Podcasts about Aglio

E' arrivata la fumata bianca! E non solo, è arrivato anche un gabbiano! Ma questa puntata la dedichiamo anche ad una piccola regione italiana, bagnata da ben due mari diversi. E poi...CIBO! Pronti? Mettetevi comodi, stiamo per partire. Trascrizione interattiva e Vocab Helper Support Easy Italian and get interactive transcripts, live vocabulary and bonus content: easyitalian.fm/membership Note dell'episodio Arriva il nuovo Papa! Leone IV. Ma come è andata? Sicuramente è stato tutto molto rapido rispetto agli ultimi. Con Raffaele seguiamo i passi del conclave, e anche un particolare inaspettato. Andiamo poi in giro per l'Italia! Questa volta andiamo in Basilicata, regione molto piccola del sud. Una delle sue particolarità? E' bagnata da DUE mari! Mar Tirreno e Mar Ionio. Film consigliato a proposito della Basilicata? "Basilicata coast to coast" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BasilicataCoastto_Coast Abbiamo parlato di uno dei monumenti famosi della Basilicata bagnata dal Mar Tirreno, ovvero del Cristo di Maratea. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cristo_Redentore Maratea https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maratea E poi CIBO! Questa volta parliamo di una ricetta che Matteo e tutti gli studenti della scula di Joy Of Languages hanno preparato per la festa per l'inizio dei corsi. Ma la ricetta? Ingredienti per 4 persone, per due persone divider per due tutti I pesi Ingredienti Puttanesca Pomodori pelati 800 g Acciughe sott'olio 25 g - Per Versione vegana si possono omettere le alici Capperi sotto sale 10 g Prezzemolo 1 mazzetto Olive di Gaeta 100 g denocciolate - Olive nere/verdi piccole Aglio 2 spicchi Peperoncino secco 2 - solo se piace piccante Olio extravergine d'oliva 30 g Sale fino q.b. Passaggi per il sugo Mettere un po' di olio in padella e aggiungere lo spicchio d'aglio, le acciughe appena l'aglio sfriggeaggiungere olive, capperi e poi pomodori aggiungre pepperoncino Togliere aglio far cuocere tutto per almeno 20 minuti aggiungere alla fine il prezzemolo, poi condire la pasta! Trascrizione Raffaele: [0:23] Ero indeciso Matteo se dirlo, se non dirlo, ho detto "forse lo dice Matteo, forse lo dico io"... Matteo: [0:29] Eh, anche io ho pensato "non lo so, lo diciamo, non lo diciamo", poi ho iniziato a pensare anche a una battuta. Però no, ho detto "vabbè, lasciamo andare così". Raffaele: [0:39] Abbiamo pensato troppo. Matteo: [0:43] Buongiorno. Raffaele: [0:44] Buongiorno a te Matteo, com'è andato questo fantastico weekend? ... Support Easy Italian and get interactive transcripts, live vocabulary and bonus content: easyitalian.fm/membership

con Massimo Di Lecce e Denise Cicchitti

In questo episodio di Educare con Calma parliamo del rapporto di bambini e ragazzi con il cellulare, anche grazie agli spunti offerti da Giulia Dall'Aglio, professionista nel campo della tecnologia e del benessere digitale delle famiglie. Partendo da un aneddoto del tour del libro che ho approfondito nella newsletter di dicembre 2024, analizziamo le dinamiche legate alla richiesta di avere il primo smartphone, e con Giulia esploriamo i dubbi che accomunano tante famiglie e gli strumenti per accompagnare nostrǝ figlǝ in questa decisione. Vi porto infine due riflessioni sul lavoro che possiamo fare anche con bimbǝ piccolǝ per arrivare preparatǝ a questo momento (e per farlo vi leggo anche un estratto della newsletter di luglio 2024), e sull'approccio alla tecnologia in famiglia. 00:30 Preadolescenti e uso dei cellulari05:15 Intervento di Giulia Dall'Aglio sulla gestione della richiesta del primo cellulare13:01 Un dietro le quinte dell'episodio14:32 Il piano digitale per la famiglia15:06 Come gettare le basi di questa conversazione22:17 L'approccio alla tecnologia in famiglia Trovate i link e i contenuti relazionati a questo episodio nella pagina del podcast su latela.com/podcast, e lì potete scaricare anche il PDF creato da Giulia: «Primo telefono? Guida pratica per genitori consapevoli», che menziono nell'episodio (cercate il numero 204 o scrivete il titolo nella lente di ingrandimento in altro a destra).

Un classico della cucina italiana con l'aggiunta di ingredienti che lo rendono unico e nutriente.

Settembre tra nuovi corsi e... aglio! Mary Jo e Daniele Di Ianni nel pomeriggio di Radio Delta 1.

Con una gara senza errori Jorge Martin ha dominato la Sprint del Sachsenring davanti al sorporendente Oliveira con l'Aprilia e Pecco Bagnaia.Bastianini medaglia di legno al quarto posto partendo dalla terza fila e Marquez addirittura sesto dopo un sorpasso all'ultima curva su Vinales, partendo dalla quinta fila.In attesa del Gran Premio di oggi ne parlano Pernat, Scalera e Aglio.

Questo è quanto suggerisce uno studio pubblicato sulla rivista scientifica Nutrients, che commentiamo a Obiettivo Salute con il prof. Stefano Erzegovesi, nutrizionista e psichiatra.

This week's speakers: Amanda Kovattana, Lierre Keith & Julie Lane, USA, Who's Afraid of Judith Butler Zanne D'Aglio, Saw it on X this week News from WDI Country Contacts for USA, Australia and New Zealand ♀♀♀♀♀♀♀♀♀ Feminist Question Time Enjoying our webinars? If you are a position to make a one-off or recurring donation to support our work, you can find out how to do so (and see our financial reports) at https://www.womensdeclaration.com/en/... - thank-you! ♀♀♀♀♀♀♀♀♀ Women's Declaration International (#WDI) Feminist Question Time is a weekly online webinar (Saturdays 3-4.30pm UK time). It is attended by a global feminist and activist audience of between 200-300. The main focus is how gender ideology is harming the rights of women and girls. See upcoming speakers and register to attend at https://bit.ly/registerFQT. There is also a monthly AUS/NZ FQT, on the last Saturday of the month at 7pm (Canberra, Melbourne, Sydney)/9pm (NZ). Register to attend at https://bit.ly/registerFQTAUSNZ. On Sundays (10am UK time), our webinar series, Radical Feminist Perspectives, offers a chance to hear leading feminists discuss radical feminist theory and politics. Register at https://bit.ly/registerRFP. WDI is the leading global organisation defending women's sex-based rights against the threats posed by gender identity ideology. Find out more at https://womensdeclaration.com, where you can join more than 30,000 people and 418 organisations from 157 countries in signing our Declaration on Women's Sex-based Rights. The Declaration reaffirms the sex-based rights of women which are set out in the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 18 December 1979 (#CEDAW). Disclaimer: Women's Declaration International hosts a range of women from all over the world on Feminist Question Time (FQT), on Radical Feminist Perspectives (RFP) and on webinars hosted by country chapters – all have signed our Declaration or have known histories of feminist activism - but beyond that, we do not know their exact views or activism. WDI does not know in detail what they will say on webinars. The views expressed by speakers in these videos are not necessarily those of WDI and we do not necessarily support views or actions that speakers have expressed or engaged in at other times. As well as the position stated in our Declaration on Women's Sex-based Rights, WDI opposes sexism, racism and anti-semitism. For more information, see our Frequently Asked Questions (https://womensdeclaration.com/en/abou...) or email info@womensdeclaration.com. #feminism #radicalfeminism #womensrights

Welkom lieve luisteraars bij een nieuwe aflevering van Podje Koken! Vandaag duiken Remco en Robbie de keuken in voor een klassieker met een pittige twist. We gaan namelijk aan de slag met Spaghetti Aglio, Olio e peperoncino, oftewel spaghetti met knoflook, olijfolie en Spaanse chilipeper. Maar om het nog spannender te maken, voegen we ook wat extra Spaanse pepers toe voor een lekker vurig accent. Deze pasta is niet alleen waanzinnig lekker, maar ook nog eens super simpel om te maken. Met slechts een paar ingrediënten tover je in een handomdraai een indrukwekkend Italiaans gerecht op tafel waar je gasten versteld van zullen staan. Het geheim? Verse ingrediënten en de juiste techniek! Dus haal je knoflookpers en je mooiste olijfolie maar tevoorschijn, want na deze aflevering wil je meteen zelf aan de slag. Vergeet trouwens niet om je creaties met ons te delen op social media met de hashtag #PodjeKoken. Wij zijn reuze benieuwd naar jullie smaakvolle spaghetti avonturen! Enne, mocht je toch iets minder pit prefereren... Je kunt de Spaanse peper natuurlijk ook weglaten of vervangen door iets milders. Maar wat ons betreft: hoe heter, hoe beter! Dus zet je koksmuts maar op en laat die knoflook maar lekker pruttelen, we gaan beginnen...

Damo provides us a fantastic aglio e olio recipe which highlights the Cobram Estate Olive Oil. Send us your recipe tips and suggestions or feedback to thesoundingboard@sen.com.au Damo's Dish is proudly supported by Cobram Estate, Australia's most awarded extra virgin olive oil. Grown, harvested and first cold pressed in Northern Victoria. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This week's speakers: Sall Grover, Australia, Tickle v Giggle: The case of gender identity v sex Zanne D'Aglio, USA, World Premier of the video "Celebrating 'So Many Women' at 35" ♀♀♀♀♀♀♀♀♀ Feminist Question Time Enjoying our webinars? If you are a position to make a one-off or recurring donation to support our work, you can find out how to do so (and see our financial reports) at https://www.womensdeclaration.com/en/... - thank-you! ♀♀♀♀♀♀♀♀♀ Women's Declaration International (#WDI) Feminist Question Time is a weekly online webinar (Saturdays 3-4.30pm UK time). It is attended by a global feminist and activist audience of between 200-300. The main focus is how gender ideology is harming the rights of women and girls. See upcoming speakers and register to attend at https://bit.ly/registerFQT. There is also a monthly AUS/NZ FQT, on the last Saturday of the month at 7pm (Canberra, Melbourne, Sydney)/9pm (NZ). Register to attend at https://bit.ly/registerFQTAUSNZ. On Sundays (10am UK time), our webinar series, Radical Feminist Perspectives, offers a chance to hear leading feminists discuss radical feminist theory and politics. Register at https://bit.ly/registerRFP. WDI is the leading global organisation defending women's sex-based rights against the threats posed by gender identity ideology. Find out more at https://womensdeclaration.com, where you can join more than 30,000 people and 418 organisations from 157 countries in signing our Declaration on Women's Sex-based Rights. The Declaration reaffirms the sex-based rights of women which are set out in the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 18 December 1979 (#CEDAW). Disclaimer: Women's Declaration International hosts a range of women from all over the world on Feminist Question Time (FQT), on Radical Feminist Perspectives (RFP) and on webinars hosted by country chapters – all have signed our Declaration or have known histories of feminist activism - but beyond that, we do not know their exact views or activism. WDI does not know in detail what they will say on webinars. The views expressed by speakers in these videos are not necessarily those of WDI and we do not necessarily support views or actions that speakers have expressed or engaged in at other times. As well as the position stated in our Declaration on Women's Sex-based Rights, WDI opposes sexism, racism and anti-semitism. For more information, see our Frequently Asked Questions (https://womensdeclaration.com/en/abou...) or email info@womensdeclaration.com. #feminism #radicalfeminism #womensrights

Con la Superbike che inizia nel fine settimana e la MotoGP dopo i test in Qatar il terzetto Pernat, Decano, Aglio si lancia in una analisi dello stato dell'arte delle due categorie. All'inizio della live c'è anche un intervento dall'Australia di Riccardo che sintetizza gli avvenimenti. Poi è un fuoco d'artificio di opinioni e Scalera per ben due volte da ragione a Carletto che all'improvviso...beh, questa dovete proprio vederla!

ROMA (ITALPRESS) - Aglio, prezzemolo e parmigiano per un piatto di pasta salutare, antibatterico e alleato della pressione arteriosa. A parlarne è Rosanna Lambertucci nella nuova puntata de La Salute Vien Mangiando.fsc/mrv

This week's speakers: Zanne D'Aglio, USA, News from Twitter X María Binetti, Argentina, Update on Argentina: the new political context Dr Suzanne, Dr Vierling video, USA, Are Women used as the tool to signal Western defeat are being conquered? ♀♀♀♀♀♀♀♀♀ Feminist Question Time Enjoying our webinars? If you are a position to make a one-off or recurring donation to support our work, you can find out how to do so (and see our financial reports) at https://www.womensdeclaration.com/en/... - thank-you! ♀♀♀♀♀♀♀♀♀ Women's Declaration International (#WDI) Feminist Question Time is a weekly online webinar (Saturdays 3-4.30pm UK time). It is attended by a global feminist and activist audience of between 200-300. The main focus is how gender ideology is harming the rights of women and girls. See upcoming speakers and register to attend at https://bit.ly/registerFQT. There is also a monthly AUS/NZ FQT, on the last Saturday of the month at 7pm (Canberra, Melbourne, Sydney)/9pm (NZ). Register to attend at https://bit.ly/registerFQTAUSNZ. On Sundays (10am UK time), our webinar series, Radical Feminist Perspectives, offers a chance to hear leading feminists discuss radical feminist theory and politics. Register at https://bit.ly/registerRFP. WDI is the leading global organisation defending women's sex-based rights against the threats posed by gender identity ideology. Find out more at https://womensdeclaration.com, where you can join more than 30,000 people and 418 organisations from 157 countries in signing our Declaration on Women's Sex-based Rights. The Declaration reaffirms the sex-based rights of women which are set out in the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 18 December 1979 (#CEDAW). Disclaimer: Women's Declaration International hosts a range of women from all over the world on Feminist Question Time (FQT), on Radical Feminist Perspectives (RFP) and on webinars hosted by country chapters – all have signed our Declaration or have known histories of feminist activism - but beyond that, we do not know their exact views or activism. WDI does not know in detail what they will say on webinars. The views expressed by speakers in these videos are not necessarily those of WDI and we do not necessarily support views or actions that speakers have expressed or engaged in at other times. As well as the position stated in our Declaration on Women's Sex-based Rights, WDI opposes sexism, racism and anti-semitism. For more information, see our Frequently Asked Questions (https://womensdeclaration.com/en/abou...) or email info@womensdeclaration.com. #feminism #radicalfeminism #womensrights

ROMA (ITALPRESS) - Cime di rapa, filetti di alici e pecorino romano per un gustosissimo piatto di orecchiette. Facile da preparare ed estremamente digeribile. A parlarne è Rosanna Lambertucci nella nuova puntata de La Salute Vien Mangiando.sat/mrv

Set phasers to punk...or was that hip hop? This week, we're taking another trip over to NYC to check in with the world's greatest band, The Beastie Boys. Back in 1995, they dropped a hardcore punk EP, ever heard it? Join Nik and Duncan as they jump all over it.

Today I'm joined by Trudy Losee and Danielle Aglio, the hosts of Long Island's hottest new real estate podcast: Chaos to Closing. I've been encouraging realtors to start podcasts for years now, and only a few have followed through with it. Trudy and Danielle realized the immense marketing power that a podcast offers all on their own, but they are still living proof of all the incredible opportunities a podcast can bring to realtors, or any business owners for that matter. Check out this latest episode of The Handsome Podcast to learn about everything that lead to their decision to start The Chaos to Closing Podcast, what many are describing as the greatest Long Island Real Estate Podcast to hit the scene in years. Sell your house, land or commercial property on: https://handsomehomebuyer.com/ Follow us on: TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@handsome_homebuyer Twitter: https://twitter.com/handsome_hb Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/handsome_homebuyer/ Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/handsome_homebuyer/ Linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/charles-weinraub-94376116b --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/charles-weinraub/message

Carletto aveva promesso di ritirarsi qualora fosse arrivata l'ufficialità del divorzio. Non ci credeva. Ora che la notizia è arrivata sembra proprio che Pernat, come Renzi, non voglia dar seguito alla sua promessa! Ma non cambia idea!L'operazione per lui è assurda e non capisce come la Honda abbia permesso questo esito della vicenda. Se la prende, ma nemmeno tanto, con Gigi Dall'Igna, motore tutt'altro che immobile, della novità che secondo lui porterà scompiglio in Ducati. E un po' anche con Ezpeleta.Non è che abbia tutti i torti, comunque con questo incipit questa puntata di Bar Sport è una delle più interessanti e divertenti mai registrate, con Paolo, il Decano, che dopo aver parlato anche con Agostini punzecchia il manager genovese e Matteo che, come al solito, fa il controcanto. Imperdibile!

Damo's Dish is proudly supported by Cobram Estate - Australia's most awarded extra virgin olive oil. Grown, harvested and first cold pressed in Northern Victoria. Aglio e Olio from Taste.com.au Recipe HERE. Ingredients 375g dried spaghettini 1/3 cup extra virgin olive oil 5 garlic cloves, crushed 1/2 tsp chilli flakes (optional) Grated parmesan (or vegetarian hard cheese), to serve Method Step 1 Cook pasta in a saucepan of boiling salted water, following packet directions until tender. Drain, reserving 1/4 cup liquid. Step 2 Heat oil in a large, non-stick frying pan over medium-low heat. Add garlic and chilli, if using. Cook for 1 to 2 minutes or until fragrant. Add pasta and reserved cooking liquid. Season with salt and pepper. Cook, tossing, for 1 to 2 minutes or until combined and heated through. Serve sprinkled with parmesan and parsley. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Nella prima giornata di prove stupisce la wildcard Dani Pedrosa che con la KTM mette in riga tutti. Nella FP2 che dà l'accesso alla Q2, con la pista più lenta per la temperatura dell'asfalto stupiscono però le Aprilia di Espargarò e Vinales che strappano le prime due posizioni. Ci ragguaglia sulla competitività della RS-GP il race manager Paolo Bonora in LIVE con Pernat, Scalera e Aglio.

Want to achieve greater success in your voice over business this year? Tom Aglio shares tried, tested and true methods for growing your voice acting business while having fun, making time for the people you love and the things that matter to you while earning more money. You’ll learn about goal setting, why a good […]

Tom Aglio is a voice actor based out of NYand is best known as the voice of AT&T Fiber.He also voices for brands like WatchMojo, McDonald's, and iHeart Mediajust to name a few.He's a direct marketing and performance coach at Abacus Entertainment in NY. tomaglio.comthevoiceoverhustle.comsteveobrienvo.com

What would an economy look like that centered justice, regenerativity and collaboration? Want to play a role? Find out more about the Next Economy MBA from LIFT Economy.  On this episode of the Getting Smart Podcast Tom Vander Ark is joined by Dr. Justin Aglio, the Executive Director of the Readiness Institute at Penn State University. Previously, Justin was a district leader in Montour School District, one of the first districts to pilot the AI+Ethics middle-grade curriculum. Links: Justin Aglio LinkedIn Montour School District Readiness Institute at Penn State University. Mark Cuban Foundation AI Bootcamp Penn State AI Ethics - Media Lab Unbundled Learning Instagram Readiness Institute  

Cosa è cambiato nell'ultimo secolo nel mondo della medicina? Quali sono state le maggiori scoperte e i più grandi fallimenti? Ma soprattutto: antibatterici naturali, farmaci, terapie alternative e placebo?Facciamo un po' di chiarezza! Abbiamo pensato di fare due chiacchiere con Salvo di Grazia, medico chirurgo specialista in ostetricia e ginecologia, socio emerito del CICAP e fondatore del blog MedBunker.Ospiti: Salvo Di GraziaRedazione: Elisa Baioni, Diego Martin, Alex Ordiner, Chiara Vitaloni, Dasara Shullani, Enrico Zabeo, Cecilia Penelope ZambelliGrafica e Logo: Fabio MialichAltri riferimenti: http://www.medbunker.it/ sito di Medbunkerhttps://www.facebook.com/MedBunker pagina facebook di Medbunkerhttps://www.instagram.com/medbunker instagram di Medbunkerhttps://twitter.com/MedBunker account twitter di Medbunkerhttps://open.spotify.com/show/49NDZwzNT20lUvhgSOvHve?si=5fed21200f9b49aa podcast di Medbunkerhttps://dottoremaeveroche.it/ Dottore ma è vero cheSigla ed effetti: https://www.zapsplat.com/ ZapsplatMusiche: https://www.epidemicsound.com/ Epidemic SoundSeguiteci sui profili social del CICAP:Facebook: @cicap.orgTwitter: @cicapInstagram: cicap_it

India Policy Watch #1: Winning The Long GameInsights on current policy issues in India — RSJMany moons ago I sat down for lunch with someone who is often referred to in the media as a ‘doyen of the industry'. Among other things, I asked him the single most important advice he would give to anyone who is at the start of their career. I didn't have any burning desire to succeed in the corporate rat race. So, I wasn't looking for a life-changing insight. I asked it because custom demanded you ask such questions of doyens like him over a meal. Also, even back then I was aware that I should fill my pitaara with such stories because sometime in future I could use them to make myself appear interesting. Anyway, he squinted at me and with something that appeared close to conviction told me, “always defer gratification”. I nodded and pronged a moody forkful of Aglio e Olio. Instant gratification.Over the years I have come to appreciate that piece of advice. Running a successful business over the long term is all about how well you trade off short-term gains with doing what's right for long-term sustainability. The odds are stacked against you because most of your shareholders, the analysts and the media are measuring you on quarterly performance. You can put out a convincing long-term story that will deliver a big, deferred outcome but how can anyone be sure you're headed that way? Any short-term wobble can have people question you. It is tough to live a life of deferred gratification. I haven't followed it to any meaningful extent in my life. Nor do I think even the doyen has done so since that meeting. But having understood how difficult deferring gratification could be, I appreciate how important it is for long-term success in any field of human endeavour. And, of course, that includes public policy in case you are wondering why am I channelling my inner Deepak Chopra and inflicting random truisms on you. OPS versus NPSThis problem of grasping short-term gains while jeopardising the long-term has been running on my mind for the past few months as I see the spectre of the Old Pension Scheme (OPS) returning as a key election promise in the manifestos of Congress and AAP in state elections. There are two issues that I have been thinking about. First, what drives a political party to make a bonfire of the future for a questionable short-term electoral gain? And I'm picking on the OPS issue and these two parties only to illustrate this point. Every party in India has done this in the past. The abandoning of the farm laws was an instance of this. So, the question is what prompts a political party to do this and, importantly, why does the average voter get seduced by this? The other question is what can be done to change the incentives of the parties to do this? In other words, how can we make sure political parties learn to defer gratification? But before I get into them, let me give you a short overview of what's happening with the demand for OPS and the problem with states returning to it while abandoning the New pension Scheme (NPS). The Congress governments in Rajasthan and Chhattisgarh have already gone back to OPS and it has promised the same in its manifesto in Himachal and Gujarat. Not to be outdone, AAP plans to return to OPS in Punjab and might make it a plank in Gujarat. Nothing catches the imagination of our politicians like a bad economic idea, so we now have the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, the RSS-affiliated trade union wing of the ruling BJP, demanding the same from the FM. As Business Standard reports:“National General Secretary of BMS, Ravindra Himte told IANS that during the meeting with Sitharaman, the organisation has urged the Finance Minister to restore the old pension system, increase the amount of minimum pension from Rs 1,000 to Rs 5,000 and to provide better health facilities to retired people under the Ayushman Bharat scheme.The BMS has also urged the Finance Minister to strengthen the social security scheme for workers and to take various other steps to protect the interests of the weaker section of the society.”For context, there are nine state elections scheduled for 2023. Pension of state government workers is a state subject. They can claim they have the mandate of the people to change this if they win using this as one of their key poll planks. Pension is a way to provide social security to workers following their retirement. A simple way to design a pension scheme is for an organisation to promise workers: upon retirement, we will continue paying, say 50 per cent, of your last drawn salary till you die. This is simple and intuitive. The worker has served the organisation for long and you reciprocate that loyalty by taking care of them after retirement. A few years of this scheme and you will soon have a reasonable request from the retired workers. The pension provided isn't keeping up with the inflation. The last drawn wage about a decade back is hardly worth anything now and a pension indexed to that is unfair to the worker. What do you do as a welfare-minded employer? You offer to index the wage to the revised pay scale that's prevalent now. So, the pension drawn by a worker is no longer 50 per cent of their wage when they were last working in the organisation. It is now 50 per cent of the wage of anyone doing the same job now to keep up with inflation. This is all good though a bit onerous. However, if you fast-forward this by a couple of decades, you will reach an uncomfortable scenario. The number of people who have retired from the organisation is now, say, equal to the number of people who are currently working. Those who have retired are drawing a pension that's 50 per cent of the existing pay scale. Simply put, if the total wages paid to working employees is Rs. 100, the pension paid to retired employees is Rs. 50. A third of the total wage bill is allocated to pension. Another decade and you might have two-thirds of the wage bill being taken up by pension. This is a problem in many ways. First, the working employee is continuing to take additional burden to pay for the ever-increasing number of retired employees. The incentive to be productive for the current employee keeps going down when they know the lion's share of any productivity gain will go to the retired pool. The organization continues to be weighed down by the pension bill. It finds it difficult to attract new talent because it cannot match market wage rates offered by newer companies that don't have such a pension bill. It also cannot invest in new products and innovations because the pension bill keeps rising. Unless the employer is the State, in which case, it can print money, increase its debt and keep paying for pension, there's really only one end state to this. The organization will go bankrupt because of its pension burden. This is not a hypothetical scenario. A whole generation of great American companies went down this path including the giant automakers of Detroit. The OPS that is being revived in many states in India is exactly this scheme. In 2004, the Union government introduced a New Pension Scheme (NPS) to avoid exactly this fate. The NPS model is quite simple. It is what is called a defined contribution model. The worker sets aside a small percentage of their salary every year towards a pension fund. The government matches that amount by making its own contribution from its coffers. This means there's an additional wage burden for the government during that year. This amount goes into a pension fund which is managed by professional fund houses regulated by the PFRDA. The fund houses have fairly rigid investment rules that prohibit them from investing in speculative assets. This ‘accumulation phase' continues till the employee retires. At the time of retirement, there's a nice little corpus that's built up. The employee can then take out, say 40 per cent of the corpus for their immediate need, the remaining amount moves into an annuity product where a fixed amount is paid out every year like a salary. Over the years the NPS scheme has been taken up by all Union government employees and gradually all state governments adopted it too. The professional fund houses that manage the NPS funds report annualised returns that have always been better than the Provident Fund (managed by the government) returns or even the best of mutual fund managers. And the first generation of retirees who use the NPS can vouch that the annuity they get has kept pace with inflation without having to wage-index their pension to the revised pay scale. This a beautiful solution that frees up the government from having a pension burden on its balance sheet after the retirement of the worker. No longer are current employees paying for the pension of the previous generation. In fact, we have often quoted the transition to NPS as one of the more successful public policy examples in India.Now, we want to undo it. There's really never been a clamour for OPS. But if you go around telling retired or near-to-retirement employees that we will give you a higher-paying pension scheme by taking you back to OPS, you might find some traction. Even if the numbers don't bear you out. Few voters will ask you how will you foot the bill. If the current and future employees don't see that eventually, they will be paying for this largesse, you might be able to convince every working employee that this will work better for them. I don't think we are there yet but I never bet against the popularity of a bad economic policy. They have tremendous seductive appeal. The Difficulty In Choosing Deferred GratificationThis is just another example where there are short-term pains in implementing a policy that will yield outsized long-term benefits. We could do that by implementing the NPS in 2004. Now, we are on the reverse. We want to implement a policy that might have short-term gains for a few but huge long-term costs for everyone. There are other similar policy questions in a democracy. How should we think about climate change? Should we take costly actions now by punishing polluting industries and impacting job creation while waiting for the benefits of these actions to pan out over decades? Or, how about increasing taxes today to rebuild roads and public infrastructure that will benefit society thirty years later? How should a political party think about these issues when their incentive is to win elections that happen every four or five years? Are democracies doomed to pick policies that are good in the short run but damaging in the long term because of this flaw?This intertemporal trade-off between maximizing societal welfare now and investing for the future is a vexing issue for political parties in a democracy. What I want to do is to understand the reasons for this trade-off being skewed in favour of short-term value maximisation and see if there's a way to engineer a choice architecture for the public that redresses it. I can think of four reasons why the skew exists.Firstly, there's the commitment problem among political parties. People are never convinced that a political party will stay the course on a particular policy. This is borne out of experience. Parties are less guided by economic ideology these days. The same set of politicians who might advocate a higher tax today and ask you to tighten your belts may change their tune tomorrow when they sense a change in the air. Also, politicians aren't permanent. There is turnover among them within a party itself. And the newer set might renege on previous commitments. So, for the citizens, paying short-term costs because you believe in the political commitment of a party now is fraught with risks.Secondly, forecasting is difficult. There's the fog of uncertainty and lack of adequate information to accurately predict these benefits. It is easier for a voter to use past performance as a guide to the future than predict it based on the impact of a new policy. The average voter anyway has only limited cognitive mind space for public policy. They might be able to think only about present outcomes with some clarity. This encourages politicians to think of policies that are typically myopic. Further, this information challenge means even if voters and the government say they care about the future, their actions will continue to be shortsighted. Separately, even those who are trained in public policy to think about the intertemporal trade-off can struggle to make accurate assumptions about the future. We live in a world that's more volatile and ambiguous than before. To predict the future and the societal context that will emerge then is a risky proposition. For the policymaker, it is optimal to maximise a more certain near-term than go out on a limb for the distant future. Thirdly, we have the old problem of concentrated benefits and diffused costs. It is natural for a smaller group for whom the benefits of a policy are concentrated to organise themselves and demand its implementation. The converse of this is also true. Any policy action where the short-term costs are to be borne by a small but organised group while the benefits will emerge over time for the wider society will get scuttled by this group. The repeal of the farm laws was an example of this. Even if the short-term pain and the long-term gains both accrue to this small group, they will oppose it. Because a better alternative for them is to redistribute the short-term pain to everyone while securing the long-term benefits for themselves. Or, to continue with the status quo.Finally, we have the problem of political parties that have either run out of ideas or who want to make a dent in new electoral terrain. To them getting a foothold through the aid of a myopic policy is worth the price. After all, they have many other policies that are better for society, which they might rationalise. Or, it is a question of survival and how does long-term matter if you will cease to exist then. This is what explains the actions of AAP and Congress on OPS. Is There A Way Out?So how does a policymaker counter these? I have a few suggestions, some of which might seem Machiavellian.First, there are ways to take the sting out of short-term costs. A deft policymaker can obfuscate some of the costs by making their calculations more complex (say, in the design of an auction or a tax) that is difficult for the voter to understand. The idea is to reduce the overt display of the cost to be paid in the short-term. The other option is to impose the short-term costs in a phased manner or in specific cohorts (‘grandfathering' certain beneficiaries for some time). There is a whole field of behavioural economics that can be used to nudge the voter towards a certain action like loss avoidance. The other way to do this is to diffuse the responsibility of who is imposing the short-term costs among many agents of the state including the government, independent regulators, corporates, local bodies or international treaties. This fragmentation of power and diffusion of the blame can make it easier to take difficult calls. They can take the sting out of the costs to be paid for future benefits. Second, there are ways in which the long-term gains can be crystallised into something more tangible in the present. There are ways in which some of the future payoffs can be advanced through well-choreographed pilots. This is particularly true for infrastructure investments where the example of a few recent successes can be talked up and few well-timed benefits early on in the investment process can convince the citizens of the long-term benefits. The other way to think about it is to play up the huge long-term consequences of not acting now with any small evidence in the present being used to project a terrible future. This is how climate change activists are playing the game today where any minor aberration in weather patterns anywhere in the world is used to proclaim ‘climate change is real'. You might disagree with them on principle but their approach to building public support is right. Third, we come to making political commitments sticky for the future so that voters are more willing to support taking short-term pain. The way to go about is to make any reversal of course difficult by making a policy difficult to dismantle. This can be achieved by placing exit barriers while implementing a policy that could include multiple players and steps whose consent would be needed to roll back a policy. They could have veto powers to stop such rollbacks. The more the institutional fragmentation, the higher the barrier to exit. Other means could be adopted too like making an amendment to the law or constitution or setting up a new independent authority to institutionalise a policy. By having such players whose incentives are aligned with long-term benefits promised in the policy, one can create a significant hurdle. The costs of reneging on a commitment go up significantly. Lastly, how do we counter the small but organised interests that might scuttle a policy because they don't want to take the short-term pain? In most cases, the problem here is how do we mobilise the larger group for whom the benefits are diffused and in the long-term to counter the smaller but highly motivated group? One of the ways to think about this is to choose a smaller subset from the larger group whose benefits (or costs in case the policy isn't chosen) might have greater salience for the group. For instance, talking about children and the future of our planet makes it easier to focus on the costs of not making climate change investments today. The ability to show with clarity that the redistribution of benefits of a policy that imposes costs on current beneficiaries and favours a future group is crucial in winning the battle of minds. The benefits are often spoken in abstract terms over a larger group than making it very specific for a focused smaller group. If that's done well, you get a countervailing force against the small, organised group that wants to retain the status quo.The intertemporal policy choice is crucial to ensure democracies don't lapse into the most shortsighted policy recommendations because that's what gets instant mass approval. The wise man who told me to ‘always defer gratification' gave me the best career advice. Unfortunately, he didn't tell me how to do it. I suspect he didn't know it too. Because it is tough.    For more on the Pension issue, check these editions:* Pension Tension in edition #174* Pension Troubles are Back in edition#162* A Framework a Week: Understanding Cognitive Maps in edition #62Thanks for reading Anticipating the Unintended! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support our work.India Policy Watch #2: The Cats See Through the Monkey's TrickInsights on domestic policy issues— Pranay KotasthaneIn edition #131, I wrote that India's fiscal federalism resembles the monkey and the two cats fable. While states fight amongst each other to corner a higher share of the total money devolved to them, the Union government can go scot-free even as it appropriates nearly 60 per cent of the divisible pool resources, raises new cesses, and uses a part of these funds to run its own centrally sponsored schemes. This focus on horizontal devolution (the formula used for sharing resources between states) masks the far more serious problems of vertical devolution (how money is split between the Union government and all states as a whole).Given this starting point, one news item from the past week caught my attention. State Finance Ministers (FMs) in the pre-budget consultation meeting with the Union FM highlighted the problems with the vertical devolution regime. Their criticisms and suggestions can be summarised as follows:* Increase states' share in goods and services tax (GST) to 60 per cent from 50 per cent at present. * Merge cesses and surcharges with the existing taxes so that states are not deprived of their share, and* Rationalise the expenditure under centrally sponsored schemes. The Tamil Nadu FM said that "All states, irrespective of political parties, expressed a common theme -- states' fiscal autonomy is greatly constrained by the extent of centrally sponsored schemes, by the extent of changing ratios of funding of such schemes”.Let's focus on the first suggestion, which seems to be a reform pathway for India's fiscal federalism. What should we make of it? First up, a clarification. The 50 per cent share that the state FMs highlighted refers to the rate of taxation and not the share of total GST collections. If you check any bill, the GST is split equally into two halves — SGST (which remains with the states) and IGST (which goes into the total divisible pool to be split between Union and state governments). Since 42 per cent of IGST is again devolved to states using the Finance Commission formula for vertical devolution, states already get about 70 per cent of the total GST collections. If the proposed change were to be made, the states' share in GST will further rise to 76.8 per cent, according to former J&K Finance Minister Haseeb Drabu. Keeping this important clarification aside, the suggestion to increase the share of SGST by 10 per cent is excellent. As I have argued earlier, any fiscal reform that increases general purpose transfers to states increases their autonomy and allows them to decide their own priorities. In a country where the GSDP per capita of the richest state (Goa) is nearly ten times that of the poorest (Bihar), one-size-fits-all schemes run from Delhi can hardly be expected to be effective. However, the proposed reform in its current form will be dead on arrival. There's nothing in it that would motivate the Union government to change its stance, and nor are states promising anything at their end in return. With some conditionalities, this reform can be made to work in the overall interest of citizens.One, states should commit to sharing a fixed percentage of their increased SGST share with local governments. State governments cannot always play victims. They are simultaneously culpable in strangling the finances of local governments. An increase in the SGST share can act as a useful incentive mechanism to fix this crucial flaw in our fiscal federalism.Two, states should commit to a fixed increase in capital expenditure. The increased fiscal space can easily be frittered away by states. Three states switching back to the costly Old Pension System that burdens future generations is a case in point. Hence, an increase in the states' GST share should be made conditional on improving the quality of expenditure.Three, the increased SGST share should be accompanied by a sunsetting of centrally sponsored schemes. This will create fiscal space for the Union government to focus on higher-level functions: defence, trade, manufacturing competitiveness, higher education, and R&D. Admittedly, this change would be the toughest part of the bargain. The Union government runs so many centrally sponsored schemes precisely because it is politically beneficial for parties to portray that our day-to-day requirements are solved directly only by the largesse of the occupant of the 7, Lok Kalyan Marg. A move away from this low-level equilibrium would need immense political capital. To make this idea palatable, a move to the 60:40 sharing can be made optional. Only states that agree to the above three conditions can transition to the new regime. The rest can continue to be stuck with the older compromise. In sum, the proposed reform merits serious discussion. Advertisement: Here's an awesome opportunity for mid-career professionals who missed out on learning the liberal arts.Global Policy Watch: Myth-busting Reservations About Global Supply ChainsInsights on global issues relevant to India— Pranay KotasthaneGeopolitics is trumping geoeconomics the world over. The good old days when international trade was unapologetically perceived as a positive-sum game are past us. Countries are pursuing expensive industrial policies across sectors, by labelling everything from the display screen of your phone to the apps on it as “strategic”. In this worldview, one constant villain is Global Supply Chains (GSCs). The dominant narrative seems to be that shorter and more domestic GSCs are more reliable, and hence government intervention to snip these GSCs is desirable.But what does the evidence suggest? A few recent papers inject some sense into the ongoing debate. In this section, I will summarise key insights from them, and link out to more readings on GSCs.The one economist to read on GSCs is Richard Baldwin. His 2012 paper Global supply chains: why they emerged, why they matter, and where they are going covers the foundational concepts lucidly. It delivers one insight after another, busting many myths in the process. Sample this:“Globalisation is often viewed as driven by the gradual lowering of natural and man-made trade costs. This is a serious misunderstanding. Globalisation has been driven by advances in two very different types of ‘connective' technologies: transportation and transmission.” …In Balwin's view, the first unbundling of globalisation was made possible by steam and made profitable by scale economies and comparative-advantage-led separation. The second unbundling was made possible by information communication technologies and made profitable by wage differences. There's a lot more in the paper that I'm still processing. Do give it a read.Meanwhile, his latest paper with Rebecca Freeman investigates if the current structure of GSCs is too “risky”. They acknowledge that the recent challenges—COVID-19, climate change and geopolitical tussles—are of a global scale and will likely reshape GSCs. They add that all firms make a risk-reward trade-off. Recent events have already driven firms to invest more in building resilience. Thus, there are just two cases where a government intervention makes sense. First, when the social evaluation of this trade-off puts greater stress on the “risk” compared to the firm's evaluation of this trade-off, there's a case for market failure. The higher the gap between these two perceptions, the higher the likelihood of government intervention. From an Indian perspective, China's recent actions have widened this gap.Second, the complexity of GSCs might make firms (especially the smaller ones) underestimate the true risks involved. This lack of information can be another justification for government action in the form of mapping and making this information public. On the issue of which interventions might actually reshape GSCs, they suggest: Locational equilibriums are unlikely to shift unless firms perceive a permanent shock and governments commit to substantial, long-term production subsidies (as with agriculture), massive regulation (as in banking), or massive state-lead interventions (as in defense). Policies on essential medical supplies and semiconductors may well prove to be more durable and effective given their critical nature. Arguments that these sectors are part of today's national defense, broadly defined, are more credible, and thus more likely to endure long enough to reshape production structures. Going beyond government interventions, they identify a trend that's of importance to us in India. Given the improvements in industrial automation and AI, future manufacturing GVCs might become shorter. At the same time, future services GVCs might become longer and more widespread, given the multilateral agreements on services trade, which are far less protectionist than those in manufacturing trade. From an Indian perspective, these propositions mean that India (or any other country) is not likely to displace China in the manufacturing of goods which are not considered “strategic”. Instead, it is automation that's more likely to reduce other countries' dependence on China. On the other hand, India's opportunity lies in the services trade. Policies such as data localisation or restrictions on human capital movements will only dampen India's chances. Perhaps, the far more important lesson from the US export controls on China is not that the US might do something similar to India, but how difficult it is to displace a country of China's size once it's embedded itself in GVCs. India's strategy should therefore be to embed itself in services GVCs. HomeWorkReading and listening recommendations on public policy matters* [Podcast] DO NOT MISS this Puliyabaazi with Ajay Shah in Hindi/English on state capacity and public policy. While you are there, subscribe to our channel :). * [Report] The State of State Finances report by Saket Surya and Tushar Chakrabarty of PRS is useful reference material for anyone interested in contemporary Indian public policy.* [Twitter Thread] For a simple explanation of the central issue in India's fiscal federalism, read Pranay's thread. * [Explainer] This Trade Deficit-101 is worth your time. It asks: What is a trade deficit and how does it affect the economy? This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit publicpolicy.substack.com

Alla vigilia di quella che potrebbe essere la sfida conclusiva per il mondiale fra Bagnaia e Quartararo entrambi hanno avuto problemi. Il più grave la frattura del dito media della mano sinistra per Fabio. Una MotoGP sempre più avvincente che ci propone l'ennesima buona prestazione di Marquez con doppia polemica: la scia con Bagnaia ed i vecchi ricordi del 2015. Ne parlano Pernat, Scalera ed Aglio con l'usuale, dissacrante, sincerità.

After yet another long break, the podcast is back with an actual life update and lessons learnt from moving across the world, twice. 

Want to build better client relationships? Tom Aglio shares direct marketing tips for promoting your voice acting services to prospects while growing your existing book of clients. In this episode, you’ll learn what direct marketing is, discover creative ways of finding work, how to nurture relationships with people you’re already working with and why every […]

El exsecretario de Control, Ramiro Dall' Aglio, recomendó en Radio EME la utilización del sistema para habilitar media mano de la calzada contraria en el caso de la ruta o bulevar para permitir la continuidad del tráfico.

Spaghetti Aglio Olio enak, sehat, bikin anak gym naksir Yg mau cerita2 bisa langsung DM atau email ke : semejangobrolhospitality@gmail.com

Please find the script below: https://ugandhin.com/13008/miso-flavoured-spaghetti-aglio-e-olio/

8. Contro l'AIDS? Aglio e peperoni

Oggi vi aggiorno su quello che è successo nell'ultima settimana, vi dico quello che ho fatto e come sarà la pubblicazione dei prossimi video spontanei. 0:00 - Pasta aglio olio e peperoncino2:47 - L'ufficio3:36 - Il futuro dei video spontanei 5:58 - Tanti miglioramenti in arrivo in IPLVGrazie all'ascolto di questo podcast imparerai e assorbirai naturalmente tanti nuovi vocaboli ed espressioni italiane e aumenterai così il tuo livello di italiano. Ti consiglio di ascoltare il podcast più volte, in questo modo le nuove parole italiane che ascolterai si fisseranno nella tua memoria a lungo termine e sarà più facile per te usarle quando dovrai parlare in italiano.

Lo chef Luca Ciano ci propone uno dei primi piatti classici della cucina italiana, ma con un "twist".

Il mercato piloti è in via di definizione. La notizia più recente è l'arrivo di Alex Marquez nel team Gresini al posto di Bastianini. Ci sono poi gli ingaggi, ancora non ufficiali, di Mir e Rins, rispettivamente in Repsol Honda e LCR Honda e l'arrivo di Raul Fernandez e Oliveira nel team Aprilia di Razali. Tutti da confermare comunque. Ne parlano Pernat, Aglio e Caregnato.

Alla tavola della bufala in tavola prepariamo con gli esperti un piatto che è un grande classico della cucina italiana: spaghetti aglio, olio e peperoncino, una ricetta semplice e veloce e promossa anche dalla scienza. Ne parliamo con il prof. Enzo Spisni, direttore del Laboratorio di Fisiologia traslazionale e Nutrizione all'Università di Bologna e la dottoressa Stefania Ruggeri, ricercatrice e nutrizionista del CREA Alimenti e Nutrizione La puntata prosegue con la dottoressa Serena Missori, endocrinologa e nutrizionista e autrice de "La dieta della tiroide biotipizzata". Con l'esperta, in occasione della settimana della tiroide, parliamo del cibo amico di questa ghiandola così preziosa per il nostro benessere Per la rubrica "aggiungi un posto a tavola" ospitiamo Stela Vujosevic, unica donna italiana tra i 100 oftalmologi più influenti al mondo nel 2022

25/04/2022 - 01/05/2022. In questa puntata: spazio alle donne di destra (Donna Assunta) e di sinistra (Basic Instict Westminster), il 25 aprile "rivisto" dalle firme di Libero, i capelli di Facchinetti e Macron che bacia un pelato, Nonna Gorilla, Dibba-Ronaldo, Zelensky disoccupato e molto, molto altro...

I "Recept tack!?" kommer Nichlas och Jerka varje vecka – inspirera med, fokusera på och avhandla en rätt de upptäckt och kommit att älska. En rätt som alla måste laga så snart tillfälle ges! För recept, tutorial och handfasta grepp följ @recepttack. Varje avsnitt och rätt finns tillagad och går att pedagogiskt följa på Instagram.

EPISODE 205. Christian Petroni links with Sabino at his brand new Kitchen/Studio. After making Aglio e Olio with Cugine they filmed this interview. Follow Christian on Instagram here https://instagram.com/christianpetroni To shop our merchandise, visit https://www.paninishoppe.com/growingupitalian Be sure to check our our Instagram https://www.instagram.com/growingupitalian As always, if you enjoyed this video, be sure to drop a Like, Comment and please SUBSCRIBE. Grazie a tutti!

Il ritorno di Livio Suppo, ex team principal in Honda HRC, con la Suzuki fa parlare Carlo Pernat, Paolo Scalera e Matteo Aglio dell'imminente inizio del mondiale MotoGP, In Qatar

Awhhh yeah baby podcast is back on the menu and this week were going to ITALIA with the help of Slim Radio legend, Michela Grasso. Founder of Spaghetti politics, Michela shows Felix and Chris her way around a real spaghetti with an Aglio e Olio, a deliciously simple garlic and oil based dish. Don't forget to cook along at home.

Al termine della prima di due giornate di test a Jerez Paolo Scalera commenta con Carlo Pernat e Matteo Aglio i progressi della Honda (senza Marquez) e l'exploit di Bastianini con la GP21. E' l'occasione per parlare di tutte le novità in arrivo. Seguite le LIVE dei test su www.gpone.com

In this episode Ben makes a gourmet pasta from one of his favorite movies: Chef (2014) --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/cookingwithben/support

La caduta di pecco Bagnaia a pochi giri dalla fine del GP assegna matematicamente la corona della MotoGP a Quartararo. Con qualche rimpianto. Le opinioni di Scalera, Pernat e Aglio su quanto è accaduto

Laura Galloway talks to the Satellite Sisters about her fascinating memoir Dalvi: Six Years In The Arctic Tundra. And yes, she did move in with a reindeer herder, stick around after he ditched her and learn the indigenous language Sami and the history and culture of the people. This book is that story plus her family story. Here's a great review of the book. We also ask her about the aurora borealis. Follow Laura Galloway on @instagram @authorlauragalloway Julie's Tuesday Trends: Dolphin Skin Putt Putt Golf for Adults Home Generators Halloween Trees #CookingWithLiz this week: Liz makes Pasta con Aglio and Olio from Stanley Tucci's new book TASTE: My Life Through Food. Watch her LIVE in the Satelliteite Sisters Facebook Group on Thursday October 21 at 8 pm ET/5 pm PT or follow @satsisters on @instagram to see the post on IGTV. Lian's recommendations on more great writing about food: PLENTY: A Memoir of Food & Family by Hannah Howard Tastemakers: Seven Immigrant Women Who Revolutionized Food in America by Mayukh Sen. The Department of Salad, a newsletter from former New Yorker editor Emily Nunn Visit our website Satellite Sisters: A Pep Talk For Modern Women For info on The Sweeney Sisters and Lian's online book clubs for The Sweeney Sisters go to www.liandolan.com Subscribe to our newsletter Pep Talk here. For all of our booklists at Bookshop.org, go to www.bookshop.org/shop/liandolan Buy The Sweeney Sisters here on bookshop.org or here on amazon. Join our community: Facebook Page, Facebook Group and on Instagram and Twitter @satsisters. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Setelah lama menghilang, kami kembali bersama anda semua dengan Pentas Podcast. Kali ini dua tajuk: Cik Leh Buat Aglio Olio Untuk Nini dan Jutawan! Mari lah sama-sama kekek dengan kita. Selalu cerita hantu kan? Kali ni kekek yok!

Its Sauce season baby!! This week we go over a few different types of sauce that can be made, along with rating them and if we've ever had them. We also took a "how Italian-American are you" quiz... Tune in to hear the results. Have a good weekend cugins. Big announcements at the end by the way, make sure you listen all the way through. #MiamiVicesinthesun Social Media: CuginPodcast --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app

Tom is a New York based voice actor who has been in the business since 2017. He is currently represented by Stewart Talent and has worked with clients such as AT&T, Heineken, Nickelodeon, IBM, and McDonald's to name a few. He loves VO because no two gigs are ever alike! I mean what job allows you to be a dinosaur in a kid's show and then talk about the Nintendo Switch in a commercial? All in the same day?!

A year-long celebration of the greatest Beastie Boys surprise of all-time! NOTE: A special addendum was added to this episode featuring Jim and Prof giving their take on the newly released "Too Many Rappers" music video. During the discussion the memory card on their recorder crashed. Instead of giving you an incomplete conversation, we'll give you a full critique at a later date.  Just lettin' you know. Thanks.

Clausura y reflexiones finales de la I Jornada Espírita de Madrid por Oscar Aglio y Valle García, que tuvo lugar en Espacio Ronda (Madrid) el 5 de Octubre 2014. ------------------ http://www.mindalia.com - La Red Social de Ayuda a través del Pensamiento http://www.circulosdeayuda.com Los videos de esta y otras conferencias y entrevistas de interés en http://www.mindaliatelevision.com Puedes escuchar este y otros audios en http://mindaliacomradio.ivoox.com