Podcasts about allahabad high court

This is the Catchup on 3 Things by The Indian Express and I'm Ichha Sharma.Today is the 15th of April and here are this week's headlines.India's retail inflation in March dropped to 3.34%, the lowest since August 2019, as food prices continued to ease, according to government data. This figure was below economists' expectations of 3.60%, and down from February's 3.61%. The sharp decline may provide room for the Reserve Bank of India to consider deeper interest rate cuts amid global concerns triggered by the U.S.-China trade war. Lower inflation could boost economic stability and consumer demand, especially at a time when global growth remains uncertain due to ongoing geopolitical tensions.The Enforcement Directorate filed a chargesheet against Congress leaders Sonia and Rahul Gandhi in the National Herald money laundering case. Special Judge Vishal Gogne reviewed the chargesheet on April 9 to consider cognisance and scheduled further proceedings for April 25. Other individuals named include senior Congress leaders Sam Pitroda and Suman Dubey. The case, which has long been politically contentious, involves allegations of financial irregularities linked to the now-defunct National Herald newspaper, formerly owned by Congress-linked entities. The ED's action intensifies legal scrutiny on the Gandhi family and Congress leadership.The Supreme Court criticised the Allahabad High Court for its March 11 remarks suggesting a rape complainant “invited trouble” and was “responsible” for the incident. The apex court said judges must be cautious and sensitive in such cases. A bench led by Justices B R Gavai and A G Masih was hearing another matter when it addressed the High Court's observations, also citing a March 17 order that downplayed acts like breast grabbing and pulling pyjama drawstrings as insufficient for rape charges. The SC's response highlights concern over judicial insensitivity in sexual assault cases.Former U.S. President Barack Obama praised Harvard University for defying the Trump administration after it froze $2.3 billion in federal funding. The White House demanded changes to admissions policies, including "merit-based" hiring, limited student activism, and a government-led audit of campus diversity. Harvard President Alan Garber rejected these requirements, and Obama called the university's stance a model for other institutions. The funding freeze follows tensions over campus freedoms and DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) policies. Obama's support emphasizes academic independence in the face of political pressure from government bodies.In response to new U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods, China has reportedly instructed its airlines to stop buying Boeing jets, escalating trade tensions. Bloomberg sources say the ban also applies to U.S. aircraft parts, likely increasing operational costs for existing Boeing fleets in China. The move adds further strain to Boeing, whose shares fell 3% in premarket trading. China is one of Boeing's largest markets, where European rival Airbus already has a stronger presence. The development reflects worsening ties as the U.S.-China trade war spreads into high-stakes sectors like aviation.This was the CatchUp on 3 Things by The Indian Express.

This is the Catchup on 3 Things by The Indian Express and I'm Flora Swain.Today is the 3rd of February and here are the headlines.Rahul Gandhi, Leader of Opposition, alleged that 70 lakh voters were added to Maharashtra's electoral rolls between the Lok Sabha and state elections. He demanded that the Election Commission provide voter data to opposition parties. Gandhi questioned the integrity of the 2022 Maharashtra polls and expressed doubt that the EC would release the requested details. He emphasized that the Constitution relies on secure votes, without which its significance is diminished.In his reply to the President's address, Rahul Gandhi criticized both the UPA and NDA governments for failing to provide a clear employment plan for India's youth. He expressed dissatisfaction with President Murmu's inaugural address, calling it similar to past speeches. Gandhi emphasized that the country's future hinges on young people and highlighted that any proposals should address their concerns and challenges, urging the Opposition bloc to focus on this issue.External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar responded to Rahul Gandhi's claims regarding his U.S. visit in December 2024. Gandhi had alleged that Jaishankar went to the U.S. to secure an invitation for PM Modi's attendance at Trump's inauguration. Jaishankar denied the accusation, stating that his visit was for meetings with U.S. officials and to chair a consuls general gathering. He clarified that the Prime Minister typically does not attend such events and India is represented by special envoys.The Supreme Court called the January 29 stampede at the Maha Kumbh “unfortunate” but directed the petitioner to approach the Allahabad High Court, where a judicial commission had already been set up to investigate the incident. Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna, hearing the case, stated that the matter was concerning but advised that the High Court be approached. Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi confirmed that the judicial commission was already in place to address the issue.U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) staffers were instructed to stay out of the agency's Washington headquarters after Elon Musk claimed he and President Trump had agreed to shut down USAID. Over 600 employees were locked out of USAID's computer systems, and those still in the system received emails about the closure. Musk, who is leading a review of the federal government with Trump's approval, said the two agreed on shutting down the agency, which has been active for over six decades.This was the Catch Up on 3 Things by the Indian Express

First, The Indian Express' Vikas Pathak discusses the ongoing row over Home Minister Amit Shah's remarks about Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, and tell us about the relationship between Ambedkar, the Congress, and the RSS.Next, The Indian Express' Legal Affairs Editor Apurva Vishwanath talks about the recent anti-Muslim remarks made by Allahabad High Court judge Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav during an event organized by the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (14:30).Finally, The Indian Express' Ritika Chopra provides an update about a 19-year-old B.Tech student who duped a top US university but was later exposed after bragging about it (25:05).Hosted, written and produced by Shashank BhargavaEdited and mixed by Suresh Pawar

This is the Catchup on 3 Things by The Indian Express and I'm Flora Swain.Today is the 5th of November and here are the headlinesIn a landmark decision, a 9-judge bench of the Supreme Court ruled that not all private property can be considered a "material resource of the community" under Article 39(b) for redistribution. Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud delivered the majority ruling, supported by six justices, while Justice BV Nagarathna agreed in a concurring opinion. Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia dissented. This ruling, which overturns decades of legal precedent, is a significant shift in the interpretation of property rights in India.Andhra Pradesh Home Minister V. Anitha, criticized by Jana Sena Party (JSP) leader Pawan Kalyan for rising crimes against women, responded by accepting the criticism constructively. Anitha, a two-time MLA, expressed that the feedback motivates her to improve and better meet public expectations. Despite the criticism, she emphasized her focus on addressing concerns seriously. Anitha, who is an ally of Kalyan's party, added that she spoke to him over the phone and will continue to work towards improving the situation.Sharad Pawar, the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) chief, hinted at retiring from active parliamentary politics, signaling his intention to pass the leadership baton to younger generations. Speaking about Maharashtra's Baramati constituency, Pawar emphasized the importance of youth leadership for the next 30 years. While Pawar stated he would step back from electoral politics, he confirmed his continued involvement in public service. His message underscored his faith in his family's legacy and the need for fresh leadership, urging support for Yugendra Pawar in the upcoming Assembly elections.The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004, with one major exception. The court ruled that provisions allowing the Board to award higher degrees like Fazil and Kamil are unconstitutional, as they conflict with the University Grants Commission Act of 1956. A three-judge bench, led by Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, overturned an earlier Allahabad High Court ruling that had declared the Act unconstitutional, marking a significant judgment on madarsa education regulations.Voting has begun in more than 20 U.S. states for the 2024 Presidential Election, including key battlegrounds like Pennsylvania, Michigan, and North Carolina. Other states joining in the process include Ohio, Georgia, and Virginia. The first ballots were cast in Dixville Notch, New Hampshire, in a long-standing tradition, with both Democratic candidate Kamala Harris and Republican contender Donald Trump tied with three votes each. As polls open across the country, all eyes are on these swing states to determine the election's outcome.This was the Catch Up on 3 Things by The Indian Express.

This is the Catchup on 3 Things by The Indian Express and I'm Flora Swain.Today is the 13th of August and here are the headlines.Calcutta HC has ordered CBI probe in the case of the rape and murder of a 31-year-old junior doctor who was found dead in a seminar hall at RG Kar Medical College and Hospital in Kolkata on Friday. Earlier in the day Chief Justice T S Sivagnanam asked why a murder case was not registered at the outset and why an unnatural death case was initiated to the West Bengal government lawyer when he claimed that an unnatural death case was registered, as there is no immediate complaint of murder. The division bench presided by the Chief Justice said the body of the postgraduate trainee was not found on the roadside, and the superintendent or the principal of the hospital could have filed the complaint.The Hindus in Bangladesh continue to protest against recent attacks on them. Chief advisor of the new interim government Muhammad Yunus who is expected to meet two minority groups today urged Bangladeshi Hindus to treat themselves as human beings and children of the soil. “You simply say that you are human, a citizen of Bangladesh, and this is your constitutional right that must be ensured. Just demand this, nothing more,” he was quoted as saying by Dhaka Tribune.A lawyer has approached the Supreme Court with a fresh application seeking compliance with its January 3, 2024, order asking the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) to “complete the pending investigations” into some of the allegations raised by the US-based short seller Hindenburg Research against Adani Group “preferably within three months”. In his plea, Advocate Vishal Tiwari said the Supreme Court in its order “clearly fixed the timeline of three months for the completion of investigations by Sebi”.While rejecting the bail application of a man booked on various charges, including those under the anti-conversion law, the Allahabad High Court recently observed that the primary objective of the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021, is to guarantee religious freedom to all, thereby reflecting the social harmony and spirit of India. The court noted that the Act's objective is to uphold the spirit of secularism in the country.Assassination attempt, nuclear dominance, cutting down on government regulations — these were some of the topics up for discussion in a conversation between Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump and billionaire Elon Musk, marking the former's comeback on the social media platform ‘X'. Trump stuck to his speech from the four-day Republican National Convention highlighting President Biden's shortcomings and calling his withdrawal from the presidential race ‘a coup'. Speaking of nuclear warming and the tug of powers, he spoke of Russia's invasion of Ukraine and claimed that it wouldn't have happened if he had been in charge.This was the Catchup on 3 Things by The Indian Express.

In 1975, the Allahabad High Court finds Prime Minister Indira Gandhi guilty of electoral malpractices during the 1971 election and rules that she needs to step down as Prime Minister. This triggers a series of events that culminate in the imposition of Emergency in India - a period when all civil liberties of common citizens, are taken away by the government.

Big Action Predicted Soon - Allahabad High Court on Conversion, Muslims दो दिन में दो झटके

*) Isolated, US & Israel see UN states back report on Israeli genocide in Gaza The UN expert who concluded Israel was committing acts of genocide in besieged Gaza has received broad support at the United Nations, with countries speaking up to back her and her report. Francesca Albanese, the special rapporteur on human rights in the Palestinian territories, told the UN Human Rights Council that countries should impose an arms embargo and sanctions on Israel. Albanese said Israel was characterising the entire Palestinian population in besieged Gaza as “targetable, killable and destroyable” and had ostentatiously laid bare its “genocidal intent” to “rid Palestine of Palestinians.” *) ‘He swam to get food for his children': 12 drown as US drops aid off Gaza Palestinian resistance group Hamas has demanded a halt to aid airdrops after 18 people drowned while attempting to reach the dropped supplies. The group said Israel must lift its brutal siege and allow aid into Gaza via land crossings. Six people were killed in stampedes and 12 others drowned off the territory's Mediterranean coast trying to salvage aid packages. *) Russia claims downing 18 airborne targets in Belgorod Russia has claimed that its air defence units downed 18 airborne targets over the southern region of Belgorod bordering Ukraine, the regional governor said. Writing on the Telegram messaging app, the governor of the Belgorod region said one person was injured and there was damage to private homes and cars. Ukraine has been staging air attacks for months on Belgorod and two nearby regions, Kursk and Voronezh. *) India court bans Muslim religious schools in UP state ahead of election A court in India has effectively banned Muslim religious schools in the country's most populous state of Uttar Pradesh. The ruling last week scraps a 2004 law governing Muslim religious schools in Uttar Pradesh, saying it violates India's constitutional secularism and ordering that students be moved to conventional schools. The Allahabad High Court order affects 2.7 million students and 10,000 teachers in 25,000 religious schools across the state. *) Türkiye stands firm against false claims of defence ties with Israel Türkiye has rejected allegations of cooperation with Israel, particularly defence-based cooperation, saying the country will not do anything that will harm Palestinians and their cause. The country's defence ministry said, “It is not possible for the Republic of Türkiye, which has always supported Palestine, to carry out or engage in any activity that would harm Palestinians.” The statement came after false claims by some media outlets that Türkiye continues to export gunpowder, weapons and ammunition to Israel.

This is the Catch Up on 3 Things for the Indian Express and I'm Flora Swain.It's the 26th of February and here are the headlines.The Allahabad High Court today dismissed an appeal filed by the Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee challenging the Varanasi district court's order to allow prayers in the Gyanvapi mosque. On 31st of January, the district court allowed prayers in the southern cellar of the Gyanvapi mosque complex. The district court order was challenged by the mosque committee in the Supreme Court which asked the committee to approach the Allahabad High Court.The Calcutta High Court on Monday clarified that there is no stay on the arrest of absconding Trinamool Congress leader Sheikh Shajahan, who has been accused of sexual harassment and landgrab in Sandeshkhali. The court directed that Shajahan, the Enforcement Directorate, the CBI, the state home secretary be impleaded as parties in the suo motu matter initiated on the allegations of sexual atrocities and land grab reported from the area in West Bengal's North 24 Parganas district.The Assam assembly witnessed stormy scenes today, with the Speaker rejecting the Opposition's bid to discuss the Cabinet's decision to repeal the Assam Muslim Marriage and Divorce Registration Act 1935. Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma had asserted that the decision had been taken to curb child marriage, stating that the Act has a provision that enables the marriage of brides and grooms below the ages of 18 and 21, respectively. The decision had been announced while the current Assembly session was ongoing and the Cabinet approved the ‘Assam Repealing Ordinance 2024' for the repeal of the Act.Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal today told the Supreme Court that he “made a mistake by retweeting” an allegedly defamatory video posted by YouTuber Dhruv Rathee in 2018. Kejriwal had approached the court challenging a Delhi High Court order upholding the summons issued to him in the criminal defamation case. On 5th of February, the High Court had said, quote, “When a public figure tweets a defamatory post, the ramifications extend far beyond a mere whisper in someone's ears.” Unquote.The Haryana Police booked 12 people, including former Bahadurgarh BJP MLA Naresh Kaushik, in connection with the murder of Indian National Lok Dal state president and former MLA Nafe Singh Rathee on Sunday. They have been booked under murder and conspiracy charges. Nafe Singh's family members and supporters have announced they will not cremate the bodies of the INLD leader and his security team member Jai Kishan, who was also killed in the attack, until the accused are arrested.This was the Catch-Up on the 3 Things by The Indian Express.

This is the Catch Up on 3 Things for the Indian Express and I'm Flora Swain.It's the 1st of February and here are the headlines.Presenting the interim Union Budget in Parliament this morning, Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman announced that there would be no change in tax rates for direct and indirect taxes, including import duties. Meanwhile, the fiscal deficit for 2024-25 is estimated at 5.1 per cent of GDP against 5.8 per cent in the current financial year. With the Lok Sabha polls right around the corner, Sitharaman kicked off her Budget speech by highlighting the economic triumphs of the Modi government over the last decade.The political reactions to the Budget were largely along expected lines. Political leaders from the ruling NDA alliance have welcomed it, while some Opposition leaders very quickly wrote it off as “disappointing”. While, Union Defence Minister Rajnath Singh called the Budget “encouraging”, Congress MP Shashi Tharoor said, quote, "It was one of the shortest speeches on record in the Budget. Not very much came out of it,” Unquote.Amid the ongoing political crisis in Jharkhand following the Hemant Soren's resignation and subsequent arrest last night, Governor CP Radhakrishnan has agreed to to meet the coalition legislators today. Late night, Champai Soren, the state's Transport Minister and a loyalist of the CM, had staked claim to form the government, but the Governor had sought time saying he will revert on their proposal after considering the legalities.The Supreme Court today asked the Anjuman Intezamia Masajid, which had approached it against the Varanasi district court's order allowing Hindus to perform prayers in the Gyanvapi mosque's southern cellar, to move the Allahabad High Court. The mosque committee, as a result, moved the Allahabad High Court. The Advocate on Record for the mosque committee, this morning, had moved an urgent application before the Supreme Court seeking its intervention.The Madhya Pradesh High Court has acquitted a 40-year-old man, who spent nearly 12 years in jail, after finding that his daughter's rape allegation against him was made after her father had objected to her being in a relationship. The court also found that she had previously admitted that her father did not have sexual relations with her. The HC noted that it was “clear like noon day that her statement by no stretch of imagination can be said to be of sterling quality”.This was the Catch-Up on the 3 Things by The Indian Express.

First, Indian Express' Asad Rehman provides the latest update on the Gyanvapi mosque dispute, highlighting the Allahabad High Court's dismissal of five petitions presented by the Uttar Pradesh Sunni Central Waqf Board and the Gyanvapi mosque committee.Next, Indian Express' Jay Mazoomdar delves into the details of an environmental assessment report that exposes how the Uttarkashi tunnel collapse and its intricate rescue operation could have been prevented (08:40).And in the end, Indian Express' Gopal Kateshiya tells us how five men constructed fake toll booths on a national highway in Gujarat (16:16).Hosted by Rahel PhiliposeWritten and produced by Rahel Philipose, Shashank Bhargava, and Utsa SarminEdited and mixed by Suresh Pawar

First, Indian Express' Udit Misra explains why the decrease in unemployment, as indicated by the latest Periodic Labour Force Survey, may not necessarily be a positive development.Next, Indian Express' Dheeraj Mishra discusses the reasons behind Moninder Singh Pandher's acquittal by the Allahabad High Court in the 2006 Nithari killings case (12:14).And in the end, Indian Express' Divya A tells us about the implications of Canada withdrawing 41 diplomats from India and suspending visa and consular services in Chandigarh, Mumbai, and Bengaluru (21:34).Hosted by Shashank BhargavaWritten and produced by Shashank Bhargava, Utsa Sarmin, and Rahel PhiliposeEdited and mixed by Suresh Pawar

For more than a decade, India has reviled alleged Nithari killer Surinder Koli as a rapist, murderer and cannibal. The Allahabad High Court, though, has now determined the evidence against consisted of little but a confession obtained through torture, and some pseudoscientific tests.The Nithari killings is just the latest in a long series of high-profile cases that demand thorough reinvestigation to establish what went wrong.

SC denies plea to terminate 26-week pregnancy, Surendra Koli, sentenced to death for Nithari horror, acquitted by Allahabad High Court, Hamas says Gaza water still cut off and other top news bulletin here.

Top news of the day: Supreme Court asks ED why Aam Aadmi Party not an accused in excise case, India slaps import ban on 98 weapons in new push for self-reliance agenda, Hindu marriage invalid without ‘Saptapadi', other rituals: Allahabad high court, Sanjay's Singh arrest in Delhi excise policy case sparks a political firestorm, Ignored red flags triggered flash floods in Sikkim

While still frowned upon in most parts of the country, live-in relationships are becoming increasingly common. Couples can choose not to get married for a number of reasons and still stay together, share a household and possibly children. So how legal are these relationships in India?  In a recent judgement, the Allahabad High Court refused to grant protection to an inter-faith couple in a live-in relationship and even stressed upon the need to create awareness about the emotional and societal pressures and legal hassles that may be created through such relationships. The Supreme Court however, over the years, has recognised the personal liberty of individuals involved, and, in a number of judgements conferred certain rights – for instance, live-in relationships can be covered under the protection from domestic violence law. But what happens in the case of separations, alimony and children? Are these protections available to same sex and queer couples? With the increasing harassment faced by inter-caste and inter-religious couples in the country, where even getting married has become challenging, do live-in relationships require more legal security?

Supreme Court- Remove Mosque from Allahabad High Court! #waqf Uttar Pradesh! Yogi Adityanath. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/ishkaran-singh-bhandari/message

A discussion forum, Samvad organised a twitter space to talk about the latest verdict of Allahabad High Court in Pilibhit fake encounter case and how will it going to affect almost every single case which is opened against police officials. This News/Article How Will Allahabad HC Verdict in Pilibhit Case Affect The Other Fake Encounters Cases? Special Talk. appeared first on Sikh Siyasat News.

Waqf Act has had to endure two inquisitions in two days from the top Courts. On Tuesday, the Supreme Court questioned the entire working of Waqf bodies and their unbridled power under S. 4, 5, 6, and 40. On Wednesday, Allahabad High Court admitted another plea to abolish Waqf Act. Sanjay Dixit analyses.

In this episode, Kunal Kamra sits down with eminent photojournalist Raghu Rai, who discusses what it was like to capture Indira Gandhi's essence from her first term to her last. He talks about her unique brand of politics and how she changed over the decades. A turning point was the 1975 Allahabad High Court judgement that convicted Gandhi of electoral malpractices. “It was the beginning of a different Indira,” Raghu says.He also talks about covering the JP movement, photographing Bhindranwale before Operation Blue Star, and how journalism has changed over the years.Listen to the full podcast by subscribing to newslaundry.com. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Can a cartoon stir unrest and bring down an elected government. Police in Maharashtra thought so when they had arrested Aseem Trivedi ten years ago for sedition. Then 24, Trivedi had tried to highlight corruption through his cartoons. The sedition case went on for several years before being struck down by Bombay High Court in 2015. The case was gone, but the stigma stayed. And Trivedi, a Kanpur lad, quit the profession forever. On Thursday, when the Supreme Court put the sedition law in abeyance, Trivedi heaved a sigh of relief. Not only because he was a victim of the IPC's section 124 (A), but also because he was one of the petitioners seeking scrapping of the law. From cartoonists to stand-up comedians and satirists to small political activists and opposition leaders, sedition law has been invoked by police in various states at what experts call a very low threshold. While arguing their case, experts point out the difference between treason and sedition. The first one is an act done against the state while the latter is against the government of the day. And criticising the government, they say, should not be penalised. Some even say that even a court decision should be under the purview of criticism. In 2016, the Allahabad High Court had held that criticism of the judiciary or a court ruling is not sedition. Former BJP leader and Union minister Arun Jaitley was the petitioner in the case. Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code, which is the law against sedition, was introduced in 1870 by the British government. And it was Thomas Macaulay who had introduced the law while drafting the penal codes. Its purpose was to stop Indian colonial subjects from expressing dissent against Britain's rule. At that time, sedition was also an offence under Britain's own penal code. While Macaulay's own country expunged the law in 2016, it stays in India.   In the first two hearings, the central government tried to defend the law. But on the third one, on Wednesday, it told the apex court that it was reviewing it. The next hearing will take place in July now, while one of three judges listening to the case, CJI NV Ramanna, retires in August.  So what does the law say? Under British rule, the punishment prescribed was transportation “beyond the seas for the term of his or her natural life”. This was amended to life imprisonment in 1955. It is still a harsh law and entails a maximum punishment of life imprisonment for anyone who, “by words spoken or written, or by visible representation… brings into hatred or contempt, or excites or attempts to excite disaffection towards the government established by law.” And, how did the British use it? During the Independence movement, this law was used extensively to try and crush political dissent. In fact, some of the prominent pre-independence cases where Section 124A was involved were against freedom fighters like Bal Gangadhar Tilak

Iss episode mein suniyee, Hardik Pandya ki fitness par Ajay Jadeja ne nishaya sadha kaha dikhava karne ki koshish ki aur ab sahi se daud bhi nahi paa rahe, Pakistan me currency ka patan US Dollar ke mukabale huye Rupees 192 ke barabar, Allahabad High Court ne ki naa aur ab Taj Mahal me 22 kamro ko khulwane Supreme Court jayenge yachikakarta.

Introduction: Time: 0.10 - 0.47 आज क्या नया है? Ukraine और Russia का युद्ध थमने का नाम नहीं ले रहा। यहाँ वहां चोरी-डकैती हुई है, कोरोना अभी भी गया नहीं है, Supreme Court के पास आज पचहत्तर cases pending हैं और मंदिर की जगह मस्जिद और मस्जिद की जगह मंदिर बनाने वाली याचिकाएं ताबड़तोड़ चल रही हैं। उन्हीं ताबड़तोड़ याचिकाओं में से ये केस बना है काशी यानी कि वाराणसी में कशी विश्वनाथ मंदिर के बगल बनी ज्ञानवापी मस्जिद का।  Gyanvapi Masjid case और क्यों इस पर हो रहा है बवाल, आईये जानते हैं। Body: Time: 0.48 - 9.12 पहला सवाल, कहाँ है ज्ञानवापी मस्जिद? वाराणसी में काशी विश्वनाथ मंदिर के बगल से सटी है ज्ञानवापी मस्जिद।   क्यों है मस्जिद पर विवाद? हिन्दू संस्थानों का मानना है कि 17वीं सदी में काशी विश्वनाथ मंदिर को एक तरफ से औरंगज़ेब द्वारा तोड़ा गया था और फिर वहां मस्जिद तामील की गई थी। अब याचिकाएं डाली जा रही हैं ये बोलते हुए कि मस्जिद का सर्वे हो, जांच-पड़ताल हो, कि क्या सही में 17वीं सदि में ऐसा कुछ हुआ था। वाराणसी की एक अदालत ने  Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) को इसके सर्वे और जांच का काम सौंप दिया मगर फिर Uttar Pradesh Sunni Central Waqf Board और Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee ने इसका विरोध किया और याचिका का सामना किया।    अब इलाहाबाद हाई कोर्ट ने गुरुवार को वाराणसी की अदालत के ऑर्डर पर स्टे लगा दिया। मगर और भी कई याचिकाएं हैं जिन्हें सुप्रीम कोर्ट को देखना पड़ेगा।    क्या है पूरा मामला?   This is an old case, originally1991 का मामला है ये। वाराणसी की एक अदालत में 1991 में कुछ याचिकाएं दायर की गई थीं। याचिकाकरता ज़्यादातर स्थानीय पुजारी थे जिनकी मांग थी कि ज्ञानवापी  मस्जिद में उन्हें पूजा-अर्चना करने दी जाए। उन याचिकाकर्ताओं का ही यही मनना था कि मुग़ल शासन के वक़्त औरंगज़ेब ने उस मंदिर को तुड़वा कर वहां मस्जिद बनवाई थी।   तो अब ये मुद्दा क्यों उठाया जा रहा है?   वाराणसी में रह रहे वकील विजय शंकर रस्तोगी ने वाराणसी के lower court में  काशी विश्वनाथ मंदिर के पीठासीन देवता के ‘next friend' बन कर ये याचिका दायर की। ‘Next Friend' उन्हें कहा जाता है जो किसी और की ओर से याचिका दायर करते हैं जो अपने लिए खड़ा नहीं हो सकता। मामला निष्क्रिय रहा और इलाहाबाद High Court ने सुनवाई भी टाल दी। लेकिन अयोध्या के बाबरी मस्जिद-राम जन्मभूमि विवाद में सुप्रीम कोर्ट के फैसले के एक महीने बाद दिसंबर 2019 में ज्ञानवापी मामले को दोबारा खरोंचा जाने लगा। याचिकाकर्ता रस्तोगी ने Swayambhu Jyotirling Bhagwan Vishweshwar के प्रतिनिधि के रूप में ज्ञानवापी मस्जिद के पुरातात्विक सर्वेक्षण यानी कि archaeological survey की मांग की। उनका दावा था कि ज्ञानवापी मस्जिद अवैध रूप से बनाई गई है।   रस्तोगी की याचिका पर नए सिरे से सुनवाई हुई और उस के बाद वाराणसी की अदालत ने इस साल अप्रैल में ज्ञानवापी मस्जिद के ढांचे के सर्वे का आदेश दिया था।   वाराणसी की अदालत ने ASI को सर्वेक्षण करने और अपनी रिपोर्ट सौंपने के लिए experts की पांच सदस्यीय समिति बैठाने करने का निर्देश दिया।   उत्तर प्रदेश सुन्नी सेंट्रल वक्फ बोर्ड और ज्ञानवापी मस्जिद चलाने वाली अंजुमन इंतजामिया मस्जिद कमेटी ने रस्तोगी की याचिका का विरोध किया।   उन्होंने ज्ञानवापी मस्जिद के सर्वेक्षण के वाराणसी अदालत के आदेश का भी विरोध किया।   फिर बीच में आना पड़ा Allahabad High Court को   मामला इलाहाबाद हाईकोर्ट तक पहुंचा। High Court ने दोनों पक्षों को सुनते हुए गुरुवार को ASI को सर्वे करने के निर्देश पर अंतरिम रोक लगाने का आदेश दिया।   Allahabad High Court के इस फैसले का बेस था Places of Worship Act, 1991. ये कानून कहता है कि 15 अगस्त, 1947 को जिस पूजा स्थल का धार्मिक चरित्र जैसा है वो वैसा ही रहेगा। अगर कोई मंदिर है तो मंदिर रहेगा, मस्जिद है तो मस्जिद और worship-place पर कोई बदलाव नहीं होगा। ये कानून Narasimha Rao के समय आया था।    निचली अदालत और उच्च न्यायालय दोनों में याचिकाकर्ता ने तर्क दिया कि 1991 का ये अधिनियम ज्ञानवापी मस्जिद पर लागू नहीं होता है क्योंकि 17 वीं शताब्दी में मस्जिद बनाने के लिए काशी विश्वनाथ मंदिर का एक हिस्सा ध्वस्त कर दिया गया था।   Places of Worship Act, 1980 के दशक के अंत और 1990 के दशक की शुरुआत में अयोध्या में राम मंदिर के निर्माण के अभियान के backdrop में आया था। बाबरी मस्जिद-राम जन्मभूमि मामले में अदालत ने exception दिया। लेकिन हाँ, ये भी कहा गया कि बाकी किसी मामले में ये लागू होगा।   मगर ये विवाद समझना ज़रूरी क्यों है?   ज्ञानवापी मस्जिद विवाद भारतीय जनता पार्टी (BJP), विश्व हिंदू परिषद (VHP) और राष्ट्रीय स्वयंसेवक संघ (RSS) ने दोबारा खरोंचा था जब अयोध्या में राम मंदिर निर्माण का अभियान चल रहा था। 3 धार्मिक जगहों के नाम थे इस manifesto में। एक तो राम जन्म भूमि दूसरा ज्ञानवापी मस्जिद और तीसरा धार्मिक स्थल मथुरा में शाही ईदगाह मस्जिद। प्रचारकों ने कहा कि शाही ईदगाह मस्जिद का निर्माण भगवान कृष्ण के जन्मस्थान पर एक मंदिर को तोड़कर किया गया था। मथुरा में एक लोकल अदालत के सामने एक अलग मामला है, जो मथुरा में कटरा केशव देव मंदिर परिसर - भगवान कृष्ण की जन्मभूमि - को दोबारा लेने की मांग कर रहा है। मथुरा कोर्ट ने इस साल फरवरी में इन केस के पार्टियों को नोटिस जारी किया था।   मगर आख़िर में बात ये है कि क्या क्या धारणाएं हैं ज्ञानवापी मस्जिद के इर्द-गिर्द और इतनी सारी संभावनाओं को याचिकाकर्ता साबित या उसका खंडन कैसे करंगे   आमतौर पर यह माना जाता है कि ज्ञानवापी मस्जिद का निर्माण औरंगजेब के आदेश पर काशी विश्वनाथ मंदिर के एक हिस्से को नष्ट करने के बाद किया गया था।   हालांकि, कुछ इतिहासकारों ने कहा है कि मस्जिद का निर्माण 14 वीं शताब्दी में जौनपुर (उत्तर प्रदेश) के एक शर्की सुल्तान ने किया था। इतिहासकार कहते हैं कि शर्की सुल्तान ने काशी विश्वनाथ मंदिर को गिराने का आदेश दिया था।   कुछ और इतिहासकारों का कहना है कि काशी विश्वनाथ मंदिर वास्तव में मुगल सम्राट अकबर के समय में बनाया गया था या फिर से बनाया गया था। अकबर के मंत्री टोडरमल ने मंदिर का निर्माण करवाया था। कहा जाता है कि टोडरमल ने दक्षिण भारत के एक विशेषज्ञ नारायण भट को काशी विश्वनाथ मंदिर के निर्माण की निगरानी के लिए कहा था।   एक और नज़रिया ये है कि काशी विश्वनाथ मंदिर और ज्ञानवापी मस्जिद दोनों का निर्माण अकबर ने अपने एक धार्मिक experiment, दीन-ए-इलाही को आगे बढ़ाने के लिए किया था।आप सभी ने दीन-ए-इलाही के बारे में कैशा 5-6 में पढ़ा तो होगा ही। ज्ञानवापी मस्जिद के प्रभारी अंजुमन इंतेजामिया मस्जिद समिति ने इस स्टैंड को बरकरार रखा है।   Conclusion: Time: 9.12 - 10.45 अब इतने दावों के बीच एक बात जो  साबित की जा चुकी है दस्तावेज़ों से, वो ये है कि मौजूदा काशी विश्वनाथ मंदिर का निर्माण इंदौर की रानी अहिल्याबाई ने 1735 के आसपास कराया था, औरंगजेब की मरने के लगभग दो दशक बाद   अब देखिये इतनी धारणाएं हैं, कहीं कुछ लिखा है कहीं कुछ। अब तो ये अदालत ही फैसला करेगी कि सच क्या है और झूठ जय है। मगर दिक्कत ये है कि लोगों का अदालतों पर से विश्वास भी डगमगा सा गया है। और शायद यही वजह है कि समाज में इतनी बेचैनी देखने को मिलती है। अब इस मसले पर जो भी update आएगा, वो हम आपको ज़रूर बताएंगे। मगर फिलहाल मैं चलती हूँ। मिलूंगी अगले FYI में with a new topic. आप अपना ख्याल रखें और सुनते रहे ABP Live Podcasts की पेशकश FYI   Host and Producer: @jhansiserani Sound designer: @lalit1121992

Introduction: Time: 0.10 - 0.47 आज क्या नया है? Ukraine और Russia का युद्ध थमने का नाम नहीं ले रहा। यहाँ वहां चोरी-डकैती हुई है, कोरोना अभी भी गया नहीं है, Supreme Court के पास आज पचहत्तर cases pending हैं और मंदिर की जगह मस्जिद और मस्जिद की जगह मंदिर बनाने वाली याचिकाएं ताबड़तोड़ चल रही हैं। उन्हीं ताबड़तोड़ याचिकाओं में से ये केस बना है काशी यानी कि वाराणसी में कशी विश्वनाथ मंदिर के बगल बनी ज्ञानवापी मस्जिद का।  Gyanvapi Masjid case और क्यों इस पर हो रहा है बवाल, आईये जानते हैं। Body: Time: 0.48 - 9.12 पहला सवाल, कहाँ है ज्ञानवापी मस्जिद? वाराणसी में काशी विश्वनाथ मंदिर के बगल से सटी है ज्ञानवापी मस्जिद।   क्यों है मस्जिद पर विवाद? हिन्दू संस्थानों का मानना है कि 17वीं सदी में काशी विश्वनाथ मंदिर को एक तरफ से औरंगज़ेब द्वारा तोड़ा गया था और फिर वहां मस्जिद तामील की गई थी। अब याचिकाएं डाली जा रही हैं ये बोलते हुए कि मस्जिद का सर्वे हो, जांच-पड़ताल हो, कि क्या सही में 17वीं सदि में ऐसा कुछ हुआ था। वाराणसी की एक अदालत ने  Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) को इसके सर्वे और जांच का काम सौंप दिया मगर फिर Uttar Pradesh Sunni Central Waqf Board और Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee ने इसका विरोध किया और याचिका का सामना किया।    अब इलाहाबाद हाई कोर्ट ने गुरुवार को वाराणसी की अदालत के ऑर्डर पर स्टे लगा दिया। मगर और भी कई याचिकाएं हैं जिन्हें सुप्रीम कोर्ट को देखना पड़ेगा।    क्या है पूरा मामला?   This is an old case, originally1991 का मामला है ये। वाराणसी की एक अदालत में 1991 में कुछ याचिकाएं दायर की गई थीं। याचिकाकरता ज़्यादातर स्थानीय पुजारी थे जिनकी मांग थी कि ज्ञानवापी  मस्जिद में उन्हें पूजा-अर्चना करने दी जाए। उन याचिकाकर्ताओं का ही यही मनना था कि मुग़ल शासन के वक़्त औरंगज़ेब ने उस मंदिर को तुड़वा कर वहां मस्जिद बनवाई थी।   तो अब ये मुद्दा क्यों उठाया जा रहा है?   वाराणसी में रह रहे वकील विजय शंकर रस्तोगी ने वाराणसी के lower court में  काशी विश्वनाथ मंदिर के पीठासीन देवता के ‘next friend' बन कर ये याचिका दायर की। ‘Next Friend' उन्हें कहा जाता है जो किसी और की ओर से याचिका दायर करते हैं जो अपने लिए खड़ा नहीं हो सकता। मामला निष्क्रिय रहा और इलाहाबाद High Court ने सुनवाई भी टाल दी। लेकिन अयोध्या के बाबरी मस्जिद-राम जन्मभूमि विवाद में सुप्रीम कोर्ट के फैसले के एक महीने बाद दिसंबर 2019 में ज्ञानवापी मामले को दोबारा खरोंचा जाने लगा। याचिकाकर्ता रस्तोगी ने Swayambhu Jyotirling Bhagwan Vishweshwar के प्रतिनिधि के रूप में ज्ञानवापी मस्जिद के पुरातात्विक सर्वेक्षण यानी कि archaeological survey की मांग की। उनका दावा था कि ज्ञानवापी मस्जिद अवैध रूप से बनाई गई है।   रस्तोगी की याचिका पर नए सिरे से सुनवाई हुई और उस के बाद वाराणसी की अदालत ने इस साल अप्रैल में ज्ञानवापी मस्जिद के ढांचे के सर्वे का आदेश दिया था।   वाराणसी की अदालत ने ASI को सर्वेक्षण करने और अपनी रिपोर्ट सौंपने के लिए experts की पांच सदस्यीय समिति बैठाने करने का निर्देश दिया।   उत्तर प्रदेश सुन्नी सेंट्रल वक्फ बोर्ड और ज्ञानवापी मस्जिद चलाने वाली अंजुमन इंतजामिया मस्जिद कमेटी ने रस्तोगी की याचिका का विरोध किया।   उन्होंने ज्ञानवापी मस्जिद के सर्वेक्षण के वाराणसी अदालत के आदेश का भी विरोध किया।   फिर बीच में आना पड़ा Allahabad High Court को   मामला इलाहाबाद हाईकोर्ट तक पहुंचा। High Court ने दोनों पक्षों को सुनते हुए गुरुवार को ASI को सर्वे करने के निर्देश पर अंतरिम रोक लगाने का आदेश दिया।   Allahabad High Court के इस फैसले का बेस था Places of Worship Act, 1991. ये कानून कहता है कि 15 अगस्त, 1947 को जिस पूजा स्थल का धार्मिक चरित्र जैसा है वो वैसा ही रहेगा। अगर कोई मंदिर है तो मंदिर रहेगा, मस्जिद है तो मस्जिद और worship-place पर कोई बदलाव नहीं होगा। ये कानून Narasimha Rao के समय आया था।    निचली अदालत और उच्च न्यायालय दोनों में याचिकाकर्ता ने तर्क दिया कि 1991 का ये अधिनियम ज्ञानवापी मस्जिद पर लागू नहीं होता है क्योंकि 17 वीं शताब्दी में मस्जिद बनाने के लिए काशी विश्वनाथ मंदिर का एक हिस्सा ध्वस्त कर दिया गया था।   Places of Worship Act, 1980 के दशक के अंत और 1990 के दशक की शुरुआत में अयोध्या में राम मंदिर के निर्माण के अभियान के backdrop में आया था। बाबरी मस्जिद-राम जन्मभूमि मामले में अदालत ने exception दिया। लेकिन हाँ, ये भी कहा गया कि बाकी किसी मामले में ये लागू होगा।   मगर ये विवाद समझना ज़रूरी क्यों है?   ज्ञानवापी मस्जिद विवाद भारतीय जनता पार्टी (BJP), विश्व हिंदू परिषद (VHP) और राष्ट्रीय स्वयंसेवक संघ (RSS) ने दोबारा खरोंचा था जब अयोध्या में राम मंदिर निर्माण का अभियान चल रहा था। 3 धार्मिक जगहों के नाम थे इस manifesto में। एक तो राम जन्म भूमि दूसरा ज्ञानवापी मस्जिद और तीसरा धार्मिक स्थल मथुरा में शाही ईदगाह मस्जिद। प्रचारकों ने कहा कि शाही ईदगाह मस्जिद का निर्माण भगवान कृष्ण के जन्मस्थान पर एक मंदिर को तोड़कर किया गया था। मथुरा में एक लोकल अदालत के सामने एक अलग मामला है, जो मथुरा में कटरा केशव देव मंदिर परिसर - भगवान कृष्ण की जन्मभूमि - को दोबारा लेने की मांग कर रहा है। मथुरा कोर्ट ने इस साल फरवरी में इन केस के पार्टियों को नोटिस जारी किया था।   मगर आख़िर में बात ये है कि क्या क्या धारणाएं हैं ज्ञानवापी मस्जिद के इर्द-गिर्द और इतनी सारी संभावनाओं को याचिकाकर्ता साबित या उसका खंडन कैसे करंगे   आमतौर पर यह माना जाता है कि ज्ञानवापी मस्जिद का निर्माण औरंगजेब के आदेश पर काशी विश्वनाथ मंदिर के एक हिस्से को नष्ट करने के बाद किया गया था।   हालांकि, कुछ इतिहासकारों ने कहा है कि मस्जिद का निर्माण 14 वीं शताब्दी में जौनपुर (उत्तर प्रदेश) के एक शर्की सुल्तान ने किया था। इतिहासकार कहते हैं कि शर्की सुल्तान ने काशी विश्वनाथ मंदिर को गिराने का आदेश दिया था।   कुछ और इतिहासकारों का कहना है कि काशी विश्वनाथ मंदिर वास्तव में मुगल सम्राट अकबर के समय में बनाया गया था या फिर से बनाया गया था। अकबर के मंत्री टोडरमल ने मंदिर का निर्माण करवाया था। कहा जाता है कि टोडरमल ने दक्षिण भारत के एक विशेषज्ञ नारायण भट को काशी विश्वनाथ मंदिर के निर्माण की निगरानी के लिए कहा था।   एक और नज़रिया ये है कि काशी विश्वनाथ मंदिर और ज्ञानवापी मस्जिद दोनों का निर्माण अकबर ने अपने एक धार्मिक experiment, दीन-ए-इलाही को आगे बढ़ाने के लिए किया था।आप सभी ने दीन-ए-इलाही के बारे में कैशा 5-6 में पढ़ा तो होगा ही। ज्ञानवापी मस्जिद के प्रभारी अंजुमन इंतेजामिया मस्जिद समिति ने इस स्टैंड को बरकरार रखा है।   Conclusion: Time: 9.12 - 10.45 अब इतने दावों के बीच एक बात जो  साबित की जा चुकी है दस्तावेज़ों से, वो ये है कि मौजूदा काशी विश्वनाथ मंदिर का निर्माण इंदौर की रानी अहिल्याबाई ने 1735 के आसपास कराया था, औरंगजेब की मरने के लगभग दो दशक बाद   अब देखिये इतनी धारणाएं हैं, कहीं कुछ लिखा है कहीं कुछ। अब तो ये अदालत ही फैसला करेगी कि सच क्या है और झूठ जय है। मगर दिक्कत ये है कि लोगों का अदालतों पर से विश्वास भी डगमगा सा गया है। और शायद यही वजह है कि समाज में इतनी बेचैनी देखने को मिलती है। अब इस मसले पर जो भी update आएगा, वो हम आपको ज़रूर बताएंगे। मगर फिलहाल मैं चलती हूँ। मिलूंगी अगले FYI में with a new topic. आप अपना ख्याल रखें और सुनते रहे ABP Live Podcasts की पेशकश FYI   Host and Producer: @jhansiserani Sound designer: @lalit1121992

GUEST ON BOARD: We are joined by Priya Mirza, who teaches political science at Zakir Husain Delhi College. Priya is the host of The Longest Constitution podcast, which looks at how the vision of the Constitution and how it affects everyday life! On 12th June 1975, 4 years after the 1971 Indian general elections, incumbent Prime Minister Indira Gandhi was found guilty by the Allahabad High Court of electoral malpractices. The complaint against her was filed by Raj Narain, her opposing candidate in the constituency of Rae Baraeli. The Court convicted her of election fraud, stripped her of her parliamentary seat, unseated her as the Prime Minister, and barred her from holding office for another 6 years. And how did Mrs. Gandhi respond? By locking down the entire country under an “Emergency” for over 2 years. Mrs. Gandhi also followed this up by passing the 39th Amendment to the Constitution, which barred any court in India from challenging the election of any person to Lok Sabha holding the office of Prime Minister. This Amendment was struck down later by the Supreme Court for trying to amend the Basic Structure of the Constitution. So Mrs. Gandhi was basically told a resounding “NO” at least twice by Indian courts. Find out more at - https://ivmpodcasts.com/miss-conduct-blogYou can follow our guest Priya Mirza on Instagram- https://www.instagram.com/thelongestconstitution_/You can follow our hosts on Instagram.Ragavi: https://www.instagram.com/ragi.dosai/Nisha: https://www.instagram.com/just.nishful.thinking/You can listen to this show and other awesome shows on the IVM Podcasts app on Android: https://ivm.today/android or iOS: https://ivm.today/ios, or any other podcast app.You can check out our website at http://www.ivmpodcasts.com/

First, Shubhajit Roy joins the podcast to discuss the significance of India's first contact with the Taliban, how the meeting went, and what it means for both India and the Taliban.Next, Amil Bhatnagar talks about the viral outbreak in Uttar Pradesh that has killed 32 children.And finally, we go over details of the Allahabad High Court's observation on the importance of cows in India.

The tragic events of the night of May 15th, 2008, in Noida, India remain a mystery today.While there are many questions as to the events of that fateful night, only the results are truly known for certain: Aarushi Talwar, 13, was found murdered in her bed on the 16th, and a day later, the body of Hemraj Banjade, 45, was found partially decomposed on the home's terrace. The years since then have resulted in two distinct CBI (the Indian equivalent of the FBI) investigations, multiple dubious interrogations using “truth serum,” the controversial conviction of the parents of the slain girl, and finally, the high stakes acquittal of these same parents in the Allahabad High Court.This episode of The True Crime Files is a guest post written by Alice of the Of Myth and Mercy podcast.https://thetruecrimefiles.com/noida-double-murders/Thank you for listening!Don't forget, you can support this blog and podcast for as little as $2/month on Patreon: www.patreon.com/thetruecrimefiles

This podcast covers all the major world news in Hindi. Today's News gives a briefing on Justice Sanjay Yadav appointed Chief Justice of Allahabad High Court ,Solar Eclipse Photos In India And World 1st Solar Eclipse Of 2021 Ring Of Fire, Delhi's first smog tower to be ready by August 15, Israel Hamas Conflict | Israeli Forces Shot Dead Three Palestinians In West Bank, Us president joe biden says america to buy pfizer vaccine doses for the world, Nine dead after bus crushed in South Korea building collapse Share your feedback at globalnewshindi@rajanibhatia.com इस पॉडकास्ट में दुनिया के सभी प्रमुख समाचार शामिल हैं। आज के समाचार में विषयों पर संक्षिप्त जानकारी दी गई है, न्यायमूर्ति संजय यादव इलाहाबाद उच्च न्यायालय के मुख्य न्यायाधीश नियुक्त, सूर्य ग्रहण भारत और दुनिया में 2021 का पहला सूर्य ग्रहण रिंग ऑफ फायर, 15 अगस्त तक तैयार होगा दिल्ली का पहला स्मॉग टॉवर, इजरायल हमास संघर्ष | वेस्ट बैंक में इजरायली बलों ने तीन फिलिस्तीनियों को मार गिराया, अमेरिकी राष्ट्रपति जो बिडेन का कहना है कि अमेरिका दुनिया के लिए फाइजर वैक्सीन की खुराक खरीदेगा, दक्षिण कोरिया की इमारत ढहने से बस के कुचलने से नौ की मौत Globalnewshindi@rajanibhatia.com पर अपनी प्रतिक्रिया साझा करें

A ridiculous Order by Allahabad High Court is slammed by the Supreme Court of India. Sanjay Dixit shows the mirror to MiLords one more time. Common sense is most uncommon has been proved yet again.

First, Kaunain Sheriff joins the show to discuss the extent of Covid infection in rural India based on recent government data. He also talks about the simultaneous decline in vaccination across the country.Next, Indian Express' Asad Rahman who reports from Uttar Pradesh shares information regarding the discovery of close to a hundred bodies in the river Ganga along the Bihar and Uttar Pradesh border region. He also discusses the role of the Allahabad High Court in directing Covid management and its recent observations highlighting the Election Commission's and the government's failure in seeing the risk of holding elections in the middle of the pandemic. (11:47)And finally, we go over details of the joint letter to the Prime Minister sent by opposition leaders with suggestions on how to control the pandemic in India. (24:35)

Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru was the first Prime Minister of India. He was quite popular among children and they called him Chacha Nehru. He was born on 14th November 1889 in Allahabad. He was the son of Swarup Ran (mother), and Motilal Nehru (father). Both his parents were attached and involved with freedom movements. He studied theosophy in his childhood and got into the Theosophical Society at age thirteen. Nehru's theosophical interests led him to the study of the Buddhist and Hindu scriptures which later culminated in his book “ The Discovery of India”. 1912, Nehru enrolled himself as an advocate of the Allahabad High Court and tried to settle down as a barrister but he was not interested in law. In 1912, Nehru attended an annual session of the Indian National Congress in Patna and joined Indian politics. He took an active part in movements like Home Rule Movement, Non-Cooperation Movement, and many more. In 1919, while he was traveling, he heard General Dyer talking about the Jallianwala Bagh Massacre. Dyer mentioned how satisfied he was after that incident. That's when Nehru decided to get freedom from the Britishers. He was sent to jail almost 9 times and there he wrote many books like his autobiography, “Towards Freedom”, “Letters from a father to his daughter”, “ Discovery of India”, “Glimpses of World History” and more. He was the right hand of Mahatma Gandhi in Indian Independence. They were an active part of the Civil Disobedience Movement, Salt Satyagraha, Quit India Movement. Nehru became the first Prime Minister of Independent India. Later he worked with Sardar Patel to unify India. In 1950 India became Republic. In 1955, he received the Bharat Ratna for his efforts on Indian industrialization. His attire- the jacket with a rose in the pocket and a Nehru cap is his style statement. Support the show: https://www.patreon.com/chimesradio See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Amazon Prime's Tandav, a nine-episode political thriller, began streaming online in mid January and ever since its release, it has received backlash from different parts of the country, especially in the form of 13 FIR's filed against Aparna Purohit, Amazon Prime Video's India creative head, the creators of the show and the cast. The Supreme Court on 5 March granted interim protection from arrest to Aparna Purohit, stating that she will not be arrested provided she cooperates with the investigation.But earlier on 25 February, an Allahabad High Court single-judge bench rejected the anticipatory bail plea filed by Purohit for allegedly “promoting religious enmity” through the show and further stating in its 20-page order that and I quote “the conduct of the applicant shows that she has scant respect for the law of the land and her conduct further disentitles her to any relief from this court."So for today' episode, we will go through what the entire Tandav case is about, what the Allahabad High Court judgement said, what the SC ruling was today and whats next for the case. Host and Producer: Himmat ShaligramGuest:Karan Tripathi, Legal Consultant for The Quint Editor: Shelly Walia Music: Big Bang FuzzListen to The Big Story podcast on:Apple: https://apple.co/2AYdLIl Saavn: http://bit.ly/2oix78C Google Podcasts: http://bit.ly/2ntMV7S Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2IyLAUQ Deezer: http://bit.ly/2Vrf5Ng Castbox: http://bit.ly/2VqZ9ur

First, The Indian Express’s Apurva Vishwanath explains the significance of a Allahabad High Court verdict related to the Special Marriage Act, which governs inter-faith weddings.  Then, Aashish Aryan explains complaints of cheating against some Indian students taking the  Graduate Record Examinations or GRE.   (13:55) And finally, a quick look at the exit of one of the four members of a panel appointed by the Supreme Court of India to examine the three contentious farm laws. (25:11)

Amid reports of rampant harassment and arrests of interfaith couples over anti-love jihad legislations, came an important judgment from the Allahabad High Court, which allows interfaith couples to have a safer registration of their marriages under the Special Marriage Act. On 14 January, a single-judge bench of Justice Vivek Chaudhary held that there is no need to mandatorily publish notices for marriages under the Special Marriage Act as is currently required. The court observed that such mandatory notices invade the fundamental rights of liberty and privacy and also affect a couple's freedom to marry a person of their choice, due to interference from state and non-state actors. What this judgment does, is uphold right to privacy and individual autonomy by leaving it up to the couple if they want to request a marriage officer to publish the notice of their union or to not publish it. This, coming at a time when fringe right-wing mobs and even the police have started interfering in unions of interfaith couples in states like Uttar Pradesh, makes it a significant judgment. While this is legal pushback against interference in interfaith marriages under Special Marriage Act, will this be able make a change on the ground as well? And can this judgment in anyway be able to challenge love jihad ordinances? Producer and Host: Shorbori PurkayasthaGuests: Vrinda Grover, Lawyer & Human Rights Activist Editor: Shelly Walia Music: Big Bang FuzzListen to The Big Story podcast on: Apple: https://apple.co/2AYdLIl Saavn: http://bit.ly/2oix78C Google Podcasts: http://bit.ly/2ntMV7S Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2IyLAUQ Deezer: http://bit.ly/2Vrf5Ng

From the Allahabad High Court reuniting a Hindu woman and a Muslim man to China lowering the criminal responsibility for seriour crimes from 14 to 12, we have handpicked the top news updates that were skipped by the mainstream media today. Here are the most important stories that were #LostInTheClutter. Download the app to read more such overlooked stories. Download app: https://bit.ly/32gH2vp

Even after the Allahabad High Court made it clear that two adults could marry anyone they wanted - Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath scored a masterstroke when he brought in an ordinance that requires interfaith couples to take permission form the local DM...2 months in advance. Also any indication of a 'forcible' conversion of religion lead to punishment of upto 10 years. Bhakt Banerjee comes in this episode to explain why the liberal response to this love Jihad episode is unwarranted and that this has been done for women safety - also that there is a evil plot afoot that no one wants to see! *** Subscribe to #TheDeshBhakt to unlock Discord / Exclusive Chats / Content *** PATREON MEMBERSHIP - https://www.patreon.com/thedeshbhakt (International Credit Card / Debit Card) JOIN MEMBERSHIP ON YOUTUBE - https://www.youtube.com/thedeshbhakt/... INSTAMOJO - https://imjo.in/XU5arJ (Phone Pe / G Pay / PayTM / BHIM / CC / DC / Netbanking) PAYPAL - https://www.paypal.me/thedeshbhakt ****** Get the New DeshBhakt Merch! ******* India Shipping Only - https://kadakmerch.com/thedeshbhakt *********Follow us on ************ YouTube: - https://youtube.com/thedeshbhakt Twitter :- https://twitter.com/thedeshbhakt Instagram :- https://instagram.com/akashbanerjee.in Facebook :- https://www.facebook.com/akashbanerje... SoundCloud :- https://soundcloud.com/thedeshbhakt ********** More DeshBhakt Videos:************ The Deshbhakt Episodes: https://bit.ly/3eLgvLv EMERGENCY: https://bit.ly/3dM4Bj8 Bhakt Banerjee Rocks: https://bit.ly/2VuFQlf B&D Media and the Public: https://bit.ly/389jjzw India explained with TheDeshbhakt: https://bit.ly/2ZjNVKD Akash-Vaani: https://bit.ly/3eKvN3h ****** Credits ******* Writer : Kaushal / Akash Editor : Tushar Producer: Avishrant --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thedeshbhakt/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/thedeshbhakt/support

Despite mounting criticism, Yogi Adityanath's government in Uttar Pradesh approved a very controversial ordinance on 24 November – which is seemingly against unlawful religious conversions, but has been repackaged as a way to combat ‘Love Jihad'. This law declares marriages after a conversion without permission to be null and void. As much as love jihad continues to be an unproven conspiracy not just in UP but in India generally, this law provides for up to five years of rigorous imprisonment and Rs 15,000, as penalty. But the punishment is stricter for 'conversions' of minors and women of the SC/ST communities. It comes with up to 10 years of imprisonment and Rs 25,000 as penalty.But this move shockingly comes around the same time when the Allahabad High Court struck down two previous orders by single judges of the same court that Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath had previously quoted as a basis for the anti-love jihad laws. Those verdicts had held that religious conversion purely for the sake of marriage was illegal, but on 11 November, a division bench of Justices Vivek Agarwal and Pankaj Naqvi held that neither of the two rulings were "good law" as they don't consider the "liberty of two matured individuals in choosing a partner or their right to freedom of choice as to with whom they would like to live with." What kind of a precedent is the Yogi government setting with this law that even in the court's view goes against the fundamental rights of citizens, that too without enough evidence to support the government's claims on love jihad? Tune in to The Big Story!Producer and Host: Shorbori PurkayasthaGuests: Mihira Sood, a Supreme Court lawyerVakasha Sachdev, The Quint's Legal Editor Editor: Shelly Walia Music: Big Bang FuzzListen to The Big Story podcast on: Apple: https://apple.co/2AYdLIl Saavn: http://bit.ly/2oix78C Google Podcasts: http://bit.ly/2ntMV7S Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2IyLAUQ Deezer: http://bit.ly/2Vrf5Ng

Today on The Leaders' Brief - People held in the custody of the Special Anti-Robbery Squad or SARS, a federal police force under the Nigerian government, have been subjected to "mock execution, beating, punching and kicking…and sexual violence.” Despite police using force to quell protests, Nigerian youth continue to hit the streets demanding a reform of the country's police force as the #EndSARS campaign gains momentum. India has found itself in the news over the Uttar Pradesh state police's handling of an alleged rape incident that has raised several fundamental questions about the right-wing nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party's rule in the country. The Allahabad High Court, who took up the case suo moto, has said, "the victim was at least entitled to decent cremation in accordance with her religious customs and rituals," and held the district administration responsible for the violation of certain fundamental rights enshrined in the Indian Constitution. German Foreign Minister Heiko Mass asked Turkey to refrain from sending gas exploration missions and causing provocation in the Mediterranean Sea. The comment came a day after Ankara sent a ship to carry out seismic surveys in the region. About egomonk: Website | Facebook | Twitter | LinkedInegomonk is a global intelligence platform delivering asymmetric outcomes by bringing organizations closer to the communities they want to serve and the leaders they wish to influence. If you wish to collaborate with us then email us at contact@egomonk.com.

Instagram link: https://www.instagram.com/nascent_carbon Shabnam, one of the two convicts in the Amroha murder case, is the first Indian woman who is set for gallows. On April 15, 2008, in Uttar Pradesh's Amroha district, Shabnam and her lover Saleem, killed the former's entire family. The duo was having an affair and wanted to get married. However, the woman's family was opposed to their marriage. Seven members of a family, including a 10-month-old child, were axed to death on the night of horror. The Sessions court sentenced them to death. However, in 2010, they approached Allahabad High Court but it upheld the death sentenced awarded to them by the sessions court. habnam then filed mercy plea in front of then President Pranab Mukherjee. They also filed a review plea in the Supreme Court. On January 23, Supreme Court reserved its judgment on the review petition filed by the convicts for killing seven members of Shabnam's family in 2008. While hearing the plea, the three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice of India SA Bobde raised questions if the conduct of a convict inside jail can be taken as “mitigating” circumstances for the commutation of the death penalty to life imprisonment. They then went to the Supreme Court. The Court did not budge with the an inch with the death sentence awarded to the convicts. Death sentence, India prepares to carry out first ever hanging of women convicts. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/abhishek-tiwari007/message

Last week, the Lucknow administration put up hoardings with photographs and addresses of those booked in cases of alleged vandalism and arson linked to protests against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act in the city on December 19. Yesterday, the Allahabad High Court ordered the Uttar Pradesh government to remove these hoardings. In this segment, Asad Rehman talks about the court's decision and the people who have been booked in these cases. Next, Krishn Kaushik talks about the reasons why two Malayalam news channels, Asianet News and Media One News, were banned for 48 hours and the law that was used to put the ban in place (07:45). And last, Ishan Bakshi explains the reasons why the Indian markets witnessed one of the sharpest falls in its history yesterday and why the fall in the crude oil price is a silver lining for the Indian economy (12:44).

India has two consumer legislations. Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and Consumer Protection Act, 2019. Which one is in force? Does Chairman/Member of the Consumer Forum have all the powers that the Forum has? Let’s find out what the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court said https://drive.google.com/open?id=1KkNqobqnFf4hVFb-0IVj6ZOsbPdoG5ic --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/lawandbehold/message

On the ninth episode of Justify: Blackout - the Kashmir Internet Shutdown judgement. Round Up cases from the last days of January: (i) Desh Raj v Balkishan, where the SC upheld the legality of striking off the right to file a written statement when the litigant causes unexplained and inordinate delays; (ii) KM Singh vs Speaker, Manipur, where the SC directed the Speaker of the Manipur Legislative Assembly to decide pending defection-disqualification applications within 4 weeks; (iii) Hanuman Laxman Aroskar v Union of India, where the SC struck a perfect balance between the development agenda and environment protection, by ensuring a proper Environment Clearance process; and (v) a significant development from the Allahabad High Court, where the State government was directed to furnish data on the number of deaths caused in the anti-CAA protests in the State on 20th December. Deep Dive into the Kashmir Internet Shutdown judgement delivered on January 10. Understand what the court held and why the judgement is seemingly an abdication of the court's duties. Listen in to a Tete-a-tete with Chintan Chandrachud, the author of “The Cases that India Forgot”. The conversation focuses on the Kashmir Internet Shutdown judgement and brings forward nuanced perspectives on the constitutionality of the government's actions as well as the propriety of the judgement. As always, write to us at justify@vidhilegalpolicy.in with the answer in our weekly legal quiz CLATTER, and stand a chance to win a thousand rupee Amazon voucher. Last week's winner was Jeevitha M N, and the correct answer was the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971.

Heads-up the lads do a deep dive with this hour-long special on the historic Babri Masjid - Ram Mandir dispute. Light on jokes, big on insight here’s a handy outline of what this episode has in store for you. 1. Timeline of events   2. Consequences of the destruction of the mosque   3. Allahabad High Court’s verdict  4. Description of the land under dispute  5. Explanation of the 3 main litigants and what they want  6. Implications of having a deity (Ram Lalla) as a plaintiff   7. Breaking down the Supreme Court’s verdict and its criticisms   8. The Supreme Court’s departures from the norms  9. Implications of the verdict on India   10. Conclusions, including some juicy speculations   11. The lads trying to save their sorry asses from being thrown in jail Here’s some additional reading material / references - Timeline   http://www.scobserver.in/beyond-the-court/a-timeline-of-key-events-in-the-babri-masjid-ram-temple-controversy Lay of the land  https://static.toiimg.com/photo/imgsize-324783,msid-67766865/67766865.jpg A detailed video about the Babri Masjid demolition  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-bhAFsnv2s + Music credit - Simon D’Souza + Write to us - hello@farfromfact.in (mailto:hello@farfromfact.in) + Follow us https://www.instagram.com/farfromfact/

#RedFM #RedFMIndia #RedFMKanpur #Purab #Morningno1

The Supreme Court delivered two critical judgments on Thursday. However, the Ayodhya-Babri Masjid verdict took precedence over the adultery law in terms of media coverage. Those championing for the construction of Ram Temple at the disputed site in Ayodhya are elated. The Vishwa Hindu Parishad has declared that the ruling has cleared the blockade and paved the way for a Ram Mandir at the Ram Janmabhoomi.The three-judge Bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra, Justices Ashok Bhushan and S Abdul Nazeer – in 2:1 majority judgement – declined to refer the Ayodhya-Ram Janmabhoomi title dispute to a larger Bench. It also refused to reconsider the 1994 Ismail Faruqi judgement that stated mosque was not an integral part of Islam. However, the Apex court also maintained that the 1994 verdict would have no bearing on the present title suit. The SC will start the hearing of the title suit from October 29. Newslaundry spoke to Zafarul Islam Khan, chairperson of Delhi Minorities Commission and Islamic scholar, on the issue. Khan said the SC verdict is not a “setback” for the minority community.“The court has said that 1994 verdict will have no bearing on the present case. It is (the SC verdict) is a welcome move,” he said. “The issue here is the title of the land – whether it belongs to this or that party (Hindus or Muslims). The Supreme Court or any other court should decide (the tittle-ship) case in the light of the law of the land and the Constitution,” Khan said. He said that the no court should decide on issues whether a Mosque, Temple or Church is an integral part of any religion or not.Khan had earlier backed Maulana Salman Nadvi’s proposal that both parties – Hindus and Muslims – should look for out of court settlement.Importantly, he said that the title rights of the disputed structure should go to one party – contrary to the Allahabad High Court verdict in which it divided the land rights between both Hindu and Muslim community. “In the Allahabad HC verdict, the Muslim community was on the losing side. If the land of the 500-year-old structure belongs to the Muslims, why should they give two-third land to the other party.” Khan maintained that he is not in favour division of the land.“Even if you give a part of it (the land) to Muslims, do you think the Muslims will be able to construct a Mosque there? I don’t think so,” Khan told this correspondent. He added the VHP’s celebrations are misplaced. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Allahabad High Court says trial judge vented own emotion in Aarushi-Hemraj murder case; Supreme Court sends Sabarimala Temple entry ban issue to Constitution Bench; ICC confirms Test championship; Royal Enfield forays into Vietnam.

Allahabad High Court acquits the Talwars in the Arushi-Hemraj murder case, overturning CBI court verdict; Ben Stokes in fresh trouble as sponsor dumps him for misconduct; Harley-Davidson launches 4 new motorcycles in India.

This week on NL Hafta, Ravish Kumar of NDTV India joins us as we discuss two of his recent blogs: What prompted him to call himself a Dalaal and why he doesn't want young journalists to idolise him. We also discuss the state of journalism schools in India and idealism in journalism. Then we discuss media's irresponsible reporting in the Sheena Bora murder case: Is the media going ahead of police? The team also discussed Samajwadi Party’s exit from the Janata Parivar and caste politics in Bihar. In the end we discuss Allahabad High Court's order to UP government to ensure national flag is hoisted at madrasas on the occasion of Independence Day and Republic Day. Produced by Kartik Nijhawan See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.