Podcasts about Boston Police Department

**Discussion begins at 4:30**Let's go back to January 28, 2022 – Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe and his girlfriend, Karen Read, had been fighting. They decided to decompress and meet up in a bar in Canton, Massachusetts, knowing that a blizzard was coming and they were likely going to be snowed in for a few days.  Karen met her boyfriend and his buddies at a bar about a mile from John's home, and then they went across the street to meet up with more of his friends.  After last call, the couple was invited to an after party about 2.5 miles away at the home of Boston Police Officer Brian Albert.  Karen didn't enter the house, for reasons we will get to later, but she dropped of John and then drove herself to his home where she allegedly fell asleep on the couch.  When Karen awoke around 5AM, she noted that John had not come home and began searching for him with the help of some friends.  They found him dead in the snow in front of the Albert residence, eventually leading to the arrest of Karen Read.  Prosecutors allege that Karen backed into John with her SUV, and left the scene, causing John O'Keefe to die d/t a basilar skull fracture and hypothermia.  She was charged with second-degree murder, manslaughter, motor vehicle homicide, and leaving the scene of a deadly crash. The defense, however, claims that John O'Keefe was likely killed by someone inside the house and that the witnesses, many of whom were affiliated with the Boston Police Department, utilized their resources to cover up the true cause of death and frame Karen Read.  The trial, lasting more than 2 months, and including more than 600 pieces of evidence and 70 witnesses, ended in a mistrial last July. The foreman told the judge "The divergence in our views are not rooted in a lack of understanding or effort but deeply held convictions that each of us carry, ultimately leading to a point where consensus is unattainable," the jury of six men and six women were hung after 4 days of deliberation.  Polling of the jurors revealed that they had all agreed that she was not guilty of murder or leaving the scene but had been confused about how to deliver a partial verdict. She is currently being retried for the same charges.  Send us a textSupport the showTheme song by INDA

STORM OF SUSPICION: The Karen Read Murder TrialKaren Read is a 44-year old equity analyst and professor who was living in Canton, Mass, with her boyfriend John O'Keefe, who was a Boston police officer. On the night of January 28, 2022, she went out with O'Keefe, his cop friends, and their wives, and they all get very drunk. She's definitely hammered when she drives O'Keefe to an after party at the home of Brian Albert, the police sergeant detective who worked with O'Keefe at the Boston Police Department.What happens next is the subject of debate...Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-opperman-report--1198501/support.

John O'Keefe, a 16-year veteran of the Boston Police Department, died of blunt force trauma and hypothermia on January 29, 2022, after being found on a fellow Boston Police Officer's front lawn during a blizzard. His girlfriend, Karen Read, is charged with allegedly backing into John with her SUV, and leaving him to die in the cold after a night of drinking. But her defense team poses a different theory – a massive cover-up spanning law enforcement agencies across Massachusetts. Karen's first case ended in a mistrial on July 1, 2024. Her second trial is set to begin in April 2025.Join us in watching the trial and get daily recaps on Crime Junkie Jury, hosted by Brandi Churchwell, only on YouTube. We know you are following this case as closely as we are, and we can't wait to hear your thoughts on the second trial! Source materials for this episode cannot be listed here due to character limitations. For a full list of sources, please visit: crimejunkiepodcast.com/infamous-john-okeefe-the-trial-of-karen-read/Did you know you can listen to this episode ad-free? Join the Fan Club! Visit crimejunkie.app/library/ to view the current membership options and policies.The Crime Junkie Merch Store is NOW OPEN! Shop the exclusive Life Rule #10 Tour collection before it's gone for good! Don't miss your chance - visit the store now! Don't miss out on all things Crime Junkie!Instagram: @crimejunkiepodcast | @audiochuckTwitter: @CrimeJunkiePod | @audiochuckTikTok: @crimejunkiepodcastFacebook: /CrimeJunkiePodcast | /audiochuckllcCrime Junkie is hosted by Ashley Flowers and Brit Prawat. Instagram: @ashleyflowers | @britprawatTwitter: @Ash_Flowers | @britprawatTikTok: @ashleyflowerscrimejunkieFacebook: /AshleyFlowers.AF Text Ashley at 317-733-7485 to talk all things true crime, get behind the scenes updates, and more!

Karen Read's first trial in the death of John O'Keefe, her boyfriend and Boston Police officer, ended with a hung jury. Now, she prepares to face a jury once again not only maintaining her innocence but claiming that those close to O'Keefe and the Boston Police Department have framed her for murder. This episode of the Court TV Podcast takes you to Dedham Massachusetts for one of the final pretrial hearings in the controversial case against Karen Read from 3/18/2025.For more on the case against Karen Read, Click Here.Watch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today https://www.courttv.com/Join the Investigation Newsletter https://www.courttv.com/email/Court TV Podcast https://www.courttv.com/podcast/FOLLOW THE CASE:Facebook https://www.facebook.com/courttvTwitter/X https://twitter.com/CourtTVInstagram https://www.instagram.com/courttvnetwork/TikTok https://www.tiktok.com/@courttvliveYouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/COURTTVWATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVE https://www.courttv.com/trials/ HOW TO FIND COURT TV https://www.courttv.com/where-to-watch/

Reina Carolina Morales Rojas was last seen on Saturday, November 26, 2022 when she left her apartment in her East Boston neighborhood. She was seen getting into a vehicle that was headed to Somerville - reportedly to a friend's house. She is believed to have entered that building on Alston St. That is the extent of what we know. But we didn't know it until she was missing for 45 days. The Boston Police Department would eventually acknowledge their obvious negligence in notifying the public. There was no urgency. Critical time was lost. With insights from Marcela García, the first journalist to report on Reina's case, we navigate the emotional toll on Reina's family and the systemic shortcomings in media coverage and police responses that hinder the search for justice.The initial lack of response to her case, both from the police and the media, is a factor in why it took time for her disappearance to gain wider notice. Reina Carolina had only been in the Boston area for a short time and did not speak English, which may have presented additional challenges in her disappearance. Another missing persons case in the region had taken up the air in the room. Marcela García, Associate Editor and columnist for The Boston Globe, covers a wide range of topics, from public education and immigration policy to social inequities and the Latinx community in Boston and beyond.Marcela GarcíaBoston Globe report on her visit to El Salvador: A heartbreaking visit to the hometown of a missing Boston womanWomen's Media CenterFBIMMMPACSources list at crimeofthetruestkind.comSend a message to the showSupport the showFollow Instagram | Facebook | BlueSky | TikTok | Threads | YouTube For show notes & source information at CrimeoftheTruestKind.comGive the dogs a bone tip jar: buymeacoffee.com/truestkindBecome a patron: Patreon.com/crimeofthetruestkindThis podcast has minimal profanity but from time to time you get one or some curse words. This isn't for kids.Music included in episodes from Joe "onlyone" Kowalski, Dug McCormack's Math Ghosts and Shredding by Andrew King

The health of our military service members and our Veterans is always a top line issue. Many suffer from illness and injury as a result of their service; and most are believed to be at higher risk for chronic sickness. Some of which is fortunately preventable. Cancer is a top concern for much of the military community. To dig into the increased risk cancer poses to our Veterans, Fran Racioppi sat down with Team Maureen; an organization focused on bringing attention and prevention of HPV and HPV-related cancers to our Veterans. Daniel Linskey, Kelly Welch and Dr. Emily Penick lead Team Maureen and founded the organization after the loss of their family and friend Maureen Russo. Worldwide, a woman dies of cervical cancer every two minutes. It is the second-most frequent cancer in the world. The military community is twice as likely to develop HPV, yet immunization rates among our servicemembers are 50% of the civilian community. 90% of HPV-related cancers are preventable through immunization.We broke down the facts of HPV, why it's rising exponentially in our military, how it's affecting both our women and men service-members, and what every single person, military and civilian, can do to prevent one of the deadliest, and preventable, cancers in society today.Check out our conversation over-looking Plymouth Harbor and with Cardinals in the air. Follow us on social media, read the full episode on our website, then head over to our YouTube channel or your favorite podcast platform to catch this conversation and our follow-up with Danny as he shares how he led the Boston Police Department during the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing. HIGHLIGHTS0:00 Introduction1:50 Welcome to the South Shore4:44 What is Cervical Cancer?8:09 How do you get Cervical Cancer?9:49 What is the effect on men?11:38 Screening for HPV12:55 Oral Health importance14:23 Low vaccination rates17:40 Why are military at risk?19:58 Vaccination process24:57 Who was Maureen?29:17 How are you educating people?33:20 How do you get involved?QUOTES“Making sure that people know about the importance of prevention of HPV and early detection for cervical cancer is our mission.”“Nobody should die of cervical cancer. It's completely preventable.” “Why not be at the forefront of HPV prevention?” “This is something that can help your kids not get cancer.” “Active duty military and Veterans are 2x as likely as civilians to develop cancers associated with HPV.” “We should be able to get to that point where no one loses a loved one to cervical cancer.”“You think you're a badass. Cancer doesn't care if you're a badass.” The Jedburgh Podcast and the Jedburgh Media Channel are an official program of Green Beret Foundation, supporting US Army Special Forces of all generations.

Mark Glover is 51 but you'd never believe it. He has the energy (and speed) of men half his age. During this episode, sponsored by Athlete Bouquets, we talk about: How Mark and I met The fact that Mark has a problem with going to fast His PR at the Geist Half Marathon despite the hills Qualifying for the Boston Marathon and his Boston experience running with the Boston Police Department the year of the Boston bombing His first sales gig at the age of 9 and why he didn't finish college Why he didn't run in school… the girls liked football players How a decade of partying with celebrities in LA took a huge toll on his body Becoming a dad six months to the day after September 11th The “mirror talk” that saved his life How he did 95% of his first marathon training on a treadmill Listening to “Lose Yourself” by Eminem on repeat during his first race Becoming a full time single dad and moving to Indiana Living and running with Crohn's disease REGNR8 Rx and learning a lot about how to upkeep his body and focus on longevity Doing Hood to Coast for the first time Losing one of his best LA friends who took the path he would have taken if it hadn't been for running Running for the abs, the medals and the times vs. the awards

John O'Keefe served as an officer with the Boston Police Department for 16 years. He dedicated his life to improving his community and supporting his family. In 2020, John met Karen Read, and they began dating. Sadly, two years later, in the early hours of January 28th, 2022, John tragically lost his life, and the evidence points to his girlfriend, Karen Read. Download Swamp Dweller Scary Stories: Itunes: https://apple.co/2L7znZp Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2WUFDG8 Check out the Swamp Dweller Merch store! http://bit.ly/32u2eh5 The Dark Swamp: Horror Stories (Episode 895)

Brian's GoFundMe: https://www.gofundme.com/f/support-brians-fight-for-justice-and-survival (https://www.gofundme.com/f/support-brians-fight-for-justice-and-survival) Become a Parajunkie here!: www.patreon.com/savannahunderground Welcome back to "The Most Haunted City on Earth," where Madison Timmons and Chris Soucy dive into the latest developments in the ongoing drama surrounding The Conjuring House. In this episode, we provide an update on the escalating situation with the current owner, Jacqueline Nuñez, whose recent social media posts have raised even more eyebrows. From claims of being hijacked by bots to accusations against the Boston Police Department and the sharing of bizarre videos featuring chatty birds, Jacqueline's online activity has become increasingly erratic. We also delve into her detailed explanations of paranormal activity at the house, where she attempts to explain the unexplainable with science and her own unique interpretations. This episode is packed with brand new, shocking revelations that you won't want to miss. We also cover the latest updates on key figures involved in the saga, including Brian Dansereau, the former General Manager, who has now created a GoFundMe to seek justice for unpaid wages after being fired under troubling circumstances. Additionally, we discuss Jason Hawes' recent video in which he shares disturbing messages sent by Jacqueline, leading him to take legal action against her. The situation at The Conjuring House continues to unravel, and we're here to bring you the latest, most detailed account of the events as they unfold. Join us for another deep dive into one of the most controversial haunted locations in the world. Jason Hawes's Video: https://youtu.be/KJm88g76l74?si=buO_mme6oGVOy6bd --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/john-taylor-timmons/support

Karen Read's defense team is pushing for the dismissal of two charges in her ongoing legal battle over the death of Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. During a hearing on Friday, Read's attorneys argued that retrying her on charges of second-degree murder and leaving the scene of a deadly accident would violate her constitutional protection against double jeopardy. The case against Read stems from a tragic incident in January 2022, where she is accused of striking O'Keefe with her SUV and leaving him to die in a snowstorm outside a Canton, Massachusetts home. O'Keefe, a 16-year veteran of the Boston Police Department, was found with injuries consistent with blunt force trauma and hypothermia. The prosecution argues that Read intentionally hit O'Keefe, while the defense maintains that he was killed inside the home and that Read was framed. The original trial ended in a mistrial after jurors reported they were deadlocked on the manslaughter charge, but Read's defense contends that the jury had already unanimously acquitted her on the charges of second-degree murder and leaving the scene. Attorney Marty Weinberg, representing Read, emphasized that “strong uncontradicted evidence” shows the jury reached a not guilty verdict on these two charges. Weinberg argued that the jury's note indicating they were deadlocked was ambiguous, and the judge should have polled the jurors or sought additional clarification before declaring a mistrial. "It's the right thing to do," Weinberg stated, urging the judge to dismiss the charges that had allegedly been acquitted. Prosecutors, however, challenged the defense's assertions, labeling them as "unsubstantiated but sensational post-trial claims." They argue that the defense is relying on hearsay and conjecture about the jury's deliberations. According to Norfolk County Assistant District Attorney Adam Lally, the jury did not return a verdict slip, and neither the guilty nor not guilty boxes were checked for any of the charges. Lally insisted that the defense is "twisting the law" with their request and that no extraneous influence or bias affected the jury. In their motion, the prosecution also pointed out that Read's defense team had the opportunity to object to the mistrial when it was declared but chose not to. "Contrary to the representation made in the defendant's motion and supporting affidavits, the defendant advocated for and consented to a mistrial," the prosecution noted. They further argued that this consent removes any double jeopardy bar to retrial. Prosecutors acknowledged that they received a voicemail and emails from individuals who identified themselves as jurors, confirming that the jury had reached a unanimous decision on two of the charges. However, they maintained that they are ethically prohibited from inquiring into the substance of the jury's deliberations and cannot guarantee confidentiality for those jurors. The defense's request to dismiss the charges comes ahead of a new trial set to begin on January 27. As part of their strategy to prevent a retrial, Read's attorneys are calling for a "post-verdict inquiry" to question all 12 jurors and establish that they had unanimously acquitted her on the two charges before the mistrial was declared. Judge Beverly Cannone, who presided over the initial trial, heard the arguments from both sides during the Friday hearing but has not yet made a decision. “I'll take it under advisement,” Judge Cannone told the court, indicating that she will rule on the matter at a later date. The case has attracted significant attention, not only because of the tragic death of a Boston police officer but also due to the contentious legal battle over Read's alleged role in the incident. As the retrial date approaches, both the defense and prosecution are preparing for what is likely to be another high-profile courtroom confrontation. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #DoubleJeopardy #LegalDefense #Mistrial #NorfolkCounty #JusticeSystem Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Karen Read's defense team is pushing for the dismissal of two charges in her ongoing legal battle over the death of Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. During a hearing on Friday, Read's attorneys argued that retrying her on charges of second-degree murder and leaving the scene of a deadly accident would violate her constitutional protection against double jeopardy. The case against Read stems from a tragic incident in January 2022, where she is accused of striking O'Keefe with her SUV and leaving him to die in a snowstorm outside a Canton, Massachusetts home. O'Keefe, a 16-year veteran of the Boston Police Department, was found with injuries consistent with blunt force trauma and hypothermia. The prosecution argues that Read intentionally hit O'Keefe, while the defense maintains that he was killed inside the home and that Read was framed. The original trial ended in a mistrial after jurors reported they were deadlocked on the manslaughter charge, but Read's defense contends that the jury had already unanimously acquitted her on the charges of second-degree murder and leaving the scene. Attorney Marty Weinberg, representing Read, emphasized that “strong uncontradicted evidence” shows the jury reached a not guilty verdict on these two charges. Weinberg argued that the jury's note indicating they were deadlocked was ambiguous, and the judge should have polled the jurors or sought additional clarification before declaring a mistrial. "It's the right thing to do," Weinberg stated, urging the judge to dismiss the charges that had allegedly been acquitted. Prosecutors, however, challenged the defense's assertions, labeling them as "unsubstantiated but sensational post-trial claims." They argue that the defense is relying on hearsay and conjecture about the jury's deliberations. According to Norfolk County Assistant District Attorney Adam Lally, the jury did not return a verdict slip, and neither the guilty nor not guilty boxes were checked for any of the charges. Lally insisted that the defense is "twisting the law" with their request and that no extraneous influence or bias affected the jury. In their motion, the prosecution also pointed out that Read's defense team had the opportunity to object to the mistrial when it was declared but chose not to. "Contrary to the representation made in the defendant's motion and supporting affidavits, the defendant advocated for and consented to a mistrial," the prosecution noted. They further argued that this consent removes any double jeopardy bar to retrial. Prosecutors acknowledged that they received a voicemail and emails from individuals who identified themselves as jurors, confirming that the jury had reached a unanimous decision on two of the charges. However, they maintained that they are ethically prohibited from inquiring into the substance of the jury's deliberations and cannot guarantee confidentiality for those jurors. The defense's request to dismiss the charges comes ahead of a new trial set to begin on January 27. As part of their strategy to prevent a retrial, Read's attorneys are calling for a "post-verdict inquiry" to question all 12 jurors and establish that they had unanimously acquitted her on the two charges before the mistrial was declared. Judge Beverly Cannone, who presided over the initial trial, heard the arguments from both sides during the Friday hearing but has not yet made a decision. “I'll take it under advisement,” Judge Cannone told the court, indicating that she will rule on the matter at a later date. The case has attracted significant attention, not only because of the tragic death of a Boston police officer but also due to the contentious legal battle over Read's alleged role in the incident. As the retrial date approaches, both the defense and prosecution are preparing for what is likely to be another high-profile courtroom confrontation. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #DoubleJeopardy #LegalDefense #Mistrial #NorfolkCounty #JusticeSystem Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Karen Read's defense team is pushing for the dismissal of two charges in her ongoing legal battle over the death of Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. During a hearing on Friday, Read's attorneys argued that retrying her on charges of second-degree murder and leaving the scene of a deadly accident would violate her constitutional protection against double jeopardy. The case against Read stems from a tragic incident in January 2022, where she is accused of striking O'Keefe with her SUV and leaving him to die in a snowstorm outside a Canton, Massachusetts home. O'Keefe, a 16-year veteran of the Boston Police Department, was found with injuries consistent with blunt force trauma and hypothermia. The prosecution argues that Read intentionally hit O'Keefe, while the defense maintains that he was killed inside the home and that Read was framed. The original trial ended in a mistrial after jurors reported they were deadlocked on the manslaughter charge, but Read's defense contends that the jury had already unanimously acquitted her on the charges of second-degree murder and leaving the scene. Attorney Marty Weinberg, representing Read, emphasized that “strong uncontradicted evidence” shows the jury reached a not guilty verdict on these two charges. Weinberg argued that the jury's note indicating they were deadlocked was ambiguous, and the judge should have polled the jurors or sought additional clarification before declaring a mistrial. "It's the right thing to do," Weinberg stated, urging the judge to dismiss the charges that had allegedly been acquitted. Prosecutors, however, challenged the defense's assertions, labeling them as "unsubstantiated but sensational post-trial claims." They argue that the defense is relying on hearsay and conjecture about the jury's deliberations. According to Norfolk County Assistant District Attorney Adam Lally, the jury did not return a verdict slip, and neither the guilty nor not guilty boxes were checked for any of the charges. Lally insisted that the defense is "twisting the law" with their request and that no extraneous influence or bias affected the jury. In their motion, the prosecution also pointed out that Read's defense team had the opportunity to object to the mistrial when it was declared but chose not to. "Contrary to the representation made in the defendant's motion and supporting affidavits, the defendant advocated for and consented to a mistrial," the prosecution noted. They further argued that this consent removes any double jeopardy bar to retrial. Prosecutors acknowledged that they received a voicemail and emails from individuals who identified themselves as jurors, confirming that the jury had reached a unanimous decision on two of the charges. However, they maintained that they are ethically prohibited from inquiring into the substance of the jury's deliberations and cannot guarantee confidentiality for those jurors. The defense's request to dismiss the charges comes ahead of a new trial set to begin on January 27. As part of their strategy to prevent a retrial, Read's attorneys are calling for a "post-verdict inquiry" to question all 12 jurors and establish that they had unanimously acquitted her on the two charges before the mistrial was declared. Judge Beverly Cannone, who presided over the initial trial, heard the arguments from both sides during the Friday hearing but has not yet made a decision. “I'll take it under advisement,” Judge Cannone told the court, indicating that she will rule on the matter at a later date. The case has attracted significant attention, not only because of the tragic death of a Boston police officer but also due to the contentious legal battle over Read's alleged role in the incident. As the retrial date approaches, both the defense and prosecution are preparing for what is likely to be another high-profile courtroom confrontation. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #DoubleJeopardy #LegalDefense #Mistrial #NorfolkCounty #JusticeSystem Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Karen Read's defense team is pushing for the dismissal of two charges in her ongoing legal battle over the death of Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. During a hearing on Friday, Read's attorneys argued that retrying her on charges of second-degree murder and leaving the scene of a deadly accident would violate her constitutional protection against double jeopardy. The case against Read stems from a tragic incident in January 2022, where she is accused of striking O'Keefe with her SUV and leaving him to die in a snowstorm outside a Canton, Massachusetts home. O'Keefe, a 16-year veteran of the Boston Police Department, was found with injuries consistent with blunt force trauma and hypothermia. The prosecution argues that Read intentionally hit O'Keefe, while the defense maintains that he was killed inside the home and that Read was framed. The original trial ended in a mistrial after jurors reported they were deadlocked on the manslaughter charge, but Read's defense contends that the jury had already unanimously acquitted her on the charges of second-degree murder and leaving the scene. Attorney Marty Weinberg, representing Read, emphasized that “strong uncontradicted evidence” shows the jury reached a not guilty verdict on these two charges. Weinberg argued that the jury's note indicating they were deadlocked was ambiguous, and the judge should have polled the jurors or sought additional clarification before declaring a mistrial. "It's the right thing to do," Weinberg stated, urging the judge to dismiss the charges that had allegedly been acquitted. Prosecutors, however, challenged the defense's assertions, labeling them as "unsubstantiated but sensational post-trial claims." They argue that the defense is relying on hearsay and conjecture about the jury's deliberations. According to Norfolk County Assistant District Attorney Adam Lally, the jury did not return a verdict slip, and neither the guilty nor not guilty boxes were checked for any of the charges. Lally insisted that the defense is "twisting the law" with their request and that no extraneous influence or bias affected the jury. In their motion, the prosecution also pointed out that Read's defense team had the opportunity to object to the mistrial when it was declared but chose not to. "Contrary to the representation made in the defendant's motion and supporting affidavits, the defendant advocated for and consented to a mistrial," the prosecution noted. They further argued that this consent removes any double jeopardy bar to retrial. Prosecutors acknowledged that they received a voicemail and emails from individuals who identified themselves as jurors, confirming that the jury had reached a unanimous decision on two of the charges. However, they maintained that they are ethically prohibited from inquiring into the substance of the jury's deliberations and cannot guarantee confidentiality for those jurors. The defense's request to dismiss the charges comes ahead of a new trial set to begin on January 27. As part of their strategy to prevent a retrial, Read's attorneys are calling for a "post-verdict inquiry" to question all 12 jurors and establish that they had unanimously acquitted her on the two charges before the mistrial was declared. Judge Beverly Cannone, who presided over the initial trial, heard the arguments from both sides during the Friday hearing but has not yet made a decision. “I'll take it under advisement,” Judge Cannone told the court, indicating that she will rule on the matter at a later date. The case has attracted significant attention, not only because of the tragic death of a Boston police officer but also due to the contentious legal battle over Read's alleged role in the incident. As the retrial date approaches, both the defense and prosecution are preparing for what is likely to be another high-profile courtroom confrontation. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #DoubleJeopardy #LegalDefense #Mistrial #NorfolkCounty #JusticeSystem Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Karen Read's defense team is pushing for the dismissal of two charges in her ongoing legal battle over the death of Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. During a hearing on Friday, Read's attorneys argued that retrying her on charges of second-degree murder and leaving the scene of a deadly accident would violate her constitutional protection against double jeopardy. The case against Read stems from a tragic incident in January 2022, where she is accused of striking O'Keefe with her SUV and leaving him to die in a snowstorm outside a Canton, Massachusetts home. O'Keefe, a 16-year veteran of the Boston Police Department, was found with injuries consistent with blunt force trauma and hypothermia. The prosecution argues that Read intentionally hit O'Keefe, while the defense maintains that he was killed inside the home and that Read was framed. The original trial ended in a mistrial after jurors reported they were deadlocked on the manslaughter charge, but Read's defense contends that the jury had already unanimously acquitted her on the charges of second-degree murder and leaving the scene. Attorney Marty Weinberg, representing Read, emphasized that “strong uncontradicted evidence” shows the jury reached a not guilty verdict on these two charges. Weinberg argued that the jury's note indicating they were deadlocked was ambiguous, and the judge should have polled the jurors or sought additional clarification before declaring a mistrial. "It's the right thing to do," Weinberg stated, urging the judge to dismiss the charges that had allegedly been acquitted. Prosecutors, however, challenged the defense's assertions, labeling them as "unsubstantiated but sensational post-trial claims." They argue that the defense is relying on hearsay and conjecture about the jury's deliberations. According to Norfolk County Assistant District Attorney Adam Lally, the jury did not return a verdict slip, and neither the guilty nor not guilty boxes were checked for any of the charges. Lally insisted that the defense is "twisting the law" with their request and that no extraneous influence or bias affected the jury. In their motion, the prosecution also pointed out that Read's defense team had the opportunity to object to the mistrial when it was declared but chose not to. "Contrary to the representation made in the defendant's motion and supporting affidavits, the defendant advocated for and consented to a mistrial," the prosecution noted. They further argued that this consent removes any double jeopardy bar to retrial. Prosecutors acknowledged that they received a voicemail and emails from individuals who identified themselves as jurors, confirming that the jury had reached a unanimous decision on two of the charges. However, they maintained that they are ethically prohibited from inquiring into the substance of the jury's deliberations and cannot guarantee confidentiality for those jurors. The defense's request to dismiss the charges comes ahead of a new trial set to begin on January 27. As part of their strategy to prevent a retrial, Read's attorneys are calling for a "post-verdict inquiry" to question all 12 jurors and establish that they had unanimously acquitted her on the two charges before the mistrial was declared. Judge Beverly Cannone, who presided over the initial trial, heard the arguments from both sides during the Friday hearing but has not yet made a decision. “I'll take it under advisement,” Judge Cannone told the court, indicating that she will rule on the matter at a later date. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

Karen Read's defense team is pushing for the dismissal of two charges in her ongoing legal battle over the death of Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. During a hearing on Friday, Read's attorneys argued that retrying her on charges of second-degree murder and leaving the scene of a deadly accident would violate her constitutional protection against double jeopardy. The case against Read stems from a tragic incident in January 2022, where she is accused of striking O'Keefe with her SUV and leaving him to die in a snowstorm outside a Canton, Massachusetts home. O'Keefe, a 16-year veteran of the Boston Police Department, was found with injuries consistent with blunt force trauma and hypothermia. The prosecution argues that Read intentionally hit O'Keefe, while the defense maintains that he was killed inside the home and that Read was framed. The original trial ended in a mistrial after jurors reported they were deadlocked on the manslaughter charge, but Read's defense contends that the jury had already unanimously acquitted her on the charges of second-degree murder and leaving the scene. Attorney Marty Weinberg, representing Read, emphasized that “strong uncontradicted evidence” shows the jury reached a not guilty verdict on these two charges. Weinberg argued that the jury's note indicating they were deadlocked was ambiguous, and the judge should have polled the jurors or sought additional clarification before declaring a mistrial. "It's the right thing to do," Weinberg stated, urging the judge to dismiss the charges that had allegedly been acquitted. Prosecutors, however, challenged the defense's assertions, labeling them as "unsubstantiated but sensational post-trial claims." They argue that the defense is relying on hearsay and conjecture about the jury's deliberations. According to Norfolk County Assistant District Attorney Adam Lally, the jury did not return a verdict slip, and neither the guilty nor not guilty boxes were checked for any of the charges. Lally insisted that the defense is "twisting the law" with their request and that no extraneous influence or bias affected the jury. In their motion, the prosecution also pointed out that Read's defense team had the opportunity to object to the mistrial when it was declared but chose not to. "Contrary to the representation made in the defendant's motion and supporting affidavits, the defendant advocated for and consented to a mistrial," the prosecution noted. They further argued that this consent removes any double jeopardy bar to retrial. Prosecutors acknowledged that they received a voicemail and emails from individuals who identified themselves as jurors, confirming that the jury had reached a unanimous decision on two of the charges. However, they maintained that they are ethically prohibited from inquiring into the substance of the jury's deliberations and cannot guarantee confidentiality for those jurors. The defense's request to dismiss the charges comes ahead of a new trial set to begin on January 27. As part of their strategy to prevent a retrial, Read's attorneys are calling for a "post-verdict inquiry" to question all 12 jurors and establish that they had unanimously acquitted her on the two charges before the mistrial was declared. Judge Beverly Cannone, who presided over the initial trial, heard the arguments from both sides during the Friday hearing but has not yet made a decision. “I'll take it under advisement,” Judge Cannone told the court, indicating that she will rule on the matter at a later date. The case has attracted significant attention, not only because of the tragic death of a Boston police officer but also due to the contentious legal battle over Read's alleged role in the incident. As the retrial date approaches, both the defense and prosecution are preparing for what is likely to be another high-profile courtroom confrontation. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #DoubleJeopardy #LegalDefense #Mistrial #NorfolkCounty #JusticeSystem Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

Karen Read's defense team is pushing for the dismissal of two charges in her ongoing legal battle over the death of Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. During a hearing on Friday, Read's attorneys argued that retrying her on charges of second-degree murder and leaving the scene of a deadly accident would violate her constitutional protection against double jeopardy. The case against Read stems from a tragic incident in January 2022, where she is accused of striking O'Keefe with her SUV and leaving him to die in a snowstorm outside a Canton, Massachusetts home. O'Keefe, a 16-year veteran of the Boston Police Department, was found with injuries consistent with blunt force trauma and hypothermia. The prosecution argues that Read intentionally hit O'Keefe, while the defense maintains that he was killed inside the home and that Read was framed. The original trial ended in a mistrial after jurors reported they were deadlocked on the manslaughter charge, but Read's defense contends that the jury had already unanimously acquitted her on the charges of second-degree murder and leaving the scene. Attorney Marty Weinberg, representing Read, emphasized that “strong uncontradicted evidence” shows the jury reached a not guilty verdict on these two charges. Weinberg argued that the jury's note indicating they were deadlocked was ambiguous, and the judge should have polled the jurors or sought additional clarification before declaring a mistrial. "It's the right thing to do," Weinberg stated, urging the judge to dismiss the charges that had allegedly been acquitted. Prosecutors, however, challenged the defense's assertions, labeling them as "unsubstantiated but sensational post-trial claims." They argue that the defense is relying on hearsay and conjecture about the jury's deliberations. According to Norfolk County Assistant District Attorney Adam Lally, the jury did not return a verdict slip, and neither the guilty nor not guilty boxes were checked for any of the charges. Lally insisted that the defense is "twisting the law" with their request and that no extraneous influence or bias affected the jury. In their motion, the prosecution also pointed out that Read's defense team had the opportunity to object to the mistrial when it was declared but chose not to. "Contrary to the representation made in the defendant's motion and supporting affidavits, the defendant advocated for and consented to a mistrial," the prosecution noted. They further argued that this consent removes any double jeopardy bar to retrial. Prosecutors acknowledged that they received a voicemail and emails from individuals who identified themselves as jurors, confirming that the jury had reached a unanimous decision on two of the charges. However, they maintained that they are ethically prohibited from inquiring into the substance of the jury's deliberations and cannot guarantee confidentiality for those jurors. The defense's request to dismiss the charges comes ahead of a new trial set to begin on January 27. As part of their strategy to prevent a retrial, Read's attorneys are calling for a "post-verdict inquiry" to question all 12 jurors and establish that they had unanimously acquitted her on the two charges before the mistrial was declared. Judge Beverly Cannone, who presided over the initial trial, heard the arguments from both sides during the Friday hearing but has not yet made a decision. “I'll take it under advisement,” Judge Cannone told the court, indicating that she will rule on the matter at a later date. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Karen Read's defense team is pushing for the dismissal of two charges in her ongoing legal battle over the death of Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. During a hearing on Friday, Read's attorneys argued that retrying her on charges of second-degree murder and leaving the scene of a deadly accident would violate her constitutional protection against double jeopardy. The case against Read stems from a tragic incident in January 2022, where she is accused of striking O'Keefe with her SUV and leaving him to die in a snowstorm outside a Canton, Massachusetts home. O'Keefe, a 16-year veteran of the Boston Police Department, was found with injuries consistent with blunt force trauma and hypothermia. The prosecution argues that Read intentionally hit O'Keefe, while the defense maintains that he was killed inside the home and that Read was framed. The original trial ended in a mistrial after jurors reported they were deadlocked on the manslaughter charge, but Read's defense contends that the jury had already unanimously acquitted her on the charges of second-degree murder and leaving the scene. Attorney Marty Weinberg, representing Read, emphasized that “strong uncontradicted evidence” shows the jury reached a not guilty verdict on these two charges. Weinberg argued that the jury's note indicating they were deadlocked was ambiguous, and the judge should have polled the jurors or sought additional clarification before declaring a mistrial. "It's the right thing to do," Weinberg stated, urging the judge to dismiss the charges that had allegedly been acquitted. Prosecutors, however, challenged the defense's assertions, labeling them as "unsubstantiated but sensational post-trial claims." They argue that the defense is relying on hearsay and conjecture about the jury's deliberations. According to Norfolk County Assistant District Attorney Adam Lally, the jury did not return a verdict slip, and neither the guilty nor not guilty boxes were checked for any of the charges. Lally insisted that the defense is "twisting the law" with their request and that no extraneous influence or bias affected the jury. In their motion, the prosecution also pointed out that Read's defense team had the opportunity to object to the mistrial when it was declared but chose not to. "Contrary to the representation made in the defendant's motion and supporting affidavits, the defendant advocated for and consented to a mistrial," the prosecution noted. They further argued that this consent removes any double jeopardy bar to retrial. Prosecutors acknowledged that they received a voicemail and emails from individuals who identified themselves as jurors, confirming that the jury had reached a unanimous decision on two of the charges. However, they maintained that they are ethically prohibited from inquiring into the substance of the jury's deliberations and cannot guarantee confidentiality for those jurors. The defense's request to dismiss the charges comes ahead of a new trial set to begin on January 27. As part of their strategy to prevent a retrial, Read's attorneys are calling for a "post-verdict inquiry" to question all 12 jurors and establish that they had unanimously acquitted her on the two charges before the mistrial was declared. Judge Beverly Cannone, who presided over the initial trial, heard the arguments from both sides during the Friday hearing but has not yet made a decision. “I'll take it under advisement,” Judge Cannone told the court, indicating that she will rule on the matter at a later date. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Karen Read's defense team is pushing for the dismissal of two charges in her ongoing legal battle over the death of Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. During a hearing on Friday, Read's attorneys argued that retrying her on charges of second-degree murder and leaving the scene of a deadly accident would violate her constitutional protection against double jeopardy. The case against Read stems from a tragic incident in January 2022, where she is accused of striking O'Keefe with her SUV and leaving him to die in a snowstorm outside a Canton, Massachusetts home. O'Keefe, a 16-year veteran of the Boston Police Department, was found with injuries consistent with blunt force trauma and hypothermia. The prosecution argues that Read intentionally hit O'Keefe, while the defense maintains that he was killed inside the home and that Read was framed. The original trial ended in a mistrial after jurors reported they were deadlocked on the manslaughter charge, but Read's defense contends that the jury had already unanimously acquitted her on the charges of second-degree murder and leaving the scene. Attorney Marty Weinberg, representing Read, emphasized that “strong uncontradicted evidence” shows the jury reached a not guilty verdict on these two charges. Weinberg argued that the jury's note indicating they were deadlocked was ambiguous, and the judge should have polled the jurors or sought additional clarification before declaring a mistrial. "It's the right thing to do," Weinberg stated, urging the judge to dismiss the charges that had allegedly been acquitted. Prosecutors, however, challenged the defense's assertions, labeling them as "unsubstantiated but sensational post-trial claims." They argue that the defense is relying on hearsay and conjecture about the jury's deliberations. According to Norfolk County Assistant District Attorney Adam Lally, the jury did not return a verdict slip, and neither the guilty nor not guilty boxes were checked for any of the charges. Lally insisted that the defense is "twisting the law" with their request and that no extraneous influence or bias affected the jury. In their motion, the prosecution also pointed out that Read's defense team had the opportunity to object to the mistrial when it was declared but chose not to. "Contrary to the representation made in the defendant's motion and supporting affidavits, the defendant advocated for and consented to a mistrial," the prosecution noted. They further argued that this consent removes any double jeopardy bar to retrial. Prosecutors acknowledged that they received a voicemail and emails from individuals who identified themselves as jurors, confirming that the jury had reached a unanimous decision on two of the charges. However, they maintained that they are ethically prohibited from inquiring into the substance of the jury's deliberations and cannot guarantee confidentiality for those jurors. The defense's request to dismiss the charges comes ahead of a new trial set to begin on January 27. As part of their strategy to prevent a retrial, Read's attorneys are calling for a "post-verdict inquiry" to question all 12 jurors and establish that they had unanimously acquitted her on the two charges before the mistrial was declared. Judge Beverly Cannone, who presided over the initial trial, heard the arguments from both sides during the Friday hearing but has not yet made a decision. “I'll take it under advisement,” Judge Cannone told the court, indicating that she will rule on the matter at a later date. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Karen Read's defense team is pushing for the dismissal of two charges in her ongoing legal battle over the death of Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. During a hearing on Friday, Read's attorneys argued that retrying her on charges of second-degree murder and leaving the scene of a deadly accident would violate her constitutional protection against double jeopardy. The case against Read stems from a tragic incident in January 2022, where she is accused of striking O'Keefe with her SUV and leaving him to die in a snowstorm outside a Canton, Massachusetts home. O'Keefe, a 16-year veteran of the Boston Police Department, was found with injuries consistent with blunt force trauma and hypothermia. The prosecution argues that Read intentionally hit O'Keefe, while the defense maintains that he was killed inside the home and that Read was framed. The original trial ended in a mistrial after jurors reported they were deadlocked on the manslaughter charge, but Read's defense contends that the jury had already unanimously acquitted her on the charges of second-degree murder and leaving the scene. Attorney Marty Weinberg, representing Read, emphasized that “strong uncontradicted evidence” shows the jury reached a not guilty verdict on these two charges. Weinberg argued that the jury's note indicating they were deadlocked was ambiguous, and the judge should have polled the jurors or sought additional clarification before declaring a mistrial. "It's the right thing to do," Weinberg stated, urging the judge to dismiss the charges that had allegedly been acquitted. Prosecutors, however, challenged the defense's assertions, labeling them as "unsubstantiated but sensational post-trial claims." They argue that the defense is relying on hearsay and conjecture about the jury's deliberations. According to Norfolk County Assistant District Attorney Adam Lally, the jury did not return a verdict slip, and neither the guilty nor not guilty boxes were checked for any of the charges. Lally insisted that the defense is "twisting the law" with their request and that no extraneous influence or bias affected the jury. In their motion, the prosecution also pointed out that Read's defense team had the opportunity to object to the mistrial when it was declared but chose not to. "Contrary to the representation made in the defendant's motion and supporting affidavits, the defendant advocated for and consented to a mistrial," the prosecution noted. They further argued that this consent removes any double jeopardy bar to retrial. Prosecutors acknowledged that they received a voicemail and emails from individuals who identified themselves as jurors, confirming that the jury had reached a unanimous decision on two of the charges. However, they maintained that they are ethically prohibited from inquiring into the substance of the jury's deliberations and cannot guarantee confidentiality for those jurors. The defense's request to dismiss the charges comes ahead of a new trial set to begin on January 27. As part of their strategy to prevent a retrial, Read's attorneys are calling for a "post-verdict inquiry" to question all 12 jurors and establish that they had unanimously acquitted her on the two charges before the mistrial was declared. Judge Beverly Cannone, who presided over the initial trial, heard the arguments from both sides during the Friday hearing but has not yet made a decision. “I'll take it under advisement,” Judge Cannone told the court, indicating that she will rule on the matter at a later date. The case has attracted significant attention, not only because of the tragic death of a Boston police officer but also due to the contentious legal battle over Read's alleged role in the incident. As the retrial date approaches, both the defense and prosecution are preparing for what is likely to be another high-profile courtroom confrontation. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #DoubleJeopardy #LegalDefense #Mistrial #NorfolkCounty #JusticeSystem Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In this episode, The Gritty Nurses and Nurse Matthew discuss two juxtaposing cases: first of a nurse who uploaded a video showing her at a strip club before her shift and a horrifying case of a nurse who fell asleep in her car and then accidentally drove off the top floor of a parking garage. We discuss both cases, the circumstances around each, the "upload/pick me" culture and how common falling asleep while driving among shift workers are. Details of Case 2: "I was so exhausted..." A Boston nurse was injured after driving off the top floor of a parking garage. Authorities responded to the incident at Faulkner Hospital in Jamaica Plain, according to a police report from the Boston Police Department. Responding officers found a “heavily damaged” 2018 Jeep Grand Cherokee next to the garage, as well as a piece of railing that appeared to match the railing on the garage's roof. Boston fire officials reportedly informed police that a vehicle had plunged off the top of the parking garage, though it was unclear how. Article: https://people.com/nurse-slept-in-car-drove-off-top-floor-hospital-parking-garage-8656111  Thank you to our episode sponsor, healthcareproviders.ca! Attention, hospital employees, retirees and HR in Canada!   Picture this: a benefit plan designed for casual and part-time hospital employees and retirees who aren't covered by their hospital's group health plan. Introducing Healthcare Providers Group Insurance Plan – a friendly partner dedicated to your health and wellbeing! With affordable plan premiums and an exceptional support team, Healthcare Providers, also known as HCP,  is dedicated to helping you every step of the way. Enrolling is easy, and you'll have access to a wide range of health and basic dental benefits from day one. Already have coverage through your spouse? HCP still has your back! For less than $32 a month, the Signature Package, which includes Life, Long-Term Disability, Accidental Death, Disease & Dismemberment, provides valuable income protection and peace of mind for the unexpected. Take charge of your health and financial security today. Visit healthcareproviders.ca to learn more! Order our Book, The Wisdom Of Nurses! Leave us a review on Amazon! https://www.harpercollins.ca/9781443468718/the-wisdom-of-nurses/  https://www.grittynurse.com/ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@grittynursepodcast  Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/grittynurse Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/gritty.nurse.podcast/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/GrittyNurse  LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/grittynurse  

Boston Mayor Michelle Wu joins Radio Boston to talk about President Biden's decision to withdraw from the presidential race, as well as what police transparency and accountability looks like within the Boston Police Department after the recent demotion of a Boston police leader.

Many dogs work for the Boston Police Department each and every day, but the department has never had a comfort dog - until now! Copper the dog is BPD's first ever comfort dog, and she's in training with her handler, Officer Tim Wilson. Nichole talks with Officer Wilson, BPD Chief of Communications Mariellen Burns, and Copper about their training journey and her role in the community.

JURY STATEMENT: “Despite all commitment to the duty entrusted to us, we find ourselves deeply divided by fundamental differences in our opinions and state of mind. The divergence in our views is not rooted in a lack of understanding or effort, but in deeply held convictions that each of us carry ultimately leading to a point where consensus is unattainable. We recognize the weight of this submission and the implications it holds.” A judge declared a mistrial Monday in the high-profile case of Karen Read, accused of killing her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O'Keefe, by striking him with her SUV and leaving him to die in a snowstorm. The case, which captivated true crime enthusiasts and conspiracy theorists alike, ended in a deadlock after jurors failed to reach a unanimous verdict despite weeks of deliberation. Read, a former adjunct professor at Bentley College, faced charges of second-degree murder and other offenses in connection with the death of O'Keefe, a 16-year veteran of the Boston Police Department. O'Keefe was found outside a fellow officer's home in Canton in January 2022, with an autopsy revealing he died of hypothermia and blunt force trauma. Prosecutors alleged that Read and O'Keefe had been drinking heavily before she dropped him off at the home of Officer Brian Albert, hitting him with her SUV as she left. “The defendant repeatedly said, ‘I hit him. I hit him. Oh my God. I hit him,'” stated Prosecutor Adam Lally, referencing Read's alleged statements after O'Keefe was found. The defense portrayed Read as a victim of a rushed and biased investigation. They suggested that O'Keefe was killed inside Albert's home, dragged outside, and left to die. “You have been lied to,” defense attorney Alan Jackson told the jury during closing arguments, asserting that the case was a “cover-up” to protect other officers. The trial featured significant evidence of police misconduct. Lead investigator State Trooper Michael Proctor admitted to sending offensive texts about Read during the investigation, which he later apologized for, though he maintained they did not influence his work. Additionally, police acknowledged using unorthodox methods to collect evidence, including red plastic cups and a leaf blower. Forensic experts were divided on whether O'Keefe's injuries were consistent with being struck by Read's SUV, which had a broken taillight. The defense pointed to injuries that suggested an altercation and the presence of Albert's aggressive dog as potential factors in O'Keefe's death. The jury was unable to reach a consensus on these conflicting accounts. **Hashtags:** #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #BostonPolice #Mistrial #TrueCrime #ForensicEvidence #JusticeForJohnOkeefe Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

JURY STATEMENT: “Despite all commitment to the duty entrusted to us, we find ourselves deeply divided by fundamental differences in our opinions and state of mind. The divergence in our views is not rooted in a lack of understanding or effort, but in deeply held convictions that each of us carry ultimately leading to a point where consensus is unattainable. We recognize the weight of this submission and the implications it holds.” A judge declared a mistrial Monday in the high-profile case of Karen Read, accused of killing her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O'Keefe, by striking him with her SUV and leaving him to die in a snowstorm. The case, which captivated true crime enthusiasts and conspiracy theorists alike, ended in a deadlock after jurors failed to reach a unanimous verdict despite weeks of deliberation. Read, a former adjunct professor at Bentley College, faced charges of second-degree murder and other offenses in connection with the death of O'Keefe, a 16-year veteran of the Boston Police Department. O'Keefe was found outside a fellow officer's home in Canton in January 2022, with an autopsy revealing he died of hypothermia and blunt force trauma. Prosecutors alleged that Read and O'Keefe had been drinking heavily before she dropped him off at the home of Officer Brian Albert, hitting him with her SUV as she left. “The defendant repeatedly said, ‘I hit him. I hit him. Oh my God. I hit him,'” stated Prosecutor Adam Lally, referencing Read's alleged statements after O'Keefe was found. The defense portrayed Read as a victim of a rushed and biased investigation. They suggested that O'Keefe was killed inside Albert's home, dragged outside, and left to die. “You have been lied to,” defense attorney Alan Jackson told the jury during closing arguments, asserting that the case was a “cover-up” to protect other officers. The trial featured significant evidence of police misconduct. Lead investigator State Trooper Michael Proctor admitted to sending offensive texts about Read during the investigation, which he later apologized for, though he maintained they did not influence his work. Additionally, police acknowledged using unorthodox methods to collect evidence, including red plastic cups and a leaf blower. Forensic experts were divided on whether O'Keefe's injuries were consistent with being struck by Read's SUV, which had a broken taillight. The defense pointed to injuries that suggested an altercation and the presence of Albert's aggressive dog as potential factors in O'Keefe's death. The jury was unable to reach a consensus on these conflicting accounts. **Hashtags:** #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #BostonPolice #Mistrial #TrueCrime #ForensicEvidence #JusticeForJohnOkeefe Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

JURY STATEMENT: “Despite all commitment to the duty entrusted to us, we find ourselves deeply divided by fundamental differences in our opinions and state of mind. The divergence in our views is not rooted in a lack of understanding or effort, but in deeply held convictions that each of us carry ultimately leading to a point where consensus is unattainable. We recognize the weight of this submission and the implications it holds.” A judge declared a mistrial Monday in the high-profile case of Karen Read, accused of killing her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O'Keefe, by striking him with her SUV and leaving him to die in a snowstorm. The case, which captivated true crime enthusiasts and conspiracy theorists alike, ended in a deadlock after jurors failed to reach a unanimous verdict despite weeks of deliberation. Read, a former adjunct professor at Bentley College, faced charges of second-degree murder and other offenses in connection with the death of O'Keefe, a 16-year veteran of the Boston Police Department. O'Keefe was found outside a fellow officer's home in Canton in January 2022, with an autopsy revealing he died of hypothermia and blunt force trauma. Prosecutors alleged that Read and O'Keefe had been drinking heavily before she dropped him off at the home of Officer Brian Albert, hitting him with her SUV as she left. “The defendant repeatedly said, ‘I hit him. I hit him. Oh my God. I hit him,'” stated Prosecutor Adam Lally, referencing Read's alleged statements after O'Keefe was found. The defense portrayed Read as a victim of a rushed and biased investigation. They suggested that O'Keefe was killed inside Albert's home, dragged outside, and left to die. “You have been lied to,” defense attorney Alan Jackson told the jury during closing arguments, asserting that the case was a “cover-up” to protect other officers. The trial featured significant evidence of police misconduct. Lead investigator State Trooper Michael Proctor admitted to sending offensive texts about Read during the investigation, which he later apologized for, though he maintained they did not influence his work. Additionally, police acknowledged using unorthodox methods to collect evidence, including red plastic cups and a leaf blower. Forensic experts were divided on whether O'Keefe's injuries were consistent with being struck by Read's SUV, which had a broken taillight. The defense pointed to injuries that suggested an altercation and the presence of Albert's aggressive dog as potential factors in O'Keefe's death. The jury was unable to reach a consensus on these conflicting accounts. **Hashtags:** #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #BostonPolice #Mistrial #TrueCrime #ForensicEvidence #JusticeForJohnOkeefe Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

A judge declared a mistrial Monday in the high-profile case of Karen Read, accused of killing her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O'Keefe, by striking him with her SUV and leaving him to die in a snowstorm. The case, which captivated true crime enthusiasts and conspiracy theorists alike, ended in a deadlock after jurors failed to reach a unanimous verdict despite weeks of deliberation. Read, a former adjunct professor at Bentley College, faced charges of second-degree murder and other offenses in connection with the death of O'Keefe, a 16-year veteran of the Boston Police Department. O'Keefe was found outside a fellow officer's home in Canton in January 2022, with an autopsy revealing he died of hypothermia and blunt force trauma. Prosecutors alleged that Read and O'Keefe had been drinking heavily before she dropped him off at the home of Officer Brian Albert, hitting him with her SUV as she left. “The defendant repeatedly said, ‘I hit him. I hit him. Oh my God. I hit him,'” stated Prosecutor Adam Lally, referencing Read's alleged statements after O'Keefe was found. The defense portrayed Read as a victim of a rushed and biased investigation. They suggested that O'Keefe was killed inside Albert's home, dragged outside, and left to die. “You have been lied to,” defense attorney Alan Jackson told the jury during closing arguments, asserting that the case was a “cover-up” to protect other officers. The trial featured significant evidence of police misconduct. Lead investigator State Trooper Michael Proctor admitted to sending offensive texts about Read during the investigation, which he later apologized for, though he maintained they did not influence his work. Additionally, police acknowledged using unorthodox methods to collect evidence, including red plastic cups and a leaf blower. Forensic experts were divided on whether O'Keefe's injuries were consistent with being struck by Read's SUV, which had a broken taillight. The defense pointed to injuries that suggested an altercation and the presence of Albert's aggressive dog as potential factors in O'Keefe's death. The jury was unable to reach a consensus on these conflicting accounts. Read's supporters, identifiable by their pink attire, gathered outside the Norfolk Superior Court daily, carrying signs reading “Free Karen Read” and expressing their belief in her innocence. “This case has been a circus,” one supporter remarked, criticizing the media attention and alleged investigative flaws. Despite the mistrial, prosecutors signaled their intention to retry the case, continuing to assert that Read was responsible for O'Keefe's death. The case will now return to court, prolonging the search for justice in a deeply polarizing and contentious trial. **Hashtags:** #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #BostonPolice #Mistrial #TrueCrime #ForensicEvidence #JusticeForJohnOkeefe Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

A judge declared a mistrial Monday in the high-profile case of Karen Read, accused of killing her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O'Keefe, by striking him with her SUV and leaving him to die in a snowstorm. The case, which captivated true crime enthusiasts and conspiracy theorists alike, ended in a deadlock after jurors failed to reach a unanimous verdict despite weeks of deliberation. Read, a former adjunct professor at Bentley College, faced charges of second-degree murder and other offenses in connection with the death of O'Keefe, a 16-year veteran of the Boston Police Department. O'Keefe was found outside a fellow officer's home in Canton in January 2022, with an autopsy revealing he died of hypothermia and blunt force trauma. Prosecutors alleged that Read and O'Keefe had been drinking heavily before she dropped him off at the home of Officer Brian Albert, hitting him with her SUV as she left. “The defendant repeatedly said, ‘I hit him. I hit him. Oh my God. I hit him,'” stated Prosecutor Adam Lally, referencing Read's alleged statements after O'Keefe was found. The defense portrayed Read as a victim of a rushed and biased investigation. They suggested that O'Keefe was killed inside Albert's home, dragged outside, and left to die. “You have been lied to,” defense attorney Alan Jackson told the jury during closing arguments, asserting that the case was a “cover-up” to protect other officers. The trial featured significant evidence of police misconduct. Lead investigator State Trooper Michael Proctor admitted to sending offensive texts about Read during the investigation, which he later apologized for, though he maintained they did not influence his work. Additionally, police acknowledged using unorthodox methods to collect evidence, including red plastic cups and a leaf blower. Forensic experts were divided on whether O'Keefe's injuries were consistent with being struck by Read's SUV, which had a broken taillight. The defense pointed to injuries that suggested an altercation and the presence of Albert's aggressive dog as potential factors in O'Keefe's death. The jury was unable to reach a consensus on these conflicting accounts. Read's supporters, identifiable by their pink attire, gathered outside the Norfolk Superior Court daily, carrying signs reading “Free Karen Read” and expressing their belief in her innocence. “This case has been a circus,” one supporter remarked, criticizing the media attention and alleged investigative flaws. Despite the mistrial, prosecutors signaled their intention to retry the case, continuing to assert that Read was responsible for O'Keefe's death. The case will now return to court, prolonging the search for justice in a deeply polarizing and contentious trial. **Hashtags:** #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #BostonPolice #Mistrial #TrueCrime #ForensicEvidence #JusticeForJohnOkeefe Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Lauren and Chan have prepared a deep dive on the trial of Karen Read, a Massachusetts woman who is being accused of murdering her Boston police officer boyfriend, John O'Keefe. The gals give an overview of this ongoing trial, which is the opposite of an open-and-shut case. They discuss the many details that are not adding up from his trial, including deleted phone calls and text messages, middle of the night internet searches, a potential police conspiracy and massive coverup, a federal investigation, and so much more. This case has Lauren and Chan truly wondering what could have happened to John O'Keefe, since the evidence is anything but clear and convincing.  Shop Clean Simple Eats protein powder and use code POPAPOLOGISTS for 10% off! Go to EarlyBirdCBD.com  to get our favorite CBD/THC gummies and use code POPAPOLOGISTS20 for 20% off. This episode is brought to you by BetterHelp.  Give online therapy a try at betterhelp.com/stunning today and get 10% off your first month.  To support the show, consider subscribing on Patreon, where you can get a bonus episode of Pop Apologists every Friday! Please note this episode may contain paid endorsements and advertisements for products and services. Individuals on the show may have a direct or indirect financial interest in products or services referred to in this episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Lauren and Chan have prepared a deep dive on the trial of Karen Read, a Massachusetts woman who is being accused of murdering her Boston police officer boyfriend, John O'Keefe. The gals give an overview of this ongoing trial, which is the opposite of an open-and-shut case. They discuss the many details that are not adding up from his trial, including deleted phone calls and text messages, middle of the night internet searches, a potential police conspiracy and massive coverup, a federal investigation, and so much more. This case has Lauren and Chan truly wondering what could have happened to John O'Keefe, since the evidence is anything but clear and convincing.  Shop Clean Simple Eats protein powder and use code POPAPOLOGISTS for 10% off! Go to EarlyBirdCBD.com  to get our favorite CBD/THC gummies and use code POPAPOLOGISTS20 for 20% off. This episode is brought to you by BetterHelp.  Give online therapy a try at betterhelp.com/stunning today and get 10% off your first month.  To support the show, consider subscribing on Patreon, where you can get a bonus episode of Pop Apologists every Friday! Please note this episode may contain paid endorsements and advertisements for products and services. Individuals on the show may have a direct or indirect financial interest in products or services referred to in this episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Karen Read's on trial for murdering her boyfriend, but what's with the Boston Police Department?  Porn sites are pissed about laws requiring identification requirements to enter their sites. Kanye is Kanyeing....again.  The King has a Ghostbusters problem.https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/how-could-trooper-michael-proctors-damaging-texts-about-karen-read-impact-her-trial-outcome/ar-BB1o2Mzmhttps://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3gg60g82meohttps://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2023/08/08/age-law-online-porn-00110148

Govenor Healy comments on testimonies given in the Karen Reed trial. The Boston Police Department are investigating a shooting in the seaport district this morning. Joey Chesnut is getting a chance to settle the beef on Netflix. Stay in "The Loop" with #iHeartRadio.

The murder trial of Karen Read, a 44-year-old woman from Mansfield, Massachusetts, entered its latest phase Thursday as Massachusetts State Police Sgt. Yuri Bukhenick returned to the stand to testify about key evidence and surveillance footage. Read stands accused of second-degree murder and other charges after allegedly hitting her boyfriend, John O'Keefe, with her black SUV during a snowstorm on January 29, 2022. The incident occurred outside a home at 34 Fairview Road in Canton following a night of drinking.   Defense attorney Alan Jackson raised questions about the validity of evidence presented by the prosecution, particularly focusing on a surveillance video showing Read's SUV inside the garage of the Canton Police Department. Jackson pointed out discrepancies in the video, including writing on another vehicle in the garage, which Sgt. Bukhenick explained as a mirrored image.   Throughout the trial, Bukhenick testified about the evidence recovered from the scene in the weeks following O'Keefe's death, including a Boston Police Department hat, a drinking straw, and various shards of glass and plastic. These items were discovered after the snow melted, offering potential clues to the events of that fateful night. In an audio recording played for the jury, Read mentioned a previous physical altercation involving O'Keefe and other individuals, suggesting that his injuries may not have been solely inflicted by her. This statement aligns with the defense's argument that someone else is responsible for O'Keefe's death. The defense also questioned Bukhenick about his initial suspicions regarding the cause of O'Keefe's death, highlighting the uncertainty surrounding the case. Additionally, Jackson raised concerns about the handling of evidence, including O'Keefe's clothing, which was bagged six days after being recovered from the scene. Surveillance footage showing Read backing her SUV out of O'Keefe's home on the night of the incident was also scrutinized during Bukhenick's testimony. The defense pointed out apparent movement of the rear wheel of O'Keefe's vehicle as Read's SUV backed out, suggesting potential inconsistencies in the prosecution's narrative. As the trial progresses, both the prosecution and defense are presenting their arguments, aiming to persuade the jury of their respective positions. The case continues to unfold, with implications that extend beyond the courtroom, highlighting the complexities of criminal investigations and legal proceedings in cases of alleged murder. #KarenReadTrial #MurderCase #LegalProceedings #CrimeSceneEvidence #SurveillanceFootage #DefenseStrategy #CriminalInvestigation #MassachusettsCourt Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

The murder trial of Karen Read, a 44-year-old woman from Mansfield, Massachusetts, entered its latest phase Thursday as Massachusetts State Police Sgt. Yuri Bukhenick returned to the stand to testify about key evidence and surveillance footage. Read stands accused of second-degree murder and other charges after allegedly hitting her boyfriend, John O'Keefe, with her black SUV during a snowstorm on January 29, 2022. The incident occurred outside a home at 34 Fairview Road in Canton following a night of drinking.   Defense attorney Alan Jackson raised questions about the validity of evidence presented by the prosecution, particularly focusing on a surveillance video showing Read's SUV inside the garage of the Canton Police Department. Jackson pointed out discrepancies in the video, including writing on another vehicle in the garage, which Sgt. Bukhenick explained as a mirrored image.   Throughout the trial, Bukhenick testified about the evidence recovered from the scene in the weeks following O'Keefe's death, including a Boston Police Department hat, a drinking straw, and various shards of glass and plastic. These items were discovered after the snow melted, offering potential clues to the events of that fateful night. In an audio recording played for the jury, Read mentioned a previous physical altercation involving O'Keefe and other individuals, suggesting that his injuries may not have been solely inflicted by her. This statement aligns with the defense's argument that someone else is responsible for O'Keefe's death. The defense also questioned Bukhenick about his initial suspicions regarding the cause of O'Keefe's death, highlighting the uncertainty surrounding the case. Additionally, Jackson raised concerns about the handling of evidence, including O'Keefe's clothing, which was bagged six days after being recovered from the scene. Surveillance footage showing Read backing her SUV out of O'Keefe's home on the night of the incident was also scrutinized during Bukhenick's testimony. The defense pointed out apparent movement of the rear wheel of O'Keefe's vehicle as Read's SUV backed out, suggesting potential inconsistencies in the prosecution's narrative. As the trial progresses, both the prosecution and defense are presenting their arguments, aiming to persuade the jury of their respective positions. The case continues to unfold, with implications that extend beyond the courtroom, highlighting the complexities of criminal investigations and legal proceedings in cases of alleged murder. #KarenReadTrial #MurderCase #LegalProceedings #CrimeSceneEvidence #SurveillanceFootage #DefenseStrategy #CriminalInvestigation #MassachusettsCourt Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The murder trial of Karen Read, a 44-year-old woman from Mansfield, Massachusetts, entered its latest phase Thursday as Massachusetts State Police Sgt. Yuri Bukhenick returned to the stand to testify about key evidence and surveillance footage. Read stands accused of second-degree murder and other charges after allegedly hitting her boyfriend, John O'Keefe, with her black SUV during a snowstorm on January 29, 2022. The incident occurred outside a home at 34 Fairview Road in Canton following a night of drinking.   Defense attorney Alan Jackson raised questions about the validity of evidence presented by the prosecution, particularly focusing on a surveillance video showing Read's SUV inside the garage of the Canton Police Department. Jackson pointed out discrepancies in the video, including writing on another vehicle in the garage, which Sgt. Bukhenick explained as a mirrored image.   Throughout the trial, Bukhenick testified about the evidence recovered from the scene in the weeks following O'Keefe's death, including a Boston Police Department hat, a drinking straw, and various shards of glass and plastic. These items were discovered after the snow melted, offering potential clues to the events of that fateful night. In an audio recording played for the jury, Read mentioned a previous physical altercation involving O'Keefe and other individuals, suggesting that his injuries may not have been solely inflicted by her. This statement aligns with the defense's argument that someone else is responsible for O'Keefe's death. The defense also questioned Bukhenick about his initial suspicions regarding the cause of O'Keefe's death, highlighting the uncertainty surrounding the case. Additionally, Jackson raised concerns about the handling of evidence, including O'Keefe's clothing, which was bagged six days after being recovered from the scene. Surveillance footage showing Read backing her SUV out of O'Keefe's home on the night of the incident was also scrutinized during Bukhenick's testimony. The defense pointed out apparent movement of the rear wheel of O'Keefe's vehicle as Read's SUV backed out, suggesting potential inconsistencies in the prosecution's narrative. As the trial progresses, both the prosecution and defense are presenting their arguments, aiming to persuade the jury of their respective positions. The case continues to unfold, with implications that extend beyond the courtroom, highlighting the complexities of criminal investigations and legal proceedings in cases of alleged murder. #KarenReadTrial #MurderCase #LegalProceedings #CrimeSceneEvidence #SurveillanceFootage #DefenseStrategy #CriminalInvestigation #MassachusettsCourt Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

John O'Keefe /// Part 2 /// 763Part 2 of 2  www.TrueCrimeGarage.comThis week we respond to the many requests to cover the John O'Keefe case / Karen Read trial with two hours of Garage coverage.  John O'Keefe was a veteran officer with the Boston Police Department.  Sadly, he was killed in January of 2022.  His body was recovered in the snow at the property of another law enforcement officer.  John's girlfriend Karen Read is accused of hitting John with her vehicle and leaving him to die.  The State says it's murder.  The defense says it's murder.  Now, hear what the Garage has to say.  Beer of the Week - Perception is Spoonfed by Vitamin Sea Brewing Garage Grade - 3 and a half bottle caps out of 5  Follow True Crime Garage on X @TrueCrimeGarage / Follow Nic on X @TCGNIC / Follow The Captain on X @TCGCaptain  Listen to True Crime Garage Off The Record where TCG breaks all of the rules and get NASTY, NASTY and sometimes even more NASTY!!!  Now available on Apple Podcast Subscriptions and to everyone everywhere on Patreon.

John O'Keefe /// Part 1 /// 762 Part 1 of 2  www.TrueCrimeGarage.comThis week we respond to the many requests to cover the John O'Keefe case / Karen Read trial with two hours of Garage coverage.  John O'Keefe was a veteran officer with the Boston Police Department.  Sadly, he was killed in January of 2022.  His body was recovered in the snow at the property of another law enforcement officer.  John's girlfriend Karen Read is accused of hitting John with her vehicle and leaving him to die.  The State says it's murder.  The defense says it's murder.  Now, hear what the Garage has to say.  Beer of the Week - Perception is Spoonfed by Vitamin Sea Brewing Garage Grade - 3 and a half bottle caps out of 5  Follow True Crime Garage on X @TrueCrimeGarage / Follow Nic on X @TCGNIC / Follow The Captain on X @TCGCaptain  Listen to True Crime Garage Off The Record where TCG breaks all of the rules and get NASTY, NASTY and sometimes even more NASTY!!!  Now available on Apple Podcast Subscriptions and to everyone everywhere on Patreon.

I outline a mega hearing the Boston City Council held with the Boston Police Department.

The trial of Karen Read, accused of second-degree murder in the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe, took a dramatic turn as the defense challenged the testimony of key witness Jennifer McCabe. The defense contends that McCabe's current testimony contradicts her earlier statements, raising questions about the reliability of her account. Jennifer McCabe testified that on the morning of January 29, 2022, she heard Karen Read say, “I hit him, I hit him, I hit him,” at the scene where O'Keefe's body was found. However, defense attorney Alan Jackson pointed out that in her April 2022 grand jury testimony, McCabe did not mention this statement. Instead, she testified that Read asked, “Could I have hit him?” or “Did I hit him?”    “I don't know if I said it in the grand jury but I can say today, with 100% certainty, that she said ‘I hit him, I hit him, I hit him,'” McCabe insisted during a tense cross-examination on the 15th day of the trial.  Karen Read, 44, faces charges of second-degree murder, motor vehicle manslaughter, and leaving the scene of a collision that resulted in the death of John O'Keefe, a 16-year veteran of the Boston Police Department. Prosecutors allege that after a night of drinking, Read and O'Keefe argued, leading to Read backing her Lexus SUV into him and leaving him to die in the cold during a snowstorm. Jackson highlighted that McCabe reiterated 12 times in her grand jury testimony that Read's statements were more questioning than affirmative. He questioned why McCabe did not initially report the alleged confession if it was her most “impactful” memory of the incident. The defense has developed a theory that others present at the home of Brian and Nicole Albert on the night of O'Keefe's death had both the motive and opportunity to kill him. Jackson suggested that there was a conspiracy among McCabe, her husband, and members of the Albert family to frame Read. This theory includes inconsistencies in phone call records and alleged opportunities for collusion. Brian Albert, one of the individuals the defense claims had a motive, is accused along with ATF Agent Brian Higgins and Colin Albert of being involved in O'Keefe's death. The defense pointed to wounds on O'Keefe's arms they say are consistent with dog bites, suggesting a possible attack by the Alberts' German shepherd, Chloe. McCabe testified about the events leading up to the discovery of O'Keefe's body. She described texting O'Keefe while he was en route to the Albert home for an afterparty with Read. “There is no story. There're facts and truth on this side of the case,” McCabe said firmly, accusing the defense of “spinning” a narrative.  As the trial continues, the discrepancies in witness testimonies and the defense's third-party killer theory have added complexity to the case. The defense's challenge to McCabe's testimony underscores the contentious nature of the trial, with both sides presenting conflicting narratives about the events leading to John O'Keefe's tragic death. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The trial of Karen Read, accused of second-degree murder in the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe, took a dramatic turn as the defense challenged the testimony of key witness Jennifer McCabe. The defense contends that McCabe's current testimony contradicts her earlier statements, raising questions about the reliability of her account. Jennifer McCabe testified that on the morning of January 29, 2022, she heard Karen Read say, “I hit him, I hit him, I hit him,” at the scene where O'Keefe's body was found. However, defense attorney Alan Jackson pointed out that in her April 2022 grand jury testimony, McCabe did not mention this statement. Instead, she testified that Read asked, “Could I have hit him?” or “Did I hit him?”    “I don't know if I said it in the grand jury but I can say today, with 100% certainty, that she said ‘I hit him, I hit him, I hit him,'” McCabe insisted during a tense cross-examination on the 15th day of the trial.  Karen Read, 44, faces charges of second-degree murder, motor vehicle manslaughter, and leaving the scene of a collision that resulted in the death of John O'Keefe, a 16-year veteran of the Boston Police Department. Prosecutors allege that after a night of drinking, Read and O'Keefe argued, leading to Read backing her Lexus SUV into him and leaving him to die in the cold during a snowstorm. Jackson highlighted that McCabe reiterated 12 times in her grand jury testimony that Read's statements were more questioning than affirmative. He questioned why McCabe did not initially report the alleged confession if it was her most “impactful” memory of the incident. The defense has developed a theory that others present at the home of Brian and Nicole Albert on the night of O'Keefe's death had both the motive and opportunity to kill him. Jackson suggested that there was a conspiracy among McCabe, her husband, and members of the Albert family to frame Read. This theory includes inconsistencies in phone call records and alleged opportunities for collusion. Brian Albert, one of the individuals the defense claims had a motive, is accused along with ATF Agent Brian Higgins and Colin Albert of being involved in O'Keefe's death. The defense pointed to wounds on O'Keefe's arms they say are consistent with dog bites, suggesting a possible attack by the Alberts' German shepherd, Chloe. McCabe testified about the events leading up to the discovery of O'Keefe's body. She described texting O'Keefe while he was en route to the Albert home for an afterparty with Read. “There is no story. There're facts and truth on this side of the case,” McCabe said firmly, accusing the defense of “spinning” a narrative. As the trial continues, the discrepancies in witness testimonies and the defense's third-party killer theory have added complexity to the case. The defense's challenge to McCabe's testimony underscores the contentious nature of the trial, with both sides presenting conflicting narratives about the events leading to John O'Keefe's tragic death. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The trial of Karen Read, accused of second-degree murder in the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe, took a dramatic turn as the defense challenged the testimony of key witness Jennifer McCabe. The defense contends that McCabe's current testimony contradicts her earlier statements, raising questions about the reliability of her account. Jennifer McCabe testified that on the morning of January 29, 2022, she heard Karen Read say, “I hit him, I hit him, I hit him,” at the scene where O'Keefe's body was found. However, defense attorney Alan Jackson pointed out that in her April 2022 grand jury testimony, McCabe did not mention this statement. Instead, she testified that Read asked, “Could I have hit him?” or “Did I hit him?”    “I don't know if I said it in the grand jury but I can say today, with 100% certainty, that she said ‘I hit him, I hit him, I hit him,'” McCabe insisted during a tense cross-examination on the 15th day of the trial.  Karen Read, 44, faces charges of second-degree murder, motor vehicle manslaughter, and leaving the scene of a collision that resulted in the death of John O'Keefe, a 16-year veteran of the Boston Police Department. Prosecutors allege that after a night of drinking, Read and O'Keefe argued, leading to Read backing her Lexus SUV into him and leaving him to die in the cold during a snowstorm. Jackson highlighted that McCabe reiterated 12 times in her grand jury testimony that Read's statements were more questioning than affirmative. He questioned why McCabe did not initially report the alleged confession if it was her most “impactful” memory of the incident. The defense has developed a theory that others present at the home of Brian and Nicole Albert on the night of O'Keefe's death had both the motive and opportunity to kill him. Jackson suggested that there was a conspiracy among McCabe, her husband, and members of the Albert family to frame Read. This theory includes inconsistencies in phone call records and alleged opportunities for collusion. Brian Albert, one of the individuals the defense claims had a motive, is accused along with ATF Agent Brian Higgins and Colin Albert of being involved in O'Keefe's death. The defense pointed to wounds on O'Keefe's arms they say are consistent with dog bites, suggesting a possible attack by the Alberts' German shepherd, Chloe. McCabe testified about the events leading up to the discovery of O'Keefe's body. She described texting O'Keefe while he was en route to the Albert home for an afterparty with Read. “There is no story. There're facts and truth on this side of the case,” McCabe said firmly, accusing the defense of “spinning” a narrative. As the trial continues, the discrepancies in witness testimonies and the defense's third-party killer theory have added complexity to the case. The defense's challenge to McCabe's testimony underscores the contentious nature of the trial, with both sides presenting conflicting narratives about the events leading to John O'Keefe's tragic death. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

Karen Read is currently on trial for the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Department officer John O'Keefe in 2022. She claims she's innocent and that another police officer, Brian Albert, Sr., and his family and connections to the Canton, Massachusetts, PD, are framing her for O'Keefe's death. Prosecutors believe Karen Read alone is the guilty party. So we've got a classic she said/they said story. Listen as I break down the crime and the case in this Part I video.#karenread  #johnokeefe #breakingnews #boston #masschusetts #asmr #missingchild #truecrime #idaho #moscowidaho #kayleegoncalves #madisonmogen #ethanchapin #xanakernodle #moscowstudentmurders #idahostudentmurders #moscowhomicides  #truecrimeunsolved #truecrimeunsolvedSupport the Show.

Right now, there is a huge case creating a stir within the true crime space and followers of this story are somewhat divided on what they believe happened on the night of January 29, 2022 outside of a home in Canton, Massachusetts.  A man named John O'Keefe, a Boston police officer, was found dead in a blizzard outside of a house in the Boston suburb.  Just six hours earlier, his girlfriend, Karen Read, dropped him off at the house in Canton, belonging to a mutual friend, Brian Albert.  But what happened during those six hours, remains somewhat of a mystery and with two very different allegations of what happened that night, there is a very clear divide in the town of Canton and the realm of true crime.  By the end of this episode, I'll be curious to hear what you think about this story.  Did Karen Read kill her boyfriend? Or is she being framed for a cover-up by influential, powerful members of the Boston Police Department? Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Contact the showEpisode 63 is a walk through the frenzy that is called "The Canton Cover-up" by some, others see it as a national spectacle. Canton, the small town 15 miles south of the city of Boston, is no stranger to tragedy. Three and a half decades ago, sweet, trusting 14-year-old Shawn Ouillette was lured into the woods, beaten, and left for dead. His 14-year-old schoolmate and eventual killer said no one would miss him. He wanted to know what it was like. To kill. That was 1986. Shawn is still missed by all who love him. His killer, Rod Matthews, remains in prison.  Fast forward to present day. The events surrounding John O'Keefe's death have split this same small town in two. The case of a 46-year-old surrogate father to his sister's orphaned kids and 16-year veteran of the Boston Police Department is a shit show to no fault of his own. Lost, as is always the case, is the victim themselves. John O'Keefe was so beloved that a GoFundMe fundraising page set up for his niece and nephew after he died, had raised more than $245,000 within its first 24 hours. Karen Read, 44, who was John O'Keefe's longtime girlfriend, was arrested within days of his death and charged with drunkenly backing into him in her SUV in a snowstorm and leaving him to bleed out and freeze to death. Read has amassed a group of supporters in what some locals refer to as a "frame job" against her by a bunch of dirty townie cops, staties, FBI agents, and DAs. The cases I refer to in this episode include: Jeffrey Curley, Cambridge, Mass, he was 10 when he was taken by a neighbor with the promise of a bike, abused and killed in 1997, his murderers were put away by then-prosecutor, David Yannetti, who is now defending Read.Beth Brodie, Groveland, Mass, 1992, she was 15 when a boy who demanded her affection planned an attack with a bat and killed her in a neighbor's bedroom. Visit JusticeforBethBrodie.com - her killer is up for parole, the hearing is Thurs, May 16 in Natick. Write the parole board and tell them No Parole for Richard Baldwin, W56202 Molly Bish, Warren, Mass, 2000 - she was 16 when she disappeared from her lifeguard job at Comins Pond. Her remains were found 3 years later in nearby Palmer. The Bishes began Missing Children's Day to honor Molly and other missing kids. We meet on Fri, May 17 at Massachusetts State House in Boston. Thanks to Dubs of True Crime Bloodhound | Subtack | Support the Show.Follow Instagram | Facebook | Twitter X | TikTok | Threads | YouTube For show notes and source information, visit CrimeoftheTruestKind.comThis podcast has minimal profanity but from time to time you get an f-bomb.Become a patron: Patreon.com/crimeofthetruestkind Music included in episodes from Joe "onlyone" Kowalski - Joe Got A New Heart FundDug McCormack's Math Ghosts. and Shredding by Andrew King

Hundreds of protestors have been arrested across the country as demonstrations against the war in Gaza intensify on college campuses. For a closer look at when and how police are involved in these protests, Amna Nawaz spoke with Frederick Lawrence, a distinguished lecturer at Georgetown University Law Center and Ed Davis, former commissioner of the Boston Police Department. PBS NewsHour is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders

Boston Police Commissioner Michael Cox joins us to discuss changes and reform in the Boston Police Department. Then, we get analysis from WBUR's Deborah Becker and Yawu Miller, formerly of the Bay State Banner.

Howie takes it local for the final hour of the week, citing the peculiar skirmish inside Massachusetts' Cannabis Control Commission (who would have guessed) and what is, seemingly, a withholding of information from the Boston Police Department.

In the realm of criminal mysteries, few cases have captured the public's fascination and imagination as profoundly as the ongoing saga of Karen Read and John O'Keefe. The story is a labyrinth of questions and intrigue, leaving an entire community divided and perplexed. As the trial looms, the burning question remains: How did this case transition from manslaughter to second-degree murder when the true intentions seem shrouded in uncertainty?    Karen Read's involvement in the death of John O'Keefe has sparked a legal firestorm that transcends the boundaries of a typical courtroom drama. The case began with Boston prosecutors initially asserting that O'Keefe's demise might have been the result of a tragic accident, possibly a hit-and-run incident involving alcohol-impaired driving. However, the narrative took an unexpected turn as the prosecution shifted gears, contending that O'Keefe's death was no accident; it was the result of an intentional act within a toxic relationship, leaving him to die.    As this extraordinary case continues to unfold, the defense team has embarked on a different route, alleging a police cover-up. Their perspective introduces a parallel narrative that challenges the very essence of the prosecution's claims. They argue that the injuries sustained by O'Keefe do not align with a vehicular collision but rather with a brutal assault, suggesting the involvement of others, potentially law enforcement officers.    Former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani, President of the West Coast Trial Lawyers Association, provided insights into the case during a recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast. Rahmani addressed the perplexing shift from manslaughter to second-degree murder charges, highlighting the profound impact on the direction of the trial.    Rahmani acknowledged the significant contrast between a narrative of accidental death versus intentional murder. He underscored that this case's complexity is further magnified by the defense's allegations of foul play involving Boston Police Department officers. The injuries observed, according to Rahmani, are more consistent with a brutal assault than a vehicular incident, making this case particularly riveting.    The legal proceedings surrounding this case have garnered immense attention, even drawing lawyers from Los Angeles to Boston. Rahmani pointed out that the pre-trial litigation has been substantial, emphasizing the likelihood that this case will indeed proceed to trial. The nation's eyes are poised on this enigmatic case, eagerly awaiting its unfolding.    The heart of the matter revolves around the issue of intent. In a vehicular manslaughter case, establishing intent can be a formidable challenge. However, this case takes a unique twist, forcing jurors to grapple with the possibility that O'Keefe's death was a deliberate act. The fact that the police officers implicated are not on trial further complicates matters.    A question that looms large in the minds of many is the potential outcome if Karen Read is found not guilty. Does it open the door to revisiting the possibility of other culpable parties? Could the focus shift from Read to the officers or individuals who were supposedly O'Keefe's friends? Rahmani suggests that prosecuting the officers after Read's acquittal could be exceedingly challenging, as their credibility may be irreparably damaged.    As the trial approaches, the central question remains: What does the future hold for Karen Read and John O'Keefe's legacy? Will justice be served, or will this enigmatic case continue to perplex and divide? The answers may hinge on the battle of experts and the jurors' ability to decipher a complex web of evidence.    The case of Karen Read and John O'Keefe transcends the boundaries of a mere courtroom drama. It is a narrative that speaks to the intricacies of human behavior, the intoxicating influence of alcohol, and the blurry line between tragedy and intent. As the legal proceedings march forward, one can't help but wonder: What truths lie hidden beneath the surface, and will they ever truly be unveiled? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the realm of criminal mysteries, few cases have captured the public's fascination and imagination as profoundly as the ongoing saga of Karen Read and John O'Keefe. The story is a labyrinth of questions and intrigue, leaving an entire community divided and perplexed. As the trial looms, the burning question remains: How did this case transition from manslaughter to second-degree murder when the true intentions seem shrouded in uncertainty?    Karen Read's involvement in the death of John O'Keefe has sparked a legal firestorm that transcends the boundaries of a typical courtroom drama. The case began with Boston prosecutors initially asserting that O'Keefe's demise might have been the result of a tragic accident, possibly a hit-and-run incident involving alcohol-impaired driving. However, the narrative took an unexpected turn as the prosecution shifted gears, contending that O'Keefe's death was no accident; it was the result of an intentional act within a toxic relationship, leaving him to die.    As this extraordinary case continues to unfold, the defense team has embarked on a different route, alleging a police cover-up. Their perspective introduces a parallel narrative that challenges the very essence of the prosecution's claims. They argue that the injuries sustained by O'Keefe do not align with a vehicular collision but rather with a brutal assault, suggesting the involvement of others, potentially law enforcement officers.    Former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani, President of the West Coast Trial Lawyers Association, provided insights into the case during a recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast. Rahmani addressed the perplexing shift from manslaughter to second-degree murder charges, highlighting the profound impact on the direction of the trial.    Rahmani acknowledged the significant contrast between a narrative of accidental death versus intentional murder. He underscored that this case's complexity is further magnified by the defense's allegations of foul play involving Boston Police Department officers. The injuries observed, according to Rahmani, are more consistent with a brutal assault than a vehicular incident, making this case particularly riveting.    The legal proceedings surrounding this case have garnered immense attention, even drawing lawyers from Los Angeles to Boston. Rahmani pointed out that the pre-trial litigation has been substantial, emphasizing the likelihood that this case will indeed proceed to trial. The nation's eyes are poised on this enigmatic case, eagerly awaiting its unfolding.    The heart of the matter revolves around the issue of intent. In a vehicular manslaughter case, establishing intent can be a formidable challenge. However, this case takes a unique twist, forcing jurors to grapple with the possibility that O'Keefe's death was a deliberate act. The fact that the police officers implicated are not on trial further complicates matters.    A question that looms large in the minds of many is the potential outcome if Karen Read is found not guilty. Does it open the door to revisiting the possibility of other culpable parties? Could the focus shift from Read to the officers or individuals who were supposedly O'Keefe's friends? Rahmani suggests that prosecuting the officers after Read's acquittal could be exceedingly challenging, as their credibility may be irreparably damaged.    As the trial approaches, the central question remains: What does the future hold for Karen Read and John O'Keefe's legacy? Will justice be served, or will this enigmatic case continue to perplex and divide? The answers may hinge on the battle of experts and the jurors' ability to decipher a complex web of evidence.    The case of Karen Read and John O'Keefe transcends the boundaries of a mere courtroom drama. It is a narrative that speaks to the intricacies of human behavior, the intoxicating influence of alcohol, and the blurry line between tragedy and intent. As the legal proceedings march forward, one can't help but wonder: What truths lie hidden beneath the surface, and will they ever truly be unveiled? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Filling in for Howie is his executive producer Taylor Cormier, who brings Officer Larry Calderone on the show to discuss the apocalyptic weekend in Boston. Hundreds of kids banded together to assault a group of cops, and after what they've had to go through the past several months, the Boston Police Department is exhausted. Taylor also hosts the Chump Line, so tune in!

BOSTON, 2014: On February 4, 2014, 13-year old Kristopher Bryan Lewis got off the school bus at his usual stop on the corner of West Selden and Morton Street in Boston, Massachusetts. He should've been home just a few minutes later around 5:30 p.m. but Kristopher never returned. Kristopher's mother Nina Cancel-Rodgers reported him missing that night. At first, police dismissed Nina's concerns. The media turned her away. She and her family took matters into their own hands, making noise and bringing awareness to her young son's disappearance. But nearly 10 years later, Nina is still waiting for her baby boy to come home.Nina gives a heart wrenching account of what it's like to have a child go missing and the lasting impact it's had on her life and the lives of her other children. She shares Kristopher's story hoping that people will start saying his name again, that they'll know Kristopher's face, and her greatest hope is that one day she'll know where he is.If you have any information about the 2013 disappearance of Kristopher Bryan Lewis, please contact the Boston Police Department at 617-343-4687. View source material and photos for this episode at darkdowneast.comFollow @darkdowneast on Instagram, Facebook, and TikTokTo suggest a case, email hello@darkdowneast.comSupport Dark Downeast on Buy Me a CoffeeShop Dark Downeast merch at darkdowneast.com/shop