Podcasts about ban tiktok

Melissa Chen is a business intelligence expert specialising in China risk and a ferocious advocate for free speech. Sponsor: Augusta Precious Metals. For your free Gold IRA info kit click https://learn.augustapreciousmetals.com/trigger or text TRIGGER to 35052. Sponsor: Manscaped. Get 20% Off PLUS Free Shipping with the code TRIGGER at https://manscaped.com Join our exclusive TRIGGERnometry community on Substack! https://triggernometry.substack.com/ OR Support TRIGGERnometry Here: Bitcoin: bc1qm6vvhduc6s3rvy8u76sllmrfpynfv94qw8p8d5 Shop Merch here - https://www.triggerpod.co.uk/shop/ Advertise on TRIGGERnometry: marketing@triggerpod.co.uk Find TRIGGERnometry on Social Media: https://twitter.com/triggerpod https://www.facebook.com/triggerpod/ https://www.instagram.com/triggerpod/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Le Café de l'e-commerce, c'est le podcast qui vous propose de faire votre veille e-commerce, différemment, dans vos oreilles, même si vous n'en pouvez plus de Blue January.Dans cet épisode, on vous parle du ban le plus discuté, du come back du ban, d'OMS et de POS. Mais aussi :

We start this week with the TikTok ban: how we got here, what happened, and, most importantly, why it means we need more decentralized services. Jason runs us through it. After the break, Joseph breaks down a site called GeoSpy which is marketing geolocation technology to the cops. In the subscribers-only section, we all scroll through an archive of old Nokia (yes, Nokia) designs. Good stuff in there. YouTube version: https://youtu.be/DOXnpENi8Sg 02:27 Decentralized Social Media Is the Only Alternative to the Tech Oligarchy The U.S. Wants to Ban TikTok for the Sins of Every Social Media Company 27:31 The Powerful AI Tool That Cops (or Stalkers) Can Use to Geolocate Photos in Seconds Nokia's Weird Y2K Designs Show the Future We Could Have Had Subscribe at 404media.co for bonus content. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Mon nouveau podcast : L'Actu TechApple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/podcast/id1790621538Podcast Addict: https://podplayer.net/?podId=5623388Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/3RjNfNg1dChW6nSQLSg6i1RSS: https://feedpress.me/lactutech.xmlTous les liens: https://notpatrick.com/#lactutechRDV Tech 601 – Ban de TikTok: la farce calibrée – Ban TikTok, influence Chinoise, Executive Orders de TrumpAu programme :Ban de TikTok: que s'est-il passé?Pourquoi TikTok est plus problématique que les autres réseaux?Trump signe la fin de la « censure » (aka modération)Le reste de l'actualitéLiens :

Your daily news in under three minutes. At Al Jazeera Podcasts, we want to hear from you, our listeners. So, please head to https://www.aljazeera.com/survey and tell us your thoughts about this show and other Al Jazeera podcasts. It only takes a few minutes! Connect with us: @AJEPodcasts on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, Threads and YouTube

I interview congressman Jake Auchincloss who is a Massachusetts rep who co-signed the bill to ban Tiktok. This was one of the first times Rep Auchincloss talked face-to-face with a TikToker on the massive implications of this ban. There are 170 millions TikTok users in the United States with over 7 million small businesses whose livelihood depends on Tiktok. Let me know what you think in the comments!! As always you can find me on all platforms under @kevincooneyy Kevin Cooney: https://www.instagram.com/kevincooneyy/  Ashley DeMato: https://www.instagram.com/ashley_demato/ 

Big Wos AKA Wosny Lambre talks about the fires in Southern Cali, should we actually ban TikTok, and news of a Israel-Gaza ceasefire. WATCH THIS EPISODE ON YOUTUBE: Youtube.com/countthedings1 Produced by John Jervay - https://twitter.com/johnjervay Sign up for The Athletic: TheAthletic.com/dings Support us on www.patreon.com/countthedings Find us: www.countthedings.com Social: @countthedings @bommpodcast Facebook: www.facebook.com/countthedings Shoot The Messenger: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/shoot-the-messenger-espionage-murder-pegasus-spyware Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Big Wos AKA Wosny Lambre talks about the fires in Southern Cali, should we actually ban TikTok, and news of a cease fire. WATCH THIS EPISODE ON YOUTUBE: Youtube.com/countthedings1 Produced by John Jervay - https://twitter.com/johnjervay Sign up for The Athletic: TheAthletic.com/dings Support us on www.patreon.com/countthedings Find us: www.countthedings.com Social: @countthedings @bommpodcast Facebook: www.facebook.com/countthedings Shoot The Messenger: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/shoot-the-messenger-espionage-murder-pegasus-spyware Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This hour, Ian Hoch drops the 2 o'clock News Bomb: Will the US actually enforce the ban on TikTok? Then, Kevin Gilmore, meteorologist at the National Weather Service, joins Ian to explain what we can expect next week when the polar vortex hits the area. Also, Dan Gill, professor at the LSU Agriculture Center and host of "The Garden Show" jumps in to give tips on how to protect your plants from cold weather.

1-15 Adam and Jordana 10a hour

The clock is ticking on TikTok. The popular video sharing app is facing a looming deadline of January 19th, when the law effectively banning it in the U.S. is set to go into effect. Unless, that is, the Supreme Court steps in to save it this week. While we wait, we revisit our 2023 debate that asked this prescient question: Should the U.S. Ban TikTok?   Arguing Yes: Kori Schake, Senior Fellow and Director of Foreign and Defense Policy Studies at the American Enterprise Institute  Arguing No: Milton Mueller, Professor at the Georgia Institute of Technology School of Public Policy; Founder and Director of the Internet Governance Project Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

170 million Americans who use TikTok will likely have to find another favourite app, as the U.S. Supreme Court is expected to ban the popular Chinese-owned platform on January 19. We connect with tech expert Amber Mac (3:00) to determine what the ban will mean for TikTok users (including Canadians), other social media giants (including Instagram and X), and free speech in general.  29:00 | Where are Real Talkers at with the TikTok ban, Meta dumping fact-checking, the future of X with the Musk-Trump bromance, and more? Jespo and Johnny jump into the Real Talk Live Chat powered by Park Power (including an unfortunate update on the "Pizzagate" guy at 44:00).  56:30 | THANK YOU to our 20,000 Real Talk Ryan Jespersen YouTube subscribers! If you're reading this and you haven't yet subscribed, what are you waiting for? ;) 1:01:00 | What does Brian Mulroney have to do with Donald Trump's comments about Canada as the 51st state? Real Talker Scott in Sherwood Park lays it out.  LET US KNOW WHAT YOU THINK OF THE SHOW: talk@ryanjespersen.com  REGISTER FOR THE REAL TALK POND HOCKEY CLASSIC: https://www.ryanjespersen.com/pond-ho... FOLLOW US ON TIKTOK, X, & INSTAGRAM: @realtalkrj & @ryanjespersen  JOIN US ON FACEBOOK & LINKEDIN: @ryanjespersen  REAL TALK MERCH: https://ryanjespersen.com/merch RECEIVE EXCLUSIVE PERKS - BECOME A REAL TALK PATRON: patreon.com/ryanjespersen THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING OUR SPONSORS! https://ryanjespersen.com/sponsors The views and opinions expressed in this show are those of the host and guests and do not necessarily reflect the position of Relay Communications Group Inc. or any affiliates.

The AP's Jennifer King reports that TikTok's 170 million users in the U.S. are waiting on a Supreme Court decision that seems likely to favor a law that will shut down the site unless it is sold.

January 13, 2025 ~ Guy, Lloyd, and Jamie talk with Honigman Law partner Matthew Schneider about the upcoming deadline for TikTok to be divested of face being banned in the U.S., and Donald Trump's sentencing in the New York hush money case.

This Day in Legal History: Charles I Placed on TrialOn January 6, 1649, the English Parliament took a momentous step by voting to place King Charles I on trial for high treason. This decision came in the wake of the English Civil War, a prolonged conflict between Royalists, loyal to the king, and Parliamentarians seeking to limit monarchical power. Leading up to the trial, the New Model Army, under Oliver Cromwell, orchestrated "Pride's Purge," expelling Members of Parliament likely to oppose the trial. The remaining assembly, known as the Rump Parliament, convened and authorized the creation of the High Court of Justice, an unprecedented legal body tasked with trying a sitting monarch.The trial marked a dramatic shift in the balance of power, challenging the divine right of kings—a cornerstone of monarchical rule. Charles I was accused of subverting the laws of England and waging war against his own people, charges that he denied, arguing that no court held legitimate authority to judge a king. Despite his defense, the court convicted Charles on January 27, 1649, sentencing him to death. His execution on January 30 sent shockwaves throughout Europe, signaling the emergence of parliamentary sovereignty and temporarily abolishing the monarchy in favor of the Commonwealth under Cromwell.This legal milestone not only altered the trajectory of English governance but also set a precedent for holding leaders accountable to the rule of law. The Supreme Court is expected to play a critical role in assessing the legality of anticipated Trump administration policies, particularly in immigration and administrative law. Immigration policies, such as ending birthright citizenship and mass deportations, are likely to be challenged in court, with outcomes depending on their framing, especially if tied to national security concerns, which the Court tends to view more favorably than economic justifications. The Court's recent decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, which limited agency power by ending Chevron deference, may have far-reaching implications for both the Biden and Trump administrations. While reducing agencies' regulatory authority aligns with Trump's deregulatory goals, it also empowers blue states and civil rights groups to challenge his policies under stricter judicial scrutiny.Challenges to agency head tenure protections and interpretations of outdated laws could also come before the Court. Trump's potential push to dismantle longstanding precedents like Humphrey's Executor v. United States could make federal agencies more directly accountable to the presidency, further politicizing their functions. Critics note that these shifts in judicial doctrine cut both ways, curbing regulatory power broadly regardless of the administration in power. This duality underscores a tension between conservative goals of limiting administrative overreach and the desire to expedite executive policy-making.Trump Likely to Test Supreme Court on Agency Powers, ImmigrationPresident Joe Biden has permanently barred offshore oil and gas drilling across over 625 million acres of US coastal waters, including the East and West Coasts, parts of the Gulf of Mexico, and sections of the Northern Bering Sea. Citing environmental risks and minimal energy gains, Biden stated the move balances conservation and energy security, ensuring that protecting coastlines and maintaining low energy prices are not mutually exclusive. The decision does not affect existing offshore leases or ongoing drilling in Alaska's Cook Inlet and the central and western Gulf of Mexico, which account for a significant portion of US energy production.Biden's action builds on temporary protections enacted by former President Trump for Florida's Gulf Coast and southeastern waters but makes them indefinite. While praised by environmental advocates and coastal communities, the oil industry criticized the move, arguing that it restricts domestic energy potential and undermines national security. Some politicians from both parties have supported these protections, emphasizing the risks demonstrated by disasters like the 2010 Deepwater Horizon spill.Although Biden's decision relies on a federal law provision that may be difficult to reverse, legal challenges could arise if a future administration attempts to undo the protections. The debate underscores tensions between environmental stewardship and energy independence.Biden Bars Offshore Oil Drilling in US Atlantic and PacificBiden to ban offshore oil, gas drilling in vast areas ahead of Trump term | ReutersThe U.S. Department of Justice has urged the Supreme Court to deny President-elect Donald Trump's request to delay a law requiring TikTok's Chinese owner, ByteDance, to sell its U.S. assets by January 19 or face a nationwide ban. Trump argued for more time after his inauguration to seek a political resolution, while the DOJ countered that ByteDance has not demonstrated it is likely to succeed on the merits of its case. The government emphasized the national security risks of TikTok's data collection on 170 million American users, framing it as a tool for potential espionage.TikTok, however, has requested the Court block the law on First Amendment grounds, claiming it is being unfairly targeted for its content rather than its data practices, especially given Congress's lack of action against other Chinese-owned apps like Shein and Temu. If the law takes effect, new downloads of TikTok will be prohibited, and existing services will degrade over time as companies are barred from providing support. The Biden administration could extend the compliance deadline by 90 days if ByteDance shows significant progress toward divestment. This marks a shift in Trump's stance from 2020, when he sought to ban TikTok over similar concerns. The Supreme Court is set to hear arguments on January 10.Justice Dept. urges Supreme Court to reject Trump request to delay TikTok ban law | ReutersDisney, Fox, and Warner Bros Discovery are appealing a court ruling that blocked the launch of their joint streaming service, Venu Sports, arguing it unfairly restricts competition and consumer choice. The district court previously halted Venu's debut after rival FuboTV sued, claiming the service violated antitrust laws by bundling sports content in a way that would harm competition and raise prices. The district court sided with Fubo, finding that the bundling practices could foreclose other sports-focused services and granted an injunction against Venu's launch.The media companies argue that the ruling denies consumers a lower-cost streaming option aimed at price-sensitive sports fans and protects Fubo from competition. They assert that Venu would increase consumer choice and lower prices. However, the Justice Department and several states have supported the injunction, stating that Venu's creation would consolidate market power among the companies—who control over half of U.S. sports rights—and hinder the emergence of competing sports-only platforms like Fubo.At the heart of the dispute is whether the bundling practices by Disney, Fox, and Warner Bros unfairly disadvantage distributors by tying access to desirable sports content with less popular programming. The appeals court will now decide if the injunction stands.Disney, Fox and Warner Bros to ask court to lift ban on launch of Venu Sports service | Reuters This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

AP correspondent Haya Panjwani reports on the Supreme Court evaluating a ban on TikTok.

News

News

A social media ban for under-16s passes the Australian Senate and will soon be a world-first law. TikTok Mom vlogger caught stealing from Target after posting video. Cape Cod woman arrested after menacing teen golfers with rubber gun. Florida man accused of beating golfer to death with golf clubs on course. New Jersey Uber Eats driver discovers burrito is actually an ounce of marijuana. Dentist accused of killing wife by poisoning her Shakes charged with attempting to get fellow inmate to kill a detective. Follow This Day in Crime on Social: X: @tenderfootTV, @thisdayincrime IG: @tenderfoot.tv, @thisdayincrime Episode Sources: A social media ban for under-16s passes the Australian Senate and will soon be a world-first law AP TikTok Mom Vlogger Allegedly Stole from Target, Got Caught When She Posted Video People Cape Cod woman arrested after menacing teen golfers with gun — that turned out to be a rubber dummy NY Post Fla. Man Accused of Beating Golfer to Death with Golf Clubs on Course: 'He's Trying to Kill Me' People New Jersey Uber Eats Driver Discovers Burrito is Actually an Oz. of Marijuana People Dentist Accused of Killing Wife by Poisoning Her Shakes Charged with Attempting to Get Fellow Inmate to Kill a Detective People To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

News roundup for this week prayers upBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/jarvis-kingston--1517583/support.

Gita Sjahrir, Head of Investment at BNI Ventures, and Jeremy Au discussed: 1. 109 Member 48 Ministry Cabinet Coalition: With the inauguration on October 20, 2024, President Prabowo Subianto expanded the cabinet from 34 to 48 ministries, the largest since 1966. Prabowo's coalition-building strategy is to accommodate political allies and unify the seven-party coalition behind him. They drew comparisons to Germany's coalition politics, emphasizing the importance of coordination between Indonesia's national and regional leaders for effective governance. 2. Temu Ban, TikTok & Bukalapak: In early October 2024, Indonesia banned Chinese social commerce platform Temu, similar to TikTok Shop which then had to acquire Tokopedia. The Indonesian government also requested Apple and Google to block the Temu app to prevent local downloads. Other nations, including the United States and EU, are scrutinizing Chinese exporter practices, with the US tightening tax exemptions on low-cost imports in 2023. Gita explained that while such protectionism shields MSMEs, Indonesia's core issues (e.g., complex bureaucracy, high business costs, lack of raw materials and a multi-year backlog for trademarks) remain unaddressed. She argued that easing these foundational barriers would create a fairer, more sustainable advantage for local businesses, rather than just temporary protection from foreign competition. 3. VC Investments: Indonesia has already attracted interest in green joint ventures (JVs), particularly with China. Jeremy highlighted MAKA Motors, founded by former GoJek CTO Raditya Wibowo, as a local player advancing EV production, while Gita mentioned Toba's push for renewable energy. They underscored the cultural importance of home ownership, noting that many Indonesians aspire to own land despite its often low financial returns, which drives prop-tech startup Rukita. Rekosistem is also a key startup addressing waste management in Indonesia's growing urban areas. They also discussed the pressures faced by Indonesia's “sandwich generation,” who often support both aging parents and their own families, and how these dynamics shape housing affordability and socio-economic mobility. Jeremy and Gita also talked about the film “Home Sweet Loan, which explores Indonesians' struggle with housing affordability, the influx of green investments into EV battery production and the regulatory challenges surrounding the rise of online gambling among youth. Watch, listen or read the full insight at https://www.bravesea.com/blog/prabowo-48-ministry-cabinet Nonton, dengar atau baca wawasan lengkapnya di https://www.bravesea.com/blog/prabowo-48-ministry-cabinet-id 观看、收听或阅读全文，请访问 https://www.bravesea.com/blog/prabowo-48-ministry-cabinet-cn Xem, nghe hoặc đọc toàn bộ thông tin chi tiết tại https://www.bravesea.com/blog/prabowo-48-ministry-cabinet-vn Get transcripts, startup resources & community discussions at www.bravesea.com WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VakR55X6BIElUEvkN02e TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@jeremyau Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/jeremyauz Twitter: https://twitter.com/jeremyau LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/bravesea English: Spotify | YouTube | Apple Podcasts Bahasa Indonesia: Spotify | YouTube | Apple Podcasts Chinese: Spotify | YouTube | Apple Podcasts Vietnamese: Spotify | YouTube | Apple Podcasts Learn more about Nika.eco! Reach out to info@nika.eco if you are a geospatial data scientist or climate researcher who is interested to partner on a pilot or research opportunities

TikTok Inc. v. Merrick Garland, argued before Chief Judge Sri Srinivasan, Circuit Judge Neomi Rao, and Senior Circuit Judge Douglas H. Ginsburg in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on September 16, 2024. Argued by Andrew J. Pincus (TikTok petitioners),  Jeffrey L. Fisher (TikTok creator petitioners), and Daniel Tenny (on behalf of Merrick Garland). Background on the case, excerpted from the Brief of the TikTok Petitioners (citations omitted): TikTok is an innovative online platform used by 170 million Americans. These Americans form part of a unique global community with more than 1 billion users worldwide, with whom they create, share, and view videos—“speaking and listening in the modern public square, and otherwise exploring the vast realms of human thought and knowledge.” All that will end on January 19, 2025, when the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act (the “Act”) will ban TikTok throughout the country. The Act is unprecedented. Never before has Congress expressly singled out and shut down a specific speech forum. Never before has Congress silenced so much speech in a single act…. Congress provided no justification for banning TikTok by fiat, while creating substantive and procedural protections, as well as unexplained exclusions, for all other companies alleged to pose the same risks. Without findings, the Court is left with statements of individual Members and a single committee report. Many of those Members criticized cherry-picked content on TikTok, merely reinforcing the Act's unconstitutionality. The report invoked national security, pointing to the speculative possibility that TikTok could be misused in the future. But a claim of national security does not override the Constitution…. The First Amendment requires this Court to examine such an extraordinary speech restriction with the utmost care and most exacting scrutiny…. Issues Presented, also from the Brief of Petitioners: Whether the Act violates the First Amendment. Whether the Act violates equal protection. Whether the Act is a Bill of Attainder. Whether the Act effects an unconstitutional taking. Resources: Public Redacted Brief for Respondent CourtListener case docket for TikTok Inc. v. Merrick Garland Background on United States v. O'Brien The Institute for Free Speech promotes and defends the political speech rights to freely speak, assemble, publish, and petition the government guaranteed by the First Amendment. If you're enjoying the Free Speech Arguments podcast, please subscribe and leave a review on your preferred podcast platform. To support the Institute's mission or inquire about legal assistance, please visit our website: www.ifs.org

ICYMI: Hour Three of ‘Later, with Mo'Kelly' Presents – Guest Host Chris Merrill filling in with thoughts on the ongoing push to ban TikTok in the United States AND social-media algorithms that recommend “sexual videos” to teen accounts…PLUS – A look at just how dangerous sneezing can be - on KFI AM 640…Live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app

Send us a Text Message.Can TikTok's data practices be trusted, or are there deeper privacy risks lurking behind its addictive interface? Privacy expert K Royal joins us to dissect the critical question, “Is that even legal?” This episode uncovers the sophisticated algorithms driving TikTok's uncanny content personalization and the significant privacy risks entailed, such as potential keystroke logging and extensive data access. We compare TikTok's practices to other social media giants, exploring why these concerns have led to global governmental crackdowns and what it means for user privacy and data security.We also tackle the contentious issue of banning TikTok in the United States, balancing national security concerns with First Amendment rights. This debate has vital implications for small businesses, artists, and influencers who depend on the platform. Could a comprehensive federal privacy law offer a better solution than an outright ban?  Royal weighs in with her expert insights, underscoring the urgent need for robust legislative action to protect consumer privacy across all media companies.  Listen in for an enlightening discussion that highlights the necessity for Congress to prioritize consumer data security in the digital age.

American lawmakers have tried for years to ban TikTok, concerned that the video app's links to China pose a national security risk.Sapna Maheshwari, a technology reporter for The Times, explains the behind-the-scenes push to rein in TikTok and discusses what a ban could mean for the app's 170 million users in the United States.Guest: Sapna Maheshwari, who covers TikTok, technology and emerging media companies for The New York Times.Background reading: A tiny group of lawmakers huddled in private about a year ago, aiming to bulletproof a bill that could ban TikTok.The TikTok law faces court challenges, a shortage of qualified buyers and Beijing's hostility.Love, hate or fear it, TikTok has changed America.For more information on today's episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.

Will you be sad to see #TikTok go? Congress has just signed a new bill that makes the ban a real possibility. We discuss. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Is banning TikTok a blow to the Chinese Communist Party...or just a boon to President Biden? John McEntee, a conservative who is thriving on TikTok, joins to make the case against a ban, and then Julie Kelly reacts to the Supreme Court's oral arguments in a crucial J6 court case. Charlie also asks: If Speaker Johnson is a "wartime speaker," why is he so afraid to fight? Become a member at members.charliekirk.com!Support the show: http://www.charliekirk.com/supportSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The House of Representatives voted to approve a bill banning TikTok in the United States. Now I'm all for dismantling the troublesome app, but this is all being hidden under the guise that they want to protect the cyber security of Americans.  Banning TikTok just isn't enough to make a difference when it comes to the safety and security of our personal information online. While big business and big government are trying to bypass your First Amendment protections, your information is still out there available to any con artist who has access to the internet. And one of your most valuable assets is the target of their schemes - Your home! These criminals simply go to the internet, find your deed, forge a signature, and take out all kinds of loans!  Today, I talked with Matthew Cox of Home Title Lock about the danger your information online is in. -- Click here to get 30 FREE days of home title monitoring from Home Title Lock! *The content presented by our partners may contain affiliate links. When you click and shop the links, Turley Talks may receive a small commission.*  Thank you for taking the time to listen to this episode.  If you enjoyed this episode, please subscribe and/or leave a review. Make sure to FOLLOW me on X (Twitter): https://twitter.com/DrTurleyTalks Do you want to be a part of the podcast and be our sponsor? Click here to partner with us and defy liberal culture! https://advertising.turleytalks.com/sponsorship If you want to get lots of articles on conservative trends, sign up for the 'New Conservative Age Rising' Email Alerts: https://turleytalks.com/subscribe/.

Rachelle Hampton and Candice Lim ask their most pressing questions about the bipartisan bill that would require TikTok's parent company to sell the app or face a ban on all devices in the U.S. While the bill is not expected to become law anytime soon, it's led to children crying on voicemails to their senators and TikTok creators preparing for the loss of their businesses, communities and collective internet histories. This podcast is produced by Se'era Spragley Ricks, Daisy Rosario, Candice Lim and Rachelle Hampton. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Sarah and Beth debate the pros and cons of the TikTok bill as well as explore why conspiracy theories are so prevalent on the platform, including ones about Catherine, the Princess of Wales.TOPICS DISCUSSEDThe Pros and Cons of the TikTik BillThe Proliferation of Conspiracy Theories on TikTokOutside of Politics: Does It Hold Up?Visit our website for complete show notes and episode resources. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The House passed a bill that could force the sale of TikTok, or ban the app altogether. But is targeting a single social media platform the best way to protect Americans from espionage and covert influence campaigns? About: On Point is WBUR's award-winning, daily public radio show and podcast. Every weekday, host Meghna Chakrabarti leads provocative conversations that help make sense of the world.

With one billion active users across more than 150 countries, TikTok is by many measures the world's most successful video app. Nearly one in three Americans have an account. It is the most downloaded app since 2021. And like virtually all of social media, user privacy concerns abound. But TikTok adds an extra layer. Owned by Chinese company ByteDance, there are worries that U.S. data could be transmitted to China's government, despite assurances from the company that it is not. Those concerns prompted President Joe Biden to ban Tiktok from government phones. More than half of U.S. states have similar controls in place. But with increased tensions between Beijing and Washington, and mounting questions of Chinese surveillance, some are calling for the U.S. to go further and ban the technology outright. Those supporting such a move often to point to a ban on another Chinese tech giant, Huawei, as an effective means of limiting China's influence and potentially extractive technological efforts. Those who argue against it say a ban would essentially undermine what has become an important tool in the video marketplace, and that such efforts are not only political motivated, but are also easily bypassed. In that context, we debate the following: Should the U.S. Ban TikTok?  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Probably not. Punchbowl's Andrew Desiderio and Kate Ruane from the Center for Democracy and Technology explain. This episode was produced by Amanda Lewellyn and Jesse Alejandro Cottrell, edited by Amina Al-Sadi, fact-checked by Laura Bullard with help from Hady Mawajdeh and Matt Collette, engineered by David Herman, and hosted by Sean Rameswaram. Transcript at vox.com/todayexplained Support Today, Explained by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Join us on this week's episode of Market Mondays, where we dive deep into the buzzing world of finance and investment, shedding light on some of the most talked-about topics in the market today. With only 32 days until the Bitcoin halving, we explore the potential impacts on the cryptocurrency world. What are your predictions post-halving?Join the Red Panda Stock Club 48hr Flash Sale:http://www.ianinvest.comOur panel of experts will also share their top trading tips for the month, invaluable insights you won't want to miss. Amidst rising speculation, we discuss the possible ban of TikTok in the United States and the implications for investors and the tech industry.We'll examine PayPal's current struggles and debate its future prospects. Can it make a comeback?Don't miss our analysis of the recent Don Lemon interview with Elon Musk, and the critical question: Is BYD outpacing Tesla, shifting the EV leadership to China?We'll take a comprehensive look at the state of the automotive industry, featuring giants like BA, F, GM, TOYOF, LCID, and PATK. How are they stacking up in today's market?The shocking report of Bruno Mars owing $50 million to MGM has lessons for investors; we'll uncover what you need to know.As Dollar Tree announces the closure of 600 Family Dollar Stores following a tumble in earnings, we debate whether it's time to buy into this stock or look towards Dollar General instead.Finally, in our "Date it or Dump it" segment, we'll dissect the potential of stocks like Jabil, Ulta, Blink Charging, and Madrigal Pharma. Should you keep them on your radar or let them go?Don't miss this packed episode full of insights, analysis, and expert advice on navigating the markets.#MarketMondays #BitcoinHalving #TradingTips #TikTokBan #PayPal #ElonMusk #BYDvsTesla #AutomotiveIndustry #BrunoMarsMGM #DollarTree #StockInvestment #Jabil #Ulta #BlinkCharging #MadrigalPharma0:00 Intro 6:28 Bitcoin Pulls Back from ATH, Halving Soon, What's Next?15:40 Ian's Trading Tip of the Month23:39 House Passes Bill that could Ban TikTok in the U.S, Senate Vote Next30:39 Why Rashad Believes There's a 0% Chance TikTok Will be Banned43:59 How TikTok is Innovating More than American Companies47:52 Will PayPal Ever Recover or is it a Finished Company?55:28 Elon Musk in Shambles in Don Lemon Interview 1:00:06 Tesla Stock Concerns & BYD Competitor1:05:40 The Current State of the Automotive Industry 1:10:53 Important Financial Tips to Remember Following Bruno Mars $50M Debt1:23:29 The Math Behind why Casinos Always Win 1:27:44 Dollar Tree Stock Falls after Poor Earnings, What Price is a Good Buy In?1:33:15 Stock Club 3-Year Bundle1:35:44 Stock Discussion: Date It or Dump It1:43:50 Societal Pressures Placed on Woman & Blackout Teaser1:46:16 NBA Talk1:57:07 OutroOur Sponsors:* Check out undefined and use my code MONDAYS for a great deal: undefinedSupport this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/marketmondays/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

TikTok - an app with around 170 Million American users - is under intense scrutiny by the U.S. government, including a bill passed by the House of Representatives which issues a threat: "sell or be banned." But how and why can the government do that? What does this kind of business restriction look like? We talked to Steven Balla of George Washington University to get the low down on regulations and bans in the United States. TLDR: This episode goes beyond the current legislation, but it's updated from an earlier version which dropped in April, 2023. CLICK HERE: Visit our website to donate to the podcast, sign up for our newsletter, get free educational materials, and more!

The Verge 's Nilay Patel, David Pierce, and Alex Cranz discuss the US House of Representatives passing a bill that could ban TikTok, the streaming news of the week, a Dyson robot, and more. Further reading: Lawmakers introduce bill that would punish app stores for hosting TikTok TikTok ban: all the news on attempts to ban the video platform  House passes bill that could ban TikTok TikTok's fate now lies with the Senate after House advances path to a ban There might be a “TikTok Photos” app in the works to take on Instagram. TikTok CEO tells users to “make their voices heard” against a bill that could ban the app in the US. Nancy Pelosi is playing TikTok-toe. Donald Trump has even more to say about the TikTok ban. President Biden says he'll sign a TikTok ban, if passed. TikTok is urging users to call Congress about a looming ban The TikTokers are revolting. Former Activision CEO Bobby Kotick is apparently eyeing TikTok. YouTube is revamping its TV app to make videos feel way more interactive  Spotify now has music videos  Neil Young's music is back on “low res Spotify” two years after Rogan protest Neil Young says the MacBook Pro has ‘Fisher-Price' audio quality Elon Musk cancels Don Lemon's show on X after a ‘tense' interview Linda Yaccarino on X: "X is becoming a video first platform” Roku hackers breach 15,000 accounts and are selling them online British monarchy rocked by bad Photoshop job The Kate Middleton photo scandal is a rare — and consequential — flub SpaceX successfully launches Starship in third flight test  Apple to allow iOS app downloads direct from websites in the EU Hands-on with the Dyson 360 Vis Nav robot vacuum Nikon is acquiring US camera manufacturer RED Email us at vergecast@theverge.com or call us at 866-VERGE11, we love hearing from you. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

It has been passed by the House already to sell or ban the social media app TikTok. Question is...Should it be banned or revamped by someone like Elon or another conservative? Speaking of Elon....After an interview with Don Lemon He fired Don from his own show premiering on X before the show even started! These two and much much more coming in today's episode. Follow us: @grahamallen1 @toddspears1776 ► Today's Sponsors: America's only Christian conservative wireless provider! www.patriotmobile.com/Graham or call 972-PATRIOT + use code GRAHAM for  FREE activation Protect your savings with the precious metal IRA specialist. www.birchgold.com Text: Graham to 989898 ► Watch LIVE on Rumble:  https://rumble.com/GrahamAllenOfficial ► Support freedom with 9/12 Merch: https://912united.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Hey BillOReilly.com Premium and Concierge Members, welcome to the No Spin News for Wednesday, March 13, 2024. Stand Up for Your Country. Tonight's rundown: Talking Points Memo: The rematch between Joe Biden and Donald Trump for the White House is now official. Hunter Biden has declined Congress' request to appear in a public hearing before the House Oversight and Judiciary Committees. Corruption in the Justice Department – this can no longer be ignored. General Counsel for Mountain States Legal Foundation joins the No Spin News. The House passed legislation that could effectively ban TikTok in the United States. Smart Life: Gold prices In a new poll, the number of Americans aged 18 – 27 who say they are not straight doubles to 22%. Easter Potato Roll? PETA asks White House to switch eggs for potatoes in annual Easter Egg roll. This Day in History: First National Bank is robbed. Final Thought: Killing the Witches and Confronting the Presidents compete for top book selection on BillOReilly.com membership gift. In Case You Missed It: Read Bill's latest column, “Who's Zoomin' Who?” Order the brand new BillOReilly.com Self Reliance coffee mug for only $24.95! Election season is here! Now's the time to get a Premium or Concierge Membership to BillOReilly.com, the only place for honest news analysis. Preorder Bill's latest book CONFRONTING THE PRESIDENTS, a No Spin assessment of every president from Washington to Biden. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The proposed legislation would force a Chinese tech giant to sell its stake in the app but its fate in the US Senate is unclear. Also: Israel says it is investigating a strike on a UN food distribution centre in Gaza; and a US man who spent most of the past 70 years in an "iron lung", dies aged 78.

The US Government Just Took The Next Step To Officially Ban TikTok! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The Rich Zeoli Show- Hour 1: On Wednesday, the House of Representatives voted in favor of the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act—a bill that would force TikTok's parent company ByteDance to divest its ownership in the social media application, citing its ties to the Chinese government. If they did not divest, the application would be banned in the United States. The legislation passed with bipartisan support 352 to 65, with those in support expressing fear that the Chinese government may be able to access American user data. But notable politicians in opposition—like former President Donald Trump, Senator Rand Paul (R-KY), Congressman Thomas Massie (R-KY), and House Freedom Caucus Chair Scott Perry (R-PA)—have all cited fears that the bill could be used as tool for government officials to interfere with speech on all social media companies. The bill will now head to the Senate—though, Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) has not committed to putting it up for a vote. President Joe Biden has vowed to sign the bill into law if it ultimately arrives at his desk. Shouldn't individuals be allowed to choose which products they use? Or is the risk of the Chinese government gaining access to American user data too great to respect individual autonomy and free markets in this instance? Senator Elizabeth Warren has suggested that the bill doesn't go far enough to prevent social media's influence, explaining that she wants “curbs in place on social media across the board,” according to Politico. Matthew Petti of Reason writes: “The Biden administration has used the specter of ‘disinformation' to push social media moderation in line with their policies. Meta has censored Middle Eastern content that opposes U.S. foreign policy, while Twitter has created loopholes for the U.S. military to run its own propaganda accounts. Of course, American law (unlike Chinese or Iranian law) limits how much the government can censor social media. Last year, courts banned and then unbanned the Biden administration from pressuring social media moderators. But the decision ultimately lies in Washington; it's not like European or Latin American voters have any say over the U.S. Supreme Court. Competition is the strongest force keeping the internet free. Whenever users find a topic banned on TikTok, they can escape to Twitter or Instagram to discuss the censored content. And when Twitter or Instagram enforce politically motivated censorship on a different topic, users can continue that discussion on TikTok. Forcing TikTok under American control is a way to block that escape route. Instead of protecting Americans from Chinese censorship, it would bring Chinese-style censorship home.” You can read more here: https://reason.com/2024/03/13/tiktoks-opponents-want-chinese-style-censorship-in-america/

Today the Chicks chat about the good news coming out of Georgia, Kamala's awkward visit to an abortion clinic, and the latest in the fight to ban TikTok.FREE Activation when you visit https://patriotmobile.com/chicks or call 972-PATRIOT use Code CHICKSIt's your lucky day!! Visit https://cozyearth.com and use Promo Code COZY CHICKS for 35% off!Get your free Risk Review today with Bulwark Capital. Visit http://www.knowyourriskradio.com Start composting today at home with Reencle.  Visit https://Reencle.co and use promo code CHICKS

Today the House voted overwhelmingly to approve a bill that would ban TikTok from operating in the U.S. or force a sale. For years politicians have threatened a ban, but this latest attempt finally gained traction. WSJ's Georgia Wells on the long push to ban the Chinese-controlled platform and how the company is fighting back. Further Listening: -The Billionaire Keeping TikTok on Your Phone  -Exclusive: TikTok's CEO on the App's Future in the U.S.  -What's Up With All the TikTok Bans?  Further Reading: -How TikTok Was Blindsided by U.S. Bill That Could Ban It  -TikTok Crackdown Shifts Into Overdrive, With Sale or Shutdown on Table  -The Billionaire Keeping TikTok on Phones in the U.S.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

6PM ET 03/13/2024 Newscast Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Stigall has some thoughts on this right off the top as the vote was taken as the show was published this morning. Mark Weaver returns to discuss an incredible day of Democrat gaslighting or "wish casting" as he calls it as the Special Counsel who issued the report on Biden document mishandling testified on the Hill. Clearly, as the election match up is set, the law fare being waged against Trump is unraveling quickly. Larry Schweikart's new book "A Patriot's History of Globalism" shares Stigall's mistrust of Congress moving on TikTok. And Steve Moore discusses D.C.'s attempt at "bettering" the lives of those who work for tips by mandating their employers pay them a huge hourly wage increase. -For more info visit the official website: https://chrisstigall.comInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/chrisstigallshow/Twitter: https://twitter.com/ChrisStigallFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/chris.stigall/Listen on Spotify: https://tinyurl.com/StigallPodListen on Apple Podcasts: https://bit.ly/StigallShowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

A.M. Edition for March 13. House lawmakers are expected to pass legislation today calling for ByteDance to divest itself of TikTok or see the app banned in its most important market. WSJ reporter Stu Woo says the bill is the most serious threat yet to TikTok's existence in America, but still faces potential hurdles in the Senate and the courts. Plus, the EU prepares to vote on world-first AI regulations. Luke Vargas hosts.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The Rich Zeoli Show- Full Episode (03/13/2024): 5:50pm- The Rich Zeoli Show is abbreviated today—thanks to college basketball. BUT Rich jams a full show's worth of content into 1 hour and 10 minutes! 5:55pm- New York Governor Kathy Hochul blames Republicans for chaos at the U.S. Southern border, Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro announces plans for a new carbon tax, and running back Saquon Barkley signs with the Philadelphia Eagles—could Jason Kelce come out of retirement? 6:05pm- On Wednesday, the House of Representatives voted in favor of the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act—a bill that would force TikTok's parent company BytDance to divest its ownership in the social media application, citing its ties to the Chinese government. If they did not divest, the application would be banned. The legislation passed with bipartisan support 352 to 65, with those in support expressing fear that the Chinese government may be able to access American user data. But notable politicians in opposition—like former President Donald Trump, Senator Rand Paul (R-KY), Congressman Thomas Massie (R-KY), and House Freedom Caucus Chair Scott Perry (R-PA)—have all cited fears that the bill could be used as tool for government officials to interfere with speech on all social media companies. The bill will now head to the Senate—though, Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) has not committed to putting it up for a vote. President Joe Biden has vowed to sign the bill into law if it ultimately arrives at his desk. Shouldn't individuals be allowed to choose which products they use? Or is the risk of the Chinese government gaining access to American user data too great to respect individual autonomy and free markets in this instance? Senator Elizabeth Warren has suggested that the bill doesn't go far enough to prevent social media's influence, explaining that she wants “curbs in place on social media across the board,” according to Politico.  6:20pm- Richard Fausset and Danny Hakim of The New York Times write: “In a surprise move on Wednesday, a judge in Atlanta quashed six of the charges against former President Donald J. Trump and his allies in the sprawling Georgia election interference case, including one related to a call that Mr. Trump made to pressure Georgia's secretary of state in early January 2021.vThe judge, Scott McAfee of Fulton Superior Court, left intact the rest of the racketeering indictment, which initially included 41 counts against 19 co-defendants.” You can read the full article here: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/13/us/donald-trump-charges-quashed-georgia-mcafee.html 6:30pm- On Tuesday night, after winning primary contests in Washington, Georgia, Mississippi, and Hawaii, Donald Trump secured the 1,215 delegates needed to officially win the Republican party's presidential nomination. President Joe Biden also earned the delegates necessary to officially win the Democrat Party nomination. 6:40pm- According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, inflation rose 3.2% year-to-year—and is up 0.4% from last month. During an interview with Fox Business, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen conceded that she should not have used the term “transitory” when describing inflation. 6:50pm- Andy Newman of The New York Times writes: “On a subway platform in the Bronx recently, a girl in a puffer coat strolled past passengers with a basket of M&M's, Kit Kats and Trident gum slung across her shoulder. She looked to be 7 or 8. Of all the manifestations of human misery that the two-year-old migrant crisis has brought to New York City, few trouble the conscience more than the sight of children selling candy on the subway — sometimes during school hours, sometimes accompanied by parents, sometimes not.” You can read the full report here: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/13/nyregion/migrant-children-selling-candy-subway-laws.html

TikTok is America's most popular app for young people. It's also controlled by the Chinese Communist Party. Now, Congress is taking bipartisan action to ban it. But is this necessary...or a mistake? Charlie talks to Joel Thayer about whether letting the Biden Admin ban apps is a good idea. Also, Zeek Arkham joins to discuss his feud with Charles Barkley over whether blacks can support MAGA. For more content, become a member at members.charliekirk.com!Support the show: http://www.charliekirk.com/supportSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.