Podcasts about Political spectrum

In this episode of the Teach Different podcast, Mattew Wood joins Dan and Steve Fouts to discuss civic responsibility through the lens of Theodore Roosevelt. He shares his journey as a middle school history teacher, discussing his passion for teaching and the importance of relationships in education. Together they unpack the quote “This country will not be a good place for any of us to live in unless we make it a good place for all of us to live in,” exploring its implications for community and individual responsibility in creating a better society. Listen for thoughtful reflections on classroom experiences, the impact of teaching philosophy, and the significance of engaging students in meaningful conversations.   Chapters 00:00 - The Journey into Teaching and Personal Background 05:06 - Experiences in Diverse Educational Settings 11:07 - The Importance of Relationships in Education 16:04 - Exploring the Quote by Teddy Roosevelt 24:31 - Creating a Positive Classroom Community 27:20 - The Political Spectrum and Community Values 31:20 - Counterclaims and the Nature of Good 34:28 - Essential Questions on Community and Individual Needs 36:23 - Historical Perspectives on Community Welfare 39:54 - Reflections on Leadership and Civic Responsibility 41:04 - The Importance of Critical Thinking in Education 41:57 - Teach Different Outro  Image Source:  Pach Brothers (photography studio), Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons  

Hour one of Larry Conners USA: RUMBLE: https://rumble.com/c/c-1568182 WEBSITE: https://www.larryconnersusa.com/ FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/larryconnersusa NEWSTALK STL: https://newstalkstl.com/larry/ The post Self Proclaimed Marxist, Hamas Supporter Continues To Send Shock Waves Across The Political Spectrum / 6P LC-USA 6-30-25 appeared first on Larry Conners USA.

In this episode of Faith for Normal People, Beau Underwood and Brian Kaylor join Pete and Jared to explore the history of how mainline Protestants have contributed to Christian nationalism in the United States. They explain how patriotic worship practices, uncritical support for the state, and assumptions about the nation's “Christian” identity have shaped the movement—and how churches today can begin to untangle faith from nationalism. Show Notes → https://thebiblefornormalpeople.com/episode-60-beau-underwood-brian-kaylor-christian-nationalism-across-the-political-spectrum/ Watch this episode on YouTube → https://youtu.be/KtmnH_URiAE ********** This episode is sponsored by Greenlight. Greenlight is the easy, convenient way for parents to raise financially smart kids and families to navigate life together. Don't wait to teach your kids real-world money skills, start your risk-free Greenlight trial today at greenlight.com/normalpeople.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

In episode 121, we dive into:* Socialism vs Communism & Socialism vs Democratic Socialism* The Progressive Platform in the U.S.* The media coverage of Bernie Sanders & his messaging* The media coverage of AOC & her messagingSources:* Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and socialism, explained* Socialism - Definition, Origins & Countries* How Did 'Socialism' Become a Dirty Word in America? | History* How Are Socialism and Communism Different? | HISTORY* Socialist vs. Capitalist Political Systems: Ideologies, Operations, and Impact on Society* Understanding the Political Spectrum from Left to Right* Congressional Progressive Caucus – The Progressive Promise* The Free Lance Star - March 5, 1985* The Telegraph – March 4, 1987* The Newburgh-Beacon Evening News - March 7, 1989* The Sunday Telegraph - November 11, 1990* Toledo Blade – February 25, 1999* The Item – February 13, 2001* 14 things Bernie Sanders has said about socialism - POLITICO* Bernie Sanders's speech defining democratic socialism, explained | Vox* Bernie Sanders - Policies* AOC - Policies* How Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez won the race that shocked the country - City & State New York* Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: "Call me a radical" - YouTube* Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez | SXSW 2019 - YouTube* AOC Shoutout to my fellow radicals, who think we shouldn't live under the thumb of $7 minimum wage* AOC vs. GOP: The Long List of Smears and Insults Hurled at Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez - Newsweek* Trump lauds AOC: 'She's got a spark that's pretty amazing'* Gerry Connolly defeats AOC to become top Democrat on Oversight Committee - CBS News* Ocasio-Cortez's future uncertain after House Oversight defeat* One Vote | Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez* Rep. Ocasio-Cortez fundraising soars as she blasts TrumpConnect with USS:* Substack* Instagram* TikTokThis episode was edited by Kevin Tanner. Learn more about him and his services here:* Website* Instagram Get full access to United SHE Stands at www.unitedshestands.com/subscribe

For years, the labels 'left' and 'right' have been used to describe where political parties sit. But are they still useful? - Godinama su se pojmovi 'ljevica' i 'desnica' koristili za opisivanje pozicija političkih stranaka. Imaju li i dalje smisla?

For years, the labels 'left' and 'right' have been used to describe where political parties sit. But are they still useful? - Durante anos, os rótulos “esquerda” e “direita” foram usados para descrever a posição dos partidos políticos. Mas eles ainda são úteis?

For years, the labels 'left' and 'right' have been used to describe where political parties sit. But are they still useful? - អស់រយៈពេលជាច្រើនឆ្នាំ ស្លាកសញ្ញា “ឆ្វេង” និង ”ស្តាំ” ត្រូវបានគេប្រើប្រាស់ដើម្បីពិពណ៌នាអំពីទីតាំងដែលគណបក្សនយោបាយអង្គុយ។ អ្នកដែលនៅខាងឆ្វេង ជឿលើគុណតម្លៃនៃភាពជឿនលឿនជាងមុន ខណៈដែលអ្នកនៅខាងស្ដាំនៃវិសាលគមនេះ ជឿលើគុណតម្លៃនៃការអភិរក្សជាជាង។ តើស្លាកទាំងនេះនៅតែមានប្រយោជន៍ដែរឬទេ? ហើយតើវាពិតជាជួយយើងឱ្យយល់ពីគោលជំហររបស់អ្នកនយោបាយ និងគណបក្សរបស់យើងមែនដែរឬទេ?

For years, the labels 'left' and 'right' have been used to describe where political parties sit. But are they still useful? - ઓડિયો સાંભળવા ઉપર આપેલા પ્લે બટન પર ક્લિક કરો.

For years, the labels 'left' and 'right' have been used to describe where political parties sit. But are they still useful? - Godinama se oznake 'lijevo' i 'desno' koriste za opisivanje političkog spektra stranaka i političara. Ali, pitanje glasi da li je ta podjela još uvijek korisna kada govorimo o glavnim strankama danas?

For years, the labels 'left' and 'right' have been used to describe where political parties sit. But are they still useful? - Για χρόνια, οι χαρακτηρισμοί «αριστερά» και «δεξιά» χρησιμοποιούνται για να περιγράψουν τη θέση των πολιτικών κομμάτων. Εξακολουθούν όμως να είναι χρήσιμοι;

For years, the labels 'left' and 'right' have been used to describe where political parties sit. But are they still useful? - Selama bertahun-tahun, label 'kiri' dan 'kanan' telah digunakan untuk menggambarkan posisi partai politik. Apakah label ini masih berguna untuk masa sekarang?

For years, the labels 'left' and 'right' have been used to describe where political parties sit. But are they still useful? - सालों से दक्षिणपंथी या वामपंथी लेबलों से यह बताया जाता रहा है कि राजनीतिक दल कहाँ बैठते हैं। क्या ये लेबल अभी भी उपयोगी हैं?

For years, the labels 'left' and 'right' have been used to describe where political parties sit. But are they still useful? - Seit Jahren werden die Bezeichnungen „links“ und „rechts“ verwendet, um zu beschreiben, wo politische Parteien stehen. Doch sind diese beiden Begriffe immer noch verwendbar?

For years, the labels 'left' and 'right' have been used to describe where political parties sit. But are they still useful? - Pendant des années, les étiquettes « gauche » et « droite » ont été utilisées pour décrire les partis politiques. Mais sont-elles toujours utiles ?

My guest on the show today is Jon Baskin, co-founder and editor of The Pointmagazine, which over the last 16 years has managed to carve out for itself a really distinctive and important space within the broader American literary intellectual scene. Jon and I have traded emails over the years, but like a lot of people who I think of as loose comrades within the broader scene, we had never actually gazed on each other's faces or heard each other's voices before we got on Zoom to do this. So it was nice to connect.We talk a lot about the birth and development of The Point, in particular its origins in the Committee on Social Thought program at the University of Chicago. We talk about its relationship to N+1 , which is in many ways the seminal magazine of the last few decades of political intellectual life on the left in America. We get into how Jon and his co-editors have managed to keep their bearings while so many other publications have been whipsawed and in some cases destroyed by the violent political energies of the past decade. And we talk about how The Point does and doesn't intersect with the emerging media landscape.This is a really fun conversation with Jon. Hope you enjoy.AI Show notes courtesy of Descript:00:00 Introduction to Eminent Americans00:17 Meet John Baskin: Co-founder of The Point Magazine01:28 The Birth and Evolution of The Point Magazine02:21 Upcoming Conversations and Projects04:38 John Baskin's Intellectual Journey05:45 The Committee on Social Thought at the University of Chicago11:49 Influences and Inspirations Behind The Point23:28 The Role of Philosophy in The Point's Editorial Vision36:30 Challenges and Conflicts in Editorial Direction43:00 The Convergence of Magazines in the Late 2000s44:43 The Role of DNA in Magazine Identity45:28 Challenges in Finding Writers47:06 Impact of Substack on Traditional Magazines49:50 Balancing Established and New Writers57:31 Exploring the Political Spectrum of The Point01:03:32 The Relationship Between Political and Cultural Conservatism01:08:22 The Point's Foray into Substack01:17:39 The Mystique of The Point and Its Editors01:19:48 Conclusion and Final Thoughts Get full access to Eminent Americans at danieloppenheimer.substack.com/subscribe

For years, the labels 'left' and 'right' have been used to describe where political parties sit. But are they still useful? - Со години, етикетите „левица“ и „десница“ се користат за да се опише каде се наоѓаат политичките партии на политичкиот спектар. Но, дали тие сè уште се корисни?

For years, the labels 'left' and 'right' have been used to describe where political parties sit. But are they still useful? - တၢ်အမံၤပနီၣ် 'စုစ့ၣ်' ဒီး 'စုထွဲ' အံၤ တၢ်သူအီၤဒ်သိးတၢ်ပာ်ဖျါ ထံရူၢ်ကီၢ်သဲးပၣ်တံၣ်သ့ၣ်တဖၣ်အတၢ်အိၣ်ဆၢထၢၣ်အဂ့ၢ်န့ၣ် အိၣ်ဝဲအနံၣ်အါမးလံ နာ်သက့ အဝဲသ့ၣ်န့ၣ် မ့ၢ်အဘျုးအိၣ်ဒ်စ့ၢ်ကီးဧါ?

For years, the labels 'left' and 'right' have been used to describe where political parties sit. But are they still useful? - Pendant des années, les étiquettes « gauche » et « droite » ont été utilisées pour décrire les partis politiques. Mais sont-elles toujours utiles ?

For years, the labels 'left' and 'right' have been used to describe where political parties sit. But are they still useful? - برای سال‌ها برچسب‌های «چپ» و «راست» برای توصیف موقعیت احزاب سیاسی استفاده شده‌اند. اما آیا هنوز هم مفید هستند؟

For years, the labels 'left' and 'right' have been used to describe where political parties sit. But are they still useful? - از سال‌ها بدین‌سو از طبقه‌بندی سیاسی جناح راست و چپ برای توصیف جایگاه احزاب سیاسی استفاده شده است. اما آیا این طبقه‌بنده تا هنوز نیز مفید و مؤثر است؟

For years, the labels 'left' and 'right' have been used to describe where political parties sit. But are they still useful? - Годинама се странке, покрети и политичари означавају као "леви" и "десни", како би се у најкраћем описали њихови политички ставови. Међутим, поставља се питање да ли је та подела и даље корисна и релевантна када говоримо о садашњим партијама?

For years, the labels 'left' and 'right' have been used to describe where political parties sit. But are they still useful? - பல ஆண்டுகளாக, அரசியல் கட்சிகள் அவர்களின் சித்தாந்தங்களை பொருத்து வலதுசாரி மற்றும் இடதுசாரி கட்சி என்று அழைக்கப்படுகிறது. ஆனால் இந்த அரசியல் சித்தாந்தம் இன்னும் பயனுள்ளதா?

For years, the labels 'left' and 'right' have been used to describe where political parties sit. But are they still useful? - Sa loob ng maraming taon, ginamit ang mga katagang "left" at "right" upang ilarawan kung ano ang pinaninidigan ng mga partidong politikal. Ang tanong, ito ba'y nagagamit pa sa kasalukuyan?

For years, the labels 'left' and 'right' have been used to describe where political parties sit. But are they still useful? - لعدة سنوات، استُخدمت مصطلحات "اليمين" و"اليسار" لتحديد مواقع الأحزاب السياسية على الخريطة الأيديولوجية. لكن هل ما زالت تحمل قيمة حقيقية اليوم؟

For years, the labels 'left' and 'right' have been used to describe where political parties sit. But are they still useful? - เป็นเวลาหลายปีที่ผู้คนมักใช้การแบ่งฝั่งตามอุดมการณ์ของพรรคการเมืองแบบกว้าง ๆ ด้วยการแทนด้วยฝั่งซ้ายและฝั่งขวา แต่การแบ่งฝั่งด้วยวิธีนี้ยังมีประโยชน์หรือไม่?

For years, the labels 'left' and 'right' have been used to describe where political parties sit. But are they still useful? - আপনি কি নিজেকে ডানপন্থী না বামপন্থী বলে বিবেচনা করেন? বছরের পর বছর ধরে এই শব্দগুলো রাজনীতিতে বিভিন্ন দলের অবস্থান বোঝাতে ব্যবহার করা হচ্ছে।

For years, the labels 'left' and 'right' have been used to describe where political parties sit. But are they still useful? - Durante años, se han usado las etiquetas "izquierda" y "derecha" para describir la posición de los partidos políticos. Pero ¿siguen siendo útiles estas etiquetas?

For years, the labels 'left' and 'right' have been used to describe where political parties sit. But are they still useful? - ਸਾਲਾਂ ਤੋਂ, 'ਖੱਬੇ' ਅਤੇ 'ਸੱਜੇ' ਲੇਬਲਾਂ ਦੀ ਵਰਤੋਂ ਇਹ ਵਰਣਨ ਕਰਨ ਲਈ ਕੀਤੀ ਜਾਂਦੀ ਰਹੀ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਰਾਜਨੀਤਿਕ ਪਾਰਟੀਆਂ ਕਿੱਥੇ ਬੈਠਦੀਆਂ ਹਨ। ਪਰ ਕੀ ਇਹ ਅਜੇ ਵੀ ਵਾਜਬ ਹਨ?

For years, the labels 'left' and 'right' have been used to describe where political parties sit. But are they still useful? - 수년 동안 '좌파(left)'와 '우파(right)'라는 용어는 정당이 속한 위치를 나타내는 데 사용되어 왔습니다. 하지만 이러한 용어가 여전히 유용한 것일까요?

For years, the labels 'left' and 'right' have been used to describe where political parties sit. But are they still useful? - 政党の方針を把握するのに長らく「右派」や「左派」という分類が使われてきました。この右と左という捉え方は現代に即しているのでしょうか？

For years, the labels 'left' and 'right' have been used to describe where political parties sit. But are they still useful? - 多年来，“左”和“右”一直被用来描述政党的立场。但这些标签如今还有意义吗？（点击上方收听音频）

For years, the labels 'left' and 'right' have been used to describe where political parties sit. But are they still useful? - Trong nhiều năm, các từ 'cánh trái' và 'cánh phải' (hay 'cánh tả' và 'cánh hữu') đã được sử dụng để mô tả vị trí của các đảng phái chính trị. Nhưng liệu chúng có còn hữu ích không?

For years, the labels 'left' and 'right' have been used to describe where political parties sit. But are they still useful? - На протяжении многих лет термины «левые» и «правые» использовались, чтобы описать политические взгляды партий. Но актуальны ли они сегодня?

For years, the labels 'left' and 'right' have been used to describe where political parties sit. But are they still useful? - Bi salan etîketên 'çep' û 'rast' ji bo vegotina partiyên siyasî tên bikaranîn. Lê ew karhatî ne?

For years, the labels 'left' and 'right' have been used to describe where political parties sit. But are they still useful? - 多年以來，「左翼」與「右翼」這兩個政治標籤一直被用來描述政黨在政治光譜上所處的位置。但這些標籤是否仍然有用？

For years, the labels 'left' and 'right' have been used to describe where political parties sit. But are they still useful? - Улс төрийн намуудын байр суурийг тодорхойлоход "зүүн" ба "баруун" гэсэн нэр томьёог олон жил ашигласан. Гэхдээ энэ нэршил одоо ч хэрэгтэй хэвээр үү?

For years, the labels 'left' and 'right' have been used to describe where political parties sit. But are they still useful? - برسوں سے، 'بائیں' اور 'دائیں' کے لیبل یہ بیان کرنے کے لیے استعمال ہوتے رہے ہیں کہ سیاسی جماعتیں کیا نقطہ نظر رکھتی ہیں۔ لیکن کیا یہ لیبل آج کے دور میں بھی کارآمد ہیں؟

For years, the labels 'left' and 'right' have been used to describe where political parties sit. But are they still useful? - Протягом багатьох років ярлики «ліві» та «праві» використовувалися для опису місця політичних партій у суспільстві. Але чи все ще вони є корисними?

For years, the labels 'left' and 'right' have been used to describe where political parties sit. But are they still useful? - ንነብስኹም ኣብ ጸጋማዊ ዲኹም የማናዊ ኣተሓሳስባ ወይ ኣረኣእያ ተቐምጥዋ፧ ንዓመታት እዚኦም ኣስማት ፖለቲካዊያን ሰልፍታት ኣብ ዝበዝሑ መርገጺታቶም ኣበየናይ ይዝንብላ ንዝብል ንምግላጽ ወይ ንምዕቃን ከገልግሉ ጸኒሖም። እቶም ናብ ጸጋም ዝዘዝዉ ኣብ ዝያዳ ገስጋሳዊ ክብርታት ዝኣምኑ`ዮም፣ እቶም ኣብ የማናዊ ወገን ናይ`ቲ መዐየሪ ዘለዉ ድማ ኣብ ዝያዳ ዓቃባውያን ክብርታት ይኣምኑ። እዞም ኣስማት ግን ክሳብ ሕጂ ጠቐምቲ ድዮም፧ መርገጺ ፖለቲካውያን ሰልፍታትናን ፖለቲከኛታትናን ንምርዳእ ብሓቂ ይሕግዙና ድዮም፧

Today:Anand Giridharadas of The.Ink argues the left-right political spectrum doesn't apply anymore. We should be thinking about things through a “who's fighting for me” frame. Then, Massachusetts' Veterans Services Secretary Dr. Jon Santiago discusses the litany of ways the Trump administration is making life more difficult for those who served our country. 

*Streamyard defaulted to my computer microphone and not my recording microphone. I apologize for the terrible sound quality. In this episode I explore how the American progressive left and conservative right share many fundamental assumptions about the use of authoritarian power. While the political spectrum in the West is usually conceptualized as left vs. right, I argue that it should be more accurately characterized as liberty vs. authority. I discuss the libertarian non-aggression principle, which states as a moral principle that violence should never be initiated against a peaceful person, and I read from Murray Rothbard and Hans-Herman Hoppe to elaborate the point. I then compare this with conservative and progressive conceptions of power, both of which affirm the use of arbitrary state power and violence to achieve their preferred social ends. This is why our only two political options are between liberty and varying degrees of authoritarianism. I then read from Mark 10:35-45, John 15, 1 John 4, and Matthew 23, showing that self-sacrificial love for others and the rejection of worldly authoritarian powers are principles fundamental to Christianity and explain how libertarianism is a more consistent modern political application of those fundamental principles.  Media Referenced:Rothbard, For a New Liberty: https://a.co/d/2nP2PZCHoppe, A Theory of Socialism and Capitalism: https://a.co/d/0jub6a2Jesus and Capitalism: https://libertarianchristians.com/episode/ep-180-jesus-and-capitalism/Mises vs. Wright: https://libertarianchristians.com/episode/ep-178-ludwig-von-mises-vs-a-christian-scholar-round-3-n-t-wright/ The Protestant Libertarian Podcast is a project of the Libertarian Christian Institute and a part of the Christians For Liberty Network. The Libertarian Christian Institute can be found at www.libertarianchristians.com.Questions, comments, suggestions? Please reach out to me at theprotestantlibertarian@gmail.com.  You can also follow the podcast on Twitter: @prolibertypod, and YouTube, @ProLibertyPod, where you will get shorts and other exclusive video content. For more about the show, you can go to theprotestantlibertarianpodcast.com. If you like the show and want to support it, you can! Go to libertarianchristians.com, where you can donate to LCI and buy The Protestant Libertarian Podcast Merch! Also, please consider giving me a star rating and leaving me a review, it really helps expand the show's profile! Thanks!

Welcome to Meaning-Making 101 where we explore the crisis of meaning in our world today, and how we may awaken from it. In this episode we consider how the Left vs Right spectrum fails to capture the nuance of how people form political opinions. Further, we learn how populism itself is not inherently Left or Right, as populist movements are by definition movements that transcend tribal and partisan confines. Join us for a deep dive into the question of how we may cultivate the wisdom to see beyond the narrowness of tribal and essentialist perceptions of reality. Let's Go! Inspired by a stellar comment from one of our listeners,  @officialpeoplespartyusa , and the video he shared with us (by Andres of  @TheMarketExit ), this one's for you, brother! Big thanks to Andres Acevedo  @TheMarketExit  for his hard work in researching and creating this video, 'The political spectrum is a myth'. Full video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYoA1R38cuc Disclaimer: This show may include copyrighted material for educational purposes that are intended to fall under the "fair use" guidelines of Section 107 of the Copyright Act. The content is used for commentary, critique, and educational insights. All rights to the original content belong to their respective owners. If you have any concerns about the use of your material, please reach out to us directly. Video covered in this episode: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYoA1R38cuc Thanks for listening! Join Actuali in podcast land where we explore the arts of mindfulness, flow, and how to realize one's most authentic Self. On your favorite podcast platform @ https://Anchor.FM/Actuali Through deep dives into life's greatest mysteries to inspiring conversations, to current events, guided Wim Hof beathing and meditations, Actuali is dedicated to revealing a clear way to view the world and our place in it. Together we change this world from the inside-out! Join us Wednesday's 7p EST on youtube.com/@actuali.podccast Playing after the fact on Spotify, Apple, and more @ https://Anchor.FM/Actuali Join Actuali on Social! Instagram: https://Instagram.com/actuali.podcast Twitter: https://Twitter.com/Actuali_Podcast Facebook: https://facebook.com/Actuali.podcast Our band, ⁠American Dharma: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCfJn_yIRo45SRHGfsjJ8Xiw A.D. on facebook: https://facebook.com/AmericanDharmaband A.D. on Instagram: https://instagram.com/American.Dharma.band A.D. on Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/americandharma The audio side of this episode will also be available on all major podcast platforms via https://Anchor.FM/Actuali Enjoy the show!

When you sit down to Thanksgiving dinner, are you going to be at a table with anyone with really different political views? Instead of fighting or remaining distant, could this be the year to try and find some common ground? Today, we share a recording of a recent live event at Vermont Public's studios in conjunction with StoryCorp. It's with Vermonters who participated in our One Small Step program. Each person was matched with a stranger with different views and life experiences. They have a facilitated conversation, and learn how to bridge their divides. They are Chris Sims of Jericho, Judy Scott of St. George, Ramona Akpo-Sani of Orwell, and Beth Howard of Williston. And from Braver Angels, we have Lincoln Earle-Centers of Montpelier and Katherine Cadwell of Fayston.We were also joined by two folks from Braver Angels, an organization with a similar mission of connecting people across political divides, Lincoln Earle-Centers of Montpelier and Katherine Cadwell of Fayston.If you are a part of an organization who would like to take part in One Small Step training, visit https://www.vermontpublic.org/2024-11-26/request-a-training-session-one-small-step-on-the-roadThis event was taped on November 17th

From 9/11 to the COVID-19 pandemic, crisis moments keep reshaping the political landscape.

In this episode, The Annuity Man discussed:  Pragmatic approach to financial planning How annuities are primarily priced Four primary benefits of annuities  Closing the gap with annuities   Key Takeaways:  Prepare for either party leadership scenarios to ensure financial stability. Approach financial planning with a pragmatic mindset, always employing the use of research and contractual guarantees.  Life expectancy drives lifetime income from annuities. Annuities are commodity products, and their guarantees change based on market conditions and demand. If you are expecting interest rates to decrease or taxes to increase, then consider locking in good contractual guarantees by shopping from various carriers.  Here are the four primary benefits of annuities: principal protection, income for life, legacy, and long-term care. When buying annuities, ask yourself these two questions: what do you want the money to do, and when do you want the guarantees to start?  Your income floor consists of your Social Security, pensions, dividend stocks, and other income sources. Use annuities to fill the gap between the income floor and other sources of income.   "Annuities are not market products, they're not growth products, they're contractually guaranteed transfer of risk products that solve for four primary things: principal protection, income for life, legacy, long term care." —  Stan The Annuity Man.    Connect with The Annuity Man:  Website: http://theannuityman.com/  Email: Stan@TheAnnuityMan.com  Book: Owner's Manuals: https://www.stantheannuityman.com/how-do-annuities-work YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCXKKxvVslbeGAlEc5sra2g  Get a Quote Today: https://www.stantheannuityman.com/annuity-calculator! 

On today's Countdown 2024 we're hitting opposite ends of the political spectrum, starting out with an up-and-coming member of the Democratic caucus, Congressman Robert Garcia from Long Beach ... and ending with former Trump advisor, David Urban.

Welcome to the Alfalfa Podcast

A recent poll is turning heads in Greece as it shows not only what appears to be a total collapse of the main opposition SYRIZA, which fell into single digit numbers, but also a noticeable decline in support for the ruling New Democracy party. Nikos Efstathiou, an Athens based journalist and author, joins Thanos Davelis to break down the key takeaways from this poll as we look at what message it sends about Greek politics, from SYRIZA with its never ending cycles of internal crises, PASOK and its effort to capture the Greek center left, and the ruling New Democracy. You can read the articles we discuss on our podcast here:New poll sees SYRIZA drop to single digits amid noticeable decline for New DemocracySYRIZA leader plays his final cardsChevron-led group to update offshore gas plan as Cyprus sets deadlineDrying lakes and thirsty trees: In drought-hit Greece, water trucks are keeping crops alive

A political realignment is happening and the Deep State is in a full-blown panic! In this episode, find out what's happening with the RFK-Trump alliance, and why it does represent one of the most epic moments in modern political history! -- Try Liver Health Formula by going to GetLiverHelp.com/Turley and claim your FREE Blood Sugar Formula gift. That's https://GetLiverHelp.com/Turley Join my new Courageous Conservative Bootcamp and get equipped to fight back and restore foundational values. Learn more at https://fight.turleytalks.com/join  *The content presented by our partners may contain affiliate links. When you click and shop the links, Turley Talks may receive a small commission.*  -- Thank you for taking the time to listen to this episode.  If you enjoyed this episode, please subscribe and/or leave a review. FOLLOW me on X (Twitter): https://twitter.com/DrTurleyTalks Click here to partner with us and defy liberal culture! https://advertising.turleytalks.com/sponsorship Sign up for the 'New Conservative Age Rising' Email Alerts to get lots of articles on conservative trends: https://turleytalks.com/subscribe/. **All clips used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).