Podcasts about Vent

Today's Topic:1. Sound Signature Review 6.238 – PTR VENT 1 on 8-in 300 BLK bolt-action. Welcome back, VENT 1 and PIP. It's been a minute. What happens when this high performance 30 caliber silencer gets significantly lower pressure input than it did in the 2024 .308 report? Technical discussion of this high-performance silencer (00:05:55)a. Re(intro) to the VENT 1 and PIP tech (00:07:41)b. VENT 1 general overview (00:12:29)c. VENT 1 silencer design and functional physics (00:18:11)d. VENT 1 subsonic 300 BLK Hazard Map in Silencer Hazard Map Brief 8.1.35 (00:38:28)e. Technical performance discussion (00:48:31)f. Performance Comparisons and Overall thoughts (00:58:50)Sponsored by  Legion Athletics and the PEW Science Laboratory!Legion Athletics: use code pewscience for BOGO off your entire first order and 20% cash back always!

Bienvenue dans notre rendez-vous hebdomadaire : le Club de C'est pas du vent. Des journalistes spécialistes de l'environnement, de RFI et d'ailleurs, reviennent sur les sujets environnementaux qui les ont marqués et partagent les coulisses de leur travail. L'occasion aussi de commenter les reportages produits par les vidéastes du réseau ePOP et les actions des Clubs RFI. Avec - Marie Bellan journaliste environnement pour Les Echos, sur le projet de loi de finance 2027 - Abdoulaye Diallo de la rédaction fufulde de RFI à Dakar : En Guinée, le fleuve Bafing à Siguiri, un patrimoine en péril. - Simon Rozé du service environnement de RFI sur le constat dressé par Copernicus au sujet de l'augmentation de la pollution à l'ozone dans le monde sous l'effet des fortes chaleurs. - Juliette Pietraszewski du service environnement de RFI. La désinformation climatique, une pratique et arme géopolitique qui ne date pas d'hier.  - Chronique des Clubs RFI avec Audrey Iattoni, qui nous parlera du projet "Ville durable et de sensibilisation de 150 collégiens aux problématiques urbaines et environnementales de la ville d'Abidjan en Côte d'Ivoire. - Chronique ePOP Science (RFI Planète Radio/IRD) de Caroline Filliette ave Gabin Colombini, chercheur pour l'IRD il travaille sur la pollution microplastiques dans les sols et a rejoint la coalition des scientifiques pour un traité efficace sur les plastiques il y a 3 ans. apporter des éclairages sur le lien étroit entre qualité des écosystèmes terrestres et des océans (80% de la pollution plastique des océans provient directement des continents) pour le film Un poisson en colère. Musiques diffusées dans l'émission :  ► Madugrada - The frontman ► Lukuboy - Desconfiança 

Bienvenue dans notre rendez-vous hebdomadaire : le Club de C'est pas du vent. Des journalistes spécialistes de l'environnement, de RFI et d'ailleurs, reviennent sur les sujets environnementaux qui les ont marqués et partagent les coulisses de leur travail. L'occasion aussi de commenter les reportages produits par les vidéastes du réseau ePOP et les actions des Clubs RFI. Avec - Marie Bellan journaliste environnement pour Les Echos, sur le projet de loi de finance 2027 - Abdoulaye Diallo de la rédaction fufulde de RFI à Dakar : En Guinée, le fleuve Bafing à Siguiri, un patrimoine en péril. - Simon Rozé du service environnement de RFI sur le constat dressé par Copernicus au sujet de l'augmentation de la pollution à l'ozone dans le monde sous l'effet des fortes chaleurs. - Juliette Pietraszewski du service environnement de RFI. La désinformation climatique, une pratique et arme géopolitique qui ne date pas d'hier.  - Chronique des Clubs RFI avec Audrey Iattoni, qui nous parlera du projet "Ville durable et de sensibilisation de 150 collégiens aux problématiques urbaines et environnementales de la ville d'Abidjan en Côte d'Ivoire. - Chronique ePOP Science (RFI Planète Radio/IRD) de Caroline Filliette ave Gabin Colombini, chercheur pour l'IRD il travaille sur la pollution microplastiques dans les sols et a rejoint la coalition des scientifiques pour un traité efficace sur les plastiques il y a 3 ans. apporter des éclairages sur le lien étroit entre qualité des écosystèmes terrestres et des océans (80% de la pollution plastique des océans provient directement des continents) pour le film Un poisson en colère. Musiques diffusées dans l'émission :  ► Madugrada - The frontman ► Lukuboy - Desconfiança 

podcast recorded with enacast.com

"Why is it always ME?" That's the question I hear again and again from women who are trying to change the dynamic in their marriage, and in this episode, I'm answering some of the hardest questions you sent me after the Speak Husband Challenge. What if he gets defensive about everything? What if you're tired of always being the one who tries? Do you really have to respect him when you're struggling to find anything to respect? And what happens when your personalities, values, or ways of seeing the world feel completely different? I'm answering these honestly, including the tough questions that challenge everything I teach. Because NO, you don't have to carry your marriage alone. But you CAN be the one who goes first. You can change the dynamic without changing your husband. Learn how inside Married-U https://married-u.com/university CHAPTERS: 00:00 – Why Is It Always On Me? 03:48 – Is Asking Him to Clean Actually Emasculating? 08:19 – Is Every Request Really an Attack? 11:42 – What If He's Not a Naturally Secure Man? 14:58 – Am I Allowed to Vent, or Am I Just Unloading? 23:15 – Should Respect Be Earned or Given? 28:21 – Why Am I the One Managing His Feelings? 34:54 – Can You Undo 15 Years of Defensiveness? 39:28 – What If Most of the Marriage Feels Like a Struggle? 47:16 – Going Alone vs. Going First

Er oppmerksomheten din så ødelagt at du vurderer å rulle videre til neste podkast allerede nå? Vent litt! I denne episoden har jeg og Anders sikret oss storfisken selv: bestselgerforfatter Johann Hari. Mannen som ga oss dårlig samvittighet for mobilbruken i Stjålet fokus, har nå kastet seg over den nye folkesporten med Tryllesprøyten (ja, vi snakker om Ozempic og slankesprøytene som alle enten tar eller har en mening om). Men fordi vi i Skravleklassen lider av nøyaktig den konsentrasjonssvikten Hari advarer mot, klarte vi selvfølgelig ikke å holde tråden. Før vi visste ordet av det, havnet vi midt i en samtale om selveste Gud. Vi sparer ikke på de store spørsmålene: Hvorfor klarer ingen av oss å lese en hel side i en bok uten å sjekke TikTok fire ganger? Er tryllesprøytene kjemisk juks, eller tidenes gave til menneskeheten? Og hvis Gud finnes – har Han egentlig lang nok oppmerksomhetsspenn til å høre på bønnene våre? Sett på podden, legg fra deg mobilen (hvis du fysisk klarer det), og bli med når Skravleklassen prøver å holde konsentrasjonen oppe i møte med en av verdens mest brennhete forfattere!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Avui dimarts, 29 de setembre, hem començat El Matí de Canal Blau Ràdio amb les notícies. Tot seguit, hem reprès amb la col·laboració amb els centres cívics de Vilanova i la Geltrú, amb qui cada mes repassem les seves activitats i propostes. Ens han acompanyat per a fer-ho la Montse Lleó, directora del Casal de la Gent Gran, i la Montse Palau, directora del Centre Cívic del Molí de Vent. Us hem portat també un nou Paraules Habitables, un pòdcast produït per La Xarxa i el TERMCAT que difon neologismes, terminologia especialitzada i paraules noves en català. I avui que és dimarts hem acabat programa amb el Castells en Blau, l'espai casteller del Matí de Canal Blau Ràdio, on el nostre cronista i bordegàs Unai Estévez ens acosta la crònica castellera dels Bordegassos, avui, amb la mirada posada en el concurs de castells d'aquest proper dissabte, 3 d'octubre. podcast recorded with enacast.com

PILARS AL VENT — El programa casteller que bufa fort a Ràdio Cubelles Arriba a Ràdio Cubelles un nou espai radiofònic amb energia jove, passió castellera i moltes ganes d'explicar els castells des de dins. PILARS AL VENT neix amb la voluntat d'apropar el món casteller a tots els oients, tant als qui ja viuen les places intensament com als qui encara volen descobrir què s'amaga darrere d'una diada. Aquest programa vol anar més enllà del que es veu a plaça. Parlarem dels nervis abans de sonar les gralles, dels silencis de concentració, de les emocions compartides i de totes aquelles històries personals que fan possible aixecar castells: des de la pinya fins al tronc, passant pels més petits i pels més veterans. A PILARS AL VENT coneixerem les veus dels castellers i castelleres que sovint no tenen micròfon però que són imprescindibles. Entrevistarem membres de la colla de Cubelles, descobrirem anècdotes, experiències i vivències humanes que expliquen per què els castells són molt més que una construcció humana. El programa comptarà també amb convidats especials vinculats al món casteller i cultural, per entendre els castells des de totes les mirades possibles. Darrere dels micròfons hi trobareu un equip apassionat pels castells: Nil Sánchez, Marc Nogueira, Jordi Lora i Pol Martínez, quatre veus amb un objectiu clar: fer arribar l'esperit casteller a través de les ones. Si vols sentir els castells, viure'ls i descobrir tot allò que no es veu… prepara't, perquè els PILARS AL VENT ja bufen a Ràdio Cubelles. podcast recorded with enacast.com

Minnesota Vikings WIN sloppy against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers! Vikings defense and Will Reichard carry the team to a victory; How concerned should the Vikings be with their offense so far; Vikings lose Justin Jefferson to an ankle injury; Vikings fans join the show to discuss the win and more on Purple Daily. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

What has you annoyed these days? See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

L'Info 7 és l'informatiu de Punt 7 Ràdio Sant Celoni. S'hi expliquen les notícies locals. Conductora: Gemma Pascual podcast recorded with enacast.com

Fifteen-year-old Melanie Ethier was just minutes from home when she vanished into the night. Despite extensive searches, suspicious sightings, and decades of investigation, no trace of her has ever been found. This week, Ashley examines the disappearance that has haunted a small Canadian town for nearly 30 years. Was it a case of mistaken identity? Was it wrong place, wrong time? Join us as we explore the dark side of humanity. If someone has information about Melanie's disappearance they are encouraged to contact one of the following: the OPP at 1-888-310-1122; Crime Stoppers; or report info to Missingkids.ca. ResourcesMissingKids.ca, Canadian Centre for Child Protection: Melanie Ethier profile. Melanie Ethier profile at MissingKids.caCBC / David Ridgen, The Next Call, Season 1: The Case of Melanie Ethier. The Next Call: Melanie Ethier series overviewTimminsToday / Ontario Provincial Police, "Investigation into Melanie Ethier's disappearance still ongoing," Sept. 29, 2020. Read the OPP release via TimminsTodayMissingKids.ca, "20 years since Melanie Ethier disappeared," 2016. 20 years since Melanie Ethier disappearedSudbury.com, "Police continue 14-year-long search for missing girl," 2010. Police continue search for Melanie EthierSudbury.com, "$50,000 reward" reporting, 2006.Reward offered in Melanie Ethier disappearanceThe Temiskaming Speaker, September 2025Melanie Ethier missing person case haunts mom 29 years laterFort Frances Times / Temiskaming Speaker, October 2025. 29-year anniversary reportingShedding Light Podcast, Season 1.  (Apple Podcasts)Wikipedia's Melanie Ethier article.  (Wikipedia)Morbid Episode: The Mysterious Disappearance of Melanie Ethier; July 4, 2021 Please like, follow, and share this podcast - we're on all of the platforms! Oh, and please leave reviews so other true crime lovers can find us. If you are trying to get a hold of us, we can only respond via: Case Files with Kat and Ashley FacebookInstagramWe're here if you need us! NEVER hesitate to reach out! FOR HELP WITH STALKING OR CYBERSTALKING:https://rainn.org/news/resources-survivors-stalking-and-cyberstalkinghttps://www.stalkingawareness.org/FOR HELP WITH DOMESTIC VIOLENCE:NATIONWIDE: https://www.thehotline.org/get-help/domestic-violence-local-resources/IN HOUSTON AREA: https://www.bayareaturningpoint.org/ or call 24/7: (281) 286-2525FOR HELP WITH SEXUAL ASSAULT:https://rainn.org/resourcesFOR HELP WITH BULLYING:Text CONNECT to 741741 Need to Vent?Simply text HOME or HOLA to 741741 to reach a live volunteer Crisis Counselor. We are always here for you. Free, 24/7, confidential.INTERNATIONAL RESOURCES - YOU ARE N...

Benvinguts al "Generaci

Retrouvez l'émission Vent de Fraîcheur du 2026-09-27 diffusée sur CJMD 96,9 FM Lévis. Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

Have a question or comment for us? We welcome you to send us a text, thank you! Host-Patricia Steen, Co-hosts-Antoine Mcfadden, Richard Shaw, June Bryant#vent101  Support the showhttps://www.facebook.com/VENT-101-103416278100472https://www.youtube.com/@v.e.n.t.101https://www.vent-101.com/https://instagram.com/v.e.n.t.101?igshid=NTA5ZTk1NTc=

Un point de résilience intéresse particulièrement le pape : la croissance spectaculaire des baptêmes d'adultes.Hébergé par Ausha. Visitez ausha.co/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Michela Martignoni, Elena Martignoni"La maledizione di Perla Bonaparte"Emilio MartiniEdizioni Corbacciowww.corbaccio.itSono le 7 di una fredda giornata di febbraio a Lungariva. L'innocente passeggiata mattutina del commissario Gigi Berté viene interrotta da un macabro ritrovamento: sulla spiaggia dove ha portato i suoi cani si imbatte nei cadaveri di una donna e un uomo legati fra loro con una cima.Sono nudi e la loro morte risale a qualche giorno prima. Ben presto, grazie ad alcuni indizi, si scoprirà la loro identità: la donna è Perla Bonaparte, nobile, ricca e chiacchierata, nativa di Lungariva da dove se n'è andata una decina di anni prima. Una maledizione, che risale alla fine dell'Ottocento, grava su di lei, come su tutte le donne della sua famiglia. L'uomo è Aiace del Grifo, un trentacinquenne originario di Genova, prestante uomo d'affari e allevatore di cavalli. Qual era il rapporto fra le due vittime, unite nella morte? Erano amanti? Oppure testimoni di qualcosa che non dovevano vedere? Per capirlo servirà il contributo non solo della consolidata squadra investigativa di Lungariva e dell'ispettore Romeo di Genova, ma anche delle testimonianze di chi li conosceva. Determinante, però, sarà il fiuto di Gigi Berté, reso più acuto dalle sue personali inclinazioni e… chissà, forse anche dal suo proverbiale caratteraccio.Dietro lo pseudonimo di Gigi Berté si nasconde un vicequestore aggiunto in carne e… coda brizzolata, che opera in un commissariato italiano. Anche dietro il nome Emilio Martini si cela qualcuno in carne e… penna: due sorelle scrittrici, Elena e Michela Martignoni, che conoscono bene il commissario, sono milanesi e frequentano da anni la Liguria. Insieme hanno scritto i romanzi storici Requiem per il giovane Borgia, Vortice d'inganni, Autunno rosso porpora e Il duca che non poteva amare, e i gialli con protagonista il commissario Berté La regina del catrame, Farfalla nera, Chiodo fisso, Doppio delitto al Miramare, Il mistero della gazza ladra, Invito a Capri con delitto, Il ritorno del Marinero, Ciak: si uccide, Il paese mormora, Il caso Mariuz, Vent'anni prima, Il botto, Sfida a Berté, L'uomo del Bogart Hotel, Aspettando Cosetta, La numero uno e La maledizione di Perla Bonaparte, oltre alle raccolte I racconti neri del commissario Berté e Talent Show.Diventa un supporter di questo podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/il-posto-delle-parole--1487855/support.IL POSTO DELLE PAROLEascoltare fa pensarehttps://ilpostodelleparole.it/

C'était en 2016. Le camp surnommé la "grande jungle", situé en périphérie de la ville de Calais, dans le nord de la France, était démantelé. Cet endroit abritait des milliers de migrants. Ils avaient tous le même rêve : traverser la Manche et rejoindre le Royaume-Uni. Dix ans après, leur détermination reste intacte.

O inventor de paisagens sonoras!Murray Schafer – A garden of bellsCorvus Corax – Saltatio Sanct MartinisDavid Lang – Vent – com Molly Barth(flute)Produção, gravação, edição e locução: marcelo brissacMúsica “Drácula” usada no prefixo e sufixo, autoria de marcelo brissac e livio tragtenberg

GESTIONNAIRES EN ACTION. On a beau aimer Warren Buffett, reste qu'à 96 ans, son départ pourrait générer un vent de fraîcheur chez Berkshire Hathaway, estime Vincent Fournier, gestionnaire de portefeuille à Claret. Le 18 septembre dernier, Berkshire Hathaway publiait un communiqué dans lequel elle confirmait que le légendaire investisseur, qui a célébré son 96e anniversaire le 30 août, quittait son poste de président du conseil d’administration «avec effet immédiat» pour devenir « président émérite ». Il sera remplacé par son fils, Howard G. Buffett, conformément au plan de succession établi de longue date. Vincent Fournier, gestionnaire de portefeuille à Claret, rappelle que le retrait de Warren Buffett s’est fait très progressivement. «La transition a tellement été bien planifiée que l’équipe de direction devrait garder une stratégie similaire à ce qui prévalait lorsqu’il était PDG», estime-t-il. «Il va peut-être y avoir de légères déviations artistiques avec la nouvelle équipe en place, mais la méthode, l'éthique et surtout la culture d'entreprise resteront inchangées», dit-il. Selon lui, les investisseurs ne devraient pas vendre les actions de Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B, 505,18$US) parce que le milliardaire se retrouve dans un rôle beaucoup moins important au sein de l’entreprise qu’il a contribué à bâtir. «Berkshire Hathaway aujourd'hui, c'est l'équivalent d'un gros portefeuille diversifié. Ça ressemble un petit peu à un fonds commun combiné à une compagnie d'assurance. Ce qui fait la force de Berkshire, c'est le fait que c'est une compagnie d'assurance qui a possède des actions et des liquidités pour payer les assurés en cas de sinistres, alors que d’autres préfèrent détenir des titres obligataires», raconte-t-il. Une équipe de direction sous le signe de la continuité Il soutient que le plus grand changement chez Berkshire Hathaway est la taille de l’entreprise, dont la valorisation boursière est supérieure à 1000 milliards de dollars américains (G$US). «Si on regarde juste en dessous de Warren puis Charlie Munger (ce dernier est décédé en novembre 2023), on a Greg Abel qui est là depuis 1999 et qui est PDG depuis janvier. Il y a aussi Ajit Jain qui dirige les activités d’assurance depuis très, très, très longtemps. Ça fait 40 ans qu'il est avec la société. Puis on a déjà désigné son successeur lorsqu’il va prendre sa retraite : Charlie Shamieh», explique le gestionnaire de portefeuille. Il soutient que les dirigeants actuels sont tout autant outillés, intelligents et expérimentés. «Le deuxième point, c'est qu'on a beau aimer Warren Buffett, mais il a quand même 96 ans. L'arrivée d'une nouvelle garde, je pense que ça peut sincèrement apporter de bonnes choses, ou du moins, un vent nouveau pour l’entreprise à long terme», croit-il. Un risque à surveiller Vincent Fournier note un risque important que l’entreprise devra un jour affronter, soit celui du décès de son emblématique dirigeant. «On sait que, lorsque Warren Buffett va décéder, il va laisser une grosse partie de sa fortune à des œuvres de charité. Alors, est-ce que la vente des actions pourrait agir comme un vent contraire pour le titre de Berkshire? Ça reste à voir», dit-il. Selon Bloomberg, la fortune de Warren Buffett est évaluée à 145 G$US et la quasi-totalité de celle-ci est liée à Berkshire Hathaway. Chose certaine, l’entreprise possédait des liquidités de 365 G$US à la fin du mois de juin. Est-ce que la nouvelle direction pourrait retourner du capital aux actionnaires sous la forme d’un dividende spécial? Le gestionnaire de portefeuille pense que non. « Le fait que Berkshire Hathaway se garde autant de liquidités, c’est peut-être pour racheter les actions que Warren Buffett léguera à divers organismes de charité à son décès. Ces derniers vont alors vouloir vendre leurs actions pour financer leurs activités. Les liquidités pourraient servir, dans le fond, à ce que la société rachète les actions pour ensuite les annuler», raconte-t-il. Ce serait une bonne manière, selon lui, de diminuer grandement le nombre d’actions en circulation, ce qui équivaudrait à retourner du capital aux actionnaires.Pour de l'information concernant l'utilisation de vos données personnelles - https://omnystudio.com/policies/listener/fr

Today's Topics:1. Sound Signature Review 6.237 – Blackbird Suppressors F556 on the 10.3-in MK18. HUB compatible 6mm silencer optimized for 5.56, 5.4 inches long without a mount, advanced hybrid design… how does this debut silencer from a new company in the space fit in with the playing field? Very strong performance, with some nuance to learn about. Technical discussion. (00:06:47)a. Intro to the F556 (00:09:59)b. F556 general overview (00:11:19)c. F556 silencer design and functional physics (00:15:22)d. F556 MK18 Hazard Map in Silencer Hazard Map Brief 8.1.34 (00:23:13)e. Technical performance discussion (00:31:16)f. Performance Comparisons and Overall thoughts (00:48:45)2. Sound Signature Review 6.238 – PTR VENT 1 on 8-in 300 BLK bolt-action. Welcome back, VENT 1 and PIP. It's been a minute. What happens when this high performance 30 caliber silencer gets significantly lower pressure input than it did in the 2024 .308 report? Spoiler alert – it scales very well. This performance is very high. Introduction to today's report. (00:54:24)Sponsored by  Legion Athletics and the PEW Science Laboratory!Legion Athletics: use code pewscience for BOGO off your entire first order and 20% cash back always!

Bienvenue dans notre rendez-vous hebdomadaire : le Club de C'est pas du vent. Des journalistes spécialistes de l'environnement, de RFI et d'ailleurs, reviennent sur les sujets environnementaux qui les ont marqués et partagent les coulisses de leur travail. L'occasion aussi de commenter les reportages produits par les vidéastes du réseau ePOP et les actions des Clubs RFI. Avec - Franck Zongwe journaliste pour Kilalo press (RDC) : En République démocratique du Congo, que devient réellement l'argent destiné à restaurer les forêts ? - Vasile Damian de la rédaction en langue roumaine de RFI la surveillance par satellite et l'IA des forêts roumaines. Une initiative du ministère de l'environnement qui fait réagir les ONG, dont WWF - Simon Rozé du service environnement de RFI sur l'Assemblée générale de l'ONU et le sommet sur le climat qui se tient ce jour à New-York - Lucile Grimberg du service environnement de RFI sur la fronde contre les data centers et comment cela pèse dans la campagne de mi-mandat aux États-Unis. - Chronique médias d'Anne Sophie Novel sur les objets parasites  - Chronique ePOP (RFI Planète Radio/IRD) de Caroline Filliette  avec Yissouf Sissoko de Côte d'Ivoire pour son film « Le ravin de la peur ». Musiques diffusées dans l'émission :  ► E.T Mensah - Medzi Medzi  ► Ayra Starr & Theodora - Ms. Paper. 

https://www.airflowexpert.com/What if one-third of all dryer fires could be prevented with regular vent cleaning? We explore why laundromat owners can't afford to ignore this critical maintenance step, and what it costs to get it right. Airflow Experts City: Old Bridge Address: 21 Hilliard Rd. Website: https://www.airflowexpert.com/

Investeringer for mer enn 150 milliarder kroner i Nord-Norge står i fare fordi det ikke er nok kapasitet i strømnettet. Hva betyr kraftmangelen for næringslivet, og hvordan kan mer kraftproduksjon, sterkere strømnett og fjernvarme bidra til å løse problemet? En ny rapport fra Kunnskapsbanken for Nord-Norge som viser at planlagte investeringer for mer enn 150 milliarder kroner i Nord-Norge mangler sikret strøm. I tillegg står nær 60 milliarder kroner i investeringer i kø for å få kraft, mens potensielle prosjekter for ytterligere 90 milliarder kroner kan bli lagt bort før de i det hele tatt søker om nettilknytning.I denne episoden av Nord-Norge i verden ser vi nærmere på konsekvensene av kraftmangelen og flaskehalsene i strømnettet.Geir Håvard Hanssen, regiondirektør i NHO Arktis, mener kraft nå er den største enkeltbarrieren for vekst og utvikling i store deler av Nord-Norge. Han peker på at manglende kapasitet allerede har ført til at prosjekter er lagt på is, og frykter at de største konsekvensene først blir synlige om 10–15 år gjennom tapte arbeidsplasser og lavere verdiskaping.Men løsningen handler ikke bare om å produsere mer kraft og bygge ut strømnettet. Daglig leder Frank Matillas i Kvitebjørn Varme viser hvordan fjernvarme kan frigjøre kapasitet ved å bruke overskuddsenergi fra blant annet avfallsforbrenning til oppvarming.I Tromsø avlaster fjernvarmen strømnettet med rundt 55 MW på de kaldeste timene. Kvitebjørn Varme arbeider også med karbonfangst, utnyttelse av overskuddsvarme fra datasentre og lagring av varme i fjellet til bruk om vinteren.Du kan lese transkripsjon av alt som ble sagt i episodene på kbnn.no/podkast.Nord-Norge i verden er produsert av Kunnskapsbanken SpareBank 1 Nord-Norge i samarbeid med Helt Digital. Programleder er Stein Vidar Loftås. Redaktør er Jeanette Gundersen. Musikken er komponert av Emil Kárlsen. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Bienvenue dans notre rendez-vous hebdomadaire : le Club de C'est pas du vent. Des journalistes spécialistes de l'environnement, de RFI et d'ailleurs, reviennent sur les sujets environnementaux qui les ont marqués et partagent les coulisses de leur travail. L'occasion aussi de commenter les reportages produits par les vidéastes du réseau ePOP et les actions des Clubs RFI. Avec - Franck Zongwe journaliste pour Kilalo press (RDC) : En République démocratique du Congo, que devient réellement l'argent destiné à restaurer les forêts ? - Vasile Damian de la rédaction en langue roumaine de RFI la surveillance par satellite et l'IA des forêts roumaines. Une initiative du ministère de l'environnement qui fait réagir les ONG, dont WWF - Simon Rozé du service environnement de RFI sur l'Assemblée générale de l'ONU et le sommet sur le climat qui se tient ce jour à New-York - Lucile Grimberg du service environnement de RFI sur la fronde contre les data centers et comment cela pèse dans la campagne de mi-mandat aux États-Unis. - Chronique médias d'Anne Sophie Novel sur les objets parasites  - Chronique ePOP (RFI Planète Radio/IRD) de Caroline Filliette  avec Yissouf Sissoko de Côte d'Ivoire pour son film « Le ravin de la peur ». Musiques diffusées dans l'émission :  ► E.T Mensah - Medzi Medzi  ► Ayra Starr & Theodora - Ms. Paper. 

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Send us Fan MailWe record a solo, unscripted vent from Los Angeles as the weather finally cools down and the city's stress feels louder than ever. We talk through a family meetup, a nasty bout of food poisoning, and why public behavior on the road and on the streets can turn dangerous fast. • thanking listeners for downloads and explaining listener support options • Suavecito sponsor shoutout and where to buy products • fall arriving in Los Angeles and coping after a brutal summer heat wave • family time in town and a quick Downtown Disney meal • food poisoning and concerns about restaurant hygiene and kitchen behavior • road rage, reckless driving, and how impatience escalates risk • California gas prices, long commutes, and frustration with freeway closures • warnings about gas theft and practical ways to protect your car • Sixth Street Bridge mini bike ride-out and why cops intervene • parenting, safety rules, and teaching kids consequences Support and download our show, everybody. If you guys wanna support our show for three dollars a month, go to our link ztalkers.buzzsprout.com. You can also support our show on paypal.me forward slash the talkers podcast. Suavecito All hair types and textures. Pompadours, side parts and slick backs.Disclaimer: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase, I may receive a commission at no extra cost to you.Support the showSupport our podcast E-Mail:    theetalkers4us@gmail.com Tip us: cash.app/$TheeTalkersandHostbuymeacoffee.com/theetalkers4u https://theetalkers.buzzsprout.com/shareSupport our Podcast kick.com/theetalkerspodcast-1theetalkers_podcast1 - Twitch(3) Theetalkers1 (@theetalkers1) / TwitterThee Talkers Podcast: Unscripted - YouTubepatreon.com/theetalkerspodtiktok.com/@theetalkerspodcasttheetalkers.buzzsprout.com

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Minnesota Vikings win UGLY against Chicago Bears; Vikings start the season 2-0 despite a rainy and ugly game in Chicago; Vikings fans join the show to discuss the victory and more on Purple Daily!See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Just a few hours before Ausar Thompson signed his new deal, perfect timing indeed, Robbie and Wes hopped on to vent some frustrations about the coverage of Jalen Duren's negotiations. The amazingly frustrating prevalence of agent-speak being the primary offender. Then, the guys take a quick trip down memory lane before playing a game of over/under.We've got you covered for all this and more in this week's episode!You can watch the entire episode on our ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠YouTube channel⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Follow Wes Davenport on Twitter ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@TheRealWesD3⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Follow Robbie Bettelon on Twitter ⁠⁠⁠@BobbyBuckets313⁠⁠⁠Follow Detroit Bad Boys on Twitter ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@DetroitBadBoys⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Want to hear your voice on the Pindown? Call ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠(313) 355-2717⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ and leave your question as a voicemail! The guys will play your message and answer your question on that week's episode! All we ask is that you keep your questions to under 45 seconds.

Lietuvoje jis toks – vienintelis ir nepakartojamas. Paskutinį šios vasaros BN LIVE su trenksmu vainikavo Vytautas Mikaitis. Pasaulį išnaršiusio „Pravalturo“ direktoriaus keliones visada lydėjo neužmirštos krepšinio istorijos ir personos. Pokalbio partneriai: – Saily eSIM. Gaukite išskirtinę 15% nuolaidą „Saily“ duomenų planams! Naudokite kodą BASKETNEWS atsiskaitydami. Atsisiųskite „Saily“ programėlę arba apsilankykite čia. – Inbank. Atsirado papildomų išlaidų? Su kodu BASKETNEWS gauk nuolaidą vartojimo paskolos sutarties mokesčiui. – DEHOME SPACE. Viena didžiausių baldų ir interjero išparduotuvių Kaune. Apsilankykite ekspozicijoje gyvai: Ateities pl. 23, Kaunas, arba internetu. Temos: Kiek Mikaitis paklojo už kirpimą? (0:00); Po 2 susitikimų Miklovas pakvietė gyvent kartu (9:26); Kodėl krepšinyje Mikaičiui dirbti buvo kančia? (15:19); Techniniai nesklandumai varo iš proto (23:13); Didžiausios iškrėstos šunybės arenose (26:52); Karolis prarūkė karjerą (32:37); Halės tvaikas auksiniame sezone (34:05); Linksmiausia spaudos konferencija (41:00); Grįžkime laiku atgal į krepšinio keliones (47:15); Geriausio regioninės TV vadovo prizas (53:24); Ar Mikaitis norėtų tapti Kėdainių meru? (57:47); Paklydęs Satoransky ir laukiamas Sabo skambutis (1:00:49); Vytautas galėjo atsidurti muitinėje? (1:10:25); Kaip Mikaitis sprendžia problemas (1:15:34); Abiem su broliu – po tėčio 50 litų (1:17:31); Į ką panašiausias Mikaitis? (1:20:46); Mikaičio hitas „Gaidys Top3“ laidoje (1:26:31); Legendomis apipinta Kęstučio g. 52-4 (1:29:39); Vytautą mokykloje vadino smaugiku (1:36:16); Ar Mikaitis yra įdėjęs į krepšį? (1:41:25); Įžymybės, su kuriomis Vytautas turi nuotrauką (1:44:36); Kaip Mikaitis sutiko Ilgauską kapinėse (1:49:38); Ką priminė Wemby tapkės (1:53:21); Šaro komplimentai Vytautui (1:54:24); Kur nerekomenduotų važiuoti niekada (1:57:09); Paskutinė šalis, į kurią pakvies visus (2:00:40); Geresnis kaimynas: Karolis ar Bertulis? (2:02:31); #1 krepšinio komentatorius (2:04:51); Taikos g. Mikaitį užpuolė trise (2:05:25); Vytautui kiti svarbesni už jį (2:09:16); Ligoninėje – Mino, smuikininkas ir balta meška (2:12:25); Pandemiją pralinksminusios Pravalturo diskotekos (2:17:20); Vienintelis Mikaičio komentuotas mačas (2:20:12); Kurioziška olimpinių transliacija iš telefono (2:22:08); Kapitonas Flintas virsta kapitonu Flirtu (2:28:02); Mikaitis kiekvieną dieną švenčia iki galo (2:30:48).

Have a question or comment for us? We welcome you to send us a text, thank you! Host-June Bryant, Co-host-Patricia Steen, Guest Panelists: Janet Johnson, Marcia Williams, Joslyn Jones, Pastor Marion McNeil, Pastor Mary Cosby #vent101 Support the showhttps://www.facebook.com/VENT-101-103416278100472https://www.youtube.com/@v.e.n.t.101https://www.vent-101.com/https://instagram.com/v.e.n.t.101?igshid=NTA5ZTk1NTc=

**CONTENT WARNING**  This episode includes discussion of domestic violence, coercive control, stalking, sexual abuse allegations, mental health, and suicide. Please take care while listening. When Mica Francis Miller died by suicide in April 2024, questions surrounding her marriage to pastor John-Paul Miller quickly captured national attention. But Mica's story is about much more than the circumstances of her death. Kat and Ashley are joined by Bay Area Turning Point's Melissa Prentice to examine Mica's documented attempts to seek help, the allegations of stalking, surveillance, financial and spiritual abuse, and the pattern known as coercive control. They also look at the fight for Mica's Law and ask whether our current domestic violence laws recognize abuse before it turns deadly. References:COERCED: The Devotion & Death of Mica Francis Miller / LunaShark MediaLunaShark Media: Mica Miller TimelineMica's List / Mica's Law, Regina B. Ward LLC, June 5, 2024John-Paul Miller Probate Affidavit, July 26, 2024Netflix: Death of the Pastor's WifeU.S. Department of Justice: Myrtle Beach Pastor Indicted for Cyberstalking Wife Before Her DeathTIME: The True Story Behind Death of the Pastor's WifePeople: What Happened to Mica Miller?People: Mica Miller's Husbands and Relationship HistoryWPDE: Mica Miller Timeline – What We KnowWPDE: Mica Miller's Request for Protection From Harassment and StalkingOxygen: Mica Miller's Family and the Fight for Legislative ChangeABC11: Attorney Urges Passage of Mica's LawWBTW: Mica's List Behind Coercive-Control BillFITSNews: Mica's List – Family Seeks Domestic Violence ReformSouth Carolina Legislature: S.702 – Coercive Control / Domestic ViolenceWomen's Law: Emotional and Psychological AbuseSafeLives: Domestic Abuse and Suicide FiguresPMC: Intimate Partner Violence and Suicidal Behavior – Systematic ReviewReflect Training: How Coercive Control Impacts Mental Health and Suicide RiskLaura Richards: Resources on Coercive Control, Stalking and Risk AssessmentCrime Analyst: Laura RichardsNewsNation: Mica Miller, Suzie Skinner and John-Paul MillerFOX8: John-Paul Miller Case Delayed Again After Sixth ContinuanceLunaShark Media: JP Miller and Wayne Miller Accused of Sexual Abuse Targeting Minors in LawsuitMica Francis Miller ObituaryA&E: Mica Miller's Death and John-Paul Miller ChargesOxygen: Mica Miller and First Husband Jeremy DeasWBTV: Criminal Charges Pending Against Pastor Featured in Netflix DocumentaryPeople: Former Church Member Claims John-Paul Miller Used Wife Mica Miller for SexNewsNation: John-Paul Miller Ministry LawsuitWPDE: JP Miller, Wayne Miller and Solid Rock Ministries LawsuitNewsNation: Content Creator Says JP Miller Promised EvidenceWPDE: Mica Miller Family Press Conference and Estate AllegationsApple Podcasts: COJ – How to Get Mica's Law PassedPlease like, follow, and share this podcast - we're on all of the platforms! Oh, and please leave reviews so other true crime lovers can find us. If you are trying to get a hold of us, we can only respond via: Case Files with Kat and Ashley FacebookInstagramWe're here if you need us! NEVER hesitate to reach out! FOR HELP WITH STALKING OR CYBERSTALKING:https://rainn.org/news/resources-survivors-stalking-and-cyberstalkinghttps://www.stalkingawareness.org/FOR HELP WITH DOMESTIC VIOLENCE:NATIONWIDE: https://www.thehotline.org/get-help/domestic-violence-local-resources/IN HOUSTON AREA: https://www.bayareaturningpoint.org/ or call 24/7: (281) 286-2525FOR HELP WITH SEXUAL ASSAULT:https://rainn.org/resourcesFOR HELP WITH BULLYING:Text CONNECT to 741741 Need to Vent?Simply text HOME or HOLA to 741741 to reach a live volunteer Crisis Counselor. We are always here for you. Free, 24/7, confidential.INTERNATIONAL RESOURCES - YOU ARE N...

David and Nick are a little heated over several things going on.  Vent along with them. Shout out to MLVC for the great Theme Song!  You can find them at https://www.instagram.com/mlvc_91/  If you have questions for either Nick or David please contact us at: bucksandbrewsllc@gmail.com

He's dead now.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

He's dead now.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

AIUC first got our attention with the NFDG backing, and have just announced a $40M series A today, with the most impressive industry advisor list we may have ever seen for an early startup behind AIUC-1, their agent standard backed by real insurance:From being Anthropic's first product hire to building the standards, testing, and insurance infrastructure meant to make frontier AI deployable, Rune Kvist is betting that the biggest constraint on AI adoption won't be capability it will be trust. In this episode, the AIUC cofounder joins swyx and Vibhu to announce a new $40M round and explain why companies like Cursor, Harvey, Lovable, and ElevenLabs are increasingly confronting a problem that gets harder as AI gets better: who is responsible when autonomous systems fail?We go deep on AIUC-1, the emerging standard for agent security, safety, and reliability; how AI agents are stress-tested for jailbreaks, hallucinations, and data leaks; and why Rune thinks standards and insurance could become critical infrastructure for AI. We also discuss the growing trust gap between governments and frontier labs, AI-enabled cyber and biological risks, why every model can ultimately be jailbroken, what happens when a $20 coding agent causes $200M of damage, whether AI engineers should be certified, and why even after AGI there may be one job the labs can never do themselves: be their own watchdog.We discuss:* Why risk, liability, and trust may become the binding constraint on AI adoption* Rune's path from reading the Scaling Laws paper to joining Anthropic in its earliest days* What Anthropic understood about scaling, compute, and the future years before it became obvious* Why Waymo illustrates the gap between AI capability and real-world deployment* AIUC's $40M round and work with Cursor, Harvey, Lovable, ElevenLabs, and other frontier AI companies* AIUC-1: a standard for AI agent security, safety, and reliability* How agents are tested for jailbreaks, hallucinations, and data leakage* Why most AI companies optimize the happy path without seriously stress-testing adversarial cases* Why AI standards may need to update every quarter instead of every decade* The emerging trust gap between frontier AI labs and governments* Cybersecurity, child safety, biological weapons, and the expanding frontier-model risk surface* Why standards and insurance may need to evolve together* How Lloyd's of London can insure AI systems and bring trust to enterprise deployment* What happens if a $20 Cursor subscription contributes to a $200M plane crash* The Air Canada chatbot case and how AI failures are beginning to clarify legal liability* Why copyright may be one of the hardest AI risks to insure* Evals, mechanistic interpretability, monitoring, and models becoming aware they're being tested* The impossible CISO mandate: adopt AI fast, but don't let anything go wrong* Why robotics will make AI liability dramatically more consequential* Whether AI engineers should have Level 1, 2, and 3 certifications* AIUC's roadmap across agents, frontier models, robotics, and universal red teaming* Why AGI could become a question of national sovereignty* Why the labs can never fully serve as their own watchdogs* The Big Short problem: how do you stop competing watchdogs from racing standards to the bottom?Rune Kvist* LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/runekvist/* X: https://x.com/RuneKvistAIUC* https://aiuc.comTimestamps00:00:00 AIUC's $40M Round and the Risk Bottleneck for AI00:01:07 From Scaling Laws to Early Anthropic00:07:58 Why Trust, Not Capability, Could Limit AI Adoption00:12:19 Founding AIUC and Building AIUC-100:18:52 How AI Agents Are Audited and Stress-Tested00:25:26 Frontier Models, Government, and the AI Trust Gap00:33:32 Cyber, Child Safety, and AI-Enabled Biological Risk00:38:14 Why Standards and Insurance Belong Together00:41:45 What Does an AI Insurance Policy Actually Cover?00:50:44 The $20 Cursor Subscription and the $200M Plane Crash00:53:53 AI Liability, Monitoring, and Earning Enterprise Trust00:56:21 From AI Agents to Models to Robotics00:58:29 Copyright, Adverse Selection, and AI Insurance01:03:28 Evals, Mechanistic Interpretability, and Eval Awareness01:08:36 The Impossible Enterprise AI Mandate01:11:52 Prediction Markets vs. AI Audits01:14:43 Should AI Engineers Be Certified?01:19:10 AIUC's Roadmap, AGI, and Who Watches the Watchdogs?TranscriptIntroduction: AIUC, the $40M Series A, and Risk as the Adoption BottleneckSwyx [00:00:00]: Okay, we're in the studio with Rune from AIUC, the Artificial Intelligence Underwriting Company, with our trusty co-host, Vibhu. Welcome.Rune Kvist [00:00:10]: Thank you. Thanks for having me. Thank you.Swyx [00:00:11]: What are you announcing today?Rune Kvist [00:00:12]: We have raised $40 million, led by Ribbit Capital and First Harmonic.Swyx [00:00:17]: You first came to my attention when Nat and Daniel invested in you guys. Is the story, like, pretty much the same? Like, what are you today versus what you thought you were back then?Rune Kvist [00:00:26]: When we raised our seed round, we had a hypothesis that at some point risk was going to hold down adoption. At that point in time, that felt kind of hypothetical, and I think that is now over. Clearly, the moment is now with Mythos and Fable. It's pretty obvious that literally the binding constraint on adoption is risk. And so for us, it feels like this is a natural continuation of the same hypothesis, but where previously it was speculation, now it feels like fact.Swyx [00:00:54]: And let's get a list of the customers that you're highlighting as part of your Series A.Rune Kvist [00:00:58]: Totally. Yeah. So we are now working with folks like Cursor, Harvey, Lovable, ElevenLabs.Swyx [00:01:05]: Yeah. Amazing. Congrats.Rune Kvist [00:01:06]: Thank you.Swyx [00:01:07]: So you were famously one of the first hires involved in GTM and product. I'm just kind of curious: what was your path into AI? Just recap.Rune's Path Into AI: Scaling Laws, Capital, and AnthropicRune Kvist [00:01:18]: Yeah.Rune Kvist [00:01:19]: Late 2021, I sold a company, my first company, an edtech company. I had a bit of time to think about what was next. I came across the Scaling Laws paper, and that just struck me like lightning. I was just like, “This is a big idea.” In short, the Scaling Laws paper just says the bigger the model, the smarter the model.Swyx [00:01:38]: So this is the Kaplan one, not the Chinchilla one?Rune Kvist [00:01:40]: Exactly, the Kaplan one.Swyx [00:01:42]: Yeah.Rune Kvist [00:01:42]: And the important thing that clicked for me there was, oh, now capital will understand this. If you put in more money, you get more money out, and so that will kick off a hype cycle. And so you get a sense of predictable returns, which is, in fact, what's played out. And so I just packed my bags. I'd never been to San Francisco. I'd never been there. I just packed my bags, flew out here to find the people who had written it. And at the time, they had just started a small lab called Anthropic. There were around 40 people at the time or so. Drank a bunch of coffee until I eventually got introduced to Dario. And at the time, they were wrestling with some of these questions of, like, should we deploy our models? Should we make revenue? How should we engage with the rest of the world? They'd just broken off from OpenAI, and it's been publicly reported that they were kind of concerned with how they were dealing with deployment. So they were wrestling with some of those questions. At this point, this is early fog of war, like early 2022. The hottest product at the time was, like, Jasper. Like, there's nothing out there. So where value was going to accrue, and what the different parts of the stack were going to be, were all open questions.Swyx [00:02:48]: I want to highlight to people, you ask these questions because you have a PPE background.Rune Kvist [00:02:52]: Yes.Swyx [00:02:52]: I actually was in Singapore in one of the sort of feeder programs for prepping people for PPE. So I had a tutor. We learned, you know, philosophy and politics and economics. But, like, I think your kind of background matters. Machine learning people who read the neural, Scaling Laws paper would not necessarily draw the same conclusions that you did. Whereas any capitalist would read that and go, “Holy s**t.”Rune Kvist [00:03:19]: Correct.Swyx [00:03:20]: Right?Rune Kvist [00:03:21]: Yes.Swyx [00:03:21]: Who tipped you onto that paper? Because it's not a paper that you normally read, right, like, in your circles?Rune Kvist [00:03:26]: Yeah. I think I'd actually, ever since AlphaGo, had some appreciation that AI was a big deal.Swyx [00:03:36]: Yeah.Rune Kvist [00:03:36]: But it kind of felt like it raised all these kind of interesting philosophical questions, but it was kind of not clear from afar where exactly that would go. But it was obvious enough that it was like, this is going to be a big thing if we find the kind of right mechanism to kind of get the techno-capital machine to work on this. But it was just not clear. And so I think there was some way in which, like, that became obvious, and also it wasn't as obvious at the time than it is now, right? Like, it was just like, wow, this is so interesting. But it still felt, coming from kind of a philosophy and economics background, it felt like if this turns out to be true, you're going to be wrestling with all of the big questions in society. Everything you've learned about politics gets thrown out of the window. Everything you've learned about economics at least gets challenged. And so what felt interesting was to be at that frontier that has ramifications across everything. So that's why I sought it out.Swyx [00:04:32]: I mean, clearly really good insight. For people who don't know, the PPE program is, like, where prime ministers are born. So then you end up meeting Dario.Rune Kvist [00:04:41]: Yep. First Dario, yeah.Swyx [00:04:43]: Yeah. Well, I mean, like, so did you get extra insights from talking with them that you didn't get from your original hypothesis?Anthropic's Early Conviction and the Scaling Laws Crystal BallRune Kvist [00:04:50]: If you read the Scaling Laws paper, you get this, like, very vague sketch of like, wow, this seems kind of important. There are some lines on a chart. This seems kind of important. And what I think the team at Anthropic had thought more about than anyone was like, what are the implications of this if you really play this out? And back then they had, kind of vision documents for what the world would look like in 2026, and they were kind of in vivid detail playing out how much compute is going to be needed, what the CapEx was going to look like, what some of the societal concerns were going to be, but also what is the amount of economic value coming out here? And so it kind of felt like they held a crystal ball that in hindsight turned out to just be dramatically correct. And they weren't holding it like they were obviously correct. They were just like, “Take this hypothesis really seriously.”Swyx [00:05:38]: Think it through, yeah.Rune Kvist [00:05:38]: And think it through in the same way as the kind of situational awareness that isSwyx [00:05:43]: Across the street.Rune Kvist [00:05:44]: Across the street.Swyx [00:05:44]: Your office, yeah. Oh my God, we're all living across the street in the same one square mile.Rune Kvist [00:05:50]: Correct. And that's now a couple of years old, but also people keep referencing it these particular weeks with Fable and Mythos, and it's like, wow, if you take this one idea seriously- For the Scaling Laws, a lot of things fall into place.Vibhu [00:06:03]: And keep in mind, at this point, this is the same team that did GPT-1, GPT-2, and GPT-3.Rune Kvist [00:06:08]: Correct.Vibhu [00:06:08]: Which is also, like, it's not just some experimentation. Like, this is a real model that we just scaled up.Rune Kvist [00:06:14]: And they had deep conviction in this idea: if you take a big blob of compute and data, it just wants to learn, and out of that will come smarter and smarter models. And all the particulars were not clear.Vibhu [00:06:26]: Yeah.Rune Kvist [00:06:27]: And all the implications were not clear. But their deep conviction in this, like, core thesis, and that was kind of dizzying. It was both phenomenally interesting and exciting, and also very quickly you get to, like, the world we know today will no longer be if this hypothesis holds. So it also just felt, like, important in some kind of grand sense.Vibhu [00:06:48]: What kind of shaped you there? So that was early 2022. Not only had GPT-1, GPT-2, and GPT-3 come out, but, you know, the amazing founders of Anthropic that have never split up, the only ones, they actually had the conviction to leave OpenAI, start their lab. You said there were about 40 people there. What was the time like there?Inside Early Anthropic: Mission, Deployment, and RiskRune Kvist [00:07:06]: It was kind of remarkably like what it looks like on the outside today. Extremely cohesive, extremely mission-oriented, and living in this tension between their two ideas, which is AI could both go really well and really bad, and we want to be part of building it. That creates astounding amounts of tension. And they were wrestling with this incentive challenge where they know they're in a race that they're in where you might get forced to cut corners, but it also felt very important to them to be at the forefront of technology. And all of those ideas were just present at that time. It kind of feels like that line has been just very clear, and I think kind of love them or hate them, they have really stuck to their guns. There's a core set of beliefs that they hold more deeply than most companies hold any beliefs.Vibhu [00:07:58]: Yeah. Fast-forward to today.Rune Kvist [00:08:00]: Yeah.Vibhu [00:08:00]: What does that lead us to AI underwriting company? What are you up to? What motivated you to start this?From Waymo to AIUC: Confidence Infrastructure for AIRune Kvist [00:08:05]: Yeah. AIUC builds confidence infrastructure for frontier AI through standards and insurance. The link from Anthropic to building confidence infrastructure, looking out the windows at Anthropic offices and seeing Waymos driving by. Already back then, early 2022, Waymos were in some ways like AGI for cars. Like, they were superhuman drivers, but you couldn't take one to the airport. And now, four and a bit years later, you still can't take your Waymo to the airport, despite now everyone having kind of looked at the evidence and being like, “They're better drivers than humans.” So in that particular instance, what's clear is that the binding constraint on AI being useful is not capability, but is that liability or risk or trust. That problem is, general. The reason why right nowRune Kvist [00:08:52]: Fable is not open for access is not because it's not a good model, it's because it's a very good model. It's just hard to make promises about what it will or will not do. And this problem gets worse as AI gets better. Basically, more intelligent AI can be more autonomous. That's more valuable, but also the risk surface grows. And so - what Waymo illustrates is that unless you build the confidence infrastructure to make promises about AI, or at least bring light to the risks, you grind adoption to a halt. Governments, banks, hospitals, militaries need to have some sense of what AI will and will not do to be able to operate for them to incorporate it. And that's the problem that we're trying to solve. Now, why standards and insurance? If you trace this problem back through history, every technology wave has had some version of this problem. So if you go back to, like, year 1900, electricity comesVibhu [00:09:47]: Ben Franklin.Rune Kvist [00:09:48]: Cars burn down, sorry, houses burn down, lots of people die. 1930s, cars are a big deal, kill lots of people. 1950s, private nuclear energy is a big deal, poses big risks. In each of those instances, the market runs ahead of regulation to create confidence infrastructure because that's required to make go/go decisions. That is required for adoption, and the market fundamentally wants adoption. And in all of those instances, common blueprint emerges between standards and insurance. The reason these two components is standards kind of provide the rules of the road, and they also specify, like, what are the tests that need to be run so we can get a sense of how high the risk is. So take in the case of cars, that's like a car crash. Great, everyone, they inform your insurance pricing today, they inform your purchasing decisions, et cetera. That's basically the risk framework. The insurers are important because they pick up the bill. So they are the private institution that is most on the side of. That is best incentivized to quantify the risks truthfully and then figure out all the ways to reduce the risk ‘cause that increases their profit. So they're basically, they help shape the incentives. And these two work really well in unison. Now, how does that show up as a company? Well, one of the things that was obvious even - or starting to become obvious even a couple years ago was that frontier companies, some of our customers today, like Cursor, Sierra, ElevenLabs, Harvey, were going to have a very easy time selling a pilot to a bank. The, like, the demo just sells itself. It's magic. But bringing that through, if you want to do a wall-to-wall rollout at a bank or a hospital, you have to go through the risk process. These banks have no idea even which questions to ask, let alone which answers are sufficient, let alone, like, how do they go and test whether these agents actually work the way they're supposed to. And so they had this problem of, like, what can we say to earn the trust? And we think there's, like, a golden sentence that goes something like, “Hey, I hear you're really worried about hallucinations or jailbreaks or whatever it may be. We've had an independent third party test us against the gold standard. We passed with flying colors. And as a vote of confidence, the world's most conservative insurers have looked at the data.” And they're willing to take some of the risk onto their balance sheet.Swyx [00:12:06]: Yeah.Rune Kvist [00:12:07]: So if something does go wrongSwyx [00:12:07]: There's money behind it, yeah.Rune Kvist [00:12:09]: Exactly. So that's kind of like the link between all this. We can get into some of the hard parts related to the technical testing, which is, I think, the crux of the matter, but I'll pause there.Swyx [00:12:19]: How did you and Rajiv come together? This-- there's always, like, you come across very confident and, you know, and we're announcing your Series A and all these things, but I want to see, like, the early initial stages of, like, idea formation.Cofounding AIUC with Rajiv DattaniRune Kvist [00:12:31]: Yeah. Rajiv is actually my soon-to-be brother-in-law.Swyx [00:12:35]: Oh.Rune Kvist [00:12:36]: So I'm actually, in a week and a half getting married to Rajiv's sister.Swyx [00:12:42]: Okay, now you're tight.Rune Kvist [00:12:44]: Exactly.Swyx [00:12:44]: Now you know.Rune Kvist [00:12:45]: So - Rajiv and I have known each other for a decade. Funny story, I met both Rajiv and his sister, Hena, at the same time when Hena and I were interns at McKinsey in London, and Rajiv was assigned as my mentor. And so met them at the same time. For the longest time, it was not obvious that we were necessarily going to work together. I was in startups. He was, an insurance partner at McKinsey. Three or four years ago, I think Hena convinced him that AI was going to be a really big thing. And so he quit his job, cushy partner job at McKinsey in London, packed his bags, flew to San Francisco, and ended up joining METR. You guys are probably online enoughSwyx [00:13:24]: CEO.Rune Kvist [00:13:24]: Exactly.Swyx [00:13:24]: We've, we've, we've heard of METR.Rune Kvist [00:13:25]: You see the plot-- the chart of the horizons of the tasks that agents can take on is doubling extremely fast. So he was COO at METR, led their partnerships with Anthropic and OpenAI to test their models before release, but also working closely with the US and UK government, to figure out, like, how do you know whether a model can be released? And in some ways, that was, like, the perfect background. He's spent a lot of time in insurance, knows that world, spent a lot of time with frontier testing of models. And so when I was bumbling around this idea space, starting with some of the ideas we talked about related to Waymo, as soon as we got into the content, we were both like, “Oh, this would be an amazing business to build together.” This is wrestling with the problem that we both think is the most important in the world from a market angle, which is kind of our intuitions is that the market can do a lot, and the faster AI moves, the harder it is for government to solve some of these problems. And then it took a little bit of time to work through what is it like to work with family.Swyx [00:14:27]: Sure.Rune Kvist [00:14:27]: And,Swyx [00:14:30]: Because you were already dating at the timeRune Kvist [00:14:31]: Yeah. Yeah, exactly.Swyx [00:14:33]: Yeah.Rune Kvist [00:14:34]: Already back then, itSwyx [00:14:35]: Yeah.Rune Kvist [00:14:35]: We felt like we were a family.Swyx [00:14:36]: Nice.Rune Kvist [00:14:36]: And so starting a business together felt like kind of a big step. And, here we are with just immense amounts of trust.Vibhu [00:14:43]: Yeah. So now you're a company of how big? How big are you guys now?AIUC-1 Certification: Agent Security, Safety, and ReliabilityRune Kvist [00:14:46]: There are just 20 of us now.Vibhu [00:14:47]: 20 of you guys now, have Series A, and you have your first certification out, the AIUC-1. Let's bring up the certification. So this is the agent certification, right? What goes into the process? I have, like, two questions here. One is, walk us through the certification, and two is, what is the process for a company to get certified, you know?Rune Kvist [00:15:08]: Great. As it says right on the top, AIUC-1 is a standard for agent security, safety, and reliability. The fundamental design principle is take all of the concerns that slow down adoption, so all the questions, all the fears that keep, security leaders in the Fortune 1000 up at night, and put them into one comprehensive framework. That's what you'll see there. You can see the six categories. Two, you want to ground all of this in technical testing. So one of the concerns with security standards that often feel kind of like theater paperwork is that they're not actually ground out in, does any of this work? Does any of this matter? And so we had a conviction from early on that was going to be the kind of crux, was to pass this, you must get tested every quarter, basically run thousands of simulations to see, well, so can it actually be jailbroken? How hard is it to jailbreak? How often does it hallucinate? How often does it leak data? Et cetera. And then the last, core idea here, if you scroll up to the top here, is to refresh it quarterly.Rune Kvist [00:16:08]: So the core trait of AI is that it moves extremely fast. Whatever concerns we're discussing today were not the same ones three months ago, and this will keep changing. Typically, standards update on a, like, a decade cycle is obviously not going to work. But the question is kind of how do you update it? And the core thing here was to basically get the risk leaders of the Fortune 1000 around the table. So if you go over to the left hereVibhu [00:16:32]: YeahRune Kvist [00:16:32]: You'll see the AIUC-1 consortium. The consortium is a group of risk leaders who run real banks, real hospitals, real critical infrastructure, who are facing these challenges every day. And we meet with these folks twice a quarter and hear what's top of mind, what is keeping them up at night. There's tremendous amount of desire for that conversation. And then we operationalize that into a specific standard that gets into. And actually, we can go into and look at whatVibhu [00:16:55]: YeahRune Kvist [00:16:55]: What even is the standard. So if we go back to introduction, out there to the left, scroll up a little bit to the wheel, click into reliability. So if you take something like hallucinations sits in reliability. There is a number of requirements here. If you go into the top one, prevent hallucinated outputs, hallucinate outputs, this is one particular requirement. This is a technical control. Basically, we want some kind of ground in this filter. The first thing you see here is what's called a crosswalk. So everyone and their grandmother has put out a framework, very high-level framework for what are the AI risks.Swyx [00:17:27]: This is basically your competition,Rune Kvist [00:17:28]: In some ways our competitionSwyx [00:17:29]: Not seriously, yeah.Rune Kvist [00:17:30]: We're, in fact, friends with them. We'll come back to why.Swyx [00:17:31]: Yeah.Rune Kvist [00:17:32]: But mapping everything together so you have one superset. The claim you're trying to support here is, if you follow this framework, then you can also see how you follow the other frameworks. But the meat of it comes down here in control activities and evidence. So control activities is like, great, you have this high-level requirement. How do you turn that down to something operational? Here's what you must do, and then what is the evidence that we're looking for?Rune Kvist [00:17:57]: And the reason we go this deep is that there's actually not that much confusion about what are the big concerns in AI. Everyone agrees to these. The question, like, what are you actually supposed to do? And so. What we found a lot of demand for is getting down to the specific evidence, that people need to look for. Whether you are Cursor building something or, even JPMorgan building something, but also if you're just a risk leader at JPMorgan, like what exactly should you ask for? What can you ask for without sounding stupid? Like if you ask for some-- you won't believe the amount of time a risk leader has asked for the IP rights to the underlying model to Cursor or something, and you're just like “Sorry, what?” Like,Swyx [00:18:39]: You slip it in there and you seeRune Kvist [00:18:40]: SlipSwyx [00:18:40]: See if you notice.Rune Kvist [00:18:41]: See if they. Exactly.Swyx [00:18:42]: Yeah.Rune Kvist [00:18:42]: Put that in the questionnaire. All right, so that's kind of what our standard is, and we update this every quarter with these folks, to keep up with the latest concerns.Swyx [00:18:51]: Can I double-click on this one?Controls, Evidence, and Third-Party TestingRune Kvist [00:18:52]: Yeah.Swyx [00:18:52]: So first of all, the website's beautiful. Like, it's so confidence-inducing which is the whole point where, like, okay, I know exactly what I'm signing up for when I talk with you. Like, I don't even have to talk to you. I can just see your whole, certification, which is great. But, like, okay, so from here, like D001.1 configure a groundedness filter, how does that get applied? Like, you have a person thatRune Kvist [00:19:16]: Yeah,Swyx [00:19:16]: Goes through it?Rune Kvist [00:19:17]: If you, go backVibhu [00:19:19]: I did see somewhere there's like, you know, fifty-one requirements, a hundred thirty controls. There's like a wholeSwyx [00:19:25]: Right. I just want to. Like, to me, this doesn't translateVibhu [00:19:27]: Yeah.Swyx [00:19:27]: Into a test or an eval.Rune Kvist [00:19:28]: Yes. So if you go into, on the left-hand side. So actually, if - before we go in there are three types of requirements. The first is technical controls, like you must implement some guardrails.Rune Kvist [00:19:42]: Two, there are test controls. So you must have an independent third party go and run some tests against you. I'll show you one of those in a second. And then three, there are policy controls. For example, you must have a person whose name is on the line when you guys f**k up, and you must have a plan for how you tell your customers and how you engage with them. They're kind of more traditional, standard type stuff. So in this particular instance, we just check whether they in fact have a ground in filter. So we will partner with an auditor. So we partner with auditors like KPMG or like Schellman who go in and do the thing auditors do, which is to check the evidence. In this case, that might be a screenshot, it might be part of the code that they need to review to see that it actually. Just that it exists.Swyx [00:20:21]: Oh, okay.Rune Kvist [00:20:22]: And then the second thingSwyx [00:20:22]: So you're not testing the effectiveness of it.Rune Kvist [00:20:24]: That's the second thing. So if you go downSwyx [00:20:25]: Yeah.Rune Kvist [00:20:25]: To the third-party testing for hallucinations out on the left, that's basically the next requirement. This is where we test how well does it actually work.Swyx [00:20:32]: Okay, and is it you testing or the auditor?Rune Kvist [00:20:34]: We test them.Rune Kvist [00:20:35]: We test them.Swyx [00:20:36]: That's a lot of work.Vibhu [00:20:37]: How long does testing take? So if I want to get certified, justCertification Timelines, Remediation, and Quarterly UpdatesRune Kvist [00:20:40]: Yeah.Vibhu [00:20:40]: How long does the end roughly take?Rune Kvist [00:20:42]: Yeah, the end, almost always is dependent on, like, our customers needVibhu [00:20:47]: Yeah.Rune Kvist [00:20:47]: To look something for us. It takes somewhere between, like, 3 to 10 weeksSwyx [00:20:52]: Yeah.Rune Kvist [00:20:52]: Depending on how up to snuff they already are. So some people show up to us with, like, extremely rigorous security programs. When we test them, it works extremely well. We can get that done very quick. Some people come to us, and they're not that far along. We give them kind of the spec that they need to build towards, and then their security teams and engineers get to work and build to meet the standard. The testing itself typically takes a couple of weeks, including the time for them to remediate. Often, we'll find something that we cannot pass, where this is actually just not up to the standard. - you won't pass the standard. And then they will need to go and implement additional safeguards or additional remediation that makes them more robust so that they can actually kind of hand on heart look at their customers in the eyes and say, like, “Hey, we've done truly our very best.”Vibhu [00:21:35]: And they're certified for a year and have quarterly updates?Rune Kvist [00:21:38]: Correct, yeah.Vibhu [00:21:39]: And, yeah, it's pretty interesting. I think, you know, what's changed since. So this is certifying agents in production, right? Your customers, like you've had Lovable, ElevenLabs, Intercom, and they've all gone through this certification.Rune Kvist [00:21:50]: Yes.Vibhu [00:21:51]: What has changed? So I see you post, like, you know, Q2 added MCP agent,How Agent Risks Are Changing: Coding, MCP, and Agent-to-Agent InteractionsRune Kvist [00:21:56]: Yeah.Vibhu [00:21:56]: agent communication. Any other things that you want to kind of highlight since the first iteration? What comes in quarterly?Rune Kvist [00:22:03]: Yeah. So some of the changes have just been agents are not just one thing. So, like, if you take agents like Cursor and compare them to Sierra, they're really quite different. And compare them to Harvey again, compare them to you out of againSwyx [00:22:16]: ElevenLabs, yeah.Rune Kvist [00:22:17]: ElevenLabs, they're all quite different. And so we wanted to design a standard that works for all of the types of agents. And we started with one that was, like, pretty text-based, like, honestly, pretty customer support-focused. That's where there's a lot of existing demand. And then over time, we've picked, some of the frontier companies in each of these other domains that we could work with and build out the standard, so, such that we know that the same standard works for code, it works for customer support, works for automation, et cetera. So that's been one big thing. Yeah, then some of the things that have been top of mind recently, Mythos is bringing up a lot of concerns for security leaders. We're starting to get more and more questions around agent interactions. It's very nascent, at the moment, but it's starting to emerge. There've been a lot of, questions related to OpenClaw and MCP. Again, like agents starting to interact with each other, is really top of mind. Then as coding agents have really taken off, that's also where banks and hospitals, et cetera, are getting more and more precise on what it is they need. So really dialing in as that start to be, like, where most of the tokens flow through in the world, getting much sharper on that.Vibhu [00:23:26]: Can you share for people that are listening that don't really think about this? Like you mentioned, there's the obvious stuff, you know, hallucination, citations. What are best practices that people should do when building agents? Like, if they come to you pretty ready with certification like, you know, they'll probably pass certification. What are the things people don't think about that they should have?Best Practices for Agent Builders: Stress Tests and GuardrailsRune Kvist [00:23:46]: The most important thing is that a lot of companies have not done a serious stress test. They spend most of the time, perhaps rightly so, optimizing for how does it work in the good case, the average case, how high-quality is the output for the customer. And a lot of these companies are pretty new, so they haven't spent a lot of time stress testing the what is there as an adversary on the other side? What are some of the complicated corner cases that you've not really considered? So I think that's, like, a frame of mind. And you'll also see this in startups. It often takes a while until they hire their first security person. They- And that's a whole different kind of risk surface than just building a good product. So a lot of that applies. Most companies actually also have the right kind of architecture. Most of them will have some kind of guardrails in place, either some that come out of the box from their model provider or they'll have built their own filters that sit in between. They just don't work very well. The difference between putting a classifier in place that, like, maybe goes and checks whether you're giving medical advice when you shouldn't and says, “Hey, if this looks like medical advice, filter it out.” Lots of companies have that in place. The question is whether it works. And it's actually pretty fiddly to sit down and think about all the ways in which you could ask for medical advice, read the academic literature on what are the kinds ofRune Kvist [00:25:03]: Framings or tricks you might play to get an AI to give you medical advice when you really shouldn't. And so there's, like, an area of expertise that's just missing. So what we find is that most people have the right building blocks in place. They don'- It doesn'- It's not rocket science, but the finicky thing is, like, getting into the corners and testing whether it works such that you can look your customers in the eye, or maybe a bank or maybe a hospital and be like, “This is going to work for you.”Vibhu [00:25:26]: I see. So we talked a lot about the agent-level certification. Where do you guys go from here? So announcing series A camera, we talked about this a bit. There's the whole security risk of Fable, government stepping in. You guys are kind of announcing that you're also going into model certification?Toward Model Certification: The Government–Lab Trust GapRune Kvist [00:25:46]: When we do a bit of cutting afterwards,Vibhu [00:25:48]: YeahRune Kvist [00:25:48]: We will not yet be announcing this,Vibhu [00:25:49]: NiceRune Kvist [00:25:50]: The question that is top of everyone's minds now is at the model level. And Mythos, then Fable, has really brought this to the fore that in addition to the commercial risk and the kind of economic security risks that are happening at the agent layer, the models are going to present risk in the national security category. The shape of the problem is very similar. You have some people that are on the hook if something goes wrong. In the case of agents, it's often security leaders in the enterprise. In this case, it's the government. They don'- haven't necessarily spent their entire lives thinking about what are the new risks that come here, what is the kind of data you might be looking for, how might you test that? But they do have to make sure that their concerns are addressed. You have some frontier AI companies that are deeply technical. They know a lot about the risks, but they fundamentally have an incentive to not always be truthful. So you have a trust gap between the government and the labs. And in every other industry, you end up with some kind of body sitting between, a neutral third party sitting between those people. There's no other industry where you allow people to audit themselves. So there is going to be a need for a third party that can take the rigor of the labs to run frontier technical evals, but can also speak legible trust in the way that the government trusts PwC to go and run financial audits. And they know that they output audit reports in a way that's consistent, that's easy to read, that's factual, that's, trustworthy. Those two things need to be brought together. And what we've learned from our work with agents is that if you want those-- that communication between those two parties to be smooth, there has to be one common standard that is public, that people can go and inspect. What are the risks that matter? Within each of these risks, what are the kinds of threat models that you're really looking for? You need to specify for each of those risks, what are the guardrails that need to be in place, and what are the tests they need to run to see whether those guardrails are effective? And then you need to go and run audits that are - technical audits that are consistent. So if you're trying to bring trust, it's extremely important that you methodically work your way through the risks. You can't send one researcher in and say, like, “Come back with whatever you find.” You need to be able to explain exactly what you did, exactly what you tried, exactly what you did not try, and therefore the kinds of promises you can and cannot make at the end of it. I think ofNeutral Third Parties, CAISI, and Model Risk AuditsRune Kvist [00:28:13]: Fable as a direct symptom of this problem that the government was told that there's a risk. The government may struggle to assess just how big that risk is. They call Anthropic, and Anthropic is trying to tell them, “Hey, actually, every model can be jailbroken.”Swyx [00:28:28]: That's not what you want to hear, right?Rune Kvist [00:28:32]: As the government, that might be hard to trust.Rune Kvist [00:28:36]: And we think that a broker is the most natural solution. In other markets, you see something like, in financial markets, you see Moody's. Moody's goes in, and they look at a bond, and they output a rating. They say like, “Here's the evidence we found. Here's the rating.” We don't decide whether anyone should buy this bond or not buy this bond. Well, that depends on their risk appetite. But we do provide this common information layer that everyone can rely on. In the case of Moody's, the government, points to them and say, “Hey, pension funds, you should probably really take care. You shouldn't risk your pensioners' money, so you can only invest in triple-A rated bonds.” That means that now the government doesn't have to staff thousands of financial technical experts to rerun forecasts every week to see whether things are correctly rated. They get to point to some neutral third party. So my hypothesis is, my hunch is that you will see a third party that sits between the government and the labs, and it could either be the government builds it themselves. So something like CAISI was set up to do exactly this. And the questionSwyx [00:29:44]: Sorry, I'm not familiar with CAISI.Rune Kvist [00:29:45]: CAISI is the Center for AI Standards and Innovation.Swyx [00:29:49]: Okay.Rune Kvist [00:29:50]: I won't get into the details, but it's a body of NIST that typically sets standards. So it's basically a government body that has AI experts. Yeah, exactly. Exactly.Swyx [00:29:59]: Very key. Very key.Rune Kvist [00:30:00]: Very key.Vibhu [00:30:00]: I think, you know, it's one of those things where when you just sit back and listen-- look at it, like, is there enough technical expertise in the government to measure, test these things right now? Probably not, right? And Fable is a result of, okay, we've had to scale back and pause things,Rune Kvist [00:30:17]: Yeah. And they have excellent people, but they have an extraordinarily small budget compared to the scale of the challenge that's ahead of us. And I think they have a role to play. The question is kind of like, who does what? We have now outlined the jobs to be done, and they're quite extensive. Every model release, there is an astounding-- Given that they take in any input, their risk surface is astounding. And so the question is really: what can only the government do, and what can the market provide here that can keep up with the pace as AI risk changes? Our perspective is that also at the model layer, the risks that people care about today are not the same ones they cared about three months ago. So the pace of legislation is too slow to deal with pinpointing the risks here. And so we think there's a lot that the market can do to surface timely information. Ultimately, there is a bunch of policy decisions here. Is the national security risks of a model too high?Swyx [00:31:12]: Yeah.Rune Kvist [00:31:12]: That's a political answer. But what we want to make sure is that the process that produces this risk information is compatible with very fast innovation. So you don't want to. This is not a question of like, can you slow the things down? Can you keep, the models locked up until-- for months on end until everyone can make a guarantee? But it is this, can you, in the time it. Given that the US is competing with China on releasing models, can you insert risk information that allows the government to, like, make rapid decisions on some of these questions? Balancing that trade-off between failing to adopt AI is going to put us at risk, but also reckless adoption is going to put us at risk. And that's a very kind of fine balance that they're going to need, like, a lot of high-quality intelligence to make.Chinese Models, Data Flows, and National Security ConcernsSwyx [00:31:55]: Just a side mention, because you mentioned Chinese models, any specific concerns that you're hearing from your CISOs about that? ‘cause I guess it's free, but.Rune Kvist [00:32:05]: CISOs have a bunch of concerns around data flows in general that they're really concerned about. So there's a lot of questions like, if these models are Chinese, where does that, where does that data go? I think a lot of this can be addressed, but they come up often.Swyx [00:32:18]: I mean, they understand they're running on American GPUs.Rune Kvist [00:32:21]: Some of them, some of them understand that they're running on American GPUs.Swyx [00:32:23]: They're not, like, phoning home every time you, like, call home.Rune Kvist [00:32:26]: No. A year ago, there was not a lot of understanding of this. I actually think, you're seeing the security leaders becoming kind of AI literate at a blistering pace, and you're actually also seeing my Twitter timeline that's very pilled and my LinkedIn feed that used to not at all be pilled kind of converge. They're both talking about Fable.Swyx [00:32:45]: Right. Yeah, that's true.Rune Kvist [00:32:46]: They are both talking about whether you can prevent models from being jailbroken these days.Swyx [00:32:51]: Yeah.Rune Kvist [00:32:52]: Like national security national security risks are now the conversation that is actually emerging. Other than that, I think you mostly see a kind of general picture: there are no concerns with any particular model or any particular model output, but there is a general nervousness of having critical infrastructure run on models that are not produced in America by Americans where the American government has control.Swyx [00:33:14]: But it doesn't necessarily show up in your framework that directly, or it might, I don't know.Rune Kvist [00:33:18]: There's a bit of stuff in there actually on the, like, the provenance of the models and disclosing that. But I think there's a bunch of use cases where running a Chinese open-source model is just the best solution.Swyx [00:33:27]: Yeah.Rune Kvist [00:33:27]: And a concern is slightly more macro here, which is not best addressed at any particular certification level.Vibhu [00:33:32]: Is there anything interesting that you see at the. You know, if you're trying to fill that middle gap, that mediation gap, any interesting stuff that you guys forecast would be required other than, you know, what the average person might expect?Cyber, Child Safety, Bio Risk, and Expert CoordinationRune Kvist [00:33:47]: There's a bunch of interesting questions about what are the risks that matter here. So right now, the risk of the day is cyber, because it's very real, very tangible. And some of the risks that are also emerging as pretty real and pretty tangible are things like child safety is becoming both extremely important, but also politically important. And then there are some of the risks that are coming down the pipeline that today feel kind of speculative, but people who spend a lot of time with the models see them coming down is things like, risks that relate to biology.Rune Kvist [00:34:18]: And specifically whether models will help adversaries produce biological weapons and making that extremely cheap, extremely accessible, producing-- making the chance of another COVID or worse pandemic. COVID was not engineered to be bad, as if you were trying to do that. So I think those are some of the risks that are coming down the pipeline. I think one other thing to just note is that agents are kind of deliberately narrow. So, like, when a frontier agent company puts a chatbot that interacts with customers, they've really tried to narrow the topics it's interested in talking about. Such that if you ask it, like, “What do you think of the president?” it will just decline, which means that the kind of risk area is somewhat smaller. For models, it is infinite. And so there's not a single expert out there who can competently evaluate the risks of cyberattacks and fifteen-year-olds having month-long conversations with a chatbot and seeing whether it will in fact recommend suicide or something horrendous like that, and can evaluate the risks that terrorists can use AI to produce bioweapons. The risk surface is just too big. And so the central challenge actually becomes how do you get those subject matter experts to work within a one coherent framework that outputs one coherent report and rating that the world can go and inspect? ‘Cause that global perspective is central, but there's not a single organization today that could produce that.Swyx [00:35:47]: And you would be the presumptive one when you put out your model standards.Rune Kvist [00:35:51]: We think there can be one company that can, with a consortium of experts, build one coherent standard. I think we've shown that across all of the enterprise risks today. We think it could be one company that could, with a consortium, specify the audit rules, basically like the inputs and outputs that all these technical experts need. What access do they need? How should they treat infosec- info security? They can look at whether the eval- evals are well-produced without necessarily being able to say, “Hey, is this a threat or not a threat?” But overall, evaluating whether the evals are good, well-constructed, that set of audit rules that basically becomes the interface for all these experts, we think one clearinghouse could put together. To be clear. When I say one company, I think of it as one company coordinating lots of this in the same way that when we saw our consortium, it's not like we say we have all the answers on agent security. What we say is we are taking on the role of eliciting all of the concerns and being the secretary that puts it together and runs a tight house such that the standard updates lockstep every quarter, and that the audit reports that come out, in this case, 100-page audit reports, uniform and crisp and clear all to the level of detail that is required for executives that need to make a clear go/go decision. So that's kind of the role that we think we might play.OWASP, Frameworks, and the Operational Audit LayerSwyx [00:37:11]: I think in many ways you're performing the role that OWASP used to do there, and you said, like, you know, competition and partners.Rune Kvist [00:37:18]: Yeah.Swyx [00:37:19]: Can you go more into, like, how they partner?Rune Kvist [00:37:20]: Yeah. So first of all, OWASP is basically an open source community of security practitioners that are coming together to build frameworks for addressing the latest security concerns. We think they are phenomenal at creating frameworks. We'- In fact, we'- First of all, we're partners with them, so we have a joint article. Two, we've learned a lot from them. We think they're a tremendous source of intelligence. What OWASP does not do is building the machine that runs third-party audits such that a company like Cursor or a company like JPMorgan could get a third party to go and review them against this and say, “Hey, you've passed the standard, and here is the report that you can use to build trust and preempt your partners' or customers' questions.” So they fundamentally try to do something different. You - They are part of the information gathering and intelligence gathering and creating clarity, but the operational layer of turning this into promises is not the business they try to be in.Swyx [00:38:14]: The standard is emerging and is doing very well. Was it necessary to then also do underwriting? Obviously it's in the name, so please remember you thought about it first. I feel like if you just have enough consensus, you don't actually need the money angle, but it does help.Vibhu [00:38:30]: I did want to also note, you guys are a profit company too, right? It's not profit where there's a whole business side to it as well?Why For-Profit Standards and Insurers MatterRune Kvist [00:38:39]: Yeah. Yeah, so I'm just getting crazySwyx [00:38:41]: I think about the money part.Rune Kvist [00:38:42]: Yeah. Yeah, let's get into the money part. Let's start from actually your question, profit versus profit. In the security space today, cybersecurity, most of the standards are produced by nonprofits. I think that's an issue.Rune Kvist [00:39:00]: The question you have to ask yourself is, how do you create good incentives for these standards to be good and keep up?Rune Kvist [00:39:09]: Nonprofits tend to not have these adverse profit incentives where they, hollow out their standard and create a race to the bottom, but they're also not at all responsive by default to the communities that they serve. There's no process-- They don't have customers that they serve where they go and ask, “What do you want? What do you want? What do you want?” And when you look at the overall satisfaction with the security standards today, people tend to just not like them very much. You do see in other domains, that profit standards can serve the world quite well. So there are examples, like we talked about Moody's before. It's not without flaws, but, it is absolutely critical societal infrastructure that gets run at an astounding scale today. Your credit score, it's FICO. It's also a profit business. And when you go back even further in history, some of the crash testing standards came out of insurance companies.Rune Kvist [00:40:06]: The insurance companies together founded the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety because they were very interested in, like, how can we use standards to drive down mortality and save money? Go back, prior-- Our name actually pays homage to the Underwriters Laboratories, UL, which, was started right around when electricity came out. Houses started burning down. Insurers, again, were paying the bill, and they were maybe also good people, but their profit incentive was, let's prevent houses from burning down. Let's test all the electrical products, the light bulbs. All the light bulbs in here are probably tested, the toasters, et cetera. And they set up, an entity to create those standards. Today, UL has a profit entity and a profit entity. What they've recognized, they spun - They started profit. They spun out a profit because what they recognized was like, hey, actually to serve customers well, you need a profit entity. The lesson here is one of the ways that the market can align incentives so you're both responsive to customersRune Kvist [00:41:07]: And not hollowing out your standard over time is to align it with insurers because they fundamentally have good incentives. And so if you're a profit standard that works closely with insurers, you get the feedback loop in such that you're really tuned into your customers, but also have their interest at heart. So that's the model that we - the kind of inspirational model that we've learned a lot from, and that's also where the name comes from. In some ways, the term underwriting can both be associated with insurance, but it's also a broad term for, like, making decisions.Rune Kvist [00:41:40]: If you underwrite a decision, you're fundamentally kind of taking ownership for the consequences of it.AI Insurance Contracts, Lloyd's of London, and ElevenLabsSwyx [00:41:45]: Yeah, I mean, what does an insurance contract look like for AI?Rune Kvist [00:41:49]: Yeah. Most of the demand comes today for insurance contracts is, sitting between people who've built AI and people who are buying AI.Swyx [00:41:56]: Yes.Rune Kvist [00:41:57]: And what you want—the reason why people want insurers involved, both for the traditional reasons, hey, if something goes wrong, we want to be compensated, but it's in particular because insurers can bring trust to the equation. Because insurers will pay for the damages, if they're willing to write an insurance policy, that is them saying, “Hey, we think there is risk here, but that is manageable.” And that is kind of a. Their incentive aligns with the enterprises adopting it, so that's a really a good signal to the market. In the same way, actually, one of the things that Waymo tried to get their first permit to even operate in San Francisco was to get a lot of insurers to stack up a huge insurance policy. In the case if something went wrong, not because Google can't pay, but because it was very valuable to have a third party go and look at that dataRune Kvist [00:42:47]: That are trusted by governments, trusted by enterprises as conservative people and say, “Hey, we've looked at it. We're actually willing to take some of this on our balance sheet.” So that's, that's kind of the reason why people are interested in it. What it looks like is, in some ways like every other insurance contract. You specify what are the perils you want to cover, how much do you want to cover them, like up to what limits, and what does it cost to cover that. And in the case of, if we take a really concrete example, ElevenLabs, bought a first of its kind AI agent insurance policy. They work with some of the biggest, enterprises that work with governments. They're really interested in going above and beyond and making promises to their customers. So they wrote a policy that covers just some of the core concerns that their customers have been asking about. And, the crucial thing was really to get Lloyd's of London, the world's oldest insurer, one of our partners, to look at this data and be that third party alongside us to say, “Hey, we think there's something here that's worth underwriting.” and that's actually what it looks like. And so they will show that contract to their customers, and they can see how much they're covered for. They can see what exactly it covers, and that will also probably change next year. They will want to write an insurance policy that might cover more.Swyx [00:44:04]: When you say Lloyd's, is it reinsurance, or are they sharing somehow at the same level orRune Kvist [00:44:11]: Yeah. So typically, the way, new companies get into insurance is that they partner with insurers such that the insurers take the majority or all of the financial risks. Fundamentally, if insurance is useful, because it brings trust, you have to be able to pay the bill. Lloyd's of London is 400 years old. They've never not paid a claim. They're extremely trusted. What Lloyd's of London struggle to do on their own is to figure out which of the risks are real, what should we be looking for, what are the kinds of technical controls, and running the tests. So they use AIUC-1 as kind of the underwriting framework, and we produce a bunch of eval results that then directly feed in to inform the pricing. So this means that ElevenLabs customers know that payment will be there. They don't have to look to our series A and see, like, do we think they have enough cash on the balance sheet? They will look at Lloyd's.Swyx [00:45:05]: Yeah.Rune Kvist [00:45:05]: Yeah.Swyx [00:45:05]: And Lloyd's, like, famously very creative. I think I remember some headline like, they insured Jennifer Lopez's, butt or something.Rune Kvist [00:45:13]: Correct.Swyx [00:45:13]: Right?Rune Kvist [00:45:13]: And I think, was it, David Beckham's right foot?Swyx [00:45:16]: So, yeah. Right?Rune Kvist [00:45:17]: And stuff like this.Swyx [00:45:18]: So, like, clearly not a large data set.Rune Kvist [00:45:22]: Exactly. It's actually a remarkable institution that's both kind of has some of the truly school virtues of having been around for a long time. They, like, really. They really operate like a trusted entity, and they have appetite to figure out the future. And I think there's a lot of recognition that both there is, like, tremendous amount of risk in AI that is poorly understood today, so getting into this business carries real risks. But also this is where lots of the risk exposure will happen in the future. This is the one market where risk is truly growing. This is the one market that will also take out some of the existing markets. Take, like, auto insurance. When there are no human drivers, how's that market going to look? Well, it's clearly going to change. How are you going to assessSwyx [00:46:08]: You want to insure Waymo?Rune Kvist [00:46:10]: I. All I'll say is the principles for how you insure Waymo are very similar to how you insure other kinds of AI.Swyx [00:46:15]: Right.Rune Kvist [00:46:15]: So again, crash testing, that's what we do for customer share at Lovable. That will also need to happen for Waymo, which is not how you do it for human drivers. So there's this growing awareness that the world is changing very fast, and the only way to learn how to underwrite AI is to write some policies. You may incur some losses and think of that as R&D expense, really. But the question for them is, like, who are the trustedtechnical partners they can get into this business with that can help them navigate and make sure they don't make, kind of foolish mistakes? But also who is willing to hear the wisdom that they have? They've done this before. They've seen it was. They were there when cyber came out. So there are lots of ways in which AI feels completely new, but there's also lots of ways in which risks look the same. And so there's actually a tremendous amount of wisdom sitting in some folks that may have gray hair, but really have, like, a keen sense of, how to quantify risk.Swyx [00:47:08]: Yeah. And the number is. So it's basically like I want fifty million dollars worth of coverage against these perils, and Lloyd's will give you a quote on it, and then you have, like, a small markup or something, and then you turn it around and do that? Is that as simple as it is?Risk Capital, Premiums, and Working with InsurersRune Kvist [00:47:23]: You basically share some of that premium.Swyx [00:47:25]: Yeah.Rune Kvist [00:47:25]: X percent goes to the people who do the pricing of it.Swyx [00:47:28]: You're. It's kind of like a. It's kind of like a merchant bank for insurance type of thing.Rune Kvist [00:47:33]: Exactly. You basically split the fee, and you can think of the insurance supply chain as, like, there's bringing the capital, there is doing the pricing, and there is doing the distribution. And typically, you will pay out some X percent of premium here, Y percent of premium here, and the rest of it will go here.Swyx [00:47:46]: Does all the insurance world work like this, or is there some point at which, like. So if right now you have equity capitalRune Kvist [00:47:51]: Yeah.Swyx [00:47:52]: At some point, maybe you start raising, debt or whatever, and then you have enough of a bank account and enough history, let's say you've been in operation for ten yearsRune Kvist [00:48:00]: Correct.Swyx [00:48:00]: That you don't need Lloyd's anymore?Rune Kvist [00:48:02]: That's totally an option. And I could see some worlds where that makes sense, specifically if there are risks that we feel high confidence that we'd want to insure where the incumbent insurers are too slow to find appetiteSwyx [00:48:13]: Okay.Rune Kvist [00:48:13]: Or simply struggle to evaluate it such that they don't want to do it. But by and large, in general, you do not want to compete with insurers on, bringing risk capital to the game for two reasons. One is that's fundamentally a cost of capital game. They have extremely low cost of capital. Startups have high cost of capital, by and large. And two, you want to hedge your bets, and it's very helpful then to also have a portfolio of home insurance, of car insurance. And we're not about to become a car insurer nor a home insurer.Rune Kvist [00:48:43]: So they have some natural advantages, which makes it much more likely that we'll partner.Swyx [00:48:48]: Yeah.Rune Kvist [00:48:48]: And they bring that, the capital at scale, and we bring the technical expertise.Swyx [00:48:51]: You're, you're going to work with them for a long time.Vibhu [00:48:52]: How are the discussions with the insurers as well? So basically, they're going off of your certification, right? They're trusting the diligence on you that your certification is valid, you tested the right things, and they're backing the money that, you know, you have the right testing in place. So any interesting takeaways from working with insurers?Rune Kvist [00:49:12]: I think the maybe the first thing is they feed into the standard as well. So if there are things that they feel like they need that they're not seeing, we are also taking that as input into the standard, because fundamentally we think a good standard is one that creates a really healthy promise ecosystem, and we think insurers are a critical part of that. And again, they are the most well-incentivized to. They see all the lost data across every. Any particular CISO knows their particular concerns. Insurers see the concerns across the entire portfolio and often have direct access to, like, what exactly happened, who was at fault, et cetera, as they do part of their forensics. So they're actually, like, a great source of intelligence on this. One of the big takeaways from cyber insurance, which is a market that didn't work that well, was that the insurance and the technical expertise was not married up. What our conviction is that standards have to precede insurance. Fundamentally, what everyone first and foremost want, whether you're a CISO at JPMorgan or a CISO at Cursor or an underwriter at Lloyd's of London syndicate, is you want to not have an incidentRune Kvist [00:50:19]: In the first place. You want to know that the risk is well-managed, and only then does insurance start to make sense. So we'll see the standard ecosystem basically run ahead of the insurance. And the reason why we. You asked us kind of why I also do insurance, this is kind of proving what we think a whole promise confidence infrastructure ecosystem needs to look like, and we think it's very compelling to bring that to life, even if we think the standard is kind of the core linchpin that unlocks the rest.Claims, Liability, Air Canada, and Duty of CareSwyx [00:50:44]: There's been no claims yet, right?Rune Kvist [00:50:45]: Nope.Swyx [00:50:46]: This is one of those things where, you know, if people haven't really worked through what it means to cover things.Rune Kvist [00:50:52]: Yeah.Swyx [00:50:52]: So for example, I pay Cursor $20 a month.Rune Kvist [00:50:55]: Yep.Swyx [00:50:56]: And I write a vibe code something that makes, a plane crash, causing $200 million worth of damage.Rune Kvist [00:51:02]: Yes.Swyx [00:51:02]:

Comme chaque année, je lis avec toujours autant de plaisir le blog d'Hervé Bizeul, le vigneron du Clos des fées, dans le Roussillon. J'adore sa plume. Pendant les vendanges, il écrit un billet par jour, du début à la fin. Dans ce journal de vendanges, il partage avec ses lecteurs ses décisions, la dureté des journées de travail, ses impressions, ses doutes, sa poésie du moment et des photos. Mais qu'est-ce que cela peut bien changer pour moi ?  Bonjour, bienvenue sur Cultivate Your French, le podcast Slow French qui vous permet de cultiver votre compréhension et votre intérêt pour le français. Dans la lettre qui accompagne cet épisode, je vous propose une question avant l'écoute, c'est un excellent moyen d'aiguiser votre oreille pour l'écoute et ainsi améliorer votre compréhension. Il y a aura aussi trois tournures à remarquer pour en faire d'autres choses avec et ainsi mieux les maîtriser pour rendre votre français naturel.  Vous pouvez vous abonner aux lettres du podcast sur www.cultivateyourfrench.com Maintenant, passons au plaisir très satisfaisant de la double écoute : je vous lis une première fois le texte lentement et ensuite vous l'entendrez à vitesse normale, c'est parti !

Bienvenue dans notre rendez-vous hebdomadaire : le Club de C'est pas du vent. Des journalistes spécialistes de l'environnement, de RFI et d'ailleurs, reviennent sur les sujets environnementaux qui les ont marqués et partagent les coulisses de leur travail. L'occasion aussi de commenter les reportages produits par les vidéastes du réseau ePOP et les actions des Clubs RFI. Avec - Gabrielle Maréchaux journaliste pour The Conversation pour son sujet : Sans eau, les forêts arrêtent de capter du CO2 - Yang Mei de la rédaction en langue chinoise de RFI : Contrairement à ce qu'on aurait pu croire, les frelons asiatiques sont plutôt considérés comme bénéfiques dans leur écosystème d'origine et cohabitent avec les abeilles locales - Simon Rozé du service environnement de RFI nous parlera du rapport de quota climat sur la désinformation - Stefanie Schüler du service environnement de RFI : le rapport annuel de Gobal Witness sort ce mercredi. Le nombre d'assassinats des défenseurs de l'environnement est à la baisse. Mais ça ne veut pas dire pour autant qu'ils et elles sont moins en danger… - Chronique entrepreneur avec Aminata Cissé, consultante en développement durable (Mali) pour son projet Bôroni marque de sacs réutilisables et écoresponsables, démarche en faveur d'alternatives durables aux emballages plastiques à usage unique. - Chronique ePOP (RFI Planète Radio/IRD) de Caroline Filliette avec Patrick Ramangason de Madagascar pour son film « Tout est nickel à Ambakarivo ». Musiques diffusées dans l'émission :  ► Rita Mitsouko - Y'a d'la haine ► Dystinct - KATKOUTA. 

Avec : Jérôme Lavrilleux, propriétaire de gîtes en Dordogne. Yael Mellul, ancienne avocate. Et Ilan Gabet, étudiant en droit. - Toujours accompagnée de Charles Magnien et sa bande, Estelle Denis s'invite à la table des français pour traiter des sujets qui font leur quotidien. Société, conso, actualité, débats, coup de gueule, coups de cœurs… En simultané sur RMC Story.

Vent'anni fa moriva Oriana Fallaci, una delle giornaliste più famose al mondo. Inviata di guerra, unica giornalista italiana sul fronte in Vietnam, voce temuta dai capi di Stato, autrice di best seller come Intervista con la storia (1974), Lettera a un bambino mai nato (1975), Un uomo (1979). Oriana Fallaci, che a soli 14 anni faceva la staffetta partigiana con il nome di battaglia “Emilia”, ha attraversato il secolo raccontandolo con uno suo stile personale, fatto di coraggio e ossessione per la ricerca di una verità, la a verità, dentro la Storia, il potere e l'animo umano. Dietro la donna pubblica c'è anche quella privata, e meno conosciuta, con le sue fragilità. A raccontarla a Laser è il suo nipote più caro, Edoardo Perazzi, erede universale di Oriana Fallaci che questa puntata di Laser vuole raccontare anche, e soprattutto, con la sua voce diretta, grazie a preziose, e ancora attuali, testimonianze e riflessioni tratte da due interviste rilasciate nel 1971 e 1974 alla RSI.

Minnesota Vikings rally for INSANE Week 1 win over the Green Bay Packers; Vikings score 29 unanswered points to beat the Packers; Vikings lose Kyler Murray early and Carson Wentz comes through; Vikings fans join the show to give their thoughts on the win and more on Purple Daily. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Chaque année, je lis avec le même plaisir le journal de vendanges d'Hervé Bizeul, le vigneron du Clos des fées, dans le Roussillon. Cette année, sa manière de regarder ses vignes m'a rendue plus attentive à ce qui m'entoure : quelques surprises m'attendaient.  This episode is entirely in French because it's designed for learners who want real spoken French, not textbook dialogues.  Level: B1–B2. The everyday narration stays accessible at B1, while specific vocabulary tied to the harvest and botany pushes toward B2 :  useful if you want vocabulary beyond the strictly conversational. D'autres épisodes à écouter aujourd'hui :  Un mystère sur la coulée verte : https://onethinginafrenchday.podbean.com/e/1951-%e2%80%94-lundi-8-fevrier-2021-%e2%80%94-mystere-sur-la-coulee-verte/ Une balade philosophique sur la coulée verte : https://onethinginafrenchday.podbean.com/e/1966-%e2%80%94-la-coulee-verte-se-prolonge-avec-philosophie/ Le blog d'Hervé Bizeul, déjà en 2019 : https://onethinginafrenchday.podbean.com/e/1709-%e2%80%94-mardi-1er-octobre-2019-%e2%80%94-les-vendanges-d-herve-bizeul/ spoken french, learn french, french stories, paris stories, french daily life, authentic french, real french, life in paris, vendanges, Hervé Bizeul, Clos des fées, Roussillon wine harvest, urban nature, coulée verte, noisettes, hydrangea Who is Hervé Bizeul? What is Clos des fées winery? Where is the Roussillon wine region in France? What happens during "les vendanges" in France? What is "la coulée verte" in Paris? Why do hydrangeas turn brown in a heatwave? When is hazelnut season in France? What does "involucre" mean in French botany? How to notice nature in an urban environment? What is a French grape harvest journal?

00:00 – 15:15 – The Colts got their asses kicked by the Ravens and it could have been worse, Zay Flowers had a career day and only played in one half, Derrick Henry continues to do Derrick Henry things, Colts lay an egg after all the offseason talk about getting off to a fast start 15:16 – 36:02 – Colts linebackers were M.I.A. in the game and Jaylon Carlies had a goose egg despite being a starter, Zay Flowers sat out the second half because the game wasn’t competitive, Colts looked abysmal on the Flowers 54-yard touchdown, caller questions the Colts secondary, the Ravens gash the Colts for over 500 yards of offense 36:03 – 48:34 – Postgame HeadlinesSupport the show: https://1075thefan.com/the-wake-up-call-1075-the-fan/See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Have a question or comment for us? We welcome you to send us a text, thank you! Host-June Bryant, Co-host-Patricia Steen, Guest Panelists- Joslyn Jones, Pastor Marion McNeil, Pastor Mary Cosby, Marcia Williams, Janet Johnson #vent101 Support the showhttps://www.facebook.com/VENT-101-103416278100472https://www.youtube.com/@v.e.n.t.101https://www.vent-101.com/https://instagram.com/v.e.n.t.101?igshid=NTA5ZTk1NTc=

"La Maison du Vent", de Auguste Bernard Kouemo Yanghu est un film poignant qui explore l'espoir, la famille et la diaspora africaine, à travers le regard d'une femme construisant une maison symbolique. on e parlòe avec le réalisateur et une des actrices. The post “La Maison du Vent”, interview avec le réalisateur Auguste Bernard Kouemo Yanghu et l’actrice Tatiana Moudjeu Pouadeu appeared first on Fred Film Radio.

In this week's episode, Ashley discusses the heartbreaking and infuriating disappearance of Angela Green, a 51-year-old mother in Prairie Village, Kansas. Throughout the investigation, her husband's story changes about 700 times, yet he is never named an official suspect and her case remains unsolved to this day. Anyone with any information about the case can either call the TIPS hotline at 816-474-TIPS or they can contact Steve at 319-573-0657.Resources:https://www.kctv5.com/2026/03/03/private-investigator-claims-new-lead-prairie-village-moms-disappearance-police-not-yet-informed/https://people.com/mom-vanished-2019-angela-green-daughter-wants-answers-11911133https://www.solvethecase.org/case/2019-2/angela-greenhttps://fox4kc.com/news/recorded-phone-calls-involving-missing-prairie-village-womans-case-raise-more-questions/ https://fox4kc.com/news/exclusive-daughter-of-missing-prairie-village-woman-aching-for-answers-as-disappearance-surpasses-a-year/Morbid: The Unbelievable Disappearance of Angela Greenhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OgoRDQkODoPlease like, follow, and share this podcast - we're on all of the platforms! Oh, and please leave reviews so other true crime lovers can find us. If you are trying to get a hold of us, we can only respond via: Case Files with Kat and Ashley FacebookInstagramWe're here if you need us! NEVER hesitate to reach out! FOR HELP WITH STALKING OR CYBERSTALKING:https://rainn.org/news/resources-survivors-stalking-and-cyberstalkinghttps://www.stalkingawareness.org/FOR HELP WITH DOMESTIC VIOLENCE:NATIONWIDE: https://www.thehotline.org/get-help/domestic-violence-local-resources/IN HOUSTON AREA: https://www.bayareaturningpoint.org/ or call 24/7: (281) 286-2525FOR HELP WITH SEXUAL ASSAULT:https://rainn.org/resourcesFOR HELP WITH BULLYING:Text CONNECT to 741741 Need to Vent?Simply text HOME or HOLA to 741741 to reach a live volunteer Crisis Counselor. We are always here for you. Free, 24/7, confidential.INTERNATIONAL RESOURCES - YOU ARE N...

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.