Podcasts about Reliability

While traveling during Pilgrimage 2026 in Germany, the guys discuss C9 Corvette rumors and the global introduction of Audi's largest vehicle ever - the Q9 and SQ9! #cardebate 1 - Does commuting mean you have to leave fun behind? #cardebate 2 - Best 3-row SUV for families at $30K. #carconclusion 1 - How do you make the i4 a little more visually appealing? #carconclusion 2 - A practical family car that's still fun. Audio-only MP3 is available on Spotify, Apple Podcasts and 10 other platforms. Look for us on Tuesdays if you'd like to watch us debate, disagree and then go drive again! 00:00 - Intro 2:16 - C9 Corvette Rumours & Musings 14:56 - Car Debate #1: Don't Leave Fun Behind 30:00 - Car Debate #2: Reliability Above All Else 35:35 - Car Conclusion #1: Make The BMW i4 Look Better 39:51 - Practical Doesn't Have To Mean Boring 41:41 - Did You See This, Continued 46:47 - Audience Questions On Social Media Thanks for taking the time to watch, and remember to support our sponsors Griot's Garage, Vredestein Tires, FCP Euro, Powerstop Brakes and Autotempest.com #griotsgarage #vredestein #fcpeuro #powerstopbrakes #autotempest Rate and review us on Apple Podcasts, and subscribe to our two YouTube channels. Write to us your Topic Tuesdays, Car Conclusions and those great Car Debates at everydaydrivertv@gmail.com or everydaydriver.com Instagram.com/everydaydriver Facebook.com/everydaydriver Audio-only MP3 is available on Spotify, Apple Podcasts and 10 other platforms. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Are wearable devices like Fitbits, Apple Watches, and fitness trackers really worth it? In this episode of the “NASM CPT Podcast,” host Rick Richey dives deep into the science and practical truth behind modern wearable tech.

 Want to quit your job and build a real land investing business?

When my daughter Carys was 10, she started a pet-sitting business. She opened a Roth IRA with the income, built a client base of dog walkers and cat owners in our neighborhood, and figured out a system for remembering security codes only after a couple of alarms went off by accident. This episode is about that decision. Skills needed for entrepreneurship come from real clients and real consequences. A kid learns to be reliable because someone is counting on her. She learns to communicate clearly, and to recognize her own capacity before she hits the edge of it. That kind of learning comes from a parent who knows the difference between sage on the stage and guide on the side. I talk through what that looked like week to week: the systems Carys built on her own and the boundary she set with a client who wanted an early morning walk. I also discussed the lessons on money that came from managing income. If you've wondered how to raise entrepreneurs without turning it into your own project, this one is for you. Questions this episode will answer What skills does a child develop through entrepreneurship? Kids build reliability, organization, client communication, and the ability to recognize their own limits before they hit them. All of it develops through the pressure of real clients depending on them. How do you raise a child to think like an entrepreneur? Step back and ask questions instead of giving answers. Let a manageable mistake happen. A child develops judgment by using it, through real experiences. What are the benefits of entrepreneurship for kids? Beyond income, kids build boundary-setting, financial literacy, and confidence that carries into other parts of their life, including schoolwork and how they talk with adults outside the family. How do you teach a child financial responsibility? Let business income lead to real decisions about saving and giving some of it away. A custodial Roth IRA becomes possible once a child has earned income of her own, and that account can grow for decades. How do you encourage entrepreneurship in a child who hasn't shown interest yet? Start with what they already gravitate toward. Interest usually shows up before ambition does, and a child is far more likely to follow through on an idea that grew out of something they already care about. What does an entrepreneurial mindset look like in a young child? It looks like a kid solving a problem because she cares about the outcome. That mindset shows up in the systems kids build for themselves. It also shows up when a client asks for more than a kid wants to give, and she says so. What you'll learn in this episode Why starting young gives kids a different relationship with failure than starting as a teenager or adultHow a 10-year-old built her own system for managing client information, without being taught toWhat it looks like to teach entrepreneurship by asking questions instead of giving answersThe specific signs that tell a parent when to step in and when to let a struggle continueHow a custodial Roth IRA works, and why business income is what makes one possible for a childWhy a child setting her own boundaries with a paying client is not the same as being difficultHow entrepreneurship connects to skills most parents are already trying to teach through chores and consequences, and why it works differently Knowing when to help and when to step back is a skill You already have the instinct to support your child's curiosity. What the Learning Membership adds is the skill of knowing exactly when to step in and when to hold back, so you're helping your child solve their own problems instead of solving them for her. That's the whole method: see where your child is stuck and offer the smallest nudge that gets them moving again. It's grounded in real research on how learning happens. Practice it long enough, and it becomes second nature. When you join before the end of day, August 8, you'll also get free access to Mind Your Own Business: For Kids, the course Carys and I built after she started her own pet-sitting business. It walks kids through testing an idea with real clients, then growing it if it works. You'll also get the You Are Your Child's Best Teacher Masterclass, 60 minutes on spotting the learning your child is already doing and starting a learning journal to track it. Enrollment is open until August 26. Click the banner to learn more. Jump to highlights 01:58 Introduction to today's episode 06:33 When children take on entrepreneurial responsibilities early, they naturally develop the ability to manage their own school preparation and daily organization instead of relying on parents to remember everything for them 13:51 Reliability isn't some complex trait; it's simply the practice of consistently following through on commitments, and children learn this best when they face real but age-appropriate consequences for their choices 19:45 What kinds of businesses actually work for kids aged 8-12 years old? 25:01 The need to save for retirement reflects a broken system where community care has been replaced by individual financial responsibility, but teaching children some skills gives them the option to choose meaningful work over desperate survival while contributing to rebuilding more caring communities 33:45 Common concerns or issues parents express when they learn about a 10-year-old running their own business 50:10 If the idea of starting a business sounds interesting to you, where do you begin? 54:02 An open invitation for Mind Your Business: For Kids 54:52 Wrapping up

Het internet is kwetsbaarder dan je misschien denkt; één programmeur liet al een keer een deel van het internet crashen, waar giganten als Netflix en Spotify last van hadden. In deze aflevering laat softwareonderzoeker Ayushi Rastogi (Rijksuniversiteit Groningen) je de wereld zien achter de apps en websites die jij elke dag gebruikt. Daar wordt namelijk wereldwijd aan gebouwd en gaat niet alleen over techniek, maar vooral ook over menselijk vertrouwen. Dat maakt het internet krachtig, maar is ook haar zwakte. Ayushi onderzoekt hoe we dat internet in de toekomst betrouwbaar en eerlijk voor iedereen houden. Want in een tijd waarin AI razendsnel nieuwe code genereert, maar ook onvoorspelbare fouten maakt, is dat één van de belangrijke vragen van deze tijd. Omdat veel wetenschappers die in Nederland werken Engels spreken, maar we hun onderzoek ook willen laten zien, hebben we voor het eerst in lange tijd een aflevering die deels in het Engels is. Voor wie toch liever in het Nederlands luistert, is dit de link naar de nagesynchroniseerde versie op YouTube: https://youtu.be/G1W-at8UFns. 0:00 Kan één iemand het hele internet laten crashen?0:54 Wat is het internet?1:19 Hoe werkt programmeertaal?1:46 Wie werkt er aan het internet?1:53 Hoe werkt open source software?2:26 Wat gebeurt er als een programmeur bepaalde codes weghaalt?3:48 Kunnen programmeurs niet elke keer zelf hun code schrijven?4:38 Wat zijn gate keepers in programmeren?5:16 Wat gebeurde er tijdens de laatste grote wereldwijde IT-storing?6:01 Wat is het Blue Screen of Death (BSoD)?6:10 Waarom maakt het uit wie software ontwikkelt?7:15 Waarom is er ongelijkheid tussen mannelijke en vrouwelijke ontwikkelaars?8:08 Wat gebeurt er als AI onze codes gaat schrijven? Benieuwd naar de studies die Ayushi noemt? Je vindt ze hier: Article on how self-tracking apps exclude women https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/12/how-self-tracking-apps-exclude-women/383673/ Study showing how factors influencing the decision to accept or reject incoming software changes are both technical and social. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2022.3165056 and https://arxiv.org/pdf/2106.01885 Study showing how contributions from women are evaluated in comparison to their male counterparts: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.111 Similar differences were seen across geographical location https://doi.org/10.1145/3239235.3240504 Humans are likely to miss errors AI introduces: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.08885 and https://doi.org/10.1109/CHASE66643.2025.00016 Future of human-AI collaboration: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2025.112699 Balancing Speed, Reliability, and Fairness: https://doi.org/10.1145/3786583.3786888 and https://doi.org/10.1145/3757060 and https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-023-10401-z See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Send us Fan MailBreakdown culture is expensive, exhausting, and strangely normal in a lot of factories. We wanted a straight-talking conversation about what actually shifts the dial, so we sat down with Dan Bridges to trace his reliability journey through soft drinks manufacturing and the hard lessons that come with it. If you've ever watched a team do “regimented” maintenance only to see the same faults return, you'll recognise the trap: activity without value, OEM checklists without context, and a blanket approach that never goes deep enough. We dig into how reliability leaders win senior leadership support by changing the language from engineering detail to outcomes like uptime, trend improvement, reduced overtime, and the true cost of firefighting. We also talk about culture on the shop floor: why being visible matters, why authenticity builds trust faster than a polished persona, and how choosing your battles keeps progress moving when resources are tight. Along the way, we tackle the reality of headcount reductions, contractor dependency, and what it takes to retain site knowledge and engineer motivation. Training and development get a proper rethink too. We explore why rigid qualifications and exam pressure can miss the point, and why targeted courses, mentoring, and understanding learning styles can build stronger engineers sooner. Tools like DISC profiling come up as a practical way to communicate better across different personality types, especially when a team's energy levels and decision styles vary. We finish by challenging the predictive maintenance hype: wireless sensors, Industry 4.0 marketing, and AI promises do not create reliability on their own. Without criticality, CMMS discipline, and defect elimination, you just collect data nobody has time to use. If you found this useful, subscribe, share it with a reliability mate, and leave us a review. What part of your maintenance strategy needs the biggest reset?Support the show

We are now recording an audio version of written posts that we will upload to Apple, Spotify, and YouTube, which you can listen to by clicking the play button above.We conclude our month long series on Strait of Hormuz (SoH) Crisis takeaways with a look at what this conflict means for the related topics of sustainability, climate, and the environment.Three key messages this week:* Many proponents and opponents of “Net Zero” are drawing the wrong conclusions about what this war means for different energy sources and technologies. Energy's natural hierarchy of needs applied at the country level mean the optimal mix of various energy sources and technologies will vary for any given country—a reality the crisis reinforces.* The topic of Sustainability needs to be right-sized and recognized for where it fits into corporate level strategies. Companies exist to generate growth and profitability for investors. Certain sustainability objectives are core to being successful over the long run. Sustainability is not a strategy in and of itself.* We shall offer free advice on what hyperscalers can learn from the oil & gas industry.We are going to do our best to not rehash our now well-known pushbacks on the excesses of the 2020-23 “Net Zero” era. The madness of that period we don't think ever returns, no matter who wins the US presidency in 2028. But we do get the question—and we are appreciative of those of you that ask—how does sustainability, climate, and the environment factor into our outlook for the energy sector, public policy, and corporate strategy and how does the SoH Crisis change or impact the views we have been articulating?We will start with a grounding on how we think about environmental and climate considerations. Our title gives it away: increasing global prosperity is our centering point, both for countries and companies. In terms of our concern level around the need to address climate change, we would characterize our specific climate opinions as broadly consistent with US Energy Secretary Chris Wright and former University of Colorado professor and Substack author (here) Roger Pielke Jr.At the country level, energy's natural hierarchy of needs that we frequently discuss is observably all any country cares about at all times (Exhibit 1). Abundant and reliable energy is a 24/7/365 pre-requisite. It needs to be affordable the vast bulk of the time. Country leaders care about geopolitical security in order to protect reliability and affordability. Clean air and clean water are 100% correlated with societal wealth. Addressing carbon emissions goes hand-in-hand with a maximum prosperity scenario where billion person-scale economies like China and India are highly motivated to crack the code on new energy technologies that are de facto lower in carbon intensity. Pretending that society and companies can be forced onto prescriptive “Paris-aligned Net Zero by 2050 pathways” was the fatal flaw of the 2020-2023 era.For companies, the only goal is to generate competitive returns and growth for shareholders. Sustainability exists at the level of community engagement, license to operate, and as a possible alternative to government regulation. It is a component of running a company similar to many other functions; it is not a strategy in its own right (e.g., pressuring oil & gas companies to transition business models in the name of addressing climate change never made sense).With that grounding, we are going to use a Q&A styled format to address how we think the related topics of sustainability, climate, and the environment will be impacted by the Strait of Hormuz Crisis.Exhibit 1: Energy's natural hierarch of needsSource: Veriten.Subscribe to Super-Spiked to receive all content via email. Also available on https://veriten.com.Q1: Does the SoH Crisis mean that the core tenet of Net Zero by 2050—which was to switch out of crude oil, natural gas, and coal into renewables, EVs, and other new tech—was correct after all?No. It does not. Our issue with Net Zero by 2050, or any other year for that matter, is that it incorrectly treats carbon emissions as the organizing principle for economic activity. It is not nor will it ever be, irrespective of how much (or little) concern any specific leader or group of citizens has about climate. There is nothing about the Strait of Hormuz Crisis that suddenly makes Net Zero pathways more relevant.Q2: So the opponents to Net Zero are correct that renewables and other new technologies are a boondoggle that plays on climate alarmism?No. It does not mean that either. The focus on non-oil, natural gas, and coal technologies will be driven by the massive unmet energy needs of the other 7 billion people on Earth that seek their own version of the prosperous lifestyles The Lucky 1 Billion of us take for granted. A specific view on climate is largely irrelevant to technology development. Reliability, affordability, and geopolitical security are the motivations to figure out new technologies. We are seeing this in real time in places like China and other Asian countries.Q3: Are there examples of countries that are adjusting away from a prior emphasis on Net Zero pathways as a result of geopolitical turmoil?We are optimistic about Norway and Canada, as two countries that are showing signs of appropriate course corrections. In the case of Norway, as a small, wealthy country, de facto mandating 100% EVs in order to not burn gasoline for consumer transportation is a choice they are free to make. More importantly, Norway is remembering that increasing oil and natural gas supply from the Norwegian North Sea is critically important to the geopolitical security and economic health of Norway, Europe, and its allies. Norway is also the home to a vibrant community of new technology companies. More oil, more natural gas, and investing in new technologies—yes!Canada's post Trudeau pivot away from Net Zero zealotry seems as much of a reaction to unfavorable rhetoric toward the country from President Trump than necessarily a recognition of how little sense it made for Canada to pursue energy policies that sought to limit the development of its massive oil sands and natural gas resources. Still, we will accept the directional improvement under PM Carney, irrespective of the apparent motivations.Long-time Super-Spiked subscribers know how critically important we believe energy and power integration between the United States and Canada is, making the recent political schism deeply unfortunate, even as it has seemingly improved energy policy decision making in Canada. The United States is economically and geopolitically stronger thanks to our close energy integration with Canada. The same is true for Canada. We credit our friend, former colleague, and current Deputy Secretary of Commerce Paul Dabbar for the idea that US + Canada + Norway would make for an outstanding trans-Atlantic alliance of energy and technology super powers (here).Q4: What else does geopolitical turmoil reveal about where the Net Zero mindset went wrong?The practical application of Net Zero by 2050 policies in many rich-world countries, states, and provinces has been to restrict domestic oil, natural gas, and coal production, mandate the use of new technologies, all while losing competitiveness in manufacturing and business more broadly. Restricting domestic energy supply, making energy prices uncompetitive, and offshoring industrial manufacturing should not be the objective of any country, state, or province. It is without question bad for geopolitical security, bad for domestic economic growth, and bad for the environment.Rather, we recommend a play on the George Castanza (Seinfeld) line (here): Show me an energy policy strategy that does the opposite. The litmus test is which country's energy and environmental policies come with competitive energy prices and business and manufacturing growth?The United Kingdom versus China is case in point. U.K. leaders have spoken glowingly about eliminating coal from their power sector and all but ending viability of the U.K. North Sea for oil and gas exploration. Yet, the country also faces the outsourcing and offshoring of its refining, petrochemical, and broader industrial base. To be clear, the U.K.'s policy challenges are not limited solely to its energy and climate policies, but those are foundational and almost certainly a meaningful contributing factor.We contrast the U.K. with China which has dramatically increased coal-fired power generation, renewables, nuclear, natural gas, and grown its domestic oil supply while building a massive strategic petroleum reserve. China is now manufacturer to the world with improving living standards for its citizens. The U.K. being on-track, or not, for domestic Net Zero is completely irrelevant to global emissions and, if anything, has been net negative for the climate given China's higher emissions profile. It has certainly been a negative for the economic competitiveness of the U.K.Q5: What are the takeaways from the Strait of Hormuz Crisis for corporate sustainability objectives?Our biggest takeaway is that sustainability is a component of running a successful company, but not a defining objective. It has generally been overstated in importance, especially by a segment of the finance world in Europe and the United States that has pushed for these objectives to gain in prominence. Companies don't exist for “sustainability.” It never made any sense to pressure oil & gas companies, as an example, to aggressively transition to low-carbon technologies in the name of Net Zero and sustainability. Companies exist to generate competitive profitability and growth for investors. Full stop.In order to generate long-term profitability and growth, various sustainability objectives (industry and company specific) for sure need to be met. Employee health and safety is at the top of the list along with ensuring the surrounding community to a given asset is also not harmed. Community engagement is core to any company's license to operate, especially when new growth plans are being pursued. The ultimate list is longer than what is mentioned here, but the point is that this area broadly does not separately merit high profile attention any more than do other critical corporate functions like human resources, legal, cybersecurity, treasury, and so forth. They all contribute to running a successful company.Q6: What are some contemporary examples of “sustainability” objectives you believe need to be addressed?Examples of current sustainability issues that we believe should be proactively addressed (not intended to be an exhaustive list):* Water disposal in the Permian Basin and water usage by AI datacenters are hot button issues that communities understandably want answers to.* We have long supported and continue to support near zero methane flaring/venting objectives for the oil & gas industry. This is a topic we have been pleasantly surprised to see the environmental community focus on globally rather than more narrowly just in the United States, Canada, or Europe, as is often the case with activists. We were also pleased to see the progress US companies have made in recent years per the World Bank (Exhibit 1).Exhibit 2: US producers have reduced flaring intensitySource: World Bank* We believe oil & gas, power sector, and hyperscaler/data center companies all have room for improvement in proactively engaging with the public on their industries, how they contribute to jobs, taxes, and economic development. It is the rare executive that is capable of speaking in normal, human, non-corporate speak language.In contrast, we do not believe a company's carbon emissions profile is relevant to its “license to operate” in a given community—a point often pushed by those advocating most loudly for Net Zero policies. No normal human being anywhere spends any time thinking about this. Putting activists aside, no regular person is protesting an oilfield or data center due to its carbon emissions intensity. Water impacts? Yes. Noise? Yes. Particulate pollution? Yes. Traffic? Yes. Carbon emissions? Give me a break.Q7: What should companies do with previously articulated Net Zero objectives?Pragmatically speaking, we recognize the significant pressure companies around the world were under during 2020-2023 to articulate company-specific “Net Zero by 2050” objectives. That said, very few if any could possibly have met those goals, since the wider world has never been even remotely on track for Net Zero be it by 2050 or any other year. The Strait of Hormuz Crisis and general geopolitical turmoil is helping more politicians and policy makers recognize that healthy energy policy starts and stops with reliability and affordability. In the interest of being transparent and sincere, companies should be truthful about whether sticking with prior Net Zero aspirations is something they actually think is (1) in the best interest of their companies and (2) is possible on any time horizon that can be modeled today.Q8: What can hyperscalers learn from the oil & gas industry?Key lessons:* You will never appease climate activists. Focus on optimizing for growth and profitability.* Your prior Net Zero objectives never had a chance of being achieved, especially if including so-called scope 3 emissions. Net Zero does not make sense at the individual company level.* Economic development, of which the technology sector today is a huge driver, is 100% correlated with clean air and clean water. Richer societies are better equipped than poorer regions to adapt to a broad range of environmental and climate issues. Americans and the wider world is overall better off that our leading technology companies exist in a similar way that we are fortunate to have healthy, vibrant, and profitable energy and power companies.* Speak sincerely and directly to the general public and the communities where you are investing about the actual impacts of your projects. You can't outsource this function. It starts with the CEO and then filters down. Skip the corporate speak and language of appeasement.* Vocally push back on policies that weaken domestic energy development opportunities in any region in which you are investing.⚡️On A Personal Note: Gone Shootin'The last time I shot a gun was in the 4th grade in what was then called Indian Guides. That almost certainly is not the name today; I think in New Jersey it is now called “Adventure Guides” which frankly is kind of lame. I believe we appropriately remembered and honored Native Americans under the original name, but society apparently disagrees with that perspective. Credit to my wife's brother's wife, who hails from the Golden State of all places, for the brilliant idea to go clay pigeon shooting during our vacation last week to The Cotswolds, about 2 hours west of London.Boy was that fun!!! We had a great instructor, Patrick I think was his name—not a fan of London or Londoners apparently; a country guy that was local to the area. There were six in our group. My brother-in-law, his wife and son, and my two daughters. All first timers. All of us successfully hit those crazy clay pigeons popping up in the field. Great job Patrick! Great job in-laws and daughters!I definitely need to practice. I had some beginners luck on the initial six shells, I want to say with five successful strikes on the ones going straight up in the air. But the ones that were flying away from us gave me more trouble and I was consistently low-left and a bit early. It was oddly tiring. A shot gun is definitely heavier than a golf club. As a second hobby, it's a keeper. Seems safter than pickleball as a golf complement.⚖️ DisclaimerI certify that these are my personal, strongly held views at the time of this post. My views are my own and not attributable to any affiliation, past or present. This is not an investment newsletter and there is no financial advice explicitly or implicitly provided here. My views can and will change in the future as warranted by updated analyses and developments. Some of my comments are made in jest for entertainment purposes; I sincerely mean no offense to anyone that takes issue. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit arjunmurti.substack.com

Jeremy and Joe evaluate the Buffalo Bills' kicking situation, specifically focusing on Tyler Bass's recent performance and career statistics compared to the league's elite kickers. They express concern over Bass's reliability in high-pressure playoff moments following a lengthy absence and recent struggles. The conversation also covers tailgating plans for the Blue and Red scrimmage and a story about a rocket crashing into the moon. 01:28 - Summer Weather Discussion 03:08 - Spacecraft Moon Collision 04:00 - Bills Scrimmage Expectations 05:31 - Tyler Bass Performance Review

Bob Zimmerman reports SpaceX's 13th Starship Super Heavy launch was a major success, demonstrating the reliability of Raptor 3 engines and the thermal protection system. Zimmerman highlights the shift toward a "capitalism model," where private companies manage missions for NASA. Meanwhile, a schizophrenic GAO report on NASA's workforce reductions suggests that budget cuts have not significantly impacted major projects, despite agency officials' claims that funding decreases are "disastrous." (15)

Why aren't hundreds of millions of intelligent robots already operating in the physical world?In this episode of NEXT with John Koetsier, John speaks with Seth Winterroth, partner at Eclipse, about the rapidly changing robotics investment landscape, the rise of physical AI, and the race to build the next generation of autonomous machines.They explore whether the world really needs hundreds of humanoid robotics companies, why timing matters as much as technology, and why some robotics startups may need to build the entire stack ... from hardware and embedded software to AI models, evaluation systems, and deployment infrastructure.The conversation also covers Genesis AI, Wayve, Project Prometheus, Apptronik, Figure, 1X, autonomous vehicles, delivery drones, industrial automation, surgical robotics, and the future of robots in the home.Topics include:• Why robots still aren't widely deployed • The five forces driving robotics investment • Whether 400 humanoid robotics companies are too many • Full-stack versus platform-based robotics strategies • The challenge of achieving reliability and safety • When useful home robots may finally arrive • Why autonomous vehicles are already robots • The industries likely to adopt robotics first • The future of manufacturing, logistics, transportation, and surgery • What the next major robotics inflection point could be Seth Winterroth is a partner at Eclipse, an investment firm focused on companies transforming physical industries. Eclipse has backed robotics and automation companies including Genesis AI, Wayve, MiND Robotics, Foxglove, and Third Wave Automation.Subscribe to NEXT for more conversations about AI, robotics, emerging technology, and the companies shaping the future.00:00 Why aren't robots everywhere yet?00:37 Introducing Seth Winterroth01:03 The robotics investment landscape02:00 Seth's background in applied robotics03:01 The five forces accelerating robotics04:04 Are there too many humanoid robot companies?05:00 Creative destruction in robotics06:02 How investors pick the winners06:38 Why robotics companies need velocity07:00 The danger of being too early or too late07:51 How Wayve benefited from entering later08:36 Project Prometheus and the $10 billion seed round09:05 Why Genesis AI is building full stack10:01 Full-stack robotics versus foundation-model platforms11:03 The dirty secret: Where are all the robots?12:03 Reliability, safety, and deployment friction12:39 The challenge of vertical integration14:02 What robotics companies should build themselves15:03 Capital requirements and the robotics J-curve16:01 How robotics companies can scale rapidly16:39 When humanoid robots may reach the market17:04 Figure, 1X NEO, Unitree, and AgiBot18:24 A broader definition of robotics19:04 Are cameras and dishwashers robots?19:39 Autonomous vehicles as embodied AI20:23 Why transportation autonomy could be transformational21:05 Why humanoids still have a long way to go21:44 One general-purpose robot or many specialized machines?22:35 What will make home robots successful?23:39 Finding the minimum viable home robot24:20 Physical and digital products25:04 Why the App Store model matters for robotics26:05 How robots will gain new capabilities over time26:35 The brutal economics of consumer robotics27:12 Consumers buy outcomes, not robots27:48 Robotics beyond humanoids28:18 Kiva Systems and the modern robotics era29:05 Why constrained environments win first30:02 Robotics in automotive manufacturing and logistics31:02 Eclipse's robotics portfolio31:31 When robots will begin walking among us32:03 The next major robotics inflection point32:42 Escaping the trough of disillusionment33:29 Why autonomous transportation is nearly solved34:04 How self-driving changes cities and society34:36 The future of robotic surgery35:01 Delivery drones and regulatory barriers35:39 Closing thoughts

We're excited to bring listeners this first of two special episodes recorded at TAPPICon 2026, April 26-29 in Columbus, OH.We had a great turnout for TAPPICon 2026 and the new program format made it easy for people to engage, learn, and grow. TAPPICon's multi-track program is planned and executed by real working papermakers, and 2026 brought Mill Monday, Technical Tuesday, and Workshop Wednesday to the forefront.As TAPPI's official event podcast, Better Together is happy to bring you the opportunity to experience a taste of what makes TAPPICon special. We've assembled three interviews recorded with attendees at the event. Our guests for this episode are:Brian Mock, owner and president of Event Capture Systems:"International Paper came to us and said, 'We need you to help us develop a camera-based safety system to add an additional layer of safety'... and it's been transformative."Joe Braun, division president, process industries and Wilson Monteiro, global  business line manager, Pulp, Paper & Fiber, ABB:"Reliability comes from the design of the plant, then the way that you are managing your asset, then (from) how you are operating your plant. If you have a stable operation, you have a direct impact on reliability."Abigail Hickman, third year dual major in ChemE/PSE at NC State University:"The opportunities are endless and industry professionals I meet... are really excited to see where I go with this."YOU can get in on the conversation! Mark your calendars for April 24 – 28, 2027, and join us in Indianapolis, IN, for TAPPICon 2027. We hope this podcast captured some of the excitement of TAPPICon but to really get it, you need to be there.Thanks to our amazing guests for sharing their knowledge and stories. Be sure to check out our second TAPPICon 2026 Episode as well, where we meet three more of our TAPPICon attendees.

Money in Revolt: From Japan's Yield Curve to the Stablecoin Surge. We are joined by David McAlvany (CEO, The McAlvany Financial Group). Topics discussed include: The Bond Market Revolt. The Global Contagion. The Parallel Dollar. Reliability, Reserves, and Stewardship.

Money in Revolt: From Japan's Yield Curve to the Stablecoin Surge. We are joined by David McAlvany (CEO, The McAlvany Financial Group). Topics discussed include: The Bond Market Revolt. The Global Contagion. The Parallel Dollar. Reliability, Reserves, and Stewardship.

Workplaces are awash with acronyms. We can sometimes hold an entire meeting using apparently impenetrable collections of letters and numbers. Acronyms are handy, though, when they make an important idea easier to remember and apply. R.E.A.L. leadership describes four practical attributes of effective leaders: Reliable, Empathetic, Aspirational and Learning. None of these qualities is revolutionary. The challenge is demonstrating them consistently when deadlines are tight, pressure is high and everyone is busy. What does R.E.A.L. leadership mean? R.E.A.L. leadership means being Reliable, Empathetic, Aspirational and committed to Learning. Together, these four attributes create trust, engagement, direction and adaptability. Leadership frameworks only matter when they influence daily behaviour. A beautifully designed company value printed on the wall is not much use when the boss repeatedly breaks promises, ignores employee concerns, communicates no compelling future and refuses to reconsider outdated ideas. The R.E.A.L. model gives executives, managers and team leaders a practical leadership checklist. Reliability creates credibility. Empathy helps leaders understand what people are experiencing. Aspiration connects everyday work to a bigger purpose. Learning prevents the leader and the organisation from becoming trapped by yesterday's success. This model applies across Japanese companies, multinational corporations, small and medium-sized enterprises and fast-growing startups. The balance may differ, but the underlying leadership expectations remain remarkably similar. Do now: Ask yourself which of the four R.E.A.L. qualities your people experience most strongly—and which one they rarely see. Why is reliability essential for leadership trust? Reliable leaders build trust by doing what they say they will do, keeping their promises and showing consistent interest in the development of their people. Reliability sounds obvious, but it frequently breaks down in practice. Leaders make commitments during meetings, become distracted by the next emergency and quietly forget what they promised. Employees do not forget. They watch whether the leader's words and actions match. Trust is not built by position, title or a magnificent name card. It develops when people see a predictable pattern of follow-through. This includes delivering decisions on time, providing promised resources, giving feedback and supporting an employee's professional growth. Leaders also need to connect organisational objectives with individual goals. Employees naturally wonder, "What is in this for me?" That is not necessarily selfishness. They want to understand how their effort affects their career, skills, reputation and future opportunities. When company and individual interests are aligned, leaders usually gain stronger commitment, greater loyalty and better execution. Do now: Review the promises you have made to your team during the past month. Close the loop on every outstanding commitment. How does empathy improve leadership performance? Empathetic leadership improves performance because leaders make better decisions when they understand the experiences, concerns and viewpoints of their people. Empathy is closely connected to listening. It is difficult to see a situation from another person's perspective when we have never taken the time to discover what that perspective actually is. Busy bosses often see the calm surface of the workplace but miss what is happening underneath. Employees may appear cooperative while privately dealing with confusion, frustration, excessive workloads or concerns about organisational change. Leaders who only demand the numbers may achieve short-term compliance, but they can lose ideas, initiative and discretionary effort. Position power works up to a point. Employees will often do what the boss commands because they have little choice. However, authority alone rarely unlocks creativity, honest feedback or intelligent disagreement. Empathetic leaders do not abandon standards or avoid difficult conversations. They combine accountability with curiosity. They listen carefully, ask thoughtful questions and communicate that they genuinely care about the people producing the results. Do now: In your next one-to-one conversation, spend more time asking and listening than explaining and directing. What makes an aspirational leader effective? Aspirational leaders help people see beyond immediate targets by connecting individual responsibilities to a meaningful and achievable future. Most organisations are consumed by the urgent. Teams concentrate on this month's sales, this quarter's costs, the latest customer complaint or the next internal deadline. These issues matter, but leadership also requires the ability to hover above the everyday melee and see the destination on the far horizon. An aspirational leader explains where the organisation is going, why the destination matters and how each person contributes to reaching it. A generic vision statement is not enough. The message must resonate with employees working in different functions, locations and career stages. A finance professional, salesperson, engineer and frontline manager may all contribute to the same strategic objective, but each needs to understand the goal in language connected to their own work. Leaders must repeatedly translate strategy into relevance. When employees can see the connection between today's tasks and tomorrow's achievement, routine work gains greater meaning. Do now: Explain your organisation's larger goal in one clear sentence, then show every team member how their role contributes to it. Why must leaders continue learning? Leaders must continue learning because experience only creates value when they examine it, challenge their assumptions and adapt their decisions. Many executives claim to have thirty years of experience. In reality, some have had one year of experience thirty times. They repeat familiar methods, defend favoured opinions and rely on approaches that worked in a different competitive environment. Their thinking becomes locked inside a mental vault, and somewhere along the way they lose the key. Senior people are especially vulnerable because previous success can make their judgement appear unchallengeable. They also become extremely busy working in the business rather than working on the business. Reflection, reading, coaching and experimentation are treated as optional luxuries. Learning leaders remain willing to permanently kill their favourite ideas when the evidence changes. They invite alternative viewpoints, study failures and test new approaches. This does not mean chasing every management fashion. It means remaining intellectually flexible enough to recognise when customers, employees, technology or competitors have moved on. Do now: Identify one long-held assumption about your business that deserves to be questioned rather than automatically defended. How can leaders apply the R.E.A.L. model every day? Leaders apply the R.E.A.L. model by turning each attribute into an observable behaviour rather than treating leadership as an abstract philosophy. For reliability, maintain a visible record of commitments and report back when actions are completed. For empathy, schedule regular conversations in which employees can discuss concerns, ideas and ambitions without being immediately interrupted or judged. For aspiration, connect team objectives to the organisation's larger purpose. Do not assume people can automatically see the connection. Repeat it, personalise it and illustrate it with concrete examples. For learning, build reflection into the working rhythm. After an important project, client meeting or decision, ask what worked, what failed and what should change next time. R.E.A.L. leadership does not require a dramatic personality. Introverted and extroverted leaders can both demonstrate these qualities. Nor does it depend on hierarchy. A project leader, new manager or experienced executive can all become more reliable, empathetic, aspirational and committed to learning. Do now: Choose one visible R.E.A.L. behaviour to practise consistently for the next thirty days. How can organisations develop more R.E.A.L. leaders? Organisations develop R.E.A.L. leaders by reinforcing these behaviours through selection, development, performance management and senior-level role modelling. Leadership expectations cannot live only in a training programme. Recruitment and promotion decisions should examine whether candidates keep commitments, listen effectively, communicate a larger direction and learn from experience. Performance discussions should also assess how results were achieved. A manager who reaches the target while exhausting the team, withholding information or damaging trust may create larger costs later. Senior executives have an especially important role. Employees study what powerful people do far more carefully than what corporate values say. When executives admit mistakes, seek feedback and honour promises, they make learning and reliability safer for everyone else. Leadership development should give managers opportunities to practise difficult conversations, coaching, strategic communication and decision-making. Knowledge alone is insufficient. People need feedback, repetition and accountability until the new behaviour becomes natural. Do now: Include at least one R.E.A.L. behaviour in every leadership development and performance conversation. Conclusion R.E.A.L. leadership is easy to remember, which is at least a useful beginning. Reliable leaders build trust. Empathetic leaders understand the people behind the performance. Aspirational leaders connect everyday work to a bigger future. Learning leaders keep adapting rather than becoming prisoners of their previous success. We already know that these qualities matter. The problem is that pressure, deadlines and constant activity make us forget—or convince us that we are too busy to practise them. Leadership does not become real because we understand a framework intellectually. It becomes real when our people repeatedly experience the behaviour. Let's change what they experience. Author bio Dr. Greg Story, Ph.D. in Japanese Decision-Making, is President of Dale Carnegie Tokyo Training and Adjunct Professor at Griffith University. He is a two-time winner of the Dale Carnegie "One Carnegie Award" in 2018 and 2021 and received the Griffith University Business School Outstanding Alumnus Award in 2012. As a Dale Carnegie Master Trainer, Greg is certified to deliver leadership, communication, sales and presentation programmes globally, including Leadership Training for Results. He has written several books, including the bestsellers Japan Business Mastery, Japan Sales Mastery and Japan Presentations Mastery, as well as Japan Leadership Mastery and How to Stop Wasting Money on Training. His books have also been translated into Japanese, including Za Eigyō（ザ営業）, Purezen no Tatsujin（プレゼンの達人）, Torēningu de Okane o Muda ni Suru no wa Yamemashō（トレーニングでお金を無駄にするのはやめましょう）and Gendaiban "Hito o Ugokasu" Rīdā（現代版「人を動かす」リーダー）. Greg publishes daily business insights on LinkedIn, Facebook and X and hosts six weekly podcasts. On YouTube, he produces The Cutting Edge Japan Business Show, Japan Business Mastery and Japan's Top Business Interviews for executives and professionals seeking practical strategies for succeeding in Japan.

Vi kollar tillbaks på årets Wikimania och hyllar alla som vann pris i årets Wikimedian. Shownotes Samanfattning av Wikimania Jans anteckningar Årets Wikimedianer Årets Wikimedian: Jules* Wikimedia pristagare: Dreamyshade Wikimedia pristagare: Barkeep49 Gemenskapsskapare: Chlod Hedersomnämnande: Mari Avetisyan Hedersomnämnande: Hijiri Favoriter Magnus favorit/tips 1: State of Wikimedia & AI 2026: Freedom, Equity, Reliability at a Crossroad (video) Magnus favorit/tips 2: Tabular data vs. structured data – How do we get to a win-win solution? (video) Magnus favorit/tips 3: Research, ”liberté-track”, (video) What Are Our Traffic Trends Telling Us and Why Does It Matter for the Movement? Are Wikimedians using AI in their work (and if yes, how)? Findings from the 2026 Community Insights survey Is Wikimedia a streamable data commons? From Dumps to Data Flows in the Age of AI Extraction From open data to sustainable data commons: A multilayered ecosystem (Construire un modèle de protection des contributions face à l'enclosure des contenus culturels numériques) Can Source Reliability Be Predicted on Wikipedia? Evidence from Feature Analysis Jans favorit/tips 1: Social integration of the new generations: How do we turn casual editors into community leaders? Jans favorit/tips 2: Three things about Wikimedia that even experienced Wikimedians might not know Jans favorit/tips 3: Adding and Managing Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons Nästa program Preliminärt 29 augusti Erkännanden Bild: Simon Delahaye for the Wikimedia Foundation, CC BY-SA 4.0 Musiken och ljudklippen är från Surf Shimmy Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com), CC BY 3.0, samt Wikimedia Sound Logo Finalist VQ97, Thaddeus Osborne, CC BY-SA 4.0, och ljudet från Wikidata’s 10th birthday video intro animation, Lea Lacroix (WMDE), CC BY-SA 4.0. Avsnittet hittas också på Wikimedia Commons. Diskutera avsnittet på projektsidans diskussion.

Artificial intelligence is often discussed through models and GPUs. This episode looks beneath that surface, at the power delivery and networking required to make AI work at scale.Host Sriram Viswanathan speaks with Rajiv Khemani, a serial deep tech entrepreneur whose career has tracked several major infrastructure cycles: internet networking, cloud switching, blockchain compute and now AI networking. Khemani reflects on his early work at NetBoost and Intel, his operating role at Cavium, and the founding of Innovium, which Marvell agreed to acquire for $1.1 billion in 2021. He also explains how work on low-power blockchain silicon led his team toward the infrastructure demands created by generative AI.The discussion examines why incumbents often overlook emerging markets, why purpose-built hardware can outperform systems inherited from an earlier technology cycle, and how founders decide whether to keep financing a company or sell while the outcome remains attractive. Khemani describes the concentration risk of selling to a small number of hyperscalers, the fragility of semiconductor supply chains, and why leading-edge chip development now demands much larger balance sheets.The conversation then turns to AI's emerging bottlenecks. Large models require many accelerators to operate as one computer, making low-latency scale-up and scale-out networks central to performance. The episode explores heterogeneous compute, open networking standards, memory scarcity, AI's growing electricity demand, and the competition between AI and Bitcoin mining for energy. Speaker Profiles and LinksSriram Viswanathan: Founding Managing Partner, Celesta Capital — https://www.linkedin.com/in/onesriram/ Rajiv Khemani: Co-founder and Executive Chairman, Upscale AI; deep-tech entrepreneur and IIT Delhi alumnus LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rajivkhemani/ Profile and contribution to the IIT, Delhi, Yardi School of Artificial Intelligence : https://scai.iitd.ac.in/rajiv-khemani References Mentioned and Further ReadingUpscale AI : https://upscaleai.com/ Upscale AI Launch Announcement : https://upscaleai.com/press-release/ Velaura AI : https://velaura.ai/ Acquisition of Innovium and cloud data-centre switching rationale, Marvell: https://www.marvell.com/company/newsroom/marvell-to-acquire-innovium-accelerates-cloud-growth-with-expanded-ethernet-switching-portfolio.html Cavium combination and infrastructure semiconductor strategy, Marvell:  https://www.marvell.com/company/newsroom/marvell-and-cavium-to-combine-creating-an-infrastructure-solutions-powerhouse.html Energy and AI, International Energy Agency: https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-and-aiEnergy demand from AI, International Energy Agency: https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-and-ai/energy-demand-from-ai Tokenisation in the context of money and other assets, Bank for International Settlements : https://www.bis.org/cpmi/publ/d225.pdf Leveraging tokenisation for payments and financial transactions, Bank for International Settlements : https://www.bis.org/publ/othp92.pdf Collective communication for clusters exceeding 100,000 GPUs, Meta researchers : https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.20171 Load balancing for AI training workloads, UC Berkeley researchers : https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.21372 Reliability in large-scale machine-learning clusters : https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.21680 Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System : https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf Timestamps:[Timestamp] Chapter Title00:00 - Highlights and welcome02:28 - From IIT Delhi to Silicon Valley07:50 - Building Through Major Technology Waves10:19 - Why Incumbents Miss Emerging Markets And Where Start-Ups Win12:47 - Building Innovium for the Cloud19:37 - Supply Shocks and Strategic Exits27:28 - From Bitcoin Chips to AI30:09 - Bitcoin, Tokenisation and Energy42:37 - Agentic AI and Future Networks53:21 - Memory, Capital and Founder Resilience

Optics is no longer a supporting accessory in the data center network. As AI infrastructure advances from 400G and 800G toward 1.6-terabit connectivity, optical components are consuming a larger share of network cost, power and operational risk. In this episode of the Data Center Frontier Show, DCF Editor in Chief Matt Vincent speaks with Bill Gartner, Senior Vice President and General Manager of Cisco's Optical Systems and Optics business, about how AI is changing the strategic role of optics. Gartner explains that optics represented roughly 10% of a network port's bill of materials at 10G. At 400G and above, the optics can cost more than the switch port itself. Reliability has also become critical: A single unstable link can force GPUs operating in parallel to stop, return to a checkpoint and restart. According to data Cisco has seen from hyperscale customers, link flaps can reduce GPU infrastructure efficiency by as much as 40%. The conversation maps the AI network across three distinct tiers: Scale-up: Connections within the rack, carrying approximately 500 times the bandwidth of a traditional WAN environment. Scale-out: Connections between racks, commonly using 400G and 800G pluggable optics. Scale-across: Coherent optical connections between data centers as AI clusters expand beyond the power limits of a single facility. Gartner also discusses Cisco's 1.6T roadmap, routed optical networking, coherent pluggable optics and the emerging debate around co-packaged and near-packaged optics. These architectures promise lower power consumption and greater density, but introduce new questions involving interoperability, replacement and operational resilience. Looking ahead, Gartner emphasizes that optics is not constraining AI network growth. It is enabling clusters to scale across racks, campuses and geographically distributed data centers, while the coming inference wave shifts the industry's focus toward cost and power efficiency.

Global schedule reliability slipped again in June, and the gap between carrier alliances is now too wide to ignore.In this episode, Lars Jensen and Caroline Weaver cover:June reliability data: global on-time performance down to 63% from 65% in May, holding well below pre-pandemic norms for months runningThe alliance breakdown: Gemini at 93.4%, its best showing since launch, versus MSC around 80%, Ocean Alliance around 70%, and Premier Alliance down near 55%How Sea-Intelligence actually measures reliability, including the three to four week lock-in window and why plus/minus one calendar day is the right yardstick, not the wrong oneNYFI this week: Asia-USWC down 1% to $5,818, Asia-USEC up 7% to $7,793, driven by a capacity split between the two coasts, and Asia-NEUR down 3% at $4,797.Sign up for weekly podcast highlights

In this episode Russell Reading interviews Leticia Hermida, Global Corporate PPA Director at Acciona Energy, about hybrid PPAs, contracts that combine generation technologies (most often solar PV and battery storage) to deliver more stable, predictable renewable energy to corporate buyers. They cover why hybrids are gaining traction, the role of storage duration, and how these structures manage price volatility and volume risk. Leticia explains common hybrid structures, regional trends (notably in Spain, Europe, the US and Chile), common misconceptions, and practical advice: define your objectives, assess value beyond headline price, and explore flexible PPA designs to meet decarbonization and risk-management goals.

Fluid Power Forum host Eric Lanke interviews Paul Michael, director of the Fluid Power Institute at Milwaukee School of Engineering, about NFPA's whitepaper "Preventing Leaks in Fluid Power Systems." Michael shares his background in lubricant formulation and hydraulic testing and describes MSOE's hands-on fluid power education. The discussion explains why leak prevention is critical to hydraulics because pressurized fluid stresses connectors, hoses, tubes, and seals, affecting reputation and sustainability.   A committee of about 25 contributors developed the report and conducted a voice-of-the-customer survey, with 75% reporting leakage problems tied to customer satisfaction, downtime, and warranty costs. Adapters and connectors were cited as the largest component-related leakage source, with 31 causes identified across design, installation, mounting, selection, and material compatibility. Michael emphasizes application-driven design to minimize maintenance, the importance of standards (including SAE hose and performance tests), and avoiding tapered pipe threads in favor of modern straight-thread and O-ring sealing approaches.   Subscribe to the Fluid Power Forum today to never miss an episode. The podcast is available on all of your favorite podcast platforms, including YouTube, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and iHeart Radio.   Read the full whitepaper at the NFPA Technology Reports website.   Connect with our host, Eric Lanke, at elanke@nfpa.com.   Connect with our guest, Paul Michael, at michael@msoe.edu.   Learn more about MSOE, at www.msoe.edu.   Find and share more interesting fluid power technologies and unique applications using #onlyfluidpowercan and follow podcast and other fluid power industry-related updates at @TheNFPA.   #Hydraulics #Sealing #LeakPrevention #Innovation #NFPAWhitepaper

Hold Fast To Truth - Reliability of Scripture: 2 Peter 1:12-21

DFR and Reliability Engineers Abstract Enrico and Fred discuss the role of reliability engineers and implementing design for reliability. Key Points Join Enrico and Fred as they discuss how reliability professionals can assist, not do, design for reliability. Topics include: The various tools involved with a good design for reliability program. The problem with a […]

In this Industry Insights episode, Alisha Pinto, senior energy industry analyst at CFC, and Chris Whittle, energy and data analyst at CFC, explore the contents of CFC's newly released issue brief, "Considerations of a Changing Grid: How Electric Cooperatives Are Ensuring Reliability." Related content:Watch the video of this episode, "Pinto, Whittle Explore New CFC Issue Brief."Download CFC's issue brief, "Considerations of a Changing Grid: How Electric Cooperatives Are Ensuring Reliability."Listen to the June 15 CFC Solutions Cast podcast episode, "Reliability in a Rapidly Changing Economy."Read the CFC Solutions Cooperative News article, "Hoosier Energy Builds Flexible Power Portfolio."For questions and requests about industry research topics, please contact utilityresearchpolicy@nrucfc.coop.CFC members can learn more about the latest industry and technology trends by visiting nrucfc.coop/Solutions.

  Every once in a while I finish a trip and, after I get home and everything dries out, I realize there were a handful of lessons that weren't obvious while I was riding. So this week, rather than another recap of the Oregon Coast, here are a few takeaways from the trip."       Takeaway #1: Constraints can make for a better tour   Weather forced changes. My tent forced bigger changes. Transit schedules forced even more changes. We stopped trying to preserve the original plan and started asking what the best trip looked like now. The revised trip ended up being more memorable than the one we planned.   Bottom line: Sometimes constraints don't ruin a tour—they become the reason it's interesting.       Takeaway #2: I think my touring philosophy is changing   I've spent years optimizing for mileage. That usually means riding through interesting places instead of experiencing them. Tillamook was the perfect example. I've passed through multiple times and barely stopped. This time I spent the day exploring instead of chasing miles.   Bottom line: I'm increasingly interested in using the bike to get me to experiences, not simply accumulate distance.       Takeaway #3: "Ride your own ride" can happen on the same trip   Brock and I started from exactly the same place. We made completely different decisions. He chose the big riding day. I chose the slower exploration day. Both approaches ended with great stories.   Bottom line: There isn't one correct version of a successful bike tour.       Takeaway #4: Transit isn't cheating   We used buses multiple times. They made the route possible. They allowed us to adapt instead of abandoning the trip. They cost almost nothing.   Bottom line: Bikes and transit complement each other remarkably well.       Takeaway #5: Gear failures change everything   "My tent is not viable." That one sentence completely changed the weekend. Once your shelter becomes unreliable, every decision becomes different. Confidence is part of your gear list.   Bottom line: Reliability beats optimization.       Takeaway #6: Where did all the bike tourists go?   Peak season. Iconic route. Excellent infrastructure. Very few loaded touring bikes.   Possible explanations:   More gravel riders? More bikepacking? Different travel habits? Something else?   Bottom line: I'm seeing enough of a pattern that I don't think it's a coincidence anymore.       Takeaway #7: I'm excited about touring again   Fitness is coming back. Losing weight has made a noticeable difference. I'm thinking differently about how I want trips to look. I was planning the next ride before this one ended.   Bottom line: That's usually a sign you're headed in the right direction.

Can AI deliver value if your asset data isn't trustworthy? In this episode, Bob Francis sits down with Joe Nichols from Octave to explore how knowledge graphs, data quality, AI-driven classification, and connected industrial intelligence are reshaping asset management and reliability.

What makes a solar energy project truly successful? Is it renewable power alone or the value it creates for the people and communities it serves? In this episode of Silicon Ranch Radio, Nick de Vries talks with Chris Jones, CEO of Middle Tennessee Electric, about meeting the "meat and potatoes" test: delivering reliable, affordable electricity while strengthening local communities. Together, they discuss the launch of CattleTracker™, the role of cost-effective locally generated solar in a growing region, and why preserving productive farmland can go hand in hand with building the grid of the future.  

In this episode of the HUNTR Podcast, we're joined by Gregg Farrell of Tactacam to take a deep dive into the technology behind the all-new Reveal 4.0 cellular trail camera and what it means for today's deer hunters. We explore the latest innovations in trail camera technology and discuss how they're changing the way hunters scout, gather information, and prepare for the season more efficiently than ever. We also discuss trail camera strategy, advancing technology, and where the future of whitetail hunting is headed. Whether you're looking to improve your trail camera setup or simply become a more effective hunter this season, this conversation is packed with valuable insights. Thanks for tuning in, and we'll catch you next week. Sit back, relax, and enjoy the show.0:00 Introduction & Early July Buck Activity3:39 The Origin of Tactacam & Reveal8:36 Reliability, Customer Service & Connectivity21:47 The Reveal 4.0 Battery Breakthrough26:52 Best Camera Settings for Performance40:46 The New Flex Pack Battery System1:08:07 Reveal Pro 4.0 Hardware & Dual-Lens Technology1:33:00 Summer to Fall Trail Camera Strategy1:54:27 The New Bluetooth Wind Sensor2:07:12 Hunting Ethics, Technology & Regulations2:45:21 Reveal 4.0 Pricing & AvailabilityCheck out the all new Reveal 4.0:https://www.tactacam.com/SUBSCRIBE TO THE CHANNEL:https://www.youtube.com/c/HUNTRTUBEShop HUNTR Merch:https://wearehuntr.com/HUNTR Podcast is presented by:Hoyt Archery: https://hoyt.com (Code HUNTR for 20% off apparel)DeerGro: https://www.deergro.com (Code HUNTR for 15% off)Predator Camo: https://www.predatorcamo.com/ (Code HUNTR for 20% off)Beast Broadheads: https://beastbroadheads.com/ (Code HUNTR for 10% off)Lone Wolf Custom Gear: https://www.lonewolfcustomgear.com/ (Code HUNTR for 10% off your first purchase)RackHub: https://www.rack-hub.com/huntr (Code HUNTR for 10% off)Pure Wildlife Blends: https://www.purewildlifeblends.com (Code HUNTR for 10% off)Primos: https://www.primos.com/ (Code HUNTR for 15% off)Bushnell: https://www.bushnell.com/ (Code HUNTR for 15% off)HHA: https://www.hhasports.com/

Send us Fan MailAI is moving at breakneck speed, but the plant floor still runs on trust, habit, and hard-earned routines. We sit down with Vinit to unpack the real challenge behind “digital transformation” in reliability: designing tools that work for an experienced workforce that values buttons, PDFs, and proven processes, while also meeting the expectations of early-career engineers who want fast answers, mobile access, and connected systems.We get practical about what actually closes the gap. Instead of big-bang rollouts, we talk roadmaps, small experiments, and pilots that demonstrate value without risking operations. We also draw a firm line around safety and accuracy: in reliability engineering, there is no room for hallucination. A fault has to be a fault, and any AI-assisted workflow must be validated, secure, and compliant across industries and markets.From there, we zoom out to connected reliability and why data trapped in folders and silos limits predictive maintenance, pattern recognition, and decision-making. We explore how central platforms such as CMMS and connected ecosystems enable sharing, faster analysis, and better prioritisation, even when legacy equipment and mixed vendors complicate integration. We also touch on how “retro” tech keeps a foothold, and why value is better measured by outcomes than by the physical box in your hand.If you care about asset reliability, maintenance strategy, industrial IoT, condition monitoring, and the culture that makes change stick, you'll take plenty from this conversation. Subscribe for more, share it with a colleague who's wrestling with adoption, and leave us a review with your answer: what would make new tech truly trustworthy in your plant?Support the show

Ett traditionsenligt inför Wikimania-special. En översikt av programmet, plattformen och en del runtomkring. Shownotes Välkommen Kort presentation av oss Jans AI-blogginlägg Wikimaniaspecial Evenemanget Programmet Vi ser fram emot: Magnus: Three things about Wikimedia that even experienced Wikimedians might not know Make a wish – improving references on Wikimedia projects State of Wikimedia & AI 2026: Freedom, Equity, Reliability at a Crossroad Jan: If AI becomes the first web interface, how can the wikimedia movement adapt? del 1, del 2 The Coolest Projects: 25 Years of Creativity and Innovation (Tribute to Deror Lin's Legacy) Unpopular Opinions & Wild Ideas (Lightning Talk Meetup) Nästa program 29 juli, Wikimania summeras Erkännanden Bild: Eclos Production, CC BY-SA 4.0 Musiken och ljudklippen är från Surf Shimmy Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com), CC BY 3.0, samt Wikimedia Sound Logo Finalist VQ97, Thaddeus Osborne, CC BY-SA 4.0, och ljudet från Wikidata’s 10th birthday video intro animation, Lea Lacroix (WMDE), CC BY-SA 4.0. Avsnittet hittas också på Wikimedia Commons. Diskutera avsnittet på projektsidans diskussion.

How can art serve as an act of resistance?    In this episode of Women of Color Rise, I speak with Jamila Ponton Bragg, founder of JamRock Productions and a leader named to the Broadway Women's Fund "Women to Watch" list. After 20 years in the nonprofit world, Jamila pivoted to theater, co-producing hits like Passover (2021), Death of a Salesman (2022), Tony Nominated Best Play Fat Ham (2023), The Whiz (2024), Gypsy (2024) and Soul Train (2025).   A proud African American woman, Jamila is on a mission to ensure women's stories have depth and aren't confined to tropes. She shares how she stayed true to her values while navigating the high-stakes world of Broadway. She shares lessons for rising leaders: •Art is Resistance. In a world that often marginalizes women of color, telling our stories is a powerful way to fight back. •Trust Your Instincts. Surround yourself with "your people"—those whose values and tastes align with your mission. •The Power of Showing Up. Leadership isn't always big gestures; it's the follow-up email, the check-in, and being present for others. •Find Your Mentors. Don't be afraid to send that "cold email." People are often more willing to help than you think. •Keep Your Message Consistent. Reliability and a clear mission build the trust needed to fundraise and lead through tough climates.   Jamila's story is a reminder that when we stand in our identity and support one another, we can change the narrative on the world's biggest stages.   Get full show notes and more information here: https://analizawolf.com/episode-125-art-as-resistance-uplifting-womens-stories-on-broadway-with-jamila-ponton-bragg  

Is there archaeological evidence that the Israelites (Hebrews) really lived in Egypt? Many skeptics claim the Exodus never happened and that the biblical account is merely legend. But what does the archaeological evidence actually reveal? In this episode of the Bible and Theology Matters Podcast, Dr. Paul Weaver welcomes biblical archaeologist Dr. Titus Kennedy to examine some of the strongest archaeological evidence supporting the biblical account of the Exodus, Israel's slavery in Egypt, the wilderness wanderings, and the conquest of Canaan. Together they discuss: Evidence for Semitic (Hebrew) peoples living in ancient Egypt Avaris (biblical Goshen) and the store cities of Pithom and Rameses The Brooklyn Papyrus and Hebrew names in Egypt Egyptian tomb paintings depicting Semitic brickmakers The Louvre Leather Roll and parallels to Exodus' brick-making account The Soleb inscriptions—the earliest known reference to the divine name Yahweh The Ipuwer Papyrus and its possible connection to the plagues The Amarna Letters and possible evidence for Joshua's conquest Why many modern scholars reject the Exodus—and how archaeology challenges those assumptions If you've ever wondered whether archaeology supports the Bible, this conversation offers a compelling cumulative case for the historical reliability of Scripture.

Every answer an AI gives you sounds equally confident, whether it's true or completely made up. That's not a bug. It's how the technology was built. Dan Klein is CTO and co-founder of Scaled Cognition, and a professor of computer science at UC Berkeley. In this conversation with Liam, Dan breaks down what a language model actually is, why it was never designed to know the truth in the first place, and why today's AI systems have no "smells," the subtle warning signs humans usually rely on to tell good information from bad. They get into why reinforcement learning from human feedback quietly trains models to tell people what they want to hear, how that can tip into outright deception, and why Dan believes reliability, not raw intelligence, is the biggest unsolved problem in AI today. Key Topics Covered: What a language model actually does at its core: next token prediction Why LLMs are plausibility engines, not truth engines The difference between a hallucination and a lie Why AI mistakes have no warning signs the way bad translations or sketchy websites do How RLHF can train models to be sycophantic instead of accurate The "package delivery" thought experiment: when reward signals diverge from truth Why bolting reliability onto LLMs after the fact doesn't work How Scaled Cognition architects models around verified actions instead of raw text generation Why bigger models aren't automatically better models The difference between disruptive technology and scaled technology Why startups, not incumbents, tend to drive technical breakthroughs What metacognition is and why today's AI systems don't have it Why Dan believes reliability is the next major frontier in AI Episode Timestamps: 00:00 Intro 00:15 What a language model actually is 06:31 From well-formed sentences to general knowledge 08:27 Why LLMs are plausibility engines, not truth engines 12:06 How Perplexity approaches verifiable answers 12:40 Dan's background and Scaled Cognition's mission 15:16 The two anti-patterns companies use to control LLMs today 21:16 How Scaled Cognition architects models differently 23:28 Does every client need a custom-trained model? 29:12 Why prompting alone can't guarantee reliability 30:55 Modularity, contracts, and building reliable systems 34:40 Why trust and digital literacy matter beyond the enterprise 39:12 Code smells and why AI mistakes have no warning signs 41:14 Are AI companies incentivized to tell the truth? 42:55 How reinforcement learning actually works 44:35 The package delivery thought experiment 48:44 Why models are trained to be sycophantic 51:01 Where this incentive is mechanically baked into the model 53:43 Does responsibility fall back on humans? 58:10 Just be more reliable than a human, not perfectly true 1:02:59 The last major technique shift in AI 1:10:55 Why frontier labs keep scaling despite the risk of disruption 1:17:15 The future of hyper-specialized models vs. one broad model 1:19:47 Is there anything uniquely human AI can't replicate? 1:25:45 Wearing three hats: professor, researcher, and CTO 1:29:47 Why Dan does what he does Connect with Dan on LinkedIn:https://www.linkedin.com/in/dan-klein/ Partner Links Upgrade your AI toolkit: https://www.theaireport.ai/ai-executive-pass Subscribe to our free newsletter: https://newsletter.theaireport.ai/subscribe Join the community: https://community.theaireport.ai/checkout/the-ai-report-welcome-gift?coupon_code=WRTH Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Bray SudburySee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

State Sen. Rob Ortt and State Assemblyman Angelo Morinello discuss concerns with power grid reliability and energy costs full 2431 Wed, 15 Jul 2026 18:00:00 +0000 befTm0kFlk7WGYUQP85TQ9OFiW4AYCmJ news,new york state,wben,rob ortt,angelo morinello WBEN Extras news,new york state,wben,rob ortt,angelo morinello State Sen. Rob Ortt and State Assemblyman Angelo Morinello discuss concerns with power grid reliability and energy costs Archive of various reports and news events 2024 © 2021 Audacy, Inc.

Nathan Packer was recently named Senior Vice President of Retail Across North America for Nutrien Ag Solutions. In his first media interview, Packer talks about industry trends and how Nutrien is planning to grow its business. Packer has a career history working for legacy companies in the Nutrien timeline including Crop Production Services. He says Nutrien is staying focused by remaining close to its customers and being ready to adopt technology to reliably serve their needs.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Soumil Arora and Kunal Shah preview the 2026 Belgian Grand Prix and how Charles Leclerc vs. Lewis Hamilton is the main on-track rivalry to follow at this point of the season. Most Formula One fans are obsessing over Lewis Hamilton's comeback or Max Verstappen's behind-the-scenes tug-of-war. But the real drama? It's brewing in the Ferrari garage—and it's hotter than a Monday morning in Monaco. This episode dives into the fierce intra-team rivalry brewing between Charles Leclerc and Lewis Hamilton, how their contrasting setups are shaking up the Ferrari strategy, and why Spa could be the key battleground for their future. - Spa's uncertain future as a permanent circuit and the potential rotation. - Ferrari's internal rivalry: Leclerc vs. Hamilton and the quest for #1. - How Lewis Hamilton continues to innovate and challenge Ferrari's supremacy. - The possible departure routes for Max Verstappen and the racing industry's shifting landscape. - Upgrades and technical advancements making waves in 2023 F1. - The energy management chess game at Spa's long straights and the latest on circuit strategies. - The evolving driver-market: Piastri, Behrman, Sainz, and the rumored moves. - The reliability woes of Aston Martin versus Cadillac's surprising sprint ahead. - Predictions: Who'll take pole, who wins, and the battle for those elusive top spots. Timestamps: 00:00 - Spa's final curtain? The circuit's last historic lap as a permanent fixture 00:29 - Ferrari's internal rivalry: Leclerc vs. Hamilton—who's really on top? 01:00 - Red Bull and Mercedes on the rivalry spectrum—who's in the lead? 01:28 - The Ferrari resurgence: Can they keep winning with both drivers? 02:16 - Leclerc's resurgence and the secret sauce in Ferrari's setup 02:45 - How energy management at Spa differs from other tracks 03:20 - Can Ferrari unlock fan trust at power-sensitive Spa? 03:45 - The Ferrari innovation list—macarena wings, small turbo, and more 04:38 - Will Lewis Hamilton continue his climb, or is the Ferrari threat real? 05:01 - Leclerc's talent: Outclassing Hamilton and pushing Ferrari forward 05:32 - The rivalry to watch: Ferrari's fight for supremacy 06:00 - Energy deployment in Spa's challenging straights—what to expect? 06:46 - Can Mercedes challenge Ferrari at Spa? Insights into team performance 07:12 - Max Verstappen: Should he stay or switch teams? The deep debate 07:36 - The unrelenting dominance of Max and the team's internal dynamics 08:09 - Ferrari's innovation dominance over Red Bull—what's driving this? 09:02 - Will Ferrari's tech wins translate into a championship? 09:47 - The importance of reliability and driver skill—who's leading now? 10:09 - Mercedes' challenges and how they might fare at Spa 10:37 - The Max Verstappen management puzzle—should he look elsewhere? 11:22 - Verstappen's loyalty versus the changing landscape of F1 teams 11:50 - Could McLaren or others lure Max away? The potential driver market moves 12:22 - Red Bull's future: Will they lose Max or hold the fort? 12:40 - Red Bull's internal struggles and the mood shift—should Max consider a move? 13:09 - The real reasons Verstappen might leave Red Bull and what that means for the sport 14:16 - The possibility of Verstappen exploring McLaren, Mercedes, or Ferrari 15:14 - Team dynamics in racing: Will Max be treated equally or as a star? 15:43 - The upcoming driver merry-go-round—who's in, who's out? 16:01 - Piastri, Behrman, and the wild speculative driver market 17:14 - Sainz to Red Bull? The surprising moves on the table 17:39 - The mysterious rear wing failures and what's up with Max? 18:02 - Are reliability issues a driver's fault or a team's? 19:10 - The corporate side of F1: Red Bull's branding and future plans 20:36 - Mercedes and the driver contract puzzle—what's next? 21:38 - Young stars like Kimi Antonelli: The future of F1 talent 22:36 - Reliability, racing pace, and the tricky art of energy management 23:01 - Spa's tricky straight zones—where will the drivers skip braking? 24:27 - Fernando Alonso's meme-quotes and the fun of unpredictable racing 25:43 - The challenge of showcasing speed in modern F1 broadcasts 26:14 - Cadillac's domination and the upcoming upgrades—can Aston Martin catch up? 27:23 - The race director's role: Making sense of chaos 28:10 - The battle for better TV graphics—battery, tire pressure, and more 29:29 - No sprint, just a classic F1 weekend—what to expect 30:01 - Who will grab pole? Is Kimi the new Max? 30:40 - Podium predictions: Will Hamilton or Leclerc take the win at Spa? 31:30 - Fan interaction and the promise of even more drama this weekend #F1 #F1Podcast #Spa #BelgianGP Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Tom Clarkson is joined by former F1 driver Jolyon Palmer and IndyCar race winner James Hinchcliffe to preview this weekend's Belgian Grand Prix.Having failed to score points in two of the last three Grands Prix due to car problems, Kimi Antonelli has seen his championship lead cut from 66 points to just 25. So what is the biggest threat to Kimi's hopes of becoming World Champion this year? His teammate George Russell, Ferrari or Mercedes' reliability issues?On a recent episode, Jolyon suggested that Ferrari need to back Lewis Hamilton over Charles Leclerc if they're to fight Mercedes for the title. After Leclerc's victory at Silverstone, has his opinion changed?The guys also discuss an ‘upset' Max Verstappen, why things could get ‘spicy' at Racing Bulls, and Carlos Sainz's reaction to a disappointing weekend for Williams at the British Grand Prix.You'll also hear their podium predictions for Spa and how wet weather could mix things up. Listen to more official F1 podcastsDrivers, in-depth on F1 Beyond The GridYour questions answered by experts on F1 Explains - right here on the F1 Nationpodcast feedThis episode is sponsored byLeesa - go to Leesa.com for 25% off select mattresses PLUS get an extra $50 off with promo code NATION, exclusive for our listeners.IM8 - give your body what it deserves with IM8! Go to IM8HEALTH.com/nation and use code NATION for a Free Welcome Kit, five free travel sachets plus ten percent off your order. #im8health 

Links For The Occult Rejectshttps://linktr.ee/theoccultrejectsOccult Research Institutehttps://www.occultresearchinstitute.org/Substackhttps://substack.com/@theoccultrejects?r=7auau0&utm_campaign=profile&utm_medium=profile-pageCash Apphttps://cash.app/$theoccultrejectsVenmo@TheOccultRejectsBuy Me A Coffeebuymeacoffee.com/TheOccultRejectsPatreonhttps://www.patreon.com/TheOccultRejectsAssmann, Jan. Death and Salvation in Ancient Egypt. Translated by David Lorton. Cornell University Press, 2005.Ariès, Philippe. The Hour of Our Death. Translated by Helen Weaver. Knopf, 1981.Beard, Mary, John North, and Simon Price. Religions of Rome. 2 vols. Cambridge University Press, 1998.Blackmore, Susan. Dying to Live: Near-Death Experiences. Prometheus Books, 1993.Boyce, Mary. Zoroastrians: Their Religious Beliefs and Practices. Routledge, 1979.Bremmer, Jan N. The Rise and Fall of the Afterlife: The 1995 Read-Tuckwell Lectures at the University of Bristol. Routledge, 2002.Chalmers, David J. “Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 2, no. 3 (1995): 200–219.Fenwick, Peter, and Elizabeth Fenwick. The Art of Dying: A Journey to Elsewhere. Continuum, 2008.Graf, Fritz, and Sarah Iles Johnston. Ritual Texts for the Afterlife: Orpheus and the Bacchic Gold Tablets. 2nd ed. Routledge, 2013.Greyson, Bruce. After: A Doctor Explores What Near-Death Experiences Reveal about Life and Beyond. St. Martin's Essentials, 2021.Greyson, Bruce. “The Near-Death Experience Scale: Construction, Reliability, and Validity.” Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 171, no. 6 (1983): 369–375.Griffiths, Roland R., William A. Richards, Una McCann, and Robert Jesse. “Psilocybin Can Occasion Mystical-Type Experiences Having Substantial and Sustained Personal Meaning and Spiritual Significance.” Psychopharmacology 187, no. 3 (2006): 268–283.Hornung, Erik. The Ancient Egyptian Books of the Afterlife. Translated by David Lorton. Cornell University Press, 1999.Johnston, Sarah Iles. Restless Dead: Encounters between the Living and the Dead in Ancient Greece. University of California Press, 1999.Kerr, Christopher W., et al. “End-of-Life Dreams and Visions: A Longitudinal Study of Hospice Patients' Experiences.” Journal of Palliative Medicine 17, no. 3 (2014): 296–303.Le Goff, Jacques. The Birth of Purgatory. Translated by Arthur Goldhammer. University of Chicago Press, 1984.Moody, Raymond A. Life After Life. Mockingbird Books, 1975.Nahm, Michael, Bruce Greyson, Emily Williams Kelly, and Erlendur Haraldsson. “Terminal Lucidity: A Review and a Case Collection.” Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 55, no. 1 (2012): 138–142.Nelson, Kevin R., Michelle Mattingly, Sherman A. Lee, and Frederick A. Schmitt. “Does the Arousal System Contribute to Near Death Experience?” Neurology 66, no. 7 (2006): 1003–1009.Obayashi, Hiroshi, ed. Death and Afterlife: Perspectives of World Religions. Greenwood Press, 1992.Osis, Karlis, and Erlendur Haraldsson. At the Hour of Death. Avon, 1977.Parnia, Sam, et al. “AWAreness during REsuscitation—II: A Multi-Center Study of Consciousness and Awareness in Cardiac Arrest.” Resuscitation 191 (2023).Plato. Phaedo. In Plato: Complete Works. Edited by John M. Cooper. Hackett, 1997.Segal, Alan F. Life After Death: A History of the Afterlife in Western Religion. Doubleday, 2004.Stevenson, Ian. Children Who Remember Previous Lives: A Question of Reincarnation. Rev. ed. McFarland, 2001.Taylor, John H., ed. Journey through the Afterlife: Ancient Egyptian Book of the Dead. Harvard University Press / British Museum Press, 2010.Tucker, Jim B. Life Before Life: A Scientific Investigation of Children's Memories of Previous Lives. St. Martin's Press, 2005.van Gennep, Arnold. The Rites of Passage. Translated by Monika B. Vizedom and Gabrielle L. Caffee. University of Chicago Press, 1960.van Lommel, Pim, Ruud van Wees, Vincent Meyers, and Ingrid Elfferich. “Near-Death Experience in Survivors of Cardiac Arrest: A Prospective Study in the Netherlands.” The Lancet 358, no. 9298 (2001): 2039–2045.Xu, Gang, et al. “Surge of Neurophysiological Coupling and Connectivity of Gamma Oscillations in the Dying Human Brain.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120, no. 19 (2023).Also want to remind people about the website, if you're into reading we have tons of information by multiple contributors, and we got t-shirts up on the site if you're interested. Fun fact, the art is all based on the eyeball. 

Be part of the Next Level Fitness Accountability Group – Reach out to Kevin or Alan on Instagram:Kevin: https://www.instagram.com/neverquitkid/Alan: https://www.instagram.com/alazaros88/Book Alan's Business Breakthrough Session. Your first 30-minute coaching call is FREE. Learn how to prioritize success and let your quality of life become the byproduct. - https://calendly.com/alanlazaros/30-minute-breakthrough-session_______________________In this episode of Next Level University, hosts Kevin Palmieri and Alan Lazaros walk through the next layer of the reliability-versus-adaptability conversation and explain why accountability is the third skill that makes consistency sustainable. Kevin and Alan break down why consistency is not just about showing up. It requires trust, flexibility, and the right pressure to follow through when conditions are not ideal.This episode will help you see which part of your consistency triangle is strongest, which one needs work, and which one may be quietly slowing your growth. Listen before your excuses start building a support group._______________________NLU is more than a podcast. From the Next Level Dreamliner to Group Coaching, we provide tools and communities to help you grow with more clarity, consistency, and accountability.Visit our website and socials through the links below.

Join us for this thought-provoking conversation with Craig Clapper, a seasoned systems engineer and founder of Reliability 4 Life, as he explores what it truly means to make systems more resilient. Craig explains why human error is an inevitable part of complex work and shares how organizations can strengthen situational awareness by helping people recognize where to focus their attention, identify the signals that matter most, and apply critical thinking in complex and safety-critical environments. Drawing on real-world examples from a variety of industries, including healthcare, Craig shares practical strategies for managing risk, improving recovery processes, and building organizational resilience. He also highlights the importance of fostering a culture of continuous learning to create safer, stronger workplaces. Don't miss this insightful conversation and dive into how to build robust systems and elevate situational awareness and critical thinking within your organization. Tune in to learn more! About the Guest: Craig Clapper is a founder and the chief knowledge officer of Reliability 4 Life, a consulting group specializing in improving human performance in complex systems using evidence-based methods derived from high-reliability organizations. Craig has more than 30 years of experience improving reliability in power, transportation, manufacturing, and healthcare. His expertise includes failure analysis, event analysis, systems thinking, system reliability improvement, and safety culture transformation.  For more Information: https://reliability4life.com/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Who was the Pharaoh of the Exodus? Did the Exodus Account Actually Really Happen? Could the Bible's account of the Exodus be historically accurate? Is there archaeological evidence to support it? In this episode of the Bible and Theology Matters Podcast, Dr. Paul Weaver sits down with biblical archaeologist Dr. Titus Kennedy to examine the biblical chronology, archaeological discoveries, and historical evidence surrounding one of Scripture's most debated events: the Exodus. Drawing from both Scripture and archaeology, Dr. Kennedy presents a compelling case for a 1446 BC Exodus and identifies Amenhotep II as the most likely Pharaoh of the Exodus. This conversation explores key biblical passages, Egyptian chronology, archaeological discoveries, and the evidence supporting the historical reliability of the Old Testament. Whether you're interested in biblical archaeology, apologetics, or defending the historicity of Scripture, this episode provides thoughtful, evidence-based answers.In This Episode:-Why 1 Kings 6:1 points to a 1446 BC Exodus-How Judges 11, Acts 13, and Galatians 3 confirm the biblical chronology -Early Date vs. Late Date Exodus: What's the evidence? -Why many scholars reject a symbolic reading of the 480 years -The challenges of Egyptian chronology -Why Amenhotep II best fits the biblical description of the Pharaoh of the Exodus -The significance of the Sphinx Dream Stele-The mystery of Prince Webensenu and Amenhotep II's tomb-Archaeological evidence supporting the biblical account -Why Ramesses II is unlikely to be the Pharaoh of the Exodus -How archaeology strengthens confidence in the historical reliability of Scripture About OurGuest Dr. Titus Kennedy is a biblical archaeologist, author, professor, and field archaeologist who has participated in numerous excavations throughout the Middle East. His research focuses on demonstrating the historical reliability of the Bible through archaeology and ancient history.Resources Mentioned

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.volts.wtf/subscribeMinnesota regulators Sydnie Lieb and Pete Wyckoff on why utility distribution spending — now a third of capital budgets and the biggest driver of rising bills — escapes the scrutiny the rest of the grid faces, and how to fix that.00:00 - Introduction04:23 - How distribution is regulated differently than generation and transmission09:25 - Why distribution matters now: an aging system and the build-more incentive14:00 - Contestable “mandatory” spending: undergrounding, DERMS software, capitalization22:19 - Reliability standards and the cost of chasing 100 percent28:42 - The MISO comparison: valuing a lost hour, and the scale of the numbers35:12 - Non-wires alternatives: batteries, the Xcel project, and modeling gaps40:31 - What regulators should require: AMI forecasts and beyond the prudence test47:22 - The speed objection: does more analysis slow things down?50:10 - Why spending caps and rate freezes are the wrong fix52:40 - Spending more anyway, and recent Minnesota PUC disappointments55:09 - Restructured markets: does the same logic apply?58:38 - The vision of a well-functioning process and scaling it nationally

Be part of the Next Level Fitness Accountability Group – Reach out to Kevin or Alan on Instagram:Kevin: https://www.instagram.com/neverquitkid/Alan: https://www.instagram.com/alazaros88/Book Alan's Business Breakthrough Session. Your first 30-minute coaching call is FREE. Learn how to prioritize success and let your quality of life become the byproduct. - https://calendly.com/alanlazaros/30-minute-breakthrough-sessionJoin the free Next Level Monthly Masterclass every first Thursday. This month, Kevin and Alan break down “Exactly How to Lose 10 Lbs in 10 Weeks” with real principles and practical tools. - https://us06web.zoom.us/meeting/register/VBwQQDevSheeBl4C97Y5Nw#/registration_______________________Can one of your greatest strengths quietly become the thing that limits your growth? In today's episode, Kevin and Alan explain the difference between reliability and adaptability, and why most people tend to lean harder toward one than the other. Kevin shares how reliability has shaped his consistency over the years, while Alan reflects on how adaptability helped him succeed in high-pressure environments but also revealed blind spots in trust, timing, and leadership.Through their experience, coaching work, and thousands of episodes, they show why growth requires both. You need the ability to adjust when life changes, and the discipline to follow through when people are counting on you._______________________NLU is more than a podcast. From the Next Level Dreamliner to Group Coaching, we provide tools and communities to help you grow with more clarity, consistency, and accountability.Visit our website and socials through the links below.

For 20% off your carVertical report, and 50% off a bundle, use code DOBBS and you can click the link here: https://www.carvertical.com/gb/landin... __________________ You can check out all of our Libertatia gear including The Lost Biker Stories, here (thank you so much for your support): www.thelibertatia.com/ Please do leave a comment and share your thoughts. If you've got a story, insight or pictures to share, you can also email hi@tuesdayatdobbs.com Instagram: www.instagram.com/@tuesday_at_dobbs My other YouTube channel: @FreddieDobbs __________________ Time Stamps: 00:00: Intro and Libertatia 01:50: The Honda CB1000R Neo, or wait for the new CB1000F? 07:18: Have Chinese bikes now lost their reputation for iffy build quality? (Brixton Cromwell 1200 and Morbidelli Timeless 1200) 12:53: The best modern motorbike for £1,500 (Suzuki GSF650 and Yamaha XJR1200) 16:24: car vertical report on a Yamaha XJR1200 18:28: The Anime inspired Honda not aimed at bikers (Honda Vultus) 21:44: The silent majority (no time for DIY mechanics) 23:44: Classic motorcycle garages are on the rise? 26:19: Bike of the week (Triumph Trident, Kawasaki W650, Yamaha Serrow

Renewables produced zero megawatts for four straight days during a recent winter storm while coal, gas and nuclear carried the full grid load. Southwestern Pennsylvania has the second-largest natural gas deposits in North America, barely tapped. And Boilermakers Local 154 Business Agent Shawn Steffee believes his region can lead the national energy and data center build-out — with a workforce ready to do it. On today's trades day episode of America's Work Force Union Podcast, Steffee discusses the Homer City campus, where he believes a 4,200-megawatt natural gas power block is under active construction alongside hyperscale data center plans he projects could generate 3,500 building trades jobs on that site alone. He addresses community concerns about water and electricity prices, makes the case that natural gas is the only near-term solution to the grid reliability crisis and describes a Local that went five years without taking a single apprentice and is now on pace for 175 new ones — with more needed still. Visit boilermakerslocal154.com to learn more.

Tom Clarkson is joined by F1TV commentary duo, former F1 driver Jolyon Palmer and lead commentator Alex Jacques, to reflect on a dramatic British Grand Prix.Charles Leclerc capitalised on more misfortune for championship leader Kimi Antonelli to take his first victory since Austin in 2024. After such a difficult run of races, why was he back to his best and how significant is this win for Charles?Reliability issues mean Antonelli has seen his championship lead cut from 66 points to just 25 over the last three rounds, but is he leaving Silverstone happier than George Russell despite the Brit taking home P2 and closing the gap to Kimi? Jolyon, Alex and Tom share their thoughts on George's continuing struggles against his teammate and the team radio message from Mercedes Team Principal Toto Wolff at the end of the race. Plus, the guys discuss why Lewis Hamilton might be ‘scratching his head' despite securing a fourth podium finish of the season and gaining more ground on Antonelli.Listen to more official F1 podcastsLando Norris on F1 Beyond The GridYour questions answered by experts on F1 Explains - right here on the F1 Nation podcast feed This episode is sponsored byBetterHelp - Don't let stigma stand in the way of support. Start therapy with BetterHelp. Sign up and get 10% off at betterhelp.com/f1nationShopify: You put in the work. Time to get paid like it. Free trial at shopify.com/nationGive your body what it deserves with IM8! Go to IM8HEALTH.com/NATION and use code NATION for a Free Welcome Kit, five free travel sachets plus ten percent off your order.Anthropic: For problems worth solving — get started with Claude at Claude.ai/nation

AI Names ‘Best’ Reliability Engineers Abstract Kirk and Fred discuss a recent AI search topic: who is the best reliability engineer? Key Points Join Kirk and Fred as they discuss how AI tends to provide answers with some bias towards the person inquiring and maybe a little bit of confirmation bias. Topics include: Why do Fred […]

Will governments, budgets, and AI economics—not model intelligence—determine who wins the AI race?This week, the biggest AI stories weren't just about new models. They revealed three major shifts that every business leader should be paying attention to. Governments are becoming active gatekeepers of frontier AI. Companies are moving away from "use the smartest model for everything" toward cost-optimized AI strategies. And specialized AI solutions are rapidly gaining ground over one-size-fits-all frontier models.If you're leading AI adoption inside your organization, these changes will influence your technology choices, budgets, competitive strategy, and long-term planning.In this episode, Isar connects the dots between regulation, economics, and innovation to explain where AI is heading—and what it means for businesses over the next 12–24 months.In this session, you'll discover:Why the U.S. government's approach to frontier AI appears to have shifted dramatically.What the Anthropic and OpenAI model restrictions could mean for future AI releases.Why China's AI ecosystem may benefit from tighter U.S. controls.How regulatory decisions could affect OpenAI, Anthropic, and their upcoming IPO ambitions.Whether independent AI safety auditors could become the future of AI regulation.Why Ford rehired hundreds of engineers after discovering AI couldn't fully replace experienced talent.What OpenAI's latest model revealed about AI reliability and model "cheating."Why enterprises are abandoning expensive frontier models for dramatically cheaper alternatives.How companies like Lindy, Uber, Amazon, and Glean are changing their AI spending strategies.Why orchestration layers and specialized AI models may become more valuable than simply building larger foundation models.The week's most important rapid-fire AI product launches, funding announcements, and industry developments.About Leveraging AIThe Ultimate AI Course for Business People: https://multiplai.ai/ai-course/YouTube Full Episodes: https://www.youtube.com/@Multiplai_AI/Connect with Isar Meitis: https://www.linkedin.com/in/isarmeitis/ Join our Live Sessions, AI Hangouts and newsletter: https://services.multiplai.ai/eventsIf you've enjoyed or benefited from some of the insights of this episode, leave us a five-star review on your favorite podcast platform, and let us know what you learned, found helpful, or liked most about this show!