Podcasts about privacy shield

Der Datentransfer zwischen der EU und den USA steht erneut auf wackeligen Beinen. Nachdem der Europäische Gerichtshof (EuGH) bereits die Vorgängerabkommen "Safe Harbor" und "Privacy Shield" gekippt hatte, droht nun auch dem aktuellen "Transatlantic Data Privacy Framework" (TADPF) ein jähes Ende. Im c't-Datenschutz-Podcast erläutern Holger und Joerg Heidrich zusammen mit Dr. Stefan Brink die komplexe Gemengelage. Brink war bis Ende 2022 Landesdatenschutzbeauftragter in Baden-Württemberg, leitet nun das Wissenschaftliche Institut für die Digitalisierung der Arbeitswelt (wida) und kennt die Problematik aus nächster Nähe. Das TADPF sollte den Datentransfer eigentlich endlich auf eine solide Basis stellen. US-Präsident Biden erließ dazu 2022 die Executive Order 14086, die den Zugriff von US-Geheimdiensten auf EU-Bürgerdaten einschränken und Beschwerdemöglichkeiten schaffen sollte. Doch die Umsetzung ist fragil. Brink erläutert, dass die Executive Order jederzeit von US-Präsident Donald Trump wieder einkassiert werden könnte. Zudem ist das vorgesehene Kontrollgremium PCLOB faktisch lahmgelegt, da ihm die Mitglieder fehlen. Die EU-Kommission versucht nach Beobachtung von Holger, die Probleme auszusitzen, doch im EU-Parlament wachse der Druck, den Angemessenheitsbeschluss aufzuheben. Auch sogenannte Standardvertragsklauseln als Alternative stehen auf tönernen Füßen, da der EuGH hohe Anforderungen an "Transfer Impact Assessments" stellt. US-Gesetze wie der CLOUD Act ermöglichen weiterhin den Zugriff auf Daten bei US-Anbietern. Für EU-Unternehmen ist es kaum leistbar, sich komplett von US-Diensten zu lösen, da eine digitale Souveränität Europas fehlt. Die Aufsichtsbehörden in Deutschland und Europa sitzen nach Brinks Schilderung zwischen den Stühlen: Sie wissen um die rechtlichen Mängel, schrecken aber vor harten Maßnahmen zurück – auch aus Furcht vor wirtschaftlichem Chaos. Stattdessen setzen sie auf Dialog und hoffen, dass Unternehmen zumindest Alternativen prüfen. Die Diskutanten sehen die Gefahr, dass der Datentransfer zum Spielball im Handelskonflikt zwischen den USA und der EU werden könnte. Am Ende bleibt die Erkenntnis: Der transatlantische Datenverkehr ist in schwere See geraten, und Unternehmen täten gut daran, sich nach Alternativen umzusehen.

Verden er i total forandring, spændingerne stiger, og usikkerhed er blevet et grundvilkår. Hvad betyder det for den offentlige sektors brug af amerikanske cloud-tjenester? Er vi nødt til at ændre kurs og i højere grad satse på at opbygge egne cloud-datacentre og sikre en dansk og europæiske digital infrastruktur? Der er i den seneste tid sået alvorlig tvivl om det juridiske fundament under danske organisationers brug af amerikanske cloud-tjenester. Dataaftalen mellem EU og USA, Transatlantic Data Privacy Framework, der blev vedtaget i juli 2023, gør det muligt, at EU-virksomheder kan bruge cloud-tjenester fra f.eks. Microsoft, Google og Amazon. Den aftale blev vedtaget, da de tidligere dataaftaler, Safe Harbor og Privacy Shield, var blevet erklæret ugyldige af EU-domstolen. Så langt så godt. Så valgte har Trump-administrationen at fyre tre demokratiske medlemmer af det vigtige tilsynsorgan Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board. Risikerer vi, at hele det juriske fundament med Transatlantic Data Privacy Framework falder fra hinanden? De juridiske bekymringer er helt reelle. Samtidig stiger de politiske spændinger i verden. USA har med Donald Trump ved roret har sat en kurs, der gør, at vi bliver nødt til at forholde os til, hvordan vi forbereder os på en eskalering af de politiske uenigheder mellem Europa og USA. Herunder også i forhold til, om vi overhovedet tør bruge amerikanske cloud-tjenester? Og har vi overhovedet noget reelt alternativ? Hør eller genhør debatten fra Dansk IT's store konference om offentlig digitalisering, OffDig, der fandt sted i marts 2025 med omkring 1.800 deltagere. Medvirkende: Lone Juric Sørensen, chef for Fælles IT og Digitalisering i Aarhus Kommune og ansvarlig for kommunens cloud-strategi Jesper Husmer Vang, advokat og partner, Hopp & Partners Klaus Larsen, it-direktør i Region Nordjylland, medlem af Dansk IT's udvalg for it i den offentlige sektor Line Sinding Skött, direktør for offentlig sektor, Microsoft Danmark Thomas Kristmar, områdechef i Statens IT og medlem af Dansk IT's udvalg for cybersikkerhed i samfundet David Heinemeier Hansson, tech-iværksætter og teknologichef i den amerikanske softwarevirksomhed 37signals Moderator: Kim Stensdal, chef for kommunikation og viden i Dansk IT

Dans cet épisode de Slow Marketing, je discute avec Julie Linden, analyste digitale spécialisée dans la mise en conformité des outils d'analyse avec le RGPD. Nous explorons les récents changements concernant Google Analytics et la légalité de son utilisation en Europe après l'adoption du Data Privacy Framework. Julie nous partage ses conseils pour assurer une conformité optimale tout en conservant des données de qualité, et nous parle de son engagement pour un marketing digital plus simple et respectueux de la vie privée.Quelques questions clés que nous abordons dans cet épisode :Comment mettre en place une solution de cookies conforme au RGPD sur son site web ?Quels sont les défis de la mise en conformité de Google Analytics pour les entreprises ?Quelles alternatives à Google Analytics existent pour un suivi des performances plus éthique ?En quoi une approche de slow marketing et de simplification des données peut-elle transformer la manière de piloter ses campagnes ?

EU's Deepfake Battle, Italy's Google Drive Misfire, and Apple's AI Lag In this episode of Hashtag Trending, sponsored by CDW Canada Tech Talks, host Jim Love dives into the European Union's innovative approach to combating deep fakes using micro expressions, the unintended consequences of Italy's Privacy Shield law blocking Google Drive, and Apple's lag in artificial intelligence development. The episode also touches on AI self-reflection capabilities and the importance of skepticism in evaluating tech advancements. Tune in for these stories and more tech insights. 00:00 Introduction and Sponsor Message 00:37 EU's Innovative Approach to Combat Deepfakes 03:28 Italy's Privacy Shield Blunder 06:02 Apple's AI Strategy: Quality Over Speed 08:57 AI Self-Reflection: A Deeper Look 10:34 Conclusion and Sign-Off

Nuovo vertice della comunità europea. Multe per gli utenti del privacy shield? Qualcomm potrebbe prendersi Intel. Amazon torna in ufficio. Queste e molte altre le notizie tech commentate nella puntata di questa settimana.Dallo studio distribuito di digitalia:Michele Di Maio, Francesco Facconi, Massimo De SantoProduttori esecutivi:Alessandro Lago, Giorgio Puglisi, @Lucatax, @Ragnar, Marcello Marigliano, Umberto Marcello, Christian Schwarz, Fabio Guardigli, Simone Magnaschi, @Ppogo, Andrea Malesani, Ligea Technology Di D'esposito Antonio, Fabio Zappa, Antonio Gargiulo, Roberto A., Antonio Manna, Guido, Fabrizio Mele, Davide Bellia, Massimo Pollastri, Cristian Pastori, @Akagrinta, Andrea Bottaro, Paola Bellini, Idle Fellow, Giuliano Arcinotti, Riccardo Gabrielli, Alberto Cuffaro, Filippo Brancaleoni, Roberto Basile, Angelo Travaglione, @Jh4Ckal, Michele Bordoni, Fiorenzo Pilla, Enrico De Anna, Fabio Brunelli, Guido Buldrighini, Roberto Bredy, Alessandro Grossi, Fabrizio Reina, Edoardo Volpi Kellerman, Davide Tinti, Arzigogolo, Nicola Fort, Andrea Delise, Fabio Filisetti, Marco Romano, Valerio Bendotti, @Michele_Da_Milano, Ftrava, Paolo Bernardini, Manuel Zavatta, Giampaolo Frello, Andrea Dell'agostinoSponsor:Links:Aceto dei quattro ladriAllarme dei medici mancano i farmaci anti-shock anafilatticoThere's something fishy about the Flappy Bird revivalUna visione futurista del sesso Breton to Musk: See you on Mars?Il digitale nella nuova Commissione Ue con Henna VirkunnenEurope needs regulatory certainty on AIApple put on notice over support for 3rd-party watches and headphonesEU to tell Apple how to do interoperability DMA styleCapitanio: Piracy Shield pronto il protocollo per multare gli utentiQualcomm might buy IntelSony reportedly picked AMD over Intel for the PS6Rogue WHOIS server gives researcher superpowersGoogle calls for halting use of WHOIS for TLS domain verificationsInstagram will force millions of teens into protected accountsInstagram makes teen accounts private by defaultFTC Staff Report on Large Social Media and Video Streaming CompaniesMeta bans Russian state media outlets on Facebook and InstagramAmazon tells employees to return to office five days a weekDa gennaio i dipendenti di Amazon non potranno più lavorare in remotoGingilli del giorno:Sta arrivando la fine del mondo?Radio BrowserPhotopeaSupporta Digitalia, diventa produttore esecutivo.

La sfida tra Lega Calcio e Cloudflare prende una piega inaspettata. Una grave perdita per il mondo della tecnologia. eBay inondata dagli smartphone olimpici, non è fair. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Le risposte dall'AGCOM per il privacy shield. La storia della backdoor di xz. Come è andata l'IPO di Reddit. Il terribile progetto Lavander. Presentiamo la Collana Digitalia. Queste e molte altre le notizie tech commentate nella puntata di questa settimana.Dallo studio distribuito di digitalia:Michele Di Maio, Francesco Facconi, Massimo De SantoProduttori esecutivi:Giuseppe Benedetti, Matteo Masconale, Manuele Macario, Nicola Bisceglie, Riccardo Peruzzini, Danny Manzini, Paolo Boschetti, Roberto Esposito, Diego Venturin, Matteo Faccio, Michele Olivieri, Davide Fogliarini, Alex Ordiner, Antonio Turdo (Thingyy), Christian Fabiani, Federico Bruno, Simone Pignatti, Danilo Sia, Roberto Barison, Nicola Pedonese, Matteo Arrighi, Stefano Orso, Massimo Dalla Motta, Arnoud Van Der Giessen, Massimiliano Saggia, Elisa Emaldi - Marco Crosa, Marcello Piliego, Maurizio Verrone, Fabio Nascimbeni, Daniele Corsi, Mirto Tondini, Roberto Tarzia, Stefano Augusto Innocenti, Matteo Molinari, Michele Coiro, Christian A Marca, Sandro Acinapura, Paolo Lucciola, Pasquale Maffei, Matteo Carpentieri, Massimiliano Casamento, Zambianchi Marco Francesco Mauro, Flavio Castro, Riccardo Gabrielli, Maurizio Galluzzo, ---, Fabrizio Bianchi, Il Pirata Lechuck, Manuel Zavatta, Giuliano Arcinotti, Davide Tinti, Nicola Gabriele Del Popolo, Matteo Sgherri, Alessandro Gheda, paolo bernardini, Arzigogolo, Nicola Fort, Capitan Harlock, ftrava, Feró, jh4ckal, Anonymous, michele_da_milano, Nicola Gabriele Del Popolo, Idle Fellow, ragnar, juleeho, akagrintaSponsor:Squarespace.com - utilizzate il codice coupon "DIGITALIA" per avere il 10% di sconto sul costo del primo acquisto.Links:GM stops sharing driver data with brokers amid backlashErnesto Castellotti: AGCOM ha risposto alla mia FOIAPiracy Shield continua a bloccare siti innocuiBlock or report fuckpiracyshieldPiracy Shield Source Code & Internal Documentation Leak OnlinePiracyShield SearchSpain suspends Telegram ban to investigate impact on usersresearch!rsc: Timeline of the xz open source attackWhat we know about the xz Utils backdoorbackdoor in upstream xz/liblzma leading to ssh server compromise1Password.co Tracking LinksReddit Insiders Selling Days After IPO; Shares DiveReddit faces new reality after cashing in on its IPODigiunare dai social durante il RamadanSono gli smartphone il problema degli adolescenti?Lavender: The AI machine directing Israels bombing spree in GazaIsraele usa AI per sterminare più civiliSan Jose is training AI to spot homeless encampments200 Artists Urge Tech Platforms: Stop Devaluing Music500 italiani e italiane che contano nell'Intelligenza ArtificialeFrom its start Gmail conditioned us to trade privacy for free servicesGoogle Podcasts Moves to the Google DumpGoogle agrees to destroy browsing data collected in Incognito modeWarning to all writers who use Google DocsGingilli del giorno:Collana Digitalia presenta: GameGPTAI for WorkPandocTotal Solar EclipseSupporta Digitalia, diventa produttore esecutivo.

Si parla di giochi poco convenzionali per Apple Vision Pro, di alcuni interessanti sconti di primavera di Amazon, di come il Privacy Shield abbia bloccato il sito di Luca, di un'intervista a Federico, di quali applicazioni usavamo all'università e...

Als der Angemessenheitsbeschluss zu Data Privacy Framework (DPF) bekannt wurde, war bei vielen Wirtschaftsverbänden die Erleichterung groß, doch Kritiker warnten umgehend, DPF könne zu einem echten Nachfolger von Privacy Shield werden und ebenfalls für ungültig erklärt werden. Für die deutsche Wirtschaft aber wäre die Rechtssicherheit wichtig, wie Verbände betonen. Im Interview erklärt Dr. Eugen Ehmann, wie Datenschutzbeauftragte den Angemessenheitsbeschluss zu DPF verstehen und bewerten können.

Dopo tre anni di incertezze, l'UE e gli USA hanno finalmente tirato fuori un nuovo accordo sulla condivisione dei dati, facendo tirare un sospiro di sollievo a giganti come Facebook e Google.Prima non c'erano accordi o, meglio, c'era il "Privacy Shield", ma è stato bloccato perché gli occhialuti dell'intelligence USA non riuscivano a tenere le mani a posto…Dopo un po' di tira e molla, e un ordine esecutivo Biden, che ha messo un po' di briglie alle sue agenzie di spionaggio, finalmente l'UE ha dato il via libera agli USA come paese con protezioni e garanzie sufficienti sui dati personali. Ma è davvero una buona notizia?No, anzi è solo mettere la polvere sotto il tappetoTutti i miei link: https://linktr.ee/br1brownFonti:La Commissione europea concede il terzo round ai trasferimenti di dati tra UE e USA presso la CGUEC'è un nuovo accordo per il trasferimento dei dati personali tra Unione Europea e Stati Uniti - Il PostTELEGRAM - INSTAGRAMSe ti va supportami https://it.tipeee.com/br1brown

Now that the European Commission has published the new EU-US Data Privacy Framework, it will be easier for organizations to transfer personal data from the EU to the United States.

In October 2022, President Biden issued an executive order regarding the European Union - U.S. Data Privacy Framework. The Framework allows for data flows between the EU and the U.S., and it was established after the European Court of Justice struck down a prior agreement known as the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield. The executive order addresses U.S. collection of signals intelligence, which has been a source of concern for EU regulators and privacy advocates. The executive order limits signals intelligence collection to defined national security objectives, requires the privacy and civil liberties of all persons be considered regardless of nationality, and the collection must be proportionate. In addition, the executive order calls for a multi-layered review process that will allow individuals to lodge complaints regarding the collection of signals intelligence.Our experts will discuss whether the Framework addresses the concerns of privacy advocates in the EU and the U.S., and they will consider the implications of the review process for U.S. intelligence collection. This program will also explore whether the EU and U.S. can reach a durable privacy agreement given the tension between EU privacy preferences and U.S. national security needs.Featuring:- Stewart Baker, Of Counsel, Steptoe & Johnson LLP- Max Schrems, Founder, NOYB- [Moderator] Matthew R. A. Heiman, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary, Waystar Health; Senior Fellow and Director of Planning, National Security InstituteVisit our website – www.RegProject.org – to learn more, view all of our content, and connect with us on social media.

In July 2023, the EU and the U.S. signed an agreement to replace the Privacy Shield with the revised Data Privacy Framework. But Schrems has said he'll try to take it down, just like he did Safe Harbor and Privacy Shield, and a French lawmaker has filed an official challenge. Julian Flamant, senior associate at Hogan Lovells, talks us through the changes and what we should EVEN DO!

By Adam Turteltaub First there was Safe Harbor, then there was Privacy Shield, both of which were struck down, leaving an enormous chasm in the rules for sharing data between the EU and the US. Now, explains, Andre Bywater, Partner, Cordery, there is a bridge: the EU-US Data Privacy Framework. The new framework seeks to address the issue that led to the court striking down Privacy Shield: access to data by US intelligence agencies. To allay European concerns the US has now put in place a two-level system to redress grievances. EU citizens can lodge a complaint with the Civil Liberties Protection Office. If not satisfied with the results there, they can escalate to the US Data Protection Court, which has the power to issue orders to have data deleted. The new framework is likely to be a big step forward, but it's not the only one data processors will have to take. Organizations will first need to determine if they are eligible to participate. Next, they will need to self-certify their processes for handling EU data, a process that will be overseen by the US Department of Commerce, with enforcement handled by the FTC. Whether self-certifying for the first time or recertifying, there are countless details to be watched. There are special provisions, for example, when it comes to HR data. And, of course, there is a question of whether courts in Europe will allow the new regime to stand. There is already speculation that a new case may be brought in January 2024. For now, though, there is a new EU-US Data Privacy Framework in place. Listen in to learn more about what your organization needs to do to comply.

Stefan Brink und Niko Härting sprechen zunächst über den Angemessenheitsbeschluss der Europäischen Kommission, der den Transfer von Personendaten in die USA erleichtert. Nach „Safe Harbor“ und „Privacy Shield“ heißt es jetzt – ganz nüchtern – „EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework“. Mal schauen, was daraus wird. Ab Minute 12:05: Susanne Baer war bis vor kurzem Richterin am BVerfG und hat am 26.5.2023 ihre Abschiedsrede gehalten, die kürzlich auszugsweise im „Spiegel“ nachzulesen war (https://www.spiegel.de/kultur/richterin-susanne-baer-sie-brauchen-grundrechte-wenn-sie-irgendwie-groesser-als-anders-kleiner-als-sind-a-51e856ed-9e43-49f9-b6c5-3963ed8f5578). In einem FAZ-Beitrag hat sich der Bonner Hochschullehrer Klaus Ferdinand Gärditz zu dieser Rede sehr kritisch geäußert (https://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/verfassungsgericht-darf-sich-nicht-der-kritik-an-seinen-urteilen-verschliessen-19021651.html). Susanne Baer zeichnet in ihrer Abschiedsrede ein düsteres Bild von dem Zustand der Gesellschaft, befürchtet ein „Rollback“. Sie beklagt eine zunehmende Diffamierung des BVerfG und seiner Richter, spricht von einem „gefährlichen Sound“ aus dem rechten Spektrum, das die Verfassungsordnung ablehne. Klaus Ferdinand Gärditz tritt dieser Sichtweise entgegen und meint, eine Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit dürfe nicht aus Sorge vor populistischen Affekten „kritikscheu“ werden: „Robustheit und die Gelassenheit, besonders wilden Blödsinn zu ignorieren, gehören zur Jobbeschreibung aller, die ein öffentliches Amt haben.“ Stefan Brink und Niko Härting diskutieren, ob es tatsächlich Anzeichen für das von Susanne Baer befürchtete „Rollback“ gibt. Dagegen könnte sprechen, dass es heute – anders als beim Amtsantritt von Susanne Baer vor 12 Jahren – kaum noch Aufsehen erregen würde, dass eine Verfassungsrichterin offen homosexuell ist. Hat Gärditz recht, wenn er meint, man sei in Karlsruhe womöglich „kritikscheu“? Gibt es in Karlsruhe eine Art „Bunkermentalität“, die sehr unterschiedliche Richterinnen und Richter zum Zusammenhalt motiviert, weil man sich populistischer, diffamierender Kritik von „Feinden der Verfassung“ ausgesetzt sieht?

Das Transatlantische Datentransferabkommen, auch bekannt als "Safe Harbor" und später als "Privacy Shield", war ein bedeutendes Abkommen, das den grenzüberschreitenden Austausch personenbezogener Daten zwischen der Europäischen Union und den Vereinigten Staaten regelte. Nach „Safe Harbor“ und „Privacy Shield“ ist das „Trans-Atlantic-Data-Privacy-Framework“ am 10.07.23 verabschiedet worden und nun der dritte Anlauf, die Datensicherheit zwischen der EU und den USA sicherzustellen. Im Podcast spreche ich mit Rechtsanwalt Stephan Schmidt über das neue Abkommen und was man darüber alles wissen sollte. Euer Feedback, alle Links zum Thema und euer Feedback unter https://digitales-unternehmertum.de/455

Moderatorin Anna Kalinowsky, heise online-Chefredakteur Dr. Volker Zota (@DocZet) und Redakteur Malte Kirchner (@maltekir) sprechen in dieser Ausgabe unter anderem über folgende Themen: - Ist Threads der Twitter-Killer? Meta startet seinen eigenen Twitter-Klon – nur nicht in der EU. Hat Threads wirklich das Zeug, Twitter abzulösen? Was macht Meta besser, was schlechter als das Original? Und hat sich die EU ein Eigentor mit dem Digital Markets Act geschossen? - Auf ein Neues – der Privacy Shield 2.0 soll aufgespannt werden: Der Pricacy Shield soll den Datentransfer zwischen der Europäischen Union und den USA regeln. Nach mehreren Anläufen soll der Datenschutzrahmen jetzt in Kraft treten. Ist mit den Nachbesserungen jetzt alles gut geregelt? Was bedeutet es, wenn es kein Abkommen gibt? Und wie reagieren die Kritiker auf den neuen Vorstoß? - Bremst ein fehlendes Wechselrichter-Bauteil tausende Balkonkraftwerke aus? Der Hersteller Deye hat auf den Einbau eines wichtigen Bauteils in seinen Mikrowechselrichtern verzichtet. Was bedeutet das für die Besitzer von Balkonkraftwerken? Was sagt Deye selbst dazu? Und wie geht es jetzt weiter? Außerdem wieder mit dabei: ein Nerd-Geburtstag, die WTF der Woche und knifflige Quizfragen. === Anzeige / Sponsorenhinweis === Intel ist ein führendes Unternehmen in der Halbleiterindustrie. Mithilfe von Computer- und Kommunikationstechnologien, die die Basis weltweiter Innovationen bilden, gestaltet Intel eine datenzentrierte Zukunft. Intels Know-how trägt dazu bei, die großen Herausforderungen der Welt zu meistern und Milliarden von Geräten sowie die Infrastruktur der intelligenten, vernetzten Welt zu schützen, weiterzuentwickeln und zu verbinden – von der Cloud über das Netzwerk bis hin zu allem, was dazwischenliegt. Weitere Informationen über Intel finden Sie unter www.intel.de. === Anzeige / Sponsorenhinweis Ende ===

In October 2022, President Biden issued an executive order regarding the European Union – U.S. Data Privacy Framework. The Framework allows for data flows between the EU and the U.S., and it was established after the European Court of Justice struck down a prior agreement known as the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield. The executive order addresses […]

In October 2022, President Biden issued an executive order regarding the European Union - U.S. Data Privacy Framework. The Framework allows for data flows between the EU and the U.S., and it was established after the European Court of Justice struck down a prior agreement known as the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield. The executive order addresses U.S. collection of signals intelligence, which has been a source of concern for EU regulators and privacy advocates. The executive order limits signals intelligence collection to defined national security objectives, requires the privacy and civil liberties of all persons be considered regardless of nationality, and the collection must be proportionate. In addition, the executive order calls for a multi-layered review process that will allow individuals to lodge complaints regarding the collection of signals intelligence.Our experts will discuss whether the Framework addresses the concerns of privacy advocates in the EU and the U.S., and they will consider the implications of the review process for U.S. intelligence collection. This program will also explore whether the EU and U.S. can reach a durable privacy agreement given the tension between EU privacy preferences and U.S. national security needs.Featuring:Max Schrems, Founder, NOYBStewart Baker, Of Counsel, Steptoe & Johnson LLPModerator: Matthew R. A. Heiman, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary, Waystar Health; Senior Fellow and Director of Planning, National Security Institute

The European Union fined Meta a record $1.3 billion for privacy violations Monday. The EU ordered Meta to stop sending users' personal information to the United States by October. Meta owns Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp. Ireland's Data Protection Commissioner (DPC) issued the fine. The punishment came after Meta continued to transfer Europeans' data beyond a 2020 EU court ruling that struck down an EU-U.S. data transfer agreement. The fine is the biggest since the EU's data privacy rules took effect five years ago. Meta promised to appeal and asked courts to suspend the decision. Earlier, the company had warned that its services could end for users in Europe.周一，欧盟因侵犯隐私而对 Meta 处以创纪录的 13 亿美元罚款。欧盟命令 Meta 在 10 月之前停止向美国发送用户的个人信息。Meta 拥有 Facebook、Instagram 和 WhatsApp。爱尔兰的数据保护专员 (DPC) 开出了罚单。惩罚是在 Meta 继续将欧洲人的数据转移到 2020 年欧盟法院的一项裁决之后，该裁决推翻了欧盟-美国。数据传输协议。这是自欧盟数据隐私规则五年前生效以来的最高罚款。Meta 承诺上诉并要求法院中止该决定。此前，该公司曾警告称，其服务可能会终止对欧洲用户的服务。The company said, “There is no immediate disruption to Facebook in Europe.” The decision applies to user information like names, email and IP addresses, messages, viewing history, location data and other information. The company uses the data for targeted online advertisements. Nick Clegg, Meta's president of global affairs, and Jennifer Newstead, the company's chief legal officer, released a statement. They said the decision was unjust and “sets a dangerous precedent for the countless other companies transferring data between the EU and U.S.” The decision is the latest development in a legal battle that began in 2013. At that time, Austrian lawyer and privacy activist Max Schrems filed a complaint about how Facebook used his data. His complaint came after former U.S. National Security Agency worker Edward Snowden's disclosure of online surveillance by U.S. security agencies. That included information that Facebook gave to the agencies the personal data of Europeans.该公司表示，“欧洲的 Facebook 不会立即受到干扰。”该决定适用于用户信息，如姓名、电子邮件和 IP 地址、消息、查看历史记录、位置数据和其他信息。该公司将这些数据用于有针对性的在线广告。Meta 全球事务总裁 Nick Clegg 和公司首席法务官 Jennifer Newstead 发表声明。他们表示，这一决定是不公正的，“为无数其他公司在欧盟和美国之间传输数据树立了一个危险的先例。”该决定是 2013 年开始的法律纠纷的最新进展。当时，奥地利律师和隐私活动家 Max Schrems 就 Facebook 如何使用他的数据提出申诉。他的投诉是在前美国国家安全局工作人员爱德华斯诺登披露美国安全机构的在线监控之后提出的。其中包括 Facebook 向这些机构提供的欧洲人个人数据信息。The EU has rules that require social media services to block speech that European officials consider harmful. Europe has passed several rules requiring policing of information and control of users' personal information. In 2020, the EU's top court struck down an agreement covering EU-U.S. data transfers called the Privacy Shield. The court said the measure did not do enough to protect Europeans from the U.S. government's electronic spying. Europe and the United States signed a deal last year on a different Privacy Shield that Meta could use. The agreement is awaiting approval from European officials.欧盟的规定要求社交媒体服务屏蔽欧洲官员认为有害的言论。欧洲已经通过了几项规则，要求对信息进行监管并控制用户的个人信息。2020 年，欧盟最高法院否决了一项涵盖欧盟与美国的协议。称为隐私盾的数据传输。法院表示，该措施不足以保护欧洲人免受美国政府的电子间谍活动。欧洲和美国去年就 Meta 可以使用的不同隐私盾签署了一项协议。该协议正在等待欧洲官员的批准。The DPC said it gave Meta five months to stop sending European user data to the U.S. It also gave the company six months to change its operations to stop transferring Europeans' user data to the U.S. If the new privacy agreement takes effect before these deadlines, "our services can continue as they do today without any disruption or impact on users," Meta said. Schrems thinks Meta has “no real chance” of getting the decision overturned. He said there is a good chance the new agreement could be struck down by the EU's top court.DPC 表示，它给了 Meta 五个月的时间来停止将欧洲用户数据发送到美国。它还给了该公司六个月的时间来改变其运营方式，以停止将欧洲人的用户数据传输到美国。如果新的隐私协议在这些截止日期之前生效，“我们的服务可以像今天一样继续，不会对用户造成任何干扰或影响，”Meta 说。Schrems 认为 Meta “没有真正的机会”推翻该决定。他说，欧盟最高法院很有可能否决新协议。"Unless U.S. surveillance laws get fixed, Meta will likely have to keep EU data in the EU,” Schrems said in a statement. Meta warned in its latest earnings report that, without a legal agreement for data transfers, it will stop offering its products and services in Europe. The social media company might have to carry out a costly and complex change to its operations if it has to stop sending user data to the U.S.施雷姆斯在一份声明中说：“除非美国监管法得到修复，否则 Meta 可能不得不将欧盟数据保留在欧盟。”Meta 在其最新的收益报告中警告说，如果没有数据传输的法律协议，它将停止提供其产品如果这家社交媒体公司不得不停止向美国发送用户数据，那么它可能不得不对其运营进行代价高昂且复杂的变革。

Oggi, al bancone di The Bar, Sergio Amato e Alessia Ajelli si confrontano su un tema molto dibattuto e di forte interesse per imprese e cittadini: i trasferimenti di dati verso gli Stati Uniti e gli step che si frappongono all'adozione di un Privacy Shield 2.0.Dopo il recente voto sfavorevole del Parlamento Europeo sulla bozza di decisione di adeguatezza UE - USA e la sanzione record comminata dal Garante Irlandese (su avallo dell'European Data Protecion Board) contro Meta per trasferimenti illegittimi di dati oltreoceano, il quadro rimane ancora incerto, proprio per la difficoltà di individuare soluzioni pratiche che possano assicurare una conformità di questi flussi transfrontalieri.

Il y a cinq ans, le vendredi 25 mai 2018, le RGPD entre en application, plongeant les entreprises, associations et établissements divers dans une inquiétude certaine. Comment se mettre en conformité ? Nouvelles obligations, sanctions renforcées, changement de philosophie dans la protection des données. Tout cela a évidemment chamboulé le monde du numérique et plus largement la vie de tous les organismes traitant des données à caractère personnel. En cinq ans, la CNIL et les autres autorités de contrôle européennes ont eu le temps d'infliger plusieurs amendes record aux GAFAM par exemple la dernière en date est tombée il y a quelques jours et META a été condamnée par l'autorité irlandaise à payer 1,2 milliard d'euros. En cinq ans, il y a aussi eu le Brexit et le Royaume-Uni a décidé d'assouplir les règles sur la protection des données, compliquant un peu plus les règles de transfert de données en Europe. En cinq ans, Maximilian Schrems a eu le temps de faire tomber le Privacy Shield, un mécanisme de protection des transferts de données entre l'Europe et les États-Unis. Et spoiler. Il ne compte pas s'arrêter là…. Hébergé par Ausha. Visitez ausha.co/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Debbie Reynolds “The Data Diva” talks to David Heinemeier Hansson, Co-owner & Chief Technology Officer of 37signals (Makers of Basecamp + HEY)We discuss the EU's proposed data transfer framework, which is still in draft form. We talk about how the framework will impact businesses and how privacy is a data issue, not a legal issue. David Heinemeier Hansson is a Danish entrepreneur who has been working with the internet since the mid-90s. He is the co-owner of an American software company, and he is currently in Denmark. In 2013, Edward Snowden revealed the NSA's tapping into global internet cables and wholesale data collection. Heinemeier Hansson was horrified by this and wondered what the European reaction would be. The EU has traditionally had a stronger stance on online privacy than the US, and Heinemeier Hansson wanted to see if that would continue in light of this new information. In the wake of the European Court of Justice's ruling that the Privacy Shield agreement between America and Europe was invalid, privacy activists have been scrambling to figure out how to reform the agreement. We discuss his journey into technology and privacy and his strong stance on the challenges that businesses face trying to do transatlantic data transfers, and businesses were left scrambling by changes in privacy regulations between Safe Harbor and Privacy Shield, legal regulations and technology, the responsibility of regulators and businesses, privacy via encryption, small companies, and data risk, reconciling US and European privacy issues in the short term, attempts to provide clarity to business about data transfers, the expense associated with compliance, and his hope for Data Privacy in the future.Support the show

On the final day of 2022, Paul Breitbarth of Catawiki and Dr. K Royal of Outschool, look back at the year 2022 - a year where a lot has happened. In the season three finale of Serious Privacy, they discuss some of the highlights of past episodes. In 2022, Paul and K made 45 Serious Privacy episodes, this one included, bringing our total to 139. They have had 25 guests, 4 conference reports, five episodes with Ralph O'Brien as co-host and one crossover episode with the Data Diva and Privacy Please podcasts. And all this content was good for almost 43,000 downloads since the start of 2022. Thank you to all of our listeners and guests - we love what we do and we love even more that you love it too.Resources:Episode S03E03 on the IAB TCF decisionEpisode S03E05 on DPIAsEpisode S03E09 celebrating 100 episodesEpisode S03E11 on data protection in AfricaEpisode S03E22 on backups and data retentionEpisode S03E28 - the cross-over episodeEpisode S03E30 on all things CEpisode S03E32 on Sam ElliottAs always, if you have comments or questions, let us know - LinkedIn, Twitter @podcastprivacy @euroPaulB @heartofprivacy @trustArc and email seriousprivacy@trustarc.com. Please do like and write comments on your favorite podcast act so other professionals can find us easier. 

We're coming down to the end of Season 3 of the Tech Policy Grind! For our last Fellow Highlight of the season (and 2022), Reema chats with Class 4 Foundry Fellow Nathan Reitinger, PhD Candidate in Computer Science at the University of Maryland...and JD? Tune in to hear about Nathan's experience in applied privacy, and what a career at the nexus of law and computer science looks like. Nathan is a lawyer and computer scientist. He holds a masters in computer science, security track, from Columbia University (advised by Steve Bellovin), a JD from Michigan State (licensed in New Hampshire), and is currently enrolled in a computer science PhD program at the University of Maryland (advised by Michelle Mazurek). Nathan's work focuses on where law and computer science meet, using tools from each of the respective disciplines to solve interesting problems. More specifically, he works in the area of applied privacy: It shouldn't take a masters-level degree in computing to obtain privacy in today's world, but it does---and we should fix that! Check out Nathan's website here; https://nathanreitinger.umiacs.io/ If you would like to sponsor an episode or propose a guest for the show, get in touch with us: foundrypodcasts@ilpfoundry.us If you'd like to support the show, please donate to the Foundry here. Article Mentioned: EU Commission Publishes Draft Adequacy Decision on Privacy Shield 2.0 [Goodwin Procter, Data + Privacy + Cybersecurity Insights Blog by Lore Leitner, Boris Segalis, Omer Tene, Gretchen Scott, Gabe Maldoff, Josephine Jay and Arjun Dhar].

On 13 December 2022, the European Commission published the long-awaited draft adequacy decision for the EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, among podcast listeners also known as the Thingy. In this episode of Serious Privacy, Paul Breitbarth of Catawiki and Dr. K Royal of Outschool talk about the adequacy decision, and what they consider is missing from it. Resources:Draft Adequacy DecisionIAPP Privacy Shield - DPF comparisonODNI Redress ProcessExecutive Order 14086OECD Policy Framework on Digital Security As always, if you have comments or questions, let us know - LinkedIn, Twitter @podcastprivacy @euroPaulB @heartofprivacy @trustArc and email seriousprivacy@trustarc.com. Please do like and write comments on your favorite podcast act so other professionals can find us easier. 

In this episode's Sighting of Radical Brilliance, our hosts discuss strategies for putting your data to work outlined in a recent Harvard Business Review article.To elucidate the complexities of moving data across borders, Lighthouse's Damian Murphy, Executive Director of Advisory Services in EMEA, joins the podcast. With Paige and Bill, Damian explains recent updates to data transfer policies, and what AI solutions can be deployed to optimize eDiscovery workflows and maximize data insights while adhering to privacy laws. Some key questions they answer, include:With fines continuing to be issued for GDPR violations and organizations grappling with how to transfer data across regions, data privacy is still not a resolved issue. What are some recent policy changes our audience should be aware of?How have these created challenges for the ways that data is managed and how organizations can ultimately utilize it?Many of our listeners are likely aware of how anonymization and pseudonymization are being utilized, but can you remind us how they work?Is there a typical approach for a client faced with the need to supply data held within the EU in order to comply with an eDiscovery order in the US?If the past is any indication, we should expect privacy policies to continue to change and impact data governance. How are anonymization and pseudonymization, and other approaches, helping prepare for what's on the horizon?If you enjoyed the show, learn more about our speakers and subscribe on the podcast homepage, rate us wherever you get your podcasts, and join in the conversation on Twitter. 

On October 7, the negotiations between the U.S. and European Commission regarding the future of the data privacy frameworks behind the Privacy Shield program were completed with the release of a Presidential Executive Order, passing the baton to the EU for the start of their adequacy process. Finally, after two years of limbo, the 5,000 businesses that … Continue reading The Future of EU-U.S. Data Transfers →

After several years of negotiation following the invalidation of the Privacy Shield by the European Court of Justice (CJEU), on October 7, the president signed an Executive Order, and the attorney general issued regulations, implementing the agreement between the U.S. and the EU announced earlier this year to replace the Privacy Shield framework. The European Commission (EC) has issued a statement that these actions will “address the concerns raised by the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Schrems II decision.” The EC is expected to make this framework the basis of an adequacy finding that the U.S. provides privacy protections that are essentially equivalent to European law.

Tom dives into the complex history and potential implications of EU-US Privacy Shield, updated.Featuring Tom Merritt.Link to episode transcript here. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This week on the podcast we cover a proposed program from the White House to create an Energy Star-like label for cybersecurity in consumer products. Before that, we cover two other updates from the federal government including a new open source tool from CISA and the latest reincarnation of Privacy Shield.

On this episode of Serious Privacy, Paul Breitbarth of Catawiki and Dr. K Royal of Outschool discuss the 10-7 series of deliberately machinated and long-awaited political events surrounding the EU-US data transfer mechanism that is intended to replace the Privacy Shield, invalidated under Schrems II back in 2020 - the “thingie.” Plus, the UK-US joint statement on adequacy consideration. These various events comprise the Executive Order (the Fact sheet along with the information on the European Commission site), the Department of Commerce statement, the Department of Justice from the Office of the Attorney General on the Data Protection review Board final rule, and the NOYB's response. As expected, and TrustArc predicted, those companies who remained in the Privacy Shield will have a transition plan. For additional information, please also see various analyses from the IAPP and the Future of Privacy Forum.  Carry the conversation further and connect with us to discuss.As always, if you have comments or questions, let us know - LinkedIn, Twitter @podcastprivacy @euroPaulB @heartofprivacy @trustArc and email seriousprivacy@trustarc.com. Please do like and write comments on your favorite podcast act so other professionals can find us easier. 

Transatlantic data flows are critical to enabling the $7.1 trillion EU-U.S. economic relationship. The EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework will restore an important legal basis for transatlantic data flows by addressing concerns that the Court of Justice of the European Union raised in striking down the prior EU-U.S. Privacy Shield framework as a valid data transfer mechanism under EU law. The post Protecting Personal Data? Executive Order to Implement the EU-US Data Privacy Framework appeared first on ComplexDiscovery.

C'est un grand pas en avant que vient de faire Joe Biden vers une nouvelle coopération avec l'Union Européenne en matière d'échange de données. Le président américain a récemment signé un décret qui permettra de protéger les citoyens de l'Union européenne de certaines ingérences venant des Etats-Unis.Ce décret arrive après les engagements réciproques sur lesquels s'étaient accordés Joe Biden et la présidente de la Commission européenne Ursula von der Leyen en mars dernier. Concrètement, ce décret pose je cite, « une base juridique importante pour les flux de données transatlantiques en répondant aux préoccupations soulevées par la Cour de justice de l'Union européenne », précise la Maison-Blanche. Pour rappel, la CJUE avait jugé en juin 2020 que cette coopération, dénommée Privacy Shield, ou le bouclier de Vie Privée en Français, n'offrait pas un niveau de protection suffisant pour les données personnelles transférées de l'UE vers les États-Unis. Le nouveau décret signé par le président américain apporte donc de nouvelle garanties en matière de confidentialité, et devrait aussi limiter la capacité des agences de sécurité et de renseignements américains à accéder aux données personnelles des citoyens de l'Union européenne.En clair, les services de renseignement américains ne pourront accéder aux données transférées qu'en cas d'absolue nécessité, comme dans le cas d'une vraie menace sur la sécurité nationale. À noter qu'en cas d'abus, les citoyens qui se sentiraient lésés pourront engager des poursuites afin de se faire dédommager. Des poursuites qui passeront par un examen mené par un organisme indépendant, dont les juges ne devront pas avoir de liens avec le gouvernement américain et devront être de vrais spécialistes de la question des données personnelles. Il s'agira vraisemblablement du tribunal de révision de la protection des données, qui sera spécialement créé.En fait, ce décret constitue la dernière étape majeure à la mise en place d'un nouvel accord de partage de données entre les USA et l'UE. Il est en effet nécessaire pour les entreprises aujourd'hui d'avoir un mot à dire sur cette question, car toutes sont concernées par ces transferts de données, GAFAM comme PME. La Commission européenne a dors et déjà a pris connaissance du décret et le transposera prochainement pour ensuite l'imposer aux entreprises tout en respectant l'esprit du texte, mais selon ses propres règles. Ce processus pourrait mettre six mois pour déboucher sur un accord définitif, soit aux alentours du mois de mars 2023. Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

C'est un grand pas en avant que vient de faire Joe Biden vers une nouvelle coopération avec l'Union Européenne en matière d'échange de données. Le président américain a récemment signé un décret qui permettra de protéger les citoyens de l'Union européenne de certaines ingérences venant des Etats-Unis. Ce décret arrive après les engagements réciproques sur lesquels s'étaient accordés Joe Biden et la présidente de la Commission européenne Ursula von der Leyen en mars dernier. Concrètement, ce décret pose je cite, « une base juridique importante pour les flux de données transatlantiques en répondant aux préoccupations soulevées par la Cour de justice de l'Union européenne », précise la Maison-Blanche. Pour rappel, la CJUE avait jugé en juin 2020 que cette coopération, dénommée Privacy Shield, ou le bouclier de Vie Privée en Français, n'offrait pas un niveau de protection suffisant pour les données personnelles transférées de l'UE vers les États-Unis. Le nouveau décret signé par le président américain apporte donc de nouvelle garanties en matière de confidentialité, et devrait aussi limiter la capacité des agences de sécurité et de renseignements américains à accéder aux données personnelles des citoyens de l'Union européenne. En clair, les services de renseignement américains ne pourront accéder aux données transférées qu'en cas d'absolue nécessité, comme dans le cas d'une vraie menace sur la sécurité nationale. À noter qu'en cas d'abus, les citoyens qui se sentiraient lésés pourront engager des poursuites afin de se faire dédommager. Des poursuites qui passeront par un examen mené par un organisme indépendant, dont les juges ne devront pas avoir de liens avec le gouvernement américain et devront être de vrais spécialistes de la question des données personnelles. Il s'agira vraisemblablement du tribunal de révision de la protection des données, qui sera spécialement créé. En fait, ce décret constitue la dernière étape majeure à la mise en place d'un nouvel accord de partage de données entre les USA et l'UE. Il est en effet nécessaire pour les entreprises aujourd'hui d'avoir un mot à dire sur cette question, car toutes sont concernées par ces transferts de données, GAFAM comme PME. La Commission européenne a dors et déjà a pris connaissance du décret et le transposera prochainement pour ensuite l'imposer aux entreprises tout en respectant l'esprit du texte, mais selon ses propres règles. Ce processus pourrait mettre six mois pour déboucher sur un accord définitif, soit aux alentours du mois de mars 2023. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Lufthansa prohíbe los AirTag en maletas facturas (¿o no?) / 40.000€ por 15 minutos en Uber / Indemnizado teletrabajador despedido por apagar su webcam / Signal añade Stories / Nuevo intento de Privacy Shield Patrocinador: La gama Volvo Recharge te ofrece una tecnología con la que podrás realizar tus trayectos diarios al trabajo utilizando únicamente el motor eléctrico sin contaminar y sin hacer ruido. Y también viajes largos utilizando únicamente el motor eléctrico sin contaminar y sin hacer ruido. — Descubre más en VolvoCars.com. Lufthansa prohíbe los AirTag en maletas facturas (¿o no?) / 40.000€ por 15 minutos en Uber / Indemnizado teletrabajador despedido por apagar su webcam / Signal añade Stories / Nuevo intento de Privacy Shield

Mark Zuckerberg has said that Facebook and Instagram might have to shut down operations if there's not a change to EU privacy requirements. It turns out that's not a threat, it's a cry for help. We learn about what might force these platforms out of the EU.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

### Apero* servAtem mise tout sur le 7 ! -> https://www.lemonde.fr/blog/binaire/2022/04/01/servatem-mise-tout-sur-le-7/### Database* Making Real-Time Data Real: Change Data Capture for Astra DB -> https://thenewstack.io/making-real-time-data-real-change-data-capture-for-astra-db/https://github.com/datastax/cdc-apache-cassandra* Unite your data and get a highly scalable, performant, native GraphQL graph database in the cloud that delivers blazingly fast query speeds. -> https://dgraph.io/### ML/AI* Deep Learning Is Hitting a Wall -> https://nautil.us/deep-learning-is-hitting-a-wall-14467/### Data-Science* Validate Your pandas DataFrame with Pandera -> https://towardsdatascience.com/validate-your-pandas-dataframe-with-pandera-2995910e564* 0.9.0: FastAPI Integration, Support GeoPandas DataFrames -> https://github.com/pandera-dev/pandera/releases/tag/v0.9.0### IoT / Time Series* Hexa Data -> https://hexa-ai.fr/annonce-du-produit-hexa-data/* Announcing Grafana Mimir, the most scalable open source TSDB in the world -> https://grafana.com/blog/2022/03/30/announcing-grafana-mimir/### RGPD & co* “Privacy Shield 2.0”? - First Reaction by Max Schrems : -> https://noyb.eu/en/privacy-shield-20-first-reaction-max-schrems* Dataviz DataExploration -> * Like Streamlit, but fast. Enabling low-latency data apps. -> https://medium.com/@ramiromedina/like-streamlit-but-fast-enabling-low-latency-data-apps-948b95b098a2SponsorsCette publication est sponsorisée par [Affini-Tech](https://affini-tech.com/) et [CerenIT](https://www.cerenit.fr/).[CerenIT](https://www.cerenit.fr/) vous accompagne pour concevoir, industrialiser ou automatiser vos plateformes mais aussi pour faire parler vos données temporelles. Ecrivez nous à [contact@cerenit.fr](mailto:contact@cerenit.fr) et retrouvez-nous aussi sur [Time Series France](https://www.timeseriesfr.org/).Affini-Tech vous accompagne dans tous vos projets Cloud et Data, pour Imaginer, Expérimenter etExecuter vos services ! ([Affini-Tech](http://affini-tech.com), La plateforme [Datatask](https://datatask.io/)) pour accélérer vos services Data et IAConsulter le [blog d'Affini-Tech](https://affini-tech.com/blog/) et le [blog de Datatask](https://datatask.io/blog/) pour en savoir plus.On recrute ! Venez cruncher de la data avec nous ! Ecrivez nous à [recrutement@affini-tech.com](mailto:recrutement@affini-tech.com)Le générique a été composé et réalisé par Maxence Lecointe.

On this episode of Serious Privacy, sponsored by TrustArc, Paul Breitbarth and K Royal some with Angelique Carson. Angelique is currently with TerraTrue but Paul and K know her best from when she was with the IAPP, International Association of Privacy Professionals. Angelique had launched the IAPP's podcast years ago,  where K was one the very first guests.The conversation flows from podcasts with its challenges and triumphs to how the privacy profession has grown over the past decade. They also discussed how professionals, whether attorneys or not,  can enter the hottest growing field.  The barriers to entry aren't insurmountable, but being successful does require a certain perspective. And if you are looking for the GDPR website K was referring to - you'll find it here.Join us as we reminisce and review what it means to be in privacy,  the changes we've seen worldwide,  and our perspective on the state of this fascinating field.In addition,  K and Angelique are attending the IAPP's Global Privacy Summit in DC April 11 - 13. This is the first GPS in three years and it's sure to make history.As always, if you like the Serious Privacy podcast, tell everyone -rate and review us in your favorite podcast app. You will find us on LinkedIn and Twitter @podcastprivacy, along with TrustArc, K as @heartofprivacy and Paul as @EuroPaulB. 

Ursula von der Leyen, la présidente de la Commission européenne a révélé la grande nouvelle au côté du président américain Joe Biden le 25 mars : un « accord de principe » a été trouvé pour « un nouveau cadre pour les flux de données transatlantiques ». Une déclaration attendue depuis près de deux ans et l'annulation du Privacy Shield.Lire l'article sur Siècle Digital. Voir Acast.com/privacy pour les informations sur la vie privée et l'opt-out.

In the 100th episode of Serious Privacy, Paul Breitbarth and Dr. K Royal connect with two of the biggest names in the privacy field, Chris Babel, the CEO of TrustArc and Hilary Wandall, Chief Compliance Officer at Dun and Bradstreet. Both Chris and Hilary were instrumental in launching Serious Privacy and critical to its success.In this completely unscripted and candid conversation, the four of them touch on both philisophical aspects of privacy and practical application. No topic was off limits! They ranged from the replacement to Privacy Shield to the growth of privacy as a career to ESG. Join them for a rousing discussion - that goes a little longer than usual. And as a special treat, we also have an interview with Immaculate Kassait, the Data Commissioner of Kenya. Feel free to comment on Twitter (@podcastprivacy @trustarc @euroPaulB @heartofprivacy) or on LinkedIn for Serious Privacy your thoughts in response.Don't forget to catch K at IAPP Global Summit April 11 - 13 for stickers and spur-of-the-moment interviews and also register for upcoming TrustArc webinars.

Lifehacks. De todo tipo de soluciones caseras a situaciones comunes. Fuente: Reddit. Cómo hoy los ciber delincuentes están apuntando como target a aquellos millonarios o personas que tienen bastante monto en criptomonedas, en sus wallets. Y cómo lo hacen? Descubren sistema de ataque que puede engañar a los sensores de proximidad de coches autónomos. Fuente: WWWhat's New EEUU y la UE llegan a un nuevo acuerdo para la transferencia de datos personales de Europa a América de manera segura. Un nuevo Privacy Shield. Fuente: Tech Crunch Cómo proteger los dispositivos conectados a internet en el hogar. Fuente: Federal Trade Commission FTC. Happy Children - P. Lion DÓNDE ESCUCHARNOS Anchor Spotify Apple Podcasts Breaker Audio Google Podcasts Pocket Casts Radio Public Playlist completa de Tech n Privacy NUESTRO BLOG CON TODA LA INFO Y LOS EPISODIOS, AQUÍ --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/andres-saravia/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/andres-saravia/support

Das "Metaverse" soll das nächste Internet werden - wünscht sich zumindest das Silicon Valley. Doch bevor es richtig losgeht, gibt es schon Probleme. Außerdem: Privacy Shield 3.0: Eine Gefahr für Meta, Google und Co.? Und der Podcast "Narcoland"Linß, Vera; Wiese, Timwww.deutschlandfunkkultur.de, BreitbandDirekter Link zur Audiodatei

Se cancela la fusión de Arm y Nvidia, Meta ve complicado ofrecer sus servicios en Europa y Tinder cobra más a usuarios de entre 30 y 49 años. Apoya este podcast escuchando, suscribiéndote y compartiéndolo. Para el análisis a fondo de las noticias acompáñanos en www.dailytechnewsshow.comArm y Nvidia anunciaron el final de sus planes de adquisición. Arm planea lanzar una Oferta Pública Inicial dentro de los próximos 12 meses y su CEO, Simon Segars deja el puesto a Rene Hass, el presidente del grupo de Propiedad Intelectual de la compañía. En el reporte anual a la Comisión de Bolsa y Valores, Meta comentó que “la compleja y cambiante legislación estadounidenses y extranjera” que involucra transferencia de datos entre Estados Unidos y la Unión Europea podrían hacer que la compañía sea “incapaz de ofrecer una cantidad considerable de sus productos y servicios, como Facebook e Instagram en Europa”. El Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea invalidó el marco previo de transferencia de datos del Escudo del Privacy Shield en 2020, lo que permitió que Meta utilizara cláusulas contractuales estándar repetitivas para la transferencia de datos. Esto ha sido impugnado en los tribunales y se espera una decisión del órgano regulador de datos de Irlanda para los próximos meses. De acuerdo con un informe de Mozilla y Consumers International, se descubrió que Tinder cobraba a los usuarios de entre 30 y 49 años un promedio de 65.3% más por el uso de Tinder+ e comparación al costo para usuarios más jóvenes. En una publicación en su blog, Tinder dijo que dejó de cobrar más dependiendo el grupo de edad en los Estados Unidos, Australia y Reino Unido, y eliminará ese incremento en todos los mercados para finales del segundo trimestre.  See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information. Become a member at https://plus.acast.com/s/noticias-de-tecnologia-express.

 Justin Antonipillai (CEO and Founder at WireWheel) is joined by Bruno Gencarelli (Head of the International Data Transfers and Protection Unit at the European Commission) to discuss the current situation with EU-US negotiations in a post Privacy Shield environment.You can follow WireWheel on social media to track the latest news in the Privacy world!Follow us on Linkedin,  Twitter, Youtube or Facebook.To learn more about WireWheel Data Privacy Management solutions, please visit www.wirewheel.io.Any questions? You can contact us at marketing@wirewheel.io!  

With the fall of Privacy Shield and the Safe Harbor program, what can we expect for the future of transatlantic data transfers? Can the EU and US work out a trade deal? More on Lothar Determann. SPEAKERS Wayne Stacy, Lothar Determann Wayne Stacy 00:00 Welcome, everyone to the Berkeley Center for Law and Technology's Experts Series podcast. This is Wayne Stacy, the Executive Director for BCLT. And today we're going to talk about the future of transatlantic data transfers. And we have with is one of the great experts in the field, Dr. Lothar Determann. Doctor Determann or I'm gonna go with Lothar for now was or is a professor, I guess lecturer is the right title. But he's a lecturer since 2004 of computer law and data privacy at Berkeley Law. And since 1995, he's been a tenured professor in Germany. So he brings expertise on the academic side from both sides of the Atlantic, if you look at his publications, Determann's Field Guide to data privacy law in California privacy law, practical guide and commentary. He's actually teaching out of that this semester. And this semester, or next semester, he's got the California privacy law course that he'll be teaching at Berkeley Law. So actually, if you go through the whole list, we can spend the 15 minutes talking about the scope of all of his work, but I'll just leave it at this: he knows a lot about transatlantic data transfers. So thank you for coming today. Lothar Determann 01:29 Thanks for inviting me, Wayne. Wayne Stacy 01:31 So what I want to turn to first is the fact that there seem to be some large finds coming out of out of Europe these days, and a slow eroding, or maybe a fast eroding of some of the shields that we used to have. So the Privacy Shield went down, you saw the Safe Harbor program go down in 2015. And now you're starting to see these new standard contract contractual clauses coming out. The real question about all of this is people get nervous is what does this mean for transatlantic data transfers, and in what's the big picture going to look like over the next few years for for US companies. Lothar Determann 02:14 For US companies, the biggest challenge has been that the general data protection regulation has extended and clarified the realm of applicability to some US companies, but also that European companies are under evermore pressure and transferring personal data to the US. European Union is a trade zone Originally, it was called the European Economic Community when they started looking at harmonizing data protection law. And the main goal was to make it easy for companies to cooperate within the bloc and transfer data across borders. So the official title of what is now often referred to as the Data Protection Directive was really about the free flow of data in Europe. And it was kind of a compromise to say, if we're all trusting each other with data, the Germans and the Spaniards and the French and the Brits at the time before Brexit, then we do need to have a prohibition from just transferring it onward somewhere else. And that was in the directive of 1995. That was there to allow more Corporation more sharing more flow within Europe. And this prohibition of transferring to the US wasn't a real big deal in the first years, because there was a general understanding that the US has privacy laws, too. And the commission worked out a compromise where US companies could sign up for a voluntary program, the Safe Harbor program, and commit to basically complying with the European rules. And then European companies could share data with them, just as if they were in Europe. But after the Snowd

This is the US Data Privacy Shield! Beth Winters (Licensed Attorney and Solutions Marketing Manager at Aparavi) will walk us through: What it is and what it is to know about it How you and your data are impacted by it How to ensure your company is ready and compliant

We receive Eduardo Ustaran and Timothy Banks to discuss Privacy Law and its international developments.What was the European Union/United States Privacy Shield and what does this mean for Canada? What do non-privacy law specialists need to know about this and what's the future for data transfers?Eduardo Ustaran is a partner with Hogan Lovells in London, where he's co-head of the privacy and cybersecurity practice. He will be part of the CBA Access to Information and Privacy Law Online Symposium.Timothy Banks  is a technology lawyer in Ottawa, he specializes in information technology and consumer law. He is the Chair of the CBA Privacy and Access Law Section and will co-host the Symposium.Register today to the CBA Access to Information and Privacy Law Online Symposium.To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): podcasts@cba.orgPlease subscribe, rate and review our podcast if you are enjoying it on Apple Podcast.

In this video we will discuss the recent Privacy Shield invalidation and the relevant implications for companies. #Privacy #PrivacyShield #Security

Welcome to TechCrunch daily news, a round up of the top tech news of the day. --Apple starts making the current iPhone in India --Revolut's Series D gets bigger --and an electric truck maker says they'll be on the road by next year. Here's your Daily Crunch. The big story is: The big Schrems II judgement that nullifies the EU-U.S. cross-border Privacy Shield that essentially protected companies in cases where they were transferring personal data of European residents to the U.S.