Podcasts about denying

A surprise reversal in the Jeffrey Epstein narrative has many people wondering what's going on and why Attorney General Pam Bondi went from saying a list of the sex offender's clients were on her desk to saying the list doesn't exist. Plus, more than half of American murders go unsolved and Red Meat digs into why.

A surprise reversal in the Jeffrey Epstein narrative has many people wondering what's going on and why Attorney General Pam Bondi went from saying a list of the sex offender's clients were on her desk to saying the list doesn't exist. Plus, more than half of American murders go unsolved and Red Meat digs into why.

A surprise reversal in the Jeffrey Epstein narrative has many people wondering what's going on and why Attorney General Pam Bondi went from saying a list of the sex offender's clients were on her desk to saying the list doesn't exist. Plus, more than half of American murders go unsolved and Red Meat digs into why.

A surprise reversal in the Jeffrey Epstein narrative has many people wondering what's going on and why Attorney General Pam Bondi went from saying a list of the sex offender's clients were on her desk to saying the list doesn't exist. Plus, more than half of American murders go unsolved and Red Meat digs into why.

The most irrefutable testimony for the truth of God is a life that has been changed and healed!While Peter and John were addressing the people, the priests, the chief of the Temple police, and some Sadducees came up, indignant that these upstart apostles were instructing the people and proclaiming that the resurrection from the dead had taken place in Jesus. They arrested them and threw them in jail until morning, for by now it was late in the evening. But many of those who listened had already believed the Message, in round numbers about five thousand! Acts 4:1-4 MSGThose who are open to God's voice will hear Him, and those who aren't, won't! The next day the council of all the rulers and elders and teachers of religious law met in Jerusalem. Annas the high priest was there, along with Caiaphas, John, Alexander, and other relatives of the high priest. Acts 4:5-6 NLTThe decision to ignore or manipulate God's truth is a form of self-deception with roots in demonic rebellion! Jesus said to the people who believed in him, “You are truly my disciples if you remain faithful to my teachings. And you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.” John 8:31-32 NLTDenying the truth doesn't make it less true or you less accountable for the consequences of disobedience.They brought in the two disciples and demanded, “By what power, or in whose name, have you done this?” Acts 4:7 NLTThen Peter, filled with the Holy Spirit, said to them, “Rulers and elders of our people, are we being questioned today because we've done a good deed for a crippled man? Do you want to know how he was healed? Let me clearly state to all of you and to all the people of Israel that he was healed by the powerful name of Jesus Christ the Nazarene, the man you crucified but whom God raised from the dead. For Jesus is the one referred to in the Scriptures, where it says, ‘The stone that you builders rejected has now become the cornerstone.' There is salvation in no one else! God has given no other name under heaven by which we must be saved.” Acts 4:8-12 NLTA man can no more diminish God's glory by refusing to worship Him than a lunatic can put out the sun by scribbling the word 'darkness' on the walls of his cell. C. S. Lewis The members of the council were amazed when they saw the boldness of Peter and John, for they could see that they were ordinary men with no special training in the Scriptures. They also recognized them as men who had been with Jesus. But since they could see the man who had been healed standing right there among them, there was nothing the council could say. Acts 4:13-14 NLT Objections to God's truth and will and fall silent against an honest assessment of His Grace and Glory.What should we do with these men?” they asked each other. “We can't deny that they have performed a miraculous sign, and everybody in Jerusalem knows about it. Acts 4:16 NLTFriends, I realize that what you and your leaders did to Jesus was done in ignorance…. Now repent of your sins and turn to God, so that your sins may be wiped away. Acts 3:17 & 19 NLTJustification and pride are the right soil for deception, while humility and repentance are the right soil for a harvest of deliverance and freedom. The council then threatened them further, but they finally let them go because they didn't know how to punish them without starting a riot. For everyone was praising God for this miraculous sign, the healing of a man who had been lame for more than forty years. Acts 4:21-22 NLTAll the believers were united in heart and mind. And they felt that what they owned was not their own, so they shared everything they had. The apostles testified powerfully to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus, and God's great blessing was upon them all. Acts 4:32-33 NLTObedient faith in the risen Christ is the foundation for everything God does in and through His people and His church. 

Jimmy Failla is still on his big summer break, so we went to the Fox Across America bullpen and called upon Rich Zeoli from WPHT in Philadelphia. Rich welcomes in criminal defense attorney David Gelman, who gives his take on the verdict in Sean ‘Diddy' Combs' sex trafficking trial. Former University of Pennsylvania swimmer Paula Scanlan share her reaction to her alma mater coming to an agreement with the Department of Education, which resulted in the school stripping program records previously held by transgender swimmer Lia Thomas. National Review Staff Writer Caroline Downey talks about how the people who voted for Zohran Mamdani in the New York City mayoral primary clearly don't understand some of the policies he supports. Fox Nation host Abby Hornacek checks in to discuss the brand-new season of “PARK'D”. PLUS, New York Post financial correspondent Lydia Moynihan stops by to shed light on whether the Big Apple can survive a Mamdani mayoral term. [00:00:00] Diddy verdict is in [00:19:10] David Gelman [00:37:30] Paula Scanlan [00:56:07] Analyzing Zohran Mamdani's radical positions [01:14:50] Caroline Downey [01:28:35] Abby Hornacek [01:32:50] Lydia Moynihan Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

In the case of Doe v. Combs et al., No. 1:24-cv-01457-JPO, the plaintiff, Jane Doe, filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and associated entities, alleging personal injury. The court issued a Memorandum and Order addressing several key motions. Firstly, the court granted the plaintiff's motion to proceed under a pseudonym, allowing her to maintain anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the allegations. Secondly, the court denied the defendants' motion to dismiss the case, finding that the plaintiff's claims were sufficiently plausible to proceed to discovery.Additionally, the court addressed the defendants' motion to strike certain allegations from the complaint, which was denied. The court found that the contested allegations were relevant to the plaintiff's claims and did not prejudice the defendants. The Memorandum and Order concluded by setting a schedule for discovery and encouraging both parties to consider settlement discussions. This decision allows the case to move forward, with both sides preparing for the next stages of litigation.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:24cv1457 Jones v. Combs Sanctions Order.pdf

United States District Judge Arun Subramanian has denied Sean Combs's renewed motion for bail following a November 22, 2024, hearing. Combs originally filed the motion on November 8, 2024, with both parties providing supplemental letters on November 25 and 26, 2024, to support their arguments. The court evaluated the presented evidence and legal arguments during the proceedings and determined that the conditions of bail sought by Combs were not appropriate under the circumstances.The decision to deny bail highlights the court's assessment that Combs's release might pose legal or procedural risks that outweigh any arguments for his freedom pending further proceedings. Details of the ruling emphasize the seriousness of the case against him, with Judge Subramanian concluding that Combs must remain in custody as the legal process continues.(commercial at 9:46)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.92.0_1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Why is it ALWAYS the German bishops?Sponsored by Charity Mobilehttps://www.charitymobile.com/rtt.phpSources:https://www.returntotradition.orgContact Me:Email: return2catholictradition@gmail.comSupport My Work:Patreonhttps://www.patreon.com/AnthonyStineSubscribeStarhttps://www.subscribestar.net/return-to-traditionBuy Me A Coffeehttps://www.buymeacoffee.com/AnthonyStinePhysical Mail:Anthony StinePO Box 3048Shawnee, OK74802Follow me on the following social media:https://www.facebook.com/ReturnToCatholicTradition/https://twitter.com/pontificatormax+JMJ+

Why is it ALWAYS the German bishops?Sponsored by Charity Mobilehttps://www.charitymobile.com/rtt.phpSources:https://www.returntotradition.orgContact Me:Email: return2catholictradition@gmail.comSupport My Work:Patreonhttps://www.patreon.com/AnthonyStineSubscribeStarhttps://www.subscribestar.net/return-to-traditionBuy Me A Coffeehttps://www.buymeacoffee.com/AnthonyStinePhysical Mail:Anthony StinePO Box 3048Shawnee, OK74802Follow me on the following social media:https://www.facebook.com/ReturnToCatholicTradition/https://twitter.com/pontificatormax+JMJ+

Big Idea: The first step to moving to competence is to realize that you lack competence.

Ben Criddle talks BYU sports every weekday from 2 to 6 pm.Today's Co-Hosts: Ben Criddle (@criddlebenjamin)Subscribe to the Cougar Sports with Ben Criddle podcast:Apple Podcasts: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/cougar-sports-with-ben-criddle/id99676

Want more MTM Vegas? Check out our Patreon for access to our exclusive weekly aftershow! patreon.com/mtmvegas Episode Description This week news broke that Hard Rock has changed some aspects of the guitar tower. With more rooms and a reduction of spa space, does this mean they are cutting back or have plans just changed? Plus find out what is growing under the new plans and what the new Hard Rock Las Vegas Guitar Tower construction looks like now. In other #news Vegas is slow this summer so we take a look at rates at the same time people are discussing what the city can do to draw tourists back. We also discuss: Elaine Wynn's condo, Virgin's two story Garden Villa, hot dog inflation at Casino Royale, the A's groundbreaking ceremony, denying payment because of a player's card and where you can soon eat NYC's oldest dim sum in Vegas. Episode Guide 0:00 Vegas hotdog inflation 0:35 A's “groundbreaking” ceremony & doubts created 2:31 BLVD update - Vast improvement over what came before 4:02 Eataly's new entrance is now open 4:40 What can Vegas do to instantly attract more tourists? 8:01 A look inside Elaine Wynn's condo - Now for sale 9:22 Virgin's two story Grand Villa 11:27 The next Vegas pedestrian bridge 12:35 A look at Vegas Summer room rates 15:32 Denying jackpots based on the players card? 17:10 NYC's oldest dim sum is coming to Vegas 19:09 Mirage Guitar Update - Cutbacks or “refined” planning? 21:21 Guitar construction update & debating views   Each week tens of thousands of people tune into our MtM Vegas news shows at http://www.YouTube.com/milestomemories. We do two news shows weekly on YouTube with this being the audio version. Never miss out on the latest happenings in and around Las Vegas! Enjoying the podcast? Please consider leaving us a positive review on your favorite podcast platform! You can also connect with us anytime at podcast@milestomemories.com.  You can subscribe on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify or by searching "MtM Vegas" or "Miles to Memories" in your favorite podcast app. Don't forget to check out our travel/miles/points podcast as well!

United States District Judge Arun Subramanian has denied Sean Combs's renewed motion for bail following a November 22, 2024, hearing. Combs originally filed the motion on November 8, 2024, with both parties providing supplemental letters on November 25 and 26, 2024, to support their arguments. The court evaluated the presented evidence and legal arguments during the proceedings and determined that the conditions of bail sought by Combs were not appropriate under the circumstances.The decision to deny bail highlights the court's assessment that Combs's release might pose legal or procedural risks that outweigh any arguments for his freedom pending further proceedings. Details of the ruling emphasize the seriousness of the case against him, with Judge Subramanian concluding that Combs must remain in custody as the legal process continues.(commercial at 9:46)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.92.0_1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Alan discusses two problems he has with the Quran's reference to crucifixion and explains why that's a huge problem for Muslims.

It's a good thing that over the years I haven't had to wear a nametag when I went to see the dentist. Yeah, I'm doing better now. But, you know, for years I didn't really anxiously await my opportunity to spend time in the dentist's chair. I'm not sure you do either. I mean, look, we all have a tendency to avoid appointments that may be unpleasant, don't we? And, in most cases, you could put off - even cancel - meetings you don't want to have. In most cases. I'm Ron Hutchcraft and I want to have A Word With You today about "The Appointment You Will Keep." In our word for today from the Word of God, God announces an appointment. It's in His Book; it's not in yours. Hebrews 9:27 - "Man is destined to die once, and after that to face judgment." God makes it very clear: we have an appointment with our Creator - or, as the old-timers used to say, "meet our Maker." Now that final reality is something that, well, we'd rather run from than face a lot of times. One alternative idea we hear a lot about is reincarnation. Of course, that's not really a new idea. Reincarnation proposes that we can escape this day of reckoning indefinitely through this endless cycle of starting over. Of course, the only One who knows for sure what happens beyond death is God Himself. And He leaves absolutely no room for us going around again when it says man's destiny is to, "die once and after that to face judgment." When God talks about facing judgment, He says you and I will have to account to Him for our life; a life that, according to the Bible, has been lived outside our Creator's plans. In God's own words, "All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God." Nobody has lived up to God's standards. Everybody has the death penalty of sin to deal with. That's why so many people become religious and try to do good. We hope we can somehow pay off our sins. But again, our way of getting ready for our appointment with God is useless. The Bible says that at the time of judgment, "Every mouth will be silenced and the whole world held accountable to God. Therefore, no one will be declared righteous (that means right with God...qualified to go to heaven) by observing the law" (or doing all the right things). There's no way you can pay your sin-bill with your religion, your generosity, or your goodness. The only way this eternal bill could be paid was by God's eternal Son, Jesus Christ. The payment we're trying to make with our goodness was already made by Jesus when He took our death penalty on His cross. The only question God's going to ask you when you keep your appointment with Him is, "What did you do with My Son?" Years ago when prairie fires would sweep across Indian lands, Native Americans would literally fight fire with fire. They would actually set a fire in a trench around their village. When the prairie fire hit that already burned area, it stopped. The principle of stopping the fire was simple: the fire cannot go where the fire has already been. The fire of God's judgment for the sinning we've all done has already fallen on His Son at the cross. If you put your trust in Jesus to be your Savior from your sin, your judgment is canceled, because the fire cannot go where the fire has already been. Other appointments can be postponed or canceled, but not your appointment with your God. Denying it, ignoring it, running from it won't change it. The only thing to do is be prepared for it! You can do that by telling Jesus right where you are that you want to begin this life-saving relationship with Him. You say, "Jesus, I'm Yours." Listen, there's much more information about how to begin with Him at our website. Please check it out, it's ANewStory.com. Somewhere in this country someone is going to keep their appointment with God today. And just like you, no one thinks it will be him or her. Someone will be wrong. Please be sure that you've settled your relationship with the Man who died so you could live. Then whenever your appointment with God is, you'll have nothing to fear.

Recent judicial decisions denying anonymity to plaintiffs in sexual assault lawsuits against Sean "Diddy" Combs could significantly influence other pending and future cases against him. In October 2024, U.S. District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ruled that a woman accusing Combs of rape in 2004 must reveal her identity to proceed with her lawsuit. The judge emphasized the public's interest in open judicial proceedings and Combs' right to investigate the accuser's background and credibility. This decision sets a precedent that may compel other plaintiffs to disclose their identities, potentially deterring some from pursuing legal action due to fears of public exposure and retaliation. The implications of this ruling extend beyond individual cases, potentially affecting the broader landscape of sexual assault litigation involving high-profile figures. Legal experts suggest that requiring plaintiffs to identify themselves could discourage victims from coming forward, especially when the accused holds significant power and influence. This development may lead to a chilling effect on the filing of similar lawsuits, as potential plaintiffs weigh the personal risks of public identification against seeking justice. Consequently, the balance between a defendant's right to a fair trial and a plaintiff's right to privacy remains a contentious issue in the legal system.Let's dive in!(commercial at 8:46)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sean ‘Diddy' Combs case: What the Jane Doe ruling could mean for the other already-filed cases | CNN

Recent judicial decisions denying anonymity to plaintiffs in sexual assault lawsuits against Sean "Diddy" Combs could significantly influence other pending and future cases against him. In October 2024, U.S. District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ruled that a woman accusing Combs of rape in 2004 must reveal her identity to proceed with her lawsuit. The judge emphasized the public's interest in open judicial proceedings and Combs' right to investigate the accuser's background and credibility. This decision sets a precedent that may compel other plaintiffs to disclose their identities, potentially deterring some from pursuing legal action due to fears of public exposure and retaliation. The implications of this ruling extend beyond individual cases, potentially affecting the broader landscape of sexual assault litigation involving high-profile figures. Legal experts suggest that requiring plaintiffs to identify themselves could discourage victims from coming forward, especially when the accused holds significant power and influence. This development may lead to a chilling effect on the filing of similar lawsuits, as potential plaintiffs weigh the personal risks of public identification against seeking justice. Consequently, the balance between a defendant's right to a fair trial and a plaintiff's right to privacy remains a contentious issue in the legal system.Let's dive in!(commercial at 8:46)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sean ‘Diddy' Combs case: What the Jane Doe ruling could mean for the other already-filed cases | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Pastor Anthony Uvenio of the Reformed Rookie podcast delves into Titus 1:15, exploring the contrast between inner and outer purity. He discusses the dangers of false teachers who rely on self-righteousness and human commandments, contrasting this with the true purity found only through faith in Christ and the regenerating work of the Holy Spirit. Key themes include the nature of "defilement," the importance of sound doctrine leading to sound living, the role of good works as fruit of salvation (not its cause), and the distinction between true and make-believe faith. The episode also highlights the significance of a renewed conscience, the dangers of self-reliance, and the importance of trusting in Christ's finished work.#reformedtheology #titus1 #solafide #solascriptura #justificationbyfaith #goodworks #TotalDepravity #ChristianLiberty #innerpurity #falseteachers www.ReformedRookie.comPodcast: https://anchor.fm/reformedrookieFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheReformedRookie Twitter: https://twitter.com/NYapologistSemper Reformanda!

In the case of Doe v. Combs et al., No. 1:24-cv-01457-JPO, the plaintiff, Jane Doe, filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and associated entities, alleging personal injury. The court issued a Memorandum and Order addressing several key motions. Firstly, the court granted the plaintiff's motion to proceed under a pseudonym, allowing her to maintain anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the allegations. Secondly, the court denied the defendants' motion to dismiss the case, finding that the plaintiff's claims were sufficiently plausible to proceed to discovery.Additionally, the court addressed the defendants' motion to strike certain allegations from the complaint, which was denied. The court found that the contested allegations were relevant to the plaintiff's claims and did not prejudice the defendants. The Memorandum and Order concluded by setting a schedule for discovery and encouraging both parties to consider settlement discussions. This decision allows the case to move forward, with both sides preparing for the next stages of litigation.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:24cv1457 Jones v. Combs Sanctions Order.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Tony is joined with William Jacobson of the Cornell Law School to talk about the Supreme Court upholding the Tennessee ban on youth gender affirming care. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

United States District Judge Arun Subramanian has denied Sean Combs's renewed motion for bail following a November 22, 2024, hearing. Combs originally filed the motion on November 8, 2024, with both parties providing supplemental letters on November 25 and 26, 2024, to support their arguments. The court evaluated the presented evidence and legal arguments during the proceedings and determined that the conditions of bail sought by Combs were not appropriate under the circumstances.The decision to deny bail highlights the court's assessment that Combs's release might pose legal or procedural risks that outweigh any arguments for his freedom pending further proceedings. Details of the ruling emphasize the seriousness of the case against him, with Judge Subramanian concluding that Combs must remain in custody as the legal process continues.(commercial at 9:46)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.92.0_1.pdf

Complex problems often assume complex solutions, but recent observations about increased levels of anxiety and depression, increased reports of loneliness, and lower rates of in-person friendships for teens and children in America today have led some school districts across the country to take direct and simple action: Take away the access to smartphones in schools.Not everyone is convinced. When social psychologist and author Jonathan Haidt proposed five solutions to what he called an "epidemic of mental illness" for young adults in America, many balked at the simplicity. Writing for the outlet Platformer, reporter Zoe Schiffer spoke with multiple behavioral psychologists who alleged that Haidt's book cherry-picks survey data, ignores mental health crises amongst adults, and over-simplifies a complex problem with a blunt solution. And in speaking on the podcast Power User, educator Brandon Cardet-Hernandez argued that phone bans in schools would harm the students that need phones the most for things like translation services and coordinating rides back home from parents with varying schedules. But Haidt isn't alone in thinking that smartphones have done serious harm to teenagers and kids today, and many schools across America are taking up the mantle to at least remove their access in their own hallways. In February, Los Angeles Unified School District did just that, and a board member for the school district told the Lock and Code podcast that he believes the change has been for the better. But for those still in doubt, there's a good reason now to look back. Today, on the Lock and Code podcast with host David Ruiz, we revisit a 2024 interview with Dr. Jean Twenge about her research into the differences in America between today's teens and the many generations that came before. A psychologist and published author, Twenge believes she has found enough data tying increased smartphone use and social media engagement with higher strains on mental health. In today's re-broadcast episode, Twenge explains where she believes there is a mental health crisis amongst today's teens, where it is unique to their generation, and whether it can all be traced to smartphones and social media. According to Dr. Twenge, the answer to all those questions is, pretty much, “Yes.” But, she said, there's still some hope to be found.“This is where the argument around smartphones and social media being behind the adolescent mental health crisis actually has, kind of paradoxically, some optimism to it. Because if that's the cause, that means we can do something about it.”Tune in today to listen to the full conversation.You can also find us on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and whatever preferred podcast platform you use.For all our cybersecurity coverage, visit Malwarebytes Labs at malwarebytes.com/blog.Show notes and credits:Intro Music: “Spellbound” by Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 Licensehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Outro Music: “Good God” by Wowa (unminus.com)Listen up—Malwarebytes doesn't just talk cybersecurity, we provide...

The judge overseeing the lawsuit filed by "Jane Doe" against Sean "Diddy" Combs ruled that the plaintiff cannot proceed anonymously. In her decision, the judge emphasized the importance of transparency in judicial proceedings, noting that while privacy concerns are understandable in sensitive cases, they do not outweigh the legal principle of openness in the courtroom. The court found that the plaintiff's request lacked specific evidence of harm that would justify anonymity, especially given the public interest surrounding the high-profile case. As a result, the plaintiff has been given a deadline to refile her case using her real name if she wishes to proceed; failure to do so could result in the case's dismissal.(commercial at 10:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:doe-v-combs-ruling-usdc-southern-new-york.pdf

In response to the Court's request during the November 22, 2024, hearing, defendant Sean Combs has submitted a letter addressing the permissible scope of his communications under the Court's order and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 23.1. Combs' legal team outlines the types of interactions he is allowed to engage in, ensuring compliance with the Court's directives while upholding his First and Sixth Amendment rights. The letter emphasizes the importance of balancing the need to prevent potential jury tampering or undue influence with Combs' constitutional rights to free speech and a fair trial.The submission seeks to clarify the boundaries of acceptable communications, proposing guidelines that would allow Combs to maintain necessary personal and professional interactions without violating legal restrictions. By providing this detailed briefing, Combs' attorneys aim to assist the Court in establishing clear parameters that protect the integrity of the judicial process while respecting the defendant's fundamental rights.United States District Judge Arun Subramanian has denied Sean Combs's renewed motion for bail following a November 22, 2024, hearing. Combs originally filed the motion on November 8, 2024, with both parties providing supplemental letters on November 25 and 26, 2024, to support their arguments. The court evaluated the presented evidence and legal arguments during the proceedings and determined that the conditions of bail sought by Combs were not appropriate under the circumstances.The decision to deny bail highlights the court's assessment that Combs's release might pose legal or procedural risks that outweigh any arguments for his freedom pending further proceedings. Details of the ruling emphasize the seriousness of the case against him, with Judge Subramanian concluding that Combs must remain in custody as the legal process continues.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.92.0_1.pdfgov.uscourts.nysd.628425.85.0.pdf

In response to the Court's request during the November 22, 2024, hearing, defendant Sean Combs has submitted a letter addressing the permissible scope of his communications under the Court's order and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 23.1. Combs' legal team outlines the types of interactions he is allowed to engage in, ensuring compliance with the Court's directives while upholding his First and Sixth Amendment rights. The letter emphasizes the importance of balancing the need to prevent potential jury tampering or undue influence with Combs' constitutional rights to free speech and a fair trial.The submission seeks to clarify the boundaries of acceptable communications, proposing guidelines that would allow Combs to maintain necessary personal and professional interactions without violating legal restrictions. By providing this detailed briefing, Combs' attorneys aim to assist the Court in establishing clear parameters that protect the integrity of the judicial process while respecting the defendant's fundamental rights.United States District Judge Arun Subramanian has denied Sean Combs's renewed motion for bail following a November 22, 2024, hearing. Combs originally filed the motion on November 8, 2024, with both parties providing supplemental letters on November 25 and 26, 2024, to support their arguments. The court evaluated the presented evidence and legal arguments during the proceedings and determined that the conditions of bail sought by Combs were not appropriate under the circumstances.The decision to deny bail highlights the court's assessment that Combs's release might pose legal or procedural risks that outweigh any arguments for his freedom pending further proceedings. Details of the ruling emphasize the seriousness of the case against him, with Judge Subramanian concluding that Combs must remain in custody as the legal process continues.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.92.0_1.pdfgov.uscourts.nysd.628425.85.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Earthquakes and volcanoes; Trees of Knowledge and Life; Fleeing the light; Hebrew Letters have meaning; "Earth" = "Erets" = aleph-resh-tzedek; Gimel = cause and effect; Divine design; Why does God allow xxxxxx?; "logos" vs "rhema"; Healing the demoniac; Learning from Genesis; Nimrod the hunter?; Human resources; Cities; Idolatry; Mighty?; Gimel-biet-resh; Returning to the Tree of Life; Cow story; Giving your live to others; Respecters of persons; Socialism; Benefactors exercising authority; Laws for Adam and Eve; Eden; Gen 26:5 Commandment; Fortress/snare?; Bondage; "Person"; vs Individual; Mem-tzdek-vav-hey; Flowing righteousness; Abraham's obedience; "Torah" = Tav-resh-hey; Law of faith; Men of the city; Natural Law = Right Reason; "God"?; LORD vs Lord; God's voice; His will; The Way of righteousness; Blessings/curses; Learning to be Israel; "Beersheba"; Denying your snares; Gen 26:25; "Gerar"; Obeying God; Gen 22:1 Tempting Abraham; Moriah?; Mem-vav-resh-yod-hey; Place where spirit of God flows; Lifting eyes = seeing more; "Worship"; Membership; Covetous practices; Tempt (Naca) = prove? Test, try; Mark of the Beast; Torment?; Violence?; The solution; Sacrifice; Will of God; State of prayer; Sticking to what's right; Evil revealing itself; Garden = protected place; Wells of righteousness; Angel of the LORD?; Today's Israel; Doing the will of the Father; Possessing gates?; Lot in Sodom's gates; God's many of Babylon; God's arrangement; Following diving spark (yod); Burnt offerings; Modern churches ruling over you; Gen 22:20; Abraham dwelling at Beersheba; Building altars; Nahor; Statues?; Insurance company story; Terah's position; Authority; The greatest destroyer of liberties; Nahor's children; Lessons for you; Bondage of Egypt; Moses echoing Abraham; Shem's blessing for Abraham; "I AM"; "aleph" = relationship of God and man; The ways of God; Seeing curses as blessings; Constantine's church; Early councils; Temple at Ephesus; Doing what Christ said to do; Melchizedek; Acting upon what you see; Learn to be Israel.

In response to the Court's request during the November 22, 2024, hearing, defendant Sean Combs has submitted a letter addressing the permissible scope of his communications under the Court's order and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 23.1. Combs' legal team outlines the types of interactions he is allowed to engage in, ensuring compliance with the Court's directives while upholding his First and Sixth Amendment rights. The letter emphasizes the importance of balancing the need to prevent potential jury tampering or undue influence with Combs' constitutional rights to free speech and a fair trial.The submission seeks to clarify the boundaries of acceptable communications, proposing guidelines that would allow Combs to maintain necessary personal and professional interactions without violating legal restrictions. By providing this detailed briefing, Combs' attorneys aim to assist the Court in establishing clear parameters that protect the integrity of the judicial process while respecting the defendant's fundamental rights.United States District Judge Arun Subramanian has denied Sean Combs's renewed motion for bail following a November 22, 2024, hearing. Combs originally filed the motion on November 8, 2024, with both parties providing supplemental letters on November 25 and 26, 2024, to support their arguments. The court evaluated the presented evidence and legal arguments during the proceedings and determined that the conditions of bail sought by Combs were not appropriate under the circumstances.The decision to deny bail highlights the court's assessment that Combs's release might pose legal or procedural risks that outweigh any arguments for his freedom pending further proceedings. Details of the ruling emphasize the seriousness of the case against him, with Judge Subramanian concluding that Combs must remain in custody as the legal process continues.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.92.0_1.pdfgov.uscourts.nysd.628425.85.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Mark Grote and Ramie Makhlouf were joined by Bulls Radio analyst Bill Wennington to discuss the team's outlook, the NBA Finals and more.

In the third hour, Mark Grote and Ramie Makhlouf were joined by Bulls Radio analyst Bill Wennington to discuss the team's outlook, the NBA Finals and more. Later, Grote and Makhlouf got a kick out of Cubs Radio play-by-play announcer Pat Hughes talking music recently.

Mike Mulligan and David Haugh were joined by Chicago Sports Network reporter K.C. Johnson to share insight on his reporting that the Bulls denied the Knicks' request to speak to head coach Billy Donovan about the coaching vacancy in New York. Johnson also discussed the Pacers taking a 2-1 lead on the Thunder in the NBA Finals.

In the case of Doe v. Combs (No. 1:24-cv-08054-MKV), the court denied the plaintiff's motion for reconsideration regarding her request to proceed under a pseudonym. The plaintiff, alleging sexual assault by Sean Combs, initially sought to maintain anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the case. However, the court emphasized the importance of transparency in judicial proceedings and found that the plaintiff's concerns did not outweigh the public's right to open access.The court acknowledged the plaintiff's fears of potential harm but determined that these concerns were speculative and unsupported by concrete evidence. It noted that many plaintiffs in similar cases proceed under their real names without incident. Consequently, the court upheld its original decision, requiring the plaintiff to refile the complaint using her legal name to ensure fairness and uphold the principles of open justice.(commercial at 8:18)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630450.22.0.pdf

The judge overseeing the lawsuit filed by "Jane Doe" against Sean "Diddy" Combs ruled that the plaintiff cannot proceed anonymously. In her decision, the judge emphasized the importance of transparency in judicial proceedings, noting that while privacy concerns are understandable in sensitive cases, they do not outweigh the legal principle of openness in the courtroom. The court found that the plaintiff's request lacked specific evidence of harm that would justify anonymity, especially given the public interest surrounding the high-profile case. As a result, the plaintiff has been given a deadline to refile her case using her real name if she wishes to proceed; failure to do so could result in the case's dismissal.(commercial at 10:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:doe-v-combs-ruling-usdc-southern-new-york.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Troy Dannen denied Nebrasketball a banner at PBA commemorating the team's Crown Championship. Did The Crown really matter? What did it do? And how high should Connor button his polo shirt?

At the beginning of this month, Israel and its apologists ferociously denied claims that IDF troops had fired upon civilians seeking aid at a Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) site, killing 31 people. On the second of June, Israeli forces again opened fire on civilians seeking aid in Gaza, killing three people and injuring more than 30. On June 3, Israeli forces again opened fire on civilians seeking aid, reportedly killing at least 27 people. The US/Israeli-backed GHF temporarily suspended operations after this spate of mass shootings. On June 8, Israeli forces again fired upon civilians seeking aid at two separate distribution points in Gaza, killing twelve. On June 9, Israel and Israeli-backed forces opened fire on a crowd at an aid site in Gaza, killing 14. And on June 10, at least 36 people were reported killed and 208 wounded when Israeli forces again fired on crowds seeking aid in Gaza. Reading by Tim Foley.

Pres. Trump's rapid deployment of the National Guard limited LA violence overnight, but California politicians sided with lefty rioters' commitment to violating the rule of law. The latest on California mayhem, plus all the morning's biggest news on the Wednesday Bob Rose Show for 6-11-25

Judge John Judge issued an order denying Bryan Kohberger's motion to strike the death penalty on the grounds that he may have Autism Spectrum Disorder. Kohberger's defense team argued that his possible diagnosis made him categorically ineligible for the death penalty under constitutional protections. However, the judge ruled that Idaho law does not recognize autism as a categorical bar to capital punishment, unlike intellectual disability. He emphasized that while evidence of Kohberger's mental health status may be presented during the sentencing phase if he is convicted, it is not a basis to prevent the State from seeking the death penalty at this stage.The judge made clear that questions about Kohberger's mental health, including any evidence of autism, must be reserved for trial and possible sentencing proceedings—not pretrial motions. He stated that ruling otherwise would require him to make findings of fact not appropriate at this phase and reiterated that the law demands that a jury, not the court alone, determine any mitigating factors after conviction. Thus, Kohberger remains eligible for the death penalty as the case proceeds toward trial.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:042425+Order+on+Defendants+Motion+to+Strike+Death+Penalty+RE+Autism+Spectrum+Disorder.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Judge John Judge issued an order denying Bryan Kohberger's motion to strike the death penalty on the grounds that he may have Autism Spectrum Disorder. Kohberger's defense team argued that his possible diagnosis made him categorically ineligible for the death penalty under constitutional protections. However, the judge ruled that Idaho law does not recognize autism as a categorical bar to capital punishment, unlike intellectual disability. He emphasized that while evidence of Kohberger's mental health status may be presented during the sentencing phase if he is convicted, it is not a basis to prevent the State from seeking the death penalty at this stage.The judge made clear that questions about Kohberger's mental health, including any evidence of autism, must be reserved for trial and possible sentencing proceedings—not pretrial motions. He stated that ruling otherwise would require him to make findings of fact not appropriate at this phase and reiterated that the law demands that a jury, not the court alone, determine any mitigating factors after conviction. Thus, Kohberger remains eligible for the death penalty as the case proceeds toward trial.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:042425+Order+on+Defendants+Motion+to+Strike+Death+Penalty+RE+Autism+Spectrum+Disorder.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Num. 16:25–32 Ezek. 13:1–11 Mark 12:18–27 1 Tim. 6:20–21 Scripture paints a challenging picture for our age. It shows that while the Church is a community of people who welcome others into it, it also has boundary lines. One of the boundary lines is the doctrine of the Trinity. In this message, we learn what Scripture says about those who teach false doctrine and highlight a few of the prominent groups and people in Church history who have taught a false doctrine of the Trinity in particular.

Genesis 33:1-20 1. Jacob's bowing reveals genuine remorse 2. Esau's embrace reveals a genuine heart forgiveness 3. Mutual tears reveals genuine reconciliation 4. Mutual loving conversation reveals genuine rebuilding 5. Jacob's distance reveals the limitations of forgiveness Excerpted from “Total Forgiveness” by R.T. Kendall What Total Forgiveness is Not: 1. Approval of what they did 2. Excusing what they did 3. Justifying what they did 4. Pardoning what they did 5. Reconciliation 6. Denying what they did 7. Blindness to what happened 8. Forgetting 9. Refusing to take the wrong seriously 10. Pretending we're not hurt What Total Forgiveness is: 1. Being aware of what someone has done and still forgiving 2. Choosing to keep no record of wrongs 3. Refusing to punish 4. Not telling what they did 5. Being merciful 6. Graciousness 7. A heart thing 8. The absence of bitterness 9. Forgiving God 10. Forgiving ourselves

Relationship Reddit Stories, OP's ex claims that she's denying him seeing their son, however he abandoned them years ago and his family protected him.0:00 Intro0:17 Story 16:05 Story 1 Comments / OP's Replies7:07 Story 1 Update 11:44 Story 1 Comments / OP's Replies13:05 Story 217:02 Story 2 Comments18:48 Story 2 Update20:31 Story 2 Comments / OP's Reply#redditupdate #redditrelationship #redditstoriesreddit Become a member at https://plus.acast.com/s/mark-narrations-the-wafflecast-reddit-stories. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Let's talk about Trump's FEMA denying North Carolina help....

Phil, Brett, & Raymond are joined by AK Kamara to discuss Trump slamming the President of South Africa over the ongoing attacks against white people, a federal judge blocking the Trump administration from deporting criminal illegal immigrants to South Sudan, a Democrat bragging about interfering with ICE operations, and the male loneliness epidemic getting worse in America.   Hosts:  Phil @PhilThatRemains (X) Brett  @PopCultureCrisis   Raymond @RaymondGStanley (X) Serge @SergeDotCom (everywhere) Guest: AK Kamara @realakkamara (X)

In this case, plaintiff John Doe alleged that Sean Combs sexually assaulted him in 1998 at the age of sixteen and sought to proceed anonymously due to the sensitive nature of his allegations. Judge Jennifer L. Rochon evaluated Doe's request to use a pseudonym according to the balancing factors outlined by the Second Circuit in Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant. After careful consideration, the court acknowledged the sensitivity of the allegations but found that Doe had not sufficiently demonstrated a substantial risk of harm or retaliation that would justify withholding his identity.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629911.64.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this case, plaintiff John Doe alleged that Sean Combs sexually assaulted him in 1998 at the age of sixteen and sought to proceed anonymously due to the sensitive nature of his allegations. Judge Jennifer L. Rochon evaluated Doe's request to use a pseudonym according to the balancing factors outlined by the Second Circuit in Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant. After careful consideration, the court acknowledged the sensitivity of the allegations but found that Doe had not sufficiently demonstrated a substantial risk of harm or retaliation that would justify withholding his identity.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629911.64.0.pdf

MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on Donald Trump denying the emergency requests of states that voted for him in an act of utter cruelty. Miracle Made: Upgrade your sleep with Miracle Made! Go to https://TryMiracle.com/MEIDAS and use the code MEIDAS to claim your FREE 3 piece towel set and save over 40% OFF! Visit https://meidasplus.com for more! Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast The Influence Continuum: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan Mea Culpa with Michael Cohen: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/mea-culpa-with-michael-cohen The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show Burn the Boats: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/burn-the-boats Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 Political Beatdown: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/political-beatdown On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered Coalition of the Sane: https://meidasnews.com/tag/coalition-of-the-sane Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices