POPULARITY
29 episodes with schedule f
5 episodes with schedule f
12 episodes with schedule f
3 episodes with schedule f
3 episodes with schedule f
6 episodes with schedule f
3 episodes with schedule f
2 episodes with schedule f
8 episodes with schedule f
Thursday, May 22nd, 2025Today, the Pentagon has officially accepted the illegal $400M emolument plane from Qatar; a federal judge held a hearing on the men disappeared to South Sudan and found the government violated a court order; a federal judge has blocked Trump's firing of two Democratic members of a privacy oversight board; hundreds of rural hospitals are at risk of closing under Trump policies; Sean Duffy sold stocks right before Trump announced his tariffs; ICE is now dismissing pending immigration cases so they can re-arrest people and remove them faster; a CEO says Trump's IRS pick promised big benefits; and Allison and Dana deliver your Good News.Thank You, PiqueLifeGet 20% off on the Radiant Skin Duo, plus a FREE starter kit at Piquelife.com/dailybeansAG is hosting - NO KINGS Waterfront Park, San Diego - Sat June 14 10am – 12pm PDTDonation link - secure.actblue.com/donate/fuelthemovementMega Happy Hour Zoom Call - you can interact with not just me and Harry Dunn, Andy McCabe, and Dana Goldberg. They'll all be there this Friday at 7 PM ET 4 PM PT. Plus, you'll get these episodes ad free and early, and get pre-sale tickets and VIP access to our live events. You can join at patreon.com/muellershewrote for as little as $3 a month.MSW Media, Blue Wave California Victory Fund | ActBlueGuest: Adam KlasfeldAll Rise NewsAll Rise News - BlueskyAdam Klasfeld (@klasfeldreports.com) - BlueSkyAdam Klasfeld (@KlasfeldReports) - TwitterStories:Immigrant Defenders Law CenterDemocratic senator says he has recordings of favors ‘promised' by Trump's IRS pick | The HillTransportation Secretary Sean Duffy Sold Stocks Two Days Before Trump Announced a Plan for Reciprocal Tariffs | ProPublicaHundreds of rural hospitals are at risk of closing, threatening critical care | CBS NewsPentagon accepts luxury jet from Qatar to use as Air Force One | ABC NewsFederal judge blocks Trump's firing of two Democratic members of privacy oversight board | AP NewsGood Trouble: Please leave a comment opposing Schedule F, which will convert many career federal servants to "at will" employees - easy to fire. Comments are due 5/23/25Federal Register :: Improving Performance, Accountability and Responsiveness in the Civil ServiceFind Upcoming Demonstrations And Actions:50501 MovementJune 14th Nationwide Demonstrations - NoKings.orgIndivisible.orgFederal workers - feel free to email me at fedoath@pm.me and let me know what you're going to do, or just vent. I'm always here to listen. Check out other MSW Media podcastsShows - MSW MediaCleanup On Aisle 45 podSubscribe for free to MuellerSheWrote on SubstackThe BreakdownFollow AG and Dana on Social MediaAllison Gill Substack|Muellershewrote, BlueSky|@muellershewrote, Threads|@muellershewrote, TikTok|@muellershewrote, IG|muellershewrote, Twitter|@MuellerSheWroteDana GoldbergBlueSky|@dgcomedy, IG|dgcomedy, facebook|dgcomedy, danagoldberg.com, Twitter|@DGComedyShare your Good News or Good Trouble:dailybeanspod.com/goodFrom The Good NewsMadnessAmerica, Let Me In – Abrams BooksSolito by Javier Zamora | GoodreadsCarsie BlantonBenton County Health DepartmentAll You FascistsLucas (1986) - IMDbReminder - you can see the pod pics if you become a Patron. The good news pics are at the bottom of the show notes of each Patreon episode! That's just one of the perks of subscribing! patreon.com/muellershewrote Mega Happy Hour Zoom Call - you can interact with not just me and Harry Dunn, Andy McCabe, and Dana Goldberg. They'll all be there this Friday 5/23/2025 at 7 PM ET 4 PM PT. Plus, you'll get these episodes ad free and early, and get pre-sale tickets and VIP access to our live events. You can join at patreon.com/muellershewrote for as little as $3 a month. Federal workers - feel free to email me at fedoath@pm.me and let me know what you're going to do, or just vent. I'm always here to listen.Share your Good News or Good Trouble:https://www.dailybeanspod.com/good/ Check out other MSW Media podcastshttps://mswmedia.com/shows/Subscribe for free to MuellerSheWrote on Substackhttps://muellershewrote.substack.comFollow AG and Dana on Social MediaDr. Allison Gill Substack|Muellershewrote, BlueSky|@muellershewrote , Threads|@muellershewrote, TikTok|@muellershewrote, IG|muellershewrote, Twitter|@MuellerSheWrote,Dana GoldbergTwitter|@DGComedy, IG|dgcomedy, facebook|dgcomedy, IG|dgcomedy, danagoldberg.com, BlueSky|@dgcomedyHave some good news; a confession; or a correction to share?Good News & Confessions - The Daily Beanshttps://www.dailybeanspod.com/confessional/ Listener Survey:http://survey.podtrac.com/start-survey.aspx?pubid=BffJOlI7qQcF&ver=shortFollow the Podcast on Apple:The Daily Beans on Apple PodcastsWant to support the show and get it ad-free and early?Supercasthttps://dailybeans.supercast.com/Patreon https://patreon.com/thedailybeansOr subscribe on Apple Podcasts with our affiliate linkThe Daily Beans on Apple Podcasts
This episode explores the dramatic changes in the US government following Elon Musk's departure and the appointment of Russ Vought. It delves into Vought's strategic moves to overhaul federal operations, emphasizing Schedule F, budget cuts, and policy reforms aimed at streamlining the government. Matt discusses the controversy surrounding these changes, their legal challenges, and the broader implications for government employees and services. He questions the balance between necessary reform and the potential for disruption, urging listeners to consider how much control the government should have over their lives. BUT BEFORE THAT, hear some news on a dollar reset date! About that thing we are doing in Vegas: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WCsH9-05vQzgZf9MAGBpUahyTqBcu9VgVqQ8pcACMT8/edit?tab=t.0 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Newt’s guest is Vincent Vernuccio, president and co-founder of the Institute for the American Worker. They discuss the significant labor policy developments and legislative efforts aimed at increasing transparency and accountability in both public and private sectors. Their conversation covers the introduction of the Start Applying Labor Transparency (SALT) Act, which seeks to amend the Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 to ensure greater transparency in financial transactions between unions and labor consultants. Vernuccio also explains the implications of President Trump's executive action, Schedule F, which aims to make certain federal employees at-will to enhance accountability. They also discuss the challenges posed by public sector unions and the potential impact of Senator Josh Hawley's Faster Labor Contracts Act, which could impose arbitration on private sector union negotiations. Vernuccio emphasizes the need for modernizing union models to align with today's workforce demands for flexibility and merit-based advancement.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
We assess the first 100 days of the Trump administration and what we can expect going forward. Skye's civic action toolkit recommendations are: Join a dinner for democracy or a coffee for change Resist isolation and say yes to building a future for ourselves. Skye Perryman is the President and CEO of Democracy Forward, which uses the law to build collective power and advance a bold, vibrant democracy for all people. Let's connect! Follow Future Hindsight on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/futurehindsightpod/ Discover new ways to #BetheSpark: https://www.futurehindsight.com/spark Follow Mila on X: https://x.com/milaatmos Follow Skye on IG: https://www.instagram.com/skyeperryman Sponsor: Thank you to Shopify! Sign up for a $1/month trial at shopify.com/hopeful. Early episodes for Patreon supporters: https://patreon.com/futurehindsight Credits: Host: Mila Atmos Guests: Skye Perryman Executive Producer: Mila Atmos Producer: Zack Travis
Send us a textPaying your children through your business is a legitimate and powerful tax strategy that can save you thousands every year!• Reduce taxes by converting business income into deductible expenses with zero tax impact• Children earning under $15,000 (2025 standard deduction) pay no income tax and don't need to file returns• Sole proprietors (Schedule C) and farms (Schedule F) don't pay payroll taxes on wages to children• S-corporations must pay payroll taxes, but strategy remains beneficial for 22%+ tax bracketsThanks for listening! Please share this episode with fellow business owners to help them save on taxes too.Create a STAN Store - Click here to try it out!Here's where you can find us! Follow along on Instagram for lots of free content for business owners daily!Shop our business guides!Our Instagram PageOur family page
In this episode, Alex reminds listeners that Project 2025 exists alongside the chaos of DOGE. As Elon Musk is distancing himself from Trump, it is time for Project 2025 to make things worse. He talks about Schedule F ruining the civil service, AmeriCorps cuts that may rock civil society, worrying cuts to climate research, and more.
Friday, April 25th, 2025Today, Pete Hegseth downloaded Signal on his Pentagon desktop to circumvent classified spaces; President Volodimyr Zalensky rejects Trump's tired Ukraine peace deal; the Trump administration moved a Venezuelan man to Texas despite a federal judge's order; the Pentagon resumes medical care for transgender troops; Trump tells Pam Bondi to launch a criminal investigation into ActBlue; Leland Dudek calls for all SSA offices employees to be converted to Schedule F; Trump's approval rating is in the toilet; the DoJ accidentally files an internal document outlining how much their case against congestion pricing sucks; and Allison delivers your Good News.Thank You, HomeChefFor a limited time, get 50% off and free shipping for your first box PLUS free dessert for life! HomeChef.com/DAILYBEANS. Must be an active subscriber to receive free dessert.POLITICAL VOICES NETWORK PRESENTS: Not The White House Correspondents' Dinner Live PPV April 26, 2025 9pm | MeetHook.live - Steph Miller, Alonzo Boden, Trea Crowder, JoJo from Jerz, Brooklyn Dad Defiant, Frank Coniff, John Fugelsang, Glenn Kirschner, Hal Sparks, Chuck Nice, Frangela, Brian Karem, Dean Obadallah and Elaine Boozler.Guest: John FugelsangTell Me Everything — John FugelsangThe John Fugelsang PodcastSiriusXM ProgressJohn Fugelsang (@johnfugelsang.bsky.social) — BlueskyPre-order Separation of Church and Hate: A Sane Person's Guide to Taking Back the Bible from Fundamentalists, Fascists, and Flock-Fleecing Frauds by John FugelsangStories:Hegseth had Signal messaging app installed on an office computer | The Washington PostNIH guts its first and largest study centered on women | Science | AAASTrump slams Zelenskyy for rejecting Ukraine-Russia negotiations, saying a deal was 'very close' | NBC NewsExclusive: Trump administration moved Venezuelan to Texas for possible deportation despite judge's order | ReutersTrump targets Democratic fundraising powerhouse ActBlue with DOJ probe | CNN PoliticsDudek calls for entire SSA offices to be converted to new Schedule F | Government ExecutiveDOJ accidentally files document outlining flaws with Trump administration's plan to kill NYC congestion pricing | ABC NewsTrump's Approval Rating Has Been Falling Steadily, Polling Average Shows | The New York TimesGood Trouble:ACTION ITEM Implementation of Schedule F - Jeremy Berg | BlueskyFederal Register :: Improving Performance, Accountability and Responsiveness in the Civil ServiceAlso, you can contact Noah Peters, Senior Advisor to the Director, by email at employeeaccountability@opm.gov From The Good NewsSigns of Justice (@signsofjustice) | IG and MSW Media (@mswmediapods) | IG Toasted MallowShared Umbrellas - BlueSkyMaryland Sheep and Wool FestivalReminder - you can see the pod pics if you become a Patron. The good news pics are at the bottom of the show notes of each Patreon episode! That's just one of the perks of subscribing! Federal workers - feel free to email me at fedoath@pm.me and let me know what you're going to do, or just vent. I'm always here to listen.Share your Good News or Good Trouble:https://www.dailybeanspod.com/good/ Check out other MSW Media podcastshttps://mswmedia.com/shows/Subscribe for free to MuellerSheWrote on Substackhttps://muellershewrote.substack.comFollow AG and Dana on Social MediaDr. Allison Gill Substack|Muellershewrote, BlueSky|@muellershewrote , Threads|@muellershewrote, TikTok|@muellershewrote, IG|muellershewrote, Twitter|@MuellerSheWrote,Dana GoldbergTwitter|@DGComedy, IG|dgcomedy, facebook|dgcomedy, IG|dgcomedy, danagoldberg.com, BlueSky|@dgcomedyHave some good news; a confession; or a correction to share?Good News & Confessions - The Daily Beanshttps://www.dailybeanspod.com/confessional/ Listener Survey:http://survey.podtrac.com/start-survey.aspx?pubid=BffJOlI7qQcF&ver=shortFollow the Podcast on Apple:The Daily Beans on Apple PodcastsWant to support the show and get it ad-free and early?Supercasthttps://dailybeans.supercast.com/Patreon https://patreon.com/thedailybeansOr subscribe on Apple Podcasts with our affiliate linkThe Daily Beans on Apple Podcasts
In this jam-packed edition of the RattlerGator Report, J.B. White brings his signature energy, spiritual insight, and unapologetic fire to one of the most explosive episodes yet. Broadcasting from Tallahassee amid technical chaos and BB-gun vandalism, JB dives into the escalating war inside the Department of Defense, where Trump's America First appointments are triggering panic and leaks among Obama-era holdovers. Anchoring his analysis in a powerful clip from Dan Caldwell's Tucker Carlson interview, JB walks through the impressive team Trump is assembling at the Pentagon, from Pete Hegseth's embattled leadership to rising figures like Elbridge Colby, Dan Raisin Kane, and Troy Mink. He unpacks the deep-state backlash, suggesting a black-ops-style leak campaign is targeting these individuals through the Defense Policy Board, where names like Susan Rice still linger suspiciously. JB speculates on a behind-the-scenes op possibly involving Elon Musk and even hints at double-agent intrigue surrounding Rice. He also reflects on Schedule F's strategic implementation, the broader financial chess game involving Bitcoin and gold, and how Trump's subtle pressure on Jerome Powell may be part of a controlled economic takedown. From Vatican vibes to Supreme Court power plays and the CIA's murky legacy, JB weaves it all together in a riveting hour of geopolitical prophecy and patriot passion. Buckle up, Trump 2.0 is just getting started.
President Donald Trump is moving to reclassify around 50,000 government employees from civil servants to political appointees under Schedule F. This would remove civil service protections from these positions, making it easier for these federal workers to be fired. In a public statement, Trump said this will help him “root out corruption,” and have the government “run like a business.”—Support independent journalism by giving us a 5-star rating.Views expressed on this podcast are opinions of the host and guests and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
Today's Headlines: Senator Chris Van Hollen revealed new details about Kilmar Abrego Garcia's transfer to a better prison in El Salvador and criticized the Trump administration's misleading photo edits suggesting gang ties. Meanwhile, California sued the administration over sweeping tariffs, and immigration issues escalated—U.S. citizens and refugees are being wrongfully detained or ordered to leave the country, including a New Mexico teen and a Connecticut doctor. The Supreme Court temporarily blocked deportations under the Alien Enemies Act, while also agreeing to hear a case on Trump's executive order to end birthright citizenship. Trump is also pushing to reclassify 50,000 federal workers under Schedule F, making them easier to fire, and is seizing control of Penn Station's $7B renovation. On trade, no deals have been finalized despite meetings with global partners, casting doubt on the administration's rushed timeline. Resources/Articles mentioned in this episode: CNN: Sen. Chris Van Hollen says Abrego Garcia described being ‘traumatized' at CECOT, has been moved to different detention center Yahoo: Trump Posts Photoshopped Image of Kilmar Abrego Garcia's Knuckle Tattoos With Disputed ‘MS-13' Interpretation Miami Herald: Despite refugee status in the U.S., young Venezuelan was deported to Salvadoran prison AZPM: U.S. citizen in Arizona detained by immigration officials for 10 days - AZPM NBC News: American doctor receives email from immigration officials telling her to leave the country immediately NY Times: Trump Administration Asks Justices to Reject A.C.L.U. Request to Pause Deportations SCOTUS Blog: Justices will hear arguments on Trump's effort to end birthright citizenship AP News: Trump moves to invoke Schedule F to make it easier to fire some federal workers NBC News: Trump faces imposing timeline to broker 75 trade deals in less than 90 days CBS News: Trump administration taking control of Penn Station renovation Morning Announcements is produced by Sami Sage alongside Bridget Schwartz and edited by Grace Hernandez-Johnson Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
President Trump advanced his plans to make it easier to fire tens of thousands of federal workers. He said he would move forward with a rule, previously known as Schedule F, allowing agencies to quickly remove employees from critical positions. White House correspondent Laura Barrón-López reports. PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders
President Trump advanced his plans to make it easier to fire tens of thousands of federal workers. He said he would move forward with a rule, previously known as Schedule F, allowing agencies to quickly remove employees from critical positions. White House correspondent Laura Barrón-López reports. PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders
As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a initiative spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation, a prominent conservative think tank, it becomes clear that this is more than just a policy blueprint – it's a comprehensive vision for reshaping American governance. This project, which has garnered significant attention and controversy, aims to guide the next conservative presidential administration in implementing a wide array of policy changes that could profoundly impact various aspects of American life.At its core, Project 2025 is a collaborative effort involving over 100 respected organizations from the conservative movement. The project's foundation is laid out in the book "Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise," published in April 2023, which is the culmination of work by more than 400 scholars and policy experts. This document outlines a sweeping policy agenda that touches on nearly every major federal agency and aspect of government operations.One of the key pillars of Project 2025 is the restructuring of federal agencies and the way they operate. For instance, the project proposes to "de-weaponize the Federal Government" by increasing accountability and oversight of the FBI and the Department of Justice. This includes measures to make federal bureaucrats more accountable to the democratically elected President and Congress, a move that critics argue could erode the independence and integrity of these agencies[1][3][5].Another significant area of focus is energy policy. Project 2025 advocates for unleashing American energy production to reduce energy prices, a goal that aligns with broader conservative sentiments on energy independence. However, this approach also raises concerns about environmental regulations and the long-term sustainability of such policies[1][5].Education is another sector that would see substantial changes under Project 2025. The initiative suggests moving control and funding of education from federal bureaucrats directly to parents and state and local governments. Proponents argue this would increase local control and efficiency, while critics worry it could lead to unequal access to quality education across different regions[1].The project also delves into highly contentious issues such as immigration and reproductive rights. It proposes securing the border, finishing the wall, and deporting illegal aliens, as well as transferring the custody of immigrant children from Health and Human Services to the Department of Homeland Security. This move is criticized for prioritizing enforcement over welfare and potentially worsening the safety and psychological well-being of vulnerable immigrant children[1][4].On reproductive rights, Project 2025 calls for the revival of the 19th-century Comstock Act to ban abortion medications and materials from being sent through the U.S. Postal Service, and the reversal of the FDA's approval of mifepristone. These proposals are part of a broader effort to restrict abortion access, which has been met with fierce opposition from organizations like the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)[3][4].The project's ambitions extend to the very structure of the federal government. It aims to establish a more unitary executive branch by increasing the president's authority over federal agencies. This includes reissuing Trump's Schedule F executive order, which would allow the dismissal of federal employees deemed 'non-performing' or disloyal. Critics argue this could erode the system of checks and balances and lead to the politicization of the federal workforce[4].Despite President Trump's public distancing from Project 2025 during his campaign, many of the policies he has implemented align closely with the project's proposals. For example, Trump's executive order ending diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs within the federal government mirrors Project 2025's call to dismantle the "DEI apparatus" at various agencies. Trump has also suggested reforms to FEMA, shifting the majority of preparedness and response costs to states and localities, a proposal that is directly outlined in Project 2025's policy book[5].The implications of these changes are far-reaching. Experts and civil rights organizations, such as the ACLU, warn that Project 2025's policies could significantly erode civil rights, undermine the independence of federal agencies, and centralize power in the executive branch. The ACLU has detailed a roadmap for fighting back against these proposals, including going to court to preserve and advance rights, working with Congress to enact policy solutions, and organizing community efforts to educate the public about the potential harms of Project 2025[3].As I reflect on the scope and ambition of Project 2025, it is clear that this initiative represents a fundamental shift in how conservatives envision American governance. The project's proponents see it as a necessary corrective to what they perceive as a bloated and unaccountable federal government, while critics view it as a dangerous erosion of civil liberties and democratic norms.Looking ahead, the implementation of Project 2025's policies will likely be a contentious and ongoing process. As the country approaches future elections and potential changes in administration, the fate of these proposals will remain a critical point of debate. Whether Project 2025 succeeds in reshaping American governance or is met with significant resistance, one thing is certain: its impact will be felt across every aspect of American life.
JB White returns with a fiery episode of the RattlerGator Report, diving headfirst into the power moves, psyops, and strategic warfare shaping Trump 2.0's offensive. From General Flynn's no-holds-barred call for treason arrests, including Obama, Brennan, and Rice, to the revival of Schedule F as the ultimate deep state-clearing weapon, JB lays out the real battle plan behind the chaos. He unpacks the escalating trade war with China, spotlighting Kevin O'Leary's bombshell radio appearance and the strategic pressure on Chinese firms exploiting U.S. legal loopholes. JB doesn't hold back on media wordplay either, torching the left's narrative about a “mistaken removal” of an MS-13 member and dismantling DOJ disinfo one rhetorical grenade at a time. There's also an impassioned defense of Stephen Miller and General Flynn, a breakdown of why normies are finally catching on to the Sun Tzu-style Trump doctrine, and a big-picture analysis of how Schedule F is being tactically reshaped to gut entrenched bureaucracy without firing a shot. From shout-outs to Badlands' upcoming Plymouth stop to a few hilarious tangents about styes, football, and “Pip Jennies,” this episode is classic RattlerGator...unfiltered, unrelenting, and unapologetically America First.
As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a sweeping initiative spearheaded by the conservative Heritage Foundation, it becomes clear that this is more than just a policy manual – it's a blueprint for a fundamental transformation of American governance.Project 2025 is the culmination of efforts from over 100 respected organizations within the conservative movement, aiming to "take down the Deep State" and return the government to the people. This ambitious plan, outlined in a 900-page manual, involves hundreds of individual policy changes that touch nearly every aspect of American life. From immigration and abortion rights to education and energy production, the scope of Project 2025 is vast and its implications profound.One of the most contentious areas addressed by Project 2025 is immigration. The plan calls for securing the border, finishing the construction of the wall, and deporting illegal aliens. It also proposes transferring the custody of immigrant children from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), a move that critics argue would prioritize enforcement over welfare and potentially worsen the safety and psychological well-being of vulnerable children[5].In the realm of reproductive rights, Project 2025 advocates for drastic measures. It suggests reviving the 19th-century Comstock Act to ban abortion medications and materials from being sent through the U.S. Postal Service and reversing the FDA's approval of mifepristone, a key medication used in abortions. These proposals are part of a broader effort to gut abortion access, with supporters like Pam Bondi, who defended President Trump during his first impeachment trial and upheld Florida's restrictive abortion ban, actively working to implement these changes[3].Education is another sector that would undergo significant changes under Project 2025. The plan aims to dismantle the federal role in education, proposing the abolition of the Department of Education and the privatization of student loans. It also recommends eliminating the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program and increasing taxes on university endowments. Sara Partridge, associate director of higher education policy at the Center for American Progress, notes that "the way I see it, Project 2025 really set out to destroy the federal role in education as we know it, and this administration has already taken major steps to weaken it"[4].The energy sector is not immune to the project's ambitious reforms. Project 2025 advocates for unleashing American energy production to reduce energy prices, including expanding energy exploration and extraction in Alaska and opening the National Petroleum Reserve to leasing and development. This aligns with broader conservative goals of reducing regulatory barriers and increasing domestic energy production[2].A key aspect of Project 2025 is its focus on restructuring the federal government to make it more accountable to the democratically elected President and Congress. This includes proposals to de-weaponize the Federal Government by increasing accountability and oversight of the FBI and DOJ, and to implement Trump's Schedule F executive order, which would allow for the dismissal of ‘non-performing' federal employees. This measure could significantly erode the system of checks and balances by centralizing power in the executive branch[5].The project also delves into social issues, such as banning biological males from competing in women's sports, a policy that reflects the conservative movement's stance on gender and sports[1].Despite President Trump's denials of direct involvement, the connections between Project 2025 and his administration are evident. The Heritage Foundation, which published the project, has direct ties to Trump's first administration, with at least 140 people who worked on Project 2025 having previously worked in Trump's administration. Kevin Roberts, the Heritage Foundation President, has described his organization's role as “institutionalizing Trumpism”[3].Experts and analysts are keenly watching the implementation of these policies, noting that while not all of Trump's actions fully adhere to Project 2025's recommendations, the core concepts are often aligned. Brendan Cantwell, a higher education professor at Michigan State University, observes that "the record established in Project 2025 and by people like Max Eden … [is] being enacted quite clearly"[4].The potential implications of Project 2025 are far-reaching and multifaceted. By centralizing power in the executive branch, undermining civil rights, and eroding essential social programs, this agenda prioritizes control over fairness, enforcement over welfare, and exclusion over inclusion. As noted by the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), the incremental steps already being taken in states like Texas and Washington are paving the way for the broader implementation of Project 2025's vision, which could significantly compromise the rights of marginalized groups[5].As we look ahead, it is clear that Project 2025 represents a critical juncture in American governance. The next few weeks and months will be pivotal, with expected executive orders and legislative actions that could reshape the landscape of federal policies. Experts predict significant changes in accreditation standards for colleges, further constraints on colleges, and potential overhauls in the student loan system[4].In conclusion, Project 2025 is not just a policy document; it is a vision for a fundamentally different America. As the country navigates these proposed changes, it is imperative to understand the scope, ambition, and potential impacts of this initiative. Whether one supports or opposes these policies, the importance of informed engagement and vigilant oversight cannot be overstated. The future of American governance hangs in the balance, and the decisions made now will shape the nation for generations to come.
As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, it becomes clear that this initiative is more than just a policy blueprint; it's a comprehensive vision for transforming the American government, rooted in conservative ideals and backed by a formidable array of scholars and policy experts.Project 2025, spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation, is the latest in a series of "Mandate for Leadership" guides that have been influential in shaping conservative policy agendas since Ronald Reagan's presidency. This 900-page document is the culmination of efforts by over 400 scholars and policy experts from across the conservative movement, aiming to provide a detailed roadmap for a future conservative administration[3][4].At its core, Project 2025 is about centralizing power and reshaping the federal government to align more closely with conservative values. One of the most contentious aspects is the proposal to significantly expand presidential powers, particularly through the reissuance of Trump's Schedule F executive order. This measure would allow the president to dismiss federal employees deemed 'non-performing' or insufficiently loyal, potentially targeting the vast majority of career civil servants who are crucial for the continuity and integrity of government operations[1][2].The plan also outlines drastic changes to federal agencies, such as the elimination of the Department of Education and the de-weaponization of the Federal Government by increasing accountability and oversight of the FBI and DOJ. For instance, Project 2025 suggests transferring the custody of immigrant children from Health and Human Services (HHS) to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), a move that critics argue would prioritize enforcement over welfare and exacerbate the safety and psychological well-being risks for vulnerable immigrant children[1][3].In the realm of reproductive rights, Project 2025 proposes stringent restrictions on abortion, going even further than some of the policies advocated by former President Donald Trump. Recent legal battles, such as the case involving the FDA's approval of mifepristone, serve as a precursor to how these policies might be implemented. Despite the Supreme Court dismissing the case on procedural grounds, it set a precedent for future legal challenges aimed at limiting access to abortion medication[1].The project's ambition extends to other critical areas, including education and energy policy. It advocates for moving control and funding of education from federal bureaucrats to parents and state and local governments, and for unleashing American energy production to reduce energy prices. Additionally, it proposes banning biological males from competing in women's sports, reflecting a broader push to redefine social and cultural norms[3].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its detailed plan for the first 180 days of a new administration. This "180-Day Playbook" is designed to ensure quick implementation of key policies, from securing the border and finishing the wall to cutting government spending and reducing inflation. This rapid-fire approach is meant to capitalize on the initial momentum of a new presidency, much like Reagan's successful implementation of 60% of the original "Mandate for Leadership" recommendations in his first year[3][4].The implications of these policies are far-reaching and have sparked significant concern among critics. Experts warn that Project 2025's recommendations could endanger democratic institutions, dismantle civil liberties, and concentrate presidential power in ways that are unprecedented in modern American history. For example, the plan's proposals for media and technology policies, including reducing NPR funding and increasing agency accountability while decreasing wasteful spending, have been seen as threats to the independence of public broadcasting and the free flow of information[4].Despite former President Trump's public denials of any affiliation with Project 2025, there is a clear overlap between the project's goals and his own policy agenda. Trump has called for similar cuts to federal agencies and has advocated for stricter immigration policies, aligning with key tenets of the project. However, Trump has also distanced himself from some of the more extreme measures outlined in the document, such as the comprehensive restrictions on abortion[2].The response from Democrats has been vehement, with the Biden campaign and other Democratic figures highlighting the dangers of Project 2025 as a way to attack Trump's policies. "It's not a secret: Look it up. They are attacking our most vulnerable citizens. The Project 2025 plan is not a game," warned actress Taraji P. Henson during the BET awards, reflecting the broader concern that this plan represents a significant threat to marginalized groups and democratic norms[2].As we look ahead, the implementation of Project 2025's policies, should they come to fruition, will be a defining moment for American governance. The project's proponents see it as a necessary correction to what they perceive as a bloated and inefficient federal government, while critics view it as a radical and risky agenda that could undermine the very foundations of American democracy.In the coming months, as the 2025 presidential transition looms, the nation will be watching closely to see how these policies are received and implemented. Will Project 2025's vision of a more centralized, conservative government become a reality, or will it face significant resistance from various stakeholders? The answer to this question will have profound implications for the future of American politics and the lives of its citizens.
As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a comprehensive and contentious plan crafted by the Heritage Foundation, I am struck by the sheer scope and ambition of this conservative blueprint. This 900-page document, often described as a guidebook for transforming American governance, has sparked intense debate and concern across the political spectrum.At its core, Project 2025 is a vision for a radically different federal government, one that amplifies presidential power and reshapes the bureaucracy to align with conservative ideals. The project is the culmination of efforts by over 400 scholars and policy experts, aiming to provide a detailed policy agenda for a potential incoming Republican administration, particularly one led by Donald Trump, despite his public denials of involvement[2][4].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its proposal to centralize power within the executive branch. The plan suggests reissuing Trump's Schedule F executive order, which would allow the president to dismiss federal employees deemed 'non-performing' or disloyal. This measure targets the vast federal workforce of approximately 3.5 million individuals, the majority of whom are career civil servants essential for maintaining government continuity and integrity. As Dr. Ray Serrano, Director of Research and Policy at LULAC, notes, "This proposal targets the vast federal workforce... enabling far-right extremists to discharge federal employees considered insufficiently loyal"[1].The project also outlines sweeping reforms to federal agencies, including the elimination of the Department of Education and significant cuts to other agencies. For instance, Project 2025 proposes transferring the custody of immigrant children from Health and Human Services (HHS) to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), prioritizing enforcement over welfare. This change would likely expand detention centers and worsen the safety and psychological well-being of vulnerable immigrant children[1].On the issue of immigration, Project 2025 advocates for mass deportations of millions of undocumented immigrants and the completion of the border wall. These policies align closely with Trump's past rhetoric, although the project goes further in some areas, such as its stance on abortion. While Trump has expressed support for certain abortion restrictions, Project 2025's proposals are more extreme, aiming to limit access to abortion medication through legal challenges and regulatory changes. A recent court case in Texas, where a judge ruled in favor of revoking the FDA's approval of mifepristone, serves as a precursor to these broader restrictions[1][2].The project's impact on reproductive rights is just one facet of its broader assault on civil liberties. It also proposes to ban biological males from competing in women's sports and to de-weaponize the federal government by increasing accountability and oversight of agencies like the FBI and DOJ. These measures are part of a larger effort to "return the government to the people" and dismantle what the project's proponents call the "Deep State"[5].In the realm of media and technology, Project 2025's plans are equally transformative. The project recommends increasing agency accountability while decreasing wasteful spending at the FCC, promoting national security, and expanding connectivity through the support of 5G and satellite technologies. It also suggests that Big Tech companies should contribute to the Universal Service Fund, currently funded through telephone bills. These proposals reflect a broader aim to reshape the regulatory landscape in favor of conservative priorities[4].Critics of Project 2025 argue that its recommendations are not just radical but also risky, potentially endangering democratic institutions and concentrating presidential power to an unprecedented degree. As Roxana Muenster from the Brookings Institution notes, "Project 2025's policy recommendations should be cause for concern: Congress enacted the 1967 Public Broadcasting Act because they believed an educated and informed citizenry was in the public, local, and national interest"[4].The Heritage Foundation and its allies, however, see Project 2025 as a necessary corrective to what they perceive as the failures of the current system. Kevin Roberts, the president of the Heritage Foundation, has warned of a "second American Revolution" that could remain bloodless if the left allows it to be, underscoring the project's urgency and the stakes involved[2].As the 2025 presidential transition looms, the implementation of Project 2025's proposals will depend on the outcome of the election. The Center for Progressive Reform and other watchdog groups are closely tracking the project's executive action proposals across 20 federal agencies, ready to highlight the devastating consequences these actions could have for workers, the environment, public health, and the rights of millions of Americans[3].In the coming months, as the political landscape continues to evolve, Project 2025 will remain a focal point of debate and contention. Whether its vision for a centralized, conservative government becomes reality or remains a blueprint for a hypothetical future, one thing is clear: the stakes are high, and the implications for American governance are profound. As we move forward, it will be crucial to monitor the project's progress and its potential to reshape the very fabric of American democracy.
As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a comprehensive policy blueprint crafted by over 400 conservative scholars and experts, I am struck by the sheer scope and ambition of this initiative. Spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation, a think tank that has significantly influenced conservative administrations since the 1980s, Project 2025 is more than just a policy agenda; it is a vision for a fundamentally transformed America.At its core, Project 2025 is a 920-page manifesto that outlines a radical policy vision for a future conservative administration. The project is built on four pillars: a detailed policy agenda, a personnel database of loyal conservatives, a private online educational tool to train these individuals, and an unpublished 180-day playbook for transition plans in the first six months of a new administration[3][4].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its proposal to centralize power in the executive branch, significantly eroding the system of checks and balances that has been a cornerstone of American democracy. The plan aims to increase the president's authority over every aspect of the federal government, allowing for the dismissal of federal employees deemed 'non-performing' or insufficiently loyal. This is exemplified by the reissuance of Trump's Schedule F executive order, which would permit the firing of career civil servants, a move that could disrupt the continuity and integrity of government operations[1][4].The implications of such a shift are profound. As Dr. Ray Serrano, Director of Research and Policy at LULAC, notes, "Project 2025 represents a substantial threat not only to individual rights but also to the very foundation of American democracy. By seeking to centralize power in the executive branch, undermine civil rights, and erode essential social programs, this radical agenda prioritizes control over fairness, enforcement over welfare, and exclusion over inclusion."[1]In the realm of reproductive rights, Project 2025 proposes sweeping changes that could drastically limit access to abortion and contraception. For instance, the plan includes a national abortion ban and restrictions on access to contraception. These policies are being tested incrementally, as seen in the recent legal challenges to the FDA's approval of mifepristone, an abortion medication. Although the Supreme Court dismissed the case on procedural grounds, it sets a precedent for future legal strategies aimed at restricting reproductive rights[1].The project also targets immigration policies, advocating for the transfer of custody of immigrant children from Health and Human Services (HHS) to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). This move would prioritize enforcement over welfare, potentially expanding detention centers and worsening the safety and psychological well-being of vulnerable immigrant children. Additionally, the proposal includes the repeal of parts of the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA), facilitating large-scale detention center use across the country[1].In the areas of media and technology, Project 2025's plans are equally daunting. The blueprint suggests weakening the reach and effectiveness of independent media by allowing the president to manipulate the FCC and launch antitrust investigations into media companies that criticize the administration. This could result in the revocation of broadcast licenses for major networks, depriving Americans of vital information about government activities. As Roxana Muenster from Brookings notes, "Project 2025's policy recommendations should be cause for concern: Congress enacted the 1967 Public Broadcasting Act because they believed an educated and informed citizenry was in the public, local, and national interest."[2]The project's economic and educational policies are also far-reaching. It proposes cutting the growth of government spending to reduce inflation, unleashing American energy production to lower energy prices, and moving control and funding of education from federal bureaucrats to parents and state and local governments. Additionally, it suggests banning biological males from competing in women's sports, a policy that reflects the project's broader stance on social issues[3].Critics argue that these policies are not just radical but also risky, endangering democratic institutions and civil liberties. The Center for American Progress warns that Project 2025 "would eliminate fundamental personal freedoms while cutting the take-home pay of millions of Americans," and "make it even harder for the American people to have a say in their government or oppose policies they disagree with."[4]As I reflect on the scope of Project 2025, it becomes clear that this initiative is not just a policy blueprint but a roadmap for a significant transformation of American governance. The project's authors and supporters see it as a way to "take down the Deep State and return the government to the people," but critics view it as an authoritarian guide that could dismantle the republic and strip away fundamental rights and freedoms[3][4].Looking ahead, the implementation of Project 2025's policies will likely be a contentious and highly visible process. With the 2025 presidential transition looming, the next few months will be crucial in determining whether this radical agenda gains traction. As the country navigates these uncharted waters, it is imperative for Americans to be aware of the potential implications of Project 2025 and to engage in the democratic process to ensure that the principles of fairness, inclusion, and democratic resilience are upheld. The future of American democracy hangs in the balance, and the choices made now will shape the nation for generations to come.
As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a comprehensive and contentious presidential transition initiative, it becomes clear that this is more than just a policy guide – it's a blueprint for a radical transformation of American governance.Project 2025, spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation, is a multi-faceted plan designed to equip the next conservative president with a detailed policy agenda, a database of potential personnel, training programs, and a playbook for the first 180 days in office. The project is led by former Trump administration officials, including Paul Dans and Spencer Chretien, which has led critics to tie it closely to Trump's policies and campaign promises, despite his public denials of involvement[2][3].At its core, Project 2025 aims to centralize power in the executive branch, a move that critics argue could significantly erode the system of checks and balances. One of the most alarming proposals involves reissuing Trump's Schedule F executive order, which would allow the president to dismiss federal employees deemed 'non-performing' or insufficiently loyal. This measure targets the vast federal workforce of approximately 3.5 million employees, potentially disrupting government operations and exacerbating hardships for communities reliant on federal support[1].The project also proposes sweeping reforms to federal agencies, including a drastic overhaul of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Project 2025 suggests transferring the custody of immigrant children from Health and Human Services (HHS) to DHS, prioritizing enforcement over welfare. This change could expand detention centers and worsen the safety and psychological well-being of vulnerable immigrant children. Additionally, the repeal of parts of the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA) would facilitate large-scale detention center use across the country[1].In the realm of reproductive rights, Project 2025's policies are equally concerning. The initiative aligns with recent legal challenges, such as the case involving the FDA's approval of mifepristone, which set a precedent for limiting access to abortion medication. These legal strategies serve as a blueprint for future restrictions on reproductive rights, signaling a potential future where Project 2025's goals are realized through similar tactics[1].The project's stance on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) practices is another contentious area. Project 2025 calls for the deletion of terms like DEI, abortion, and gender equality from federal rules, agency regulations, and legislation. This aligns with Trump's recent executive order ending all DEI programs within the federal government, which he claimed could violate federal civil rights laws and exclude Americans from opportunities based on their race or sex[3].Project 2025 also outlines significant changes to disaster response and emergency funding. The plan proposes reforming FEMA emergency spending to shift the majority of preparedness and response costs to states and localities, rather than the federal government. This recommendation is based on the argument that FEMA is "overtasked" and "overcompensates for the lack of state and local preparedness and response." The project suggests ending preparedness grants for states and localities, arguing that DHS should not be in the business of handing out federal tax dollars[3].In the area of media and technology, Project 2025's proposals are equally far-reaching. The initiative calls for increasing agency accountability while decreasing wasteful spending at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). It also advocates for promoting national security and economic prosperity by reducing the digital divide and expanding connectivity through 5G and satellite technologies. Additionally, the project recommends that Big Tech companies contribute to the Universal Service Fund, currently funded through telephone bills[4].Paul Dans, the former director of Project 2025, has been candid about the project's ambitions. In a recent interview, he expressed his delight with how the Trump administration has implemented aspects of the project, saying, "It's actually way beyond my wildest dreams... The way that they've been able to move and upset the orthodoxy, and at the same time really capture the imagination of the people, I think portends a great four years."[5]Despite Trump's public denials, the alignment between his policies and Project 2025's proposals is striking. As Dans noted, "Directionally, they have a lot in common... Trump is seizing every minute of every hour." This close alignment has led Democrats to warn that Project 2025 represents a "radical" agenda that could mean a ban on abortion, elimination of LGBTQ+ rights, and a complete overhaul of the federal administrative state[5].As we look ahead, the implications of Project 2025 are daunting. Critics argue that its recommendations could endanger democratic institutions, dismantle civil liberties, and concentrate presidential power. The project's focus on centralizing authority and undermining checks and balances raises serious concerns about the future of American governance.In the coming months, as the Trump administration continues to implement policies outlined in Project 2025, we can expect significant legal and legislative battles. The Supreme Court's role in adjudicating these changes will be crucial, as will the response from state governments and civil society organizations. As Paul Dans ominously suggested, "The deep state is going to get its breath back," indicating a long and contentious road ahead.Project 2025 is not just a policy guide; it is a vision for a fundamentally different America. As the country navigates these profound changes, it remains to be seen whether this vision will be realized and what the long-term consequences will be for American democracy. One thing is certain: the next few years will be pivotal in shaping the future of governance in the United States.
As I delved into the intricacies of Project 2025, a comprehensive and contentious initiative spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation, I couldn't help but feel a sense of unease about the potential future of American governance. This project, often described as a blueprint for a conservative revolution, is more than just a policy guide; it's a roadmap for a radical overhaul of the federal government, crafted by over 400 scholars and backed by more than 100 conservative groups.At its core, Project 2025 is designed to equip the next Republican president with a detailed policy agenda, a database of vetted personnel, training programs for potential administration members, and a playbook of actions to be implemented within the first 180 days in office. The project's leadership, which includes former Trump administration officials like Paul Dans and Spencer Chretien, has drawn significant attention due to its ties to the Trump administration, despite Trump's public disavowal of the initiative[2][3].One of the most alarming aspects of Project 2025 is its proposal to centralize power within the executive branch, potentially eroding the system of checks and balances that underpins American democracy. For instance, the project suggests reissuing Trump's Schedule F executive order, which would allow the president to dismiss federal employees deemed 'non-performing' or insufficiently loyal. This measure targets the vast federal workforce of approximately 3.5 million individuals, the majority of whom are career civil servants essential for maintaining government continuity and integrity[1].The implications of such a move are far-reaching. As Dr. Ray Serrano, Director of Research and Policy at LULAC, notes, "Project 2025 represents a substantial threat not only to individual rights but also to the very foundation of American democracy. By seeking to centralize power in the executive branch, undermine civil rights, and erode essential social programs, this radical agenda prioritizes control over fairness, enforcement over welfare, and exclusion over inclusion[1]."Another critical area where Project 2025 proposes significant changes is in the handling of immigrant children. The project advocates for transferring custody of these children from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), a move that would prioritize enforcement over child welfare. This shift could lead to the expansion of detention centers and worsen the safety and psychological well-being of vulnerable immigrant children[1].The project also delves into reproductive rights, suggesting strategies to limit access to abortion. For example, a recent legal case in Texas, where a judge ruled to revoke the FDA's approval of mifepristone, serves as a precedent for how Project 2025's goals could be realized through similar legal maneuvers. Although the Supreme Court dismissed the case on procedural grounds, it highlights the potential for future restrictions on reproductive rights through targeted legal challenges[1].In addition to these policy proposals, Project 2025 aims to reshape various federal agencies and their functions. For instance, it recommends reforming FEMA's emergency spending to shift the majority of preparedness and response costs from the federal government to states and localities. This change is justified by the argument that FEMA is "overtasked, overcompensates for the lack of state and local preparedness and response, and is regularly in deep debt[3]."The project also targets diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) practices within the federal government. Trump, aligning with Project 2025's policy book, has signed an executive order ending all DEI programs, claiming they can violate federal civil rights laws and exclude Americans based on their race or sex. The project calls for the deletion of terms like DEI, abortion, and gender equality from federal rules, regulations, and legislation[3].The economic and social impacts of these proposals are profound. According to Democracy Forward, if these plans are enacted, 4.3 million people could lose overtime protections, 40 million people could see their food assistance reduced, and 220,000 American jobs could be lost. The project's authors aim to achieve these changes through executive branch actions, bypassing the need for congressional approval, which critics argue is an anti-democratic approach[5].As I reflect on the scope and ambition of Project 2025, it becomes clear that this initiative is not just a policy blueprint but a vision for a fundamentally different America. Kevin Roberts, President of the Heritage Foundation, has described this effort as part of a "second American Revolution," one that could remain bloodless only if the left allows it to be[2].The upcoming months will be crucial as the country approaches the 2025 presidential term. The implementation of Project 2025's proposals will depend on the political landscape and the willingness of the next administration to adopt these radical changes. As Paul Dans, the outgoing director of Project 2025, noted, the readiness of the conservative movement and the alignment of Trump's actions with the project's goals are "testaments to the initiative's efforts[3]."In conclusion, Project 2025 is a stark reminder of the ongoing battle for the soul of American governance. As the nation navigates these proposed reforms, it is imperative to understand the potential implications and to engage in a robust public discourse about the future we want to build. The stakes are high, and the choices made in the coming years will shape the trajectory of American democracy for generations to come.
One of the most difficult debates right now is whether the new career civil servant classification is a good thing or a bad thing. It's called Policy-Career, a new name for Schedule F. The Trump administration has willed it into being with an executive order. For the case against this classification, we turn to long-time government accountability watcher Joe Spielberger from the Project on Government Oversight. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoicesSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
We just heard the case against that new class of civil service called career-policy. Formerly called Schedule F, it's the Trump administration's way to make the civil service more accountable. For a cautious view of why it might work this time around, we turn to a senior fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, Sean Higgins. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
We just heard the case against that new class of civil service called career-policy. Formerly called Schedule F, it's the Trump administration's way to make the civil service more accountable. For a cautious view of why it might work this time around, we turn to a senior fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, Sean Higgins. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoicesSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
One of the most difficult debates right now is whether the new career civil servant classification is a good thing or a bad thing. It's called Policy-Career, a new name for Schedule F. The Trump administration has willed it into being with an executive order. For the case against this classification, we turn to long-time government accountability watcher Joe Spielberger from the Project on Government Oversight. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Elon Musk has invaded Washington. He has set loose a pack of feral teenage code monkeys with a god complex inside every federal agency, promising to do for Washington what he did for Twitter. What could possibly go wrong? Oh, and Musk also has a plan to “rightsize” the government by waving unenforceable contracts at federal employees to induce them into resigning. There's a Fork in the Road all right, but this one is perhaps best not taken. Links: Nat'l Counsel of Nonprofits v. OMB (“Nonprofits Case”) docket https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69583571/national-council-of-nonprofits-v-office-of-management-and-budget/ Elon Musk Wants to Get Operational Control of the Treasury's Payment System. This Could Not Possibly Be More Dangerous by https://www.crisesnotes.com/elon-musk-wants-to-get-operational-control-of-the-treasurys-payment-system-this-could-not-possibly-be-more-dangerous/ Office of Personnel Management “Fork in the Road” https://www.opm.gov/fork OPM Guidance on Schedule Policy/Career (formerly Schedule F) https://chcoc.gov/sites/default/files/OPM%20Memorandum%20re%20Schedule%20Policy%20Career%20Guidance%2001-27-25%20FINAL.pdf American Federation of Gov't Employees v. Trump docket https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69588089/american-federation-of-government-employees-afl-cio-v-trump/ VSIP 5 U.S.C. § 3521 et seq. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/part-III/subpart-B/chapter-35/subchapter-II Truman EO 9830 https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/executive-order-9830-amending-the-civil-service-rules-and-providing-for-federal-personnel Show Links: https://www.lawandchaospod.com/ BlueSky: @LawAndChaosPod Threads: @LawAndChaosPod Twitter: @LawAndChaosPod Patreon: patreon.com/LawAndChaosPod
Independent investigative journalism, broadcasting, trouble-making and muckraking with Brad Friedman of BradBlog.com
Trump issued dozens of imperial edicts — oh, sorry, executive orders. Many of them are wildly illegal, mostly are deeply cruel, and all are being challenged in court. We'll discuss the pending injunctions on his birthright citizenship order and the “pause” on government spending so that he can redline the federal budget and delete all the “woke.” Links: Trump v. Meta docket https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/61568745/trump-v-meta-platforms-inc/ American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO v. Trump docket https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69588089/american-federation-of-government-employees-afl-cio-v-trump/ OMB M-25-13 https://www.washingtonpost.com/documents/deb7af80-48b6-4b8a-8bfa-3d84fd7c3ec8.pdf?itid=lk_inline_manual_2 OMB CLARIFICATION MEMO https://ngma.memberclicks.net/assets/docs/White%20House%20OMB%20Clarification%20Memo.pdf Nat'l Counsel of Nonprofits v. OMB (“Nonprofits Case”) docket https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69583571/national-council-of-nonprofits-v-office-of-management-and-budget/ State of New York v. Trump (“States Case”) docket https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69585994/state-of-new-york-v-trump/ OPM Guidance on Schedule F https://www.chcoc.gov/content/guidance-implementing-president-trump%E2%80%99s-executive-order-titled-restoring-accountability Show Links: https://www.lawandchaospod.com/ BlueSky: @LawAndChaosPod Threads: @LawAndChaosPod Twitter: @LawAndChaosPod
Thursday, January 30th, 2025Today, the White House has rescinded it's illegal impoundment order for federal spending; the AFGE and NTEU have recommended against federal employees accepting the deferred resignation sent out to all federal employees until they can gather additional information; Elon Musk lackeys have taken over the office of personnel management; the administration has been hit with yet another lawsuit this time over Schedule F implementation; Democrats have flipped a deep red Iowa state senate seat; the USDA Inspector General that was investigating Musk has been physically escorted out of her office; Trump has signed an executive order creating a concentration camp on Guantanamo; US Senator Bob Menendez has been sentenced to 11 years in prison; and Allison and Dana deliver your Good News.Thank You Helix SleepGo to HelixSleep.com/dailybeans for 20% Off Sitewide plus 2 Free Dream Pillows with mattress purchase.Guest: Leigh McGowanThe PoliticsGirl Podcast@politicsgirl.bsky.social - BlueskyPoliticsGirl (@IAmPoliticsGirl) - TwitterFederal workers - feel free to email me at fedoath@pm.me and let me know what you're going to do, or just vent. I'm always here to listen. The Breakdown - Allison Gill | SubstackStories:Trump White House rescinds order freezing federal spending, reversing course - Jeff Stein and Tony Romm | The Washington PostExclusive: USDA inspector general escorted out of her office after defying White House - Rachael Levy | ReutersElon Musk Lackeys Have Taken Over the Office of Personnel Management | WIREDTrump Administration Hit With Another Lawsuit Over Schedule F Order - Matt Cohen | Democracy DocketGood Trouble Call Lisa Murkowski, Susan Collins, Mitch McConnell, and Bill Cassidy and tell them to vote NO NO NO on RFK Jr. Also, it might be a good idea to remind fetterman to vote no. Call all five of them, then please ask a friend to call all five of them. Contacting U.S. SenatorsStates in the SenateHave some good news; a confession; or a correction to share?Good News & Confessions - The Daily Beanshttps://www.dailybeanspod.com/confessional/From The Good NewsZIMMER WINS Senate District-35Reminder - you can see the pod pics if you become a Patron. The good news pics are at the bottom of the show notes of each Patreon episode! That's just one of the perks of subscribing! Check out other MSW Media podcastshttps://mswmedia.com/shows/Subscribe for free to MuellerSheWrote on Substackhttps://muellershewrote.substack.comFollow AG and Dana on Social MediaDr. Allison Gill Substack|Muellershewrote, Twitter|@MuellerSheWrote, Threads|@muellershewrote, TikTok|@muellershewrote, IG|muellershewrote, BlueSky|@muellershewroteDana GoldbergTwitter|@DGComedy, IG|dgcomedy, facebook|dgcomedy, IG|dgcomedy, danagoldberg.com, BlueSky|@dgcomedyHave some good news; a confession; or a correction to share?Good News & Confessions - The Daily Beanshttps://www.dailybeanspod.com/confessional/ Listener Survey:http://survey.podtrac.com/start-survey.aspx?pubid=BffJOlI7qQcF&ver=shortFollow the Podcast on Apple:The Daily Beans on Apple PodcastsWant to support the show and get it ad-free and early?Supercasthttps://dailybeans.supercast.com/Patreon https://patreon.com/thedailybeansOr subscribe on Apple Podcasts with our affiliate linkThe Daily Beans on Apple Podcasts
The Trump administration is reclassifying federal workers as Schedule F, making them easier to fire, and put a stop to remote work. In hopes of compelling federal employees to quit, and thereby shrink the government workforce. Heaton makes the case that if your goal is to shrink government, this is a counter productive way to do it.
In this episode of Bionic Planet, Season 10, Episode 115, we dive into the significant environmental implications of the executive orders signed by President Donald Trump on his first day in office. Originally, we had planned to focus this season on Africa, but the rapid changes in U.S. environmental policy prompted us to shift gears. I connected with Tim Male last week. Tim, who founded the Environmental Policy Innovation Center in 2017, has a wealth of experience in environmental policy, having worked in various capacities, including at the White House and with organizations like Defenders of Wildlife. Both Tim and I share a commitment to addressing climate challenges, despite our differing perspectives on party policies. In our discussion, we unpack Tim's recent LinkedIn post, where he meticulously breaks down the ten executive actions that target environmental regulations. We explore the unprecedented number of executive orders issued in such a short time frame and the potential consequences of these actions. Tim emphasizes that while executive orders can set priorities for federal agencies, they must still align with existing laws, which can lead to legal challenges. We delve into specific orders, starting with the requirement for the "God squad" under the Endangered Species Act to meet more frequently and expedite reviews of projects that could impact endangered species. Tim explains the historical context of this committee and its potential to prioritize development over environmental protections. Next, we discuss directives to the Army Corps of Engineers to expedite permitting processes under the Clean Water Act and the Endangered Species Act, raising concerns about the implications for environmental safeguards. Tim provides insights into the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and its role in ensuring that federal actions minimize environmental harm. We also examine the revocation of President Carter's executive order aimed at making environmental impact statements more accessible to the public, which Tim argues could lead to confusion and inconsistency across federal agencies. The episode continues with a discussion on the rescinding of protections for ancient forests and the withdrawal from international efforts to combat deforestation. Tim highlights the significance of ecosystem service valuation and the potential loss of guidance that could have helped quantify the benefits of environmental services. We touch on the broader implications of these actions, including the potential for increased energy production at the expense of environmental protections. As we wrap up, we reflect on the long-term consequences of these executive orders and the potential for legal challenges. Tim expresses concern about the sweeping nature of these actions and the message they send to communities affected by energy projects. This episode serves as a critical examination of the intersection between politics and environmental policy, providing listeners with a deeper understanding of the current landscape and the challenges ahead in the fight against climate change. Timestamps 00:00:00 - Introduction to Season 10 and Episode Overview 00:02:09 - Trump's Executive Orders on Environmental Policies 00:03:29 - The Role of Executive Orders in U.S. Government 00:04:01 - Critique of Trump's Environmental Actions 00:05:01 - Legal Challenges to Executive Orders 00:06:19 - Endangered Species Act and the God Squad 00:10:11 - Clean Water Act and Emergency Procedures 00:13:42 - Understanding NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act) 00:16:03 - Revocation of Carter's NEPA Executive Order 00:19:12 - Rescinding Protections for Ancient Forests 00:21:49 - International Cooperation on Deforestation 00:23:09 - Ecosystem Service Valuation Guidance Rescinded 00:28:05 - Nature-Based Solutions and Their Importance 00:29:59 - Action Plans for Energy Production Regulations 00:32:19 - Suspension of Policies Related to Energy in Alaska 00:34:27 - Impact of Schedule F on Federal Employment 00:38:11 - DOJ Teams and Federal Workforce Changes 00:41:00 - The Role of Professionals in Government 00:44:25 - Conclusion and Future Implications Quotes "On his very first day in office, President Donald Trump signed 78 executive actions, and 10 of them targeted environmental policies." - 00:02:09 "It's pretty hard to find the wheat among the chaff in this set of actions from the environment." - 00:04:01 "What this order is foreshadowing is a bunch of people who are much more likely to prioritize a development project are going to get the final say on conflicts involving endangered species." - 00:09:33 "This is really just we're not going to do it." - 00:04:33 "The law is pretty limited in terms of who can, you know, ask for an appeal of the decision." - 00:10:21 "This is a part of that same executive order from President Biden that is being rescinded." - 00:20:25 "It's a broad and messy brush that they're painting across the forest landscape in a way that is pretty harmful." - 00:21:18 "This is a White House that's showing great interest in expanding the power of the White House." - 00:18:00 "There's people across the federal government who are very creative at saying, well, you've told me to do it this way, and that's not legal." - 00:42:19 "At the end of the day, I don't know what your philosophy is on how democracy is supposed to work, but, you know, at some level, the winner is supposed to get to decide what happens next." - 00:36:38 Keywords Bionic Planet Season 10 Episode 115 Donald Trump Tim Mayle Environmental Policy Innovation Center White House Defenders of Wildlife Nairobi LinkedIn Endangered Species Act Alaska Clean Water Act National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) Obama administration Biden administration Anthropocene Steve Zwick snail darter whooping cranes Trans-Alaskan pipeline liquefied natural gas (LNG) Tongass National Forest U.S. Digital Service Virginia Youngkin ecosystem services climate emergency energy dominance fossil fuels Native Alaskans Paris Accord Washington, D.C. environmental impact statements mitigation banking biodiversity carbon sequestration emergency procedures federal workforce Schedule F Department of Justice (DOJ)
Host Jon Herold dissects a jam-packed weekend of political developments. From Trump's swift actions against Colombia's deportation defiance to new executive orders targeting FEMA and abortion funding, this episode breaks down the key stories shaping America's future. Dive into updates on AI competition with China, insights into the Schedule F initiative, and ongoing immigration enforcement. Plus, a masterclass on leadership from Trump as he reasserts America's dominance on the global stage. Don't miss this detailed breakdown of today's top stories.
It's Casual Friday! Sam and Emma speak with Krystal Ball, co-host of Krystal, Kyle, & Friends and Breaking Points, to round up the week in news. First, Sam and Emma run through updates on Trump's assault on civil servants, his attempt to overturn birthright citizenship, the arrival of federal troops to the southern border, Trump's dangerous empowerment of ICE, the likely confirmation of Pete Hegseth, more Trump pardons, Meta's anti-abortion actions, Mike Johnson's request of Casey Hutchinson, and Trump's halting of police reform agreements, before expanding on the role of Trump's “Schedule F” attack on civil servants, and watching Jeff Merkley come right at Russ Vought for his desire to trap sick people in poverty. Krystal Ball then joins, diving right into Trump's clear and active effort to exercise his plan of maximalist lawlessness, with blanket pardons to violent January 6th rioters, blatantly unconstitutional acts like overturning birthright citizenship, and the launching of a shady cryptocurrency to hide backroom dealings. Expanding on this, Ball explores the particular role the Big Tech oligarchy plays in backing the Trump regime, with mass amounts of wealth stored in and funding the world of AI and cryptocurrency – two institutions whose primary uses are in bolstering and protecting exploitation – and why this political move by the industry is a necessity in an era where they are becoming more and more representative of the massive, unproductive hoards of wealth tied up among elite capitalists. After tackling the particular role the Democratic Party played in making this era of Big Money and Big Tech a bipartisan one, and how that, alongside the corporate capture of the media, has created an environment with utterly weakened opposition to fascism – with Dems having capitulated to the Trump worldview in the hopes of bringing about a kinder, gentler fascism – wrapping up with the need to stay clear about the anti-fascist and anti-oligarchy messaging, and the environmental, social, and economic impacts they create. Sam and Emma also touch on Trump's recent actions to overturn the federal pledge to not discriminate in federal contracts, and the snitch-order sent out over federal DEI practices. And in the Fun Half: Sam and Emma unpack the immediate impact of Trump's severe mass criminalization and threat of deportation of undocumented migrants, with farmers in the citrus and dairy industries seeing their workforce disappear overnight, before talking with Kieth from Chicago about Trump's NIH shutdown and the collective nature of science, and exploring Trump's crackdown on the administrative state with the perspective of USDA worker Leo from CA. Elon sycophants Ben Shapiro and PBD jump to his defense over the “did a literal Sieg Heil at the inauguration” allegations, and the MR Team reflects on videos from the Aldaghma family in the wake of a tentative ceasefire in Gaza, plus, your calls and IMs! Follow Krystal on Twitter here: https://x.com/krystalball Check out Krystal, Kyle & Friends: https://krystalkyleandfriends.substack.com/ Check out Breaking Points here: https://www.youtube.com/c/breakingpoints Donate to the Gaza Bakery here: https://www.gofundme.com/f/gaza-bakery-feeding-displaced-families Become a member at JoinTheMajorityReport.com: https://fans.fm/majority/join Follow us on TikTok here!: https://www.tiktok.com/@majorityreportfm Check us out on Twitch here!: https://www.twitch.tv/themajorityreport Find our Rumble stream here!: https://rumble.com/user/majorityreport Check out our alt YouTube channel here!: https://www.youtube.com/majorityreportlive Gift a Majority Report subscription here: https://fans.fm/majority/gift Subscribe to the ESVN YouTube channel here: https://www.youtube.com/esvnshow Subscribe to the AMQuickie newsletter here: https://am-quickie.ghost.io/ Join the Majority Report Discord! https://majoritydiscord.com/ Get all your MR merch at our store: https://shop.majorityreportradio.com/ Get the free Majority Report App!: https://majority.fm/app Go to https://JustCoffee.coop and use coupon code majority to get 10% off your purchase! Check out today's sponsors: Ritual: Essential for Men is a quality multivitamin from a company you can actually trust. Get 25% off your first month for a limited time at https://ritual.com/MAJORITY. That's https://ritual.com/MAJORITY for 25% off your first month. Sunset Lake CBD: Head on over to https://SunsetLakeCBD.com and use code Tincture to save 35% on tinctures. See their site for terms and conditions. Follow the Majority Report crew on Twitter: @SamSeder @EmmaVigeland @MattLech @BradKAlsop Check out Matt's show, Left Reckoning, on Youtube, and subscribe on Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/leftreckoning Check out Matt Binder's YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/mattbinder Subscribe to Brandon's show The Discourse on Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/ExpandTheDiscourse Check out Ava Raiza's music here! https://avaraiza.bandcamp.com/ The Majority Report with Sam Seder - https://majorityreportradio.com/
In this episode of the "How to Protect the Ocean" podcast, host Andrew Lewin discusses the significant executive actions Donald Trump took on his first day in office that will impact ocean policies. The episode highlights several key policies that were revoked or altered, which pose threats to the ocean environment: Revocation of Biden's Executive Orders: Trump rescinded multiple executive orders from the Biden administration to protect public health and the environment and address the climate crisis. This included orders that directed federal agencies to confront climate change and protect marine ecosystems. Removal of Offshore Exploration Protections: Trump's actions included the removal of protections against offshore oil and natural gas exploration on the outer continental shelf. This could lead to increased drilling activities, which are detrimental to marine environments. National Energy Emergency Declaration: Trump declared a national energy emergency, which expedited the review and permitting processes for new oil and gas production. This declaration is seen as favoring fossil fuels over renewable energy sources, despite the latter being more cost-effective and environmentally friendly. Halting Offshore Wind Projects: In a contradictory move, Trump issued a temporary withdrawal of all areas on the outer continental shelf from offshore wind leasing. This decision undermines the development of renewable energy sources that could help mitigate climate change. Dismantling of the Civil Service: The reinstatement of Schedule F allows for the conversion of career civil servants into political appointees, which could weaken the scientific integrity and effectiveness of agencies like NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) and BOEM (Bureau of Ocean Energy Management). Withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accord: Trump's decision to pull out of the Paris Agreement removes the U.S. from international climate negotiations, limiting its ability to influence global climate policy and potentially exacerbating ocean-related issues. The episode emphasizes the importance of public engagement and advocacy to counter these policies, urging listeners to contact their representatives to express support for ocean protection initiatives. Link to article: https://www.southernfriedscience.com/how-donald-trumps-day-1-executive-actions-impact-the-ocean/ Follow a career in conservation: https://www.conservation-careers.com/online-training/ Use the code SUFB to get 33% off courses and the careers program. Do you want to join my Ocean Community? Sign Up for Updates on the process: www.speakupforblue.com/oceanapp Sign up for our Newsletter: http://www.speakupforblue.com/newsletter Facebook Group: https://bit.ly/3NmYvsI Connect with Speak Up For Blue: Website: https://bit.ly/3fOF3Wf Instagram: https://bit.ly/3rIaJSG TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@speakupforblue Twitter: https://bit.ly/3rHZxpc YouTube: www.speakupforblue.com/youtube
Within hours of Donald Trump's inauguration, numerous executive actions were signed and over 1500 pardons were issued for nearly all of the January 6th defendants, despite his vice president and attorney general nominee suggesting a more refined approach. So, on this first full day of Trump's second term, hosts Andrew Weissmann and Mary McCord review the blunt nature of these pardons, especially for those convicted of violent acts that day. Then they turn to pardons issued by President Biden in his final hours in office to shield those targeted by Trump for retribution- including members of Congress, those who testified in the J6 investigation, and members of his own family. And finally, Mary and Andrew dive into the myriad of executive actions signed by Trump as legal challenges begin to mount around things like getting rid of birthright citizenship, using the military domestically at our border, undoing the TikTok ban and the creation of DOGE.Further reading: Here is Mary's recent write up in the Atlantic: A Sweeping January 6 Pardon Is an Attack on the JudiciaryWant to listen to this show without ads? Sign up for MSNBC Premium on Apple Podcasts.
With Cliff Schecter. The Dark Ride begins again. Donald pardons all 1,500 insurrectionists. Elon Musk's Nazi salute. The billionaires in attendance. Donald reinstated Schedule F, so he can fire and replace federal workers without cause. Donald has been sued over DOGE. Did he confess to rigging the election? Six in 10 Americans are optimistic about the second Trump term. Donald rescinded executive order to lower prescription drug prices. MAGA fans left out in the cold. A word to our trans friends. With music by Monday Favors, Rebel Queens, and more!See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
So we're here folks. 24 hours later, and we have the sequel. DJT is back in the White House and he has different friends this time. But if your like most folks, you probably didn't watch. That's fine, Nicky Trend and Manny Oso are here to let you know what happened!But also, they need to get some of these new Executive Orders on the table. Amendment 14 is being compromised. We're outta the WHO. There's been a National Emergency Declared. And guess what folks,…. We're getting a Gilf of America!That and more, more… 4 more years of more to come.But anyways you tell us!- can you explain Schedule F for Manny?- What are you feeling now that we're over 24 hours in?- Have eggs gone down yet? Just askin…To keep up with the Ducks in charge follow:FB & IG: @BubblebathstoriesNicky Trendz IG: @nickyTRENDZManny Oso IG: @gotnotime4dissFor official Merch head over to Bubblebathstories.co☎️ Or call us at 347-878-1144 !!!
This special series is a joint production by David Pepper and Resolute Square. The book, “Trump's Project 2025: Up Close And Personal” by David Pepper, is available for purchase at https://a.co/d/adWcJ4S. To start, special guest host Stuart Stevens weighs in on day one of the confirmation hearings and the abomination that is the slate of nominees Trump has put forward for some of the most important positions in the Executive Branch. In Chapter 3, the fact-based fictional story of Dr. Yvette Hardman and JJ Newsom depicts the dismantling of expertise and science-based decision making in the federal government under a possible second Trump administration guided by Project 2025. Dr. Hardman, an experienced infectious disease expert, is removed from her position at the CDC and replaced by JJ Newsom, an unqualified political loyalist with no relevant experience. This reflects Project 2025's plan to fill government positions with partisan appointees rather than nonpartisan experts. The new administration rejects science-based pandemic response recommendations from Dr. Hardman instead prioritizing political and economic considerations over public health. This aligns with Project 2025's directives to limit the CDC's ability to make public health recommendations. The story highlights the Trump administration's hostility towards science and the displacement of experienced civil servants, which Project 2025 seeks to accelerate through measures like the "Schedule F" executive order to reclassify and fire federal employees. Overall, the narrative illustrates how a second Trump term guided by Project 2025 would undermine the role of expertise and independent scientific advice in government, with potentially disastrous consequences for public health and safety. Trump's Project 2025: Up Close and Personal is available on all the podcast apps and at 2025pod.com. We'd also like to thank all the artists who volunteered their time to make this episode: CCH Pounder, Richard Schiff and Jason Kravits who read the chapters and Omid Abtahi, Tom Nichols, Laurie Burke and Joanne Carducci who did the voices. Sound design by Marilys Ernst and Jon Moser. Trump's Project 2025: Up Close and Personal was written by David Pepper and produced by Pepper, Melissa Jo Peltier and Jay Feldman and is a production of Ovington Avenue Productions and The Bill Press Pod. Follow Resolute Square: Instagram Twitter TikTok Find out more at Resolute Square Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
In this episode, Dinesh reveals the significance of Schedule F, a mechanism for Trump, Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy to clean out the waste and excess in the federal bureaucracy. Debbie and Dinesh discuss crime in New York, the backstory on presidential pardons, and Australia's new law banning social media access for young people under the age of 16, and a preview of a very special children's book by our friend Terrence Williams.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Thursday, December 5th, 2024Today, Trump considers replacing Hegseth with either Ron DeSantis or Jonie Ernst for Secretary of Defense; the CEO of United Health was shot in New York; we have the main takeaways from Supreme Court oral arguments over gender affirming care for trans teens; Ken Chesebro moves to vacate his guilty plea in Georgia; Rudy Giuliani is getting desperate as he asks Judge Beryl Howell for more time while representing himself; Trump asks to have his entire Fulton County case thrown out; Jerry Nadler is stepping down as ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee and endorsing Jamie Raskin; Democrats flip the final House seat up for grabs setting up a razor thin majority for Republicans; today in fuck around and find out, union members are upset that Trump has signaled that he's canceling a steel export deal; and Allison delivers your Good News.Thank You HomeChefFor a limited time, HomeChef is offering you 18 Free Meals PLUS Free Dessert for Life and of course, Free Shipping on your first box! Go to HomeChef.com/DAILYBEANS.If you want to support what Harry and I are up to, head to patreon.com/aisle45podStories:Takeaways from the Supreme Court arguments on transgender health care ban: Conservatives skeptical (Lindsay Whitehurst | AP News)The Hidden Danger of the Supreme Court's New Trans Rights Case (Mark Joseph Stern | Slate)Hegseth strikes defiant tone as Trump weighs several options for replacing him (Caitlin Yilek, Ed O'Keefe, James LaPorta, Alan He | CBS News)Police hunt for gunman after UnitedHealthcare CEO killed in New York City (CNN)'Gut punch': Trump upsets local union leaders by opposing U.S. Steel-Nippon deal (Ryan Deto | Trib Live)Guest: Dan Goldman - U.S. House of RepresentativesCongressman Dan Goldman - House.gov@repdangoldman - Blue Sky@danielsgoldman - Twitterrepdangoldman - InstagramHave some good news; a confession; or a correction to share?Good News & Confessions - The Daily Beanshttps://www.dailybeanspod.com/confessional/From The Good NewsMurder in Her First Degree (Red Brick Mysteries Book 1) eBook : Bentham, Lizzie (Amazon)Dogs Trust (dogstrust.ie)Dogs Trust USA (dogstrustusa.org)REVOLUTIONARY WOMEN IN MUSIC|LEFT OF CENTER (rockhall.com)The Seed Theatre (b4ck.org)Osage Nation (osagenation-nsn.gov) Check out other MSW Media podcastshttps://mswmedia.com/shows/Subscribe for free to MuellerSheWrote on Substackhttps://muellershewrote.substack.comFollow AG and Dana on Social MediaDr. Allison Gill Substack|Muellershewrote, Twitter|@MuellerSheWrote, Threads|@muellershewrote, TikTok|@muellershewrote, IG|muellershewrote, BlueSky|@muellershewroteDana GoldbergTwitter|@DGComedy, IG|dgcomedy, facebook|dgcomedy, IG|dgcomedy, danagoldberg.com, BlueSky|@dgcomedyHave some good news; a confession; or a correction to share?Good News & Confessions - The Daily Beanshttps://www.dailybeanspod.com/confessional/ Listener Survey:http://survey.podtrac.com/start-survey.aspx?pubid=BffJOlI7qQcF&ver=shortFollow the Podcast on Apple:The Daily Beans on Apple PodcastsWant to support the show and get it ad-free and early?Supercasthttps://dailybeans.supercast.com/Patreon https://patreon.com/thedailybeansOr subscribe on Apple Podcasts with our affiliate linkThe Daily Beans on Apple Podcasts
This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit www.politix.fmA blustery Donald Trump statement threatening large tariffs on Canadian and Mexican imports (plus increased tariffs on Chinese goods) raises the question of why the outgoing Biden administration, the lame-duck Congress, and the broader civil society have taken few proactive steps to create obstacles to coming Trump abuses.Matt and Brian discuss:* Is the opposition simply exhausted?* Do Democrats and Trump-wary Republicans in Congress simply think he's full of shit?* Is it wiser to take a wait-and-see approach (will Pete Hegseth actually be confirmed? does Trump really intend to impose these tariffs?) than to push back before the damage is done?Then, behind the paywall, a more detailed discussion of how the administration is battening down the hatches ahead of Trump's presidency, and what more should be done. Is it better to frustrate Trump's ambitions than to let him sweep in and do toxic, politically damaging stuff? Can institutional memory be preserved, outside the administration if necessary, so Trump can't do irrevocable damage to stuff the government does well? And what's a better, holistically: honey or maple syrup? Opium or cocaine?All that, plus the full Politix archive are available to paid subscribers—just upgrade your subscription and pipe full episodes directly to your favorite podcast app via your own private feed. Further reading:* Matt on why Trump's stunt-based form of “leadership” might not work out under current economic conditions. * Brian on why Democrats should start thinking now about how they'll go about rebuilding, if and when they ever retake government. * Flashback to 2000, when the George W. Bush campaign discussed its plans to reject the election results if won the popular vote but lost the lost the Electoral College.
Today's Headlines: Donald Trump's second-term transition is already making waves with controversial picks like Russ Vought for OMB, Linda McMahon for Education Secretary, and Matthew Whitaker for NATO Ambassador—all pushing Christian nationalism and MAGA-focused policies. Vought's Schedule F plan could let Trump replace career government workers with politically loyal staff. Trump is also ignoring standard transfer protocols, pressuring Senate Republicans to block Biden's judicial picks, and backing Matt Gaetz for Attorney General—even as Gaetz faces serious ethics scandals. Meanwhile, Speaker Mike Johnson has banned transgender people from certain Capitol bathrooms, targeting Rep.-elect Sarah McBride. On a different note, Pew Research revealed that 21% of Americans now get their news from social media influencers, showing just how much the media landscape is shifting. Resources/Articles mentioned in this episode: Media Matters: Trump set to appoint Project 2025 architect Russ Vought to Office of Management and Budget | Media Matters for America NBC News: Trump names former wrestling executive Linda McMahon as his pick for education secretary WA Post: Vance seeks to build support among senators for Matt Gaetz as attorney general WA Post: House Ethics Committee saw records suggesting Matt Gaetz paid women for sex The Daily Beast: Trump Orders Republican Senators to Block Biden Judges WA Post: President-elect Donald Trump is now receiving intelligence briefings WA Post: Trump ignores transition rules. It's a ‘hostile takeover,' ally says WA Post: Speaker Johnson restricts use of Capitol bathrooms by transgender people Pew Research: America's News Influencers Morning Announcements is produced by Sami Sage alongside Bridget Schwartz and edited by Grace Hernandez-Johnson Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Watch The X22 Report On Video No videos found Click On Picture To See Larger PictureThe [DS] rushed to get climate regs in to make more difficult for Trump to remove, big fail. Rates cuts had no effect on inflation, inflation is rising. DOGE has been formed and now Elon and Vivek will cut and cut govt waste. [CB] panicking. The [DS] is being very nice to Trump, they want a smooth transition, they want to help, when criminals are nice to your face they are planning something. The [DS] ran a war game simulation for Trump's second term. Trump has nominated the dream team, remember the head fake. Trump is ready to drain the swamp, panic in DC, remember schedule "f". (function(w,d,s,i){w.ldAdInit=w.ldAdInit||[];w.ldAdInit.push({slot:13499335648425062,size:[0, 0],id:"ld-7164-1323"});if(!d.getElementById(i)){var j=d.createElement(s),p=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];j.async=true;j.src="//cdn2.customads.co/_js/ajs.js";j.id=i;p.parentNode.insertBefore(j,p);}})(window,document,"script","ld-ajs"); Economy White House: We Rushed to Get Climate Regulations in So They'd Be Harder to Repeal White House National Climate Adviser Ali Zaidi stated that “we really ran early this year to finalize” many climate regulations “before May, which, really, I think, ensures durability relative to this arcane statute, the Congressional Review Act. So, I think, because of that foresight, we have, actually, quite a durable regulatory regime going into the next few years.” Host Joumanna Bercetche asked, [relevant exchange begins around 2:10] “Well, there are still a couple of months left, as well, of the administration. I do wonder if there's anything that can be done on the regulation front, because regulation can swing quite quickly and it's set at the federal level. Is there anything that your administration is focusing on to make sure that the climate regulation stays intact as well?” Zaidi responded, “Yeah. One of the things we're making sure that we do on the spending front is to get as many of those resources in the hands of communities, nine out of every ten dollars in the investment agenda, already into the bloodstream. On the regulatory front, we really ran early this year to finalize a lot of the key regulations before May, which, really, I think, ensures durability relative to this arcane statute, the Congressional Review Act. So, I think, because of that foresight, we have, actually, quite a durable regulatory regime going into the next few years.” Source: breitbart.com https://twitter.com/KobeissiLetter/status/1856694768765411760 https://twitter.com/KobeissiLetter/status/1856700864615878691 7. Hospital Services Inflation: 3.9% 8. Food Away From Home Inflation: 3.8% Both headline and Core CPI inflation are now higher than they were 2 months ago. The US economy added the least amount of jobs in October since the pandemic in 2020. Consumers are struggling. Mexico is preparing to engage in trade wars with the US Mexico's government signaled that it planned to hit back with trade restrictions of its own if President-elect Donald J. Trump followed through on his threats to impose sky-high tariffs on Mexican exports to the United States. “If you put 25 percents tariffs on me, I have to react with tariffs,” Marcelo Ebrard, Mexico's economy minister, told a radio interviewer on Monday. “Structurally, we have the conditions to play in Mexico's favor,” he added. Such moves could send shock waves through the economy of Mexico, which is exceptionally dependent on trade with the United States, exporting about 80 percent of its goods to its northern neighbor. But an array of sectors in the United States, including farmers and manufacturers of semiconductors and chemicals, also relies on exporting to Mexico, which last year eclipsed China to become the largest trading partner of the United States. Complex supply chains also intertwine the economies of both countries,
What are recess appointments? And with Republicans controlling the Senate, will President-elect Trump's nominees face any hurdles in their confirmation process? In an excerpt from a new episode of the CAFE Insider podcast, Preet Bharara and Joyce Vance discuss Trump's ongoing nominations of cabinet members and other high-profile positions. Despite Republicans controlling the Senate, Trump has called on candidates vying to replace Republican leader Mitch McConnell to permit his nominees to take office without confirmation votes using the recess appointments power. In the full episode, Preet and Joyce discuss: – How Trump's return to the White House will likely mark the end of his criminal prosecutions, with the federal election interference case and sentencing in Manhattan already facing new delays; – The expected reinstatement of Trump's “Schedule F” executive order, which would reclassify many federal staff members as at-will employees; and – The charges filed by the Department of Justice against an Iranian man for allegedly plotting to assassinate Trump. CAFE Insiders click HERE to listen to the full analysis. To become a member of CAFE Insider head to cafe.com/insider. You'll get access to full episodes of the podcast and other exclusive content. This podcast is brought to you by CAFE and Vox Media Podcast Network. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
The Democratic Party has traditionally been pro-union and relied on the support of the working class. But the results of yesterday’s election show the tide may be turning. We’ll get into how President-elect Trump enamored these voters to win another term in the White House and how we can expect a new Trump administration to shake up the economy and defy democratic norms. Plus, we’ll talk about some of the trailblazers elected to Congress and state offices. Here’s everything we talked about today: “Who is Bernie Moreno, Ohio's new GOP senator-elect and crypto champion?” from The Washington Post “Sarah McBride becomes the first out transgender person elected to Congress” from NBC News “How markets are responding to the prospect of another Trump presidency” from Marketplace “Black women notch historic Senate wins in an election year defined by potential firsts” from AP News “Meet the history-makers of the 2024 elections” from CNN Politics “How could the return of Trump-era ‘Schedule F’ job appointments reshape the federal workforce?” from Marketplace “Donald Trump Has Tools to Fire Powerful Financial Regulator in Term Two” from Bloomberg Send us all your thoughts, feelings and questions about the election. You can email us at makemesmart@marketplace.org or leave us a voicemail at 508-U-B-SMART.
The Democratic Party has traditionally been pro-union and relied on the support of the working class. But the results of yesterday’s election show the tide may be turning. We’ll get into how President-elect Trump enamored these voters to win another term in the White House and how we can expect a new Trump administration to shake up the economy and defy democratic norms. Plus, we’ll talk about some of the trailblazers elected to Congress and state offices. Here’s everything we talked about today: “Who is Bernie Moreno, Ohio's new GOP senator-elect and crypto champion?” from The Washington Post “Sarah McBride becomes the first out transgender person elected to Congress” from NBC News “How markets are responding to the prospect of another Trump presidency” from Marketplace “Black women notch historic Senate wins in an election year defined by potential firsts” from AP News “Meet the history-makers of the 2024 elections” from CNN Politics “How could the return of Trump-era ‘Schedule F’ job appointments reshape the federal workforce?” from Marketplace “Donald Trump Has Tools to Fire Powerful Financial Regulator in Term Two” from Bloomberg Send us all your thoughts, feelings and questions about the election. You can email us at makemesmart@marketplace.org or leave us a voicemail at 508-U-B-SMART.
An estimated 50,000 civil service jobs were slated to become political appointments under a Trump-era executive order. If Donald Trump returns to the White House, there’s a chance he’ll reinstate it, leading to the biggest federal workforce shakeup in nearly 150 years. Also in this episode: A new resource for farmers market pricing and the key to sustainable wage growth.
An estimated 50,000 civil service jobs were slated to become political appointments under a Trump-era executive order. If Donald Trump returns to the White House, there’s a chance he’ll reinstate it, leading to the biggest federal workforce shakeup in nearly 150 years. Also in this episode: A new resource for farmers market pricing and the key to sustainable wage growth.
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
