Podcasts about inspectors

Step inside a real home inspection with Certified Professional Inspector, CPI® Julie Erck as she walks you through the process from start to finish—following the InterNACHI® Standards of Practice (SOP) every step of the way. In this webinar, Julie explains what inspectors are required to inspect, how the SOP guides decision-making in the field, and what clients can expect during a professional home inspection.After the walkthrough, Julie answers audience questions, providing expert clarification and real-world advice you can apply immediately. Whether you're part of the inspection industry or simply want a clearer understanding of how a professional inspection works, this episode delivers valuable, standards-based knowledge you won't want to miss.

Maigrets_Mistake_Inspector_Maigret_Book 7

Reddit rSlash Storytime r maliciouscompliance where I'm either in charge or I'm not, so I made it so I was both "Please use the proper channels" alright bet

L'inspector Joaquim Martín és el nou coordinador dels serveis de protecció civil i policia local. Fa uns mesos, el fins ara cap de Protecció Civil, Felip Carbonell, es va jubilar. Ara, la figura de cap com a tal no hi és, però l'inspector Martín s'encarrega de coordinar aquest servei amb la policia, a través de l'àrea de seguretat ciutadana. Per tant, hi ha una sola àrea, amb un sol cap d'àrea, que és l'inspector en cap, César Martínez, i tant la logística com tots els sistemes de gestió de la informació i les prioritats estan dins d'un mateix paraigües logístic i normatiu. L'objectiu d'aquest sistema de treball és, en definitiva, optimitzar recursos. “L'objectiu és l'optimització dels serveis, que continuen sent autònoms, i penso que és la fórmula per fer créixer i, en definitiva, donar un millor servei”Joaquim Martín Joaquim Martín remarca que Protecció Civil és, principalment, un servei de caràcter preventiu. No obstant això, quan en una situació d'emergència encara no han arribat o bé no donen a l'abast altres cossos de seguretat o d'emergències, també s'han d'encarregar de la coordinació de la situació. “Una protecció civil que és molt necessària a l'hora de gestionar, primer, que no hi hagi riscos ni per al medi ambient ni per a les persones i, per altra banda, un control del compliment d'aquelles obligacions de tenir previstos els mitjans de control d'aquests riscos”Joaquim Martín Les valoracions del nou sistema de treball, segons el coordinador dels serveis de Protecció Civil i Policia Local són, per ara, positives.

Clement Manyathela and Mandy Weiner speak to Bantu Holomisa, Mkhuleko Hlengwa, Jomo Sibiya, Nomvula Mukonyane, Songezo Zibi, Herman Mashaba, Des Van Royen, Dr Mike Masiapato, Parks Tau, Mmusi Maimane, Gayton McKenzie, Zingiswa Losi and Willie Aucamp who share their views on President Cyril Ramaphosas speech. They also reflect on whether the speech addressed the major concerns of the citizens or if it was another talk shop according to the description of some.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Maigrets_Mistake_Inspector_Maigret_Book 6

Therians Recontravolteados, Pintaos Prohibidos, Chimenea Portátil, Gafas Palillo, Smombi PostMortem, Ciudad Vertedero, GloryHoling Necrobestialista, Hipodromo Salmancito, Fugu Crowfunding, Isidorol-Chus, Gafas Insectoides, Burbuja Aérea y mucho más. ENLACES Apartamentos vandalizados https://www.berliner-zeitung.de/mensch-metropole/habersaathstrasse-vermummte-verwuesten-wohnungen-in-berlin-mitte-li.10018690 BasuraStone https://cincodias.elpais.com/companias/2026-02-12/blackstone-y-eqt-compran-urbaser-por-5800-millones-de-euros.html Planificacion Islamica https://borneobulletin.com.bn/executive-committee-meets-to-plan-1448h-national-islamic-celebrations/ Abrazar la Paz https://borneobulletin.com.bn/iban-woman-finds-peace-and-purpose-in-islam/ Hipodromos Salman https://www.arabnews.com/node/2632500/saudi-arabia Ayusepstein https://www.msn.com/es-es/noticias/internacional/ayuso-compara-a-m%C3%A9xico-con-la-situaci%C3%B3n-de-cuba-o-venezuela-y-claudia-sheinbaum-se-lo-explica-como-nunca/ar-AA1WemLc?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=698e53ff32684ef8b1dd82a0782a03a4&ei=56 Gafas Palillo https://www.politico.eu/article/friedrich-merz-calls-on-germans-to-work-more-and-sparks-a-fierce-backlash/ Miles de Salafos https://apnews.com/photo-gallery/iraq-syria-islamic-state-detainees-interrogation-4659d0b511e8b6059fa5b15271e30939 Examen Ocular https://www.dawn.com/news/1972699/sc-orders-formation-of-medical-team-for-imrans-eye-examination-passes-directives-for-phone-call-with-son Doctor Evil https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/world-news/gallery/putin-goes-full-doctor-evil-36703786 Isabel A Lago https://www.20minutos.es/madrid/ayuso-anuncia-medalla-internacional-comunidad-madrid-estados-unidos-su-intervencion-por-video-mar-lago_6932566_0.html Baaal quemado https://esrt.space/actualidad/586606-video-manifestantes-iranies-queman-efigie-baal-epstein?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=messenger&utm_campaign=telegram_actualidadrt Leyes jordanas https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.dw.com/es/israel-deroga-ley-que-impide-a-jud%25C3%25ADos-comprar-tierra-en-cisjordania/a-75862684 Buitres alemanes te quieren llenar de yankees la Costa del Sol https://cincodias.elpais.com/companias/2026-02-12/la-gestora-hotelera-del-fondo-aleman-asg-quiere-triplicar-su-cartera-en-espana-en-tres-anos.html Youngsters AsustaPutas https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/sex-workers-living-fear-terrorised-36711768 Bebes Congelados https://www.bfmtv.com/police-justice/deux-bebes-retrouves-dans-le-congelateur-d-une-maison-en-haute-saone-la-mere-mise-en-examen-pour-meurtre_AN-202602130303.html Terrible Respuesta https://www.bfmtv.com/international/asie/coree-nord/la-coree-du-nord-promet-une-terrible-reponse-en-cas-de-nouvelle-incursion-de-drone-venue-du-sud_AD-202602130267.html Enemigos de Italia https://www.politico.eu/article/meloni-slams-enemies-italy-railway-sabotage-and-anti-olympics-protests/ Viva Níger https://avia-es.com/news/niger-oficialno-obyavil-o-vstuplenii-v-voynu-s-franciey Retribuciones reales https://lavozdeibiza.com/actualidad/suben-los-sueldos-de-los-funcionarios-de-la-corona-cuales-son-los-nuevos-montos/ Inspector de queso https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/world-news/gallery/kim-jong-un-turns-cheese-36710176 Maccabi Barcelona https://www.enlacejudio.com/2026/02/06/maccabi-barcelona-se-inaugura-con-mas-de-300-asistentes-y-celebra-la-identidad-judia-y-el-deporte/ Ciudad Vertedero https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/we-live-uks-worst-fly-36714671 Enterrados en billetes ( Monumental de Damasco) https://mpr21.info/dinero-saudi-para-rescatar-a-los-yihadistas-sirios-de-la-ruina/ Fransua Internacional https://www.dawn.com/news/1972446/french-ex-teacher-charged-with-assault-of-89-minors Benidormmmmm https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/benidorm-gearing-up-maddest-season-36704350 Contrabando de acero https://www.hispantv.com/noticias/espana/640472/policia-registra-sidenor-venta-acero-empresa-arma-israel No bienvenidos https://www.hispantv.com/noticias/africa/640148/somalia-no-permite-presencia-militar-israeli-en-somalilandia Pesquero Chino https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2026/02/13/japan/japan-arrests-chinese-fisihing-boat-captain/ Turba Condenada https://www.dawn.com/news/1972596/12-sentenced-to-death-over-lawmakers-mob-killing-in-sri-lanka Gran Hermano Sexual https://www.ultimahora.es/sucesos/ultimas/2026/02/11/2567677/red-prostitucion-mujeres-colombia-mallorca.html?utm_source=Tambien-en&utm_medium=internal Ciudad Cerebral https://www.koreaherald.com/article/10673654 Nombramiento Polemico https://www.bfmtv.com/politique/front-national/marine-le-pen-appelle-emmanuel-macron-a-abandonner-la-nomination-d-amelie-de-montchalin-a-la-cour-des-comptes_AD-202602110436.html Submarinos Nucleares https://www.koreaherald.com/article/10675504 Beisbolrrushers https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2026/02/12/japan/crime-legal/japan-high-school-ballplayers-child-pornography/ Fraude Record https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2026/02/12/japan/crime-legal/japan-2025-crime-figures/ Mano Chilota https://www.ultimahora.es/sucesos/ultimas/2026/02/10/2566879/detenido-hombre-por-abusos-sexuales-companera-piso-palma-durante-mas-mes.html Base de los salafos volcánicos https://es.news-front.su/2026/02/13/estados-unidos-abandona-una-base-militar-clave-en-siria/ Tony Guti https://actualidad-rt.com/actualidad/586922-onu-islamico-intentar-asesinar-cinco Balconing Naval https://es.news-front.su/2026/02/13/estados-unidos-sufre-una-primera-baja-en-las-operaciones-en-el-caribe/ Nazi PeloRoto ( PeloDrácula) https://magyarnemzet.hu/english/2026/02/zelenskys-officer-threatens-hungary-with-military-invasion-video Free Fire Max https://elcaso.elnacional.cat/es/noticias/pedofilo-nina-8-anos-amposta-videojuego-videos-fotos_1551617102.html Refea y recontra-nazi https://actualidad-rt.com/actualidad/586384-nieta-oficial-nazi-zajarova-eleccion Uberrush masivo https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/05/business/uber-safety-rape-verdict.html IA Boys https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/feb/06/deepfake-taking-place-on-an-industrial-scale-study-finds Jaamat https://www.news18.com/india/jamaat-sweeps-bangladeshs-areas-bordering-bengal-should-india-be-worried-exclusive-ws-l-9900654.html Secuestro Conyugal https://elcaso.elnacional.cat/es/noticias/dos-anos-secuestrada-pareja-murcia-palizas-violaciones_1551464102.html Tarique Rahman https://www.news18.com/world/who-is-tarique-rahman-khaleda-zias-son-set-to-become-bangladeshs-next-pm-9899955.html Padre Borracho https://www.news18.com/india/drunk-father-burns-daughters-schoolbooks-police-buy-her-new-set-in-karnataka-skn-ws-l-9895852.html Bloqueo Naval https://tg24.sky.it/politica/2026/02/12/meloni-blocco-navale-come-funziona Triangulo Amoroso https://www.news18.com/india/mumbai-teenager-shot-dead-by-boyfriends-partner-in-love-triangle-row-ws-el-9896869.html ICE europeo https://www.politico.eu/article/europe-far-right-pushes-for-ice-style-police-amid-migration-crackdown/ People of Wallmart https://www.20minutos.es/lainformacion/economia-y-finanzas/monstruo-estadounidense-comercio-bajo-coste-que-se-resiste-desembarcar-espana-ahorra-dinero-vive-mejor_6930483_0.html Asalto al Blindado https://actu17.fr/international/italie-un-commando-lourdement-arme-attaque-deux-fourgons-blindes-echange-de-tirs-avec-les-carabiniers.html Broma smombi https://www.20minutos.es/internacional/unos-cazas-israelies-escoltan-un-vuelo-despues-que-una-familia-leyese-palabra-terrorista-movil-un-pasajero_6931481_0.html Akelarre MagufUkro Nazi https://actualidad-rt.com/actualidad/586239-chupacabras-colectivo-zajarova-medios-occidentales-fascismo-esoterico-kiev Pelotudo electrificado https://www.t13.cl/noticia/mundo/ministro-argentino-se-ofrecio-como-voluntario-presentacion-policial-termino-suelo-9-2-2026 Jeffrey CagaPechos https://actualidad-rt.com/actualidad/586562-revelan-sostuvo-vinculos-mas-largos-epstein Limite Poblacional https://www.diariodenavarra.es/noticias/actualidad/internacional/2026/02/13/suiza-votara-limita-poblacion-10-millones-frenar-inmigracion-810026-29.html Abrochense los cinturones ( Burbuja Aérea) https://g1.globo.com/sp/sao-paulo/noticia/2026/02/09/piloto-da-tam-e-preso-dentro-de-aviao-no-aeroporto-de-guarulhos.ghtml Milla Verde https://www.i24news.tv/en/news/israel/defense/artc-prison-service-prepares-for-possible-implementation-of-death-penalty-for-terrorists Los Golden Roma https://www.infobae.com/mexico/2026/02/13/vincularon-a-proceso-a-la-colombiana-de-los-golden-roma-celula-ligada-a-la-chokiza-en-ecatepec/ Funcionarios smombis https://www.inform.kz/ru/kasim-zhomart-tokaev-raskritikoval-gossluzhashih-za-nezhelanie-chitat-dlinnie-teksti-a74fbb?ysclid=mlgbbwwc33187362158 Judios blanquitos https://www.jta.org/2026/02/06/israel/former-moscow-rabbi-says-he-rebuffed-proposal-to-convert-a-million-russians-discussed-in-epstein-files-recording Dandy perucho https://www.americatv.com.pe/noticias/actualidad/jose-jeri-respondio-fiesta-cumpleanos-cieneguilla-n515671 Pelo Toyota https://rollcall.com/factbase/trump/transcript/donald-trump-interview-larry-kudlow-fox-business-february-9-2023/ KelKelkelkelKel https://saharareporters.com/2026/02/12/bandits-abduct-catholic-church-worker-pregnant-wife-over-30-residents-kaduna-community Vande Mataram https://www.news18.com/india/muslim-law-board-opposes-centres-vande-mataram-directive-says-it-is-unconstitutional-9898947.html Erasmus Hindu https://www.news18.com/india/over-50-of-global-exploitation-racism-complaints-by-indian-students-come-from-russia-govt-ws-l-9893802.html Láser Langosta https://www.wsj.com/us-news/faa-halts-el-paso-flights-for-unspecified-security-reasons-163e0966 Antiguos Autodefensas ( El Fresa y el Botox) https://www.infobae.com/mexico/2026/02/11/quien-es-jando-o-el-fresa-el-nuevo-lider-de-los-blancos-de-troya-tras-la-caida-de-el-botox-en-michoacan/ Esclavismo CogePerros https://www.elmostrador.cl/noticias/mundo/2026/02/12/la-califican-como-esclavista-senado-argentino-aprueba-reforma-laboral-de-milei/ Decorador del Orejotas https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15552673/Royal-decorator-hanged-King-Charles-criticised-paint-jobs.html Estética pedofi https://actualidad-rt.com/actualidad/586856-cara-bebe-correspondencia-epstein-rinoplastia Sillito submarinista https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01613664.pdf Entrenamiento anglo https://avia-es.com/news/britanskaya-armiya-imitiruet-ukrainskiy-front-london-nachal-podgotovku-soldat-k-pryamomu Negri acosada https://www.leparisien.fr/culture-loisirs/cinema/ca-me-degoute-linfluenceuse-paola-locatelli-evoque-des-messages-de-footballeurs-recus-lorsquelle-avait-14-ans-10-02-2026-7XYHKKNFH5HQHCAM3XF6FKLJ3Q.php Lectura obligada https://www.jta.org/2026/02/09/united-states/anne-frank-and-night-may-soon-be-required-reading-in-texas-public-schools-is-that-good-for-the-jews Sultán Nucleón https://avia-es.com/news/turciya-oficialno-dopustila-sozdanie-sobstvennogo-atomnogo-arsenala-v-otvet-na-regionalnye Satán apedreado y quemado https://actualidad-rt.com/actualidad/586606-video-manifestantes-iranies-queman-efigie-baal-epstein Buzos Hohol www.lemonde.fr/afrique/article/2026/02/05/au-senegal-le-petrolier-mersin-a-bien-ete-victime-d-une-attaque-ciblee_6665525_3212.html Vulcanismo ( WoodyHarrisonismo) https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/yellowstones-supervolcano-creating-19-mile-36715123?int_source=nba Borracho Maga https://www.telecinco.es/noticias/internacional/20260210/padre-alcoholico-mata-hija-disparo-texas-discutir-sobre-donald-trump-tenencia-armas_18_018311584.html Estado numero 51 https://www.africanews.com/2026/02/11/shootings-at-school-and-home-in-british-columbia-canada-leave-10-dead/ Baile Nazi-Mozarista https://www.africanews.com/2026/02/13/vienna-opera-ball-dazzles-5500-guests-at-austrias-grand-gala/ Ejercito desplegado https://www.africanews.com/2026/02/13/south-africas-political-parties-largely-welcome-troop-deployment/ Pancetachuk https://www.farodevigo.es/espana/2026/02/10/presidente-parlamento-ucrania-ayuda-espana-genocidio-rusia-126669482.html Centinela del Artico https://www.20minutos.es/internacional/centinela-artico-asi-sera-operacion-militar-otan-para-blindar-isla-artica-las-intenciones-putin-xi-jinping_6933282_0.html Aumento de Sueldo https://www.iltalehti.fi/kotimaa/a/ae708d1c-9c98-4d61-a745-cc04eeb60df9 Conducta Honrada https://www.elcorreo.com/internacional/europa/suecia-endurece-acceso-nacionalidad-politicas-extranjeria-asilo-20260210193339-ntrc.html Dia del Trafico https://www.iltalehti.fi/kotimaa/a/7c553714-abe0-4170-8d5d-e8af7382d878 Princesa Sexy https://www.infobae.com/espana/2026/02/12/la-princesa-con-la-que-estaba-obsesionado-epstein-no-era-ni-mette-marit-ni-sofia-de-suecia-la-persona-de-la-realeza-mas-sexy-del-mundo/ Shuka Blacks https://www.africanews.com/2026/02/11/kenya-fm-to-visit-russia-over-forced-conscripts-in-ukraine/ Gafas Insectoides https://www.africanews.com/2026/02/10/gates-foundation-denies-claims-its-behind-mosquito-surge-in-kenya/ Resultados en tiempo real https://www.africanews.com/2026/02/10/nigeria-senate-approves-live-electronic-publication-of-election-results/ Manguangua 2030 https://www.africanews.com/2026/02/12/uproar-in-zimbabwe-over-cabinet-plan-to-extend-presidents-rule-to-2030/ Paul por la tele https://www.africanews.com/2026/02/11/cameroon-president-biya-delays-elections-once-again/ El selso ( o Rinoceronting) https://www.africanews.com/2026/02/12/rhino-poaching-in-south-africas-kruger-park-doubles-despite-national-drop/ Drill drilll drill https://www.africanews.com/2026/02/12/libya-grants-foreign-oil-companies-exploration-licences/ Disculpa ministerial https://iharare.com/zimbabwe-tourism-minister-personally-apologises-after-viral-us30-fine-to-sa-tourist/ Hoholaco FollaCascos https://www.africanews.com/2026/02/12/ukrainian-athlete-drops-out-of-of-winter-olympics-over-banned-helmet/ Pelo Negacionista https://apnews.com/live/trump-immigration-climate-change-2-12-2026 Isidoro Recontra viejo https://www.esdiario.com/nacional/260213/179697/felipe-gonzalez-torres-expulsarlo-psoe.html Dia del Fugu https://www.africanews.com/2026/02/12/ghana-introduces-weekly-fugu-day-to-celebrate-and-promote-traditional-clothes/

Send a text We're coming out of the gate strong for Season 11 of Sirens, Slammers and Service with an incredible conversation featuring Nancy Farmer. Nancy takes us through her long and impactful career with the Calgary Police Service—from what first motivated her to join policing, to rising through the ranks to an Inspector of the Support Section, and even achieving her tactical operators number along the way. We dive into leadership, resilience, and the realities behind the badge.The conversation doesn't stop at retirement… because Nancy tried it twice.She opens up about the challenges of her first retirement, the identity shift that followed, and how equestrian pursuits and cultural learning at Tsuu T'ina helped shape the next chapter. That journey ultimately led to the launch of Pepper Insights Limited, a business rooted in experience, reflection, and purpose.This episode is honest, inspiring, and packed with wisdom—and it's just the beginning of Season 11. Buckle up. We've got so much more coming your way. Blue Line Fitness Testing is a premier law enforcement fitness testing and training center based in Edmonton. Specializing in helping individuals prepare for the physical demands of a career in law enforcement, we offer comprehensive fitness evaluations, specialized training programs, and classes tailored to meet the unique needs of our clients. Support the showWant to support this podcast even more! Make a monthly subscription for only $3 a month here! Interested in becoming a first responder? Reach out to learn more! Email - info@bluelinefitnesstesting.comBlue Line Fitness TestingFacebook - https://www.facebook.com/bluelinefitnesstestingInstagram - https://www.instagram.com/bluelinefitnesstesting/LinkedIn - Nikki Cloutier

Former NYPD Inspector & Current Fox News Correspondent Paul Mauro joins Sid live from Arizona to report on the latest developments in the Nancy Guthrie abduction case. Despite the initial lack of suspects, recent video footage has surfaced showing a masked man outside Guthrie's house, potentially identifying features. Mauro highlights the suspect's efforts to avoid leaving DNA evidence and possible mistakes that may lead to his capture. The conversation also touches on the shift in media focus from searching for Nancy to catching the perpetrator, raising concerns about her well-being given her medical needs. Paul remains hopeful but acknowledges the complexities and setbacks in the investigation, including the role of digital evidence and other suspects, such as Guthrie's son-in-law. The incident involves sophisticated elements like Bitcoin transactions, but also seemingly amateurish actions, adding to the case's perplexity. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Every week Ryan, his team and an expert guest discuss relevant topics and answer questions about that weeks episode of Guilt.This weeks guests:Former Detective Inspector Ben OffnerRyan WolfBella OffnerJacob SaffleGot a question for the team?Email Bella at bella@bfpr.com or visit www.theguiltpodcast.comGuilt is a 100% Independent Podcast. Support the Podcast by becoming a Brevity+ subscriber. For a small monthly or annual fee you can both support the show and get a ton of amazing features, including Early Episode Release, Bonus Episodes, Ad Free Listening and exclusive access to the Guilt Podcast 'War Room' on www.theguiltpodcast.com where you'll find timelines, maps, case files, exclusive episode video content and more!Subscribe today on Apple or Spotify (Supporting Cast). For details on how to subscribe please visit our website www.theguiltpodcast.com/how-to-subscribeIf you have information about any of our cases or you would like to suggest a case or a story, please visit our website www.theguiltpodcast.com and use our contact form to contact us.Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/guilt. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Ep. 80 - Joining me is Jim Dudley, host of Police1's acclaimed podcast Policing Matters. Jim was with the San Francisco Police Department for 32 years, rising to the rank of Deputy Chief. He takes us back to policing in San Francisco in the 1980s and walks through how the profession — and crime itself — evolved over the decades, from the crack epidemic to today's open drug use and reforms impacting law enforcement like reducing felony charges to misdemeanors. He reflects on his time as an Investigator in the Bureau of Inspectors, working cases ranging from burglary and property crimes to domestic violence, assaults, and serious violent offenses.Jim also speaks candidly about the critical incident in which he used deadly force to save his own life and his partner's during a struggle with an armed suspect. We discuss the reality of being investigated after a fatal use-of-force incident, the emotional toll that follows, and how that experience shaped his leadership style when supporting officers navigating their own critical incidents.Since retiring in 2013, Jim has continued serving the profession as the host of Policing Matters and as a criminal justice instructor at San Francisco State University, where he has taught for 14 years. We touch on a topic of particular interest to me and that is the impact criminal justice professors can have on framing the national narrative on policing. Thank you, Jim.I also want to thank the listeners who I mention in the episode: @Luv fitness pal and @Emandagat01left very kind words in their five-star reviews on Apple podcasts. It means a lot to me. Here's where you can find Jim and Policing Matters: Policing Matters podcastPolicing Matters YouTubeInstagram:https://www.instagram.com/policing_matterspodcast/ LinkedIn:https://www.linkedin.com/in/jimdudley1946/ My interview with Jim Dudley on “Policing Matters”Thanks for listening to On Being a Police Officer. YOU are what keeps me going.Find me on my social or email me your thoughts:Instagram: on_being_a_police_officerFacebook: On Being a Police Officer Abby@Ellsworthproductions.comwww.onbeingapoliceofficer.com©Abby Ellsworth. All booking, interviews, editing, and production by Abby Ellsworth. Music courtesy of freesound.org

Maigrets_Mistake_Inspector_Maigret_Book 5

Que corte de carne es tu favorito?Conviértete en un supporter de este podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/chistes-y-mas-con-julio-y-el-marciano--3287516/support.

Maigrets_Mistake_Inspector_Maigret_Book 4

Maigrets_Mistake_Inspector_Maigret_Book 3

Les bones dades i el bon funcionament de l'any passat han fet que els cossos de seguretat hagin optat per repetir el dispositiu extraordinari de seguretat del Carnaval del 2025. Només hi haurà petits canvis com el fet que diumenge i dimarts el Centre d'Atenció Primària de Sitges es mantindrà obert 24 hores, la ubicació del punt lila fix que enguany se situarà a Can Perico o el fet que la recepció dels detinguts aquest any es traslladarà a la comissaria de Mossos d'Esquadra de Sitges per després traslladar-los a Vilanova i la Geltrú. Mossos d'Esquadra mantindrà els mateixos recursos dels darrers anys que inclouran policia aèria, marítima, de trànsit, drons i un mínim de sis equips d'ARROS, aquest fet el converteix en el segon dispositiu més gran de tot Catalunya després del del Mobile World Congress. El dispositiu comptarà també les nits de dissabte, diumenge i dimarts amb la presència del Centre Operatiu de Seguretat (CECOR) on es coordinarà la tasca de tots els cossos implicats més enllà de mossos d'esquadra i policia local i que comptarà un any més amb el SEM, Bombers, Protecció Civil i Creu Roja. Més enllà del treball preventiu del dispositiu la davallada dels fets delictius dependrà del bon funcionament de rodalies, l'any passat el Carnaval es va veure afectat per una vaga de maquinistes que va fer disminuir la xifra de visitants i en conseqüència la de les potencials víctimes i la dels delictes, la complicada situació de rodalies de les darreres setmanes fa pensar que podria afectar a la xifra de visitants que rep Sitges per Carnaval tot i que Renfe té previst augmentar la xifra de trens en els dies clau. Ho han explicat Toni Santervás, Inspector Cap de l'Àrea Bàsica Policial del Garraf dels Mossos d'Esquadra, Jordi Altarriba, Inspector de la Policia Local de Sitges i l'alcaldessa de Sitges, Aurora Carbonell. L'entrada Sitges repeteix dispositiu de seguretat del Carnaval amb l’afegit que el CAP obrirà 24 hores diumenge i dimarts i pendent de com aniran els trens ha aparegut primer a Radio Maricel.

Maigrets_Mistake_Inspector_Maigret_Book 2

KS Bill would allow inspectors into rentals without permission HR 2 full 2408 Wed, 04 Feb 2026 17:08:37 +0000 l4GS6BKzl6TQoKXD6EcvR1qxy4XU0MbO news MIDDAY with JAYME & WIER news KS Bill would allow inspectors into rentals without permission HR 2 From local news & politics, to what's trending, sports & personal stories...MIDDAY with JAYME & WIER will get you through the middle of your day! © 2025 Audacy, Inc. News False https://player.amperwavep

The Department of Justice's Office of the Inspector General conducted an unannounced inspection of the Federal Correctional Institution (FCI) Tallahassee, a low-security women's federal prison in Florida, and found alarming and serious operational deficiencies that raise questions about inmate safety, basic hygiene, and institutional competence. Inspectors documented rotting and unsanitary food storage, including moldy bread and insect-infested cereal, rodent droppings, and refrigerators containing spoiled vegetables, conditions that violated Federal Bureau of Prisons policies and posed clear health hazards to those incarcerated there. They also found chronic infrastructure decay, with frequent water leaks so severe that inmates resorted to using sanitary products to block drips, damaged ceilings and walls, worn bedding, inoperable showers and toilets, and pervasive black substance on bathroom surfaces — all reflecting deep neglect in basic living conditions. The facility scored as “high risk” under an OIG risk assessment tool, indicating systemic rather than isolated problems.Beyond physical conditions, the OIG report highlighted staffing shortages and security weaknesses that further undermined safety and order at FCI Tallahassee. Inspectors found ineffective and delayed investigations into staff misconduct, inconsistent search procedures that fueled mistrust among inmates, and procedures that left significant blind spots in camera monitoring, increasing opportunities for contraband and undetected problems. Many misconduct investigations had languished for more than two years, and staff repeatedly misgendered transgender inmates, demonstrating disrespectful and problematic conduct. Inmates reported fear of reprisals for raising complaints, underscoring a breakdown in trust between prisoners and staff. While the report predated Maxwell's transfer and did not focus on her individually, its revelations paint a distressing picture of the facility's conditions and operational failures during the period she resided there, contributing to public concern about the environment where a high-profile prisoner was held.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

To watch a video version of this podcast, click here: https://youtu.be/c9hch5yyc-UIn this episode, Reuben Saltzman and Tessa Murry are joined by Structure Tech's Services Manager, Eric Houseman, for a wild home‑inspection story that starts with a simple missing bath‑fan termination and snowballs into a major discovery. What begins as routine training turns into a dramatic game of telephone between inspectors, agents, sellers, and contractors—and ends with one of the most shocking ventilation mistakes the team has ever seen: a bathroom exhaust fan tied directly into a power‑vent water heater exhaust.Along the way, the trio talked about communication pitfalls, the importance of clear reporting, the routine inspection steps that prevent safety issues, and the unexpected discoveries that even seasoned inspectors don't see coming. It's an episode filled with lessons, surprises, and plenty of inspector banter.Here's the link to Inspector Empire Builder: https://www.iebcoaching.com/eventsCheck out this link to our new favorite Combustible Gas Detector, the TPI 720b:https://amzn.to/3NgZtv7TakeawaysClear communication during inspections is essential—verbal explanations can easily be distorted.Always wait for the published report, which is the most accurate representation of the findings.Words matter: “exhaust gas leak” is not the same as “gas leak.”Inspectors should avoid paraphrasing defects; copy the exact language from the report when relaying information.Even “routine” findings require careful verification—small details prevent major hazards.A bath fan must exhaust to the exterior, and improper venting can create serious safety risks.Creativity in home projects isn't always a good thing—especially when it involves exhaust systems and combustion appliances.When something seems off, dig deeper; sometimes the truth is hidden behind drywall.A well‑written report, complete with photos and precise language, is a home inspector's best protection.Even experienced inspectors learn new things—sometimes in the most unexpected ways.Chapters00:00  Introduction and Minnesota's heavy current events01:07  Shifting to lighter topics and home‑inspection talk02:35  Combustible gas detectors: retiring the TIFF 890005:00  The new winner: TPI 270B07:21  Show sponsor shout‑out: IEB08:35  Reuben's reverse osmosis saga (and user error)11:35  Tessa's stinky well‑water updates13:31  Introduction to Eric's “thrown under the bus” story14:25  The inspection setup and counting exhaust points16:45  The missing basement bath‑fan termination18:14  The telephone game between clients, agents, and sellers19:37  HVAC contractor conflicts with the findings20:55  Re‑inspection and detective work22:17  The shocking discovery: bath fan tied into water‑heater exhaust23:59  Why this is dangerous: carbon monoxide risk25:11  No apology, but valuable lessons27:33  How communication gaps amplify issues28:44  Importance of clear reporting and avoiding paraphrasing30:33  Wrapping the episode; preview of next topic31:48  Closing remarks

Maigrets_Mistake_Inspector_Maigret_Book

In this segment we're going back to the Office of Inspector General's report on Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, but this time with a perspective that simply didn't exist when most people first read it — the full, unfiltered interview Alex Acosta gave to the Inspector General after the scandal finally exploded. Because once you've seen how Acosta explains himself, how he hedges, how he minimizes, how he quietly rewrites his own role in real time, that OIG report stops reading like a neutral internal review and starts reading like a document built around what Acosta was willing to admit, not what actually happened. Passages that once sounded procedural now look evasive, timelines that once seemed complete suddenly feel selectively curated, and key conclusions begin to rest on a version of events that Acosta himself later contradicted under questioning. What we're really doing here is stress-testing the government's own narrative — comparing what the OIG said happened with what the chief architect of the deal later admitted, denied, and carefully avoided — and in the process, exposing just how much of the official record may have been shaped not by truth, but by damage control.The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein's high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:dl (justice.gov)

In this segment we're going back to the Office of Inspector General's report on Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, but this time with a perspective that simply didn't exist when most people first read it — the full, unfiltered interview Alex Acosta gave to the Inspector General after the scandal finally exploded. Because once you've seen how Acosta explains himself, how he hedges, how he minimizes, how he quietly rewrites his own role in real time, that OIG report stops reading like a neutral internal review and starts reading like a document built around what Acosta was willing to admit, not what actually happened. Passages that once sounded procedural now look evasive, timelines that once seemed complete suddenly feel selectively curated, and key conclusions begin to rest on a version of events that Acosta himself later contradicted under questioning. What we're really doing here is stress-testing the government's own narrative — comparing what the OIG said happened with what the chief architect of the deal later admitted, denied, and carefully avoided — and in the process, exposing just how much of the official record may have been shaped not by truth, but by damage control.The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein's high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:dl (justice.gov)This episode includes AI-generated content.

In this segment we're going back to the Office of Inspector General's report on Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, but this time with a perspective that simply didn't exist when most people first read it — the full, unfiltered interview Alex Acosta gave to the Inspector General after the scandal finally exploded. Because once you've seen how Acosta explains himself, how he hedges, how he minimizes, how he quietly rewrites his own role in real time, that OIG report stops reading like a neutral internal review and starts reading like a document built around what Acosta was willing to admit, not what actually happened. Passages that once sounded procedural now look evasive, timelines that once seemed complete suddenly feel selectively curated, and key conclusions begin to rest on a version of events that Acosta himself later contradicted under questioning. What we're really doing here is stress-testing the government's own narrative — comparing what the OIG said happened with what the chief architect of the deal later admitted, denied, and carefully avoided — and in the process, exposing just how much of the official record may have been shaped not by truth, but by damage control.The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein's high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:dl (justice.gov)

In this segment we're going back to the Office of Inspector General's report on Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, but this time with a perspective that simply didn't exist when most people first read it — the full, unfiltered interview Alex Acosta gave to the Inspector General after the scandal finally exploded. Because once you've seen how Acosta explains himself, how he hedges, how he minimizes, how he quietly rewrites his own role in real time, that OIG report stops reading like a neutral internal review and starts reading like a document built around what Acosta was willing to admit, not what actually happened. Passages that once sounded procedural now look evasive, timelines that once seemed complete suddenly feel selectively curated, and key conclusions begin to rest on a version of events that Acosta himself later contradicted under questioning. What we're really doing here is stress-testing the government's own narrative — comparing what the OIG said happened with what the chief architect of the deal later admitted, denied, and carefully avoided — and in the process, exposing just how much of the official record may have been shaped not by truth, but by damage control.The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein's high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:dl (justice.gov)

In this segment we're going back to the Office of Inspector General's report on Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, but this time with a perspective that simply didn't exist when most people first read it — the full, unfiltered interview Alex Acosta gave to the Inspector General after the scandal finally exploded. Because once you've seen how Acosta explains himself, how he hedges, how he minimizes, how he quietly rewrites his own role in real time, that OIG report stops reading like a neutral internal review and starts reading like a document built around what Acosta was willing to admit, not what actually happened. Passages that once sounded procedural now look evasive, timelines that once seemed complete suddenly feel selectively curated, and key conclusions begin to rest on a version of events that Acosta himself later contradicted under questioning. What we're really doing here is stress-testing the government's own narrative — comparing what the OIG said happened with what the chief architect of the deal later admitted, denied, and carefully avoided — and in the process, exposing just how much of the official record may have been shaped not by truth, but by damage control.The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein's high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:dl (justice.gov)

Inspector General for the United States Department of Labor & Former Congressman, Anthony D'Esposito, calls into the show to discuss his plans to travel to Minneapolis to check in on the federal agents dealing with violent protesters daily. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this segment we're going back to the Office of Inspector General's report on Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, but this time with a perspective that simply didn't exist when most people first read it — the full, unfiltered interview Alex Acosta gave to the Inspector General after the scandal finally exploded. Because once you've seen how Acosta explains himself, how he hedges, how he minimizes, how he quietly rewrites his own role in real time, that OIG report stops reading like a neutral internal review and starts reading like a document built around what Acosta was willing to admit, not what actually happened. Passages that once sounded procedural now look evasive, timelines that once seemed complete suddenly feel selectively curated, and key conclusions begin to rest on a version of events that Acosta himself later contradicted under questioning. What we're really doing here is stress-testing the government's own narrative — comparing what the OIG said happened with what the chief architect of the deal later admitted, denied, and carefully avoided — and in the process, exposing just how much of the official record may have been shaped not by truth, but by damage control.The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein's high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:dl (justice.gov)

In this segment we're going back to the Office of Inspector General's report on Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, but this time with a perspective that simply didn't exist when most people first read it — the full, unfiltered interview Alex Acosta gave to the Inspector General after the scandal finally exploded. Because once you've seen how Acosta explains himself, how he hedges, how he minimizes, how he quietly rewrites his own role in real time, that OIG report stops reading like a neutral internal review and starts reading like a document built around what Acosta was willing to admit, not what actually happened. Passages that once sounded procedural now look evasive, timelines that once seemed complete suddenly feel selectively curated, and key conclusions begin to rest on a version of events that Acosta himself later contradicted under questioning. What we're really doing here is stress-testing the government's own narrative — comparing what the OIG said happened with what the chief architect of the deal later admitted, denied, and carefully avoided — and in the process, exposing just how much of the official record may have been shaped not by truth, but by damage control.The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein's high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:dl (justice.gov)

In this segment we're going back to the Office of Inspector General's report on Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, but this time with a perspective that simply didn't exist when most people first read it — the full, unfiltered interview Alex Acosta gave to the Inspector General after the scandal finally exploded. Because once you've seen how Acosta explains himself, how he hedges, how he minimizes, how he quietly rewrites his own role in real time, that OIG report stops reading like a neutral internal review and starts reading like a document built around what Acosta was willing to admit, not what actually happened. Passages that once sounded procedural now look evasive, timelines that once seemed complete suddenly feel selectively curated, and key conclusions begin to rest on a version of events that Acosta himself later contradicted under questioning. What we're really doing here is stress-testing the government's own narrative — comparing what the OIG said happened with what the chief architect of the deal later admitted, denied, and carefully avoided — and in the process, exposing just how much of the official record may have been shaped not by truth, but by damage control.The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein's high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:dl (justice.gov)

This episode is powerful because it focuses on the value of Home Inspectors to the electrician and not just the buyer and/or seller. You may be shocked, pun intended, to learn what Paul Abernathy, a nationally recognized electrical expert, thinks about home inspectors and what they bring to the table for electricians. We, as electricians and electrical contractors, are always looking to grow our business, to increase our exposure, and to simply be the best we can be.So, embracing the Home Inspection Industry is very important to an electrical contractor's success. Yes, I know the actual Electrician likes to bash the stuff in a home inspection report when things are called out that seem frivolous, but at the end of the day, you, the Electrician, are getting paid to either fix the issues or give a detailed explanation of what is acceptable. Once that interaction is done, it's up to the negotiation between the buyer and seller, and nothing you say in a report, be it the home inspection report or electrical follow-up evaluation, should be biased or one-sided. Simply state the facts, collect your check, and move on. Listen as Paul Abernathy, CEO and Founder of Electrical Code Academy, Inc., the leading electrical educator in the country, discusses electrical code, electrical trade, and electrical business-related topics to help electricians maximize their knowledge and industry investment.If you are looking to learn more about the National Electrical Code, for electrical exam preparation, or to better your knowledge of the NEC, then visit https://fasttraxsystem.com for all the electrical code training you will ever need by the leading electrical educator in the country with the best NEC learning program on the planet.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/master-the-nec-podcast--1083733/support.Struggling with the National Electrical Code? Discover the real difference at Electrical Code Academy, Inc.—where you'll learn from the nation's most down-to-earth NEC expert who genuinely cares about your success. No fluff. No gimmicks. Just the best NEC training you'll actually remember.Visit https://FastTraxSystem.com to learn more.

The Department of Justice's Office of the Inspector General conducted an unannounced inspection of the Federal Correctional Institution (FCI) Tallahassee, a low-security women's federal prison in Florida, and found alarming and serious operational deficiencies that raise questions about inmate safety, basic hygiene, and institutional competence. Inspectors documented rotting and unsanitary food storage, including moldy bread and insect-infested cereal, rodent droppings, and refrigerators containing spoiled vegetables, conditions that violated Federal Bureau of Prisons policies and posed clear health hazards to those incarcerated there. They also found chronic infrastructure decay, with frequent water leaks so severe that inmates resorted to using sanitary products to block drips, damaged ceilings and walls, worn bedding, inoperable showers and toilets, and pervasive black substance on bathroom surfaces — all reflecting deep neglect in basic living conditions. The facility scored as “high risk” under an OIG risk assessment tool, indicating systemic rather than isolated problems.Beyond physical conditions, the OIG report highlighted staffing shortages and security weaknesses that further undermined safety and order at FCI Tallahassee. Inspectors found ineffective and delayed investigations into staff misconduct, inconsistent search procedures that fueled mistrust among inmates, and procedures that left significant blind spots in camera monitoring, increasing opportunities for contraband and undetected problems. Many misconduct investigations had languished for more than two years, and staff repeatedly misgendered transgender inmates, demonstrating disrespectful and problematic conduct. Inmates reported fear of reprisals for raising complaints, underscoring a breakdown in trust between prisoners and staff. While the report predated Maxwell's transfer and did not focus on her individually, its revelations paint a distressing picture of the facility's conditions and operational failures during the period she resided there, contributing to public concern about the environment where a high-profile prisoner was held.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

This episode is powerful because it focuses on the value of Home Inspectors to the electrician and not just the buyer and/or seller. You may be shocked, pun intended, to learn what Paul Abernathy, a nationally recognized electrical expert, thinks about home inspectors and what they bring to the table for electricians. We, as electricians and electrical contractors, are always looking to grow our business, to increase our exposure, and to simply be the best we can be.So, embracing the Home Inspection Industry is very important to an electrical contractor's success. Yes, I know the actual Electrician likes to bash the stuff in a home inspection report when things are called out that seem frivolous, but at the end of the day, you, the Electrician, are getting paid to either fix the issues or give a detailed explanation of what is acceptable. Once that interaction is done, it's up to the negotiation between the buyer and seller, and nothing you say in a report, be it the home inspection report or electrical follow-up evaluation, should be biased or one-sided. State the facts, collect your check, and move on. Listen as Paul Abernathy, CEO and Founder of Electrical Code Academy, Inc., the leading electrical educator in the country, discusses electrical code, electrical trade, and electrical business-related topics to help electricians maximize their knowledge and industry investment.If you are looking to learn more about the National Electrical Code, for electrical exam preparation, or to better your knowledge of the NEC, then visit https://fasttraxsystem.com for all the electrical code training you will ever need by the leading electrical educator in the country with the best NEC learning program on the planet.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/electrify-electrician-podcast--4131858/support.

This episode is powerful because it focuses on the value of Home Inspectors to the electrician and not just the buyer and/or seller. You may be shocked, pun intended, to learn what Paul Abernathy, a nationally recognized electrical expert, thinks about home inspectors and what they bring to the table for electricians. We, as electricians and electrical contractors, are always looking to grow our business, to increase our exposure, and to simply be the best we can be.So, embracing the Home Inspection Industry is very important to an electrical contractor's success. Yes, I know the actual Electrician likes to bash the stuff in a home inspection report when things are called out that seem frivolous, but at the end of the day, you, the Electrician, are getting paid to either fix the issues or give a detailed explanation of what is acceptable. Once that interaction is done, it's up to the negotiation between the buyer and seller, and nothing you say in a report, be it the home inspection report or electrical follow-up evaluation, should be biased or one-sided. Simply state the facts, collect your check, and move on. Listen as Paul Abernathy, CEO and Founder of Electrical Code Academy, Inc., the leading electrical educator in the country, discusses electrical code, electrical trade, and electrical business-related topics to help electricians maximize their knowledge and industry investment.If you are looking to learn more about the National Electrical Code, for electrical exam preparation, or to better your knowledge of the NEC, then visit https://fasttraxsystem.com for all the electrical code training you will ever need by the leading electrical educator in the country with the best NEC learning program on the planet.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/ask-paul-national-electrical-code--4971115/support.

In this segment we're going back to the Office of Inspector General's report on Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, but this time with a perspective that simply didn't exist when most people first read it — the full, unfiltered interview Alex Acosta gave to the Inspector General after the scandal finally exploded. Because once you've seen how Acosta explains himself, how he hedges, how he minimizes, how he quietly rewrites his own role in real time, that OIG report stops reading like a neutral internal review and starts reading like a document built around what Acosta was willing to admit, not what actually happened. Passages that once sounded procedural now look evasive, timelines that once seemed complete suddenly feel selectively curated, and key conclusions begin to rest on a version of events that Acosta himself later contradicted under questioning. What we're really doing here is stress-testing the government's own narrative — comparing what the OIG said happened with what the chief architect of the deal later admitted, denied, and carefully avoided — and in the process, exposing just how much of the official record may have been shaped not by truth, but by damage control.The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein's high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:dl (justice.gov)

In this segment we're going back to the Office of Inspector General's report on Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, but this time with a perspective that simply didn't exist when most people first read it — the full, unfiltered interview Alex Acosta gave to the Inspector General after the scandal finally exploded. Because once you've seen how Acosta explains himself, how he hedges, how he minimizes, how he quietly rewrites his own role in real time, that OIG report stops reading like a neutral internal review and starts reading like a document built around what Acosta was willing to admit, not what actually happened. Passages that once sounded procedural now look evasive, timelines that once seemed complete suddenly feel selectively curated, and key conclusions begin to rest on a version of events that Acosta himself later contradicted under questioning. What we're really doing here is stress-testing the government's own narrative — comparing what the OIG said happened with what the chief architect of the deal later admitted, denied, and carefully avoided — and in the process, exposing just how much of the official record may have been shaped not by truth, but by damage control.The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein's high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:dl (justice.gov)

In this segment we're going back to the Office of Inspector General's report on Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, but this time with a perspective that simply didn't exist when most people first read it — the full, unfiltered interview Alex Acosta gave to the Inspector General after the scandal finally exploded. Because once you've seen how Acosta explains himself, how he hedges, how he minimizes, how he quietly rewrites his own role in real time, that OIG report stops reading like a neutral internal review and starts reading like a document built around what Acosta was willing to admit, not what actually happened. Passages that once sounded procedural now look evasive, timelines that once seemed complete suddenly feel selectively curated, and key conclusions begin to rest on a version of events that Acosta himself later contradicted under questioning. What we're really doing here is stress-testing the government's own narrative — comparing what the OIG said happened with what the chief architect of the deal later admitted, denied, and carefully avoided — and in the process, exposing just how much of the official record may have been shaped not by truth, but by damage control.The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein's high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:dl (justice.gov)

In this segment we're going back to the Office of Inspector General's report on Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, but this time with a perspective that simply didn't exist when most people first read it — the full, unfiltered interview Alex Acosta gave to the Inspector General after the scandal finally exploded. Because once you've seen how Acosta explains himself, how he hedges, how he minimizes, how he quietly rewrites his own role in real time, that OIG report stops reading like a neutral internal review and starts reading like a document built around what Acosta was willing to admit, not what actually happened. Passages that once sounded procedural now look evasive, timelines that once seemed complete suddenly feel selectively curated, and key conclusions begin to rest on a version of events that Acosta himself later contradicted under questioning. What we're really doing here is stress-testing the government's own narrative — comparing what the OIG said happened with what the chief architect of the deal later admitted, denied, and carefully avoided — and in the process, exposing just how much of the official record may have been shaped not by truth, but by damage control.The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein's high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:dl (justice.gov)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this segment we're going back to the Office of Inspector General's report on Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, but this time with a perspective that simply didn't exist when most people first read it — the full, unfiltered interview Alex Acosta gave to the Inspector General after the scandal finally exploded. Because once you've seen how Acosta explains himself, how he hedges, how he minimizes, how he quietly rewrites his own role in real time, that OIG report stops reading like a neutral internal review and starts reading like a document built around what Acosta was willing to admit, not what actually happened. Passages that once sounded procedural now look evasive, timelines that once seemed complete suddenly feel selectively curated, and key conclusions begin to rest on a version of events that Acosta himself later contradicted under questioning. What we're really doing here is stress-testing the government's own narrative — comparing what the OIG said happened with what the chief architect of the deal later admitted, denied, and carefully avoided — and in the process, exposing just how much of the official record may have been shaped not by truth, but by damage control.The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein's high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:dl (justice.gov)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this segment we're going back to the Office of Inspector General's report on Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, but this time with a perspective that simply didn't exist when most people first read it — the full, unfiltered interview Alex Acosta gave to the Inspector General after the scandal finally exploded. Because once you've seen how Acosta explains himself, how he hedges, how he minimizes, how he quietly rewrites his own role in real time, that OIG report stops reading like a neutral internal review and starts reading like a document built around what Acosta was willing to admit, not what actually happened. Passages that once sounded procedural now look evasive, timelines that once seemed complete suddenly feel selectively curated, and key conclusions begin to rest on a version of events that Acosta himself later contradicted under questioning. What we're really doing here is stress-testing the government's own narrative — comparing what the OIG said happened with what the chief architect of the deal later admitted, denied, and carefully avoided — and in the process, exposing just how much of the official record may have been shaped not by truth, but by damage control.The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein's high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:dl (justice.gov)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this segment we're going back to the Office of Inspector General's report on Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, but this time with a perspective that simply didn't exist when most people first read it — the full, unfiltered interview Alex Acosta gave to the Inspector General after the scandal finally exploded. Because once you've seen how Acosta explains himself, how he hedges, how he minimizes, how he quietly rewrites his own role in real time, that OIG report stops reading like a neutral internal review and starts reading like a document built around what Acosta was willing to admit, not what actually happened. Passages that once sounded procedural now look evasive, timelines that once seemed complete suddenly feel selectively curated, and key conclusions begin to rest on a version of events that Acosta himself later contradicted under questioning. What we're really doing here is stress-testing the government's own narrative — comparing what the OIG said happened with what the chief architect of the deal later admitted, denied, and carefully avoided — and in the process, exposing just how much of the official record may have been shaped not by truth, but by damage control.The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein's high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:dl (justice.gov)

In this segment we're going back to the Office of Inspector General's report on Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, but this time with a perspective that simply didn't exist when most people first read it — the full, unfiltered interview Alex Acosta gave to the Inspector General after the scandal finally exploded. Because once you've seen how Acosta explains himself, how he hedges, how he minimizes, how he quietly rewrites his own role in real time, that OIG report stops reading like a neutral internal review and starts reading like a document built around what Acosta was willing to admit, not what actually happened. Passages that once sounded procedural now look evasive, timelines that once seemed complete suddenly feel selectively curated, and key conclusions begin to rest on a version of events that Acosta himself later contradicted under questioning. What we're really doing here is stress-testing the government's own narrative — comparing what the OIG said happened with what the chief architect of the deal later admitted, denied, and carefully avoided — and in the process, exposing just how much of the official record may have been shaped not by truth, but by damage control.The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein's high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:dl (justice.gov)

In this segment we're going back to the Office of Inspector General's report on Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, but this time with a perspective that simply didn't exist when most people first read it — the full, unfiltered interview Alex Acosta gave to the Inspector General after the scandal finally exploded. Because once you've seen how Acosta explains himself, how he hedges, how he minimizes, how he quietly rewrites his own role in real time, that OIG report stops reading like a neutral internal review and starts reading like a document built around what Acosta was willing to admit, not what actually happened. Passages that once sounded procedural now look evasive, timelines that once seemed complete suddenly feel selectively curated, and key conclusions begin to rest on a version of events that Acosta himself later contradicted under questioning. What we're really doing here is stress-testing the government's own narrative — comparing what the OIG said happened with what the chief architect of the deal later admitted, denied, and carefully avoided — and in the process, exposing just how much of the official record may have been shaped not by truth, but by damage control.The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein's high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:dl (justice.gov)

In this segment we're going back to the Office of Inspector General's report on Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, but this time with a perspective that simply didn't exist when most people first read it — the full, unfiltered interview Alex Acosta gave to the Inspector General after the scandal finally exploded. Because once you've seen how Acosta explains himself, how he hedges, how he minimizes, how he quietly rewrites his own role in real time, that OIG report stops reading like a neutral internal review and starts reading like a document built around what Acosta was willing to admit, not what actually happened. Passages that once sounded procedural now look evasive, timelines that once seemed complete suddenly feel selectively curated, and key conclusions begin to rest on a version of events that Acosta himself later contradicted under questioning. What we're really doing here is stress-testing the government's own narrative — comparing what the OIG said happened with what the chief architect of the deal later admitted, denied, and carefully avoided — and in the process, exposing just how much of the official record may have been shaped not by truth, but by damage control.The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein's high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:dl (justice.gov)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this segment we're going back to the Office of Inspector General's report on Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, but this time with a perspective that simply didn't exist when most people first read it — the full, unfiltered interview Alex Acosta gave to the Inspector General after the scandal finally exploded. Because once you've seen how Acosta explains himself, how he hedges, how he minimizes, how he quietly rewrites his own role in real time, that OIG report stops reading like a neutral internal review and starts reading like a document built around what Acosta was willing to admit, not what actually happened. Passages that once sounded procedural now look evasive, timelines that once seemed complete suddenly feel selectively curated, and key conclusions begin to rest on a version of events that Acosta himself later contradicted under questioning. What we're really doing here is stress-testing the government's own narrative — comparing what the OIG said happened with what the chief architect of the deal later admitted, denied, and carefully avoided — and in the process, exposing just how much of the official record may have been shaped not by truth, but by damage control.The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein's high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:dl (justice.gov)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this segment we're going back to the Office of Inspector General's report on Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, but this time with a perspective that simply didn't exist when most people first read it — the full, unfiltered interview Alex Acosta gave to the Inspector General after the scandal finally exploded. Because once you've seen how Acosta explains himself, how he hedges, how he minimizes, how he quietly rewrites his own role in real time, that OIG report stops reading like a neutral internal review and starts reading like a document built around what Acosta was willing to admit, not what actually happened. Passages that once sounded procedural now look evasive, timelines that once seemed complete suddenly feel selectively curated, and key conclusions begin to rest on a version of events that Acosta himself later contradicted under questioning. What we're really doing here is stress-testing the government's own narrative — comparing what the OIG said happened with what the chief architect of the deal later admitted, denied, and carefully avoided — and in the process, exposing just how much of the official record may have been shaped not by truth, but by damage control.The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein's high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:dl (justice.gov)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this segment we're going back to the Office of Inspector General's report on Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, but this time with a perspective that simply didn't exist when most people first read it — the full, unfiltered interview Alex Acosta gave to the Inspector General after the scandal finally exploded. Because once you've seen how Acosta explains himself, how he hedges, how he minimizes, how he quietly rewrites his own role in real time, that OIG report stops reading like a neutral internal review and starts reading like a document built around what Acosta was willing to admit, not what actually happened. Passages that once sounded procedural now look evasive, timelines that once seemed complete suddenly feel selectively curated, and key conclusions begin to rest on a version of events that Acosta himself later contradicted under questioning. What we're really doing here is stress-testing the government's own narrative — comparing what the OIG said happened with what the chief architect of the deal later admitted, denied, and carefully avoided — and in the process, exposing just how much of the official record may have been shaped not by truth, but by damage control.The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein's high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:dl (justice.gov)

In this segment we're going back to the Office of Inspector General's report on Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, but this time with a perspective that simply didn't exist when most people first read it — the full, unfiltered interview Alex Acosta gave to the Inspector General after the scandal finally exploded. Because once you've seen how Acosta explains himself, how he hedges, how he minimizes, how he quietly rewrites his own role in real time, that OIG report stops reading like a neutral internal review and starts reading like a document built around what Acosta was willing to admit, not what actually happened. Passages that once sounded procedural now look evasive, timelines that once seemed complete suddenly feel selectively curated, and key conclusions begin to rest on a version of events that Acosta himself later contradicted under questioning. What we're really doing here is stress-testing the government's own narrative — comparing what the OIG said happened with what the chief architect of the deal later admitted, denied, and carefully avoided — and in the process, exposing just how much of the official record may have been shaped not by truth, but by damage control.The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein's high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:dl (justice.gov)

In this segment we're going back to the Office of Inspector General's report on Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, but this time with a perspective that simply didn't exist when most people first read it — the full, unfiltered interview Alex Acosta gave to the Inspector General after the scandal finally exploded. Because once you've seen how Acosta explains himself, how he hedges, how he minimizes, how he quietly rewrites his own role in real time, that OIG report stops reading like a neutral internal review and starts reading like a document built around what Acosta was willing to admit, not what actually happened. Passages that once sounded procedural now look evasive, timelines that once seemed complete suddenly feel selectively curated, and key conclusions begin to rest on a version of events that Acosta himself later contradicted under questioning. What we're really doing here is stress-testing the government's own narrative — comparing what the OIG said happened with what the chief architect of the deal later admitted, denied, and carefully avoided — and in the process, exposing just how much of the official record may have been shaped not by truth, but by damage control.The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein's high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:dl (justice.gov)

Am I the Genius? is the show where you get real answers to questions you've always wondered but didn't think to ask. Subscribe on YouTube - youtube.com/@amithegenius?sub_confirmation=1 Am I the Jerk? on Instagram - instagram.com/amithegenius Am I the Jerk? on Spotify - ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://open.spotify.com/show/0uEkxvRMpxLuuHeyPVVioF?si=b279dadfe593432b⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ x.com/amithejerk facebook.com/amithejerk SUBMIT YOUR OWN STORIES HERE ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠http://amithejerk.com/submit⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Mint Mobile - Get this new customer offer and your 3-month Unlimited wireless plan for just 15 bucks a month at MINTMOBILE.com/AITJ Quince - Keep it classic and cool — with long-lasting staples from Quince. Go to Quince.com/AITJ for free shipping on your order and three hundred and sixty-five -day returns. EveryPlate - Dig into these flavor-packed meals your household will love. New customers can enjoy this special offer of only $1.99 a meal. Go to everyplate.com/podcast and use code AITG199 to get started. Green Chef - Head to Greenchef.com/50AITJ and use code 50AITJ to get fifty percent off your first month, then twenty percent off for two months with free shipping. Lola Blankets - Get 35% off your entire order at Lolablankets.com by using code AITJ at checkout. Uncommon Goods - To get 15% off your next gift, go to UncommonGoods.com/AITJ Don't miss out on this limited-time offer. Uncommon Goods. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices