POPULARITY
2 episodes with infringe
5 episodes with infringe
2 episodes with infringe
2 episodes with infringe
2 episodes with infringe
Clark Neily joins us once again, this time to discuss the thorny matter of constitutional interpretation.00:00 Introduction and Overview00:26 TSA Phone Searches and the Right to Privacy06:26 The University of Michigan Abandons Traditional Grades10:31 Foolishness of the Week: Transgender Athletes and the WNBA18:48 Clark Neily on How to Read the Constitution21:54 Originalism vs. Textualism27:02 Applying the Constitution to Modern Technology30:31 Wiretapping, Smartphones, and the Fourth Amendment33:06 Constitutional Rights at the Border36:54 What the Constitution Really Means by a “Jury”40:22 Original Meaning and the Second Amendment50:01 The Right to Bear Arms and Resisting Government57:36 Equal Protection and the Fourteenth Amendment01:09:49 How Far Does the Second Amendment Go?01:13:35 What Does It Mean to “Infringe” a Right?01:25:14 The Forgotten Privileges or Immunities Clause01:27:07 Closing Thoughts
AI-generated images are no longer a futuristic party trick. They are sitting inside marketing departments, startup pitch decks, agency workflows, website headers, product mockups, and social media calendars. The visuals are fast, cheap, and often surprisingly polished. They can also be legally awkward, because the phrase “the robot made it” does not automatically protect a business from copyright, trademark, trade secret, or publicity-rights problems.In this episode-style breakdown, we explore the question every founder, creator, and marketing team should ask before publishing AI visuals: can AI-generated images infringe intellectual property?The answer is yes, sometimes. An AI image may create copyright risk if it reproduces protected expression from an existing illustration, photo, character, poster, or design. It may create trademark risk if it looks too similar to a known logo, product package, mascot, icon, or brand identity. It may create trade secret risk if someone uploads confidential business information, invention drawings, customer files, unreleased screenshots, or private design concepts into a tool without checking the terms. It may also create publicity-rights risk if it imitates a real person in a commercial context.The episode also explains the ownership problem. In the United States, copyright generally requires human authorship. That means raw AI-generated output may not receive strong copyright protection unless a person contributed meaningful creative control through selection, editing, arrangement, or transformation. For businesses, that creates a strange situation: an AI image can be risky enough to trigger a claim, yet not human-authored enough to become a strong company asset. That is the robot art lawyer problem, and yes, it deserves its own tiny briefcase.We walk through practical steps businesses can take right now. Start by defining the use case. Internal brainstorming images are not the same as logos, paid ads, product packaging, investor materials, or website hero graphics. The more public and commercial the use, the more review it deserves.Next, avoid prompts that intentionally target protected material. Do not ask for famous characters, living artists' styles, competitor logos, celebrity lookalikes, branded packaging, sports team designs, or movie-scene replicas. Describe the visual qualities you want instead: clean, modern, playful, technical, blue-toned, founder-friendly, polished, or minimal. Let the robot understand the vibe without handing it a lawsuit starter kit.Review outputs before publication. Look for confusingly similar marks, recognizable characters, hidden logos, fake watermarks, copied-looking compositions, celebrity-like faces, and anything that seems too familiar. Reverse image search can help, but it is not perfect. Human review still matters.The discussion also covers confidential information. Trade secrets depend on reasonable secrecy efforts. Uploading unreleased product drawings, patent figures, client materials, or internal strategy files into an unapproved AI tool can weaken those efforts. The prompt box is not always a vault. Sometimes it is more like a very talented toaster with a memory.Finally, we talk about policy. Businesses do not need to panic, but they do need guardrails. Approved tools, banned prompt categories, confidentiality rules, documentation habits, human-editing requirements, and legal review triggers can make AI image use faster and safer. The robot can sketch. The humans should approve.This topic matters because AI creativity is not slowing down. The companies that win will not be the ones that ignore AI or the ones that let everyone prompt recklessly. The winners will use AI thoughtfully, document human creativity, clear brand-critical assets, and protect confidential information before it becomes a problem.To chat about this one-on-one, grab a free consult at strategymeeting.com
Stellenbosch University has approved revised residence rules that ban the use, possession and smoking of cannabis in all university-managed student accommodation. While cannabis use is legal in certain private settings in South Africa, the university argues that residences are shared living and learning spaces rather than private homes. Lester Kiewit speaks to Dr Leslie Van Rooi, the Dean of Students, about the legal and practical implications of the policy, and how universities balance individual rights with community wellbeing. Good Morning Cape Town with Lester Kiewit is a podcast of the CapeTalk breakfast show. This programme is your authentic Cape Town wake-up call. Good Morning Cape Town with Lester Kiewit is informative, enlightening and accessible. The team’s ability to spot & share relevant and unusual stories make the programme inclusive and thought-provoking. Don’t miss the popular World View feature at 7:45am daily. Listen out for #LesterInYourLounge which is an outside broadcast – from the home of a listener in a different part of Cape Town - on the first Wednesday of every month. This show introduces you to interesting Capetonians as well as their favourite communities, habits, local personalities and neighbourhood news. Thank you for listening to a podcast from Good Morning Cape Town with Lester Kiewit. Listen live on Primedia+ weekdays between 06:00 and 09:00 (SA Time) to Good Morning CapeTalk with Lester Kiewit broadcast on CapeTalk https://buff.ly/NnFM3Nk For more from the show go to https://buff.ly/xGkqLbT or find all the catch-up podcasts here https://buff.ly/f9Eeb7i Subscribe to the CapeTalk Daily and Weekly Newsletters https://buff.ly/sbvVZD5 Follow us on social media CapeTalk on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@capetalk CapeTalk on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ CapeTalk on X: https://x.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@CapeTalkSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
The Constitution Study with Host Paul Engel – Questions arise as federal agencies, lawmakers, and public institutions face scrutiny over elections, audits, speech, and accountability. Lawsuits, investigations, and political pressure reveal competing motives and civil liberty concerns, challenging citizens to consider how power is exercised and whether oversight protects rights or undermines them in complex democratic public systems...
The Constitution Study with Host Paul Engel – Questions arise as federal agencies, lawmakers, and public institutions face scrutiny over elections, audits, speech, and accountability. Lawsuits, investigations, and political pressure reveal competing motives and civil liberty concerns, challenging citizens to consider how power is exercised and whether oversight protects rights or undermines them in complex democratic public systems...
In this episode we're going to continue our look at the five Basic Beliefs of living a Reasonable life by looking at the third belief “Being reasonable consists of the right to do whatever does not infringe on the rights of others: thus, exercise of these rights has no limits other than those which secure to other members of society enjoyment of those same rights.”
This hour, Scoot continues the conversation about the pushback against same-sex-marriage, explains why he's against changing "Veterans Day" to "Victory Day", why Pelicans coach Willie Green should be fired, and more.
Rarely am I asked a question I've never heard before. But it happened last week at Ohio State, and the question was very perceptive because it addresses both the heart of sin and the way many of us are raising our children. Join me for today's Daily Word & Prayer to learn more.Scripture Used in Today's MessagePrioverbs 3:5-6To find Tom on Instagram, Facebook, TiKTok, and elsewhere, go to linktr.ee/tomthepreacher
The lawyer for Convicted murderer and rapist, Thabo Bester says his client will suffer prejudice, as streaming a new Netflix documentary will infringe on his right to a fair trial. MoAfrika Wa Maila is addressing the High Court in Pretoria where Bester and his girlfriend Nandipha Magudumana have launched an urgent application to halt the release of documentary "Beauty and the Bester". Referring to the trailer, Wa Maila said Bester's right to human dignity and his right to be presumed innocent until guilty has been infringed upon. Sakina Kamwendo spoke to SABC Reporter, Pearl Magubane...
Retired High Court Judge Bernard Barton joined Pat this morning on the show to discuss how the proposals to overhaul defamation laws may infringe on civil liberties.
The Quartering Live on Rumble Monday-Friday at 5:30PM (Eastern Time) Episode originally aired on 5/1/2024 https://rumble.com/c/TheQuartering
In this episode we're going to continue our look at the five Basic Beliefs of living a Reasonable life by looking at the third belief “Being reasonable consists of the right to do whatever does not infringe on the rights of others: thus, exercise of these rights has no limits other than those which secure to other members of society enjoyment of those same rights.”
The gun grabbers are at it again and this time it's right here in Michigan! NRA Board of Director member, Rick Ector is back with us again this time to alert Michigan residents about his next live appearance to discuss gun law changes in Michigan: Red Flag Laws, Long Gun Registration, and Firearm Storage Law. Event will be held at Recoil Firearms in Taylor, MI. There are two sessions: 12pm - 2pm and 4pm - 6pm.Event link: https://www.legallyarmedindetroit.com/2023/12/event-important-laws-that-michigan.htmlRick is also seeking re-election to the NRA Board of Directors next year. Ballots will be in NRA Magazines in February 2024.NRA Board member. Nominating Committee Endorsed Candidate. Life Member. Outreach Committee (2020-2024). NRA Training Counselor, CRSO, and Instructor (Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun, Personal Protection I and II, Cartridge & Shotgun Shell Reloading, and Home Firearm Safety). Founded "Legally Armed In Detroit" that cumulatively organized free shooting classes for 8,800+ women (2012-Present). NRA-ILA Grassroots Spotlight (8/2023). Women's event recap in "America's 1st Freedom" (2/2022). Cover feature in "America's 1st Freedom" (2/2021). Gun Owners for Trump Advisory Board (2020). Organized "Rally for Peace" at Michigan Capitol (2020). GOA "Top 10 in 2019." SAF "Defender of Liberty" (2016). MCRGO "Gun Advocate of the Year" (2014). Features: "Meet NRA Instructor Rick Ector, the Left's Worst Nightmare" (2021), "Jordan Klepper Solves Guns" (2017), and "Detroit: Armed and Determined" (2014). Writer: "AmmoLand" and "Shooting Illustrated." Advocacy: "Cam & Co." (75x), "Fox 2 Detroit" (61x), "Tucker Carlson," and "Fox & Friends." Earned 160+ IMDB credits.Get your thoughts in ahead of showtime or during so we can add your comments to the live chat show. Send your questions to us via our Dangerous Super Chats link here: http://www.dangeroussuperchats.com/SUPPORT THE SHOWSuper Chat Tip https://bit.ly/42W7iZHBuzzsprout https://bit.ly/3m50hFTSubscribeStar http://bit.ly/42Y0qM8Paypal http://bit.ly/3Gv3ZjpPatreon http://bit.ly/3G37AVxCONNECT WITH USWebsite https://www.dangerousinfopodcast.com/Guilded Chatroom http://bit.ly/42OayqyEmail the show dangerousinfopodcast@protonmail.comJoin mailing list http://bit.ly/3Kku5YtSOCIALSInstagram https://www.instagram.com/dangerousinfo/Twitter https://twitter.com/jaymz_jesseGab https://gab.com/JessejaymzTruth Social https://truthsocial.com/@jessejaymzWATCH LIVERumble https://rumble.com/c/DangerousInfoPodcastPilled Foxhole https://pilled.net/profile/144176Twitch https://www.twitch.tv/dangerousinfopodcastTwitter https://twitter.com/jaymz_jesseSMART is the acronym that was created by technocrats that have setup the "internet of things" that will eventually enslave humanity to their needs. Support the show
Reagindo a posts do Instragram que mandam pra mim, de pessoas e provas | Meia-Maratona de João Pessoa não oferece guarda-volumes? Não pode não oferecer. Isso infringe a Norma 7 da CBAt (3.5.12) | MAratona de Sorocaba dá tiro no pé a dizer que vai desclassificar corredores que usarem fones de ouvido na prova | E muito mais | | PARCEIROS | GEIS DE CARBOIDRATO Z2 - https://www.z2foods.com/ - Use o cupom CORRIDANOAR para ter 10% de desconto | INSIDER - camisetas, bonés, roupas íntimas e mais - https://bit.ly/insidercna - Cupom CORRIDANOAR12 para 12% de desconto | PULSEIRAS DE IDENTIFICAÇÃO SELFID - https://www.selfid.com.br/ use o CUPOM "CNA2019" 10% de desconto | ÓCULOS YOPP - https://cnoar.run/oculosyopp - Use o cupom "corridanoar10" para ter 10% de desconto em todo o site | PROVAS LIVE! RUN XP - https://liverun.com.br/ | use o cupom CORRIDANOAR para ter 20% de desconto | PRODUTOS CORRIDA NO AR e CAFÉ & CORRIDA https://www.runfor.com.br/corrida-no-ar | Use o cupom "CAFEECORRIDA10" para ter para ter 10% de desconto
This series on artificial intelligence explores recent breakthroughs of AI, its broader societal implications and its future potential. In this presentation, Pamela Samuelson, professor of Law and Information at UC Berkeley, discusses whether computer-generated texts and images fall under the copyright law. She says that early on, the consensus was that AI was just a tool, like a camera, so humans could claim copyright in machine-generated outputs to which they made contributions. Now the consensus is that AI-generated texts and images are not copyrightable for the lack of a human author. The urgent questions today focus on whether ingesting in-copyright works as training data is copyright infringement and whether the outputs of AI programs are infringing derivative works of the ingested images. Four recent lawsuits, one involving GitHub's Copilot and three involving Stable Diffusion, will address these issues. Samuelson has been a member of the UC Berkeley School of Law faculty since 1996. She has written and spoken extensively about the challenges that new information technologies pose for traditional legal regimes, especially for intellectual property law. She is a member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences, a fellow of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), a contributing editor of Communications of the ACM, a past fellow of the John D. & Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, a member of the American Law Institute, and an honorary professor of the University of Amsterdam. Series: "The Future of AI" [Science] [Business] [Show ID: 38859]
This series on artificial intelligence explores recent breakthroughs of AI, its broader societal implications and its future potential. In this presentation, Pamela Samuelson, professor of Law and Information at UC Berkeley, discusses whether computer-generated texts and images fall under the copyright law. She says that early on, the consensus was that AI was just a tool, like a camera, so humans could claim copyright in machine-generated outputs to which they made contributions. Now the consensus is that AI-generated texts and images are not copyrightable for the lack of a human author. The urgent questions today focus on whether ingesting in-copyright works as training data is copyright infringement and whether the outputs of AI programs are infringing derivative works of the ingested images. Four recent lawsuits, one involving GitHub's Copilot and three involving Stable Diffusion, will address these issues. Samuelson has been a member of the UC Berkeley School of Law faculty since 1996. She has written and spoken extensively about the challenges that new information technologies pose for traditional legal regimes, especially for intellectual property law. She is a member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences, a fellow of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), a contributing editor of Communications of the ACM, a past fellow of the John D. & Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, a member of the American Law Institute, and an honorary professor of the University of Amsterdam. Series: "The Future of AI" [Science] [Business] [Show ID: 38859]
This series on artificial intelligence explores recent breakthroughs of AI, its broader societal implications and its future potential. In this presentation, Pamela Samuelson, professor of Law and Information at UC Berkeley, discusses whether computer-generated texts and images fall under the copyright law. She says that early on, the consensus was that AI was just a tool, like a camera, so humans could claim copyright in machine-generated outputs to which they made contributions. Now the consensus is that AI-generated texts and images are not copyrightable for the lack of a human author. The urgent questions today focus on whether ingesting in-copyright works as training data is copyright infringement and whether the outputs of AI programs are infringing derivative works of the ingested images. Four recent lawsuits, one involving GitHub's Copilot and three involving Stable Diffusion, will address these issues. Samuelson has been a member of the UC Berkeley School of Law faculty since 1996. She has written and spoken extensively about the challenges that new information technologies pose for traditional legal regimes, especially for intellectual property law. She is a member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences, a fellow of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), a contributing editor of Communications of the ACM, a past fellow of the John D. & Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, a member of the American Law Institute, and an honorary professor of the University of Amsterdam. Series: "The Future of AI" [Science] [Business] [Show ID: 38859]
This series on artificial intelligence explores recent breakthroughs of AI, its broader societal implications and its future potential. In this presentation, Pamela Samuelson, professor of Law and Information at UC Berkeley, discusses whether computer-generated texts and images fall under the copyright law. She says that early on, the consensus was that AI was just a tool, like a camera, so humans could claim copyright in machine-generated outputs to which they made contributions. Now the consensus is that AI-generated texts and images are not copyrightable for the lack of a human author. The urgent questions today focus on whether ingesting in-copyright works as training data is copyright infringement and whether the outputs of AI programs are infringing derivative works of the ingested images. Four recent lawsuits, one involving GitHub's Copilot and three involving Stable Diffusion, will address these issues. Samuelson has been a member of the UC Berkeley School of Law faculty since 1996. She has written and spoken extensively about the challenges that new information technologies pose for traditional legal regimes, especially for intellectual property law. She is a member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences, a fellow of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), a contributing editor of Communications of the ACM, a past fellow of the John D. & Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, a member of the American Law Institute, and an honorary professor of the University of Amsterdam. Series: "The Future of AI" [Science] [Business] [Show ID: 38859]
This series on artificial intelligence explores recent breakthroughs of AI, its broader societal implications and its future potential. In this presentation, Pamela Samuelson, professor of Law and Information at UC Berkeley, discusses whether computer-generated texts and images fall under the copyright law. She says that early on, the consensus was that AI was just a tool, like a camera, so humans could claim copyright in machine-generated outputs to which they made contributions. Now the consensus is that AI-generated texts and images are not copyrightable for the lack of a human author. The urgent questions today focus on whether ingesting in-copyright works as training data is copyright infringement and whether the outputs of AI programs are infringing derivative works of the ingested images. Four recent lawsuits, one involving GitHub's Copilot and three involving Stable Diffusion, will address these issues. Samuelson has been a member of the UC Berkeley School of Law faculty since 1996. She has written and spoken extensively about the challenges that new information technologies pose for traditional legal regimes, especially for intellectual property law. She is a member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences, a fellow of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), a contributing editor of Communications of the ACM, a past fellow of the John D. & Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, a member of the American Law Institute, and an honorary professor of the University of Amsterdam. Series: "The Future of AI" [Science] [Business] [Show ID: 38859]
Montana is one of the states in our country signing anti-queer and anti-transgender laws – among the rash of laws signed just this year, since January, in Montana, are laws that allow healthcare providers to refuse patients based on conscience, that define biological sex as only male or female, that prevent gender-affirming medical care for transgender kids, and that prohibit drag shows and drag story hours if there are minors present. These new laws will hurt Montana's transgender residents – and that's essentially their intention. Our guest today is raising a more specific concern, and says that Montana's anti-transgender laws will hurt Indigenous peoples' religious expression. Rosalyn LaPier, is an indigenous writer, environmental historian, ethnobotanist, and a professor of history at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Rosalyn is an enrolled member of the Blackfeet Tribe of Montana and Métis. Read Rosalyn LaPier's latest publication: https://theconversation.com/new-anti-transgender-laws-will-hurt-indigenous-peoples-rights-and-religious-expression-205742 Check out Rosalyn LaPier's website: https://www.rosalynlapier.com/ Follow Rosalyn LaPier on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rozlapier —- Subscribe to this podcast: https://plinkhq.com/i/1637968343?to=page Get in touch: lawanddisorder@kpfa.org Follow us on socials @LawAndDis: https://twitter.com/LawAndDis; https://www.instagram.com/lawanddis/ The post Montana's Attacks on Trans Rights Infringe on Native Sovereignty w/ Rosalyn LaPier appeared first on KPFA.
Recently, there was a court case about one employee claiming the use of the requested pronouns of another employee went against their religion, so they would not do it. What would you do if you were an employer in this situation? The answer is trickier than you think. Our main guidance: engage in the interactive process. Listen to Paul Edwards, Nora Gustafson, and Amanda Rishor sit down to unpack this issue and the best way to handle it as an employer.
Deborah Caldwell-Stone, director of the American Library Association's Office for Intellectual Freedom, joins Steve Cochran for a look at what it means to remove books from libraries and if it diminishes a child's 'right to read'. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Iconic hip hop group De La Soul's music is finally available on streaming platforms, just in time for the fiftieth anniversary of hip hop. To say listeners are overjoyed is an understatement. Only a few days after their streaming debut, De La Soul's 1989 debut album, 3 Feet High and Rising, soared to no. 5 on the UK album chart, even topping their original 1990 high of no. 13. For fans this was a long time coming. The hip hop group had a towering presence in the 80s and 90s, their playful ingenuity and eccentricity even inspired other greats like the Beastie Boys, Childish Gambino, OutKast, and the Pharcyde. But what kept De La Soul's tunes out of rotation for decades — and thus, largely out of the public imagination — was an infuriating entanglement of legal restrictions surrounding sampling, an art form where producers take snippets of songs and stitch them together to form sonic collages. For this week's pod extra, OTM Correspondent Micah Loewinger speaks to Dan Charnas, an associate arts professor at NYU and author of the book "Dilla Time: The Life and Afterlife of J Dilla, the Hip-Hop Producer Who Reinvented Rhythm," about how music copyright law suppresses the artistic voices of hip hop producers.
Iconic hip hop group De La Soul's music is finally available on streaming platforms, just in time for the fiftieth anniversary of hip hop. To say listeners are overjoyed is an understatement. Only a few days after their streaming debut, De La Soul's 1989 debut album, 3 Feet High and Rising, soared to no. 5 on the UK album chart, even topping their original 1990 high of no. 13. For fans this was a long time coming. The hip hop group had a towering presence in the 80s and 90s, their playful ingenuity and eccentricity even inspired other greats like the Beastie Boys, Childish Gambino, OutKast, and the Pharcyde. But what kept De La Soul's tunes out of rotation for decades — and thus, largely out of the public imagination — was an infuriating entanglement of legal restrictions surrounding sampling, an art form where producers take snippets of songs and stitch them together to form sonic collages. For this week's pod extra, OTM Correspondent Micah Loewinger speaks to Dan Charnas, an associate arts professor at NYU and author of the book "Dilla Time: The Life and Afterlife of J Dilla, the Hip-Hop Producer Who Reinvented Rhythm," about how music copyright law suppresses the artistic voices of hip hop producers.
In this episode we're going to continue our look at the five Basic Beliefs of living a Reasonable life by looking at the third belief “Being reasonable consists of the right to do whatever does not infringe on the rights of others: thus, exercise of these rights has no limits other than those which secure to other members of society enjoyment of those same rights.”
The fourth draft of the Digital Personal Data Protection Bill is all set to be presented in the Parliament during the ongoing Budget session. While it makes a strong case for creating laws to prevent the personal information of citizens from being harvested and exploited, the Bill is playing blind to two Important factors. This in turn could end up creating a crony-capitalist economy where an individual's freedom of choice is put at risk.Tune in.
Rep. Graham Filler is the state representative for Michigan's 93rd House District, a former assistant attorney general, and minority vice chair of the Michigan House Criminal Justice Committee. Michigan ‘red flag' laws infringe on due process and don't work. Proposed gun control laws.
Critical and Thinking features comedians Ty Barnett and Ian Harris. The show is streamed live on Facebook every Thursday at noon(ish). Follow us on facebook here Episodes are released on all podcast platforms the following Monday. Questions or comments? Message us on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/Criticalandthinking
Author Pam Long discusses the Colorado Department of Health and Environment's (CDPHE) plans to infringe on your right to protect yourself and your family. Dr. Jill Vecchio addresses the Project Veritas Pfizer video. Colorado HD-51 Representative Ron Weinberg notes what is happening at the Capitol.
Sejam bem-vindos ao milésimo octingentésimo trigésimo nono Spin de Notícias, o seu giro diário de informações científicas... em escala sub-atômica. E nesse Spin de Notícias falaremos sobre...Inteligência Artificial! *Este episódio, assim como tantos outros projetos vindouros, só foi possível por conta do Patronato do SciCast. Se você quiser mais episódios assim, contribua conosco!*
Sejam bem-vindos ao milésimo octingentésimo trigésimo nono Spin de Notícias, o seu giro diário de informações científicas... em escala sub-atômica. E nesse Spin de Notícias falaremos sobre...Inteligência Artificial! *Este episódio, assim como tantos outros projetos vindouros, só foi possível por conta do Patronato do SciCast. Se você quiser mais episódios assim, contribua conosco!*
CMU's Andy Malt and Chris Cooke review key events in music and the music business from the last week, including M People's anger at Liz Truss walking on stage at the Conservative Party conference to their song 'Moving On Up' and whether or not her doing so was copyright infringement, plus Apple Music's big brag that it now has over 100 million tracks available for users to listen to. STORIES DISCUSSED THIS WEEK • M People hit out as Liz Truss walks on stage to Moving On Up • Apple Music catalogue passes 100 million tracks ALSO MENTIONED • CMU Insights copyright training (for any Conservative MPs reading) MORE FROM CMU • Upcoming CMU webinars • Buy MMF and CMU Insights' Dissecting The Digital Dollar book on Amazon • Sign up to receive the CMU Daily news bulletin • Listen to the full Setlist theme tune
Today, we are talking CA shutting the lights off, NY implementing new laws against our 2nd Amendment, and the money-laundering non-profit organization called "Onward Together" that Hilary Clinton funnels money through to the Alliance for Youth Justice. We must fight against corruption. The only way is to expose the truth. Speak the truth and share your thoughts with us. Thank you for listening! The Conversation Starts Here. --- --- --- --- --- --- Email your thoughts and questions to press.thecurrent@gmail.com Follow us on IG: The Current Conservative on IG Sunny's IG Allie's IG
A group of parents known as Stand Up Montana brought two cases in Gallatin and Missoula counties where mask rules were implemented in districts last school year in order to limit the spread of the coronavirus.
In busy downtowns of metropolitan cities such as Beijing, Shanghai and Chengdu, fashionistas are often ambushed by street photographers. Flattering it might be, but does everybody enjoy having their image captured on other people's cameras without warning(01:08)? / From pristine natural scenery to man-made architectural wonders, tourist destinations all suffer from the gnawing headache of littering. We look at examples from around the world in hope of finding out the most efficient way to solve this problem(26:04). / A new study says coffee may have stimulating effects on your shopping experience. Besides making your heart pump faster, coffee also makes you spend more. Is there any truth to this(46:12)? On the show: Laiming, Ningjing and Huang Shan
In Episode 285 of District of Conservation, Gabriella addresses two news items: the problems with The RETURN Act and Governor Larry Hogan (R-MD) loosening restrictions on concealed carry permit applications in wake of NYSRPA vs Bruen. SHOW NOTES Rep. Clyde Introduces Legislation to Eliminate the Excise Tax on Firearms and Ammunition The RETURN Act Text How Excise Taxes Don't Infringe on Second Amendment Rights Pittman-Robertson: The Good Excise Tax Letter: Conservation Groups Praising PR Funds NCSU: 60-80% of Conservation Funding from Sportsmen and Women (Including PR Funds) Governor Larry Hogan Statement on Maryland CHP Baltimore Sun: Maryland Gov. Hogan calls on state police to suspend ‘good and substantial reason' standard for carrying a concealed gun --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/district-of-conservation/support
Top Texas law enforcement official chastised Uvalde police after evidence emerged showing police refused to enter classroom where children were being shot. https://www.infowars.com/posts/ray-of-hope-the-economy-is-collapsing-but-the-great-awakening-is-expanding-wednesday-live/
What's in a word? Lots, maybe, when its a key word in the most contentious debate in America. The word "infringe" determines the threshold of how the Constitution should be enforced. But do we understand the word, and if we do, are we applying it correctly in our political debates over guns and politics? In this cast we look at how framers like Washington, Madison, Hamilton and Jefferson used the word, and how it's applied in DC v. Heller and US v. Miller. We contrast infringe to its Constitutional cousin abridge, and we look at what the NRA asserts about the 2nd amendment's words, including the word infringe. We also look at the current New York carry law Supreme Court case and where the Court is likely to go, and look at guns and politics in general. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Dan supports an 'all of the above' strategy in working to deter and limit school shootings in real time, including arming teachers and staff who are willing to undergo the training and certification required to lawfully possess firearms in the school buildings themselves. However, we cannot infringe on the Constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens who have done nothing wrong simply to deny legal access to guns for a relative few bad actors on the lunatic fringe.
Gun laws may change more frequently than any other other category of law. Whether it's laws to increase your liberty or laws to infringe your rights, there are always new bills being introduced. Rob Sexton, BFA Legislative Affairs Director, talks about recent bills to mandate trigger locks, create deadly force brochures, and repeal permitless carry, plus a bill to prevent required liability insurance.
Getting old sucks. And, with that, comes achy joints and nagging health issues. Jeremy and Kirk both talk about their bad hips, how the oil industry is slowly killing us, why abortion is a woman's right to choose, Elon buying twitter when he could have ended world hunger, holding strong to your morals and integrity, breaking up the country into smaller countries, World Cup, and watching movies. Yeah, very eclectic, but super fun and insightful as usual. This podcast is all about letting people know our perspective on food, culture, and branding aspects of things. You're gonna hear some shit with which you may or may not agree. However, the perspective that is provided is open and honest. Frankly, it's gonna make some people a little mad. It's not done in a way to be assholes, but in a way to make you think of us as being jerks. After all, "Jeremy" and "Kirk", does equal "Jirk"._______________________________________________About Jeremy and Kirk.Jeremy Smith is the President of Launchpad Group USA, and they specialize in helping brands in the Costco space, with presentations and business strategy. His expertise in the food and beverage space, as well as his depth in observation and analysis to trends in the food world, make his unique perspective valued and respected. Learn more about Launchpad Group USA https://launchpadgroupusa.com/Kirk Visola is the Founder and Creative Director of MIND THE FONT™, a full scale branding and packaging design agency. He brings over 20 years of CPG experience to the packaging and branding design space, and understands how shelf aesthetics can make an impact for established and emerging brands. Check out their work at http://www.mindthefont.com
Joining us once again is Greg Glaser, a health freedom lawyer in California who is dedicated to the preservation of constitutional rights, especially in the wake of COVID vaccination issues. Today, Greg Glaser discusses the topic of vaccination skepticism as well as the “Nice Act”, which is a federal bill that he helped write which seeks to prevent mandatory vaccinations across the country for all vaccines. This bill is aimed to defend his mission of supporting America's health freedom rights in the vaccination sphere. Glaser believes if this bill passes, it could wipe out mandatory vaccinations overnight. Tune in now to learn more about: How the vaccination program as a whole has caused untold damage to the public. The difference of health in vaccinated vs unvaccinated people. How censorship is being used to control the vaccination narrative. How mainstream media influence is fading away as their credibility crumbles. It seems that as new vaccine data continues to be exposed, the public may be developing a renewed sense of healthy skepticism. Perhaps as people wake up, the corruption that has been buried by money will be exposed. Learn about the importance of vaccination autonomy in this enlightening discussion with Greg Glaser. To find out more about Greg Glaser and his work on the Nice Act bill, visit niceact.org Episode also available on Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/38oMlMr
In this episode we're going to continue our look at the five Basic Beliefs of living a Reasonable life by looking at the third belief “Being reasonable consists of the right to do whatever does not infringe on the rights of others: thus, exercise of these rights has no limits other than those which secure to other members of society enjoyment of those same rights.”
This week, Mick and Austin finally discuss the big, pink, contagious elephant in the room: the COVID-19 Pandemic. How have their lives changes int he past 18 months? When do they think we will get through this? And most importantly, how can we get more people vaccinated and safe from this deadly virus?Also, stay tuned to the end of the episode to hear a few quick details about Season 2 of The UnMascing Podcast!Join us @unmascingpod on Instagram to let us know how you have made it through the pandemmy!
This is the current attack on our 2nd Amendment Rights!It's time to call your senators and tell them to protect our 2nd Amendment Rights!The Senate will be voting on hr1446 and hr8 very soon! This is just the Governments way of infringing on our rights! Here is hr1446: https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/1446Here is hr8: https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/8/textFBI Statistics: https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/...
In this episode we discuss Bill H.R. 127, a sweeping gun restriction bill. We talk about the broader implications of the bill and also touch on the difference between legislation and social pressure. In the full length episode we read and react to the bill in its entirety, you can check that out at tacticalamericanconversations.com
Music creatives, regardless of the genre have been inspired by songs from their childhood or by studying music idols. The lines between inspiration and imitation have been blurred tremendously. There has been a rise in Music Copyright Infringement cases over the past couple of years thanks in part to two of the most popular forms of Copyright Infringement: Sampling and Interpolation. As a music creative, it is important for you to understand copyright infringement so that you can determine if the risk is greater than the reward. --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/melanatedmusicology/support
Today on The Rated R Safety Show, we talk about all things safety and the news, In our main story, we discuss people infringing on others' copyrights so they can ride their copyright owners' coattails! Hear it all today on The Rated R Safety Show. Mature Audience Only!
© 2020-2026 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
