Podcasts about jpo

In the case of Doe v. Combs et al., No. 1:24-cv-01457-JPO, the plaintiff, Jane Doe, filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and associated entities, alleging personal injury. The court issued a Memorandum and Order addressing several key motions. Firstly, the court granted the plaintiff's motion to proceed under a pseudonym, allowing her to maintain anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the allegations. Secondly, the court denied the defendants' motion to dismiss the case, finding that the plaintiff's claims were sufficiently plausible to proceed to discovery.Additionally, the court addressed the defendants' motion to strike certain allegations from the complaint, which was denied. The court found that the contested allegations were relevant to the plaintiff's claims and did not prejudice the defendants. The Memorandum and Order concluded by setting a schedule for discovery and encouraging both parties to consider settlement discussions. This decision allows the case to move forward, with both sides preparing for the next stages of litigation.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:24cv1457 Jones v. Combs Sanctions Order.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The telephone conference in the case of 24 Civ. 1475 (JPO) took place between attorneys Zakarin and Blackburn, with Judge J. Paul Oetken presiding. The discussion primarily centered on procedural issues, including the timeline for motions and discovery. Zakarin argued for an expedited schedule to address key evidentiary matters critical to his client's position, citing potential prejudice if delays continued. Blackburn countered by emphasizing the need for thorough discovery to ensure all relevant materials were accounted for, arguing against rushing the process. Both sides agreed on the importance of resolving these disputes efficiently but differed significantly on the approach.Judge Oetken stressed the need for cooperation between the parties and highlighted his preference for minimizing unnecessary motions. He set preliminary deadlines for document production and urged counsel to work collaboratively on narrowing disputes before formal filings. The judge indicated a tentative schedule for a future hearing, contingent on the progress of discovery, while cautioning both parties against dilatory tactics. The call concluded with the judge emphasizing the importance of clear communication between counsel to avoid escalating procedural disagreements.(commercial at 8:38)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:o49rJONc

The telephone conference in the case of 24 Civ. 1475 (JPO) took place between attorneys Zakarin and Blackburn, with Judge J. Paul Oetken presiding. The discussion primarily centered on procedural issues, including the timeline for motions and discovery. Zakarin argued for an expedited schedule to address key evidentiary matters critical to his client's position, citing potential prejudice if delays continued. Blackburn countered by emphasizing the need for thorough discovery to ensure all relevant materials were accounted for, arguing against rushing the process. Both sides agreed on the importance of resolving these disputes efficiently but differed significantly on the approach.Judge Oetken stressed the need for cooperation between the parties and highlighted his preference for minimizing unnecessary motions. He set preliminary deadlines for document production and urged counsel to work collaboratively on narrowing disputes before formal filings. The judge indicated a tentative schedule for a future hearing, contingent on the progress of discovery, while cautioning both parties against dilatory tactics. The call concluded with the judge emphasizing the importance of clear communication between counsel to avoid escalating procedural disagreements.(commercial at 8:38)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:o49rJONc

​In Case No. 24-CV-07774 (JPO), the defendants, including Sean Combs and associated entities, have filed a Memorandum of Law supporting their Motion to Dismiss the complaint brought by the plaintiff, John Doe. The defendants argue that the plaintiff's allegations lack sufficient factual basis and fail to meet the necessary legal standards to proceed. They contend that the claims are speculative and do not establish the required elements to support causes of action against them.Additionally, the defendants assert that certain claims are barred by statutes of limitations and that the plaintiff has not demonstrated any applicable exceptions to these time constraints. They also challenge the appropriateness of the plaintiff proceeding under a pseudonym without prior court approval, emphasizing the importance of transparency in judicial proceedings. Based on these arguments, the defendants request that the court dismiss the complaint in its entirety.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629907.58.0.pdf

​In Case No. 24-CV-07774 (JPO), the defendants, including Sean Combs and associated entities, have filed a Memorandum of Law supporting their Motion to Dismiss the complaint brought by the plaintiff, John Doe. The defendants argue that the plaintiff's allegations lack sufficient factual basis and fail to meet the necessary legal standards to proceed. They contend that the claims are speculative and do not establish the required elements to support causes of action against them.Additionally, the defendants assert that certain claims are barred by statutes of limitations and that the plaintiff has not demonstrated any applicable exceptions to these time constraints. They also challenge the appropriateness of the plaintiff proceeding under a pseudonym without prior court approval, emphasizing the importance of transparency in judicial proceedings. Based on these arguments, the defendants request that the court dismiss the complaint in its entirety.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629907.58.0.pdf

Dr. Jeff Martus from Vanderbilt University joins the podcast to discuss his recent article on comparative outcomes between plating and intramedullary nails for the treatment of forearm fractures in children and adolescents. The theme for the episode is trauma and touches on management of a variety of fractures including lateral condyles, supracondylar humerus fractures, pelvic and acetabular trauma, and even the pitfalls of mutton bustin'. Your hosts are Will Morris (Scottish Rite for Children). Tyler McDonald (University of South Alabama), Craig Louer (Vanderbilt), and Julia Sanders (University of Colorado). Music by A. A. Alto. References: Forearm Fractures in Older Children and Adolescents: ORIF is Safer Than IMN With Equivalent Outcomes. JPO. 2025 Mar. PMID: 39445700 Practice Patterns Vary Widely in the Care of Pediatric and Adolescent Pelvic and Acetabular Fractures: A CORTICES Survey. JPO. 2025 Mar. PMID: 39428588. Pediatric Lateral Condyle Fractures with Elbow Dislocation: Revisiting the Song Classification of the Most Severe Injuries. JPO. 2025 Mar. PMID: 3990788. Percutaneous Screw Fixation for the Management of Delayed Unions in Pediatric Lateral Humeral Condylar Fractures. JPO. 2025 Mar. PMID: 39523729. Presentation to the Emergency Department Increases the Likelihood of Surgical Management of Minimally Displaced Gartland Type IIa Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures. JPO.2025 Mar. PMID: 39327894. Remodeling of Sagittal Plane Malunion After Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures. JPO. 2020 Nov/Dec. PMID: 32604347. From Sheep to Sling: Pediatric Injuries Due to Rodeo Mutton Bustin'. JPO. 2025 Apr. PMID: 39831656.

​In Case No. 24-CV-07774 (JPO), the defendants, including Sean Combs and associated entities, have filed a Memorandum of Law supporting their Motion to Dismiss the complaint brought by the plaintiff, John Doe. The defendants argue that the plaintiff's allegations lack sufficient factual basis and fail to meet the necessary legal standards to proceed. They contend that the claims are speculative and do not establish the required elements to support causes of action against them.Additionally, the defendants assert that certain claims are barred by statutes of limitations and that the plaintiff has not demonstrated any applicable exceptions to these time constraints. They also challenge the appropriateness of the plaintiff proceeding under a pseudonym without prior court approval, emphasizing the importance of transparency in judicial proceedings. Based on these arguments, the defendants request that the court dismiss the complaint in its entirety.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629907.58.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In Case No. 24-CV-07774 (JPO), the defendants, including Sean Combs and associated entities, have filed a Memorandum of Law supporting their Motion to Dismiss the complaint brought by the plaintiff, John Doe. The defendants argue that the plaintiff's allegations lack sufficient factual basis and fail to meet the necessary legal standards to proceed. They contend that the claims are speculative and do not establish the required elements to support causes of action against them.Additionally, the defendants assert that certain claims are barred by statutes of limitations and that the plaintiff has not demonstrated any applicable exceptions to these time constraints. They also challenge the appropriateness of the plaintiff proceeding under a pseudonym without prior court approval, emphasizing the importance of transparency in judicial proceedings. Based on these arguments, the defendants request that the court dismiss the complaint in its entirety.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629907.58.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Les experts et journalistes de RFI répondent à vos questions sur l'opposant ougandais Kizza Besigye, les tensions entre Zelensky et Trump sur les terres rares ukrainiennes et la reprise des recherches sur la disparition du vol MH370. Turquie : le PKK annonce une trêve après 40 ans de lutte armée En réponse à l'appel du chef historique kurde, le PKK a annoncé un cessez-le-feu avec la Turquie, mais sans parler de désarmement ou de dissolution. L'appel d'Abdullah Öcalan peut-il finir par être entendu ? Peut-il voir sa peine être allégée ? Est-ce le signe d'un apaisement entre les kurdes et la Turquie après plusieurs années de conflit ?Avec Anne Andlauer, correspondante de RFI à Ankara.  Ouganda : l'opposant Kizza Besigye jugé par une cour civile À la suite de pressions nationales et internationales, l'opposant ougandais, d'abord jugé devant un tribunal militaire, a finalement comparu devant un tribunal civil. Son transfert devant la cour civile augmente-t-il ses chances de libération ? Qu'est-ce que cela change dans le cours de son procès ?Avec Christina Okello, journaliste au service Afrique de RFI. Guerre en Ukraine : pas d'accord signé sur les terres rares ukrainiennes À la suite d'un échange tendu entre les présidents Zelensky et Trump, aucun accord n'a été conclu concernant les minerais ukrainiens. Pourquoi les deux partis n'arrivent-ils pas à se mettre d'accord à ce sujet ? Pourquoi les États-Unis souhaitent-ils absolument accéder aux terres rares ukrainiennes ?Avec Emmanuel Hache, adjoint scientifique à IFP Énergies nouvelles et directeur de recherche à l'IRIS.  Malaysia Airlines : pourquoi les recherches reprennent onze ans après sa disparition ? Onze ans après la disparition du vol MH370, des recherches ont repris dans l'océan Indien pour retrouver des potentiels débris du Boeing 777 de Malaysia Airlines. Pourquoi reprendre les recherches tant d'années après le drame ? Comment vont-elles s'organiser ? Avec Gilles Diharce, contrôleur aérien et auteur du livre Le mystère du vol MH370 (éditions JPO).

Dr. Aaron Huser from Washington University in St. Louis joins us to discuss his recent article on the 2-year outcomes of a surgical technique for treating knee flexion contracture in patients with arthrogryposis. This episode also includes a surprise drop-in from Dr. Perry Schoenecker. We also highlight recent studies on arthrogryposis, radiolucent lesions in children with osteogenesis imperfecta, and rod deformation after cutting. Your hosts are Tyler McDonald (University of South Alabama), Craig Louer (Vanderbilt), Carter Clement (Manning Family Children's Hospital in New Orleans), and Will Morris (Texas Scottish Rite in Dallas). Music by A. A. Aalto. References: 1) Increasing the Knee Arc of Motion in Patients With Arthrogryposis: Minimum 2-year Follow-up. Huser et al. JPO. 2025 Feb. PMID: 39466235. 2) Analysis of Scoliosis Rod Deformation After Cutting with a Surgical Rod Cutter. Egan et al. Spine Deformity. 2025 Jan. PMID: 39881049. 3) Do Not Forget the Spine MRI in Children with Arthrogryposis Multiplex Congenita: High Prevalence of Tethered Spinal Cord and Preliminary Clinical Findings Following Detethering. Nugraha et al. JPO. 2025 Feb. PMID: 39380182. 4) Evaluation of Radiolucent Lesions in Cortices of Long Bones in Osteogenesis Imperfecta Patients. Cook et al. JPOSNA. 2024 Oct.  5) Long-term Clinical and Radiographic Results of Posteromedial Lateral Release for Neuromuscular Clubfoot Deformity. May et al. JPO. 2025 Feb. PMID: 39501684.

Florian Dobler and Nathalie Alexander from the Laboratory for Gait Analysis in St. Gallen, Switzerland, join the show to discuss their recent research on the impact of obesity on femur development. The conversation spans several of their gait-related studies on lower extremity rotation and the effects of femoral and tibial osteotomies. Your hosts are Carter Clement from Children's Hospital of New Orleans and Tyler McDonald from University of South Alabama. Music by A. A. Aalto.   References: 1) Body Mass Index is Related to Femoral Anteversion, Hip Rotation During Gait, and Passive Hip Range of Motion in Children and Adolescents. Dobler et al. JPO, Oct 2024. PMID: 39482988. 2) Effect of femoral derotational osteotomy in patients with idiopathic increased femoral anteversion on joint loading and muscular demands. Alexander et al. JCO, Aug 2024. PMID: 39391579. 3) Compensatory gait deviations in patients with increased outward tibial torsion pre and post tibial derotation osteotomy. Alexander et al. Gait & Posture, 2020. PMID: 31981934. 4) Does pathologically increased or decreased tibial torsion affect muscle activations during walking in typically developing adolescents? Alexander et al. Journal of Biomechanics, 2021. PMID: 34509912.

In the case of United States v. Sean Combs (1:24-cr-00542-AS), Judge Arun Subramanian issued an opinion and order denying the defendant's motion for discovery and an evidentiary hearing. Sean Combs had alleged that the government improperly leaked information about the case and sought further investigation into these claims. Specifically, the motion (Dkt. 30) called for disclosure of relevant materials and a formal hearing to address the purported leaks.Judge Subramanian, however, found no sufficient evidence to warrant granting the motion. The ruling emphasized that the defendant failed to meet the legal threshold required to demonstrate a credible basis for the allegations or to justify the requested relief. Consequently, the court declined to authorize further discovery or proceedings on the matter, leaving the case to proceed without additional inquiry into the alleged leaks.In the case of Doe v. Combs et al., No. 1:24-cv-01457-JPO, the plaintiff, Jane Doe, filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and associated entities, alleging personal injury. The court issued a Memorandum and Order addressing several key motions. Firstly, the court granted the plaintiff's motion to proceed under a pseudonym, allowing her to maintain anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the allegations. Secondly, the court denied the defendants' motion to dismiss the case, finding that the plaintiff's claims were sufficiently plausible to proceed to discovery.Additionally, the court addressed the defendants' motion to strike certain allegations from the complaint, which was denied. The court found that the contested allegations were relevant to the plaintiff's claims and did not prejudice the defendants. The Memorandum and Order concluded by setting a schedule for discovery and encouraging both parties to consider settlement discussions. This decision allows the case to move forward, with both sides preparing for the next stages of litigation.(commercial at 10:26)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:24cv1457 Jones v. Combs Sanctions Order.pdf

In the case of United States v. Sean Combs (1:24-cr-00542-AS), Judge Arun Subramanian issued an opinion and order denying the defendant's motion for discovery and an evidentiary hearing. Sean Combs had alleged that the government improperly leaked information about the case and sought further investigation into these claims. Specifically, the motion (Dkt. 30) called for disclosure of relevant materials and a formal hearing to address the purported leaks.Judge Subramanian, however, found no sufficient evidence to warrant granting the motion. The ruling emphasized that the defendant failed to meet the legal threshold required to demonstrate a credible basis for the allegations or to justify the requested relief. Consequently, the court declined to authorize further discovery or proceedings on the matter, leaving the case to proceed without additional inquiry into the alleged leaks.In the case of Doe v. Combs et al., No. 1:24-cv-01457-JPO, the plaintiff, Jane Doe, filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and associated entities, alleging personal injury. The court issued a Memorandum and Order addressing several key motions. Firstly, the court granted the plaintiff's motion to proceed under a pseudonym, allowing her to maintain anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the allegations. Secondly, the court denied the defendants' motion to dismiss the case, finding that the plaintiff's claims were sufficiently plausible to proceed to discovery.Additionally, the court addressed the defendants' motion to strike certain allegations from the complaint, which was denied. The court found that the contested allegations were relevant to the plaintiff's claims and did not prejudice the defendants. The Memorandum and Order concluded by setting a schedule for discovery and encouraging both parties to consider settlement discussions. This decision allows the case to move forward, with both sides preparing for the next stages of litigation.(commercial at 10:26)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:24cv1457 Jones v. Combs Sanctions Order.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the Memorandum of Law in Support of Macy's Motion to Dismiss in case 1:24-cv-07774-JPO, Macy's argues that the plaintiff's claims lack legal merit and should be dismissed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Macy's contends that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, asserting that the allegations are either legally insufficient or unsupported by factual evidence. The memorandum emphasizes that the plaintiff has not met the necessary pleading standards to establish the essential elements of the claims, including specific instances of wrongdoing or a direct link between Macy's actions and any alleged harm.Additionally, Macy's argues that certain claims are barred by law, such as those preempted by federal statutes or time-barred under the applicable statute of limitations. The memorandum also highlights procedural and jurisdictional issues, asserting that the case lacks the factual and legal foundation to proceed. Macy's requests that the Court dismiss the complaint in its entirety, maintaining that the claims are overly broad, speculative, and fail to establish a plausible basis for relief under the law.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:TO:

In the Memorandum of Law in Support of Macy's Motion to Dismiss in case 1:24-cv-07774-JPO, Macy's argues that the plaintiff's claims lack legal merit and should be dismissed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Macy's contends that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, asserting that the allegations are either legally insufficient or unsupported by factual evidence. The memorandum emphasizes that the plaintiff has not met the necessary pleading standards to establish the essential elements of the claims, including specific instances of wrongdoing or a direct link between Macy's actions and any alleged harm.Additionally, Macy's argues that certain claims are barred by law, such as those preempted by federal statutes or time-barred under the applicable statute of limitations. The memorandum also highlights procedural and jurisdictional issues, asserting that the case lacks the factual and legal foundation to proceed. Macy's requests that the Court dismiss the complaint in its entirety, maintaining that the claims are overly broad, speculative, and fail to establish a plausible basis for relief under the law.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:TO:

In the Memorandum of Law in Support of Macy's Motion to Dismiss in case 1:24-cv-07774-JPO, Macy's argues that the plaintiff's claims lack legal merit and should be dismissed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Macy's contends that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, asserting that the allegations are either legally insufficient or unsupported by factual evidence. The memorandum emphasizes that the plaintiff has not met the necessary pleading standards to establish the essential elements of the claims, including specific instances of wrongdoing or a direct link between Macy's actions and any alleged harm.Additionally, Macy's argues that certain claims are barred by law, such as those preempted by federal statutes or time-barred under the applicable statute of limitations. The memorandum also highlights procedural and jurisdictional issues, asserting that the case lacks the factual and legal foundation to proceed. Macy's requests that the Court dismiss the complaint in its entirety, maintaining that the claims are overly broad, speculative, and fail to establish a plausible basis for relief under the law.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:TO:

In the Memorandum of Law in Support of Macy's Motion to Dismiss in case 1:24-cv-07774-JPO, Macy's argues that the plaintiff's claims lack legal merit and should be dismissed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Macy's contends that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, asserting that the allegations are either legally insufficient or unsupported by factual evidence. The memorandum emphasizes that the plaintiff has not met the necessary pleading standards to establish the essential elements of the claims, including specific instances of wrongdoing or a direct link between Macy's actions and any alleged harm.Additionally, Macy's argues that certain claims are barred by law, such as those preempted by federal statutes or time-barred under the applicable statute of limitations. The memorandum also highlights procedural and jurisdictional issues, asserting that the case lacks the factual and legal foundation to proceed. Macy's requests that the Court dismiss the complaint in its entirety, maintaining that the claims are overly broad, speculative, and fail to establish a plausible basis for relief under the law.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:TO:

In our season 4 premiere, Dr. Steve Gard, editor-in-chief of the Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics (JPO), speaks with Dr. Brian Hafner, a renowned professor and researcher at the University of Washington, about the peer review process in scientific publishing. Together, they explore the critical role of peer review in maintaining high standards in research, emphasizing the responsibilities and practicalities involved. Dr. Hafner highlights the importance of clinicians actively reading and evaluating scientific literature to ensure the publication of impactful research that benefits the O&P community. The episode delves into JPO's peer reviewer eligibility criteria, outlines the review process, and offers strategies for providing constructive and effective feedback.   O&P Research Insights is produced by Association Briefings.

In the Memorandum of Law in Support of Macy's Motion to Dismiss in case 1:24-cv-07774-JPO, Macy's argues that the plaintiff's claims lack legal merit and should be dismissed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Macy's contends that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, asserting that the allegations are either legally insufficient or unsupported by factual evidence. The memorandum emphasizes that the plaintiff has not met the necessary pleading standards to establish the essential elements of the claims, including specific instances of wrongdoing or a direct link between Macy's actions and any alleged harm.Additionally, Macy's argues that certain claims are barred by law, such as those preempted by federal statutes or time-barred under the applicable statute of limitations. The memorandum also highlights procedural and jurisdictional issues, asserting that the case lacks the factual and legal foundation to proceed. Macy's requests that the Court dismiss the complaint in its entirety, maintaining that the claims are overly broad, speculative, and fail to establish a plausible basis for relief under the law.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:TO:Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the Memorandum of Law in Support of Macy's Motion to Dismiss in case 1:24-cv-07774-JPO, Macy's argues that the plaintiff's claims lack legal merit and should be dismissed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Macy's contends that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, asserting that the allegations are either legally insufficient or unsupported by factual evidence. The memorandum emphasizes that the plaintiff has not met the necessary pleading standards to establish the essential elements of the claims, including specific instances of wrongdoing or a direct link between Macy's actions and any alleged harm.Additionally, Macy's argues that certain claims are barred by law, such as those preempted by federal statutes or time-barred under the applicable statute of limitations. The memorandum also highlights procedural and jurisdictional issues, asserting that the case lacks the factual and legal foundation to proceed. Macy's requests that the Court dismiss the complaint in its entirety, maintaining that the claims are overly broad, speculative, and fail to establish a plausible basis for relief under the law.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:TO:Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The telephone conference in the case of 24 Civ. 1475 (JPO) took place between attorneys Zakarin and Blackburn, with Judge J. Paul Oetken presiding. The discussion primarily centered on procedural issues, including the timeline for motions and discovery. Zakarin argued for an expedited schedule to address key evidentiary matters critical to his client's position, citing potential prejudice if delays continued. Blackburn countered by emphasizing the need for thorough discovery to ensure all relevant materials were accounted for, arguing against rushing the process. Both sides agreed on the importance of resolving these disputes efficiently but differed significantly on the approach.Judge Oetken stressed the need for cooperation between the parties and highlighted his preference for minimizing unnecessary motions. He set preliminary deadlines for document production and urged counsel to work collaboratively on narrowing disputes before formal filings. The judge indicated a tentative schedule for a future hearing, contingent on the progress of discovery, while cautioning both parties against dilatory tactics. The call concluded with the judge emphasizing the importance of clear communication between counsel to avoid escalating procedural disagreements.(commercial at 8:38)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:o49rJONc

The telephone conference in the case of 24 Civ. 1475 (JPO) took place between attorneys Zakarin and Blackburn, with Judge J. Paul Oetken presiding. The discussion primarily centered on procedural issues, including the timeline for motions and discovery. Zakarin argued for an expedited schedule to address key evidentiary matters critical to his client's position, citing potential prejudice if delays continued. Blackburn countered by emphasizing the need for thorough discovery to ensure all relevant materials were accounted for, arguing against rushing the process. Both sides agreed on the importance of resolving these disputes efficiently but differed significantly on the approach.Judge Oetken stressed the need for cooperation between the parties and highlighted his preference for minimizing unnecessary motions. He set preliminary deadlines for document production and urged counsel to work collaboratively on narrowing disputes before formal filings. The judge indicated a tentative schedule for a future hearing, contingent on the progress of discovery, while cautioning both parties against dilatory tactics. The call concluded with the judge emphasizing the importance of clear communication between counsel to avoid escalating procedural disagreements.(commercial at 8:38)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:o49rJONcBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the case of Doe v. Combs et al., No. 1:24-cv-01457-JPO, the plaintiff, Jane Doe, filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and associated entities, alleging personal injury. The court issued a Memorandum and Order addressing several key motions. Firstly, the court granted the plaintiff's motion to proceed under a pseudonym, allowing her to maintain anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the allegations. Secondly, the court denied the defendants' motion to dismiss the case, finding that the plaintiff's claims were sufficiently plausible to proceed to discovery.Additionally, the court addressed the defendants' motion to strike certain allegations from the complaint, which was denied. The court found that the contested allegations were relevant to the plaintiff's claims and did not prejudice the defendants. The Memorandum and Order concluded by setting a schedule for discovery and encouraging both parties to consider settlement discussions. This decision allows the case to move forward, with both sides preparing for the next stages of litigation.(commercial at 10:26)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:24cv1457 Jones v. Combs Sanctions Order.pdf

In the case of Doe v. Combs et al., No. 1:24-cv-01457-JPO, the plaintiff, Jane Doe, filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and associated entities, alleging personal injury. The court issued a Memorandum and Order addressing several key motions. Firstly, the court granted the plaintiff's motion to proceed under a pseudonym, allowing her to maintain anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the allegations. Secondly, the court denied the defendants' motion to dismiss the case, finding that the plaintiff's claims were sufficiently plausible to proceed to discovery.Additionally, the court addressed the defendants' motion to strike certain allegations from the complaint, which was denied. The court found that the contested allegations were relevant to the plaintiff's claims and did not prejudice the defendants. The Memorandum and Order concluded by setting a schedule for discovery and encouraging both parties to consider settlement discussions. This decision allows the case to move forward, with both sides preparing for the next stages of litigation.(commercial at 10:26)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:24cv1457 Jones v. Combs Sanctions Order.pdf

In the case of Doe v. Combs et al., No. 1:24-cv-01457-JPO, the plaintiff, Jane Doe, filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and associated entities, alleging personal injury. The court issued a Memorandum and Order addressing several key motions. Firstly, the court granted the plaintiff's motion to proceed under a pseudonym, allowing her to maintain anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the allegations. Secondly, the court denied the defendants' motion to dismiss the case, finding that the plaintiff's claims were sufficiently plausible to proceed to discovery.Additionally, the court addressed the defendants' motion to strike certain allegations from the complaint, which was denied. The court found that the contested allegations were relevant to the plaintiff's claims and did not prejudice the defendants. The Memorandum and Order concluded by setting a schedule for discovery and encouraging both parties to consider settlement discussions. This decision allows the case to move forward, with both sides preparing for the next stages of litigation.(commercial at 10:26)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:24cv1457 Jones v. Combs Sanctions Order.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The telephone conference in the case of 24 Civ. 1475 (JPO) took place between attorneys Zakarin and Blackburn, with Judge J. Paul Oetken presiding. The discussion primarily centered on procedural issues, including the timeline for motions and discovery. Zakarin argued for an expedited schedule to address key evidentiary matters critical to his client's position, citing potential prejudice if delays continued. Blackburn countered by emphasizing the need for thorough discovery to ensure all relevant materials were accounted for, arguing against rushing the process. Both sides agreed on the importance of resolving these disputes efficiently but differed significantly on the approach.Judge Oetken stressed the need for cooperation between the parties and highlighted his preference for minimizing unnecessary motions. He set preliminary deadlines for document production and urged counsel to work collaboratively on narrowing disputes before formal filings. The judge indicated a tentative schedule for a future hearing, contingent on the progress of discovery, while cautioning both parties against dilatory tactics. The call concluded with the judge emphasizing the importance of clear communication between counsel to avoid escalating procedural disagreements.(commercial at 8:38)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:o49rJONc

The telephone conference in the case of 24 Civ. 1475 (JPO) took place between attorneys Zakarin and Blackburn, with Judge J. Paul Oetken presiding. The discussion primarily centered on procedural issues, including the timeline for motions and discovery. Zakarin argued for an expedited schedule to address key evidentiary matters critical to his client's position, citing potential prejudice if delays continued. Blackburn countered by emphasizing the need for thorough discovery to ensure all relevant materials were accounted for, arguing against rushing the process. Both sides agreed on the importance of resolving these disputes efficiently but differed significantly on the approach.Judge Oetken stressed the need for cooperation between the parties and highlighted his preference for minimizing unnecessary motions. He set preliminary deadlines for document production and urged counsel to work collaboratively on narrowing disputes before formal filings. The judge indicated a tentative schedule for a future hearing, contingent on the progress of discovery, while cautioning both parties against dilatory tactics. The call concluded with the judge emphasizing the importance of clear communication between counsel to avoid escalating procedural disagreements.(commercial at 11:55)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:o49rJONc

The telephone conference in the case of 24 Civ. 1475 (JPO) took place between attorneys Zakarin and Blackburn, with Judge J. Paul Oetken presiding. The discussion primarily centered on procedural issues, including the timeline for motions and discovery. Zakarin argued for an expedited schedule to address key evidentiary matters critical to his client's position, citing potential prejudice if delays continued. Blackburn countered by emphasizing the need for thorough discovery to ensure all relevant materials were accounted for, arguing against rushing the process. Both sides agreed on the importance of resolving these disputes efficiently but differed significantly on the approach.Judge Oetken stressed the need for cooperation between the parties and highlighted his preference for minimizing unnecessary motions. He set preliminary deadlines for document production and urged counsel to work collaboratively on narrowing disputes before formal filings. The judge indicated a tentative schedule for a future hearing, contingent on the progress of discovery, while cautioning both parties against dilatory tactics. The call concluded with the judge emphasizing the importance of clear communication between counsel to avoid escalating procedural disagreements.(commercial at 8:38)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:o49rJONcBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The telephone conference in the case of 24 Civ. 1475 (JPO) took place between attorneys Zakarin and Blackburn, with Judge J. Paul Oetken presiding. The discussion primarily centered on procedural issues, including the timeline for motions and discovery. Zakarin argued for an expedited schedule to address key evidentiary matters critical to his client's position, citing potential prejudice if delays continued. Blackburn countered by emphasizing the need for thorough discovery to ensure all relevant materials were accounted for, arguing against rushing the process. Both sides agreed on the importance of resolving these disputes efficiently but differed significantly on the approach.Judge Oetken stressed the need for cooperation between the parties and highlighted his preference for minimizing unnecessary motions. He set preliminary deadlines for document production and urged counsel to work collaboratively on narrowing disputes before formal filings. The judge indicated a tentative schedule for a future hearing, contingent on the progress of discovery, while cautioning both parties against dilatory tactics. The call concluded with the judge emphasizing the importance of clear communication between counsel to avoid escalating procedural disagreements.(commercial at 11:02)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:o49rJONcBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The telephone conference in the case of 24 Civ. 1475 (JPO) took place between attorneys Zakarin and Blackburn, with Judge J. Paul Oetken presiding. The discussion primarily centered on procedural issues, including the timeline for motions and discovery. Zakarin argued for an expedited schedule to address key evidentiary matters critical to his client's position, citing potential prejudice if delays continued. Blackburn countered by emphasizing the need for thorough discovery to ensure all relevant materials were accounted for, arguing against rushing the process. Both sides agreed on the importance of resolving these disputes efficiently but differed significantly on the approach.Judge Oetken stressed the need for cooperation between the parties and highlighted his preference for minimizing unnecessary motions. He set preliminary deadlines for document production and urged counsel to work collaboratively on narrowing disputes before formal filings. The judge indicated a tentative schedule for a future hearing, contingent on the progress of discovery, while cautioning both parties against dilatory tactics. The call concluded with the judge emphasizing the importance of clear communication between counsel to avoid escalating procedural disagreements.(commercial at 8:38)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:o49rJONc

The telephone conference in the case of 24 Civ. 1475 (JPO) took place between attorneys Zakarin and Blackburn, with Judge J. Paul Oetken presiding. The discussion primarily centered on procedural issues, including the timeline for motions and discovery. Zakarin argued for an expedited schedule to address key evidentiary matters critical to his client's position, citing potential prejudice if delays continued. Blackburn countered by emphasizing the need for thorough discovery to ensure all relevant materials were accounted for, arguing against rushing the process. Both sides agreed on the importance of resolving these disputes efficiently but differed significantly on the approach.Judge Oetken stressed the need for cooperation between the parties and highlighted his preference for minimizing unnecessary motions. He set preliminary deadlines for document production and urged counsel to work collaboratively on narrowing disputes before formal filings. The judge indicated a tentative schedule for a future hearing, contingent on the progress of discovery, while cautioning both parties against dilatory tactics. The call concluded with the judge emphasizing the importance of clear communication between counsel to avoid escalating procedural disagreements.(commercial at 8:38)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:o49rJONc

Dr. Bob Kay from CHLA joins the show to discuss his recent research on access to hip reconstruction surgery for neuromuscular patients in the Los Angeles area. The Lightning Round discussion spans numerous hip topics including hip preservation surgery and Perthes as well as recent studies on MPFL reconstruction. Your hosts are Carter Clement from Children's Hospital of New Orleans, Josh Holt from Iowa, and Tyler McDonald from University of South Alabama. Music by A. A. Aalto.   References: X-Ray Adventures: https://www.amazon.com/X-ray-Adventures-Carter-Clement/dp/B0D9C5CRTF 1) Timely Hip Surgery Access in Children with Cerebral Palsy: Unaffected by Social Disadvantage at a Large Urban Safety Net Hospital. Wimmer et al. JPO, Oct 2024. PMID: 39350583. 2) Exploring the Experiences and Expectations of Adolescent Females Undergoing Periacetabular Osteotomy. Luck et al. JPO, Aug 2024. PMID: 39171434. 3) Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Adolescents Undergoing Pelvic Osteotomy: Insights From a Propensity-matched Retrospective Cohort Study. Mittal et al. JPO, Oct 2024. PMID: 39363394. 4) Prevalence and Risk Factors for Stiffness Following Open Reduction for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip. Desai et al. JPO, Nov-Dec 2024. PMID: 39021118. 5) Adherence to Wide-Abduction Brace Treatment is Associated With Improved Hip Abduction and Radiographic Outcomes in Legg-Calvé-Perthes Disease. Prasadh et al. JPO, Nov-Dec 2024. PMID: 39187945. 6) Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction in Adolescents: What Parents Care About. Culpepper et al. JPO, Aug 2024. PMID: 39171383. 7) Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Improves Patella Alta. Yang et al. JPO, Sep 2024. PMID: 39279747.

Dr. Jennifer Bauer from Seattle Children's Hospital is our special guest on this episode in which we discuss her recent randomized controlled trial which tested the effect of pre-operative carbohydrate drink on post-operative return of bowel function in pediatric spine fusion patients. This episode also highlights some recent work looking at the reversibility of hemiepiphysiodesis after PETS technique, a multicenter study of short versus long leg casting for distal tibial physeal fractures, and a 3D study of the distal femoral physis. Your hosts are Tyler McDonald from University of South Alabama, Craig Louer from Vanderbilt, and Julia Sanders from Children's Hospital Colorado. Music by A. A. Aalto. References: 1) Pre-operative carbohydrate drink in pediatric spine fusion: randomized control trial. Bauer et al. Spine Deform. 2024 Sep. PMID: 38769218. 2) Transphyseal Hemiepiphysiodesis: Is it Truly Reversible? Abdelaziz et al. JPO. 2024 Aug. PMID: 39187967. 3) Long Leg Versus Short Leg Cast Immobilization for Treatment of Salter-Harris II Distal Tibial Fractures After Closed Reduction: A Multisite Retrospective Study. Souder et al. JPOSNA. 2024 Aug. 4) Physeal Location on the Distal Femoral Cortical Surface Is Consistently Proximal to Apparent Location on the Perfect Lateral Radiograph: A 3-Dimensional Digitally Reconstructed Radiograph Study. Rosenthal et al. JAAOS. 2024 Aug. PMID: 38773850.

Dr. Dan Sucato from TSRH joins the show to discuss his recent research comparing osteotomy types for severe stable SCFE: Modified Dunn vs. Imhauser. The episode also covers multiple controversies in the worlds of hip preservation and spine deformity. The crew also discusses research spanning Perthes, CP, compartment syndrome, and more. Your hosts are Carter Clement from Children's Hospital of New Orleans, Josh Holt from University of Iowa, Craig Louer from Vanderbilt, and Tyler McDonald from University of South Alabama. Music by A. A. Aalto.   References: 1) Surgeon recommendations for physical activity in patients with pediatric hip conditions. Li et al. JPO 2024. PMID: 38835293. 2) Hip Surgery is Not More Painful Than Spine Surgery in Children With Cerebral Palsy. Padilla et al. JPO 2024. PMID: 38934603. 3) The Prevalence of Acute Compartment Syndrome in Pediatric Tibial Tubercle Fractures. Martinez et al. JPO 2024. PMID: 39021084. 4) Preliminary Study of Motion Preservation Following Posterior Dynamic Distraction Device in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients. Todderud et al. JPO 2024. PMID: 38946041. 5) Single Versus 3-incision Triple Pelvic Osteotomy: Comparison of Clinical and Radiologic Results. Kolac et al. JPO 2024. PMID: 38783820. 6) Predictors of Persistent Limp Following Proximal Femoral Varus Osteotomy for Perthes Disease. Orellana et al. JPO 2024. PMID: 38659309.

Ray White chats with Bongani Tembe, Chief Executive and Artistic Director of the JPO's Early Spring Season, which runs from August 8 to August 29 and features a riveting lineup of international conductors and soloists, as well as familiar faces and exciting debut performances.   See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Dr. Todd Blumberg from Seattle Children's joins the show to discuss his recent research proving the importance of careful patient positioning while obtaining a hip ultrasound in a Pavlik Harness. This episode also covers recent research on intra-op imaging after reducing a dislocated hip, screening scoliosis patients for hip dysplasia, and more. Your hosts are Carter Clement from Children's Hospital of New Orleans, Josh Holt from University of Iowa, and Craig Louer from Vanderbilt. Music by A. A. Aalto.   References: 1) Standardized in-harness Ultrasound Protocol Improves Success Rate of Brace Treatment for Dislocated Hips. Pargas-Colina et al. JPO 2024. PMID: 38647138. 2) Epidemiology of Pediatric Dog Walking-Related Injuries Among Children Presenting to US Emergency Departments, 2001 to 2020. Maxson et al. JPO 2024. PMID: 38899976. 3) Adolescent Athletes with Stronger Athletic Identity Perceptions Have Weaker Fear Avoidance Perceptions During Musculoskeletal Injury Rehabilitation Return to Sports Preparation. Ferman et al. JPO 2024. 38767118. 4) The Prevalence of Hip Dysplasia on Radiographs for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Fowler et al. JPO 2024. 38826034. 5) Intraoperative 3D Fluoroscopy During Open Reduction for DDH: An Effective Alternative to Postoperative CT/MRI. Baljoun et al. JPO 2024. 38779959.

Welcome to this episode of Now that's Significant, a market research podcast. Today's guest is JP Soltesz, a strategist, innovator, and futurist. The main topic Michael and JPO discussed is how market researchers can build on their human skills in a technology-first, AI-driven world. Here are five key takeaways from the episode: 1. Commercial drivers of AI: AI can automate mundane and repetitive tasks, freeing up employees for more strategic and higher-value work, potentially leading to revenue growth and reduced costs. 2. Preparing for an AI-driven workplace: Employees should be open to AI, identify tasks suitable for automation, and embrace upskilling opportunities. Leaders need to be transparent about their AI adoption strategies and encourage employee input. 3. Uniquely human characteristics: While AI can mimic creativity, curiosity, competitiveness, and compassion to some extent, humans have a limitless capacity for these traits. 4. The importance of human creativity: Consumers value human-driven creativity, as seen in the enduring popularity of live music and the rejection of performance-enhancing drugs in sports. 5. The power of human curiosity: True curiosity involves active listening and a willingness to act on new information, something AI cannot fully replicate. After listening to episode, it's well worth considering: In a world increasingly shaped by AI, how can we leverage our uniquely human strengths to thrive in the future of work? Tune in to other episodes of Now that's Significant for more insights on the latest advice, trends, and innovations in the insights industry. *** Infotools Harmoni is a fit-for-purpose market research analysis, visualization, and reporting platform that gives the world's leading brands the tools they need to better understand their consumers, customers, organization, and market. www.infotools.com Established in 1990, we work with some of the world's top brands around the world, including Coca-Cola, Orange, Samsung, and Mondelēz. Our powerful cloud-based platform, Harmoni, is purpose-built for market research. From data processing to investigation, dashboards to collaboration, Harmoni is a true "data-to-decision-making" solution for in-house corporate insights teams and agencies. While we don't facilitate market research surveys, we make it easy for to find and share compelling insights that go over-and-above what stakeholders want, inspiring them to act decisively. One of the most powerful features of Harmoni is Discover, a time-tested, time-saving, and investigative approach to data analysis. Using automated analyses to reveal patterns and trends, Discover minimizes potential research bias by removing the need for requesting and manually analyzing scores of cumbersome crosstabs – often seeing what you can't. Discover helps you easily find what differentiates groups that matter to you, uncover what makes them unique, and deliver data points that are interesting, relevant, and statistically significant, plus see things others can't. Add to all this an impending GenAI feature, and you have an extremely powerful, future-proofed tool. 

Dr. Jonathan Schoenecker from Vanderbilt joins the show to discuss his recent research on using CRP to manage musculoskeletal infections. This episode also covers recent research on the value of axial imaging in infections, numerous hip preservation treatments and considerations, and more. This episode is sponsored by OrthoFix. Your hosts are Craig Louer from Vanderbilt, Carter Clement from Children's Hospital of New Orleans, Josh Holt from University of Iowa, and Julia Sanders from Children's Hospital Colorado. Music by A. A. Aalto.   "Main Event" Citations 1. CRP Predicts the Need to Escalate Care After Initial Debridement for Musculoskeletal Infection. Moore-Lotridge et al. JPO. 2024 Mar. PMID: 37997444 2. Clinical Utility of Repeat Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies Among Children With Acute Hematogenous Osteomyelitis. Thorne et al. JPO. 2024 Mar. PMID: 38477331 "Lightning Round" Citations 1. A Role for Thyroid Testing in Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis? 32% Rate of Abnormal Values in Tested Patients. Nielsen et al. JPO. 2024 Feb. PMID: 38415747 2. Intraoperative Epiphyseal Perfusion Monitoring Does Not Reliably Predict Osteonecrosis Following Treatment of Unstable SCFE. Ellsworth et al. JPO. 2024 Feb. PMID: 38411144 3. Traditional Versus Water-resistant Short Leg Casting: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study. Carveth et al. JPO. 2024 Feb. PMID: 38329338 4. Microwave Ablation of the Pig Growth Plate: Proof of Concept for Minimally Invasive Epiphysiodesis. Noonan et al. CORR. 2024 Mar. PMID: 38471002

Shogo Matsunaga's practice covers legal advice and representation before courts in patent infringement disputes in the ICT and semiconductor technology sectors, trademark infringement disputes including anti-counterfeiting measures. Shogo is one of the most influential SEP experts in Japan, one of the organizers of the so-called “SEP study group in Japan,” and a Partner at Sonderhoff & Einsel, where he has worked on many SEP cases in the past. At Sonderhoff & Einsel, a law firm with German roots that has quite some history and is over 100 years in practice, Shogo represents Japanese clients in their worldwide SEP licensing negotiations and SEP litigation disputes. Japan has experienced only a handful of SEP cases thus far, including the Apple v. Samsung case, which saw a verdict delivered on May 16, 2014. Shogo discusses and expands upon the court ruling in the podcast because he feels that the outcome of the cases is often misinterpreted. He explains that Japanese courts are too often perceived as standards implementer friendly, which he explains is different. Shogo reveals that he was several times very close to being part of another SEP case in Japan, but when after all, the parties settled. But Shogo believes we will soon see the next SEP case litigated in Japan, maybe later this year. This also makes sense because Shogo explains that Japanese courts are efficient and that the Japanese smartphone market is huge, with strong sales numbers for high-end smartphone generations and brands.Japanese government agencies like the JPO or the METI have published guidelines for SEP licensing negotiations and fair value calculations. These guidelines, Shogo explains, are, however, not binding for courts and, in practice, only used sometimes. Like the JPO “Manual of Hantei”, a service by the JPO to claim chart Japanese patents – a service that was hardly ever used because claim chart results would be published.Shogo elaborates and compares the German court systems with the Japanese court systems, which have similarities because the Japanese patent system used the German system as the foundation. Even today, German courts have developed to handle multiple SEP cases per year, which differs from Japanese courts. Shogo explains the reason for that is that, as of today, the definition of a willing licensee in Japan could be clearer. SEP enforcing parties fear losing the case or only getting low royalties when litigating in Japanese courts. Again, Shogo does not see it that way and encourages SEP holders to try the courts again.Shogo describes how the Japanese industries have been behind in terms of SEP licensing. Also, in Japan, many suppliers indemnify OEMs when shipping connectivity solutions. Indemnification is decreasing, but Shogo feels the industry needs to change faster. Shogo, however, has a good feeling about the rising IoT industry in Japan and is eager to learn about SEP licensing and engage in understanding it early on. Shogo regularly meets with the Japanese IP industry experts in a group organized by METI called “SEP study group”. This group comprises over 150 member experts from various industries like Telecom, Automotive, Manufacturing, Home Appliances and many more. The Japanese community is well organized. However, Shogo explains when it's about SEPs, the different points of view, e.g., between automotive OEMs and the SEP owners, are often not openly discussed. Shogo would love to see more contrivers discussions. After all, Japan remains an exciting market and may soon become another important SEP litigation venue.

Par ici, les podcasts des interviews ! Deux émissions en direct de l’IUT, de 10h à 12h ; de 14h à 16h, par une team Campus motivée ! Merci à Juliette, Camille, Bastien, Fred, Marc et Mélissa. Merci au Service Audiovisuel de l’IUT pour le materiel mis à disposition, et à Delphine Clémenceau, qui a […] L'article JPO 2024 à l’IUT de Tours est apparu en premier sur Radio Campus Tours - 99.5 FM.

Samedi matin, j'ai accompagné Felicia aux journées portes ouvertes, les JPO, de l'université de La Sorbonne, sur le campus de Malesherbes dans le 17e. On commence à s'intéresser à ce qu'elle fera après le bac. Vous savez qu'elle a actuellement trois spécialités et en fonction des deux qu'elle gardera l'année prochaine, les possibilités d'études sont différentes.  www.onethinginafrenchday.com  

Dr. Dan Perry, a children's orthopaedist and NIHR research professor from Liverpool, joins the show to discuss his recent research, including numerous ongoing multicenter trials spanning the UK and beyond: SCIENCE, CRAAFT, FORCE, BASIS, ODD SOCKS, to name a few. The lightning round touches on compartment syndrome in ECMO, why pedipods get low online reviews, and more. This episode is sponsored by OrthoFix. Your hosts are Carter Clement from Children's Hospital of New Orleans and Craig Louer from Vanderbilt. Music by A. A. Aalto.   References:   Joseph et al. Radiological assessment of hip disease in children with cerebral palsy: development of a core measurement set. Bone & Joint Open. Nov 2023. PMID 37909150.   Bridges et al. Acute Compartment Syndrome in Pediatric Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support. JPO. Dec 2023 Epub. PMID 38084004.   Torres-Izquierdo et al. Is There a Role for Isolated Closed Reduction in the Emergency Department Without Fixation for Displaced Proximal Humerus Fractures in Adolescents? JPO. Dec 2023 Epub. PMID 38151963.   Martino et al. The Optimal Age for Surgical Management of DDH Differs by Treatment Method. JPO. Nov 2023 Epub. PMID 37970702.   Hitchman et al. An Analysis of Negative One-star Patient Reviews and Complaints for Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgeons throughout the United States: A Retrospective Study. JPO. Nov 2023 Epub. PMID 37970712.

This week on The Gimmick Street Wrestling Podcast Funky Sam Medina is joined by Florida wrestling personality Jordan Pierce Owens.Sam and JPO take cover some news topics and take a dive into this Saturday's Royal Rumble.

Dr. Ben Shore from Boston Children's joins the show to discuss his recent research on trauma, infection, discharge planning, neuromuscular hips, and more. The lightning round covers Vitamin D deficiency, scoliosis bracing, guided growth, and shared decision making. This episode is sponsored by Depuy Synthes Spine. Your hosts are Craig Louer from Vanderbilt, Carter Clement from Children's Hospital of New Orleans, Julia Sanders from Children's Hospital Colorado, and Josh Holt from University of Iowa. Music by A. A. Aalto.   References:   Watkins et al. The Reliability of Intraoperative Hip Arthrography in Cerebral Palsy Hip Reconstruction. JPOSNA 2023. https://doi.org/10.55275/JPOSNA-2023-595   Flaugh et al. Barriers to Discharge After Hip Reconstruction Surgery in Non-ambulatory Children With Neurological Complex Chronic Conditions. JPO Sept 2022.   Upasani et al with CORTICES Study Group. Practice Variation in the Surgical Management of Children With Acute Hematogenous Osteomyelitis. JPO 2022.   Montgomery et al. Minimizing Surgeon Radiation Exposure During Operative Treatment of Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures. JPO 2023.   Lightning Round   Karkenny et al. Pediatric Fractures: Does Vitamin D Play a Role? JPO 2023.   Catanzano et al. Cast or Nail? Using a Preference-Based Tool for Shared Decision-Making in Pediatric Femoral Shaft Fracture Treatment. JPO 2023.   Zapata et al. Early brace treatment for idiopathic scoliosis may change the paradigm to improve curves. Spine Deformity 2023.   McGinley et al. Faster Rate of Correction with Distal Femoral Transphyseal Screws Versus Plates in Hemiepiphysiodesis for Coronal-Plane Knee Deformity: Age- and Sex-Matched Cohorts of Skeletally Immature Patients. JBJS 2023.

Dr. Coleen Sabatini from UCSF joins the show to discuss implicit bias and bullying in our field, changing and international trends in supracondylars, and two international orthopedic public health issues she is immersed in solving: gluteal fibrosis and post-injection paralysis. The lightning round highlights new ultrasound techniques, SCFE implants, and more.    Your hosts are Carter Clement from Children's Hospital of New Orleans, Craig Louer from Vanderbilt, and Josh Holt from University of Iowa. Music by A. A. Alto.   References:   New Injury Patterns in Pediatric Supracondylar Fractures During COVID-19: Beds Are the New Monkey Bars. Soriano et al. JPO Apr 2023. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36662751/   Supracondylar humerus fractures in low- and lower middle-income countries: a scoping review of the current epidemiology, treatment modalities, and outcomes. Challa et al. International Orthopedics 2020. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32691122/   Implicit Racial Bias in Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery. Guzek et al. JPO 2022. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35522848/   The Prevalence of Bullying Among Pediatric Orthopaedic Patients. Carrillo et al. JPO 2021. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34294669/   Epidemiology and treatment outcomes in pediatric patients with post-injection paralysis. Song et al. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2022. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35932071/   Surgical Release of Gluteal Fibrosis in Children Results in Sustained Benefit at 5-Year Follow-up. Reilly et al. JPO 2021. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33481480/   Gluteal Fibrosis and Its Surgical Treatment. Alves et al. JBJS 2019. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30801376/   Gluteal fibrosis, post-injection paralysis, and related injection practices in Uganda: a qualitative analysis. Alves et al. BMC Health Services Research 2018. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30477506/   Burden of gluteal fibrosis and post-injection paralysis in the children of Kumi District in Uganda. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2018. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30249239/   Lightning Round:   The Usefulness of Dynamic Ultrasonography in Nursemaid's Elbow: A Prospective Case Series of 13 Patients Reconsideration of the Pathophysiology of Nursemaid's Elbow. Tsai et al. JPO July 2023. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36962080/   Seven-year Outcomes of Adolescent Forearm Fractures Treated With Plate Fixation. Folkman et al. JPO June 2023. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37072917/   The Addition of Daytime Physiotherapeutic Scoliosis-specific Exercises to Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Nighttime Bracing Reduces Curve Progression. Zapata et al. JPO July 2023. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36922003/   Who Benefits From Allowing the Physis to Grow in Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis? Winger et al. JPO July 2023. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36977364/        

Dr Matt Ellington from Central Texas Pediatric Orthopedics joins the show this month! We discuss pain management for ACL reconstruction and the danger of opioid use disorders, as well as grit scores and Dr Ellington's pearls for a variety of sports cases. The lightning round highlights the outcomes of THA in pediatric patients, spinal trauma classification systems, and long term outcomes after scoliosis surgery.    Your hosts are Julia Sanders from Children's Hospital Colorado, Carter Clement from Children's Hospital of New Orleans, Craig Louer from Vanderbilt, and Josh Holt from University of Iowa. This episode is sponsored by Nuvasive. Music by A. A. Alto.   References:   Akazawa et al. Health-Related Quality of Life of Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis at Least 40 Years After Surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2023.   Pascual-Leone N et al. Higher Grit Scores Are Associated With Earlier Increases in Knee Flexion Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Meniscus Repair in Pediatric Patients. JPO. 2023.   Sborov KD et al. Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Scale Can Help Identify Intra-Abdominal Injury in Children Injured in an MVC. JPOSNA. 2023.   Whitmarsh-Brown MA et al. Modernizing Our Understanding of Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Pediatric and Young Adult Patient: A Single-center Experience. JPO. 2023..   Cahan et al. Opioid Represcriptions After ACL Reconstruction in Adolescents Are Associated With Subsequent Opioid Use Disorder. JPO. 2023..   O'Neill NP et al. The Reliability of the AO Spine Upper Cervical Classification System in Children: Results of a Multi-Center Study. JPO. 2023.   Wagner et al. Variability in Pain Management Practices for Pediatric Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. JPO. 2023.

We open up today's last show continuing to debrief from last week's JPO, and we talk about the setup of where we were, and all the big time interactions we had as a show. Then, we let the Stallion tell a story about how he got together with a Grandma down at Myrtle Beach. We then move on to some Junkies content as EB wants to do a Manning-Cast for Commanders games. Then, we end on discussing the 9/11 menu that a restaurant in Stafford came up with that made national headlines. 

9/12 Hour 1   3:00 Commanders comeback win over Jaguars 17:00 Grading Carson Wentz 35:00 JPO sets a Maryland record with 890 players

The day we have been waiting for a while is here, we are LIVE from MGM inside the JPO room recording a fresh Bit Season episode for everyone. We then have our own presents for ourselves for our 50th episode, and basically the 1 year anniversary of Bit Season. We then take you inside the JPO, and commentate what we're seeing so far. We also get to talk about todays broadcast from MGM as Big John made his return to the show. Lastly, we end on Drab telling us what he was doing prior to todays episode. Like, comment, and subscribe! 

9/6 Hour 4   1:00 Mike Tirico 25:00 JPO 2022 Junkies itinerary 36:00 NY Times tennis writer Christopher Clary