Podcasts about RCP

Jon Madorsky is Managing Partner and Co-Portfolio manager of the secondaries strategy at RCP Advisors, one of the largest managers focused exclusively on North American lower middle market buyouts. Jon joined the firm 21 years ago and has participated in the growth of the secondaries business from its earliest stages. His partner, Alex Abell, joined me on the show last year and that conversation is replayed in the feed.   Our conversation covers the history and maturation of the secondaries market from a red-headed stepchild to a modern portfolio tool. We discuss the use cases, transaction types, and capital sources in secondaries, RCP's investment strategy, levers of value creation, portfolio construction, and exit strategy. Jon also shares his perspective on secondary market pricing, growth, risks, and the future of the industry. If you'd like to learn more, reach out to Jon directly at jon@rcpadvisors.com.  Learn More Follow Ted on Twitter at @tseides or LinkedIn Subscribe to the mailing list Access Transcript with Premium Membership

Alex Abell is a Managing Partner at RCP Advisors, which at $14 billion of committed capital, is one of the largest firms focused exclusively on lower-middle market buyouts. Alex has spent twenty-three years in the business, starting on the LP side, building Atlas Diligence – a research and advisory platform focused on advanced analytics, and then merging Atlas with RCP a decade ago. Today, he helps manage RCP's research efforts, its customized solutions, and advisory services. Our conversation covers Alex's path and lessons learned investing in lower middle market buyout funds across assessing managers with data, benchmarking, blending quantitative and qualitative factors, and applying insights to primary and secondary investing. Alex and I just scratch the surface on what's possible with analytics in the private markets. If you'd like to learn more, reach out to Alex directly at alex@rcpadvisors.com Learn More Follow Ted on Twitter at @tseides or LinkedIn Subscribe to the mailing list Access Transcript with Premium Membership

Andrew Walworth, Tom Bevan and Carl Cannon discuss last night's private dinner for top investors in the Trump family's $TRUMP crypto coin. Also, today a judge halted the Trump administration's move to strip Harvard of its ability to enroll international students. They also talk about what has changed in the five years since the killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis by police, which happened on May 25, 2020. Plus, this week's “You Can't Be Serious” segment. Next, Carl talks to Harvard Law Professor Emeritus Alan Dershowitz about his new book "The Preventative State", which deals with balancing the increasing capacity of new technology to predict and prevent crime and the preservation of civil liberty. And finally, Andrew talks to RCP contributor and author John J. Waters on how Americans should mark Memorial Day, and Trump's now aborted plan to change the name of Veterans Day to “Victory Day for World War I,” a move that was opposed by many veterans' groups.

Andrew Walworth, Tom Bevan and Carl Cannon discuss reactions to former FBI director James Comey's Instagram post of the numbers “8647” spelled out using seashells on the beach, which some have interpreted as a threat aimed at President Trump. Also, current FBI director Kash Patel says he will move 1,500 agents out of Washington, and that the FBI will leave the Hoover Building in downtown DC. They also talk about the politics behind a House resolution introduced by Rep. Summer Lee (D.-PA) yesterday designed to give reparations to descendants of American slaves. PLUS this week's “You Can't Be Serious” – a look at the most outrageous statements or events of the past week. Next, Carl Cannon talks to historian Jason Steinhauer about Trump's decision to fire Carla Hayden, the Librarian of Congress and congressional reaction to the move. And lastly, RCP contributor Maggie Miller talks to journalist John Murawski about his recent reporting on the University of Austin (UATX) and the School of Civic Leadership at the University of Texas. Both are part of a growing national movement hoping to revive classical education by emphasizing the Great Books, free markets, and individual liberty.

W tym odcinku podcastu dr hab. Szymon Wiecha dzieli się swoją wiedzą na temat testów wysiłkowych i ich roli w optymalizacji treningów oraz poprawie wyników sportowych. Dr hab. prof. Szczepan Wiecha jest specjalistą w dziedzinie nauk medycznych i nauk o zdrowiu w dyscyplinie nauk o kulturze fizycznej. Obecnie pełni funkcję profesora w Centrum Kardiologii Klinicznej Państwowego Instytutu Medycznego MSWiA w Warszawie. Jest również założycielem i prezesem kliniki Sportslab w Warszawie. Jest autorem wielu publikacji w renomowanych międzynarodowych czasopismach naukowych. Kieruje również badaniami dotyczącymi personalizacji treningów fizycznych i strategii regeneracji mięśniowej. Poza działalnością naukową jest także zaangażowany w dydaktykę oraz popularyzację wiedzy z zakresu fizjologii wysiłku i zdrowego stylu życia. W odcinku rozmawiamy między innymi o:  znaczeniu wyników takich parametrów jak VO2max w kontekście wydolności organizmu  metodyce wykonania testu wysiłkowego  przygotowaniu do testu wydolnościowego  parametrach ocenianych podczas testu, takich jak VO2max, HRmax, wentylacja płuc (VE), oraz próg beztlenowy (RCP)  wnioskach, które można wyciągnąć z raportu po wykonanym teście wysiłkowym, oraz wpływie tych wyników na planowanie treningów  zmianach zachodzących w organizmach sportowców wytrzymałościowych w wyniku systematycznych testów wysiłkowych  badaniach naukowych prowadzonych przez profesora Szczepana Wiechę  znanych sportowcach, którzy byli badani w pracowni prób wysiłkowych, takich jak biegacze długodystansowi, kolarze i triathloniści  różnicach w testach wydolnościowych pomiędzy sportowcami wyczynowymi a amatorami Podcast możecie znaleźć wielu platformach do słuchania m. in.:

Andrew Walworth, Tom Bevan and Carl Cannon discuss Donald Trump's comments on Sunday regarding the U.S. Constitution, and former Vice President Mike Pence's remarks at the JFK Library in Boston, where he received the “Profiles in Courage” award for his actions on January 6th. They also wonder how Congressional Republicans are handling the question of Medicaid funding in the 2026 budget negotiations, and how a scandal involving John Reid, Republican candidate for lieutenant governor of Virginia, is roiling the Republican Party ahead of the 2025 gubernatorial election. Plus, they talk about discuss Trump's proposal to convert Alcatraz from a tourist destination to an operational prison, and to place a 100 percent tariff on films produced overseas. Then finally, Tom Bevan talks to RCP contributor Richard Porter about Illinois governor J.B. Pritzker's recent trip to New Hampshire and whether he has national ambitions.

In this edition of the Money Makers Investment Trusts Podcast, Jonathan Davis, editor of the Investment Trusts Handbook and winner of the 2024 AIC Best Broadcast Journalist Award, is joined by Laura Elkin, lead manager of AEW UK REIT (AEWU), and Maggie Fanari, CEO of RIT Capital (RCP). These discussions were recorded on 01 May 2025 and 27 March 2025 respectively. *** Out now: The 2025 Investment Trusts Handbook *** The Investment Trusts Handbook is an independent educational publication designed to provide investors with a handy annual reference book that summarises all you need to know about investment trusts. Now in its eighth year, the Handbook is a high-quality, full-colour hardback of more than 340 pages, the largest yet, with reviews of the past year, extensive interviews and commentary, plus nearly 80 pages of “how to” information and performance data. Available to order from Harriman House (https://harriman-house.com/ithb2025) or Amazon. There is also a free e-book version you can read on a PC, tablet or smartphone, plus an audiobook version. *** Section Timestamps: 0:00:24 - Introduction - 0:00:41 - Talking to Laura Elkin, AEW UK REIT - 0:01:42 - AEWU's Q1 2025 results - 0:02:57 - Valuations across the commercial property sector - 0:04:55 - Asset management and adding value - 0:12:32 - Raising more capital and issuing new equity - 0:13:28 - Scope for consolidation in the sector - 0:17:16 - Risks to continued strong performance - 0:20:55 - Dividend policy 0:24:53 - A short break - 0:25:59 - Talking to Maggie Fanari, RIT Capital Partners - 0:26:18 - How Maggie became CEO of RCP - 0:27:49 - Characterising RCP's performance issues - 0:29:46 - How the brand lost its luster - 0:33:23 - Reasons for the significant discount - 0:35:35 - The cost disclosure issue - 0:38:46 - The driver for reducing private investments - 0:39:30 - How the operating environment might develop - 0:42:22 - Characterising performance - 0:43:11 - The value of the dollar - 0:44:22 - Lessons from managing a Canadian pension fund - 0:47:22 - The buyback programme - 0:49:13 - The RIT Capital offer 0:51:45 - Close If you enjoy the weekly podcast, you may also find value in joining The Money Makers Circle. This is a membership scheme that offers listeners to the podcast an opportunity, in return for a modest monthly or annual subscription, to receive additional premium content, including interviews, performance data, links to third party research, market/portfolio reviews and regular comments from the editor. A subscription costs £12 a month or £120 for one year. This week, as well as the usual features, the Circle features a profile of Law Debenture Corporation (LWDB). Future profiles include European Opportunities (EOT) and J.P.Morgan US Smaller Companies (JUSC). Our new expanded weekly subscriber email includes a comprehensive summary of all the latest news plus the week's biggest share price, NAV and discount movements. Subscribe and you will never miss any important developments from the sector. For more information please visit money-makers.co/membership-join. Membership helps to cover the cost of producing the weekly investment trust podcast, which will continue to be free for the foreseeable future. We are very grateful for your continued support and the enthusiastic response to our more than 270 podcasts since launch. You can find more information, including relevant disclosures, at www.money-makers.co. Please note that this podcast is provided for educational purposes only and nothing you hear should be considered as investment advice. Our podcasts are also available on the Association of Investment Companies website, www.theaic.co.uk. Produced by Ben Gamblin - www.bgprofessional.co.uk

Andrew Walworth and RCP White House correspondent Phil Wegmann discuss the reassignment of National Security Advisor Mike Waltz to become the next U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations. Also, a look at the implications of the minerals agreement between Ukraine and the U.S., signed Wednesday night. Then, Andrew Walworth, Tom Bevan, and Carl Cannon discuss the battle between Democratic strategist James Carville and Democratic National Committee Vice Chair David Hogg. Also, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) faces a decision: whether to run for the top Democratic spot on the House Oversight Committee or pass in order to spend more time in the field. Next, Carl Cannon talks to RCP columnist John Maxwell Hamilton about Abundance, a new book by Ezra Kelin and Derek Thompson that provides advice to progressives. And finally, Andrew Walworth talks to RCP White House correspondent Phil Wegmann about President Trump's efforts to change the way senior government officials are compensated, and the future of DOGE after Elon Musk.

Andrew Walworth, Tom Bevan, and National Review columnist Heather Wilheim preview tonight's speech by 2024 Democratic Presidential nominee Kamala Harris. They also discuss Wisconsin's Supreme Court decision to suspend Milwaukee circuit judge Hannah Dugan, who has been charged with helping an illegal immigrant avoid arrest by ICE agents. Plus, they chat about Trump's campaign-style speech in Detroit delivered on Tuesday evening, and his oval office interview with ABC News senior national correspondent Terry Moran. Next, Tom Bevan talks to RCP contributor and author Greg Orman about the first 100 days of organized opposition to the second Trump administration. How fares “The Resistance"? And finally, Andrew Walworth talks to Law Professor and Boston Herald columnist Wendy Murphy about a landmark case involving why women can't register for the draft, and why this is - in her view “the most important women's rights case of the past 50 years”.

In this episode of the RCP Medicine podcast, Rebecca Kuruvilla, a previous RCP clinical education fellow and an ST7 Clinical Pharmacology and GIM registrar talks with Professor Sir Ian Gilmore, an honorary consultant physician with a specialist interest in liver disease. They discuss the rising issue of alcohol-related harm in the UK, the impact of Covid-19 on alcohol misuse, and the role of regulation in reducing health harms. Professor Gilmore also shares insights on the changing drinking culture, the influence of the alcohol industry, and the importance of evidence-based policies to address this significant public health challenge. Professor Sir Ian Gilmore is an honorary consultant physician at the Royal Liverpool University Hospital and holds an honorary chair at the University of Liverpool. With a specialist interest in liver disease, he has served as the president of the Royal College of Physicians and is the founding chair of the Alcohol Health Alliance UK, a coalition of over 50 organizations working together to reduce the harm caused by alcohol. Professor Gilmore has been a vocal advocate for evidence-based policies to tackle alcohol misuse and has contributed significantly to public health research and policy.ResourcesAlcohol Health AllianceAlcohol advice - NHSRCP LinksEducation and learning | RCP Events | RCP Membership | RCP Improving care | RCP Policy and campaigns | RCP Creditsmusic by bensound.com

In this episode we welcomed Julie Miller, RCP, an addiction recovery coach and podcaster from Colorado. After overcoming a decade-long battle with alcohol addiction, Julie transformed her life by facing shame, embracing authenticity, and creating a purpose-filled existence. Now, she dedicates herself to helping others find freedom from addiction through coaching, podcasting, and fostering a supportive recovery community.Tune into this episode for an engaging discussion about what comes after the initial step into sobriety. We'll explore how to move beyond sober curiosity in January, embrace long-term lifestyle changes, and build a life so full there's no space left for alcohol. Together, we'll delve into integrating yoga, mindfulness, and intentional practices to sustain sobriety throughout the year.Learn more about Julie and her podcast at: https://throughtheglassrecovery.com/Support the showRead Alex's Writing at the Intersection of the Bhavagad Gita, Patanjali's Sutras, The Buddha Dharma and Mental Health at:https://thedailydharma.substack.com/Check Out All Our Upcoming Retreats, Programs and Offerings at:https://www.themindfullifepractice.com/

Andrew Walworth, Tom Bevan, and RCP White House correspondent Phil Wegmann discuss the arrest of Wisconsin judge Hannah Dugan on obstruction charges after she allegedly helped an illegal immigrant evade FBI agents who were waiting outside her courtroom. Then, after yesterday's deadly Russian attack on Kyiv, they wonder: is Donald Trump going to push Russia for concessions at the peace table? Plus, they joke about this weekend's 2025 White House Correspondents' Dinner, and poke fun with this week's “You Can't Be Serious” segment. Next, Tom Bevan talks to Stuart Taylor, Jr., president of Princetonians for Free Speech and an RCP contributor, about the Trump administration's decision to suspend hundreds of millions of dollars in grants to the university over its treatment of Jewish students. And closing up the week, RCP Contributor Charlie Stone talks to Peter Beinart, author of Being Jewish After the Destruction of Gaza: A Reckoning about the founding of the Jewish state, the current situation in Gaza, and the chances for peace.

A Iniciativa da Campanha de Reavaliação em Ressuscitação Veterinária (RECOVER) tem o objetivo de desenvolver e disseminar as primeiras diretrizes de ressuscitaçãocardiopulmonar (RCP) veterinária baseadas em evidências. Dra. Sibele Konno, colaboradora do Vetsapiens e médica veterinária com Certificação Recover, vem contar neste episódio sua experiência na obtenção deste certificado e porque ele é tão importante. Site Recover: www.recoverinitiative.org Sibele Konno - Médica Veterinária graduada pela FMVZ-USP- Residência em Clínica Médica pela FMVZ-USP- Pós-graduação Lato Sensu em Medicina Intensiva - PAV- Pós-graduação em Liderança, Coaching e Gestão de Pessoas - PUCRSConecte-se com o Vetsapiens!www.vetsapiens.com https://www.facebook.com/vetsapienshttps://www.instagram.com/vetsapiens/

Andrew Walworth, Tom Bevan, and National Review columnist Heather Wilhelm discuss the battle between Harvard University and Donald Trump, and the results of the new Harvard Youth Poll, which tracks attitudes of Americans between the ages of 18 and 29. They also talk about a new lawsuit that claims Trump has superseded presidential authority on tariffs, and media reports that Trump has backed down on the trade war with China. Next, Andrew Walworth talks to Chris Ruddy, CEO of Newsmax Media about the strategy behind America's fourth most watched cable news network, how digital media is reshaping the television business, and whether the Voice of America should be shut down. And winding it up, Carl Cannon talks to RCP editors Cathi Warren and Anne Welty about the “Bell to Bell, No Cell” Act, which bans smartphones in Arkansas' public schools, and the nationwide push to restrict cellphone usage in classrooms.

Part Two   How To Live a Healthier life  (Body Soul and Spirit) Part Two begins with me explaining: THE IMPORTANCE OF OUR CONSCIENCE -- AS FAR AS OUR HEALTH     1Timothy_1:19  Holding faith, and a good (clear) conscience; which some having put away concerning FAITH have made shipwreck: We need to clear our conscience:   FOR FAITH SAKE    FOR OUR OWN SAKES    FOR OTHERS SAKE   FOR HEALTH SAKE Stephanie's testimony of the powerful impact on her health in the clearing of her conscience. There are many other testimonies by both Charlie and Stephanie as to the years of their journey in learning what they are sharing and what ittook to apply it in their own lives. Stephanie's biographical background as listed on the Root Cause Protocol website:  I believe God the Creator has designed our bodies with many processes to function optimally when given the proper minerals and nutrients. Itook Morley Robbins RCP Institute training in 2023 after being on the Root Cause Protocol for five years. This Protocol works! My degrees in biology and medical technology gave me an interest in research and made me curious aboutexactly how the RCP worked in our body to fix cellular dysregulation. Some of the Multiple Topics we need to understand that are covered in Part Two Much information is shared  about the critical importance of magnesium, copper and iron, The proper intake of Vitamin C, the benefits of Cod Liver Oils,  Retinol, the best type of Olive Oil to Use, Vitamins in General,  Seed Oils, the cells in your body and how they impact your health, the great benefit of Omega 3, Best type of butter to eat, Oxidative Stress, The STOPS AND THE STARTS that will greatly benefit your health, Dairy Products, Bread and Cereal purchased in Stores, the benefits to your health and the sun, the critical importance ofwhole grains, fluoride cautions, adrenal glands, vagal nerve exercises, zinc, how our bodies make energy, raw milk, how stress worry and fear impact your health, understanding mitochondria, grass and pasture fed beef and pork, sugar, honey, the power of thankfulness and health,  and more. At the end of the podcast we explain some insights from  1Timothy 4:4:   For every creature of God is good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving: 1Ti 4:5  For it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer. We also explain how God's mercy and grace is manifested through the rising of the sun.

(0:25) Descobren que os ratos axudan aos seus conxéneres cando perden o coñecemento practicando unha especie de RCP. (5:33) A xornalista e sexóloga Laura Veiga fálanos dos libros de autoaxuda menstrual. (17:15) Damián Copena, do Grupo de investigación en Estudios de Historia Empresarial e sectorial da Pesca, Industria e Comercio (GESPIC) da USC, publicou xunto con María Gómez un traballo na revista *Medical History* sobre a febre das sambesugas no século XIX en España para uso médico. (39:57) A banda deseñada "Deep me" e "Deep it" fai un achegamento experimental á IA. Nolo comenta Daniel Pizarro na sección "Cambio de fase".^resumo

Andrew Walworth, Tom Bevan, and Carl Cannon discuss Secretary of State Marco Rubio saying: if there is no movement in the Ukraine peace talks within the next few days, President Trump is prepared to “move on.” And they talk about Senator Chris Van Hollen's (D. MD) meeting with Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who is in a Salvadoran prison after being deported from the United States. They also discuss the meaning of Saturday's 250th anniversary of the first combat of the American Revolution: the Battle of Lexington and Concord. Plus, this week's “You Can't Be Serious” segment. Next, Tom Bevan talks to Pollster Spencer Kimball about a brand-new poll from RealClear Opinion Research that looks at Americans' attitudes on two hot-button issues: tariffs and immigration. And finally, Carl Cannon talks to RCP contributors Cathi Warren and Anne Welty about the outbreak of measles in Texas and the role of immunization in stopping its spread.

Gisela y Santiago hablaron sobre una muy buena noticia casi muere un hombre en el subte y el grupo GEA lo salvó con RCP

¿Qué hacer cuando nos quedamos tirados con el coche? Lo primero que hay que hacer es tener el coche o el vehículo que sea en perfecto estado de revista, de esa forma reducimos la posibilidad de quedarnos tirados. Revisar bien de verdad el coche antes de salir de viaje, cambiar el aceite a su tiempo, controlar el resto de fluidos del vehículo es imprescindible para reducir la posibilidad de quedarse tirado. ¿Y si lo que sucede es un pinchazo? Conducta PAS 1. Protege 2. Avisa 3. Socorre Profundiza Su objetivo es garantizar la seguridad de los implicados, alertar a los servicios de emergencia y prestar ayuda a las víctimas sin agravar su estado. PROTEGER: Garantizar la seguridad en el lugar del accidente • Detenerse en un lugar seguro sin obstaculizar el tráfico. • Encender las luces de emergencia y colocar la señal V-16 o los triángulos de preseñalización si es seguro hacerlo. • Utilizar chaleco reflectante antes de salir del vehículo. • Evaluar los riesgos (fugas de combustible, riesgo de incendio, tráfico en la zona). • No mover a las víctimas salvo riesgo inminente (incendio o peligro de explosión). AVISAR: Contactar con los servicios de emergencia • Llamar al 112 y proporcionar información clave: • Ubicación exacta del accidente (carretera, kilómetro, referencia). • Número y estado de los heridos. • Tipo de vehículos implicados y riesgos adicionales (fuego, fuga de combustible, etc.). • Seguir las indicaciones del operador del 112. SOCORRER: Prestar ayuda a los heridos sin agravar su estado Actuar según los principios de primeros auxilios: • Comprobar la conciencia de los heridos (hablarles, estimular su respuesta). • Verificar la respiración y, si es necesario, iniciar maniobras de reanimación (RCP). • No retirar el casco a motoristas salvo riesgo vital. • Cubrir a los heridos para evitar la hipotermia. • Tranquilizar a las víctimas hasta la llegada de los servicios de emergencia. Aspectos legales y sanciones a tener en cuenta si te encuentras un accidente Omisión del deber de socorro: No auxiliar a una víctima en un accidente de tráfico puede ser considerado delito, con penas de hasta 4 años de prisión y retirada del permiso de conducir. Interferencia en el rescate: Manipular a las víctimas sin conocimiento puede agravar sus lesiones y generar responsabilidad legal. ¿Cuál es la Importancia de la Conducta PAS? ✔ Reduce el riesgo de nuevos accidentes. ✔ Aumenta las posibilidades de supervivencia de los heridos. ✔ Facilita la intervención rápida de los equipos de emergencia. ✔ Fomenta la cultura de seguridad vial y responsabilidad ciudadana. Hasta aquí el programa de hoy del podcast de seguridad vial y educación vial. ¿Quieres escuchar episodios anteriores sobre seguridad en moto? • P138 100 tramos más peligrosos para motoristas https://go.ivoox.com/rf/72292314 • P154 Hugo de 14 años muere en el campeonato Europeo de motociclismo. https://go.ivoox.com/rf/73574655 • P176 Motos sin ITV https://go.ivoox.com/rf/75543112 • P262 Seguridad Vial en moto No me llames paquete https://go.ivoox.com/rf/93733543 • P289 Caídas en quad o moto y la importancia de la equipación adecuada. Seguridad vial Dakar 2023 https://go.ivoox.com/rf/101146657 • P300 Seguridad vial en moto en el Dakar https://go.ivoox.com/rf/101515123 • P327 Seguridad vial en moto, formación conducción, compra de equitación y exigir la retirada de guardarraíles asesinos https://go.ivoox.com/rf/105221622 • P376 seguridad vial en moto, episodio 5 del verano de seguridad en Onda Cero https://go.ivoox.com/rf/114152759 • P470 La seguridad vial en moto a debate https://go.ivoox.com/rf/126752010 • P566 chaleco airbag moto para la atgc https://go.ivoox.com/rf/135729959 • P557 4000 motos en la manifestación motera por la seguridad vial https://go.ivoox.com/rf/134812092 ¿Quieres escuchar episodios anteriores sobre seguridad en Euro NCAP? • P22 Seguridad infantil en Euro NCAP 2020 https://go.ivoox.com/rf/60410726 • P31 La seguridad infantil de los 7 coches ensayados en Euro NCAP 2020 https://go.ivoox.com/rf/63999896 • P119 En AutoFM hablamos del origen de lo que hoy es Euro NCAP https://go.ivoox.com/rf/70766776 • P192 Hyundai Ioniq 5 en Euro NCAP https://go.ivoox.com/rf/77624794 • P200 El coche más seguro para niños según Euro NCAP https://go.ivoox.com/rf/79810679 • P278 ¿Qué es EuroNCAP? https://go.ivoox.com/rf/97118681 • P320 Seguridad EuroNCAP en el Lexus RX https://go.ivoox.com/rf/104093361 • P325 Cupra en Euro NCAP seguridad made in Spain https://go.ivoox.com/rf/104841125 • P353 Euro NCAP y la seguridad de nuestros vehículos https://go.ivoox.com/rf/111970962 • P413 Etiquetas de seguridad en EuroNCAP https://go.ivoox.com/rf/121984964 • P426 BMW Serie 5 en EuroNCAP https://go.ivoox.com/rf/121989858 ¿Quieres escuchar episodios anteriores sobre patinetes eléctricos (VMP) y su influencia en la educación vial y seguridad vial? • VMP o los patinetes eléctricos (13-11-2020) https://go.ivoox.com/rf/58970634 • P29 200€ de multa a los patinetes que circulen por la acera (19-1-2021) https://go.ivoox.com/rf/63999858 • P39 El 80% de los accidentados en patinete eléctrico iban sin casco. https://go.ivoox.com/rf/64652023 • P88. En la sección de RiveKids dentro de AutoFM hablamos de atropellos de niños con patinete eléctrico VMP https://go.ivoox.com/rf/68488690 • P134 Tráfico dice que se va a poner duro con patinetes y bicicletas https://go.ivoox.com/rf/71998645 • P205 certificado para VMP y manual de características del patinete eléctrico https://go.ivoox.com/rf/81250012 ¿Quieres escuchar episodios anteriores sobre cómo la DGT afronta la educación vial y seguridad vial? • P47. La DGT recauda más de un millón de euros al día en multas https://go.ivoox.com/rf/65042824 • P68 2.880 conductores fueron denunciados dos o más veces en un mismo año por no llevar el cinturón de seguridad. https://go.ivoox.com/rf/66793732 • P72 La otra cara del rescate en carretera. DGT https://go.ivoox.com/rf/67030950 • P78 ¿Por qué nos denuncia la DGT en España? https://go.ivoox.com/rf/67470851 • P85 los tribunales anulan la mitad de las multas que pone la DGT. https://go.ivoox.com/rf/68027004 • P189 Cómo adelantar con seguridad https://go.ivoox.com/rf/76818386 • 6 puntos por usar el móvil al volante y más cambios de la DGT. https://go.ivoox.com/rf/60394281 • P383 ¿Hay que abrochar el cinturón de seguridad incluso sin ocupantes en las plazas traseras? https://go.ivoox.com/rf/115775880 • P444 Ocurrencias de la DGT en 2024 https://go.ivoox.com/rf/124103189 • P559 estrategia de país en la seguridad vial https://go.ivoox.com/rf/134812303 • P447 Propuestas de la DGT para bajar fallecidos en carretera https://go.ivoox.com/rf/124482117 ¿Quieres escuchar episodios anteriores del podcast de educación vial y seguridad vial? • P6 Coronavirus y Seguridad Vial https://go.ivoox.com/rf/49513283 • P169 Seguridad vial en Onda Cero https://go.ivoox.com/rf/74292123 • P125 ¿Isofix en un SsangYong Rodius? Y mucha más seguridad vial https://go.ivoox.com/rf/71289331 • P196 Seguridad vial para bebés prematuros y CIPSEVI https://go.ivoox.com/rf/78652365 • P168 Sin ruedas no hay seguridad vial https://go.ivoox.com/rf/74292023 • P182 La educación vial en El Enfoque, Onda Madrid https://go.ivoox.com/rf/76018355 • P7 Mascarillas y guantes son al coronavirus lo que el cinturón de seguridad y los SRI a la violencia vial https://go.ivoox.com/rf/50038459 • P197 Estudio sobre la inseguridad vial en el contenido de las series en Capital Radio https://go.ivoox.com/rf/78897119 • P565 la mayoría de gente no usa el cinturón de seguridad https://go.ivoox.com/rf/135729932 • P561 4 de cada 10 conductores dan positivo en drogas https://go.ivoox.com/rf/134812530 • P541 La DGT no sabe dónde hay más de 650 millones de euros https://go.ivoox.com/rf/133580231 ¿Quieres escuchar episodios anteriores del podcast de seguridad vial en el Dakar? • P290 Lluvia torrencial, helicópteros que no pueden volar y buggies en medio de riadas. Seguridad vial Dakar 2023 https://go.ivoox.com/rf/101146767 • P291. Señalización de accidentes en la carrera más dura del mundo. Seguridad vial Dakar 2023 https://go.ivoox.com/rf/101146815 • P295 Exceso de velocidad, radar, sanción y distancia de frenado. Seguridad vial Dakar 2023 https://go.ivoox.com/rf/101147162 • P297 Muere atropellado por conseguir la mejor foto. Seguridad vial Dakar 2023 https://go.ivoox.com/rf/101514720 • P302 El Dakar 2023 da una lección de seguridad vial. La velocidad no mata, matan otras cosas. Seguridad vial Dakar https://go.ivoox.com/rf/101515334 • P301 Seguridad Vial con Manolo Plaza en el Dakar y en la vida. Seguridad vial Dakar 2023 https://go.ivoox.com/rf/101515325 • P300 La seguridad vial en moto en el Dakar y en las carreteras españolas. Seguridad vial Dakar 2023 https://go.ivoox.com/rf/101515123 • P294 Cansancio y fatiga extrema en competición. Seguridad vial Dakar 2023 https://go.ivoox.com/rf/101147100 • P296 ¿Es más seguro un chasis tubular? Biomecánica del impacto y aceleraciones en la seguridad vial Dakar 2023 https://go.ivoox.com/rf/101514635 • P288 Arco antivuelco o jaula de seguridad. Seguridad vial Dakar 2023 https://go.ivoox.com/rf/100776113 • P293 Hans. Seguridad vial Dakar 2023 https://go.ivoox.com/rf/101146904 • P292. Pos seguridad después de un vuelco o un accidente ¿qué hacer?. Seguridad vial Dakar 2023 https://go.ivoox.com/rf/101146866 • P287 Arnés vs cinturón de seguridad. Seguridad vial Dakar 2023 https://go.ivoox.com/rf/100775999 • P299 Conducir sin luna en la seguridad vial Dakar 2023 https://go.ivoox.com/rf/101515049 • P298 Fallece atropellado un aficionado que estaba viendo el Dakar 2023. Seguridad vial dentro y fuera de la competición https://go.ivoox.com/rf/101514818 • P430 Prologo Dakar 2024, seguridad vial https://go.ivoox.com/rf/122182887 • P438 Etapa 10 Dakar 2024 competición vs vida real en la señalización https://go.ivoox.com/rf/123338733 • P435 Etapa 5 Dakar 2024, la fatiga https://go.ivoox.com/rf/122440640 • P440 Etapa de descanso Dakar 2024 los twit de la DGT https://go.ivoox.com/rf/123339096 • P439 Etapa 11 Dakar 2024 adelantamientos extremos https://go.ivoox.com/rf/123338820 • P436 Atropello de un espectador en el Dakar 2024 https://go.ivoox.com/rf/122440725 • P434 Etapa 4 seguridad jurídica y excesos de velocidad en el Dakar 2024 https://go.ivoox.com/rf/122440464 • P431 Etapa 1 Dakar 2024, espectador atropellado https://go.ivoox.com/rf/122229047 • P432 Etapa 2 Dakar 2024, jaula de seguridad y Carles Falcón https://go.ivoox.com/rf/122229139 • P433 Etapa 3 Dakar 2024, los 3 impactos de un accidente https://go.ivoox.com/rf/122440325 “El verdadero viaje es el que termina como comenzó, con felicidad e inocencia” Feliz viaje hasta el próximo programa. _______________________________________

Andrew Walworth, Tom Bevan, and Carl Cannon discuss the shifting White House rhetoric surrounding Trump's trade policies. They also talk about yesterday's House vote that would curtail federal judges' ability to place nationwide injunctions on presidential orders, and whether the measure will pass in the Senate. Plus, Donald Trump's executive order directing the Department of Justice to investigate former White House officials Chris Krebs and Miles Taylor, who Trump accused of “treason.” Also, Kennedy Center officials report that a fireworks show on March 29 attracted the largest audience in the Center's history. And finally, Carl Cannon talks to RCP contributor Eric Spitz about alleged anti-Jewish bias on the campus of M.I.T., and the political rivalry between California Governor Gavin Newsom and Former Vice President Kamala Harris.

Andrew Walworth, Tom Bevan and Carl Cannon discuss Former President Barrack Obama's recent appearance at Hamilton College where he criticized the Trump Administration, and Kamala Harris' speech on Trump's policies where she told the audience, “I told you so”. They also talk about the market reaction to Trump's tariffs. Amid growing calls for the president to negotiate lower trade barriers with allies and partners, will the Administration stand firm on across-the-board tariffs? Plus, they chat about the two women who will likely vie for the governorship of Virginia this fall, and whether the race tells us anything about what to expect in the 2028 midterms. Then finally, Tom Bevan talks to RCP contributor Richard Porter about Trump's authority over trade policy, and the politics driving Trump on tariffs.

Andrew Walworth, Tom Bevan, and Carl Cannon discuss the results of elections in two Florida congressional districts and a statewide contest for the state supreme court in Wisconsin. Plus, they chat about the political consequences of Trump's tariff policies. Then, they talk about U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi's decision to seek the death penalty in the trial of Luigi Mangione, who is charged with the murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson. Also, a nursery school student in Britain is expelled from school for what authorities call his “inability to believe a transgender person is actually a ‘real' female or male". Next, Tom Bevan and RealClearPolitics senior elections analyst Sean Trende dive deeper into the results of Tuesday's elections in Florida and Wisconsin. Then finally, Carl Cannon talks to RCP contributor and Democratic strategist Dane Strother about the future of the Democratic Party.

Andrew Walworth, Tom Bevan, and RCP White House Correspondent Phil Wegmann discuss the duo's  “Fighting Oligarchy” Tour, the future of the Democratic Party, and whether Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez will run for president.  Then they discuss next steps in Ukraine and President Zelensky's cover-story interview in Time magazine. Comedian Conan O'Brien is awarded the Mark Twain Prize in a celebration that featured multiple jokes about President Trump. Also, former Utah Representative Mia Love, the first Black Republican woman in Congress, is dead at age 49. Tom Bevan talks to RCP contributor Richard Porter about the fight between The White House and some of America's top legal firms. And Andrew Walworth talks to RealClear Investigations editor J. Peder Zane about a new article by RCI writer Paul Sperry that looks into allegations that FBI Director James Comey used a female undercover agent to fish for evidence of criminal activity by the Trump campaign as early as June, 2015."Image of Alexandria Ocasio Cortez courtesy of Gage Skidmore from Surprise, AZ, United States of America, CC BY-SA 2.0 via Wikimedia Commons"

In Ep. 97, Jerry & Utah treasurer Marlo Oaks discuss the historical & political state of Europe’s anti-fossil fuel mandates, how ESG mandates on American companies hurt American employees, and a powerful legal strategy by which the Trump administration can push back against European regulators. Also, why it’s premature to take ‘victory laps’ against ESG & DEI. Read Treasurer Oaks’ op-ed for RCP here: https://www.realclearpolicy.com/articles/2025/02/27/collusion_coercion_and_the_eus_corporate_sustainability_directives_1094273.htmlSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Can history be understood scientifically? Modern science shows us that all realms of nature are dictated by objective laws—from quantum physics to molecular biology. But most mainstream historians refuse to admit that the same is true about human society.As Marx famously said: “Men make their own history, but they do not make it as they please.” History isn't merely driven by the free will of great individuals. Nor is it a senseless mess, as postmodernist thinkers would have you believe. The economic structure of a given society sets the stage for historical development. Great changes in politics and culture are driven by changes in production. By studying this relation, we can develop the tools we need to leave our own mark on history.Therefore, we are proud to release a presentation by Marcus Katryniuk, an activist of the RCP, on the Materialist Conception of History, and how workers and youth can make history.Further Reading:What is Historical Materialism?Civilization, Barbarism, and the Marxist View of History

Canada now has a former banker, never elected to any political post in his life, in the most important seat of the country. He has miraculously resuscitated the Liberals, capitalizing on the fears raised by Trump's threats. But while Carney may fight against Trump, the question remains: In whose interests? In this week's episode of the Revolutionary Communist Podcast, RCP activists Joel Bergman & Marco LaGrotta provide a Communist perspective on what is happening.If you liked this episode of the podcast, be sure to check out our latest article on marxist.ca - Ruling class places its bets on Mark Carney

Andrew Walworth, Tom Bevan, and Carl Cannon discuss key players to watch, including Pete Buttigieg, Rahm Emanual, Gavin Newsom and Tim Walz, as well as Senator Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) who announced her decision not to run again in 2026. Also, how Democrats, including former first lady Michelle Obama, are embracing podcasting to reach new audiences. Then, they talk about Russian president Vladimir Putin's positive statements about a possible armistice in Ukraine, and Trump's threat of a 200 percent tariff on imported European alcoholic beverages. Next, Carl interviews Andy Rotherham, co-founder and senior partner at Bellwether and member of the Virginia Board of Education, on Randi Weingarten, the teachers' union, and layoffs at the Department of Education. And finally, Andrew Walworth interviews Real Clear Investigations journalist James Varney about his RCP article "A New Beltway Mystery: Follow the Biden EPA Money" which outlines how $27 billion in green grants were funneled to nonprofits in a process that new EPA administrator Lee Zeldin calls “a deeply entrenched pattern of political favoritism” aimed at Democratic-aligned groups.

Andrew Walworth, Tom Bevan, and Carl Cannon discuss the U.S. and Ukraine Talks in Saudi Arabia, the Ukrainian drone attacks on Moscow, and federal funding cuts to American universities. They also talk about ActBlue leadership changes, and who is funding the "Families Over Billionaires” media campaign. Next, Tom Bevan and Sean Trende discuss recent polls, including a new survey of Americans attitudes toward Republicans and Democrats on handling the economy. And finally, Andy talks to RCP national reporter and author Susan Crabtree about her book that is coming out today: “Fool's Gold: The Radicals, Con Artists, and Traitors Who Killed the California Dream and Now Threaten Us All.”

Andrew Walworth, Tom Bevan, RCP Contributor Richard Porter and White House correspondent Phil Wegmann discuss today's fiery Oval Office meeting between Trump and Zelensky regarding the rare minerals deal and Russia's war against Ukraine. They also talk about today's nationwide protest where consumers were asked to boycott big box and online stores. Also, the Supreme Court's reacts to arguments over a reverse discrimination case brought by a an Ohio woman who claims she was passed over for a promotion and demoted in favor of gay coworkers. Next, John Feehery and Andrew Walworth discuss whether Speaker Mike Johnson will be able to shepherd a budget deal through Congress, and whether spending cuts advocated by DOGE will be reflected in the final budget. And finally, Carl Cannon interviews RCP contributor Sam Jeffries. Sam is a freelance writer who wrote a piece for RealClearBooks about September 5, the movie about the Palestinian terrorists who murdered Israeli athletes at the 1972 Olympic Games.

Tom Bevan, Carl Cannon and Sean Trende discuss President Trump's first cabinet meeting and the House's dramatic passage of a budget last night. They also look at Byron Donalds' chances to become Governor of Florida, Gavin Newsom's new podcast, and Jeff Bezos' announcement about the Washington Post Opinion Page. Next, Carl Cannon interviews Richard Porter about his RCP column on J.B. Pritzker's budget address comparing Trump and MAGA to Nazi Germany. And lastly, Andrew Walworth chats with James Robbins from the Institute of World Politics about US relations with Russia, China, and the future of nuclear proliferation.

The  U.S.-Canada trade war has become the central question in Canadian politics. As Trump pivots U.S. foreign policy to attempt to assert the dominance of U.S. capital on the continent, politicians and business leaders are panicking, trying to avoid disaster.In response, there has been a developing mood of Canadian nationalism with widespread support for counter tariffs and buy-Canadian policies.But  what is the position of communists faced with this situation?RCP activists Joel Bergman and Marco La Grotta discuss how communists must respond to this unprecedented situation.Join the RCP: https://www.marxist.ca/join

Andrew Walworth, Tom Bevan, and Carl Cannon discuss how federal judges have struck down or delayed some of Trump's signature reform efforts and how the administration and Congress are reacting. They also talk about President Trump's legal maneuvers, including calling off the prosecution of Mayor Eric Adams of New York City and pardoning Former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich. Plus, today's White House meeting between King Abdullah of Jordan and President Trump, and Vice President J.D. Vance's address in Paris about regulating artificial intelligence, his first major policy speech since taking office. And finally, Tom Bevan talks to RCP contributor Richard Porter about how Trump's executive orders will fare under judicial review, and the role of Congress going forward.

Andrew Walworth, Tom Bevan, and Carl Cannon discuss President Trump's appearance at the Super Bowl, Taylor Swift, and the changing political messaging by the NFL. They also talk about the not-so-subtle politics of some of Sunday night's Super Bowl television ads, including those from the NFL, Nike, Lays, Jeep and other advertisers. Plus, the legal challenges to DOGE's recent activities, and whether the Democrats' opposition to DOGE is sound politics. And finally, Tom Bevan talks with RCP senior elections analyst Sean Trende about current public opinion, including a CBS/Yougov poll released this weekend that showed Trump with a 53 percent approval rating.

In this episode of the RCP Medicine Podcast, Dr. Rohan Mehra, an Infectious Diseases/Microbiology SPR, discusses the critical role of behavioural science in addressing health inequalities. Decreased vaccine uptake and lack of engagement with healthcare services are pressing issues, particularly among those affected by health disparities. To shed light on these challenges, Rohan  is joined by Professor Susan Michie, a leading expert in health psychology and behaviour change from University College London. With her extensive research and practical expertise, Professor Michie explores how we can apply behavioural science to improve healthcare engagement and design effective interventions. Tune in to discover how understanding human behaviour can drive meaningful change in health outcomes.References:A synthesis of evidence for policy from behavioural science during COVID-19, Ruggeri et al.https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06840-9The human behaviour change project www.humanbehaviourchange.orgComplex Systems for Sustainability and Health https://www.ucl.ac.uk/complex-urban-systems/cussh.Behaviour Change Wheel: A Guide to Designing Interventions www.behaviourchangewheel.comWHO behavioural science grouphttps://www.who.int/initiatives/behavioural-sciences 

The 2020s have so far been marked by pandemic, war, and startling technological breakthroughs. Conversations around climate disaster, great-power conflict, and malicious AI are seemingly everywhere. It's enough to make anyone feel like the end might be near. Toby Ord has made it his mission to figure out just how close we are to catastrophe — and maybe not close at all!Ord is the author of the 2020 book, The Precipice: Existential Risk and the Future of Humanity. Back then, I interviewed Ord on the American Enterprise Institute's Political Economy podcast, and you can listen to that episode here. In 2024, he delivered his talk, The Precipice Revisited, in which he reassessed his outlook on the biggest threats facing humanity.Today on Faster, Please — The Podcast, Ord and I address the lessons of Covid, our risk of nuclear war, potential pathways for AI, and much more.Ord is a senior researcher at Oxford University. He has previously advised the UN, World Health Organization, World Economic Forum, and the office of the UK Prime Minister.In This Episode* Climate change (1:30)* Nuclear energy (6:14)* Nuclear war (8:00)* Pandemic (10:19)* Killer AI (15:07)* Artificial General Intelligence (21:01)Below is a lightly edited transcript of our conversation. Climate change (1:30). . . the two worst pathways, we're pretty clearly not on, and so that's pretty good news that we're kind of headed more towards one of the better pathways in terms of the emissions that we'll put out there.Pethokoukis: Let's just start out by taking a brief tour through the existential landscape and how you see it now versus when you first wrote the book The Precipice, which I've mentioned frequently in my writings. I love that book, love to see a sequel at some point, maybe one's in the works . . . but let's start with the existential risk, which has dominated many people's thinking for the past quarter-century, which is climate change.My sense is, not just you, but many people are somewhat less worried than they were five years ago, 10 years ago. Perhaps they see at least the most extreme outcomes less likely. How do you see it?Ord: I would agree with that. I'm not sure that everyone sees it that way, but there were two really big and good pieces of news on climate that were rarely reported in the media. One of them is that there's the question about how many emissions there'll be. We don't know how much carbon humanity will emit into the atmosphere before we get it under control, and there are these different emissions pathways, these RCP 4.5 and things like this you'll have heard of. And often, when people would give a sketch of how bad things could be, they would talk about RCP 8.5, which is the worst of these pathways, and we're very clearly not on that, and we're also, I think pretty clearly now, not on RCP 6, either. So the two worst pathways, we're pretty clearly not on, and so that's pretty good news that we're kind of headed more towards one of the better pathways in terms of the emissions that we'll put out there.What are we doing right?Ultimately, some of those pathways were based on business-as-usual ideas that there wouldn't be climate change as one of the biggest issues in the international political sphere over decades. So ultimately, nations have been switching over to renewables and low-carbon forms of power, which is good news. They could be doing it much more of it, but it's still good news. Back when we initially created these things, I think we would've been surprised and happy to find out that we were going to end up among the better two pathways instead of the worst ones.The other big one is that, as well as how much we'll admit, there's the question of how bad is it to have a certain amount of carbon in the atmosphere? In particular, how much warming does it produce? And this is something of which there's been massive uncertainty. The general idea is that we're trying to predict, if we were to double the amount of carbon in the atmosphere compared to pre-industrial times, how many degrees of warming would there be? The best guess since the year I was born, 1979, has been three degrees of warming, but the uncertainty has been somewhere between one and a half degrees and four and a half.Is that Celsius or Fahrenheit, by the way?This is all Celsius. The climate community has kept the same uncertainty from 1979 all the way up to 2020, and it's a wild level of uncertainty: Four and a half degrees of warming is three times one and a half degrees of warming, so the range is up to triple these levels of degrees of warming based on this amount of carbon. So massive uncertainty that hadn't changed over many decades.Now they've actually revised that and have actually brought in the range of uncertainty. Now they're pretty sure that it's somewhere between two and a half and four degrees, and this is based on better understanding of climate feedbacks. This is good news if you're concerned about worst-case climate change. It's saying it's closer to the central estimate than we'd previously thought, whereas previously we thought that there was a pretty high chance that it could even be higher than four and a half degrees of warming.When you hear these targets of one and a half degrees of warming or two degrees of warming, they sound quite precise, but in reality, we were just so uncertain of how much warming would follow from any particular amount of emissions that it was very hard to know. And that could mean that things are better than we'd thought, but it could also mean things could be much worse. And if you are concerned about existential risks from climate change, then those kind of tail events where it's much worse than we would've thought the things would really get, and we're now pretty sure that we're not on one of those extreme emissions pathways and also that we're not in a world where the temperature is extremely sensitive to those emissions.Nuclear energy (6:14)Ultimately, when it comes to the deaths caused by different power sources, coal . . . killed many more people than nuclear does — much, much more . . .What do you make of this emerging nuclear power revival you're seeing across Europe, Asia, and in the United States? At least the United States it's partially being driven by the need for more power for these AI data centers. How does it change your perception of risk in a world where many rich countries, or maybe even not-so-rich countries, start re-embracing nuclear energy?In terms of the local risks with the power plants, so risks of meltdown or other types of harmful radiation leak, I'm not too concerned about that. Ultimately, when it comes to the deaths caused by different power sources, coal, even setting aside global warming, just through particulates being produced in the soot, killed many more people than nuclear does — much, much more, and so nuclear is a pretty safe form of energy production as it happens, contrary to popular perception. So I'm in favor of that. But the proliferation concerns, if it is countries that didn't already have nuclear power, then the possibility that they would be able to use that to start a weapons program would be concerning.And as sort of a mechanism for more clean energy. Do you view nuclear as clean energy?Yes, I think so. It's certainly not carbon-producing energy. I think that it has various downsides, including the difficulty of knowing exactly what to do with the fuel, that will be a very long lasting problem. But I think it's become clear that the problems caused by other forms of energy are much larger and we should switch to the thing that has fewer problems, rather than more problems.Nuclear war (8:00)I do think that the Ukraine war, in particular, has created a lot of possible flashpoints.I recently finished a book called Nuclear War: A Scenario, which is kind of a minute-by-minute look at how a nuclear war could break out. If you read the book, the book is terrifying because it really goes into a lot of — and I live near Washington DC, so when it gives its various scenarios, certainly my house is included in the blast zone, so really a frightening book. But when it tried to explain how a war would start, I didn't find it a particularly compelling book. The scenarios for actually starting a conflict, I didn't think sounded particularly realistic.Do you feel — and obviously we have Russia invade Ukraine and loose talk by Vladimir Putin about nuclear weapons — do you feel more or less confident that we'll avoid a nuclear war than you did when you wrote the book?Much less confident, actually. I guess I should say, when I wrote the book, it came out in 2020, I finished the writing in 2019, and ultimately we were in a time of relatively low nuclear risk, and I feel that the risk has risen. That said, I was trying to provide estimates for the risk over the next hundred years, and so I wasn't assuming that the low-risk period would continue indefinitely, but it was quite a shock to end up so quickly back in this period of heightened tensions and threats of nuclear escalation, the type of thing I thought was really from my parents' generation. So yes, I do think that the Ukraine war, in particular, has created a lot of possible flashpoints. That said, the temperature has come down on the conversation in the last year, so that's something.Of course, the conversation might heat right back up if we see a Chinese invasion of Taiwan. I've been very bullish about the US economy and world economy over the rest of this decade, but the exception is as long as we don't have a war with China, from an economic point of view, but certainly also a nuclear point of view. Two nuclear armed powers in conflict? That would not be an insignificant event from the existential-risk perspective.It is good that China has a smaller nuclear arsenal than the US or Russia, but there could easily be a great tragedy.Pandemic (10:19)Overall, a lot of countries really just muddled through not very well, and the large institutions that were supposed to protect us from these things, like the CDC and the WHO, didn't do a great job either.The book comes out during the pandemic. Did our response to the pandemic make you more or less confident in our ability and willingness to confront that kind of outbreak? The worst one that saw in a hundred years?Yeah, overall, it made me much less confident. There'd been general thought by those who look at these large catastrophic risks that when the chips are down and the threat is imminent, that people will see it and will band together and put a lot of effort into it; that once you see the asteroid in your telescope and it's headed for you, then things will really get together — a bit like in the action movies or what have you.That's where I take my cue from, exactly.And with Covid, it was kind of staring us in the face. Those of us who followed these things closely were quite alarmed a long time before the national authorities were. Overall, a lot of countries really just muddled through not very well, and the large institutions that were supposed to protect us from these things, like the CDC and the WHO, didn't do a great job either. That said, scientists, particularly developing RNA vaccines, did better than I expected.In the years leading up to the pandemic, certainly we'd seen other outbreaks, they'd had the avian flu outbreak, and you know as well as I do, there were . . . how many white papers or scenario-planning exercises for just this sort of event. I think I recall a story where, in 2018, Bill Gates had a conversation with President Trump during his first term about the risk of just such an outbreak. So it's not as if this thing came out of the blue. In many ways we saw the asteroid, it was just pretty far away. But to me, that says something again about as humans, our ability to deal with severe, but infrequent, risks.And obviously, not having a true global, nasty outbreak in a hundred years, where should we focus our efforts? On preparation? Making sure we have enough ventilators? Or our ability to respond? Because it seems like the preparation route will only go so far, and the reason it wasn't a much worse outbreak is because we have a really strong ability to respond.I'm not sure if it's the same across all risks as to how preparation versus ability to respond, which one is better. In some risks, there's also other possibilities like avoiding an outbreak, say, an accidental outbreak happening at all, or avoiding a nuclear war starting and not needing to actually respond at all. I'm not sure if there's an overall rule as to which one was better.Do you have an opinion on the outbreak of Covid?I don't know whether it was a lab leak. I think it's a very plausible hypothesis, but plausible doesn't mean it's proven.And does the post-Covid reaction, at least in the United States, to vaccines, does that make you more or less confident in our ability to deal with . . . the kind of societal cohesion and confidence to tackle a big problem, to have enough trust? Maybe our leaders don't deserve that trust, but what do you make from this kind of pushback against vaccines and — at least in the United States — our medical authorities?When Covid was first really striking Europe and America, it was generally thought that, while China was locking down the Wuhan area, that Western countries wouldn't be able to lock down, that it wasn't something that we could really do, but then various governments did order lockdowns. That said, if you look at the data on movement of citizens, it turns out that citizens stopped moving around prior to the lockdowns, so the lockdown announcements were more kind of like the tail, rather than the dog.But over time, citizens wanted to kind of get back out and interact more, and the rules were preventing them, and if a large fraction of the citizens were under something like house arrest for the better part of a year, would that lead to some fairly extreme resentment and some backlash, some of which was fairly irrational? Yeah, that is actually exactly the kind of thing that you would expect. It was very difficult to get a whole lot of people to row together and take the same kind of response that we needed to coordinate the response to prevent the spread, and pushing for that had some of these bad consequences, which are also going to make it harder for next time. We haven't exactly learned the right lessons.Killer AI (15:07)If we make things that are smarter than us and are not inherently able to control their values or give them moral rules to work within, then we should expect them to ultimately be calling the shots.We're more than halfway through our chat and now we're going to get to the topic probably most people would like to hear about: After the robots take our jobs, are they going to kill us? What do you think? What is your concern about AI risk?I'm quite concerned about it. Ultimately, when I wrote my book, I put AI risk as the biggest existential risk, albeit the most uncertain, as well, and I would still say that. That said, some things have gotten better since then.I would assume what makes you less confident is one, what seems to be the rapid advance — not just the rapid advance of the technology, but you have the two leading countries in a geopolitical globalization also being the leaders in the technology and not wanting to slow it down. I would imagine that would make you more worried that we will move too quickly. What would make you more confident that we would avoid any serious existential downsides?I agree with your supposition that the attempts by the US and China to turn this into some kind of arms race are quite concerning. But here are a few things: Back when I was writing the book, the leading AI systems with things like AlphaGo, if you remember that, or the Atari plane systems.Quaint. Quite quaint.It was very zero-sum, reinforcement-learning-based game playing, where these systems were learning directly to behave adversarially to other systems, and they could only understand the kind of limited aspect about the world, and struggle, and overcoming your adversary. That was really all they could do, and the idea of teaching them about ethics, or how to treat people, and the diversity of human values seemed almost impossible: How do you tell a chess program about that?But then what we've ended up with is systems that are not inherently agents, they're not inherently trying to maximize something. Rather, you ask them questions and they blurt out some answers. These systems have read more books on ethics and moral philosophy than I have, and they've read all kinds of books about the human condition. Almost all novels that have ever been published, and pretty much every page of every novel involves people judging the actions of other people and having some kind of opinions about them, and so there's a huge amount of data about human values, and how we think about each other, and what's inappropriate behavior. And if you ask the systems about these things, they're pretty good at judging whether something's inappropriate behavior, if you describe it.The real challenge remaining is to get them to care about that, but at least the knowledge is in the system, and that's something that previously seemed extremely difficult to do. Also, these systems, there are versions that do reasoning and that spend longer with a private text stream where they think — it's kind of like sub-vocalizing thoughts to themselves before they answer. When they do that, these systems are thinking in plain English, and that's something that we really didn't expect. If you look at all of the weights of a neural network, it's quite inscrutable, famously difficult to know what it's doing, but somehow we've ended up with systems that are actually thinking in English and where that could be inspected by some oversight process. There are a number of ways in which things are better than I'd feared.So what is your actual existential risk scenario look like? This is what you're most concerned about happening with AI.I think it's quite hard to be all that concrete on it at the moment, partly because things change so quickly. I don't think that there's going to be some kind of existential catastrophe from AI in the next couple of years, partly because the current systems require so much compute in order to run them that they can only be run at very specialized and large places, of which there's only a few in the world. So that means the possibility that they break out and copy themselves into other systems is not really there, in which case, the possibility of turning them off is much possible as well.Also, they're not yet intelligent enough to be able to execute a lengthy plan. If you have some kind of complex task for them, that requires, say, 10 steps — for example, booking a flight on the internet by clicking through all of the appropriate pages, and finding out when the times are, and managing to book your ticket, and fill in the special codes they sent to your email, and things like that. That's a somewhat laborious task and the systems can't do things like that yet. There's still the case that, even if they've got a, say, 90 percent chance of completing any particular step, that the 10 percent chances of failure add up, and eventually it's likely to fail somewhere along the line and not be able to recover. They'll probably get better at that, but at the moment, the inability to actually execute any complex plans does provide some safety.Ultimately, the concern is that, at a more abstract level, we're building systems which are smarter than us at many things, and we're attempting to make them much more general and to be smarter than us across the board. If you know that one player is a better chess player than another, suppose Magnus Carlsen's playing me at chess, I can't predict exactly how he's going to beat me, but I can know with quite high likelihood that he will end up beating me. I'll end up in checkmate, even though I don't know what moves will happen in between here and there, and I think that it's similar with AI systems. If we make things that are smarter than us and are not inherently able to control their values or give them moral rules to work within, then we should expect them to ultimately be calling the shots.Artificial General Intelligence (21:01)Ultimately, existential risks are global public goods problems.I frequently check out the Metaculus online prediction platform, and I think currently on that platform, 2027 for what they would call “weak AGI,” artificial general intelligence — a date which has moved up two months in the past week as we're recording this, and then I think 2031 also has accelerated for “strong AGI,” so this is pretty soon, 2027 or 2031, quite soon. Is that kind of what you're assuming is going to happen, that we're going to have to deal with very powerful technologies quite quickly?Yeah, I think that those are good numbers for the typical case, what you should be expecting. I think that a lot of people wouldn't be shocked if it turns out that there is some kind of obstacle that slows down progress and takes longer before it gets overcome, but it's also wouldn't be surprising at this point if there are no more big obstacles and it's just a matter of scaling things up and doing fairly simple processes to get it to work.It's now a multi-billion dollar industry, so there's a lot of money focused on ironing out any kinks or overcoming any obstacles on the way. So I expect it to move pretty quickly and those timelines sound very realistic. Maybe even sooner.When you wrote the book, what did you put as the risk to human existence over the next a hundred years, and what is it now?When I wrote the book, I thought it was about one in six.So it's still one in six . . . ?Yeah, I think that's still about right, and I would say that most of that is coming from AI.This isn't, I guess, a specific risk, but, to the extent that being positive about our future means also being positive on our ability to work together, countries working together, what do you make of society going in the other direction where we seem more suspicious of other countries, or more even — in the United States — more suspicious of our allies, more suspicious of international agreements, whether they're trade or military alliances. To me, I would think that the Age of Globalization would've, on net, lowered that risk to one in six, and if we're going to have less globalization, to me, that would tend to increase that risk.That could be right. Certainly increased suspicion, to the point of paranoia or cynicism about other nations and their ability to form deals on these things, is not going to be helpful at all. Ultimately, existential risks are global public goods problems. This continued functioning of human civilization is this global public good and existential risk is the opposite. And so these are things where, one way to look at it is that the US has about four percent of the world's people, so one in 25 people live in the US, and so an existential risk is hitting 25 times as many people as. So if every country is just interested in themself, they'll undervalue it by a factor of 25 or so, and the countries need to work together in order to overcome that kind of problem. Ultimately, if one of us falls victim to these risks, then we all do, and so it definitely does call out for international cooperation. And I think that it has a strong basis for international cooperation. It is in all of our interests. There are also verification possibilities and so on, and I'm actually quite optimistic about treaties and other ways to move forward.On sale everywhere The Conservative Futurist: How To Create the Sci-Fi World We Were PromisedMicro Reads▶ Economics* Tech tycoons have got the economics of AI wrong - Economist* Progress in Artificial Intelligence and its Determinants - Arxiv* The role of personality traits in shaping economic returns amid technological change - CEPR▶ Business* Tech CEOs try to reassure Wall Street after DeepSeek shock - Wapo* DeepSeek Calls for Deep Breaths From Big Tech Over Earnings - Bberg Opinion* Apple's AI Moment Is Still a Ways Off - WSJ* Bill Gates Isn't Like Those Other Tech Billionaires - NYT* OpenAI's Sam Altman and SoftBank's Masayoshi Son Are AI's New Power Couple - WSJ* SoftBank Said to Be in Talks to Invest as Much as $25 Billion in OpenAI - NYT* Microsoft sheds $200bn in market value after cloud sales disappoint - FT▶ Policy/Politics* ‘High anxiety moment': Biden's NIH chief talks Trump 2.0 and the future of US science - Nature* Government Tech Workers Forced to Defend Projects to Random Elon Musk Bros - Wired* EXCLUSIVE: NSF starts vetting all grants to comply with Trump's orders - Science* Milei, Modi, Trump: an anti-red-tape revolution is under way - Economist* FDA Deregulation of E-Cigarettes Saved Lives and Spurred Innovation - Marginal Revolution* Donald Trump revives ideas of a Star Wars-like missile shield - Economist▶ AI/Digital* Is DeepSeek Really a Threat? - PS* ChatGPT vs. Claude vs. DeepSeek: The Battle to Be My AI Work Assistant - WSJ* OpenAI teases “new era” of AI in US, deepens ties with government - Ars* AI's Power Requirements Under Exponential Growth - Rand* How DeepSeek Took a Chunk Out of Big AI - Bberg* DeepSeek poses a challenge to Beijing as much as to Silicon Valley - Economist▶ Biotech/Health* Creatine shows promise for treating depression - NS* FDA approves new, non-opioid painkiller Journavx - Wapo▶ Clean Energy/Climate* Another Boffo Energy Forecast, Just in Time for DeepSeek - Heatmap News* Column: Nuclear revival puts uranium back in the critical spotlight - Mining* A Michigan nuclear plant is slated to restart, but Trump could complicate things - Grist▶ Robotics/AVs* AIs and Robots Should Sound Robotic - IEEE Spectrum* Robot beauticians touch down in California - FT Opinion▶ Space/Transportation* A Flag on Mars? Maybe Not So Soon. - NYT* Asteroid triggers global defence plan amid chance of collision with Earth in 2032 - The Guardian* Lurking Inside an Asteroid: Life's Ingredients - NYT▶ Up Wing/Down Wing* An Ancient 'Lost City' Is Uncovered in Mexico - NYT* Reflecting on Rome, London and Chicago after the Los Angeles fires - Wapo Opinion▶ Substacks/Newsletters* I spent two days testing DeepSeek R1 - Understanding AI* China's Technological Advantage -overlapping tech-industrial ecosystems - AI Supremacy* The state of decarbonization in five charts - Exponential View* The mistake of the century - Slow Boring* The Child Penalty: An International View - Conversable Economist* Deep Deepseek History and Impact on the Future of AI - next BIG futureFaster, Please! is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit fasterplease.substack.com/subscribe

This week we're talking film music. But more specifically, we're diving into the world of RCP: a collaborative company setup by Hans Zimmer that has quietly scored a vast majority of modern Hollywood films. How and who's part of this exclusive club? Well you'll just have to listen to find out. Check out our various rewards and tiers on patreon: www.patreon.com/sequelisers Website: www.sequelisers.com/  Discord: www.sequelisers.com/discord  Shop: www.sequelisers.com/shop  Instagram: instagram.com/sequelisers TikTok: tiktok.com/@sequelisers Music by Daniel Williams Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Andrew Walworth, Tom Bevan, Carl Cannon and RCP White House correspondent Phil Wegmann discuss the first cable sent by Secretary of State Marco Rubio to US embassies around the world, and what it portends for his tenure. They also talk about Tuesday's press conference at the White House concerning “Stargate,” a major infrastructure project to promote AI in the US. Also, a look at Trump's suggested solution to California's water issues. Plus, Carl talks about the career, wit and wisdom of Ichiro Suzuki of the Seattle Mariners, who just became the first Asian player elected to baseball's Hall of Fame. Then finally, Carl Cannon talks to RCP columnist John Maxwell Hamilton about Donald Trump's first two days in office.

Donald Trump is back in power and this time around he is threatening 25 per cent tariffs against Canadian goods. He has even gone so far as to threaten to annex Canada, turning it into a 51st state. Joel Bergman and Rob Lyon from the Revolutionary Communist party met for an episode of the Revolutionary Communist Podcast where they break down what this means, from a Marxist point of view. Join the RCP: https://www.marxist.ca/join Register for the Marxist Winter School: https://www.marxist.ca/school

Andrew Walworth, Carl Cannon and Emily Jashinsky, Washington correspondent for Unherd and host of the Youtube show “Undercurrents,” discuss today's memorial service for Jimmy Carter at Washington's National Cathedral. Then, they talk about Meta's decision to end third-party fact checking for its social media platforms and what impact it will have on journalism and on the fact-checking industry. Next, they discuss Trump's meeting on Wednesday with GOP Senators, and the push to get workers to return to the office full-time, a movement resisted by some Gen Z employees who are used to working remotely. And finally, RCP national correspondent Susan Crabtree and Andrew Walworth discuss how California governor Gavin Newsom and President-Elect Donald Trump have engaged over the Los Angeles wildfires.

En este episodio, hablamos con Miguel Asal, un experto en situaciones críticas, sobre cómo sobrevivir a un ataque al corazón y salvar vidas en momentos de emergencia. Cada año se registran más de 30,000 ataques cardíacos, y conocer los pasos clave puede marcar la diferencia entre la vida y la muerte. Además, exploramos impactantes historias de superación y momentos que nos enseñan cómo actuar cuando la vida nos pone a prueba. Este podcast te ofrece una guía para enfrentar lo inesperado.

In the season premiere of season 7, w34z3l shares valuable strategies for gaining a competitive edge in online #poker. He emphasizes the importance of tools like HUDs for informational advantage, discusses the role of table selection, and explains how high-volume play impacts hourly rates. We also examine how poker rooms may counteract players' edges with restrictions like HUD limits and hand history access, stressing the need for players to be selective in choosing poker rooms that align with their strategies.   00:00 Welcome To Season 7 00:51 Introduction to Poker Edge 01:12 Key Areas to Gain an Edge 01:24 Importance of HUD and Table Selection 02:19 Volume and Hand Histories 03:54 Use of Scripts and Game Softness 05:10 Poker Rooms Counteracting Your Edge 06:52 Fast Format Games and HUD Limitations 08:26 Hand History and Table Cap Restrictions 10:17 Variance Increases and Player Value Index 12:02 High Rake and Graphics Overkill 14:16 Criteria for Choosing a Poker Room 20:51 Coaching and Training Sites 24:42 Final Thoughts on Maintaining Your Edge   **LINKS** · Upgrade To PRO Now: https://redchippoker.com/pro-membership · Protect Yourself Against Online Cheating: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JEtzT2OtiiQ · Understanding Your Winrate: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wb5Yc_scPQs   **JOIN US ON DISCORD** Join our free poker Discord today: https://redchippoker.com/discord

Andrew Walworth is joined by RCP Senior Elections Analyst Sean Trende and RCP White House correspondent Phil Wegmann to discuss today's certification of election results on Capitol Hill, as well as the future of pardons for the January 6th defendants. Then, they talk about the announcement by Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau that he is resigning as head of the Liberal Party and how that will affect US/Canadian relations in the future. Next, they chat about what happens next on Capitol Hill concerning legislation dealing with immigration, taxes and energy. And they take a look at President Biden's visit to New Orleans today to meet with victims of the recent terrorist attack in the French Quarter. Then, wrapping it up, RCP contributor Charlie Stone interviews Jon Long and Ford Fischer, the creators of the documentary “Fight Like Hell,” which chronicles the events leading up to and including January 6, 2021. The documentary (https://www.fightlikehellmovie.org/) features never-before-seen footage and attempts to cover J6 without bias.

Andrew Walworth, Carl Cannon and RCP White House correspondent Phil Wegmann discuss the recent attacks in New Orleans and Las Vegas and the policy challenges posed by domestic terrorism. They also talk about the start of the 119th Congress and the future of Mike Johnson's speakership. Plus, a look at the upcoming confirmation hearings for Trump's most controversial cabinet choices. Next, Carl Cannon talks with RCP Contributor J. Peder Zane about his latest RCP article on what legacy media can do right in the year ahead. And finally, Andrew Walworth talks to Geoffrey Pohanka, chairman of Pohanka Automotive Group and past chair of the National Automobile Dealers Association about how “range anxiety” affects the adoption of electric vehicles and how Trump's policies may change the auto industry.

First, Tom Bevan talks to RCP contributor Richard Porter about the hit movie Gladiator II, and whether it is an allegory for Donald Trump's political comeback. Then, Carl Cannon talks to Tevi Troy, senior fellow at the Ronald Regan Institute and the author of "The Power and the Money: The Epic Clashes Between Commanders in Chief and Titans of Industry” about what Joe Biden can get done in the less than seven weeks left in his presidency. Next, Andrew Walworth talks to author James Piereson about his New Criterion article on why Trump's new Department of Government Efficiency should target the N.E.D., and why it's so hard to shut down any government-funded operation. And finally, Andrew Walworth talks to Wall Street Journal columnist William Galston about the future of the N.E.D., which is reportedly targeted by Trump's new Department of Government Efficiency for elimination.

Happy Holidays! We're back, like for real for real. I catch y'all up to speed on where I've been and what the future of RCP looks like. I missed everyone and it's so good to be behind the mic again!

Andrew Walworth, Tom Bevan and Carl Cannon discuss the influence wielded by Elon Musk, especially in regard to the Congressional budget process. They also talk about a new Newsweek article by Rep. Pramila Jayapal, Chair of the House Progressive Caucus, on how the Democrats can regain power by “unrigging” the system and Politifact's annual poll of its readers, ranking ten whoppers told by politicians over the past year. Next, Tom speaks with White House reporter Phil Wegmann about America Fest. Then finally, in his most recent interview for the video series “The Unknowns,” RCP contributor Charlie Stone talks to legal analyst and journalist Jack Ford about the defense's strategy in the upcoming trial of Luigi Mangione for the murder of healthcare executive Brian Thompson.

Andrew Walworth, Tom Bevan and Carl Cannon discuss how the leaders of Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) have rejected the congressional Continuing Budget Resolution and a new report from The House Administration Subcommittee that accuses former Rep. Liz Cheney of engaging in witness tampering during the Jan. 6 House investigation. They chat about Rahm Emmanuel's recent Washington Post op-ed outlining a comeback strategy for the Democratic Party and take a look at the political travails of Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. Plus, Carl Cannon talks to RCP contributor Eric Spitz about public reaction to the Hunter Biden pardon.

The Rich Zeoli Show- Hour 3: 5:00pm- A new CNN report follows a Michigan autoworker who has been a lifelong Democrat but is now voting for Donald Trump on November 5th. He blames the Biden-Harris Administration for electric vehicle mandates that have harmed the automotive industry. Will other Michigan voters make similar decisions? 5:10pm- Kamala Harris's Pennsylvania Catholic Problem. William McGurn of The Wall Street Journal writes: “Less than four weeks from the election, Michigan's Democratic governor made an in-kind contribution to Donald Trump's campaign. Gretchen Whitmer appeared last week in a video featuring her placing a Dorito chip on the tongue of a kneeling social-media influencer. After Michigan's bishops denounced the clip as ‘specifically imitating the posture and gestures of Catholics receiving the Holy Eucharist,' Ms. Whitmer apologized. The kicker: She was wearing a Harris-Walz campaign hat in the video. The swing-state governor says she had no idea people might find the post offensive, which speaks to how out of touch Democratic elites are. That cluelessness may prove costly in an election in which Kamala Harris and Donald Trump are separated by less than half a point in the RealClearPolitics polling average for the seven battleground states. In the most important of these—Pennsylvania—the latest RCP average shows Mr. Trump leads 48.3% to 47.9%. Ms. Harris's problem is that exit polls from 2020 show 30% of the state's voters are Catholic.” You can read the full editorial here: https://www.wsj.com/opinion/kamala-harris-catholic-voter-problem-san-fran-progressive-doesnt-fit-pennsylvania-0994c322 5:20pm- On Tuesday, Donald Trump participated in a Latino Roundtable in Miami, Florida. At one point, the conversation focused on the tens of thousands undocumented migrant children who have gone missing under the Biden-Harris Administration. 5:40pm- David Urban— Political Commentator for CNN & Volunteer Senior Advisor to Donald Trump—joins The Rich Zeoli Show and reacts to Kamala Harris's campaign walking back their support for fracking, Trump working at a McDonald's drive thru, and Tim Walz appearing on The View as part of the campaign's efforts to appeal to male voters!

In part one of Red Eye Radio with Gary McNamara and Eric Harley, we start with "The Kamala Funkadelic" and go back to McDonald's for all the fallout and over analysis for his fast food stop. Also the Kamala Tour w/ Liz Chaney, Tim Walz audio from The View and CNN's supportive comments toward Trump, a glance at the RCP polls, Kamala's failing campaign, various commentary and OpEd's supporting Trumps photo opp at McDonald's. Also we are 2 weeks away from the election and there is a zero tolerance policy on voter fraud, some comments on early voting, Lindsay Graham's slam on Kamala. Also what if Joe Biden was the better candidate after all (article by liberal Harlan Ollman). Also "RICO 101", Jerry Seinfeld backtracking on his comments, Dave Ramsey says "I'm voting for Trump!", some 80-83% of adults say the economy is the key issue of the campaign, and much more. For more talk on the issues that matter to you, listen on radio stations across America Monday-Friday 12am-5am CT (1am-6am ET and 10pm-3am PT), download the RED EYE RADIO SHOW app, asking your smart speaker, or listening at RedEyeRadioShow.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Steve, Todd, and Aaron discuss CNN's Erin Burnett and her real-time discovery on TV that Kamala Harris might just be crazy. Then, the team pays homage to the now late-great James Earl Jones and the legacy he and his voice left on pop culture. In Hour Two, the team plays another round of "Legit Poll or Not" featuring the RCP average of six battleground states. Finally, Megan Basham joins the program to recap the ongoing backlash to her recent book, "Shepherds for Sale." Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices