205 - Mayor Karen Bass is putting on a disasterclass. 1210 - Side question - All time way of speaking 1215 - Journalist Bill O'Reilly joins us today. Where did he develop his speaking cadence? What is next for Trump as he takes office in less than two weeks? How is he handling the transition and what are Trump's expectations for himself? Despite Trump's flaws, Bill does have faith Trump can do well given his determination. Where is H-1B on the list of priorities? Any new books coming soon? 1220 - Jim Kelly stops in for some impressions as we give our side question answers. 1240 - How did Nixon become President twice despite being a very awkward guy? 1250 - A California resident wonders why the local government is playing “Russian Roulette” with their lives?

Guests: Julia Ainsley, Ryan Reilly, Alexi McCammond, Jennifer Horn, Sahil Kapur, Sen. Sherrod BrownTonight: New details on attacks in New Orleans and Las Vegas as the next administration bends reality for its own purposes. What we're learning about both attacks and the information wars surrounding them. Then, Biden's move to protect Donald Trump's political targets from his threats of retribution. And what we know about the first big test of the new Congress just hours from now. Want more of Chris? Download and subscribe to his podcast, “Why Is This Happening? The Chris Hayes podcast” wherever you get your podcasts.