Podcasts about Third Amendment

The Bill of Rights to the United States Constitution holds some of the most treasured rights held by Americans.  This includes the rights of free speech, religion, assembly, due process, and protections against unreasonable searches and seizures, and self incrimination.  However, there are other parts to the bill of rights. Parts that don't get quite as much as attention.  Learn more about the Third Amendment and why it was put into the Constitution on this episode of Everything Everywhere Daily. Sponsors Newspapers.com Get 20% off your subscription to Newspapers.com Mint Mobile Cut your wireless bill to 15 bucks a month at mintmobile.com/eed Quince Go to quince.com/daily for 365-day returns, plus free shipping on your order! Stitch Fix Go to stitchfix.com/everywhere to have a stylist help you look your best Tourist Office of Spain Plan your next adventure at Spain.info  Stash Go to get.stash.com/EVERYTHING to see how you can receive $25 towards your first stock purchase and to view important disclosures. Subscribe to the podcast!  https://everything-everywhere.com/everything-everywhere-daily-podcast/ -------------------------------- Executive Producer: Charles Daniel Associate Producers: Austin Oetken & Cameron Kieffer   Become a supporter on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/everythingeverywhere Update your podcast app at newpodcastapps.com Discord Server: https://discord.gg/UkRUJFh Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/everythingeverywhere/ Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/everythingeverywheredaily Twitter: https://twitter.com/everywheretrip Website: https://everything-everywhere.com/  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The Bill of Rights The Bill of Rights is the first 10 Amendments to theConstitution of The United States, it was ratified on December 15, 1791.The Bill of Rights spells out Americans' rights in relationto their government. It guarantees civil rights and liberties to theindividual—like freedom of speech, press, and religion. It sets rules for dueprocess of law, and reserves all powers not delegated to the Federal Governmentto the people or the States. And it specifies that “the enumeration in theConstitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparageothers retained by the people.” The First Amendment provides several rights protections: toexpress ideas through speech and the press, to assemble or gather with a groupto protest or for other reasons, and to ask the government to fix problems. Italso protects the right to religious beliefs and practices. It prevents thegovernment from creating or favoring a religion. The Second Amendment protects the right to keep and beararms. The Third Amendment prevents government from forcinghomeowners to allow soldiers to use their homes. Before the Revolutionary War,laws gave British soldiers the right to take over private homes. The Fourth Amendment bars the government from unreasonablesearch and seizure of an individual or their private property. The Fifth Amendment provides several protections for peopleaccused of crimes. It states that serious criminal charges must be started by agrand jury.  A person cannot be triedtwice for the same offense or have property taken away without justcompensation. People have the right against self-incrimination and cannot beimprisoned without due process of law. The Sixth Amendment provides additional protections topeople accused of crimes, such as, the right to a speedy and public trial, incriminal cases, trial by an impartial jury, and to be informed of criminalcharges. Witnesses must face the accused, and the accused is allowed his or herown witnesses and to be represented by a lawyer. The Seventh Amendment extends the right to a jury trial inFederal civil cases. The Eighth Amendment bars excessive bail and fines and a crueland unusual punishment. The Ninth Amendment states that listing specific rights inthe Constitution does not mean that people do not have other right, that havenot been spelled out. The Tenth Amendment says that the Federal Government onlyhas those powers delegated in the Constitution. If it isn't listed, it belongsto the states or to the people.

November 19, 2024 Eden City Council MeetingAGENDA1. Meeting called to order by: Neville Hall, Mayor2. Invocation: Pastor Jackie Valentine, Ambassadors for Christ Ministries3. Pledge of Allegiance: Daniel Greig, U.S. Navy Veteran and Commander of American Legion Post 2544. Recognitions:a. 2024 Special Event Sponsors, Volunteers & Staff. Cindy Adams, Marketing & Special Events Manager5. Roll Call6. Set Meeting Agenda7. Public Hearings:a. (1) Consideration of a zoning map amendment and adoption of an ordinance to rezone 0.42 acres at 403 Morgan Road from Residential 12 to Neighborhood Mixed Use - Zoning Case Z-24-05. Kelly Stultz, Planning & Community Development Director(2) Consideration of a resolution adopting a statement of consistency regarding the proposed map amendment in Z-24-05. Kelly Stultz, Planning & Community Development Directorb. Consideration to adopt an ordinance annexing the property located at 773 Summit Loop (continued from the 10-15-24 regular meeting). Kelly Stultz, Planning & Community Development Director8. Requests and Petitions of Citizens9. Unfinished Business10. New Business:a. Consideration to appoint a replacement of a Firefighters' Relief Fund member. Chris White, Fire Chief11. Reports from Staff:a. City Manager's Report. Jon Mendenhall, City Managerb. Boards & Commissions Appointments. Kelly Stultz, Planning & Community Development Director12. Consent Agenda:a. Approval and adoption of the October 15 regular meeting minutes. Deanna Hunt, City Clerkb. Approval and adoption of an ordinance amending Chapter 15 (Utilities), Article II of the Code of Ordinances. Melinda Ward, Utilities Managerc. Approval and adoption of a Third Amendment to the Waste Management Agreement. Dusty Curry, Operations Superintendent; Tammie McMichael, Director of Finance & Personneld. Approval to purchase 10.22 acres in the Bear Slide area for sewer maintenance purposes, storm drainage access, siphon access and greenway extension. Erin Gilley, City Attorney; Kelly Stultz, Planning & Community Development Directore. Approval and adoption of Policies, Plans, Resolutions and Ordinances for the Leaksville CDBG – Neighborhood Revitalization project. Kelly Stultz, Planning & Community Development Directorf. Approval and adoption to renew an agreement with the Eden ABC Board for law enforcement in the City of Eden. Erin Gilley, City Attorney; Paul Moore, Police Chief13. Announcements14. Adjournment###

The Third Amendment. Maybe you've heard it as part of a punchline. It's the one about quartering troops — two words you probably haven't heard side by side since about the late 1700s.At first glance, it might not seem super relevant to modern life. But in fact, the U.S. government has gotten away with violating the Third Amendment several times since its ratification — and every time it's gone largely unnoticed.Today on Throughline's We the People: In a time of escalating political violence, police forces armed with military equipment, and more frequent and devastating natural disasters, why the Third Amendment deserves a closer look.Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoicesNPR Privacy Policy

A.J. Jacobs learned the hard way that donning a tricorne hat and marching around Manhattan with a 1700s musket will earn you a lot of strange looks. In the wake of several controversial rulings by the Supreme Court and the ongoing debate about how the Constitution should be interpreted, Jacobs set out to understand what it means to live by the Constitution. In The Year of Living Constitutionally, A.J. Jacobs tries to get inside the minds of the Founding Fathers by living as closely as possible to the original meaning of the Constitution. He asserts his right to free speech by writing his opinions on parchment with a quill and handing them out to strangers in Times Square. He consents to quartering a soldier, as is his Third Amendment right. He turns his home into a traditional 1790s household by lighting candles instead of using electricity, boiling mutton, and—because women were not allowed to sign contracts—feebly attempting to take over his wife's day job, which involves a lot of contract negotiations. The book blends unforgettable adventures—delivering a handwritten petition to Congress, applying for a Letter of Marque to become a legal pirate for the government, and battling redcoats as part of a Revolutionary War reenactment group—with dozens of interviews from constitutional experts from both sides. Jacobs dives deep into originalism and living constitutionalism, the two rival ways of interpreting the document. Much like he did with the Bible in The Year of Living Biblically, Jacobs provides a crash course on our Constitution as he experiences the benefits and perils of living like it's the 1790s. He relishes, for instance, the slow thinking of the era, free from social media alerts. But also discovers the progress we've made since 1789 when married women couldn't own property. Now more than ever, Americans need to understand the meaning and value of the Constitution. As politicians and Supreme Court Justices wage a high-stakes battle over how literally we should interpret the Constitution, A.J. Jacobs provides an entertaining yet illuminating look into how this storied document fits into our democracy today. A.J. Jacobs is a journalist, lecturer, and human guinea pig whose books include Drop Dead Healthy, The Year of Living Biblically, and The Puzzler. A contributor to NPR, The New York Times, and Esquire, among other media outlets, Jacobs lives in New York City with his family. His new book is The Year of Living Constitutionally: One Man's Humble Quest to Follow the Constitution's Original Meaning. Shermer and Jacobs discuss: what possessed him to spend a year living constitutionally and biblically • what the Constitution really says and means • the Supreme Court's rulings on guns, religion, women's rights and more • what happens if you become an ultimate originalist and follow the Constitution using the mindset and tools of the Founders • why originalism is not the best approach • what happened when he carried a musket on the streets of NYC • an 18th century view of rights • election cakes • epistemic humility • democracy • how that Founders would be shocked at today's government, and how the president is far too powerful.

Welcome to an interview with the author of The Year of Living Constitutionally: One Man's Humble Quest to Follow the Constitution's Original Meaning, AJ Jacobs. In The Year of Living Constitutionally, A.J. Jacobs tries to get inside the minds of the Founding Fathers by living as closely as possible to the original meaning of the Constitution. He asserts his right to free speech by writing his opinions on parchment with a quill and handing them out to strangers in Times Square. He consents to quartering a soldier, as is his Third Amendment right. He turns his home into a traditional 1790s household by lighting candles instead of using electricity, boiling mutton, and—because women were not allowed to sign contracts— feebly attempting to take over his wife's day job, which involves a lot of contract negotiations.   A.J. Jacobs is a journalist, lecturer, and human guinea pig whose books include Drop Dead Healthy, The Year of Living Biblically, and The Puzzler. He is host of the podcast The Puzzler. A contributor to NPR, The New York Times, and Esquire, among other media outlets, Jacobs lives in New York City with his family.   Get AJ's new book here: https://rb.gy/wir520 The Year of Living Constitutionally: One Man's Humble Quest to Follow the Constitution's Original Meaning   Here are some free gifts for you: Overall Approach Used in Well-Managed Strategy Studies free download: www.firmsconsulting.com/OverallApproach   McKinsey & BCG winning resume free download: www.firmsconsulting.com/resumepdf   Enjoying this episode? Get access to sample advanced training episodes here: www.firmsconsulting.com/promo

A.J. Jacobs learned the hard way that donning a tricorne hat and marching around Manhattan with a 1700s musket will earn you a lot of strange looks. In the wake of several controversial rulings by the Supreme Court and the on-going debate about how the Constitution should be interpreted, Jacobs set out to understand what it means to live by the Constitution. In The Year of Living Constitutionally, A.J. Jacobs tries to get inside the minds of the Founding Fathers by living as closely as possible to the original meaning of the Constitution. He asserts his right to free speech by writing his opinions on parchment with a quill and handing them out to strangers in Times Square. He consents to quartering a soldier, as is his Third Amendment right. He turns his home into a traditional 1790s household by lighting candles instead of using electricity, boiling mutton, and—because women were not allowed to sign contracts— feebly attempting to take over his wife's day job, which involves a lot of contract negotiations.

Welcome to Strategy Skills episode 447, featuring an interview with the author of The Year of Living Constitutionally: One Man's Humble Quest to Follow the Constitution's Original Meaning, AJ Jacobs. In The Year of Living Constitutionally, A.J. Jacobs tries to get inside the minds of the Founding Fathers by living as closely as possible to the original meaning of the Constitution. He asserts his right to free speech by writing his opinions on parchment with a quill and handing them out to strangers in Times Square. He consents to quartering a soldier, as is his Third Amendment right. He turns his home into a traditional 1790s household by lighting candles instead of using electricity, boiling mutton, and—because women were not allowed to sign contracts— feebly attempting to take over his wife's day job, which involves a lot of contract negotiations.   A.J. Jacobs is a journalist, lecturer, and human guinea pig whose books include Drop Dead Healthy, The Year of Living Biblically, and The Puzzler. He is host of the podcast The Puzzler. A contributor to NPR, The New York Times, and Esquire, among other media outlets, Jacobs lives in New York City with his family.   Get AJ's new book here: https://rb.gy/wir520 The Year of Living Constitutionally: One Man's Humble Quest to Follow the Constitution's Original Meaning Here are some free gifts for you: Overall Approach Used in Well-Managed Strategy Studies free download: www.firmsconsulting.com/OverallApproach   McKinsey & BCG winning resume free download: www.firmsconsulting.com/resumepdf   Enjoying this episode? Get access to sample advanced training episodes here: www.firmsconsulting.com/promo  

On today's podcast, Mike Slater opines on orange slices at kid's soccer games and whether the universe bends towards justice or chaos. Trust us when we say that you'll want to listen to the podcast to get where Slater goes with this!Following that, Mike welcomes Anti-Squatter Activist Flash Shelton to the program to talk about the rising rates of squatters in America and how he's part of an effort combat them. Could we be headed for a landmark Third Amendment lawsuit? Don't miss this riveting interview!

This will change your opinion of the "freest" country in the world. An unfiltered, exclusive interview with investigative journalist Steve Baker hours after his arrest by the FBI. He's being attacked for his use of the First Amendment and the Third Amendment. And to add insult to injury, the FBI has forced him to surrender his firearms. The Biden White House has supplied a new term for illegal immigrants. And a trans Air Force officer was honored for saying we need more brain power to increase national security. Kendall Bailey and Lindsey Graham of "Pretty Little Patriot" also join the show. Today's Sponsors: Text SARA to 989898 and get your free info kit on gold. Then, talk to a precious metals specialist about how to protect your savings from persistent inflation with gold. PreBorn! To donate, dial #250 and say keyword “baby” or go to https://preborn.com/sara Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Does Housing Illegal Migrants Violate The Third Amendment? And Breitbart News World Editor Frances Martel Talks About The Threat Of The Houthis 

The Third Amendment to the Constitution prohibits the quartering of soldiers in private homes. This might sound strange to us now, but it was a reality for American colonists in the pre-Revolutionary era, who were deprived of this right by the British authorities even though it was a right allowed to their British brethren. Center for Civic Education

Welcome to the Instant Trivia podcast episode 1017, where we ask the best trivia on the Internet. Round 1. Category: I'Ll Have Thirds 1: It says you can't be forced to let soldiers live in your house. the Third Amendment. 2: This annual observance that's on the third Sunday in June should seem familial to you. Father's Day. 3: This third book in the King James Bible says, "It shall be a perpetual statute... that ye eat neither fat nor blood". Leviticus. 4: This general who died late in 1945 led the U.S. Third Army on major campaigns of World War II including Normandy. (George S.) Patton. 5: In 1996 this Reform Party presidential candidate, a Texas businessman, got third place with 8 million votes. Ross Perot. Round 2. Category: What Sort Of Establishment Is This? 1: The type of roadhouse called a this joint lent its name to a coin-operated music machine. a juke joint. 2: In Mexico, it's a bar; on Tatooine, it's also "an ideal spot to hire a starship's crew". a cantina. 3: If you encounter a meat and three establishment in the American South, the "three" refers to these. the side dishes. 4: Raw bars traditionally serve live, uncooked these. oysters (shellfish, clams). 5: There's an alloy in this word for a type of casual restaurant, French for "brewery". a brasserie. Round 3. Category: 1988 1: The Thatcher government imposed a broadcast ban on this political wing of the IRA. Sinn Fein. 2: Bone, Crossbeak and Bonnet, or, as the Eskimos called them, Pontu, Siku and Kannick. gray whales that were trapped. 3: In August this Indiana senator was chosen as the Republican vice-presidential nominee. Dan Quayle. 4: In mid-March, Midway Island will be midway along the path of one of these. a solar eclipse. 5: Along with the Marcoses, this Saudi arms merchant was indicted in October on charges of racketeering. Adnan Khashoggi. Round 4. Category: Singers' Shared First Names 1: Chesney and Loggins. Kenny. 2: Nicks and Wonder. Stevie. 3: Trevi and Gaynor. Gloria. 4: Bolton and Buble. Michael. 5: Maines and Merchant. Natalie. Round 5. Category: In Life 1: In regard to benefits, ssa.gov says this period of your life begins at age 62. retirement. 2: In common law, the age of this, signaling adulthood, is presumed to be 14 in boys and 12 in girls. puberty. 3: In the Holmes-Rahe life stress inventory, the death of a spouse is tops, while this similar outcome is second. divorce. 4: In Catholicism this sacrament, administered on baptized persons at least age 7, allows you to take communion. confirmation. 5: "When age chills the blood", waxed Byron, "our sweetest memorial" will be the "first" this "of love". kiss. Thanks for listening! Come back tomorrow for more exciting trivia! Special thanks to https://blog.feedspot.com/trivia_podcasts/

This episode contains: Three hosts for three times the fun! Steven is drinking some coffee from Green Day and Oakland Coffee, have you heard there's a new album coming? Ben's brother gives us some feedback on space mining and fiction: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Moon_Is_a_Harsh_Mistress We chat about how to read more by listening more. How do you read / listen to books?  Step Up 2 Tha Streetz: 8,000 steps a day to reduce the risk of premature death. A study has identified, for the first time, the optimal number of steps at which people would gain the greatest benefits. We talk about how most people have some sort of pedometer on them in the form of a smartwatch or phone, but getting out there to take the steps can still be a challenge. To be clear, there are no health deficiencies if you walk more than the suggested 8,000 steps. Steven once logged over 20,000 steps (while at Disneyland).  https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/10/231026131551.htm How's Your Pokedex coming? ASH - Ai Pocket Field Guide. Inspired by the legendary Pokedex, ASH was developed as a digital artifact that could help children connect and learn about and protect the biodiversity that surrounds them every day. This looks like an amazing thing that all children should have to help them explore the natural world around them...but we can't find a buy button. Is this a real product or just a concept? We can't tell, but the idea of ot being real is intriguing!  https://www.finh.cc/ash?ref=sidebar  This Week in Space (but really 30 years ago): How would we know whether there is life on Earth? This bolf experiment found out. Thirty years ago, astronomer Carl Sagan convinced NASA to turn a passing space probe's instruments on Earth to look for life — with results that still reverberate today. In 1989 the Galileo spacecraft was launched, and later pointed at Earth to see if we could detect "life" which would give us a powerful control for when we would eventually probe exoplanets (which had yet to be discovered). Very cool. Steven is reminded of a mission in Starfield where an old generation ship is discovered at an already colonized planet.  https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03230-z  Big Question: How many personal liberties would you give up for health and safety? We have quite a discussion this week, covering everything from gun control to different constitutional amendments, plugging into and out of the Matrix, Covid quarantine restrictions and fatigue, physical and mental health vs community responsibilities, personal liberties, governmental trust, revolutions and rebellions, and a whole lot more!  

At first glance, in a contemporary view, the Third Amendment may seem like a relic from the founding era of our country.  Today, it would seem strange for the military to require homeowners to house and feed soldiers.  We think it just would not happen. Perhaps the certainty around it not happening today should be attributed to the Third Amendment's success: being so unambiguous and precise when it was written.  Join our all-star student panel and returning guest Hans von Spakovsky, Senior Legal Fellow at the Heritage Foundation, for this insightful discussion on this oft-overlooked yet critical amendment and the important founding principles it reflects, including the right to property. 

Part 3: The Third Amendment - Limits on Quartering Soldiers in Modern Times. Welcome to the third part of Session 3, where we continue our exploration of the Bill of Rights by examining the Third Amendment. While the Third Amendment may not be as frequently litigated as some others, it still holds relevance in modern times as it places limits on the quartering of soldiers in private homes. The Third Amendment Text. Let's begin by examining the text of the Third Amendment: Third Amendment Text: "No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law." Historical Context. To understand the Third Amendment's significance, it's essential to consider the historical context in which it was drafted. The amendment was a response to the Quartering Act of 1765 and the experiences of colonists during the American Revolution. The Quartering Act allowed British soldiers to be housed in colonists' private homes without their consent. This was deeply resented by the colonists and contributed to the broader grievances that led to the American Revolution. Protection of Privacy and Property. The Third Amendment is fundamentally about protecting the privacy and property rights of individuals from government intrusion. It establishes two important principles: Consent of the Owner: In times of peace, no soldier can be quartered in a private home without the consent of the homeowner. This places a strong emphasis on the sanctity of private property. Prescribed by Law in Wartime: In times of war, if the government deems it necessary to quarter soldiers in private homes, it must do so in a manner prescribed by law. This ensures that such intrusions are subject to legal and constitutional constraints. Modern Relevance. While the Third Amendment is not often the focus of contemporary legal disputes, it remains relevant in several ways: Protection of Privacy: The Third Amendment is an important part of the broader framework of constitutional protections for individual privacy. It underscores the principle that government intrusion into private homes should be limited and subject to legal safeguards. Limitation on Military Power: The amendment reflects a broader constitutional concern about the potential abuse of military power during times of peace and war. It reminds us of the importance of civilian control over the military. Historical Significance: The Third Amendment serves as a historical reminder of the grievances that contributed to the American Revolution and the foundational principles on which the United States was built. Limited Legal Cases. It's worth noting that there have been very few legal cases directly involving the Third Amendment. This is because, in practice, the government rarely seeks to quarter soldiers in private homes in modern times. However, the amendment still stands as a protection against such actions if they were to occur. Conclusion. In conclusion, the Third Amendment may not be the most frequently discussed or litigated amendment in the Bill of Rights, but it plays a significant role in upholding principles of privacy and property rights. It reminds us of the importance of protecting individual homes from unwarranted government intrusion. As we continue our exploration of the Bill of Rights in the upcoming sessions, we will examine each amendment and its relevance, both historically and in modern times. Thank you for joining me in this discussion. In our next session, we will turn our attention to the Fourth Amendment and its critical role in safeguarding against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. See you next time! --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Welcome back, everyone, to the third part of our session on the Preamble and Articles of the U.S. Constitution. In the previous segments, we analyzed the significance of the Preamble and conducted a comprehensive examination of each Article of the Constitution. Today, we will delve into the Amendments of the Constitution, with a specific focus on the Bill of Rights and the critical additions that have shaped our legal landscape. Introduction to the Amendments. As we explore the Amendments, it's important to remember that the Constitution is not static. The Founding Fathers understood the need for flexibility and adaptation, and thus, they established a mechanism to amend the Constitution. Amendments can address emerging issues, correct shortcomings, and expand upon the fundamental rights protected by the Constitution. The Bill of Rights - First Ten Amendments. The Bill of Rights, the first ten Amendments to the Constitution, holds a special place in American history and jurisprudence. These Amendments were added in response to concerns about individual liberties and governmental power, serving as a check against potential abuses. Amendment I: Freedom of Religion, Speech, Press, Assembly, and Petition. The First Amendment guarantees the fundamental rights of freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition. These rights form the cornerstone of our democracy, ensuring that citizens can express their beliefs and opinions without fear of government interference. Amendment II: Right to Bear Arms. The Second Amendment protects the right of individuals to bear arms for self-defense and the defense of the nation. The interpretation of this Amendment has sparked debates about gun control and the balance between individual rights and public safety. Amendment III: Quartering of Soldiers. The Third Amendment prohibits the government from quartering soldiers in private homes during peacetime without the owner's consent. While less frequently litigated, it underscores the importance of protecting individual property rights. The Bill of Rights - Cont. Let's continue our exploration of the Bill of Rights: Amendment IV: Search and Seizure. The Fourth Amendment safeguards individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures by requiring warrants to be issued based on probable cause. It ensures the protection of personal privacy and limits the government's power to intrude into citizens' lives. Amendment V: Due Process, Double Jeopardy, Self-Incrimination The Fifth Amendment enshrines several important protections, including the right to due process of law, protection against double jeopardy, and the right to remain silent to avoid self-incrimination. Amendment VI: Right to a Fair Trial. The Sixth Amendment guarantees a fair and speedy trial, the right to confront witnesses, and the right to legal representation. It ensures that individuals accused of crimes have the opportunity to present their case and receive a fair hearing. Amendment VII: Right to Trial by Jury. The Seventh Amendment guarantees the right to a jury trial in civil cases involving disputes over property or money. This Amendment reflects the value placed on the judgment of one's peers. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

It's not every day people sit around and talk about the 3rd amendment. And yet, it was important in its time. And is used sometimes to refer to an array of rights. What is quarter? What are soldiers? What does this little amendment mean today, if anything? A re-broadcast of our episode on the Third Amendment about quartering soldiers, starting with. And a look at legal battles in fairly recent history and then one that occurred right after I recorded the episode. (which was resolved in the way I predicted on this cast).   We are part of Airwave Media Network Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Hello! Welcome to the third episode of this miniseries describing every amendment to the US Constitution! Today we will be talking about the history and verbiage of the third amendment! Hope you all enjoy!

This week on Historia Obscura: how a series of reforms after a prison riot led to a legal battle over the applicability of the least-known amendment of the Bill of Rights. Special thanks to Patreon subscribers Barbara, Lisa Chase, and Tom! Subscribe to my Patreon at https://www.patreon.com/historiaobscura! --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/historiaobscura/message

The Third Amendment was written in response to the Quartering Act of 1765, which was a British law authorizing colonial governors to requisition certain buildings, including parts of people's homes, for housing British troops. Center for Civic Education

Join the guys with their first live stream - It didn't quite work out, but listen in as they stumble through this and discuss the election results!The somehow found time to partake in some rapid takes!lifefromthepatio.com

One might question why the 3rd Amendment was given such a lofty position behind 1st amendment protections and the right to keep and bear arms. It's not often talked about and doesn't drive the news cycle or inspire mass protesting.  So why did The Founders codify that we do not have to quarter soldiers in our homes?  What act of parliament was this amendment directly countering? And what role did the Boston Tea Party play to inspire such an amendment?  Join our special guest, Hans von Spakovsky with the Heritage Foundation, and our all-star lineup of student panelists for this insightful conversation into the Third Amendment.

C3 celebrates the passage of the Inflation Reduction Act and welcomes the additional 87,000 IRS agents that will soon be auditing all of our tax returns! Good thing the Third Amendment won't apply so we can all ensure they have a safe place to stay. In this episode we dive into the "Won't do anything for" Inflation Reduction Act and Josh breaks news about the FBI's "don't say" raid on President Trump's Mar-a-Largo residence. Head over to www.culperscanteencup.com for the podcast and YouTube, or you can find us on Apple Podcasts at https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/culpers-canteen-cup/id1506424751, Spotify, Amazon, your favorite podcast host, or on our YouTube channel at https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLeqtSkQejOM4aC64MqauV6peSDfIwoCNR Don't forget to hit up our web page for our latest blogs and follow the rest of our socials at https://linktr.ee/culperscanteencup As always, big thanks to Carlton Zeus for his intro music. Check him out on Apple Music or at www.carltonzeus.com.

ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Council Bill No. 2022-126: A Resolution Appointing Madison Story and Reappointing Adrianne Brehm to the Historic Preservation Commission in the City of Champaign Council Bill No. 2022-127: An Ordinance Amending Section 10-22.1(b) of the Champaign Municipal Code Council Bill No. 2022-128: A Resolution Granting Comcast of Illinois/Indiana/Ohio, LLC, A Cable Television Franchise Extension Through December 1, 2031 Council Bill No. 2022-129: A Resolution Approving a Third Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Intergovernmental Agreement with the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois Relative to Funding for the Champaign County Convention and Visitors Bureau, Champaign County Economic Development Corporation and 40 North/88 West, Inc. Council Bill No. 2022-130: A Resolution Designating a Developer of Record for 47 East Main Street Council Bill No. 2022-131: A Resolution Approving an Engineering Services Agreement with Clark Dietz, Inc. for the 2023 Concrete Street Improvements Project Council Bill No. 2022-132: A Resolution for Improvement of Streets by Municipalities Under the Illinois Highway Code

President Biden taunts Republicans, Disinformation Czar Janckowicz call CRT "disinformation for profit" and Senator Mark Warner admits years of warrant-less surveillance. Have a nice day.... See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Twenty-third Amendment to the United States Constitution extends the right to participate in presidential elections to the District of Columbia. The amendment grants the district electors in the Electoral College as though it were a state, though the district can never have more electors than the least-populous state. The manner in which the electors are appointed is to be determined by Congress. The Twenty-third Amendment was proposed by the 86th Congress on June 16, 1960; it was ratified by the requisite number of states on March 29, 1961. The Constitution provides that each state receives presidential electors equal to the combined number of seats it has in the Senate and the House of Representatives. As the District of Columbia is not a state, it was not entitled to any electors prior to the adoption of the Twenty-third Amendment. As early as 1888, some journalists and members of Congress favored a constitutional amendment to grant the district electoral votes, but such an amendment did not win widespread support until the rise of the civil rights movement in the 1950s. The amendment was not seen as a partisan measure, and ratification of the amendment was endorsed by President Dwight D Eisenhower and both major party candidates in the 1960 presidential election. The ratification of the amendment made the district the only entity other than the states to have any representation in the Electoral College. The first presidential election in which the District of Columbia participated was the election of 1964. Starting with that election the District of Columbia has consistently had three members of the Electoral College, this being the constitutionally implied minimum number it is entitled to; notwithstanding the constitutionally entrenched limitation on its number of electors, the District's population has never reached the threshold where it otherwise would have been entitled to more than three. Since the passage of the Twenty-third Amendment, all but one of the district's electoral votes have been cast for the Democratic Party's presidential candidates. The Twenty-third Amendment did not grant the district voting rights in Congress, nor did it give the district the right to participate in the process that allows the Constitution to be amended. An unsuccessful proposed constitutional amendment to do this was proposed by Congress in 1978, but it was not ratified by enough states for it to be adopted. Many citizens of the district favor statehood or further constitutional amendments to address these issues.

Procedural due process When the government seeks to burden a person's protected liberty interest or property interest, the Supreme Court has held that procedural due process requires that, at a minimum, the government provide the person notice, an opportunity to be heard at an oral hearing, and a decision by a neutral decision-maker. For example, such a process is due when a government agency seeks to terminate civil service employees, expel a student from public school, or cut off a welfare recipient's benefits. The Court has also ruled that the Due Process Clause requires judges to recuse themselves in cases where the judge has a conflict of interest. For example, in Caperton v A T Massey Coal Company (2009), the Court ruled that a justice of the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia had to recuse himself from a case involving a major contributor to his campaign for election to that court. Incorporation. While many state constitutions are modeled after the United States Constitution and federal laws, those state constitutions did not necessarily include provisions comparable to the Bill of Rights. In Barron v Baltimore (1833), the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the Bill of Rights restrained only the federal government, not the states. However, the Supreme Court has subsequently held that most provisions of the Bill of Rights apply to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment under a doctrine called "incorporation". Whether incorporation was intended by the amendment's framers, such as John Bingham, has been debated by legal historians. According to legal scholar Akhil Reed Amar, the framers and early supporters of the Fourteenth Amendment believed that it would ensure that the states would be required to recognize the same individual rights as the federal government; all these rights were likely understood as falling within the "privileges or immunities" safeguarded by the amendment. By the latter half of the 20th century, nearly all of the rights in the Bill of Rights had been applied to the states. The Supreme Court has held that the amendment's Due Process Clause incorporates all of the substantive protections of the First, Second, Fourth, Fifth (except for its Grand Jury Clause) and Sixth Amendments, along with the Excessive Fines Clause and Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause of the Eighth Amendment. While the Third Amendment has not been applied to the states by the Supreme Court, the Second Circuit ruled that it did apply to the states within that circuit's jurisdiction in Engblom v Carey. The Seventh Amendment right to jury trial in civil cases has been held not to be applicable to the states, but the amendment's Re-Examination Clause does apply to "a case tried before a jury in a state court and brought to the Supreme Court on appeal". The Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment became the last right to be incorporated when the Supreme Court ruled in Timbs v Indiana (2019) that right to apply to the states. Equal Protection Clause

The Third Amendment to the United States Constitution places restrictions on the quartering of soldiers in private homes without the owner's consent, forbidding the practice in peacetime. The amendment is a response to the Quartering Acts passed by the British parliament during the buildup to the American Revolutionary War, which had allowed the British Army to lodge soldiers in private residences. The Third Amendment was introduced in Congress in 1789 by James Madison as a part of the United States Bill of Rights, in response to Anti-Federalist objections to the new Constitution. Congress proposed the amendment to the states on September 28, 1789, and by December 15, 1791, the necessary three-quarters of the states had ratified it. Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson announced the adoption of the amendment on March 1, 1792. The amendment is one of the least controversial of the Constitution and is rarely litigated, with criminal justice writer Radley Balko calling it the "runt piglet" of the U.S. Constitution. To date, it has never been the primary basis of a Supreme Court decision, though it was the basis of the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit case Engblom v Carey in 1982. Text. The complete text of the amendment is: No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.. Background. In 1765, the British parliament enacted the first of the Quartering Acts, requiring the American colonies to pay the costs of British soldiers serving in the colonies, and requiring that if the local barracks provided insufficient space, that the colonists lodge the troops in alehouses, inns, and livery stables. After the Boston Tea Party, the Quartering Act of 1774 was enacted. As one of the Intolerable Acts that pushed the colonies toward revolution, it authorized British troops to be housed wherever necessary, including in private homes. The quartering of troops was cited as one of the colonists' grievances in the United States Declaration of Independence.

The Third Amendment to the United States Constitution places restrictions on the quartering of soldiers in private homes without the owner's consent, forbidding the practice in peacetime. The amendment is a response to the Quartering Acts passed by the British parliament during the buildup to the American Revolutionary War, which had allowed the British Army to lodge soldiers in private residences. The Third Amendment was introduced in Congress in 1789 by James Madison as a part of the United States Bill of Rights, in response to Anti-Federalist objections to the new Constitution. Congress proposed the amendment to the states on September 28, 1789, and by December 15, 1791, the necessary three-quarters of the states had ratified it. Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson announced the adoption of the amendment on March 1, 1792. The amendment is one of the least controversial of the Constitution and is rarely litigated, with criminal justice writer Radley Balko calling it the "runt piglet" of the U.S. Constitution. To date, it has never been the primary basis of a Supreme Court decision, though it was the basis of the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit case Engblom v Carey in 1982. Text. The complete text of the amendment is: No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.. Background. In 1765, the British parliament enacted the first of the Quartering Acts, requiring the American colonies to pay the costs of British soldiers serving in the colonies, and requiring that if the local barracks provided insufficient space, that the colonists lodge the troops in alehouses, inns, and livery stables. After the Boston Tea Party, the Quartering Act of 1774 was enacted. As one of the Intolerable Acts that pushed the colonies toward revolution, it authorized British troops to be housed wherever necessary, including in private homes. The quartering of troops was cited as one of the colonists' grievances in the United States Declaration of Independence.

We dedicate this show to the Pro Say Family Christmas. Drum roll please? It's our annual Best Of The Offbeats episode looking back on our favorite weird legal news of the year! We're checking back on the Morrison & Foerster attorney who spent $400,000 of the firm's money on products like “butt-enhancing trunks;” the West Virginia woman who faked her own death with the help of her husband; a Covid-19 eviction ban argument centered on the oft-forgotten Third Amendment; and finally, a Pro Say history lesson on the evolution of the lawyer joke. Yes, we worked really hard this year. But of course, so do washing machines. Happy holidays everyone!

The Twenty-Third Amendment gives the citizens of Washington, D.C. the right to vote in US Presidential elections, and also gives the city its own slate of electors in the Electoral College. This is what the amendment says, why it was needed, and what it does not provide to Washington, D.C. and its citizens. Podcast Show Notes: https://ancestralfindings.com/the-twenty-third-amendment-the-constitutional-amendments/  Genealogy Clips Podcast: https://genealogyclips.com Historical Postcard Giveaway: https://ancestralfindings.com/postcard-giveaway/ Free Genealogy eBooks: https://ancestralstuff.com Hard To Find Surnames: https://ancestralfindings.com/surnames Follow on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/AncestralFindings Support Ancestral Findings: https://ancestralfindings.com/donation #Genealogy #AncestralFindings #GenealogyClips

This week we sat down with one of TNP's own Opinion Writers, Bryce Hoehn, who is also the founder of the Third Amendment Club at Ohio University. You can find new episodes on Monday at thenewpolitical.com or wherever else podcasts can be downloaded. Credits: Host/Manager/Writer: Emily Zeiler - @emily_zeiler Host/Writer/Editor: Bo Kuhn - @bokuhnJOUR Guest: Bryce Hoehn: @bryce_hoehn Intro/Outro song - Dance Summer by Muza Production via Adobe Stock.

Ubbe Iwwerks had a lifelong crusade against letters in his own name.

Driven by the delta variant, Covid-19 infections are spiking across the country, leaving courts and law firms to once again grapple with public health and safety measures. On this week's episode, we're breaking down the patchwork of new restrictions, from courthouse mask rules to BigLaw vaccine mandates. Also this week, a public corruption trial with such bad lawyering that the First Circuit granted a redo; and an interesting argument against the Covid-19 eviction ban centered on the almost-never-invoked Third Amendment.

We discuss the Third Amendment and individual rights vis a vis the military. Namely, should we suspend rights for the sake of national security? We also discuss the draft and its constitutionality.-----------------------Two practicing lawyers pontificating on law and philosophy.  Why should you care? Rarely is their an intersection of law and philosophy when discussing major issues that effect us all in society today. Brenton and Therron use their legal experience and background in philosophy to look at issues in a MUCH different way. Perhaps you think about these issues in relation to religion, philosophy or common sense. Listen, think, enjoy and respond. Enjoy the PhiLAWsophy podcast. We would love to hear from you: info@themcintyrelawfirm.com

We WILL find a new world order! But not this week.The Confederacy of Andropolia | The United States of Sebmerica | The Democracy of ZanstraliaLet us know what you think about how we deal with these issues by contacting/arguing with us on social media!Please consider supporting us on PatreonLike us on Facebook!Follow us on twitter @worldorderpodEmail us: anewworldorderpodcast@gmail.comOr visit our Website: www.thatsnotcanonproductions.comHosts: Sebastian Briguglio, Andrew Szosler & Zane C WeberRecorded and Produced by Zane C Weber Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

We WILL find a new world order! But not this week.The Confederacy of Andropolia | The United States of Sebmerica | The Democracy of ZanstraliaLet us know what you think about how we deal with these issues by contacting/arguing with us on social media!Please consider supporting us on PatreonLike us on Facebook!Follow us on twitter @worldorderpodEmail us: anewworldorderpodcast@gmail.comOr visit our Website: www.thatsnotcanonproductions.comHosts: Sebastian Briguglio, Andrew Szosler & Zane C WeberRecorded and Produced by Zane C Weber Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

We WILL find a new world order! But not this week.The Confederacy of Andropolia | The United States of Sebmerica | The Democracy of ZanstraliaLet us know what you think about how we deal with these issues by contacting/arguing with us on social media!Please consider supporting us on PatreonLike us on Facebook!Follow us on twitter @worldorderpodEmail us: anewworldorderpodcast@gmail.comOr visit our Website: www.thatsnotcanonproductions.comHosts: Sebastian Briguglio, Andrew Szosler & Zane C WeberRecorded and Produced by Zane C Weber Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

We WILL find a new world order! But not this week.The Confederacy of Andropolia | The United States of Sebmerica | The Democracy of ZanstraliaLet us know what you think about how we deal with these issues by contacting/arguing with us on social media!Please consider supporting us on PatreonLike us on Facebook!Follow us on twitter @worldorderpodEmail us: anewworldorderpodcast@gmail.comOr visit our Website: www.thatsnotcanonproductions.comHosts: Sebastian Briguglio, Andrew Szosler & Zane C WeberRecorded and Produced by Zane C Weber Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

We WILL find a new world order! But not this week.Zane looks into the idea of monitoring his populaces internet usage as a way of preventing crimes.Seb looks into whether or not he should murder clones. Yep, that happened.Andrew looks into reshaping the bedrock foundations of his nation by looking into changing his nationa compulsory Military Service.The Confederacy of Andropolia | The United States of Sebmerica | The Democracy of ZanstraliaLet us know what you think about how we deal with these issues by contacting/arguing with us on social media!Please consider supporting us on PatreonLike us on Facebook!Follow us on twitter @worldorderpodEmail us: anewworldorderpodcast@gmail.comOr visit our Website: www.thatsnotcanonproductions.comHosts: Sebastian Briguglio, Andrew Szosler & Zane C WeberRecorded and Produced by Zane C Weber Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Continuing the Bill of Rights series, with the Third Amendment. Remembering Pearl Harbor. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Andrew targets the mentally ill and those suffering from depression, Zane gets down and dirty with political referendums all while Seb talks pollution, hipsters and fruity flavours.The Confederacy of Andropolia | The United States of Sebmerica | The Democracy of ZanstraliaLet us know what you think about how we deal with these issues by contacting/arguing with us on social media!Please consider supporting us on PatreonLike us on Facebook!Follow us on twitter @worldorderpodEmail us: anewworldorderpodcast@gmail.comOr visit our Website: www.thatsnotcanonproductions.comHosts: Sebastian Briguglio, Andrew Szosler & Zane C WeberRecorded and Produced by Zane C Weber Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This week! Andrew talks about toilets and other gross things, Seb enters the classical music scene and Zane talks about political financial donations. It's a politics party and you're all invited!The Confederacy of Andropolia | The United States of Sebmerica | The Democracy of ZanstraliaLet us know what you think about how we deal with these issues by contacting/arguing with us on social media!Please consider supporting us on PatreonLike us on Facebook!Follow us on twitter @worldorderpodEmail us: anewworldorderpodcast@gmail.comOr visit our Website: www.thatsnotcanonproductions.comHosts: Sebastian Briguglio, Andrew Szosler & Zane C WeberRecorded and Produced by Zane C Weber Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Oh god, what will those dastardly terrorists do next?!Andrew looks into the goings on of his state-run prisons. Who knew giving his prisoners solid gold toilets a few weeks ago would have any negative repercussions?Zane laughs in the face of the patriot act and refuses to further monitor the activities of his citizens.Seb takes a look at GMO Corn Crops. Will he sign the crop rights over to the sinister McSanto corporation or leave it open to small farmers.The Confederacy of Andropolia | The United States of Sebmerica | The Democracy of ZanstraliaLet us know what you think about how we deal with these issues by contacting/arguing with us on social media!Please consider supporting us on PatreonLike us on Facebook!Follow us on twitter @worldorderpodEmail us: anewworldorderpodcast@gmail.comOr visit our Website: www.thatsnotcanonproductions.comHosts: Sebastian Briguglio, Andrew Szosler & Zane C WeberRecorded and Produced by Zane C Weber Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

We WILL find a new world order! But not this week.Quick game: Guess which host gave the government full access to every dead body?Which country built floating sky palaces?And which country legalised drugs in all sports?If you guessed all three good job, you're probably smarter than our hosts.The Confederacy of Andropolia | The United States of Sebmerica | The Democracy of ZanstraliaLet us know what you think about how we deal with these issues by contacting/arguing with us on social media!Please consider supporting us on PatreonLike us on Facebook!Follow us on twitter @worldorderpodEmail us: anewworldorderpodcast@gmail.comOr visit our Website: www.thatsnotcanonproductions.comHosts: Sebastian Briguglio, Andrew Szosler & Zane C WeberRecorded and Produced by Zane C Weber Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Due to a lack of voter turnout, The Phenomenal One, Sebastian must address the issue of how to decrease his national political apathy.Zane takes a look at his judicial system after a botched trial to see whether or not he can fix the failings of a jury-based trial.After a series of attacks by a foreign animal (who remains unchecked by any natural predators) - Andrew must once again turn to eugenics to sort out this problem on a genetic level.The Confederacy of Andropolia | The United States of Sebmerica | The Democracy of ZanstraliaLet us know what you think about how we deal with these issues by contacting/arguing with us on social media!Please consider supporting us on PatreonLike us on Facebook!Follow us on twitter @worldorderpodEmail us: anewworldorderpodcast@gmail.comOr visit our Website: www.thatsnotcanonproductions.comHosts: Sebastian Briguglio, Andrew Szosler & Zane C WeberRecorded and Produced by Zane C Weber Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

We WILL find a new world order! But not this week. This week we discuss and/or argue about the youth of our nations. The Confederacy of Andropolia | The United States of Sebmerica | The Democracy of ZanstraliaLet us know what you think about how we deal with these issues by contacting/arguing with us on social media!Please consider supporting us on PatreonLike us on Facebook!Follow us on twitter @worldorderpodEmail us: anewworldorderpodcast@gmail.comOr visit our Website: www.thatsnotcanonproductions.comHosts: Sebastian Briguglio, Andrew Szosler & Zane C WeberRecorded and Produced by Zane C Weber Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

We WILL find a new world order! But not this week. This week we discuss and/or argue about the powers of government.The Confederacy of Andropolia | The United States of Sebmerica | The Democracy of ZanstraliaLet us know what you think about how we deal with these issues by contacting/arguing with us on social media!Please consider supporting us on PatreonLike us on Facebook!Follow us on twitter @worldorderpodEmail us: anewworldorderpodcast@gmail.comOr visit our Website: www.thatsnotcanonproductions.comHosts: Sebastian Briguglio, Andrew Szosler & Zane C WeberRecorded and Produced by Zane C Weber Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.