Podcasts about atmospheric administration noaa

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the Navy have partnered to secure the seas NOAA's establishment in 1807. During Sea-Air-Space 2025, Rear Adm. Chad Cary, director of NOAA's Commissioned Officer Corps and the NOAA Office of Marine and Aviation Operations, spoke to GovCIO Media & Research about NOAA's work integrating AI integration and autonomous systems into its operations, which he says have increased efficiency by 20 to 40% in data collection for research. Cary also says that NOAA is modernizing platforms and collaborating with academia and industry to leverage emerging technologies for better mission outcomes and marine domain awareness.

Staff and budget cuts at local offices of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), are degrading weather forecasts and adding chaos to New England's commercial fisheries. Proposed additional cuts could throw fisheries, scientific research and weather forecasting into further disarray, threatening lives and livelihoods throughout the region.

In this episode, we break down the upcoming MA-IDIQ: Administrative, Clerical, and Non-Scientific Support Services contract from the Department of Commerce – National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Set aside exclusively for SBA-certified Women-Owned Small Businesses (WOSBs), this $30.28M opportunity includes 6 anticipated awards and a planned RFP release in June 2025.We'll explore:Contract scope and service areasSet-aside requirements for WOSBsInsights on the previous RFP and incumbent landscapeWhat your business can do now to get a head startIf you're a WOSB looking to expand into NOAA or federal administrative support, this episode is a must-listen.

In this debut episode, Frank Indiviglio, CTO at National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) explains the power of AI data science and high performance computing to transform vast raw data into actionable insights—from hurricane forecasting to coral reef monitoring. He discusses how AI improves data processing efficiency, the importance of blending science and tech to scale forecasting, and how open data efforts are balanced with cybersecurity to build public trust. With cross-sector collaboration driving innovation, NOAA is leading the charge in turning raw data into real-world impact. Tune in to the full episode to hear how tech is transforming how we understand our planet.

President Trump has made sweeping changes to America's policies on climate since being sworn in 100 hundred days ago. He has announced plans to "unleash" American energy, including revitalising the coal industry and boosting oil and gas. The President has also cut funding for clean energy projects and renewables, while slashing jobs in government-funded climate research. Experts also say Washington's trade tariffs are having a big impact on the global market for new technologies such as solar panels and electric vehicles.So what does all this mean for the green transition in America and beyond? In this show, Graihagh Jackson talks to the BBC's US Environment Correspondent Carl Nasman, BBC Climate Editor Justin Rowlatt and Zerin Osho, Director of the India Programme at the Institute for Governance & Sustainable Development based in Washington DC. Graihagh also chats to Tom Di Liberto, a climate scientist who was recently fired from America's National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).Presenter: Graihagh Jackson Producers: Sophie Eastaugh and Beth Timmins Production Coordinator: Brenda Brown Sound Mix: Gabriel O'Regan and Tom Brignell Editor: Simon WattsIf you have a question, email us at theclimatequestion@bbc.com or leave a WhatsApp message at + 44 8000 321 721

Guest Michelle Barker Panelist Richard Littauer Show Notes In this episode of Sustain, host Richard Littauer welcomes Michelle Barker, Director of the Research Software Alliance (ReSA), for an in-depth conversation about the critical yet often overlooked role of research software in open science. Michelle shares her journey from sociologist to open science advocate, unpacking how ReSA fosters global collaboration to support software developed for research. Together, they explore what it means to build “social infrastructure” in the open source ecosystem, the challenges of aligning international stakeholders, and how ReSA is shaping the future of research through strategy, connection, and community-driven solutions. Press the download button now to hear more! [00:01:58] Michelle explains how she got involved in open science and open source software. [00:04:35] Why Research Software? Michelle shares that ReSA was founded to coordinate globally on research software, which lacked unified international representation unlike open data. [00:07:21] We hear about ReSA's engagement strategy and the three main strategies: knowledge sharing, stakeholder collaboration, and governance evolution. [00:09:37] ReSA includes RSEs as one of many stakeholders and works broadly across funders, policymakers, infrastructure providers, and more. [00:10:26] Research software is defined as software developed within a research context to solve a research problem and most is open source but not all. [00:13:12] Richard asks about tracking engagement, and Michelle shares it's hard to quantify outcomes, but standard metrics include newsletter subs, citations, and forum attendance. [00:15:08] Michelle explains the role of social infrastructure. [00:17:37] What's hard about being a social infrastructure? Michelle talks about the challenge of how to motivate groups of people to work together. [00:19:52] Michelle shares her personal approach to networking: research, targeting key individuals, emotional engagement, and strategic planning for conferences. [00:24:35] A new strategy plan is rolling out and Michelle shares what's different. [00:27:32] ReSA is working to establish research software as its own recognized field. [00:29:57] Michelle recognizes shared challenges of both open source and research sectors. The keys to success are spotlight wins and demonstrate value through supported infrastructure and recognized contributions. [00:30:40] Find out where you can find out more about ReSA. Spotlight [00:31:11] Richard's spotlight is the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). [00:31:48] Michelle's spotlight is Softcite. Links SustainOSS (https://sustainoss.org/) podcast@sustainoss.org (mailto:podcast@sustainoss.org) richard@sustainoss.org (mailto:richard@sustainoss.org) SustainOSS Discourse (https://discourse.sustainoss.org/) SustainOSS Mastodon (https://mastodon.social/tags/sustainoss) SustainOSS Bluesky (https://bsky.app/profile/sustainoss.bsky.social) SustainOSS LinkedIn (https://www.linkedin.com/company/sustainoss/) Open Collective-SustainOSS (Contribute) (https://opencollective.com/sustainoss) Richard Littauer Socials (https://www.burntfen.com/2023-05-30/socials) Michelle Barker LinkedIn (https://www.linkedin.com/in/michelledbarker/) Research Software Alliance (ReSA) (https://www.researchsoft.org/) ReSA LinkedIn (https://www.linkedin.com/company/research-software-alliance/) ReSA Mastodon (https://fosstodon.org/@researchsoft) ReSA Bluesky (https://bsky.app/profile/researchsoftware.bsky.social) Sustain Podcast-Episode 264: Neil Chue Hong on the Software Sustainability Institute (https://podcast.sustainoss.org/264) USRSE'25: Philadelphia, PA Oct 6-8, 2025 (https://us-rse.org/) US-RSE (https://us-rse.org/) NOAA (https://www.noaa.gov/) Softcite (https://github.com/softcite/softcite_dataset_v2) Strategic Report Overview (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XAioZINde902hlujD9hIaiIK5Eagx7w5XP9f8Q7P0KU/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.lbr59vck876) Full Strategic Report (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-nyor44kBo5v6lb92ajjzJmYFJ-TXLcafyUz9luQMVk/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.iiwcx8uz2jje) Defining Research Software: a controversial discussion (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5504016) Credits Produced by Richard Littauer (https://www.burntfen.com/) Edited by Paul M. Bahr at Peachtree Sound (https://www.peachtreesound.com/) Show notes by DeAnn Bahr Peachtree Sound (https://www.peachtreesound.com/) Special Guest: Michelle Barker.

The South African National Space Agency (Sansa) weather centre says a solar storm that hit planet Earth recently, has impacted satellite navigation systems in South Africa. Based on data from the United States National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), a Severe-class solar storm hit on Wednesday. Sakina Kamwendo spoke to SANSA Space Weather Forecaster, Salma Khan

US President Donald Trump, since his inauguration, has seen the cutting of jobs and funding in certain departments as part of his wider process to cut government spending.One of the victims of these cuts is America's weather departments, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), which provides data for forecasting, sparking fears that the US might be unprepared for future weather events.David Amelotti, Reporter and Anchor at First Alert 4 News from St Louis, Missouri joins Kieran to discuss, and Alan O'Reilly from Carlow Weather joins to discuss the impact it may have on Irish weather reporting.

Since the first time Man planted a garden or fought a battle, weather has been vital to success and survival. The weather has famously decided wars. In some cases, weather has been the key factor in the rise and fall of whole Empires. Like many other contemporary real experts, today's guest, Jim Lee, is an independent researcher, in this case, into weather modification.   Why Weather Matters   George Washington avoided surrendering his army in the Battle of Long Island by deceiving the British about his movements and then withdrawing 9,000 men, supplies, and cannons overnight and into the next morning across the East River while a fog miraculously provided cover. If that Providential escape had failed, the War of Independence could have ended.   Napoleon attacked Imperial Russia as winter arrived and was soundly defeated by both poor planning and the vicious cold, decimating the French army, which had over 100,000 men captured, 380,000 dead, and only 27,000 returning to France.   Decades later, despite France's failure in 1812, Hitler's army tried attacking the Soviet Union during World War II and managed to hang on with brutal tactics until winter arrived and the Germans were soundly defeated. Many of the German survivors who managed to make it back to Germany alive were badly disfigured by frostbite, which had claimed noses, eyelids, fingers, and toes. The Germans also murdered over 1 million civilian Soviet Jews during the invasion. The German army troops captured over 5 million Soviet troops and deliberately starved over 3.3 million Soviet prisoners of war in brutal disregard for the established rules of war. Despite the most savage and determined fighting, the weather heavily influenced the failure of the German assault upon the Soviet Union.   Any effective military will invest whatever it can to predict, manage, and manipulate weather systems.   More recently, during the Vietnam War, the US seeded clouds over the Ho Chi Min trail in order to mire down enemy North Vietnamese soldiers from moving South.   Growing Concern About Abuses of Weather Control in the US   Many concerns have arisen that Earth's weather is being manipulated in ways harmful to the citizenry and the economy. The hurricane that hit the Hawaiian Island of Maui and the accompanying firestorm that devastated the town of Lahaina in 2023 with grave loss of life and destruction of the community appeared very suspicious. Hurricane Helene and then Milton chewed up Florida and demolished Southeastern Appalachia communities in North Carolina and Eastern Tennessee. Have behaved in unusual ways and produced unusual and shockingly high amounts of damage and loss of life. Many citizens have questioned what aspects of the storms may have been “enhanced” or manipulated. The lack of official assistance being provided to survivors of these devastating events has understandably increased suspicion.   The federal government has done nothing to alleviate citizen concerns; instead, it has encouraged censorship through social media. The usual claims of conspiracy theory have been lobbed against anyone raising these questions, but as it turns out, citizens are asking very good questions.   Government Censorship   The federal government censors and curtails information and public discussion on subjects like weather manipulation. For a good review of the state of government censorship in the world today, listen to the Joe Rogan interview with Mike Benz that aired this month. The federal government funds, coordinates, and gives orders to its own branches and federal agencies and to non-government organizations (NGOs), nonprofits, universities, and others to censor and eliminate free speech. There are literally hundreds of thousands of hired individuals manipulating the truth as hired guns through traditional news outlets, social media, university outlets, book publishers, and scientific journals.   Weather Modification, Inc.   The absurdity of these government denials was recently highlighted by a photo of a plane on TikTok with a large corporate logo across its fuselage that said, “Weather Modification, International.” The Weather Modification International website was surprisingly empty, but when I checked the web archive for earlier versions, I found that their website started being stripped of data in early 2020. The 2019 archive offered a more robust introduction to the company. Turns out, Weather Modification Inc. has been operating since its founding in 1961 by two farmers/pilots. As of 2019, the company had grown to almost 40 aircraft and 100 personnel. Here is a screenshot of the 2019 “Who We Are” web page.     Weather Modification, Incorporated has been in business since 1961. Their current website declares:   “When most people look up they see clouds. WE SEE POTENTIAL.” About us: Now, more than ever, the worldwide need for solutions to atmospheric necessities such as water resource management and environmental quality monitoring, is critical. With nearly a half-century of successful programs, our experience speaks for itself.   Let us help you better manage your atmospheric and water resources.   In the archive, Weather Modification Inc. had a very robust and international list of governmental, military, academic, and private clients. The client list for the United States included the US Department of Defense (DOD), the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and its National Hurricane Center, the Naval Surface Warfare Center, several state cloud seeding or weather modification programs, and more. They also have a number of international government clients.   Our Guest Today, Jim Lee   Despite censorship and other barriers, some intrepid truth-tellers have been collecting and revealing the discovered facts and information concerning both the details of weather manipulation and how it has now been weaponized against U.S. citizens, against all moral and legal limitations.   One of these truth-tellers is today's guest, Jim Lee. He has devoted his work to “separating fact from fiction regarding geoengineering, pollution, privacy, and propaganda in an easy-to-understand way.”   Jim Lee has been gathering and sharing news regarding weather manipulation since 2012. He has gathered and published a collection of historical evidence and news about weather modification that I believe is unmatched anywhere else. His goals are to “enact changes in laws worldwide to bring transparency and accountability for weather modification and geoengineering experiments.” The interview with Jim Lee makes clear that there is nothing conspiratorial about weather modification except the government's attempts to hide it from the public.     His historical Weather Modification History internet collection of thousands of news articles going back more than 100 years is a masterpiece in organization and research. In addition to the screenshots of the media articles, each is linked to the full version of the article, offering an unprecedented review of the history of documented weather management and manipulation.   Lee's accompanying climate viewer maps website is his most remarkable feat, inviting visitors to explore weather issues in depth. His maps are gorgeous.   Jim Lee has directly addressed what he calls the “pseudoscience, fear-porn, clickbait, and the facts” surrounding Helene and Milton. He concludes that proving federal or any other attempts to modify the hurricanes cannot be done but that seeding with chemicals or mechanical devices is possible but there is no data to prove it in this case.   Jim Lee examines in detail on his website why radar or HAARP involvement is impossible, explaining:   First of all, HAARP was not on during either of these storms. If you want to learn more about HAARP and the three ionospheric heaters worldwide, check out my page on Space Weather Modification. You can tell when HAARP is on simply by checking HAM radio or WebSDR and tuning into 2.8 to 10 MHz. It was not.   That leaves NEXRAD Doppler radar, aka WSR-88D. Can a NEXRAD radar alter a hurricane? NO! Why? It's all about the numbers. NEXRAD can produce a peak of 750,000 watts with an average power of around 1300 watts. Let's compare that to a hurricane:   7,000,000,000,000,000 watts or joules/second. 7 quadrillion watts vs 750,000 watts. You do the math.   There is a great deal of old-fashioned weather modifications through seeding and chemtrails (pollution in the sky whether as a byproduct of exhaust or deliberately produced) that have resulted in changing conditions for some of our most fertile and fruitful farmlands turning them from abundant crop producers to wastelands. That alone–the loss of millions of acres of cropland—and the bounty they produce, is alarming enough to warrant our direct attention.   Were the recent hurricanes manipulated by seeding clouds in some way? Lee says, “There isn't evidence.” There are disagreements within the freedom network about this point, but Lee says he and colleagues looked for any airplane traffic, but there was none. So, unless there were undiscovered spy planes with their identifying transponders turned off, there was no manipulation.   There is confirmation of weather modification and manipulation that has now clearly been directed at our own United States citizens and their productivity. Our guest, Jim Lee, tells us about how these practices are used by governments, federal and sometimes state, as well as by private industries. Reasons for manipulating weather vary and include efforts to increase or decrease rainfall and water tables through snow melt and to encourage greater amounts of snow for ski season. Managing rainfall to perfect the growing and harvesting of crops is also attempted.   One of the most serious aspects of climate manipulation is the tolerance shown and lack of measurement of nanoparticles that are spewed into the upper atmosphere by global air traffic.   Listen to us today as we learn so much more about how heavily and capriciously our weather is manipulated, the risks this presents, and what we can do to protect ourselves and our world.   Jim Lee and his marvelous websites can all be found at Connect with ClimateViewer and Weather Modification History. Readers can also connect to Jim through his Substack: The Climate Viewer Report.   ______   Learn more about Dr. Peter Breggin's work: https://breggin.com/   See more from Dr. Breggin's long history of being a reformer in psychiatry: https://breggin.com/Psychiatry-as-an-Instrument-of-Social-and-Political-Control   Psychiatric Drug Withdrawal, the how-to manual @ https://breggin.com/a-guide-for-prescribers-therapists-patients-and-their-families/   Get a copy of Dr. Breggin's latest book: WHO ARE THE “THEY” - THESE GLOBAL PREDATORS? WHAT ARE THEIR MOTIVES AND THEIR PLANS FOR US? HOW CAN WE DEFEND AGAINST THEM? Covid-19 and the Global Predators: We are the Prey Get a copy: https://www.wearetheprey.com/   “No other book so comprehensively covers the details of COVID-19 criminal conduct as well as its origins in a network of global predators seeking wealth and power at the expense of human freedom and prosperity, under cover of false public health policies.”   ~ Robert F Kennedy, Jr Author of #1 bestseller The Real Anthony Fauci and Founder, Chairman and Chief Legal Counsel for Children's Health Defense.

Retired National Weather Service Meteorologist Hugh Johnson spoke with Brea Barthel and Lennox Apudo about the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the National Weather Service.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) operates underwater microphone arrays throughout the world's oceans, going them th ability to listen to goings-on below the surface. Many sounds capture by those hydrophones they recognize--but some, they don't. In this episode I'll share some of these mysterious sounds with you. What do YOU think they are?

As the U.S. swings a budgetary axe at the federal government, one of the biggest casualties is climate science. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) faces a brutal 20% workforce reduction—jeopardizing critical research just when we need it most. So, what's really at stake? And is Donald Trump Making America Dumb Again?This week on Cleaning Up, host Bryony Worthington takes us deep inside the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, where scientists are on the front lines of tracking our planet's most urgent environmental challenges.Meet Ralph Keeling, the scientist carrying forward his father's legendary legacy—the Keeling Curve, the definitive record of our atmosphere's rising carbon dioxide levels. His decades of meticulous measurements lay bare the stark truth about climate change and why these long-term observations are more vital now than ever.And that's not all. We also sit down with Professor Ray Weiss, the atmospheric detective who played a key role in saving the ozone layer. His work helped drive the Montreal Protocol—one of humanity's greatest environmental victories.With climate science under attack, what lessons can we learn from past successes? And what happens if we stop listening to the data?Leadership Circle:Cleaning Up is supported by the Leadership Circle, and its founding members: Actis, Alcazar Energy, Division Kempner, EcoPragma Capital, EDP of Portugal, Eurelectric, the Gilardini Foundation, KKR, National Grid, Octopus Energy, Quadrature Climate Foundation, SDCL and Wärtsilä. For more information on the Leadership Circle, please visit https://www.cleaningup.live. Links:Scripps Institution of Oceanography: https://scripps.ucsd.edu/The Keeling Curve: https://keelingcurve.ucsd.edu/The Keeling Curve Foundation: https://www.keelingcurve.org/AGAGE (The Advanced Global Atmospheric Gases Experiment): https://www-air.larc.nasa.gov/missions/agage/History of the Montreal Protocal: https://www.unep.org/ozonaction/who-we-are/about-montreal-protocol 

Retired National Weather Service meteorologist Hugh Johnson brings us a reflection on the winter of 2024-25, and his weekly forecast. He notes that this winter was the first one since 1913-14 that the average temperature was below normal each month, and that the Capital Region recently had winds of up to 60 mph, another record-breaker. For the forecast, while temps may reach 40's on Wednesday and 50's on Friday, he says to not put away the snow shovels just yet. Preview for next week: he'll discuss the impact of budget cuts expected for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Produced by Brea Barthel for Hudson Mohawk Magazine.

Over the weekend, a federal judge ruled that Donald Trump's firing of the head of the Office of Special Counsel was unlawful, and ordered that the head – Hampton Dellinger – be reinstated. The case is likely to head to the Supreme Court after this, but Judge Amy Berman Jackson absolutely torched the administration in her ruling, and that's going to be quite a hurdle to overcome at the High Court. During an appearance on The Joe Rogan Experience on Friday, the world's richest man and government parasite Elon Musk declared that Social Security was a “ponzi scheme.” This phrase has been used by Republicans for years to describe virtually any financial plan that they don't like, but they have been particularly forceful with slapping this label onto Social Security. Musk and his fellow Republicans want people to suffer and work forever, that's the bottom line.Donald Trump continued his mass firings last week, on Thursday hitting the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the National Weather Service. By removing the very people that we rely upon for weather forecasting and warnings, Trump has endangered the entire country – right as severe weather is about to become a major concern for the very Red State citizens who put him back in office. Donald Trump and JD Vance's behavior during their meeting with Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky late last week was so atrocious that it may have permanently destroyed alliances that have existed for decades or longer. Following the disaster of a meeting, leaders across the world spoke out in support of both Ukraine and Zelensky, some taking direct shots at the juvenile behavior that US leaders engaged in. Text and and let us know your thoughts on today's stories!Subscribe to our YouTube channel to stay up to date on all of Farron's content: https://www.youtube.com/FarronBalancedFollow Farron on social media! Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/FarronBalanced Twitter: https://twitter.com/farronbalanced Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/farronbalanced TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@farronbalanced?lang=en

USA TODAY Washington Bureau Chief Susan Page explains the “unprecedented” meeting between the world leaders. President Zelenskyy later declined the opportunity to apologize to President Trump during an appearance on Fox News. The Education Department offers employees $25K to quit or retire by Monday.Hundreds of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) employees were fired this week. Some Americans are opting to raise their own chickens amid the rising price of eggs. The investigation into the death of actor Gene Hackman revealed he may have been dead for 10 days before his body was found. USA TODAY Managing Editor for Life and Entertainment Laura Trujillo shares some of what we can expect at the 97th Academy Awards.Have feedback on the show? Please send us an email at podcasts@USATODAY.com.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

This Day in Legal History: Reichstag Fire DecreeOn February 28, 1933, German President Paul von Hindenburg issued the Reichstag Fire Decree, formally known as the Presidential Decree for the Protection of People and State. The decree was a direct response to the Reichstag fire the night before, which the Nazi Party blamed on Communists. It suspended key civil liberties, including freedom of speech, press, assembly, and protection from unlawful detention. The decree also allowed warrantless arrests and indefinite imprisonment of political opponents. Using this power, the Nazis swiftly arrested thousands of Communists, Socialists, and other adversaries. The decree marked the legal foundation of Nazi repression and paved the way for the Enabling Act, passed on March 23, which granted Hitler dictatorial powers. By July 14, 1933, the Nazis had criminalized all political opposition, establishing a one-party state. The decree remained technically in effect throughout Nazi rule, providing a legal cover for widespread persecution. It exemplified how emergency powers, once enacted, can be used to erode democracy rather than protect it.KPMG has received approval to practice law in Arizona, making it the first Big Four accounting firm to do so in the U.S. However, due to legal prohibitions, the firm cannot offer legal services to its audit clients, limiting its potential customer base. Despite this restriction, KPMG expects to attract many new clients rather than shedding existing ones. The Arizona Supreme Court's approval aligns with its goal of increasing access to legal services, but it also introduces a well-funded competitor to traditional law firms. Other Big Four firms like Deloitte, PwC, and EY may eventually follow suit.While U.S. regulations bar auditors from providing legal services to public company clients, Arizona's decision opens opportunities in the non-audit market. KPMG plans to focus on services complementing traditional legal work, such as contract management and supply chain restructuring. The firm must maintain an internal compliance program, overseen by attorney David Rizzo, and submit biannual reports to the state. With consulting already a major revenue stream, KPMG sees legal services as a way to expand further, particularly through technological advancements like AI.KPMG Must Pivot Around Audit Clients in Creating US Law PracticeThe Trump administration's Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has dropped five enforcement cases against financial institutions, including a major lawsuit against Capital One over $2 billion in alleged illegal interest charges. Other dismissed cases involved student loan servicer PHEAA, Vanderbilt Mortgage, Rocket Homes, and Heights Finance, all of which had been accused of various predatory lending and mortgage fraud practices. The move significantly weakens the agency's legal actions against financial firms investigated for consumer abuse.The mass dismissals coincide with Trump's broader effort to dismantle the CFPB, an agency he has long opposed. His nominee for CFPB director, Jonathan McKernan, testified before the Senate, promising to enforce consumer protection laws but criticizing past enforcement as excessive. Meanwhile, Trump's administration has fired CFPB staff, shut down its Washington offices, and attempted to cancel its lease, though legal challenges have temporarily halted further layoffs.Consumer advocates, including Public Citizen and the Consumer Federation of America, condemned the dismissals, warning they encourage financial misconduct. The CFPB now has fewer than 20 active cases, with several likely to be paused under new leadership. While McKernan claims he will follow the law, critics fear a watered-down agency unable to protect consumers from financial abuses.Trump admin drops 5 consumer watchdog cases, including Capital One | ReutersA federal judge has ordered the Department of Government Efficiency (DGE) to provide a representative for a deposition regarding its authority, structure, and operations. The ruling by U.S. District Judge John Bates also requires the Trump administration to produce documents and answer questions in a lawsuit brought by labor unions and nonprofits. The plaintiffs seek to block DGE's access to systems at three federal agencies, citing concerns over transparency and legality.The Justice Department opposed the order, but Bates ruled that critical details about DGE remain unclear. While he allowed questioning on DGE's access to personal data, he limited inquiries into trade secrets or other confidential business records. The judge also set an eight-hour cap on questioning representatives from DGE and the agencies.Bates previously denied an immediate restraining order blocking DGE's access, stating the plaintiffs had not yet proven legal violations. Meanwhile, the White House recently disclosed that Elon Musk is not the actual administrator of DGE, contradicting earlier claims by Trump. Other lawsuits challenging DGE's legality and access to government records remain ongoing.Judge Orders Musk's DOGE, Agency Staff to Testify in LawsuitA federal judge in California has temporarily blocked the Trump administration from ordering mass firings of probationary federal employees at agencies like the Department of Defense and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). U.S. District Judge William Alsup ruled that the Office of Personnel Management (OPM)lacks the authority to direct agencies to fire workers, contradicting administration claims that it was merely issuing guidance.Trump, backed by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, has sought to slash federal jobs as part of a broader plan to cut $1 trillion from the national budget. The layoffs have drawn opposition from Democrats, unions, and government employees, who argue they are illegal and threaten essential government functions, including veterans' services, scientific research, and national parks.While 5,400 Defense Department employees are still set to be fired, Alsup ordered OPM to rescind memos directing mass layoffs. The ruling is temporary while the legal challenge proceeds, with plaintiffs arguing OPM violated administrative law by issuing directives outside its authority. Meanwhile, Trump's administration continues to push for deeper federal workforce cuts, with agencies required to submit reduction plans by March 13.US judge halts Trump administration's calls for mass firings at agencies | Reuters This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a sweeping initiative led by the Heritage Foundation, I am struck by the sheer breadth and ambition of its proposals. This project, often described as a "manifesto" for the next conservative president of the United States, has been a topic of intense debate and scrutiny, particularly in the wake of Donald Trump's second term.At its core, Project 2025 is a comprehensive blueprint aimed at reshaping the federal government in line with conservative principles. The project's main document, "Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise," outlines four primary policy areas: restoring the family as the centerpiece of American life, dismantling the administrative state, defending national sovereignty and borders, and securing individual rights.One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its call for a radical overhaul of various federal agencies. For instance, the project recommends merging the Bureau of Economic Analysis, the Census Bureau, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics into a single entity, aligning its mission with conservative values. This includes maximizing the hiring of political appointees in statistical analysis positions, a move that critics argue could politicize data collection and analysis[2].The project also proposes abolishing several key agencies, including the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which is responsible for enforcing antitrust laws. Additionally, it suggests shrinking the role of the National Labor Relations Board, which protects employees' rights to organize and fight unfair labor practices. These changes are part of a broader strategy to reduce the regulatory footprint of the federal government and align it more closely with conservative ideologies[2].In the realm of energy and climate policy, Project 2025's recommendations are particularly contentious. The project advises the president to "eradicate climate change references from absolutely everywhere," including repealing regulations that curb emissions and downsizing the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). It also advocates for abandoning strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and abolishing the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), which it labels as a "main driver of the climate change alarm industry"[2].Dr. Emma Shortis, director of international and security affairs at The Australia Institute, highlights the significant implications of these proposals. "Project 2025 shines a light on the significance of what is happening and the danger of what Trump is doing," she notes. "Almost everywhere you look at what Trump is doing, there will be a reflection in some form — sometimes direct, sometimes indirect, of what is recommended by Project 2025"[1].The project's vision for education is equally transformative. It proposes closing the Department of Education and transferring control over education funding and policy to the states. This includes a significant reduction in federal enforcement of civil rights in schools and the elimination of programs like the Head Start initiative, which provides services to children from low-income families. Instead, public funds would be available as school vouchers, even for parents sending their children to private or religious schools[2].Project 2025 also targets the healthcare system, with proposals that reflect a strong conservative stance. It suggests reforming the Department of Health and Human Services to promote traditional nuclear family structures and prohibiting Medicare from negotiating drug prices. The project also advocates for denying gender-affirming care to transgender people and eliminating insurance coverage for certain reproductive health services, such as the morning-after pill Ella[2].The expansion of presidential powers is another critical component of Project 2025. The initiative seeks to place the entire executive branch under direct presidential control, eliminating the independence of agencies like the DOJ, FBI, and Federal Communications Commission. This is based on a controversial interpretation of the unitary executive theory, which aims to centralize greater control over the government in the White House. As Kevin Roberts, a proponent of the project, puts it, "all federal employees should answer to the president"[2].In terms of personnel, Project 2025 proposes reclassifying tens of thousands of federal civil service workers as political appointees, allowing for their replacement with Trump loyalists. This includes the use of a questionnaire to screen potential recruits for their adherence to the project's agenda, a move that echoes Trump's previous efforts to remove perceived disloyal employees from government positions[2].The project's impact on foreign policy and international aid is also noteworthy. It recommends scaling back the global footprint of the US Agency for International Development (USAID) and aligning foreign aid with foreign policy objectives. This includes a freeze on most foreign aid and a review of programs related to reproductive rights, family planning, diversity equity and inclusion (DEI) matters, climate funding, and democracy promotion[1].As I reflect on the scope and ambition of Project 2025, it becomes clear that this initiative represents a fundamental shift in how the federal government operates. The project's proposals are not just policy changes but a redefinition of the role of government in American society. While supporters argue that these changes are necessary to restore conservative values and reduce bureaucratic overreach, critics like Dr. Shortis warn of the dangers of such sweeping reforms.As the country moves forward under Trump's second term, the implementation of Project 2025's proposals will be a critical area of focus. With several executive orders already issued in line with the project's recommendations, the coming months will reveal whether these changes will reshape American governance as profoundly as the project's authors envision. One thing is certain: the journey ahead will be marked by intense debate, significant challenges, and far-reaching consequences for the nation.

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a sense of unease settles in, not just because of its ambitious scope, but also due to the profound implications it holds for the future of American governance. This initiative, spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation and crafted by former Trump administration officials, is more than just a policy blueprint; it is a comprehensive plan to reshape the federal government in the image of conservative ideology.At its core, Project 2025 is a 900-page manual titled "Mandate For Leadership," which outlines a radical restructuring of the executive branch. The project's architects, including Paul Dans and Spencer Chretien, both veterans of the Trump administration, have woven together a tapestry of policy proposals that touch nearly every aspect of American life. From immigration and abortion rights to free speech and racial justice, no area is left unscathed[1][4].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its expansion of presidential powers. The initiative advocates for a unitary executive theory, which centralizes greater control over the government in the White House. Kevin Roberts, President of the Heritage Foundation, has been clear about this vision: "All federal employees should answer to the president." This approach aims to eliminate the independence of key agencies such as the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)[3].The project's personnel strategy is equally alarming. It proposes reclassifying tens of thousands of federal civil service workers as political appointees, allowing for their replacement with loyalists to a conservative president. This is part of a broader effort to create a "wrecking ball for the administrative state," as described by Russ Vought, a key figure in the project. The Heritage Foundation plans to have 20,000 personnel in its database by the end of 2024, all screened through a questionnaire designed to test their commitment to Trump's "America First" agenda[3].The Department of Justice is another target for significant reform under Project 2025. The initiative views the DOJ as a "bloated bureaucracy" that has "forfeited the trust" of the American people. It recommends a thorough overhaul, with the DOJ's Civil Rights Division focusing on combating "affirmative discrimination" or "anti-white racism." This would involve prosecuting state and local governments, institutions of higher education, and private employers with diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) or affirmative action programs. Gene Hamilton, a former Trump DOJ official, argues that these programs "come at the expense of other Americans—and in nearly all cases violate longstanding federal law"[3].In the realm of economic policy, Project 2025's proposals are just as far-reaching. It suggests cutting overtime protections for 4.3 million workers, stopping efforts to lower prescription drug prices, and limiting access to food assistance for over 40 million people who rely on it monthly. The project also aims to eliminate funding for key public transportation projects, such as the Capital Investment Grants (CIG) program, which has been crucial for awarding billions of dollars for infrastructure projects across the country. This could make it much harder for Americans without cars to get to work and travel around their communities[2].Environmental policies are not spared either. Project 2025 seeks to undo significant climate action by attacking the EPA's "Endangerment Finding," a critical component of the Clean Air Act that requires the EPA to curb emissions of greenhouse gases. The project proposes 'updating' this finding, which would restrict the federal government's mandate to combat climate change. Additionally, it suggests disbanding the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), which provides critical weather data and scientific research[2].The impact on healthcare is also profound. Project 2025 recommends pushing more people towards Medicare Advantage and other private options, which could affect 33 million people. It also proposes eliminating the Head Start early education program, which serves over 1 million children, and restricting access to medication abortion[2].Despite the project's sweeping ambitions, its architects and supporters face significant criticism. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has been vocal about the project's potential to erode democracy and perpetuate bigotry, injustice, and inequality. The ACLU argues that many of Project 2025's recommendations are outright unconstitutional and rely on support from the executive branch and Congress[1].Donald Trump, despite his claims of having no connection to Project 2025, has ties that are hard to ignore. At least 140 people who worked on the project previously worked in Trump's administration, and Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts has described his organization's role as "institutionalizing Trumpism." Trump's disavowal of the project in public statements contrasts sharply with the involvement of his former officials and the alignment of the project's policies with his own campaign promises[1][4].As we move forward, the implications of Project 2025 become increasingly clear. If implemented, it could fundamentally alter the balance of power within the federal government, centralizing control in the White House and undermining the independence of critical agencies. The project's focus on dismantling safety nets, rolling back civil rights protections, and undoing climate action sets a perilous course for the nation.In the coming months, as the 2024 elections approach, the fate of Project 2025 will likely be a central issue. Will it serve as a blueprint for a new administration, or will it be rejected as an overreach of executive power? The answer will depend on the choices made by voters and policymakers. One thing is certain, however: the future of American governance hangs in the balance, and the decisions made now will shape the country for generations to come.

Watch The X22 Report On Video No videos found Click On Picture To See Larger Picture The Secretary of Energy exposed the entire climate scam. Newsom has been working on the high speed train for 17 years, billions laundered. Trump is in the process of creating a parallel economy, when the time is right he will transition to the new system. The [DS] criminal system is being exposed, they set up a very complex system to hide their money laundering. Elon is exposing the first part, we are in the anger stage, the cult still doesn't believe, soon they will. People are taking the red pill and Trump is going to show them how deep the rabbit hole really goes. The great awakening continues. Time to wake the rest of the people up and bring them to the next level.   (function(w,d,s,i){w.ldAdInit=w.ldAdInit||[];w.ldAdInit.push({slot:13499335648425062,size:[0, 0],id:"ld-7164-1323"});if(!d.getElementById(i)){var j=d.createElement(s),p=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];j.async=true;j.src="//cdn2.customads.co/_js/ajs.js";j.id=i;p.parentNode.insertBefore(j,p);}})(window,document,"script","ld-ajs"); Economy https://twitter.com/MarcNixon24/status/1887214153020100950   https://twitter.com/SenBrianJones/status/1886508001819005330  this train to nowhere. DEFUND THE HIGH SPEED RAIL! #FixCalifornia https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1887585824218509380 Political/Rights https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1887262455694270724 https://twitter.com/BasedMikeLee/status/1887350804031340725 Our taxpayer dollars were being used to fund the invasion of our country   https://twitter.com/charliekirk11/status/1887329931425948175   https://twitter.com/WallStreetMav/status/1887467526407299236 https://twitter.com/BehizyTweets/status/1887206948111786183 https://twitter.com/DataRepublican/status/1886613749148344527 $186,438,735 (2022)   EIN: 134080201 One grant stands out: located in Kenya, with a description stating "PROVIDE REGIONAL REFUGEE PROCESSING SERVICE IN AFRICA FOR ALL US REFUGEE ADMISSIONS."  Does this mean the U.S. has been processing refugees directly from Africa?   Geopolitical/Police State Federal Judge BLOCKS DOGE from Gaining Access to “Sensitive” Treasury Department Payment Records – DOGE Team Previously Discovered Treasury was Funding Terrorist Groups A federal judge on Thursday blocked the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) from obtaining access to ‘sensitive‘ Treasury Department payment records for a period of time. Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly wrote in her order that Treasury officials “will not provide access to any payment record or payment system of records maintained within the [Treasury] Bureau of Fiscal Service.” Here is a link to the order here. This ruling comes after multiple government employee unions sued the Treasury Department over who could access the material. The lawsuit claimed Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent improperly allowed Elon Musk's team to access the materials, supposedly exposing personal financial information to unauthorized people. Source: thegatewaypundit.com DOGE now has access to NOAA's IT systems; reviewing DEI program, sources say At least one member of the DOGE was requested access. The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is now scrutinizing the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the federal agency responsible for forecasting the weather, researching and analyzing climate and weather data and monitoring and tracking extreme weather events like hurricanes, several sources familiar with the matter told ABC News. Source: abc.com https://twitter.com/DOGE/status/1887277159947117027 https://twitter.com/HomericFuturist/status/1887163577280209026 https://twitter.com/Patri0tContr0l/status/1887564349662712170   https://twitter.com/amuse/status/1887499537280905558 https://twitter.

significant security breach has been identified within the U.S. Treasury Department, where unauthorized individuals gained administrator-level access to critical financial systems, including the Payment Automation Manager (PAM) and the Secure Payment System (SPS). This breach raises serious concerns about the integrity of the U.S. financial system, as it allows for unauthorized modifications to federal payment workflows and security configurations. The threat actors, linked to a private sector entity, have reportedly acquired elevated privileges without the necessary government vetting or legal authorization, potentially compromising sensitive financial operations and personal data of millions of Americans.The implications of this breach extend beyond the Treasury, as individuals associated with the threat actors have also gained unauthorized access to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). This unauthorized entry raises alarms about the potential compromise of classified environmental data and the integrity of agency operations. Lawmakers are expressing significant concern over the breach, particularly regarding its impact on federal funding mechanisms and the privacy of citizens. Affected customers have filed a lawsuit against the Treasury Department, alleging failures in enforcing access controls that could jeopardize personal and financial information.The discussion highlights the importance of cybersecurity governance, compliance, and access control, emphasizing that security is not solely about defending against external threats. The podcast stresses that insider threats and unauthorized privileged access are equally critical issues that businesses must address. It calls for a shift in how organizations perceive security, advocating for a zero-trust approach and robust identity and access management practices. The need for continuous monitoring and strict auditing of privileged accounts is underscored, as unauthorized access can occur regardless of the actors' intent.In addition to the main story, the episode covers several other cybersecurity-related topics, including the exposure of over one million chat records by DeepSeek, which has raised concerns about data security among AI providers. Microsoft announced the discontinuation of its Defender VPN service due to low usage, while Let's Encrypt plans to end its expiration notification email service. Cloudflare has introduced a feature to enhance online image authenticity, and the Trump administration has eliminated a key framework for AI integration into federal cloud services. These developments reflect broader trends in cybersecurity, privacy, and the evolving landscape of technology governance. Four things to know today 00:00 Cybersecurity 101: If Even the Government Can't Control Access, What About Your Business?  06:39 DeepSeek Leaks a Million Chat Records—And the Pentagon Wants Nothing to Do with It08:58 Microsoft Pulls the Plug on Defender VPN—Was Anyone Using It?10:57 FedRAMP Shake-Up: No Special Treatment for AI as Trump Administration Ends Key Framework  Supported by:  https://www.huntress.com/mspradio/Event: https://nerdiocon.com/ All our Sponsors: https://businessof.tech/sponsors/ Do you want the show on your podcast app or the written versions of the stories? Subscribe to the Business of Tech: https://www.businessof.tech/subscribe/Looking for a link from the stories? The entire script of the show, with links to articles, are posted in each story on https://www.businessof.tech/ Support the show on Patreon: https://patreon.com/mspradio/ Want to be a guest on Business of Tech: Daily 10-Minute IT Services Insights? Send Dave Sobel a message on PodMatch, here: https://www.podmatch.com/hostdetailpreview/businessoftech Want our stuff? Cool Merch? Wear “Why Do We Care?” - Visit https://mspradio.myspreadshop.com Follow us on:LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/28908079/YouTube: https://youtube.com/mspradio/Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/mspradionews/Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mspradio/TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@businessoftechBluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/businessof.tech

As I delved into the intricacies of Project 2025, a sweeping political initiative crafted by the American conservative think tank The Heritage Foundation, I couldn't help but feel a sense of both fascination and trepidation. This project, unveiled in April 2023, is more than just a set of policy recommendations; it is a comprehensive blueprint for a radical overhaul of the federal government and its agencies, should a conservative president take office.At its core, Project 2025 envisions a fundamental transformation of American governance, aligning it closely with conservative principles. One of the most striking aspects is its proposal to dismantle or significantly alter several key federal agencies. For instance, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) would be dismantled, and the Department of Education (ED) would be abolished, with its programs either transferred or terminated. The Department of Justice (DOJ), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Department of Commerce (DOC), Federal Communications Commission (FCC), and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) would all come under direct partisan control, a move that Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts defends as necessary to align these agencies with the president's vision, arguing that "the notion of independent federal agencies or federal employees who don't answer to the president violates the very foundation of our democratic republic"[1].The project's economic reforms are equally ambitious. It advocates for abolishing the Federal Reserve and replacing it with a commodity-backed currency, such as gold, and shifting from an income tax to a consumption tax. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 would be extended, and individual income taxes would be simplified to two flat tax rates: 15% for incomes up to the Social Security Wage Base and 30% above that. However, this simplification would come at a cost, as most deductions, credits, and exclusions would be eliminated, likely increasing taxes for millions of low- and middle-income households[1].In the realm of education, Project 2025 seeks to dramatically reduce the federal government's role, promoting school choice and parental rights over federal standards. The Department of Education would be eliminated, and programs under the Individuals with Disabilities' Education Act (IDEA) would be administered by the Department of Health and Human Services. Federal funding for low-income students would expire, and public funds would be redirected as school vouchers, even for private or religious schools. This shift is part of a broader philosophy that views education as a private rather than a public good[1].The project's stance on climate change and environmental regulations is stark. It proposes eradicating climate change references from all government policies, repealing regulations that curb emissions, and downsizing the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) would be abolished, and states would be prevented from adopting stricter regulations on vehicular emissions. Diana Furchtgott-Roth, the Heritage Foundation's energy and climate director, suggests that the EPA should support the consumption of more natural gas, despite concerns about methane leaks, a potent greenhouse gas[1].Healthcare is another area where Project 2025 seeks significant changes. It aims to reform the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) to promote traditional nuclear family structures. Medicare would be prohibited from negotiating drug prices, and the Medicare Advantage program would be promoted. Federal healthcare providers would be barred from offering gender-affirming care to transgender individuals, and insurance coverage for emergency contraception would be eliminated. Medicaid funding would be cut through various measures, including caps on federal funding and stricter work requirements for beneficiaries[1].The project's vision for law enforcement is equally transformative. The DOJ would be reformed to combat what it terms "affirmative discrimination" or "anti-white racism," and would prosecute state and local governments, institutions of higher education, and private employers with diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs. The FBI would be made personally accountable to the president, and consent decrees between the DOJ and local police departments would be curtailed[1].One of the most contentious aspects of Project 2025 is its relationship with the Trump campaign. Despite initial acknowledgments that the project aligns with Trump's Agenda 47 proposals, the campaign has since sought to distance itself. Trump has denied any direct involvement, stating, "[I] have no idea who is in charge of it," but Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts has contradicted this, saying he personally discussed the project with Trump[1].The latest developments have only added to the controversy. In July 2024, Kevin Roberts sparked outrage by suggesting that the project is part of a "second American Revolution" that would remain bloodless if the left allowed it to be. This statement, coupled with Trump's subsequent attempts to distance himself from the project, has led many political commentators to question the sincerity of these denials. Philip Bump of *The Washington Post* argues that it is impossible to separate Trump's campaign from Project 2025, given the extensive involvement of Trump advisors and the frequent mention of Trump's name in the document[1].As I reflect on the scope and ambition of Project 2025, it becomes clear that this initiative represents a seismic shift in how the federal government could operate. The project's proponents see it as a necessary correction to what they perceive as a liberal bias in government agencies and policies. However, critics argue that these changes would undermine critical protections and services, particularly for vulnerable populations.Looking ahead, the implementation of Project 2025's proposals would depend on the outcome of future elections and the political will of a potential conservative administration. As the project's director, Paul Dans, steps down and Kevin Roberts assumes leadership, the initiative remains a focal point of political debate. Whether Project 2025 becomes a blueprint for governance or a footnote in the history of conservative policy initiatives remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: its impact on American politics will be profound.As we approach the next milestones in this saga, it is crucial to continue monitoring the developments and implications of Project 2025. Will it reshape the federal government in its image, or will it face significant resistance? The answer will depend on the complex interplay of political forces and the will of the American people. For now, Project 2025 stands as a stark reminder of the deep divisions and competing visions that shape the American political landscape.

As I delved into the intricacies of Project 2025, a initiative spearheaded by the conservative think tank, the Heritage Foundation, I found myself navigating a complex web of policy proposals, personnel plans, and training programs all aimed at reshaping the American government under a future Republican administration.Project 2025 is more than just a policy blueprint; it is a comprehensive strategy designed to ensure a seamless transition and the swift implementation of conservative policies from the very first day of a new presidency. The project is built on four pillars: a detailed policy guide, a database of potential personnel, a training program for these candidates, and a playbook outlining actions to be taken within the first 180 days in office[1][5].At the heart of Project 2025 lies a sweeping overhaul of the federal government. The initiative envisions dramatic changes to various federal agencies, some of which are nothing short of revolutionary. For instance, the project proposes abolishing the Department of Education, transferring its programs to the Department of Health and Human Services, and significantly curtailing federal involvement in education. This move is part of a broader effort to elevate school choice and parental rights, with the federal government reduced to a mere statistics-keeping role in education[2].The Department of Homeland Security is another target, with Project 2025 advocating for its dismantling. This would be accompanied by a hardline stance on immigration, including mass deportations, increased border enforcement, and the construction of a border wall. The project also suggests deploying the military for domestic law enforcement, a move that has raised significant concerns about the militarization of American society[2].Healthcare is another area where Project 2025 seeks profound changes. The initiative recommends reforms to the Department of Health and Human Services to promote traditional nuclear family structures and to prohibit Medicare from negotiating drug prices. It also proposes cutting funding for Medicaid, imposing stricter work requirements for beneficiaries, and eliminating federal oversight of state Medicaid programs. Additionally, the project aims to deny gender-affirming care to transgender individuals and eliminate insurance coverage for emergency contraception[2].The environment and climate change are also in the crosshairs. Project 2025 advises a future Republican president to "eradicate climate change references from absolutely everywhere" in government policies, effectively nullifying efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This includes repealing regulations that curb emissions, downsizing the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and abolishing the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)[2].These proposals are not just isolated suggestions but part of a broader vision to centralize power in the White House. Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts argues, "The notion of independent federal agencies or federal employees who don't answer to the president violates the very foundation of our democratic republic." This aligns with the unitary executive theory, which seeks to expand presidential control over the government, a concept that has been supported by conservative justices and think tanks since the Reagan era[2].The project's approach to law enforcement is equally contentious. It calls for a thorough reform of the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), making them more accountable to the president. The DOJ would be tasked with combating "affirmative discrimination" or "anti-white racism," and would prosecute state and local governments, institutions of higher education, and private employers with diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs[2].Despite the ambitious scope of these proposals, former President Donald Trump has publicly distanced himself from Project 2025. In a social media post, Trump stated, "I know nothing about Project 2025. I have no idea who is behind it. I disagree with some of the things they're saying and some of the things they're saying are absolutely ridiculous and abysmal." However, the involvement of high-ranking officials from his administration, such as Paul Dans and Spencer Chretien, suggests a closer connection than Trump admits[1].Critics argue that Project 2025's proposals are not just policy recommendations but a blueprint for a radical transformation of American governance. Darrell West, an expert in governance, notes that the inconsistencies in the plan may be designed to appeal to specific donors or industries, highlighting the potential for special interests to influence policy[2].As the 2024 presidential election approaches, Project 2025 remains a focal point of debate. Its proponents see it as a necessary corrective to what they perceive as the overreach of the Biden administration, while critics view it as a dangerous erosion of democratic norms and civil rights protections.Looking ahead, the success of Project 2025 will depend on several key factors. The ability of its proponents to assemble a cohesive team of conservative administrators, the effectiveness of their training programs, and the political will to implement such sweeping changes will all be crucial. As Paul Dans, the outgoing director of Project 2025, emphasized, "If we are going to rescue the country from the grip of the radical Left, we need both a governing agenda and the right people in place, ready to carry this agenda out on Day One of the next conservative Administration"[5].As the nation prepares for the potential implementation of these policies, one thing is clear: Project 2025 represents a seismic shift in the way America could be governed. Whether this vision aligns with the values and interests of the broader American public remains to be seen, but its impact, if realized, would undoubtedly be profound.

As I delved into the intricacies of Project 2025, a political initiative crafted by the American conservative think tank The Heritage Foundation, I was struck by the sheer breadth and depth of its proposed changes to the fabric of American governance. Published in April 2023, this project is more than just a policy guide; it is a comprehensive blueprint for a radical overhaul of the federal government, its agencies, and the very principles that guide them.At its core, Project 2025 envisions a federal government that is decidedly more conservative, with sweeping changes to economic and social policies. One of the most striking aspects is the plan to dismantle or significantly alter several key federal agencies. For instance, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) would be dismantled, and the Department of Education (ED) would be abolished, with its programs either transferred or terminated. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) would be made less independent, and it would be prohibited from funding research involving embryonic stem cells[1].The project's authors, many of whom are former Trump administration officials, propose a stark shift in environmental and climate policies. They advocate for the eradication of climate change references from all government documents and the abandonment of strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This includes repealing regulations that curb emissions, downsizing the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and abolishing the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), which they criticize as a main driver of the "climate change alarm industry"[1].The Heritage Foundation's vision extends to the realm of law enforcement, where the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) would undergo significant reforms. The DOJ would be tasked with combating "affirmative discrimination" or "anti-white racism," and it would prosecute state and local governments, institutions of higher education, and private employers with diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) or affirmative action programs. The FBI would be made directly accountable to the president, reflecting a broader theme of centralizing executive power[1].In the area of healthcare, Project 2025 proposes substantial changes, including cuts to Medicare and Medicaid. The plan suggests prohibiting Medicare from negotiating drug prices and promoting the Medicare Advantage program, which consists of private insurance plans. Federal healthcare providers would be barred from offering gender-affirming care to transgender individuals, and insurance coverage for emergency contraception would be eliminated. The project also aims to reform the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) to promote traditional nuclear family structures[1].Education is another sector that would see dramatic changes. The federal government's role in education would be drastically reduced, with the Department of Education's responsibilities devolving to the states. Federal enforcement of civil rights in schools would be curtailed, and programs like the Head Start initiative for low-income families would be eliminated. Public funds for education would be available as school vouchers, even for private or religious schools, reflecting the project's view that education is a private rather than a public good[1].The project's approach to immigration is equally stringent, recommending the arrest, detention, and mass deportation of illegal immigrants living in the U.S. and the deployment of the military for domestic law enforcement. This aligns with a broader theme of enhancing presidential powers, as advocated by Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts, who argues that "the notion of independent federal agencies or federal employees who don't answer to the president violates the very foundation of our democratic republic"[1].One of the most contentious aspects of Project 2025 is its plan to reclassify tens of thousands of federal civil service workers as political appointees, allowing for their replacement with loyalists to a conservative president. This move is part of a larger strategy to reshape the federal workforce according to Trump's ideology, using tools like a personnel database and a questionnaire to screen potential recruits for their adherence to the project's agenda[1].Despite the extensive influence of former Trump administration officials on Project 2025, Trump himself has attempted to distance himself from the initiative. In a social media post, he stated, "I know nothing about Project 2025. I have no idea who is behind it. I disagree with some of the things they're saying and some of the things they're saying are absolutely ridiculous and abysmal."[3]However, the ties between Project 2025 and Trump's policies are undeniable. The project's policy guide includes over 270 proposals that align with Trump's past policies and current campaign promises. This has led critics to view Project 2025 as a de facto blueprint for Trump's second term, despite his public disavowal[3].As I reflect on the scope and ambition of Project 2025, it becomes clear that this initiative represents a fundamental challenge to the current structure and values of American governance. The proposed changes are not merely tweaks to existing policies but a wholesale transformation of the federal government's role in society.Looking ahead, the implementation of Project 2025's proposals will depend on several key milestones. The first 180 days of the next Republican president's term will be crucial, as outlined in the project's playbook. This period will see the execution of many of the proposed actions, including the reorganization of federal agencies, the appointment of new personnel, and the rollout of new policies[3].As the nation approaches these critical decision points, it is essential to consider the potential implications of Project 2025. Will these changes lead to a more efficient and responsive government, or will they undermine the very foundations of American democracy? The answers to these questions will unfold in the coming months and years, but one thing is certain: Project 2025 represents a seismic shift in the political landscape, one that will have far-reaching consequences for the future of American governance.

SpaceTime Series 28 Episode 07Dark Matter's Role in Milky Way's Stellar StreamsNew research suggests that dark matter may have influenced the formation of the GD-1 stellar stream in the Milky Way. A study in the Astrophysical Journal Letters proposes that a core-collapsing, self-interacting dark matter subhalo could explain the unusual spur and gap features observed in the stream. This finding could deepen our understanding of dark matter's properties and its influence on the universe.Sun's Triple Solar Flare EruptionThe Sun has unleashed three significant X-class solar flares in a single day, with the first and third being X1.1 flares and the second an X1.5. These powerful eruptions, detected by NOAA's Solar Ultraviolet Imager, are part of the Sun's approach to solar maximum, the peak of its 11-year solar cycle. Solar flares can disrupt Earth's communications, power grids, and pose health risks to astronauts.Quadrantids Meteor Shower SpectacleThe Earth is experiencing the Quadrantids meteor shower, offering a dazzling display of shooting stars. Originating from the near-Earth asteroid 2003 EH1, the Quadrantids are best viewed from dark locations, with peak sightings expected in the Pacific region. Sky watchers can anticipate around 50 meteors per hour, with potential fireballs enhancing the spectacle.00:00 This is space time series 28 episode 7 for broadcast on 15 January 202500:46 New research proposes a self interacting dark matter subhalo could explain GD1 features04:24 The sun unleashed three significant X class solar flares on the same day07:19 Earth is experiencing one of its most spectacular meteor showers, the Quadrantids14:31 A quarter of the world's freshwater animals are at risk of extinction16:43 Facebook boss Mark Zuckerberg admits that his fact checkers are dishonest20:28 CES has wrapped up in Las Vegas with lots of interesting gadgetswww.spacetimewithstuartgary.comwww.bitesz.com

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a sprawling initiative crafted by the Heritage Foundation, I am struck by the sheer breadth and depth of its ambitions. This 900-page blueprint, released in April 2023, is more than just a policy document; it is a vision for a radical restructuring of the American federal government, aligned with a staunchly conservative agenda.At its core, Project 2025 is a comprehensive plan designed to guide a potential future conservative administration, with ties that are unmistakably linked to the Trump campaign. Despite Trump's public disavowal, the connections run deep: many of the project's authors and contributors are veterans of Trump's first administration or are closely associated with his inner circle. For instance, John McEntee, a senior advisor to Project 2025, was the director of the White House Presidential Personnel Office under Trump, and Kevin Roberts, the president of the Heritage Foundation, was part of Trump's 2016 transition team[4][5].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its sweeping proposal to overhaul various federal agencies. The Department of Education, for example, would be abolished, with its programs either transferred or terminated. The Department of Homeland Security would be dismantled, and the Department of Justice, along with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, would come under partisan control. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) would also face significant changes, with the FTC potentially being abolished altogether[1].In the realm of science policy, Project 2025 outlines a future where fundamental research is prioritized over practical applications. The Department of Energy would focus on research that the private sector would not otherwise undertake, while programs focused on climate change would be significantly curtailed. The National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) would be broken up, with its climate change research activities heavily criticized as part of the "climate change alarm industry"[2].The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) would undergo a transformative shift, with proposals to prevent the agency from using what the project deems "unrealistic" projections of climate change impacts. The EPA would also be required to obtain clear congressional authorization for any science activity, and its staff would be selected based on managerial skills rather than scientific qualifications. This approach is encapsulated in the words of Mandy Gunasekara, the EPA chapter author and former chief of staff at the EPA during the previous Trump administration, who advocates for reforms that would significantly limit the EPA's role in addressing climate change[2].The project's stance on social and civil rights issues is equally profound. It labels diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA) initiatives as "managerialist left-wing race and gender ideology" that must be eradicated. Funding for critical race theory would be banned, and civil rights data collection, including racial classifications, would be halted. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) would be shrunk, with its resources redirected to protect white men from employment discrimination rather than its traditional role of safeguarding the rights of marginalized groups[3].In the realm of technology and media, Project 2025 proposes significant reforms. The FCC would be held to greater accountability while reducing what the project sees as wasteful spending. Regulations on media ownership would be revised to promote competition, though with a caveat: adversary ownership above 10% in any American entity would need to be transparently disclosed for national security reasons. The project also advocates for expanding 5G and satellite connectivity, such as StarLink, to reduce the digital divide and support economic prosperity[4].The economic policies outlined in Project 2025 are no less ambitious. The plan includes tax cuts, though there is internal disagreement on protectionism. Medicare and Medicaid would face cuts, and the government would be urged to explicitly reject abortion as healthcare. Emergency contraception and abortion pills would be subject to prosecution under the Comstock Act, a law dating back to the 19th century. Work requirements would be instituted for those reliant on food stamps, and overtime rules could be altered to weaken protections and decrease overtime pay for some workers[1].Critics argue that these proposals amount to a blueprint for an autocratic takeover, eroding democratic norms and civil liberties. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has been vocal in its opposition, highlighting the project's potential to undermine protections for LGBTQ employees, immigrants, and racial equity. As the ACLU puts it, Project 2025 threatens to "erode our democracy" and is a call to action against "bigotry, injustice, and inequality"[5].As we approach the potential implementation of these policies in 2025, the stakes are high. The project's authors envision a rapid and comprehensive transformation of the federal government, one that would align with conservative principles and significantly alter the landscape of American governance. Whether these proposals will become reality remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: Project 2025 represents a seismic shift in policy direction, one that will have far-reaching implications for every aspect of American life.In the coming months, as the political landscape continues to evolve, the fate of Project 2025 will likely be a central point of contention. Will its vision for a radically restructured government come to fruition, or will it face significant resistance? The answer to this question will shape the future of American governance in ways both profound and far-reaching. As we navigate this critical juncture, it is imperative to remain vigilant and informed, for the decisions made now will have lasting impacts on the nation's trajectory.

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a initiative spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation, it becomes clear that this is more than just a policy blueprint – it's a comprehensive vision for a radical restructuring of the American government and its agencies.Project 2025, published in April 2022, is the brainchild of former Trump administration officials, including Paul Dans and Spencer Chretien, who have woven together a 900-page manual titled "Mandate For Leadership." This document outlines a sweeping overhaul of the federal government, touching on nearly every aspect of American life, from economic policies and social programs to science agencies and environmental regulations.One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its ambition to reshape the very fabric of federal agencies. For instance, the project proposes dismantling the Department of Education, transferring its programs or terminating them altogether, in favor of promoting school choice and increasing parental control over schools[1][3][4].The Department of Homeland Security is another target, with Project 2025 advocating for its dismantling. This move is part of a broader strategy to redefine immigration policies, aligning with the project's stance that "men and women are biological realities and married men and women are the ideal, natural family"[3].Economic reforms are a significant component of Project 2025. The plan criticizes the Federal Reserve, blaming it for the business cycle, and suggests abolishing it in favor of a commodity-backed currency, such as the gold standard. It also recommends simplifying individual income taxes to two flat tax rates: 15% on incomes up to the Social Security Wage Base and 30% above that. However, this proposal is likely to increase taxes for millions of low- and middle-income households[1].The project's approach to science policy is equally transformative. It prioritizes fundamental research over deployment, arguing that many current Department of Energy programs act as subsidies to the private sector. The plan proposes eliminating offices focused on energy technology development and climate change programs, and reshaping the U.S. Global Change and Research Program to critically analyze and potentially refuse any assessments prepared under the Biden administration[2].Climate change research is a particular target, with Project 2025 describing the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) as "one of the main drivers of the climate change alarm industry." The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is also in the crosshairs, with proposals to prevent the agency from using "unrealistic" climate change impact projections and to require clear congressional authorization for any science activity[2].Healthcare is another area where Project 2025 seeks significant changes. The plan calls for cutting Medicare and Medicaid, and urges the government to explicitly reject abortion as healthcare. It also seeks to eliminate coverage of emergency contraception and use the Comstock Act to prosecute those who send and receive contraceptives and abortion pills[1].The project's vision for the workforce is marked by a push for more stringent work requirements. For example, it proposes legislation requiring Americans to be paid more for working on Sundays and institutes work requirements for people reliant on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), which issues food stamps. Additionally, changes to overtime rules could weaken protections and decrease overtime pay for some workers[1].The influence of Project 2025 extends beyond policy proposals; it also envisions a structural overhaul of the federal bureaucracy. The project advocates for the "unitary executive" theory, which would place the entire federal bureaucracy under the direct control of the president, eliminating civil service protections for thousands of government employees. This move would allow these positions to be filled by political appointees beholden to the executive[3].Despite attempts by Donald Trump to distance himself from Project 2025, the connections between the two are undeniable. The project's senior advisor, John McEntee, has stated that they and the Trump campaign planned to "integrate a lot of our work"[1]. Russell Vought, founder of the Center for Renewing America (CRA), which is on Project 2025's advisory board, has been named policy director of the Republican National Committee platform committee. Vought has acknowledged that Trump has "blessed" the CRA's efforts and is "very supportive of what we do"[1].As we look ahead, the implications of Project 2025 are profound. If implemented, these policies could fundamentally alter the balance of power within the federal government, reshape the social and economic landscape, and have far-reaching consequences for environmental and healthcare policies.In the words of Kevin Roberts, the president of the Heritage Foundation, the goal is to "institutionalize Trumpism." However, critics argue that many of these proposals are not only radical but also potentially unconstitutional. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has warned that Project 2025 threatens to erode democracy and has called for action to fight against its implementation[5].As the 2024 presidential election approaches, Project 2025 stands as a critical blueprint that could shape the future of American governance. Whether these proposals will become reality remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: the stakes are high, and the potential impact on American society is immense. As we navigate these uncertain times, it is crucial to remain vigilant and informed about the policies that could redefine our nation's trajectory.

Since the first time Man planted a garden or fought a battle, weather has been vital to success and survival. The weather has famously decided wars. In some cases, weather has been the key factor in the rise and fall of whole Empires. Like many other contemporary real experts, today's guest, Jim Lee, is an independent researcher, in this case, into weather modification.   Why Weather Matters   George Washington avoided surrendering his army in the Battle of Long Island by deceiving the British about his movements and then withdrawing 9,000 men, supplies, and cannons overnight and into the next morning across the East River while a fog miraculously provided cover. If that Providential escape had failed, the War of Independence could have ended.   Napoleon attacked Imperial Russia as winter arrived and was soundly defeated by both poor planning and the vicious cold, decimating the French army, which had over 100,000 men captured, 380,000 dead, and only 27,000 returning to France.   Decades later, despite France's failure in 1812, Hitler's army tried attacking the Soviet Union during World War II and managed to hang on with brutal tactics until winter arrived and the Germans were soundly defeated. Many of the German survivors who managed to make it back to Germany alive were badly disfigured by frostbite, which had claimed noses, eyelids, fingers, and toes. The Germans also murdered over 1 million civilian Soviet Jews during the invasion. The German army troops captured over 5 million Soviet troops and deliberately starved over 3.3 million Soviet prisoners of war in brutal disregard for the established rules of war. Despite the most savage and determined fighting, the weather heavily influenced the failure of the German assault upon the Soviet Union.   Any effective military will invest whatever it can to predict, manage, and manipulate weather systems.   More recently, during the Vietnam War, the US seeded clouds over the Ho Chi Min trail in order to mire down enemy North Vietnamese soldiers from moving South.   Growing Concern About Abuses of Weather Control in the US   Many concerns have arisen that Earth's weather is being manipulated in ways harmful to the citizenry and the economy. The hurricane that hit the Hawaiian Island of Maui and the accompanying firestorm that devastated the town of Lahaina in 2023 with grave loss of life and destruction of the community appeared very suspicious. Hurricane Helene and then Milton chewed up Florida and demolished Southeastern Appalachia communities in North Carolina and Eastern Tennessee. Have behaved in unusual ways and produced unusual and shockingly high amounts of damage and loss of life. Many citizens have questioned what aspects of the storms may have been “enhanced” or manipulated. The lack of official assistance being provided to survivors of these devastating events has understandably increased suspicion.   The federal government has done nothing to alleviate citizen concerns; instead, it has encouraged censorship through social media. The usual claims of conspiracy theory have been lobbed against anyone raising these questions, but as it turns out, citizens are asking very good questions.   Government Censorship   The federal government censors and curtails information and public discussion on subjects like weather manipulation. For a good review of the state of government censorship in the world today, listen to the Joe Rogan interview with Mike Benz that aired this month. The federal government funds, coordinates, and gives orders to its own branches and federal agencies and to non-government organizations (NGOs), nonprofits, universities, and others to censor and eliminate free speech. There are literally hundreds of thousands of hired individuals manipulating the truth as hired guns through traditional news outlets, social media, university outlets, book publishers, and scientific journals.   Weather Modification, Inc.   The absurdity of these government denials was recently highlighted by a photo of a plane on TikTok with a large corporate logo across its fuselage that said, “Weather Modification, International.” The Weather Modification International website was surprisingly empty, but when I checked the web archive for earlier versions, I found that their website started being stripped of data in early 2020. The 2019 archive offered a more robust introduction to the company. Turns out, Weather Modification Inc. has been operating since its founding in 1961 by two farmers/pilots. As of 2019, the company had grown to almost 40 aircraft and 100 personnel. Here is a screenshot of the 2019 “Who We Are” web page.     Weather Modification, Incorporated has been in business since 1961. Their current website declares:   “When most people look up they see clouds. WE SEE POTENTIAL.” About us: Now, more than ever, the worldwide need for solutions to atmospheric necessities such as water resource management and environmental quality monitoring, is critical. With nearly a half-century of successful programs, our experience speaks for itself.   Let us help you better manage your atmospheric and water resources.   In the archive, Weather Modification Inc. had a very robust and international list of governmental, military, academic, and private clients. The client list for the United States included the US Department of Defense (DOD), the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and its National Hurricane Center, the Naval Surface Warfare Center, several state cloud seeding or weather modification programs, and more. They also have a number of international government clients.   Our Guest Today, Jim Lee   Despite censorship and other barriers, some intrepid truth-tellers have been collecting and revealing the discovered facts and information concerning both the details of weather manipulation and how it has now been weaponized against U.S. citizens, against all moral and legal limitations.   One of these truth-tellers is today's guest, Jim Lee. He has devoted his work to “separating fact from fiction regarding geoengineering, pollution, privacy, and propaganda in an easy-to-understand way.”   Jim Lee has been gathering and sharing news regarding weather manipulation since 2012. He has gathered and published a collection of historical evidence and news about weather modification that I believe is unmatched anywhere else. His goals are to “enact changes in laws worldwide to bring transparency and accountability for weather modification and geoengineering experiments.” The interview with Jim Lee makes clear that there is nothing conspiratorial about weather modification except the government's attempts to hide it from the public.     His historical Weather Modification History internet collection of thousands of news articles going back more than 100 years is a masterpiece in organization and research. In addition to the screenshots of the media articles, each is linked to the full version of the article, offering an unprecedented review of the history of documented weather management and manipulation.   Lee's accompanying climate viewer maps website is his most remarkable feat, inviting visitors to explore weather issues in depth. His maps are gorgeous.   Jim Lee has directly addressed what he calls the “pseudoscience, fear-porn, clickbait, and the facts” surrounding Helene and Milton. He concludes that proving federal or any other attempts to modify the hurricanes cannot be done but that seeding with chemicals or mechanical devices is possible but there is no data to prove it in this case.   Jim Lee examines in detail on his website why radar or HAARP involvement is impossible, explaining:   First of all, HAARP was not on during either of these storms. If you want to learn more about HAARP and the three ionospheric heaters worldwide, check out my page on Space Weather Modification. You can tell when HAARP is on simply by checking HAM radio or WebSDR and tuning into 2.8 to 10 MHz. It was not.   That leaves NEXRAD Doppler radar, aka WSR-88D. Can a NEXRAD radar alter a hurricane? NO! Why? It's all about the numbers. NEXRAD can produce a peak of 750,000 watts with an average power of around 1300 watts. Let's compare that to a hurricane:   7,000,000,000,000,000 watts or joules/second. 7 quadrillion watts vs 750,000 watts. You do the math.   There is a great deal of old-fashioned weather modifications through seeding and chemtrails (pollution in the sky whether as a byproduct of exhaust or deliberately produced) that have resulted in changing conditions for some of our most fertile and fruitful farmlands turning them from abundant crop producers to wastelands. That alone–the loss of millions of acres of cropland—and the bounty they produce, is alarming enough to warrant our direct attention.   Were the recent hurricanes manipulated by seeding clouds in some way? Lee says, “There isn't evidence.” There are disagreements within the freedom network about this point, but Lee says he and colleagues looked for any airplane traffic, but there was none. So, unless there were undiscovered spy planes with their identifying transponders turned off, there was no manipulation.   There is confirmation of weather modification and manipulation that has now clearly been directed at our own United States citizens and their productivity. Our guest, Jim Lee, tells us about how these practices are used by governments, federal and sometimes state, as well as by private industries. Reasons for manipulating weather vary and include efforts to increase or decrease rainfall and water tables through snow melt and to encourage greater amounts of snow for ski season. Managing rainfall to perfect the growing and harvesting of crops is also attempted.   One of the most serious aspects of climate manipulation is the tolerance shown and lack of measurement of nanoparticles that are spewed into the upper atmosphere by global air traffic.   Listen to us today as we learn so much more about how heavily and capriciously our weather is manipulated, the risks this presents, and what we can do to protect ourselves and our world.   Jim Lee and his marvelous websites can all be found at Connect with ClimateViewer and Weather Modification History. Readers can also connect to Jim through his Substack: The Climate Viewer Report.   ______   Learn more about Dr. Peter Breggin's work: https://breggin.com/   See more from Dr. Breggin's long history of being a reformer in psychiatry: https://breggin.com/Psychiatry-as-an-Instrument-of-Social-and-Political-Control   Psychiatric Drug Withdrawal, the how-to manual @ https://breggin.com/a-guide-for-prescribers-therapists-patients-and-their-families/   Get a copy of Dr. Breggin's latest book: WHO ARE THE “THEY” - THESE GLOBAL PREDATORS? WHAT ARE THEIR MOTIVES AND THEIR PLANS FOR US? HOW CAN WE DEFEND AGAINST THEM? Covid-19 and the Global Predators: We are the Prey Get a copy: https://www.wearetheprey.com/   “No other book so comprehensively covers the details of COVID-19 criminal conduct as well as its origins in a network of global predators seeking wealth and power at the expense of human freedom and prosperity, under cover of false public health policies.”   ~ Robert F Kennedy, Jr Author of #1 bestseller The Real Anthony Fauci and Founder, Chairman and Chief Legal Counsel for Children's Health Defense.

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a initiative spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation, I am struck by the sheer scope and ambition of its proposals. This is not just a policy guide; it is a comprehensive blueprint for a radical overhaul of American governance, tailored for the next Republican president, with many eyes on Donald Trump should he win the presidential election.At its core, Project 2025 is built around four pillars: a detailed policy guide, a database of potential personnel for the next administration, a training program dubbed the "Presidential Administration Academy," and a playbook for actions to be taken within the first 180 days in office. Led by former Trump administration officials Paul Dans and Spencer Chretien, this project has drawn significant attention and criticism for its ties to Trump's past policies and current campaign promises[3].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its vision for the federal government's structure and function. The project proposes dismantling several key departments, including the Department of Education, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The Department of Education, for instance, would be abolished to facilitate school choice and increase parental control over schools, with federal programs and standards devolving to the states. This move would also see the elimination of programs like Head Start, which serves over 833,000 children living in poverty, and the federal fund for low-income students under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965[1][2].The project's approach to education is emblematic of its broader philosophy: education is viewed as a private rather than a public good. This is reflected in proposals to make public funds available as school vouchers, even for parents sending their children to private or religious schools, and cuts to funding for free school meals. The critique of "woke propaganda" in public schools further underscores the project's commitment to conservative principles in education[1].In the realm of healthcare, Project 2025 suggests significant changes, including cuts to Medicare and Medicaid, and the explicit rejection of abortion as healthcare. The plan also urges the government to eliminate coverage of emergency contraception and to use the Comstock Act to prosecute those who send and receive contraceptives and abortion pills. These proposals align with the project's stance on social issues, such as declaring that "men and women are biological realities and married men and women are the ideal, natural family"[1][2].The project's energy and climate policies are equally contentious. It advocates for reducing environmental and climate change regulations to favor fossil fuels, repealing the Inflation Reduction Act, and closing offices focused on clean energy and climate change mitigation. Diana Furchtgott-Roth, the Heritage Foundation's energy and climate director, suggests that the EPA should support the consumption of more natural gas, despite concerns about methane leaks. The project also proposes relaxing restrictions on oil drilling and preventing states from adopting stricter regulations on vehicular emissions[1][4].The impact on science agencies is profound. Project 2025 recommends prioritizing fundamental research over deployment, arguing that many current programs act as subsidies to the private sector. It proposes eliminating offices focused on energy technology development and climate change, and reshaping the U.S. Global Change and Research Program to align with conservative principles. The National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) would be broken up, with its climate change research activities heavily curtailed. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) would be subject to closer oversight by political appointees, with a focus on managerial skills over scientific qualifications[4].The project's approach to labor and employment is also noteworthy. It suggests eliminating civil service protections for thousands of government employees, allowing them to be replaced by political appointees. This "unitary executive" theory aims to streamline decision-making but raises concerns about the politicization of the federal bureaucracy. Additionally, the project proposes changes to overtime rules that could weaken protections and decrease overtime pay for some workers, and introduces work requirements for people reliant on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)[1][2].Expert analyses highlight the inconsistencies and potential implications of these proposals. Darrell West argues that the inconsistencies are designed for fundraising from certain industries or donors that would benefit. The project's emphasis on political appointees over merit-based staffing and its push for deregulation in key sectors have raised alarms about the potential for increased corruption and decreased public oversight[1].As I reflect on the breadth of Project 2025's proposals, it becomes clear that this initiative represents a fundamental shift in how the federal government operates and the values it upholds. The project's backers see it as a necessary correction to what they perceive as a bloated, inefficient, and overly liberal bureaucracy. Critics, however, view it as a dangerous erosion of public services, environmental protections, and social safety nets.Looking forward, the implementation of Project 2025's policies hinges on the outcome of the next presidential election. If a Republican president aligned with these proposals takes office, the first 180 days will be crucial in setting the tone for the administration. The project's playbook outlines a series of swift actions designed to reshape the government according to its vision. Whether this vision aligns with the broader interests of the American public remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: Project 2025 is a blueprint for a significantly different America.

Where do whales live? Where do they go? These are just some of the questions the US federal government would like to answer by introducing a bill (H.R. 10292) called the Whale CHARTS Act. In this episode of the How to Protect the Ocean podcast, host Andrew Lauren discusses the recently introduced Whale Conservation Habitat Analysis Research and Technical Strategies Act, also known as the Whale Charts Act. This bipartisan legislation aims to enhance the protection of baleen and sperm whales by improving our understanding of their feeding areas, calving grounds, and migration routes. Key points covered in the episode include: Objectives of the Whale Charts Act: The bill seeks to create high-resolution distribution maps of whale populations, develop predictive models to forecast shifts in whale habitats due to climate change, and conduct targeted research on understudied baleen whale species. Importance of Mapping: Enhanced mapping and predictive modeling are crucial for preventing dangerous collisions between vessels and whales. The North Atlantic right whale, for example, is often struck by ships, and understanding their migration routes is essential for their conservation. Use of Technology: The act encourages the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) to utilize innovative data sources, such as passive acoustic monitoring and satellite imagery, to improve the accuracy of habitat maps. This technology integration aims to safeguard marine wildlife while ensuring safer navigation for boaters. Bipartisan Support: The episode emphasizes that the Whale Charts Act has bipartisan support, making it a viable piece of legislation that could pass. Listeners are encouraged to contact their federal representatives to express support for the bill. Overall, the episode highlights the significance of mapping and tracking whale populations not only for their protection but also for the safety of human activities in marine environments. By leveraging advanced technology and data, the Whale Charts Act represents a proactive step towards harmonizing maritime operations with the natural behaviors of whales. Link to article: https://ecomagazine.com/news/policy/new-bill-introduced-to-improve-predictive-mapping-technology-for-whale-and-boater-safety/ US Congresspeople associated with the bill: Rep. Vern Buchanan (R-Florida): https://buchanan.house.gov/constituent-validation  Rep. Doris Matsui (D-California): https://matsuiforms.house.gov/contact/ Rep. Nicole Malliotakis(R-New York): https://malliotakis.house.gov/contact Rep. Jared Huffman (D-California): https://huffman.house.gov/contact/ Follow a career in conservation: https://www.conservation-careers.com/online-training/ Use the code SUFB to get 33% off courses and the careers program.   Do you want to join my Ocean Community? Sign Up for Updates on the process: www.speakupforblue.com/oceanapp   Sign up for our Newsletter: http://www.speakupforblue.com/newsletter   Facebook Group: https://bit.ly/3NmYvsI Connect with Speak Up For Blue: Website: https://bit.ly/3fOF3Wf Instagram: https://bit.ly/3rIaJSG TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@speakupforblue Twitter: https://bit.ly/3rHZxpc YouTube: www.speakupforblue.com/youtube  

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a sweeping initiative crafted by the Heritage Foundation, I am struck by the sheer breadth and ambition of its proposals. This 900-page blueprint, released in April 2022, outlines a radical restructuring of the federal government, aligning it with a staunchly conservative agenda. Despite President Donald Trump's attempts to distance himself from the project, the connections between Project 2025 and his campaign are undeniable.At its core, Project 2025 is a comprehensive plan to reshape American governance, touching on nearly every aspect of federal policy. One of the most striking aspects is its vision for the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). The project proposes politicizing these agencies, empowering the president to use them to target political opponents and enforce a radical agenda. As the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) notes, this could lead to a significant erosion of civil liberties and the rule of law[5].The project's authors also envision drastic changes to various federal agencies. For instance, they recommend dismantling the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and abolishing the Department of Education (ED), transferring or terminating its programs. The Department of Commerce would see significant alterations as well, with the Economic Development Administration (EDA) either abolished or repurposed to assist "rural communities destroyed by the Biden administration's attack on domestic energy production"[1].In the realm of science policy, Project 2025 is equally transformative. It suggests focusing the Department of Energy on fundamental research, rather than technology development and climate change programs. The report argues that many current DOE programs act as subsidies to the private sector for government-favored resources, and proposes eliminating offices focused on energy technology and climate change. This shift is part of a broader strategy to roll back climate science initiatives, including reshaping the U.S. Global Change and Research Program and preventing the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from using "unrealistic" projections of climate change impacts[2].The EPA itself would undergo significant changes, with its research activities subject to closer oversight by political appointees rather than scientists. The project proposes that EPA grants be managed by political appointees and that the public be incentivized to scrutinize the agency's scientific conduct. Diana Furchtgott-Roth, the Heritage Foundation's energy and climate director, has suggested that the EPA support increased consumption of natural gas, despite concerns from climatologists about the potential for increased methane leaks[1].Project 2025 also targets the National Institutes of Health (NIH), aiming to make it less independent and stopping its funding for research involving embryonic stem cells. The National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) would be broken up, with its climate change research activities severely curtailed. Thomas Gilman, who served under Trump as the chief financial officer of the Commerce Department, describes NOAA as "one of the main drivers of the climate change alarm industry"[2].The project's economic policies are just as far-reaching. It proposes instituting tax cuts, though there is disagreement among its writers on the issue of protectionism. Medicare and Medicaid would face significant cuts, and the government would be urged to explicitly reject abortion as healthcare. The project also seeks to eliminate coverage of emergency contraception and use the Comstock Act to prosecute those who send and receive contraceptives and abortion pills[1].In the area of labor and employment, Project 2025 recommends instituting work requirements for those reliant on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and weakening overtime protections. It also suggests legislation requiring Americans to be paid more for working on Sundays, based on the premise that "God ordained the Sabbath as a day of rest"[1].The implications of these proposals are profound. Critics argue that Project 2025 represents a blueprint for an autocratic takeover, compromising the checks and balances of the U.S. system of government. The plan involves purging the civil service, firing independent agency leaders, and conditioning federal funding on political fealty. This could lead to a situation where thousands of political operatives, hand-picked for their loyalty to the president, control key government positions regardless of their qualifications or commitment to constitutional duty[3].The project's approach to technology and media policies is equally concerning. It proposes increasing agency accountability at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) while decreasing wasteful spending and promoting national security and economic prosperity. However, it also suggests that Big Tech companies should fund the Universal Service Fund, currently supported through telephone bills, and that media ownership regulations are outdated and stifle competition[4].As I reflect on the scope of Project 2025, it becomes clear that this initiative is not just a policy blueprint but a vision for a fundamentally different America. The project's authors and supporters see it as a way to "institutionalize Trumpism," as Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts has described it. However, critics like the ACLU warn that it threatens to erode democracy, perpetuate bigotry, and undermine justice and equality[5].Looking ahead, the implementation of Project 2025's proposals hinges on several key milestones. The upcoming presidential term will be crucial, as the project's success depends on a conservative administration willing to enact its recommendations. With Russell Vought, the founder of the Center for Renewing America, now serving as the policy director of the Republican National Committee platform committee, and given the ongoing connections between Project 2025 and the Trump campaign, the stage is set for a potentially transformative period in American governance[1].As the nation approaches these critical decision points, it is imperative to engage in a thorough and informed discussion about the implications of Project 2025. Whether one views this initiative as a necessary correction to current policies or a dangerous erosion of democratic principles, its impact on American life will be profound. As we navigate this complex landscape, it is crucial to remain vigilant and ensure that any changes to our governance system are made with the utmost care and a deep respect for the principles of democracy.

As I delved into the intricacies of Project 2025, a comprehensive policy initiative spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation, I found myself navigating a complex web of proposals that promise to reshape the very fabric of American governance. This 900-page blueprint, crafted by over 400 conservative scholars, is more than just a policy guide; it is a vision for a fundamentally different federal government.At its core, Project 2025 is designed to provide a incoming Republican administration with a detailed roadmap for its first four years in office. The project is led by former Trump administration officials, including Paul Dans, who served as chief of staff at the Office of Personnel Management, and Spencer Chretien, a former special assistant to President Trump. Despite Trump's attempts to distance himself from the project, the connections run deep, with many authors having served in his first administration or working within his inner circle[5].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its sweeping overhaul of federal agencies. The Department of Education, for instance, would be abolished, with its programs either transferred or terminated. This move aligns with long-held conservative critiques of federal intervention in education, advocating instead for greater support for school choice[5].The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), established in the wake of the 9/11 attacks, would also face significant changes. Project 2025 proposes dismantling DHS and reorganizing its components under other departments or into a new, standalone border and immigration agency. This agency would be staffed by over 100,000 employees, reflecting a hardened stance on immigration enforcement and border security[5].Environmental and climate policies are another area where Project 2025 seeks radical change. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) would be transformed to prioritize managerial skills over scientific expertise in its staffing. The project suggests preventing the EPA from using "unrealistic" climate change impact projections and requiring clear congressional authorization for any science activity. This includes a proposal to close the EPA's Office of Environmental Justice and External Civil Rights, and to relax regulations on the fossil fuel industry, such as removing restrictions on oil drilling imposed by the Bureau of Land Management[1][2].The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is also in the crosshairs, with Project 2025 describing it as a "main driver of the climate change alarm industry" that is "harmful to future U.S. prosperity." The proposal includes breaking up NOAA and downsizing its operations, reflecting a broader skepticism towards climate change research and policy[5].In the realm of science policy, Project 2025 prioritizes fundamental research over applied technology development. The Department of Energy would focus on research that the private sector would not otherwise conduct, eliminating many programs focused on energy technology and climate change. The U.S. Global Change and Research Program, which coordinates climate change research across agencies, would be reshaped to critically analyze and potentially reject assessments prepared under the Biden administration[2].The project also outlines significant changes to the National Institutes of Health (NIH), proposing to make it less independent and stopping its funding for research involving embryonic stem cells. This move aligns with conservative positions on ethical issues in medical research[1].Economic policies are another key area of focus. Project 2025 advocates for tax cuts, though its authors are split on the issue of protectionism. The plan includes cutting Medicare and Medicaid, and instituting work requirements for those reliant on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Additionally, it proposes changes to overtime rules that could weaken protections and decrease overtime pay for some workers[1].The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) would see increased accountability and reduced wasteful spending, with a focus on promoting national security and economic prosperity. The project suggests expanding 5G and satellite connectivity, such as StarLink, to reduce the digital divide and ensure every American has access to high-speed internet. Big Tech companies would be expected to contribute to the Universal Service Fund, currently funded through telephone bills[4].Project 2025's vision extends to social issues as well. The agenda calls for the Food and Drug Administration to reverse its approval of the abortion pill mifepristone and to reinstate more stringent rules for its use. It also proposes using the Comstock Act to prosecute those who send and receive contraceptives and abortion pills, reflecting a strong stance against abortion and reproductive rights[5].Critics have labeled Project 2025 as a blueprint for an autocratic takeover, citing its extensive plans to dismantle the bureaucracy of the "Administrative State" and bring independent agencies under White House control. Darrell West of the Brookings Institution argues that the inconsistencies in the plan are designed to appeal to specific industries or donors that would benefit from the proposed changes[1].As I reflect on the scope and ambition of Project 2025, it becomes clear that this initiative represents a seismic shift in how the federal government operates. The project's authors envision a government that is more aligned with conservative principles, less involved in social and environmental issues, and more focused on economic growth and national security.The coming months will be crucial as the project's recommendations begin to take shape. With the transition to a new administration on the horizon, the implementation of these policies will depend on a complex interplay between the executive branch, Congress, and the judiciary. As Paul Dans, the outgoing director of Project 2025, noted, the project does not speak for any candidate or campaign, but its influence on the next conservative president's agenda is undeniable[1].As the nation prepares for these potential changes, one thing is certain: Project 2025 is not just a policy document but a roadmap for a fundamentally different America. Whether its vision aligns with the values and needs of the American people remains to be seen, but one thing is clear – the impact of Project 2025 will be felt for years to come.

As I delved into the intricacies of Project 2025, a sweeping initiative crafted by the Heritage Foundation, I couldn't help but feel a sense of both fascination and trepidation. This 900-page blueprint, released in April 2022, outlines a radical restructuring of the federal government, envisioning a future that is as ambitious as it is contentious.At its core, Project 2025 is a comprehensive policy agenda designed to guide a potential conservative administration, with ties that run deep into the circles of former President Donald Trump. Despite Trump's public disavowal of the project, the connections are undeniable; many of its authors and contributors are veterans of Trump's first administration or closely aligned with his inner circle[3][4].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its proposal to overhaul various federal agencies. The Department of Education, for instance, would be abolished, with its programs either transferred or terminated. The Department of Homeland Security would be dismantled, and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) would be made less independent, with a specific ban on funding research involving embryonic stem cells[1].The project also targets environmental and climate change regulations, advocating for a significant rollback to favor fossil fuels. Diana Furchtgott-Roth, the Heritage Foundation's energy and climate director, suggests that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) should support increased consumption of natural gas, despite concerns from climatologists about the potential for increased methane leaks[1].In the realm of science policy, Project 2025 prioritizes fundamental research over deployment, arguing that many current Department of Energy (DOE) programs act as subsidies to the private sector. It proposes eliminating offices focused on energy technology development and climate change programs, and reshaping the U.S. Global Change and Research Program to critically analyze and potentially refuse any assessments prepared under the Biden administration[2].The National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is another agency in the crosshairs, with Project 2025 describing it as a "main driver of the climate change alarm industry" and proposing its breakup. The EPA would be restricted from using "unrealistic" projections of climate change impacts and would require clear congressional authorization for any science activity[2].The project's vision extends to the economy and labor policies as well. It recommends instituting work requirements for those reliant on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and proposes changes to overtime rules that could weaken protections and decrease overtime pay for some workers. Additionally, it suggests legislation requiring higher pay for working on Sundays, based on the principle that "God ordained the Sabbath as a day of rest"[1].In the technology and media sector, Project 2025 is keen on addressing what it perceives as the threats posed by Big Tech. The authors argue that business concentration should no longer be considered solely in economic terms but also in socio-political terms, suggesting that antitrust laws should be applied more rigorously to prevent what they see as a "leftist" agenda. The project also emphasizes the need to subvert China's goal of becoming the global leader in artificial intelligence (AI) by investing in and protecting American innovation[3].The implications of these proposals are far-reaching and have sparked significant debate. Critics, such as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), view Project 2025 as a blueprint for an "autocratic takeover," threatening to erode democracy and undermine various rights, including abortion and reproductive rights, LGBTQ rights, immigrants' rights, and racial equity[4].Darrell West, an expert in the field, points out the inconsistencies in the plan, suggesting they are designed to attract funding from certain industries or donors that would benefit from the proposed changes. This raises questions about the true motivations behind the project and whether it serves a broader conservative agenda or specific corporate interests[1].As the 2024 elections have concluded, the connections between Project 2025 and the Trump campaign have become more apparent. Despite Trump's attempts to distance himself, the involvement of key figures like John McEntee and Russell Vought, who have transitioned between roles in the Trump administration and Project 2025, underscores the deep ties between the two[1][4].Looking ahead, the implementation of Project 2025's recommendations would depend on the next conservative president's willingness to adopt these sweeping changes. With Kevin Roberts, who previously worked on Trump's transition team, now leading the project, the stage is set for a potentially transformative period in American governance.As we approach 2025, the fate of Project 2025 hangs in the balance. Will its ambitious and sometimes controversial proposals reshape the federal government, or will they face significant resistance from Congress, civil society, and the courts? One thing is certain: the next few years will be pivotal in determining the future of American governance and the extent to which Project 2025's vision becomes a reality.

On Indigenous Peoples Day in October 2024, The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) designated the Chumash Heritage National Marine Sanctuary off the California coast. The Chumash Heritage National Marine Sanctuary makes it America's 17th national marine sanctuary, the sixth off the U.S. West Coast, and it is considered one of the largest in the National Marine Sanctuary System. The sanctuary encompasses 4,543 square miles of Central California's coastal and ocean waters, providing protection to nationally significant natural, cultural, and historical resources while bringing new opportunities for research, community engagement, and education and outreach activities. While much of the settler colonial and some Indigenous media treated the designation of the Chumash Heritage National Marine Sanctuary as beneficial for the Chumash Nation and Mother Earth, there are larger questions about the true origins of the proposed Chumash Maritime Sanctuary along with National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) process of adhering to all bands of Chumash nations free, prior, and informed consent international rights, and the failed mechanisms within between different Chumash bands and the NOAA, plus more. Today on American Indian Airwaves we address all these questions with our guests who combined with themselves and their ancestors have decades of living experiences protecting their cultural and traditional practices while simultaneous resisting settler colonial violence. Guest: o Micheal Khus-Zarate (Chumash), Board Member of the Coastal Band of the Chumash Nation and Marcus Lopez (Barbareño band of the Chumash Nation), co-host and executive producer of American Indian Airwaves.

Send us a textToday's conversation is with climate specialist, Rick Thoman. Topics discussed include climate impacts on caribou herds of the Arctic, The Arctic Report Card 2024, Arctic ERMA, CAPRI, and the challenges Arctic communities face as marine traffic increases in the Arctic.  Rick Thoman, a climate specialist at IARC's Alaska Center for Climate Assessment and Policy (ACCAP).  Rick is a contributor and editor of the Arctic Report Card and was also awarded NOAA Distinguished Career Award for Professional Achievement in 2020. Rick was honored after a 30 plus year career with the National Weather Service for continued efforts to improve climate services in Alaska and for outstanding outreach efforts working with the Alaska Native community.The Arctic Report Card is an annual report led by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration(NOAA). The efforts of scientists and climate specialists to create this robust scientific report every year is impressive.  The amount of work contributed to this scientific document is extremely important in documenting climate change in the Arctic, which is warming at an alarming rate. The Report Card is intended for a wide audience, including scientists, teachers, students, decision-makers and the general public interested in the Arctic environment and science. It is encouraged that the Report Card to be utilized and studied, as the scientific community has created it to be an easily read report for the general population to better understand the complexities of the warming Arctic.Here are the links to the 2023 Arctic Report Card and NOAA website:https://arctic.noaa.gov/report-card/report-card-2023/The Arctic Report Card 2024 will be published on December 10th, 2024.https://www.arctic.noaa.govThanks for tuning into the Alaska Climate and Aviation Podcast!Katie WriterJournalist/Pilot/Photographerktphotowork@gmail.comSupport the showYou can visit my website for links to other episodes and see aerial photography of South Central Alaska at:https://www.katiewritergallery.com

SummaryWhat are the key principles of African leadership that nonprofit leaders globally could benefit from adopting?How does the African concept of Ubuntu translate into practical leadership strategies for nonprofit organizations?How does African leadership balance individual and collective success, and how might nonprofit teams benefit from seeking the same balance?In this NGO Soul+Strategy podcast episode, I interview Albert Anoubon Momo, axecutive, author, and board member, about leadership lessons we can all learn from African cultures. Albert's Bio:Co-founder of a brand new company offering geospatial consulting services to emerging economiesFormer Vice President and Executive Director, Emerging Markets and Funded Projects at the Trimble companyFormer Director of Institutional Business Development at TrimbleManagement and Program Analyst at USAIDAlbert played multiple other roles as senior geo-scientist and GIS and software engineer, including at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) inside the US Government. We discuss: Albert has been a student of leadership from early adult life onwards, and he runs a large Facebook group on leadership. His experience has been primarily in the private sector , though he also plays governance roles in the nonprofit sphere, such as his role Board Chair of Cadasta (where Tosca is also on the board)Albert urges listeners to focus on what the African continent can bring to the rest of the world, and not to assume Africa just consumes from the rest of the world (especially when it comes to West-influenced leadership models)Subregions within the huge continent of Africa have had different influences on leadership approaches and practices: in Northern Africa and the Sahel, Islamic influences have prevailed while French colonizers brought more hierarchically oriented thinking to leadership; in coastal Africa, colonizers introduced Christianity which persists till today; and in Southern and Eastern Africa, Zulu-inspired Ubuntu philosophy has dominatedUbuntu as the most well known African philosophy emphasizes interdependence, solidarity, shared community, and communalism (also within organizational leadership and management) – different from the individualism more prevalent in Western societiesWhat Western leadership practices can learn from African leadership approaches regarding employee engagement, shared value, shared futures, solidarity, and humanismIn African cultures, traditionally councils of elders have played an important conflict resolution role; it is beneficial for global North/Western nonprofits to take account of these Councils' approach to seeking win-win resolutions rather than zero-sum litigation, their focus on the common good, common ground and shared goals. Resources:Albert's LinkedIn ProfileAlbert's Facebook group on LeadershipBook YouTube video of this podcastClick here to subscribe to be alerted when new podcast episodes come out or when Tosca produces other thought leadership pieces.Or email Tosca at tosca@5oaksconsulting.org if you want to talk about your social sector organization's needs, challenges, and opportun

Please note, this episode was recorded in early September, before Hurricane Helene devastated Western North Carolina. That's why the storm isn't mentioned in our discussion. Our thoughts are with those affected, and the City has been actively sending personnel and resources to assist in recovery efforts.In this episode of the Big Ideas Raleigh Podcast, hosts Dan Bagley and producer Dr. Sarah Glova are joined by two climate action experts: Kathie Dello, State Climatologist of North Carolina and Director of the North Carolina State Climate Office at NC State University, and Megan Anderson, Sustainability Lead at the City of Raleigh. Together, they explore how Raleigh is setting the standard for climate action, being the first city in the region to secure key grants and national partnerships. Learn about Raleigh's innovative approach to sustainability and discover actionable ways to get involved, whether you're an individual, family, business owner, or activist. Climate change impacts us all, and Raleigh is leading by example. Residents will find plenty to celebrate, while listeners from other cities will want to take notes and apply some of these impactful strategies.Tune in to hear why climate action is not just a government initiative but a community effort where everyone has a role to play.Please note: This episode was recorded in early September, before Hurricane Helene impacted Western North Carolina. That's why the storm isn't mentioned in our discussion. Our thoughts are with those affected, and the City has been actively sending personnel and resources to assist in recovery efforts.Resources:Learn more about the City of Raleigh's Climate Action and how you can get involved:Visit the City of Raleigh's website to learn more about what we're doing related to climate action: https://raleighnc.gov/climate-actionReview the City's Climate Action Plan: https://raleighnc.gov/climate-action-and-sustainability/services/community-climate-action-planLearn More about the City's Office of Sustainability. https://raleighnc.gov/climate-action-and-sustainabilityCheck out the Urban Heat Island project: https://raleighnc.gov/climate-action-and-sustainability/services/mapping-urban-heat-islandsLearn more about Dr. Kathie Dello in her interview with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), an agency within the US Department of Commerce: https://cpo.noaa.gov/interview-with-climate-scientist-kathie-dello/ ---Big Ideas Raleigh is powered by the City of Raleigh Communications and Strategy and Innovation Departments, hosted by Dan Bagley, and produced by Dr. Sarah Glova and Earfluence.

Hurricane Milton caused a major storm surge, but also a reverse one. And, Lake Michigan's surface temperature has been above average nearly every day this year so far. All five Great Lakes are heating up.The Science Behind Hurricane MiltonOn October 9, Hurricane Milton made landfall in Siesta Key, Florida, then barrelled across the state. This comes just a couple of weeks after Hurricane Helene devastated parts of the southeastern US. Hurricane Milton dumped up to 18 inches of rain in some places, flooding cars, homes, and other buildings. Several people are confirmed dead. Around 3 million are without power.Hurricane Milton was expected to cause a 15-foot storm surge, but it appears that the storm surge maxed out at five to six feet. And there wasn't just a storm surge, but a reverse one.Ira talks with Maggie Koerth, science writer and editorial lead for Carbon Plan, about some of the science of Hurricane Milton. They also discuss other science stories from the week, including President Biden's new rule for replacing lead pipes, concerns about the security of genetic data with 23andMe, and how to tell if an elephant is left or right-trunked.Lake Michigan Swimmers Enjoy ‘Unsettling' Warm WaterOn a sunny, mid-September afternoon, Olu Demuren took a running start off the concrete ledge just south of Belmont Harbor and leapt into Lake Michigan for the first time.“I was preparing myself for cold water,” Demuren said. “And this immediately felt very nice.”The water along Chicago's lakeshore averaged an unseasonable 71 degrees that day. The weather was picturesque too: clear blue skies and temperatures in the mid-80s. Annelise Rittberg watched their friends from the concrete ledge and said the weather felt “deeply abnormal.”“While it's fun to be out here, it's also unsettling,” Rittberg said.Lake Michigan is heating up. The lake's surface temperature has surpassed the running average dating back to 1995 nearly every day this year, according to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) data. And it's not just one Great Lake. All five are warming. The massive bodies of water, which provide drinking water to more than 30 million people, are among the fastest-warming lakes worldwide, according to the federal government's Fifth National Climate Assessment.Read the full story at sciencefriday.com.Transcripts for each segment will be available after the show airs on sciencefriday.com. Subscribe to this podcast. Plus, to stay updated on all things science, sign up for Science Friday's newsletters.

At Climate Week NYC 2024, many conversations focused on improving public understanding of climate change — also known as climate literacy. In this episode of the ESG Insider podcast we explore how increasing climate literacy can help prepare the future workforce for the green job opportunities that will come with the low-carbon transition.  We sit down on the sidelines of The Nest Climate Campus with Kathleen Rogers, President of Earthday.org. This is a nonprofit that grew out of the first Earth Day in 1970 and has a goal of raising public awareness about environmental issues.   We also talk with Frank Niepold, Senior Climate Education Coordinator at the Climate Program Office of the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Frank co-authored a new interagency climate literacy guide for educators, communicators, and decisionmakers.  To understand how culture can help educate about climate change, we speak to AY Young, a United Nations Young Leader who uses his music to spread awareness about sustainability issues including the UN's 17 Sustainable Development Goals.  And we hear how some companies are approaching the topic in interviews with Gayle Schueller, Senior Vice President and Chief Sustainability Officer at technology and manufacturing company 3M; and Holly Paeper, President of the Commercial HVAC Americas business at Trane Technologies, a building technology and energy solutions company.  Listen to our prior episodes from Climate Week NYC 2024 here:  Kicking off Climate Week NYC with an urgent to-do list: https://www.spglobal.com/esg/podcasts/kicking-off-climate-week-nyc-with-an-urgent-to-do-list CDP CEO talks climate, nature and the future of sustainability disclosure: https://www.spglobal.com/esg/podcasts/cdp-ceo-talks-climate-nature-and-the-future-of-sustainability-disclosure   Audubon CEO on why bird loss indicates a planet in crisis: https://www.spglobal.com/esg/podcasts/audubon-ceo-on-why-bird-loss-indicates-a-planet-in-crisis   SBTi interim CEO on what's next for net-zero standards: https://www.spglobal.com/esg/podcasts/sbti-interim-ceo-on-what-s-next-for-net-zero-standards California state senator talks climate disclosure featuring: https://www.spglobal.com/esg/podcasts/california-state-senator-talks-climate-disclosure   This piece was published by S&P Global Sustainable1, a part of S&P Global.   Copyright ©2024 by S&P Global  DISCLAIMER  By accessing this Podcast, I acknowledge that S&P GLOBAL makes no warranty, guarantee, or representation as to the accuracy or sufficiency of the information featured in this Podcast. The information, opinions, and recommendations presented in this Podcast are for general information only and any reliance on the information provided in this Podcast is done at your own risk. This Podcast should not be considered professional advice. Unless specifically stated otherwise, S&P GLOBAL does not endorse, approve, recommend, or certify any information, product, process, service, or organization presented or mentioned in this Podcast, and information from this Podcast should not be referenced in any way to imply such approval or endorsement. The third party materials or content of any third party site referenced in this Podcast do not necessarily reflect the opinions, standards or policies of S&P GLOBAL. S&P GLOBAL assumes no responsibility or liability for the accuracy or completeness of the content contained in third party materials or on third party sites referenced in this Podcast or the compliance with applicable laws of such materials and/or links referenced herein. Moreover, S&P GLOBAL makes no warranty that this Podcast, or the server that makes it available, is free of viruses, worms, or other elements or codes that manifest contaminating or destructive properties.  S&P GLOBAL EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL LIABILITY OR RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR OTHER DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF ANY INDIVIDUAL'S USE OF, REFERENCE TO, RELIANCE ON, OR INABILITY TO USE, THIS PODCAST OR THE INFORMATION PRESENTED IN THIS PODCAST. 

(AURN NEWS) — The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has issued urgent warnings as Tropical Storm Helene approaches the southeastern United States. According to NOAA's latest advisory, Helene is forecast to intensify to near hurricane strength Wednesday as it nears the northeastern coast of the Yucatan Peninsula, where a Hurricane Warning is in effect. NOAA warns of a life-threatening storm surge danger along the entire west coast of the Florida Peninsula and Florida's Big Bend, with the highest inundation levels expected along the Big Bend coast. The agency has also issued a Hurricane Warning for portions of Florida's Big Bend, where damaging hurricane-force winds are anticipated. The agency urged residents to complete preparations by early Thursday. As the storm moves inland, NOAA is warning of considerable flash and urban flooding across portions of Florida, the Southeast, southern Appalachians, and the Tennessee Valley from Wednesday through Friday, with a risk of landslides in the southern Appalachians. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Where do climate and security intersect today? Amanda McCarty, director of the Climate Ready Nation initiative at the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), joins the SM Highlights podcast to talk about how climate change is a “destabilizer” for organizations and individuals worldwide and how scientists are reevaluating what they measure to track new effects and map a path to resilience. Additional Resources Take security higher with GSX: https://www.gsx.org/ Learn how to build resilience and deal with unknown knowns in this year's GSX Game Changer sessions: https://www.gsx.org/game-changers/ Learn more about the Climate Ready Nation initiative and NOAA here: https://www.noaa.gov/building-a-climate-ready-nation Interested in understanding how climate change intersects with security risks? Read more from Security Management: https://www.asisonline.org/security-management-magazine/articles/2023/05/climate-change-and-security/ Learn more about security's role in resilience and anti-fragility here: https://www.asisonline.org/security-management-magazine/articles/2024/07/resilience/ Study the links between climate extremes and mass migration and displacement with Security Management: https://www.asisonline.org/security-management-magazine/latest-news/today-in-security/2024/june/mass-migration-extremism-climate/

2024 has already been a difficult year for extreme weather. The hurricane season on the eastern seaboard of North America is already one of the earliest active seasons on record. Meanwhile, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) in the US, as of August 8th, this year has already seen 19 weather events cause damage upwards of a billion dollars, with 149 people left dead. That's in the US alone.So, how are supercomputing and high performance computing helping to mitigate the effects of such extreme weather? Joining us to discuss is Ilene Carpenter, Earth Sciences segment manager at Hewlett Packard Enterprise. This is Technology Now, a weekly show from Hewlett Packard Enterprise. Every week we look at a story that's been making headlines, take a look at the technology behind it, and explain why it matters to organizations and what we can learn from it. Do you have a question for the expert? Ask it here using this Google form: https://forms.gle/8vzFNnPa94awARHMA About this week's guest, Ilene Carpenter: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ilene-carpenter-9a15511/ Sources cited in this week's episode:The first computer weather predictions: https://web.archive.org/web/20200626175559/https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/101943.pdfUS National Weather Service computing power: https://www.weather.gov/about/supercomputers#:~:text=NWS%20super%20computers%20hold%20numerical,buoys%2C%20radar%2C%20and%20moreUK Met Office computing power: https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/about-us/who-we-are/innovation/supercomputerStatistics on US extreme weather damage in 2024: https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/billions/Atom interferometry breakthrough: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.ade4454

2024 has already been a difficult year for extreme weather. The hurricane season on the eastern seaboard of North America is already one of the earliest active seasons on record. Meanwhile, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) in the US, as of August 8th, this year has already seen 19 weather events cause damage upwards of a billion dollars, with 149 people left dead. That's in the US alone.So, how are supercomputing and high performance computing helping to mitigate the effects of such extreme weather? Joining us to discuss is Ilene Carpenter, Earth Sciences segment manager at Hewlett Packard Enterprise. This is Technology Now, a weekly show from Hewlett Packard Enterprise. Every week we look at a story that's been making headlines, take a look at the technology behind it, and explain why it matters to organizations and what we can learn from it. Do you have a question for the expert? Ask it here using this Google form: https://forms.gle/8vzFNnPa94awARHMA About this week's guest, Ilene Carpenter: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ilene-carpenter-9a15511/ Sources cited in this week's episode:The first computer weather predictions: https://web.archive.org/web/20200626175559/https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/101943.pdfUS National Weather Service computing power: https://www.weather.gov/about/supercomputers#:~:text=NWS%20super%20computers%20hold%20numerical,buoys%2C%20radar%2C%20and%20moreUK Met Office computing power: https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/about-us/who-we-are/innovation/supercomputerStatistics on US extreme weather damage in 2024: https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/billions/Atom interferometry breakthrough: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.ade4454

(AURN News) — As Hurricane Francine barrels toward the northern Gulf Coast, residents and officials in Louisiana and Mississippi are preparing for its imminent arrival. The category one hurricane, currently churning in the Gulf of Mexico, is expected to make landfall later today, bringing with it a host of life-threatening conditions, according to the National Weather Service. Forecasters are particularly concerned about the storm surge, which threatens to inundate coastal areas of Louisiana and Mississippi. Hurricane warnings blanket much of the Louisiana coast, with tropical storm warnings extending further inland. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) predicts that tropical storm conditions will begin to affect the area as early as Wednesday morning, with hurricane-force winds following close behind. “An elongated area of low pressure located over the central tropical Atlantic continues to produce some disorganized shower and thunderstorm activity. Environmental conditions appear marginally conducive for some slight development during the next day or two while the system moves westward at 5 to 10 mph over the central tropical Atlantic,” The National Hurricane Center posted on Facebook. As Francine approaches, it's not just wind and storm surge that have officials worried. The storm is expected to dump significant amounts of rain across a wide swath of the southeastern United States. Flash flood watches are in effect for the Lower Tennessee Valley and the Lower Mississippi Valley. Hurricane hunter aircraft were dispatched Wednesday morning to gather crucial data about Francine. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

As summer wanes and we celebrate back-to-school time with our friends in academia, students, and parents, we're pleased to launch Season 8 of the Engineering With Nature® Podcast! Host Sarah Thorne recently caught up with Jeff King, National Lead of the Engineering With Nature (EWN) Program, to discuss what the EWN Team has been up to over the summer, share some highlights from Season 7, and offer a glimpse of what's ahead in Season 8.As Jeff describes, the EWN Team has had a busy summer extending the reach of EWN by collaborating with engineering and landscape architect colleagues, and working with the EWN Proving Grounds leads on larger, more ambitious projects. “We've started to envision really large EWN projects that will be pursued at a systems level so that we can maximize the function and benefits that can be derived from these projects. I'm really excited about having an opportunity to publish these as ‘EWN Playbooks' and have them available soon.” The EWN Team is also growing. Steven Bailey, a landscape architect, recently joined the Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC). His hire reflects the growing importance of landscape architecture in EWN. And continuing EWN's tradition of training the next generation of EWN practitioners, Claire Middendorf, an Environmental & Ecological Engineering student at Purdue University, completed a summer internship working with Burton Suedel, one of our frequent EWN Podcast hosts.Jeff is encouraged, and excited about the progress of EWN more broadly within the USACE on the contribution EWN and NBS are making to the navigation, flood risk management, and ecosystem restoration missions. “Many elements within the USACE are now focused on NBS and wanting to have NBS be prioritized across all of our business lines. The conversations we're having are focused on what can we do as an organization to accelerate implementation of NBS.”Jeff and the EWN Team continued outreach to external partners to expand opportunities for integration of NBS. They have been reaching out to colleagues in the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) in the US, and internationally, to colleagues with the Environmental Agency in the United Kingdom, and the Rijkswaterstaat, which is responsible for the design, construction, management and maintenance of the Netherlands' primary infrastructure facilities. The theme for Season 8 is Channeling the Energy. That Jeff explains is inspired by the energy and excitement in the conversations that he has with all the EWN and NBS practitioners, collaborators and educators that he meets. “It's that energy and it's very contagious. So, that's our theme – channeling the energy.” Listeners can expect another great lineup of episodes in Season 8, including topics such as the nexus of climate change and health, climate policy initiatives being driven by NOAA; how the Navy is incorporating NBS into their plans and projects; and some of the groundbreaking work being done by our EWN colleagues in both the policy and program areas.Mark your calendar for the launch of Season 8 on September 25! In Season 8, Episode 1, we're speaking with Dr. Chris Lemon, Johns Hopkins Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins Institute for Planetary Health, and Fellow of the Bloomberg American Health Initiative. We focus on Chris's journey into climate change and global health challenges. We hope you'll tune in.For more information and resource links, please visit the EWN Podcast page on the EWN website at https://www.engineeringwithnature.org/  Jeff King at LinkedInSarah Thorne at LinkedInDave Trafford at LinkedIn

Max Tritt is a Fisheries Biologist with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Max has lived all over the country and after serving the military for 20 years followed his passion for fish. Max is actively involved in outreach - he's been a presenter at the Maine Science Festival numerous times - and his work as a scientist for the Federal government provides some insights into how the Federal government uses and explains science.Our conversation was recorded in April 2024. ~~~~~The Maine Science Podcast is a production of the Maine Discovery Museum. It is recorded at Discovery Studios, at the Maine Discovery Museum, in Bangor, ME. The Maine Science Podcast is hosted and executive produced by Kate Dickerson; edited and produced by Scott Loiselle.The Discover Maine theme was composed and performed by Nick Parker.To support our work: https://www.mainediscoverymuseum.org/donate. Find us online:Maine Discovery MuseumMaine Science FestivalMaine Discovery Museum on social media: Facebook InstagramMaine Science Festival on social media: Facebook Twitter InstagramMaine Science Podcast on social media: Facebook Twitter Instagram © 2024 Maine Discovery Museum

August 8, 2024 -- An $18 million grant from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) will support training in ocean restoration practices at Mendocino College and broaden kelp restoration efforts. Tristin McHugh, the kelp project director for the Nature Conservancy, which won the grant, describes the impact she hopes the grant will have on the Mendocino Coast.

**Discussion begins at 4:30**Reports of aquatic humanoids, or mermaids, living in our oceans have existed for thousands of years.  Japanese legends, greek mythology, and ancient folklore all contain tales of half-fish, half-human hybrids.  More recently, Animal Planet released a series called, "Mermaids: A Body Found".  This film which was described by Animal Planet as Science Fiction based on some real events and scientific theory, claimed that mermaids are real and that scientists from the National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) were concealing the truth about the existence of mermaids.  A statement from NOAA simply says that 'no real evidence of aquatic humanoids has ever been found'.  Can we believe the hundreds of sightings that have been reported?  Or are these more likely misidentified manatees or other sea creatures as NOAA would have us believe?  Given what we know about the unexplored ocean depths, is it possible that these mysterious creatures do, in fact, exist. Send us a Text Message.Support the Show.Theme song by INDA

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is predicting an 'above-normal' hurricane season saying there could be as many as 25 named storms, the most they have ever predicted. NOAA attributes the prediction to a number of factors including warmer than normal ocean temperatures in the Atlantic Ocean and La Nina conditions in the Pacific. The expected heavier than normal hurricane season comes at a time when the director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is warning the agency could be facing a budget shortfall this year. FOX's Eben Brown speaks with Mike Brennan, National Hurricane Center Director, Erik Hooks, Deputy Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency and Florida Congressman Jared Moskowitz about this upcoming hurricane season, the advancements in safety warnings and the need for more funding for disaster relief. Click Here To Follow 'The FOX News Rundown: Evening Edition' Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Tonight Brian features an interview that he co-hosted with Daniel Barnett from the UK. They got to sit down and have a very candid conversation with The Skeptical Scientist from Finding Bigfoot, Ranae Holland. Research Biologist Ranae Holland was born and raised in Sioux Falls, South Dakota. There, she was first introduced to the Bigfoot craze in the 1970's by her father. They forged a special connection while watching movies and televisions shows, and reading about Bigfoot. In 2011, Ranae became a co-host of the Animal Planet show, "Finding Bigfoot". Though Ranae is not a member of the BFRO and does not believe in Bigfoot, she is fascinated by the phenomenon, and is excited to have found a way to combine her scientific knowledge, fieldwork skills, and love of the wilderness to investigate alleged sightings. She received her Bachelor of Science degree from the School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences at the University of Washington, where she was selected for and worked with the distinguished Alaska Salmon Program. For over a decade, Ranae has conducted fisheries research throughout the Pacific Northwest and Alaska. Ranae continues with her efforts as a dedicated field biologist, and she regularly works for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), as well as private entities. Her most recent field research efforts are focused on steelhead behavior in the Umpqua River basin in South Central Oregon. In keeping with her enjoyment of the outdoors, Ranae spends her free time Spey and fly fishing, hiking, camping and kayaking. She also enjoys teaching and lecturing to students about critical thinking, science, conservation, and, of course, her search for Bigfoot.Get Our FREE NewsletterGet Brian's Book Sasquatch Unleashed The Truth Behind The LegendLeave Us A VoicemailVisit Our WebsiteSupport Our SponsorsVisit Hangar 1 PublishingFactor Meals Use Code ODYSSEY50 At CheckoutBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/sasquatch-odyssey--4839697/support.

Today, I'm bringing you something a little different. As most of you already know, my new media company, Ontocalypse Productions—headed up by myself, Jay Christopher King, and Jordan Flowers, is currently in the midst of completing our first docuseries due out this summer entitled The Beyond: UFOs & A New Reality. While we're hard at work on that, posting for the podcast will be a little bit more sporadic over the next few weeks, but rest-assured that The UFO Rabbit Hole will be back to its regularly scheduled programming in June. And you'll still be getting a couple more new episodes in the meantime, including part 2 of the Through The Looking Glass series before then. But while things are a little quieter around here, I thought it would be a great opportunity to bring you guys something special. That's why I'm teaming up with Jay to bring you a series of never-before-released talks from his phenomenal Inquiry into Anomalous Experience & the Phenomenon conference series—or Inquire Anomalous for short. Regular listeners of the show have definitely heard me talk about Inquire Anomalous before. These have been my absolute favorite conferences to attend over the past few years. They're small, intimate, and the all-star line up of speakers who are truly on the bleeding edge of anomalous studies makes it a truly unmatched experience. In this first talk presented by Inquire Anomalous, we'll be hearing from Tim Gallaudet. Tim Gallaudet is a retired Rear Admiral in the U.S. Navy, and a career oceanographer. His former roles include serving as the Deputy Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), as well as the Oceanographer of the Navy. He's also the former superintendent of the U.S. Naval Observatory. More recently, Admiral Gallaudet has made exciting contributions to the field of UAP studies, particularly in the realm of the too-often overlooked subject of USOs or Unidentified Submersible Objects. He recently released a new article through the Sol Foundation which is a must-read on the topic. You can find that linked int he episode brief below.—————————————This episode is brought to you by The Experiencer Group. The Experiencer Group is a private online community dedicated to support, curiosity & community for people who've had anomalous events of all kinds. They hold regular support meetings for people who are processing anomalous experiences, book clubs, special guest speaker presentations, and more. You can learn more and sign up at tegmembers.com.—————————————EPISODE BRIEFINQUIRE ANOMALOUS YOUTUBE CHANNELThe full video of this talk will be released on the Inquire Anomalous Youtube channel on Friday, April 5th. Subscribe now and click the bell so you get the alert when it goes live.BECOME A PATRONPatrons get lots of great perks like early and ad-free episodes, access to the private The UFO Rabbit Hole Discord server, and twice-monthly Patron Zoom calls with Kelly Chase.Memberships start at just $5/month.GET THE BOOKGet a SIGNED COPYGet it on AmazonFOLLOWWebsiteTwitterFacebookBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-ufo-rabbit-hole-podcast--5746035/support.