Podcasts about title changes

Send us Fan MailAmazon's 75-character title limit changes how sellers write product titles, place keywords, and use Item Highlights for Amazon SEO. Amazon product title guidelines now split search terms between a 75-character item name and a searchable 125-character Item Highlights field. The video covers the 2026 rollout, Amazon AI title changes, repeated-word rules, mobile search, keyword order, testing, and seller control.Sellers who refuse to let Amazon AI choose their highest-value keywords can schedule a listing strategy call before rankings move: https://bit.ly/4jMZtxu#AmazonSEO #AmazonFBA #AmazonSeller #AmazonListingOptimizationWant free resources? Dowload our Free Amazon guides here:Download the 2026 Amazon AI Operating Manual: https://bit.ly/3SLmusPAmazon Receiving Delay Guide: https://hubs.ly/Q04cdD4c0Amazon Catalog Spring Cleaning: https://hubs.ly/Q046BVfp0Amazon Proft Margin Defense 2026: https://hubs.ly/Q042trRH0Amazon SEO Toolkit 2026: https://bit.ly/4oC2ClTAmazon Seller Strategy Report 2026: https://bit.ly/3YN1RME2026 Ecommerce Website & SEO Readiness Checklist: https://hubs.ly/Q04btghf0Amazon 2026 PPC guide: https://bit.ly/4lF0OYXTimestamps00:00 - Amazon 75-Character Title Limit Explained00:39 - Why Amazon Shortened Product Titles for Mobile01:14 - Amazon Title Rollout Timeline and Category Changes01:50 - Keyword Repetition Rules for Item Highlights02:33 - Testing Shorter Titles and Avoiding Amazon AI-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Follow us:LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/28605816/Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/stevenpopemag/Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/myamazonguys/Twitter: https://twitter.com/myamazonguySubscribe to the My Amazon Guy podcast: https://podcast.myamazonguy.comApple Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/my-amazon-guy/id1501974229Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4A5ASHGGfr6s4wWNQIqyVwSupport the show

When the Title Changes but the Authority Doesn't: Family Business Succession with Paul Edelman Most family business succession plans fail not because the legal structure is wrong, but because authority never actually moves. In this episode of Wealth Actually, Frazer Rice talks with Paul Edelman, PhD of Edelman & Associates about how to tell the difference between a real handoff and a cosmetic one. Edelman unbundles succession into six separate questions, explains the three behavioral tells that reveal who is really in charge, draws a hard line between a legitimate safeguard and an open-ended veto, and makes the case that agreement from a family is not the same thing as ownership of a decision. https://youtu.be/p2KCsftvM74 Key Takeaways Succession is not one decision — it is at least six. Who gets the economic benefit of ownership, who votes the shares, who appoints and removes directors, who runs operations, who receives what information, and who retains informal influence after formal authority ends. Watch behavior, not titles. Compensation changes and org charts are easy to read and easy to fake. How decisions actually get made — and whether they get reversed — is the real signal. Three tells that authority hasn't moved: the next management layer still routes real decisions to the founder; the successor has never had a disputed call stand; and in a genuine crisis, the founder is the one who walks into the room. Speed is not the test. A five-year transition can be disciplined development; a six-month transition can be denial with a deadline. The test is whether milestones and readiness criteria are observable and stable, or whether the goalposts keep moving. “Not ready” is not a concern — it is a placeholder. If a founder cannot restate it in specific, testable terms, the obstacle is emotional rather than substantive, and it needs a different path. Advisor impatience often masquerades as clarity. When you catch yourself thinking “why can't they just do this,” ask whose timeline is actually being served — the family's, or your need to close the file. A safeguard is bounded; a veto is not. Reserve specific extraordinary decisions with defined scope, thresholds, triggers, evidence, and duration. “The successor is in charge unless the founder feels uncomfortable” is an undefined operational veto. Agreement is not ownership. A family can be outvoted and formally agree while owning nothing. Ownership comes from having weighed the trade-offs and the implications of each option in the room. Timestamps [00:00] Cold open — why “he's just not ready” is untestable [01:05] Welcome: founders at the sell-or-transfer crossroads [01:48] Unbundling succession into six separate questions [02:23] Running a diagnostic on where the founder actually is [03:00] Watch behavior, not titles — and what the CFO tells you [04:00] Decision reversals and the second-guessing test [05:00] The crisis test: who owns the emergency [05:36] Fast handoff vs. staged succession and prolonged ambiguity [06:10] Milestones that show it's working — and goalposts that keep moving [08:00] Inside vs. outside successors and family dynamics [08:54] Competing heirs and the outside CEO as bridge or avoidance [09:47] Reading resistance: making “not ready” addressable [11:10] The advisory ecosystem's frustration with stalled progress [12:16] Whose timeline is being served? [13:31] Push, pause, or reframe — the art and science of advising [15:00] When to change the forum, the decision rights, or bring in a facilitator [15:36] Safeguards vs. vetoes and the trap doors founders build [17:37] Board composition: independence vs. familiarity [20:00] Restructuring boards to create seats for new expertise [20:54] Income-dependent family members vs. growth-minded owners [21:34] Agreement is not ownership: dividends vs. reinvestment [23:31] Matching complexity to the outcomes you need [25:00] Communicating decisions to people who weren't in the room [25:26] How to reach Paul Edelman [25:46] The Edelman–Shenkman trilogy for estate planning attorneys [29:19] Close Pull Quotes “If the CFO briefs the new successor CEO and then confirms things with Dad, then the org chart is not telling the real story.” — Paul Edelman “To have authority when things are going well is fine. But the person who owns the crisis is the one who's really owning the leadership.” — Paul Edelman “A safeguard should be limited, explicit, and connected to some extraordinary risk. A veto is an ongoing ability to stop or reverse any old ordinary decision.” — Paul Edelman “Just because there's an agreement in name doesn't mean there's ownership of the decision.” — Paul Edelman About the Guest Paul Edelman, PhD is a coach, facilitator, and mentor at Edelman & Associates, where he works with family enterprise and family office leaders on decisions that cannot be delegated. He holds a PhD in developmental psychology from Harvard University and a BS in physics from MIT, and serves as faculty at The UHNW Institute and the Bertarelli Institute for Family Entrepreneurship at Babson College. Contact Paul Edelman Email: paul@edelmancoaching.com Website: edelmancoaching.com (contact form on site) LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/pauledelman The Edelman & Shenkman Trilogy Paul and Martin M. “Marty” Shenkman, CPA, MBA, JD, PFS, AEP (Distinguished), of Shenkman Tietz, have written a three-part series aimed at estate planning attorneys: Simplicity and its trade-offs — When Clients Ask for a Simple Estate Plan, WealthManagement.com / Trusts & Estates, July 8, 2026. The language of estate planning conversations — published in Steve Leimberg's LISI Estate Planning Newsletter (subscriber archive). Beneficiary education — forthcoming October 2026, expected in Estate Planning. Paul's running author archive: wealthmanagement.com/author/paul-edelman More from Paul Edelman Approval Is Not Ownership: Helping Family Office Investment Decisions Hold Under Pressure — Family Wealth Report, July 1, 2026 How Families Can Override Emotions to Make Better Judgments — Family Business Magazine, April 9, 2026 Lessons For Families And Their Advisors From A Hit TV Series — Family Wealth Report, February 24, 2026 Stronger Family Bonds and Better Strategic Decisions — FFI Practitioner, January 20, 2026 Frequently Asked Questions What are the six questions a family business succession decision should be broken into?Who receives the economic benefit of ownership; who votes the shares; who appoints and removes directors; who runs the company operationally; who receives what information; and who continues to hold influence after formal authority ends. Bundling these into a single “handoff” decision is what creates ambiguity. How can you tell whether authority has really transferred to a successor?Watch three behaviors. First, where the next management layer goes for real decisions — employees are excellent at reading where power actually lives. Second, whether the successor has ever made a call the founder disagreed with and had it stand. Third, the crisis test: when a covenant breaks or a key employee leaves, who walks into the room and who gets briefed afterward. Is a fast succession better than a gradual one?Speed itself is not the test. A five-year transition can represent disciplined development, and a six-month transition can be avoidance followed by an arbitrary deadline. What matters is whether responsibility moves against observable milestones, whether the successor learns from outcomes instead of being rescued, and whether readiness criteria stay fixed rather than shifting each time the successor advances. What is the difference between a safeguard and a veto?A safeguard is limited, explicit, and tied to extraordinary risk — selling the company, debt above a threshold, issuing new equity, changing core strategy, or related-party transactions — with defined scope, thresholds, process, duration, trigger, evidence, and who decides. A veto is an ongoing ability to stop or reverse ordinary decisions. If the founder can intervene whenever they feel uncomfortable, that is an undefined operational veto. How should advisors handle their own frustration with a stalled family?Notice that impatience often feels like clarity. When you think “I see exactly what they need to do, why can't they just do it,” that is often the moment to slow down and ask whose timeline is being served — whether the ambiguity is genuinely damaging the company, or whether the recommendation mainly closes the case and relieves the advisor's discomfort with uncertainty. What makes an independent director genuinely independent in a family company?The ability to exercise business judgment and fiduciary duty free from undue family influence or loyalty to a particular branch. A director who is the founder's golfing buddy or tied to one family faction will struggle to deliver the value independence is supposed to provide. Why isn't agreement good enough?Because agreement in name is not ownership. A family branch can be outvoted, formally accept the outcome, and still feel no responsibility for it. Ownership comes from working through the trade-offs — what each option makes better and worse — so participants can say they helped weigh the considerations even if the result was not their first choice. Full Transcript [00:00] Paul Edelman: The resistance often takes the form of some sort of concern that is stated like, for example, the most general concern that people will say is, well, he or she, the likely successor, is just not ready. But that phrase “not ready” is at a very high level of generality. It's not specific enough to be testable or to be capable of being satisfied. So the challenge is to work with the founder to help them express their concern in terms that are actually addressable. [00:36] Announcer: Welcome back to the Wealth Actually podcast, the show that features experts, entrepreneurs, and commentators that will give you the right knowledge, planning, and guidance so you can preserve your assets and enjoy your wealth. Learn more and subscribe today at wealthactually.com. This podcast is for educational and entertainment purposes. It is neither investment, legal, nor tax advice and does not represent the opinions of the employers of the host or guests. [01:05] Frazer Rice: Welcome aboard, Paul. [01:07] Paul Edelman: Thanks, Frazer. Looking forward to our conversation. [01:09] Frazer Rice: Well, it's important because I deal with a bunch of founders and a bunch of other business owners, families, et cetera, that are trying to make sense out of the concept of passing along the business either to the next generation or deciding to sell it, and all sorts of parts of that tough crossroads that everybody has to go through at some point. And that's really the crux of your practice — to help people with those conversations. [01:34] Paul Edelman: Yes. [01:35] Frazer Rice: So when we're thinking about that and kind of unbundling the decision to pass the business along, when a family wants to talk about that, what are the separate parts of that decision that need to be contemplated? [01:48] Paul Edelman: Well, I see at least six different questions that need to be separated. One is who receives the economic benefit of ownership in the company. Another is who gets to vote the shares. And a third is who appoints and removes the directors. Then there's who runs the company from an operational standpoint, and who receives what information. And then, who continues to have influence even though they may no longer have formal authority. [02:23] Frazer Rice: So once you get into the… it always seems to me to be tough to sort of say, okay, here are six things that have to happen, and that's a lot for somebody to digest in the course of one or two meetings and get the buy-in from all the different constituencies that are interested in what the business is up to. How do you run a diagnostic to understand where a founder is — or generation one — in their own head space, and understanding what control being passed on looks like in summary form on those six different aspects that you brought up? [03:00] Paul Edelman: I think the key thing is to watch behavior more than titles. People often pay a lot of attention to when the titles have shifted or compensation shifts, things like that. But they pay less attention to how decisions are being made and whether those decisions get reversed. So when the title has moved but the authority hasn't moved, you tend to see three different things. First of all, you can see something going on at the next level down in management — not with the founder and successor per se, but with the other executives. You can ask yourself, who do they go to for the real decisions? If the CFO briefs the new successor CEO and then confirms things with Dad, then the org chart is not telling the real story. [04:00] Paul Edelman: Employees are excellent at reading where the actual power lives, because they can't afford to be wrong about that sort of thing. So that's one clue. Another is to look at decision reversals, or what is more commonly called second-guessing. You want to look for whether the successor has made a call that the founder disagreed with. And if so, did it stand, or did it get reversed? If the company is two years into succession and that's never happened, it's possible that the successor is pre-clearing everything with the former CEO and only making decisions that they know will be approved. So in that case, it's not real authority. And a third situation is what you could call a crisis test. [05:00] Paul Edelman: So when something genuinely bad happens — there's a breach of a covenant, or a key employee departs, or a lawsuit — the question is, who do people go to? Who walks into the boardroom and into the decision-making situation, and who ends up getting briefed afterwards? To have authority when things are going well is fine, but the person who owns the crisis is the one who's really owning the leadership, in a sense. [05:36] Frazer Rice: So one of the avenues that I think is interesting, that I read in your materials ahead of time, was the idea that a quick succession oftentimes — and maybe not often, but can be — a better avenue in terms of moving the succession forward, as opposed to having a staged succession where a long period of ruminating and decision-making often perpetuates ambiguity, or even confusion, amongst different constituencies both managerially and ownership-wise. [06:10] Paul Edelman: Speed itself is not the test. You could have a five-year transition that represents disciplined development of the successor, and you could also have a six-month transition that essentially is a denial of what needs to happen, followed by some kind of a deadline. But you certainly don't want to allow things to drift. If the transition is proceeding gradually, you can tell it's working if responsibility and authority are moving according to observable milestones. So the successor is making increasingly consequential decisions. They're learning from the outcomes rather than being rescued by the founder or the prior leader from their mistakes. [07:01] Paul Edelman: They're developing important relationships and they're becoming someone that others rely on. The criteria for readiness also should become clearer over time, and the founder's involvement should change in ways that are recognizable. So that's the ideal. But sometimes a gradual transition represents avoidance, and in those cases you see criteria — sometimes people refer to them as the goalposts — that keep moving. And decisions are repeatedly returned to the founder. Also, each step that the successor takes toward greater authority may be followed by a new reason why the founder feels that they're not ready. So the question that can be asked is: what are the capabilities that the successor is developing, and what specific evidence would demonstrate that? [08:00] Frazer Rice: When you're diagnosing what those capabilities are, as part of that diagnosis, if the successor is inside the family versus outside the family, how do you diagnose whether that is a positive or a negative, in addition to maybe the harder skill sets that are being dealt with? [08:29] Paul Edelman: If the successor is from inside or outside the family, I would say that many of the capabilities needed for leadership are the same. [08:40] Frazer Rice: Yeah, I was going to say — if you run into situations where a family member is capable skill-wise, but there are dynamics issues that have prevented their succession to the throne, essentially. [08:54] Paul Edelman: Sometimes there may be a situation in which you have more than one potential successor and they're in competition with one another, and the family is reluctant to declare a winner. And so one move that can be made in that situation is to essentially bypass the decision by going to the outside to bring in someone. It could be a kind of conflict avoidance mechanism. On the other hand, if no successor is really ready, then sometimes going to the outside can be an interim move. So some companies will hire an external candidate for CEO with the expectation that part of the responsibility will be to develop one of the family members who ultimately may take over. [09:47] Frazer Rice: And so part of your methodology is to read resistance in the room and understand where those pain points are. How does a founder, or generation one, or the successive generations understand what the resistance is? And how do you help them overcome that? [10:02] Paul Edelman: The resistance often takes the form of some sort of concern that is stated like — for example, the most general concern that people say is, well, he or she, the likely successor, is just not ready. But that phrase “not ready” is at a very high level of generality. It's not specific enough to be testable or to be capable of being satisfied. So the challenge is to work with the founder to help them express their concern in terms that are actually addressable. If you try to do that and you're unable to, that's an indication that the concern is less about something specific and addressable, and more about some unpleasant feelings that the founder is experiencing — and that implies a different path for how to address those, or what needs to be done. [11:10] Frazer Rice: For those of us in, let's call it the advisory ecosystem — that can be the wealth manager, or the lawyer, or the accountant, the people who help guide the technical succession issues, whether it's tax planning or trusts and estates or even just the corporate handoff — oftentimes we're presented with situations that just get muddled, and we look at lack of progress with frustration. How does an advisor deal with that, when the instinct and in a sense the business model is to try to push, to get resolution and to get progress on these types of issues? [12:16] Paul Edelman: The signal that I watch for is what that impatience feels like to the advisor. Sometimes it feels like clarity. The advisor says to himself, oh, I see exactly what they need to do — why can't they just do this? And in my experience, that's often the moment when it's helpful for the advisor to slow down. Not because the family should be allowed to delay indefinitely, but because the advisor's own need for resolution may begin to shape what they say and do, and the advice that they give. [13:00] Paul Edelman: One useful check that advisors can use for themselves is to ask whose timeline is being served. There may be a genuine business reason to act — it may be, for example, that the continued ambiguity is hurting the company, or weakening the successor, or leaving employees unsure about who's in charge. But I would also ask myself, and other advisors can ask themselves, whether their recommendation is mainly to help them close the case, or to demonstrate progress, or to relieve their own discomfort with uncertainty. [13:31] Frazer Rice: The concept of — this is really, I guess, the mix of art and science of advising — between push versus pause versus a total restructure or a reframing of the conversation. There's an intersection of, you have to have the technicals down, but then experience in dealing with personalities, experience with dealing with the specific family and situation, and guiding that. [14:15] Frazer Rice: I imagine occasionally you run into situations where, at the intersection between the advisors and the family, they feel stuck. And so then the concept of getting them unstuck — yet there is resistance to maybe bringing in a facilitator to help grease the skids and get the conversation moving again. How do you help that reframing discussion? [14:40] Paul Edelman: I guess the question I would ask is, where do things stand? Has a decision actually been made, or is the obstacle substantive, or is it the process? So when a decision has been reached through a legitimate process and what you see is some sort of executional drag or discomfort, those are the situations where I think it's helpful to hold the boundary. You can acknowledge whatever feelings may be slowing things down, but there's not a need to reopen the decision. [14:55] Paul Edelman: On the other hand, if the discomfort that people are feeling suggests that there's some sort of important concern that hasn't yet been understood, then that's where I would pause. And that pause can involve useful work. You can ask people, what is it you're trying to protect? What are the consequences that you fear? What would need to be true for proceeding to feel responsible rather than reckless? And then there are times when it makes sense to restructure or to add structure. So for example, the choices are pretty clear, but the same conversation keeps recurring and producing the same result. In that case, you want to think in terms of either changing the forum, or clarifying the decision rights, or maybe dividing the issue into smaller decisions, or even bringing someone in to help structure the conversation, like a third-party facilitator. [15:36] Frazer Rice: The handoff ultimately — when the founder, or generation one, has gotten to the point where they're ready to move things along to the next set of operators, the next set of owners — and at the same time, in order to feel safe, they've created some safeguards, or let's call it some trap doors or back doors, to be able to help influence decisions if they feel like things are going in a different direction. How do you think about it so that they don't turn into pain points — maybe regret that turns into a veto power that stymies the succession, even if it's already been decided and put in motion? [16:21] Paul Edelman: Well, I think you put your finger on it. There's a key distinction to be made here between a safeguard and a veto. A safeguard should be limited, explicit, and connected to some extraordinary risk, whereas a veto is kind of an ongoing ability to stop or reverse any old ordinary decision. So when it comes to safeguards, a family might reserve certain kinds of decisions — like selling the company, or taking on debt above a certain level, or issuing new equity, or changing the basic business strategy, or entering into a transaction with a family member. [16:59] Paul Edelman: Those kinds of things can be specified, and the scope, the threshold, the decision process and the duration of the safeguard should be clear — as well as who can invoke that protection, what evidence is required, and who decides whether the trigger has occurred, and so on. So the problems arise when the arrangement is essentially one in which the successor is in charge unless the founder feels uncomfortable. If the founder is allowed to intervene anytime they feel uncomfortable, as opposed to for these specific kinds of reasons, then you're dealing with more of an undefined operational veto. [17:37] Frazer Rice: To that end — boards of directors related to these companies, whether they're private or public, but we're really talking about private in most cases. The constitution of those boards: how involved do you get in that? And what is the importance of independence versus familiarity versus family member input, to act as a go-between in many ways between founder, the operational executives, and then ultimately the owners? [18:07] Paul Edelman: Well, in order to really add value — the kind of value that independent directors can potentially offer to a company — they need to be adequately independent. That is to say, they need to be able to exercise their sound business judgment and carry out their fiduciary responsibilities in a way that is free from undue influence by other kinds of family considerations, and potentially loyalty to particular family members. So I think in those cases where a so-called independent board member is actually a golfing buddy of the CEO or the founder, or has a tie to one particular family member or branch of the family, it may be harder for them to bring the full value that an independent director can bring. [18:55] Paul Edelman: Then of course, another reason why companies bring in independent directors is because they have some additional expertise that the current board members or family members lack. So for example, a colleague and I are working with a company right now where the core business has been subject to commoditization, and they've made a strategic decision to diversify. But in order to diversify, they need to bring in people with new expertise, particularly in the line of business that they want to move into. In order to do that, they need to create some space in their board or boards of directors — they have several different kinds of boards. And as part of this, we were brought in to take a look at those existing boards and help them think about how to restructure in a way that could create some open seats while minimizing the displacement of people who are currently board members, including family members who are board members, who may not feel too positively about losing their board seat. [20:54] Frazer Rice: Related to board seats, but more specifically to family ownership — the concept of family members who rely on the family business for income, versus maybe other parts of the family that are looking at the business and thinking of growing the valuation or innovating with the business, that type of thing. With the tension between those two different components, how do you solve for that and have that conversation stay productive, when I imagine it can get emotional very quickly? [21:34] Paul Edelman: This is where a third-party facilitator can be helpful to slow things down. When things begin to get heated, it's often helpful to have a neutral or impartial person present who can help to reduce the heat in the conversations. There are a number of things in particular that can be done under those circumstances. First of all, anytime there are these kinds of tough decisions, there's never a single right answer. There's always trade-offs involved. And some boards work their way through these things by voting. I'm dealing with a situation right now where some members of the family were outvoted. At the end of that vote, they say, okay, we now have an agreement, we're going to move forward with this. But just because there's an agreement in name doesn't mean there's ownership of the decision. [22:34] Paul Edelman: So in order to create ownership, I think it is helpful to have the difficult conversations and to consider the implications of going one way versus another. If we were to distribute all this money in the form of dividends, what would be the benefits of that, and what would be the costs associated with that? And on the other hand, if we were to plow it all back into growth of the business, what's the upside and downside of that? Only by considering different options and the implications of each can the family ultimately arrive at a decision where people feel like, well, I may not have agreed to this, but I was part of the discussion, I was part of the process of weighing the different considerations, and I'm willing to buy into this. In other words, I feel some ownership for this decision. [23:31] Frazer Rice: As we start to wind down here, an interesting concept is what should all the constituencies come away with from the decision-making process. And as a follow-up to that is simplicity versus complexity of the solution. How do you manage that so that you take care of the needs of the business and the needs for structuring, with the need for simplicity, so that everyone who comes away from the discussion and the decision-making understands what's been put in place? [24:06] Paul Edelman: As far as the solution itself goes, the level of complexity should match what's required to accomplish the desired outcomes. So complexity for its own sake is not useful. But when you're trying to accomplish more than one thing at a time, it may require a more complex approach to the solution. So that's on the solution side. Now the other side of it has to do with communication. How do you share what's been decided with other people, especially people who haven't been in the room? And I think that the best way to do that is to try to explain clearly what was the context of the situation in which the need to make this decision arose; what were the desired outcomes that the decision makers were trying to produce, what were they trying to accomplish; and the flip side of that is what were they trying to avoid, or what were they trying to protect. [25:00] Paul Edelman: When you share all of that, the rationale for the decision becomes more understandable, and also you have a better case for justifying any complexity that's part of the decision. As far as complexity goes, of course, you want to use the simplest, most straightforward language to describe what you've come up with. But I think the key thing to getting buy-in is to make sure that the rationale is clear, and people understand that there was a thoughtful and systematic process behind it. [25:26] Frazer Rice: Really good stuff. Paul, how do people find you to hear more about what you're up to? [25:32] Paul Edelman: My website is edelmancoaching.com. So people can go to edelmancoaching.com, read more about the work that I do, and there's a contact form there. Or people can simply email paul@edelmancoaching.com. [25:46] Frazer Rice: Just to — because you're being very humble — you have a couple of articles coming out with Marty Shenkman, where the intersection of probably the trust and estate planning and the actual, let's say, getting the business ready for the next generation, whatever form that takes, is probably front and center there. How would people find that? [26:06] Paul Edelman: So we've written three articles recently, kind of a trilogy, and they're each going to be carried in different places. Two have already come out, and one is due to come out. These are aimed primarily at estate planning attorneys. But the first one is on when the client asks for a simple estate plan. And this relates a little bit to what you were describing, in a different domain — the domain of trusts and estate plans and so on. But the point that we make is that the client's request for simplicity is understandable, and ideally the attorney will validate that. But at the same time, along with the request for simplicity goes potentially some compromises, because when you have multiple desired outcomes, it may take more of a complex structure to achieve those outcomes. So the role of the planner is not to introduce complexity for its own sake, but to make clear to the client [27:06] Paul Edelman: what trade-offs they'd be making if they went with a simpler plan, and what additional protections they can get by considering a more complicated one. Then the second piece is on the use of language in these estate planning conversations. And again, it relates to this concept we were talking about a minute ago, of the difference between agreement and ownership. Some clients are willing to agree to whatever the attorney says. If you say to them, “Well, I think this is the best plan for you,” they say, “Fine, where do I sign?” But the goal, ideally, is more than just agreement. It's ownership. Because in the absence of ownership — and by ownership, I mean that the client understands the trade-offs that are being made, they feel that they had agency in the process of making those trade-offs — [28:06] Paul Edelman: and ultimately, if something doesn't work out as well as hoped, people will not go back and point a finger at the planner and say, “You did this, how could you do this?” or something like that, but rather, “This was a collaborative effort. You made clear what the choices were, and we made them together.” So that piece talks about language, and how, for example, there's a difference between saying to a client “you should do this,” and speaking to them in terms of what they can do. [28:42] Frazer Rice: And then the third piece — when's that coming out? [28:46] Paul Edelman: The third piece is on beneficiary education, and that one will come out in October. And so the first piece came out in a publication called Wealth Management. The second piece came out in a newsletter that's published by, I think it's LISI. And the piece that's coming out in October is, I think, being published in a magazine or a journal, something like Estate Planning. [29:19] Frazer Rice: They're everywhere. So, terrific. Well, Paul, thanks for being on. I'll put all that in the show notes, and look forward to staying in touch. [29:26] Paul Edelman: Thanks very much, Frazer. [29:28] Announcer: This podcast is for educational and entertainment purposes. It is neither investment, legal, nor tax advice, and does not represent the opinions of the employers of the host or guests. Additional Links Mark Tepsich of Family Governance https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT/

Supporters of California's Proposition 39, a voter ID initiative on the November 2026 ballot, have filed a lawsuit against Attorney General Rob Bonta, claiming he unlawfully changed the measure's ballot title in a way that could prejudice voters against it. Please Like, Comment and Follow 'Philip Teresi on KMJ' on all platforms: --- Philip Teresi on KMJ is available on the KMJNOW app, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube or wherever else you listen to podcasts. -- Philip Teresi on KMJ Weekdays 2-6 PM Pacific on News/Talk 580 AM & 105.9 FM KMJ | Website | Facebook | Instagram | X | Podcast | Amazon | - Everything KMJ KMJNOW App | Podcasts | Facebook | X | Instagram See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Supporters of California's Proposition 39, a voter ID initiative on the November 2026 ballot, have filed a lawsuit against Attorney General Rob Bonta, claiming he unlawfully changed the measure's ballot title in a way that could prejudice voters against it. Please Like, Comment and Follow 'Philip Teresi on KMJ' on all platforms: --- Philip Teresi on KMJ is available on the KMJNOW app, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube or wherever else you listen to podcasts. -- Philip Teresi on KMJ Weekdays 2-6 PM Pacific on News/Talk 580 AM & 105.9 FM KMJ | Website | Facebook | Instagram | X | Podcast | Amazon | - Everything KMJ KMJNOW App | Podcasts | Facebook | X | Instagram See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Amazon title limits are changing. Learn how to protect your most important keywords, update listings faster, and keep Amazon's AI from making costly changes to your product titles. Amazon is introducing a major product title update beginning July 27, and sellers need to understand what is changing before Amazon's AI starts rewriting their listings. Most product titles will be limited to 75 characters, while an additional 125 characters can be placed in a new Item Highlights field. Although Amazon says the split should not affect indexing, advertising relevance, or searchability, sellers should still carefully review which keywords remain in their titles and how important phrases are structured. In this episode, Bradley Sutton explains why the first 75 characters still matter for Amazon SEO and how sellers should prioritize their brand name, main product keyword, and key distinguishing features such as size, color, or quantity. He also demonstrates how to preview Amazon's proposed AI changes inside Seller Central. While Amazon's recommendations may preserve most listing content, even a small wording change can remove an important exact keyword phrase and potentially weaken a product's relevancy signal.   For sellers managing hundreds or thousands of listings, manually reviewing every title is not practical. That is where Helium 10's new Bulk Optimize Titles feature inside Listing Builder becomes especially valuable. Diamond Plan members can select multiple active listings, generate AI-recommended titles and Item Highlights, review the suggestions from one screen, and sync the optimized content directly to Amazon. The tool is designed to preserve valuable keyword phrases while keeping listings compliant with Amazon's new character limits.   Amazon's update does not need to become a last-minute emergency. Review your titles, protect your most valuable search terms, and use the right tools to update your catalog efficiently. Sellers who want access to Bulk Optimize Titles can use coupon code SSP20 to save 20% on the Helium 10 Diamond Plan for six months. Do not wait for Amazon's AI to decide how your products should be presented. Take control of your listings before the changes take effect. In episode 540 of the AM/PM Podcast, Bradley talks about: 00:00 - Introduction 00:49 - The July 27 Amazon Title Requirements 01:14 - How Titles And Item Highlights Will Be Split 03:00 - Why Product Titles Matter For Amazon SEO 04:30 - What To Include In The First 75 Characters 05:00 - Previewing Amazon's AI Title Changes 07:22 - How Amazon's AI Can Remove Important Keywords 09:19 - The 14-Day Review And Approval Period 10:42 - Helium 10's New Bulk Optimize Titles Feature 11:55 - Amazon AI Versus Helium 10's Recommendations 12:50 - Syncing Optimized Titles Directly To Amazon 13:55 - Save 20% On The Diamond Plan With This Discount Code 15:39 - Creating New Listings Under The Updated Format 17:42 - Final Title Optimization Checklist

Does WWE have a problem with it's main event picture?! Could AEW Redemption be seen as a "side quest" pay-per-view?! This week the crew talks about the latest with CM Punk, Cody Rhodes, Roman Reigns, Seth Rollins, Rhea Ripley, Jacob Fatu, Liv Morgan and more on the WWE side of things! They also dive into the latest with TNA wrestling and Leon Slater, Ricky Sosa, Xia Brookside, The Hardy's, The System and more. Finally, we give our predictions for AEW Redemption! Does Kenny Omega help Kevin Knight see the light? Does Willow Nightingale have crowning moment versus Thekla and how does Mercedes Mone get involved?Welcome back to REBOOKED!0:00 - IntroWWE03:22 - Pull/Cody & Punk 'tension'13:26 - Danhausen, Gable & More23:03 - Yes, Oba gave up his title shot28:48 - This Vision thing32:33 - What ARE the best things in WWE right now?TNA40:17 - Setting up for Slater46:56 - A New Member of Order 4AEW Redemption this weekend!56:00 - Title Defenses, Painmaker Returns01:10:11 - Ospreay is gonna hurt someone01:18:46 - TBS & World Titles01:30:13 - 24/7 Champion of the Week⏰ Subscribe to the channel to be alerted! https://www.youtube.com/@REBOOKEDWrestling?sub_confirmation=1

EXCLUSIVE: Assemblyman David Tangipa describes Sacramento as a "Zombie Horde" while discussing California's decision to change the Voter ID ballot title for November. The original title for the ballot was: "ESTABLISHES ADDITIONAL VOTER IDENTIFICATION AND CITIZENSHIP VERIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT." (Sept. 19, 2025). On July 21st, the title was changed to: "PROHIBITS CITIZENS FROM VOTING UNLESS THEY PRESENT GOVERNMENT-ISSUED IDENTIFICATION. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT." Tangipa argues the new wording unfairly reframes the measure. Please Like, Comment and Follow 'Broeske & Musson' on all platforms: --- The ‘Broeske & Musson Podcast’ is available on the KMJNOW app, Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever else you listen to podcasts. --- ‘Broeske & Musson' Weekdays 9-11 AM Pacific on News/Talk 580 AM & 105.9 FM KMJ | Facebook | Podcast| X | - Everything KMJ KMJNOW App | Podcasts | Facebook | X | InstagramSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

PWTorch editor Wade Keller presents the Flagship Flashback edition of the Wade Keller Pro Wrestling Podcast with PWTorch columnist Greg Parks. They begin with thoughts on Bobby Lashley's angle at the end of Raw on Monday and what it meant. Then they discussed Paul Orndorff's career. Other topics included AEW viewership last week when they returned to the road, the importance of WWE correcting course and sparking interest in upcoming weeks back on the road, ROH's PPV and the way the ROH Title changed hands, what could spark NXT, and a full Money in the Bank PPV preview.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/wade-keller-pro-wrestling-podcast--3076978/support.

Welcome to Episode #63 of Shooting Sharp - Summer of Title Changes Mike is now joined by cohost Jay Pagliaro as we enter a new era of Shooting Sharp The boys open up speaking on UFC 329 with the demise of Conor McGregor but the emergence of Gable Steveson and the star shining moment for Paddy Pimblett Then we run through a everything that went down at AEW Beach Break on the road to AEW Redemption and All In, before heading over to WWE where we run through Smackdown and Raw.  We close up shop with a preview of this weekend's Saturday Nights Main Event at MSG and a look at what else is going on in the week ahead.  Check out the Shooting Sharp Podcast Every Tuesday, only on the North South Connection Podcast Network. Follow us on X at @ShootingSharpPC 

Both companies changed their world title on "free" TV. Let's talk about that.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Both companies changed their world title on "free" TV. Let's talk about that.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The Pro Wrestling Boom Podcast with Jason Powell features Brass Ring Media and SI.com's Zack Heydorn sharing his in-person take on CM Punk winning the WWE Championship and the reaction to Oba Femi, plus Kenny Omega's AEW World Championship win, Dark Side of the Ring on TNA, and more...Order Zack's book "Stunning: The Wrestling Artistry of Steve Austin" here.

After previewing Conor McGregor's UFC return coming up this weekend and talking Maxxine Dupri's heel turn on Raw, Graham "GSM" Matthews and RJ Marceau offer their honest analysis on what's been a super eventful week in wrestling, starting with Kenny Omega beating MJF for the AEW World Championship on Dynamite. Why now and not at Redemption in Canada at the end of the month? Will it end up being a three-way with Omega, MJF and Will Ospreay at All In? Where does MJF go from here? That leads them into their next hot topic: CM Punk returning on Raw to dethrone Sami Zayn as Undisputed WWE Champion! As cool of a moment as it was in Chicago, it also didn't make a ton of sense, and the duo discuss why. They also talk about how it could have been worse, why a heel turn for Punk should be coming and if it would work, and why all hope may not be lost for Zayn going forward. To close out the episode, GSM and RJ share their thoughts on Sheamus leaving WWE after refusing to restructure his current deal, what's being lost in context, if he'll end up in AEW, what it says about Triple H's style of booking, and more!

On this week's episode of Destination Impact, Zac Clarke and Jerud Buhagiar give a full review of TNA Slammiversary, discuss any signs of shifting booking philosophies, building challengers for the Knockouts Championship while also filling out the field for the newly announced TNA Knockouts Television Championship tournament. Also, in the VIP-exclusive aftershow, JB and Zac discuss more of JB's hits & misses from the go-home episode of Impact, and they discuss TNA's usage of cinematic style content.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/pwtorch-dailycast--3276210/support.

NXT Great American Bash 2026 delivered a pair of memorable matches amid a strange show -- and Getting Over is here to break it down! Host Adam Silverstein jumps on the mic to tackle 2026 NXT Great American Bash results with grades in our signature instant analysis review. "The Silver King" covers Kendal Grey outlasting Lola Vice and moving to the top of the women's division, Zaria bludgeoning Tatum Paxley to conclude a banger and Tony D'Angelo vs. NARAKU disappointing, plus Saqon Shugars, Shiloh Hill and Wren Sinclair standing out, AAA integrating more closely with NXT and a detailed breakdown premium live events debuting on The CW in the United States. Follow Getting Over on Twitter, Bluesky & YouTube @GettingOverCast.

This episode of Going In Raw is sponsored by Hims! Start your free online visit for personalized treatment options for hair loss, ED, weight loss and more today at http://www.hims.com/goinginraw Consider joining Friendo Club by clicking JOIN ($5/month) OR becoming a $5+ Patron at http://www.patreon.com/steveandlarson!

WWE Night of Champions 2026 delivered while setting the stage for SummerSlam -- and Getting Over is here to break it down! Host Adam Silverstein and co-host Chris Vannini jump on the mic to tackle 2026 WWE Night of Champions results with grades in our signature instant analysis review. "The Silver King" and "Vintage" cover Sami Zayn's shocking WWE Championship victory over Cody Rhodes and GUNTHER, Oba Femi (King of the Ring) and IYO SKY (Queen of the Ring) emerging over Jey Uso and Liv Morgan, Seth Rollins and Bron Breakker going to war inside a steel cage and much more. What does this all mean for WWE SummerSlam 2026, and how will Roman Reigns and Brock Lesnar factor into future plans? The guys discuss all of that and more. Follow Getting Over on Twitter, Bluesky & YouTube @GettingOverCast. EXCLUSIVE NordVPN Deal ➼ https://nordvpn.com/GETTINGOVER | Try it risk-free now with a 30-day money-back guarantee!

NJPW Dominion 6.14 In Osaka-Jo HallNJPW World Television Title MatchKonosuke Takeshita (c) defeats SANADA (8:24)No Disqualification MatchJake Lee defeats El Phantasmo (w/Jado) by referee's decision (9:40)Tag Team MatchTaichi & Yuya Uemura defeat TMDK (Ryohei Oiwa & Zack Sabre Jr.) (13:15)Singles MatchEl Desperado defeats Mistico (9:33)NEVER Openweight Title MatchAaron Wolf defeats Ren Narita (w/Dick Togo, Yoshinobu Kanemaru & Yujiro Takahashi) (c) (9:24) - TITLE CHANGE !!!IWGP Tag Team Title MatchUnited Empire (Great-O-Khan & HENARE) defeat Knockout Brothers (OSKAR & Yuto-Ice) (c) (21:30) - TITLE CHANGE !!!IWGP Global Heavyweight Title Three Way MatchShota Umino defeats Andrade El Idolo (c) and Drilla Moloney (16:20) - TITLE CHANGE !!!IWGP Junior Heavyweight Title MatchYOH defeats DOUKI (w/SHO) (c) (17:57) - TITLE CHANGE !!!IWGP Heavyweight Title MatchYota Tsuji (w/Shingo Takagi) defeats Callum Newman (w/Francesco Akira, Great-O-Khan, Jake Lee & Zane Jay) (c) (24:32) - TITLE CHANGE !!!#NJPW #AEW #ForbiddenDoor

Jalen Brunson's championship with the Knicks sets off a heated debate about where he now belongs among New York's biggest sports legends. Evan Roberts argues that Brunson did something so rare and meaningful for the city that he has already moved past names like Eli Manning and Derek Jeter, while Tiki Barber pushes back on how quickly one title can rewrite the hierarchy. The conversation digs into what truly makes a New York icon, from championship runs and franchise droughts to star power, toughness, clutch moments and lasting love from fans. Callers jump in with passionate cases for Brunson, Eli, Messier and Jeter, turning the discussion into a larger question about whether the magnitude of saving the Knicks can outweigh longevity, rings and worldwide fame.

Hey everyone, this is a special NJPW edition of Eat Sleep Elite where we talk about the latest show Dominion 2026. Enjoy IWGP Heavyweight Championship: Yota Tsuji defeated Callum Newman (c) to capture the title.IWGP Junior Heavyweight Championship: DOUKI (c) retained his title against YOH.IWGP Global Heavyweight Championship: Shota Umino won a three-way match against Andrade El Idolo and Drilla Moloney.IWGP Tag Team Championships: HENARE & Great-O-Khan defeated OSKAR & Yuto-Ice (The Knockout Brothers) to win the titles.NJPW World Television Championship: Konosuke Takeshita (c) defeated SANADA.NEVER Openweight Championship: Ren Narita (c) defeated Aaron Wolf.No Disqualification Match: El Phantasmo defeated Jake Lee.Special Singles Match: El Desperado defeated Mistico.Tag Team Match: Yuya Uemura & Taichi defeated Zack Sabre Jr. & Ryohei Oiwa

AEW Double or Nothing 2026 delivered as arguably the best event of the year so far -- and Getting Over is here to break it down! Host Adam Silverstein and co-host Chris Vannini tackle 2026 AEW Double or Nothing results with grades in our signature analysis review. "The Silver King" and "Vintage" cover three title changes with MJF beating Darby Allin, Konosuke Takeshita outlasting Kazuchika Okada and Cope & Cage toppling FTR; Will Ospreay and Swerve Strickland emerging as expected from banger matches; the value of continuing the Stadium Stampede concept and some lessons that AEW should learn from one of the company's most successful pay-per-views. Plus, what does all of this mean for AEW All In 2026? Follow Getting Over on Twitter, Bluesky & YouTube @GettingOverCast.

In our post-PPV "Wrestling Night in America" format, PWTorch columnist Greg Parks is joined by PWTorch.com contributor Brandon LeClair to discuss in-depth night one of WWE WrestleMania, including interaction with those contributing in the chat. They break down all seven matches on the card, including Paige's return in the Fatal Four-Way Women's Tag Title Match, Liv Morgan's title win, the use of celebrities, the short matches, and a main even with too many twists and turns.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/pwtorch-dailycast--3276210/support.

This episode of Going In Raw is sponsored by Surfshark VPN! Go to https://surfshark.com/raw or use code RAW at checkout to get 4 extra months of Surfshark VPN! Consider joining Friendo Club by clicking JOIN ($5/month) OR becoming a $5+ Patron at http://www.patreon.com/steveandlarson!

This week on the Tapped In Podcast, Nick McDaniel and Jacked Jameson break down a Georgia wrestling scene that's starting to feel more competitive—and more crowded—than ever.A huge night at Southern Honor Wrestling saw multiple major moments…Bryce Cannon walks away as the new JTS Legacy Champion, while Alexander Lev continues to hold onto the SHW Championship in a stacked two-falls main event.But one of the biggest takeaways might not have been a title change…After going toe-to-toe with Joe Black, JT Paradox may have just elevated himself into a completely different conversation.Meanwhile, over in 1FW, the roster continues to grow—and fast.With new matchups, returning names, and multiple debuts, the question becomes:1FW is building depth on the growing roster… and new faces push themselves into top positioning.We also dive into:• Whether Christian Taylor's involvement is pushing Grayson Pierce closer to the title picture• If Tyler Shoop has quietly worked his way into contention• The growing tag team depth across the Georgia scene• And what the arrival of Pro Wrestling Domination could mean moving forwardPlus, the Life Advice segment returns with two real listener questions:• What do you do when someone never pays their share when you go out?• And how do you deal with the person who always uses speakerphone in public?If you follow independent wrestling, Georgia wrestling, and enjoy real conversation mixed with personality and debate, this is the show for you.▶ Watch now: tappedoutpod.comFan Question:Is Georgia wrestling becoming too crowded at the top—or is this the best it's ever been?#TappedInPodcast #ProWrestling #IndyWrestling #GeorgiaWrestling #WrestlingPodcast #1FW #SHW #IndependentWrestling #WrestlingNews #AEW #WWE

In this week's 5 Yrs Ago Flashback episode of the Wade Keller Pro Wrestling Post-show (4-13-2021), Kelly Wells, Tom Stoup, and Nate Lindberg cover the first Tuesday night show featuring a title change, pacing improving with no counter-programming, three women's champions in a surprise fan-service scene, and more.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/wade-keller-pro-wrestling-post-shows--3275545/support.

NXT Stand & Deliver 2026 exceeded expectations as the brand's tentpole premium live event -- and Getting Over is here to break it down! Host Adam Silverstein tackles 2026 NXT Stand & Deliver results with grades in Getting Over's signature instant analysis review. "The Silver King" covers a pair monumental title changes as Tony D'Angelo and Lola Vice bookended the show by emerging as the new NXT champions. What's ahead for Joe Hendry, Ricky Saints, Ethan Page, Jacy Jayne and Kendal Grey? Plus, Tatum Paxley and Blake Monroe stand out, Sol Ruca and Zaria leave a bit to be desired, and Johnny Gargano remains over in NXT. What's ahead as WWE WrestleMania 42 approaches and the company's next season begins? Follow Getting Over on Twitter, Bluesky & YouTube @GettingOverCast.

Smark Out Moment presents Episode 747 of the Smack Talk podcast, breaking down the latest wrestling news, rumors, and hot topics from WWE, AEW, NJPW, TNA and more.This week's Hot Tags include:Seth Rollins “arrested” angle on WWE Monday Night RawWWE Hall of Fame 2026 Legacy inductees: Sycho Sid & Bad News BrownChris Jericho trademarks “Cornerstone”Damian Priest & R-Truth win the WWE Tag Team ChampionshipNew WWE ID recruits and Gallus signing with MLWCallum Newman wins the New Japan CupPlus, predictions for NXT Roadblock and TNA Sacrifice 2026, along with a full roundup of the week's biggest moments from Raw, SmackDown, Dynamite, Collision, NXT, ROH and more.

AEW Revolution 2026 kicked off the company's pay-per-view season with a bang -- and Getting Over is here to break it down! Host Adam Silverstein and co-host Chris Vannini tackle 2026 AEW Revolution results with grades in our signature analysis review. "The Silver King" and "Vintage" cover the extremes of a Texas Death Match between MJF and Hangman Page, Andrade El Idolo outlasting Bandido and a bevy of surprises including the returns of Will Ospreay, Kenny Omega, Adam Copeland and Christian Cage; the debut of Ronda Rousey to confront Toni Storm; the signing of Mistico and an unexpected title change. Plus: What's next for Jon Moxley, Konosuke Takeshita, Swerve Strickland, Brody King, FTR, the Young Bucks and more with All In ahead? Follow Getting Over on Twitter, Bluesky & YouTube @GettingOverCast.

NXT Vengeance Day 2026 delivered beyond expectation, setting the road to Stand & Deliver ablaze -- and Getting Over is here to break it down! Host Adam Silverstein tackles 2026 NXT Vengeance Day results with grades in our signature instant analysis review. "The Silver King" covers Ethan Page's involvement in Joe Hendry vs. Ricky Saints, Tatum Paxley getting revenge on Izzi Dame, Blake Monroe finding herself against Jaida Parker, Lola Vice and Kelani Jordan battling in NXT Underground and Tony D'Angelo emerging from brawl with Dion Lennox that began in the parking lot. Plus, what's ahead in WWE for Jacy Jayne, Sol Ruca and Zaria? Follow Getting Over on Twitter, Bluesky & YouTube @GettingOverCast.

Sean Ross Sapp (@SeanRossSapp) and Alex Pawlowski (@AlexSourGraps) review tonight's episode of AEW Dynamite, March 4, 2026: -MJF vs. Kevin Knight for the AEW World Championship -Thekla vs. Thunder Rosa for the AEW Women's World Championship -Orange Cassidy & Darby Allin vs. Gabe Kidd & Clark Connors -Jon Moxley vs. Hechicero -Brawling Birds vs. The IInspiration -“Hangman” Adam Page in action Grab your EXCLUSIVE NordVPN Deal by going to http://nordvpn.com/fightful to get a Huge Discount off your NordVPN Plan + a Bonus Gift! It's completely risk free with Nord's 30 day money-back guarantee! ➼ https://nordvpn.com/fightful Try it risk-free now with a 30-day money-back guarantee! If you want to bet on Wrestling, or any other sport, check out our new partner where we get ALL of our odds! https://mybookie.website/joinwithFIGHTFUL and use the promo code FIGHTFUL. Deposit $100, get $50. Go in with $200, and they'll make it $100! Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Sean Ross Sapp (@SeanRossSapp) reviews tonight's episode of WWE Raw, March 2, 2026 including: -Roman Reigns returns -World Heavyweight Champion CM Punk appears -GM Adam Pearce addresses Seth Rollins' interference at Elimination Chamber -AJ Lee celebrates her Women's Intercontinental Championship victory over Becky Lynch -Men's Intercontinental Championship: Dominik Mysterio (c) vs. Penta -Gunther vs. Dragon Lee Grab your EXCLUSIVE NordVPN Deal by going to http://nordvpn.com/fightful to get a Huge Discount off your NordVPN Plan + a Bonus Gift! It's completely risk free with Nord's 30 day money-back guarantee! ➼ https://nordvpn.com/fightful Try it risk-free now with a 30-day money-back guarantee! If you want to bet on Wrestling, or any other sport, check out our new partner where we get ALL of our odds! https://mybookie.website/joinwithFIGHTFUL and use the promo code FIGHTFUL. Deposit $100, get $50. Go in with $200, and they'll make it $100! For a limited time, our listeners get 50% off FOR LIFE, Free Shipping, AND 3 Free Gifts at Mars Men at Mengotomars.com Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

WWE has made curious decisions with NXT Vengeance Day and NXT Stand & Deliver as AEW Revolution 2026 continues building -- and Getting Over is here to break it all down! Host Adam Silverstein opens with news about AJ Styles and NXT premium live events [3:05] before covering the latest from both brands: NXT [13:40] running the split of Sol Ruca and Zaria as Tatum Paxley reemerged and three titles changed hands with Myles Bourne beating Ethan Page and Vanity Project standing tall; AEW [34:20] settling on a stipulation for MJF vs. Hangman Page after a convoluted build as Swerve Strickland reengaged and the Death Riders continued feuding to no end with Don Callis Family. Follow Getting Over on Twitter, Bluesky & YouTube @GettingOverCast.

Nate Lindberg and Kelly Wells discuss Ethan Page vs. Myles Borne, Zaria finally turning on Sol Ruca, two other title changes, and more.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/pwtorch-dailycast--3276210/support.

In this week's AEW Week In Review, Ryan and Denton break down all the action from AEW Collision (February 7, 2026) and AEW Dynamite (February 11, 2026) — and AEW made some MAJOR booking decisions that have the wrestling world talking. On AEW Collision: HOOK declares himself the new leader of The Opps with Samoa Joe injured and Powerhouse Hobbs gone. Is this the start of a major push or another stalled storyline?Tommaso Ciampa retains the TNT Championship against Roderick Strong and Claudio Castagnoli… but should we have known his reign wouldn't last long?On AEW Dynamite: Tommaso Ciampa LOSES the TNT Championship to Kyle Fletcher after only 12 days. Why did AEW pull the trigger so quickly?Thekla defeats Kris Statlander to become the new AEW Women's Champion in the main event. Two major title changes in one week — smart booking or overreaction?Kenny Omega and Swerve Strickland come to blows ahead of their highly anticipated showdown next week.The Young Bucks defeat The Rascalz and a returning Private Party, setting up FTR vs. Young Bucks AGAIN. Are we excited or fatigued?We close the episode with our LVD (Least Valuable Dude) and MVD (Most Valuable Dude) of the week.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/two-dudes-with-attitudes-a-wrestling-podcast--5927275/support.

Support our sponsors this week by using the links below for the exclusive Solomonster offers!EXPRESSVPN ▶ Get an extra FOUR MONTHS FREE of the #1 trusted VPN at http://www.expressvpn.com/solomonsterFACTOR MEALS ▶ Use code "solomonster50off" at http://www.factormeals.com/solomonster50off to get 50 PERCENT OFF your first box plus FREE BREAKFAST for one year!Solomonster reviews the final AEW Dynamite before Grand Slam Australia with TWO title changes, one of which was completely baffling coming so soon after the title just changed hands, but what a banger of a match it was.  Kenny Omega and Swerve Strickland set the date and place for their showdown, an AEW original tag team returns to the ring and more.***Follow Solomonster on X (formerly Twitter) for news and opinion:http://x.com/solomonsterSubscribe to the Solomonster Sounds Off on YouTube:https://www.youtube.com/user/TheSolomonster?sub_confirmation=1Become a Solomonster Sounds Off Channel Member:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9jcg7mk93fGNqWPMfl_Aig/join

Kyle Fletcher and Thekla won their title matches. Were both title changes a good decision for what's next? Should AEW have followed up on the anti-ICE chants on last week's show that got so much attention? Did they effectively build Grand Slam Australia? Did Kenny Omega and Swerve Strickland step up for their summit?PWTorch editor Wade Keller is joined by PWTorch's Chris Adams discuss just about everything else from Dynamite with live chat interactions throughout including the return of the tassel version of The Young Bucks, the state of the Death Riders, and more.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/wade-keller-pro-wrestling-post-shows--3275545/support.

Botched kickouts, forgotten stipulations, and everything in between. Simon Miller presents 7 Totally Accidental Wrestling Title Changes...ENJOY!Follow us on Twitter:@SimonMiller316@WhatCultureWWEFor more awesome content, check out: whatculture.com/wwe Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Support our sponsor this week by using the link below for the exclusive Solomonster offer!BETTERHELP ▶ Get 10 PERCENT OFF your first month and give online therapy a try at http://www.betterhelp.com/solomonster to start being your best self. Thanks to BetterHelp for sponsoring this week's episode!Solomonster reviews the first WWE Raw of 2026 with CM Punk defending his World Heavyweight Championship against Bron Breakker and TWO title changes on the show, which also set up a major match for Germany next week.  Yet this was a perfect example of one of those WWE shows where things happen, but it largely feels lifeless and boring.  An oh yeah, Je'Von Evans was announced as the newest addition to the Raw roster... during a commercial break.***Follow Solomonster on X (formerly Twitter) for news and opinion:http://x.com/solomonsterSubscribe to the Solomonster Sounds Off on YouTube:https://www.youtube.com/user/TheSolomonster?sub_confirmation=1Become a Solomonster Sounds Off Channel Member:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9jcg7mk93fGNqWPMfl_Aig/join

Michael Hamflett (briefly) reviews Friday's SmackDown, previews tonight's Monday Night Raw, and has some major SPOILERS for the taped December 26th edition of SmackDown, including:All the Cody Rhodes/Drew McIntyre home invasion aftermath!Chaos in Women's Tag Team Division!Dominik Mysterio injury news!Title changes & 2026 title matches!A massive NXT call-up?!Enjoy! Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.