Podcasts about presidential executive orders

This lecture defines Presidential Executive Orders as directives issued by the President to manage federal government operations, carrying the force of law without congressional approval. Executive orders enable Presidents to direct federal agencies and respond to national issues. They have played a role in shaping civil rights, military policy, and economic regulations.The President's authority to issue executive orders stems from Article II of the U.S. Constitution:The Take Care Clause (Art. II, §3) ensures the President oversees the execution of federal laws and policies.The Commander-in-Chief Clause (Art. II, §2) grants the President authority over the military.The Executive Power Clause (Art. II, §1) vests executive power in the President.Statutory Authority: Congress can delegate specific powers to the President through legislation.Executive orders are binding on federal agencies and do not require congressional approval, but they are subject to judicial review and can be repealed by a successor. Presidents use executive orders in various contexts:Administrative OrganizationForeign Policy and National SecurityRegulatory and Economic PolicyCivil Rights and Social IssuesEmergency ResponsePublic Health MeasuresEnergy and Environmental PolicyTechnology and CybersecurityCriminal Justice and Law EnforcementExecutive orders must derive authority from the Constitution or statute. Courts can invalidate executive orders that exceed constitutional or statutory authority. Congress can limit the effect of an executive order or refuse to fund initiatives enacted by it. Executive orders may face political resistance, public opinion, lawsuits, or congressional action. States may challenge executive orders that infringe upon state sovereignty. Executive orders do not have permanent legal standing and can be revoked or modified by future Presidents.Examples of executive orders include:Emancipation Proclamation (1863)Executive Order 9066 (1942)Desegregation of the Armed Forces (1948)Creation of the Environmental Protection Agency (1970)DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) (2012)Immigration Ban (2017)Equal Pay Initiative (1963)Cybersecurity and Critical Infrastructure Protection (2013)Climate Action Plan (2013)The “Buy American, Hire American” Order (2017)Other Presidential actions include presidential memoranda, presidential proclamations, national security directives, signing statements, presidential determinations, and presidential directives. Executive orders provide the President with a mechanism for efficient action, but their use is subject to constitutional and legal constraints.

Presidential Executive Orders: Definition, Authority, and ScopeDefinition: Presidential Executive Orders are directives issued by the President to manage federal government operations.Authority:Article II of the U.S. Constitution:Take Care Clause: Ensures the President oversees the execution of federal laws and policies effectively.Commander-in-Chief Clause: Grants the President authority over the military.Executive Power Clause: Vests executive power in the President.Statutory Authority: Congress may delegate specific powers to the President through legislation.Characteristics:Binding on Federal AgenciesDo Not Require Congressional ApprovalSubject to Judicial ReviewCan Be Repealed by a SuccessorScope and Use:Administrative OrganizationForeign Policy and National SecurityRegulatory and Economic PolicyCivil Rights and Social IssuesEmergency ResponsePublic Health MeasuresEnergy and Environmental PolicyTechnology and CybersecurityCriminal Justice and Law EnforcementLimitations:Must Derive Authority from the Constitution or StatuteJudicial ReviewCongressional OverridePublic and Political PressureState Opposition and Federalism ConcernsDuration and Repeal by SuccessorsNotable Executive Orders in U.S. History:Emancipation Proclamation (1863)Executive Order 9066 (1942)Desegregation of the Armed Forces (1948)Creation of the Environmental Protection Agency (1970)DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) (2012)Immigration Ban (2017)Equal Pay Initiative (1963)Cybersecurity and Critical Infrastructure Protection (2013)Climate Action Plan (2013)The “Buy American, Hire American” Order (2017)Executive Orders vs. Other Presidential Actions:Executive Orders: Legally binding directives issued by the President with the force of law within the executive branch.Presidential Memoranda: Less formal than executive orders, often used for internal guidance within the executive branch or to announce policy decisions.Presidential Proclamations: Public statements that may declare national days of observance, make policy announcements, or address specific issues.National Security Directives: Classified instructions concerning national security matters, often issued by the President to relevant agencies.Signing Statements: Issued by the President when signing a bill into law, these statements outline the President's interpretation of the legislation.Presidential Determinations: Official documents used to direct federal agencies on specific policies.Presidential Directives: Broader in scope, these include Homeland Security Presidential Directives and other specific policy instructions given to executive branch officials.

I open the podcast with the Serenity Prayer and how I feel it relates to the Nation and myself. Then I talk to Jon Warner about recent events concerning the Nation. Presidential Executive Orders signed and executed. I finally ask why do we even have rules concerning who runs in Legislative elections, why bother to get signatures when you can just jump in at the last minute as a write in candidate

Washington, DC, January 30, 2024 — On this podcast episode, the National Association of County and City Health Officials' (NACCHO) Director of Government Affairs, Victoria Van de Vate, and Government Affairs Senior Specialist, Lauren Soule discuss updates on the 119th Congress and committee leadership, FY25 funding, Senate confirmation hearings, and new Presidential executive orders related to public health activities. To get more public health policy updates and to subscribe to NACCHO's News from Washington weekly newsletter, visit: www.naccho.org/advocacy/news. Contact us at govtaffairs@naccho.org.    Later in the program (8:35), Nicholas Adams, Senior Program Analyst for Environmental Health at NACCHO, concludes the five-part Food Safety series by reviewing the resources and programs shared by previous guests and highlighting NACCHO projects that support local food safety. Nicholas discusses how initiatives like the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Voluntary National Retail Food Regulatory Program Standards, the NEHA-FDA Retail Flexible Funding Model, Retail Program Standards Networks, Oral Learner Train the Trainer Program, and the Council to Improve Foodborne Illness Outbreak Response provide local health departments with the tools to create a safer food system and have a voice in national food safety conversations.  ###   About NACCHO The National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO) represents the over 3,300 local governmental health departments across the country. These city, county, metropolitan, district, and tribal departments work every day to protect and promote health and well-being for all people in their communities. For more information, visit www.naccho.org.

The boys discuss the card stock and font of the latest round of Presidential Executive Orders, Ben relates a bizarre overhead between two rich religious zealots and Lee provides on update on his ongoing neighborhood drama.

Wingman John Salak joined VERONICA LIVE to discuss President Trump's Inauguration, Biden & J6 Pardons, Presidential Executive Orders, and Florida's first ever Arctic Blast Blizzard.

President Trump issued a record number of executive orders for his first day in office. For a closer look at the power of these orders and their limits, Amna Nawaz spoke with Andrew Rudalevige, professor of government at Bowdoin College and author of "The New Imperial Presidency." PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders

President Trump promised a record number of executive orders on his first day in office. For a closer look at the power of these orders and their limits, Amna Nawaz spoke with Andrew Rudalevige, professor of government at Bowdoin College and author of "The New Imperial Presidency." PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders

Executive Orders What are they? Presidential Executive Orders are official directives issued by the President of the United States to manage and direct the operations of the federal government. They instruct federal agencies on how to implement laws and policies, and are not meant to create new laws, but provide instructions on how existing laws are to be applied and enforced. Executive orders carry the force of law and are legally binding. Other Presidential Directives Proclamations: These are often ceremonial or symbolic and lack the legal weight of Executive Orders. Presidential Memoranda: These are generally less formal and typically address internal agency matters, rather than broad policy directives. Executive Agreements: Used for international relations and do not carry the force of law within the U.S.; they also do not require Senate approval like treaties. Constitutional and Statutory Basis The President's authority to issue Executive Orders stems from Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution, which grants the President broad executive power to ensure the laws are faithfully executed. This is an implied power, not explicitly stated. Congress often passes laws that delegate specific powers to the executive branch, empowering the President to take actions necessary to implement and enforce those laws. Range and Scope Executive Orders address a wide range of issues, from national security and environmental protection to immigration and economic policy. While they cannot create new laws, they can create new policies within the scope of existing legislation and modify or reverse existing policies set by prior administrations. Executive Orders often instruct federal agencies to take specific actions to ensure their operations align with the administration's objectives. Checks and Balances Presidents can revoke or modify their own or their predecessors' Executive Orders, allowing for policy shifts with changes in administration. Congress can pass legislation to counteract or restrict the impact of an Executive Order, as long as they are acting within their constitutional authority. Courts can strike down Executive Orders that are deemed unconstitutional or that exceed the President's authority. The US government's system of checks and balances prevents the misuse of Executive Orders, involving legislative, judicial, and public opinion elements. Impact on Daily Life Executive Orders have a tangible impact on everyday life, often in ways that are not immediately obvious. The document specifically notes the effects of Executive Orders on Environmental regulations, Immigration policies, Healthcare Access, and Economic regulations. Understanding executive orders is crucial for engaged citizenship, enabling people to hold their leaders accountable. Key Facts Executive Orders are legally binding presidential directives. They are a primary tool for Presidential management of federal agencies. Executive Orders do not create new laws but guide the implementation of existing ones. They can be revoked or modified by the President. They are subject to judicial review and congressional oversight. They have a wide-ranging impact on daily life. The US Constitution does not explicitly mention Executive Orders, but they are based on an interpretation of implied executive power. Executive Orders have been used throughout US history for a variety of issues ranging from declarations of freedom to the creation of government agencies. Conclusion Executive Orders are a significant and powerful tool that Presidents use to shape national policy and federal operations. Understanding how they work, their limitations, and the checks and balances in place to prevent abuse of power is essential for all citizens. The ability of the average person to access information on the specifics of Executive Orders, and to understand them, is crucial to engaging in the democratic process and exercising effective civic responsibility. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Parole In Place is an application based on humanitarian relief principles. In this blog post, I will explain the PIP facts so you don't have to get news through the grapevine.  First, it's important to note that U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services began accepting PIP applications on the 19th of August 2024. Since then, a Federal District Judge has issued a temporary stay against the legal relief for 14 days. What does this mean? Can you still file for PIP? -- The answer is yes absolutely. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services has made it clear that they are still accepting applications over the next 14 days. After the 14-day period, it is unknown what will happen next.

EP-099 Derek Johnson on Bifurcated Legal Systems Derek Johnson pays attention. And he knows military law. Through a direct time-line of events associated with Donald Trump's Presidential Executive Orders and optical hints, Derek believes Donald Trump is still the Commander in Chief. But not the President of the United States. Yeah, it's a bit confusing, and will take an open mind to hear. However, Derek Johnson is sincere, and he has facts to back his political theory. Derek's Epic Emotional Facebook Live Rant Derek's Document Write-Ups Derek Johnson's Country Music Executive Order Federal Registry

Natural mineral may help reverse memory loss University of Queensland (Australia), February 7, 2022 Selenium—a mineral found in many foods—could reverse the cognitive impact of stroke and boost learning and memory in aging brains, according to University of Queensland research. Queensland Brain Institute (QBI) lead researcher Dr. Tara Walker said studies on the impact of exercise on the aging brain found levels of a protein key to transporting selenium in the blood were elevated by physical activity. The research team investigated whether dietary selenium supplements could replicate the effects of exercise. (NEXT) Poor sleep can triple risk for heart disease University of South Florida, February 7, 2022 Individual aspects of poor sleep can be detrimental to heart health. But if you combine them, the risk of heart disease can increase by as much as 141 percent. That's the finding of a new study published in the journal Scientific Reports. The University of South Florida-led study reviewed sleep data of 6,820 U.S. adults with an average age of 53 who self-reported their sleep characteristics and heart diseasehistory. Among the participants, 633 also wore a research device (actigraphy) around their wrist that captured sleep activity. (NEXT) Curcumin-pepper combination shows antioxidant benefits for diabetics: RCT Baqiyatallah, Shiraz and Mashhad universities (Iran), February 7, 2022 Curcumin and Piperine may reduce oxidative stress in patients suffering from type 2 diabetes, according to results of a randomized controlled trial. Clinical data published in the PubMed-listed journal Inflammopharmacology shows for the first time that the curcuminoid–piperine combination supplement may impact measures of oxidative stress in type 2 diabetes.Results showed that the curcuminoid-piperine combination resulted in an 21.9% reduction in MDA levels, compared to baseline levels, while no statistically significant changes were observed in the placebo group. In addition, the curcuminoid-piperine combination increased SOD and TAC levels by 11.6% and 21.1%, respectively, compared to baseline. On the other hand, these decreased by 12.6% and 17%, respectively in the placebo group, compared to placebo.  (VIDEOS) Here is Glen Greenwald talking with Howard Kurtz Trudeau's Brother Kyle Kemper takes Firm Stance against the Vaccine Mandate and “The Great Reset” (OTHER NEWS) Colossal Financial Pyramid: BlackRock and The WEF “Great Reset” F. William Engdahl – Global Research, June 20, 2021 A virtually unregulated investment firm today exercises more political and financial influence than the Federal Reserve and most governments on this planet. The firm, BlackRock Inc., the world's largest asset manager, invests a staggering $9 trillion in client funds worldwide, a sum more than double the annual GDP of the Federal Republic of Germany. This colossus sits atop the pyramid of world corporate ownership, including in China most recently. Since 1988 the company has put itself in a position to de facto control the Federal Reserve, most Wall Street mega-banks, including Goldman Sachs, the Davos World Economic Forum Great Reset, the Biden Administration and, if left unchecked, the economic future of our world. BlackRock is the epitome of what Mussolini called Corporatism, where an unelected corporate elite dictates top down to the population. How the world's largest “shadow bank” exercises this enormous power over the world ought to concern us. BlackRock since Larry Fink founded it in 1988 has managed to assemble unique financial software and assets that no other entity has. BlackRock's Aladdin risk-management system, a software tool that can track and analyze trading, monitors more than $18 trillion in assets for 200 financial firms including the Federal Reserve and European central banks. He who “monitors” also knows, we can imagine. BlackRock has been called a financial “Swiss Army Knife — institutional investor, money manager, private equity firm, and global government partner rolled into one.” Yet mainstream media treats the company as just another Wall Street financial firm. There is a seamless interface that ties the UN Agenda 2030 with the Davos World Economic Forum Great Reset and the nascent economic policies of the Biden Administration. That interface is BlackRock. Team Biden and BlackRock By now it should be clear to anyone who bothers to look, that the person who claims to be US President, 78-year old Joe Biden, is not making any decisions. He even has difficulty reading a teleprompter or answering prepared questions from friendly media without confusing Syria and Libya or even whether he is President. He is being micromanaged by a group of handlers to maintain a scripted “image” of a President while policy is made behind the scenes by others. It eerily reminds of the 1979 Peter Sellers film character, Chauncey Gardiner, in Being There. What is less public are the key policy persons running economic policy for Biden Inc. They are simply said, BlackRock. Much as Goldman Sachs ran economic policy under Obama and also Trump, today BlackRock is filling that key role. The deal apparently was sealed in January, 2019 when Joe Biden, then-candidate and long-shot chance to defeat Trump, went to meet with Larry Fink in New York, who reportedly told “working class Joe,” that, “I'm here to help.” Now as President in one of his first appointees, Biden named Brian Deese to be the Director of the National Economic Council, the President's main adviser for economic policy. One of the early Presidential Executive Orders dealt with economics and climate policy. That's not surprising, as Deese came from Fink's BlackRock where he was Global Head of Sustainable Investing. Before joining BlackRock, Deese held senior economic posts under Obama, including replacing John Podesta as Senior Adviser to the President where he worked alongside Valerie Jarrett. Under Obama, Deese played a key role in negotiating the Global Warming Paris Accords. In the key policy post as Deputy Treasury Secretary under Secretary Janet Yellen, we find Nigerian-born Adewale “Wally” Adeyemo. Adeyemo also comes from BlackRock where from 2017 to 2019 he was a senior adviser and Chief of Staff to BlackRock CEO Larry Fink, after leaving the Obama Administration. His personal ties to Obama are strong, as Obama named him the first President of the Obama Foundation in 2019. And a third senior BlackRock person running economic policy in the Administration now is also unusual in several respects. Michael Pyle is the Senior Economic Adviser to Vice President Kamala Harris. He came to Washington from the position as the Global Chief Investment Strategist at BlackRock where he oversaw the strategy for investing some $9 trillion of funds. Before joining BlackRock at the highest level, he had also been in the Obama Administration as a senior adviser to the Undersecretary of the Treasury for International Affairs, and in 2015 became an adviser to the Hillary Clinton presidential bid. The fact that three of the most influential economic appointees of the Biden Administration come from BlackRock, and before that all from the Obama Administration, is noteworthy. There is a definite pattern and suggests that the role of BlackRock in Washington is far larger than we are being told. What is BlackRock? Never before has a financial company with so much influence over world markets been so hidden from public scrutiny. That's no accident. As it is technically not a bank making bank loans or taking deposits, it evades the regulation oversight from the Federal Reserve even though it does what most mega banks like HSBC or JP MorganChase do—buy, sell securities for profit. When there was a Congressional push to include asset managers such as BlackRock and Vanguard Funds under the post-2008 Dodd-Frank law as “systemically important financial institutions” or SIFIs, a huge lobbying push from BlackRock ended the threat. BlackRock is essentially a law onto itself. And indeed it is “systemically important” as no other, with possible exception of Vanguard, which is said to also be a major shareholder in BlackRock. BlackRock founder and CEO Larry Fink is clearly interested in buying influence globally. He made former German CDU MP Friederich Merz head of BlackRock Germany when it looked as if he might succeed Chancellor Merkel, and former British Chancellor of Exchequer George Osborne as “political consultant.” Fink named former Hillary Clinton Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills to the BlackRock board when it seemed certain Hillary would soon be in the White House. He has named former central bankers to his board and gone on to secure lucrative contracts with their former institutions. Stanley Fisher, former head of the Bank of Israel and also later Vice Chairman of the Federal Reserve is now Senior Adviser at BlackRock. Philipp Hildebrand, former Swiss National Bank president, is vice chairman at BlackRock, where he oversees the BlackRock Investment Institute. Jean Boivin, the former deputy governor of the Bank of Canada, is the global head of research at BlackRock's investment institute. BlackRock and the Fed It was this ex-central bank team at BlackRock that developed an “emergency” bailout plan for Fed chairman Powell in March 2019 as financial markets appeared on the brink of another 2008 “Lehman crisis” meltdown. As “thank you,” the Fed chairman Jerome Powell named BlackRock in a no-bid role to manage all of the Fed's corporate bond purchase programs, including bonds where BlackRock itself invests. Conflict of interest? A group of some 30 NGOs wrote to Fed Chairman Powell, “By giving BlackRock full control of this debt buyout program, the Fed… makes BlackRock even more systemically important to the financial system. Yet BlackRock is not subject to the regulatory scrutiny of even smaller systemically important financial institutions.” In a detailed report in 2019, a Washington non-profit research group, Campaign for Accountability, noted that, “BlackRock, the world's largest asset manager, implemented a strategy of lobbying, campaign contributions, and revolving door hires to fight off government regulation and establish itself as one of the most powerful financial companies in the world.” The New York Fed hired BlackRock in March 2019 to manage its commercial mortgage-backed securities program and its $750 billion primary and secondary purchases of corporate bonds and ETFs in no-bid contracts. US financial journalists Pam and Russ Martens in critiquing that murky 2019 Fed bailout of Wall Street remarked, “for the first time in history, the Fed has hired BlackRock to “go direct” and buy up $750 billion in both primary and secondary corporate bonds and bond ETFs (Exchange Traded Funds), a product of which BlackRock is one of the largest purveyors in the world.” They went on, “Adding further outrage, the BlackRock-run program will get $75 billion of the $454 billion in taxpayers' money to eat the losses on its corporate bond purchases, which will include its own ETFs, which the Fed is allowing it to buy…” Fed head Jerome Powell and Larry Fink know each other well, apparently. Even after Powell gave BlackRock the hugely lucrative no-bid “go direct” deal, Powell continued to have the same BlackRock manage an estimated $25 million of Powell's private securities investments. Public records show that in this time Powell held direct confidential phone calls with BlackRock CEO Fink. According to required financial disclosure, BlackRock managed to double the value of Powell's investments from the year before! No conflict of interest, or? A Very BlackRock in Mexico BlackRock's murky history in Mexico shows that conflicts of interest and influence-building with leading government agencies is not restricted to just the USA. PRI Presidential candidate Peña Nieto went to Wall Street during his campaign in November 2011. There he met Larry Fink. What followed the Nieto victory in 2012 was a tight relationship between Fink and Nieto that was riddled with conflict of interest, cronyism and corruption. Most likely to be certain BlackRock was on the winning side in the corrupt new Nieto regime, Fink named 52-year-old Marcos Antonio Slim Domit, billionaire son of Mexico's wealthiest and arguably most corrupt man, Carlos Slim, to BlackRock's Board. Marcos Antonio, along with his brother Carlos Slim Domit, run the father's huge business empire today. Carlos Slim Domit, the eldest son, was Co-Chair of the World Economic Forum Latin America in 2015, and currently serves as chairman of the board of America Movil where BlackRock is a major investor. Small cozy world. The father, Carlos Slim, at the time named by Forbes as World's Richest Person, built an empire based around his sweetheart acquisition of Telemex (later America Movil). Then President, Carlos Salinas de Gortari, in effect gifted the telecom empire to Slim in 1989. Salinas later fled Mexico on charges of stealing more than $10 billion from state coffers. As with much in Mexico since the 1980s drug money apparently played a huge role with the elder Carlos Slim, father of BlackRock director Marcos Slim. In 2015 WikiLeaks released company internal emails from the private intelligence corporation, Stratfor. Stratfor writes in an April 2011 email, the time BlackRock is establishing its Mexico plans, that a US DEA Special Agent, William F. Dionne confirmed Carlos Slim's ties to the Mexican drug cartels. Stratfor asks Dionne, “Billy, is the MX (Mexican) billionaire Carlos Slim linked to the narcos?” Dionne replies, “Regarding your question, the MX telecommunication billionaire is.” In a country where 44% of the population lives in poverty you don't become the world's richest man in just two decades selling Girl Scout cookies. Fink and Mexican PPP With Marcos Slim on his BlackRock board and new president Enrique Peña Nieto, Larry Fink's Mexican partner in Nieto Peña's $590 billion PublicPrivatePartnership (PPP) alliance, BlackRock, was ready to reap the harvest. To fine-tune his new Mexican operations, Fink named former Mexican Undersecretary of Finance Gerardo Rodriguez Regordosa to direct BlackRock Emerging Market Strategy in 2013. Then in 2016 Peña Nieto appointed Isaac Volin, then head of BlackRock Mexico to be No. 2 at PEMEX where he presided over corruption, scandals and the largest loss in PEMEX history, $38 billion. Peña Nieto had opened the huge oil state monopoly, PEMEX, to private investors for the first time since nationalization in the 1930s. The first to benefit was Fink's BlackRock. Within seven months, BlackRock had secured $1 billion in PEMEX energy projects, many as the only bidder. During the tenure of Peña Nieto, one of the most controversial and least popular presidents, BlackRock prospered by the cozy ties. It soon was engaged in highly profitable (and corrupt) infrastructure projects under Peña Nieto including not only oil and gas pipelines and wells but also including toll roads, hospitals, gas pipelines and even prisons. Notably, BlackRock's Mexican “friend” Peña Nieto was also “friends” not only with Carlos Slim but with the head of the notorious Sinaloa Cartel, “El Chapo” Guzman. In court testimony in 2019 in New York Alex Cifuentes, a Colombian drug lord who has described himself as El Chapo's “right-hand man,” testified that just after his election in 2012, Peña Nieto had requested $250 million from the Sinaloa Cartel before settling on $100 million. We can only guess what for. Larry Fink and WEF Great Reset In 2019 Larry Fink joined the Board of the Davos World Economic Forum, the Swiss-based organization that for some 40 years has advanced economic globalization. Fink, who is close to the WEF's technocrat head, Klaus Schwab, of Great Reset notoriety, now stands positioned to use the huge weight of BlackRock to create what is potentially, if it doesn't collapse before, the world's largest Ponzi scam, ESG corporate investing. Fink with $9 trillion to leverage is pushing the greatest shift of capital in history into a scam known as ESG Investing. The UN “sustainable economy” agenda is being realized quietly by the very same global banks which have created the financial crises in 2008. This time they are preparing the Klaus Schwab WEF Great Reset by steering hundreds of billions and soon trillions in investment to their hand-picked “woke” companies, and away from the “not woke” such as oil and gas companies or coal. BlackRock since 2018 has been in the forefront to create a new investment infrastructure that picks “winners” or “losers” for investment according to how serious that company is about ESG—Environment, Social values and Governance. For example a company gets positive ratings for the seriousness of its hiring gender diverse management and employees, or takes measures to eliminate their carbon “footprint” by making their energy sources green or sustainable to use the UN term. How corporations contribute to a global sustainable governance is the most vague of the ESG, and could include anything from corporate donations to Black Lives Matter to supporting UN agencies such as WHO. Oil companies like ExxonMobil or coal companies no matter how clear are doomed as Fink and friends now promote their financial Great Reset or Green New Deal. This is why he cut a deal with the Biden presidency in 2019. Follow the money. And we can expect that the New York Times will cheer BlackRock on as it destroys the world financial structures. Since 2017 BlackRock has been the paper's largest shareholder. Carlos Slim was second largest. Even Carl Icahn, a ruthless Wall Street asset stripper, once called BlackRock, “an extremely dangerous company… I used to say, you know, the mafia has a better code of ethics than you guys.” (NEXT) Can Joe Rogan Save Free Speech? Jonathan Turley, February 3, 2022 Below is my column on the campaign to cancel Joe Rogan and his podcast. Various celebrities and artists have joined the movement for censoring Joe Rogan, including Mary Trump. The White House has called for even greater action from Spotify to limit or remove content. We have also heard the same false narrative that, since the First Amendment only covers government action, this is not by definition a free speech issue. The argument is entirely divorced from any understanding of free speech. As we have previously discussed, the First Amendment is not the full or exclusive embodiment of free speech. It addresses just one of the dangers to free speech posed by government regulation. Many of us view free speech as a human right. Corporate censorship of social media clearly impacts free speech, and replacing Big Brother with a cadre of Little Brothers actually allows for far greater control of free expression. When it comes to media, information or social media platforms, corporate censorship can have a devastating impact on free speech. For Spotify, the choice between Rogan's 11 million listeners or an aging rocker was economically clear, even with other artists threatening to pull their music from the platform. The music side of Spotify is reportedly not making much revenue, but Rogan and podcasts are a cash machine. Spotify now has 365 million subscribers and its advertising revenues have doubled with the help of the podcast market. Revenue from podcasts is up a staggering 627 percent on Spotify. However, even if the company was not motivated by its better angels, that may actually be better news for free speech. The free-fall of free speech has largely been due to greed. Companies see no profit in defending dissenting viewpoints. Now, for the first time, the economics may have actually worked against censorship and for free speech. At least in this instance, to paraphrase “Wall Street's” Gordon Gekko, “Greed is good” for free speech. The famous economist Arthur Cecil Pigou once explained that corporations are not “social” but market creatures moved by profits, not principles. No matter how “woke” many companies may appear, there is an economic calculation behind corporate action. Most companies yield to demands because it is wealth-maximizing. There was a calculation that woke statements or censorship policies would protect a company from protests while opposing customers would still want its product. That calculation has been a disaster for free speech. The First Amendment only addresses the primary threat that existed in the 18th century against free speech: the government. It does not limit private companies, which have free speech rights like individuals. Activists and politicians used that blind spot to do indirectly what they could not do directly in censoring opposing viewpoints. Democratic leaders, including President Biden, have encouraged companies to expand what they euphemistically call “content modification” to block dissenting views on vaccines, election integrity, global warming, gender identity and a range of other issues. As a result, social media companies and other corporations now regulate speech in the United States to a degree that an actual state media would struggle to replicate. Faced with a growing cancel culture, companies are scrubbing their platforms of dissenting viewpoints and converting forums into echo chambers. Rogan's popularity is precisely due to the fact that he is uncensored in what he says. As many networks and newspapers have become more of an echo chamber, viewers and readers have fled en masse. Trust in the media has fallen to just 46 percent and as low as 40 percent in recent polling. While Young reportedly relies on Spotify for 60 percent of his royalty income, Spotify does not rely on Young or other rock stars for its primary profits. It is the reverse of market conditions from just a couple years ago. While Rogan has promised to be more careful in how information is presented on his show (and Spotify will add “advisories” on podcasts), his podcast survived the celebrity onslaught. As various investors seek to create free speech alternatives to Twitter and YouTube, there may be an emerging market for free speech products. This does not mean that Joe Rogan is the new Thomas Paine or that this small skirmish is a turning point in the war over free speech. Indeed, the campaign continues against Spotify. However, with the explosion of corporate censorship, free speech advocates have begun to look at figures like Rogan as “super survivors,” people who seem to have natural immunities protecting them from an otherwise lethal threat. If we can replicate those economic antibodies, we just might be able to develop a protection against censorship and the cancel culture.

The break neck pace of new Presidential Executive Orders is turning toward health care. Congress is pulling out long planned legislation and slipping it in omnibus packages with thousands of pages that can't possibly be properly vetted let along read and studied. Beware the of stealth takeover of healthcare - it is happening right before our eyes. Host Dr. Hal Scherz unpacks the policies that are hidden in plan site.

Today InPerspective with Dr. Harry Reeder February 1, 2021

Today InPerspective with Dr. Harry Reeder February 1, 2021

We have become accustomed to seeing our Presidents issue Executive Orders. They range from fairly mundane to incredibly controversial. So where does the authority come from for the President to simple issue and Executive Order and create a law? Find our where that authority comes from and more in this episode of Civil Dis-Course Please subscribe for more episodes! --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/jake-gudde/support

Ron Howrigon is back in the virtual studio to analyze Donald Trump’s 4200-word “doctrine” for a new healthcare system, created by Presidential Executive Orders [his words, not ours.] We also look at Biden’s “Strive for Five” healthcare tweaks to Obamacare and beyond. Lastly, we discuss how both candidates may have to modify their healthcare platforms based on the fate of Obamacare in the Supreme Court. In this episode, we lay out the two most likely scenarios…

This week, in part two, we are speaking with Dr. Peter Vincent Pry. He is the Executive Director of the EMP Task Force on National and Homeland Security. We discuss the two Presidential Executive Orders since March of 2019 and why it is so important to ensure they are implemented. In Part two we also discuss the threats to our nation through nefarious acts by the Chinese, Iran, N. Korea and Russia. Weapons of Mass Destruction come in many forms, and where are our political and military leader heads at?Links Guest Links Website: https://emptaskforce.us/Books referred to in interview:The Power And The Light: The Congressional EMP Commission's War To Save America 2001-2020 https://amzn.to/35OWFvoThe first Congressional EMP Task Force Reports (ALL): http://www.firstempcommission.org/Website: https://civildefenseradio.com/Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CivilDefenseRadioTwitter: https://twitter.com/Civil_Def_RadioAdvertisersPlease send us a note via our website for specifics on where to get the best essential oils for your emergency kit: www.civildefenseradio.com/Contact

This week , in part one, we are speaking with Dr. Peter Vincent Pry. He is the Executive Director of the EMP Task Force on National and Homeland Security. We discuss the two Presidential Executive Orders since March of 2019 and why it is so important to ensure they are implemented. In Part two we also discuss the threats to our nation through nefarious acts by the Chinese, Iran, N. Korea and Russia. Weapons of Mass Destruction come in many forms, and where are our political and military leader heads at?Links Guest Links Website: https://emptaskforce.us/Books referred to in interview:The Power And The Light: The Congressional EMP Commission's War To Save America 2001-2020 https://amzn.to/35OWFvoThe first Congressional EMP Task Force Reports (ALL): http://www.firstempcommission.org/Website: https://civildefenseradio.com/Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CivilDefenseRadioTwitter: https://twitter.com/Civil_Def_RadioAdvertisersPlease send us a note via our website for specifics on where to get the best essential oils for your emergency kit: www.civildefenseradio.com/Contact

Boondoggle regular Florence Whitengale joins Bill in this episode to discuss and vent about current events involving COVID-19, Nationwide Lockdowns, and FEMA Camps. Once again making the most of their time on COVID-19 Lockdown, creating more music for their upcoming release The PANDEMIC Party Mixtape Vol. 1. Bill and Flo also talk about Presidential Executive Orders while reading from William Coopers book BEHOLD A PALE HORSE, and how some of the warnings Bill Cooper tried giving the American People in his book are lining up with events taking place in our country and government today. So tune in and get educated as only Bill and Flo can try and teach you. Enjoy our additional segments featuring music from the Flo White Show and Stories from the VFW Hall. Please subscribe and give 5 stars and review. Every review we receive on either Apple Podcast or Google Music we will mention you on a future episode and our Social Media pages. Follow Today's Boondoggle  also on our Social Media as well as  DomainCle.com and on Anchor.fm Also please consider financially supporting us so we can continue to provide you with quality entertainment. --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/domain-cleveland/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/domain-cleveland/support

Boondoggle regular Florence Whitengale joins Bill in this episode to discuss and vent about current events involving COVID-19, Nationwide Lockdowns, and FEMA Camps. Once again making the most of their time on COVID-19 Lockdown, creating more music for their upcoming release The PANDEMIC Party Mixtape Vol. 1. Bill and Flo also talk about Presidential Executive Orders while reading from William Coopers book BEHOLD A PALE HORSE, and how some of the warnings Bill Cooper tried giving the American People in his book are lining up with events taking place in our country and government today. So tune in and get educated as only Bill and Flo can try and teach you. Enjoy our additional segments featuring music from the Flo White Show and Stories from the VFW Hall. Please subscribe and give 5 stars and review. Every review we receive on either Apple Podcast or Google Music we will mention you on a future episode and our Social Media pages. Follow Today's Boondoggle  also on our Social Media as well as  DomainCle.com and on Anchor.fm Also please consider financially supporting us so we can continue to provide you with quality entertainment. --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/domain-cleveland/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/domain-cleveland/support

Picked up Florida Irma's coming to give you a blow job. Women are now the sexist ones. Presidential Executive Orders, can be reversed in a New York Minute.

This week in the Law School Insider we are bringing you Brendan Beery, Professor of Law at Western Michigan University Cooley Law School. We talk to Professor Beery about the field of Constitutional Law, especially in relation to some of the actions of the new President of the United States.

The crew is back and better than ever! Again, thanks for all the support and welcome new listeners. This episode we discuss a couple of the Presidential Executive Orders and how to slide in DMs! We're having a contest, slide into J. Wells' DM on IG @msjnc fellas and see if you can grab her attention. Don't come at her weak or you'll get laughed at... As always, the email is open for questions and comments TheTwoCentsPCast@gmail.com

FRIDAY WITH FRITZ is a new and occasional addition to FritzCast. Friday With Fritz will typically be a smaller episode, and more focused on one or two topics rather than tackling a whole weeks worth of information. IN THIS Friday With Fritz: How many Executive Order's do you think President Trump has signed? You may think he has signed many, but the news has been slightly misleading. I specifically look over the current Presidential Executive Orders and Memorandums. MONDAY will bring an episode that looks at the difference between Executive Order and Memorandum. If you'd like your thoughts shared on Monday's programs, comment on this track, Tweet @FritzQS, Post on the FaceBook page (https://www.facebook.com/TheFritzCast/) or e-mail fritzcastpodcast@gmail.com. Music by: www.bensound.com

Tonight Shepherdess Celeste who has a background in medicine and government digs into the new 88 page CDC/HHS regulation on Communicable Diseases and how it will impact your life. Interstate travel restrictionsForced medical examsMandatory vaccinationsElectronic surveillance including wearable technolgiesPersonal coercsion into a contractual agreement with the federal government, including agreeing to implement all Presidential Executive Orders and Congressional Acts to be "free" And more...tonight at 6 PM MT Shepherdess Celeste will gladly take your calls and questions on this dangerous turn of events. 

1st hour: Chuck Morse discusses the threat associated with the Ebola Virus, the history of Presidential Executive Orders and the Mid-Term Election. 2nd hour: Chuck Morse interviews Carrie Stuart Parks, author of "A Cry from the Dust" a historic fiction involving the 1857 The Mountain Meadows Massacre, a slaughter of pioneers by a secretive Mormon group the Avenging Angels. Website: http://www.carriestuartparks.com/