Podcasts about toal

Convicted murderer Alex Murdaugh has launched a new bid for freedom, filing an appeal to overturn his convictions for the brutal 2021 murders of his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul. This latest development, a meticulously crafted 121-page document submitted to the South Carolina Supreme Court, alleges jury tampering by Becky Hill, the former clerk of court for Colleton County. The appeal raises questions about judicial integrity, challenging the fairness of one of the most high-profile trials in recent history. Allegations of Jury Tampering Murdaugh, once a scion of South Carolina's powerful Low Country legal dynasty, is serving two consecutive life sentences for the killings, convictions handed down after a jury deliberated for less than three hours. His legal team now claims that Hill, who resigned earlier this year under a cloud of ethics violations, improperly influenced the jury. Allegations include Hill's private conversations with jurors about Murdaugh's guilt and advice to “watch his body language.” These accusations include claims that Hill entered the jury room during deliberations, a breach of protocol that contradicts judicial procedures meant to ensure impartiality. Hill's actions have drawn further scrutiny due to her decision to publish a book, Behind the Doors of Justice, shortly after the trial. While the book reportedly earned her significant financial gains, it has since been removed from circulation. Critics argue that her financial and public aspirations created a conflict of interest, compromising the sanctity of the trial process. Murdaugh's attorneys argue that Hill's actions should result in a mistrial, emphasizing that interference of this nature cannot stand in a court of law, particularly in such a critical case. The appeal also revives debates about the evidence used during the trial. Central to Murdaugh's conviction was damning cell phone data that placed him at the Moselle estate near the time of the murders. Prosecutors presented a chilling narrative: Murdaugh ambushed his son, Paul, in the kennel area, shooting him twice with a shotgun before using a .300 Blackout semi-automatic rifle on Maggie, firing five times even as she collapsed to her knees. The brutal nature of the killings and the forensic evidence presented were pivotal in securing the guilty verdict. Murdaugh's defense contends that the jury's ability to fairly weigh this evidence was compromised by Hill's alleged misconduct. They argue that her reported comments to jurors introduced bias, undermining the principle of impartiality. Hill's alleged ethical lapses extend beyond the Murdaugh trial. In June, South Carolina officials filed ethics violations against her, citing misuse of county funds, unauthorized bonuses, and orchestrating a photograph of Murdaugh in his holding cell—a move that further sensationalized an already high-profile case. Hill has denied wrongdoing related to the trial, stating that her resignation in March was prompted by public scrutiny and a desire to focus on her family. Nevertheless, these allegations have fueled debates about the integrity of Murdaugh's conviction. Legal experts and the public alike are grappling with the implications of a trial potentially compromised by personal ambition and ethical violations. The murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh shocked South Carolina and drew national attention, partly due to the family's storied history. For nearly a century, the Murdaughs wielded unparalleled influence as solicitors and district attorneys in the Low Country region. That legacy began to unravel with revelations of Alex Murdaugh's financial crimes. Concurrent with his murder convictions, Murdaugh was sentenced to 40 years in federal prison for defrauding clients of millions. Prosecutors accused him of exploiting vulnerable clients to fund a lavish lifestyle. At sentencing, Murdaugh expressed remorse but offered little solace to those he'd wronged. The Supreme Court Steps In In January, Murdaugh's defense first raised the issue of jury tampering with former South Carolina Chief Justice Jean Toal, who dismissed the allegations, citing insufficient evidence to prove the comments swayed the verdict. However, in August, the Supreme Court overturned Toal's decision, agreeing to consider whether the alleged tampering merits a retrial. Legal analysts have noted that the court's decision to review the matter reflects the seriousness of the allegations and their potential to undermine public confidence in the justice system. Public opinion remains sharply divided. To some, Murdaugh's appeal is a desperate ploy from a man already convicted of heinous crimes. To others, the allegations against Hill represent a betrayal of judicial ethics that, if proven, could undermine the legitimacy of the verdict. As the Supreme Court prepares to deliberate, the implications are clear: justice must not only be done but be seen to be done. Murdaugh's legal team is also contesting the inclusion of his financial crimes during the murder trial, arguing that the evidence prejudiced the jury by portraying him as morally bankrupt. Prosecutors counter that the financial pressures Murdaugh faced provided a motive for the murders, a theory central to their case. The inclusion of this evidence remains a contentious point that could play a pivotal role in the Supreme Court's decision. Legal experts continue to debate whether admitting financial crimes was necessary to understand Murdaugh's motives or whether it unfairly tainted the jury's perception of him. As South Carolina awaits the court's ruling, the Murdaugh saga continues to captivate and polarize. At its core lies a complex interplay of privilege, power, and justice, with each development adding new layers of intrigue. Whether this appeal will result in a retrial or reaffirm the convictions, one thing is certain: the reverberations of this case will be felt for years to come. The outcome will not only determine Murdaugh's future but also set a precedent for addressing allegations of misconduct in high-stakes trials, ensuring the integrity of the justice system remains uncompromised. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Convicted murderer Alex Murdaugh has launched a new bid for freedom, filing an appeal to overturn his convictions for the brutal 2021 murders of his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul. This latest development, a meticulously crafted 121-page document submitted to the South Carolina Supreme Court, alleges jury tampering by Becky Hill, the former clerk of court for Colleton County. The appeal raises questions about judicial integrity, challenging the fairness of one of the most high-profile trials in recent history. Allegations of Jury Tampering Murdaugh, once a scion of South Carolina's powerful Low Country legal dynasty, is serving two consecutive life sentences for the killings, convictions handed down after a jury deliberated for less than three hours. His legal team now claims that Hill, who resigned earlier this year under a cloud of ethics violations, improperly influenced the jury. Allegations include Hill's private conversations with jurors about Murdaugh's guilt and advice to “watch his body language.” These accusations include claims that Hill entered the jury room during deliberations, a breach of protocol that contradicts judicial procedures meant to ensure impartiality. Hill's actions have drawn further scrutiny due to her decision to publish a book, Behind the Doors of Justice, shortly after the trial. While the book reportedly earned her significant financial gains, it has since been removed from circulation. Critics argue that her financial and public aspirations created a conflict of interest, compromising the sanctity of the trial process. Murdaugh's attorneys argue that Hill's actions should result in a mistrial, emphasizing that interference of this nature cannot stand in a court of law, particularly in such a critical case. The appeal also revives debates about the evidence used during the trial. Central to Murdaugh's conviction was damning cell phone data that placed him at the Moselle estate near the time of the murders. Prosecutors presented a chilling narrative: Murdaugh ambushed his son, Paul, in the kennel area, shooting him twice with a shotgun before using a .300 Blackout semi-automatic rifle on Maggie, firing five times even as she collapsed to her knees. The brutal nature of the killings and the forensic evidence presented were pivotal in securing the guilty verdict. Murdaugh's defense contends that the jury's ability to fairly weigh this evidence was compromised by Hill's alleged misconduct. They argue that her reported comments to jurors introduced bias, undermining the principle of impartiality. Hill's alleged ethical lapses extend beyond the Murdaugh trial. In June, South Carolina officials filed ethics violations against her, citing misuse of county funds, unauthorized bonuses, and orchestrating a photograph of Murdaugh in his holding cell—a move that further sensationalized an already high-profile case. Hill has denied wrongdoing related to the trial, stating that her resignation in March was prompted by public scrutiny and a desire to focus on her family. Nevertheless, these allegations have fueled debates about the integrity of Murdaugh's conviction. Legal experts and the public alike are grappling with the implications of a trial potentially compromised by personal ambition and ethical violations. The murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh shocked South Carolina and drew national attention, partly due to the family's storied history. For nearly a century, the Murdaughs wielded unparalleled influence as solicitors and district attorneys in the Low Country region. That legacy began to unravel with revelations of Alex Murdaugh's financial crimes. Concurrent with his murder convictions, Murdaugh was sentenced to 40 years in federal prison for defrauding clients of millions. Prosecutors accused him of exploiting vulnerable clients to fund a lavish lifestyle. At sentencing, Murdaugh expressed remorse but offered little solace to those he'd wronged. The Supreme Court Steps In In January, Murdaugh's defense first raised the issue of jury tampering with former South Carolina Chief Justice Jean Toal, who dismissed the allegations, citing insufficient evidence to prove the comments swayed the verdict. However, in August, the Supreme Court overturned Toal's decision, agreeing to consider whether the alleged tampering merits a retrial. Legal analysts have noted that the court's decision to review the matter reflects the seriousness of the allegations and their potential to undermine public confidence in the justice system. Public opinion remains sharply divided. To some, Murdaugh's appeal is a desperate ploy from a man already convicted of heinous crimes. To others, the allegations against Hill represent a betrayal of judicial ethics that, if proven, could undermine the legitimacy of the verdict. As the Supreme Court prepares to deliberate, the implications are clear: justice must not only be done but be seen to be done. Murdaugh's legal team is also contesting the inclusion of his financial crimes during the murder trial, arguing that the evidence prejudiced the jury by portraying him as morally bankrupt. Prosecutors counter that the financial pressures Murdaugh faced provided a motive for the murders, a theory central to their case. The inclusion of this evidence remains a contentious point that could play a pivotal role in the Supreme Court's decision. Legal experts continue to debate whether admitting financial crimes was necessary to understand Murdaugh's motives or whether it unfairly tainted the jury's perception of him. As South Carolina awaits the court's ruling, the Murdaugh saga continues to captivate and polarize. At its core lies a complex interplay of privilege, power, and justice, with each development adding new layers of intrigue. Whether this appeal will result in a retrial or reaffirm the convictions, one thing is certain: the reverberations of this case will be felt for years to come. The outcome will not only determine Murdaugh's future but also set a precedent for addressing allegations of misconduct in high-stakes trials, ensuring the integrity of the justice system remains uncompromised. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Convicted murderer Alex Murdaugh has launched a new bid for freedom, filing an appeal to overturn his convictions for the brutal 2021 murders of his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul. This latest development, a meticulously crafted 121-page document submitted to the South Carolina Supreme Court, alleges jury tampering by Becky Hill, the former clerk of court for Colleton County. The appeal raises questions about judicial integrity, challenging the fairness of one of the most high-profile trials in recent history. Allegations of Jury Tampering Murdaugh, once a scion of South Carolina's powerful Low Country legal dynasty, is serving two consecutive life sentences for the killings, convictions handed down after a jury deliberated for less than three hours. His legal team now claims that Hill, who resigned earlier this year under a cloud of ethics violations, improperly influenced the jury. Allegations include Hill's private conversations with jurors about Murdaugh's guilt and advice to “watch his body language.” These accusations include claims that Hill entered the jury room during deliberations, a breach of protocol that contradicts judicial procedures meant to ensure impartiality. Hill's actions have drawn further scrutiny due to her decision to publish a book, Behind the Doors of Justice, shortly after the trial. While the book reportedly earned her significant financial gains, it has since been removed from circulation. Critics argue that her financial and public aspirations created a conflict of interest, compromising the sanctity of the trial process. Murdaugh's attorneys argue that Hill's actions should result in a mistrial, emphasizing that interference of this nature cannot stand in a court of law, particularly in such a critical case. The appeal also revives debates about the evidence used during the trial. Central to Murdaugh's conviction was damning cell phone data that placed him at the Moselle estate near the time of the murders. Prosecutors presented a chilling narrative: Murdaugh ambushed his son, Paul, in the kennel area, shooting him twice with a shotgun before using a .300 Blackout semi-automatic rifle on Maggie, firing five times even as she collapsed to her knees. The brutal nature of the killings and the forensic evidence presented were pivotal in securing the guilty verdict. Murdaugh's defense contends that the jury's ability to fairly weigh this evidence was compromised by Hill's alleged misconduct. They argue that her reported comments to jurors introduced bias, undermining the principle of impartiality. Hill's alleged ethical lapses extend beyond the Murdaugh trial. In June, South Carolina officials filed ethics violations against her, citing misuse of county funds, unauthorized bonuses, and orchestrating a photograph of Murdaugh in his holding cell—a move that further sensationalized an already high-profile case. Hill has denied wrongdoing related to the trial, stating that her resignation in March was prompted by public scrutiny and a desire to focus on her family. Nevertheless, these allegations have fueled debates about the integrity of Murdaugh's conviction. Legal experts and the public alike are grappling with the implications of a trial potentially compromised by personal ambition and ethical violations. The murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh shocked South Carolina and drew national attention, partly due to the family's storied history. For nearly a century, the Murdaughs wielded unparalleled influence as solicitors and district attorneys in the Low Country region. That legacy began to unravel with revelations of Alex Murdaugh's financial crimes. Concurrent with his murder convictions, Murdaugh was sentenced to 40 years in federal prison for defrauding clients of millions. Prosecutors accused him of exploiting vulnerable clients to fund a lavish lifestyle. At sentencing, Murdaugh expressed remorse but offered little solace to those he'd wronged. The Supreme Court Steps In In January, Murdaugh's defense first raised the issue of jury tampering with former South Carolina Chief Justice Jean Toal, who dismissed the allegations, citing insufficient evidence to prove the comments swayed the verdict. However, in August, the Supreme Court overturned Toal's decision, agreeing to consider whether the alleged tampering merits a retrial. Legal analysts have noted that the court's decision to review the matter reflects the seriousness of the allegations and their potential to undermine public confidence in the justice system. Public opinion remains sharply divided. To some, Murdaugh's appeal is a desperate ploy from a man already convicted of heinous crimes. To others, the allegations against Hill represent a betrayal of judicial ethics that, if proven, could undermine the legitimacy of the verdict. As the Supreme Court prepares to deliberate, the implications are clear: justice must not only be done but be seen to be done. Murdaugh's legal team is also contesting the inclusion of his financial crimes during the murder trial, arguing that the evidence prejudiced the jury by portraying him as morally bankrupt. Prosecutors counter that the financial pressures Murdaugh faced provided a motive for the murders, a theory central to their case. The inclusion of this evidence remains a contentious point that could play a pivotal role in the Supreme Court's decision. Legal experts continue to debate whether admitting financial crimes was necessary to understand Murdaugh's motives or whether it unfairly tainted the jury's perception of him. As South Carolina awaits the court's ruling, the Murdaugh saga continues to captivate and polarize. At its core lies a complex interplay of privilege, power, and justice, with each development adding new layers of intrigue. Whether this appeal will result in a retrial or reaffirm the convictions, one thing is certain: the reverberations of this case will be felt for years to come. The outcome will not only determine Murdaugh's future but also set a precedent for addressing allegations of misconduct in high-stakes trials, ensuring the integrity of the justice system remains uncompromised. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

We're familiar with the idea that history shapes contemporary politics, but what about the reverse? How do today's political dynamics influence the way we remember the past? In this episode, we explore a compelling study that examines this question in the context of Ukraine—a country caught between conflicting historical narratives from Russia and the West. Since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the nation has endured not only a devastating war but also an intense battle over history, identity, and legitimacy. Yet, these struggles are deeply rooted in Ukraine's complex past. The study we discuss was conducted in 2019, offering a snapshot from before the war. It investigates how Ukrainians recall their families' experiences of victimisation during the Second World War and whether these memories are shaped by their present-day political beliefs. Joining us to discuss these findings is Kristin Bakke, Professor of Political Science and International Relations at UCL and co-author of the study. Mentioned in this episode: Bakke, K. M., Rickard, K., O'Loughlin, J., & Toal, G. (2024). Politicizing Memory: Evidence from Ukraine. Problems of Post-Communism, 1–20. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10758216.2024.2316037 The study in The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/growing-number-of-war-weary-ukrainians-would-reluctantly-give-up-territory-to-save-lives-suggests-recent-survey-238285 UCL's Department of Political Science and School of Public Policy offers a uniquely stimulating environment for the study of all fields of politics, including international relations, political theory, human rights, public policy-making and administration. The Department is recognised for its world-class research and policy impact, ranking among the top departments in the UK on both the 2021 Research Excellence Framework and the latest Guardian rankings. Show Contributors Kristin Bakke Alan Renwick

We're familiar with the idea that history shapes contemporary politics, but what about the reverse? How do today's political dynamics influence the way we remember the past?In this episode, we explore a compelling study that examines this question in the context of Ukraine—a country caught between conflicting historical narratives from Russia and the West.Since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the nation has endured not only a devastating war but also an intense battle over history, identity, and legitimacy. Yet, these struggles are deeply rooted in Ukraine's complex past.The study we discuss was conducted in 2019, offering a snapshot from before the war. It investigates how Ukrainians recall their families' experiences of victimisation during the Second World War and whether these memories are shaped by their present-day political beliefs.Joining us to discuss these findings is Kristin Bakke, Professor of Political Science and International Relations at UCL and co-author of the study. Mentioned in this episode:Bakke, K. M., Rickard, K., O'Loughlin, J., & Toal, G. (2024). Politicizing Memory: Evidence from Ukraine. Problems of Post-Communism, 1–20. The study in The Conversation. UCL's Department of Political Science and School of Public Policy offers a uniquely stimulating environment for the study of all fields of politics, including international relations, political theory, human rights, public policy-making and administration. The Department is recognised for its world-class research and policy impact, ranking among the top departments in the UK on both the 2021 Research Excellence Framework and the latest Guardian rankings.

With there being no main episode this week. Here is another Patreon bonus episode where Toal is joined by Mark Dallas and Neil "Wee Man" Bratchpiece!

Join the patreon now and get even more bonus content! www.patreon.com/apintandtwoshots We are proudly sponsored by G4 Claims/G4 Podcast Studio & CBD Oil Scotland http://www.notatfaultclaim.com/ Not at Fault Claim Made Easy. We can provide you with complete accident management support you require. We recover our costs from the at fault party, we wont take a percentage off your compensation claim. You can also contact your insurance company for assistance or instruct a solicitor of your choice. https://www.cbdoilscotland.com/ USE CODE CBD30 for 30% off! CBD Oil Scotland is a family-run business established in 2015. From their own experiences with CBD, they have seen a need to bring high-quality CBD products to the market at a price that was more accessible for everyone. Specialising in CBD means they can focus on what really matters to their customers in regard to the products: quality, transparency, and affordability. We hand deliver their products all over the country, so you can meet the team and have a point of contact to listen to your queries and share your experiences. CBD has become a large and lucrative market, and it is easy to distinguish which businesses are there purely for commercial gain, and which are there for the right reasons. They believe we are here for the right reasons: to provide the best quality product in Scotland at the best possible price, with the best customer service. https://turkiyeglasgow.co.uk/ Turkish cuisine is one of the most varied cuisines in the world. Turkiye the authentic Turkish restaurant in Glasgow! One destination to eat excellent grilled meats in an elegant atmosphere. First of a kind bringing you the best from the Turkish Kitchen. A pure Merchant city ambience and a place absolutely not flashy that is worth seeing, You will find Inspirational and traditional dishes of Turkish cuisine all in one roof .

With Carl away, Julian is in charge and joined by two very funny men in Dominic Holland and Tom Toal. They chat about New York, Dominic's superhero son, non-alcoholic beer, corporate gigs and much more! If you enjoy the show and want to hear the full length episodes plus extras, sign up to our Patreon at www.patreon.com/wearetvi  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Kate Kennedy meets musicians who, like her, had to stop playing after injury and reconsider their relationship with their instruments. We all know that listening to music can have a positive impact on wellbeing and mental health. But what about the performer? The truth is, for anyone wanting to turn professional, this is a highly competitive and pressurised environment often driven in part by fear and anxiety. It's a problem that can have a disproportionate effect on young people - which is why trumpeter Rebecca Toal and cellist Hattie Butterworth started their podcast, Things Musicians Don't Talk About, to try to break the taboo of not acknowledging the difficulties with mental illness that many musicians face. They talk to Kate about their personal experience of 'the system' for training musicians that can so easily break down, often resulting in crippling anxiety and burn-out. Obsessive behaviour and eating disorders are not uncommon as people try to gain some control over the endless cycle of practice and performance. By creating the podcast, Rebecca and Hattie have found a creative way to use their experiences to forge a new and less damaging path for themselves, but also to help others by sharing musicians' experiences honestly. Presenter: Kate Kennedy Producer: Erika Wright Production Coordinator: Elisabeth Tuohy Executive Producer: Rami Tzabar Healing Musicians is a TellTale Industries production for BBC Radio 3

We look at the new book by Gerard Toal. See more about Oceans Rise Empires Fall: Why Geopolitics Hastens Climate Catastrophe here. Oceans Rise Empires Fall: Why Geopolitics Hastens Climate Catastrophe, reviewed This title definitely caught our imagination. The concept does make a lot of sense. As war rages in Ukraine you can only wonder about the environmental impacts of the massive level of destruction inflicted. Naturally you need to fight as another country tries to take your land, but it does show that at a wider level, how on earth can humanity deal with global climate concerns if it is still trying to invade and seize land from other countries. This therefore is a massive problem and constraint on tackling any types of global environmental problems when different nations can not even work together. The book covers historical considerations and contexts well, with several good and informative chapters covering the geopolitical history of what has happened already. In some ways the title's reference to oceans rising seemed almost metaphorical rather than literal. Whereas we would have been interested in a more specific description of where oceans might rise and how it could impact on particular empires. For us the book spent longer in theoretical considerations rather than diving down into specific details and predictions of where and who might be most affected. Horses for courses perhaps. More about the book It is the decisive decade for climate change action, yet great power competition is surging. Geo-economic rivalries and territorial conflicts over Ukraine and Taiwan appear more important than collective action against catastrophic climate change. Why do great powers favor competition and rivalry over transnational policies to address the greatest threat humanity has ever faced? In Oceans Rise Empires Fall, Gerard Toal identifies geopolitics as the culprit. Examining its meaning, history, and leading thinkers, he exposes the geo-ecological foundations of geopolitics and the struggles for living space that it expresses. The book isolates three Earth-controlling practices that characterize geopolitics. The territorial control imperatives of great powers preclude collaborative behavior to address common challenges. Competing world historical missions drive rivalries and wars, like Russia's fossil-fuel-funded aggression against Ukraine. Military-industrial competition over leading edge technologies and critical minerals takes priority over collaborative decarbonization policies. In the contest between geopolitics and sustainable climate policies, the former takes precedence - especially when competition shifts to outright conflict. In this book, Toal interrogates that relationship and its stakes for the ongoing acceleration of climate change. About the author: Gerard Toal is Professor of Geography at Virginia Tech and the author of numerous books, including Near Abroad (Oxford), Bosnia Remade (Oxford, co-authored) and Critical Geopolitics (Minnesota). Advance praise for Oceans Rise Empires Fall "Toal has produced another stunningly original and indispensable contribution to our understanding of geopolitics. With great historical sweep and analytical insight, the book exposes how the great powers' enduring obsession with territorial defense, the projection of exceptional ideologies, and embrace of new technologies have accelerated global environmental catastrophe while insulating foreign policy and security officials from confronting the disastrous impact of their state-centered decisions." ALEXANDER COOLEY, Claire Tow Professor of Political Science, Barnard College, Columbia University, and coauthor of Exit from Hegemony: The Unraveling from the American Global Order "In Oceans Rise Empires Fall, Gerard Toal provides a masterful analysis of the ongoing interplay between geopolitical rivalry and the natural environment. As he persuasively demonstrates, the worldwide drive for geopolitical advantage has entailed an ever-...

In this episode of the Plain Speech Podcast, Michael Clary interviews Auron MacIntyre, author of 'Total State,' political commentator on YouTube and at the Blaze. They discuss the current political climate, the influence of progressive secular humanism in society, and the importance of conservative Christians understanding and engaging with societal changes. The conversation also covers MacIntyre's book, “Total State,” which is a big Red Pill about the way politics works in modern America. They explore the concept of the cathedral, a decentralized network controlling cultural consensus, and the spiritual aspects behind political ideologies. Additionally, the episode touches on localism as a response to federal overreach and the spiritual forces believed to be at play in shaping societal norms and beliefs. 00:00 Introduction to the Plain Speech Podcast 00:10 Interview Preview: Discussing 'Total State' with RN MacIntyre 00:57 Addressing Pride Month and Christian Response 01:48 Introducing 'God's Good Design': A Book on Biblical Sexuality 04:28 The Interview Begins: Getting to Know RN MacIntyre 04:37 RN MacIntyre's Christian Faith and Background 06:29 Discussing Southern Baptist Life and Upcoming Votes 07:56 Exploring Political Commentary and the Journey to The Blaze 16:53 Understanding the Total State: A Deep Dive 27:03 The Role of Opposition in the Total State 30:30 Navigating Political Power and Ideology 31:04 The Evolution of Public Perception: Bush to Trump 31:39 Exploring the Quest for Power: Ideology vs. Control 32:09 Italian Elite Theory and the Political Formula 36:31 The Cathedral: Manufacturing Cultural Consensus 44:10 Localism as a Response to Global Narratives 51:19 Theological Perspectives on Modern Ideologies 58:49 Engaging with Media and Upcoming Projects Buy Total State on Amazon Follow Auron on X: https://x.com/AuronMacintyre Find all the rest of Auron's work here Get Michael's book, God's Good Design (Amazon, Canon+) #AuronMacIntyre #TotalState #Culture #Localism #CathedralTheory #PoliticalRealism #Family #Conservatism #politics

► ACSOM is LIVE throughout June. Get your tickets on the links below!

Dr. Mark Smith of the Institute for Southern Studies is joined by the 2024 McNair Conversation in Southern Studies Honoree, Chief Justice Jean Toal. This discussion explores the Chief Justice's upbringing in South Carolina, her experience in southern politics, and her signal achievements in the legal field. The McNair Conversation is an annual event in which thinkers, leaders, and just plain interested people from the South are interviewed about their lives and how they understand the region. It is funded in part by a generous grant from the estate of the late Robert McNair, governor of South Carolina from 1965-1971.

In today's podcast, Paul has a conversation with Doug Toal of RhizeBio, an Ag Start-up. We discuss his career before starting RhizeBio and what is the goal for the company in how they help farmers.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In the high-stakes drama enveloping Alex Murdaugh's quest for a new trial, the legal community and public alike stand at a crossroads, pondering the intricate dance of law, ethics, and justice. A recent development, as dissected in an episode of "Hidden Killers" hosted by Tony Brueski with guest Bob Motta, defense attorney and host of the podcast Defense Diaries, casts a long shadow over the future of Murdaugh's pursuit of a retrial. The question now looms large: Is the path to justice a labyrinthine journey fraught with legal complexities, or a straightforward road that's merely seen as convoluted?  The core of the controversy stems from Judge Toal's decision to deny Alex Murdaugh a new trial, despite compelling testimony from a juror – referred to as Juror Z – who admitted their verdict was influenced by former clerk of court, Becky Hill. This revelation might have been seen as a "slam dunk" for Murdaugh's defense, suggesting a clear breach of the juror's impartiality. Yet, Judge Toal's ruling was unmoved by this testimony, sparking a debate that transcends the courtroom and delves into the very essence of legal integrity.  Bob Motta provided insight into the legal proceedings, suggesting that Judge Toal, with her storied legal background and tenure on the South Carolina Supreme Court, had likely anticipated the appeal long before the hearing concluded. Her decision to deny the retrial, according to Motta, was based on a stringent interpretation of what constitutes jury tampering, emphasizing the need for evidence that the tampering directly affected the trial's outcome. This interpretation, however, raises questions about the sufficiency of a juror's admission of influence in altering the course of justice.  In the high-stakes drama enveloping Alex Murdaugh's quest for a new trial, the legal community and public alike stand at a crossroads, pondering the intricate dance of law, ethics, and justice. A recent development, as dissected in an episode of "Hidden Killers" hosted by Tony Brueski with guest Bob Motta, defense attorney and host of the podcast Defense Diaries, casts a long shadow over the future of Murdaugh's pursuit of a retrial. The question now looms large: Is the path to justice a labyrinthine journey fraught with legal complexities, or a straightforward road that's merely seen as convoluted? The core of the controversy stems from Judge Toal's decision to deny Alex Murdaugh a new trial, despite compelling testimony from a juror – referred to as Juror Z – who admitted their verdict was influenced by former clerk of court, Becky Hill. This revelation might have been seen as a "slam dunk" for Murdaugh's defense, suggesting a clear breach of the juror's impartiality. Yet, Judge Toal's ruling was unmoved by this testimony, sparking a debate that transcends the courtroom and delves into the very essence of legal integrity. Bob Motta provided insight into the legal proceedings, suggesting that Judge Toal, with her storied legal background and tenure on the South Carolina Supreme Court, had likely anticipated the appeal long before the hearing concluded. Her decision to deny the retrial, according to Motta, was based on a stringent interpretation of what constitutes jury tampering, emphasizing the need for evidence that the tampering directly affected the trial's outcome. This interpretation, however, raises questions about the sufficiency of a juror's admission of influence in altering the course of justice. The conversation highlighted a legal paradox at the heart of the debate: does the intent behind Becky Hill's alleged influence bear more weight than the impact of her actions? Motta argued that the focus on intent over actual impact might set a dangerous precedent, potentially allowing clerks or other court officials leeway to discuss the case with jurors, as long as the intent to influence is not proven. This, he contends, undermines the foundational principle that any communication about the case with jurors is inherently improper. As Murdaugh's legal team gears up for the appeal, the discourse shifts to the appellate courts' role in reassessing Judge Toal's decision. Motta predicts that the appellate court will not only review the decision based on the record but also scrutinize the standard applied by Judge Toal during the evidentiary hearing. The possibility of a new trial, therefore, hinges on whether the appellate court finds Toal's interpretation of the law and her judgment in this instance to be flawed. The case stands as a pivotal moment for the justice system, challenging legal professionals and the public to consider the delicate balance between the letter of the law and the spirit of justice. The Murdaugh saga, with its twists and turns, serves as a litmus test for the legal community's adherence to principles of fairness, impartiality, and the sanctity of the jury system. As we stand at this crossroads, one must ponder: Will the appellate process unveil a path to retrial for Alex Murdaugh, thereby reinforcing the integrity of the justice system? Or will it affirm Judge Toal's decision, setting a precedent that could reshape our understanding of jury tampering and its implications for future trials? In the labyrinth of legal entanglements, the pursuit of justice continues, reminding us that the journey is often as significant as the destination. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the high-stakes drama enveloping Alex Murdaugh's quest for a new trial, the legal community and public alike stand at a crossroads, pondering the intricate dance of law, ethics, and justice. A recent development, as dissected in an episode of "Hidden Killers" hosted by Tony Brueski with guest Bob Motta, defense attorney and host of the podcast Defense Diaries, casts a long shadow over the future of Murdaugh's pursuit of a retrial. The question now looms large: Is the path to justice a labyrinthine journey fraught with legal complexities, or a straightforward road that's merely seen as convoluted?  The core of the controversy stems from Judge Toal's decision to deny Alex Murdaugh a new trial, despite compelling testimony from a juror – referred to as Juror Z – who admitted their verdict was influenced by former clerk of court, Becky Hill. This revelation might have been seen as a "slam dunk" for Murdaugh's defense, suggesting a clear breach of the juror's impartiality. Yet, Judge Toal's ruling was unmoved by this testimony, sparking a debate that transcends the courtroom and delves into the very essence of legal integrity.  Bob Motta provided insight into the legal proceedings, suggesting that Judge Toal, with her storied legal background and tenure on the South Carolina Supreme Court, had likely anticipated the appeal long before the hearing concluded. Her decision to deny the retrial, according to Motta, was based on a stringent interpretation of what constitutes jury tampering, emphasizing the need for evidence that the tampering directly affected the trial's outcome. This interpretation, however, raises questions about the sufficiency of a juror's admission of influence in altering the course of justice.  In the high-stakes drama enveloping Alex Murdaugh's quest for a new trial, the legal community and public alike stand at a crossroads, pondering the intricate dance of law, ethics, and justice. A recent development, as dissected in an episode of "Hidden Killers" hosted by Tony Brueski with guest Bob Motta, defense attorney and host of the podcast Defense Diaries, casts a long shadow over the future of Murdaugh's pursuit of a retrial. The question now looms large: Is the path to justice a labyrinthine journey fraught with legal complexities, or a straightforward road that's merely seen as convoluted? The core of the controversy stems from Judge Toal's decision to deny Alex Murdaugh a new trial, despite compelling testimony from a juror – referred to as Juror Z – who admitted their verdict was influenced by former clerk of court, Becky Hill. This revelation might have been seen as a "slam dunk" for Murdaugh's defense, suggesting a clear breach of the juror's impartiality. Yet, Judge Toal's ruling was unmoved by this testimony, sparking a debate that transcends the courtroom and delves into the very essence of legal integrity. Bob Motta provided insight into the legal proceedings, suggesting that Judge Toal, with her storied legal background and tenure on the South Carolina Supreme Court, had likely anticipated the appeal long before the hearing concluded. Her decision to deny the retrial, according to Motta, was based on a stringent interpretation of what constitutes jury tampering, emphasizing the need for evidence that the tampering directly affected the trial's outcome. This interpretation, however, raises questions about the sufficiency of a juror's admission of influence in altering the course of justice. The conversation highlighted a legal paradox at the heart of the debate: does the intent behind Becky Hill's alleged influence bear more weight than the impact of her actions? Motta argued that the focus on intent over actual impact might set a dangerous precedent, potentially allowing clerks or other court officials leeway to discuss the case with jurors, as long as the intent to influence is not proven. This, he contends, undermines the foundational principle that any communication about the case with jurors is inherently improper. As Murdaugh's legal team gears up for the appeal, the discourse shifts to the appellate courts' role in reassessing Judge Toal's decision. Motta predicts that the appellate court will not only review the decision based on the record but also scrutinize the standard applied by Judge Toal during the evidentiary hearing. The possibility of a new trial, therefore, hinges on whether the appellate court finds Toal's interpretation of the law and her judgment in this instance to be flawed. The case stands as a pivotal moment for the justice system, challenging legal professionals and the public to consider the delicate balance between the letter of the law and the spirit of justice. The Murdaugh saga, with its twists and turns, serves as a litmus test for the legal community's adherence to principles of fairness, impartiality, and the sanctity of the jury system. As we stand at this crossroads, one must ponder: Will the appellate process unveil a path to retrial for Alex Murdaugh, thereby reinforcing the integrity of the justice system? Or will it affirm Judge Toal's decision, setting a precedent that could reshape our understanding of jury tampering and its implications for future trials? In the labyrinth of legal entanglements, the pursuit of justice continues, reminding us that the journey is often as significant as the destination. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the high-stakes drama enveloping Alex Murdaugh's quest for a new trial, the legal community and public alike stand at a crossroads, pondering the intricate dance of law, ethics, and justice. A recent development, as dissected in an episode of "Hidden Killers" hosted by Tony Brueski with guest Bob Motta, defense attorney and host of the podcast Defense Diaries, casts a long shadow over the future of Murdaugh's pursuit of a retrial. The question now looms large: Is the path to justice a labyrinthine journey fraught with legal complexities, or a straightforward road that's merely seen as convoluted?  The core of the controversy stems from Judge Toal's decision to deny Alex Murdaugh a new trial, despite compelling testimony from a juror – referred to as Juror Z – who admitted their verdict was influenced by former clerk of court, Becky Hill. This revelation might have been seen as a "slam dunk" for Murdaugh's defense, suggesting a clear breach of the juror's impartiality. Yet, Judge Toal's ruling was unmoved by this testimony, sparking a debate that transcends the courtroom and delves into the very essence of legal integrity.  Bob Motta provided insight into the legal proceedings, suggesting that Judge Toal, with her storied legal background and tenure on the South Carolina Supreme Court, had likely anticipated the appeal long before the hearing concluded. Her decision to deny the retrial, according to Motta, was based on a stringent interpretation of what constitutes jury tampering, emphasizing the need for evidence that the tampering directly affected the trial's outcome. This interpretation, however, raises questions about the sufficiency of a juror's admission of influence in altering the course of justice.  In the high-stakes drama enveloping Alex Murdaugh's quest for a new trial, the legal community and public alike stand at a crossroads, pondering the intricate dance of law, ethics, and justice. A recent development, as dissected in an episode of "Hidden Killers" hosted by Tony Brueski with guest Bob Motta, defense attorney and host of the podcast Defense Diaries, casts a long shadow over the future of Murdaugh's pursuit of a retrial. The question now looms large: Is the path to justice a labyrinthine journey fraught with legal complexities, or a straightforward road that's merely seen as convoluted? The core of the controversy stems from Judge Toal's decision to deny Alex Murdaugh a new trial, despite compelling testimony from a juror – referred to as Juror Z – who admitted their verdict was influenced by former clerk of court, Becky Hill. This revelation might have been seen as a "slam dunk" for Murdaugh's defense, suggesting a clear breach of the juror's impartiality. Yet, Judge Toal's ruling was unmoved by this testimony, sparking a debate that transcends the courtroom and delves into the very essence of legal integrity. Bob Motta provided insight into the legal proceedings, suggesting that Judge Toal, with her storied legal background and tenure on the South Carolina Supreme Court, had likely anticipated the appeal long before the hearing concluded. Her decision to deny the retrial, according to Motta, was based on a stringent interpretation of what constitutes jury tampering, emphasizing the need for evidence that the tampering directly affected the trial's outcome. This interpretation, however, raises questions about the sufficiency of a juror's admission of influence in altering the course of justice. The conversation highlighted a legal paradox at the heart of the debate: does the intent behind Becky Hill's alleged influence bear more weight than the impact of her actions? Motta argued that the focus on intent over actual impact might set a dangerous precedent, potentially allowing clerks or other court officials leeway to discuss the case with jurors, as long as the intent to influence is not proven. This, he contends, undermines the foundational principle that any communication about the case with jurors is inherently improper. As Murdaugh's legal team gears up for the appeal, the discourse shifts to the appellate courts' role in reassessing Judge Toal's decision. Motta predicts that the appellate court will not only review the decision based on the record but also scrutinize the standard applied by Judge Toal during the evidentiary hearing. The possibility of a new trial, therefore, hinges on whether the appellate court finds Toal's interpretation of the law and her judgment in this instance to be flawed. The case stands as a pivotal moment for the justice system, challenging legal professionals and the public to consider the delicate balance between the letter of the law and the spirit of justice. The Murdaugh saga, with its twists and turns, serves as a litmus test for the legal community's adherence to principles of fairness, impartiality, and the sanctity of the jury system. As we stand at this crossroads, one must ponder: Will the appellate process unveil a path to retrial for Alex Murdaugh, thereby reinforcing the integrity of the justice system? Or will it affirm Judge Toal's decision, setting a precedent that could reshape our understanding of jury tampering and its implications for future trials? In the labyrinth of legal entanglements, the pursuit of justice continues, reminding us that the journey is often as significant as the destination. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a recent twist in the Alex Murdaugh case saga, discussions have veered into the complex territory of appellate courts, jury influence, and the role of key figures like Judge Toal and Becky Hill. The "Hidden Killers" podcast, hosted by Tony Brueski, featured an enlightening conversation with Robin Dreeke, a retired FBI Special Agent, delving into the nuances of the ongoing legal battle. This discourse raises a crucial question: Is the judicial system's integrity at stake, or is it functioning precisely as intended, ensuring the utmost scrutiny and fairness in high-profile cases? Murdaugh's journey towards a potential retrial hit a significant roadblock when Judge Toal, overseeing the evidentiary hearing, deemed the presented arguments insufficient for granting a new trial. Despite a juror's assertion that Becky Hill, the former clerk of court, had influenced their verdict decision, Judge Toal ruled against Murdaugh's appeal for a retrial. This decision has ignited debates on the standards of proof required to overturn a conviction and the judicial discretion wielded by judges. Dreeke and Brueski pondered the future steps for Murdaugh, emphasizing that the saga is far from over. Dreeke speculated, "I would put money on that we will see an Alex Murdaugh retrial, probably just not as soon as we wanted it to be." The conversation shifted towards Judge Toal's motivations, contemplating whether her decision was influenced by a desire not to be the one granting Murdaugh a new trial. This speculation opens a broader discussion on the challenges and pressures faced by judges in high-stakes legal proceedings. Central to the retrial request is the allegation against Becky Hill for jury tampering. The juror's testimony that Hill's words swayed their decision has spotlighted the intricate balance between juror independence and external influences. Dreeke remarked on the importance of the judicial system's checks and balances, expressing relief that the system appears to be working, despite individual missteps. The podcast delved into the potential implications of the appellate process and the roles of both the defense and prosecution in navigating these legal waters. The discussion highlighted the systemic safeguards designed to correct or uphold trial outcomes through appellate review. Yet, it also touched on the personal and professional dilemmas judges like Toal face, balancing legal standards with public and personal expectations. Brueski and Dreeke's conversation leaves listeners with more questions than answers. What will the appellate courts decide, and how will additional evidence or allegations, such as the unresolved wiretapping investigation related to Becky Hill, affect the case's trajectory? Moreover, the speculation around juror motivations and the integrity of their testimony adds another layer of complexity to an already convoluted case. As the Alex Murdaugh case continues to unfold, the "Hidden Killers" podcast episode serves as a microcosm of the broader debates surrounding the American legal system. How far can, and should, the system go to ensure justice is served fairly and impartially, especially in cases that capture the public's attention and scrutiny? In conclusion, the discussions between Brueski and Dreeke offer a fascinating glimpse into the inner workings of legal strategy, judicial discretion, and the quest for justice in a highly publicized case. As the saga progresses, the overarching question remains: Will the judicial system's mechanisms for review and appeal ultimately reinforce the public's trust in its ability to deliver justice, or will it underscore the complexities and potential frailties within? The Alex Murdaugh case, with its layers of legal, ethical, and societal implications, continues to challenge and provoke, ensuring its place in the annals of true crime and legal analysis for years to come. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In a recent twist in the Alex Murdaugh case saga, discussions have veered into the complex territory of appellate courts, jury influence, and the role of key figures like Judge Toal and Becky Hill. The "Hidden Killers" podcast, hosted by Tony Brueski, featured an enlightening conversation with Robin Dreeke, a retired FBI Special Agent, delving into the nuances of the ongoing legal battle. This discourse raises a crucial question: Is the judicial system's integrity at stake, or is it functioning precisely as intended, ensuring the utmost scrutiny and fairness in high-profile cases? Murdaugh's journey towards a potential retrial hit a significant roadblock when Judge Toal, overseeing the evidentiary hearing, deemed the presented arguments insufficient for granting a new trial. Despite a juror's assertion that Becky Hill, the former clerk of court, had influenced their verdict decision, Judge Toal ruled against Murdaugh's appeal for a retrial. This decision has ignited debates on the standards of proof required to overturn a conviction and the judicial discretion wielded by judges. Dreeke and Brueski pondered the future steps for Murdaugh, emphasizing that the saga is far from over. Dreeke speculated, "I would put money on that we will see an Alex Murdaugh retrial, probably just not as soon as we wanted it to be." The conversation shifted towards Judge Toal's motivations, contemplating whether her decision was influenced by a desire not to be the one granting Murdaugh a new trial. This speculation opens a broader discussion on the challenges and pressures faced by judges in high-stakes legal proceedings. Central to the retrial request is the allegation against Becky Hill for jury tampering. The juror's testimony that Hill's words swayed their decision has spotlighted the intricate balance between juror independence and external influences. Dreeke remarked on the importance of the judicial system's checks and balances, expressing relief that the system appears to be working, despite individual missteps. The podcast delved into the potential implications of the appellate process and the roles of both the defense and prosecution in navigating these legal waters. The discussion highlighted the systemic safeguards designed to correct or uphold trial outcomes through appellate review. Yet, it also touched on the personal and professional dilemmas judges like Toal face, balancing legal standards with public and personal expectations. Brueski and Dreeke's conversation leaves listeners with more questions than answers. What will the appellate courts decide, and how will additional evidence or allegations, such as the unresolved wiretapping investigation related to Becky Hill, affect the case's trajectory? Moreover, the speculation around juror motivations and the integrity of their testimony adds another layer of complexity to an already convoluted case. As the Alex Murdaugh case continues to unfold, the "Hidden Killers" podcast episode serves as a microcosm of the broader debates surrounding the American legal system. How far can, and should, the system go to ensure justice is served fairly and impartially, especially in cases that capture the public's attention and scrutiny? In conclusion, the discussions between Brueski and Dreeke offer a fascinating glimpse into the inner workings of legal strategy, judicial discretion, and the quest for justice in a highly publicized case. As the saga progresses, the overarching question remains: Will the judicial system's mechanisms for review and appeal ultimately reinforce the public's trust in its ability to deliver justice, or will it underscore the complexities and potential frailties within? The Alex Murdaugh case, with its layers of legal, ethical, and societal implications, continues to challenge and provoke, ensuring its place in the annals of true crime and legal analysis for years to come. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In a recent twist in the Alex Murdaugh case saga, discussions have veered into the complex territory of appellate courts, jury influence, and the role of key figures like Judge Toal and Becky Hill. The "Hidden Killers" podcast, hosted by Tony Brueski, featured an enlightening conversation with Robin Dreeke, a retired FBI Special Agent, delving into the nuances of the ongoing legal battle. This discourse raises a crucial question: Is the judicial system's integrity at stake, or is it functioning precisely as intended, ensuring the utmost scrutiny and fairness in high-profile cases? Murdaugh's journey towards a potential retrial hit a significant roadblock when Judge Toal, overseeing the evidentiary hearing, deemed the presented arguments insufficient for granting a new trial. Despite a juror's assertion that Becky Hill, the former clerk of court, had influenced their verdict decision, Judge Toal ruled against Murdaugh's appeal for a retrial. This decision has ignited debates on the standards of proof required to overturn a conviction and the judicial discretion wielded by judges. Dreeke and Brueski pondered the future steps for Murdaugh, emphasizing that the saga is far from over. Dreeke speculated, "I would put money on that we will see an Alex Murdaugh retrial, probably just not as soon as we wanted it to be." The conversation shifted towards Judge Toal's motivations, contemplating whether her decision was influenced by a desire not to be the one granting Murdaugh a new trial. This speculation opens a broader discussion on the challenges and pressures faced by judges in high-stakes legal proceedings. Central to the retrial request is the allegation against Becky Hill for jury tampering. The juror's testimony that Hill's words swayed their decision has spotlighted the intricate balance between juror independence and external influences. Dreeke remarked on the importance of the judicial system's checks and balances, expressing relief that the system appears to be working, despite individual missteps. The podcast delved into the potential implications of the appellate process and the roles of both the defense and prosecution in navigating these legal waters. The discussion highlighted the systemic safeguards designed to correct or uphold trial outcomes through appellate review. Yet, it also touched on the personal and professional dilemmas judges like Toal face, balancing legal standards with public and personal expectations. Brueski and Dreeke's conversation leaves listeners with more questions than answers. What will the appellate courts decide, and how will additional evidence or allegations, such as the unresolved wiretapping investigation related to Becky Hill, affect the case's trajectory? Moreover, the speculation around juror motivations and the integrity of their testimony adds another layer of complexity to an already convoluted case. As the Alex Murdaugh case continues to unfold, the "Hidden Killers" podcast episode serves as a microcosm of the broader debates surrounding the American legal system. How far can, and should, the system go to ensure justice is served fairly and impartially, especially in cases that capture the public's attention and scrutiny? In conclusion, the discussions between Brueski and Dreeke offer a fascinating glimpse into the inner workings of legal strategy, judicial discretion, and the quest for justice in a highly publicized case. As the saga progresses, the overarching question remains: Will the judicial system's mechanisms for review and appeal ultimately reinforce the public's trust in its ability to deliver justice, or will it underscore the complexities and potential frailties within? The Alex Murdaugh case, with its layers of legal, ethical, and societal implications, continues to challenge and provoke, ensuring its place in the annals of true crime and legal analysis for years to come. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In the ongoing legal drama surrounding Alex Murdaugh, the recent denial of a new trial by Judge Toal has sparked intense debate and speculation over the future of the case. Despite a juror, known only as Juror Z, explicitly stating that their decision was influenced by the words of Becky Hill, the clerk of court, Judge Toal found this testimony insufficient to warrant a retrial. This decision has left many questioning the integrity of the trial process and what lies ahead for Murdaugh. Jennifer Coffindaffer, a retired FBI special agent and guest on Tony Brueski's "Hidden Killers" podcast, shared her insights into the court's proceedings. Coffindaffer was not surprised by the outcome, given the strict criteria set by Judge Toal for proving jury tampering. According to Coffindaffer, the requirement to prove intent made it an almost impossible task for Murdaugh's defense. "When I saw that narrow focus, I thought, 'Oh my God, there's no way they're going to be able to prove that because you'd have to get into her mind,'" Coffindaffer explained. The controversy centers on Becky Hill's alleged statements to Juror Z, which purportedly swayed the juror's decision. Despite this claim, Judge Toal concluded that the evidence presented was not enough to overturn the verdict. This has led to discussions about the role of intent in jury tampering and whether the mere impact of Hill's words, regardless of her intention, should have been enough to prompt a retrial. Brueski and Coffindaffer speculated on Judge Toal's reluctance to grant a new trial. "I do halfway wonder about, did Judge Toal just not want to be the person to give Alex Murdaugh a new trial," Brueski pondered, suggesting that Toal might prefer to leave such a contentious decision to an appellate court. This raises questions about the personal and professional pressures judges face in high-profile cases and how these pressures might influence their decisions. The discussion also delved into the peculiar situation of having one juror's testimony against the collective memory of the others. Coffindaffer noted the unusual nature of the case, where 11 jurors contradicted the experiences of one, highlighting the challenges in proving jury tampering under such circumstances. As Murdaugh's legal team prepares to challenge the ruling, the appellate process looms as the next battlefield. Coffindaffer gave the possibility of an overturned decision a slim 10 percent chance, citing the robust experience of Judge Toal and the legal precedent she established. Yet, the door remains ajar for Murdaugh's defense to present their case to higher courts, which could scrutinize Toal's narrow interpretation of the law and the evidence presented. This phase of the Murdaugh saga leaves us with more questions than answers. How will appellate courts view the singular influence of Becky Hill on Juror Z? Will further investigations into Hill's actions or other undisclosed evidence shift the legal landscape? And most importantly, can the appellate process provide a clearer resolution to a case mired in controversy and public intrigue? In conclusion, the decision not to grant Alex Murdaugh a new trial, despite the dramatic claims of jury influence, underscores the complexities of legal procedures and the high stakes involved in overturning a conviction. As the case advances through the appellate courts, the public, legal experts, and those directly involved in the case watch closely, eager to see whether justice will serve the letter of the law or if the spirit of fairness will guide the final outcome. Will the appellate courts offer Murdaugh another shot at freedom, or will the current verdict stand as a testament to the judicial system's rigor? Only time will tell, but one thing is certain: the debate over justice, intent, and influence in the courtroom is far from over. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the ongoing legal drama surrounding Alex Murdaugh, the recent denial of a new trial by Judge Toal has sparked intense debate and speculation over the future of the case. Despite a juror, known only as Juror Z, explicitly stating that their decision was influenced by the words of Becky Hill, the clerk of court, Judge Toal found this testimony insufficient to warrant a retrial. This decision has left many questioning the integrity of the trial process and what lies ahead for Murdaugh. Jennifer Coffindaffer, a retired FBI special agent and guest on Tony Brueski's "Hidden Killers" podcast, shared her insights into the court's proceedings. Coffindaffer was not surprised by the outcome, given the strict criteria set by Judge Toal for proving jury tampering. According to Coffindaffer, the requirement to prove intent made it an almost impossible task for Murdaugh's defense. "When I saw that narrow focus, I thought, 'Oh my God, there's no way they're going to be able to prove that because you'd have to get into her mind,'" Coffindaffer explained. The controversy centers on Becky Hill's alleged statements to Juror Z, which purportedly swayed the juror's decision. Despite this claim, Judge Toal concluded that the evidence presented was not enough to overturn the verdict. This has led to discussions about the role of intent in jury tampering and whether the mere impact of Hill's words, regardless of her intention, should have been enough to prompt a retrial. Brueski and Coffindaffer speculated on Judge Toal's reluctance to grant a new trial. "I do halfway wonder about, did Judge Toal just not want to be the person to give Alex Murdaugh a new trial," Brueski pondered, suggesting that Toal might prefer to leave such a contentious decision to an appellate court. This raises questions about the personal and professional pressures judges face in high-profile cases and how these pressures might influence their decisions. The discussion also delved into the peculiar situation of having one juror's testimony against the collective memory of the others. Coffindaffer noted the unusual nature of the case, where 11 jurors contradicted the experiences of one, highlighting the challenges in proving jury tampering under such circumstances. As Murdaugh's legal team prepares to challenge the ruling, the appellate process looms as the next battlefield. Coffindaffer gave the possibility of an overturned decision a slim 10 percent chance, citing the robust experience of Judge Toal and the legal precedent she established. Yet, the door remains ajar for Murdaugh's defense to present their case to higher courts, which could scrutinize Toal's narrow interpretation of the law and the evidence presented. This phase of the Murdaugh saga leaves us with more questions than answers. How will appellate courts view the singular influence of Becky Hill on Juror Z? Will further investigations into Hill's actions or other undisclosed evidence shift the legal landscape? And most importantly, can the appellate process provide a clearer resolution to a case mired in controversy and public intrigue? In conclusion, the decision not to grant Alex Murdaugh a new trial, despite the dramatic claims of jury influence, underscores the complexities of legal procedures and the high stakes involved in overturning a conviction. As the case advances through the appellate courts, the public, legal experts, and those directly involved in the case watch closely, eager to see whether justice will serve the letter of the law or if the spirit of fairness will guide the final outcome. Will the appellate courts offer Murdaugh another shot at freedom, or will the current verdict stand as a testament to the judicial system's rigor? Only time will tell, but one thing is certain: the debate over justice, intent, and influence in the courtroom is far from over. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Becky Hill, who ran as the Republican candidate for Colleton County's clerk of court with promises of "leadership with integrity," is now confronting a turbulent crossroads in her political career as her first term nears its end. Hill's bid for reelection remains uncertain as she navigates two criminal investigations and severe criticism from former South Carolina Chief Justice Jean Toal. Toal's criticism arose from allegations that Hill made inappropriate comments in front of jurors during the highly-publicized murder trial of former Hampton lawyer Alex Murdaugh in March. While Toal ultimately ruled that these comments did not warrant a retrial, she questioned the credibility of Hill's testimony, citing the clerk's susceptibility to the "siren call of celebrity." The State Law Enforcement Division (SLED) confirmed its ongoing investigations into Hill's interactions with the jury and potential misuse of her office, even after Toal's decision. SLED spokeswoman Renee Wunderlich emphasized that Toal's ruling did not affect the status of their active investigations. Additionally, Hill's cellphone was seized in connection with a SLED investigation into her son, Jeffrey Hill, who served as Colleton County's IT director. Jeffrey Hill faced charges of wiretapping, and the investigation into his actions could have implications for Becky Hill's political future. While the South Carolina Supreme Court holds the power to remove or reassign judges, it lacks explicit authority over elected clerks, and historically, it has not sought to remove any clerk from office this century, according to a Post and Courier review of court orders. Becky Hill's ultimate fate in office hinges on Colleton County's voters, who may have the opportunity to weigh in during the state's June 11 primaries if she chooses to run for reelection. As of now, no candidates have publicly declared their intent to challenge Hill, and the Colleton County GOP has not clarified whether they would support her candidacy. The Colleton County Democratic Party, on the other hand, is actively seeking potential challengers. Clarence Wiggins, the party's chair, stated that they are actively recruiting candidates and discussing the clerk election at every party meeting, indicating a potential shift in the political landscape. Candidates must declare their intentions soon, with the filing period for office opening in mid-March and closing on April 1. Becky Hill has remained tight-lipped about her future plans and has not responded to inquiries from The Post and Courier. Her attorney, Justin Bamberg, has declined to comment on her situation. Hill's credibility has faced scrutiny before Toal's critique. In December, she admitted to plagiarizing the introduction to her book, raising questions about her trustworthiness. On the witness stand, these concerns intensified as she denied making any comments about the case to jurors, directly contradicting the testimony of three deliberating jurors and one alternate who asserted that Hill discussed Alex Murdaugh's plans to testify in his own defense. As Becky Hill contemplates her political future, the uncertainty surrounding her candidacy and the ongoing investigations cast a shadow over her promise of "leadership with integrity" in Colleton County's clerk of court office. The coming months will determine whether she can weather this storm and secure another term in office or if challengers will emerge to compete for the position in the primaries. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Becky Hill, who ran as the Republican candidate for Colleton County's clerk of court with promises of "leadership with integrity," is now confronting a turbulent crossroads in her political career as her first term nears its end. Hill's bid for reelection remains uncertain as she navigates two criminal investigations and severe criticism from former South Carolina Chief Justice Jean Toal. Toal's criticism arose from allegations that Hill made inappropriate comments in front of jurors during the highly-publicized murder trial of former Hampton lawyer Alex Murdaugh in March. While Toal ultimately ruled that these comments did not warrant a retrial, she questioned the credibility of Hill's testimony, citing the clerk's susceptibility to the "siren call of celebrity." The State Law Enforcement Division (SLED) confirmed its ongoing investigations into Hill's interactions with the jury and potential misuse of her office, even after Toal's decision. SLED spokeswoman Renee Wunderlich emphasized that Toal's ruling did not affect the status of their active investigations. Additionally, Hill's cellphone was seized in connection with a SLED investigation into her son, Jeffrey Hill, who served as Colleton County's IT director. Jeffrey Hill faced charges of wiretapping, and the investigation into his actions could have implications for Becky Hill's political future. While the South Carolina Supreme Court holds the power to remove or reassign judges, it lacks explicit authority over elected clerks, and historically, it has not sought to remove any clerk from office this century, according to a Post and Courier review of court orders. Becky Hill's ultimate fate in office hinges on Colleton County's voters, who may have the opportunity to weigh in during the state's June 11 primaries if she chooses to run for reelection. As of now, no candidates have publicly declared their intent to challenge Hill, and the Colleton County GOP has not clarified whether they would support her candidacy. The Colleton County Democratic Party, on the other hand, is actively seeking potential challengers. Clarence Wiggins, the party's chair, stated that they are actively recruiting candidates and discussing the clerk election at every party meeting, indicating a potential shift in the political landscape. Candidates must declare their intentions soon, with the filing period for office opening in mid-March and closing on April 1. Becky Hill has remained tight-lipped about her future plans and has not responded to inquiries from The Post and Courier. Her attorney, Justin Bamberg, has declined to comment on her situation. Hill's credibility has faced scrutiny before Toal's critique. In December, she admitted to plagiarizing the introduction to her book, raising questions about her trustworthiness. On the witness stand, these concerns intensified as she denied making any comments about the case to jurors, directly contradicting the testimony of three deliberating jurors and one alternate who asserted that Hill discussed Alex Murdaugh's plans to testify in his own defense. As Becky Hill contemplates her political future, the uncertainty surrounding her candidacy and the ongoing investigations cast a shadow over her promise of "leadership with integrity" in Colleton County's clerk of court office. The coming months will determine whether she can weather this storm and secure another term in office or if challengers will emerge to compete for the position in the primaries. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The Alex Murdaugh Rollercoaster (finally) comes to a stop. True Sunlight Co-hosts Mandy Matney and Liz Farrell break down everything that happened at the very weird and very wild evidentiary hearing where Justice Jean Toal brought much-needed sanity to the state of South Carolina. After nearly seven hours of hearing from the jurors who found Alex guilty of murder and other testimony, Justice Toal concluded that Colleton County Clerk Becky Hill made “fleeting and foolish” comments to people around her, including one or more jurors, in her quest for publicity but that she did not tamper with the jury.  In other news, Mandy is excited to go back to Columbia South Carolina as we celebrate justice at the Capital City Club Columbia, SC to bring a special evening event you won't want to miss!! Luna Shark CEO and celebrated journalist Mandy Matney will be joined by Attorney and Legal Director of the South Carolina Victim Assistance Network, Sarah A. Ford, for an evening reception and examination of state government, true crime and media and of course the conclusion of this very long saga. This Exclusive In-Person Event is restricted to Invited Clubs Members and Luna Shark Premium Members Only – RSVP Today By Clicking the following link or visit lunasharkmedia.com/events to learn more. https://lunasharkmedia.com/event/capital-city-club-confidential/ In February we're offering your first month of Soak Up The Sun membership for 50% off. Join Luna Shark Premium today at Lunashark.Supercast.com. Premium Members also get access to searchable case files, written articles with documents, case photos, episode videos and exclusive live experiences with our hosts on lunasharkmedia.com all in one place. CLICK HERE to learn more: https://bit.ly/3BdUtOE. And for those just wanting ad-free listening without all the other great content, we now offer ad-free listening on Apple Podcast through a subscription to Luna Shark Plus on the Apple Podcasts App. Or become a member on YouTube for exclusive videos and ad-free episodes. SUNscribe to our free email list to get that special offer for first time members, receive alerts on bonus episodes, calls to action, new shows and updates. CLICK HERE to learn more: https://bit.ly/3KBMJcP Visit our new events page Lunasharkmedia.com/events where you can learn about the upcoming in-person and virtual appearances from hosts! And a special thank you to our sponsors: Microdose.com, PELOTON, and VUORI. Use promo code "MANDY" for a special offer! For current & accurate updates: TrueSunlight.com facebook.com/TrueSunlightPodcast/ Instagram.com/TrueSunlightPod Twitter.com/mandymatney Twitter.com/elizfarrell youtube.com/@LunaSharkMedia Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Justice Toal denied a request from Alex Murdaugh for a new trial on his murder conviction. Alex's defense team argued jury tampering by Clerk of Courts, Becky Hill. You can hear parts of the evidentiary hearing in this episode, and our reaction to the action. Seton Tucker and Matt Harris started the podcast shortly after the murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh. The Impact of Influence podcast will continue covering true crime stories from th southeast region of the United States. Seton and Matt also host The Wicked South Podcast with journalist Michael DeWitt. Search for Impact of Influence on Facebook. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Cup of Justice co-hosts Mandy Matney, Liz Farrell and Eric Bland have been vindicated … once again. After four long months of screaming from the rooftops that Team Murdaugh did not have evidence of jury tampering, COJ finally gets to close the lid on that debate: There will be no new trial for murderer Alex Murdaugh. In a tumultuous hearing that lasted all day, Justice Jean Toal — who, like her colleague Judge Clifton Newman, gives us hope — ruled that while Colleton County Clerk of Court Becky Hill may have been foolish, fame-seeking and not entirely credible, she did not tamper with the jury for her book sales. On today's show Mandy, Liz and Eric discuss what went down in Richland County Courthouse on Monday and what comes next now that they have their answer.    In other news, Mandy is excited to go back to Columbia South Carolina as we celebrate justice at the Capital City Club Columbia, SC to bring a special evening event you won't want to miss!! Luna Shark CEO and celebrated journalist Mandy Matney will be joined by Attorney and Legal Director of the South Carolina Victim Assistance Network, Sarah A. Ford, for an evening reception and examination of state government, true crime and media and of course the conclusion of this very long saga. This Exclusive In-Person Event is restricted to Invited Clubs Members and Luna Shark Premium Members Only – RSVP Today By Clicking the following link or visit lunasharkmedia.com/events to learn more. https://lunasharkmedia.com/event/capital-city-club-confidential/ Mandy's new book, Blood on Their Hands arrived November 14th. Go to www.bloodontheirhandsbook.com to learn more.  Check out EB's new merch with a mission at theericbland.com or the Luna Shark Merch With a Mission shop at lunasharkmerch.com/ Premium Members also get access to searchable case files, written articles with documents, case photos, episode videos and exclusive live experiences with our hosts on lunasharkmedia.com all in one place. CLICK HERE to learn more: https://bit.ly/3BdUtOE. And for those just wanting ad-free listening without all the other great content, we now offer ad-free listening on Apple Podcast through a subscription to Luna Shark Plus on the Apple Podcasts App. And we also offer access to exclusive video content through our new YouTube Premiere subscription. SUNscribe to our free email list to get alerts on bonus episodes, calls to action, new shows and updates. CLICK HERE to learn more: https://bit.ly/3KBMJcP *** NEW: If you ever notice audio errors in the pod, email info@lunasharkmedia.com and we'll send you fun merch if you find something that needs to be adjusted! *** Find us on social media: Twitter.com/mandymatney - Twitter.com/elizfarrell - Twitter.com/theericbland https://www.facebook.com/cupofjustice/ YouTube *The views expressed on the Cup of Justice bonus episodes do not constitute legal advice. Listeners desiring legal advice for any particular legal matter are urged to consult an attorney of their choosing who can provide legal advice based upon a full understanding of the facts and circumstances of their claim. The views expressed on the Cup of Justice episodes also do not express the views or opinions of Bland Richter, LLP, or its attorneys. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

In a hearing that could potentially impact the fate of Alex Murdaugh, a juror from his 2023 murder trial has alleged feeling pressured by Colleton County Clerk Becky Hill and other jurors to render a guilty verdict. The hearing, overseen by retired South Carolina Judge Jean Toal, aims to investigate claims of jury tampering by Hill and how it may have influenced Murdaugh's conviction.    During the hearing on Monday morning, a juror identified as Juror Z came forward with startling allegations against Hill. Juror Z stated that Hill instructed the jury to closely monitor Murdaugh's actions and made other comments that raised concerns. "To me, it felt like she made it seem like he was already guilty," Juror Z remarked. When asked by the judge if Hill's comments had an impact on their verdict, Juror Z confirmed that it did.    Juror Z further revealed that the jury's foreperson had mentioned that Murdaugh was "crying on cue," and jurors often discussed the trial outside of the courtroom before deliberations. Additionally, Juror Z claimed that Hill pressured them to speak to television reporters after the trial.    However, a majority of the other jurors who were questioned offered different accounts. Many stated that they had not heard Hill make any comments about Murdaugh, and some denied that such comments were ever made. Among those who admitted to hearing Hill's comments, they maintained that it did not influence their decision to deliver a guilty verdict.    Becky Hill took the stand on Monday afternoon to respond to these allegations.    Previously, Murdaugh's legal team had presented affidavits signed by a juror who voted to convict him, the one who was removed from the jury, and testimony from a paralegal involved in the jury interviews.    Additionally, Toal had heard testimony from a juror publicly identified as Juror X ahead of Monday's hearing. Juror X had been accused by Murdaugh's defense of pressuring the jury to reach a quick verdict to secure a book deal and media appearances related to the trial. However, this opportunity was jeopardized after the trial concluded with a guilty verdict. Moreover, Juror X faced criticism for parts of a book she authored about the trial being plagiarized, leading to the suspension of book sales, and her son being charged with wiretapping.    Judge Toal has expressed her intention to focus on whether Hill's alleged comments to the jury had an inappropriate influence on the final verdict.    Alex Murdaugh, a once-prominent attorney hailing from a politically influential South Carolina family, had received consecutive life sentences in March for the 2021 deaths of his wife and son. His actions also brought renewed attention to the 2018 "trip and fall" death of the family's housekeeper in their home.    In November, Murdaugh was sentenced to 27 years in state prison as part of a plea agreement for financial crimes, admitting to embezzling $12 million from clients over a decade. This plea deal mandated that he serve 85% of his sentence. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a daylong evidentiary hearing, Judge Jean Toal has denied convicted murderer Alex Murdaugh's request for a new trial. The hearing centered on allegations that Colleton County Clerk of Court Rebecca Hill had tampered with the jury and tainted the verdict.    Following extensive testimony from all 12 jurors who served in Murdaugh's trial and Rebecca Hill, Judge Toal made her ruling. Toal noted that while Hill's credibility as a witness was questionable, her actions did not ultimately influence the jury's decision.    "I simply do not believe that our South Carolina Supreme Court requires a new trial in a very lengthy trial on the strength of some fleeting and foolish comments by a publicity-seeking clerk of court," Judge Toal stated.    During her testimony, Hill vehemently denied tampering with the jury for financial gain or any other reason. She stated, "I did not have a conversation with any juror about any topic related to this case." When questioned about her book about the trial, Hill emphasized that the verdict's outcome did not matter to her, whether it was guilty, not guilty, or a mistrial.    Hill revealed that she had earned approximately $100,000 from the sales of her self-published book, "Behind the Doors of Justice: The Murdaugh Murders," which she co-authored. However, the book was withdrawn from sale last month after it was discovered that Hill had plagiarized a passage from a BBC News article.    Following Hill's testimony, Rhonda McElveen, the court clerk of Barnwell County who had assisted Hill during Murdaugh's trial, provided conflicting testimony. McElveen stated that Hill had made comments suggesting that a guilty verdict would be more advantageous for book sales.    Alex Murdaugh, dressed in an orange prison jumpsuit and accompanied by his legal team, was present in the packed courtroom during the hearing. Alex Murdaugh, a former prominent personal injury lawyer, had been found guilty in the 2021 fatal shootings of his wife and son at their Colleton County estate. The evidentiary hearing aimed to determine whether Murdaugh's appeal for a new trial should be granted based on allegations of jury tampering raised by his defense.    Throughout the hearing, Judge Toal focused on Hill's testimony and the statements of former jurors to assess the validity of the tampering allegations. While most jurors denied that Hill's communications had influenced their guilty verdict, one juror, referred to as Juror Z, initially claimed that Hill had instructed the jury not to be fooled by Murdaugh and to watch him closely.    However, Juror Z's testimony during the hearing contradicted her earlier affidavit, leading to further questioning by Judge Toal. The proceedings took an unexpected turn when it was revealed that some jurors had accessed Juror Z's testimony on their cellphones during a break, violating Toal's instructions.    Despite the outcome of the murder appeal, Alex Murdaugh will remain in prison. In November, he received a 27-year prison sentence after pleading guilty to 22 counts of financial crimes against his clients, which will run concurrently with his federal sentence for similar financial crimes pleaded guilty to in September. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a daylong evidentiary hearing, Judge Jean Toal has denied convicted murderer Alex Murdaugh's request for a new trial. The hearing centered on allegations that Colleton County Clerk of Court Rebecca Hill had tampered with the jury and tainted the verdict.    Following extensive testimony from all 12 jurors who served in Murdaugh's trial and Rebecca Hill, Judge Toal made her ruling. Toal noted that while Hill's credibility as a witness was questionable, her actions did not ultimately influence the jury's decision.    "I simply do not believe that our South Carolina Supreme Court requires a new trial in a very lengthy trial on the strength of some fleeting and foolish comments by a publicity-seeking clerk of court," Judge Toal stated.    During her testimony, Hill vehemently denied tampering with the jury for financial gain or any other reason. She stated, "I did not have a conversation with any juror about any topic related to this case." When questioned about her book about the trial, Hill emphasized that the verdict's outcome did not matter to her, whether it was guilty, not guilty, or a mistrial.    Hill revealed that she had earned approximately $100,000 from the sales of her self-published book, "Behind the Doors of Justice: The Murdaugh Murders," which she co-authored. However, the book was withdrawn from sale last month after it was discovered that Hill had plagiarized a passage from a BBC News article.    Following Hill's testimony, Rhonda McElveen, the court clerk of Barnwell County who had assisted Hill during Murdaugh's trial, provided conflicting testimony. McElveen stated that Hill had made comments suggesting that a guilty verdict would be more advantageous for book sales.    Alex Murdaugh, dressed in an orange prison jumpsuit and accompanied by his legal team, was present in the packed courtroom during the hearing. Alex Murdaugh, a former prominent personal injury lawyer, had been found guilty in the 2021 fatal shootings of his wife and son at their Colleton County estate. The evidentiary hearing aimed to determine whether Murdaugh's appeal for a new trial should be granted based on allegations of jury tampering raised by his defense.    Throughout the hearing, Judge Toal focused on Hill's testimony and the statements of former jurors to assess the validity of the tampering allegations. While most jurors denied that Hill's communications had influenced their guilty verdict, one juror, referred to as Juror Z, initially claimed that Hill had instructed the jury not to be fooled by Murdaugh and to watch him closely.    However, Juror Z's testimony during the hearing contradicted her earlier affidavit, leading to further questioning by Judge Toal. The proceedings took an unexpected turn when it was revealed that some jurors had accessed Juror Z's testimony on their cellphones during a break, violating Toal's instructions.    Despite the outcome of the murder appeal, Alex Murdaugh will remain in prison. In November, he received a 27-year prison sentence after pleading guilty to 22 counts of financial crimes against his clients, which will run concurrently with his federal sentence for similar financial crimes pleaded guilty to in September. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a daylong evidentiary hearing, Judge Jean Toal has denied convicted murderer Alex Murdaugh's request for a new trial. The hearing centered on allegations that Colleton County Clerk of Court Rebecca Hill had tampered with the jury and tainted the verdict.    Following extensive testimony from all 12 jurors who served in Murdaugh's trial and Rebecca Hill, Judge Toal made her ruling. Toal noted that while Hill's credibility as a witness was questionable, her actions did not ultimately influence the jury's decision.    "I simply do not believe that our South Carolina Supreme Court requires a new trial in a very lengthy trial on the strength of some fleeting and foolish comments by a publicity-seeking clerk of court," Judge Toal stated.    During her testimony, Hill vehemently denied tampering with the jury for financial gain or any other reason. She stated, "I did not have a conversation with any juror about any topic related to this case." When questioned about her book about the trial, Hill emphasized that the verdict's outcome did not matter to her, whether it was guilty, not guilty, or a mistrial.    Hill revealed that she had earned approximately $100,000 from the sales of her self-published book, "Behind the Doors of Justice: The Murdaugh Murders," which she co-authored. However, the book was withdrawn from sale last month after it was discovered that Hill had plagiarized a passage from a BBC News article.    Following Hill's testimony, Rhonda McElveen, the court clerk of Barnwell County who had assisted Hill during Murdaugh's trial, provided conflicting testimony. McElveen stated that Hill had made comments suggesting that a guilty verdict would be more advantageous for book sales.    Alex Murdaugh, dressed in an orange prison jumpsuit and accompanied by his legal team, was present in the packed courtroom during the hearing. After Judge Toal's ruling, Murdaugh's lawyers announced their intention to appeal the decision.    Alex Murdaugh, a former prominent personal injury lawyer, had been found guilty in the 2021 fatal shootings of his wife and son at their Colleton County estate. The evidentiary hearing aimed to determine whether Murdaugh's appeal for a new trial should be granted based on allegations of jury tampering raised by his defense.    Throughout the hearing, Judge Toal focused on Hill's testimony and the statements of former jurors to assess the validity of the tampering allegations. While most jurors denied that Hill's communications had influenced their guilty verdict, one juror, referred to as Juror Z, initially claimed that Hill had instructed the jury not to be fooled by Murdaugh and to watch him closely.    However, Juror Z's testimony during the hearing contradicted her earlier affidavit, leading to further questioning by Judge Toal. The proceedings took an unexpected turn when it was revealed that some jurors had accessed Juror Z's testimony on their cellphones during a break, violating Toal's instructions.    Despite the outcome of the murder appeal, Alex Murdaugh will remain in prison. In November, he received a 27-year prison sentence after pleading guilty to 22 counts of financial crimes against his clients, which will run concurrently with his federal sentence for similar financial crimes pleaded guilty to in September. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a daylong evidentiary hearing, Judge Jean Toal has denied convicted murderer Alex Murdaugh's request for a new trial. The hearing centered on allegations that Colleton County Clerk of Court Rebecca Hill had tampered with the jury and tainted the verdict.    Following extensive testimony from all 12 jurors who served in Murdaugh's trial and Rebecca Hill, Judge Toal made her ruling. Toal noted that while Hill's credibility as a witness was questionable, her actions did not ultimately influence the jury's decision.    "I simply do not believe that our South Carolina Supreme Court requires a new trial in a very lengthy trial on the strength of some fleeting and foolish comments by a publicity-seeking clerk of court," Judge Toal stated.    During her testimony, Hill vehemently denied tampering with the jury for financial gain or any other reason. She stated, "I did not have a conversation with any juror about any topic related to this case." When questioned about her book about the trial, Hill emphasized that the verdict's outcome did not matter to her, whether it was guilty, not guilty, or a mistrial.    Hill revealed that she had earned approximately $100,000 from the sales of her self-published book, "Behind the Doors of Justice: The Murdaugh Murders," which she co-authored. However, the book was withdrawn from sale last month after it was discovered that Hill had plagiarized a passage from a BBC News article.    Following Hill's testimony, Rhonda McElveen, the court clerk of Barnwell County who had assisted Hill during Murdaugh's trial, provided conflicting testimony. McElveen stated that Hill had made comments suggesting that a guilty verdict would be more advantageous for book sales.    Alex Murdaugh, dressed in an orange prison jumpsuit and accompanied by his legal team, was present in the packed courtroom during the hearing. After Judge Toal's ruling, Murdaugh's lawyers announced their intention to appeal the decision.    Lawyer Jim Griffin stated, "We feel vindicated on the facts." He added, "There's an innocent man here who was wrongly convicted."    Alex Murdaugh, a former prominent personal injury lawyer, had been found guilty in the 2021 fatal shootings of his wife and son at their Colleton County estate. The evidentiary hearing aimed to determine whether Murdaugh's appeal for a new trial should be granted based on allegations of jury tampering raised by his defense.    Throughout the hearing, Judge Toal focused on Hill's testimony and the statements of former jurors to assess the validity of the tampering allegations. While most jurors denied that Hill's communications had influenced their guilty verdict, one juror, referred to as Juror Z, initially claimed that Hill had instructed the jury not to be fooled by Murdaugh and to watch him closely.    However, Juror Z's testimony during the hearing contradicted her earlier affidavit, leading to further questioning by Judge Toal. The proceedings took an unexpected turn when it was revealed that some jurors had accessed Juror Z's testimony on their cellphones during a break, violating Toal's instructions.    Despite the outcome of the murder appeal, Alex Murdaugh will remain in prison. In November, he received a 27-year prison sentence after pleading guilty to 22 counts of financial crimes against his clients, which will run concurrently with his federal sentence for similar financial crimes pleaded guilty to in September. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a hearing that could potentially impact the fate of Alex Murdaugh, a juror from his 2023 murder trial has alleged feeling pressured by Colleton County Clerk Becky Hill and other jurors to render a guilty verdict. The hearing, overseen by retired South Carolina Judge Jean Toal, aims to investigate claims of jury tampering by Hill and how it may have influenced Murdaugh's conviction. During the hearing on Monday morning, a juror identified as Juror Z came forward with startling allegations against Hill. Juror Z stated that Hill instructed the jury to closely monitor Murdaugh's actions and made other comments that raised concerns. "To me, it felt like she made it seem like he was already guilty," Juror Z remarked. When asked by the judge if Hill's comments had an impact on their verdict, Juror Z confirmed that it did. Juror Z further revealed that the jury's foreperson had mentioned that Murdaugh was "crying on cue," and jurors often discussed the trial outside of the courtroom before deliberations. Additionally, Juror Z claimed that Hill pressured them to speak to television reporters after the trial. However, a majority of the other jurors who were questioned offered different accounts. Many stated that they had not heard Hill make any comments about Murdaugh, and some denied that such comments were ever made. Among those who admitted to hearing Hill's comments, they maintained that it did not influence their decision to deliver a guilty verdict. Becky Hill took the stand on Monday afternoon to respond to these allegations. Previously, Murdaugh's legal team had presented affidavits signed by a juror who voted to convict him, the one who was removed from the jury, and testimony from a paralegal involved in the jury interviews. Additionally, Toal had heard testimony from a juror publicly identified as Juror X ahead of Monday's hearing. Juror X had been accused by Murdaugh's defense of pressuring the jury to reach a quick verdict to secure a book deal and media appearances related to the trial. However, this opportunity was jeopardized after the trial concluded with a guilty verdict. Moreover, Juror X faced criticism for parts of a book she authored about the trial being plagiarized, leading to the suspension of book sales, and her son being charged with wiretapping. Judge Toal has expressed her intention to focus on whether Hill's alleged comments to the jury had an inappropriate influence on the final verdict. Alex Murdaugh, a once-prominent attorney hailing from a politically influential South Carolina family, had received consecutive life sentences in March for the 2021 deaths of his wife and son. His actions also brought renewed attention to the 2018 "trip and fall" death of the family's housekeeper in their home. In November, Murdaugh was sentenced to 27 years in state prison as part of a plea agreement for financial crimes, admitting to embezzling $12 million from clients over a decade. This plea deal mandated that he serve 85% of his sentence. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a daylong evidentiary hearing, Judge Jean Toal has denied convicted murderer Alex Murdaugh's request for a new trial. The hearing centered on allegations that Colleton County Clerk of Court Rebecca Hill had tampered with the jury and tainted the verdict.    Following extensive testimony from all 12 jurors who served in Murdaugh's trial and Rebecca Hill, Judge Toal made her ruling. Toal noted that while Hill's credibility as a witness was questionable, her actions did not ultimately influence the jury's decision.    "I simply do not believe that our South Carolina Supreme Court requires a new trial in a very lengthy trial on the strength of some fleeting and foolish comments by a publicity-seeking clerk of court," Judge Toal stated.    During her testimony, Hill vehemently denied tampering with the jury for financial gain or any other reason. She stated, "I did not have a conversation with any juror about any topic related to this case." When questioned about her book about the trial, Hill emphasized that the verdict's outcome did not matter to her, whether it was guilty, not guilty, or a mistrial.    Hill revealed that she had earned approximately $100,000 from the sales of her self-published book, "Behind the Doors of Justice: The Murdaugh Murders," which she co-authored. However, the book was withdrawn from sale last month after it was discovered that Hill had plagiarized a passage from a BBC News article.    Following Hill's testimony, Rhonda McElveen, the court clerk of Barnwell County who had assisted Hill during Murdaugh's trial, provided conflicting testimony. McElveen stated that Hill had made comments suggesting that a guilty verdict would be more advantageous for book sales.    Alex Murdaugh, dressed in an orange prison jumpsuit and accompanied by his legal team, was present in the packed courtroom during the hearing. Alex Murdaugh, a former prominent personal injury lawyer, had been found guilty in the 2021 fatal shootings of his wife and son at their Colleton County estate. The evidentiary hearing aimed to determine whether Murdaugh's appeal for a new trial should be granted based on allegations of jury tampering raised by his defense.    Throughout the hearing, Judge Toal focused on Hill's testimony and the statements of former jurors to assess the validity of the tampering allegations. While most jurors denied that Hill's communications had influenced their guilty verdict, one juror, referred to as Juror Z, initially claimed that Hill had instructed the jury not to be fooled by Murdaugh and to watch him closely.    However, Juror Z's testimony during the hearing contradicted her earlier affidavit, leading to further questioning by Judge Toal. The proceedings took an unexpected turn when it was revealed that some jurors had accessed Juror Z's testimony on their cellphones during a break, violating Toal's instructions.    Despite the outcome of the murder appeal, Alex Murdaugh will remain in prison. In November, he received a 27-year prison sentence after pleading guilty to 22 counts of financial crimes against his clients, which will run concurrently with his federal sentence for similar financial crimes pleaded guilty to in September. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a daylong evidentiary hearing, Judge Jean Toal has denied convicted murderer Alex Murdaugh's request for a new trial. The hearing centered on allegations that Colleton County Clerk of Court Rebecca Hill had tampered with the jury and tainted the verdict.    Following extensive testimony from all 12 jurors who served in Murdaugh's trial and Rebecca Hill, Judge Toal made her ruling. Toal noted that while Hill's credibility as a witness was questionable, her actions did not ultimately influence the jury's decision.    "I simply do not believe that our South Carolina Supreme Court requires a new trial in a very lengthy trial on the strength of some fleeting and foolish comments by a publicity-seeking clerk of court," Judge Toal stated.    During her testimony, Hill vehemently denied tampering with the jury for financial gain or any other reason. She stated, "I did not have a conversation with any juror about any topic related to this case." When questioned about her book about the trial, Hill emphasized that the verdict's outcome did not matter to her, whether it was guilty, not guilty, or a mistrial.    Hill revealed that she had earned approximately $100,000 from the sales of her self-published book, "Behind the Doors of Justice: The Murdaugh Murders," which she co-authored. However, the book was withdrawn from sale last month after it was discovered that Hill had plagiarized a passage from a BBC News article.    Following Hill's testimony, Rhonda McElveen, the court clerk of Barnwell County who had assisted Hill during Murdaugh's trial, provided conflicting testimony. McElveen stated that Hill had made comments suggesting that a guilty verdict would be more advantageous for book sales.    Alex Murdaugh, dressed in an orange prison jumpsuit and accompanied by his legal team, was present in the packed courtroom during the hearing. Alex Murdaugh, a former prominent personal injury lawyer, had been found guilty in the 2021 fatal shootings of his wife and son at their Colleton County estate. The evidentiary hearing aimed to determine whether Murdaugh's appeal for a new trial should be granted based on allegations of jury tampering raised by his defense.    Throughout the hearing, Judge Toal focused on Hill's testimony and the statements of former jurors to assess the validity of the tampering allegations. While most jurors denied that Hill's communications had influenced their guilty verdict, one juror, referred to as Juror Z, initially claimed that Hill had instructed the jury not to be fooled by Murdaugh and to watch him closely.    However, Juror Z's testimony during the hearing contradicted her earlier affidavit, leading to further questioning by Judge Toal. The proceedings took an unexpected turn when it was revealed that some jurors had accessed Juror Z's testimony on their cellphones during a break, violating Toal's instructions.    Despite the outcome of the murder appeal, Alex Murdaugh will remain in prison. In November, he received a 27-year prison sentence after pleading guilty to 22 counts of financial crimes against his clients, which will run concurrently with his federal sentence for similar financial crimes pleaded guilty to in September. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a daylong evidentiary hearing, Judge Jean Toal has denied convicted murderer Alex Murdaugh's request for a new trial. The hearing centered on allegations that Colleton County Clerk of Court Rebecca Hill had tampered with the jury and tainted the verdict.    Following extensive testimony from all 12 jurors who served in Murdaugh's trial and Rebecca Hill, Judge Toal made her ruling. Toal noted that while Hill's credibility as a witness was questionable, her actions did not ultimately influence the jury's decision.    "I simply do not believe that our South Carolina Supreme Court requires a new trial in a very lengthy trial on the strength of some fleeting and foolish comments by a publicity-seeking clerk of court," Judge Toal stated.    During her testimony, Hill vehemently denied tampering with the jury for financial gain or any other reason. She stated, "I did not have a conversation with any juror about any topic related to this case." When questioned about her book about the trial, Hill emphasized that the verdict's outcome did not matter to her, whether it was guilty, not guilty, or a mistrial.    Hill revealed that she had earned approximately $100,000 from the sales of her self-published book, "Behind the Doors of Justice: The Murdaugh Murders," which she co-authored. However, the book was withdrawn from sale last month after it was discovered that Hill had plagiarized a passage from a BBC News article.    Following Hill's testimony, Rhonda McElveen, the court clerk of Barnwell County who had assisted Hill during Murdaugh's trial, provided conflicting testimony. McElveen stated that Hill had made comments suggesting that a guilty verdict would be more advantageous for book sales.    Alex Murdaugh, dressed in an orange prison jumpsuit and accompanied by his legal team, was present in the packed courtroom during the hearing. After Judge Toal's ruling, Murdaugh's lawyers announced their intention to appeal the decision.    Alex Murdaugh, a former prominent personal injury lawyer, had been found guilty in the 2021 fatal shootings of his wife and son at their Colleton County estate. The evidentiary hearing aimed to determine whether Murdaugh's appeal for a new trial should be granted based on allegations of jury tampering raised by his defense.    Throughout the hearing, Judge Toal focused on Hill's testimony and the statements of former jurors to assess the validity of the tampering allegations. While most jurors denied that Hill's communications had influenced their guilty verdict, one juror, referred to as Juror Z, initially claimed that Hill had instructed the jury not to be fooled by Murdaugh and to watch him closely.    However, Juror Z's testimony during the hearing contradicted her earlier affidavit, leading to further questioning by Judge Toal. The proceedings took an unexpected turn when it was revealed that some jurors had accessed Juror Z's testimony on their cellphones during a break, violating Toal's instructions.    Despite the outcome of the murder appeal, Alex Murdaugh will remain in prison. In November, he received a 27-year prison sentence after pleading guilty to 22 counts of financial crimes against his clients, which will run concurrently with his federal sentence for similar financial crimes pleaded guilty to in September. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a daylong evidentiary hearing, Judge Jean Toal has denied convicted murderer Alex Murdaugh's request for a new trial. The hearing centered on allegations that Colleton County Clerk of Court Rebecca Hill had tampered with the jury and tainted the verdict.    Following extensive testimony from all 12 jurors who served in Murdaugh's trial and Rebecca Hill, Judge Toal made her ruling. Toal noted that while Hill's credibility as a witness was questionable, her actions did not ultimately influence the jury's decision.    "I simply do not believe that our South Carolina Supreme Court requires a new trial in a very lengthy trial on the strength of some fleeting and foolish comments by a publicity-seeking clerk of court," Judge Toal stated.    During her testimony, Hill vehemently denied tampering with the jury for financial gain or any other reason. She stated, "I did not have a conversation with any juror about any topic related to this case." When questioned about her book about the trial, Hill emphasized that the verdict's outcome did not matter to her, whether it was guilty, not guilty, or a mistrial.    Hill revealed that she had earned approximately $100,000 from the sales of her self-published book, "Behind the Doors of Justice: The Murdaugh Murders," which she co-authored. However, the book was withdrawn from sale last month after it was discovered that Hill had plagiarized a passage from a BBC News article.    Following Hill's testimony, Rhonda McElveen, the court clerk of Barnwell County who had assisted Hill during Murdaugh's trial, provided conflicting testimony. McElveen stated that Hill had made comments suggesting that a guilty verdict would be more advantageous for book sales.    Alex Murdaugh, dressed in an orange prison jumpsuit and accompanied by his legal team, was present in the packed courtroom during the hearing. After Judge Toal's ruling, Murdaugh's lawyers announced their intention to appeal the decision.    Lawyer Jim Griffin stated, "We feel vindicated on the facts." He added, "There's an innocent man here who was wrongly convicted."    Alex Murdaugh, a former prominent personal injury lawyer, had been found guilty in the 2021 fatal shootings of his wife and son at their Colleton County estate. The evidentiary hearing aimed to determine whether Murdaugh's appeal for a new trial should be granted based on allegations of jury tampering raised by his defense.    Throughout the hearing, Judge Toal focused on Hill's testimony and the statements of former jurors to assess the validity of the tampering allegations. While most jurors denied that Hill's communications had influenced their guilty verdict, one juror, referred to as Juror Z, initially claimed that Hill had instructed the jury not to be fooled by Murdaugh and to watch him closely.    However, Juror Z's testimony during the hearing contradicted her earlier affidavit, leading to further questioning by Judge Toal. The proceedings took an unexpected turn when it was revealed that some jurors had accessed Juror Z's testimony on their cellphones during a break, violating Toal's instructions.    Despite the outcome of the murder appeal, Alex Murdaugh will remain in prison. In November, he received a 27-year prison sentence after pleading guilty to 22 counts of financial crimes against his clients, which will run concurrently with his federal sentence for similar financial crimes pleaded guilty to in September. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a hearing that could potentially impact the fate of Alex Murdaugh, a juror from his 2023 murder trial has alleged feeling pressured by Colleton County Clerk Becky Hill and other jurors to render a guilty verdict. The hearing, overseen by retired South Carolina Judge Jean Toal, aims to investigate claims of jury tampering by Hill and how it may have influenced Murdaugh's conviction.    During the hearing on Monday morning, a juror identified as Juror Z came forward with startling allegations against Hill. Juror Z stated that Hill instructed the jury to closely monitor Murdaugh's actions and made other comments that raised concerns. "To me, it felt like she made it seem like he was already guilty," Juror Z remarked. When asked by the judge if Hill's comments had an impact on their verdict, Juror Z confirmed that it did.    Juror Z further revealed that the jury's foreperson had mentioned that Murdaugh was "crying on cue," and jurors often discussed the trial outside of the courtroom before deliberations. Additionally, Juror Z claimed that Hill pressured them to speak to television reporters after the trial.    However, a majority of the other jurors who were questioned offered different accounts. Many stated that they had not heard Hill make any comments about Murdaugh, and some denied that such comments were ever made. Among those who admitted to hearing Hill's comments, they maintained that it did not influence their decision to deliver a guilty verdict.    Becky Hill took the stand on Monday afternoon to respond to these allegations.    Previously, Murdaugh's legal team had presented affidavits signed by a juror who voted to convict him, the one who was removed from the jury, and testimony from a paralegal involved in the jury interviews.    Additionally, Toal had heard testimony from a juror publicly identified as Juror X ahead of Monday's hearing. Juror X had been accused by Murdaugh's defense of pressuring the jury to reach a quick verdict to secure a book deal and media appearances related to the trial. However, this opportunity was jeopardized after the trial concluded with a guilty verdict. Moreover, Juror X faced criticism for parts of a book she authored about the trial being plagiarized, leading to the suspension of book sales, and her son being charged with wiretapping.    Judge Toal has expressed her intention to focus on whether Hill's alleged comments to the jury had an inappropriate influence on the final verdict.    Alex Murdaugh, a once-prominent attorney hailing from a politically influential South Carolina family, had received consecutive life sentences in March for the 2021 deaths of his wife and son. His actions also brought renewed attention to the 2018 "trip and fall" death of the family's housekeeper in their home.    In November, Murdaugh was sentenced to 27 years in state prison as part of a plea agreement for financial crimes, admitting to embezzling $12 million from clients over a decade. This plea deal mandated that he serve 85% of his sentence. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a hearing that could potentially impact the fate of Alex Murdaugh, a juror from his 2023 murder trial has alleged feeling pressured by Colleton County Clerk Becky Hill and other jurors to render a guilty verdict. The hearing, overseen by retired South Carolina Judge Jean Toal, aims to investigate claims of jury tampering by Hill and how it may have influenced Murdaugh's conviction. During the hearing on Monday morning, a juror identified as Juror Z came forward with startling allegations against Hill. Juror Z stated that Hill instructed the jury to closely monitor Murdaugh's actions and made other comments that raised concerns. "To me, it felt like she made it seem like he was already guilty," Juror Z remarked. When asked by the judge if Hill's comments had an impact on their verdict, Juror Z confirmed that it did. Juror Z further revealed that the jury's foreperson had mentioned that Murdaugh was "crying on cue," and jurors often discussed the trial outside of the courtroom before deliberations. Additionally, Juror Z claimed that Hill pressured them to speak to television reporters after the trial. However, a majority of the other jurors who were questioned offered different accounts. Many stated that they had not heard Hill make any comments about Murdaugh, and some denied that such comments were ever made. Among those who admitted to hearing Hill's comments, they maintained that it did not influence their decision to deliver a guilty verdict. Becky Hill took the stand on Monday afternoon to respond to these allegations. Previously, Murdaugh's legal team had presented affidavits signed by a juror who voted to convict him, the one who was removed from the jury, and testimony from a paralegal involved in the jury interviews. Additionally, Toal had heard testimony from a juror publicly identified as Juror X ahead of Monday's hearing. Juror X had been accused by Murdaugh's defense of pressuring the jury to reach a quick verdict to secure a book deal and media appearances related to the trial. However, this opportunity was jeopardized after the trial concluded with a guilty verdict. Moreover, Juror X faced criticism for parts of a book she authored about the trial being plagiarized, leading to the suspension of book sales, and her son being charged with wiretapping. Judge Toal has expressed her intention to focus on whether Hill's alleged comments to the jury had an inappropriate influence on the final verdict. Alex Murdaugh, a once-prominent attorney hailing from a politically influential South Carolina family, had received consecutive life sentences in March for the 2021 deaths of his wife and son. His actions also brought renewed attention to the 2018 "trip and fall" death of the family's housekeeper in their home. In November, Murdaugh was sentenced to 27 years in state prison as part of a plea agreement for financial crimes, admitting to embezzling $12 million from clients over a decade. This plea deal mandated that he serve 85% of his sentence. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

On today's show, True Sunlight Co-hosts Mandy Matney and Liz Farrell finally see some hope after five months of Murdaugh chaos. This week, Justice Jean Toal sent a strong message to Dick Harpootlian and Jim Griffin that her courtroom will not be a place for them to put Colleton County Clerk Becky Hill on trial in their quest to get Alex Murdaugh a new trial. Left with their playbook ripped in shreds, what will Team Murdaugh's next move be? Mandy and Liz discuss the highlights from this week's status conference and what they think will happen in the lead up to Alex's Jan. 29th hearing. The biggest question heading into Tuesday's hearing was how Justice Toal would interpret the law – if she will decide on Alex's new trial based on evidence of Becky's actions with the jurors affecting the verdict OR based on evidence showing that Becky's communication with the jury COULD HAVE affected the verdict.  And it didn't take long for Judge Toal to make a clear decision on that and set the tone for the hearing... Let's get into it... In January we're offering your first month of Soak Up The Sun membership for 50% off and our SUNscribers will get an email this Friday for 50% off their first three months of Soak Up The Sun Membership. So join our email list to get that special offer for first time members. Join Luna Shark Premium today at Lunashark.Supercast.com. Premium Members also get access to searchable case files, written articles with documents, case photos, episode videos and exclusive live experiences with our hosts on lunasharkmedia.com all in one place. CLICK HERE to learn more: https://bit.ly/3BdUtOE. And for those just wanting ad-free listening without all the other great content, we now offer ad-free listening on Apple Podcast through a subscription to Luna Shark Plus on the Apple Podcasts App. Or become a member on YouTube for exclusive videos and ad-free episodes. SUNscribe to our free email list to get alerts on bonus episodes, calls to action, new shows and updates. CLICK HERE to learn more: https://bit.ly/3KBMJcP Visit our new events page Lunasharkmedia.com/events where you can learn about the upcoming in-person and virtual appearances from hosts! And a special thank you to our sponsors: Microdose.com, PELOTON, and VUORI. Use promo code "MANDY" for a special offer! *This episode contains strong language For current & accurate updates: TrueSunlight.com facebook.com/TrueSunlightPodcast/ Instagram.com/TrueSunlightPod Twitter.com/mandymatney Twitter.com/elizfarrell youtube.com/@LunaSharkMedia Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

I attended the status conference for Alex Murdaugh. His chance for a new trial got a lot less likely after Judge Toal limited what will be allowed in when his evidentiary hearing begins on January 29th. Rex Heuermann, the suspected Long Island Serial Killer, was charged in a 4th murder. He now stands accused of murdering Maureen Brianard-Barnes. Also, breaking down the evidence against Rex. Lindsay Shiver is back in the US until her status conference & trial in the Bahamas. She is accused of conspiring to murder her former Alabama football star husband, Robert Shiver. She now says he won't let her see their children or tell where they are. Richard Allen's new attorneys say the move to another prison hasn't solved the inhumane treatment Allen has been receiving. The Supreme Court will hear arguments on 1/18/24 about several matters in Allen's case, including removing Judge Gull. Donate: PayPal - prettyliesandalibis@gmail.com Venmo - @prettyliesalibisBuy Me A Coffee - https://www.buymeacoffee.com/prettyliesrCash App- PrettyliesandalibisAll links: https://linktr.ee/prettyliesandalibisMerch: prettyliesandalibis.myshopify.com10% off with code SHERLOCK10 .Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/PrettyLiesAndAlibis

Alex Murdaugh's three-day evidentiary hearing takes place later this month. The hearings will held in open court and court-controlled television cameras will be allowed. They cannot, however, focus on the faces of testifying jurors, who will be referred to by their juror numbers, not their names. The hearing will determine whether Murdaugh will be granted a new murder trial, after his attorneys, alleged jury tampering by Colleton County Clerk of Court Rebecca “Becky” Hill. Former S.C. Chief Justice Jean Toal is now the judge hearing the case. She took control of her South Carolina courtroom -, making several rulings affecting Alex Murdaugh's bid. His attorneys say jury tampering by Colleton County Clerk of Court Becky Hill impacted the original trial's outcome, and that according to Toal, will be the defense's burden to prove. The attorneys argued the law only required them to prove improper contact with jurors had occurred. Toal says she will rule that, “Prejudice must be proved, not presumed.” Toal says the stand she will take on the specific evidence of ”what was said, when it was said, and how it impacted the jury,” lies with the defense, not an assumption on Becky Hill's credibility. Toal told the courtroom that she would not allow the upcoming evidentiary hearing to turn into a trial of Becky Hill. Becky Hill is facing her own ongoing ethics and criminal investigations related to her conduct during and after the Murdaugh trial.  The judge says she intends to limit the witness list to the twelve deliberating jurors and Becky Hill.   An alternate juror and Juror 785, now known as the “egg lady” due to her insistence that she retrieve a dozen eggs from the jury room before leaving the courthouse, will not be allowed to testify.  Toal says she sees  “no necessity” to hear from anyone other than the (deliberating) jurors.”   What's more, Toal says she will be the one asking the questions. Joining Nancy Grace Today: Ronnie Richter – Attorney for Sandy Smith, Satterfield family, and other victims of Alex Murdaugh; Partner, Bland Richter Law Firm; Twitter: @BlandRichterSC  Dr. Bethany Marshall – Psychoanalyst (Beverly Hills); Twitter: @DrBethanyLive/ Instagram & TikTok: drbethanymarshall; Appearing in the new show, “Paris in Love” on Peacock Chris McDonough – Director At the Cold Case Foundation, Former Homicide Detective; Host of YouTube channel: “The Interview Room” Dr. Michelle Dupre – Forensic Pathologist and former Medical Examiner, Author: “Homicide Investigation Field Guide” & “Investigating Child Abuse Field Guide”, Ret. Police Detective Lexington County Sheriff's Department Jennifer Wood - Director of Research at FITSNews.com; X: @IndyJenn_  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

True Sunlight Podcast co-hosts Mandy Matney, Liz Farrell and everyone's favorite attorney Eric Bland all agree that Alex Murdaugh has extremely low chances of getting a new trial after Justice Toal essentially took Dick and Jim's wide scope of allegations related to potential jury tampering and tore 95 percent of them to shreds.  While Dick and Jim convinced the media — and frankly, way too many other people — that this hearing will come down to Becky's credibility, Justice Toal said... Oh wait!! No it wont! Essentially, Judge Toal ruled that “prejudice must be proven and not presumed” — meaning she does not care about Becky's problems, she cares about what was said to the JURORS WHO RENDERED A VERDICT.  This was extremely validating for all of us because we have felt we've been on this lonely gaslit island for months now being pretty much the only members of the media to say there needs to be a separation between Becky's ethical issues and evidence of jury tampering.... So yes, 'Toal ya so'...  Let's get into it.... Mandy's new book, Blood on Their Hands arrived November 14th. Go to www.bloodontheirhandsbook.com to learn more.  Check out EB's new merch with a mission at theericbland.com or the Luna Shark Merch With a Mission shop at lunasharkmerch.com/ Premium Members also get access to searchable case files, written articles with documents, case photos, episode videos and exclusive live experiences with our hosts on lunasharkmedia.com all in one place. CLICK HERE to learn more: https://bit.ly/3BdUtOE. And for those just wanting ad-free listening without all the other great content, we now offer ad-free listening on Apple Podcast through a subscription to Luna Shark Plus on the Apple Podcasts App. And we also offer access to exclusive video content through our new YouTube Premiere subscription. SUNscribe to our free email list to get alerts on bonus episodes, calls to action, new shows and updates. CLICK HERE to learn more: https://bit.ly/3KBMJcP *** NEW: If you ever notice audio errors in the pod, email info@lunasharkmedia.com and we'll send you fun merch if you find something that needs to be adjusted! *** Find us on social media: Twitter.com/mandymatney - Twitter.com/elizfarrell - Twitter.com/theericbland https://www.facebook.com/cupofjustice/ YouTube *The views expressed on the Cup of Justice bonus episodes do not constitute legal advice. Listeners desiring legal advice for any particular legal matter are urged to consult an attorney of their choosing who can provide legal advice based upon a full understanding of the facts and circumstances of their claim. The views expressed on the Cup of Justice episodes also do not express the views or opinions of Bland Richter, LLP, or its attorneys. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Alex Murdaugh, convicted of murdering his wife and son, appeared in a pre-trial public status hearing on Tuesday. The judge discussed the upcoming hearing later this month, which will determine if Murdaugh should be granted a new trial.    In October, Murdaugh's legal team filed for a new trial, arguing that the court clerk had unduly influenced the jury during his trial for the murder of his wife and younger son. At the pre-trial hearing, the defense presented reasons for an evidentiary hearing, while the state contended that such a motion should have been filed within 10 days of the verdict. They also claimed the defense was aware of the clerk's alleged misconduct before this deadline.    Former South Carolina Supreme Court Chief Justice Jean Toal, who replaced Judge Clifton Newman in the case, emphasized the need for factual evidence. Toal faces the decision of whether to repeat a six-week murder trial that involved over 70 witnesses and around 800 exhibits. She was appointed by the state's highest court to manage the significant decision of a retrial.    Central to the defense's appeal are claims that Colleton County Clerk of Court Becky Hill tampered with the jury, influencing their verdict for personal gain. Allegations include Hill questioning jurors about Murdaugh's guilt, discrediting his testimony, and accompanying jurors to post-trial media interviews in New York City. Hill has denied these accusations.    Toal will also decide if jurors can testify privately for their protection. The defense is scheduled to present evidence in a three-day hearing starting January 29.    Murdaugh is currently serving a life sentence without parole for the June 2021 murders, plus an additional 27 years for financial crimes, including stealing about $12 million. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Alex Murdaugh, convicted of murdering his wife and son, appeared in a pre-trial public status hearing on Tuesday. The judge discussed the upcoming hearing later this month, which will determine if Murdaugh should be granted a new trial.    In October, Murdaugh's legal team filed for a new trial, arguing that the court clerk had unduly influenced the jury during his trial for the murder of his wife and younger son. At the pre-trial hearing, the defense presented reasons for an evidentiary hearing, while the state contended that such a motion should have been filed within 10 days of the verdict. They also claimed the defense was aware of the clerk's alleged misconduct before this deadline.    Former South Carolina Supreme Court Chief Justice Jean Toal, who replaced Judge Clifton Newman in the case, emphasized the need for factual evidence. Toal faces the decision of whether to repeat a six-week murder trial that involved over 70 witnesses and around 800 exhibits. She was appointed by the state's highest court to manage the significant decision of a retrial.    Central to the defense's appeal are claims that Colleton County Clerk of Court Becky Hill tampered with the jury, influencing their verdict for personal gain. Allegations include Hill questioning jurors about Murdaugh's guilt, discrediting his testimony, and accompanying jurors to post-trial media interviews in New York City. Hill has denied these accusations.    Toal will also decide if jurors can testify privately for their protection. The defense is scheduled to present evidence in a three-day hearing starting January 29.    Murdaugh is currently serving a life sentence without parole for the June 2021 murders, plus an additional 27 years for financial crimes, including stealing about $12 million.  Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

True Sunlight Podcast co-hosts Mandy Matney, Liz Farrell and everyone's favorite attorney Eric Bland discuss what they expect to see now that Justice Jean Toal has been assigned to hear Alex Murdaugh's motion for a new trial. Is her assignment a win for Team Murdaugh? Or will justice prevail? Plus, the three talk about what was revealed when Colleton County released a year's worth of Clerk of Court Becky Hill's emails — including the frustrating revelation that Becky was behind two petty lies being spread by trolls. Today we focused on the appointment of Justice Jean Toal to hear Alex Murdaugh's motion for a new trial. Eric shares his personal experiences with Justice Toal, plus we share what our sources have been telling us about what her appointment might mean and what we can expect to see in the next two months. Also in the episode we talk about the reckless publication of more than 2,000 emails from Becky County email address and some of the chaos that this has caused.  On this episode, Premium Members get insight into common consequences (or lack there of) for ethics violations in South Carolina and how the most recent data dump caused cruel harassment of a special needs adult that happens to be a dear friend of this show and our hosts. Join Luna Shark Premium today at Lunashark.Supercast.com. Premium Members also get access to searchable case files, written articles with documents, case photos, episode videos and exclusive live experiences with our hosts on lunasharkmedia.com all in one place. CLICK HERE to learn more: https://bit.ly/3BdUtOE. And for those just wanting ad-free listening without all the other great content, we now offer ad-free listening on Apple Podcast through a subscription to Luna Shark Plus on the Apple Podcasts App. And we also offer access to exclusive video content through our new YouTube Premiere subscription. SUNscribe to our free email list to get alerts on bonus episodes, calls to action, new shows and updates. CLICK HERE to learn more: https://bit.ly/3KBMJcP Mandy's new book, Blood on Their Hands arrived November 14th. Go to www.bloodontheirhandsbook.com to learn more.  Check out EB's new merch with a mission at theericbland.com or the Luna Shark Merch With a Mission shop at lunasharkmerch.com/ *** NEW: If you ever notice audio errors in the pod, email info@lunasharkmedia.com and we'll send you fun merch if you find something that needs to be adjusted! *** Find us on social media: Twitter.com/mandymatney - Twitter.com/elizfarrell - Twitter.com/theericbland https://www.facebook.com/cupofjustice/ YouTube *The views expressed on the Cup of Justice bonus episodes do not constitute legal advice. Listeners desiring legal advice for any particular legal matter are urged to consult an attorney of their choosing who can provide legal advice based upon a full understanding of the facts and circumstances of their claim. The views expressed on the Cup of Justice episodes also do not express the views or opinions of Bland Richter, LLP, or its attorneys. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First and foremost, we are announcing a new way to send tips and communications as we pursue answers in the death of Stephen Smith. It's time to turn up the pressure and remind everyone that this is the case to close in 2024. If you feel comfortable to send tips straight to SLED, please do so at tips@SLED.SC.gov. If you want to send confidential tips to our team in coordination with Stephen's mom Sandy, you can now do so at AnswersForStephen.com. 2024 will mark 9 years since Stephen's death and we're going to do everything in our power so that Sandy doesn't have to spend another year wondering what happened to her son. There is STILL HOPE THAT WE CAN SOLVE THIS CASE. And by the way, there is a $30,000 reward for anyone who gives information that leads to an arrest.  We refuse to let this case go cold, no matter how many distractions the Murdaugh mess throws our way. If you know something, say something. Please. For Sandy, for Stephen's family. We are begging you. AnswersForStephen.com or tips@SLED.SC.gov. Now, in this 30th episode of True Sunlight, South Carolina's Supreme Court has finally assigned someone to take over for Judge Clifton Newman and hear Alex Murdaugh's motion for a new murder trial. Who is former Chief Justice Jean Toal? And what could the appointment of this legal trailblazer mean for the future of Alex's case? True Sunlight Co-hosts Mandy Matney and Liz Farrell discuss the latest development in the Murdaugh Murders Saga. Plus they answer listener questions about Becky Hill's case and whose side they're on. Visit our new events page Lunasharkmedia.com/events where you can learn about the upcoming in-person and virtual appearances from hosts! Join Luna Shark Premium today at Lunashark.Supercast.com. Premium Members also get access to searchable case files, written articles with documents, case photos, episode videos and exclusive live experiences with our hosts on lunasharkmedia.com all in one place. CLICK HERE to learn more: https://bit.ly/3BdUtOE. And for those just wanting ad-free listening without all the other great content, we now offer ad-free listening on Apple Podcast through a subscription to Luna Shark Plus on the Apple Podcasts App. SUNscribe to our free email list to get alerts on bonus episodes, calls to action, new shows and updates. CLICK HERE to learn more: https://bit.ly/3KBMJcP And a special thank you to our sponsors: Microdose.com, PELOTON, and VUORI. Use promo code "MANDY" for a special offer! For current & accurate updates: TrueSunlight.com facebook.com/TrueSunlightPodcast/ Instagram.com/TrueSunlightPod Twitter.com/mandymatney Twitter.com/elizfarrell youtube.com/@LunaSharkMedia Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices