Podcasts about Frazer

Ken and Frazer discuss expectations for Lamar Jackson and LS Nick Moore.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Ken and Frazer discuss expectations for QB Lamar Jackson and LS Nick Moore.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Frazer, Joe, and Andy talk about Steve Yzerman out as Red Wings GM, famous hockey nicknames, and 1 rule each of us would change.

A huge love in for the Second Doctor era and a fight over the best and worst stories to crown one story a winner! Incredible accents, new box sets, crazy quotes and mad opinions guaranteed!

Frazer, Joe, and Andy discuss Leo Carlsson staying in Anaheim, the Dylan Larkin drama, Jason Robertson going to arbitration, and all the recent NHL offseason news.

Frazer, Joe, and Andy breakdown a crazy week of free agent signings and trades in the NHL.

Tonight on Brett Orchard's Old Time Radio Show, we're settling in with the timeless comfort of Dad's Army: A Stripe for Frazer. One of Britain's best-loved classic comedies, Dad's Army is full of gentle humour, wartime nostalgia and that wonderfully familiar feeling of Sunday evenings gone by. Whether you grew up with Captain Mainwaring, Sergeant Wilson, Corporal Jones and Private Pike, or you're discovering Walmington-on-Sea for the first time, this is classic British comedy at its warmest. Make yourself comfortable, put the kettle on, dim the lights and enjoy another cosy journey back into the golden age of radio. Subscribe for classic British comedy, old time radio, vintage mysteries and calm night-time listening. dayslikethis.life #DadsArmy #ClassicBritishComedy #OldTimeRadio #SundayNightListening #BedtimeListening

SmackDown gave us a very strong show this week. Not perfect, but a lot to like. Tiffany Stratton and Alexa Bliss opened with a fun tag match, Rey Fenix and Nathan Frazer absolutely tore it up for the AAA Cruiserweight Championship, LA Knight had another tense Bloodline-related segment with Solo Sikoa, and Giulia picked up a nice win before Blake Monroe made a strong debut by laying her out.Danhausen TV happened, which was fine for what it was, Jade Cargill kept wrecking people, and the final face-off involving Cody Rhodes, Gunther, Sami Zayn, Jey Uso, and Oba Femi gave the show a big chaotic ending heading into Night of Champions. The best part of the night for me? Fenix vs. Frazer was fantastic.Overall, this was an easy SmackDown to watch. Good wrestling, a few meaningful developments, and a final segment that made the title picture feel busy in the right way. In this review, I break down everything that mattered from WWE SmackDown 6/26/26 in under 10 minutes.Visit our website ➡️➡️➡️ https://www.majesticproduction.com/Watch our full podcast here ➡️➡️➡️ anchor.fm/majestic-production

Watch the full livestream: https://youtube.com/live/aM9pps7qZH4?feature=shareBig news and fun reflections on our A.R.S. Spring Workshops last week in Austin, Texas. Frater R.C. returns to Canada after 10 days in Austin, Texas, describing the city as lush, vibrant, and friendlier than Vancouver, and announces he has signed a multi-year lease there so his business is now based in Austin. He demonstrates a new two-camera setup, gifts channel memberships, and promotes free/paid offerings including HermeticMysterySchool.com and the Enochian course (enochiangrimoire.com), plus a planned live Enochian operation. He recaps Arcane Research Society production upgrades (multiple 4K cameras, expanded AV team), thanks collaborators like Jason Louv, and outlines upcoming events: the annual spring Austin event renamed “MagiCon” (April, broad “art of magic” focus, aiming to grow into a castle venue), and the biggest “EnochiaCon” yet in Austin in November with expanded in-person workshops (e.g., Terry Burns, Craig Williams, Dr. David Hill, Temple Louv, and his LBRP masterclass), plus Prague in 2027.He contrasts U.S. vs. Canadian costs (especially groceries), discusses major improvement in long-term psoriasis via a strict no-sugar/no-carb diet, weight loss, and reluctance to take immune-suppressing medications, and reflects on how illness affected his social life. He addresses critiques of Liam Christopher's Golden Dawn-related material as a different system that can confuse students, while not wanting to “trash” him. The stream includes an Austin souvenir (a lapis lazuli heart lamp), a book haul and reviews—highlighting M. David Litwa's Hermes (including deluxe editions), a JPS Hebrew-English Tanakh, William James's Varieties of Religious Experience, Frazer's Golden Bough, Pico's Oration, a rare Yeats Shadowy Waters manuscript study, and a Vampire: The Masquerade encyclopedia gift—plus brief Yeats readings, roleplaying discussion, and closing plans for future streams and a DruidCraft tarot session.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/magick-without-fears-frater-r-c-hermetic-podcast/exclusive-contentAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Want more exclusive content?! http://prometheuslens.supercast.com to sign up for the "All Access Pass" and get early access to episodes, private community, members only episodes, private Q & A's, and coming documentaries. We also have a $4 dollar a month package that gets you early access and an ad free listening experience!==================== SummaryJoin me as we read through J.G. Frazer's The Golden Bough!!====================

Frazer, Joe, and Andy discuss the trade of Brady Tkachuk to Florida, other big trades, and a very weak Hall of Fame class.

À l'heure des fake news, il faut lire Marc Bloch et ses Réflexions d'un historien sur les fausses nouvelles de la Grande guerre ou encore L'Étrange défaite, témoignage écrit dans l'été 40 où s'exerce son art de la critique historique en partant du temps présent pour mieux appréhender le passé, avec humanité. Pionnier de l'Histoire moderne, témoin de son propre temps, Marc Bloch est un ancien combattant de la Première Guerre mondiale, engagé volontaire en 1940 à l'âge de 53 ans. L'historien combattant entre dans la résistance active dès 1943 au sein du mouvement Franc-Tireur dans la région Rhône-Alpes. Finalement arrêté et torturé par la Gestapo sur dénonciation, Marc Bloch est fusillé à Saint-Didier-de-Formans, le 16 juin 1944, par les nazis. Père et mari aimant, époux de Simonne, Marc Bloch a choisi de sacrifier sa vie pour la Patrie, celle que sa famille juive alsacienne a choisie en 1870 : la France. Pour son entrée au Panthéon avec son épouse Simonne Vidal, nous écoutons les mots de Marc Bloch dans la voix de la comédienne Anne Alvaro - enregistrée aux Rendez-vous de l'Histoire de Blois 2025- avec nos invités Matis Bloch, son arrière-petit-fils et l'historienne Annette Becker, ainsi que les lauréats du Concours lycéen Franco-Allemand Marc Bloch organisé par le Centre Marc Bloch de Berlin dans un reportage de Pascal Thibault, notre correspondant en Allemagne. Avec tous nos remerciements aux Rendez-vous de l'Histoire de Blois pour la performance Marc Bloch l'Homme, l'Historien et tout particulièrement à la comédienne Anne Alvaro.   ► Les livres de Marc Bloch cités dans l'émission : Réflexions d'un historien sur les fausses nouvelles de la guerre, aux éditions Dunod « Les fausses nouvelles, dans toute la multiplicité de leurs formes – simples racontars, impostures, légendes – ont rempli la vie de l'humanité. Comment naissent-elles ? De quels éléments tirent-elles leur substance ? Comment se propagent-elles, gagnant en ampleur à mesure qu'elles passent de bouche en bouche ou d'écrit en écrit ? Nulle question plus que celles-là ne mérite de passionner quiconque aime à réfléchir sur l'histoire. » Marc Bloch a été un combattant de la Grande Guerre. Mais, au milieu des combats, il n'a jamais oublié de s'interroger sur la source des informations qui parcouraient les tranchées : d'où venaient-elles et pourquoi de fausses nouvelles avaient-elles tant de succès ? En 1921, il interpelle ses contemporains avec un article court et éclairant dont la réflexion est toujours d'actualité. Les rois thaumaturges, aux éditions Gallimard De 1944, date de sa mort héroïque, au début des années 1970, Marc Bloch est surtout apparu comme le cofondateur (avec Lucien Febvre) de la revue Annales, qui renouvela la méthode historique, et l'auteur d'une grande synthèse, La Société féodale (1939-1940). Depuis une dizaine d'années, les historiens et les chercheurs en Sciences humaines et sociales pensent de plus en plus que le grand livre de Marc Bloch, c'est son premier vrai livre : Les rois thaumaturges (1924). Il est consacré à l'étude d'un rite curieux : la guérison miraculeuse, par simple toucher des mains, des écrouelles ou scrofules (adénite tuberculeuse). L'attribution de ce pouvoir aux rois de France et d'Angleterre remonte probablement au XIIè siècle ; elle va durer en Angleterre jusqu'au début du XVIIIè siècle, en France jusqu'en 1825, date du sacre de Charles X. Comment se déroulait le rituel du toucher royal ? Quelle était la vraie nature du pouvoir monarchique : les rois étaient-ils des personnages sacrés, des sorciers faiseurs de miracles ? Pourquoi, enfin, a-t-on cru puis cessé de croire au miracle royal ? Trois questions qui ont amené Marc Bloch à explorer les chemins de la psychologie collective, des rites et des mythes, des croyances populaires. Pour éclairer le phénomène, il a eu recours à l'anthropologie et à son plus grand théoricien d'alors, Frazer, au comparatisme avec les sociétés les plus diverses, aux arcanes de la médecine populaire traditionnelle. C'est un jalon essentiel dans l'exploration des mentalités et l'invention d'une anthropologie historique. Dans son importante préface, Jacques Le Goff s'efforce de préciser les raisons personnelles et les milieux intellectuels qui ont conduit Marc Bloch à écrire ce livre exceptionnel, gros d'avenir, puis à abandonner cette voie, et fait le point sur la situation des Rois thaumaturges dans la recherche historique et anthropologique aujourd'hui, dont ce livre est l'un des phares.   L'étrange défaite, aux éditions Gallimard « Témoignage », était-il écrit sur la première page du manuscrit rédigé d'une traite à l'été 1940, puis dissimulé en attente de jours meilleurs, et finalement publié en 1946 aux Éditions Franc-Tireur, émanation du groupe résistant dans lequel Marc Bloch s'est engagé jusqu'à son arrestation au printemps 1944. Le « plus vieux capitaine de l'armée française », comme il aimait se décrire, combattant de 1914 devenu engagé volontaire en 1939, y propose autant un examen de conscience qu'une analyse sans concession de la France battue en quelques semaines. Pour réaliser cette histoire immédiate, il met à profit ses compétences d'historien des sociétés et des mentalités du Moyen-Âge, tout en se tournant vers l'avenir : « Un jour viendra, tôt ou tard, j'en ai la ferme espérance, où la France verra de nouveau s'épanouir, sur son vieux sol béni déjà de tant de moissons, la liberté de pensée et de jugement. Alors les dossiers cachés s'ouvriront ; les brumes […] se lèveront peu à peu ; et peut-être les chercheurs occupés à les percer trouveront-ils quelque profit à feuilleter, s'ils le savent découvrir, ce procès-verbal de l'an 1940. »   Écrits de guerre, aux éditions Armand Colin L'ouvrage ne se présente pas sous la forme classique d'un récit continu divisé en chapitres sur un sujet précis. Son unité est constituée par le personnage central Marc Bloch autour duquel gravitent des questions variées, toutes ayant un lien plus ou moins direct avec la guerre et l'expérience de la guerre. C'est un travail élaboré à partir d'un dossier constitué par Marc Bloch intitulé Souvenirs de guerre, composé de documents de natures diverses, coupures de presse, lettres manuscrites, écrits personnels, cartes postales d'origine variée, etc. présentés au lecteur. La reproduction des carnets de guerre de Marc Bloch complète ce recueil de documents ainsi que deux textes, l'un le récit des premiers mois de la Grande Guerre vécus par Marc Bloch, déjà publié sous la forme du Cahier des Annales, n° 26, 1969 sous le titre Souvenirs de guerre 1914-1915, l'article célèbre de la Revue de synthèse historique, Réflexions d'un historien sur les fausses nouvelles de la guerre. Une longue introduction de Stéphane Audoin-Rouzeau situe Marc Bloch dans la guerre et propose une réflexion sur la manière dont celle-ci a influencé sa pensée et son œuvre.   ► Pour l'entrée au Panthéon de Marc Bloch, découvrez l'exposition Marc Bloch, l'esprit de l'Histoire. .

Join Stephen Streett as he delves into the history of Israel through the lens of scripture. This sermon explores the journey of the Israelites from Egypt to the wilderness, focusing on themes of rebellion, faithfulness, and transformation. With a strong emphasis on understanding God's statutes and the importance of worship, Stephen encourages listeners to reflect on their own spiritual journey and relationship with God.

Host: Paul McIntyre, Editor-At-Large Not all retailers are victims of scale. North America is pouring billions of dollars into retail media, largely sponsored search and digital screens, making giants like Amazon, Kroger and Walmart richer and other retailers chasing scraps. But luxury department store chain Holt Renfrew has carved out a higher-end niche in Canada, and its physical-plus-digital approach is pulling in new advertisers like Mercedes, as well as taking a larger share of endemic advertiser budgets as they bid to build brand and drive performance in a single hit. Demand for both physical and digital inventory is running hot, helped partly by Holt Renfrew’s retail media operation three years ago moving to its own P&L under trade marketing boss, Ashlee Nickel – whose 16 years at the firm also span merchandise, buying and vendor marketing. It means she speaks the merchandise team’s language as well as that of brands selling through the store. That’s critical to avoid “conflict”, says Sonder’s Jonathan Hopkins. “Media has been used as merch’s sweetie jar for decades, and that entrenched behaviour doesn't change overnight.” He argues retailers will increasingly struggle with their retail media ambitions unless they “create a cross-functional team with people from merch, marketing, finance, media,” all pulling in the same direction. Even then, he says, “give and take” is a pre-requisite. “Pick your battles would be my recommendation.” Since the shift from top line co-op to standalone, Holt Renfrew’s profitable media revenue has changed how every program is priced, packaged, and pitched to vendors. In all, it’s packing 245 distinct media formats, all evaluated by Sonder. It will soon have another – but given Holt Renfrew’s store environment makes even Apple’s look cluttered, a design challenge looms as the retailer mulls how to roll out a screen network that doesn’t damage that aesthetic. Sonder’s Angus Frazer isn’t worried – subtlety is key, he says. “Retail media is not an excuse to ignore CX. Done well, it's an opportunity to improve CX and deliver on broader business objectives.” I.e. “highly profitable commercialisation”. Trade marketing boss Nickel is now hunting more of them – in places where few retailers have thought to monetise. She’s already added in-store beauty carts and cafe menu takeovers to the inventory stack, and has brands queuing up for its in-store Montreal F1 Grand Prix weekend experience – and Holt Renfrew doesn’t even have an official partnership. “One of the biggest opportunities in the space right now is looking beyond the obvious,” says Nickel. “When you start thinking differently about the retail environment, there are often opportunities that don't fit within a traditional media place.” Outside of physical environments – and despite huge digital retail media spend, many are overlooking powerful channels – particularly email, say Sonder’s Frazer and Hopkins, leaving easy money on the table.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Frazer, Joe, and Andy talk about Carolina being Stanley Cup Champions, Vegas and Toronto coaching hires, and All NHL teams.

Frazer, Joe, and Andy discuss the Stanley Cup Final being tied 2-2, Larkin wanting out of Detroit, Babcock being hired and/or blocked from being hired in Edmonton, and Milan Lucic retiring.

Thank you for downloading the Trap One Podcast. On this episode Keith, Frazer and Mark discuss the novelisation of Jubilee by Robert Shearman. You can order the book here #ad

Frazer, Joe, and Andy discuss what the Knights winning Game 1 means for rest of the series. Mario back with Penguins? Werenski wins the Norris trophy and RIP Claude Lemieux.

ALEXANDRIA SEYDEL from Ripples Edge Advisors shares expert strategies on “getting the business ready to sell.” We focus on exit planning and getting the most value out of the transaction. Discover how early planning, owner mindset, and strategic positioning can lead to successful exits and satisfied owners. https://youtu.be/8OwhCRCBZl4 https://open.spotify.com/episode/2qawd64OYzljBvU9xqS8df?si=1Xvv2OUFSbeBtUDeJGTMXg KEY TOPICS Early exit planning and owner mindset,Getting the business ready for sale and transfer.Risk assessment and deal readiness.Owner satisfaction and post-sale happiness.Capital raising and growth strategies. SOUND BITES for “GETTING THE BUSINESS READY TO SELL” “Getting clear on owner success is crucial.”“Start exit planning 2-5 years in advance.”“Family dynamics can be deal breakers.” Chapters 00:00 Navigating Business Exits: An Introduction.02:57 Understanding Owner Satisfaction Post-Sale..05:55 Preparing for Sale: The Importance of Readiness.09:00 Building a Succession Plan for Business Continuity.11:49 Assessing Business Value: The Exit Readiness Assessment.15:08 Evaluating Growth Opportunities and Capital Needs.17:58 Cash vs. Equity: Making Informed Decisions.21:03 Finding the Right Buyers: The Role of Advisors.24:08 Addressing Family Dynamics in Business Sales.26:59 Checklist for Business Owners Considering Sale. RESOURCES Ripples Edge Advisors – https://ripplesedgeadvisors.com/ GUEST LINKS LinkedIn – https://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandriaseydel/ QSBS For Founders – https://frazerrice.com/qsbs-for-founders/ TRANSCRIPT Frazer RiceWelcome aboard, Alex. Alexandria SeydelHi Frazer, so nice to be here. Thank you for having me. Frazer RiceThank you for being on. We’re at a time now with the economy where it feels like it’s roaring. Valuations on things are going up, up, up. And people who have founded businesses are exploring their options. That’s kind of where you step in with your firm Ripple’s Edge Advisors. Talk to us about what you do to help founders get ready. Not only in understanding what they have in their own business. How to go through the daunting process of exploring their options. Getting their business bulletproof for when people start looking under the hood. Alexandria SeydelAbsolutely. My background is as an M&A attorney, so I came from the deal side. My co-founder is an operator — she actually knows how to run the businesses. It’s a very good duo. I think like a buyer, first and foremost. That’s how I was trained. So how we help business owners now is we jump in two to five years before exit. We’re trying to solve a problem still being missed by most of the industry. Brokers and bankers know how to get deals done, create auctions, create demand, and sell for high prices. That’s all great. But the gap I was seeing was the need to jump in with the owner before that process. Getting clear on what’s a win for them. There are some startling stats about owner dissatisfaction post-sale. Some surveys show 70 to 80% of owners are dissatisfied after selling. I’d argue that’s not because they sold — it’s because they sold to the wrong person in the wrong way. So it’s the who and the how. Jumping in with them earlier. Before we go to market, Before we start talking multiples and financials. Getting with the owner and doing the work on what a win looks like for them. What do they care about in the process? When they think about their life through this deal and post-deal, what do they want to feel and see? How do they want to operate on an average Tuesday. Yes, after all the cool vacations with all the freedom and the new chapter. After that, what do you want to be doing? And when you look back at that beautiful business you built and then sold, what do you want to see in it? Is it that client service remains the same? Is it that the ethos of the company remains the same? Or is it simply: “Alex, I’m satisfied with the biggest wire at closing we can get, and I’ll be a happy camper moving on to the next phase of life.” Really getting with that owner earlier to get clear on that — what’s a win for them and what’s a win for their business — that’s where we start. Then we begin implementing and helping them build those exit strategies from there. We believe that foundational vision and values work is really going to help bring down that dissatisfaction number. So now we’re building an exit that feels right for the owner, right for the business, and helps them feel good about that transaction. Frazer RiceFrom the estate planning and tax planning side of things, I totally agree that the earlier you start, the more tools you have at your disposal and the better it turns out. I did a piece on pre-exit planning — really engineering what your calendar is going to look like a year after the sale. And I see a lot of dissatisfaction with people who sell and then lose purpose, or aren’t quite equipped to deal with their lower participation in the thing they built, the baby they helped give birth to. They end up unmoored, and that’s part of the depression they sometimes feel if they haven’t really gamed it out and thought through how to replace the structure and the drive it took to build something. It sounds like we’re saying the same thing from slightly different angles. Alexandria SeydelTotally, absolutely. On your side, you’re such a critical part of the team when we start this process. One of the first two questions we ask every client is: who’s your wealth advisor, and who is your tax strategist? Hopefully they’re already in communication, but if they aren’t — you’re looking at the personal side, focused on what the family structure looks like financially, the tax strategies and planning that we know has to happen. And because you’re doing this work — which not all advisors do — you’re getting really clear on the personal side. I’m coming at it from the business balance sheet and business trajectory; you’re coming from the personal side. They work well together. I like to jump in early with the other advisors working with these owners to get really clear, because not only do we know there are structural and strategic things we need to put in place years in advance, but we also need to get clear on what’s a win for them personally and business-wise. Frazer RiceOne of the things you mentioned is the idea of getting the business ready to be sold. I’m fast-forwarding to the concept of getting it Sarbanes-Oxley ready in case a public company wants to buy it — so it can slot neatly into a balance sheet. But that’s really shorthand for saying things are professionally managed: bookkeeping, process, accounts receivable, accounts payable — all formally documented. So that when a buyer starts looking under the hood, they don’t start applying discounts for things they’ll have to fix later. Is that part of what you do? Alexandria SeydelExactly. Being trained as a lawyer on the buy side, my goal — usually at the 11th hour — was to advise my client, the buyer, on risk. And to assess whether the purchase price offered in the letter of intent actually held up once we looked under the hood. The best part of my job now — and way more fun — is that instead of just identifying risk and applying discounts (because almost every deal goes through some form of repricing), I’m jumping in with the sellers and owners hopefully a year or two in advance. We find things a buyer is going to see as a risk, things that would prompt a reprice, and we now have the opportunity to make those things shinier. So that when the buyer looks under the hood, the high end of the multiple range is validated. It’s not just the financials the purchase price is based on — it’s all the other things buyers care about: the people, the processes. Is this a truly transferable asset they can step into, run, and grow? Another big thing we work on is owner dependence. Most owners think the business doesn’t depend on them, but there are often significant opportunities to continue reducing that dependence — so that a buyer sees this as a true transferable asset they can step into and grow. Frazer RiceI imagine there are a couple of come-to-Jesus discussions where you have to tell the owner their revenue is too dependent on them personally. On one end of the spectrum, think of a law firm where business comes in because people think you’re a great lawyer — that doesn’t transfer cleanly. You want the recurring revenue to come from somewhere else. That’s one issue I’m sure you have to sit someone down and address. The five-year runway is helpful there — it gives you time to build in a succession plan, not just for the sale, but operationally, so that value still sits in the business whether you’re there or not. The second thing I find interesting is where you sit somebody down and say: this would look a lot better if you took less money out of the business. If we can put that back into EBITDA, then when a buyer starts applying multiples, they’re multiplying against something bigger rather than against a number deflated by, say, buying a boat. Do you get into that conversation? Alexandria SeydelYes, we do, and we take a cursory look at that fairly quickly. Then we bring in support if needed — whether that’s on the accounting side, how money flows through the business to affect the bottom line and create the story. Every buyer wants at least three years of financials; we want that growth story to look strong, and we want to start building it now. If we need to bring in a fractional controller or a fractional CFO depending on the size and sophistication of the business, that’s something we pull in right away. On your first point — we actually have an architect client right now at exactly that phase. He has a right-hand woman architect who’s been with him for over ten years, and he wants her to have the opportunity to step into the business. He also has a son who’s an architect and wants the same opportunity for him. So we’re building a succession plan. And one of the first problems we addressed was that he’s still driving almost all of the top-line revenue — nearly all the business development runs through him. So we’re asking: when does this right-hand woman get involved in the sales process? What percentage of meetings is she in? What is she bringing in herself? His timeline is five to seven years, so we have time to build this out — continuing to train her, continuing to elevate her and others in the business who can drive relationships and sustain that revenue flow, the recurring revenue that comes from major referral partners and developers giving him large contracts. And on the equity side: what’s the incentive plan? How do we get her aligned with the goals of the business so she genuinely wants to take ownership, both literally and figuratively? We’re building an equity incentive plan with her. On the process and sales side, we’re setting goals — she’s in a certain percentage of meetings by year-end, driving a certain percentage of revenue. We’re helping him set those goals and build a plan to execute on them. Frazer RiceAnd all of that also sets up a longer-term exit — maybe selling the practice to a larger architectural firm or a private equity-backed platform down the line. Alexandria SeydelExactly. And on a slightly longer timeline, all of that work makes the business more efficient operationally and more attractive as a potential sale — whether that’s to those two individuals in a succession plan or to an outside buyer. Frazer RiceWhat happens when a business comes to you and maybe the brand is well respected and things look good from the outside, but there’s decay underneath? They come to you and say they’re ready to sell, but when you look at it, the dollar signs in their eyes are based on something that existed a long time ago and has since been left to deteriorate. What do you do in that situation? Alexandria SeydelWe start with what we call an Exit Readiness Assessment — it’s a 90-minute virtual session that pulls you out of your inbox, out of the fires you’re fighting every day, and lets you step back and look at every dimension of your business through the lens of what a buyer is going to assess. It produces a readiness score and tranches everything into three buckets: value adds (greater multiple), value detractors (reduction in sale price), and deal killers — things like accounting or legal issues so significant that a buyer doesn’t just reprice, they walk away entirely. That assessment becomes the foundation for a roadmap: what are the most important things to fix, and in what order? We all have limited time, energy, and capital. The triage framework helps you apply those resources to the things that actually move the needle. And yes, there is often a come-to-Jesus moment. Sometimes an owner comes in burned out — they just want to hand over the keys. We want to avoid that situation, but if you get there proactively rather than reactively, if you’ve already done the work with advisors like Frazer and like us to put systems, people, and processes in place, your readiness score is in much better shape. If you haven’t done that work, it requires a harder conversation — what do you want out of this? What are your goals? And what can we realistically accomplish in what period of time? Frazer RiceWhat about founders who want to grow and are looking for outside capital, but want to stay involved? How do you think about sourcing that capital and making sure the partners are the right fit? Alexandria SeydelWe have several clients right now raising seed rounds, and one working through whether to raise a Series A. I think that discussion has to be framed, at least in part, through the exit lens. There’s a lot of pressure right now — especially in AI or capital-hungry industries — to raise the big splashy Series A, make the oversubscribed round LinkedIn post. Great, I’m all for it if you actually need that capital. But there’s a lot to consider first: are these the right partners? What limitations does this put on your exit pathway? I have one client who has a really nice business growing at a solid clip — I think it could exit in the $20 million range in the next year or two, and he’s still the primary owner. He’s feeling pressure from his industry where raising a big Series A is the norm. I asked him what he wants to be doing in two years. His answer was surfing in Portugal. If you raise a Series A right now, you are not surfing in Portugal in two years. So with that in mind, is this the business you want to keep growing? Are you ready to bring in people who have real influence over how you sell, who you sell to, and for how much? Your timeline gets extended and your decision-making authority gets diluted. Maybe the Series A is right because you need the capital to grow — but even then, does it have to be a $50 or $100 million round? Could it be $10 million? Even the size of the round affects the cap table, the governance, and ultimately the exit. Frazer RiceHave you had the difficult situation where someone is presented with an offer that mixes cash and stock in the acquiring company — and you’re looking at it thinking maybe they should push for all cash, or maybe they should walk away entirely? Alexandria SeydelYes, and I’m very comfortable in that conversation. My advice almost always starts the same way: get as much cash at close as possible. Reduce the earnout tranche. A lot of deals come in structured across three buckets — cash at close, earnout, and rollover equity in the buyer. I’ve seen deals close where five years later that rollover equity is worth zero. So I walk every owner through this exercise: if the earnout and the rollover equity both go to zero, are you completely comfortable walking away with just the cash at close? If that feels okay, then we can dial those other numbers however we need. If it doesn’t feel okay, then we need to ask harder questions — do we need to grow more first? Do we need to negotiate different terms? Do we have multiple LOIs with different structures we can compare? The institutional buyers will always tell you the rollover equity is going to 10x. Always. And as the lawyer, I used to be delivering that reality check at the 11th hour when it was almost too late. Now that I get to work with owners before that process, I can prime them early: rollover equity, in our minds, is always worth zero unless proven otherwise. If it 10x’s, that’s the cherry on top — incredible. But don’t build your retirement plan around it. Frazer RiceAre you part of the process of generating buyer interest? I imagine it’s often industry-specific — there are people who understand the space and know the players. But how do you get a few LOIs on the table so it doesn’t become a fire sale? Alexandria SeydelWe consciously made the decision not to become brokers or registered broker-dealers, for two reasons. One, I want to stay fully aligned with the owner’s actual goals. This has happened: we started working with a woman, began building up her people and processes, and 18 months later she said, “Wait — I actually have more freedom now. I’m operating at a higher level because the business is starting to run without me.” The work we were doing to prepare for a sale also just made the business more enjoyable to run. She decided to grow for another year or two instead. Because our compensation isn’t tied to a success fee at closing, we can fully support that decision. Two, deal brokers and investment bankers are often highly industry-specific. A banker who knows your manufacturing sector deeply is going to be more effective in market than we would be. So we refer our clients to multiple specialists in their industry, help them assess fit, and — because I’m trained in reviewing those contracts — help them understand what they’re actually agreeing to in the engagement letter. Then once that team goes to market, we stay on the owner’s shoulder throughout the process. My consistent message: fit matters. Trust your gut. If this buyer doesn’t feel right, honor that, and let’s figure it out before we’re at the closing table. Frazer RiceHow do you tell a founder or family-owned business that the family dynamics are a value detractor? If there’s conflict — someone looking for income while others want to grow, every decision a fight — I imagine buyers pick up on that quickly. Alexandria SeydelIt starts with being human first. Understanding the people behind the business, understanding the family dynamics. A lot of M&A professionals have no interest in going there. My co-founder Kim Wozny and I both actually like that part. We like knowing the people, understanding the dynamics, understanding when someone has a mental block around part of their business because of a fear mindset, or when pressure from a family member is pulling them in a direction they don’t want to go. Being willing to dig into that — as a third-party neutral advisor working for the founders first — is part of what we do. And on the process side, if you have four siblings who own a second-generation business and three want to grow while one wants to sell, how do you show that fourth person that now isn’t the right time? You give them more information, more context, more understanding. And where necessary, you wrap enough process and procedure around that situation so that a buyer can see that this one person being out of alignment doesn’t constitute a major risk to the business. Frazer RiceDon’t give the buyer a reason to say no or pay less. If you can batten that down ahead of time, it’s worth it. As we wind down — what’s a short checklist for founders who are thinking about selling? What are the first steps to assess their readiness? Alexandria SeydelFirst and foremost: it’s never too early to start thinking about it. Even just getting clarity on your personal vision — what you want out of this — helps direct major business decisions as you grow. We have two clients right now considering joint ventures. One is actually moving forward with a new 50/50 partner; the other decided against it. They’re on very different exit timelines, and those exit pathways are a large part of why a joint venture may or may not be the right choice for each of them. I’m always happy to just talk to founders about how they’re thinking about this, even without any formal engagement. I want more owners thinking about exit earlier — it only does them a massive service. And one practical exercise I love: the Europe Test. Imagine you’re going to Europe for three weeks, somewhere with no cell reception. Who calls you first? What processes break? What sits in your inbox undone? It’s a more fun version of the “hit by a bus” question — and it’s a really useful early diagnostic for where the business still depends too heavily on you. Start uncovering those things now, so you have the time and runway to fix them. Frazer RiceTerrific stuff. Alex, how do people find you and your firm? Alexandria SeydelI’m Alexandria Seydel — last name spelled S-E-Y-D-E-L. You can find me on LinkedIn, where I’m active all the time, or look up Ripple’s Edge Advisors. Reach out via email or LinkedIn message. Even if you’re just starting to think about it, I love having that conversation. Frazer RicePerfect — that will all be in the show notes. Thank you for being on. Alexandria SeydelThank you, Frazer. https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT/ ALTERNATE TITLES The 5-Year Exit Strategy Blueprint: Preparing Your Business for Sale Getting The Business Ready to Sell How to Maximize Business Value Before Selling KEYWORDS (GETTING THE BUSINESS READY TO SELL) business exit planning, M&A, business valuation, succession planning, sale readiness, owner dissatisfaction, deal structuring, growth strategies, capital raising, exit readiness assessment, getting the business ready to sell,

Join Chris Montgomery in this inspiring sermon as he challenges the Frazer congregation to embrace their calling in fulfilling the Great Commission. Through personal stories and biblical teachings, Chris encourages believers to live a commissioned life, engage in authentic community, and serve with commitment. Discover the importance of seeing, seeking, and serving as a united church, and learn how to let go of distractions to follow Jesus wholeheartedly.

Frazer, Joe, and Andy discuss Vegas sweeping Colorado, Carolina up on Montreal, Geno returning to Pittsburgh, and dysfunction already in Toronto.

Frazer, Joe, and Andy talk Conference Finals, Vegas shenanigans, and more.

How will a kickboxing world champion fare against one of the greatest heavyweights of all time? That's the question Buncey puts to Olympic bronze medallist Frazer Clarke as the pair look ahead to this weekend's spectacular showdown beneath the Egyptian pyramids between Rico Verhoeven and Oleksandr Usyk. Plus, they reflect on Dave Allen's defeat to Filip Hrgovic, while Frazer gives an update on his own career after his narrow loss to Justis Huni.

In this inspiring sermon, Neil Epler calls for unity among believers, emphasizing the teachings of Jesus Christ. Drawing from the Gospel of John, he explores the importance of community, prayer, and focusing on God's word. Through anecdotes and scriptural references, Epler encourages the congregation to strive for unity, reflecting the prayer of Jesus for His followers to be one. This message is a reminder of the power of coming together as a community of faith to glorify God and fulfill His mission.

Frazer, Joe, and Andy dig deep into the 2nd round of the playoffs, talk about what Toronto should do with Auston Matthews, and some NHL award choices.

fWotD Episode 3294: Golden Bough (Aeneid) Welcome to featured Wiki of the Day, your daily dose of knowledge from Wikipedia's finest articles.The featured article for Tuesday, 12 May 2026, is Golden Bough (Aeneid).The Golden Bough is a fantastical object described in the Aeneid, an epic poem by the Roman poet Virgil composed between 29 and 19 BCE narrating the adventures of the Trojan hero Aeneas after the Trojan War. The episode of the Golden Bough is found in its sixth book and is part of Aeneas's journey into the Underworld. The bough itself acts as proof of Aeneas's divine favour, and allows him to pass into the Underworld. He is tasked to find it in an expansive forest, which he accomplishes with the aid of his mother, the goddess Venus, and to remove it from its host tree. Although Aeneas has been told that it would come easily, if his journey is ordained by fate, Virgil describes the bough as briefly hesitating before he takes it.Virgil's portrayal of the bough has no direct literary antecedents, though it draws on several precedents from literature, folklore and philosophy. Scholars have connected it with, among others, the Golden Fleece in the story of the Argonauts; symbolic objects associated with deities such as Hermes, Dionysus and Circe; and the branches carried by prospective initiates into the Eleusinian Mysteries, a Greek religious rite centred on a symbolic journey into the Underworld. Virgil associates it with both death and immortality, partly by way of symbolic associations in Graeco-Roman culture between gold and the gods. It also recalls ideas put forth by the Roman philosopher Lucretius as to the nature of the soul. The episode of the Golden Bough was parodied by authors including Virgil's contemporary Ovid, and drawn upon by later Roman poets including Lucan and Valerius Flaccus.Early interpretations of the Golden Bough tended to give it an allegorical function, particularly via Pythagorean and Neoplatonist philosophy, which viewed it as symbolic of the choice between virtue and vice. Medieval commentators often considered it a symbol of wisdom, and several Christian theologians interpreted it as representing Christian wisdom and virtue. In the sixteenth century, it became a heraldic symbol of the Florentine House of Medici. Early modern receptions of the bough, including those of François Rabelais and Jonathan Swift, were often parodic or obscene. In the twentieth century, scholars following the Harvard School interpretation of the Aeneid argued that Virgil's use of the bough reflected his ambivalence towards Aeneas and the latter's mission to set in motion the rise of the Roman Empire. Other critics have highlighted echoes between the episode of the Golden Bough and the morally charged deaths of two of Aeneas's antagonists, Dido and Turnus.In the fourth or fifth century CE, the commentator Servius connected the bough to rex Nemorensis, a priest of the goddess Diana at Lake Nemi whose office was passed on by the killing of its holder. This equation influenced the anthropologist James George Frazer, who used the bough for the title of his 1890 work on comparative religion. The bough is recalled in Dante Alighieri's Divine Comedy and was the subject of an 1834 painting by J. M. W. Turner, which was used as the frontispiece for the early editions of Frazer's book. It was an influential motif in the "Byzantium" poems of W. B. Yeats and in the poetry of Seamus Heaney, who made several translations of Virgil's account of the episode. Scholars have also drawn parallels between the Golden Bough and significant objects in the novels of J. R. R. Tolkien.This recording reflects the Wikipedia text as of 00:53 UTC on Tuesday, 12 May 2026.For the full current version of the article, see Golden Bough (Aeneid) on Wikipedia.This podcast uses content from Wikipedia under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License.Visit our archives at wikioftheday.com and subscribe to stay updated on new episodes.Follow us on Mastodon at @wikioftheday@masto.ai.Also check out Curmudgeon's Corner, a current events podcast.Until next time, I'm standard Emma.

This new episode of Magic and Medicines has perhaps been a long time coming - we're finally talking all about Wicca!We trace earlier ideas which informed the path scholars call a 'magico-religion' back to the early 19th century, when historians first hypothesised about the existing of an ancient, secret witch cult.Through texts like Charles Leland's Aradia, via Frazer's The Golden Bough, to the highly influential (if historically dubious) work of Margaret Murray, we arrive in the melting pot of secret societies and orders which emerged from Western esotericism in the first part of the 20th century.Although such theories left most members of the Folklore Society cold, they thoroughly inspired Gerald Gardner, and the development of what would become Wicca began.It's a twisty, turny journey, with witch traditions of dubious ancient origin, Cones of Power, and many, many breakaway branches, all the way through to sparkling Geocities sites, teen witches, and the rich, eclectic patchwork that is international Wicca today. We really hope you enjoy the episode, and we will speak to you again on Thursday with another double bill of Lang Tales!Three Ravens is an English Myth and Folklore podcast hosted by award-winning writers Martin Vaux and Eleanor Conlon.Released on Mondays, each weekly episode focuses on one of England's 39 historic counties, exploring the history, folklore and traditions of the area, from ghosts and mermaids to mythical monsters, half-forgotten heroes, bloody legends, and much, much more. Then, and most importantly, the pair take turns to tell a new version of an ancient story from that county - all before discussing what that tale might mean, where it might have come from, and the truths it reveals about England's hidden past...Bonus Episodes are released on Thursdays plus Local Legends episodes on Saturdays - interviews with acclaimed authors, folklorists, podcasters and historians with unique perspectives on that week's county.With a range of exclusive content on Patreon, too, including audio ghost tours, the Three Ravens Newsletter, and monthly Three Ravens Film Club episodes about folk horror films from across the decades, why not join us around the campfire and listen in?REGISTER FOR THE TALES OF SOUTHERN ENGLAND TOURVisit our website Join our Patreon Social media channels and sponsors Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The third and final section elaborates the "deductive" method of myth criticism, and gets into the details of the fourfold cycle of the myth of the hero, which Frye believes underlies all of literature. Some references to Frazer and Jung, and discussion of Blade Runner/Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep as a case study.To support the show, and get early access to episodes and bonus content (written and audio), please visit https://www.patreon.com/symbolpod.--AA

Frazer and Joe recap Round , discuss Round 2, and talk Malkin's future, and the Toronto Maple Leafs.

Join Logan Jeffcoat, student minister at Frazer, as she delivers an inspiring sermon based on John 14:1-14. This video captures a heartfelt message about faith, trust, and the path to God through Jesus Christ. Logan discusses the importance of seeking God's face first and finding satisfaction in His presence rather than solely in His gifts. This sermon is particularly meaningful for graduating seniors, encouraging them to trust in God as they embark on new journeys.

Frazer James aren't looking for every candidate. They're looking for A++ people.Check out the jobs and book a meeting with James Mackay today!!And if that's you, or if you're also interested in attracting some of the industry's best talent, then this episode was made for you.In this week's episode of Financial Planner Life, Sam Oakes is joined by James Mackay, co-founder of Frazer James, to find out what a firm that's serious about attracting exceptional talent actually looks like from the inside.James and Chris Hindle built Frazer James from scratch, with no clients or referrals, and today it's growing at 40% year on year. The reason? A founding philosophy that is rarely brought to fruition: build the business you'd actually want to work for.He breaks down exactly what that means in practice. Explaining the five-stage career framework inside every role. The benefits package, which includes a four-month paid sabbatical, a 5% personal growth allowance and up to three months working abroad. Plus, the associate financial planner pathway, a carefully designed development programme that actually delivers on what most firms only promise.The episode's key takeaways

Frazer, Joe, and Andy look at every first-round matchup and discuss how the younger teams jumped out to leads in the series but the older teams are clawing back.

Has the impossible been achieved? Has Frazer made allowed me to find a way to enjoy The Kings Demons?

We're baaaaaaaack!!! Ben takes on Heart Attack chanteuse DEMI LOVATO and Frazer goes for a very ho hum trip to Morrisons.. UR WELCOME!Insta: @urwelcomeamericaTwitter: @urwelcomeUSAEmail: UrWelcomeAmericaPodcast@gmail.com

Who else but our Frazer could take hold of this insignificant little two parter and shout from the rooftops about it. His beguiling argument starts here...

This week on talkBOXING, in association with DAZN, Simon Jordan, Spencer Oliver and Paul Smith are joined by Olympic Bronze Medallist Frazer Clarke!The guys react to Tyson Fury v Anthony Joshua being confirmed for 2025, preview the huge heavyweight bout between Fabio Wardley and Daniel Dubois, what's next for Frazer & much more!Check out talkSPORT's Socials:

A delightful episode celebrating Jodie Whittaker and the 13th Doctor and determining the Strictly Come Hamster best episode of the era...

Thank you for downloading the Trap One Podcast. On this instalment Si, UK Jason, Mark D, Tom and David discuss the recently returned third episode of The Daleks' Master Plan, Devil's Planet. With special guest contribution from Frazer. You can view Devil's Planet on the BBC iPlayer here. You can support the brilliant work of Film is Fabulous here.

Frazer, Joe, and Andy make their Round 1 Playoff predictions, look back at their pre-season picks, and talk about the Hall of Famers retiring this year.

Frazer, Joe, and Andy talk about the Islanders firing Roy, Celebrini for MVP, the incredible job Tocchet has done in Philly and MORE.

BRADY WELLER discusses the intricacies of QSBS rollovers, including eligibility, timing, and strategic planning for founders and investors. The goal is to help the listener maximize tax benefits and navigate the legal complexities of this powerful tool. https://youtu.be/gvQ0ZskvWVI QSBS, tax exemption, startup founders, rollover, legal structuring, investment strategy, tax planning, startup exit, C corporation, Key Topics QSBS eligibility and benefits Challenges in executing rollovers Legal and tax considerations for founders Timing and risk management in rollovers Strategic structuring for maximum benefit “QSBS ROLLOVERS” Sound Bites “60 days is a very short window for founders.” “Rollover continues your holding period clock.” “Partial rollovers are common for founders.” Chapters 00:00 Understanding QSBS and Its Benefits 03:07 Challenges for Founders in QSBS Compliance 05:54 Advising Founders on QSBS Rollovers 08:57 Structuring New Ventures for QSBS Eligibility 12:00 Navigating QSBS for Tech and Non-Tech Founders 14:54 Investor Considerations in QSBS Transactions 17:46 State-Specific QSBS Regulations and Planning 20:57 Future of QSBS and Strategic Planning Resources Brady Weller on LinkedIn qsbsrollover.com qsbsreference.com Frazer Rice and Michael Arlein discuss the nuts and bolts of 1202 QSBS Features for Founders Guest links LinkedIn Transcript Frazer Rice (00:01.314)Welcome aboard, Brady. Brady Weller (QSBS Rollover) (00:03.043)Hey, Frazer, thanks for having me. Frazer Rice (00:04.738)Well, you are the nice compliment to a piece I just did with Michael Arlene on QSBS. We covered some of the nuts and bolts around 1202. You come at it from a little bit different angle. It’s usually where people, founders especially, have issues sort of complying with things like the three and five year rule. And otherwise really maximizing the capability of the rollover and the tax significance for it. Tell us a little bit about who benefits and what you do here. Brady Weller (QSBS Rollover) (00:35.107)Yeah, QSBS is. by far the biggest tax exemption available to individual taxpayers in the U.S. So it’s been something that hasn’t been up. I should say there’s not a massive advisory network around it. So it’s not something that’s been taken advantage of, I think, to its full scope. Michael, who you had on recently, is a top trust and estate planner for founders of companies around QSBS. The specific problem that QSBS rollover solve is for a shareholder of an early stage company. Most often founders or very early investors, say, maybe series A or earlier shareholders. It’s an incentive to basically hold your stock for a quote unquote long time. In this sense, that means, you know, now under some new rules, basically three to five plus years. It’s a tax exemption available to folks who hold their stock for at least five years. Then they can exclude from federal income tax now up to $15 million of gains when they sell that stock. So you have to be a shareholder in an early stage C corporation, early stage company. Frazer Rice (01:50.616).Those founders before three to five years are trying to figure out how to use this tool. What are the challenges in making sure they don’t blow up the transaction by transferring something poorly. Or having their company grow too large or have too much cash or those types of things? Maybe list out a little bit some of the challenges that are out there that that a founder needs to be aware of. Brady Weller (QSBS Rollover) (02:22.509).Yeah. So we don’t have to constantly caveat. I’ll mainly talk as though we’re speaking about the pre July 5th, 2025 rules for QSPS. Anything, any stock issued after that date, middle of last year. is under a slightly different set of rules. They are more expanded rules, but I’ll speak to this sort of from those old rules. And so the old rules state that you have to hold your stock for at least five years. And if you do, you can exclude a large portion from federal income tax, usually $10 million for founders. But if you don’t hold the stock for five years, your only option is to take the cash from that sale. For example, say you sell stock at year three or year four, and purchase new QSBS eligible stock with that cash within 60 days. So it’s sort of like the 1031 exchange. Folks maybe are more familiar with real estate property exchanges. Its sort of like a 1031 exchange for stock. So you take the cash and you purchase a like kind quote unquote asset with it. Now the challenge with that is 60 days is not a very long time. And when you’re a founder of a company who just went through liquidity. You just got your deal done and the whirlwind that that is. Now you’re dealing maybe in a post liquidity world. You’re maybe running another team at the acquirer or you’re otherwise involved. 60 days is not a long time to be able to find and diligence a new opportunity. . It’s just not feasible. Especially for founders to use that cash to say buy stock in someone else’s company. It just doesn’t make sense. Like risk adjusted, I suppose. Frazer Rice (04:05.579)No, it’s a miracle that your company did great. Now you have to go and find another miracle and make it work within 60 days. It’s crazy. Brady Weller (QSBS Rollover) (04:10.143).That that’s the biggest that’s probably the biggest barrier to executing them. For the longest time there just weren’t a lot of people. They hadn’t come alongside founders to help advise them on structured ways that they could do these rollovers. Yeah, the options are risky. It’s like take your money and invest it in Dave’s startup in San Francisco. He’s going to lose your money. So that may be what you want to do with that money. To keep your risk profile sort of moving. But that’s not tax planning in any way. Right. To make that decision just to save on federal income tax might not be the best way to use your rollover. So we’ve seen it much more for angel investors, something that they might use. People who want to maybe have a lot of deal flow. A lot of investment opportunities in front of them. But they want to keep that risk profile moving. I’d say timing and risk are the two biggest challenges when you’re trying to execute a rollover. Frazer Rice (05:13.805).As a detail on that, you’ve got your company. You’ve got $10 million coming to you. Hopefully tax free, similar to a 1031. You don’t have to go into one company, you could go into a basket of companies. Brady Weller (QSBS Rollover) (05:28.579).Yeah, you could take the cash, say you make $10 million from a sale. You could pay taxes on $3 million of it, assuming you haven’t hit your five year requirement. Then, you could roll over the other seven in various other deals. You could put it all into one new company. What the rollover actually does is it continues your holding period clock from the last stock. So if you held for three years in your original company stock, You sell. You’re able to reinvest those proceeds within 60 days. It continues your holding period. Once you’re beyond a combined five the next liquidity event in the second company. Now you have proper seasoning on your shares, for lack of a better word, and then you can sell them under the QSPS exemption. Frazer Rice (06:17.143)So, this gets to what you do on a day-to-day basis. So a founder comes to you and says, all right, I’ve got this situation I think that’s coming. And I need some advice. You’re sort of letting them know what’s happening here. How do you advise them, in a sense, whether it’s through your company or even as a general matter? Do you have a suite of other founders and companies that are out there? And then… Maybe also similar to a 1031, is there sort of an intermediary function that needs to happen in order for the asset or the cash to go into sort of a, for lack of word, like an escrow account to then be deployed correctly into the eligible next company so that you keep that period going. Brady Weller (QSBS Rollover) (06:50.713)Boom. Brady Weller (QSBS Rollover) (07:05.839)That’s a good question. It’s not as formalized as the, you know, in terms of the 1031 world where there’s sort of a designated intermediary and that’s sort of required step in the process. This is very much the wire goes into your checking account for the sale of company A stock. Frazer Rice (07:11.703)Mm-hmm. Brady Weller (QSBS Rollover) (07:22.281)You send a wire back out to purchase stock in company B. When someone comes to us and is looking for guidance on how to do a rollover, sometimes they’ve talked to tax or trust in state attorneys already, or maybe they’re CPA. And there are maybe 50 folks in the US who have, I’d say, Frazer Rice (07:37.463)Sure. Brady Weller (QSBS Rollover) (07:45.07)I call it advanced QSPS planning knowledge, which is they have the trust planning strategies, rollover knowledge, all of these things that sort of at their disposal that they can speak to, but it’s a very small network. so our firm is actually the only non-CPA non-law firm in the country that deals directly with founders on these. And so we ended up kind of playing quarterback, connecting them with the right attorneys, maybe the right CPA, if they don’t have one to make sure that the team is sort of assembled. You know, because the risk profile of taking your money and investing in someone else’s company typically doesn’t align with most founders’ interests at that time, the service that we provide is helping them to roll that money into a new startup of their own. We think these founder-led rollovers where the founder or the shareholder who sold their original stock can now direct the proceeds into a new entity that they own and control. It’s a really great way to execute this. It gives the shareholder, the founder the optimal amount of flexibility and control over the proceeds over time. So they can handle their own risk profile. Frazer Rice (08:57.921)So for the founder who built their business originally, they sell it and you’re sort of with them along the way to roll it over into another founder led situation. Are there any mechanics that you help with to sort of ensure that that takes place correctly? There’s so many, it seems like so many tiger traps along the way that you can stick your foot in and you did every, your intent was there, but maybe you did something weird or incorrect. Brady Weller (QSBS Rollover) (09:26.617)Yeah. Frazer Rice (09:26.721)Maybe a better way to ask this question is what are the things in that receiving new QSBS rollover do you want to see or a founder should make sure they have in place before they go ahead and pull the trigger? Brady Weller (QSBS Rollover) (09:41.904)We want to make sure it’s a C corporation. First of all, a lot of times when founders start their first companies, they just, you know, incorporate an LLC somewhere and start doing business. A lot of times there’s not even, maybe there’s, you know, two or $3,000 transferred to a checking account, you know, from their personal to their checking. That’s how you start most businesses. But when you’re, when you’re starting a rollover business, we have to see a couple other things. One is we want to make sure it’s a C corp from day one. Frazer Rice (09:58.989)Right. Brady Weller (QSBS Rollover) (10:09.123)You know, it’s okay if it’s a single owner C Corp where the founders, the, you know, only board member, only director. It’s, you know, it’s your entity. That’s fine. but we also want to see a purchase agreement, some kind of stock purchase agreement. So you can’t just transfer money from your chase savings account where the wire landed to the new business account and, know, go on about, about the business. we want to see a stock purchase agreement. And so some of those agreements, and the optimal way to do those for sort of the, the, the long run. Sometimes, we would obviously we have our template docs in ways that we might advise to do it. But very often we refer that out to legal counsel and coordinate there to make sure that just all the purchase agreements and governance docs and those types of things are in a good place. You know, it’s really making sure we have the purchase agreements and that the money gets moved to the corporate bank account, the new business bank account within 60 days. It’s really not a long period of time. And we run into a lot of situations where If someone’s not kind of quarterbacking the process, deadlines get away quickly and then administrative issues with a bank might push you beyond the 60 day window. We’ve seen that a few times and it can obviously cost you a lot of money. Frazer Rice (11:24.468)The, when you get to a point where the next business that this is going into, often the qualifications of being a QSBS eligible business can be a little bit murky. I’m thinking healthcare for instance, where like a hospital or that type of thing would traditionally probably not be a QSBS situation, but a healthcare service provider or a biotech company or something like that is. Brady Weller (QSBS Rollover) (11:46.937)Yeah. Frazer Rice (11:51.029)Do you help founders think about that? in many ways, there’s sort of the which came first, the idea for the company or the company itself. How do you make sure people stay on all fours on that front? Brady Weller (QSBS Rollover) (12:00.56)Yeah. Yeah, I if you build a startup before, know that the ideas in the early stage sometimes are extremely malleable. And when you start testing things in the market, the business very often changes. You know, we majority work with tech founders and that’s not because, you know, QSBS is well suited for tech. I think a lot of people think that to be QSBS, to be a technology company. That’s not true. It’s just that we most often see QSBS. We run into people who are knowledgeable about QSBS in the venture space. So venture backed start up, like traditional startup businesses, has 80 % plus of those companies are tech businesses. And then the other 20 % is manufacturing, biotech, life science, e-commerce, those types of things. But majority of people that we do these transaction with are in tech. And so by virtue of that, their rollover business ends up being, most of the time, ideas that they have are tech adjacent. So that’s a great place to be. I’d say some things to avoid. What we hear often people coming to us wanting to roll over into real estate in some way or another. And there are ways that the business that you start as part of a QSPS roll over can hold real estate assets long term, depending on the business type. But you have to be really careful there not to, in the eyes of the IRS, look like a real estate holding company or have too much of your assets tied up in sort of like passive real estate holdings. And so I’d say that’s the murkiest stuff that we run into. Brady Weller (QSBS Rollover) (13:37.822).Most of the businesses that we are helping founders start and grow as part of a QSPS rollover are B2B or B2C tech. Either web applications or mobile applications, e-commerce stores. We have a few hardware sort of based companies or like very physical product based companies as well. Frazer Rice (13:58.431)For a lot of tech founders, the idea of taking some money off the table is important. And I would think that maybe partial QSPS situations come up. This isn’t an all or nothing thing. You can take some money off the table and then allocate other parts, maybe half off and then the other half you can roll into the next company. Brady Weller (QSBS Rollover) (14:14.137)Yeah. Brady Weller (QSBS Rollover) (14:18.798)I’d say an extremely common situation that we see is maybe a founder. in New York who is raising maybe a Series B, call it a 50 or $60 million Series B. We saw a lot of these size rounds with the AI kind of boom happening and might be an opportunity to take, you know, four to $6 million off the table as secondary at that stage in the company’s growth. so you have this founder who just got $5 million wired to their bank account, maybe their first money. They’ve been renting in a condo or apartment in the city and they’re still very much like in high growth stage with company so they don’t have a lot of bandwidth to run a new business. And so they’ll really try and de-risk themselves. That is, maybe pay taxes on a million, a million and a half, give themselves a cushion right away, maybe buy a condo or you know whatever, stabilize their life just a bit and roll over the other four, three and a half million, you know, and manage a project on the side that way. That’s a really common situation we see. Frazer Rice (15:19.624)For investors who are invested in a lot of different things and maybe you know, they’ve got six or seven companies that are QSBS eligible and they are sort of rolling the dice on that and sort of picking and choosing which one should go into which that type of thing What’s different about it from an investor standpoint than from an operator standpoint? Brady Weller (QSBS Rollover) (15:43.758)Yeah, I think the biggest thing investors have to pay attention to is if you receive a distribution that isn’t QSPS eligible because of holding period, you cannot just take that money and invest it back into a venture fund. and call that a rollover. The money can go into a venture fund, but that capital also has to be called and deployed into, an investment from that fund. Meaning you can’t just invest in the, in the partnership at the partnership level in a venture fund and it’s sit there undeployed and be eligible for QSBS. It actually has to be fully deployed into target, target opportunities within 60 days. So that’s something that I think that we’ve run into a couple of times with, with investors is they think, I’ll just, know, Fund2 is open at, you know, XYZ firm. I’ll just roll the money over there. But it does have to be deployed still within that 60 day window. So that’s something that we hear a lot of. You know, if you’re an investor, I would keep, you know, you don’t always have the perfect deal ready at the right time. But keeping good relationships with the founders that… you’re partnering with, you know, you never know when someone might be able to open up a tranche on the side or sell some secondary to you. if you’re trying to still get access to that deal sort of outside of a normal round. Frazer Rice (17:07.445)So for the companies that are in your orbit, obviously you’re probably checking in saying, hey, you didn’t do anything to blow up your QSBS status. But for the companies that aren’t that way, and let’s say you’re a founder and you’ve got a nice situation where you’re able to take some money off the table and maybe put it into. one of the things that your friends put together or something like that. How do you think about a checklist or what are the questions to ask to make sure that the recipient investor or recipient of the investment is QSBS eligible and will sort of stick to it? Brady Weller (QSBS Rollover) (17:46.48)Yeah, you want to ensure first that the company is small enough. so under the old rules that I mentioned, the company would have to have less than $50 million of gross assets. A really great proxy for that is just how much has that company raised? You know, if you’re trying to invest in a company and they’ve raised $120 million, it’s very likely that they have at some point blown the asset test and they’re not issuing QSPS anymore. It’s very, it’s not always, but it’s very possible. A lot of people confuse that test for valuation. which is a mistake, you could have a billion dollar company in terms of market value, you know, with only 20 or 25 million dollars worth of assets on the balance sheet. It is possible, especially in some of these high multiple high growth tech businesses. And so, yeah, not confusing valuation with gross assets is one thing to pay attention to. the other is ensuring just that the company is a C corp, especially for early stage investors. I’m talking like first money in, maybe before, you know, pre seed or pre seed, would say, ensuring that the right structuring is in place such that, know, you’re getting stock issued directly from a C corporation at that time you’re investing. So I would say that’s something to worry about more if you’re, you know, an angel. who does a lot of sort of direct sourcing of deals and you’re not going through a fund. Most of the time, if someone’s raised capital directly from a venture fund, all the paperwork and things that you’re going to look for as far as QSPS are going to be in place, because most VCs are pretty well acquainted at this point with, hey, let’s make sure this is eligible before we get in here. Frazer Rice (19:27.913)Right. And just to distinguish, an LLC that elects to be taxed as a C Corp versus a C Corp, C Corp, is there any distinction there for our listeners? Brady Weller (QSBS Rollover) (19:39.673)Yes. Generally, we would say as long as the LLC has made that C-Corp election before issuing more at that stage, guess, membership units of stock, as long as they’ve made that C-Corp election prior to issuing the stock, then we feel generally good about it. But yeah, an LLC, it’s an entity structure whose default taxation is as a pass-through, but an LLC can also be taxed as a C-Corp and can issue quote unquote QSBS eligible shares. or units as well, so it is possible. Frazer Rice (20:12.683)I was gonna say, so for the listeners out there, C-Corp doesn’t just mean C-Corp, but the real operative language is that it’s taxed as a C-Corp component, and that should be part of your checklist as you go down the list of companies to potentially roll into. So for those people who aren’t exactly founders, but maybe are investors or otherwise part of businesses that they’ve been included in, et cetera. Those non-venture-backed businesses, what are the opportunities there for QSBS and then the ability to roll it over into other things? Brady Weller (QSBS Rollover) (20:48.708)Yeah, I would say it’s very rare that we see a non-venture-backed business in between the coasts, I’ll say, right? Like not one of these like kind of like call them coastal elite tech businesses. I’m talking about your like legacy family business in, you know, North Carolina. Frazer Rice (20:59.488)I mean… Brady Weller (QSBS Rollover) (21:11.856)Most of the time we’re going to see those as pass-throughs or partnerships, maybe like an S-Corp. You would see that type of structure and those businesses, while they could be amazing businesses, the interest in them isn’t QSPS eligible because it has to be issued from a C-Corporation. Most of the time, the planning opportunity we see with those types of businesses is around the time of maybe a generational transition or other type of transition planning where Maybe the children take over from the parents and they establish a plan. Hey, we’re going to take it over, but we want to plan to sell maybe the next five to seven years. I hear this a lot. And opportunity. If you are in an industry in a sector where stock sales are common in the industry for exiting the businesses, changing, electing to be treated as a C Corp or restructuring to a C Corporation from one of those pass through structures is an opportunity because you could sort of reorganize, reissue stock, now start your QSBS five year time clock. And, you know, hopefully the business keeps doing well and you can have that exit opportunity down the line. And at that point, take advantage of QSBS. Again, the thing you want to pay attention to is that you actually be able to do a stock sale at that time because QSBS requires a sale of stock, not an asset sale. And so that’s a really important distinction. So make sure either that you’re in an industry where that’s common or you’re working with counsel who understands what you’re trying to accomplish before you make those decisions about how you’re setting your entity up at that stage. Frazer Rice (22:41.353)Right. Frazer Rice (22:56.758)I just have a comment for me with the passage of the new law that we sort of alluded to where previously you really didn’t start thinking about this until fully five years. The new law, people can start thinking about it within three. You get 50 % of the benefit of the exclusion at three years. Brady Weller (QSBS Rollover) (23:08.282)Mm-hmm. Frazer Rice (23:15.21)And I’ve run into people where three years suddenly seems like a short amount of time, whereas five years, I think everyone was sort of like, we’ll get there eventually. you know, they’re they’re they’re fighting for their survival anyway. And if that happens to work terrific in this case, I think that the law moving the timeline up a little bit has had an interesting impact on those conversion discussions, because I think people are now starting to say, hey, you know what? I can get to three years. And, you know, with the speed at the and the rate at which things change at this point, it’s much more realistic than I think it might have been going back in time. Brady Weller (QSBS Rollover) (23:50.896)And if you have a stable business where you feel comfortable making projections, say three years out, so to what that business could look like at that time, it’s really becoming more common now to do what you’re calling like choice of entity studies, right? So working with someone who can model out with the difference in taxation, both at the company level and at the point of. Frazer Rice (24:05.482)Mm-hmm. Brady Weller (QSBS Rollover) (24:15.276)selling stock, what the optimal structure may be depending on your time horizon tax it, your expectations for growth or lack thereof. So that’s something that some valuation firms, business advisories, some law firms or CPA tax advisories may be able to do. If you’re in that situation, you’re trying to figure out, hey, what’s the math look like based on my baseline assumptions of what this business will be and can help you sort of make those decisions about how to plan. over the next three to seven years. Frazer Rice (24:47.402)As part of that reorganization too, I’ve talked to a few people who are in, let’s call it personality-based businesses, whether they’re podcasters or influencers or other types of things that are a little bit adjacent to maybe typical software companies. And I’ve brought up the notion that you may be disqualified now, but you may have a future growth opportunity within your business to make it fall more in line with a QSBS-defined business. And so, you if you’ve got the time and the ability and it makes a business sense, it may make sense to start thinking about either sectioning that off or developing that business line for something a little bit later on. Brady Weller (QSBS Rollover) (25:27.95)Yeah, being strategic about where those adjacent businesses, how they’re structured and where they’re built. And I mean, where like in terms of a legal entity level sense, I’m thinking about, for instance, several golf YouTubers, make a lot of golf content online, but now they’re announcing partnerships to, you know, design clothing, you know, have their own clothing line, or maybe they’ve entered a, a joint venture with a golf club maker or maybe an emerging brand and they’re taking equity. Frazer Rice (25:41.983)Mm-hmm. Brady Weller (QSBS Rollover) (25:57.826)Those are really interesting options and I think that you still have the opportunity to leverage your personal brand to grow that business but separating them out so that you know your reliance on your personal brand doesn’t ruin QSBS. That’s actually getting to one of the rules around qualified small business stock which is that the companies can’t be based on the skill or reputation of a single person. And so that’s when we think about Frazer Rice (26:24.938)Mm-hmm. Brady Weller (QSBS Rollover) (26:27.632)Like entertainers, athletes, social media personalities. MrBeast, for instance, couldn’t sell MrBeast, the YouTube channel necessarily, as QSBS eligible interest because of that rule more than likely. And that’s obviously a broad brush, paying attention to where you hold your business interests is important for this if you’re in that space. Frazer Rice (26:53.5)Any state thoughts? I know California QSBS is uncoupled from the federal QSBS and New York threatened it and apparently that got knocked down. New Jersey just coupled with the federal government so that people weren’t scared away from doing that. How does that figure into your analysis? Brady Weller (QSBS Rollover) (27:04.304)you Yeah. Brady Weller (QSBS Rollover) (27:12.784)It’s sort of a battle of the coast. It’s like which coast of the United States is going to be most investor and founder friendly with relation to these things. Yeah, because California hasn’t followed it for a long time. Oregon and Washington state are close behind there. And then we have the sort of somewhat the opposite happening on the East Coast. So as an East Coast guy, I hope it becomes a hub. But yeah, there is some sort of. Frazer Rice (27:19.528)Right. Brady Weller (QSBS Rollover) (27:36.388)you know, state and local tax planning, strategic planning that you might be able to do if you have the foresight and, you know, the right data to determine where you might become a resident or taxpayer prior to an exit. You might talk with a. assault attorney or assault advisor state and local tax is usually tax advisors CPAs or or tax attorneys who can help you think through Hey, does it make a difference whether or not I move from California to Texas? What does that look like for my family? What does that look like for my post-tax exit situation? because where the company is headquartered, as long as it’s in the United States, doesn’t matter for QSPS, just has to be a domestic USC corporation. And so remembering that QSPS is fundamentally an individual taxpayer incentive means that regardless of where the shareholders are located, you’re gonna be beholden to that specific state of where you live and their roles around QSPS. Frazer Rice (28:36.906)Terrific stuff. Brady, we’re winding down here. How do people find you and your company and any sort of parting thoughts? Brady Weller (QSBS Rollover) (28:44.516)Yeah, I’m personally very active on LinkedIn. So you can find me there, Brady Weller and our website, qsbsrollover.com. We also have a sort of an open source QSBS advisory referral site called qsbsreference.com. And so you can find us at either of those places. We’d be happy to help you out and point you in the right direction. Frazer Rice (29:05.13)Brady, thanks for being on. Brady Weller (QSBS Rollover) (29:06.874)Thanks, Frazier, appreciate it. Keywords QSBS, tax exemption, startup founders, rollover, legal structuring, investment strategy, tax planning, startup exit, C corporation, legal advice Titles Mastering QSBS Rollovers: Strategies for Founders and Investors The Ultimate Guide to QSBS Tax Exemptions and Rollovers https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT/

In Touch speaks with three visually impaired people about their current work and projects. Clarke Reynolds, aka Mr Dot, is an artist and a runner who is taking on the Brighton marathon with the help of Rayban Meta smart glasses and Be My Eyes. Jixie Dye is trying to inspire young readers with her latest children's book, The Welsh Witch and the Queen's Curse and Frazer Tibbitts is the 2026 winner of one of the Make a Difference Awards and is an avid football fan. Frazer has turned his passion for football into a regular slot on his local radio station, BBC WM and Beacon Vision's talking newspaper.Presenter: Peter White Producer: Beth Hemmings Production Coordinator: Helen Surtees Website image description: Peter White sits smiling in the centre of the image and he is wearing a dark green jumper. Above Peter's head is the BBC logo (three separate white squares house each of the three letters). Bottom centre and overlaying the image are the words "In Touch" and the Radio 4 logo (the word ‘radio' in a bold white font, with the number 4 inside of a white circle). The background is a bright mid-blue with two rectangles angled diagonally to the right. Both are behind Peter, one is a darker blue and the other is a lighter blue.

Frazer, Joe, and Andy talk about the insane playoff races, Treliving fired in Toronto, and Tortorella hired in Vegas.

Francis Ford Coppola's epic about the Vietnam War draws as much from J.G. Frazer's The Golden Bough and Jessie Weston's landmark Arthurian study From Ritual to Romance as it does from Joseph Conrad's novel of African colonialism Heart of Darkness. It's a grail quest with no grail, a pilgrimage with no relief. It's the end of kings, and the end of the world. Starring Martin Sheen, Marlon Brando, Robert Duvall, Laurence Fishburn, and Dennis Hopper. Written by John Milius. Directed by Francis Ford Coppola. This is a preview of the latest episode of our series Hollywood Avalon. To hear the entire episode, join the Mary Versus the Movies patreon for $3/month to hear this and the entire series Hollywood Avalon: https://www.patreon.com/maryvsmovies. 

Trust is one of the most fundamental parts of every relationship. If you don't trust your teen, or you notice they don't trust you, it will be hard to build the kind of parent-child relationship you want to have with your struggling teen or young adult.But sometimes it can feel like an impossible task to ‘just trust' your teen again, especially if that trust has been broken before. So how does trust actually work and more importantly… how do you begin to rebuild it when it feels broken?In this episode, I sit down again with Danny Frazer to break down the anatomy of trust, using Brené Brown's powerful BRAVING framework. We don't just talk theory - we explore what this actually looks like in real-life parenting, especially when your teen is struggling.Because here's the truth: trust isn't built in big, dramatic moments. It's built (and rebuilt) in the small, everyday interactions between you and your child.And often, it starts with you.In this episode on how to rebuild trust with your teen, we discuss:What trust actually means (and why it feels so complicated as a parent);Brené Brown's BRAVING framework explained in a practical, relatable way for parents of struggling teens and young adults;Why boundaries are essential for building trust (not the opposite);How reliability shows up in the small, everyday moments;The role of accountability and repair in strengthening your relationship;Why integrity and consistency matter more than perfection;How to practice non-judgment and shift into curiosity with your teen;What it really means to be generous (without becoming passive);Why parents need to go first when it comes to rebuilding trust;And much more!More about Danny FrazerDanny Frazer has spent nearly 30 years working in wilderness therapy and behavioral healthcare, including co-founding Open Sky Wilderness Therapy in 2006 and serving in leadership roles across the organization. For six of those years, he worked in admissions at Open Sky, speaking with and supporting thousands of families as they navigated the difficult decision of whether residential treatment was the right step for their family. Those conversations deeply shaped how he understands the realities parents face when contending with an at-risk child.Today, he works as a leadership and business coach, helping leaders in behavioral healthcare navigate these complex, high-stress environments. He also volunteers his time as a board member of the Deer Hill Foundation, an outdoor adventure education and service learning program for youth located in Southwest Colorado. And, he is an active parent of two boys, including a teenager, an experience that continues to ground his work and perspective.Looking for support?

Frazer, Joe, and Andy talk about all the teams in each conference hanging on or off the playoff ledge.

“Breaking the Glass Ceiling: Julia Carreon’s Fight Against Corporate Gaslighting” In this episode, Frazer Rice sits down with Julia Carreon to explore her recent high-profile litigation against a major financial institution and her powerful insights on women in leadership, corporate culture, and overcoming systemic barriers. YOUTUBE https://youtu.be/e05k7SVQ2xI We discuss: Julia's experience with workplace gaslighting and her litigation journey with Wells Fargo The importance of transparency, accountability, and protecting yourself in corporate environments How societal and corporate cultures disadvantage women, especially around motherhood and leadership The themes and motivations behind Julia's book, Walking on Broken Glass Practical strategies women can use to build political capital and safeguard their careers The significance of external networks and understanding your personal strengths The evolving landscape of equity, ownership, and governance in corporations How to proactively prepare for and respond to systemic workplace challenges SPOTIFY https://open.spotify.com/episode/5c546gs6Qctx4bGOvalgXj?si=1dDyJxnwSyu4tnhXxpzVxg Timestamps: 00:00 – Introduction: Julia's litigation and book overview 02:03 – Gaslighting in corporate culture and early experiences 04:14 – Dealing with systemic backstage politics and fighting for justice 05:10 – Motivations for writing Walking on Broken Glass 08:08 – Diagnosing workplace culture and gender dynamics 09:33 – The weaponized HR department and accountability 11:38 – Protecting yourself: cultural awareness and bias 13:12 – Demographics, gender disparities, and moving forward 15:12 – Institutional misogyny and societal shifts 16:05 – Motherhood, work-life balance, and corporate support 18:28 – Questions of corporate culture change post-COVID 22:21 – The fear factor and change in workplace loyalty 27:12 – Tactical career strategies and building political capital 28:15 – Always Be Executing (ABE) and tracking success 30:53 – The ownership mentality and equity's role in career resilience 34:45 – Building internal and external networks for support 36:49 – Understanding personal aptitudes through testing and reflection 40:12 – Leveraging political capital and seizing opportunities 43:31 – How to follow Julia and stay updated on her journey Transcript Frazer Rice (00:01.004)Welcome aboard, Julia. Julia (00:03.32)Thanks for having me. Frazer Rice (00:04.652)Well, as I said in the opening, the concept of gaslighting in the boardroom is something that certainly isn’t new, but it doesn’t make it any more comfortable for the people who deal with it on a day-to-day basis or as part of their career. And you’re in the midst of litigation right now with a major financial services company. Maybe talk a little bit about what’s going on there. Julia (00:24.801)Yeah, so I am in a high profile lawsuit with my former employer. I would say this is not a path that anyone chooses on purpose. In my particular case, Frazer, I spent 20 years at Wells Fargo, 15 of which were pretty spectacular. I have come to realize almost maybe fairy tale like in terms of my experience. I want to talk about some of the things later on that made it a fairy tale. So yeah, I wouldn’t have chosen this. I did not see the culture at my former employer coming for me. I was blindsided by it and it got ugly quickly. One of the things that I think I am doing here. Or at least trying to do is not be shy about it. Not hide from it. Try to show women a different way for how to deal with these situations. Because I have very strong feelings about the fact. With the rollback of DEI and the current administration’s point of view on women, that we’re going backwards. If women don’t start fighting for ourselves in a more public way and without fear, then I don’t know where we’re going to be in the next five to 10 years. I am soldiering on and it’s not easy to your point. But it is what it is and it’s a fight that I believe is worthy. Frazer Rice (02:03.608)So it’s a daunting task taking on a big bank. Big financial services firm, whether it’s in this situation or frankly any. It’s just these well-resourced big behemoths. What has been the experience been like so far? As far as gathering information? Of getting the walls built that you need to in order to live your life while you go through this conflict with this bank? Julia (02:29.822)It’s hat that is the million dollar question. Right? I will say that in my case i got really fortunate and came across a quote. It’s going to sound really strange. But i came across a quote that said fear is fake and danger is real but fear is fake. I believe that the patriarchy wants women to be afraid. So it tells us these bad things are going to happen if you take on a big firm like this. It is grueling. The days are long sometimes. But once I internalize the reality that it is all fake in terms of all of the bad things that you think could happen really can’t happen. Worst case scenario, there’s nothing Like I’m not going to die. They’re not going to, you know, take away my family. Like all of these things, right? We tell ourselves that it could get really nasty. And in my case, I have to stay really grounded in the fact that what I’m doing is worthy. We tried my lawyer and I tried for 14 months to come to a different answer. And so in a way, not just telling myself fear is fake. But in another way, I kind of feel like it’s my destiny. Because, I just want to say this real quick, I had 20 years at a place that was not toxic. And so I know what good looks like, and this is not good. So in that way, I really feel like it’s my destiny. And so that’s what you do, and you have to have a good support network. I have a great husband, so that really helps. Frazer Rice (04:14.21)The, as I’ve told people, sometimes doing the right thing or going after something that upholds justice. It can be expensive and hard. I give you kudos for standing up. Not only for yourself, but others who are going through a difficult situation. Where you’ve had a significant wrong done to you. You’ve written a book about this experience as well. We can take some time to think, to talk about what the book tries to do. First of all, writing one in tandem with the process here, I think is a bit unusual. Some people do it after the fact. To go through a catharsis after going through a difficult process. Talk about first the why of the book.thhen we’ll talk a little bit about what you talk about in it. Julia (05:17.241)The book is called Walking on Broken Glass: Navigating the Aftermath of the Glass Ceiling.” It was co-written with a fabulous woman named Shannon Nutter. I hope people follow on LinkedIn. The book is not squarely about what happened to me the book came together. With Shannon and I meeting on LinkedIn. Then discovering that we had a lot of the same shared experiences as we are Gen X. in hindsight. Our generation has had the opportunity to have the most benefit of the Gloria Steinem Women’s Movement. Think about the fact that we got the advantage of the birth control and all of the DEI efforts that have been in the last 15, 20 years. And we really felt like there was still a long way to go. Then all of that is starting to go backwards. So last year when we met or the year before, we’re like, my God, the idea that we got the best of the best is shocking to us. And so what are we going to do about it? We really wanted the book to speak to women of all ages in their career. But it was written from a lens of two then 53 year old women who had seen a lot. We wanted to give the book as a love letter or a gift to our 35 year old self. To say, this is what we should have or wish we had known 20 years ago. Because we would have done things differently if we had really faced kind of what the challenges were that women are facing at work. In a real way right not in a way that sugarcoats it or pretends to throw it under the rug. And or always makes it the woman’s fault like the woman always has to be changing and evolving in order to adapt to the systems and i you know it’s exhausting right so the book was written for that reason and it does tap into a lot of the things that we both experienced. Julia (07:35.17)But it isn’t a kind of a personal journal of what happened to me with my former employer. Frazer Rice (07:39.82)Right, one of the things that I found useful about the book is you divided it into three sections. I think it brings us sort of clarity into what you’re trying to achieve here. The first one is just diagnosing the situation that you’re in. Maybe talk a little bit about that. Part one the understanding of your surroundings. What’s happening around you. The conditions that women are facing as they embark on these big situations in the workplace. Julia (08:08.982)Yeah. So the first part of the book does give a primer on kind of the history of feminism and how did we get here and what are some of the big open questions that are still left to answer. We also want to set the stage that makes it very clear that women are accountable for our actions in the workplace. Like this is not in any way a book that seeks to make someone who’s failing feel good about the fact that they’re failing, right? Shannon and I both reached really high levels of corporate success at major global firm. There is a lot of work to do. So we really try to dimension how, what are some effective ways for you to approach that work? What are some of the pitfalls and how are some of the ways that you can handle that? In a way that’s kind of clear-eyed, but never about putting the blame or the onus on the company. And if you don’t mind, I want to say something about that because it relates to my lawsuit. One of the things that I’ve heard criticisms about is that people on social media often I saw when I kind of scanned the landscape of it recently are, this woman is naive. She thinks. HR is her friend because one of the things that I have sued my former employer for is a weaponized HR department and I want to get very clear. mean, Frazer, you don’t manage hundreds of people in 13 states like I did for a very long time successfully innovating, having great client experience team scores and having great employee team scores, right? If you believe HR is your friend. So that’s not what i’m trying to say what i’m trying to say in my lawsuit is. HR shouldn’t be picking off people for political reasons either. We are saying all the way along there is shared accountability between the employer and the employee. That’s really important. I think that you know one of the backlash is going too far field here. Julia (10:27.401)We went so far politically correct on some things that some employees do show up to work and think that they just need things handed to them. And I do think that that was part of the backlash, right? So I just am always striving for balance. I think we should all be always striving for balance. Frazer Rice (10:45.13)One of the concepts too, I think in the book that I sort of grabbed onto and enjoyed was the idea of taking steps to protect yourself. You’re dealing with a lot of different asymmetries when you work for a big company. You’re dealing with information asymmetry, you’re dealing with political asymmetry, you’re dealing with resource asymmetry. Sometimes you’re even dealing with just… Accountability asymmetry in terms of, you some people get free passes at other times people are judged on things or unfairly judged on different criteria that just don’t make a lot of sense. If we step back for a second and for people who are trying to understand, I’ll put it in quotes, how the world works and how to how to be aware of one’s and to protect yourself, what would be the first couple of things that you would tell people to think about on that back? Julia (11:38.471)The number one thing is I would be very aware of the kind of culture that you’re operating in. And it’s very easy to take for granted what a culture really is, what your own personal bias and history is, and then how is it that you are fitting. into that culture with your own shared history. So I love to be candid, right? And provocative about my own situation. If I could do something different, I would be very aware of what my biases were going into Citi with 20 years of being at a place where It was a really fair game, but probably because I had a lot of political capital and I grew up there. So I understood it. But I went into that place thinking that I was a fancy managing director, that obviously I was hired to be a change maker. I can do a lot of great things. And I was, you know, doing my thing, not realizing that I was swimming in a different lake and that lake was filled. with a lot of different kinds of wildlife that I was unprepared for. So, I mean, that’s really important. Frazer Rice (13:12.398)As we talk a little bit about some sort of bullet questions as far as how your experience has gone, the demographics of the workplace are different and changing. On one hand, college graduates are now majority women or higher in just about every college situation. Yet institutions like the CFP, the women make up… Believe the number is somewhere in the 24 % range. So you have this weird dichotomy of more women entering the workplace, but not in the numbers necessarily that would indicate that they are in places to make as much change as they would like. They are still in the vast minority in terms of boards of directors and executive positions at almost every Fortune 500 company that I can think of. As we chart a path forward where, let’s call it merit. Julia (13:58.813)Mm-hmm. Frazer Rice (14:04.494)presides over sort of misogyny and I guess I would call it sort of political gamesmanship. How do you think about that in terms of advice for people entering the workforce? Julia (14:16.461)Yeah, look, so nobody gets to say that women aren’t in the pipeline, right? I mean, that just, doesn’t hold up, especially at the more junior levels, right, of entering the workforce after college. What starts to happen is that it starts to go downhill as you get higher and higher up into hierarchy. And I believe that there is a mismatch between women who want to work and do the right thing. And we’re going to talk about this. Then what does it mean to also then become a mother and give birth and have to manage all of that? And then coming up against institutional misogyny. Obviously my perspective in the last 18 months has changed about the degree to which institutional misogyny exists. Because I had a fairy tale experience before I was able to be willfully blind about the realities. so a really direct way of answering your question is that our book is seeking to hit women in the face with the realities of this because I don’t think we’re gonna change it overnight, right? And it is so entrenched, it’s getting worse and it will get worse. Before it gets better, but I do believe that it will get better eventually because the old system that’s, know, aging out, baby boomers are aging out. Like I think that there’s going to be cracks in that. And then there would be a tsunami of change. But right now the old guard is hanging on and, we are going backwards. And so we just have to be realistic about what it requires to go forward. And we talk about what that is. Frazer Rice (16:05.58)One of the things, right, and so let’s touch back on the motherhood issue, is, that is biology. And so women who go that route and have kids. Which is frankly one of the big precepts in society. Unfortunately. n some ways takes you out of the normal trajectory of a corporate path, just from a time perspective. Certainly, the balance of work that happens at the household level. Where that ends up alling usually, creates a stress that is not well understood or received at the corporate level. What are your thoughts on that front? As far as charting a path that recognizes that reality and at the same time doesn’t put upon going the other direction necessarily in terms of favoring one outcome or the other. Julia (17:02.019)I know a lot of women who did not have children because they felt like that it would, it would harm their career. And, um, certainly it’s a personal issue and there’s no judgment from me. I don’t think I would have had children if I hadn’t met my husband. He was willing to do 50 % of the workload and he has, and, always has probably does maybe more than 50. It is a very deeply personal issue. What I have strong feelings about the fact that companies who lean in to, don’t expect the woman to lean in, but the company leans in to supporting pregnant women, have higher loyalty scores. They have better team member satisfaction. They get a lot from those women that they have supported. This is a crazy story, Frazer. I was pregnant and or just coming back from maternity leave all three times I got major promotions at Wells. I mean, think about that. And I now, because I lived my life kind of in a vacuum for a long time, I didn’t realize that this wasn’t happening to other people, right? So look at me now. I am 25 years from when I got hired, still saying that Wells is a great company. because of my own personal experience. And they got a lot out of me, but I gave a lot back. So to me, supporting women who are pregnant doesn’t have to be a zero sum game. Yet somehow that is the narrative. And I would love to ask you why that is. Like, I mean, what has happened to corporate culture that this is such a pervasive issue when If you were to scan a lot of my Gen X friends, we did not have the same experience. Frazer Rice (19:04.147)I mean, from my perspective, I don’t know. I think that I blame some of this a little bit on the COVID blip in the sense that managers of all types just have no idea where to go as far as how to treat people fairly, either from a work from home experience or how that reconciles with… women in particular who are having careers and families in addition to what’s going on with other folks like the men in the world. My short answer is I don’t know. The longer answer is that I think between the shorter news cycle, social media, work from home, there are a lot of different change agents out there that have taken the focus off of. maybe the issues that worth talking about right now. And as a managerial class, especially as millennials are taking up the mantle on that front, they’re either forgetting about this particular issue and understanding the importance that it has, or they are just so overwhelmed by change at this point and self-preservation that it’s just an area where they’re triaging the different issues that they can deal with. Julia (20:22.492)Do you do you at all think that it is a problem of losing common sense and like letting rigid ideology take over from common sense. I certainly was benefited from working from home for most of my career, right? So it’s fascinating. Frazer Rice (20:46.061)Common sense isn’t common. And depending on the institution that you’re dealing with, work from home is either an excellent tool or a cover to hide under if you’re a mediocre performer. If you’re a manager out of sight, out of mind is a difficult place to be. I think that we’re I think everyone is reconciling to the relative absence of work and sort of acclimating to Zoom phone calls and things like that. And that gets you then away from taking care of the real issues, which is to make sure that the company’s doing right, the employees are doing right by the company, and at the same time that people are being treated fairly, because I think when people are so disparate, it just becomes a real management challenge. What we’re talking about as far as making sure that women are treated fairly in the workplace, Combine that with, I would say, message confusion that occurs in social media, where some loud voices may not be the right voices to be taking up this mantle, versus some of the quieter, stable people who are really the exemplars that we’d really like to point to. Sometimes that gets mixed. And I think the brew, if you stir it together, I think is created. Maybe if we think that there was progress since the 70s on through the 80s, 90s, 2000s for fairness and women progressing within the corporate ladder nicely, I think this the COVID blip has been a bit of a toe stub on that front. That’s an opinion, extremely uninformed, but more of an observation. Julia (22:35.713)No, no, but well, listen, I just I love it because I do want to unpack it just a little bit. It’s what’s fascinating to me is that I negotiated 15 years before covid to work remote and then my boss knowing that I had to be on the road three to four weeks a month regardless was like, I’d rather you be happy where you live because you’re to be on the road regardless. So I got to work from home and then during COVID when they tried to bring everybody back, they’re like, well, you can’t be the only exception. And I’m like, okay, I have been an exception for 15 years. So that’s where I go back to, know, where is this right balance? did, I mean, COVID is as good a reason as any that it’s things are upside down. I mean, really it’s a great theory. Frazer Rice (23:22.671)Well, it also bespeaks different corporations have different cultures and certainly some people are worried about other things than others. Muriel Siebert, who I think is an amazing example of someone who took a look at Wall Street and said, look, I refuse to be held back by anything here. She started her own company and to call it a company is to not give it the respect it’s due. She’s a major absolute force in Wall Street and one of the real legends. To me, entrepreneurism is one way through this. to create the company that you want to work in is, in some ways, to me, one of the solutions for people who are having difficulty in a corporate environment that they’re in right now. Whether they’re able to be the change agent within, which is often hard at a big, you know, bulky company that turns with the agility of a battleship as opposed to being nimble in doing things or going out and starting on their own, which involves its own risks. That to me is one of the solutions. But again, not without risk, not easy by any stretch. Where did that fit into your mindset as you were thinking about this? Julia (24:37.16)Well, so, so she is an icon, not just because of what she was able to accomplish, but she also did it, I think, without a college degree. And she did it. And this is important. She did it fearlessly. And what I would love to go back in time and have a conversation with her about where did she tap into that fearlessness? And you will start to see. Frazer Rice (24:48.665)Mm-hmm. Julia (25:06.77)On my own social media, am trying to tap into that whole mindset of women need to lose fear. I’ve already talked about it, but here’s what’s important to know, right? By 2030 in the US alone, women will control $34 trillion of investable assets. I believe that that is when you start seeing the game change. Look at how Mackenzie Scott is giving without glory. I posted that in a remark that’s gone semi-viral on LinkedIn. Like she is giving without glory. She wants to give, she wants to be anonymous almost about it, and she’s giving without handcuffs. And what is she giving to? She’s giving to communities, she’s giving to schools, she’s giving to healthcare. I mean, it gives me goosebumps every single time. And so I feel like women When we start to control more, we’ll start giving in, Alice Walton is the same way, giving in a different way to change society in a more meaningful way at scale. And Muriel was a pioneer in that regard. And she is someone I think we need the next generation to know about. because she was so fearless and it’s an inspiration. But you and i both know that all kinds of things that women have accomplished are never spoken about in the same way that they are about man and about men. I do think that that’s one of the great things about some of we can go into social media some of the social media change that we see happening with alpha female and all of these great accounts that are just starting to say, know what ladies, we don’t have to buy into the patriarchy. We can do it our own way. And so I think we will finally see change, but I wanna be very clear, Frazer, it’s going to get worse before it gets better. Frazer Rice (27:12.195)Got it. So for people who are in a corporate structure, corporate environment, aren’t ready to make the leap to starting their own business, which is obviously a difficult decision, but when you’re in there, what are the things tactically that one can do to prepare, not only prepare themselves, but protect themselves against these forces that are out there? One of the thoughts I had is making sure that in the job description that you’re able to point to numerical or formulaic successes so that if a narrative is being built against you, you can point to dollars created or jobs saved or metrics that in the boardroom. Not only just qualitative successes, but also quantitative ones that makes it difficult for people to ignore you from a pure dollar perspective. Things like that, what pops up in your mind? That you would tell people to think about in terms of art directing their career. Julia (28:15.023)Yeah, well, the number one thing that I always say, and I’m kind of, it’s kind of a legend for it. So it’s ABE and it stands for Always Be Executing. And when I look back and see how successful I was in a corporate setting, of course, in my case, it was that I had a great boss and a great mentor and sponsor in him. But actually, I was always focused on executing and doing it in a way that is collaborative so that you don’t have the knives coming for you from every direction. think a lot of people who the more successful that you get in your career, you think, I’m fabulous because I’m fabulous. No. You need a mindset of I’m fabulous because I am creating a team around me, no matter who I am, even if I’m not the boss, to protect each other and help each other and lift each other up. if you are always executing and you hit on it, right, as a woman, you should always be keeping track of your metrics in a way that is tangible and defensible. But you also should never take for granted the fact that no matter how senior you are, you need to be getting something done. And I do think that it is a big mistake for people to get high on their own supply and forget that. And then, and then the sharks will come for you. So always do something. And this is just a final thing, cause I have lots of people that I mentor. They’re like, just name one thing. I’m going to give you one thing. Send meeting notes. If you go to a meeting, and everybody’s on a call, 15 people are on a call. If you’re the one who sends meeting notes and this is a hot button, right? For women, they’re like, well, I’m not the secretary. I don’t wanna take me. You know what? Put your ego, park it in a parking lot and send meeting notes. You would be shocked how much goodwill and how effective you’re perceived when those notes, like say a project is going downhill and somebody goes, but. Julia (30:30.157)Such and so committed to this and you’re like, those meeting notes were written by Julia Carrion. Nobody has to do that. But corporations get unwieldy. lot of churn happens. A lot of stuff doesn’t get done in a day. If you can demonstrate that you are someone who is acting in good faith and doing small things to keep the needle moving, somebody in senior management is going to notice that, I promise. Frazer Rice (30:53.763)The other thing I sort of, and this doesn’t just go for women, this is for people generally, is the ownership mentality and the move toward equity, and by equity I mean stock equity, where the mindset to me shifts when you move from sort of salary and bonus to equity in the firm. And that subtle shift suddenly puts you in a different position in terms of sitting at the same table as someone who is, let’s call it quote unquote, making the decisions. When you’re there and your ownership of the firm, however small it is, is rendered unimportant. First of all, that tells you to go. Second of all, I just feel like the people who exist on that plane bring up different things and then are thought of differently. Does that track with your experience? Julia (31:48.819)It does, but I think that this goes to kind of how is the corporate world changing and then how does that impact employees? So, and where I’m going with this is when I was at Wells, my compensation was a third, a third, a third. So it was a third cash, a third cash bonus and a third in stock. Do you want to know what’s going on? And I don’t know if you know what’s happened on Wall Street. Every single major bank is moving to you only get a quarter in equity and the rest of it is cash. So I think that the onus to here is on corporations to be thinking about how they’re treating employees. And to your point, what, what does that mean when you show up and how vested are you in the option? Just real quick, I want to give a shout out to Maureen Clough. I don’t know if you follow her, she just yesterday did an amazing six minute post on why companies are losing loyalty from employees. so like, again, this goes back to is everybody backsliding right now because these corporations have to realize that in order to keep good talent, you want them to have a stake in the game, but that’s winnowing, I think. Frazer Rice (33:11.819)I know. I agree. Frankly you know to me at the larger institutions that aren’t willing to sort of play ball as far as involving people in the ownership that’s a signal and when it’s a signal then you know if you’re good at your job and you bring things to bear you know there are other there are other places out there. I think those places that value you want you around and they want you to be able to participate and how the broader governance of the company works. It’s a lot like how Goldman Sachs was back when it was in the partnership days. Everyone who was a partner there understood how everything else was working and ultimately that meant that, I don’t know, I feel like Goldman still does well now, but it’s a different climate, different firm where you’re completely involved in everything else and therefore the information is out there and… it’s something that you’re not blindsided as much by what’s happening in other divisions within your firm. Julia (34:15.472)Yeah, totally agree. Frazer Rice (34:16.911)One other thought that as we were sort of squiring through this was the idea that it’s important to have information sources or networks both within your company that are outside of your reporting line, but also information networks and support outside your company. I call it sort of the kitchen cabinet of people who are similarly situated or in different spots so that you have context into which to sort of find out what your what you’re up against both inside the company and outside of it. Is that something that makes sense to you or is it something that was lacking in your current situation? How did you think about that? Julia (34:57.906)Hmm. I love that because in 2017, I took stock of the fact that I had become too comfortable in my lane and I was seeing that my influence at Wells was waning for whatever reason. And so I started blogging on LinkedIn in 2017. Because of a conversation with a Harvard sociologist that I write a lot about. Fscinating guy who predicted the current turmoil 10 years, almost 10 years ago. And so I started networking outside and I could not agree with you more that you need to be building your networks, not just inside. That goes without saying, right? Like I had a great career partly because I was a boss at gaining political capital at Wells all the time, right? Giving goodwill and getting it back but outside is critical. during our book, what we found out is, that women are more likely to put that aside. Because we feel like we’ve got too many other things going on, work, know, kids, all of the pressures, trying not to, you know, have a nervous breakdown on any given day, trying to stay fit, dealing with menopause. Which of course is a whole other thing that is a whole other bag of tricks. And so we don’t do it as much and it hurts us. So I absolutely think being deliberate about an external network is essential. When women ask me how to do that, I say to commit to a certain number of hours, half an hour to two hour, whatever you can give a week to doing it deliberately. I wish I had done that earlier in my career for sure. So it’s great advice. Frazer Rice (36:49.865)Along that line, I’m a big believer in being aware of your surroundings. In a sense aware of yourself and what your skills. Things that you’re annoyed are at are and what you’re good at and what you’re not good at. Did you take any tests or anything to understand what your aptitudes were or what you were interested in or more importantly not interested in or how you interact with other people personality wise and Is that something that resonates with you? sort of am a big sports fan. Dan Quinn, who’s the Washington commander coach. He got fired from the Falcons. He did a real deep soul searching and went in and got tested on a whole bunch of different things and where he came up short, where he was really good. And that allowed him to get hired again and to have at least some initial success with the team and hopefully going forward from my rooting perspective. But where does that fit into your analysis for people? Julia (37:50.351)Did somebody set that question up? That’s what I want to know. I am a huge believer in strength finders. Some people take discs, some do Myers-Briggs. The reason I asked if it was a setup is because strength finders saved my life. I was deemed top talent when I was like 34 years old at Wells and they gave me a career coach who by the way was Sarah Grady is her name. and she was Dick Kvasevich’s legend on Wall Street. She was his leadership coach and she gave me strength finders and I very quickly was very clear my top five strengths and then my bottom five strengths are not a surprise. Like I am zero. I’m like negative zero at woo. I was like, it won’t even shock you for a minute. Yes i do think that those kinds of valuations are critical and in fact i’m gonna talk to my twenty year old son about taking one i think you’ll end up taking disk but. One thousand percent if you if you do not know what you’re good at and why then try to find out because it can save your life i mean the awareness and the learnings that i got about myself. From taking one test have stayed with me for 25 years. And I’m gonna be really blunt here. I forgot those lessons when I stepped into a new culture and it was painful. So I think you have to also be disciplined about… Take it again, remind yourself, reread whatever book helps you stay grounded in who you are and how you’re showing up. And get some friends to give you feedback. Frazer Rice (39:44.111)Well, mean, people get better or change or worse at certain things. And so you’re not the same person you were 20 years ago. And, you know, it merits revisiting every once in a while. As we wind down here, unfortunately, we probably could go on for about three hours, which I wish we could do. But one of the things that I think is interesting, too, you talked about political capital and building it up, is that I think one piece of advice that I tend to give to people who are starting out and might be useful in the situation that we’re describing here is that when you have political capital, you’ve got to be willing to spend it occasionally. Careers, in my experience, take quantum leaps in that you’ll be going around for a while and then something good will happen and then you’ve got to kind of take advantage of the advantage while you have the advantage of having the advantage and moving up and then reestablishing the plane. And it’s a little bit like a ratchet where when the wrench turns, it doesn’t turn backward. You can kind of continue to elevate on that point. Is that something that you saw where, you know, as you were making the moves up the ladder that didn’t happen at the last situation that maybe might’ve been something that could’ve turned out differently? Julia (41:01.791)Yes, and I think that being more aware of my surroundings would have helped. I don’t think it would have changed the outcome in the other example. But the political capital that I was able to gain is that I got promoted every single time Wells did a major merger when people were panicking about their jobs. Frazer Rice (41:08.623)Mm-hmm. Julia (41:31.061)And one of the things that I did that you and I could probably discuss for two days is I gave up control of trying to manage the outcome. In other words, I went to senior management with two major mergers and I said, you know what? I don’t care what I do for the time that the companies are trying to come together. You give me something hard to do and ugly and I will get it done the right way. And then you decide whether I get rewarded or not. And when I crushed both of those tasks, I got major promotions. So I think it, I think a lot of people think, I’m going, I had a, had an employee who told me I should just get promoted because I’m sitting here and I’ve been sitting here for two years. mean, it really, life just really doesn’t work that way. In my experience, you got to work your ass off for it. And, and you have to put your ego aside and you have to hope that the universe is gonna pay you back. And I believe that because the universe always has. I believe that even now with my current situation, like everything that has brought me here has made me a spokesperson for like a better way because of what happened to me, right? I had 20 years of goodness and then I had something really hard happen. And I’m trying to make lemonade out of a very difficult situation because it is the only way, the only way out is through. So I just have to keep going through and I love the idea of yes, you’ve got to spend your political capital. can’t, know, George Bush said that you can’t just collect it. What are you collecting it for? If you’re not going to spend it. Frazer Rice (43:17.817)Exactly. Okay, we have to disembark here, unfortunately. How should people keep track of your situation? How do they find the book? And how do people get in touch? Julia (43:31.846)Yep. I have, um, I’m on LinkedIn. I have a website, juliacarrion.com. If you are looking for, I’m doing some consulting on a digital transformation always and org design or whatever. So you can find me there. And then, um, you know, today’s a big day. We are filing today or tomorrow, a response to my lawsuit. So it would probably make the news. Thank you to you for being a great ally to women and having me on. The book is walking on broken glass.com. It’s such a great name. So you can order the book on the website from any of your favorite book resellers. Frazer Rice (44:14.639)Super, well good luck with the legal proceedings. All of your information will have that in the show notes so people can find it easily. I think you’re coming off of a difficult situation. I think you’re gonna turn it into something far more transformative. Even you’re envisioning it right now. So I’m hoping for the best here. Resources & Links: Walking on Broken Glass: Navigating the Aftermath of the Glass Ceiling StrengthsFinder Assessment Julia Carrion on LinkedIn Julia Carrion's Website Connect with Julia: LinkedIn Website Stay tuned for updates on her legal case and ongoing advocacy efforts. Don't miss her insights into transforming adversity into empowerment and systemic change. https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Actually-Intelligent-Decision-Making-1-ebook/dp/B07FPQJJQT/ Keywords: Gaslighting, Corporate Culture, Women in Leadership, Workplace Equity, Julia Carreon, Wells Fargo, Citi, Legal Battle, Glass Ceiling, Political Capital, StrengthsFinder, Work-Life Balance, Systemic Change, Weaponized HR

Frazer, Joe, and Andy discuss Buffalo's rise to the top of the Atlantic and the fallout from the trade deadline.

Hello everyone, and welcome to The Relatable Voice Podcast. Today we are on the road, driving to the UK, to chat with our guest, Ellen Frazer Jameson. Ellen is a journalist, broadcaster, and author of more than twenty books, both fiction and nonfiction. Her work has taken her from writing for magazines to national newspapers, and eventually to becoming an on-air presenter with the BBC, where she interviewed more than 1,000 people in just one year — from celebrities and award-winning figures to everyday people with extraordinary stories. Her latest book, “103 Days Sailing Around the World on the Queen Mary 2,” is out now.  Find out more at:  www.ellenfrazerjameson.com

Sharpening Your Edge Charlie Woida and Caleb FrazerTOPICS COVEREDCharlie WoidaSmall school advantagesCharacter is who you are when no one is watchingCaleb FrazerControl what you can control without being afraid of what you can't controlChange your mindset as not everything is going to go your wayHelp us grow our GET YOUR EDGE community and share the podcast.#chop-itGET YOUR EDGE PODCASTInstagram and X- @getyouredgepodDean Contactwww.foxvalleythrowsclub.comInstagram and X- @foxvalleythrowsBrian Contactwww.sportsadvantedge.comInstagram- @sportsadvantedge / @brianbott23X- @botter23 / @sportadvantedgeEmail- Brian@sportsadvantedge.comGraphics and Logo- Bailey MarashInstagram and X- @bmarasch13#foxvalleythrows #getyouredge #sportsadvantedge #hardwork #athlete #makernation #foxvalley #fireit #feedthecats #loadthedawgs #dynamicfitness