Podcasts about despite trump

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 22, 2025 5:35

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, it becomes clear that this initiative is not just another policy blueprint, but a comprehensive and ambitious plan to reshape the very fabric of the U.S. federal government. Conceived by a coalition of conservative scholars, policy experts, and former Trump administration officials, Project 2025 aims to consolidate executive power and implement a slew of radical reforms that could have far-reaching implications for American governance.At its core, Project 2025 is driven by four key pillars designed to create an effective conservative administration. This involves a significant overhaul of the federal civil service system, where merit-based hiring would be replaced by appointments based on loyalty to the administration. This shift is particularly evident in the proposed takeover of key government agencies such as the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Department of Commerce (DOC), and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC)[5].Imagine a scenario where the DOJ, an institution meant to uphold the law impartially, is transformed into a partisan tool. This is exactly what Project 2025 envisions, with the DOJ being tasked to prosecute "anti-white racism" instead of protecting against discrimination across all groups. This proposal is not just a policy change; it represents a fundamental shift in how justice is perceived and administered in the United States.The project also targets other federal agencies for dismantling or significant restructuring. For instance, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Department of Education (ED) are slated for abolition, reflecting a broader disdain for the current bureaucratic structure. The National Institutes of Health (NIH), a cornerstone of medical research, would see its independence curtailed, with specific proposals to defund stem cell research. These changes are not merely administrative; they signify a profound reorientation of national priorities[5].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its economic agenda. The plan advocates for reducing environmental regulations to favor fossil fuels, a move that would likely exacerbate climate change and undermine decades of environmental protection efforts. Additionally, it proposes a flat income tax for individuals and significant tax cuts for corporations, which critics argue would widen the income gap and burden lower-income Americans. Medicare and Medicaid, critical safety nets for millions, would face cuts, further straining the healthcare system[5].The social and cultural implications of Project 2025 are equally profound. The initiative seeks to criminalize pornography and remove legal protections against anti-LGBT discrimination, rolling back hard-won rights for marginalized communities. Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs would be ended, reflecting a broader rejection of progressive social policies. The plan even goes so far as to propose laws supported by the Christian right, including the criminalization of sending and receiving abortion and birth control medications, and eliminating coverage of emergency contraception[5].Immigration policy is another area where Project 2025's vision is starkly different from current practices. The plan recommends the arrest, detention, and mass deportation of illegal immigrants, and even suggests deploying the U.S. Armed Forces for domestic law enforcement. This approach not only raises serious constitutional concerns but also underscores a harsh and punitive stance on immigration[5].The architects of Project 2025 are not mere theorists; many have direct ties to Donald Trump's administration and campaign. Several key contributors worked in Trump's first administration or his 2024 election campaign, and the project's goals align closely with Trump's *Agenda 47* program. Despite Trump's later attempts to distance himself from the plan, his second administration has already begun implementing many of its proposals. Just four days into his second term, nearly two-thirds of Trump's executive actions mirrored or partially mirrored Project 2025's recommendations[5].As I reflect on the scope and ambition of Project 2025, it becomes clear that this is not just a policy initiative but a vision for a fundamentally different America. The project's proponents see it as a necessary corrective to what they perceive as a bloated, inefficient, and overly liberal federal government. However, critics warn that these changes could have devastating consequences for workers, the environment, and marginalized communities.Looking ahead, the implementation of Project 2025 will likely be marked by intense political battles and legal challenges. As the country navigates these changes, it will be crucial to monitor how these policies affect real people and communities. The next few years will be a critical period, as the full impact of Project 2025 becomes clearer and the nation grapples with the implications of such profound governance reforms.In the end, Project 2025 is a testament to the enduring power of ideological vision in shaping public policy. Whether one views it as a necessary revolution or a dangerous overreach, it is undeniable that this initiative has the potential to reshape the very foundations of American governance. As we move forward, it is essential to engage in a nuanced and informed discussion about the future we want to build and the values we wish to uphold.

Toll on Manhattan drivers remains in effect, despite Trump's Easter Sunday deadline

donald trump manhattan easter sunday deadline remains drivers toll despite trump

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 20, 2025 0:49

AP correspondent Julie Walker reports a toll on Manhattan drivers remains in effect, despite Trump's Easter Sunday deadline.

The New Global Paradigm Shift And How To Invest

Money Tree Investing

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 18, 2025 80:20

Dan Rasmussen returns to talk about how to invest during this global paradigm shift. Rasmussen shares how the post-2008 investment environment has shifted, with international markets now outperforming, volatility spiking, and the dollar weakening. He critiques the AI investment narrative, challenges in AI profitability, the misalignment between AI hype and real-world economic value, and the implications of rising geopolitical and market uncertainty. We discuss... Dan Rasmussen runs the hedge fund Verdad, focusing on microcap value, credit, and market-neutral strategies. His new book, The Humble Investor, compiles insights from a decade of writing research notes. How the post-2008 market was defined by low volatility, strong U.S. equity performance, and growth stock dominance. In 2025, international markets have started outperforming U.S. equities, signaling a potential regime shift. As AI skepticism grows, tech giants have seen declining returns due to increased capital intensity. The profitability of AI investments remains unclear, with few killer applications and unsustainable infrastructure costs. Chipmakers like Nvidia require enormous customer spending just to justify current valuations. The long-term viability of AI, citing high operational costs and uncertain end-user benefits. Rising market volatility, potentially driven by politics and the dollar, is pushing investors toward safer, lower-volatility assets. Despite years of underperformance, international investing may be entering a comeback phase. Google is testing a shift from a pay-per-click to a pay-per-lead ad model in select zip codes. ChatGPT is becoming a preferred tool for research due to speed, accuracy, and reduced noise compared to Google. The uncertainty around AI profitability makes current tech valuations speculative and potentially risky. Potential large-scale layoffs in government and academia could ripple through the broader economy. Shifting public-sector workers to private-sector roles is uncertain and may not offset job losses. Despite Trump's influence, AI is seen as a more dominant force for markets than political shifts. Japan is highlighted as a promising international market due to undervalued stocks with fortress balance sheets. Gold has become a favored allocation, with some portfolios holding as much as 35% due to recent strong performance. Today's Panelists: Megan Gorman | The Wealth Intersection Douglas Heagren | Pro College Planners Kirk Chisholm | Innovative Wealth Follow on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/moneytreepodcast Follow LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/money-tree-investing-podcast Follow on Twitter/X: https://x.com/MTIPodcast For more information, visit the show notes at https://moneytreepodcast.com/global-paradigm-shift-dan-rasmussen-704

google ai japan gold global rising chatgpt invest shifting nvidia verdad paradigm shift rasmussen despite trump dan rasmussen

Al Ansari exchange $200 million deal in Bahrain

Bitesize Business Breakfast Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 14, 2025 24:59

14 Apr 2025. Al Ansari Exchange is expanding — we speak to CEO Rashid Al Ansari about their $200 million deal in Bahrain. Despite Trump’s partial U-turn on tariffs, bond yields are still climbing — NYU Abu Dhabi’s Barthelemy Bonadio explains why. Plus, market strategist Jessica Amir joins us to analyse Trump’s decision to spare smartphones and computers in the latest round of trade war tactics.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

donald trump exchange bahrain ansari million deal despite trump nyu abu dhabi jessica amir

Niall Ferguson: The Trade War and the Battle for the 21st Century

Honestly with Bari Weiss

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 10, 2025 70:21

If your head has been spinning since Donald Trump walked into the White House Rose Garden and declared “Liberation Day” last Wednesday, we don't blame you. And not just because it was nauseating watching the stock market or your 401(k) crash down, but because it wasn't clear what exactly we were looking at. As our guest today, economic historian and Free Press columnist Niall Ferguson, wrote in our pages last week: "Depending on your worldview, you probably think Trump's tariff blitz is one of two things. Either a committed protectionist is trying to Make America Great Again by killing “globalism,” ending “forever wars,” and bringing manufacturing jobs back to the United States. Let's call this Project Minecraft. Alternatively, an unhinged demagogue is crashing both the world economy and the liberal international order, mainly to the advantage of authoritarian regimes…But here is what is actually happening: The American empire that came into existence after the failed autarky and isolationism of the 1930s is being broken up after 80 years. Despite Trump's imperial impulses—wanting to annex Greenland, calling for Canada to become the 51st state—he is engaged right now in a kind of wild decolonization project." Whether or not you agree with Niall's conclusion, there's no question that the real story here is not about the particular tariff rate for Cambodia or Taiwan; rather, it's fundamentally about reordering America's place in the world. Over the past decade, there's been an intense debate over what role America should play on the world stage, in geopolitics, in trade, and in technology. Trump has made a very clear set of decisions on that question. And that's the case whether or not most Americans understand the consequences. So what are the consequences when the U.S. acts unilaterally to upend the global trading system? What is the outcome when the U.S. weaponizes its own economic power? What happens when the world order, as we know it, is upended? Will these actions embolden our adversaries, or weaken them? Will this ultimately make us poorer, or better off? Has the American empire reached its end? And, was this inevitable or self-inflicted? One note: While Bari and Niall were recording this conversation, Trump announced a 90-day pause on the reciprocal tariffs. Notably, there's no pause on the tariffs for China. In fact, it went up to 125 percent. But the point remains. And the face-off between America and China has only heated up. What does that mean? Is the twenty-first century destined to be ours, or China's? All these questions and more with Free Press columnist Niall Ferguson. If you liked what you heard from Honestly, the best way to support us is to go to TheFP.com and become a Free Press subscriber today. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Egg prices increase to record high despite Trump's predictions and bird flu outbreak slowing

donald trump predictions prices outbreak slowing bird flu record high despite trump

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 10, 2025 0:46

AP correspondent Haya Panjwani reports on a new record in egg prices.

Egg prices increase to record high despite Trump's predictions and bird flu outbreak slowing

donald trump predictions prices outbreak slowing bird flu record high despite trump josh funk

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 10, 2025 1:00

AP correspondent Josh Funk reports that egg prices remain surprisingly high, and it's drawing attention from regulators.

Despite Trump's wishes the AP is allowed in the White House again

Adam and Jordana

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 9, 2025 16:36

Professor Jane Kirtley of the Silha Center for the Study of Media Ethics and Law joins Adam and Jordana.

donald trump law news study white house allowed wishes media ethics despite trump

Radical Transformation Unveiled: Exploring the Sweeping Reforms of Project 2025

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 3, 2025 6:28

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a comprehensive policy initiative crafted by the Heritage Foundation, it becomes clear that this is more than just a set of recommendations – it's a blueprint for a radical transformation of the American government. This 900-page manifesto, designed to guide a potential conservative administration, outlines sweeping reforms that touch every facet of federal governance, from education and environmental policy to media regulation and disaster response.At its core, Project 2025 is about consolidating executive power and reshaping the federal government in a distinctly conservative image. One of the most striking aspects of this plan is its vision for education. The project advocates for the elimination of the Department of Education, transferring its responsibilities to the states and significantly reducing federal involvement in education policy. This includes ending federal funding for programs like Title I, which provides crucial support to schools in low-income areas, and dismantling the Head Start program that serves over a million children from low-income families[1][4][5].Roger Severino, a key figure associated with the project, has argued that Head Start does not provide value, though he has not provided evidence to support this claim. Instead, Project 2025 promotes school vouchers with no strings attached, even for private or religious schools, and cuts to funding for free school meals. This approach reflects a fundamental shift in how education is viewed – from a public good to a private one[1].The project's stance on education is just one part of a broader critique of what it terms "federal government overreach." In the realm of civil rights, Project 2025 proposes significant curtailments. It recommends ending federal investigations into schools for disparate impacts of disciplinary measures on the basis of race or ethnicity and transferring civil rights enforcement responsibilities from the Department of Education to the Department of Justice, where enforcement would be limited to litigation[1].This theme of reducing federal oversight extends to environmental policy as well. Project 2025 seeks to dismantle key components of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), including the Office of Environmental Justice and External Civil Rights. It advocates for reversing the EPA's 2009 finding that carbon dioxide emissions are harmful to human health, thereby preventing the federal government from regulating greenhouse gas emissions. The project also supports increased consumption of natural gas, despite concerns from climatologists about methane leaks, and aims to block the expansion of the national electrical grid and the transition to renewable energy[1].The project's climate policy is particularly contentious, with even some Republican climate advocates disagreeing with its stance. Benji Backer, founder of the American Conservation Coalition, has noted a growing consensus among younger Republicans that human activity causes climate change and has called Project 2025's approach "wrongheaded"[1].In addition to these policy proposals, Project 2025 also outlines a vision for media and technology policies. It suggests increasing agency accountability at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) while reducing what it deems "wasteful spending." The project promotes national security and economic prosperity through measures like expanding 5G connectivity and requiring Big Tech companies to contribute to the Universal Service Fund. However, critics argue that these recommendations could endanger democratic institutions and concentrate presidential power[2].The project's impact on disaster response is another area of concern. It proposes reforming the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) by shifting the majority of preparedness and response costs to states and localities. This includes ending preparedness grants for states and localities, a move that aligns with Trump's recent suggestions to leave disaster response management to the states[3].Project 2025 also delves into the realm of public health and social welfare. It advocates for withdrawing from the World Health Organization, a move Trump has already made and then reversed during his previous administration. The project criticizes the WHO's handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and suggests that the U.S. should be prepared to take drastic measures against international organizations that act contrary to U.S. interests[3].The economic and social implications of these proposals are far-reaching. Project 2025 suggests cutting overtime protections for 4.3 million workers, limiting access to food assistance for over 40 million people, and restricting safety nets for farmers. It also proposes eliminating funding for key public transportation projects and consolidating or eliminating programs like the Economic Development Administration (EDA), which has invested billions in transformative infrastructure projects[5].Critics, including Democrats and some independent experts, have been vocal about the dangers of Project 2025. They argue that its recommendations could dismantle civil liberties, concentrate presidential power, and endanger democratic institutions. James Singer, a spokesperson for the Biden campaign, has likened the project to an attempt to make Trump a "tyrannical king" at the expense of American democracy[4].Despite Trump's public distancing from the project, there is significant overlap between his policies and those outlined in Project 2025. The Heritage Foundation emphasizes that while the project does not speak for any candidate, it is ultimately up to the president to decide which recommendations to implement. This ambiguity has led to a heated political debate, with Democrats using Project 2025 as a rallying cry against Trump's potential second term[4].As the 2025 presidential term approaches, Project 2025 stands as a pivotal document that could shape the future of American governance. Its proposals are not just policy recommendations but a vision for a fundamentally different role of the federal government in American life. Whether these changes will come to fruition remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: Project 2025 represents a seismic shift in the political landscape, one that will be closely watched and fiercely debated in the months to come.

Radical Transformation Ahead: Project 2025's Blueprint for Reshaping American Governance

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 1, 2025 6:10

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a comprehensive and contentious presidential transition initiative, it becomes clear that this is more than just a policy guide – it's a blueprint for a radical transformation of American governance.Project 2025, spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation, is a multi-faceted plan designed to equip the next conservative president with a detailed policy agenda, a database of potential personnel, training programs, and a playbook for the first 180 days in office. The project is led by former Trump administration officials, including Paul Dans and Spencer Chretien, which has led critics to tie it closely to Trump's policies and campaign promises, despite his public denials of involvement[2][3].At its core, Project 2025 aims to centralize power in the executive branch, a move that critics argue could significantly erode the system of checks and balances. One of the most alarming proposals involves reissuing Trump's Schedule F executive order, which would allow the president to dismiss federal employees deemed 'non-performing' or insufficiently loyal. This measure targets the vast federal workforce of approximately 3.5 million employees, potentially disrupting government operations and exacerbating hardships for communities reliant on federal support[1].The project also proposes sweeping reforms to federal agencies, including a drastic overhaul of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Project 2025 suggests transferring the custody of immigrant children from Health and Human Services (HHS) to DHS, prioritizing enforcement over welfare. This change could expand detention centers and worsen the safety and psychological well-being of vulnerable immigrant children. Additionally, the repeal of parts of the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA) would facilitate large-scale detention center use across the country[1].In the realm of reproductive rights, Project 2025's policies are equally concerning. The initiative aligns with recent legal challenges, such as the case involving the FDA's approval of mifepristone, which set a precedent for limiting access to abortion medication. These legal strategies serve as a blueprint for future restrictions on reproductive rights, signaling a potential future where Project 2025's goals are realized through similar tactics[1].The project's stance on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) practices is another contentious area. Project 2025 calls for the deletion of terms like DEI, abortion, and gender equality from federal rules, agency regulations, and legislation. This aligns with Trump's recent executive order ending all DEI programs within the federal government, which he claimed could violate federal civil rights laws and exclude Americans from opportunities based on their race or sex[3].Project 2025 also outlines significant changes to disaster response and emergency funding. The plan proposes reforming FEMA emergency spending to shift the majority of preparedness and response costs to states and localities, rather than the federal government. This recommendation is based on the argument that FEMA is "overtasked" and "overcompensates for the lack of state and local preparedness and response." The project suggests ending preparedness grants for states and localities, arguing that DHS should not be in the business of handing out federal tax dollars[3].In the area of media and technology, Project 2025's proposals are equally far-reaching. The initiative calls for increasing agency accountability while decreasing wasteful spending at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). It also advocates for promoting national security and economic prosperity by reducing the digital divide and expanding connectivity through 5G and satellite technologies. Additionally, the project recommends that Big Tech companies contribute to the Universal Service Fund, currently funded through telephone bills[4].Paul Dans, the former director of Project 2025, has been candid about the project's ambitions. In a recent interview, he expressed his delight with how the Trump administration has implemented aspects of the project, saying, "It's actually way beyond my wildest dreams... The way that they've been able to move and upset the orthodoxy, and at the same time really capture the imagination of the people, I think portends a great four years."[5]Despite Trump's public denials, the alignment between his policies and Project 2025's proposals is striking. As Dans noted, "Directionally, they have a lot in common... Trump is seizing every minute of every hour." This close alignment has led Democrats to warn that Project 2025 represents a "radical" agenda that could mean a ban on abortion, elimination of LGBTQ+ rights, and a complete overhaul of the federal administrative state[5].As we look ahead, the implications of Project 2025 are daunting. Critics argue that its recommendations could endanger democratic institutions, dismantle civil liberties, and concentrate presidential power. The project's focus on centralizing authority and undermining checks and balances raises serious concerns about the future of American governance.In the coming months, as the Trump administration continues to implement policies outlined in Project 2025, we can expect significant legal and legislative battles. The Supreme Court's role in adjudicating these changes will be crucial, as will the response from state governments and civil society organizations. As Paul Dans ominously suggested, "The deep state is going to get its breath back," indicating a long and contentious road ahead.Project 2025 is not just a policy guide; it is a vision for a fundamentally different America. As the country navigates these profound changes, it remains to be seen whether this vision will be realized and what the long-term consequences will be for American democracy. One thing is certain: the next few years will be pivotal in shaping the future of governance in the United States.

"Transforming America: Project 2025's Sweeping Conservative Vision Sparks Debate"

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 30, 2025 7:20

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a comprehensive and contentious initiative spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation, it becomes clear that this is more than just a policy blueprint – it's a vision for a fundamentally transformed American governance.Project 2025 is the culmination of efforts by over 400 scholars and conservative groups, led by former Trump administration officials Paul Dans and Spencer Chretien. This 900-page manifesto outlines a sweeping overhaul of federal policies, aiming to reshape the government in line with conservative principles. The project is structured around four key pillars: a detailed policy guide, a database of potential personnel, a training program for these candidates, and a playbook for actions to be taken within the first 180 days of a new administration[2][4].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its approach to education. The initiative criticizes what it terms "woke propaganda" in public schools and advocates for a significant reduction in the federal government's role in education. This includes closing the Department of Education and transferring its responsibilities to the states. Programs under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) would be administered by the Department of Health and Human Services, and the National Center for Education Statistics would become part of the Census Bureau. The federal government, according to Project 2025, should merely keep statistics, rather than enforcing civil rights in schools or investigating disparate impacts of disciplinary measures on racial or ethnic grounds[1].The project also proposes drastic changes in education funding. It suggests allowing Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to expire, which would remove $18 billion in federal funds for schools in low-income areas. Instead, public funds would be available as school vouchers, even for parents sending their children to private or religious schools. This shift is part of a broader philosophy that views education as a private rather than a public good[1].In the realm of environmental policy, Project 2025's vision is equally radical. It seeks to downsize the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), close the EPA's Office of Environmental Justice and External Civil Rights, and reverse the 2009 EPA finding that carbon dioxide emissions are harmful to human health. This would prevent the federal government from regulating greenhouse gas emissions. The project also advocates for blocking the expansion of the national electrical grid, stymying the transition to renewable energy, and relaxing regulations on the fossil fuel industry. For instance, it suggests removing restrictions on oil drilling imposed by the Bureau of Land Management and promoting Arctic drilling[1].The implications of these environmental policies are far-reaching. Nonpartisan experts warn that without expanding the electrical grid, renewable energy projects will have to slow down. Additionally, the project's stance on climate change mitigation is at odds with many Republicans who acknowledge the importance of addressing climate change. Benji Backer, founder of the American Conservation Coalition, has criticized Project 2025's climate policies as "wrongheaded" and noted a growing consensus among younger Republicans that human activity causes climate change[1].Project 2025 also targets other federal agencies and programs. It proposes reforming the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) by shifting the majority of preparedness and response costs to states and localities. This move is justified by the argument that FEMA is "overtasked" and "overcompensates for the lack of state and local preparedness and response." The project further suggests ending preparedness grants for states and localities, arguing that these grants should be terminated to prevent the Department of Homeland Security from "handing out federal tax dollars"[3].In the area of technology and media, Project 2025's recommendations are equally sweeping. It calls for increasing agency accountability while decreasing wasteful spending at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The project also advocates for promoting national security and economic prosperity by supporting the expansion of 5G networks and satellite technologies like StarLink. Additionally, it suggests that Big Tech companies should contribute to the Universal Service Fund, which is currently funded through telephone bills[4].The project's approach to civil rights and social policies is another contentious area. It proposes rolling back diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs across federal agencies, arguing that these policies can violate federal civil rights laws. Project 2025 also aims to dismantle the DEI apparatus in various agencies and eliminate terms like "DEI," "abortion," and "gender equality" from federal rules and regulations. This stance aligns with Trump's executive order ending all DEI programs within the federal government, which he claimed could shut out Americans "who deserve a shot at the American dream" due to their race or sex[3].Critics of Project 2025, including Democrats and some Republicans, have been vocal about its potential impacts. Vice President Kamala Harris has described the project as a plan to "return America to a dark past," and President Biden has accused Trump of lying about his connections to the initiative, stating that it "should scare every single American"[2].Despite Trump's public disavowal of Project 2025, the initiative's connections to his administration are undeniable. Former high-ranking officials like Ben Carson, John Ratcliffe, and Peter Navarro are listed as authors or contributors to the policy agenda. This close association has led critics to argue that Project 2025 is essentially a blueprint for a second Trump term, one that could endanger democratic institutions and concentrate presidential power[2][4].As the 2024 elections approach, Project 2025 stands as a significant milestone in the debate over the future of American governance. Its proposals, if implemented, would mark a profound shift in federal policies, from education and environmental regulation to technology and civil rights. Whether these changes would be beneficial or detrimental remains a subject of intense debate.In the words of Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts, the nation is "in the process of the second American Revolution," which he hopes will remain bloodless. However, the radical nature of Project 2025's proposals has raised concerns among many that this revolution could come at a steep cost to democratic values and social welfare[2].As we move forward, the fate of Project 2025 will likely be decided in the political arena. Will its vision for a more conservative, decentralized government prevail, or will it face significant resistance from those who see it as a threat to the fabric of American society? The answer will depend on the choices made by voters, policymakers, and the next administration. One thing is certain, however: Project 2025 has set the stage for a critical conversation about the future of America, one that will shape the country's trajectory for years to come.

Radical Transformation Ahead: The Conservative Vision of Project 2025 Unveiled

president donald trump education news local executives schools executive orders business as usual despite trump

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 30, 2025 7:13

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a comprehensive and contentious initiative spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation, it becomes clear that this is more than just a policy blueprint – it's a vision for a fundamentally transformed American governance.Project 2025 is the culmination of efforts by over 400 scholars and conservative groups, led by former Trump administration officials such as Paul Dans and Spencer Chretien. This 900-page manifesto outlines a sweeping overhaul of federal policies, aiming to reshape the government in line with conservative principles. The project is structured around four key pillars: a detailed policy guide, a database of potential personnel, a training program for these candidates, and a playbook for actions to be taken within the first 180 days of a new administration[2][4].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its approach to education. The initiative criticizes what it terms "woke propaganda" in public schools, advocating for a significant reduction in the federal government's role in education. This includes closing the Department of Education and transferring control over education funding and policy to the states. The proposal also suggests that programs under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) be administered by the Department of Health and Human Services, and that the National Center for Education Statistics become part of the Census Bureau. The federal government, according to Project 2025, should be limited to a statistics-keeping role in education, with federal enforcement of civil rights in schools curtailed and transferred to the Department of Justice[1].The implications of these changes are profound. For instance, Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, which provides $18 billion in federal funds for schools in low-income areas, would be allowed to expire. Instead, public funds would be available as school vouchers, even for parents sending their children to private or religious schools. This shift could drastically alter the educational landscape, potentially exacerbating existing inequalities. As Roger Severino, a proponent of the project, has argued, the Head Start program, which serves over a million children from low-income families, does not provide value, although he has not provided evidence to support this claim[1].Project 2025's vision extends far beyond education. In the realm of environmental policy, the initiative is starkly at odds with current climate change mitigation efforts. It advocates for downsizing the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), closing the EPA's Office of Environmental Justice and External Civil Rights, and reversing the 2009 EPA finding that carbon dioxide emissions are harmful to human health. This would prevent the federal government from regulating greenhouse gas emissions. The project also supports the expansion of fossil fuel use, including Arctic drilling, and encourages allied nations to rely on fossil fuels. Diana Furchtgott-Roth, Heritage Foundation's energy and climate director, has suggested that the EPA should support increased consumption of natural gas, despite concerns about methane leaks[1].These environmental proposals have been met with significant criticism. Republican climate advocates, such as Sarah E. Hunt and Benji Backer, have disagreed with Project 2025's climate policies, emphasizing the importance of supporting good energy and climate policy. Backer noted a growing consensus among younger Republicans that human activity causes climate change, calling Project 2025's stance "wrongheaded"[1].The project's impact on federal agencies is another critical area of focus. Project 2025 recommends reforming the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) by shifting the majority of preparedness and response costs to states and localities. This aligns with Trump's past suggestions to leave disaster response management to the states, arguing that "that's what states are for, to take care of problems"[3].In addition, the initiative calls for the dismantling of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs across federal agencies. Trump has echoed this sentiment, signing an executive order to end all DEI programs within the federal government, claiming they can violate federal civil rights laws. Project 2025 goes further, advocating for the deletion of terms like DEI, abortion, and gender equality from all federal rules and regulations[3].The project also targets the civil service and the bureaucracy of the "Administrative State." It proposes a hiring freeze for federal civilian employees and suggests preventing "burrowing-in" by outgoing political appointees. This is part of a broader strategy to reduce the size of the federal workforce and bring independent agencies under White House control[4].Critics of Project 2025 argue that its recommendations are not only radical but also risky, potentially endangering democratic institutions and civil liberties. The initiative's approach to data collection, for example, involves consolidating the Bureau of Economic Analysis, Census Bureau, and Bureau of Labor Statistics, which could significantly impact the independence and reliability of economic data[5].The economic implications are equally concerning. Project 2025 proposes eliminating funding for key public transportation projects, such as the Capital Investment Grants (CIG) program, which has been crucial for awarding federal grants to local communities for infrastructure projects. This could make it harder for Americans without cars to commute and travel, affecting their ability to work and maintain social connections[5].Moreover, the project aims to restrict safety nets for farmers, limiting assistance to 'unusual situations' despite the common challenges farmers face due to unpredictable weather and market conditions. This could disproportionately impact low-income farmers who rely on these safety nets to survive economic downturns[5].As we look ahead, it is clear that Project 2025 represents a significant turning point in American governance. The initiative's comprehensive and far-reaching proposals have the potential to reshape numerous aspects of federal policy, from education and environmental regulation to civil service and economic development.Despite Trump's attempts to distance himself from the project, the connections between his policies and those of Project 2025 are undeniable. As Democrats continue to criticize the initiative, calling it a "plan to return America to a dark past," the debate surrounding Project 2025 is likely to intensify in the coming months[2].As the 2025 presidential transition approaches, the implementation of Project 2025's policies will depend on the outcome of the election and the willingness of the next administration to adopt these radical changes. Whether these proposals will become the blueprint for a new era in American governance remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: the stakes are high, and the future of American policy hangs in the balance.

It's business as usual for local schools despite Trump's executive order

A New Morning

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 21, 2025 8:15

President Trump signed an executive order Thursday aimed at dismantling the Department of Education. Michael Cornell, President of the Erie-Niagara School Superintendents Association, says there's no concerns right now that any federal funding will be lost.

Putin Ramps Up Attacks On Ukraine Despite Trump Deal

Erin Burnett OutFront

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 20, 2025 48:17

Putin is ramping up attacks on Ukraine, defying Trump as a Putin insider gives OutFront exclusive insight into Putin's game. Plus, new reporting on Trump's legal strategy as he takes on federal judges. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

donald trump ukraine vladimir putin attacks ramps despite trump outfront trump deal

Guest: James Li - The Epstein Files Cover-Up & How MAGA Became Pro-Censorship

The Free Thought Project Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 17, 2025 60:44 Transcription Available

Jason and Matt sit down with independent journalist and commentator James Li, known for his sharp analysis and objective take on current events. James has built a dedicated following by cutting through political narratives and exposing the bipartisan corruption that keeps the establishment in power. His work focuses on media manipulation, government overreach, and the illusions that keep people trapped in the left-right paradigm. We kick things off with the Epstein files—the long-promised, yet still-unreleased bombshell that MAGA diehards swore would bring down the establishment. Despite Trump's years in office and continued influence, the files remain buried. Why is that? Who benefits from keeping them hidden? And why do so many still believe the myth that their political savior will one day deliver "justice"? From there, we shift focus to Trump's own ties to Epstein, dissecting the reality behind their relationship and how the duopoly blinds its followers to the crimes of their own side. While the left obsesses over Trump's scandals, the right conveniently ignores the ones that implicate their own idols. Then, we get into Trump's latest campaign of censorship—an effort supposedly aimed at "stopping antisemitism" but one that will undoubtedly be weaponized against the very people currently cheering it on. The same crowd that once decried cancel culture and government control over speech is now applauding the expansion of the censorship regime. We break down how this strategy plays directly into the hands of the establishment. James leaves us on a high note, answering our white pill question on how people can break free from the mental control of the duopoly and reclaim their ability to think critically. Join us for an enlightening conversation that delves into the intersection of politics, media, and freedom, as we explore the challenges and opportunities facing independent thinkers in today's complex information landscape. If you're tired of the partisan nonsense and ready for an honest, unfiltered look at what's really going on, this episode is for you. (Length: 1:03:11) Follow James on X: https://mobile.x.com/5149jamesli Follow James on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/5149jamesli Follow James on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@5149jamesli Follow James on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@5149JamesLi Follow James' Work on Breaking Points: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTjb7ZxT5zm41wz7arT2Z8to_S_VI2VP0

tiktok donald trump work files censorship maga epstein cover up breaking point despite trump

650. Anders Puck Nielsen (in Kyiv) - Europe Closer to War than Peace Despite Trump's Ceasefire Initiative

Silicon Curtain

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 15, 2025 53:10

GUEST: Anders Puck Nielsen - YouTuber and military analyst. Today I'm speaking with Anders Puck Nielsen, military analyst and influential YouTuber based in Denmark. He specialises in naval warfare and strategy; in today's video we are going to be talking about the Ukrainian withdrawal from Kursk, the state of NATO and repetition of Kremlin narratives coming from the White House and Trump's inner circle. ----------LINKS:https://www.youtube.com/@anderspuck https://twitter.com/anderspuckhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/anderspucknielsen/https://apnielsen.info/en/frontpage/----------SUPPORT THE CHANNEL:https://www.buymeacoffee.com/siliconcurtainhttps://www.patreon.com/siliconcurtain----------TRUSTED CHARITIES ON THE GROUND:Save Ukrainehttps://www.saveukraineua.org/Superhumans - Hospital for war traumashttps://superhumans.com/en/UNBROKEN - Treatment. Prosthesis. Rehabilitation for Ukrainians in Ukrainehttps://unbroken.org.ua/Come Back Alivehttps://savelife.in.ua/en/Chefs For Ukraine - World Central Kitchenhttps://wck.org/relief/activation-chefs-for-ukraineUNITED24 - An initiative of President Zelenskyyhttps://u24.gov.ua/Serhiy Prytula Charity Foundationhttps://prytulafoundation.orgNGO “Herojam Slava”https://heroiamslava.org/kharpp - Reconstruction project supporting communities in Kharkiv and Przemyślhttps://kharpp.com/NOR DOG Animal Rescuehttps://www.nor-dog.org/home/----------PLATFORMS:Twitter: https://twitter.com/CurtainSiliconInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/siliconcurtain/Podcast: https://open.spotify.com/show/4thRZj6NO7y93zG11JMtqmLinkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/finkjonathan/Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/siliconcurtain----------Welcome to the Silicon Curtain podcast. Please like and subscribe if you like the content we produce. It will really help to increase the popularity of our content in YouTube's algorithm. Our material is now being made available on popular podcasting platforms as well, such as Spotify and Apple Podcasts.

03/14/25: Illinois universities stay put on diversity efforts despite Trump

Crain's Daily Gist

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 14, 2025 21:25

At a recent Crain's event, Illinois university leaders showed a united front as President Donald Trump's threats to crack down on higher education loom. Crain's education reporter Brandon Dupré discusses with Amy Guth.Plus: Sterling Bay moving Fulton Market HQ; in remarks to teachers union, Gov. Pritzker lashes out at Trump's education cuts; according to census data, the Chicago metro area and Cook County are growing again; plans for Lakeview hotel focused on LGBTQ+ community move forward.

donald trump chicago diversity lgbtq illinois effort universities gov crain pritzker cook county lakeview stay put despite trump amy guth

Why America's gas turbine shortage could upend Trump's energy plans

POLITICO Energy

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 12, 2025 10:12

Despite Trump administration officials touting their moves to boost oil and gas, the head of one of America's largest utilities said renewable projects remain more attractive because of a shortage of natural gas turbines. POLITICO Energy Editor Matt Daily breaks down the somewhat contradictory messages coming out of CERAWeek, if there's anything Trump can do to solve this problem and what this means for America's energy outlook. Plus, former Nuclear Regulatory Commission Chair Chris Hanson emphasized the importance of the agency's independence following a recent executive order from President Donald Trump. Nirmal Mulaikal is the co-host and producer of POLITICO Energy. Annie Rees is the managing producer for audio at POLITICO. Gloria Gonzalez is the deputy energy editor for POLITICO. Matt Daily is the energy editor for POLITICO. For more news on energy and the environment, subscribe to Power Switch, our free evening newsletter: https://www.politico.com/power-switch And for even deeper coverage and analysis, read our Morning Energy newsletter by subscribing to POLITICO Pro: https://subscriber.politicopro.com/newsletter-archive/morning-energy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

america donald trump energy shortage politico turbine upend despite trump ceraweek politico pro

Did Somebody Say FIFA Coin?

Tapping Into Crypto

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 12, 2025 16:48

300 days post-halving and still no altcoin season—what gives? Despite Trump's Crypto Strategic Reserve being signed into law and the White House Crypto Summit going off without a hitch, prices are tumbling, and not just in the crypto markets. But worry not, because Pav and Ted are diving into why this market cycle feels different, what the FIFA president was doing at a crypto summit, and whether this bloodbath might actually be the perfect time to buy. You'll hear: What's actually in Trump's Bitcoin strategic reserve executive order (hint: no XRP) Why the market hasn't responded even 300+ days post-halving The parallels between the post-ETF slump and current market conditions Why the crypto market is tanking despite seemingly bullish US government news Ted and Pav's personal strategies for weathering the current market bloodbath … and much more! Want to see what we're looking at every episode? Watch the YouTube version of the podcast here. Keen to join in TIC Tipping? Reset your demo mode and let us know your picks on @tappingintocrypto on instagram or X @tappingintocrypto Ready to start? Get $10 of FREE Bitcoin on Swyftx when you sign up and verify: https://trade.swyftx.com.au/register/?promoRef=tappingintocrypto10btc To get the latest updates, hit subscribe and follow us over on the gram @tappingintocrypto or X @tappingintocrypto If you can't wait to learn more, check out these blogs from our friends over at Swyftx. The Tapping into Crypto podcast is for entertainment purposes only and the opinions on this podcast belong to individuals and are not affiliated with any companies mentioned. Any advice is general in nature and does not take into account your personal situation, if you're looking to get advice, please seek out a licensed financial advisor.

donald trump bitcoin crypto reset fifa coins tapping etf keen pav despite trump free bitcoin swyftx

Europe Market Open: Stocks subdued despite Trump's tariff concessions into Payrolls

Ransquawk Rundown, Daily Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 7, 2025 3:11

US President Trump signed amendments to the Canada & Mexico tariffs; however, this failed to lift risk sentimentFed's Waller says he does not see the case for a March cut and the median view of two 2025 cuts "remains reasonable"; Bostic said they need to be patientUS futures attempted to recover off the Wall St. pressure but failed to make much ground into Payrolls, European futures point to a weak openDXY pressured and below 104.00, EUR above 1.08; ECB officials see an April showdown on whether to cut or not with the odds reportedly growingBunds attempt to nurse some downside but remain sub-129.00, USTs firmed with yields softer across the curveLooking ahead, highlights include UK Halifax House Prices, German Industrial Orders, French Trade Balance, EZ Employment (Final), US NFP, Canadian Jobs, Chinese Trade Balance, White House Crypto Summit, Speakers including Fed's Powell, Bostic, Bowman, Williams, Kugler & ECB's LagardeRead the full report covering Equities, Forex, Fixed Income, Commodites and more on Newsquawk

Hour 1 | Trump's Speech, Dem Reactions & South Carolina Politics | 03-05-25

The Charlie James Show Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 5, 2025 33:44

In this hour, we dive into President Trump's powerful speech to Congress, which drew sharp contrasts between his successes and the Democrats' divisive agenda. Despite Trump's unifying message, the media and left-wing commentators, like MSNBC's Nicole Wallace, continued their campaign of hatred and distortion. Then, we shift focus to South Carolina, where Barbara Arthur discusses her run for chair of the state's GOP, emphasizing the need to restore law, order, and faith in the party. Finally, Charlie highlights the critical importance of voter turnout, stressing how South Carolina's dismal 13.5% primary turnout threatens the future of state politics and the values that make it great. | https://www.audacy.com/989word | The Charlie James Show | Listen on Spotify : https://spoti.fi/3MXOvGP | Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-charlie-james-show-podcast/id1547262821 | Join our Live Stream Weekdays - 3pm to 7pm | Follow us on Social Media: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/989word, Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-2031096, X: https://twitter.com/989word, Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/989word/ | Red Meat, Greenville." 03/05/25

spotify donald trump politics news congress south carolina speech democrats reactions gop rumble msnbc greenville red meat despite trump nicole wallace

Stocks Rally Despite Trump-Zelenskyy Clash

MRKT Matrix

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 28, 2025 8:49

MRKT Matrix - Friday, February 28th S&P 500 trades higher Friday following a brief intraday sell-off on Trump-Zelenskyy spat (CNBC) Zelenskyy leaves White House after Ukraine talks collapse (CNBC) Trump's Tariff Onslaught Is Coming Faster Than His Team Can Carry It Out (WSJ) Fed's Favored Inflation Gauge Rises at Mild Pace, Spending Falls (Bloomberg) Analysts Making Larger Cuts Than Average to EPS Estimates for S&P 500 Companies for Q1 (FactSet) Bitcoin Down 25% From All-Time High as Crypto Rout Worsens (Bloomberg) Tumbling Tesla Shares Leave Investors Bracing for More Losses (Bloomberg) Here are the other stocks forming the ‘death cross' following Microsoft this week (CNBC) Google announces layoffs in its HR, cloud units as part of ongoing cost cuts (CNBC) State Street, Apollo's Private Credit ETF Raises SEC Concern (Bloomberg) --- Subscribe to our newsletter: https://riskreversalmedia.beehiiv.com/subscribe MRKT Matrix by RiskReversal Media is a daily AI powered podcast bringing you the top stories moving financial markets Story curation by RiskReversal, scripts by Perplexity Pro, voice by ElevenLabs

donald trump ai ukraine microsoft white house companies clash apollo rally stocks zelenskyy elevenlabs despite trump

UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves Talks Targeting Increased US Trade Despite Trump Tariffs Threat

Bloomberg Talks

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 26, 2025 6:16 Transcription Available

UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves wants to boost commerce with the US, its biggest single-country trading partner, even as President Donald Trump threatens widespread trade tariffs.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

donald trump threats increased targeting trump tariffs rachel reeves us trade despite trump uk chancellor

Solar's future in the age of Musk and Trump

Afternoon Drive with John Maytham

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 24, 2025 7:03

John Maytham is joined by Steven Boykey Sidley, professor of practice at JBS, University of Johannesburg, columnist-at-large for Daily Maverick, and partner at Bridge Capital, to explore how Donald Trump’s leadership and rhetoric on climate change could impact the solar industry. Despite Trump’s dismissal of climate concerns as a “giant hoax,” solar energy is on track to dominate global energy markets.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

university donald trump elon musk solar johannesburg jbs despite trump daily maverick

Trump Trials update for 02-23-2025

united states new york president donald trump washington supreme court manhattan justice department jack smith southern district trump trial judge aileen cannon trump trials despite trump judge chutkan

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 23, 2025 2:20

As we navigate the complex landscape of Donald Trump's court trials, let's dive straight into the latest developments. Just a few weeks ago, on January 10, 2025, President Trump was sentenced to an unconditional discharge in the New York case involving falsifying business records. This case, which began on April 15, 2024, saw Trump found guilty of 34 felony counts by a Manhattan jury on May 30, 2024[3].Before the sentencing, Trump had sought to halt the proceedings, arguing that preparing for a criminal sentencing while preparing to lead the country as President imposed an "intolerable, unconstitutional burden" on him. He filed an appeal to the Supreme Court, citing the justices' decision in *Trump v. United States* and arguing for presidential immunity. However, Justice Juan Merchan rejected Trump's plea, emphasizing that all that remained was the imposition of sentence and that Trump could appear virtually to alleviate his concerns[1].Despite Trump's efforts to delay the sentencing, Justice Merchan proceeded with the original schedule. Trump was ultimately sentenced to an unconditional discharge, meaning he would not face any serious punishment, but the fact of his conviction would remain on record[3].In other cases, Trump faced indictments in the Southern District of Florida and Washington, D.C. The Florida case, which charged Trump and his aides with retaining national defense information and obstruction of justice, was dismissed by Judge Aileen Cannon due to the improper appointment and funding of Special Counsel Jack Smith. The Justice Department later dismissed the appeal against Trump and his co-defendants[3].The Washington, D.C. case, which involved charges of obstructing an official proceeding and conspiracy, was also dismissed by Judge Chutkan after the Supreme Court remanded the case back to the district court[3].As of today, February 23, 2025, these developments mark significant milestones in the ongoing saga of Trump's legal battles. The unconditional discharge in the New York case and the dismissals in the Florida and D.C. cases underscore the complex and often contentious nature of these proceedings.

WH Says Musk Not Leading DOGE In Court Filing Despite Trump Remarks

Erin Burnett OutFront

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 19, 2025 48:06

The White House is insisting it is Trump, not Elon Musk, overseeing efforts to upend the United States government. But, that is not what Trump and Musk have said. So, who is in charge? Plus, Trump parrots Putin, falsely claiming Ukraine started the war with Russia. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

united states donald trump russia ukraine elon musk white house court vladimir putin doge filing remarks despite trump

Tens of millions of dead people aren't getting Social Security checks, despite Trump and Musk claims

donald trump elon musk millions claims checks social security tens dead people getting social despite trump

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 19, 2025 0:51

AP Washington correspondent Sagar Meghani reports on the Trump administration's false claims about tens of millions of dead people getting Social Security checks.

Trump Trials update for 02-14-2025

united states new york president donald trump washington supreme court manhattan stormy daniels sonia sotomayor fulton county southern district trump trial trump trials despite trump

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 14, 2025 2:20

As we navigate the complex landscape of Donald Trump's legal battles, a recent development has taken center stage. Just a few weeks ago, on January 10, 2025, President Trump was sentenced in the New York case to an unconditional discharge by Justice Juan Merchan. This sentencing came after a Manhattan jury found Trump guilty of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in May 2024[3].However, before the sentencing, Trump made a last-minute appeal to the Supreme Court, asking the justices to halt the criminal sentencing scheduled for January 10. In a 40-page filing, Trump argued that preparing for a criminal sentencing while preparing to lead the country as President imposed an "intolerable, unconstitutional burden" on him. He cited the Supreme Court's decision in *Trump v. United States*, arguing that the criminal proceedings in state court should be put on hold while his claims of presidential immunity are addressed[1].Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who handles emergency appeals from New York, directed prosecutors to respond to Trump's request by January 9. Despite Trump's efforts, his request was ultimately denied, and the sentencing proceeded as scheduled.The New York case revolves around Trump's reimbursement of adult film star Stormy Daniels in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election. Trump was found guilty of falsifying business records to hide these reimbursements. The judge in the case, Juan Merchan, had previously indicated that he did not intend to sentence Trump to jail time, opting instead for an unconditional discharge[1].This development marks a significant chapter in Trump's ongoing legal battles, which include cases in the Southern District of Florida, Washington, D.C., and Fulton County, Georgia. The legal landscape continues to evolve, with Trump's legal team navigating multiple fronts in his defense[3].As we reflect on these recent events, it becomes clear that the legal challenges facing President Trump are far from over. The unconditional discharge in the New York case may have brought a measure of closure to one chapter, but the broader narrative of Trump's legal trials remains very much in progress.

Fed chair says bank accounts 'safe' despite Trump's teardown of consumer protection agency

donald trump safe agency federal reserve bank accounts jerome powell tear down consumer protection fed chair despite trump

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 11, 2025 0:59

AP Washington correspondent Sagar Meghani reports on Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell's reassurance about bank accounts amid a Trump move to shutter a key consumer financial regulatory agency.

Trump Trials update for 02-10-2025

united states new york university president donald trump business michigan supreme court stormy daniels sonia sotomayor trump trial ross school trump trials will thomas despite trump

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 10, 2025 2:48

Here's a narrative script on the recent court trials involving Donald Trump:As we stand today, February 10, 2025, the legal landscape surrounding Donald Trump continues to unfold with unprecedented twists and turns. Just a few weeks ago, on January 8, Trump made a dramatic appeal to the Supreme Court, seeking to halt his criminal sentencing scheduled for January 10 in his New York hush money case. Trump, who was found guilty of 34 counts of falsifying business records to hide reimbursements made to adult film star Stormy Daniels, argued that preparing for sentencing while preparing to lead the country as President imposed an "intolerable, unconstitutional burden" on him[1].Trump's legal team, led by John Sauer, his intended nominee for solicitor general, urged the court to put the proceedings on hold to allow him to appeal. They cited the Supreme Court's decision in *Trump v. United States*, which they argued granted Trump presidential immunity that should be addressed before any further criminal proceedings. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who handles emergency appeals from New York, directed prosecutors to respond to Trump's request by January 9.Despite Trump's efforts, the sentencing proceeded as scheduled, with Judge Juan Merchan granting Trump an "unconditional discharge," meaning Trump would not face any serious punishment but the fact of his conviction would remain. This decision, however, may not be the final word. Trump's legal team has been pointing to the *Trump v. United States* decision, which could potentially lead to the reversal of his New York conviction.According to Will Thomas, assistant professor of business law at the University of Michigan's Ross School of Business, the Supreme Court's decision in *Trump v. United States* has created a new constitutional framework that could reshape Trump's ongoing state prosecutions in New York and Georgia. The high court's ruling that evidence related to a president's "official acts" cannot be admitted in subsequent criminal cases unless prosecutors clear a high legal threshold could be crucial in Trump's appeal[3].The stage is set for Trump to challenge his New York conviction, with the Supreme Court likely to have the last word. Trump has already sought to skip to the end, asking the Supreme Court to take his case now, a request that was declined but with four conservative justices signaling their readiness to take up the issue sooner rather than later. As the legal battle continues, one thing is clear: Donald Trump's presidency is marked by unprecedented legal entanglements that will continue to cast a shadow over his term in office.

Critical Thinking - Could Gaza become the USA's 51st State?

The Black Spy Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 10, 2025 54:06

Critical Thinking Could Gaza become the USA's 51st State? The Black Spy Podcast, Season 18, Episode 0010 In this week's Black Spy Podcast we attempt to answer the question on most people's lips who have an interest in geo-politics - could Gaza really become the US's 51st State: President Trump's proposal for the U.S. to "take over" Gaza and transform it into the "Riviera of the Middle East" has sparked widespread controversy and criticism. The plan involves relocating nearly 2 million Palestinians from Gaza to other countries, with the U.S. assuming ownership and redeveloping the territory into a luxury destination. While Trump claims this would bring peace and economic prosperity, the proposal has been condemned as a violation of international law, akin to ethnic cleansing, and a threat to regional stability . Arab states, including Egypt and Jordan, have rejected the idea, emphasizing the need for a two-state solution and the protection of Palestinian rights . Critics argue the plan is impractical, risks radicalizing Palestinians, and could destabilize neighboring countries . Despite Trump's assertion that "everybody loves" the idea, the global backlash suggests it is unlikely to gain traction and may further complicate Middle East peace efforts. Once again this week's Black Spy podcast has attempted to today's burning questions, from which we might all learn. Don't forget to subscribe to The Black Spy Podcast to never miss an episode. Contact Firgas via her Linkedin at Firgas Esack Daps Contact Dr. Rachel on substance. To contact the Black Spy or donate to The Black Spy Podcast utilise the following: To donate - Patreon.com/TheBlackSpyPodcast Email: carltonking2003@gmail.com Facebook: The Black Spy Podcast Facebook: Carlton King Author Twitter@Carlton_King Instagram@carltonkingauthor To read Carlton's Autobiography: “Black Ops – The incredible true story of a British secret agent” Click the link below: https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/BO1MTV2GDF/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_awdb_WNZ5MT89T9C14CB53651 Carlton, Firgas and Dr Rachel are available for speaking events. For this purpose use the contact details above

Trump Trials update for 02-09-2025

donald trump conversations congress maga pardon shove mea culpa capitol police hemphill despite trump

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 9, 2025 2:40

Here's a narrative script on the recent court trials involving Donald Trump:Donald Trump, the President-elect of the United States, has been at the center of a high-profile court case in New York. On January 10, 2025, Trump was sentenced to an unconditional discharge in his hush money case. This means that while he won't face any serious punishment, the fact of his conviction remains.The case revolves around Trump's falsification of business records to hide reimbursements made to adult film star Stormy Daniels in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election. Trump was found guilty of 34 counts of falsifying business records in May. The judge in the case, Juan Merchan, had indicated that he did not intend to sentence Trump to jail time, opting instead for an unconditional discharge.However, Trump sought to halt the sentencing process, arguing that as President-elect, he should be granted immunity from criminal proceedings. Trump's legal team filed an emergency appeal with the Supreme Court, asking the justices to intervene and put the sentencing on hold. In a 40-page filing, Trump argued that preparing for a criminal sentencing while preparing to lead the country as President imposed an "intolerable, unconstitutional burden" on him.Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who handles emergency appeals from New York, directed prosecutors to respond to Trump's request by January 10. Trump's appeal cited the Supreme Court's decision in *Trump v. United States*, arguing that the criminal proceedings in state court should be put on hold while his claims of presidential immunity are addressed.Despite Trump's efforts, the sentencing proceeded as scheduled on January 10, 2025. Trump's legal team also sought emergency relief from the New York Court of Appeals, the state's highest court, but their request was denied.In another legal development, a federal court recently considered a case involving Trump's executive orders on federal funding. The court found that the states are likely to succeed on the merits of some of their claims, including allegations that Trump's actions violated the separation of powers and the Spending Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The court issued a temporary restraining order, citing the potential disruption to health, education, and other public services due to the pause in federal funding.These recent court cases highlight the ongoing legal challenges facing Donald Trump as he prepares to take office as President of the United States.

united states new york president donald trump supreme court constitution appeals stormy daniels sonia sotomayor trump trial trump trials new york court despite trump donald trump donald trump

Take This Pardon and Shove It! + A Conversation With Pamela Hemphill

Mea Culpa

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 3, 2025 74:26

Today on Mea Culpa, I'm joined by Pamela Hemphill, known as “MAGA Granny,” who attended the January 6th riot, served 60 days in prison, and is now finishing probation. Despite Trump's mass pardons for Jan 6 rioters, Pam has been outspoken in rejecting his clemency, arguing it dishonors the Capitol Police and undermines accountability. We discuss the dangers of rewriting history, the radicalization of Trump's supporters, and the role of media in spreading propaganda. Pam also shares her journey of breaking free from MAGA disinformation and her frustration with Congress for failing to stand up to Trump's authoritarian agenda. Thanks to our sponsor: L-Nutra: Just visit https://ProlonLife.com/MEACULPA to claim your 15% discount and your bonus gift. Subscribe to Michael's NEW Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@TheMichaelCohenShow Join us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/PoliticalBeatdown Add the Mea Culpa podcast feed: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/mea-culpa-with-michael-cohen Add the Political Beatdown podcast feed: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/political-beatdown Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Trump Trials update for 02-03-2025