POPULARITY
Once described as the 'comedian's comedian' Stewart Lee has been performing stand up since 1988. He is known for pushing boundaries with his intelligent, self-referential and often provocative style of comedy but in his new show 'Stewart Lee vs the Man Wulf' he questions his place on the comedy circuit in an era of increasing populism rhetoric and the popularity of, in his words “$60m Netflix comedians of hate.” In this episode of Ways to Change the World with Krishnan Guru-Murthy he discusses the state of comedy today and what he thinks of the comedy style of comics like Ricky Gervais and Dave Chappelle as well as why he wouldn't tour America right now. As The Observer, the world's oldest Sunday newspaper begins a new era under Tortoise media he also reflects on his column for the paper which he's stopped after 15 years. Produced by Holly Snelling and Sachin Croker
He was burned in effigy. Protesters were arrested. Now, Michael Knowles returns. In this explosive episode of Cross The Line, Michael Knowles heads back to the University of Pittsburgh—the same campus where he was met with violent protests, chaos, and national headlines. This time, it's personal. Following the arrest of activist Brian DiPippa, who injured a police officer during the protest, Michael revisits the campus to speak with students, confront the narrative, and expose the truth about free speech, political extremism, and the growing hostility toward conservatives on college campuses. - - - Today's Sponsor: ExpressVPN - Protect your online privacy today by going to https://ExpressVPN.com/michaelYT and you can get an extra 4 months FREE
Adolescence: Brilliant TV or WOKE Propaganda? In this video, Jon Gaunt debates Netflix's latest hit series, Adolescence, and asks the tough questions: Is it a true reflection of modern-day Britain, or is it a form of WOKE propaganda? Led by Stephen Graham, Adolescence portrays a grim reality for young boys today, but does it reflect the real challenges they're facing, such as the influence of figures like Andrew Tate, the rise of incels, and increasing violence in schools? Some critics argue that the film presents a false and woke depiction of the issues surrounding youth violence in Britain as the family is white. Jon also discusses the troubling portrayal of misogyny, toxic masculinity, and the fatal stabbings carried out by young men in the UK, questioning whether it accurately reflects reality. As Adolescence sparks debates over the responsibility of new media, Gaunty also tackles questions on whether more male teachers and extra-curricular activities are the solution, and if banning smartphones could be a step towards protecting kids. Should Keir Starmer fund the film's showing in schools, and is this the Cathy Come Home moment of the 21st century? Join us for a thought-provoking discussion on whether Adolescence is brilliant TV or harmful fiction. Keywords and Tags: Adolescence Netflix, WOKE propaganda, Stephen Graham, UK politics, toxic masculinity, Andrew Tate, incel threat, male teachers in schools, adolescent violence, UK stabbings, media influence, Keir Starmer, free speech debate, boys and smartphones, extracurricular activities, Cathy Come Home, Netflix series review, modern Britain TV, youth culture, UK media.
Starmer's Labour are making April Fools of us all BUT it's no joke! #Taiwo Owatemi #National Insurance #CouncilTax #costofliving In this hard-hitting video, Jon Gaunt exposes how Starmer's Labour Party is making April Fools of the UK public with their broken promises and misleading claims. Despite Rachel Reeves boasting that we will all be £500 better off soon, the reality is far worse. According to the Centre for Economics and Business Research (CEBR), Starmer's policies will result in devastating cost increases for households across the country. The National Insurance (NI) hike alone will wipe out at least £565 from family budgets. Additionally, Gaunty explores the reality of rising costs, from council tax increases (£90 on average) to soaring water bills (£123), and the impact of higher energy bills (£111), broadband fees (£21.99), and road tax (£5). To top it off, TV licenses are going up by a fiver, all while Starmer and his Chancellor boast about the £500 households will allegedly feel "better off." Meanwhile a SENIOR Labour MP is using taxpayers' cash to pay “pet rent” so she can live with her cockapoo dog in London. Taiwo Owatemi is helping to get £5 billion of cuts to disability benefits through parliament for Labour at the same time as a bombshell document reveals that the Coventry North West MP is charging taxpayers £900 a year extra in rent so her pet pooch Bella can live with her. She is Jon Gaunt's Local MP and Gaunty believes that she is a self-serving pig with her snout in the trough! Meanwhile, Starmer is parading around the world as if he's a global statesman while failing to address the real issues at home. This video highlights the stark contrast between the Labour leader's rhetoric and the harsh reality faced by hard-working families. From higher taxes to his obsession with banning ninja knives, Starmer's priorities are out of touch with the struggles of ordinary people. As we prepare for even more tax hikes, it's clear that Starmer and his Chancellor are only fooling themselves—and us. Stay tuned for more UK political analysis, debate, and free speech discussions on the issues that matter most. Follow me on my socials here: https://x.com/home https://www.facebook.com/JonGaunt/ https://www.tiktok.com/@jongauntofficial Website https://www.jongaunt.com Support me here https://www.buymeacoffee.com/Jongaunt This video is a politics blog and social commentary by award winning talk radio star, Jon Gaunt
Dan and Corey kick off the show with some tech issues and quickly turn to roasting Trump for turning the White House into a Tesla showroom, cracking jokes about him not knowing how to drive a car. They dive into a serious discussion about Mahmood Khalil, a Columbia grad who faces deportation for criticizing Israel, mocking the government's BS moves and lack of due process. The talk shifts to debanking, with Tim Scott's pathetic FIRM Act, which is supposed to protect free speech but really just screws over small businesses. They also highlight Thomas Massey's ongoing budget battles with Trump and mock the absurdities of the political landscape, all while keeping the humor as crude and low-brow as possible. The episode wraps up with more laughs, ridiculous impressions, and a nod to the chaos of current events.00:00 Welcome to Libservative01:02 Technical Difficulties and Trump Talk01:46 The MAGA Movement and Free Speech07:01 Rosie O'Donnell's Move to Ireland12:38 Trump's Petty Moves and BLM Plaza19:33 Protests and Outside Agitators27:59 DEI Purge and AI Mishaps38:39 Public Restroom Dilemma39:21 Jack the Ripper Identified45:00 Transgender vs. Transgenics46:47 First Amendment Violations01:06:52 Debanking and Financial Regulations01:24:41 Libertarian and Leftist Ideologies01:26:21 Critique of Neoliberalism01:29:08 The FIRM Act and Its Implications01:34:22 Overregulation and Its Consequences01:37:46 Thomas Massey vs. Donald Trump01:42:50 Trump's Economic Policies01:52:40 Trump and Tesla: A Bizarre Encounter02:03:55 Closing Remarks and Filibustering
Is violent crime truly out of control in the UK? In this eye-opening video, we dive deep into some of the most horrific crimes that have shocked the nation. From the life sentence of Kyle Clifford, who brutally raped and murdered his ex-girlfriend, her sister, and mother, to the growing gang warfare in UK cities fueled by the ongoing drug trade. We also examine the chilling murders of young girls in Southport by Alex Rudakubana, a brutal reminder of the threat of Islamist extremism. Are UK laws too soft on violent offenders? Should we restore the death penalty to deter criminals? What is the role of the police and parents in protecting the public? In this video, we debate the UK's criminal justice system, the effectiveness of current sentencing, and the broader societal impacts of these heinous acts. Join the discussion on UK politics, violent crime, crime prevention, and free speech. We analyse the controversial topics surrounding crime, punishment, and public safety. Don't miss out on this thought-provoking video exploring whether our justice system is truly up to the task in combating the rising tide of violent crime in the UK. Keywords & Search Terms: violent crime UK, Kyle Clifford life sentence, rapist murderer UK, gang warfare UK, drug war UK cities, UK murders, Southport murders, Alex Rudakubana, Islamist extremism UK, death penalty debate UK, soft sentencing UK, police responsibility crime UK, parents responsibility crime UK, UK justice system, UK criminal justice system, violent crime debate, crime rates UK, crime prevention UK, free speech UK politics, UK crime statistics 2025. Tags: UK politics, violent crime UK, Kyle Clifford, gang violence UK, drug gangs UK, Southport murders, death penalty UK, Islamist extremism, crime prevention UK, police role UK, UK criminal justice, free speech debate, UK news, crime statistics UK, sentencing debate, political discussion, UK law.
Trump #KeirStarmer #UKPolitics #Trump2024 From Politician to King: The Rise of Trump and the Fall of Starmer. Is Keir Starmer's leadership on the brink of collapse? Meanwhile, Donald Trump continues to dominate the global stage! In just four weeks, Trump has made major diplomatic moves, nearly brokering a peace deal in Ukraine, presenting a solution for Gaza, and forcing Europe to pay for its own defence. His America First policies have strengthened U.S. borders and solidified his unmatched leadership. After the high-stakes meeting between Trump and Keir Starmer in Washington, D.C., it was evident who the real leader was. Trump delivered a masterclass in diplomacy, leaving Starmer looking weak, lost, and ineffective. As Trump's influence grows, Starmer struggles to keep control of his party and the UK's future.
Welcome to the Alfalfa Podcast
In this episode of the Conflict Skills Podcast, host Simon Goode discusses five online debate tactics that are ineffective when used with friends and family, and offers alternatives for better communication. He emphasises the importance of avoiding aggressive behaviors like interrupting, applying pressure, and using sarcasm, suggesting instead to listen respectfully, reduce pressure, and acknowledge differing viewpoints. The episode aims to help listeners improve their conflict resolution skills in personal relationships by reflecting on Simon's own past mistakes and learning from them.--------------------Online Debate Tactics That Don't Work (With Friends & Family)Interrupting and Controlling the ConversationHow it manifests in conversations (e.g., talking over, steering the conversation)Results and outcomes of using this tacticPersonal anecdote about Simon's usage of this tacticApplying PressureDifferent ways pressure is applied (e.g., fixed choice questions, not letting thoughts form)Outcomes and the other person's typical reactionsExamples that illustrate pressure applicationSimon's discussion on workplace application vs. personal contextsHumor and RidiculeUse of sarcasm and humor in debatesExamples of sarcastic ridiculePsychological impact on social survival and tribe dynamicsRisks associated with this tactic in emotionally charged conversationsStraw ManningDefinition and explanation of the straw man argumentExamples of straw manningHow it causes disengagementSimon's personal history with this tacticWalking AwaySituations where walking away might be seen as losing or ending the debateImpact of unfinished business with friendsImportance of long-term relationship dynamicsEffective Strategies for Managing Debates and DisagreementsAllowing Space and Letting Them SpeakApologizing for interruptionsFocusing on active listeningMethods to signal attention and readiness to listenReducing PressureGiving control over the timing and location of the conversationAllowing autonomy and choiceExamples of reducing perceived pressureRespect and DeferenceBeing overly deferential and respectful in both language and behaviorTreating the other person's perspective with seriousness and importanceSituational examples of applying respect and deferenceSteel ManningDefinition of steel manningTechniques to present the other person's argument in the best possible lightBenefits of acknowledging the internal logic of others' perspectivesLeaving Room for Continued DialogueConfirming the opportunity for future discussionsSuggestions for ending conversations on good termsValidating different views without pressure to resolve immediatelyClick here to send me a quick message via FanMailwebsite: simongoode.com email: podcast@simongoode.com
In a crazy and failing attempt to divert attention away from his own guilt, Keir Starmer wants to blame Amazon for selling knives for the slaughter of the innocents in Southport! It's disgusting to spin the story like this but the Mainstream media are complicit in this foul act as they make it the talking point of the day! The establishment often proposes superficial solutions like banning knife sales, but is this truly the answer? I explore the recent tragic events in Southport and why these measures fail to address the underlying issues. Is this just another diversion tactic to avoid holding key institutions accountable? I scrutinize Keir Starmer's role, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), and whether the public is being told the full story. Why aren't we addressing systemic problems, social failures, immigration and gaps in law enforcement? This debate raises questions about personal responsibility, societal influences, and the erosion of trust in our leaders and justice system. Join me as I unpack these pressing UK political issues, promote free speech, and challenge the mainstream narrative. Be part of the conversation in the comments – your voice matters! Tags: UK politics, knife crime debate, Keir Starmer critique, CPS accountability, Southport knife crime, UK justice system, free speech debate, political commentary, UK news analysis, Starmer knife crime, UK law enforcement failures, free speech radio, UK current events, UK knife sales ban. Search Terms: "UK knife crime debate," "Keir Starmer accountability," "Southport tragedy analysis," "UK free speech politics," "CPS failures in UK," "UK justice system news," "knife sales ban debate."
Britain is a Paedo Paradise! Or so it seems with all the child sex scandals of the past few years. Keir Starmer needs to get off his sun lounger and address the Nation and order an independent investigation into who knew what and when about the child rapes in our Northern Towns. Top Cop Maggie Oliver who investigated previous child sex rape cases says that "Starmer is as guilty as anyone" for ignoring the abuse. Did top officials, clergy, and institutions turn a blind eye to protect their reputations? The truth is of course that many in power did exactly that. They ignored it for the sake of community cohesion which if true is an absolute outrage. The only way to clear the air is a full investigation and a swift one too. This is above party politics and is a stain on the whole Establishment. This video is a must-watch for anyone interested in UK politics, news, and free speech, as I confront uncomfortable truths and demand accountability. Don't miss this vital conversation about justice, transparency, and the protection of vulnerable children. Tags: UK politics, child abuse scandal, Britain news, archbishop scandal, institutional cover-up, free speech debate, UK news today, UK politics debate, grooming gangs, UK justice system, political commentary, Britain scandals, debate radio UK, child protection UK, systemic failure UK.
On today's episode of Uncommon Sense with Ginny Robinson, we're continuing our discussion about the controversial comments from Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy about importing foreign Indian cheap labor slaves to replace hardworking Americans. But this time, we're also shining a spotlight on Elon Musk's alarming behavior on X (formerly Twitter). While touting "free speech," Musk has been banning and demonetizing voices who dare to challenge him or his globalist agenda.Why are these so-called leaders abandoning America First principles? And what does it mean for the future of free speech when even self-proclaimed champions of the First Amendment silence dissent? Tune in for Part 2, where we unpack the truth behind the rhetoric and hold these powerful figures accountable.--https://noblegoldinvestments.com/invest/--Order Culture: https://www.paypal.com/ncp/payment/SLYWFXAB6479S
In this podcast, I tackle the question: Is 63 too old to be a YouTuber? As an advocate for free speech and an active participant in UK politics and news, I explore the concept of age and its relevance in the world of YouTube and content creation. With the rise of independent voices, especially in the realm of political commentary, I delve into how people of all ages, including those over 60, can make a real impact in today's media landscape. Whether you're passionate about UK politics, news analysis, or debating hot topics, age should not be a barrier to entering the YouTube space. Join me as I discuss the challenges and opportunities for older creators and why age diversity is crucial for free speech and open dialogue. If you're considering starting your own YouTube channel or you're interested in the intersection of UK politics, news, and free speech, this video is for you! Keywords & SEO Tags: UK politics, free speech, YouTube for beginners, 63 year old YouTuber, age and YouTube, UK news, debate radio, older YouTubers, free speech debate, UK political commentary, age diversity in media, news commentary, political debates UK, YouTube tips for seniors, UK radio free speech, political debate 2024, how to be a YouTuber after 60.
In anticipation of more pro-Palestinian protests, many college administrators rolled out new rules this fall that include getting pre-approval for posting flyers or hosting demonstrations. Brittany is joined by UC Irvine sociology professor David S. Meyer, who studies social movements and public policy, and Chronicle of Higher Education reporter Kate Hidalgo Bellows. They discuss the changes on campuses and how they tie into debates over free speech. Then, Brittany kicks off a new series exploring horror tropes. It's called The Trilogy of Terror. First up: Beelzebub. Brittany invites Travis Stevens and Klaus Yoder, historians and co-hosts of the podcast Seven Heads, Ten Horns: The History of the Devil, to talk about the symbology of the devil and how representations of him in horror movies have changed over time.Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoicesNPR Privacy Policy
TODAY ON THE ROBERT SCOTT BELL SHOW: Jonathan Emord, Big Pharma Power Play, Kamala's Economic Stumble, Rand Paul Budget Fix, Free Speech Debate, Vax-Induced Measles, Iron Deficiency Rising, GMO Crop Dilemma, Rumex Crispus, and MORE! https://robertscottbell.com/jonathan-emord-big-pharma-power-play-kamalas-economic-stumble-rand-paul-budget-fix-free-speech-debate-vax-induced-measles-iron-deficiency-rising-gmo-crop-dilemma-rumex-crispus-and-more/
French authorities detain Telegram's chief executive as part of a content moderation investigation, which has reignited the debate about free speech online. Plus, oil prices reached a two-week high as Libya says it is shutting down oil production, and Grenada triggers a first-of-its-kind ‘hurricane clause' to pause its debt repayments.Mentioned in this podcast:Oil hits 2-week high after Libya says it will shut down crude exports Grenada triggers ‘hurricane clause' to suspend bond paymentsTelegram says detained founder Pavel Durov has ‘nothing to hide' The FT News Briefing is produced by Niamh Rowe, Fiona Symon, Sonja Hutson, Kasia Broussalian and Marc Filippino. Additional help from Breen Turner, Sam Giovinco, Peter Barber, Michael Lello, David da Silva and Gavin Kallmann. Our engineer is Monica Lopez. Topher Forhecz is the FT's executive producer. The FT's global head of audio is Cheryl Brumley. The show's theme song is by Metaphor Music.Read a transcript of this episode on FT.com Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Telegram CEO Arrest Sparks Free Speech Debate Description: The founder of the Dubai-based app Telegram was arrested in France this weekend as part of an investigation into criminal activity on the encrypted messaging platform. It has broader implications for U.S. social apps as they gear up for an unprecedented election, the first with easily-accessible AI-generated content, and it's sparked a debate in tech circles over free speech.
After the government announced it may ditch the Conservatives' law to fight cancel culture on campuses, Ed Vaizey asks whether freedom of speech at University is under threat. He hears the cases for and against - including from former universities minister Robert Halfon, who was in government when the law was passed.Plus: Columnists Miranda Green and Carolyn Quinn discuss Keir Starmer's spat with X owner Elon Musk, the state of our prisons, and heckling Liz Truss at Fringe. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Wellington's Victoria University's controversial free speech debate is back on, with more speakers added. A panel discussion around the role of universities in free speech was meant to be held on Monday, but it was pushed to the end of May, after opposition from some students. Victoria University Vice Chancellor Nic Smith told Heather du Plessis-Allan they've added more people than anticipated. Smith said there's now two debates - “People with a viewpoint, and people who are more interested in the principles and regulations of what speech is.” LISTEN ABOVE. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Violent protests over the Israel-Hamas war have reached boiling point across university campuses in the United States.Pro-Palestinian protesters are demanding their universities cut ties with Israel or any companies that support its ongoing war in Gaza.On the Sky News Daily, Niall Paterson gets eyewitness analysis from US correspondent Mark Stone in George Washington University. They discuss the arrests, tear gas and counter-protest violence that is taking over universities. Plus, Lauren Lassabe Shepherd, a historian at the University of New Orleans and author of ‘Resistance from the Right: Conservatives and the Campus Wars', looks at how these protests compare to others the US has seen and analyses if the action could lead to change. Producer: Soila Apparicio and Emma Rae WoodhouseEditor: Philly Beaumont
This week on Politics Central, former Te Whatu Ora chairperson Rob Campbell criticises the organisation's decision to make savings at the country's hospitals, saying they are 'extraordinary' and signal poor management. Later, five academics and public figures were set to debate free speech at Victoria University in Wellington last Monday, but backlash within the university has seen the event postponed. Both Victoria University's Students' Association president and the university's Vice-Chancellor offer their takes. LISTEN ABOVESee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Join me and Chris to discuss the massive decision by the NHS to stop prescribing puberty blockers. We'll also delve into the free speech debate surrounding Palestine marches. Finally, Liam Fox MP stood up in PMQS to discuss how Down syndrome babies can be aborted up until birth. Follow me: https://twitter.com/RoryPodcaster Follow guest: https://www.instagram.com/ccousins0/ (00:00) - Introduction (02:00) - NHS England to stop prescribing puberty blockers (08:50) - BBC apologies for calling Reform UK 'far right' (17:00) - Heated free speech debate over Palestine marches (40:10) - “Absolutely horrendous” – Liam Fox MP speaks out against abortion up to birth for Down's syndrome Sources https://righttolife.org.uk/news/absolutely-horrendous-liam-fox-mp-speaks-out-against-abortion-up-to-birth-for-downs-syndrome https://news.sky.com/story/legislation-which-allows-abortion-of-babies-with-downs-syndrome-up-until-birth-upheld-by-court-of-appeal-12755187 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-68549091
This episode features writing from and about Gaza, and explores the imperative to write, between hope and hopelessness, at a time when words both seem to count enormously and to not be enough. Show NotesThis episode's cover art is by Chema Peral @chema_peralLetter from Gaza by Ghassan Kanafani was written in 1956.Mahmoud Darwish's Silence for the Sake of Gaza is part of his 1973 collection Journal of an Ordinary Grief. The poet Mosab Abu Toha has written about his arrest and his family's voyage out of GazaAtef Abu Seif's “Don't Look Left: A Diary of Genocide” is forthcoming from Comma PressFady Jouda's poetry collection [...] is forthcoming from Milkweed PressYou can read poetry in translation by Salim al-Naffar and Hiba Abu Nada, both killed under Israeli bombardment, at ArabLit. Other magazines that have been translating and sharing Palestinian poetry include Mizna, Fikra, LitHub, The Baffler, and Protean magazine.The book that was removed from the curriculum in Newark is the book Sonia Nimr co-wrote with Elizabeth Laird, A Little Piece of Ground. Ghassan Hages' essay “Gaza and the Coming Age of the Warrior” asks: “Is it ethical to write something ‘interesting' about a massacre as the massacre is unfolding?”Andrea Long Chu's essay “The Free Speech Debate is a Trap” calls for “fighting with words.”At the end of the episode, Basman Eldirawi reads his poem “Santa” in honor of Refaat Alareer, an educator and poet who was killed on December 7. #ReadforRefaat is part of a week of action being called for by the Publishers for Palestine collective. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
You may be surprised where some professors fall on campus free speech.
Where is the line between art, and advertising? The unresolved question is testing the direct democracy of a small New England town, where a painting of pastries has led to zoning dispute, a First Amendment lawsuit and a local vote.The town zoning board got involved, deciding that the pastry painting was not so much art as advertising, and so could not remain as is because of its size. Faced with modifying or removing the mural, or possibly dealing with fines and criminal charges, the bakery owner sued, saying the town is violating his freedom of speech rights.
Bakery owner Sean Young was thrilled when high school art students covered the big blank wall over his doorway last spring with a painting of the sun shining over a mountain range made of sprinkle-covered chocolate and strawberry donuts, a blueberry muffin, a cinnamon roll and other pastries. The display got rave reviews, and Young looked forward to collaborating with the school on more mural projects at his roadside bakery in Conway, New Hampshire. Then the town zoning board got involved, deciding that the pastry painting was not so much art as advertising, and so could not remain as is because of its size. Faced with modifying or removing the mural, or possibly dealing with fines and criminal charges, Young sued, saying the town is violating his freedom of speech rights. “They said it would be art elsewhere,” Young told The Associated Press in an interview. “It's just not art here.” “The town should not have the right to police art,” he said. “Those kids put their heart in it,” retiree Steve Downing said. He thinks the painting should stay. “Everyone has to comply with the ordinance,” said Charlie Birch, a former U.S. Forest Service worker. “And even though it was done by the students, which was well done, and I give them a lot of credit for it ... if you have the ordinance, ‘One for all,' that's where we are. You can't really make any exceptions, otherwise everybody else will want the exception.” Board member Luigi Bartolomeo said he thinks the pastry painting is art, not advertising. He read the definition out loud at the board's meeting in August, and said he agrees with a local attorney who called it “unconstitutionally vague.” “I think it's a very badly written piece of code here,” said Bartolomeo, who recently retired. But Board Chairperson John Colbath said the board has to work with the ordinance, which was approved by voters, and that there is a process to change that. This article was provided by The Associated Press.
The fourth episode of The Mike Gallagher Show's “No Interruptions Podcast” features Jeff Bermant who is the Founder/CEO of TUSK and Svante Myrick who is the President and CEO of “People For the American Way”. TUSK is a browser that encourages free speech and doesn't censor any conservative content. “People For the American Way" is an organization that has engaged cultural and community leaders and individual activists in campaigns promoting freedom of expression, civic engagement, fair courts. Do Mr. Bermant and Mr. Myrick believe that free speech is under assault in America? Does AOC's recent remarks gloating about Tucker Carlson's firing from Fox News seem problematic to these guests? Should all speech be protected? Is there an effort in America to censor more conservative content and speech? Should political activists be able to give speeches at college campuses without being violently shut down? You can check out the “People For the American Way” website which is www.www.pfaw.org. TUSK can be found at www.tuskbrowser.com. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
The fourth episode of The Mike Gallagher Show's “No Interruptions Podcast” features Jeff Bermant who is the Founder/CEO of TUSK and Svante Myrick who is the President and CEO of “People For the American Way”. TUSK is a browser that encourages free speech and doesn't censor any conservative content. “People For the American Way" is an organization that has engaged cultural and community leaders and individual activists in campaigns promoting freedom of expression, civic engagement, fair courts. Do Mr. Bermant and Mr. Myrick believe that free speech is under assault in America? Does AOC's recent remarks gloating about Tucker Carlson's firing from Fox News seem problematic to these guests? Should all speech be protected? Is there an effort in America to censor more conservative content and speech? Should political activists be able to give speeches at college campuses without being violently shut down? You can check out the “People For the American Way” website which is www.www.pfaw.org. TUSK can be found at www.tuskbrowser.com. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
I stand for freedom of speech and freedom of expression... and yes, I can respect you even if I don't agree with you. Also, just because I like one thing that someone has to say doesn't mean I automatically agree with EVERYTHING they say. Is this the end of free speech as we know it? Luca$.
SYNOPSIS:Blasphemy is any offense to religious sentiments. Globally, 79 countries have laws penalising blasphemy, ranging from secular states (like Canada, Finland, and Germany) to countries with a state religion (like Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Saudi Arabia). In secular democratic countries, while these laws protect the rights of minority religious communities and attempt to preserve social harmony, they are heavily criticised on the grounds of being unconstitutional and obtrusive to the right to freedom of speech. Critics also believe that these laws are counterproductive and instead push society to be more intolerant of alternative ideas and belief systems, making the very foundations of religious and moral beliefs more fragile and insecure. Religious reform and social change against draconian religious practices could only be possible because of staunch criticism. Poets, philosophers, authors and even scientists and discoverers who have been persecuted in the past on grounds of blasphemy enjoy popular credibility today for their contributions.Merits of religious criticism do not however disregard the potential risk to social harmony and possible validation of hostile behavior veiled under the garb of critique. What makes matters more complicated is the active rise in interreligious and inter-sect hatred and access to platforms to express opinions publicly that could potentially be provocative, aggressive, and hurtful to the sentiments of members of certain groups. The Indian constitution in its Article 19(2) provides for “reasonable restrictions” on the freedom of speech to precisely avoid and curb such intentioned violence. Article 295A punishes “deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings of any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs”. Though India does not have explicit Blasphemy Laws, critics believe that free speech and radical thought is repeatedly impeded in India by invoking these two provisions in the constitution, making it a covert Blasphemy Law. Incarceration of religious minorities and instances of mob violence, lynching and vigilante justice surface up repeatedly in the name of religious blasphemy.International organizations like the UNHRC and ICCPR have repeatedly questioned the degree to which blasphemy laws are compliant with fundamental human rights. How should then countries navigate between blasphemy, heresy, and hate speech? Is it justified to trade some part of individual freedom for an attempt at social peace? Does criminalisation of religious criticism protect the faith-holders or does it further create instability in the society? Should Blasphemy be punished? EXPLORE MORE:Find out about upcoming sessions and learn how you can join them live and become a part of the conversation - https://www.argumentativeindians.comDISCLAIMER:We invite thought leaders from across the ideological spectrum. The guests in our sessions express their independent views and opinions. Argumentative Indians does not profess to subscribe, agree or endorse the same or be in anyway responsible for the stance, words and comments of our guests.Explore More at - www.argumentativeindians.comDISCLAIMER:We invite thought leaders from across the ideological spectrum. The guests in our sessions express their independent views and opinions. Argumentative Indians does not profess to subscribe, agree or endorse the same or be in anyway responsible for the stance, words and comments of our guests.
There's a lot of talk about social media, free speech, and censorship, but...what the hell are we actually talking about? This issue is actually a couple of issues. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
With Elon Musk now poised to become the sole owner of Twitter, he's promising to take a much more hands off approach to content moderation. It's a promise that has cheered many critics of Twitter who have long accused the social media giant of unfair censorship and political bias, but it's also alarmed the experts and advocates who have spent the last several years pushing the site to take a more active role in policing misinformation, abuse and hate speech. On this edition of KCBS In Depth we wade into that debate and consider what it takes to safeguard free speech in the digital age. Guests: Imran Ahmed, CEO, Center for Countering Digital Hate David Greene, civil liberties director, Electronic Frontier Foundation David Rand, professor of management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Host: Keith Menconi
Welcome back. In this week's episode, we start off the show by taking a look at the ongoing chaos in Haiti. The small island nation is in the midst of violent turmoil, and we get a look inside due to excellent reporting by Vice. Next, we discuss the tragic death of Elijah McClain at the hands of police. After that, we get into a lengthy debate on free speech. The New York Times has had a couple of articles this past week detailing how the membership of the ACLU is torn on the issue, and a bill was introduced in congress to regulate the major tech companies. We discuss where the lines should be drawn for acceptable speech, and what policies we would like to see. We also discuss China's rise as a dominant world superpower, and discuss some features of the country such as their economic model. In addition, we talk about the Uighur Muslim atrocities in China. I have linked the BBC articles below for you to read through, they are excellent and disturbing. Thanks for watching the show. Please subscribe to us on YouTube, follow us on Twitch, and please consider supporting us Patreon so that we can continue to improve and expand the show. Have an excellent rest of your week. Most recent BBC article on forced labor in the Uighur region of China. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-57419071 February 2nd piece by BBC detailing the horrors experienced by the female Uighur. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-55794071 Patreon - https://www.patreon.com/explodingstar/posts Check out our website - https://explodingstarpodcast.wordpress.com/
Early in 2019, there was a new executive order signed requiring colleges and universities that receive federal funds to extend free-speech protections to men and women on campus. Many people criticized this move as simply unnecessary. While others were relieved that an executive order was made to ensure certain voices were not censored or disinvited […]
In this episode of the Judgment call Podcast Jim Rutt and I talk about: 00:02:10 A look into the distinguished life and career experience of Jim00:14:04 What is GameB all about? What are the main tenets of this new operating system for society? 00:21:01 Is GameB setting a limit of the growth of society? Should population size be limited? Why the ‘West’ need to reduce resource consumption by 80%.00:29:03 How Jim envisions citizens to be enticed by GameB?00:35:10 Why do we see the decline in productivity growth? Is that a sign of the GameA coming to an end?00:43:59 Jim’s thoughts on the singularity.00:51:30 What role does and did religion play in human and economic development? 01:07:57 What happened to the voice of the Silicon Valley CEOs in the Free Speech Debate? Why wokeism won’t overcome the forces of competition.01:21:01 Why the influence of the Frankfurt school has grown so visibly in the last 10-20 years? Why is the draw to socialism to strong lately?01:29:21 Is an America with ONE Billion people a good idea?01:33:13 ‘America is the best thing that ever happened to the human race’. Who said it?01:38:01 Are we headed for a single global government?and much more! You may also this episode on Youtube – #51 Jim Rutt (Is GameB the new operating system for society?). Jim Rutt is the former CEO of Network Solutions. The New York Times once referred to him as “the Internet’s bad boy” due to his reputation for creative mischief. He sold Network Solutions at the peak of the Dot Com boom and then went into scientific research. Jim has been affiliated with the Santa Fe Institute since 2002, serving as Chairman from 2009 thru 2012. Tune into The Jim Rutt Show or follow Jim on Twitter and Medium.
https://www.justnist.com/https://amzn.to/3lkg3YEPATREON: https://www.patreon.com/minddogtvSponsors:https://podmatch.com/signup/minddogtvhttps://mybookie.com Promo Code minddoghttps://record.webpartners.co/_6_DFqqtZcLQWqcfzuvZcQGNd7ZgqdRLk/1https://apply.fundwise.com/minddoghttps://myvitalc.com/minddog. promo code minddogtvhttps://skillbuilder.academy/dashboard?view_sequence=1601856764231x540742189759856640&promoCode=MINDDOG100OFFhttps://shareasale.com/r.cfm?b=599839&u=1659788&m=52971&urllink=&afftrack=https://enticeme.com/#minddog
After the January 6th insurrection at the U.S. Capitol, several social-media companies banned a host of far-right figures, as well as President Trump. The move provoked an outcry among conservatives, many of whom accused those companies of violating users’ First Amendment rights. The country’s ever-present disagreements over what, exactly, constitutes free speech have taken on new urgency in this era of little-regulated social media, disinformation, exhortations to violence, and so-called cancel culture. Andrew Marantz joins Dorothy Wickenden to discuss the future of free speech in our splintered nation.
President Trump was recently banned from most social media platforms last week. This likely will affect his ability to reach his audience. President Trump has about a week to go until his term in office expires. He has been subject to much controversy over the past few weeks due to the January 6th Storming of the U.S. Capitol. President Trump, with bans on some platforms, will need to reach his audience through other forms of media. CORRECTION: President Trump would not be disqualified from holding office again if he is convicted by the Senate. Congress would have to hold a separate vote on the matter. DISCLAIMER: I am not a lawyer nor do I claim to have expertise of the practice of law. However, I have studied constitutional law at the undergraduate level. --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/stellar-spark/support
The beheading of a schoolteacher who had shown his class cartoons of the prophet Muhammad during a lesson on free speech has rekindled a debate in France about secularism and the state’s role in regulating free expression
The murder of a schoolteacher who had shown his class cartoons of the prophet Muhammad during a lesson on free speech has rekindled a debate in France over secularism and the state’s role in regulating free expression. Help support our independent journalism at theguardian.com/infocus
On this weeks episode I dive into a crazy story of how an armed thief robbed multiple GameStop stores for over $130,000 worth of merchandise along with another debate about free speech while gaming online. Now on Spotify! https://open.spotify.com/show/5gYAuijvDxtZM54jyNIivA Subscribe on iTunes! https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/game-talk-radio/id1231907355?mt=2 Follow me on Twitter! @gametradegregg Join us on Discord: https://discord.gg/R8kCeES Join us on Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/groups/thedroprate Like, follow, subscribe. http://www.twitter.com/thedroprate http://www.tumblr.com/thedroprate http://www.facebook.com/thedroprate http://www.instagram.com/thedroprate Music from https://filmmusic.io: "District Four" by Kevin MacLeod (https://incompetech.com) Licence: CC BY (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) Music from https://filmmusic.io: "Spellbound" by Kevin MacLeod (https://incompetech.com) Licence: CC BY (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Philosophy: 'Should there be limits on free speech?' For the first time since its inception, 'Lincoln Leads' explores Philosophy. Our panellists, Dr Alexander Prescott-Couch (Tutorial Fellow in Philosophy), Ian Brownhill (2003, Barrister at No 5 Chambers), and Benjamin Musachio (2017, MPhil in International Development) tackle the question of whether there should be limits on free speech. In this lecture, we learn about the conceptual significance of free speech in the canon of western philosophy, the policing of speech by the State and the Self, and the debates surrounding no-platforming on campus. 'Lincoln Leads' is a seminar series designed to foster conversation between Lincoln's common rooms and alumni, as well as to showcase the exceptional research taking place in the College.
I started this week with the crazy story of the guy who stole a plane from Sea-Tac airport and killed himself with it. Then I get into the crazy story about the nutty Muslim compound in New Mexico supposedly training school shooters, and the free speech debate with Alex Jones. Of course I had a good child sex sting story, the masturbating bicyclist got shot by a grandmother, and a dude ignored his symptoms until his penis fell off. Music: Static-X/"Push It"
Two online provocateurs from Canada sparked debate about free speech and hate speech here without ever setting foot in the country or saying anything meaningful about New Zealand.
Two online provocateurs from Canada sparked debate about free speech and hate speech here without ever setting foot in the country or saying anything meaningful about New Zealand.
Is this new ban a step forward for civilised debate or a barrier to free speech?
On this drive I share some notes from my previous interview episode with Rafa Conde, and speak about law enforcement and the many common misconceptions that exist. I talk about the need for a strong warrior class in society that understands the true warrior ethos and the princicple of justice. I then discuss the current free speech debate, open border polices, criminality, and victim culture. Hope it helps! If you enjoy this episode please commnet/like and share. Cheers! DW
Today, we hear from Martha Jones, the Society of Black Almuni Professor of History at Johns Hopkins University, and formerly a professor at the University of Michigan. Jones brings some of her experience especially at that latter institution to bear on our topic today: politics on college campuses. We’re lucky she does. There’s been a lot of talk about campus politics, on both the left and right. On the right, we often hear about so-called liberal snowflakes who can’t bear to hear arguments that they don’t agree with, so they attempt to banish conservative speakers from their campuses and threaten to undermine the principle, the right, of freedom of expression. And on the center-left, we hear from some critics that identity politics is the problem: that students are so obsessed with the dynamics of personal identity and are thus incapable of or uninterested in the hard work of coalition building, sustained organizing, especially on the left. This latter position was stated pretty succinctly by the liberal critic Mark Lilla recently in the Chronicle of Higher Education, in an article titled “How Colleges Are Strangling Liberalism.” Martha Jones and I reference that piece because it does sum up the critique from the center-left quite well, and it relates to Lilla’s widely discussed and debated piece in the New York Times, “The End of Identity Liberalism.” We also address the future of free expression on campus: where Jones thinks that debate is headed, and how, in the wake of Charlottesville, it’s entered the mainstream.
Giles Fraser, commentator and Anglican priest, talks with Free Speech Debate about the relationship between free speech and religion, and the Charlie Hebdo attacks in Paris.
In this interview for Free Speech Debate, renowned Philosophy Professor Rae Langton speaks about the value of philosophy for our understanding of free speech and discusses aspects of her work on pornography and the silencing of women.
Former British MI5 agent Annie Machon revealed, together with David Shayler, alleged criminal behaviour within the agency. In an interview with Free Speech Debate, she speaks about the need for official channels through which whistleblowers can voice their concerns.
This week gets a little heated when comedian, Harrison Greenbaum calls out Steven's bravery for an unflattering story. Also, Stalker Jim checks in and Evan Delshaw stops by! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Dr Dorian Singh and Sebastian Huempfer discuss Free Speech Debate, a project founded on the belief that making content freely available for non-commercial purposes is an integral part of promoting a global debate on free expression. Dr Dorian Singh is Research manager for the Dahrendorf Programme and Sebastian Huempfer is Associate Editor for Free Speech Debate.
The John Layfield and Michael Cole Show Archives - WebTalkRadio.net
I don’t think we have total free speech, for instance you can’t yell ‘fire’ in a crowd or ‘I have a bomb’ in an airport without getting in trouble, so there is a limit and the question is where that limit is. VP Ryan has a budget which is something Obama and Romney don’t, of […] The post The John Layfield Show – VP Ryan and history of VP picks that didn’t work out. Free speech debate on Military Funeral Protests appeared first on WebTalkRadio.net.
This month's podcast focuses on the sometimes fine line between artistic expression and free speech. It features interviews with filmmaker Nick Sturdee on the Russian art collective Voina, and stand-up comedian Tom Greeves on the UK's parody laws. The podcast also contains snippets of some of the best content on the Free Speech Debate website including a discussion on Islam with Irshad Manji, author of Allah, Liberty and Love, as well as with Rebecca MacKinnon, author of Consent of the Networked, on the need for netizens to take back control of the internet.
Free Speech Debate's monthly podcast features a round-up of interviews on the site including Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales, former Formula One boss Max Mosley and Chinese scholar Yan Xuetong. Hosts Brian Pellot and Katie Engelhart speak to Viktor Mayer-Schönberger about his new book Delete: The Virtue of Forgetting in the Digital Age and discuss Aids denialism with FSD team member Casey Selwyn.
In this short introductory video, the director of Free Speech Debate, talks about the objectives of this Oxford University research project.
Professor Timothy Garton Ash (Director of Free Speech Debate) interviews Jimmy Wales (Founder of Wikipedia) on the topic of global free speech and the internet. This was the launch event of Free Speech Debate and took place in Oxford on 19 Jan 2012.
In this short introductory video, the director of Free Speech Debate, talks about the objectives of this Oxford University research project.
Professor Timothy Garton Ash (Director of Free Speech Debate) interviews Jimmy Wales (Founder of Wikipedia) on the topic of global free speech and the internet. This was the launch event of Free Speech Debate and took place in Oxford on 19 Jan 2012.