Podcasts about scientific paper

In this episode of Wildlife By The Numbers, Grant and Matt continue their discussion on writing a scientific paper. They share with us writing the paper backwards by starting with the results, what to avoid in the discussion section, the abstract, title, and realistic number of drafts. Is 15 or 20 drafts a realistic number of drafts? Listen in and discover the answer. Quotes from this episode:"One of the things I see often happen in the discussion is people want to talk about things that are way outside the bounds of a particular study. So the study was designed to answer some specific question, and there's this desire usually to make the study answer questions that are kind of beyond that frame of inference.""...he'll take a piece of the paper out and put in a new document. And that was just a huge help for me because I do get distracted by just the text on the paper and just the volume of text on the paper. So sometimes if I need to focus in on a paragraph or a section, I'll just cut that out and make a new document, and then just put it back in when I feel like I got it right."In a future episode, they will cover choosing where to submit the paper and how to handle the review process.Episode music: Shapeshifter by Mr Smith is licensed under a Attribution 4.0 International License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/https://freemusicarchive.org/music/mr-smith/studio-city/shapeshifter/

In this episode of Wildlife By The Numbers, Matt and Grant, a duo who has been co-authoring papers together for over a decade, give a candid discussion on publication to share your work. They have a lively discussion of how they write a scientific paper, and dive into the Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion sections of a paper sharing how their writing was influenced by their professors as well. They have saved the abstract, editing, proofing, and deciding which journal to submit to for another episode.Quotes from this episode..."Writing is the backbone of what scientists do, and it's extremely important to write up what you're doing and present that in a format that has been reviewed by other scientists. At the most basic level, folks can understand that you wanna share your knowledge. But there's a number of reasons why you want to write a scientific paper, have that go through a a rigorous peer review, and then publish it. One of them is, as I just said, you wanna share the information so others can learn from it and others can build off it and improve and contribute to the field of wildlife biology or ecology or whatever science your your discipline you're working with and advance that field, help folks understand the issue that you're working on because it may it may spur other questions that they have or help them with the work that they're doing. Scientific writing also in that peer review process also brings credibility to your work.""Why in the world do we use such a format? Why is it not like if I do a presentation at a scientific meeting, I may do some methods and results to discuss that, and then start over again. And do that multiple times even for one smaller type that might be a chapter in a thesis or dissertation. I'm not gonna roll all my results together and talk through all those individual results and then discuss all of them afterwards, it just doesn't flow very well. So why in the world do we do it that way?""What Stuart has impressed upon me is in your introduction, you have the first three hundred words is what's gonna grab your reader. And in that first three hundred words, you should speak to what the issue is that you're addressing, why it's important, why it matters, and then how you resolve it. So the first three hundred words, what's the issue? Why does it matter? And then how do you address it? And that's how he taught me to write it." Episode music: Shapeshifter by Mr Smith is licensed under a Attribution 4.0 International License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/https://freemusicarchive.org/music/mr-smith/studio-city/shapeshifter/

This week Magnum & Izzo discuss whether or not humans were the first advanced industrial civilization on Earth. EPISODE 125 OF THE SWERVE PODCAST ↩️

The controversial issue of males in women's sport has reared its head at the Paris Olympics. In this episode, the team discuss the case of two boxers who were disqualified after failing 'gender eligibility tests' by their international federation at last year's World Championships but, despite being biologically male, are competing in Paris. We discuss how this situation has arisen, including an explanation of the governance issues that led to their inclusion, and the biological factors that give rise to the Differences of Sex Development (DSDs) that are thought to be responsible for these two cases. We explain how significant male advantage is in sport, and why boxing, of all the sports, is one that should recognise male biology and its implications. Finally, we offer insight into the International Olympic Committee's (IOC) Principles of Fairness and Inclusion, contrasting this with other sports that regulate women's sport and exclude male advantage.Show notesHere's where you go to sign up for Patron, with a small monthly pledge, which then gives you access to our Discourse forum where other listeners share their thoughts and responses to these issuesThe IOC's Framework on Inclusion with the ten principles discussed in the show, including "Number 1: Inclusion", and "No Presumption of Advantage"The Scientific Paper that accompanied the IOC Framework aboveWe (Ross) co-authored a scientific rebuttal to that paper, addressing some of the issues with the science and human rightsHere is the IOC Guidance on language use in Paris, as raised by Gareth on the showThe International Boxing Association Technical and Competition Rules, which include, at 4.2. Eligibility Guidelines for Gender. Get bonus content on Patreon Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In California, the AMA Guides 5th Edition is used to determine impairment rating for workers' compensation. In this video, Dr. John Alchemy examines an upcoming scientific paper that he is participating in, which takes a look at the Guides, and examines methods for revising the way that they are used. For more information on this episode, and other helpful tips about workers' compensation, visit the RateFast Blog. Visit our YouTube channel to see this video and more!If you're a workers' compensation provider, adjuster, or case manager check out RateFast Express: the service that writes your impairment reports with you!Questions? Comments? Suggestions for podcast episodes? Reach out to us anytime at caworkcompreport@rate-fast.com!Connect with RateFast CEO Dr. John Alchemy on LinkedIn!

Teslas dont rust, do they? News, and updates. Special guest Jeff Brown from Griots Garage.  Support the Drivers Club: https://www.overcrestproductions.com/driversclub 00:00 Introduction 04:57 Rust and the Cybertruck 08:03 Tesla Cybertruck Rusting 15:37 Stainless Steel and Rust 22:16 Cybertruck's Stainless Steel Composition 26:03 Environmental Contaminants 29:05 Deposits and Fallout 30:3 1 Tesla Cybertruck Rust Issue 51:21 - Satellite Crash into Earth's Atmosphere  53:31 - The Force of a School Bus-sized Satellite  1:02:50 - Tractor Trailer Theft of Brand New Corvettes  1:06:18 - Camels and Zebras on the Freeway  1:11:55 - The Case of the Suspected Chinese Spy Pigeon  1:16:11 - Man Caught at the Border with a Python in His Pants  1:16:19 - Scientific Paper with Exaggerated Rodent  --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/overcrest/support

In this episode Prof. Erin Fraser joins me for part two of our introduction to primary scientific literature. This time... did you know most of us don't read these "papers" from start to finish? in this episode we try to demystify the process and we admit... we have to look up words just like everyone else! 

You want your scientific article to be published and reach the scientific community, but you move in a highly competitive world. To do this, you must write your article with the Trinity in mind: three types of people who will evaluate your article—Editor, Reviewer, and Reader.Each member of the Trinity has different desires, determinants, and fears. You cannot write your article without understanding all three, without considering their views and passions. If your article appeals to all of them, it will succeed. You will not have achieved your goals if you fail in only one.This is the podcast version of my blog's episode Who do you have to think about when writing a scientific paper? The Trinity This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit demadaria.substack.com

Please welcome LWA Coach Jess Kirschmann to the Born to Thrive Podcast! Jess is a PhD student at the University of Houston and an assistant coach on the LWA team. Jess is studying to get her PhD in kinesiology and is collaborating with special Oympics, exploring resources for college students, and learning about what happens with sports retirement at the collegiate level. Jess has been part of the LWA team since January 2023, today we talk about her journey starting as a LWA client, changes in her relationships, and how her mindset has changed to become a version of herself that she is proud of.    (1:33) Intro (5:30) Jess's mindset shift to prioritize herself (9:30) Changes in Jess's relationships  (14:30) Figuring out compromises to reach your goals (16:00) Digging deeper to figure out your why (19:25) Keeping promises to yourself (22:50) Looking at the positive over the negative (25:30) Give yourself grace instead of reacting  (30:00) Question things and get curious (35:45) Your doesn't need to be physical (38:39) Jess's 1st first author scientific publication  (45:35) Life is a research experiment  (48:20) Jess's goals moving forward (50:24) Never break promises to yourself   Follow Jess at: Instagram: @_fitjess  TikTok: @_fitjess ------------------------------ Click Here to Purchase the Unposed Unbothered Journal! Click Here to Download LWA's Free Transformation Blueprint  Save 10% with "alex" from Buffbunny: https://www.buffbunny.com/?rfsn=6261901.6ab300 Save 20% with alex from Legion: https://legionathletics.com/products/workout-supplements/?r=zrxnw&utm_source=bc_alex-allen_zrxnw&utm_campaign=bc Click Here to Apply for 1:1 Coaching with LWA Coaching

In this episode, Morten interviews Kristina Vaarst Andersen, the senior author of our recent paper co-published in CoffeeMind. It is a paper covering the interpretation of the data we collected in a research project investigating the dynamics of business models of coffee roasteries. We started this project around eight years ago, and despite struggling with collecting enough data, we have finally gotten an excellent paper written up and published. Unfortunately, Morten did not set the microphones correctly, but hopefully, it is well enough polished in post-production for you to extract the meaning.Please find the paper here (Presse the 'Fulltext' link on the right side of the page):https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/creativity-and-commerce-a-shifting-balance-for-specialty-foods-an

This is part 2 of a two part lesson on how to read a scientific paper. In part 1 Prof Joanna Coleman and I talked about the parts of a scientific paper and we compare our approaches to actually sitting down and trying to understand scientific publications. We also introduced the topic of "co-evolution". In this episode Prof. Coleman and I actually read a paper together and we talk about it as we go.  What we liked, what was important, what did we both get from this paper. The paper we are going to read is a short, reasonably easy to read report on how bats and pitcher plants may have co-evolved. Grafe TU, Schöner CR, Kerth G, Junaidi A, Schöner MG. A novel resource-service mutualism between bats and pitcher plants. Biol Lett. 2011 Jun 23;7(3):436-9. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.1141.If you are a university professor and would like a suggested assignment that goes along with this two part episode feel free to email the podcast and i'll explain the different assignments I have used as a follow up in different classes. EASTER EGG - this paper inspired the cover art for BioAudio. The wonderful image that I was given permission to use by Wren Bailee. 

If you are a university professor - how often do you ask your class to read a paper... and how often do you actually explain how they should do it?  As a student, how often has someone actually walked you through how to understand scientific publications.... my guess is not enough!Teaching from scientific publications is great, but they take practice to get onto the style of writing. As scientists, we read and write so many, sometimes we forget how steep that learning curve is. I was  surprised when a student stopped me after class last year and said "but, how do I read the paper you gave us, what am I supposed to get from it? It's like a different language". The student was quite correct. Reading scientific literature is a skill we all need to learn and practice. So Professor Joanna Coleman and I sat down and created this two part episode on how to read a scientific paper. In part 1 we talk about what goes into the different sections of a scientific paper,  and we compare how each of us would approach reading a paper. We also introduce the topic of co-evolution (which is what we are going to read about). In part 2 we actually read a paper together. 

AccuWeather Daily brings you the top trending weather story of the day - every day.

به پادکستی برای زیست شناسی محاسباتی و ترویج علم خوش آمدید فصل سوم قسمت هجدهم: یک مقاله علمی را چگونه بخوانیم مقاله اصلی این اپیزود از طریق این لینک در دسترس است.  مهمان این اپیزود: امیر صفدریان برای ارسال نظرات میتوانید از طریق ادمین کانال تلگرامی یا توییتر پادکست در تماس باشید @jafarilab Did you enjoy exploring my podcast? Buy me a coffee --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/mohieddin-jafari/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/mohieddin-jafari/support

Ep273 - Orlando Brown Vs Bow Wow Topics - Orlando Brown's Mental Health - Mass Shooting in Greenwood - A.I. Bot Wrote a Scientific Paper on Itself Hosted by @JoeBossRadio & @ChefRock516 Follow us on All Social Media @RiseUpWorldwide Listen in at www.RiseUpWorldwide.net or FB Live We Do Not Own The Rights To The Music!! Playlist by powered by @DjLostNFound 1. Helga - Porch Love 2. Round Here (Part 1) - Tobe Nwigwe 3. Bloodline - Opto Music 4. JW3 - Rizz E 5. Giving is Living - Tee Supreme 6. Y.K.T.D. - Q-Flo, Table, Scribe Music 7. Season - Jamil, 350 8. P[[s - Dj LostNFound, Reconcile, Tallysama 9. Used To - DJLC, Jack Tyler 10. Vibin - Steveie Valentine 11. Play You - Mykeyyj, Mike Teezy 12. AWOL - Sb Tone #GynesisRadio #TransformationRadio #YesHourRadio #UrbanGospel#Podcast #Radio #NowPlaying #ArtistManagement #SocialMediaMarketing #CHH #RealCHH #TruthMusic #Trending #HipHop #HisHopRadio #HisHopNation  #ChristLikeRadio #ShareTheWealth

Dr. Refky Nicola interviews Sarah Atzen and Dr. David Bluemke to discuss "Top 10 Tips for Writing Your Scientific Paper: The Radiology Scientific Style Guide".  Top 10 Tips for Writing Your Scientific Paper: The RadiologyScientific Style Guide. Atzen and Bluemke. Radiology 2022; 304:1–2.

In this Weekly Update, Betsy Ashton hosts a panelists of guest which include one of our British FLCCC Alliance members: Dr. Scott Mitchell. They will be discussing the paper that was just released: "Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis to Inform Clinical Guidelines" Authors of this paper include our own Dr. Scott Mitchell and Dr. Tess Lawrie from BIRD. Donate to the Front Line Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance, Inc To educate medical professionals and the public in safe and effective ways to prevent and treat COVID-19. Click here to make a donation: https://covid19criticalcare.com/network-support/support-our-work/ GoFundMe: https://charity.gofundme.com/donate/project/front-line-covid-19-critical-care-alliance/joyce-kamen Buy FLCCC gear at: https://theflcccstore.org/ Subscribe to our mailing list on our website: http://flccc.net/signup Follow us on Telegram: https://t.me/FLCCC_Alliance

Listen to this interview of Jari Saramäki, author of How to Write a Scientific Paper: An Academic Self-Help Guide for PhD Students (2018) and professor of computational science at Aalto University, Finland. We talk about how hard soft skills are. Jari Saramäki : "Yes, I think that there is something to a kind of immersion approach to learning. Because you can learn a lot by observing, by imitating, by looking at things and asking questions. But this is something you need to decide to do. So, you can read a paper so that you just read and try to get the science out of it. Or, you can start reading it as if you wanted to write a similar paper, so that you look at its structure, the shape of its sentences, and so on. You try, basically, to absorb all this information that's in the writing. But you need to know that there is this method of reading. So, yes, as teachers, we should maybe be trying to point this out to students: 'Next time when you read a paper, forget about the science, and try instead to look at the sentences and the paragraphs. Write like a one-sentence summary of each paragraph, and then observe in your sentences how the whole paper has been structured.' So, yeah, we should definitely encourage our students to do more of this kind of immersive learning." Watch Daniel Shea edit your science here. Write Daniel at writeyourresearch@gmail.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Listen to this interview of Jari Saramäki, author of How to Write a Scientific Paper: An Academic Self-Help Guide for PhD Students (2018) and professor of computational science at Aalto University, Finland. We talk about how hard soft skills are. Jari Saramäki : "Yes, I think that there is something to a kind of immersion approach to learning. Because you can learn a lot by observing, by imitating, by looking at things and asking questions. But this is something you need to decide to do. So, you can read a paper so that you just read and try to get the science out of it. Or, you can start reading it as if you wanted to write a similar paper, so that you look at its structure, the shape of its sentences, and so on. You try, basically, to absorb all this information that's in the writing. But you need to know that there is this method of reading. So, yes, as teachers, we should maybe be trying to point this out to students: 'Next time when you read a paper, forget about the science, and try instead to look at the sentences and the paragraphs. Write like a one-sentence summary of each paragraph, and then observe in your sentences how the whole paper has been structured.' So, yeah, we should definitely encourage our students to do more of this kind of immersive learning." Watch Daniel Shea edit your science here. Write Daniel at writeyourresearch@gmail.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

Listen to this interview of Jari Saramäki, author of How to Write a Scientific Paper: An Academic Self-Help Guide for PhD Students (2018) and professor of computational science at Aalto University, Finland. We talk about how hard soft skills are. Jari Saramäki : "Yes, I think that there is something to a kind of immersion approach to learning. Because you can learn a lot by observing, by imitating, by looking at things and asking questions. But this is something you need to decide to do. So, you can read a paper so that you just read and try to get the science out of it. Or, you can start reading it as if you wanted to write a similar paper, so that you look at its structure, the shape of its sentences, and so on. You try, basically, to absorb all this information that's in the writing. But you need to know that there is this method of reading. So, yes, as teachers, we should maybe be trying to point this out to students: 'Next time when you read a paper, forget about the science, and try instead to look at the sentences and the paragraphs. Write like a one-sentence summary of each paragraph, and then observe in your sentences how the whole paper has been structured.' So, yeah, we should definitely encourage our students to do more of this kind of immersive learning." Watch Daniel Shea edit your science here. Write Daniel at writeyourresearch@gmail.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/science

A new Scientific Paper claims to have found a link between the Biblical parable of Sodom & Gamora and a mysteries Asteroid. Is a peculiar event in Russia in the early 20th century the solution to what happened to these mythical cities? We break down what happened, and why this "report" was published. We are also joined by Blake Smith of Monster Talk and In Research of Fame. A well respected skeptic researcher  of the weird and mysterious. He has been a figure head in the community for years, given talks and hosting numerus guests on his shows. We don't do the traditional interview with Blake but have him join on the whole show - even for Monster Quest! The Monster Quest this episode is a  S02E02 - Mega Hog. There have been documented reports, with real photo evidence of Mega Hogs roaming the south. Large bores that might be reaching 1000+ pounds. So what is going on here? Monsterquest sendss out a team to find out...but we explain it in a but more detail. Support the show (https://www.patreon.com/PlasticPlesiosaurPodcast)

Masa Pandemi Covid 19, Refokusing Anggaran bukan halangan untuk tetap bekerja, beraktivitas sesuai Tugas dan Fungsi BPTP, bahkan harus memberikan output lebih, berupa Scientific Paper, dan Scientific Book. Begitu ungkap Kepala BPTP Jatim Dr. Catur Hermanto. Mau tau lengkapnya cerita beliau? Yukk kita simak di Episode ini. --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/dani-medionovianto/support

In this episode, we tackle a topic that can strike fear in the heart of even the best mentor—how to develop students into strong technical writers.In this episode we discuss tips for making the writing process manageable:Get them started earlyBreak writing up into small sections Ask them to develop an outline for each section before they start writing it then meet and have them talk though the main points for the sectionProvide feedback on sections so they are able to learn and progress throughout the processMake sure that you point out what they did right as well as what needs to be improvedResources mentioned that can be adapted to assist your students in their writing journeyGuidelines for writing a literature review by Helen Mongan-Rallis http://www.duluth.umn.edu/~hrallis/guides/researching/litreview.html.Writing a Scientific Paper. Adapted from Cox (1990) https://www.luther.edu/biology/assets/writing_scientific_papers_2.pdfWe want to hear from you!The question of the week is: How do you help your students become strong technical writers? Share your thoughts with us in the comments! If you are enjoying this podcast please leave a rating or review, and join us over on Twitter to let us know what topics you'd like to hear more about.You can also join the conversation on our LinkedIn group page The Graduate Mentoring Blueprint

For the 40th episode of Snippets, we have with us, Dr. Jyotirmay Biswas, Director of Uveitis and Ocular Pathology department, Sankara Nethralaya, sharing some practical points in writing a scientific paper . Please submit your valuable feedback at: https://forms.gle/k7LVRkuNSFgeuib78 Follow us on Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/SNippets-106093427853136 & Twitter: https://twitter.com/SnippetsP for weekly updates!! Subscribe to our podcast on the respective platforms --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/sankara-nethralaya/message

A panel of experts discuss the practical scientific challenges of publishing during COVID-19, the current landscape of medical writing, as well as new and emerging career opportunities in the field. [Education] [Show ID: 36618]

A panel of experts discuss the practical scientific challenges of publishing during COVID-19, the current landscape of medical writing, as well as new and emerging career opportunities in the field. [Education] [Show ID: 36618]

A panel of experts discuss the practical scientific challenges of publishing during COVID-19, the current landscape of medical writing, as well as new and emerging career opportunities in the field. [Education] [Show ID: 36618]

A panel of experts discuss the practical scientific challenges of publishing during COVID-19, the current landscape of medical writing, as well as new and emerging career opportunities in the field. [Education] [Show ID: 36618]

A panel of experts discuss the practical scientific challenges of publishing during COVID-19, the current landscape of medical writing, as well as new and emerging career opportunities in the field. [Education] [Show ID: 36618]

A panel of experts discuss the practical scientific challenges of publishing during COVID-19, the current landscape of medical writing, as well as new and emerging career opportunities in the field. [Education] [Show ID: 36618]

A panel of experts discuss the practical scientific challenges of publishing during COVID-19, the current landscape of medical writing, as well as new and emerging career opportunities in the field. [Education] [Show ID: 36618]

A panel of experts discuss the practical scientific challenges of publishing during COVID-19, the current landscape of medical writing, as well as new and emerging career opportunities in the field. [Education] [Show ID: 36618]

A panel of experts discuss the practical scientific challenges of publishing during COVID-19, the current landscape of medical writing, as well as new and emerging career opportunities in the field. [Education] [Show ID: 36618]

In this first extended Ten Minute Tips, Kyle uses the extra time well to review his strategies to effectively read, digest, and understand any scientific paper. If you read papers along with us for the Watts Doc episodes, this may be a good playbook to pull from. Cover art on this is an example of "data massage" as mentioned in the episode.

It’s time for the Super Awesome Science Show SASS Class on grief. I want to thank everyone who reached out to me. We received quite a few Emails and DMs about the episode and it seems like many of you are opening up about other areas of science with respect to this pandemic. I’ll be getting to one such question in this show. Our guest is once again, Katherine Shear. She is the Marion E. Kenworthy Professor of Psychiatry in Social Work at the Columbia School of Social Work and the Columbia College of Physicians and Surgeons. She’s also the founding director of the Center for Complicated Grief. If you didn’t hear your question, make sure to contact me on Twitter, by Email and now, via voice message at Speakpipe.com/SASS. Just follow the link below and send me your thoughts. Twitter: @JATetro Email: thegermguy@gmail.com Guest: Katherine Shear https://socialwork.columbia.edu/faculty-research/faculty/full-time/m-katherine-shear/ Center for Complicated Grief https://complicatedgrief.columbia.edu/for-the-public/complicated-grief-public/overview/ Scientific Paper on Mass Gatherings by Yuki Furuse https://www.journalofinfection.com/article/S0163-4453(20)30759-3/fulltext#%20 The Risk of Gatherings web app by Yuki Furuse: https://yukifuruse.shinyapps.io/covid_eventrisk_en/   See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

JCRS Associate European Editor Sathish Srinivasan talks to JCRS European Editor Thomas Kohnen about why peer review is important for ophthalmologists and how to peer review.

The process of writing a scientific paper can be complex with lots of little details nobody tells you about. We discuss how it all works practically, from the inception of an idea to getting your paper into review.

A discussion on the very way scientific research is presented, is it possible for the scientific community to move beyond simple papers and PDFs? This episode is primarily built on this article: https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/04/the-scientific-paper-is-obsolete/556676/ --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/METACEPTION/support

How do you go from an idea to a scientific paper? Everyday Einstein interviews exoplanetary scientist Moiya McTier to learn about whether planets only form around certain kinds of stars and why we should trust scientific papers. Read the transcript at https://quickanddirtytips.com/education/science/publishing-scientific-paper FOLLOW EVERYDAY EINSTEIN Facebook: facebook.com/qdteinstein/ Twitter: twitter.com/qdteinstein

Hello Everyone! In today’s show I interview my friends Dr. Rob Abbott and Adam Sadowski about their Scientific Paper on the effects of the Autoimmune Paleo Diet and Hashimoto’s Thyroiditis. Join me

Who's cooler? Ruth or Nadia? Make your bets, and then listen to find out!

Journalists discuss Answers to the Big Questions and Hawking’s recent paper on black holes

In this week's episode of Conversation on Tap, Joel and Jose embrace Trump derangement syndrome. But before they drunkenly stumbled into that topic, they poured themselves several-- more than several-- pints of M.Special American Lager, a tasty brew out of Goleta, California. For their FRED Talks, Joel talked about Mt Waialeale as one of the wettest places on earth, though the top spot belongs to Mawsynram-- and talked about whether or not water is wet. Jose then talked about Pope Francis and the false accusation that he denied the existence of hell. At this point, the two rabble-rousers jumped into the topic of Trump. They covered everything from his constant lies to his love for Wikileaks to his blatant racism to his numerous ties to Russia. But they also took evangelical Christians to task for their blind support for Trump, as well as liberals who refused to support Hillary Clinton. As they wrapped up, Joel talked about an article in the Atlantic entitled The Scientific Paper is Obsolete. Jose ended by talking about Pope Francis' exhortation entitled Gaudete et Exsultate. Our next episode is on Fake News, and it will likely be a two-part episode, so stay tuned! Salut!

Jessica Forde, Yuvi Panda and Chris Holdgraf join Melanie and Mark to discuss Project Jupyter from it’s interactive notebook origin story to the various open source modular projects it’s grown into supporting data research and applications. We dive specifically into JupyterHub using Kubernetes to enable a multi-user server. We also talk about Binder, an interactive development environment that makes work easily reproducible. Jessica Forde Jessica Forde is a Project Jupyter Maintainer with a background in reinforcement learning and Bayesian statistics. At Project Jupyter, she works primarily on JupyterHub, Binder, and JuptyerLab to improve access to scientific computing and scientific research. Her previous open source projects include datamicroscopes, a DARPA-funded Bayesian nonparametrics library in Python, and density, a wireless device data tool at Columbia University. Jessica has also worked as a machine learning researcher and data scientist in a variety of applications including healthcare, energy, and human capital. Yuvi Panda Yuvi Panda is the Project Jupyter Technical Operations Architect in the UC Berkeley Data Sciences Division. He works on making it easy for people who don’t traditionally consider themselves “programmers” to do things with code. He builds tools (e.g., Quarry, PAWS, etc.) to sidestep the list of historical accidents that constitute the “command line tax” that people have to pay before doing productive things with computing. Chris Holdgraf Chris Holdgraf is a is a Project Jupyter Maintainer and Data Science Fellow at the Berkeley Institute for Data Science and a Community Architect at the Data Science Education Program at UC Berkeley. His background is in cognitive and computational neuroscience, where he used predictive models to understand the auditory system in the human brain. He’s interested in the boundary between technology, open-source software, and scientific workflows, as well as creating new pathways for this kind of work in science and the academy. He’s a core member of Project Jupyter, specifically working with JupyterHub and Binder, two open-source projects that make it easier for researchers and educators to do their work in the cloud. He works on these core tools, along with research and educational projects that use these tools at Berkeley and in the broader open science community. Cool things of the week Dragonball hosted on GC / powered by Spanner blog and GDC presentation at Developer Day Cloud Text-to-Speech API powered by DeepMind WaveNet blog and docs Now you can deploy to Kubernetes Engine from Gitlab blog Interview Jupyter site JupyterHub github Binder site and docs JupyterLab site Kubernetes site github Jupyter Notebook github LIGO (Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory) site and binder Paul Romer, World Bank Chief Economist blog and jupyter notebook The Scientific Paper is Obsolete article Large Scale Teaching Infrastructure with Kubernetes - Yuvi Panda, Berkeley University video Data 8: The Foundations of Data Science site Zero to JupyterHub site JupyterHub Deploy Docker github Jupyter Gitter channels Jupyter Pop-Up, May 15th site JupyterCon, Aug 21-24 site Question of the week How did Google’s predictions do during March Madness? How to build a realt time prediction model: Architecting live NCAA predictions Final Four halftime - fed data from first half to create prediction on second half and created a 30 second spot that ran on CBS before game play sample prediction ad Kaggle Competition site Where can you find us next? Melanie is speaking about AI at Techtonica today, and April 14th will be participating in a panel on Diversity and Inclusion at the Harker Research Symposium

Every day the newspapers have stories about ‘the latest scientific breakthrough’. But how do you tell if the latest paper is novel and ground breaking, or just a load of nonsense? Critically appraising scientific papers used to be a specialist skill, but it’s something anyone can do. What is good quality evidence? What is statistically significant? Just what is a p value? Stephen is a clinical lecturer in Geriatric Medicine at Glasgow University where his role combines research into aging and clinical practice, and has just finished writing up his PhD.

How do breakthroughs happen? Not how we think. Movies, books, and articles, constrained by time and word limits, often leave out the realities --  the messy work, filled with dead ends, abandoned questions, and accidental discoveries. That is what Stuart Firestein, Professor of Biological Sciences at Columbia University, wants to change. He believes that the roles ignorance and failure play in the discovery process are vastly underappreciated, so much so that he has written two books about them, Ignorance: How It Drives Science, and Failure: Why Science is So Successful. An advisor for the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation program for The Public Understanding of Science, Stuart shares insights from his own work as a successful researcher and scientist and from those of his peers, as well as scientific philosophers and historians. Insights from our interview:   Knowledge and facts are important insofar as they help us ask better questions Conscious ignorance offers a useful playground for discovery The messy process of science and discovery is where the value lies The disconnect between scientific textbooks and courses and actual science The innovative course he teaches that helps students gain a scientific mindset What it is that makes a problem interesting How scientists, researchers, and creatives look for connections Why failure can be useful even if it never leads to an eventual success The fact that the more expert a person is the less certain they will be How systems limit innovation Why we need better tools for assessment and evaluation in schools Why we need feedback tools that are more diagnostic and less judgmental Why he worries most about people who dislike or are disinterested in science Why he sees his lab as a cauldron of curiosity How writing books requires a different way of looking at things How philosophy and history can impact science in an interactive way Selected Links to Topics Mentioned Stuart Firestein @FiresteinS Be Bad First by Erika Andersen Is the Scientific Paper a Fraud by Peter Medawar James Clerk Maxwell Principles of Neuroscience Eric Kandel Kenneth Rogoff D.H. Lawrence Do No Harm by Henry Marsh MCAT NIH NSF Sidney Brenner Michael Krasny Karl Popper Thomas Kuhn Isaiah Berlin If you enjoy the podcast, please rate and review it on iTunes. For automatic delivery of new episodes, be sure to subscribe. As always, thanks for listening! Thank you to Emmy-award-winning Creative Director Vanida Vae for designing the Curious Minds logo, and thank you to Rob Mancabelli for all of his production expertise! www.gayleallen.net LinkedIn @GAllenTC

This month we discuss Scientific Paper Writing - a Survival Guide by Bodil Holst. Every budding researcher must eventually write a scientific paper, and yet how to do this is not something that is usually taught. Some supervisors provide excellent guidance and others – let's be diplomatic – don't. So Bodil host has produced a book that teaches the basics: how to arrange your information to help you get started, the order in which to complete the different sections, but also how to write your title and abstract to get your article noticed, read and cited. Hear an extract from the book, an interview with Bodil Host, and the views of the Chemistry World team in this month's podcast.  You can read our review of Scientific Paper Writing  here, and find all our book reviews here. We want to include you, the Chemistry World reader, in the conversation so join us next month when we’ll be discussing Sorting the beef from the bull – the science of food fraud forensics by Richard Evershed and Nicola Temple. Tweet your thoughts to @ChemistryWorld, or use the hashtag #BookClubCW and we’ll endeavour to include your opinions (or questions) on the podcast.

In the biomedical sciences we use the ICMJE criteria for authorship, and if these are followed there is actually no upper limit for the number of authors on a scientific paper as long as all authors fulfill the four authorship criteria.

This month, we discuss how to write quality scientific papers

Thieme Verlagsbine globl globel0:00Mon, 19 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0200

Thieme Verlagsbine globl globel0:00Mon, 19 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0200

Writing a scientific paper is different than writing, say a theory paper, and there are certain things your professor will be looking for. This podcast will tell you how to write a clear thesis and produce a proper scientific paper.

How you format your lab report is important if you want your work to be organized and clear to readers. This podcast details how to format your report properly.

Students often struggle writing their first, or even fifth, thesis. Free tools, like OpenOffice, are supposed to help writing these documents, but most of the times they cause more trouble. The problem here is not OpenOffice necessarily, but the lack of understanding how these apps work. LibreOffice, OpenOffice, NeoOffice (and most other document writing apps) have built-in features to support writing – instead of hinder. They are able to create an automatic table of contents and a bibliography index, they can reference material throughout the document, they can handle tables and other media. The problem though, without a basic understanding of the underlying mechanisms, documents are going to be a pain to write, with every chapter looking differently. Sometimes students even try to create their own table of contents by hand. This is all stuff these programs can do for you. We show you how. AppInfos: OpenOffice.org LibreOffice NeoOffice

Writing is the avenue through which you will become part of the broader national and international group of investigators. A convincing presentation of your thoughts and work are essential for success. (September 19, 2007)