Podcasts about privacy regulation

My guest on this week's episode of the podcast is Daniel McCarthy, who is an Associate Professor of Marketing at the University of Maryland's Robert H. Smith School of Business. The topic of our conversation is a draft paper for which Daniel is a co-author: Evaluating the Impact of Privacy Regulation on E-Commerce Firms: Evidence from Apple's App Tracking Transparency. I cited this paper in Could ATT be rolled back?, and we unpack the paper's findings in detail in the episode.Among other things, we discuss:Background on the paper, including its general methodology and principal findings;Why so little academic research has been dedicated to the effects of ATT;The qualities of small business marketing that made it disproportionately susceptible to the restrictions of ATT;How SMBs have adapted to ATT;The consequences of ATT on lower-funnel metrics and how the impact of ATT on upper-funnel metrics might be misleading;The misapprehensions or points of confusion about ATT that are most common;Thanks to the sponsors of this week's episode of the Mobile Dev Memo podcast:INCRMNTAL⁠⁠. True attribution measures incrementality, always on.⁠⁠⁠Clarisights⁠⁠⁠. Marketing analytics that makes it easy to get answers, iterate fast, and show the impact of your work. Go to⁠⁠⁠ clarisights.com/demo⁠⁠⁠ to try it out for free.ContextSDK. ContextSDK uses over 200 smartphone signals to detect a user's real-world context, allowing apps to deliver perfectly timed push notifications and in-app offers.Interested in sponsoring the Mobile Dev Memo podcast? Contact ⁠Marketecture⁠.

My guests on this week's episode of the podcast are John Lynch and JP Dube. John is the University of Colorado Distinguished Professor at the Leeds School of Business, University of Colorado-Boulder, and JP is the James M. Kilts Distinguished Service Professor of Marketing at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business. Together, along with a number of co-authors, they have written a draft paper titled The Intended and Unintended Consequences of Privacy Regulation for Consumer Marketing, which is the subject of our conversation. Among other things, we discuss: The various compromises that are inherent in instituting privacy-related data restrictions; What regulators and government officials get wrong about personalized advertising; The difference between consumers' stated and revealed privacy preferences; The benefits to consumers of privacy; The potential win-win proposition of personalized advertising and price discrimination; How the GDPR should be instructive for US policymakers. Thanks to the sponsors of this week's episode of the Mobile Dev Memo podcast: INCRMNTAL⁠⁠. True attribution measures incrementality, always on. ⁠⁠⁠Clarisights⁠⁠⁠. Marketing analytics that makes it easy to get answers, iterate fast, and show the impact of your work. Go to⁠⁠⁠ clarisights.com/demo⁠⁠⁠ to try it out for free. ContextSDK. ContextSDK uses over 200 smartphone signals to detect a user's real-world context, allowing apps to deliver perfectly timed push notifications and in-app offers. Interested in sponsoring the Mobile Dev Memo podcast? Contact ⁠Marketecture⁠.

Meta's trajectory over the past few years has been defined by its response to Apple's App Tracking Transparency, or ATT, privacy policy, with its recovery serving as a blueprint for success in the modern digital advertising operating environment. And in adapting to ATT, Meta may have executed one of the most remarkable, wholesale business model transitions in modern corporate history. The company transformed the core engagement model of its two flagship products, Facebook and Instagram, while re-engineering the digital advertising infrastructure that serves as the singular revenue engine of its business. And in doing so, Meta grew its stock price from a low point of less than $100 in February 2023 -- a level the company hadn't seen since 2016 -- to over $600 today. How did Meta go from a 4% year-over-year revenue decline in Q3 2022, with Mark Zuckerberg earnestly entreating investors to remain patient, to 25% revenue growth in Q3 2023? And what catalyzed both of these inflections? In this podcast, I'll tell the story of Meta's renaissance: the factors that led to the company's tumultuous decline in 2022 and, critically, what the company changed to invigorate growth in 2023 and 2024. Resources referenced in this podcast: Understanding conversion optimization in digital advertising Facebook's App Event Optimization tool showcases the power of its data in Q1 earnings Digital Advertising, Demand Routing, and the Millionaires' Mall The changing face of mobile marketing with event-based bidding Facebook may take 7% revenue hit from Apple privacy changes The App Tracking Transparency recession The perilous mythology of Brand Marketing for digital products The big economy of small advertisers Evaluating the Impact of Privacy Regulation on E-Commerce Firms: Evidence from Apple's App Tracking Transparency (working paper) Unpacking Meta's pivot to an open graph and short-form video Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) Morgan Stanley 2024 Technology, Media & Telecom Conference (Transcript) Unpacking Meta's Q2 2022 earnings: measurement still looms large Is CAPI future-proof? Meta's AEM update and the disappearing IP address Understanding Google's Universal App Campaign (UAC) changes What comes next after Facebook's VO campaign strategy? Generative AI for ad creative: five value milestones Thanks to the sponsors of this week's episode of the Mobile Dev Memo podcast: Vibe. Vibe is the leading Streaming TV ad platform for small and medium-sized businesses looking for actionable advertising campaign performance. INCRMNTAL⁠⁠. True attribution measures incrementality, always on. Interested in sponsoring the Mobile Dev Memo podcast? Contact ⁠Marketecture⁠. The Mobile Dev Memo podcast is available on: Apple Podcasts Spotify Google Podcasts

In this episode of the MadTech Podcast, Mark Krebs, Chief Strategy Officer, Publicis Media, Singapore & Southeast Asia, joins Lindsay Rowntree and Mat Broughton to discuss privacy and compliance certification, Google's hand being forced over app stores, and the rise of shoppable TV.

In today's episode of "AI Lawyer Talking Tech," we explore the fast-evolving intersection of artificial intelligence and the legal industry. We'll cover new legislation in California aimed at protecting performers' digital likenesses, examine how legal departments are leveraging AI to drive cost efficiencies, and unpack the latest regulatory updates impacting AI use in elections and employment law. We'll also dive into the growing adoption of cloud strategies in law firms and how legal technologists are transforming in-house teams. Stay tuned as we break down the major developments and insights driving the future of legal technology. Sample Job Descriptions for In-House Legal Counsel (Examples)20 Sep 2024MatterSuite By CaseFoxCalifornia Enacts Generative AI Law Addressing “Digital Replicas” of Performers19 Sep 2024New Media and Technology Law BlogWebinar: The State of AI Legislation19 Sep 2024Seyfarth ShawThe BR Privacy & Security Download: September 202419 Sep 2024Blank RomeNewsom so triggered by Musk sharing meme that he's not ruling out legal action20 Sep 2024American Wire NewsLaw Firm Leadership Training: 7 Essential Competencies For Aspiring Legal Leaders20 Sep 2024eLearning IndustryInvestment in client experience biggest priority for SME law firms looking to grow20 Sep 2024Legal FuturesHow are legal firms developing their cloud strategies?20 Sep 2024Legal FuturesReconnecting and Redefining: The CLOC APAC Summit Experience20 Sep 2024CLOC.orgToday is the golden era for law firm communications and marketing20 Sep 2024The Global Legal PostClock is ticking to pass federal laws to regulate AI in elections20 Sep 2024KSTPTexas Court Dismisses Consensys Lawsuit Against SEC Over Ethereum20 Sep 2024CryptoNews.netTwo Yale students named Obama Voyager scholars19 Sep 2024YaleNews ArticlesGov. Abbott swears in judges for newly created Texas Business Courts in Fort Worth19 Sep 2024AOL.comSOC 2 Reports and ISO 27001 Certification for Law Firms: Why Now?19 Sep 2024BDO United StatesWhat Every Startup Enterprise Should Know About Protecting Intellectual Property19 Sep 2024HypepotamusAt AI Summit, Attendees Ponder Potential, Limits of AI in Legal Space19 Sep 2024District of Columbia Bar5 Ways Legal Departments Use Legal Technology for Cost Savings19 Sep 2024JD SupraCybersecurity in the Age of Industry 4.0 – Part 219 Sep 2024National Law ReviewA Cheat Sheet from the National Advertising Division Conference 202419 Sep 2024JD SupraA Rising Attorney's Career in Data Protection19 Sep 2024Legal Talk NetworkThe Shrinking Ownership of Law Practice Management Technology (Part 4 of 4): Wrapping It All Up19 Sep 2024LawSitesConstangy Welcomes Five New Attorneys, Strengthening Presence Across Five Cities19 Sep 2024Constangy Brooks Smith & Prophete LLPGoogle seeks dismissal of £7bn UK antitrust case over online search dominance19 Sep 2024Tech MonitorNintendo sues ‘Palworld' over controversial characters resembling Pokémon19 Sep 2024Market Research Telecast

The Senate has taken its biggest swing yet at regulating social media and how it's used by children. On Tuesday, lawmakers voted overwhelmingly in favor of the Kids Online Safety and Privacy Act. But the legislation has been the subject of a major lobbying campaign, and those advocates from the tech industry, parents' groups and civil society will now bear down on the House. POLITICO reporter Ruth Reader joins host Steven Overly to explain the latest.

For more in-depth discussion of these topics and links to the news we discuss, subscribe to the Marketecture newsletter at https://news.marketecture.tvCopyright (C) 2024 Marketecture Media, Inc.

Sridhar Manyem, senior director, AM Best, said other key issues with data from wearables include using it ethically and compliantly. Manyem spoke with AM Best TV at Insurtech Hartford Symposium 2024.

In this episode on "Measuring the Effectiveness of Privacy Regulation' Steve Wright explores the complexity of evaluating privacy regulation effectiveness. He emphasises the need for assistance from external experts, including regulatory authorities, researchers, industry representatives, and civil society organisations. Evaluating privacy regulations requires careful consideration and collaboration due to the multifaceted nature of the task. It's crucial to select accurate data sources and acknowledge that the effectiveness of privacy regulations can change with evolving technology and societal norms.

In this episode, you will listen to Luiza Jarovsky and Prof. Orly Lobel talking about privacy, AI, and innovation, and her acclaimed books: "The Equality Machine" and "You Don't Own Me." They also discuss her legal article "The Law of AI for good."Prof. Lobel is the Warren Distinguished Professor of Law, the Director of the Center for Employment and Labor Law, and a founding member of the Center for Intellectual Property Law and Markets at the University of San Diego. Her interdisciplinary research is published widely in the top journals in law, economics, and psychology.Luiza Jarovsky is a lawyer, CEO of Implement Privacy, and author of Luiza's Newsletter.Read more about Luiza's work at https://www.luizajarovsky.comSubscribe to Luiza's Newsletter: https://www.luizasnewsletter.comCheck out the courses and training programs Luiza is leading at https://www.implementprivacy.comFollow Luiza on social media:LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/luizajarovskyTwitter: https://www.twitter.com/luizaJarovskyYouTube: https://youtube.com/@luizajarovsky

We discuss the challenges and opportunities of implementing the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA) and other state-level privacy regulations. This panel consists of experts in privacy law and policy, and will focus on the unique challenges and considerations of implementing state-level privacy regulations. They will discuss the requirements of the CPRA and other state laws, and explore best practices for compliance.Additionally, the panel will discuss the potential challenges and opportunities of coordinating among different states to create a consistent and effective framework for privacy regulation.

Learn more about Circle Converge22: https://circle.com/converge Stablecoins are here to stay and continue to help pave the way for the mainstream adoption of Web3 and DeFi. Although Europe sees privacy as fundamental by design, there is room for improvement when it comes to financial transactions. Centralized databases can be hacked. For this reason, DeFi and crypto in general can provide solutions to both future digital asset security threats and global banking.   In this episode of The Money Movement, Jeremy is joined by Pascal Gauthier, Chairman & CEO of Ledger*. *Ledger supports EUROC.

Learn more about Circle Converge22: https://circle.com/converge Stablecoins are here to stay and continue to help pave the way for the mainstream adoption of Web3 and DeFi. Although Europe sees privacy as fundamental by design, there is room for improvement when it comes to financial transactions. Centralized databases can be hacked. For this reason, DeFi and crypto in general can provide solutions to both future digital asset security threats and global banking.   In this episode of The Money Movement, Jeremy is joined by Pascal Gauthier, Chairman & CEO of Ledger*. *Ledger supports EUROC.  They cover:

On this episode we are going to be breaking down the concepts of cookie deprecation, privacy regulations and their effect on marketing. I will be helping you learn a little bit about what you can do to overcome these challenges.We're going to explain what a cookie is and explain the differences between first party and third party data. We're gonna cover the changes that apple has made in the past several years, as well as some of the changes that are likely to come in the future.Most importantly this episode is focused on what you can do to “future proof” your marketing efforts regardless of the technology or regulatory changes that are on the horizon.

Your entire life is an open book of information collected by tech companies. According to Tom Wheeler, former head of the Federal Communications Commission, the privacy problem is shockingly large, getting bigger, and has frightening consequences. What, if anything, can be done? Listen and find out.

Don't sleep on privacy regulation. So far 2022 may be lacking 2018's one-two punch of the General Data Protection taking effect in Europe and the California Consumer Protection Act being passed in the U.S., but a spate of recent regulatory jabs could be setting up for a right hook. Consider the privacy regulation moves of the past couple months. The recently introduced American Data Privacy and Protection Act is the latest congressional bill proposing a federal privacy law in the U.S. The California Privacy Protection Agency released a draft of proposed regulations for enforcing California's privacy law. Europe has passed the Digital Markets Act and Digital Services Act, each of which covers targeted advertising and data management. And GDPR enforcement is picking up. “The canary in the coal mine of what is triggering all this attention is the digital advertising ecosystem,” said Dominique Shelton Leipzig, a partner at the law firm Mayer Brown where she serves as the lead for global data innovation as well as ad tech privacy and data management. In the latest episode of the Digiday Podcast, Shelton Leipzig surveyed the current privacy regulation landscape and interpreted what it portends for the digital ad industry. Her verdict? “With all the regulation, there's a minefield for companies approaching the space,” Shelton Leipzig said.

What it takes for a company to be resilient is constantly evolving, driven by macro socio-economic disruptions and micro business issues influencing a change in business models. A four-part series with FTI Consulting and Conventus Law focusing on the key areas where organisations can protect value and take action, to address critical issues and mitigate risks.We are in a period of rapid regulatory evolution with respect to data privacy. As Julie Brill, Chief Privacy Officer and Corporate Vice-President for Global Privacy and Regulatory Affairs, Microsoft says, “The regulatory tsunami is coming”. The data privacy landscape in Asia is varied, complex and evolving. We are already seeing the wheels of change in motion as the data privacy laws of several Asian jurisdictions are being updated to reflect more closely the European data protection regime (eg PIPL).In this special episode, FTI Consulting's Gino Bello hosts Sandeep Jadav and Tim de Sousa at FTI Consulting to unpack the state of regulations in the data privacy space and how businesses can tackle these challenges.

In this episode, our guests share insights into the special features of Finnish employment privacy regulation, as well as hot topics and case law. Subscribe to our podcast today to stay up to date on employment issues from law experts worldwide.Host: Kato Aerts (email) (Lydian / Belgium) Guest Speakers: Eija Warma-Lehtinen (email) & Ville Kukkonen (email) (Castrén & Snellman / Finland)Visit the ELA website at www.ela.law.

Abstract: How are data privacy laws like GDPR impacting business? What can we learn from Amazon's $850M fine last year, and Facebook's recent posture about leaving Europe altogether? In this episode of Principled Podcast, LRN Chief Legal Officer Aitken Thompson, talks about data privacy regulation with Donovan Burke, Partner at VGC LLP and General Counsel at DWELLoptimal Inc. Listen in as the two discuss what's happening now in the regulatory space when it comes to data privacy and protection, and what steps organizations can take to stay ahead.   Featured guest: Donovan Burke is a dynamic and visionary legal advisor and thought leader focusing in Emerging Companies, Corporate Structure and Governance, Mergers & Acquisitions, Seed and Venture Capital, Initial Public Offerings, Corporate & Securities, and an expertise in Data Privacy. He is a proven legal counselor and executive as a Partner in premier global law firms and General Counsel of major technology ventures.   Featured Host:  Aitken Thompson became interested in the then-nascent field of educational technology after starting his legal career at Kirkland & Ellis. He left law firm life and co-founded Thompson Educational Consultants and, subsequently, Taskstream, LLC. Taskstream quickly became a leading company in assessment and accreditation for higher education. Aitken served as Chief Operating Officer, leading the legal, human resources and finance functions of the business.   Beginning in 2016, Taskstream underwent a rapid expansion, merging with five other ed-tech companies in a span on 18 months and, in the process, becoming Watermark, LLC, and creating the “Educational Information System” category of ed-tech. During this period, Aitken's legal and HR focus expanded to encompass private equity investment and the transition between primary sponsors, cultural and process integration amongst the various merged entities, and the management and harmonization of legacy client and vendor contracts. Aitken is a graduate of Columbia College and Columbia Law School. He is a life-long New Yorker, but spends as much time as he can sailing off the East End of Long Island.   Transcript:  Intro: Welcome to the Principled Podcast brought to you by LRN. The Principled podcast brings together the collective wisdom on ethics, business and compliance, transformative stories of leadership and inspiring workplace culture. Listen in to discover valuable strategies from our community of business leaders and workplace change makers. Aitken Thompson:           How are data privacy laws like GDPR impacting business? What can we learn from Amazon's $850 million fine last year, and Facebook's recent posture about leaving Europe altogether? Hello and welcome to another episode of LRN's Principled Podcast. I'm your host Aitken Thompson, chief legal officer at LRN. And today I'm joined by Donovan Burke partner at VGC LLP and general counsel at Dwell Optimal incorporated. We're going to be talking about data privacy regulation, what's happening now, and how organizations can stay ahead. Donovan Burke is a real expert in this space. He's also proven legal counselor and executive as a partner in premier global law firms and general counsel of major technology ventures. Donovan thanks for joining me on the Principled podcast. Donovan Burke:               Oh, thanks for having me Aitken, pleasure to be here. Aitken Thompson:           Great. Let's just jump right in by this time I think it's safe to say that most, if not all, CCO's and GC's are at least aware of GDPR and the California equivalent CCPA, they are also aware it's a very fast developing area of regulation here and in Europe. Can you just give us a lay of the land for those who don't know, or not as aware as they would want to be about these privacy and data regulations? Donovan Burke: Absolutely. In the United States, these regulations were more of a secular variety in the recent history, laws applying to health or financial services. All had elements of them that are data privacy elements. But for several decades, Europe in particular has developed very sophisticated, comprehensive data privacy laws. The most well known of which is the GDPR and GDPR like laws are the laws that are proliferating presently, and they're comprehensive privacy laws that govern specifically information relating to an identifiable person, and protect that person's rights with respect to that information. Aitken Thompson:           So what are the trends in data privacy and security that you think that CCO's and GC's and CTO's for that matter should be thinking about in 22 and beyond? Donovan Burke:               Well, as I mentioned before, these laws are proliferating. Not only is the GDPR itself becoming more complex, there's more guidance coming out on it every day. GDPR laws are being exported and adopted in a lot of other jurisdictions, Brazil, China, India, and in the United States, starting with California and the CCPA, which will soon become the CPRA and Colorado and Virginia, and there's a handful of other states that this year are expected to adopt GDPR like laws. So, I think this is not a trend that's going away anytime soon. These laws all have extra territorial jurisdiction, meaning it only requires usually a fairly tenuous nexus in order to be covered by these laws, and as more jurisdictions adopt them, the more likely it is that any given venture is going to run into data privacy issues, that are consistent with the GDPR like law. Aitken Thompson:           So what can GC's and CCO's do as sort of action items for protecting their companies and educating their employees on GDPR and CCPA? Donovan Burke: Yeah, well, just taking a step back, these laws, training employees is not only a means to complying with the substantive, or the other substantive aspects of the law, because of course you need to do that. The employees are the ones that are where the rubber meets the road. They're the ones that really need to be able to identify when a privacy issue potentially arises. The average employee is not, nor could they possibly devote the time to having the expertise to solve these problems, but they need to be able to elevate them. But apart from that very critical function of knowing when to alert someone who's an expert in this area, in order to properly assess a potential privacy issue, these laws actually require the training and documentation of the training as part of the accountability and showing that they're in compliance with the law. So it's a critical, critical aspect. Aitken Thompson:           [inaudible 00:04:44] people who are aware of GDPR and CCPA, which as you mentioned, is now going to be known as CPRA. Are there other jurisdictions, nations, and for that matter inside The United States that are also promulgating similar laws that people have to be aware of and follow the action vis-a-vis those laws and regulations promulgated underneath them? Donovan Burke: Yeah. Oh for sure. And that's obvious. Brazil came out a year or so ago. I believe it became effective with a GDPR law, very close to the GDPR. China has a law that is derived in large part from the GDPR and India also. Obviously these are huge markets and that is going to continue to be the trend. And as we mentioned the CCPA has already, after just having been effective for a couple of years, is becoming the CPRA, and what that really is move even closer of the GDPR, adding some special considerations for sensitive data and other key GDPR concepts. Aitken Thompson:           So it's my impression that people are aware that these laws do carry some potential stiff penalties and enforcement actions are available by governments potentially, and also potentially by individual people who had their data exposed. But I get the feeling that a lot of CCO's and GC's are still not taking the enforcement mechanisms as seriously as they should. Has that been your impression, or am I off on that? Donovan Burke:               I think that has been true, although I think given that enforcement has, I believe it's trebled in the case of the European union enforcement actions and, really expensive ones like the Amazon that you mentioned that was $800 million or so ultimate hit to Amazon. So I think they're waking up and I think they should be. Let's take this in a couple of pieces. Private rights of action can get extraordinarily expensive in the United States where these GDPR like laws have been implemented, the private rights of actions are fairly limited today. They're not nearly as limited in the European Union. Although recent court cases have made it a little more difficult for folks to bring private rights of action. But I think there's been a lot of forbearance on the part of authorities that bring the enforcement actions apart from being sued by a person, the actual agencies that enforce these laws. I think they've given people a break, because they realize that these are new laws, they've been changing so rapidly. It's really hard to figure out how to comply even the authorities themselves aren't sure how to enforce the laws until there's some more guidance from the promulgating authorities. And that's certainly been the case in California, and also been the case in the European Union, where until recently most of the enforcement actions were where there was kind of an obvious and urgent issue, a breach, where there was a data breach. That would be where the authorities would step in, but now in all jurisdictions, it seems like that break is over and there's enough guidance to know how to enforce, and so you're seeing a lot more actions in the European Union, for example, where there for failure to have a proper legal purpose or a lot of other more subtle aspects, apart from there just being a massive data breach, which is an obvious problem. Aitken Thompson:           And when you say legal purpose, you mean legal purpose to have, and to share the data? Donovan Burke:               Exactly, under the GDPR you have to have a legal basis for processing the data, and there are a number of bases that you can have, including a legitimate purpose or consent. And some form of that generally finds its way into the laws of any jurisdiction that has a GDPR like law. But the point I'm making is there are a lot of, for example, there are disclosure requirements, very specific kind of what you need to cover and disclose, and what you need to do in order to get the right kind of consent. And I think all of those types of more technical issues that the authorities have been willing to overlook because they've been in a state of flux. And what does that mean, and how do you do it? But I think they're getting to a point where they feel like people ought to know it enough at this point, and there's enough guidance to where these laws are going to be enforced. Aitken Thompson:           Right. And you sort of getting into sort of the aspect of best practices, or the topic of best practices, certainly as CCO's and GC's, how we react to regulatory risk is in the main reaction, prospectively is to put in some best practices in place. Make sure you're following the correct procedures. But in the complicated regulatory situation, like data privacy is. How are companies handling these multiple geographies and jurisdictions and certainly slightly different requirements in each one, although they're sort of related? Is the answer just to apply the most restrictive rules globally, or do you create redundant systems and regionalize those systems in conjunction with where you are, where your data sits? Ultimately, what are the factors that go into the decision on how to, how to handle data? Donovan Burke:               Well, the answer, is it going with the most onerous laws, the most demanding jurisdiction, or is it to really try to be more compartmental in terms of compliance? The answer to that is yes, it's both depending on your resources, and how the laws impact transacting your business. Really large scale enterprises that have a particularly heavy personal data component where it drives their revenues is critical core to their business. If the most onerous laws are antithetical to collecting and using the data that in a way that's most profitable for them, then obviously they're incentivized to try and have a different user experience for different jurisdictions, so that they can maximize the use of the data jurisdiction by jurisdiction. Whereas other enterprises where the personal data component, isn't so important and where the data that they have to collect isn't really impacted over jurisdictions and there's less an incentive to behave differently, and to have a different experience jurisdiction by jurisdiction. And at the top level of all this, is money. No matter how large the organization, there are only so many resources that can be thrown at this particular aspect of doing business. And certainly you want to try and achieve an optimal level of compliance, but at the end of the day, for a lot of people in charge of these programs and enterprises, it's figuring out how best to leverage the resources that they have. Aitken Thompson:           Absolutely. I believe that's more or less true of all compliance efforts, but certainly one as complex as this one. One follow up question on that obviously a short podcast is a textual analysis of these very complicated laws, are sort of well beyond our scope here, but it had occurred to me, and I wanted to ask you. As between the GDPR CCPA, are there actually conflicting requirements, with either, or that we have to think there may not be? But I'd love to ask the question. Donovan Burke:               Yeah, there can be, the privacy laws themselves don't tend to be in conflict, but for example, the privacy requirements, as we mentioned at the beginning, these data privacy laws have an extended jurisdiction. So just because it's the GDPR and it's the European Union, it extends to really anyone who establishes a nexus with the European Union, which most large US corporations, for example have that nexus. And so often the conflict will come up in personal data, that's required to be disclosed in litigation and other administrative matters here, where our rules of litigation and our laws, rules, regulations, require disclosure of information that the similar laws in the European Union do not require. And so you may be required to disclose information pursuant to laws here, and disclosure of that information is in conflict with your obligations under the GDPR. Aitken Thompson:           Got it, it's interesting, we've been talking mostly in the last couple minutes about sort of the compliance end of things, but CCO's are called chief ethics and compliance officers first for a reason. And so beyond compliance and beyond the sort of fear of enforcement actions, and balance saying compliance with business objectives, what are the positive, obviously these laws were created and are being enforced to protect people, and protect their data and their identity, and all sorts of other things. So there should be some positive in terms of compliance and following these laws. What do you see as a positive for that the CCO or GC you can point to, and sort of animate the discussion with, regarding these privacy laws regarding what's to gain from complying with GDPR and CCPA and the other regulations? Donovan Burke:               Yeah, well the debate over whether data privacy and privacy generally is a good thing, was settled thousands of years ago, all these laws derived originally out of some of the original texts of the world's religions and then evolved into charters of the European Commission and the United Nations, and have found their way. So certainly there is a huge ethical component and a human rights component, to providing people with protection of their data, in addition to being perceived as a true ethical issue that it is a substantial, competitive advantage. It's a market differentiator, consumers definitely will tend to gravitate towards a company that is perceived as taking the privacy of its data seriously. And surveys have identified it as the top ESG category for consumers. And it's also regarded by investors as a key ESG concern. And it's not just in the context of being attractive to the customers of a business, but as you well know, companies are looking at and buying and joint venturing and doing all kinds of business combination arrangements with other companies. And that is increasingly becoming a matter for diligence, and real consideration in terms of value and compatibility in doing these corporate transactions. Aitken Thompson:           Absolutely. And certainly LRN has done a fair amount of research on this, and all our research points to the fact that data privacy along with other ESG issues are becoming more and more, very, very important issue for corporate boards, both public and private boards. Well clearly this is the conversation we could be having all day, but we're out of time now, Donovan. So thank you so much for joining me for this episode. Donovan Burke:               Oh, I really appreciate you having me, the time flew. Aitken Thompson:           Great. Thank you. My name is Aitken Thompson, and I want to thank you all for listening to the principled podcast by LRN. Outro:   We hope you enjoyed this episode. The Principled podcast is brought to you by LRN at LRN. Our mission is to inspire principled performance and global organizations by helping them foster winning ethical cultures rooted in sustainable values. Please visit us at lrn.com to learn more. And if you enjoyed this episode, subscribe to our podcast on Apple podcasts, Stitcher, Google podcasts, or wherever you listen. And don't forget to leave us a review.  

On this episode of Health Care Beat, our special series continues on Seyfarth's publication, The Future of Health Care in the US: What a Post-Pandemic Health Care System Could Look Like (Second Edition). Host Adam Laughton discusses the chapter he authored that focuses on three key areas specific to HIPAA and privacy regulation: 1) the impact that new and developing virtual and remote technologies will have on the shape and scope of HIPAA and associated privacy issues; 2) whether the COVID-19 contingency waivers will be repealed entirely, remain in place, or substantially survive in some modified form; and 3) recent developments not directly related to the COVID-19 pandemic, but which still have significant potential to alter HIPAA regulations and enforcement in the future. To request a copy of the Future of Health Care in the US publication, please cut and paste the following link into your internet browser: https://www.seyfarth.com/news-insights/the-future-of-health-care-in-the-us.html.

Apple's recent privacy changes got me thinking that this and other privacy changes are a reflection of how bad marketing has become over the past five years. Instead of trying to earn attention, marketers have been trying to buy attention and sneak into our attention streams. Now responsible companies are changing their tech to protect people and the government is looking at regulations to oversee companies like Facebook. Marketing has to get their act together fast and stop generating leads and start creating high-quality sales opportunities that close.

Data protection and competition enforcement have been on a collision course in recent years. The Big Tech platforms have amassed powerful market share with vast amounts of user data. This inevitable convergence is shaping up on both sides of the Atlantic. U.S. President Joe Biden has appointed notable antitrust proponents to powerful government positions in recent months. And in Brussels, the European Commission has released a slew of draft legislation to help bolster its Digital Single Market efforts, curtail Big Tech hegemony, and promote competition. Journalist Samuel Stolton has been following these developments with an ear to the ground in Brussels. Host Jedidiah Bracy recently caught up with Stolton right as news emerged that Amazon faces a record $888 million fine related to GDPR violations.

Julia is General Counsel & Chief Privacy Officer at TripleLift. She oversees the company's legal matters and is responsible for ensuring that TripleLift's technology, practices, and procedures meet global privacy requirements. With data privacy becoming one of marketing's biggest challenges and new privacy laws requiring a new way of interacting with buyers, brands are being forced to get more personal as consumers demand a more individualized experience from each brand they interact with, despite being more cautious about sharing their data. On this podcast episode of the Radically Transparent podcast, brought to you by Okotpost, Shullman talks through the silver linings of data privacy regulation for the B2B marketing industry as a whole. Not missing a beat, she dives head-first into how personal data collection has become so deeply tied into the consumer's digital experience and busts some of the fake news around data privacy regulations, GDPR and its impact on B2B business activities. She even forecasts what the future of “identity” or lack thereof may look like in the coming years. Certainly an episode not to be missed!

Laura Linkomies talks to two privacy experts, Marta Dunphy-Moriel, Partner at Deloitte, and Alexander Dittel, Associate Director  at Deloitte about privacy issues with adtech. Learn what companies using adtech can do to be transparent and comply with the UK Data Protection Act. 

To mark Data Privacy Day, this special-edition MLex podcast examines the year that was and glances ahead at what lies in store for privacy regulation and enforcement. Mike Swift will chat about the impact of new data-privacy enforcement agencies around the world, the controversial collapse of the Privacy Shield allowing trans-Atlantic data transfers and the advent of muscular national sovereignty in regulating global digital companies. We also examine how the incoming Biden administration may want to ride the wave of privacy enforcement directed at Big Tech.

EPISODE 49: Data privacy continues to be affected by new state, federal and global regulations, which companies will need to navigate in 2021. In this episode of Growthcast, DHG covers key privacy concepts, potentially emerging regulation in 2021 and how to improve your company’s cyber incident management.

In our third episode of the Encrypted Economy, we spoke with David Harris, co-founder of Mantenu, a consumer friendlily platform for streamlining enterprise management and compliance.  David discussed how he became interested in privacy after have a long career running financial companies.  We spoke about the ethics of data privacy and the tradeoffs that can occur with rapid adoption of emerging technologies, before turning to how transparency and control are becoming the central tenets of individual privacy rights as an emerging area of the law and how innovation is going to shape our digital identities. It was a great early episode to have on our show and a theme we will continue to explore as part of the encrypted economy.Topics·         The vision for blockchain removing intermediaries versus practical realities·         The Ethics of data collection and personal data privacy·         The evolving nature of data privacy norms and regulation·         GDPR & CCPA·         Providing transparency to consumers regarding how their data is being used·         Manetu's platform & security·         Digital identities and the emergence of trusted networks  Resource LinksManetu Site - https://www.manetu.com/ David's LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/davidfxharris Hyperledger Blockchain - https://www.hyperledger.org/ 

In this episode of ETH's Center for Law & Economics vlog and podcast series, Professor Stefan Bechtold (ETH Zurich) talks with Professor Tobias Salz (MIT) about his recent study on the effects of the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), using a novel dataset from an online travel intermediary. Paper References Guy Aridor - Columbia Yeon-Koo Che - Columbia Tobias Salz - MIT The Effect of Privacy Regulation on the Data Industry: Empirical Evidence from GDPR https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/public_events/1548288/privacycon-2020-guy_aridor.pdf Audio Credits Trailer music: AllttA by AllttA https://youtu.be/ZawLOcbQZ2w

In this Payments on Fire® George and Scott Giordano, VP and Sr. Counsel, Privacy and Compliance at data privacy management firm Spirion, talk about what can and has gone wrong, the high cost of sanctions for failure, and how to reduce the risks attendant with the handling of personal data.   Privacy. It’s a huge issue. Many of us are concerned as individuals with how our personal data - our personally identifiable information or PII - is shared by social media and throughout today’s massive data ecosystem without our knowledge or without our case by case granting of permission. As a result of those concerns, various jurisdictions around the work have enacted privacy-focused legislation that has teeth. The EU’s General Data Privacy Regulation (GDPR) focuses on data protection and privacy where consent for PII is required. It also addresses data domicility, where the data about an EU system must reside. GDPR applies to entities doing business in Europe - i.e. it applies to thousands of US companies. In the US, one of the leading regulatory steps is on the ballot this year in California. Its proposed data privacy regulation, the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), would provide for: * The right to know about the personal information a business collects about them and how it is used and shared; * The right to delete personal information collected from them (with some exceptions); * The right to opt-out of the sale of their personal information; and * The right to non-discrimination for exercising their CCPA rights. Any business doing business in CA will be affected by the CCPA, including data brokers. These regulations are an attempt to return a measure of control to individuals over the sea of personal data that makes it possible, for instance, for an entity to correlate the data of a handful of payment transactions to identify an individual with high confidence. The ramifications of these regulations are many. In this podcast, we hear of how a Midwest bank, that does not business itself in the EU, became subject to GDPR regulations because of the activities of one of its clients. We are living in a world where the social implications of wide data sharing are obvious. What’s not so clear are the business ramifications of privacy regulations and the data custodianship they demand. In this Payments on Fire® George and Scott Giordano, VP and Sr. Counsel, Privacy and Compliance at data privacy management firm Spirion, talk about what can and has gone wrong, the high cost of sanctions for failure, and how to reduce the risks attendant with the handling of personal data. We are at the beginning of a decades long evolution of how privacy is supported and data is managed. Shaping that path will be regulations, the decisions reached through multiple lawsuits, and the response by technology and data providers.

Law is a conservative profession.  In law school we read the great appellate decisions and learned about the tremendous importance of precedent in our legal system.  In truth, the law is always evolving and adapting to changing societal attitudes and new developments in business, the sciences and technology.  New statutes and regulations are always being adopted to address new legal concerns and even case law evolves. If you want to remain relevant in the profession, it is important to keep reinventing yourself.  The current pandemic and accompanying financial upheaval underscores this.  In the past two months, for example, every business and employment lawyer has needed to become an expert on the CARES act.  In the past 2 years, every corporation that collects any personal data has had to learn how to comply with the California Consumer Privacy Act, GDPR in Europe and similar state privacy statutes. The digitization of our economy has had a particularly strong impact on our legal system.  It has never been easier to create, store and copy massive amounts of data.  This has had great implications for privacy, the protection of intellectual property rights and the tension between IP protection and creating strong incentives for innovation.  Lawyers will continue to play a key role in shaping and interpreting the competing legal interests of law enforcement, private citizens, businesses and artists.  So where are the career opportunities in the midst of all of this disruption? In this episode, my guest, Professor Jessica Silbey, answers that question.  Professor Silbey is Director of the Center for Law, Innovation and Creativity at Northeastern University School of Law (also known as CLIC).  She is a leading scholar and nationally recognized expert on intellectual property and the use of film to communicate about law.  Professor Silbey is the author of several books on intellectual property, creativity and invention. She studies the role that intellectual property plays to sustain and frustrate creative and innovative communities. She is a frequent presenter at national and international conferences, and a Guggenheim fellow. CLIC combines the study of innovation and creativity with Northeastern University School of Law's social justice mission. The faculty teach courses on information security, privacy regulation, entertainment and media law, intellectual property, Internet and e-commerce, lawyering and entrepreneurship, and creative communities.

Is European Union privacy regulation being exported to the United States? How is data a commercial good? And what lessons should US policymakers draw from the EU experience? In this episode of The Marketplace of Ideas, hear Federal Trade Commissioner Noah Philips address these questions and more in his keynote from our Program on Economics & Privacy briefing held in December 2019 in Washington, DC. .

Robert talks with Richard about privacy regulations including GDPR & CCPA, privacy program drivers, and his transition from globetrotting GDPR evangelist at IBM to Global IG Director at White & Case law firm, one of the world's largest. RIchard also talks about how he got into the computer business, which was somewhat by accident!

What exactly California's newly-enacted, landmark data privacy law means for impacted businesses, compliance attorneys, and consumer advocates remains to some degree uncertain, as regulations attending the statute are still being finalized. Experts in the area John W. Berry and Grant A. Davis-Denny (Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP) discuss ambiguities the forthcoming regulations will resolve, and forecast what those resolutions may look like.

00:00 Intro 01:30 Privacy Coins and the Importance of Marketing 06:35 The Evolution of Privacy Regulation 10:00 The Double-edged Sword of Government Backdoors (and Trump’s Tweet) 13:30 Balancing Liberty with Government Enforcement / “You support this heinous thing that no one supports?” 17:15 Financial Action Task Force (FATF) Travel Rule on Money Laundering 23:00 What... Read More » The post Bitcoin Maximalism, Privacy and Regulation, and Current Events – with Reuben Yap appeared first on ⋆ Crypto Ramble ⋆.

Do recent state privacy rules, like California's CCPA, impinge on free speech, violate the dormant commerce clause, or are they preempted by other federal laws? Ian Adams and Jennifer Huddleston discuss.Featuring:- Ian Adams, Vice President of Policy, TechFreedom- Jennifer Huddleston, Research Fellow, Mercatus Center, George Mason UniversityVisit our website – www.RegProject.org – to learn more, view all of our content, and connect with us on social media.

Do recent state privacy rules, like California's CCPA, impinge on free speech, violate the dormant commerce clause, or are they preempted by other federal laws? Ian Adams and Jennifer Huddleston discuss.Featuring:- Ian Adams, Vice President of Policy, TechFreedom- Jennifer Huddleston, Research Fellow, Mercatus Center, George Mason UniversityVisit our website – www.RegProject.org – to learn more, view all of our content, and connect with us on social media.

Professor Yafit Lev-Aretz of the Zicklin School of Business at Baruch College and Professor Katherine Strandburg of NYU Law discuss the relationship between privacy regulation and innovation.  We examine ways to add nuance to discussions about the relationship between privacy regulation and innovation, and focus on how regulation can often be used to direct innovation in socially productive directions. 

TechGC Website SUBSCRIBE to Good Counsel Newsletter Follow on Twitter Follow on LinkedIn

Privacy law is developing quickly in the United States and is becoming all the more important with the development of California's Privacy Law. Our guest, Alysa Hutnik, is the Consumer Protection Officer for the Antitrust Section and an expert on privacy law. In this episode, Alysa speaks with John Roberti and Anora Wang about privacy law generally and California’s new privacy law, its substance and relationship to other laws. Listen to this episode to learn more about how California and other states are shaping an expansive privacy regulatory regime in the United States. Hosted by: John Roberti and Anora Wang

The GDPR is a very broad set of regulations, with 99 Articles that each contain one to many specific requirements related to personal data, and how it must be protected, restrictions on use and sharing, requirements for giving individuals access to their own personal data, and many other rights for the data subjects. This episode focuses on 3 of those many topics where much confusion exists. 1) Were all those email notifications on May 25 really necessary for GDPR compliance? 2) What is considered to be personal data, and in what possible forms? (HINT: It's not just digital) 3) What types of organizations and people must comply with GDPR? We will also hit upon the additional requirements for data protection within individual countries, the protections for EU citizens as well as EU residents, is government surveillance in the EU subject to GDPR requirements, the growing tsunami of GDPR actions and complaints, and recommendations for GDPR compliance.

Hold on to your apps folks, because we have an entire show on the topic of Facebook's recent "data breach."  

New regulations from the EU are impacting customer data around the world and causing companies to make big changes or risk getting hit with heavy fines. But instead of fearing the change and just throwing money at the problem, complying with the regulations can be thought of as an opportunity to rethink and improve the customer experience.             The General Data Privacy Regulation (GDPR) is creating a buzz that Jeff Nicholson, VP CRM Product Marketing at Pegasystems, likens to the anticipation surrounding Y2K. Essentially, the new regulation requires any company anywhere in the world that uses EU residents' personal data to re-think their data strategy. That means that companies in the US are still affected if they have ever done anything like collect email addresses or names of people who live in the EU. If companies don't comply with the regulations, they could be fined up to 4% of their total global revenue. Under GDPR, individual customers can approach companies to find out what personal data they have, and organizations have to provide the data to the customer. Essentially, the new rules change who owns personal data—instead of companies, the power is now in the hands of customers.             The new rules come at a time when data breaches are found every day and affect millions of people a year. People around the world are more aware of their personal data and want to find ways to protect it and know who has access to it. Companies must take safeguarding their customers' data very seriously. If customers don't feel their information is being protected, they will take their business elsewhere, which can lead to huge PR and financial consequences for companies.             A recent survey found that more than 90% of multinational companies consider GDPR to be a top priority, and many are allocating significant budget to solve data problems and come into compliance. The majority of large companies say they plan to spend at least a million dollars on their new data strategy.             If the money is being spent anyway, smart companies will put it to good use and do more than just put their data practices in compliance with GDPR—they will use it as an opportunity to transform customer experience and become a leader in their fields. This is a great chance for companies to combine compliance with marketing. Instead of simply just plugging a hole in the data stream, think of how you collect data and how it can be better used and targeted. Now that customers have more control over what companies have their information, irrelevant communication from companies puts those brands at risk of losing the customer. All it takes is one bad communication for the customer to opt out and have their data removed.             The best companies not only respect and safeguard customer information but also use it to create open lines of communication that really help the customer. With all the data available, companies have the potential to create targeted outreach that meets the needs of every individual customer. This can be done a number of ways, but Jeff recommends getting people from across the company, especially from compliance and marketing, involved. Investing in the right technology to monitor, track, and safeguard customer data is also incredibly important. Being transparent with the customer information you have can also build a better relationship with customers. Many people are wary about who has their personal data, and they will likely be more trusting of companies that can show where they gathered the data, what they are using it for, and who has access to it. Data plays a huge role in customer experience, and being able to monitor and target it better can lead to better relationships between companies and customers.             GDPR is changing how companies handle customer data, but it is much more than just a compliance issue. In order to lead the new data conversation, companies should use the opportunity to re-think their customer experience and find new, relevant ways to reach out to customers.    

In this episode Joel and Dennis discuss the recent action by Congress to remove consumer privacy protection when it comes to your ISP. They discuss what is hyperbole and what isn't and what we can do to still protect out privacy. They also discuss how the vote went down and how it connects to money donated from ISPs.   A History Of ISPs and Privacy Regulation: https://www.groundedreason.com/truth-repealing-online-privacy-protection/ What to look for in a VPN: https://www.groundedreason.com/what-is-a-vpn-and-how-to-chose-the-best-one/ OpenSecrets: https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2017/03/vote-correlation-internet-privacy-res/ ISP Donations to Votes: https://www.opensecrets.org/datasets/house-privacy-vote-correlation  Jared Newman's Tech Hive Article on Cord Cutting: http://www.techhive.com/article/3186232/streaming-services/no-cord-cutting-will-not-break-the-internet.amp.html Please Subscribe to The Show in iTunes, Stitcher, or your Podcast App. Be sure to visit https://www.groundedreason.com  for more tech tips and subscribe to the podcast on your favorite player using the links below. Subscribe Free on iTunes - https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/grounded-reason-podcast/id1140661229?mt=2 Subscribe Free on Android - http://subscribeonandroid.com/groundedreason.libsyn.com/rss Subscribe Free on Stitcher - http://www.stitcher.com/podcast/grounded-reason-podcast Subscribe Free on Google Play - https://play.google.com/music/m/Ijyw42al3inofdsxd3s44v6rxny?t%3DGrounded_Reason_Podcast Please rate and review the show in iTunes. If you want to send us questions or comments please use any of the methods below. For more information on cutting the cord visit - https://www.groundedreason.com Call and leave a question or comment for the show: (650) 825-5477 (TALK-GRP) Grounded Reason Facebook Page - https://www.facebook.com/GroundedReason/ Email us at podcast@groundedreason.com  

Episode 26 - Legislation, Privacy & Regulation.  The SAA podcast is hosted by Mr Clayton Pummill and joined by Dustin Wilcox (CISO @ Centene) and Daniel Farris (Shareholder @ Polsinelli) to discuss Legislation, Privacy & Regulatory landscapes.