Podcasts about denying

Let's talk about Trump's FEMA denying North Carolina help....

1. The Departing, Denying and Deceiving 2. The Anointing and Abiding 3. The Perseverance Of The Saints

Phil, Brett, & Raymond are joined by AK Kamara to discuss Trump slamming the President of South Africa over the ongoing attacks against white people, a federal judge blocking the Trump administration from deporting criminal illegal immigrants to South Sudan, a Democrat bragging about interfering with ICE operations, and the male loneliness epidemic getting worse in America.   Hosts:  Phil @PhilThatRemains (X) Brett  @PopCultureCrisis   Raymond @RaymondGStanley (X) Serge @SergeDotCom (everywhere) Guest: AK Kamara @realakkamara (X)

In this case, plaintiff John Doe alleged that Sean Combs sexually assaulted him in 1998 at the age of sixteen and sought to proceed anonymously due to the sensitive nature of his allegations. Judge Jennifer L. Rochon evaluated Doe's request to use a pseudonym according to the balancing factors outlined by the Second Circuit in Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant. After careful consideration, the court acknowledged the sensitivity of the allegations but found that Doe had not sufficiently demonstrated a substantial risk of harm or retaliation that would justify withholding his identity.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629911.64.0.pdf

A bill recently passed by lawmakers in Washington state could open the door for illegal immigrants to receive cash assistance under a program designed to provide housing assistance and other essential items to certain low-income residents unable to work, critics say.The state's Democratic-controlled Legislature last month passed SB 5232, which has been delivered to Democratic Gov. Bob Ferguson. The bill updates provisions related to the state's Housing and Essential Needs Referral Program (HEN), which provides assistance to low-income U.S. citizens, lawful permanent residents and victims of human trafficking if they can't work due to their physical or mental condition.

Is Choosing Passion Over Paychecks Worth It? Please Subscribe + Rate & Review KMJ’s Afternoon Drive with Philip Teresi & E. Curtis Johnson wherever you listen! --- KMJ’s Afternoon Drive with Philip Teresi & E. Curtis Johnson is available on the KMJNOW app, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music or wherever else you listen. --- Philip Teresi & E. Curtis Johnson – KMJ’s Afternoon Drive Weekdays 2-6 PM Pacific on News/Talk 580 & 105.9 KMJ DriveKMJ.com | Podcast | Facebook | X | Instagram --- Everything KMJ: kmjnow.com | Streaming | Podcasts | Facebook | X | Instagram See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Is Choosing Passion Over Paychecks Worth It? Please Subscribe + Rate & Review KMJ’s Afternoon Drive with Philip Teresi & E. Curtis Johnson wherever you listen! --- KMJ’s Afternoon Drive with Philip Teresi & E. Curtis Johnson is available on the KMJNOW app, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music or wherever else you listen. --- Philip Teresi & E. Curtis Johnson – KMJ’s Afternoon Drive Weekdays 2-6 PM Pacific on News/Talk 580 & 105.9 KMJ DriveKMJ.com | Podcast | Facebook | X | Instagram --- Everything KMJ: kmjnow.com | Streaming | Podcasts | Facebook | X | Instagram See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Send us a textForget the comforting traditions—this Easter, Harvest Sarasota boldly asked, "Are we denying the resurrection with our lives?" In this provocative sermon, we unpack the revolutionary reality of Jesus' resurrection beyond mere belief, challenging our complicity with injustice, inequality, and oppression. Pastor Dan Minor urges us to confront uncomfortable truths: when we ignore racism, homophobia, sexism, poverty, and every form of exclusion, we're effectively denying the transformative power of resurrection itself.Drawing inspiration from Mary Magdalene—the overlooked woman whose radical solidarity defied societal norms—we're called to revolutionary living, fierce advocacy, and persistent compassion. It's not enough to celebrate a historical event; it's time to embody it by standing boldly with the marginalized and silenced.Join us as we reject hollow proclamations and affirm a faith that demands action. Harvest is a fully affirming, inclusive (including the LGBTQ+ community) progressive Christian church located in Sarasota, Florida.Follow us on Social Media:Instagram - Instagram.com/harvestsarasotaFacebook - Facebook.com/harvestsarasotaTikTok CLICK HEREDONATE to support our podcast HERERecorded live at Harvest Church in Sarasota by Michael Thomas Regina and Stephen Lehman of Boardtown Creative

This week on CodeWACK! How is America doing on sexual and reproductive health nearly three years after the Dobbs decision overturned Roe v. Wade? What are the real-life human rights consequences of abortion bans now sweeping across many states? To unpack the fallout, we spoke with Jennie Wetter, Director of the rePROs Fight Back initiative at The Population Institute, where she champions sexual and reproductive health, rights, and justice every day. Jennie also hosts the rePros Fight Back Podcast, offering deep dives into abortion access, birth control, sex ed, LGBTQ+ rights, and more. This is part one of a powerful two-part series with Jennie. Check out the Transcript and Show Notes for more! And please keep Code WACK! on the air with a tax-deductible donation at heal-ca.org/donate.   

This week on CodeWACK! How is America doing on sexual and reproductive health nearly three years after the Dobbs decision overturned Roe v. Wade? What are the real-life human rights consequences of abortion bans now sweeping across many states? To unpack the fallout, we spoke with Jennie Wetter, Director of the rePROs Fight Back initiative at The Population Institute, where she champions sexual and reproductive health, rights, and justice every day. Jennie also hosts the rePros Fight Back Podcast, offering deep dives into abortion access, birth control, sex ed, LGBTQ+ rights, and more. This is part one of a powerful two-part series with Jennie. Check out the Transcript and Show Notes for more! And please keep Code WACK! on the air with a tax-deductible donation at heal-ca.org/donate.

limitation Denying Faith #RTTBROS #NightlightFaith That Defies Limitations #Nightlight #RTTBROS Faith That Defies Limitations"Then said Jonathan, Come, and let us go over unto the garrison of these uncircumcised: it may be that the LORD will work for us: for there is no restraint to the LORD to save by many or by few." - 1 Samuel 14:6 (KJV)Jonathan found himself in a seemingly impossible situation. The Philistines had established a formidable garrison, and the Israelite forces were vastly outnumbered and poorly equipped. King Saul, Jonathan's father, was hesitant and uncertain. But Jonathan saw beyond the physical limitations to the unlimited power of God."There is no restraint to the LORD to save by many or by few." These words reveal the heart of true faith—a recognition that God's ability to work is not constrained by human limitations. Jonathan understood that victory doesn't depend on the size of the army but on the size of our God.How often do we find ourselves looking at obstacles rather than opportunities? We count our resources, measure our abilities, and conclude that certain challenges are simply beyond us. We forget that the God we serve specializes in doing the impossible through those willing to step out in faith.Jonathan didn't say, "The LORD will definitely work for us." He said, "It may be that the LORD will work for us." This wasn't doubt but humble dependence. Jonathan recognized God's sovereignty while still being willing to act. His faith wasn't presumption; it was courageous obedience with an open hand.The results were remarkable. With just his armor-bearer by his side, Jonathan launched an attack that triggered a chain reaction, resulting in a great victory for Israel. What appeared to be a foolish risk became a powerful testimony to God's faithfulness.Where in your life do you need to declare, "There is no restraint to the LORD"? What impossible situation are you facing that requires Jonathan-like faith? Remember, God is not limited by your limitations. He delights in showing His strength through our weakness.Let us be people who, like Jonathan, are willing to step out in faith, recognizing that our God is not constrained by numbers, resources, or human impossibilities. May we have the courage to say, "Come, and let us go," trusting not in our own strength but in the unlimited power of our God.#FaithOverFear #NoRestraintToGod #VictoryInJesus Be sure to Like, Share, Follow and subscribe it helps get the word out.https://linktr.ee/rttbros

God is there to help us in our endeavors to reach higher goals, whether that is weight loss, happiness in motherhood or in a relationship he can help us.  Telling Yourself the Truth Book Negative Effects of Sugar in Motherhood Episode Lose Weight Without Counting Calories or Macros **Morning Sickness Mini Course for Mental Health (Formerly the Positive Pregnancy Program)**: This self-led video program, made to help foster positivity durning pregnancy. It is for women who have or do struggle with pregnancy and who want to have strong mental health during and specifically the first trimester of pregnancy during the nausea! This Mini Course will help you mentally navigate the hardships of the physical changes of pregnancy, especially that morning sickness phase. Direct link to Morning Sickness Mini Course for Mental Health Positivity in Pregnancy and Motherhood website: Positiveinpregnancy.com Library of Pregnancy Podcasts that go through pregnancy: (you will have to scroll down, just a little :) ) https://positiveinpregnancy.com/pregnancyishard YouTube for Positivity in Pregnancy: https://www.youtube.com/@PregnancyisHardwithJosly-nd8wd Here is the Facebook Page for Pregnancy is hard: I have documented my journey of my fourth baby on this page and have other juicy and good tips for enjoying pregnancy better. https://www.facebook.com/pregnancyishard Here is the Pregnancy is Hard Support Group on Facebook: Let's offer support, help and fun for those in the trenches of pregnancy! https://www.facebook.com/groups/165102315544693 Instagram: @positivityinpregnancy Email me at: positivityinpregnancy@gmail.com  

In this April 29, 2025 order, Judge John C. Judge denies Bryan Kohberger's motion to strike the death penalty from the case and his accompanying request to implement alternative trial procedures based on that removal. Kohberger's defense had argued that the State's intent to seek the death penalty was flawed due to alleged constitutional and procedural defects, including vague statutory language, the burden imposed on the defense, and the manner in which aggravating factors were presented. However, the court rejected these claims, finding that Idaho's death penalty procedures are legally sound and do not warrant dismissal at this stage. Judge Judge emphasized that many of the defense's arguments are better suited for consideration after the trial, during the sentencing phase or through appellate review if a conviction occurs.Additionally, the court declined to adopt the defense's suggested modifications to trial procedures, such as a bifurcated guilt-and-sentencing structure or adjustments to jury selection criteria. Judge Judge ruled that existing Idaho criminal procedures provide sufficient due process and that there is no legal basis to preemptively alter them based solely on the possibility of a capital sentence. The ruling solidifies the prosecution's ability to pursue the death penalty against Kohberger, keeping capital punishment on the table if he is convicted of the 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:042925+Order+on+Defendants+Motion+to+Strike+Death+Penalty+and+Adopt+other+Necessary+Procedures.pdf

In this April 29, 2025 order, Judge John C. Judge denies Bryan Kohberger's motion to strike the death penalty from the case and his accompanying request to implement alternative trial procedures based on that removal. Kohberger's defense had argued that the State's intent to seek the death penalty was flawed due to alleged constitutional and procedural defects, including vague statutory language, the burden imposed on the defense, and the manner in which aggravating factors were presented. However, the court rejected these claims, finding that Idaho's death penalty procedures are legally sound and do not warrant dismissal at this stage. Judge Judge emphasized that many of the defense's arguments are better suited for consideration after the trial, during the sentencing phase or through appellate review if a conviction occurs.Additionally, the court declined to adopt the defense's suggested modifications to trial procedures, such as a bifurcated guilt-and-sentencing structure or adjustments to jury selection criteria. Judge Judge ruled that existing Idaho criminal procedures provide sufficient due process and that there is no legal basis to preemptively alter them based solely on the possibility of a capital sentence. The ruling solidifies the prosecution's ability to pursue the death penalty against Kohberger, keeping capital punishment on the table if he is convicted of the 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:042925+Order+on+Defendants+Motion+to+Strike+Death+Penalty+and+Adopt+other+Necessary+Procedures.pdf

Judge John Judge issued an order denying Bryan Kohberger's motion to strike the death penalty on the grounds that he may have Autism Spectrum Disorder. Kohberger's defense team argued that his possible diagnosis made him categorically ineligible for the death penalty under constitutional protections. However, the judge ruled that Idaho law does not recognize autism as a categorical bar to capital punishment, unlike intellectual disability. He emphasized that while evidence of Kohberger's mental health status may be presented during the sentencing phase if he is convicted, it is not a basis to prevent the State from seeking the death penalty at this stage.The judge made clear that questions about Kohberger's mental health, including any evidence of autism, must be reserved for trial and possible sentencing proceedings—not pretrial motions. He stated that ruling otherwise would require him to make findings of fact not appropriate at this phase and reiterated that the law demands that a jury, not the court alone, determine any mitigating factors after conviction. Thus, Kohberger remains eligible for the death penalty as the case proceeds toward trial.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:042425+Order+on+Defendants+Motion+to+Strike+Death+Penalty+RE+Autism+Spectrum+Disorder.pdf

Judge John Judge issued an order denying Bryan Kohberger's motion to strike the death penalty on the grounds that he may have Autism Spectrum Disorder. Kohberger's defense team argued that his possible diagnosis made him categorically ineligible for the death penalty under constitutional protections. However, the judge ruled that Idaho law does not recognize autism as a categorical bar to capital punishment, unlike intellectual disability. He emphasized that while evidence of Kohberger's mental health status may be presented during the sentencing phase if he is convicted, it is not a basis to prevent the State from seeking the death penalty at this stage.The judge made clear that questions about Kohberger's mental health, including any evidence of autism, must be reserved for trial and possible sentencing proceedings—not pretrial motions. He stated that ruling otherwise would require him to make findings of fact not appropriate at this phase and reiterated that the law demands that a jury, not the court alone, determine any mitigating factors after conviction. Thus, Kohberger remains eligible for the death penalty as the case proceeds toward trial.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:042425+Order+on+Defendants+Motion+to+Strike+Death+Penalty+RE+Autism+Spectrum+Disorder.pdf

Judge John Judge issued an order denying Bryan Kohberger's motion to strike the death penalty on the grounds that he may have Autism Spectrum Disorder. Kohberger's defense team argued that his possible diagnosis made him categorically ineligible for the death penalty under constitutional protections. However, the judge ruled that Idaho law does not recognize autism as a categorical bar to capital punishment, unlike intellectual disability. He emphasized that while evidence of Kohberger's mental health status may be presented during the sentencing phase if he is convicted, it is not a basis to prevent the State from seeking the death penalty at this stage.The judge made clear that questions about Kohberger's mental health, including any evidence of autism, must be reserved for trial and possible sentencing proceedings—not pretrial motions. He stated that ruling otherwise would require him to make findings of fact not appropriate at this phase and reiterated that the law demands that a jury, not the court alone, determine any mitigating factors after conviction. Thus, Kohberger remains eligible for the death penalty as the case proceeds toward trial.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:042425+Order+on+Defendants+Motion+to+Strike+Death+Penalty+RE+Autism+Spectrum+Disorder.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Judge John Judge issued an order denying Bryan Kohberger's motion to strike the death penalty on the grounds that he may have Autism Spectrum Disorder. Kohberger's defense team argued that his possible diagnosis made him categorically ineligible for the death penalty under constitutional protections. However, the judge ruled that Idaho law does not recognize autism as a categorical bar to capital punishment, unlike intellectual disability. He emphasized that while evidence of Kohberger's mental health status may be presented during the sentencing phase if he is convicted, it is not a basis to prevent the State from seeking the death penalty at this stage.The judge made clear that questions about Kohberger's mental health, including any evidence of autism, must be reserved for trial and possible sentencing proceedings—not pretrial motions. He stated that ruling otherwise would require him to make findings of fact not appropriate at this phase and reiterated that the law demands that a jury, not the court alone, determine any mitigating factors after conviction. Thus, Kohberger remains eligible for the death penalty as the case proceeds toward trial.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:042425+Order+on+Defendants+Motion+to+Strike+Death+Penalty+RE+Autism+Spectrum+Disorder.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

This message was given by Pastor DJ Ritchey on Friday, April 18, 2025 at Memorial Heights Baptist Church.

In 1 Corinthians Chapter 9, Paul leads us into an attitude and posture of self-less-ness.  It looks like self-discipline, self-denial, self-control in ways of being self... less.  Imagine a world where everyone looked not only to their own interests but to the interests of others? 

Judge John Judge issued an order denying Bryan Kohberger's motion to strike the death penalty on the grounds that he may have Autism Spectrum Disorder. Kohberger's defense team argued that his possible diagnosis made him categorically ineligible for the death penalty under constitutional protections. However, the judge ruled that Idaho law does not recognize autism as a categorical bar to capital punishment, unlike intellectual disability. He emphasized that while evidence of Kohberger's mental health status may be presented during the sentencing phase if he is convicted, it is not a basis to prevent the State from seeking the death penalty at this stage.The judge made clear that questions about Kohberger's mental health, including any evidence of autism, must be reserved for trial and possible sentencing proceedings—not pretrial motions. He stated that ruling otherwise would require him to make findings of fact not appropriate at this phase and reiterated that the law demands that a jury, not the court alone, determine any mitigating factors after conviction. Thus, Kohberger remains eligible for the death penalty as the case proceeds toward trial.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:042425+Order+on+Defendants+Motion+to+Strike+Death+Penalty+RE+Autism+Spectrum+Disorder.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Judge John Judge issued an order denying Bryan Kohberger's motion to strike the death penalty on the grounds that he may have Autism Spectrum Disorder. Kohberger's defense team argued that his possible diagnosis made him categorically ineligible for the death penalty under constitutional protections. However, the judge ruled that Idaho law does not recognize autism as a categorical bar to capital punishment, unlike intellectual disability. He emphasized that while evidence of Kohberger's mental health status may be presented during the sentencing phase if he is convicted, it is not a basis to prevent the State from seeking the death penalty at this stage.The judge made clear that questions about Kohberger's mental health, including any evidence of autism, must be reserved for trial and possible sentencing proceedings—not pretrial motions. He stated that ruling otherwise would require him to make findings of fact not appropriate at this phase and reiterated that the law demands that a jury, not the court alone, determine any mitigating factors after conviction. Thus, Kohberger remains eligible for the death penalty as the case proceeds toward trial.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:042425+Order+on+Defendants+Motion+to+Strike+Death+Penalty+RE+Autism+Spectrum+Disorder.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

We all have moments where life feels overwhelming, and doubt creeps in when we least expect it. Peter was no exception. The bold, impulsive disciple knew what it was like to drown, deflect, and deny. Yet his story didn't end with failure; it was rewritten by the grace of Jesus. This week, as we dive into Peter's journey, we'll discover that our doubts don't disqualify us—they can become the starting point for a deeper, more fearless faith.THE BIG IDEA: When you're drowning in doubt, Jesus reaches out.

MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on Donald Trump denying the emergency requests of states that voted for him in an act of utter cruelty. Miracle Made: Upgrade your sleep with Miracle Made! Go to https://TryMiracle.com/MEIDAS and use the code MEIDAS to claim your FREE 3 piece towel set and save over 40% OFF! Visit https://meidasplus.com for more! Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast The Influence Continuum: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan Mea Culpa with Michael Cohen: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/mea-culpa-with-michael-cohen The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show Burn the Boats: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/burn-the-boats Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 Political Beatdown: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/political-beatdown On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered Coalition of the Sane: https://meidasnews.com/tag/coalition-of-the-sane Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

AP Washington correspondent Sagar Meghani reports on two more federal court rulings against the Trump administration.

04-23-25 - Passwords Reacts/Emails - Shannon Sharpe Denying Allegations Of Sexual Assault Over Rough Sex Texts w/20yo - Kanye Places Ad Seeking Hooligan Choir Willing To Wear Swastika ShirtsSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

04-23-25 - Passwords Reacts/Emails - Shannon Sharpe Denying Allegations Of Sexual Assault Over Rough Sex Texts w/20yo - Kanye Places Ad Seeking Hooligan Choir Willing To Wear Swastika ShirtsSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

If you've ever felt emotionally exhausted—even while doing all the “right” things—this episode is for you. I'm sharing a personal story and unpacking something I see in so many women I work with: the quiet, often unnoticed pattern of denying your own needs in the name of being kind, helpful, or faithful. We'll talk about how these patterns take root, how faith communities can unknowingly reinforce them, and why that emotional exhaustion you're feeling might be trying to tell you something important. In this episode, I explore: * How codependency hides behind helping & overfunctioning * How the fawn response might be showing up in your life * The impact of church messages that tell us to "die to ourselves" without teaching us how to live * What healthy dependence looks like * Why your locus of control—internal vs. external—matters more than you think Have a question for Dr. Alison? Leave it here. Find a full transcript and list of resources from this episode here. If you enjoyed this episode, you'll love: Episode 5: What is Codependency and Why Does it Matter? Episode 14: The Fawn Response & The Hidden Root of People Pleasing Thanks to our sponsors: For 20% off your order, head to Reliefband.com and use code BESTOFYOU. Go to Quince.com/bestofyou for 365-day returns, plus free shipping on your order! Visit GoGeviti.com to learn more about how you can start optimizing your health without leaving home today and use code BESTOFYOU. Contact Restoring the Soul today and learn how their Intensive Counseling Process can jump start your journey to the place you want to be. As a special gift for The Best of You podcast listeners, download their pdf called "5 Ways Unresolved Trauma May Be Derailing Your Relationship." I want all my listeners to enjoy a deep, restful night's sleep with a new mattress from Birch. Go to birchliving.com/bestofyou for 20% off sitewide! Editing by Giulia Hjort Music by Andy Luiten Sound editing by Kelly Kramarik While Dr. Cook is a counselor, the content of this podcast and any of the products provided by Dr. Cook are not specific counseling advice nor are they a substitute for individual counseling. The content and products provided on this podcast are for informational purposes only. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Blanco Contreras v. Bondi, No. 22-1538 (1st Cir. Apr. 9, 2025)exceptional and extremely unusual hardship; Wilkinson; ignoring evidence; failure to consider psychological reportMatter of Iskandarani, 29 I&N Dec. 26 (BIA 2025)notice of appeal deadline; oral decision; written decision; 8 C.F.R. § 1003.38(b); law addendum  Matter of O-A-R-G-, 29 I&N Dec. 30 (BIA 2025)former police officers; immutability; particular social group; nexus; animus, anti-circularity; M-R-M-S-; police officers; FARC; Colombia  Thankarasa v. Att'y Gen. U.S., No. 23-3204 (3d Cir. Apr. 10, 2025)denying asylum as a matter of discretion; entry fraud; Matt of Pula; reconsidering asylum when withholding of removal is granted; Tamil; Sri Lanka Chavez v. Bondi, No. 23-1379 (4th Cir. Apr. 10, 2025)CIMT; petit larceny; Loper Bright; affirmative defense; mens rea; reprehensible conduct; changing societal norms; due respect for Diaz-LizarragaThank you NILA!https://immigrationlitigation.org/ Sponsors and friends of the podcast!Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.Cerenade"Leader in providing smart, secure, and intuitive cloud-based solutions"Click me!The Pen & Sword College (formerly The Clinic at Sharma-Crawford Attorneys at Law) Use Promo Code: ImmReview2025Link to Nonprofit: https://thepen-and-swordkc.org/ Link to books:https://www.rekhasharmacrawford.com/ Stafi"Remote staffing solutions for businesses of all sizes"Promo Code: STAFI2025Click me!Want to become a patron?Click here to check out our Patreon Page!CONTACT INFORMATIONEmail: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreviewAbout your hostCase notesRecent criminal-immigration article (p.18)Featured in San Diego VoyagerDISCLAIMER & CREDITSSee Eps. 1-200Support the show

What Should Not Be Normalized in Our Profession? Curt and Katie chat about a discussion that came up in the Modern Therapists Facebook group – What is something that you wish other therapists would stop pretending is normal. We explore the normalization of waiting until license renewal for CE, balancing accountability without chastising clients, and acknowledging countertransference in therapy. We also tackle the high costs of specialized training, the problems of treating children in isolation without family involvement, and the systemic issue of unpaid internships and low therapist wages.  Transcripts for this episode will be available at mtsgpodcast.com! In this podcast episode we explore frustrations modern therapists have with our profession Curt and Katie dive into some of the things that therapists normalize that maybe they shouldn't, gathered from discussions in the Modern Therapist Facebook Group. What are struggles that are normalized for therapists? ·      Waiting until right before license renewal to complete continuing education (CE) ·    Not figuring out the difference between holding clients accountable vs. chastising or bullying them ·     Failing to acknowledge countertransference and true emotions in therapy ·      The high costs of specialized training ·      Not recognizing the importance of family involvement in child therapy ·      The impact of unpaid internships and low wages for therapists Is the therapy profession setting itself up for burnout and financial struggle? ·      Many therapists procrastinate CE requirements, leading to unnecessary stress. ·      Holding clients accountable is important, but it shouldn't come at the cost of rapport or shame. ·      Denying countertransference is unrealistic — therapists have emotions too! ·      Expensive training creates barriers to specialization, limiting accessibility. ·      Therapists treating children without involving family may not be setting up the child for success. ·      Unpaid internships and low wages continue to undervalue therapists' work, making financial stability difficult. What can therapists do to improve their profession? ·      Plan CE credits early to avoid last-minute stress. ·      Frame accountability in a way that supports clients and aligns with their stated goals rather than chastises them. ·      Acknowledge emotions in therapy without making sessions about the therapist. ·      Seek out reasonably priced training options and advocate for more affordable education. ·      Encourage family involvement when working with children (when appropriate). ·      Push for industry-wide changes in pay and internship standards. Stay in Touch with Curt, Katie, and the whole Therapy Reimagined #TherapyMovement: Our Linktree: https://linktr.ee/therapyreimagined Modern Therapist's Survival Guide Creative Credits: Voice Over by DW McCann https://www.facebook.com/McCannDW/ Music by Crystal Grooms Mangano https://groomsymusic.com/

The dive into the court documents continues in this episode as we begin taking a look at Judge John Judge's order denying Shannon Gray's request to be exempt from the gag order.(commercial at 10:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:06232023+Ordr+Denying+Shanon+Grays+Req+to+be+Exempt+from+the+Amnd+Nondiss+Ordr+Grant+Req+the+Ordr+be+Clarif.pdf (amazonaws.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The dive into the court documents continues in this episode as we begin taking a look at Judge John Judge's order denying Shannon Gray's request to be exempt from the gag order.(commercial at 10:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:06232023+Ordr+Denying+Shanon+Grays+Req+to+be+Exempt+from+the+Amnd+Nondiss+Ordr+Grant+Req+the+Ordr+be+Clarif.pdf (amazonaws.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The dive into the court documents continues in this episode as we begin taking a look at Judge John Judge's order denying Shannon Gray's request to be exempt from the gag order.(commercial at 10:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:06232023+Ordr+Denying+Shanon+Grays+Req+to+be+Exempt+from+the+Amnd+Nondiss+Ordr+Grant+Req+the+Ordr+be+Clarif.pdf (amazonaws.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

More than 2 million Americans are living with limb loss. A federal report says that number is expected to almost double by 2050. Recent reporting by KFF Health News found that many who have lost limbs are hitting roadblocks when they try to get insurance to cover the cost of prosthetic limbs. Ali Rogin speaks with KFF Health News contributing writer Michelle Andrews to learn more. PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders

More than 2 million Americans are living with limb loss. A federal report says that number is expected to almost double by 2050. Recent reporting by KFF Health News found that many who have lost limbs are hitting roadblocks when they try to get insurance to cover the cost of prosthetic limbs. Ali Rogin speaks with KFF Health News contributing writer Michelle Andrews to learn more. PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders

The dive into the court documents continues in this episode as we begin taking a look at Judge John Judge's order denying Shannon Gray's request to be exempt from the gag order.(commercial at 10:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:06232023+Ordr+Denying+Shanon+Grays+Req+to+be+Exempt+from+the+Amnd+Nondiss+Ordr+Grant+Req+the+Ordr+be+Clarif.pdf (amazonaws.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Walking in holy ghost power makes for an amazing life! YOU NEED IT!

7:35 AM - INTERVIEW - NICK MINOCK - Emmy winning journalist at ABC7-WJLA in Washington, DC SOCIAL MEDIA: https://x.com/NickMinock Victim denies Fairfax County prosecutor's claims that she agreed with 'lenient' plea deal Where to find more about WMAL's morning show: Follow the Show Podcasts on Apple podcasts, Audible and Spotify. Follow WMAL's "O'Connor and Company" on X: @WMALDC, @LarryOConnor, @Jgunlock, @patricepinkfile, and @heatherhunterdc. Facebook: WMALDC and Larry O'Connor Instagram: WMALDC Show Website: https://www.wmal.com/oconnor-company/ How to listen live weekdays from 5 to 9 AM: https://www.wmal.com/listenlive/ Episode: Tuesday, April 8, 2025 / 7 AM Hour See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Fear isn't the enemy—it's just misunderstood. In this raw and insightful conversation, we explore the hidden ways fear shapes our decisions, our relationships, and even our identities. From the trap of denying fear to the subtle psychosis of mistaking thoughts for reality, we dive into how stories we tell ourselves become prisons we don't even see. We unpack the emotional weight of self-judgment, the illusion of control, and why karaoke might just be the ultimate metaphor for life. If you've ever felt stuck between who you think you are and who you might become—this one's for you. Let go, tune in, and discover the power of presence beyond the story. [00:00:00] Fear as a constant presence and the importance of recognizing it rather than denying it. [00:02:46] How fear of success and attachment to personal narratives stop us from trying new things. [00:04:19] Denying fear creates sub-stories that mask the real reasons we hesitate. [00:06:14] Vilifying our past choices blocks us from understanding the value of those experiences. [00:07:31] The carrot-and-stick mentality as a valid step in moving through fear. [00:09:36] Physical pain from past overexertion and the insight gained through consequence. [00:11:39] The distinction between pain and suffering, and how storytelling creates suffering. [00:13:00] Fear as distortion on the glass of perception—clarity comes from observing it directly. [00:14:10] Karaoke as a metaphor for being present and letting go of fear and self-judgment. [00:15:58] Everyday psychosis: mistaking thoughts for reality and how it separates us from life. [00:18:11] How being present and dropping your story helps others let go of theirs. [00:20:50] Saying the “wrong thing” often leads to unexpected, meaningful human connection. [00:22:56] Letting go doesn't mean recklessness—it means trusting yourself without micromanaging. [00:25:30] Spiritual paths as detours to eventual self-honesty—insight isn't mystical, it's honest. [00:28:35] A karaoke business encounter reveals how others' fear-based stories shape reactions.

In this case, plaintiff John Doe alleged that Sean Combs sexually assaulted him in 1998 at the age of sixteen and sought to proceed anonymously due to the sensitive nature of his allegations. Judge Jennifer L. Rochon evaluated Doe's request to use a pseudonym according to the balancing factors outlined by the Second Circuit in Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant. After careful consideration, the court acknowledged the sensitivity of the allegations but found that Doe had not sufficiently demonstrated a substantial risk of harm or retaliation that would justify withholding his identity.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629911.64.0.pdf

In this case, plaintiff John Doe alleged that Sean Combs sexually assaulted him in 1998 at the age of sixteen and sought to proceed anonymously due to the sensitive nature of his allegations. Judge Jennifer L. Rochon evaluated Doe's request to use a pseudonym according to the balancing factors outlined by the Second Circuit in Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant. After careful consideration, the court acknowledged the sensitivity of the allegations but found that Doe had not sufficiently demonstrated a substantial risk of harm or retaliation that would justify withholding his identity.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629911.64.0.pdf

In the March 2025 Opinion and Order for case Rodney Jones v. Sean Combs et al. (24-CV-1457), Judge J. Paul Oetken ruled on motions to dismiss brought by Sean Combs and several co-defendants. While five of Jones's seventeen claims were dismissed—including claims under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) and Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) against Combs Global and Love Records—multiple key allegations were allowed to proceed. These surviving claims include sexual assault, battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and premises liability against Sean Combs, Kristina Khorram, Justin Combs, Cuba Gooding Jr., and Jane Doe 1 (allegedly “Yung Miami's cousin”). The court found that many of Jones's accusations, including being drugged, sexually assaulted, and trafficked across state and international lines, were sufficiently detailed to survive the defendants' efforts to have the case dismissed entirely.The ruling outlines severe and graphic allegations, including incidents where Jones claims he was sexually assaulted, manipulated, and trafficked while working closely with Sean Combs between 2022 and 2023. Jones alleges Combs used power and influence in the music industry to coerce him into unwanted sexual activity, promising professional success in return. The complaint details incidents in Los Angeles, Miami, New York, the US Virgin Islands, and Saint-Barthélemy, including claims of being drugged, groped, and assaulted by Combs and others in his circle. The court emphasized that while some claims lacked sufficient legal basis or specificity, the core allegations—particularly those describing direct physical and psychological abuse—were compelling enough to proceed to discovery and potentially trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:24cv1457 Jones v Combs MTD Opn.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the March 2025 Opinion and Order for case Rodney Jones v. Sean Combs et al. (24-CV-1457), Judge J. Paul Oetken ruled on motions to dismiss brought by Sean Combs and several co-defendants. While five of Jones's seventeen claims were dismissed—including claims under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) and Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) against Combs Global and Love Records—multiple key allegations were allowed to proceed. These surviving claims include sexual assault, battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and premises liability against Sean Combs, Kristina Khorram, Justin Combs, Cuba Gooding Jr., and Jane Doe 1 (allegedly “Yung Miami's cousin”). The court found that many of Jones's accusations, including being drugged, sexually assaulted, and trafficked across state and international lines, were sufficiently detailed to survive the defendants' efforts to have the case dismissed entirely.The ruling outlines severe and graphic allegations, including incidents where Jones claims he was sexually assaulted, manipulated, and trafficked while working closely with Sean Combs between 2022 and 2023. Jones alleges Combs used power and influence in the music industry to coerce him into unwanted sexual activity, promising professional success in return. The complaint details incidents in Los Angeles, Miami, New York, the US Virgin Islands, and Saint-Barthélemy, including claims of being drugged, groped, and assaulted by Combs and others in his circle. The court emphasized that while some claims lacked sufficient legal basis or specificity, the core allegations—particularly those describing direct physical and psychological abuse—were compelling enough to proceed to discovery and potentially trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:24cv1457 Jones v Combs MTD Opn.pdf

In the March 2025 Opinion and Order for case Rodney Jones v. Sean Combs et al. (24-CV-1457), Judge J. Paul Oetken ruled on motions to dismiss brought by Sean Combs and several co-defendants. While five of Jones's seventeen claims were dismissed—including claims under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) and Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) against Combs Global and Love Records—multiple key allegations were allowed to proceed. These surviving claims include sexual assault, battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and premises liability against Sean Combs, Kristina Khorram, Justin Combs, Cuba Gooding Jr., and Jane Doe 1 (allegedly “Yung Miami's cousin”). The court found that many of Jones's accusations, including being drugged, sexually assaulted, and trafficked across state and international lines, were sufficiently detailed to survive the defendants' efforts to have the case dismissed entirely.The ruling outlines severe and graphic allegations, including incidents where Jones claims he was sexually assaulted, manipulated, and trafficked while working closely with Sean Combs between 2022 and 2023. Jones alleges Combs used power and influence in the music industry to coerce him into unwanted sexual activity, promising professional success in return. The complaint details incidents in Los Angeles, Miami, New York, the US Virgin Islands, and Saint-Barthélemy, including claims of being drugged, groped, and assaulted by Combs and others in his circle. The court emphasized that while some claims lacked sufficient legal basis or specificity, the core allegations—particularly those describing direct physical and psychological abuse—were compelling enough to proceed to discovery and potentially trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:24cv1457 Jones v Combs MTD Opn.pdf

In the March 2025 Opinion and Order for case Rodney Jones v. Sean Combs et al. (24-CV-1457), Judge J. Paul Oetken ruled on motions to dismiss brought by Sean Combs and several co-defendants. While five of Jones's seventeen claims were dismissed—including claims under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) and Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) against Combs Global and Love Records—multiple key allegations were allowed to proceed. These surviving claims include sexual assault, battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and premises liability against Sean Combs, Kristina Khorram, Justin Combs, Cuba Gooding Jr., and Jane Doe 1 (allegedly “Yung Miami's cousin”). The court found that many of Jones's accusations, including being drugged, sexually assaulted, and trafficked across state and international lines, were sufficiently detailed to survive the defendants' efforts to have the case dismissed entirely.The ruling outlines severe and graphic allegations, including incidents where Jones claims he was sexually assaulted, manipulated, and trafficked while working closely with Sean Combs between 2022 and 2023. Jones alleges Combs used power and influence in the music industry to coerce him into unwanted sexual activity, promising professional success in return. The complaint details incidents in Los Angeles, Miami, New York, the US Virgin Islands, and Saint-Barthélemy, including claims of being drugged, groped, and assaulted by Combs and others in his circle. The court emphasized that while some claims lacked sufficient legal basis or specificity, the core allegations—particularly those describing direct physical and psychological abuse—were compelling enough to proceed to discovery and potentially trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:24cv1457 Jones v Combs MTD Opn.pdf

In the March 2025 Opinion and Order for case Rodney Jones v. Sean Combs et al. (24-CV-1457), Judge J. Paul Oetken ruled on motions to dismiss brought by Sean Combs and several co-defendants. While five of Jones's seventeen claims were dismissed—including claims under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) and Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) against Combs Global and Love Records—multiple key allegations were allowed to proceed. These surviving claims include sexual assault, battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and premises liability against Sean Combs, Kristina Khorram, Justin Combs, Cuba Gooding Jr., and Jane Doe 1 (allegedly “Yung Miami's cousin”). The court found that many of Jones's accusations, including being drugged, sexually assaulted, and trafficked across state and international lines, were sufficiently detailed to survive the defendants' efforts to have the case dismissed entirely.The ruling outlines severe and graphic allegations, including incidents where Jones claims he was sexually assaulted, manipulated, and trafficked while working closely with Sean Combs between 2022 and 2023. Jones alleges Combs used power and influence in the music industry to coerce him into unwanted sexual activity, promising professional success in return. The complaint details incidents in Los Angeles, Miami, New York, the US Virgin Islands, and Saint-Barthélemy, including claims of being drugged, groped, and assaulted by Combs and others in his circle. The court emphasized that while some claims lacked sufficient legal basis or specificity, the core allegations—particularly those describing direct physical and psychological abuse—were compelling enough to proceed to discovery and potentially trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:24cv1457 Jones v Combs MTD Opn.pdf

In the March 2025 Opinion and Order for case Rodney Jones v. Sean Combs et al. (24-CV-1457), Judge J. Paul Oetken ruled on motions to dismiss brought by Sean Combs and several co-defendants. While five of Jones's seventeen claims were dismissed—including claims under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) and Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) against Combs Global and Love Records—multiple key allegations were allowed to proceed. These surviving claims include sexual assault, battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and premises liability against Sean Combs, Kristina Khorram, Justin Combs, Cuba Gooding Jr., and Jane Doe 1 (allegedly “Yung Miami's cousin”). The court found that many of Jones's accusations, including being drugged, sexually assaulted, and trafficked across state and international lines, were sufficiently detailed to survive the defendants' efforts to have the case dismissed entirely.The ruling outlines severe and graphic allegations, including incidents where Jones claims he was sexually assaulted, manipulated, and trafficked while working closely with Sean Combs between 2022 and 2023. Jones alleges Combs used power and influence in the music industry to coerce him into unwanted sexual activity, promising professional success in return. The complaint details incidents in Los Angeles, Miami, New York, the US Virgin Islands, and Saint-Barthélemy, including claims of being drugged, groped, and assaulted by Combs and others in his circle. The court emphasized that while some claims lacked sufficient legal basis or specificity, the core allegations—particularly those describing direct physical and psychological abuse—were compelling enough to proceed to discovery and potentially trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:24cv1457 Jones v Combs MTD Opn.pdf

Guest: Dave Reichart on Ferfuson Denying Timothy Pauley's release // After outcry, Bob Ferguson reverses Jay Inslee’s decision to parole triple murderer // Tim Eyman Rips Democrats for Gutting the Parents Bill of Rights Initiative // Security removes Tim Eyman, citizens from WA Senate hearing on Parents’ Bill of Rights changes // Bill Maher Says ‘F**k You’ to Critics of His Scheduled Trump White House Meeting

Have you ever wrestled with the idea of denying yourself, wondering if it means you don't matter? Many of us have been taught to put others before ourselves, but somewhere along the way, that message got distorted into believing our feelings, needs, and limits don't count. When we internalize this misunderstanding, setting boundaries can feel wrong—almost as if we're going against God. But what if denying ourselves doesn't mean becoming invisible or neglecting our well-being? What if it actually means surrendering our will to God while still honoring the way He created us? Let's explore what Jesus truly meant by self-denial and how it aligns with living a healthy, God-honoring life—one where boundaries and love coexist. Rooting for you, Jessica Next steps: Get my free 3-day study and learn how to deal with your emotions in a biblical way: https://www.jessicahottle.com/3-day-study/ Learn more about working with me 1:1 as your mental health coach: https://www.jessicahottle.com/mental-health-coaching Or book your free 20-minute consultation here! Check out my biblical studies: https://www.jessicahottle.com/shop Work with me in my Untangle Your Thoughts program: https://www.jessicahottle.com/heal Email me at >> jessica@jessicahottle.com The information shared in this podcast is for educational and informational purposes only and is not intended as medical or clinical advice. While we discuss mental health topics, this is not a substitute for professional care. Please consult with a qualified healthcare provider for advice specific to your situation.