POPULARITY
9 episodes with learning resources
5 episodes with learning resources
5 episodes with learning resources
4 episodes with learning resources
3 episodes with learning resources
3 episodes with learning resources
2 episodes with learning resources
2 episodes with learning resources
2 episodes with learning resources
It's November 19th, 2025, and if you've been following the headlines, you know the name Donald Trump has been front and center—once again, dominating courtroom news across the nation. Just yesterday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a pair of consolidated cases involving “Trump, President of the United States versus V.O.S. Selections, Inc.” and "Learning Resources, Inc. versus Trump, President of the United States.” According to the official Supreme Court November calendar, the energy in the courtroom was electric as the justices pressed both sides on issues ranging from executive authority to civil liberties. Legal analysts rushed out of the chamber, some shaking their heads, others feverishly texting updates as arguments wrapped up after more than an hour of fierce debate.While the Supreme Court scene drew the spotlight, several other federal courtrooms have been just as heated over the past few days. Polico and Lawfare have both highlighted the growing drama as an appeals court panel is considering a hefty million-dollar penalty against Trump for what they describe as a “frivolous lawsuit” targeting Hillary Clinton. One judge on the panel openly questioned Trump's legal strategy, asking pointedly whether his effort to revive the lawsuit was “bad faith” litigation. Analysts said the former president's moves in the courtroom seem as much about making headlines as about winning legal victories, and this latest run-in with an appeals court could make history if the million-dollar penalty is upheld.But that's far from the only legal battle roiling the Trump orbit. Just Security notes that a slew of ongoing lawsuits have tested the limits of Trump's executive power since he returned to office earlier this year. Most notably, litigation over his controversial executive orders targeting prominent law firms—orders that called for curtailing their government contracts and suspending employees' security clearances—has drawn intense scrutiny from judges and civil rights advocates. A federal court in Washington is still weighing whether to permanently block these orders, and legal experts say the final ruling could have far-reaching implications for the separation of powers and for how presidents can respond to perceived political enemies.On the civil rights front, court challenges continue to mount against Trump's bans affecting healthcare for transgender youth and restrictions on “gender ideology” in federal programs. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts and advocacy groups like PFLAG are suing the Trump administration in what they call a fight for constitutional rights. With temporary injunctions in place and permanent rulings pending, the nation is watching closely to see how these legal battles play out—and what precedents they will set for years to come.All the while, outside the courthouses, protestors and supporters vie for attention, their voices echoing through the marble corridors and onto the evening news.Thanks for tuning in to this week's update on the unfolding Trump court dramas. Be sure to join us next week for more as the legal fireworks continue. This has been a Quiet Please production—visit Quiet Please Dot A I for more stories like this.Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3QsFor more check out http://www.quietplease.aiThis content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI
Tax Notes managing legal reporter Caitlin Mullaney explores the Supreme Court's oral arguments in V.O.S. Selections and Learning Resources and predicts whether the Court will strike down President Trump's tariffs. For related tax news, read the following in Tax Notes:Michigan Agencies Forecast Tariff Impacts on Prices, JobsSupreme Court Justices Question Trump's IEEPA TariffsTrump-Xi Summit Yields Lower Tariffs All Around**This episode is sponsored by Avalara. For more information, visit avalara.com.***CreditsHost: David D. StewartExecutive Producers: Jeanne Rauch-Zender, Paige JonesProducers: Jordan Parrish, Peyton RhodesAudio Engineers: Jordan Parrish, Peyton Rhodes****Nominate someone for the Tax Analysts Award of Distinction in U.S. Federal Taxation! For more information, visit awards.taxanalysts.org.
We're digging deep this week at the Armchair Attorney® Podcast as we dive into two Supreme Court cases. The first case is Learning Resources, Inc. v Trump. At issue is whether IEEPA authorizes the use of tariffs, and if it does, did Congress unconstitutionally delegate that power to the President? Oral arguments were last week, we'll discuss! The next case is Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC, which will determine whether federal law preempts state-law claims against freight brokers for negligently selecting a motor carrier. Broker liability! This case is significant because different federal circuits have had conflicting rulings on the issue, and the Supreme Court's decision is expected to create a unified standard for all brokers nationwide.This program is brought to you by DAT Freight & Analytics. Since 1978, DAT has helped truckers & brokers discover more available loads. Whether you're heading home or looking for your next adventure, DAT is building the most trusted marketplace in freight. New users of DAT can save 10% off for the first 12 months by following the link below. Built on the latest technology, DAT One gives you control over every aspect of moving freight, so that you can run your business with speed & efficiency. This program is also brought to you by our newest sponsor, GenLogs. GenLogs is setting a new standard of care for freight intelligence. Book your demo for GenLogs today at www.genlogs.io today!
The economy, trillions of dollars, and consequences unknown are on the line in the tarrifs case, Learning Resources v. Trump. We present the justices and the advocates in their own voices from the oral argument, and Akhil reacts in real time as he hears the clips for the first time. It's a three hour argument, so this is the first of a two-parter. The Court's recent doctrines, including major questions and non-delegation are in play, perhaps, and therefore many are watching this case closely for consistency vs politics in the Court itself. And of course there's history and constitutional issues at stake, so we are right at home. Join us! CLE is available for lawyers and judges from podcast.njsba.com.
This week, Paul and Mesh begin with Alls Fair, Ryan Murphy's star-studded, critically-panned over-the-top legal drama streaming on Hulu and a ranking of their top legal dramas. Next, they discuss England's recently-announced education reforms which were, in part, receptive to Ed Sheeran's call for educators to embrace teaching music in the classroom. Finally, Paul provides a high-level recap of Learning Resources v. Trump, a recent case argued before the Supreme Court in which the government justifies trade tariffs as a necessary exercise of emergency powers. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
On this episode: The Supreme Court is considering a major separation-of-powers case that could redefine the limits of presidential authority during national emergencies, and help define what exactly constitutes a national emergency. Learning Resources v. Trump challenges President Trump's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose sweeping tariffs on nearly every U.S. trading partner — tariffs justified largely by declaring a series of national emergencies.At issue is whether the law gives the president the power to impose tariffs without explicit congressional approval, and how far courts can go in reviewing those emergency declarations. Elizabeth ‘Liza' Goitein, senior director of the Brennan Center's Liberty and National Security Program, explains the oral arguments made on November 5th, how their eventual decision could affect Trump's signature policy and future presidents, and what the ruling might mean for the balance of power between Congress and the Executive Branch.Learn more about the case: https://ballotpedia.org/Learning_Resources,_Inc._v._Trump Read Liza's analysis: https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/whats-stake-supreme-court-tariffs-case Complete a brief 5 minute survey to review the show and share some feedback: https://forms.gle/zPxYSog5civyvEKX6 Sign up for our Newsletters: https://ballotpedia.org/Ballotpedia_Email_Updates Stream "On the Ballot" on Spotify or wherever you listen to podcasts. If you have questions, comments, or love for BP, feel free to reach out at ontheballot@ballotpedia.org or on X (formerly Twitter) @Ballotpedia.*On The Ballot is a conversational podcast featuring interviews with guests across the political spectrum. The views and opinions expressed by them are solely their own and are not representative of the views of the host or Ballotpedia as a whole.
Live from Crooked Con in Washington, Leah, Kate, and Melissa unpack the surprisingly not-awful oral arguments for Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, which put the president's tariffs in the hot seat. Then the hosts are joined by Representative LaMonica McIver of New Jersey to discuss the bogus charges against her for “assaulting” federal agents while conducting an oversight visit of an ICE detention center. Finally, friend of the pod Steve Vladeck joins Leah to break down the 3D chess behind Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's Friday night order granting an administrative stay in a case about the funding of SNAP benefits. Read Steve's excellent piece on the subject here, and enter Leah's Lawless giveaway here.Favorite Things:Kate: Judge Sara Ellis's reading of Chicago by Carl Sandburg; How to Be a Good Citizen When Your Country Does Bad Things, M. Gessen (NYT); The 25 Young(ish) New Democrats to Watch, Matt Stieb and Kaleigh Rogers (New York Magazine)Leah: Zohran Mamdani's Victory SpeechMelissa: The Can't Win Victory Fund Get tickets for STRICT SCRUTINY LIVE – The Bad Decisions Tour 2025! 3/6/26 – San Francisco3/7/26 – Los AngelesLearn more: http://crooked.com/events Order your copy of Leah's book, Lawless: How the Supreme Court Runs on Conservative Grievance, Fringe Theories, and Bad VibesFollow us on Instagram, Threads, and Bluesky Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
Full audio of the Supreme Court oral argument in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump (No. 24-1287), argued November 5, 2025. This high-stakes case tests whether the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) authorizes President Trump's use of national emergency declarations to impose broad import tariffs—and, if so, whether that sweeping authority is an unconstitutional delegation of Congress's taxing power. The Justices press both sides on statutory text, separation of powers, and the limits of executive economic "emergency" authority in a case with massive implications for trade, small businesses, and presidential power. Check out the official Crime Talk merch at the Crime Talk Store: scottreisch.com/crime-talk-store. #LearningResourcesvTrump #SCOTUS #SupremeCourt #Tariffs #SeparationOfPowers #CrimeTalk
The Republican-appointed Supreme Court justices have been treating the Trump administration with such extreme deference that we were honestly a little flummoxed listening to this week's arguments over his “Liberation Day” tariffs. Shockingly, during Wednesday's arguments in Learning Resources v. Trump and Trump v. V.O.S. Selections, it seemed like the justices were in fact, concerned with presidential overreach. But was this a true bridge-too-far-moment, or were they more concerned about their own pocketbooks? This week, Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern discussed the arguments with Marc Busch, the Karl F. Landegger Professor of International Business Diplomacy at the Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University. Busch is an expert on international trade policy and law, and signed onto an amicus brief on behalf of trade scholars explaining the history and context of IEEPA. Want more Amicus? Join Slate Plus to unlock weekly bonus episodes with exclusive legal analysis. Plus, you'll access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. You can subscribe directly from the Amicus show page on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Or, visit slate.com/amicusplus to get access wherever you listen. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
The Republican-appointed Supreme Court justices have been treating the Trump administration with such extreme deference that we were honestly a little flummoxed listening to this week's arguments over his “Liberation Day” tariffs. Shockingly, during Wednesday's arguments in Learning Resources v. Trump and Trump v. V.O.S. Selections, it seemed like the justices were in fact, concerned with presidential overreach. But was this a true bridge-too-far-moment, or were they more concerned about their own pocketbooks? This week, Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern discussed the arguments with Marc Busch, the Karl F. Landegger Professor of International Business Diplomacy at the Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University. Busch is an expert on international trade policy and law, and signed onto an amicus brief on behalf of trade scholars explaining the history and context of IEEPA. Want more Amicus? Join Slate Plus to unlock weekly bonus episodes with exclusive legal analysis. Plus, you'll access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. You can subscribe directly from the Amicus show page on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Or, visit slate.com/amicusplus to get access wherever you listen. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
The Republican-appointed Supreme Court justices have been treating the Trump administration with such extreme deference that we were honestly a little flummoxed listening to this week's arguments over his “Liberation Day” tariffs. Shockingly, during Wednesday's arguments in Learning Resources v. Trump and Trump v. V.O.S. Selections, it seemed like the justices were in fact, concerned with presidential overreach. But was this a true bridge-too-far-moment, or were they more concerned about their own pocketbooks? This week, Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern discussed the arguments with Marc Busch, the Karl F. Landegger Professor of International Business Diplomacy at the Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University. Busch is an expert on international trade policy and law, and signed onto an amicus brief on behalf of trade scholars explaining the history and context of IEEPA. Want more Amicus? Join Slate Plus to unlock weekly bonus episodes with exclusive legal analysis. Plus, you'll access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. You can subscribe directly from the Amicus show page on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Or, visit slate.com/amicusplus to get access wherever you listen. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
OA1205 - It's another good news Friday! Voting rights expert Jenessa runs down some of the highlights of the off-year blue sweep in this week's elections, as well as some recent unsung national victories for voting and disability rights. Matt then checks in on the Supreme Court's oral arguments from the challenge to Trump's unprecedented tariffs and why it is looking like he might actually lose his administration's first attempt to defend one of his second administration's policies on the merits. Finally, in today's footnote: Why a federal judge recently decided that a lawsuit brought by the man whose penis was once featured on the cover of the most important albums of 1990s smelled like summary judgment. Supreme Court oral arguments in Learning Resources, Inc v. Trump (11/5/2025) The International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) of 1977 “Regulating Imports with a Reciprocal Tariff to Rectify Trade Pratcies that Contribute to Large and Persistent Annual United States Goods Trade Deficits,” The White House (4/2/2025)(executive order on tariffs) Solicitor General John Sauer's brief in Learning Resources Plaintiff's second amended complaint in Elden v. Nirvana LLC et al D.C. federal judge Coleen Kollar-Kotelly's opinion in combined litigation challenging Trump's executive order on citizenship requirements for voting (10/31/25) DC federal judge Amir Ali's order in National Association of the Deaf v. Trump (11/4/25) Order granting defendants' motion for summary judgment in Elden v. Nirvana, LLC (9/30/2025)
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the consolidated cases of Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump and Trump v. V.O.S. Selections, Inc., both of which challenged some of the president's authority to unilaterally issue foreign duties. Trump has justified his broad “reciprocal tariffs” on U.S trading partners by declaring a national emergency under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which prompted the legal challenges. The court's decision could set the precedent for presidential authority over trade and the use of emergency powers.Ad-free podcasts are here!To listen to this podcast ad-free, and to enjoy our subscriber only premium content, go to ReadTangle.com to sign up!You can read today's podcast here, our “Under the Radar” story here and today's “Have a nice day” story here.You can subscribe to Tangle by clicking here or drop something in our tip jar by clicking here. Take the survey: How do you think the Supreme Court will rule? Let us know.Disagree? That's okay. My opinion is just one of many. Write in and let us know why, and we'll consider publishing your feedback.Our Executive Editor and Founder is Isaac Saul. Our Executive Producer is Jon Lall.This podcast was written by: Isaac Saul and edited and engineered by Dewey Thomas. Music for the podcast was produced by Diet 75.Our newsletter is edited by Managing Editor Ari Weitzman, Senior Editor Will Kaback, Lindsey Knuth, Kendall White, Bailey Saul, and Audrey Moorehead. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
The American nation faces a legal question of existential dimensions tomorrow in oral argument before the US Supreme Court on the scope of the power of the President to exercise emergency tariff powers as delegated to him by Congress.The oral argument combines two separate cases that have been working their way through the inferior federal courts: Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump (24-1287), Trump v. V.O.S. Selections (25A327).Will the Supreme Court rule, correctly, that the democratically elected Article II Executive Branch President Donald J. Trump, to whom the Article I Congress has delegated emergency tariff powers, has the authority to leverage those tariffs to address and mitigate the nation's trade and other international emergencies? Or will a series of unelected, black-robed, tyrannical, inferior, district trial court judges, happily acceding to the political will of the anti-American Progressive Fascists win in their feckless argument that American commerce must instead be subject to manipulation and exploitation by scores of foreign and hostile nations?
Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, President of U.S. | 11/05/25 | Docket #: 24-1287 24-1287 LEARNING RESOURCES, INC. V. TRUMP DECISION BELOW: THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI BEFORE JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. CONSOLIDATED WITH 25-250 FOR ONE HOUR ORAL ARGUMENT. EXPEDITED BRIEFING. THE CASES WILL BE SET FOR ARGUMENT IN THE FIRST WEEK OF THE NOVEMBER 2025 ARGUMENT SESSION. CERT. GRANTED 9/9/2025 QUESTION PRESENTED: The International Emergency Economic Powers Act, 50 U.S.C. § 1701 et seq. ("IEEPA") permits the President, upon a valid emergency declaration, to "investigate, block during the pendency of an investigation, regulate, direct and compel, nullify, void, prevent or prohibit, any acquisition, holding, withholding, use, transfer, withdrawal, transportation, importation or exportation of, or dealing in, or exercising any right, power, or privilege with respect to, or transactions involving, any property in which any foreign country or a national thereof has any interest[.]" Id. § l 702(a)(1)(B). Until now, no President in IEEPA's nearly 50-year history has ever invoked it to impose tariffs-let alone the sweeping worldwide tariffs imposed pursuant to the executive orders challenged here. The question presented is: Whether IEEPA authorizes the President to impose tariffs. LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: 25-5202
International Bankruptcy, Restructuring, True Crime and Appeals - Court Audio Recording Podcast
From the U.S. Supreme Court website: supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/audio/2025/24-1287
Desde la llegada de Donald Trump al poder, los aranceles impuestos por su administración han generado un profundo impacto en la economía global, afectando tanto a gobiernos como a empresas de distintos tamaños. Para muchas corporaciones, adaptarse a las nuevas tarifas comerciales ha representado uno de los mayores desafíos del año 2025. En un inicio, la incertidumbre giraba en torno a cómo reaccionarían las grandes compañías estadounidenses ante estas medidas. Sin embargo, gigantes tecnológicos como Nvidia, Google o Meta optaron por incrementar sus inversiones dentro del país, trasladando parte de su producción desde el extranjero hacia territorio norteamericano para esquivar los costos adicionales derivados de los aranceles. A pesar de que la atención mediática se ha centrado en las estrategias de las grandes corporaciones, el impacto real se ha sentido con mayor crudeza en las pequeñas y medianas empresas. Estas compañías carecen de los recursos financieros necesarios para adaptarse con rapidez a los cambios impuestos por la política comercial de Trump. Un ejemplo claro es el de Learning Resources, una empresa familiar dedicada a la fabricación de juguetes educativos. Su director ejecutivo, Rick Woldenberg, ha llevado su caso ante la justicia, denunciando los perjuicios económicos que los aranceles han provocado en su negocio. Junto con el bufete Akin Gump, Woldenberg asistió a las audiencias del Tribunal Supremo, donde los jueces comenzaron a cuestionar la legitimidad del uso de la Ley de Poderes Económicos de Emergencia Internacional para justificar estas medidas. El reclamo principal de Woldenberg es sencillo: exige que el gobierno le devuelva el dinero perdido a causa de los gravámenes. Aunque algunos magistrados mostraron una postura crítica hacia el alcance de la autoridad presidencial en materia comercial, cualquier cambio legal tomará tiempo en concretarse. Mientras tanto, cientos de empresas pequeñas continúan luchando por sobrevivir ante la presión económica. A diferencia de las grandes multinacionales, carecen de la liquidez necesaria para trasladar su producción o absorber los costos adicionales. Otro caso emblemático es el de Micro Kits, una empresa que fabrica juguetes y sintetizadores educativos. Su fundador, David Levi, también presentó una demanda, argumentando que su compañía depende de los chips importados desde China. Cuando en primavera los aranceles sobre estos componentes superaron el 100%, se vio obligado a suspender las importaciones, afectando gravemente su producción. Historias como la suya reflejan la incertidumbre que enfrentan miles de pequeñas empresas familiares, que ahora temen que las políticas arancelarias de Trump puedan marcar el comienzo de su fin.
A case in which the Court will decide whether the International Emergency Powers Act, 50 U.S.C. § 1701 (“IEEPA”), permits the president to impose tariffs.
Executive Power: May the President address the balance of trade by imposing tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act? - Argued: Wed, 05 Nov 2025 18:58:48 EDT
Each month, a panel of constitutional experts convenes to discuss the Court’s upcoming docket sitting by sitting. The cases covered in this preview are listed below.Rico v. U.S. (November 3) - Fugitive-Tolling; Issue(s): Whether the fugitive-tolling doctrine applies in the context of supervised release.Hencely v. Fluor Corporation (November 4) - Federal Tort Claims Act;Issue(s): Whether Boyle v. United Technologies Corp. should be extended to allow federal interests emanating from the Federal Tort Claims Act’s combatant-activities exception to preempt state tort claims against a government contractor for conduct that breached its contract and violated military orders.The Hain Celestial Group v. Palmquist (November 4) - Civil Procedure; Issue(s): Whether a district court's final judgment as to completely diverse parties must be vacated when an appellate court later determines that it erred by dismissing a non-diverse party at the time of removal.Coney Island Auto Parts Unlimited v. Burton (November 5) - Civil Procedure; Issue(s): Whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(c)(1) imposes any time limit to set aside a void default judgment for lack of personal jurisdiction.Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump (November 5) - Tariffs, IEEPA; Issue (s): Whether the International Emergency Economic Powers Act authorizes the president to impose tariffs.The GEO Group v. Menocal (November 10) - Sovereign Immunity; Issue(s): Whether an order denying a government contractor’s claim of derivative sovereign immunity is immediately appealable under the collateral-order doctrine.Landor v. Louisiana Department of Corrections and Public Safety (November 10) - Civil Rights; Issue(s): Whether an individual may sue a government official in his individual capacity for damages for violations of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000.Rutherford v. U.S. (November 12) - First Step Act; Issue(s): Whether a district court may consider disparities created by the First Step Act’s prospective changes in sentencing law when deciding if “extraordinary and compelling reasons” warrant a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i).Fernandez v. U.S. (November 12) - Compassionate Release; Issue(s): Whether a combination of “extraordinary and compelling reasons” that may warrant a discretionary sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) can include reasons that may also be alleged as grounds for vacatur of a sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.Featuring:Prof. Thomas C. Berg, James L. Oberstar Professor of Law and Public Policy, University of St. Thomas School of LawZac Morgan, Senior Litigation Counsel, Washington Legal FoundationProf. Jacob Schuman, Associate Professor of Law, Temple University Beasley School of LawProf. Erica Zunkel, Director of Clinical and Experiential Learning, Clinical Professor of Law, & Director of the Criminal and Juvenile Justice Clinic, University of Chicago Law School(Moderator) Logan Spena, Legal Counsel, Center for Free Speech, Alliance Defending Freedom
Sarah Isgur and David French preview the biggest Supreme Court case of the term, Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, which challenges President Donald Trump's power to impose sweeping tariffs on virtually all goods imported into the United States. For additional analysis, join the SCOTUSbloglive blog on November 5 at 10:00 a.m. ET. The Agenda:—How to get CLE credit by listening to Advisory Opinions—Laying the groundwork for Trump's tariffs case—Divided liberal justices—National Guard deployment to Chicago on the interim docket—Sex markers on passports—Justices aren't policy experts Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Bennett Nuss chats with New Civil Liberties Alliance Senior Litigation Counsel John Vecchione about the tariff case pending before the Supreme Court, Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump. They discuss the main arguments about the extent of the president's power over tariff policy and what the court might decide. Notes: Trump's tariffs are unconstitutional—we're suing to end […]
Kate, Leah, and Melissa dive into the legal pushback over ICE and the National Guard in Chicago and Portland, anti-marriage equality goblin Kim Davis's unwelcome return to the courts, the administration's lawless strikes on boats in the waters around South America, and the specter of Trump 3.0. Then, they preview November's SCOTUS cases, including Learning Resources v. Trump, which challenges Trump's authority to impose tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Favorite things:Leah: Task (HBO Max); West End Girl, Lily Allen; The Kavanaugh Stop - 50 days later, Chris Geidner (Law Dork); The Supreme Court's Self-Defeating Supremacy, Steve Vladeck (The Supreme Court Review); God's Chief Justice, Doug Bock Clark (ProPublica); Lawyers March for Democracy on November 15 at 1-3pm.Kate: The Emergency, George Packer; Expert Backgrounder on War Powers Resolution 60-Day Clock for Boat Strikes Expiring Monday, Rebecca Ingber and Jessica Thibodeau (Just Security)Melissa: Impermissible Punishments: How Prison Became a Problem for Democracy, Judith ResnikHurricane relief for Jamaica:The WalkGood Jamaica Relief FundThe American Friends of JamaicaGlobal Empowerment MissionMercy CorpsFood for the Poor Jamaica Get tickets for STRICT SCRUTINY LIVE – The Bad Decisions Tour 2025! 3/6/26 – San Francisco3/7/26 – Los AngelesLearn more: http://crooked.com/events Get tickets to CROOKED CON November 6-7 in Washington, D.C at http://crookedcon.com Order your copy of Leah's book, Lawless: How the Supreme Court Runs on Conservative Grievance, Fringe Theories, and Bad VibesFollow us on Instagram, Threads, and Bluesky Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
“The Chief Justice… is presiding over the end of the rule of law in America”. That quote did not come from host Dahlia Lithwick, but this week's guest, former Federal Circuit Court Judge and George H. W. Bush appointee, J Michael Luttig. On this week's show, Judge Luttig explains the unprecedented split we're seeing between the federal courts and the highest court in the land in response to Trump's lawlessness on everything from tariffs, to due process, to deploying the National Guard, and what it all means for the future of American democracy. Next, Dahlia talks to the CEO of the small family business at the center of the tariffs case that will be argued at SCOTUS on Wednesday. Rick Woldenberg of Learning Resources explains why he's standing up to Trump's monarchic power grab, and why he sees himself standing shoulder-to-shoulder with James Madison. Want more Amicus? Join Slate Plus to unlock weekly bonus episodes with exclusive legal analysis. Plus, you'll access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. You can subscribe directly from the Amicus show page on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Or, visit slate.com/amicusplus to get access wherever you listen. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
“The Chief Justice… is presiding over the end of the rule of law in America”. That quote did not come from host Dahlia Lithwick, but this week's guest, former Federal Circuit Court Judge and George H. W. Bush appointee, J Michael Luttig. On this week's show, Judge Luttig explains the unprecedented split we're seeing between the federal courts and the highest court in the land in response to Trump's lawlessness on everything from tariffs, to due process, to deploying the National Guard, and what it all means for the future of American democracy. Next, Dahlia talks to the CEO of the small family business at the center of the tariffs case that will be argued at SCOTUS on Wednesday. Rick Woldenberg of Learning Resources explains why he's standing up to Trump's monarchic power grab, and why he sees himself standing shoulder-to-shoulder with James Madison. Want more Amicus? Join Slate Plus to unlock weekly bonus episodes with exclusive legal analysis. Plus, you'll access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. You can subscribe directly from the Amicus show page on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Or, visit slate.com/amicusplus to get access wherever you listen. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
“The Chief Justice… is presiding over the end of the rule of law in America”. That quote did not come from host Dahlia Lithwick, but this week's guest, former Federal Circuit Court Judge and George H. W. Bush appointee, J Michael Luttig. On this week's show, Judge Luttig explains the unprecedented split we're seeing between the federal courts and the highest court in the land in response to Trump's lawlessness on everything from tariffs, to due process, to deploying the National Guard, and what it all means for the future of American democracy. Next, Dahlia talks to the CEO of the small family business at the center of the tariffs case that will be argued at SCOTUS on Wednesday. Rick Woldenberg of Learning Resources explains why he's standing up to Trump's monarchic power grab, and why he sees himself standing shoulder-to-shoulder with James Madison. Want more Amicus? Join Slate Plus to unlock weekly bonus episodes with exclusive legal analysis. Plus, you'll access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. You can subscribe directly from the Amicus show page on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Or, visit slate.com/amicusplus to get access wherever you listen. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Sarah Isgur and David French discuss the Eighth Amendment in light of a prisoner's request to die by firing squad. But first, join us for a livestream analysis of Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, the case that asks whether the International Emergency Economic Powers Act authorizes the president to impose tariffs. (Click on SCOTUSblog's oral arguments page for updates.) The Agenda:—National Guard in Portland—Eliminating horizontal stare decisis—A defense of the spoils system—Who should argue in the tariffs case?—Did we get immigration wrong for the entire Biden administration? Advisory Opinions is a production of The Dispatch, a digital media company covering politics, policy, and culture from a non-partisan, conservative perspective. To access all of The Dispatch's offerings—including access to all of our articles, members-only newsletters, and bonus podcast episodes—click here. If you'd like to remove all ads from your podcast experience, consider becoming a premium Dispatch member by clicking here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
The US-China tariff war has upended global manufacturing, forcing companies like Chicago-based Learning Resources to fundamentally change how and where its products are made. On today’s Big Take Asia podcast, K. Oanh Ha heads to Vietnam, where the toymaker has begun shifting the production of its popular children’s toys. We examine how the company is managing its complex shift from China – where its toys have been made for decades – what the factory boom means for communities on the ground in Vietnam and how all of this will impact consumers. Further listening: The American Toymaker Suing Trump Over Destructive TariffsXi’s Top Bargaining Chip Is a Trade War Game ChangerSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
The US-China tariff war has upended global manufacturing, forcing companies like Chicago-based Learning Resources to fundamentally change how and where its products are made. On today’s Big Take Asia podcast, K. Oanh Ha heads to Vietnam, where the toymaker has begun shifting the production of its popular children’s toys. We examine how the company is managing its complex shift from China – where its toys have been made for decades – what the factory boom means for communities on the ground in Vietnam and how all of this will impact consumers. Further listening: The American Toymaker Suing Trump Over Destructive TariffsXi’s Top Bargaining Chip Is a Trade War Game ChangerSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
In this podcast episode, Debbie McKeegan interviews Frank Maeder, president of NedGraphics, discussing the latest software release and its significance in the textile design industry. They explore the importance of software updates, the integration of AI in design tools, and the introduction of new features like AI-assisted tagging and colourway generation. The conversation also delves into realism and simulation in textile design, highlighting the launch of the OPTINED Academy for training users on these advanced tools. Overall, the episode emphasises the need for continuous adaptation and learning in a rapidly evolving industry.
The Institute of Internal Auditors Presents: All Things Internal Audit Tech Charles King sits down with Kavin Anburaj from Meta to explore how privacy intersects with internal auditing. They discuss why auditors should care about privacy, key data risks, global regulations, and practical steps for auditing privacy programs. From core privacy principles such as transparency, consent, and data minimization, to lessons learned in cross-functional collaboration, this episode provides auditors with a roadmap for tackling privacy audits in an AI-driven world. HOST: Charles King, CIA, CPA, CFE, CMA AI and Internal Audit Leader, KPMG LLP GUEST: Kavin Anburaj, CISA, CIPP/US Internal Audit Director, Meta KEY POINTS: Introduction [00:00–00:00:27] Why Privacy Matters for Auditors [00:01:18–00:02:04] Identifying Data with Privacy Implications [00:02:09–00:04:12] Core Privacy Principles [00:05:21–00:09:34] User Rights and Data Traceability [00:09:41–00:12:27] Auditing Privacy Programs [00:13:02–00:16:30] Lessons Learned from Auditing Privacy [00:18:10–00:21:18] Writing with Precision [00:21:22–00:23:18] Learning Resources for Privacy Auditors [00:23:28–00:25:33] Final Thoughts [00:25:42–00:26:40] IIA RELATED CONTENT: Interested in this topic? Visit the links below for more resources: Auditing the Cybersecurity Program Certificate Global Perspectives and Insights: Cybersecurity Technology Hub Knowledge Centers: Artificial Intelligence Privacy and Data Protection: Part 3 2025 Financial Services Exchange Conference Visit The IIA's website or YouTube channel for related topics and more. Follow All Things Internal Audit: Apple Podcasts Spotify Libsyn Deezer
It's been quite a week watching the unfolding drama in our nation's courts, as the spotlight turns squarely on Donald Trump and the tsunami of litigation swirling around him. I'm here to walk you through what's happened—rapid fire—so let's jump right into the heart of the courtroom battles gripping the country.Washington D.C. has become the epicenter for Trump's most recent legal showdowns. Major cases have been dragging executive actions from his administration into the harsh glow of judicial scrutiny. The National Association of the Deaf, for example, is in the thick of a civil liberties battle. They've sued Trump alongside White House staff Susan Wiles and Karoline Leavitt, arguing that the administration's decision to halt ASL interpretation at official briefings violates not only the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 but the core tenets of the First and Fifth Amendments. This case highlights not just accessibility, but the larger question of equal protection and freedom of information. The deaf and hard of hearing community is demanding that the government reinstate these vital services or face judicial intervention.Meanwhile, Executive Order 14248 has triggered another storm of litigation over election law. The Democratic National Committee, the League of United Latin American Citizens, and the states of Washington and Oregon have challenged sweeping changes that require documentary proof of citizenship for voter registration, freeze federal funds to noncompliant states, and reassess voting systems across the country. Judge Kollar-Kotelly denied a motion by Trump's team to strike the case, signaling that the courts are taking these challenges seriously as they weigh the balance between election integrity and civil rights. The stakes are sky-high as the nation looks ahead to November.But the drama extends all the way to the Supreme Court. As the new term kicked off last week, the justices are staring down monumental cases that could redefine presidential power itself. The most contentious? Trump v. V.O.S. Selections and Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, which thrust the issue of massive tariffs right onto the Supreme Court's docket. The lower courts have said Trump exceeded his authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, but Trump maintains that his ability to “regulate” foreign imports implicitly includes imposing tariffs. Legal analysts, like Deepak Gupta, are calling it a once-in-a-century test—a battle that could fundamentally alter how much power the presidency wields.Behind the scenes, litigation trackers from Lawfare and Just Security have been working overtime, cataloging dozens of actions challenging Trump's sweeping executive orders. From restoring the death penalty to accessibility and election rules, each case chips away at—or tries to reinforce—the boundary between presidential power and constitutional rights.It's clear that the coming days, and indeed the next several months, will see Trump's legal fate played out not just in headlines but in courtroom arguments and rulings with profound national impact. The questions swirling in America's courts aren't just about Donald Trump—they're about what the presidency itself should be.Thanks for tuning in, and be sure to come back next week for more of the latest updates. This has been a Quiet Please production. For more, check out Quiet Please Dot A I.Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3QsFor more check out http://www.quietplease.aiThis content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI
In this crossover episode of The Lobby Shop and Talking with One Voice podcasts, The Lobby Shop team is joined by Omar Nashashibi to talk with Rick Woldenberg, CEO of Learning Resources and hand2mind, who is the plaintiff in the landmark Supreme Court case challenging tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), scheduled for argument in November. Rick discusses his company, the impact of the tariffs, and why manufacturing all his products in the United States isn't feasible. He also shares why he chose to pursue the case when larger companies and trade associations declined—and what it's like to be in the media spotlight during such high-stakes litigation.
In this crossover episode of The Lobby Shop and Talking with One Voice podcasts, The Lobby Shop team is joined by Omar Nashashibi to talk with Rick Woldenberg, CEO of Learning Resources and hand2mind, who is the plaintiff in the landmark Supreme Court case challenging tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), scheduled for argument in November. Rick discusses his company, the impact of the tariffs, and why manufacturing all his products in the United States isn't feasible. He also shares why he chose to pursue the case when larger companies and trade associations declined—and what it's like to be in the media spotlight during such high-stakes litigation.
The federal government shuts down as the Supreme Court returns. Our panel looks at the Trump team's plan to use the shutdown for mass layoffs —and previews a new Supreme Court term packed with big fights over tariffs, emergency powers, and the future of “independent” agencies.Featuring: Ryan Bourne, Gene Healy, Thomas Berry, and Jeffrey MironRomina Boccia, "Thoughts About The Impending Government Shutdown," The Debt Dispatch, September 30, 2025.Jeffrey Miron, "Some Libertarians Cheer When Government Shuts Down: Here's Why They Shouldn't," Vox, January 21, 2018.Ryan Bourne, "The Libertarian Experiment That Isn't," Cato at Liberty blog, January 11, 2019.Thomas A. Berry, Brent Skorup, and Charles Brandt, "Learning Resources v. Trump," Cato Amicus Brief, July 30, 2025. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
It's that time of year again—back to school!!! In this episode of The Library is Open Podcast, we welcome back Telishia "Tee" Murray, Director of Library and Learning Resources at Galveston College's David Glenn Hunt Memorial Library to talk about all things back to school. Tee shares the months-long prep that goes on to ensure student success; the data and reporting processes her library implements to produce comprehensive reports; and the programming and outreach initiatives library staff use to welcome students into the library and create a safe, nurturing space. Learn more about the library's Data Dashboard here: https://library.gc.edu/data-dashboard/homeFollow Galveston College Library on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/galvestoncollegelibrary
The Trade Guys welcome Rick Woldenberg, CEO of hand2mind and Learning Resources, whose companies are plaintiffs in a lawsuit challenging the Trump administration's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. They explore the case, its broader implications, and how tariffs are affecting American businesses.
SELF-REPLICATING DEATH JABS 4 YOU! -- Dr. Sheri Tenpenny Protect Your Retirement W/ a PHYSICAL Gold IRA https://www.sgtreportgold.com/ CALL( 877) 646-5347 - Noble Gold is Who I Trust ---------------- Find out NOW which 3 Foods Chuck Norris Avoids Like the Plague! https://chuckdefense.com/sgt It's FREE. Click above! Dr; Sherri Tenpenny returns to SGT Report with the horrible truth about the existing bioweapons and the NEW self-amplifying (self-replicating) mRNA "vaccines" plus she has a new book out for YOUR library 'ZERO Accountability in a Failed System'. Thanks for tuning in. Get the new book from Dr. Tenpenny HERE: https://drtenpenny.com/zero/ Dr, Tenpenny's Learning Resources: https://learning4you.org/ https://rumble.com/embed/v6u3a2w/?pub=2peuz
Episode: Summer Tarot Series with Jennifer Doman Host: Terri Ann Heiman Guest: Jennifer Doman, Owner of Ritual and Shelter Episode Sponsor: Ritual and Shelter Recording Location: San Diego, California Episode Overview In this enlightening episode of The Empowered Spirit Show's summer tarot series, host Terri Ann Heiman sits down with Jennifer Doman, the inspiring owner of Ritual and Shelter metaphysical store in Homewood, Alabama. This conversation explores the transformative power of tarot, the journey of spiritual awakening, and how a metaphysical business can serve as a healing sanctuary for the community. Jennifer shares her personal journey from chronic pain to healing through Reiki, her evolution as a tarot reader, and the unexpected discoveries about autism and telepathic abilities that have shaped her understanding of spiritual communication. The episode offers valuable insights for both tarot beginners and experienced practitioners, while highlighting the importance of creating safe spaces for spiritual exploration and healing. Guest Biography: Jennifer Doman Jennifer Doman is a Reiki Master Teacher and the visionary owner of Ritual and Shelter, a metaphysical store and healing sanctuary located in Homewood, Alabama. Her journey into holistic healing began through personal necessity after undergoing multiple back surgeries that failed to provide relief from chronic pain. Through her exploration of alternative healing methods, Jennifer discovered the transformative power of Reiki, which not only healed her physical pain but ignited a passion for helping others find similar relief. In 2021, Jennifer successfully obtained her Reiki Master Teacher certification and has since developed a unique approach that combines Reiki healing with complementary practices including energy healing, crystal healing, sound healing, and intuitive healing. Her personal experience with trauma and pain has enabled her to create a deeply empathetic and effective healing practice. Jennifer's spiritual journey has recently expanded to include a profound understanding of autism and telepathic abilities, following her own diagnosis and exploration of the connections between neurodivergence and spiritual gifts. She specializes in working with autistic individuals and their families, helping them understand and develop their unique spiritual abilities. Specialties: •Reiki for pain and trauma •Tarot reading with chakra-based approach •Crystal and energy healing •Supporting neurodivergent individuals in spiritual development •Creating inclusive spiritual community spaces Key Topics Discussed 1. The Tarot Journey: Finding Your Deck Jennifer shares her experience of choosing her first tarot deck and the importance of artwork resonating with the reader. She discusses the challenge of learning with her first deck (Pagan of the World's Tarot) and how switching to the Rider-Waite-Smith system accelerated her learning process. Key Insights: •Artwork must speak to you personally for effective deck connection •The Rider-Waite-Smith system provides clear, descriptive imagery for beginners •Each deck has its own personality and delivers different types of messages •Learning tarot is a long-term journey that requires patience and practice 2. Reading Philosophy: Projection vs. Prediction Jennifer explains her approach to tarot reading, emphasizing energy work and healing over fortune-telling. She describes her unique method of reading through the chakra system and how this approach provides more meaningful guidance for clients. Key Insights: •Focus on projection (energy reading) rather than prediction •Seven-card chakra spread as a comprehensive reading method •Tarot as a tool for identifying trauma, grief, and emotional blocks •Integration of Reiki energy during readings for enhanced healing 3. Building a Metaphysical Business During COVID The conversation explores Jennifer's journey of opening Ritual and Shelter during the pandemic, transforming from a women's wellness store to a full metaphysical sanctuary. She discusses the challenges and rewards of creating a spiritual community space in conservative Alabama. Key Insights: •Community need drove business evolution •Customers seeking crystals and tarot sustained the business during COVID •Importance of trauma-informed approaches in spiritual retail •Creating safe spaces for spiritual exploration and healing 4. The Witch Archetype and Feminine Empowerment Jennifer courageously discusses claiming the witch identity and what it represents in terms of feminine empowerment, rebellion against societal constraints, and standing up for personal rights. Key Insights: •Witch as archetype of empowered feminine energy •Reclaiming power and refusing to be diminished •The importance of not "playing small" in spiritual work •Balancing controversial identity with love-based practice 5. Autism, Telepathy, and Spiritual Gifts A profound discussion about Jennifer's recent autism diagnosis and her discoveries about the connection between neurodivergence and telepathic abilities, particularly in nonverbal autistic individuals. Key Insights: •Reference to "Telepathy Tapes" podcast and its revelations •Autistic individuals may have enhanced telepathic abilities •Children with autism drawn to specific crystals for healing •Connection between neurodivergence and star seed/galactic energies Memorable Quotes On Choosing Tarot Decks "The artwork must speak to you. If you want to resonate with that deck and you want to get messages from that deck, you must resonate with the artwork. It must speak to you. You have to like it." - Jennifer Doman On Reading Philosophy "I typically do not like it for prediction because I know that we can change every circumstance. So I am reading tarot based on energy." - Jennifer Doman On Spiritual Communication "Those cards are universe speaking through me... it is almost comical how often I pull those cards and it reflects exactly what we've just been talking about." - Jennifer Doman On Self-Healing with Tarot "When you're just reading tarot like it's a book and just looking at those messages, what does this card represent in myself? Right now, it's automatically a healing session for yourself." - Jennifer Doman On Feminine Empowerment "The witch represents this sort of female rage. And I think we need that so bad right now... when you say I'm a witch, it says, I'm not gonna let somebody just walk over me anymore." - Jennifer Doman On Playing Small "You're playing small. Stop it... why do I play small to fit in? I never fit in... I'm not gonna fit in." - Terri Ann Heiman On Spiritual Awakening "There is a spiritual responsibility to our souls, to ourself, to upgrade our energy and recognize a vibration with which we work with every single day." - Terry Ann Hyman Actionable Takeaways For Tarot Beginners 1.Choose Your Deck Mindfully: Select a tarot deck based on artwork that genuinely resonates with you, not just popularity or recommendations 2.Start with Rider-Waite-Smith: Begin your learning journey with a Rider-Waite-Smith based deck for clear, descriptive imagery 3.Practice Self-Reading: Use your tarot deck like a book for self-reflection, asking "What does this card represent in myself right now?" 4.Be Patient with Learning: Expect a learning curve of several months to feel comfortable with your deck For Spiritual Practice 1.Focus on Energy, Not Prediction: Use tarot for understanding current energy patterns rather than trying to predict the future 2.Try Chakra Spreads: Experiment with seven-card chakra spreads to understand energy blocks and healing needs 3.Combine Modalities: Integrate tarot with other healing practices like Reiki, crystal work, or meditation 4.Trust Your Intuition: Pay attention to intuitive hits and messages, even if they seem unusual or unexpected For Personal Empowerment 1.Stop Playing Small: Embrace your authentic spiritual path without shrinking to fit others' expectations 2.Create Sacred Space: Establish environments where spiritual exploration and healing can occur safely 3.Support Spiritual Community: Seek out and support local metaphysical businesses and practitioners 4.Embrace Your Archetype: Understand and embody the spiritual archetypes that resonate with your authentic self For Parents and Caregivers 1.Observe Crystal Connections: Notice if children, especially neurodivergent children, are drawn to specific crystals or spiritual tools 2.Explore Alternative Communication: Consider that nonverbal individuals may have enhanced telepathic or intuitive abilities 3.Lower Your Energy: Practice calming techniques to create space for subtle spiritual communication Resources and Links Ritual and Shelter •Website: ritualshelter.com •Instagram: @ritualshelter_shop •Pinterest: Ritual Plus Shelter •Location: Homewood, Alabama •Services: Tarot sessions, Reiki, Sound Bowl healing, Crystal healing, Witch consultations Tarot Decks Mentioned •Pagan of the World's Tarot - Jennifer's first deck •Rider-Waite-Smith Tarot - Recommended for beginners •Dreaming Moon Tarot - Australian artist, beautiful Rider-Waite-Smith variation •Somnia Tarot by Nicholas Bruno - Based on sleep paralysis dreams, Jennifer's current favorite •Wild Unknown Tarot by Kim Krans - Mentioned for artistic evolution •Empowered Spirit Deck by Terri Ann Heiman - Host's tarot deck Books and Learning Resources •"78 Degrees of Wisdom" - Recommended tarot learning book •Terri Ann Heiman's Tarot Course - Mentioned as a valuable learning resource •Telepathy Tapes Podcast - Referenced for autism and telepathy research Host's Offerings •5-Day Summer Bootcamp for Emotional Eating (July 22-26) •Focus on Gap tapping™ technique •Addresses cravings, binging, body image, and "fat talk" •VIP option available for deeper one-on-one work •Gap Tapping Technique - Method for bridging the gap between where you are and where you want to be Spiritual and Healing Modalities Discussed •Reiki Healing - Energy healing for pain and trauma •Crystal Healing - Using crystals for energetic support •Sound Bowl Healing - Vibrational healing therapy •Chakra Balancing - Seven-energy-center healing approach •Intuitive Healing - Psychic and empathic healing methods Current Astrological Context (as of recording) •Full Moon in Capricorn - Recently passed, supporting grounding and growth •Mercury Retrograde - July 17th through August, in Cancer and Leo •Potential for emotional reflection and relationship changes •Mindfulness is needed for travel, communication, and technology
Trump’s trade war has thrown American businesses, which source everything from aircraft parts to baby strollers from China, into chaos. Now some companies are challenging the president’s tariff rulings in the courts. On today’s Big Take Asia Podcast, host K. Oanh Ha is joined by Rick Woldenberg, CEO of the toy company Learning Resources, and Bloomberg’s Lucille Liu, to talk about the impact of the trade war on US importers and Chinese manufacturers and what it ultimately means for American consumers. Read more: Chinese Toymaker Takes Drastic Action to Survive Trump’s TariffsFurther listening: Live from Hong Kong: Why China Can Afford to Wait for a Deal, and the US Can’tThe US and China’s High-Stakes DiplomacySee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Stephen Woldenberg, senior vice president of sales at Vernon Hills-based toy company Learning Resources, joins Lisa Dent to discuss his challenge to President Donald Trump's tariffs before the U.S. Supreme Court. With 60% of the company's goods previously sourced from China, Woldenberg was forced to restructure the supply chain. He recently filed a petition asking […]
This Day in Legal History: Georgia v. McCollumOn June 18, 1992, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in Georgia v. McCollum, 505 U.S. 42 (1992), holding that criminal defendants cannot use peremptory challenges to exclude jurors on the basis of race. This decision extended the logic of Batson v. Kentucky—which barred prosecutors from racially discriminatory jury strikes—to defense attorneys, ensuring both sides are bound by the Equal Protection Clause. The case involved white defendants in Georgia who sought to remove Black jurors, prompting the state to challenge the defense's strikes as racially biased.The Court, in a 7–2 opinion written by Justice Blackmun, reasoned that racial discrimination in jury selection, regardless of the source, undermines public confidence in the justice system and the constitutional guarantee of a fair trial. It emphasized that the courtroom is not a private forum and that all participants—prosecutors, defense attorneys, and judges—must adhere to constitutional principles.Importantly, the decision addressed the state action requirement, acknowledging that while defense attorneys are not state actors in the traditional sense, their participation in the jury selection process is conducted under judicial supervision and is thus attributable to the state. This broadened the scope of equal protection enforcement in criminal proceedings.The ruling was a major step toward eradicating racial bias in the judicial process, reinforcing that justice must not only be impartial but also be perceived as such. By holding defense attorneys to the same standard as prosecutors, the Court ensured that the integrity of jury selection is preserved across the board. The decision also highlighted the evolving understanding of the judiciary's role in preventing systemic discrimination, even in adversarial settings.Georgia v. McCollum remains a critical precedent in both constitutional law and criminal procedure, illustrating the Court's commitment to fairness in one of the most fundamental aspects of the legal system—trial by jury.U.S. District Judge Julia Kobick expanded a prior injunction, blocking the Trump administration's passport policy that restricted transgender, nonbinary, and intersex individuals from obtaining passports reflecting their gender identity. Kobick found that the State Department's revised policy—mandating passports list only “biological” sex at birth—likely violated the Fifth Amendment by discriminating on the basis of sex and reflecting irrational bias.Initially, the injunction applied only to six plaintiffs, but Kobick's ruling now grants class-action status, halting enforcement of the policy nationwide. The policy stems from an executive order signed by Trump after returning to office in January 2025, directing all federal agencies to recognize only two sexes and abandon the gender marker flexibility introduced under the Biden administration in 2022.The ruling marks a legal setback for the administration's effort to reimpose binary sex classifications across federal documents. The ACLU, representing the plaintiffs, called it a critical win for transgender rights. The White House condemned the ruling as judicial overreach. The broader case remains ongoing.US judge blocks Trump passport policy targeting transgender people | ReutersEducational toy company Learning Resources petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to take up its challenge to President Donald Trump's tariffs before lower court appeals conclude. The company argues that Trump's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose broad tariffs is unconstitutional and economically damaging, citing a May 29 district court ruling that found the tariffs illegal. That decision, however, is currently stayed pending appeal.Learning Resources' CEO, Rick Woldenberg, warned that delaying Supreme Court review could cost American businesses up to $150 billion due to ongoing tariff-related costs. He described the tariffs as a hidden tax and accused the government of forcing importers to act as involuntary tax collectors.Two federal courts have already ruled against Trump's interpretation of IEEPA, a law historically used for targeted sanctions, not general trade policy. The administration defends the tariffs as a legal response to national emergencies like trade imbalances and drug trafficking, though critics say the justification is legally thin and economically harmful.While rare, the Supreme Court has expedited cases of national significance in the past, such as Biden's student loan forgiveness plan. A key appeals court hearing on Trump's tariff authority is scheduled for July 31.Small business seeks early Supreme Court review of Trump's tariffs | ReutersA federal judge has also temporarily blocked the Trump administration from enforcing a new Department of Defense policy that would cap indirect cost reimbursements to universities at 15%. The move came in response to a lawsuit filed by 12 research institutions—including MIT and Johns Hopkins—as well as major academic associations. These groups argued that the cap violated existing federal regulations and congressional intent.The Department of Defense had framed the policy as a cost-saving measure, with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth claiming it could save up to $900 million annually. However, universities rely on indirect cost reimbursements to fund infrastructure, staff, and equipment that support research across multiple projects—not just the ones directly funded.The ruling by Judge Brian Murphy, a Biden appointee, mirrors earlier judicial blocks of similar funding cuts proposed by the NIH and Department of Energy. A hearing is scheduled for July 2 to determine whether a longer-term injunction should be issued. The case highlights growing legal resistance to the administration's broader push to reduce federal spending on scientific research.US judge blocks Defense Department from slashing federal research funding | ReutersThe U.S. Supreme Court upheld Tennessee's law banning puberty blockers and hormone therapy for transgender minors in a 6–3 decision that sets a national precedent and effectively greenlights similar restrictions in over 20 states. Writing for the majority, Chief Justice Roberts concluded that the law neither classifies based on sex nor targets transgender status, and thus only required rational basis review—not heightened constitutional scrutiny. The Court accepted Tennessee's framing of the law as neutral and medically cautious, not discriminatory, citing European health policy shifts and purported uncertainty around gender-affirming care as justification.Critics, including the Court's liberal bloc, argued the law does in fact discriminate based on sex and gender identity by banning medical treatment only when it aims to affirm a transgender identity. Justice Sotomayor, in dissent, emphasized that the law's language and application plainly hinge on a minor's “sex as assigned at birth,” drawing troubling parallels to older jurisprudence that permitted covert forms of discrimination under the guise of neutrality.The ruling marks a major rollback of legal protections for transgender youth, ignoring years of precedent that increasingly recognized transgender identity as a constitutionally protected status. By lowering the scrutiny threshold and deferring to legislative “uncertainty,” the Court provided a road map for states to restrict gender-affirming care through general, non-explicitly discriminatory language. The majority's refusal to engage with medical consensus or the real-world impact on transgender youth reveals a troubling judicial posture: one that values legislative deference over individual rights, even when the stakes include physical and psychological harm to a vulnerable group.Supreme Court Upholds Curbs on Treatment for Transgender Minors This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe
En la edición de hoy del Radar Empresarial, analizamos el caso de Hasbro, la última gran compañía en tomar decisiones difíciles ante el impacto de los aranceles comerciales. El gigante del sector juguetero ha anunciado el despido del 3% de su plantilla global, lo que equivale a unos 150 empleados de un total cercano a los 5.000. El epicentro del problema sigue siendo China. Aunque Hasbro ha reducido su dependencia del país asiático —hace apenas unos años el 90% de su producción se realizaba allí—, aún fabrica cerca del 50% de sus productos en ese territorio. Esta exposición, en un contexto de tensiones comerciales, llevó a la empresa a plantearse un objetivo ambicioso: reducir su producción en China a menos del 40%. Actualmente, Hasbro distribuye su manufactura en ocho países, pero el número podría aumentar a nueve o diez, según señaló su CEO, Chris Cocks, durante una conferencia con analistas en abril. En ella, subrayó que la empresa está en una posición sólida, aunque reconoció que el entorno es complejo y exige decisiones estratégicas firmes. El malestar con los aranceles también se extiende a otros actores de la industria. Learning Resources, otro fabricante de juguetes, ha impugnado ante la Corte Suprema los aranceles impuestos por Donald Trump, argumentando que fueron aprobados sin pasar por el Congreso. Aunque el caso tiene escasas posibilidades legales, revela la incomodidad del sector. Trump, por su parte, ha reconocido que estas medidas podrían hacer que los juguetes sean más caros y menos accesibles para los niños estadounidenses. Frente a este panorama, muchas empresas están apostando por el sector digital. Hasbro, de hecho, logró superar las expectativas del primer trimestre gracias a sus productos digitales. El mercado global de juguetes inteligentes alcanzó los 19.000 millones de dólares y crece a un ritmo del 14,4% anual.
In this conversation, Dr. Loui Lord Nelson discusses the connections between technical theater and Universal Design for Learning (UDL), emphasizing the importance of intentional design in educational environments. The conversation explores barriers to implementing UDL, the significance of emotional connections in learning, and the necessity of fostering collaboration and community among learners. Dr. Nelson highlights the role of educators in creating inclusive and supportive learning spaces that cater to the diverse needs of all students. In this conversation, Loui Lord Nelson, Ph.D., discusses the principles of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and how to make learning more accessible and engaging for all students. She emphasizes the importance of context in learning, the use of metaphors like sunsets to explain UDL, and provides practical resources for educators looking to implement UDL strategies. The discussion also touches on the significance of designing for barriers and fostering learner agency, as well as the iterative nature of design in educational settings. Ready to learn more from our guest? https://theudlapproach.com/ Chapters 00:00 The Intersection of Technical Theater and UDL 04:09 Intentional Design in Learning Environments 11:14 Barriers to Implementing UDL 17:44 Emotional Connections in Learning 22:14 Fostering Collaboration and Community 30:33 Accessible Learning Resources 31:33 The Sunset Analogy for UDL 36:10 Starting Points for UDL Implementation 40:31 Understanding UDL Gears 46:42 Designing for Barriers and Agency 52:44 The Design Workflow and Reflection
Welcome to Hot Topics! Join host Gabrielle Crichlow in this episode, where she sits down with fellow tutorpreneur Debbie Malewicki, founder of USA Tutors. Together, they dive into Debbie's journey into the tutoring industry, exploring the driving forces behind her passion for education and student success.Debbie brings a wealth of experience from her time overseeing a large tutoring center at the University of New Haven. With a mission to dispel common myths about tutoring, she aims to make it an accessible and welcoming resource for all students, whether they are struggling or high-achieving. In this episode, discover how Debbie adapted to the challenges of the pandemic by shifting her focus from in-person to online tutoring, establishing a national team of dedicated educators committed to personalizing learning experiences. Her company, USA Tutors, offers flexible and affordable packages for K-12 academic support, higher education tutoring, and college prep services, emphasizing the importance of fostering self-awareness and problem-solving skills in students, rather than just completing assignments.Tune in for an inspiring conversation that redefines tutoring and highlights the transformative impact of personalized education!Who is Debbie Malewicki?Debbie entered the tutoring field at 17 and never left. From working as a student tutor to a professional, heading a community college writing lab, and later serving as the director of the Center for Learning Resources at the University of New Haven, Debbie believes in utilizing a personalized and metacognitive approach that fosters independence in the learning process. In 2012, Debbie received the annual UNH award for Excellence in Student and Faculty Support. Her last university team won one of the 2016 ACTP national award for Excellence in Academic Strategies and Outcomes. In 2018, Debbie founded USA Tutors, a tutoring and college prep. services company of professional educators who patiently support our clients in achieving their educational goals.You can find Debbie:On the web: https://usa-tutors.com/On Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/USATutorsOn Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/usatutors.ioOn LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/usa-tutors-llcPromotional Deals:Buy a package of 10 hours of tutoring or college prep consulting time at our regular rates and receive the 11th hour free.Buy a package of 15 hours (or more) of tutoring or college prep services at our regular rates for a 10% discount.Mention "Hot Topics Podcast" when you buy a package of two hours with the second hour at a 50% discount.Watch this episode on YouTube: https://youtube.com/live/gh3DePMD22sRate this episode on IMDB: https://m.imdb.com/title/tt33958102/?ref_=ext_shr_lnk********************************************Follow Gabrielle Crichlow:On Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/gabrielle.crichlow On Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/gabrielle.crichlowFollow A Step Ahead Tutoring Services:On Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/astepaheadtutoringservicesOn Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/astepaheadtutoringservicesOn X: https://www.x.com/ASATS2013On YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@astepaheadtutoringservicesOn TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@asats2013On Eventbrite: https://astepaheadtutoringservices.eventbrite.comVisit us on the web: https://www.astepaheadtutoringservices.comSign up for our email list: https://squareup.com/outreach/a41DaE/subscribeSign up for our text list: https://eztxt.s3.amazonaws.com/534571/widgets/61fc686d8d6665.90336120.htmlCheck out our entire "Hot Topics!" podcast: https://www.astepaheadtutoringservices.com/hottopicspodcastSupport us:Cash App: https://cash.app/$ASATS2013PayPal: https://paypal.me/ASATS2013Venmo: https://venmo.com/u/ASATS2013Zelle: success@astepaheadtutoringservices.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/hot-topics--5600971/support Original date of episode: October 11, 2024
Daniel Clewlow fills in for Adam Cox, and he talks to Kevin Ramchurn, a maths tutor and the Managing Director of Suited Tutor, a private tutor company. In today's episode, Daniel and Kevin talk about how class sizes effect student learning, and how online resources are helping students access a wide range of new education options, including personal tutors.
Part 2 of our deep dive into Disability Insurance (DI) on the ShiftShapers Podcast goes beyond the basics—diving into strategic implementation, evolving underwriting standards, and revenue-generating opportunities for advisors.In this episode, host David Saltzman continues the conversation with Don Schamay, Regional Director of Executive Benefits at The Principal, to explore how disability insurance can be a transformative tool for both clients and advisors. Don shares his insights on how DI is becoming more accessible and relevant across demographics—from young professionals starting their financial journey to high-income executives looking to protect complex compensation packages. He explains how advisors can offer real value by aligning DI solutions with life stages, business needs, and long-term financial goals.Whether you're an advisor looking to enhance your client relationships or a business owner considering executive benefits, this episode is packed with actionable insights and forward-thinking strategies.✅ Key Takeaways from the Episode:Young Professionals and DI DI isn't just for high earners—young professionals stand to gain the most by locking in coverage early, when they're healthy and premiums are lowest. Don shares how DI can be a cornerstone of early-stage financial planning.Business & Executive Solutions Business owners and C-suite professionals have unique income protection needs. Learn how DI solutions can be customized to protect not only personal income but also business continuity and executive benefits.Underwriting Improvements Traditional DI policies were often viewed as complex and hard to secure, but times have changed. With faster, more flexible underwriting options, advisors can now help clients get covered more efficiently than ever before.Revenue Potential for Advisors DI is more than a risk management tool—it's a practice-building opportunity. By positioning themselves as income protection strategists, advisors can deepen trust, retain clients, and grow revenue.Advisor Education and Client Communication Don emphasizes the advisor's role as an educator—helping clients truly understand the risks of income loss and the powerful ways DI can protect what they've worked so hard to build.⏳ Episode Timestamps:
In this episode of The Effective Lawyer, Jack Zinda dives into three key topics that impact law firm growth, efficiency, and leadership. Host Jack Zinda answers listener questions on the best books for personal and professional development, the role of AI in modern law practice, and what "superpower" sets successful law firms apart. Packed with insights from years of experience, this episode offers practical takeaways for lawyers looking to scale their firms and sharpen their skills. Discussed in This Episode: Essential Books & Learning Resources for Lawyers The E-Myth by Michael Gerber – A foundational book for understanding law firm management and scaling. The Effective Executive by Peter Drucker – Key insights on productivity and decision-making. The 4-Hour Workweek by Tim Ferriss – Practical strategies on delegation and efficiency. Getting Things Done by David Allen – A framework for reducing stress and improving task management. David Ball on Damages – Trial strategy essentials. Ongoing CLEs and jurisdiction-specific training to stay ahead in legal practice. The importance of always reading a business book, an advocacy book, and a tactical resource to continuously improve. AI & Legal Tech: Streamlining Law Firm Operations The evolving role of AI in intake, case management, and marketing. Experimenting with AI-driven case summarization for improved efficiency. Using AI for content generation, legal research, and internal workflow automation. Best practices for AI integration, including compliance with ethical and data privacy regulations. Encouraging team-wide AI adoption to boost productivity and leverage emerging technologies. What Is a Law Firm's Superpower? The defining trait is empathy – The ability to deeply understand clients, opponents, and decision-makers. Understanding the real-life impact of injuries on clients beyond just legal damages. Empathizing with insurance adjusters and defense attorneys to negotiate more effectively. Recognizing what motivates judges and tailoring trial strategies accordingly. The power of emotional intelligence in case strategy, client relations, and firm culture. Connect with Us: Have a question for Jack? jack@zindalaw.com 512-246-2224
In this episode of the Productivity Smarts Podcast, Gerald J. Leonard sits down with Dr. Ona Newton, CEO and founder of Tobams Group, to dive into the world of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) principles and how businesses can seamlessly integrate them into their strategies.. They kick things off with a new segment, "Sustainability Smarts," where they explore how companies can move beyond checking boxes for compliance and truly embed sustainability into their core practices. Dr. Newton shares insights on the real challenges businesses face—like superficial compliance and a lack of understanding—and offers practical strategies for overcoming these hurdles, from strategic planning to better stakeholder engagement. She emphasizes how sustainability is not just a trend but a crucial factor for long-term success and standing out in a competitive market. However, she also warns against the pitfalls of greenwashing, reminding us that authenticity is key. Want to ensure your business stays ahead in this changing landscape? Tune in now to hear Dr. Newton's expert advice on making sustainability a real, impactful part of your business strategy. Don't forget to subscribe for more insights on how to optimize your productivity and make a lasting impact! What We Discuss [00:02:01] - Introducing Dr. Ona Newton [00:05:46] - Challenges in ESG Integration [00:09:31] - Three-Legged Stool of ESG [00:14:50] - Balancing Profitability and Sustainability [00:17:45] - Technology's Role in ESG [00:21:31] - The Future of Sustainable Businesses [00:23:18] - Measuring Sustainability Progress [00:26:00] - Learning Resources and Publications Notable Quotes [00:03:46] "I think what sustainability does is it brings everyone together. I don't think anyone is exempted." — Dr. Ona Newton [00:12:45] "I was so challenged at that point in time because what they're doing is good, but then I was considering my own comfort because I was so hot and I'm not used to this." — Dr. Ona Newton [00:20:32] "I started writing books on sustainability and encouraging teachers to teach that as extracurricular across the schools in different parts of the world because there's nothing that really is there for children of this age group to really understand what it means." — Dr. Ona Newton [00:21:31] "The future belongs to sustainable businesses. ESG is no longer just about compliance; it's about staying relevant in a rapidly changing world." — Dr. Ona Newton [00:23:05] "Companies are going to want to invest and work with you if they know that a part of the profits that they're giving you is going to go back into their community and do some good for people and make a difference." — Gerald J. Leonard [00:24:28] "As climate change accelerates, I think the most critical action businesses can take is to decarbonize their operations by adopting renewable energy and enhancing energy efficiency." — Dr. Ona Newton Our Guest Dr. Ona Newton is the CEO and founder of Tobams Group, where she champions African talent, development, and global opportunities. A visionary leader, executive coach, and digital transformation strategist, she is dedicated to creating social impact through sustainability. With over 20 years of expertise, Dr. Newton has led initiatives for major global organizations, promoting strategic governance and empowering the next generation of leaders. She has authored influential books and mentors individuals to create lasting, transformative change. Dr. Ona Newton Website https://tobamsgroup.com/founder LinkedIn: https://linkedin.com/in/dr-ona-newton-fbcs-frsa-fsip-8b809926a Books: https://www.amazon.ca/stores/Ona-Newton/author/B0DHRJJ6M7 Productivity Smarts Podcast Website - productivitysmartspodcast.com Gerald J. Leonard Website - geraldjleonard.com Turnberry Premiere website - turnberrypremiere.com Scheduler - vcita.com/v/geraldjleonard Kiva is a loan, not a donation, allowing you to cycle your money and create a personal impact worldwide. https://www.kiva.org/lender/topmindshelpingtopminds
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
