Podcasts about Farce

There's been a lot of talk about potential sanctions Manchester City could face for all these charges they've been found guilty of, but has anybody given much thought to the Premier League season that is actually going on right now?Luke, Jim & Vish are here to discuss what this season could mean for the other clubs up and down the league. Plus, an early shout for the England outsiders we think could go to Euro 2028 (Marcus would have been in his element), and John Prescott as a football manager.Get your Football Ramble x Admiral kit here.Find us on Bluesky, X, Instagram, TikTok and YouTube, and email us here: show@footballramble.com.Sign up to the Football Ramble Patreon for ad-free shows for just $5 per month: https://www.patreon.com/footballramble.***Please take the time to rate us on your podcast app. It means a great deal to the show and will make it easier for other potential listeners to find us. Thanks!*** The Football Ramble, the original and best football podcast. No cliches. No ex-pros like Peter Crouch or The Rest is Football. Just the funniest football conversation out there. Your guardian for the season, daily not weekly. Stick to the Ramble, totally. Choose the Ramble vs everyone else.Brand new podcasts every single weekday throughout the Premier League and Champions League season, covering Arsenal, Aston Villa, Bournemouth, Brentford, Brighton, Chelsea, Coventry City, Crystal Palace, Everton, Fulham, Hull City, Ipswich Town, Leeds United, Liverpool, Man City, Manchester United, Newcastle United, Nottingham Forest, Sunderland and Spurs. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode, John dives into the chaos surrounding the recent Senate Judiciary Committee hearing with special counsel Jack Smith, where he faced off against Republican senators attempting to undermine his investigation into Donald Trump's actions. John highlights the absurdity of the GOP's tactics, including their attempts to discredit Smith with irrelevant questions about NBA games, showcasing the party's desperate need to defend Trump amid mounting evidence of wrongdoing.Joining John is the insightful Tara Devlin, who discusses the ongoing culture wars, and the need for Democrats to reclaim the narrative against the backdrop of fear and misinformation. They talk about the Republican Party's rotating panic machine, exploring how fearmongering tactics have become a staple in their playbook.Later, John speaks with Keri Leigh Merritt, author of "An Inconvenient Woman: The Extraordinary Life of Lillian Smith, the Southerner Who Defied Jim Crow America", who shares the extraordinary life of Lillian Smith, a pioneer of civil rights and LGBTQ+ advocacy in the Jim Crow South. They discuss Smith's radical ideas and the importance of her legacy in today's political climate.Finally, John and his comedic panel, featuring Rhonda Hansome and Keith Price, tackle the latest headlines, including the troubling investigation into the death of Nolan Wells and the implications of systemic racism and privilege in America today.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Max Laughton, Ben Cotton and Ben Waterworth review the 2026 AFL Grand Final and preview the trade period on the Fox Footy Podcast, with breakdowns of Brisbane's incredible comeback for a threepeat, Fremantle's all-time heartbreaker, the furore over the Norm Smith Medal vote, plus Fair or Farce and much more.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Message us ANONYMOUSLYCostume Designer Audrey Marlene rejoins us in the club for her choice “The Birdcage,” (d. Nichols 1996). Starring: Robin Williams (RIP), Nathan Lane, and Gene Hackman (RIP). Paul has thoughts about Ronald Reagan, The Jeb Bushes, Margaret Thatcher, Richard Nixon, and Nancy Reagan. He's decided you will hear them, and without a doubt, the worst ad in Review Review history....please clap...9/24!**All episodes contain explicit language**Main Artwork - Ben McFadden'Review Review Intro/Outro' Themes - Jamie Henwood"What Are We Watching?" & "Whatcha Been Doin'?" Themes - Matthew Fosket"Fun Facts" Theme - Chris Olds/Paul RootLead-Ins Edited/Conceptualized by - Ben McFaddenProduced by - Ben McFadden & Paul Root ("Shelf Help" - Paul Root)Podcast/Program Concept - Paul Root***This Podcast/Program is for entertainment purposes only. This Podcast/Program includes parody. This Podcast/Program contains peer review, film review, and film/art preservation discussions. 

Max Laughton, Will Faulkner and Ben Waterworth review the preliminary finals and preview the Grand Final of the 2026 AFL season on the Fox Footy Podcast, with breakdowns of the two epic qrand final qualifiers & the seasons of the losers, Nick Daicos' Brownlow Medal triumph, plus Fair or Farce and much more.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Max Laughton, Jack Jovanovski and Ben Waterworth review the semi-finals and preview the preliminary finals of the 2026 AFL season on the Fox Footy Podcast, including the incredibly close premiership race, Zak Butters picking the Western Bulldogs and the controversy around the proposed deal, plus Fair or Farce and much more.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Jes Staley's testimony to Congress was extraordinarily difficult to believe because his repeated claims of ignorance about Jeffrey Epstein collided with the sheer depth of their relationship and with Staley's own admissions under questioning. Staley maintained that he never knew Epstein was trafficking or abusing girls, yet he acknowledged an association that involved hundreds of communications, repeated visits to Epstein's Manhattan townhouse and Little St. James, and continued contact after Epstein's 2008 conviction. He also admitted sharing confidential and potentially market-sensitive JPMorgan information with Epstein, including information about the bank's communications with the Federal Reserve during the 2008 financial crisis, pending transactions and his own compensation. Staley further acknowledged that Epstein had named him as a trustee of his estate after Epstein was already a convicted sex offender. Against that record, the idea that Staley somehow remained oblivious to the kind of man Epstein was became exceedingly hard to swallow. His testimony required the listener to believe that one of the most sophisticated bankers in the world could recognize Epstein as a trusted confidant worthy of sensitive banking information and extraordinary personal access, yet somehow failed to recognize the enormous warning signs surrounding him.There were also moments where Staley's answers appeared less like simple failures of memory and more like attempts to explain away documentary evidence that was sitting directly in front of Congress. His descriptions of the relationship had already been contradicted by earlier messages in which he referred to Epstein in intensely personal terms, while bizarre emails involving references such as “Snow White” and other coded or sexualized language created additional credibility problems when Staley claimed he could not explain what some of them meant. He tried to maintain a distinction between knowing Epstein personally and knowing anything about his sexual conduct, even while acknowledging that he had sex with one of Epstein's assistants after meeting her through Epstein and had spent years inside Epstein's social world. Whether every false or implausible answer could ultimately be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to constitute criminal perjury is a separate legal question, because that would require proof that Staley knowingly made a materially false statement rather than merely giving an evasive or mistaken answer. But judged against the emails, travel, financial dealings, confidential information sharing and Staley's own admissions, significant portions of his testimony were extremely difficult to reconcile with the established record, and his repeated professions of ignorance often sounded less like credible explanations than an effort to preserve a version of events that the documents themselves had already badly damaged.toc ontact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Jes Staley's testimony to Congress was extraordinarily difficult to believe because his repeated claims of ignorance about Jeffrey Epstein collided with the sheer depth of their relationship and with Staley's own admissions under questioning. Staley maintained that he never knew Epstein was trafficking or abusing girls, yet he acknowledged an association that involved hundreds of communications, repeated visits to Epstein's Manhattan townhouse and Little St. James, and continued contact after Epstein's 2008 conviction. He also admitted sharing confidential and potentially market-sensitive JPMorgan information with Epstein, including information about the bank's communications with the Federal Reserve during the 2008 financial crisis, pending transactions and his own compensation. Staley further acknowledged that Epstein had named him as a trustee of his estate after Epstein was already a convicted sex offender. Against that record, the idea that Staley somehow remained oblivious to the kind of man Epstein was became exceedingly hard to swallow. His testimony required the listener to believe that one of the most sophisticated bankers in the world could recognize Epstein as a trusted confidant worthy of sensitive banking information and extraordinary personal access, yet somehow failed to recognize the enormous warning signs surrounding him.There were also moments where Staley's answers appeared less like simple failures of memory and more like attempts to explain away documentary evidence that was sitting directly in front of Congress. His descriptions of the relationship had already been contradicted by earlier messages in which he referred to Epstein in intensely personal terms, while bizarre emails involving references such as “Snow White” and other coded or sexualized language created additional credibility problems when Staley claimed he could not explain what some of them meant. He tried to maintain a distinction between knowing Epstein personally and knowing anything about his sexual conduct, even while acknowledging that he had sex with one of Epstein's assistants after meeting her through Epstein and had spent years inside Epstein's social world. Whether every false or implausible answer could ultimately be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to constitute criminal perjury is a separate legal question, because that would require proof that Staley knowingly made a materially false statement rather than merely giving an evasive or mistaken answer. But judged against the emails, travel, financial dealings, confidential information sharing and Staley's own admissions, significant portions of his testimony were extremely difficult to reconcile with the established record, and his repeated professions of ignorance often sounded less like credible explanations than an effort to preserve a version of events that the documents themselves had already badly damaged.toc ontact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Jes Staley's testimony to Congress was extraordinarily difficult to believe because his repeated claims of ignorance about Jeffrey Epstein collided with the sheer depth of their relationship and with Staley's own admissions under questioning. Staley maintained that he never knew Epstein was trafficking or abusing girls, yet he acknowledged an association that involved hundreds of communications, repeated visits to Epstein's Manhattan townhouse and Little St. James, and continued contact after Epstein's 2008 conviction. He also admitted sharing confidential and potentially market-sensitive JPMorgan information with Epstein, including information about the bank's communications with the Federal Reserve during the 2008 financial crisis, pending transactions and his own compensation. Staley further acknowledged that Epstein had named him as a trustee of his estate after Epstein was already a convicted sex offender. Against that record, the idea that Staley somehow remained oblivious to the kind of man Epstein was became exceedingly hard to swallow. His testimony required the listener to believe that one of the most sophisticated bankers in the world could recognize Epstein as a trusted confidant worthy of sensitive banking information and extraordinary personal access, yet somehow failed to recognize the enormous warning signs surrounding him.There were also moments where Staley's answers appeared less like simple failures of memory and more like attempts to explain away documentary evidence that was sitting directly in front of Congress. His descriptions of the relationship had already been contradicted by earlier messages in which he referred to Epstein in intensely personal terms, while bizarre emails involving references such as “Snow White” and other coded or sexualized language created additional credibility problems when Staley claimed he could not explain what some of them meant. He tried to maintain a distinction between knowing Epstein personally and knowing anything about his sexual conduct, even while acknowledging that he had sex with one of Epstein's assistants after meeting her through Epstein and had spent years inside Epstein's social world. Whether every false or implausible answer could ultimately be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to constitute criminal perjury is a separate legal question, because that would require proof that Staley knowingly made a materially false statement rather than merely giving an evasive or mistaken answer. But judged against the emails, travel, financial dealings, confidential information sharing and Staley's own admissions, significant portions of his testimony were extremely difficult to reconcile with the established record, and his repeated professions of ignorance often sounded less like credible explanations than an effort to preserve a version of events that the documents themselves had already badly damaged.toc ontact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Jes Staley's testimony to Congress was extraordinarily difficult to believe because his repeated claims of ignorance about Jeffrey Epstein collided with the sheer depth of their relationship and with Staley's own admissions under questioning. Staley maintained that he never knew Epstein was trafficking or abusing girls, yet he acknowledged an association that involved hundreds of communications, repeated visits to Epstein's Manhattan townhouse and Little St. James, and continued contact after Epstein's 2008 conviction. He also admitted sharing confidential and potentially market-sensitive JPMorgan information with Epstein, including information about the bank's communications with the Federal Reserve during the 2008 financial crisis, pending transactions and his own compensation. Staley further acknowledged that Epstein had named him as a trustee of his estate after Epstein was already a convicted sex offender. Against that record, the idea that Staley somehow remained oblivious to the kind of man Epstein was became exceedingly hard to swallow. His testimony required the listener to believe that one of the most sophisticated bankers in the world could recognize Epstein as a trusted confidant worthy of sensitive banking information and extraordinary personal access, yet somehow failed to recognize the enormous warning signs surrounding him.There were also moments where Staley's answers appeared less like simple failures of memory and more like attempts to explain away documentary evidence that was sitting directly in front of Congress. His descriptions of the relationship had already been contradicted by earlier messages in which he referred to Epstein in intensely personal terms, while bizarre emails involving references such as “Snow White” and other coded or sexualized language created additional credibility problems when Staley claimed he could not explain what some of them meant. He tried to maintain a distinction between knowing Epstein personally and knowing anything about his sexual conduct, even while acknowledging that he had sex with one of Epstein's assistants after meeting her through Epstein and had spent years inside Epstein's social world. Whether every false or implausible answer could ultimately be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to constitute criminal perjury is a separate legal question, because that would require proof that Staley knowingly made a materially false statement rather than merely giving an evasive or mistaken answer. But judged against the emails, travel, financial dealings, confidential information sharing and Staley's own admissions, significant portions of his testimony were extremely difficult to reconcile with the established record, and his repeated professions of ignorance often sounded less like credible explanations than an effort to preserve a version of events that the documents themselves had already badly damaged.toc ontact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Jes Staley's testimony to Congress was extraordinarily difficult to believe because his repeated claims of ignorance about Jeffrey Epstein collided with the sheer depth of their relationship and with Staley's own admissions under questioning. Staley maintained that he never knew Epstein was trafficking or abusing girls, yet he acknowledged an association that involved hundreds of communications, repeated visits to Epstein's Manhattan townhouse and Little St. James, and continued contact after Epstein's 2008 conviction. He also admitted sharing confidential and potentially market-sensitive JPMorgan information with Epstein, including information about the bank's communications with the Federal Reserve during the 2008 financial crisis, pending transactions and his own compensation. Staley further acknowledged that Epstein had named him as a trustee of his estate after Epstein was already a convicted sex offender. Against that record, the idea that Staley somehow remained oblivious to the kind of man Epstein was became exceedingly hard to swallow. His testimony required the listener to believe that one of the most sophisticated bankers in the world could recognize Epstein as a trusted confidant worthy of sensitive banking information and extraordinary personal access, yet somehow failed to recognize the enormous warning signs surrounding him.There were also moments where Staley's answers appeared less like simple failures of memory and more like attempts to explain away documentary evidence that was sitting directly in front of Congress. His descriptions of the relationship had already been contradicted by earlier messages in which he referred to Epstein in intensely personal terms, while bizarre emails involving references such as “Snow White” and other coded or sexualized language created additional credibility problems when Staley claimed he could not explain what some of them meant. He tried to maintain a distinction between knowing Epstein personally and knowing anything about his sexual conduct, even while acknowledging that he had sex with one of Epstein's assistants after meeting her through Epstein and had spent years inside Epstein's social world. Whether every false or implausible answer could ultimately be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to constitute criminal perjury is a separate legal question, because that would require proof that Staley knowingly made a materially false statement rather than merely giving an evasive or mistaken answer. But judged against the emails, travel, financial dealings, confidential information sharing and Staley's own admissions, significant portions of his testimony were extremely difficult to reconcile with the established record, and his repeated professions of ignorance often sounded less like credible explanations than an effort to preserve a version of events that the documents themselves had already badly damaged.toc ontact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jes Staley's testimony to Congress was extraordinarily difficult to believe because his repeated claims of ignorance about Jeffrey Epstein collided with the sheer depth of their relationship and with Staley's own admissions under questioning. Staley maintained that he never knew Epstein was trafficking or abusing girls, yet he acknowledged an association that involved hundreds of communications, repeated visits to Epstein's Manhattan townhouse and Little St. James, and continued contact after Epstein's 2008 conviction. He also admitted sharing confidential and potentially market-sensitive JPMorgan information with Epstein, including information about the bank's communications with the Federal Reserve during the 2008 financial crisis, pending transactions and his own compensation. Staley further acknowledged that Epstein had named him as a trustee of his estate after Epstein was already a convicted sex offender. Against that record, the idea that Staley somehow remained oblivious to the kind of man Epstein was became exceedingly hard to swallow. His testimony required the listener to believe that one of the most sophisticated bankers in the world could recognize Epstein as a trusted confidant worthy of sensitive banking information and extraordinary personal access, yet somehow failed to recognize the enormous warning signs surrounding him.There were also moments where Staley's answers appeared less like simple failures of memory and more like attempts to explain away documentary evidence that was sitting directly in front of Congress. His descriptions of the relationship had already been contradicted by earlier messages in which he referred to Epstein in intensely personal terms, while bizarre emails involving references such as “Snow White” and other coded or sexualized language created additional credibility problems when Staley claimed he could not explain what some of them meant. He tried to maintain a distinction between knowing Epstein personally and knowing anything about his sexual conduct, even while acknowledging that he had sex with one of Epstein's assistants after meeting her through Epstein and had spent years inside Epstein's social world. Whether every false or implausible answer could ultimately be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to constitute criminal perjury is a separate legal question, because that would require proof that Staley knowingly made a materially false statement rather than merely giving an evasive or mistaken answer. But judged against the emails, travel, financial dealings, confidential information sharing and Staley's own admissions, significant portions of his testimony were extremely difficult to reconcile with the established record, and his repeated professions of ignorance often sounded less like credible explanations than an effort to preserve a version of events that the documents themselves had already badly damaged.toc ontact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Max Laughton, Ben Cotton and Ben Waterworth review week 2 of the finals and preview the semi-finals of the 2026 AFL season on the Fox Footy Podcast, with breakdowns of the stunning qualifying final upsets, who the new flag favourite is, Alastair Clarkson's sacking from North Melbourne, plus Fair or Farce and much more.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

https://dwyercrime.blog/2026/09/05/260901-dwyer-a-farce-tupac-shakur-murder-trial/feed/ 0 3908

Andy and Brendan are excited for Labor Day weekend and bring the energy for this Whiparound Friday episode ahead of the holiday. They begin with Mike Sposa's win at the U.S. Senior Amateur Championship at Baltimore Country Club. Andy is inspired by this story of resilience in the amateur game and wonders how Sposa had the time to get so good at golf while he was busy making 90 cuts on the PGA Tour! The two break down yet another example of the farce that is "reinstated amateurism" and wonder how the USGA let this guy bank in the ranks after such a long pro career. Brendan continues the heartwarming start to the show with a Sergio Garcia tale from the Omega European Masters that you won't want to miss. From there, they discuss this weekend's Walker Cup at Lahinch Golf Club. Team USA has to face not only the best Great Britain & Ireland team in recent memory, but they're also battling a stomach bug that has taken over the teamroom. From there, Andy shares some research into the Christiaan Bezuidenhout Presidents Cup pick and decides that C-Bez should play all five sessions for the Internationals. Kevin Van Valkenburg returns with yet another B. Draddy P-Cup Flashback about the 2015 matches and some Phil Mickelson hijinks in South Korea. Andy and Brendan wrap with news regarding Good Good and the RBC Heritage before sending this episode on its way into a holiday weekend. Use promo code SGS30 for 30% off Presidents Cup gear at B. Draddy!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Max Laughton, Ben Cotton and Ben Waterworth review the wildcard finals and preview the qualifying & elimination finals from the 2026 AFL season on the Fox Footy Podcast, with breakdowns of Melbourne, Collingwood and Scott Pendlebury's respective exits, previews of this week's four finals, plus Fair or Farce and much more.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Max Laughton, Will Faulkner and Ben Waterworth preview the 2026 AFL wildcard finals on the Fox Footy Podcast, with breakdowns of the top 10 teams' chances, reviews of the bottom 8 sides' seasons, questions over Essendon's new coach, Fair or Farce and much more.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Republicans and Democrats agree that the federal campaign finance system is a failure. The limits on contributions to candidates can be easily circumvented and it's difficult to track how money is influencing politics. One of the Democrats who agrees with this assessment is U.S. Sen. Elissa Slotkin, a Democrat from Michigan, who was in St. Louis last week to talk about, among other things, a national ethics overhaul. Slotkin provides her ideas on “The Politically Speaking Hour on St. Louis on the Air.”

Why are US troops in South Korea? Dr. Van Jackson talks about his history working Korea policy, and why he doesn't think the old rationale holds up in 2026. The real meaning of the Pentagon's announcement to produce 200,000 drones for "drone dominance." With Alexander Vindman's loss to Angie Nixon in the Florida senate primary, we are seeing the twighlight of the "resistance liberal" from Trump 1.0. Could party structures modeled on DSA, the Democratic Socialists of America, emerge in other countries? There's a bond market crisis that could spark a financial meldown--here's why interest rates are rising. Also this episode: Dr. Jackson shares his panel discussion about left populism, democratic socialism, and the upcoming New Zealand at the NZ Fabian Society.  Subscribe to the Un-Diplomatic Newsletter: https://www.un-diplomatic.com/  Watch Un-Diplomatic Podcast on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@un-diplomaticpodcast  Disclaimer: The views expressed are those of the individuals and not of any institutions

Max Laughton, Will Faulkner and Ben Waterworth review Round 23 and preview Round 24 of the 2026 AFL season on the Fox Footy Podcast, with a breakdown of the Sydney Swans' off-field scandal that has rocked the game just a week out from the finals, plus the ladder implications from the final round, Fair or Farce and much more.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The so-called phase one release of the Epstein files was nothing more than a pathetic PR puppet show dressed up as transparency. Instead of inviting the only people who actually deserved to be in that room—the survivors—the organizers hand-selected a cast of online clowns and grifters who have about as much understanding of the Epstein case as a houseplant. They paraded around the White House like they won a radio contest, smiling for cameras, posting selfies, and pushing prewritten talking points as if they were uncovering Watergate. It was state-sponsored propaganda masquerading as accountability, an insult delivered with a smile. Survivors were ignored, the press was sidelined, and instead the public was spoon-fed a carefully constructed narrative built for PR optics, not truth.What should have been a moment of brutal honesty and real disclosure was reduced to a circus of Twitter personalities and YouTube hustlers with zero investigative credibility—people who built their brands on culture-war outrage and have never spent a second doing real reporting on Epstein. The entire spectacle reeked of panic management, damage control, and political theater designed to neutralize public pressure and pretend progress was being made without actually releasing anything of substance. It was a grotesque mockery of justice: a stage play designed to distract, deflect, and buy time. If the goal was to treat the public like idiots and spit in the face of survivors, mission accomplished.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

EXCLUSIVE: Trump Sparks 'Sitting Duck' Assassination Fears With Catering Cart 'Farce'Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

C dans l'air l'invité du 14 février 2026 avec Martial You, éditorialiste économique à RTL et auteur du livre "Les Dindons" (Éd. Robert Laffont), surnom qu'il donne à ces classes moyennes en déclin depuis près de cinquante ans.Selon le journaliste, les ménages de la classe moyenne gagnent à deux entre 2 362 et 5 084 euros net par mois. Il y ajoute les retraités. Une classe qui représente donc environ deux Français sur trois. Il estime que Les Dindons ont initialement été trahies par François Mitterrand lorsqu'il est arrivé au pouvoir en 1981 : les classes moyennes paieraient l'addition de la réduction du temps de travail et du passage de l'âge de départ à la retraite à 60 ans. A cela s'ajoutent les conséquences de la mondialisation, la pression fiscale (l'impôt sur le revenu pesait 3,7 % du PIB au milieu des années 70, contre 10 % aujourd'hui), la dévalorisation du diplôme, les bas salaires... Mais aussi et surtout le coût du logement (les prix ont bondi de 88 % en vingt ans, hors inflation, selon l'Institut Montaigne), compromettant le rêve de la maison individuelle cher des classes moyennes. Les Français sont donc contraints d'arbitrer dans leurs dépenses. Le budget consacré à l'alimentation est ainsi en baisse. Martial You identifie toutefois ce qu'il appelle une "société de l'abonnement" : une famille peut totaliser plus de dix abonnements. Pour un salaire médian à 2 100 euros net, selon l'Insee, les abonnements représentent plus de 3 % du budget familial. L'inflation apparue en 2022 a pris à la gorge des classes moyennes déjà exsangues, dont la colère exprimée lors du mouvement des Gilets jaunes n'a pas été prise en considération par des politiques qui leur paraissent déconnectés de la réalité de leur quotidien, comme en témoigne le "piège de la voiture électrique" d'après Martial You. L'éditorialiste considère qu'"au nom de la sauvegarde du climat, on est en train de piéger les moins riches en les faisant plonger dans le rêve de la voiture électrique." Les classes moyennes vont également devoir faire face aux défis à venir : l'intelligence artificielle, qui menace déjà de détruire leurs emplois, et les réseaux sociaux, qui surfent sur leur colère.

Max Laughton, Ben Cotton and Ben Waterworth review Round 22 and preview Round 23 of the 2026 AFL season on the Fox Footy Podcast, with an in-depth look at Geelong's concussion contract clause saga and the penalty it deserves, plus The Run Home with two weeks left, Fair or Farce and much more.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Multiple sources inside Iran say that Iran's new Supreme Leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, has been rushed to the hospital and is in critical condition. Megan Rapinoe goes on an UNHINGED rant, accusing Sophie Cunningham and Riley Gaines of pushing nonsense because they're trying to protect women's sports. A United Nations study SHATTERS the Gaza “starvation” narrative. WNBA star Gabby Williams supports trans women playing in the league, saying “the battle has changed”.Thank you for supporting our sponsors that make The Dana Show possible…Alliance Defending Freedomhttps://JoinADF.org/DanaAlliance Defending Freedom is on the front lines defending the freedoms and values that matter. Join the fight today. Byrnahttps://Byrna.com/DanaTrusted by law enforcement, security professionals, and everyday Americans—defend yourself and your family with Byrna.HumanNhttps://Humann.com/DanaGet the limited edition Watermelon Flavor and find out how to get a FREE 30-day supply before they sell out.Patriot Mobilehttp://PatriotMobile.com/DANAVisit online or call 972-PATRIOT and use promo code DANA for a FREE month of service.Relief Factorhttps://www.ReliefFactor.comYou could be the next person sharing a Relief Factor success story. Get started today with the 3-Week QuickStart for only $17.76.Ghost Bedhttps://GhostBed.com/DANAGhostBed has the cooling luxury mattress you need for the best summer sleep. Use code DANA for an extra 10% off sitewide.Webroothttps://Webroot.com/DanaSave 60% off Webroot. Protect your devices. Protect your family. Protect your peace of mind. Live a better digital life with Webroot. Fast Growing Treeshttps://FastGrowingTrees.com/DanaGet an additional 20% off  your first Fast Growing Trees. Get better plants and a better looking yard. Noble Goldhttps://NobleGoldInvestments.com/DanaIf you want to see how physical gold and silver could fit into your portfolio, download Noble Gold Investments FREE Wealth Protection Kit.Concerned Women For Americahttps://ConcernedWomen.org/DanaDonate today and together, we can defend our girls, equip parents and protect the next generation.Chapterhttps://Chapter.org/DanaAsk Chapter today if you could be saving money on your medicare coverageSubscribe today and stay in the loop on all things news with The Dana Show. Follow us here for more daily clips, updates, and commentary:YoutubeFacebookInstagramXMore InfoWebsite

Max Laughton, Jack Jovanovski and Ben Waterworth review Round 21 and preview Round 22 of the 2026 AFL season on the Fox Footy Podcast, including breakdowns of Carlton's stunning finals-shaping win over Brisbane, Jack's take from inside Ross Lyon's latest testy presser, plus Fair or Farce and much more.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Die Weltgeschichte macht keine Pause – und der Kampf um die Demokratie in Deutschland erst recht nicht. In diesem Video analysiert Roland Tichy drei besorgniserregende Entwicklungen, die zeigen, wie der Rechtsstaat und gesellschaftliche Werte zunehmend unter Druck geraten. Die Themen der Sendung: 1. Kabinettsumbildung ohne Eid: Friedrich Merz und sein neues Kabinett treten an, ohne vor dem Bundestag den Amtseid abzulegen. Was als „Zeitersparnis“ verkauft wird, ist eine tiefe Missachtung demokratischer Symbole und der Pflicht, dem Wohle des deutschen Volkes zu dienen. 2. Demokratie-Abbau in Niedersachsen: In Lüneburg wird die freie Wahl zur Farce. Wie SPD und Grüne versuchen, unliebsame politische Konkurrenten durch fragwürdige Gutachten des Verfassungsschutzes und Schauprozesse im Wahlausschuss zu verhindern. 3. Skandal in der Kirche: Der Bund der Deutschen Katholischen Jugend (BDKJ) und die Vorfälle bei den St. Georg Pfadfindern. Roland Tichy spricht über die schockierende Sexualisierung von Kindern, das Schweigen der Bischöfe und den Kampf um die Meinungsfreiheit gegen drohende Klagen. Es ist Zeit, genau hinzusehen. Wenn die Regierung das Gesetz missachtet und Institutionen wegschauen, ist die Wachsamkeit der Bürger gefragt.

Just days into Minnesota Vikings Training Camp it is clear Kevin O'Connell's QB competition is no farce. J.J. McCarthy and Kyler Murray are largely splitting reps. The Minnesota Star Tribune's Chip Scoggins joins Purple Daily's Judd Zulgad for an overview on the first few days of camp. How are the two Quarterbacks stacking up in the competition and what to make of their personality differences. Come for the Minnesota Vikings talk but stay for a breakdown on Chip Scoggins typing style. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

On this Salcedo Storm Podcast: Brandon Waltens, Senior Editor at Texas Scorecard. 

In Deutschland besuchen mittlerweile zehn Prozent aller Schülerinnen und Schüler eine Privatschule - oft, um dem Sanierungsstau und chronischem Lehrermangel an staatlichen Schulen zu entgehen. Es droht ein verhängnisvolles Zwei-Klassen-System. Ein Kommentar von Tanja Dückers www.deutschlandfunkkultur.de, Politisches Feuilleton

Ben Cotton, Max Laughton and Ben Waterworth break down a newsy AFL weekend, including the latest trade whispers, Max King’s luckless setback and how Harley Reid is treated. Plus the bottom-three teams assessed, a full preview of Round 21, Fair or Farce and much more.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Stupid Extra 7-22-2026 …He Declared the Election is a Farce

Max Laughton, Will Faulkner and Ben Waterworth review Round 19 and preview Round 20 of the 2026 AFL season on the Fox Footy Podcast, breaking down Tasmania hiring Ken Hinkley as their first coach and how they'll build their list, plus analysis of the finals race with five rounds left, Fair or Farce and much more.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Dawn Stensland opens the hour with the stunning final exoneration of Zachary Reihl, a local Marine veteran, Temple University graduate, and J6 defendant who had his seditious conspiracy conviction completely thrown out. Dawn breaks down how Reihl survived over a year in pre-trial solitary confinement while treated worse than international terrorists. Reihl joins the show directly to expose the malicious tactics used by federal prosecutors—including withholding evidence, using coerced witness testimony, and scheduling critical hearings on his wife's pregnancy due date—and details his upcoming book and documentary highlighting the weaponization of the justice system. The crew then shifts focus to Washington, where Supreme Court Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Elena Kagan delivered rare Capitol Hill testimony to justify a major budget increase amid skyrocketing personal threats. We react to Justice Barrett's chilling, highly personal accounts of having to explain a bulletproof vest to her twelve-year-old son during the Dobbs leak and experiencing a dangerous swatting incident at her family home. Meanwhile, Donald Trump dominates the foreign policy front, greeting the new businessman-turned-prime-minister of Iraq at the White House and posting a massive Truth Social decree detailing a total maritime blockade on Iranian cargo and massive trade agreements in the Gulf. Finally, Abington Township Police Chief and Pennsylvania Chiefs of Police Association President Patrick Malloy joins the show to provide a law enforcement perspective on the growing debate over Flock license plate reader cameras. Chief Malloy addresses the privacy concerns of libertarians while demonstrating how these devices are vital in tracking international theft rings, locating missing non-verbal children, and solving local burglaries. Malloy also weighs in on a tragic hit-and-run arrest in Abington and argues passionately that true criminal justice reform in the region is completely impossible without comprehensive education reform and school choice.

Max Laughton, Ben Cotton and Ben Waterworth review Round 18 and preview Round 19 of the 2026 AFL season on the Fox Footy Podcast, with breakdowns of Geelong's continued slide down the table, the state of the finals race and whether Fremantle can be stopped, plus Fair or Farce and much more.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode of the PRmoment Podcast's weekly news review, Ben Smith is joined by Angie Moxon and Mark Borkowski for a wide‑ranging discussion spanning British politics, football, FIFA's reputation, and Wimbledon.The conversation opens with what Angie has dubbed “the politics of farce”, focusing on Nigel Farage, the Reform party, Count Binface, and the Clacton by‑election. Angie predicts Count Binface could “trash” Farage and laments that, despite the historic struggle to win the vote, British politics has descended into something comical and depressing. Public disillusionment, she argues, is understandable given the corruption and behaviour of politicians.Mark acknowledges Farage's skill as a communicator and campaigner, noting how effectively he has handled tough questions about a £5 million donation from Christopher Harborne. However, he suggests that Farage has “crossed the line” regarding rules on political funding and now faces appropriate scrutiny, potentially including police investigation. Mark argues that Farage's strengths as a campaigner do not necessarily translate into being a capable constituency MP, and suggests many Reform supporters may worry about his actual ability to represent them.The trio then discuss the strategic move by other major parties to unite against Farage by refusing to play his “let the people decide” by‑election game. Mark sees this as a rare moment of unity against political outliers that, if repeated more often, might strengthen parliamentary democracy. Angie reflects on the demographic profile of Clacton – likely older voters – and suggests this still favours Farage, though national mood and protest votes could yet shape the result. Ben points out that Reform typically struggle to exceed 30–35% of the vote, making them vulnerable if they face a single unity candidate.The discussion shifts to sport, starting with the World Cup and Kylian Mbappé's handling of a racist remarks from a Paraguayan senator Celeste Amarilla. Mark praises the transformation in elite footballer behaviour, contrasting today's professionalism with the troubles of past stars such as Gazza and Wayne Rooney. Top players like Mbappé, Ronaldo, Bellingham, and Kane are portrayed as heavily media‑trained, acutely aware of their social‑media power, and highly responsible communicators who understand their status as global icons. Angie adds a personal perspective, recalling the open racism she heard on football terraces as a child and highlighting how far, despite serious remaining problems, things have improved.From there, the panel turns to FIFA's communications and governance. Mark brands FIFA's PR an “absolute disaster” and is scathing about Gianni Infantino's ego and political manoeuvring, including the rescinding of a controversial red card and the theatrical awarding of a “peace prize” to Donald Trump. Angie broadens the critique to the systemic corruption and “jobs for the boys” culture she sees in male‑dominated sports administration and corporate leadership, arguing this erodes credibility and is terrible public relations.Finally, the conversation moves to Wimbledon. Ben notes that, in a World Cup year with a depleted British tennis contingent, organisers must have been worried about interest – until Arthur Ferry's unexpected run to the semi‑finals. Angie welcomes him as a much‑needed “Great British hope” whose success can lift viewing figures. Ben closes by observing that the power of sport to capture attention and provide a temporary escape from a troubled world is as strong as ever.“We're now in a season of political farce – and that's a tragedy for a country where people fought so hard to win the vote.” Angie Moxon [00:00:49]–[00:01:20]“Farage is a remarkable communicator – but he's never been a man who embraces rules, and this time he's crossed the line.” Mark Borkowski [00:01:29]–[00:02:15]“If you woke up from a 40‑year sleep and saw the last two weeks' headlines, you'd ask: what on earth has happened to this country?” Mark Borkowski00:02:56]–[00:03:18]“Count Binface's best strategy might be to stay quiet – and let Farage's circus speak for itself.” Angie Moxon  [00:05:04]–[00:05:35]“Today's superstars – Mbappé, Bellingham, Kane, Ronaldo – are not just great players; they're some of the sharpest communicators in global sport.” Mark Borkowski[00:06:17]–[00:08:06]“I grew up hearing vile racism on the terraces as a little girl – so when modern players call it out, it really matters.” Angie Moxon[00:08:25]–[00:09:10]“FIFA's PR has been an absolute disaster; Infantino's ego is centre‑stage while the credibility of the organisation collapses.” Mark Borkowski[00:09:10]–[00:10:18]“This is a classic ‘jobs for the boys' structure – male, closed, and corrupt – and it's terrible PR for football.” Angie Moxon[00:10:51]–[00:11:22]“Despite all the scandals, the World Cup still pulls in more than half the planet – that's the scale of spectacle we're talking about.” Mark Borkowski [00:11:43]–[00:12:37]“Arthur Ferry turning up in a Wimbledon semi‑final is exactly the kind of underdog story broadcasters dream of in a World Cup year.” Ben Smith (with context from Angie)[00:12:46]–[00:13:17]

6pm - GUEST - CARLEEN JOHNSON - THE CENTER SQUARE // State fails to investigate daycares with no children despite media reports // Completely nuts: Dutch gallery covers floor in peanut butter to honour late artist // Where is the line between art and farce? // Aussie star stunned after using CIA pain-control technique

Nigel Farage's by-election stunt has blown up in his face – but could he really lose to Count Binface? Donald Trump has gone back to bombing and declared the Iran ceasefire “over”. Will this Groundhog Day ever end? And Prince Harry lost his landmark privacy case against the Daily Mail's publisher – will more cases follow or is this it? Alex von Tunzelmann joins Jacob Jarvis to discuss the biggest, strangest and under-reported stories of the week. • Back us on Patreon – www.patreon.com/bunkercast Written and presented by Jacob Jarvis. Producer: James Liddell. Audio production: Jade Bailey. Managing Editor: Jacob Jarvis. Group Editor: Andrew Harrison. Music by Kenny Dickinson. THE BUNKER is a Podmasters Production. www.podmasters.co.uk Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Jeremy Kyle reacts as Count Binface heads to Clacton, leaving Nigel Farage facing a surreal by-election after major parties decline participation. Meanwhile, Labour's leadership contest appears settled, with Al Carns backing Andy Burnham after ruling out his own bid.Wake up with Talk Breakfast in full on YouTube, DAB+ radio, Samsung TV Plus or the Talk App on your TV from 6am every morning. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Welcome back to World Cup Daily #37! Today, John is joined by Graham Homer to break down a breathtaking final pair of Round-of-16 matches. We navigate high-stakes tactical shifts, late-game collapses, and boiling touchline controversies while celebrating the tournament's first official day of rest!We break down the final whistle analysis and elite upcoming previews unfiltered:The 11-Minute Response: Argentina books a thrilling quarterfinal spot against Switzerland after erasing a shock 2-0 deficit to eliminate Egypt 3-2. Ibrahim handed the Pharos a stunning 15th-minute lead before Mostafa Shobeir saved a Lionel Messi penalty. While Egypt doubled their lead through Zico in the 67th minute, Argentina flipped the script. Cristian Romero, Messi, and Enzo Fernández struck three times in 11 minutes to complete a breathtaking comeback.The Post-Match Farce: We analyze Egypt manager Hossam Hassan's fiery post-match comments slamming the tournament system and alleging a rigged bracket. We track the Egyptian Football Association's official FIFA complaint against French referee François Letexier and dissect Egypt's negative 5-4-1 defensive substitutions that completely invited the champions back into the game.The Pacific Coast Snorfest: Switzerland edges out Colombia on penalties (0-0, 4-3 pens) to lock down the final quarterfinal berth. Played at BC Place in Vancouver, it was a pure clash of opposite philosophies—Colombia's aggressive attacking winger channels versus a highly disciplined Swiss block. Despite Switzerland missing core attacking stars due to pre-match injuries, their stable defensive know-how neutralized Luis Díaz to drag the game to the penalty lottery.⏱️ MID-SHOW HYDRATION BREAK

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Max Laughton, Will Faulkner and Ben Waterworth review Round 17 and preview Round 18 of the 2026 AFL season on the Fox Footy Podcast, with breakdowns of the big upsets from the weekend and their impact on the finals race, the Brayden Maynard umpire contact furore, plus Fair or Farce and much more.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

What a night of drama! FIFA threatened to change England's kick off time against Mexico due to storms only for discussions to break down, Matt Lawton joins Tom to offer the latest on a bizarre and farcical situation at this tournament.Drama on the pitch too as Cape Verde come agonisingly close to beating Argentina, scoring some stunning goals in a 3-2 defeat. Paul Hirst reports from that thriller and James Gheerbrant watches Egypt beat Australia on penalties. In part two Tom catches up with Martin Samuel to discuss England's hopes, French brilliance and his general tournament reflections. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

On this episode, Cat hosts a special Farce of July conversation featuring Indigenous and Black organizers reflecting on sovereignty, liberation, and the ongoing struggle for justice. Guests include Corrina Gould, Chair of the Confederated Villages of Lisjan; Indigenous leader & organizer Morning Star Gali; and organizer, author, and Black Power Media co-founder Kalonji Jama Changa. —- Subscribe to this podcast: https://plinkhq.com/i/1637968343?to=page Get in touch: lawanddisorder@kpfa.org Follow us on socials @LawAndDis: https://twitter.com/LawAndDis; https://www.instagram.com/lawanddis/ The post Farce of July Special with Corrina Gould, Morning Star Gali and Kalonji Changa appeared first on KPFA.

Billabong Presents The Occy Grom Comp & Merge Live Now! It’s an ATS classic brought to you from the swamps of Mordor (aka Smivvy’s joint) where the lads cut loose on all the shiz that’s been dripping from the might surfing seacock’s Jap-eye for the past two weeks. Slurp it up!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

C-Lo starts with George Springer's ‘little league HR' in the first against the Mets. The Mets have lost 9-of-10. The Yankees lost their fifth straight and have been terrible offensively.

This week, the guys discuss holidays, cigars, looking up things, play an USA history game, and much more. Tell a friend, tell a hobo... As always, send questions and comments to theretrohale@gmail.com and check out the after show at patreon.com/theretrohale  Thanks for listening, ENJOT IT!

In the spring of 2026, Anthropic released to the public what it described as its most capable AI model to date... and then the U.S. government shut it down seventy-two hours later. That subsequent sequence of events, both strange and almost operatic in its timing, is the kind of thing we might genuinely call "unprecedented." It was also a crystalline illustration of something philosophers have been decrying for decades, namely, the difference between performing ethical responsibility and actually exercising it.What does it mean to reason morally about the risks of a technology about which we do not yet fully understand its potential future impacts? Given that a very small number of decisionmakers will shape the conditions of life for everyone else for the next several decades, what do they owe to the people who will bear the consequences of those decisions without having had any say in them? When "ethical AI" has become a brand strategy rather than a careful, historically-informed and theoretically-grounded practice, how do we hold anyone accountable for the gap between what they say and what they do?Grab a drink and join our co-host Leigh M. Johnson as she asks us to consider exactly how sloppy the current "AI ethics" discourse is, what moral reasoning actually requires. and why the people who most need to be doing it seem to be the ones least interested in the task.Full episode notes available at this link:https://hotelbarpodcast.com/podcast/mythosfablefarce---------------------SUBSCRIBE to the podcast now to automatically download new episodes!SUPPORT Hotel Bar Sessions podcast on Patreon here! (Or by contributing one-time donations here!)BOOKMARK the Hotel Bar Sessions website here for detailed show notes and reading lists, and contact any of our co-hosts here.Hotel Bar Sessions is also on Facebook, YouTube, BlueSky, Instagram, and TikTok. Like, follow, share, duet, whatever... just make sure your friends know about us! ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

Karina Mößbauer präsentiert das Morning Briefing.

The actor and comedian is keenly aware of humanity's limitations, but he's not giving up. Thoughts? Email us at theinterview@nytimes.com Watch our show on YouTube: youtube.com/@TheInterviewPodcast For transcripts and more, visit: nytimes.com/theinterview   Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. You can also subscribe via your favorite podcast app here https://www.nytimes.com/activate-access/audio?source=podcatcher. For more podcasts and narrated articles, download The New York Times app at nytimes.com/app. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.