Podcasts about darrell west

Alongside a surge in data center construction, a growing protest movement has emerged in the US, with locals voicing concerns over electricity and water usage. Protests have put around 12 gigawatts of data center capacity at risk, analyst John Murray from S&P Global Energy tells the Energy Evolution podcast. To address concerns, tech firms need to improve transparency and deliver clear local benefits, said Darrell West, senior fellow in the Center for Technology Innovation within the Governance Studies program at think tank Brookings. To answer questions on sustainability and power consumption, host Camilla Naschert is joined by Aaron Tinjum of trade association Data Center Coalition. The news clip featured in this episode is from ABC News, July 19, 2026. 

Alongside a surge in data center construction, a growing protest movement has emerged in the US, with locals voicing concerns over electricity and water usage. Protests have put around 12 gigawatts of data center capacity at risk, analyst John Murray from S&P Global Energy tells the Energy Evolution podcast. To address concerns, tech firms need to improve transparency and deliver clear local benefits, said Darrell West, senior fellow in the Center for Technology Innovation within the Governance Studies program at think tank Brookings. To answer questions on sustainability and power consumption, host Camilla Naschert is joined by Aaron Tinjum of trade association Data Center Coalition. The news clip featured in this episode is from ABC News, July 19, 2026. 

The space economy is accelerating at a rapid pace with advances in space tourism, mining, exploration, communications, and defense, but to expand upon these activities, the U.S. needs to invest in ground stations and space infrastructure to help commercial firms take advantage of the growing opportunities. In this episode, co-host Darrell West is joined by Bridgit Mendler of Northwood Space and Mariel Borowitz of the Georgia Institute of Technology to discuss the importance of these investments and how the government can best support new advancements. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Technological advances are reshaping manufacturing processes, and robotics, in particular, are important to improve efficiency and advance military preparedness. Yet there are questions about what robotics can do and what governments and businesses should be doing to accelerate these technologies. In this episode, co-host Darrell West is joined by Suzy Teele of the ARM Institute to discuss these questions and her work on advancing innovations. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Underpinning the growing use of AI is the need for state-of-the-art data centers. These data centers host a large number of file servers and networking equipment that can store, process, and analyze text, images, code, and other information sources.  While data centers have been around throughout the computer, internet and cloud eras none so big and controversial as these.  One proposed in the state of Utah is larger than Manhattan.  Really!  The objection to these data centers has formed in red and blue states.  The concerns relate to the impact on water supplies needed to cool them, particularly in the Southwest, the spikes in electricity costs, the noise emitted and the giveaways that communities and states have bestowed upon them even if the economic impact on the local workforce is not very impactful.  Large tech companies are feeling the backlash and trying to develop community impact packages that deliver more to the sites where they are being built.  More than 4,000 are already in operation and 3,000 more are being planned or under construction.  To discuss this issue of growing importance is Darrell West, of Brookings, co-author of the book, “Turning Point: Policymaking in the Era of Artificial Intelligence.”

The menace is everywhere and you can hardly spot it, stop it or punish it. Synopsis: Every third Friday of the month, The Straits Times gets its US Bureau Chief to analyse the hottest political and trending talking points. Singapore recently ordered social media platforms to block access to 14 online posts that target the Indian community, such as by suggesting that Singapore was being overrun by Indians. Investigations showed that the content most likely originated from a platform based in China and was subsequently carried on other platforms and websites, the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) said in a statement on June 6. In this episode, US Bureau Chief Bhagyashree Garekar chats with a US-based expert who has studied disinformation, defined as organised and systematic efforts to manipulate people and to transmit false narratives. Darrell West of the Brookings Institution has carried out extensive research on how technologies such as generative AI can be used to create serious threats to personal safety, race relations and governance. He is a senior fellow at the Center for Technology Innovation within the Governance Studies programme. He is the co-author of Lies That Kill: A Citizen’s Guide to Disinformation. It explains how falsehoods spread and what citizens, institutions, and policymakers can do to resist them. His bottom line? Only you can protect yourself from disinformation. Highlights (click/tap above): 1:03 Disinformation is more than misinformation 4:12 Where is all the disinformation coming from? 5:08 How Iran beat the US in information war 8:10 Does the US use disinformation as well? 10:12 Who’s at the top of the disinfo game? 13:30 Do disinfo producers ever pay a price? 19:04 Disinformation will get worse ahead of US elections 20:41 Only you can protect you 24:32 Are Gen Z better at detecting fakes? More articles on: Singapore blocks online posts targeting Indian community; content likely from China-based platform: https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/politics/spore-blocks-online-posts-targeting-indian-community-content-likely-from-china-based-platform Behind the anti-Indian posts: How social media pages mix divisive narratives with clickbait: https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/behind-the-anti-indian-posts-how-social-media-pages-mix-divisive-narratives-with-clickbait Read Bhagyashree Garekar’s articles: https://str.sg/whNo Bhagyashree Garekar’s LinkedIn: https://str.sg/gD6E Sign up for ST’s weekly Asian Insider newsletter: https://str.sg/sfpz Host: Bhagyashree Garekar (bhagya@sph.com.sg) Produced and edited by: Fa’izah Sani Executive producer: Ernest Luis Follow Asian Insider Podcast on Fridays here: Channel: https://str.sg/JWa7 Apple Podcasts: https://str.sg/JWa8 Spotify: https://str.sg/JWaX Feedback to: podcast@sph.com.sg --- Follow more ST podcast channels: All-in-one ST Podcasts channel: https://str.sg/wvz7 Get more updates: http://str.sg/stpodcasts The Usual Place Podcast YouTube: https://str.sg/theusualplacepodcast --- Get The Straits Times app, which has a dedicated podcast player section: The App Store: https://str.sg/icyB Google Play: https://str.sg/icyX --- #STAsianInsiderSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The menace is everywhere and you can hardly spot it, stop it or punish it. Synopsis: Every third Friday of the month, The Straits Times gets its US Bureau Chief to analyse the hottest political and trending talking points. Singapore recently ordered social media platforms to block access to 14 online posts that target the Indian community, such as by suggesting that Singapore was being overrun by Indians. Investigations showed that the content most likely originated from a platform based in China and was subsequently carried on other platforms and websites, the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) said in a statement on June 6. In this episode, US Bureau Chief Bhagyashree Garekar chats with a US-based expert who has studied disinformation, defined as organised and systematic efforts to manipulate people and to transmit false narratives. Darrell West of the Brookings Institution has carried out extensive research on how technologies such as generative AI can be used to create serious threats to personal safety, race relations and governance. He is a senior fellow at the Center for Technology Innovation within the Governance Studies programme. He is the co-author of Lies That Kill: A Citizen’s Guide to Disinformation. It explains how falsehoods spread and what citizens, institutions, and policymakers can do to resist them. His bottom line? Only you can protect yourself from disinformation. Highlights (click/tap above): 1:03 Disinformation is more than misinformation 4:12 Where is all the disinformation coming from? 5:08 How Iran beat the US in information war 8:10 Does the US use disinformation as well? 10:12 Who’s at the top of the disinfo game? 13:30 Do disinfo producers ever pay a price? 19:04 Disinformation will get worse ahead of US elections 20:41 Only you can protect you 24:32 Are Gen Z better at detecting fakes? More articles on: Singapore blocks online posts targeting Indian community; content likely from China-based platform: https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/politics/spore-blocks-online-posts-targeting-indian-community-content-likely-from-china-based-platform Behind the anti-Indian posts: How social media pages mix divisive narratives with clickbait: https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/behind-the-anti-indian-posts-how-social-media-pages-mix-divisive-narratives-with-clickbait Read Bhagyashree Garekar’s articles: https://str.sg/whNo Bhagyashree Garekar’s LinkedIn: https://str.sg/gD6E Sign up for ST’s weekly Asian Insider newsletter: https://str.sg/sfpz Host: Bhagyashree Garekar (bhagya@sph.com.sg) Produced and edited by: Fa’izah Sani Executive producer: Ernest Luis Follow Asian Insider Podcast on Fridays here: Channel: https://str.sg/JWa7 Apple Podcasts: https://str.sg/JWa8 Spotify: https://str.sg/JWaX Feedback to: podcast@sph.com.sg --- Follow more ST podcast channels: All-in-one ST Podcasts channel: https://str.sg/wvz7 Get more updates: http://str.sg/stpodcasts The Usual Place Podcast YouTube: https://str.sg/theusualplacepodcast --- Get The Straits Times app, which has a dedicated podcast player section: The App Store: https://str.sg/icyB Google Play: https://str.sg/icyX --- #STAsianInsiderSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Technology is accelerating rapidly, raising concerns about how artificial intelligence and other tools are altering communications, decisionmaking, and governance. Yet, these important conversations often overlook how technology can strengthen democratic institutions by expanding participation and improving service delivery. In this episode, co-host Darrell West is joined by Beth Simone Noveck to discuss these possibilities explored in her new book, “Reboot: AI and the Race to Save Democracy.” Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Cars and trucks are being digitally connected through online sensors, safety devices, and entertainment systems, leading some observers to call vehicles today "smart phones on wheels." These features offer tremendous convenience for drivers and passengers, though the ubiquitous connections raise questions about privacy, security, legal liability, and consumer protection. In this episode, Darrell West is joined by Ian Barlow to discuss connected vehicles and opportunities to protect consumers. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The U.S. will soon launch a crewed ship to circle the moon and test equipment for takeoff and reentry, raising interesting questions about space exploration and the role of private companies. In this episode, co-host Darrell West is joined by Casey Dreier of the Planetary Society to discuss this mission and the China-U.S. rivalry over space. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

From advances in generative AI to crackdowns on kids' use of social media, various discussions around technology are likely to continue or expand in 2026. This includes questions about how states and the federal government might regulate these technologies and what areas will be at the forefront of legislation. In this episode, co-hosts Darrell West and Nicol Turner Lee share their thoughts on what's ahead for tech in 2026. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Data centers are crucial for AI, but with thousands of file servers, they also require large amounts of energy and water. As more facilities are built, it's important to understand this usage and how it might affect surrounding communities. In this episode, co-host Darrell West is joined by Joseph Kane to discuss how data centers use water and the policy questions surrounding these resources. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

AI is the transformative technology of our time, yet undergirding the growing use of AI is the need for state-of-the-art data centers that host the file servers and networking equipment that store, process, and analyze information. In this episode, Nicol Turner Lee and Darrell West discuss what data centers are, their number and distribution, barriers to development, and ways to overcome those challenges. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Digital technologies and data analytics are increasingly being used to help athletes and coaches better monitor their performance and find areas for improvement. In this episode, Darrell West is joined by NFL player Kelvin Beachum and professor Arthur Daemmrich about how these developments could transform sports and the experience of fans. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

As driverless cars hit the roads in more cities, some researchers are trying to improve their efficiency and navigational systems by creating social networks of autonomous vehicles. In this episode, Darrell West speaks with Yong Liu about this research project and how it might improve the reliability of these systems while protecting passengers' privacy. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Amid excitement around advancements in space exploration, there are unresolved issues concerning the role of private firms. Some companies receive billions of dollars in federal money and private sector leaders have been appointed to top positions at agencies like NASA. In this episode, co-host Darrell West speaks with investigative journalist Eric Lipton of the New York Times about the implications of these partnerships and what it means for space policy. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

There is talk of “unleashing AI” and removing burdensome regulations on its use within the new Trump administration. Staff members associated with the Department of Government Efficiency are using AI to analyze agency operations, gaining extraordinary access to government data. In this episode, co-host Darrell West speaks with Professor Allison Stanger on how DOGE is using AI in government and the risks presented by its access to government information. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a sweeping initiative crafted by the Heritage Foundation, it becomes clear that this is more than just a policy blueprint – it's a vision for a fundamentally transformed American government. Led by former Trump administration officials Paul Dans and Spencer Chretien, this project is designed to guide the next Republican president in implementing a conservative agenda that touches nearly every aspect of federal governance.At its core, Project 2025 is built on four pillars: a comprehensive policy guide, a database of conservative personnel, training programs for these individuals, and a detailed playbook for the first 180 days of the new administration. This structure is meant to ensure that conservatives are not just winning elections, but also have the right people and plans in place to execute their vision from day one[4].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its ambitious plan to reshape the federal bureaucracy. The project advocates for significant cuts to the federal workforce and the elimination of several key agencies, including the Department of Education and the Department of Homeland Security. The Department of Education, for instance, would be abolished, with its programs either transferred or terminated. This move is part of a broader strategy to reduce the federal government's role in education, elevating school choice and parental rights instead. Federal funds for low-income students would be converted into school vouchers, even for those attending private or religious schools, and programs like Head Start would be eliminated[1].The project also targets the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), proposing to place these agencies under direct presidential control. This aligns with the unitary executive theory, which centralizes greater control over the government in the White House. According to Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts, "The notion of independent federal agencies or federal employees who don't answer to the president violates the very foundation of our democratic republic"[1].In the realm of healthcare, Project 2025 suggests drastic reforms. It proposes to cut funding for Medicaid, imposing stricter work requirements and limits on lifetime benefits. The Department of Health and Human Services would be reformed to promote traditional nuclear families, and Medicare would be prohibited from negotiating drug prices. Additionally, federal healthcare providers would be barred from offering gender-affirming care to transgender individuals, and insurance coverage for emergency contraception would be eliminated[1].The project's stance on environmental and climate change policies is equally contentious. It recommends reducing environmental regulations to favor fossil fuels and preventing the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from using certain climate change impact projections. Mandy Gunasekara, former chief of staff at the EPA during the Trump administration, authored the EPA chapter, arguing that the agency's science activities should require clear congressional authorization[5].Project 2025 also delves into law enforcement, proposing a DOJ that would combat what it terms "affirmative discrimination" or "anti-white racism." The Civil Rights Division would prosecute state and local governments, institutions of higher education, and private employers with diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) or affirmative action programs. This approach is based on the argument that such programs violate federal law and come at the expense of other Americans[1].The project's impact on science and research is significant as well. It suggests prioritizing basic research while rolling back climate science initiatives. Academic and technology exchanges with countries like China would be restricted, and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) would be prohibited from funding research involving embryonic stem cells. The NIH would also be made less independent, with easier procedures for firing employees and removing DEI programs[5].Recent developments indicate that these proposals are not mere theoretical exercises. Donald Trump's early executive actions since his return to office have mirrored or partially mirrored several of Project 2025's proposals. For example, Trump revived the Schedule F executive order, which allows certain federal employees to be reclassified as political appointees, making them easier to remove. This move aligns with Project 2025's goal of reducing the independence of the federal workforce and empowering the executive branch[2].Critics argue that these actions and proposals are designed to benefit specific industries or donors, rather than the broader public. Darrell West notes that the inconsistencies in the plan may be intended for fundraising purposes, targeting industries that would benefit from the proposed changes[1].As Project 2025 continues to shape the conservative agenda, its implications for American governance are profound. The centralization of power in the White House, the dismantling of key federal agencies, and the significant cuts to social and environmental programs all point to a future where the federal government's role is dramatically reduced. Whether this vision aligns with the broader interests of the American people remains a subject of intense debate.Looking ahead, the next milestones for Project 2025 will be closely watched. As the 2025 presidential transition approaches, the project's coalition of over 100 conservative groups will continue to grow and influence policy discussions. The training programs and personnel database will be crucial in preparing conservatives for key roles in the new administration. The playbook for the first 180 days will serve as a roadmap for swift and decisive action, aiming to bring about the sweeping changes envisioned by Project 2025.In the end, Project 2025 represents a clear and ambitious vision for conservative governance, one that promises to reshape the very fabric of American government. As this project unfolds, it will be essential to monitor its progress and assess its impact on the nation, ensuring that the changes it brings align with the democratic principles and the diverse needs of the American people.

As I delved into the intricacies of Project 2025, a initiative spearheaded by the conservative think tank, the Heritage Foundation, I found myself navigating a complex web of policy proposals, personnel plans, and training programs all aimed at reshaping the American government under a future Republican administration.Project 2025 is more than just a policy blueprint; it is a comprehensive strategy designed to ensure a seamless transition and the swift implementation of conservative policies from the very first day of a new presidency. The project is built on four pillars: a detailed policy guide, a database of potential personnel, a training program for these candidates, and a playbook outlining actions to be taken within the first 180 days in office[1][5].At the heart of Project 2025 lies a sweeping overhaul of the federal government. The initiative envisions dramatic changes to various federal agencies, some of which are nothing short of revolutionary. For instance, the project proposes abolishing the Department of Education, transferring its programs to the Department of Health and Human Services, and significantly curtailing federal involvement in education. This move is part of a broader effort to elevate school choice and parental rights, with the federal government reduced to a mere statistics-keeping role in education[2].The Department of Homeland Security is another target, with Project 2025 advocating for its dismantling. This would be accompanied by a hardline stance on immigration, including mass deportations, increased border enforcement, and the construction of a border wall. The project also suggests deploying the military for domestic law enforcement, a move that has raised significant concerns about the militarization of American society[2].Healthcare is another area where Project 2025 seeks profound changes. The initiative recommends reforms to the Department of Health and Human Services to promote traditional nuclear family structures and to prohibit Medicare from negotiating drug prices. It also proposes cutting funding for Medicaid, imposing stricter work requirements for beneficiaries, and eliminating federal oversight of state Medicaid programs. Additionally, the project aims to deny gender-affirming care to transgender individuals and eliminate insurance coverage for emergency contraception[2].The environment and climate change are also in the crosshairs. Project 2025 advises a future Republican president to "eradicate climate change references from absolutely everywhere" in government policies, effectively nullifying efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This includes repealing regulations that curb emissions, downsizing the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and abolishing the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)[2].These proposals are not just isolated suggestions but part of a broader vision to centralize power in the White House. Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts argues, "The notion of independent federal agencies or federal employees who don't answer to the president violates the very foundation of our democratic republic." This aligns with the unitary executive theory, which seeks to expand presidential control over the government, a concept that has been supported by conservative justices and think tanks since the Reagan era[2].The project's approach to law enforcement is equally contentious. It calls for a thorough reform of the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), making them more accountable to the president. The DOJ would be tasked with combating "affirmative discrimination" or "anti-white racism," and would prosecute state and local governments, institutions of higher education, and private employers with diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs[2].Despite the ambitious scope of these proposals, former President Donald Trump has publicly distanced himself from Project 2025. In a social media post, Trump stated, "I know nothing about Project 2025. I have no idea who is behind it. I disagree with some of the things they're saying and some of the things they're saying are absolutely ridiculous and abysmal." However, the involvement of high-ranking officials from his administration, such as Paul Dans and Spencer Chretien, suggests a closer connection than Trump admits[1].Critics argue that Project 2025's proposals are not just policy recommendations but a blueprint for a radical transformation of American governance. Darrell West, an expert in governance, notes that the inconsistencies in the plan may be designed to appeal to specific donors or industries, highlighting the potential for special interests to influence policy[2].As the 2024 presidential election approaches, Project 2025 remains a focal point of debate. Its proponents see it as a necessary corrective to what they perceive as the overreach of the Biden administration, while critics view it as a dangerous erosion of democratic norms and civil rights protections.Looking ahead, the success of Project 2025 will depend on several key factors. The ability of its proponents to assemble a cohesive team of conservative administrators, the effectiveness of their training programs, and the political will to implement such sweeping changes will all be crucial. As Paul Dans, the outgoing director of Project 2025, emphasized, "If we are going to rescue the country from the grip of the radical Left, we need both a governing agenda and the right people in place, ready to carry this agenda out on Day One of the next conservative Administration"[5].As the nation prepares for the potential implementation of these policies, one thing is clear: Project 2025 represents a seismic shift in the way America could be governed. Whether this vision aligns with the values and interests of the broader American public remains to be seen, but its impact, if realized, would undoubtedly be profound.

As I delved into the intricacies of Project 2025, a sweeping initiative crafted by the Heritage Foundation, I couldn't help but feel a sense of both fascination and trepidation. This project, unveiled in April 2023, is more than just a policy blueprint; it's a vision for a fundamentally transformed American government, one that aligns closely with the ideological leanings of its conservative architects.At its core, Project 2025 is a four-pillar initiative: a detailed policy guide, a database of potential personnel, a training program for these candidates, and a playbook for the first 180 days of a new administration. Led by former Trump administration officials Paul Dans and Spencer Chretien, this project has drawn significant attention for its ambitious and often controversial proposals.One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its plan to overhaul the federal government's structure and function. The project envisions a drastic reduction in the role of several key agencies. For instance, it proposes dismantling the Department of Homeland Security and abolishing the Department of Education, transferring its programs to the Department of Health and Human Services or terminating them altogether[1][3][4].The Department of Education, in particular, is a focal point. Project 2025 advocates for a significant curtailment of federal involvement in education, promoting school choice and parental rights instead. This would involve eliminating federal programs and standards, allowing states to opt out, and transferring responsibilities such as those under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) to other departments. The federal government's role would be reduced to mere statistics-keeping, with civil rights enforcement in schools being significantly curtailed[1].In the realm of healthcare, Project 2025 suggests profound changes. It recommends reforms to the Department of Health and Human Services to promote traditional nuclear family structures and opposes gender-affirming care for transgender individuals. The project also seeks to limit Medicare's ability to negotiate drug prices, promote private insurance plans through Medicare Advantage, and eliminate insurance coverage for emergency contraception like the morning-after pill Ella[1].The project's stance on law enforcement is equally transformative. It calls for a thorough reform of the Department of Justice (DOJ), criticizing it for being "a bloated bureaucracy" with a "radical liberal agenda." The DOJ would be required to combat what the project terms "affirmative discrimination" or "anti-white racism," and it would be tasked with prosecuting state and local governments, institutions of higher education, and private employers with diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs. The FBI would be made directly accountable to the president, and consent decrees between the DOJ and local police departments would be curtailed[1].Environmental and climate policies are also in the crosshairs. Project 2025 proposes reducing environmental and climate change regulations to favor fossil fuels, preventing the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from using certain climate change impact projections, and requiring congressional authorization for all EPA science activities. The project argues that many current programs "act as subsidies to the private sector for government-favored resources," and it suggests eliminating offices focused on energy technology development and climate change[1][4].The project's vision for the executive branch is one of centralized control, aligning with the unitary executive theory. This would place all federal agencies under direct presidential control, eliminating their independence. As Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts argues, "The notion of independent federal agencies or federal employees who don't answer to the president violates the very foundation of our democratic republic."[1]Personnel changes are another critical component. Project 2025 recommends reclassifying tens of thousands of federal civil service workers as political appointees, allowing for their replacement with individuals loyal to a conservative agenda. This includes using a questionnaire to screen potential recruits for their adherence to the project's ideology, a tactic reminiscent of Trump's efforts to ensure loyalty during his presidency[1][3].The implications of these proposals are far-reaching and have sparked significant debate. Critics argue that such changes would undermine the integrity of federal agencies, erode civil rights protections, and harm vulnerable populations. Darrell West, for example, points out the inconsistencies in the plan, suggesting they are designed to appeal to specific industries or donors who would benefit from these changes[1].Despite the controversy, Project 2025 remains a blueprint that could shape the future of American governance. As we move forward, it is crucial to monitor its development and the reactions it elicits. With the 2025 timeline looming, the next few months will be pivotal in determining whether these proposals become policy.In the words of Kevin Roberts, "The nation is in the process of the second American Revolution, which will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be." Whether this revolution materializes and what form it takes will depend on the political landscape and the will of the American people. As Project 2025 continues to evolve, one thing is clear: its impact on American governance could be profound and lasting.

Donald Trump's election could set the stage for a sweeping policy overhaul, fueled by ambitious plans to make the United States the crypto capital of the world. From a potential national Bitcoin reserve to pro-crypto regulatory leadership, the sector is gearing up for a transformative period. With a Republican-controlled Congress and big industry campaign contributions in the 2024 election, the stakes are set for dramatic changes in crypto-policy and the overall crypto-landscape.This week on the TechTank Podcast, co-hosts Darrell West is joined by Aaron Klein, a Senior Fellow at the Center on Regulation and Markets at the Brookings Institution to discuss if the U.S will become the crypto capital of the world. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This week on the TechTank Podcast, Darrell West talks with Zia Qureshi a Brookings Institution Senior Fellow in Global Economy and Development about how cutting-edge tech like AI, quantum computing, and cloud storage are shaping inequality. They dive into whether these innovations will widen the gap between those with access to tech and those without, and what we can do to make sure technology benefits everyone. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This week on The TechTank Podcast, Nicol Turner Lee and Darrell West explore how the Vice President candidate's tech policy stances might influence the campaigns and the election, and whether they will ultimately shape the future of technology in the United States. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Join us to learn about Darrell's latest research, books, and insights. He's local, he's global, and he's talking about the topics that we are having in our own homes and with our friends these days. 

With the presidential election just two months away, this is prime disinformation season. The period immediately before and after Election Day is when administrators worry most about campaigns to deceive voters. On POLITICO Tech, Darrell West from the Brookings Institution joins host Steven Overly to discuss the new book “Lies That Kill” and how people can protect themselves from online disinformation.

This week on the TechTank podcast, co-host Nicol Turner Lee is joined by her colleagues, co-host Darrell West, and Elaine Kamarck, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and Founding Director of the Center for Effective Public Management. Together, they will discuss the impact of disinformation on society and explore solutions presented in the new book authored by Darrell and Elaine titled Lies That Kill: A Citizen's Guide to Disinformation. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode of the TechTank podcast, co-host, Darrell West speaks to Nicol Turner Lee, co-host and author of Digitally Invisible, to discuss what can be done by policymakers, industry, and civil society to talk about her new book, and share her thoughts on what it will take to narrow the widening disparities that exist around connectivity. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This week on the TechTank Podcast, co-host Darrell West is joined by Roxana Mika Muenster, COMPASS fellow at Brookings' Center for Technology and a doctoral student at Cornell University. Together, they explore what Project 2025 envisions for tech and media policy, and try to understand the impact their agenda would have on industry politics, and the voters themselves. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This week on the TechTank Podcast, co-host Dr. Nicol Turner Lee is joined by Steven Overly, the host of POLITICO Tech at POLITICO, and Darrell West, Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institution and TechTank co-host. Together, they discuss where tech and tech policies are in the upcoming election and understand what hotbed issues resonate with candidates and voters alike. [Note: This episode was recorded before the announcement of Biden's exit from the race on July 21, 2024.] Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In just over a decade, Republican J.D. Vance has risen from law school graduate to best-selling author to U.S. senator to vice presidential nominee. And fueling the ascent has been tech billionaire Peter Thiel. On POLITICO Tech, Brookings Institution senior fellow Darrell West joins host Steven Overly to explain this fortuitous relationship, and the impact it could have on Election Day and beyond.

From July 17, 2020: Darrell West and John Allen are the authors of the book, "Turning Point: Policymaking in the Era of Artificial Intelligence," a broad look at the impact that artificial intelligence systems are likely to have on everything from the military, to health care, to vehicles and transportation, and to international great power competition. They spoke with Benjamin Wittes about the book and the question of how we should govern AI systems. What makes for ethical uses of AI? What makes it scary? What are the anxieties that people have about artificial intelligence, and to what extent are the fears legitimate?To receive ad-free podcasts, become a Lawfare Material Supporter at www.patreon.com/lawfare. You can also support Lawfare by making a one-time donation at https://givebutter.com/c/trumptrials.Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/lawfare. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Join us on the latest episode of the TechTank Podcast, where co-hosts Darrell West and Nicol Turner Lee dive into the opportunities and challenges of the AI roadmap developed by Senator Schumer (D-NY) and the bipartisan commission. Tune in for an insightful discussion on the complexities and implications of this new initiative. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

What really happened inside the wake of NYPD Officer Jonathan Diller after the governor of New York showed up and tried to get in? She was denied entry. This same thing has happened in the separate country of Seattle as well because the governor there was complicit in the death of police officers because he has refused to prosecute illegal immigrant drug dealers. In Chicago, a “tougher on crime” candidate was ahead by 10,000 votes, until 10,000 votes were found that hadn't been counted yet and the race tightened. I'll tell you about an entertainer and political commentator that sold his house for 829% above its value. This is the same man who has said President Trump doing the same with his properties was a crime, yet here he is doing that very thing. And in Oklahoma, a woman was visited by the FBI for conservative views she shared on Facebook. Yes, in America, some crimes are more criminal than others. What does God's Word say? 1 Corinthians 14:33For God is not a God of disorder but of peace—as in all the congregations of the Lord's people.Episode 1,508 Links:Jesse Watters breaks down what REALLY went on inside NYPD Officer Jonathan Diller's wake, per his source that watched it unfold at the Funeral Home. [pretty sure that's Brian Kilmeade, who lives in same townAfter the 'tougher-on-crime' candidate lead by 10,000 votes in Chicago's Cook County State's Attorney race, 10,000 mail-in ballots were found due to ‘human error' - Now, the race is separated by only 1% of votesThere's no going back: feds are now hunting down Americans who simply viewed “certain” YouTube videos…Minnesota AG Keith Ellison on car theft: "We are investigating 2 automakers. Their cars are too easy to steal for young people."A thug with 7 prior arrests punched a lady directly in the face last week in Brooklyn. The man fractured her face, permanently damaged her lip, and knocked out teeth. Franz Jeudy is already out on the streets. He was released without bail.Pres. Biden nominated someone to the U.S. Court of Federal Claims who has never even argued a motion or tried a case there. “So, the answer is zero?”“That is correct, Senator.”After Elon Musk took over X, most fact-checkers were fired. The site is now rife with trash talk and lies. "The toothpaste is out of the tube," says Darrell West of the Brookings Institution.BEHOLD: The Biden regime's disturbing and unauthorized new “federal red flag” center…It's starting in Oklahoma City.  FBI visit due to a Social Media post.  You've got to be kidding.GOP House will officially investigate Biden's dark and shadowy 2020 “color revolution” group…4Patriots https://4Patriots.com/Todd Stay connected when the power goes out and get free shipping on orders over $97.    Alan's Soaps https://alanssoaps.com/TODD Use coupon code ‘TODD' to save an additional 10% off the bundle price.  Bioptimizers https://bioptimizers.com/todd Use promo code TODD for 10% of your order and get up to 2 travel size bottles of Magnesium Breakthrough free.      Bonefrog   https://bonefrogcoffee.com/todd Use code TODD at checkout to receive 10% off your first purchase and 15% on subscriptions.  Bulwark Capital  Bulwark Capital Management (bulwarkcapitalmgmt.com) Call 866-779-RISK or visit online to get their FREE Common Cents Investing Guide. GreenHaven Interactive Digital Marketing https://greenhaveninteractive.com Your Worldclass Website Will Get Found on Google!  Liver Health https://GetLiverHelp.com/Todd Order today and get your FREE bottle of Nano Powered Omega3 and free bonus gift.

On this week's episode of the TechTank Podcast, Co-host Darrell West will delve into the significance of the mission to the Moon and its implications for future US space exploration policy. Joining Darrell is distinguished expert Marina Koren, a staff writer at The Atlantic. Marina regularly contributes to the magazine and recently authored an article titled “Apollo's Sequel Will Be a Gold Rush.” Together, they will explore the future of space exploration and the role of private companies. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this week's episode of the TechTank Podcast, co-host Darrell West delves into the future and capabilities of powerful quantum computers. To aid in comprehending these revolutionary machines, Darrell West is joined by Joseph Keller, Visiting Fellow in Foreign Policy at the Strobe Talbott Center for Security, Strategy, and Technology. Tune in for a highly informative conversation. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this week's episode of the TechTank podcast, co-hosts Nicol Turner Lee and Darrell West kickoff 2024 with an insightful conversation on the state of tech policy with returning guests, MattPerault, Director of the Center on Science & Technology Policy at UNC-Chapel Hill, and ScottBrennen, the Head of Online Expression Policy at the Center on Technology Policy at UNC-Chapel Hill. Together, they discuss the intricacies of state policy within the dynamic and ever-evolving tech landscape, exploring key challenges and potential solutions that shape the future oftechnology governance. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Little federal policymaking is likely to get done in an election year. But that doesn't mean tech policy will be totally dead in Washington. On POLITICO Tech, Darrell West from the Brookings Institution explains what Congress could actually get done if lawmakers set aside their differences -- again, in an election year.

In this episode of the TechTank Podcast Co-host Darrell West and Nicol Turner Lee discuss what lies ahead for tech policy in 2024 and what people should watch for from Congress, the Biden Administration, state and local government, and court cases. They cover topics such as AI, infrastructure implementation, problems of bias, safety, and transparency, and competition policy. A number of initiatives are pending, which likely will make the coming year an exciting time for technology policy. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode of The TechTank Podcast, co-host Darrell West engages in a conversation withElaine Kamarck, the Founding Director of the Center for Effective Public Management, and aSenior Fellow in Governance Studies at the Brookings Institution. Together, they explore thetransformative impact of AI on the political landscape and explore what lies ahead for theupcoming election. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode, co-host Darrell West will be joined by Tom Colvin, a Senior Policy Advisor in the Office of Technology, Policy, and Strategy (OTPS) at NASA. In light of recent international interest in returning to the moon, they will discuss the implications of new lunar landings for the future of space exploration. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode, co-host Darrell West explores the ramifications of judicial constraints on executive agencies. Joining the conversation is Barry Rabe, a professor of political science and public policy at the University of Michigan and a nonresident senior fellow in Governance Studies at the Brookings Institution. Together, they will discuss what the recent court decisions mean for new climate technologies, historical precedents on checks-and-balances, and the US as a leader in global trade and clean energy. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Artificial intelligence is quickly becoming a big part of the 2024 election. It's especially being harnessed by campaigns to create AI-generated ads that attack their opponents. But it's not just being used in ads. Darrell West from the Brookings Institution breaks down how artificial intelligence is impacting the 2024 election and how voters can discern fact from fiction. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

How is artificial intelligence impacting economies, political environments, financial markets and misinformation? In this podcast, Julian Jacobs, senior economist, OMFIF, interviews Darrell West, senior fellow, the Brookings Institution, to discuss the promises and perils that may emerge as countries embrace AI. What are the policy challenges and how can governments work to counter them? This podcast will discuss the implications of AI on economic inequality, productivity growth, central banking, financial stability and misinformation amid the rise of large language models. Darrell West is a senior fellow for Brookings' Center for Technology Innovation within the Governance Studies program and a co-editor-in-chief of TechTank. West is the former vice-president and director of Governance Studies. His current research focuses on artificial intelligence, robotics and the future of work. West is also director of the John Hazen White Manufacturing Initiative. Prior to joining Brookings, he was the John Hazen White Professor of Political Science and Public Policy and director of the Taubman Center for Public Policy at Brown University.

With the 2024 elections around the corner, political tensions are running high, and there isconsiderable concern about how generative AI will affect campaigns and election turnout. Thisweek, on the TechTank Podcast, co-host Darrell West will engage in a conversation on thesecrucial matters with Sarah M.L. Bender, an accomplished JD candidate from the University ofMichigan and the author of the article titled "Algorithmic Elections" in the Michigan LawReview. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

From November 28, 2022: In this episode of the podcast, co-host Darrell West speaks to Nicol Turner Lee, senior fellow in Governance Studies and director of the Center for Technology Innovation at Brookings and Tom Wheeler, a visiting fellow in Governance Studies and the author of a forthcoming Brookings book, “Techlash” about Twitter's future, and the consequences of recent tumultuous changes at the company. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

There has been considerable interest in recent months in generative AI that can answer questions, develop videos, write code, and perform many other tasks. On this week's episode of the TechTank Podcast, co-host, Darrell West, is joined by a distinguished expert, John Villasenor, professor of engineering, law, public policy, and management at UCLA and co-director of its Institute for Technology, Law, and Policy to discuss if generative AI will take jobs. Will it be possible for organizations to use these new tools to automate job tasks and reduce dependence on human labor? Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

On this week's episode of the TechTank Podcast, co-host, Darrell West, dives into howWikipedia handles content moderation, disinformation, and bias. The site is a trusted source ofinformation for many people, but little is known about how it makes decisions and handlescontroversies surrounding its material. Guests are Isabelle Langrock, a PhD candidate at theAnnenberg School for Communication at the University of Pennsylvania, who is writing adissertation on Open Knowledge Production and Digital Access; and Kent Campbell, aStrategist at Reputation X, a firm that researches Wikipedia references, talk pages, and historicalediting patterns. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

After a 3 Hour Meeting with Xi Jinping, Biden Declares No New Cold War With China | With Election Deniers Making Up a Third of the New Congress, Could They Elect Trump as Their Speaker? | The Collapse of the FTX Cryptocurrency Exchange and the 75% Loss in the Value of Bitcoin backgroundbriefing.org/donate twitter.com/ianmastersmedia facebook.com/ianmastersmedia

This week, the Senior Fellow of Center Tech Innovation, Darrell West joins Abby in the classroom to help explain Artificial Intelligence. Darrell examines the origins of Artificial Intelligence, as well as the pros and cons of this technology. He also answers a question on the possibility of AI technologies developing morals and empathy as science advances. Later, Darrell reveals to Abby examples of artificial intelligence that we may not always recognize. Keep up with Abby after class on Twitter: @AbbyHornacek Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices