Podcasts about placing

Today my guest is Ritam Chaurey, who is an Assistant Professor at Johns Hopkins University's School of Advanced International Studies. We talked about structural transformation in India over the last three decades, how firm level behavior responds to regulatory and fiscal changes, how firms choose between capital and labor, or permanent versus contractual labor, land use and factory location, and much more. Recorded April 29th, 2026. Read a full transcript enhanced with helpful links. Connect with Ideas of India Follow us on X Follow Shruti on X Follow Ritam on X Click here for the latest Ideas of India episodes sent straight to your inbox. Timestamps (00:00:00) - Intro (00:01:07) - The Industrial Disputes Act, Permanent Workers, and Contractors (00:10:14) - Impacts of Reliance on Contract Labor (00:16:02) - Labor Protections and Their Impact on Firm Behavior (00:22:35) - Binding Constraints and the Rise of 'Invisible Workers' (00:27:46) - Labor Supply Preferences in Structural Transformation (00:34:07) - A 'Bad Law,' Musclemen, and the Evolution of Debt Law in India (00:40:21) - SARFAESI's Unintended Consequences (00:46:28) - The Drop in Fixed-Capital Assets (00:48:57) - The Impact of Judicial Delays on Labor-Capital Substitution (00:52:41) - The Bankruptcy Code and Marginal Improvements (00:55:54) - Spillover Benefits of Relaxing Land Use Regulation (01:04:18) - Location-Specific Subsidies and Barrier Relaxation (01:06:36) - A Case Study: Uttarakhand and Himachal (01:13:32) - The Impact of New Bank Branches in Underbanked Communities (01:23:24) - The Demonetization Shock (01:29:48) - Outro

Jaxxon Podcast Presented by Jaxxon Jewelry.Shop the best Men's chains

2 campaign committees have been established by the Missouri Realtors, Scott Charton is a spokesman for Missourians for Fair Governance/Missourians for Fair Taxation. They are actively campaigning to stop Amendments. Placing the amendments on an August ballot is an, 'attempt to try to sneak something past the people,' says Charton.

Welcome back to another episode of Man vs Marriage.This Episode is in our Big Picture Deep Dive series.Legacy is an impact made on you that inspires you to become a better version of who you are. It makes an impact positive or negative.I learned a valuable lesson when I coached HS Football. What I did today would affect my tomorrow and my future. However, when you are building something you will not see it as a fully formed or finished project until the project meets its completion.Until now you may not have recognized that you have the opportunity to make an impact on human history in an historic fashion. It's what I called “Placing a Demand on History” — doing the work with excellence no matter the outcome, which is almost always out of your control. What is within your control are the things you are directly responsible for — my process: Focus on what you can affect.Placing a demand on history means walking out your purpose, doing the work in such a manner that who you are and what you have done becomes undeniable. In essence, it is your Legacy.Legacy is the long game — built by daily execution, not perfection.Main Show Content Legacy is the long game — built by daily execution, not perfection. It is being built by passivity or by purpose. By excuses or by execution. It outlives us once our time on this earth has come to a close. It's your Legacy. Your approach to life and legacy is being watched by your family, but the real work happens when no one else is looking. That congruency and commitment to integrity gives you internal credibility so when the tough times come you walk through the fire and stand tall.Bullet PointsLegacy is the long game — built by daily execution, not perfectionIt is being built by passivity or by purposeBuilt by excuses or by executionIt outlives us once our time on this earth has come to a closeClose + Call to Action Ask yourself: Are you building your legacy by purpose or passivity? How are you a man you can trust? Do you have internal credibility? Are you executing on living by excuses? Are you prepared to place a demand on history?This week, place a demand on history. Choose one thing and execute it with excellence even when no one is watching. Share this episode with 5 men. Next week we go deeper into Jesus as the greatest legacy.Contact Info Email: quincy@mvsmpodcast.com Website: MVSMpodcast.com

Gene Zannetti talks with Montana state champion Tegan Jones about winning his first state title as a senior after placing fourth the year before, how four years of mindset training helped him through trial and error to find what worked best for him, why hearing "believe in yourself" from an outside perspective who had accomplished what he wanted to do made all the difference, and how he applied the same wrestling principles of hard methodical work to get accepted into Penn and Brown while aspiring to become a surgeon.Timestamps:1:22 - Four years of mindset training through trial and error3:44 - Placing fourth at states then pivoting for senior year4:03 - Building self-confidence wrestling older guys as a freshman5:06 - Why it's different hearing advice from an outside perspective7:24 - Not worried about wins or losses, just focused on performing9:20 - Fortune favors the bold: Aristotle quote before state finals12:38 - Applying wrestling principles to get into Ivy League schools

You know the saying: where your attention goes, energy flows. So let me ask you this: in a time of empire collapse, where are you placing your attention? Are you focusing on the despair fed to us by mainstream media? Or can you direct some of your energy towards joy?In this week's episode, I talk about how thriving is possible when the world feels too much. Restoration and connection are important to helping us keep going in the fight for liberation. Don't give in to despair and hopelessness! Listen in to learn how to not just survive, but thrive.Spotify: ⁠https://open.spotify.com/show/3NmlshGX4ijHPXmFIgT1Nu⁠ Apple: ⁠https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/spiritual-grit/id1497436520⁠  ===============Today's poems/ Books mentioned:Tarot/Oracle Card: The Knight of Cups (Reversed)Poem: “Elephant God” by Hafiz=============== Courses / Exclusive Content / Book Mentioned:Subscribe to “Adventures in Midlife” newsletter: ⁠leslieann.substack.com⁠Instagram: @leslieannhobayan Email: ⁠leslieann@hobayanhouse.comYoutube: ⁠https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLxAeQWRRsSo5E7PBJdZUeoEAYXnAtuyRy⁠Kapwa bowls: https://hobayanhouse.com/kapwa-bowls 

Greater St. Louis Area Scouting District Scout Executive Kenny Wolff says Scouts who participate in placing flags on US Veterans graves at Jefferson learn about, 'reflecting, gratitude and respect.' Wolff says almost 200,000 flags will be placed, and says the view of them is, 'so moving and humbling.' (Photo by Andy Lyons/Getty Images)

In this episode, I'm taking you to beautiful Loire Valley France — a region known for fairytale châteaux, sparkling wine, charming villages, and wonderfully relaxed countryside travel. I share some of my favorite experiences in the Loire Valley including visits to stunning castles like Château de Chenonceau, Château d'Azay-le-Rideau, and Château de Villandry, along with wine tastings at local vineyards and easy walks through the French countryside.I also talk about wandering the lively market in Amboise, discovering quiet villages, and why slowing down in the Loire Valley made the experience even more meaningful. Whether you're interested in château hopping, cycling and walking trails, local wine, or simply soaking up small-town France at a gentler pace, this episode will give you plenty of inspiration for planning your own Loire Valley adventure.Want to chat more about the Loire Valley?Email me at Lynne@WanderYourWay.comIn this episode:1:22: Intro + announcements4:42: Placing the Loire Valley on the map9:04: Where to stay10:54: Château de Chenonceau15:38: Château d'Azay-le-Rideau18:58: Château de Villandry24:20: Vineyards31:00: Towns & villages41:01: Getting around42:05: Wrapping it upImportant links:Loire Valley TourismLoire LoversWander Your WayWander Your Way AdventuresWander Your Way ResourcesSafety WingChâteau de ChenonceauChâteau d'Azay-le-RideauChâteau de VillandryPlou et FilsAlain Robert ★ Support this podcast ★

On this episode of Proof-of-PR, Kelley Weaver is joined by ​​Evan Drake, the founder of Soulcraft, an agentic marketing agency helping businesses of all sizes speak from their soul in the AI era. Evan has spent 20 years shaping brand narratives at companies like Apple and Chainlink. Soulcraft specializes in the new discipline of AI search optimization, and at the core of everything is something Evan calls a soul.md, a structured identity file that teaches AI agents to sound like you. He is also the creator of Opensoul as an 'agency of agents,' built entirely around intelligent automation. To stay up-to-date on upcoming guests and news by following us on Twitter at @ProofOfPR. #PRtips #TheBitcoinConference #ProofofPR #MediaRelations ●▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬● ⏰ Timestamps: 0:00 | Intro 1:32 | Who is Evan Drake? 4:07 | Recreating the Marketing stack 6:15 | Soul markdown standard 8:15 | Autonomous Agency of AI Agents 13:15 | Opensoul replaces cost of marketing hires 16:44 | Downtime of Claude AI & problem for businesses 19:20 | AI search optimization 22:14 | BITWIRE AD 26:15 | Placing brands into "high intent" AI conversation 28:05 | AI advertising with LLMs 32:01 | AI conversations on Twitter 33:24 | Will companies begin to pivot their marketing strategies? 41:04 | How should crypto brands think about AI and marketing? 42:54 | How to keep up with Evan Drake 44:50 | Outro ●▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬●

FDR declares an "unlimited national emergency" in May 1941, placing the country on a wartime footing and targeting dissenters. He begins labeling Lindbergh and America First supporters as "copperheads" and "fifth columnists," effectively questioning their loyalty. Lindbergh's reputation suffers a fatal blow after a speech in Des Moines, where he identifies the British, the Jews, and the administration as those pushing for war. Branded an anti-Semite and Nazi sympathizer, he becomes politically radioactive. This controversy leads to the decline and eventual disbandment of the America First Committee as war becomes imminent. (7/8)1936

Let's catch up! Check out the visual on YouTube! Word on the street is Wendy is placing blame on Eddie and Lisa Wu is accused of "theft by deception."  Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Gene Zannetti talks with New York state champion Ryker Cox about winning his first state title as a junior at 160 pounds, how working on his mindset helped him jump levels in wrestling by staying focused one step at a time, why his reset button became raising his eyebrows to mentally reset between sequences, how key losses during the season lit a fire under him and made him a completely different wrestler, and wrestling through pneumonia and the flu to win a tournament just weeks before states.Timestamps:2:14 - Following his dad's footsteps4:46 - Placing fourth at states lit a fire for the offseason6:00 - Mindset helped him jump levels in wrestling8:23 - His reset button is raising his eyebrows10:00 - The loss that changed his whole season10:43 - Wrestling through pneumonia and the flu11:40 - Breaking through his mental block at Eastern States13:28 - Hiring an assistant coach for practice partners14:12 - Coming in as the one seed and establishing dominance

In this episode, I explore 5 common triggers for overeating in the evening. This includes: - 1. Dietary restraint and/or not eating enough during the day. 2. Placing food on the pedestal of the day. 3. The 'I've Blown it Effect'. 4. Alcohol. 5. Emotional triggers. I hope that you find it helpful.  

A lot of local business owners don't struggle with marketing, they struggle with staying remembered. And email marketing often gets pushed aside because social media feels faster, easier, and more visible. The thing is, those platforms don't belong to you.Email marketing changes that. It gives you a direct line to your audience without algorithms deciding who sees you and when. And for a local business, that shift is the difference between being occasionally noticed and consistently booked.What you'll hear in this episode is a grounded breakdown of how to build a simple, sustainable email list without funnels, complicated systems, or overthinking every word. Because effective email marketing isn't about complexity. It's about clarity and consistency.You'll learn how email marketing for local business owners works differently than online influencers or digital-first brands. Instead of chasing volume, you focus on relevance, relationships, and repeat customers who already know your name or are close enough to become regulars.We break down four simple ways to start building your list quickly: Creating a simple, no-pressure signup offer your customers actually want  Placing opt-ins everywhere your audience already interacts with your business Treating email as relationship-building, not performance marketing This is where most people overcomplicate things. But marketing for local business doesn't need to look like a tech startup funnel. It needs to feel human, consistent, and useful.You'll also hear real-world examples from service-based businesses like bakers, estheticians, and contractors who use local business strategies to stay top of mind without relying on social media alone. And this is where content marketing becomes practical, not theoretical. Your emails don't need to be long or polished. They need to be useful, timely, and real.If you've been stuck in overthinking mode, this episode connects the dots between simplicity and results. Because copywriting isn't about sounding perfect, it's about sounding like yourself so your audience actually trusts what you say.And if you have more questions about email marketing, go listen to Episode #18: The 3 types of emails every small business owner needs, which builds on this foundation and shows you exactly what to send once your list is growing.By the end of this episode, you'll understand why email marketing for local business is one of the most underused tools for sustainable growth, and how to start using it in a way that actually fits your time, energy, and business model.If you're ready to stop guessing and start building something that compounds over time, you can book a free call with me to map out your next steps and get your email strategy working properly for your business.This episode was mixed and edited by Cardinal Studio.

The Vault has become something that rallies God's people together around a cause greater than any single church or denomination. The preservation and propagation of preaching is kingdom work, and we are united in that great work. This is the followup video of The Vault UK that was recently established and opened officially at the LTBS Centre in Ahoghill, Northern Ireland. The foundation has been laid and what remains is to fill the racks with the servers and storage arrays necessary for it to be a true full replica of The Vault HQ in Greenville SC. Placing a full Vault replica in the UK together with a trusted partner like LTBS is a key part of ensuring that the preaching preserved on SermonAudio remains protected, accessible, and resilient well into the future. Learn more here https://www.sermonaudio.com/news/the-vault-uk-followup Support us here: sermonaudio.com/vault

Etiquette, manners, and beyond! In this episode, Nick and Leah tackle receiving black napkins in restaurants, squatting in strangers' kitchens, slurping smelly foods on airplanes, and much more. Please follow us! (We'd send you a handwritten thank-you note if we could.)Have a question for us? Call or text (267) CALL-RBW or visit ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ask.wyrbw.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠EPISODE CONTENTSAMUSE-BOUCHE: Napkins 201A QUESTION OF ETIQUETTE: Making phone calls on airplanesQUESTIONS FROM THE WILDERNESS: Should we host a difficult houseguest again or should we just decline? What do I do when I don't want to reschedule with a friend who has cancelled on me five times?VENT OR REPENT: An unfortunate airplane seatmate, Bringing too many items to the express laneCORDIALS OF KINDNESS: Thanks for the theater outing, Thanks for the nice reviewsTHINGS MENTIONED DURING THE SHOWBasic napkin etiquette (Episode 20)Napkin rings (Episode 94)Placing napkins on a table (Episode 230)Should passengers make phone calls on airplanes with new Wi Fi (USA Today)YOU ARE CORDIALLY INVITED TO...Share our show with a friend⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Follow us on Instagram⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠, ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Facebook⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠, ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠TikTok, and YouTubeVisit our official website⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Sign up for our newsletter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Call, text, or email us your questions⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Leave us a review on Apple Podcasts⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Buy some fabulous official merchandise⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Become a member on PatreonCREDITSHosts: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Nick Leighton⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ & ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Leah Bonnema⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Producer & Editor: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Nick Leighton⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Theme Music: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Rob Paravonian⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ADVERTISE ON OUR SHOW⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Click here for details⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠TRANSCRIPT⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Episode 306See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In "The Fragility of Trust in Leadership," Timothy Staton delves into the critical role of trust within organizations. This episode explores how trust varies across different leadership levels, emphasizing its delicate nature as responsibilities increase. Key concepts include the "Goldilocks leadership" approach, which balances firmness and empathy. Staton discusses how trust is built on character and competence, and why emotional discipline and transparency are vital for leaders. This insightful episode is essential for understanding how trust shapes organizational culture and leadership effectiveness. Core Points: Trust diminishes as leadership responsibilities grow. Senior leaders have less room for mistakes due to broader consequences impacting entire organizations and external stakeholders. Leader behavior, even subtle actions or silence, is amplified at senior levels, directly shaping organizational culture and team confidence. Culture is defined by tolerated behaviors, not just stated values. Leaders who overlook substandard actions inadvertently set new, lower expectations. Effective leadership balances empathy and accountability. It requires both strong character and proven competence, with neither being sufficient alone. Leadership fit is crucial. Placing a technically skilled individual in a leadership role without considering their suitability for that specific context, team, and season can harm organizational culture. Connect With Tim Website: timstatingtheobvious.com Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/timstatingtheobvious YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHfDcITKUdniO8R3RP0lvdw Instagram: @TimStating TikTok: @timstatingtheobvious LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/tim-staton-04b41a271/ SKOOL Community: https://www.skool.com/timstatingtheobvious-9537/about?ref=de9c7e65d8ba4eeabc1a8eea413c125b

Placing a Rock on the Tombstone by Rabbi Avi Harari

In this lively gaming podcast episode, the GZ Chop Shop hosts delve into the latest industry news, Sony's controversial DRM practices, the evolution of Nintendo, and the future of gaming technology and subscriptions. They share insights, historical anecdotes, and bold opinions on the current state of gaming. This episode dives into the latest in gaming industry controversies, upcoming console changes, and the impact of studio decisions on game development. They explore Sony's potential price hikes, the fallout from canceled projects like Gang of Dragons, and the wild world of game crossovers, including Evangelion and Final Fantasy XIV. Key TopicsSony's DRM practices and their implicationsThe history and impact of Nintendo's innovationCurrent trends in the gaming industry and market competition, Sony's upcoming console changes, and price increaseThe cancellation and controversy surrounding ScaleboundThe trend of crossovers in gaming: Evangelion, Final Fantasy XIV, and moreThe challenges faced by game studios and the industry's failure rateChapters00:00 Return from Japan: Gaming Insights00:41 Sony's Controversial Moves02:52 The Impact of DRM on Gamers06:19 Sony's Competitive Landscape08:10 Microsoft's Strategic Shifts11:07 The Future of Xbox and Game Pass13:10 The Role of Exclusives in Gaming15:17 Nintendo's Unique Position in the Market17:31 The Evolution of Gaming Consoles27:26 Reflections on Gaming History28:47 The Future of Gaming Consoles29:44 Subscription Models in Gaming34:15 The Subscription Economy's Impact37:42 Sony's PlayStation Plus Changes41:27 The Next Generation of Consoles44:54 The Rise and Fall of Gang of Dragons47:27 The Cost of Game Development49:34 The Reality of Game Studios51:22 Success Stories in Game Development55:00 Crossover Madness: Final Fantasy and Evangelion01:05:17 Wrap-Up and Future Insights ResourcesSony Official SiteNintendo Official SiteXbox Official Site GameStopSuper Potato Retro StoreFinal Fantasy XIV Official SiteEvangelion SeriesGame Crossover TrendsJoin our newsletter!Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/gzchopshop. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Placing the temple at the center of our lives.

In this episode of The Full Arch Podcast, Dr. Steven Vorholt shares insights from his time at Thrive Live in Las Vegas, where he delivered a lecture focused on the role of implants in general dentistry. Speaking to a room of primarily general dentists, he breaks down why implants should no longer be seen as a specialty procedure and why more GPs need to start bringing this treatment in-house. The episode explores the current state of implant dentistry, highlighting how few GPs in the U.S. are placing implants despite it being one of the fastest-growing sectors in dentistry. Dr. Vorholt also dives into the business side of implants, explaining how referrals impact case acceptance, revenue, and overall practice value and why keeping procedures in-house can significantly change outcomes. Key Insights:

WEEI Celtics Insider Justin Turpin on the C's lack of secondary scoring // BREAKING NEWS: Garrett Crochet on the IL with left shoulder inflammation // What's next for the Red Sox after placing Crochet on the IL? //

Nicholas "Harry" Callas reacts to the Steelers enacting a rare UFA tender on QB Aaron Rodgers on Tuesday.

"Resurrection Bodies?!?" 1 Corinthians 15:35-49 1. God is the giver of bodies. (vs. 38,45)Genesis 1:26-27; 2:7 Psalm 139:13-17 Revelation 20:11-15 2. Resurrected bodies are radically different but distinctly recognizable. (vs. 35-37, 39-49)--Philippians 3:20-21 1John 3:2…Are you waiting eagerly for your “forever body”? -Processing suffering. 2Corinthians 4:16-5:5-Pursuing pleasure. Hebrews 11:24-26 Psalm 16:11-Placing your hopes in modern medicine. Romans 8:22-24a

The official narrative surrounding Nicholas Tartaglione's placement in the same housing unit as Jeffrey Epstein has always strained credibility, especially when viewed against the broader backdrop of Epstein's status as one of the most high-profile detainees in federal custody. Tartaglione wasn't some low-risk, white-collar offender—he was a former police officer accused of committing multiple brutal murders, a man already associated with extreme violence. Placing someone with that profile anywhere near Epstein, who had already been the target of an alleged assault just weeks earlier, raises immediate and obvious questions about judgment, protocol, and intent. Federal detention standards are built around risk classification, separation, and protective measures for vulnerable inmates, yet in this case, those safeguards appear either ignored or deliberately bypassed. The explanation that this was a routine or acceptable placement doesn't hold up under scrutiny, particularly given the attention Epstein's case was receiving at the highest levels of government and media. When layered on top of documented irregularities inside the facility—staffing shortages, broken cameras, and procedural lapses—the decision to house Tartaglione in proximity to Epstein feels less like an oversight and more like a glaring contradiction to established correctional practices.Tartaglione's denial that he assaulted Epstein only deepens the skepticism rather than resolving it. While he has publicly rejected claims of involvement, the mere fact that he was in a position where such an allegation could even arise underscores how compromised the situation already was. In a properly managed facility, especially one holding a detainee as sensitive as Epstein, there shouldn't be ambiguity about who had access, who posed a threat, or how interactions were monitored. The denial doesn't answer the core issue—it sidesteps it. It doesn't explain why a detainee with a documented history of violence was placed in proximity to Epstein in the first place, nor does it address the institutional failures that made such a scenario possible. Given the pattern of inconsistencies surrounding Epstein's detention—from unexplained movements to lapses in surveillance—the Tartaglione episode fits into a larger mosaic of questionable decisions that collectively erode confidence in the official account. Whether or not Tartaglione physically attacked Epstein becomes almost secondary to the more troubling reality: the system created conditions where that possibility existed at all, and then failed to provide clear, credible answers afterward.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The official narrative surrounding Nicholas Tartaglione's placement in the same housing unit as Jeffrey Epstein has always strained credibility, especially when viewed against the broader backdrop of Epstein's status as one of the most high-profile detainees in federal custody. Tartaglione wasn't some low-risk, white-collar offender—he was a former police officer accused of committing multiple brutal murders, a man already associated with extreme violence. Placing someone with that profile anywhere near Epstein, who had already been the target of an alleged assault just weeks earlier, raises immediate and obvious questions about judgment, protocol, and intent. Federal detention standards are built around risk classification, separation, and protective measures for vulnerable inmates, yet in this case, those safeguards appear either ignored or deliberately bypassed. The explanation that this was a routine or acceptable placement doesn't hold up under scrutiny, particularly given the attention Epstein's case was receiving at the highest levels of government and media. When layered on top of documented irregularities inside the facility—staffing shortages, broken cameras, and procedural lapses—the decision to house Tartaglione in proximity to Epstein feels less like an oversight and more like a glaring contradiction to established correctional practices.Tartaglione's denial that he assaulted Epstein only deepens the skepticism rather than resolving it. While he has publicly rejected claims of involvement, the mere fact that he was in a position where such an allegation could even arise underscores how compromised the situation already was. In a properly managed facility, especially one holding a detainee as sensitive as Epstein, there shouldn't be ambiguity about who had access, who posed a threat, or how interactions were monitored. The denial doesn't answer the core issue—it sidesteps it. It doesn't explain why a detainee with a documented history of violence was placed in proximity to Epstein in the first place, nor does it address the institutional failures that made such a scenario possible. Given the pattern of inconsistencies surrounding Epstein's detention—from unexplained movements to lapses in surveillance—the Tartaglione episode fits into a larger mosaic of questionable decisions that collectively erode confidence in the official account. Whether or not Tartaglione physically attacked Epstein becomes almost secondary to the more troubling reality: the system created conditions where that possibility existed at all, and then failed to provide clear, credible answers afterward.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Placing bets on the Maduro raid. Accountability, better late than never. How many dead are on the voter roles? Is the republican party fake. Is the FAL outdated? Follow The Jesse Kelly Show on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@TheJesseKellyShowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Kalshi caught and suspended three political candidates who bet on the outcomes of their own elections, the prediction market company said in a statement on Wednesday, fining the three politicians and issuing five-year bans from their platform. Minnesota State Senator Matt Klein, a candidate running for the Democratic nomination for Minnesota's second district in the House of Representatives, agreed to pay a $539.85 fine. Ezekiel Enriquez, a former candidate for the Republican primary for a congressional district in Texas, was fined $784.20. Enriquez lost this race after the primary elections in March. Both Klein and Enriquez bought less than $100 worth of contracts on their own elections, according to Kalshi's filings, and both were also issued five-year suspensions. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

If you're looking for Netherlands hidden gems, this episode is your invitation to discover the country beyond Amsterdam.I'm joined by Rachel Heller, a longtime resident and Founder of Rachel's Ruminations, who shares what it's really like to explore the Netherlands beyond the main stops.We talk about life in Groningen, visiting Amsterdam in a more thoughtful way, and why hopping on a bike outside the city might be one of the best things you do.Rachel also introduces lesser-known spots — like Bourtange and the historic towns of Friesland — that offer a quieter, more local feel.If you're looking for a more meaningful way to experience the country, this episode will give you a few ideas. And maybe shift how you think about visiting altogether.Want to chat more about the Netherlands?Send me a message at Lynne@WanderYourWay.comIn this episode:1:07: Introducing Rachel Heller3:50: Rachel's Story6:27: Placing the Netherlands on the map7:13: Amsterdam12:40: Bourtange, Friesland and Elfsteden 18:55: Cities near Amsterdam20:05: Tulips & Windmills26:36: Islands & Coastline30:15: Favorite places38:12: The Hauge & Rotterdam40:10: Logistics & Tips49:31: Take aways53:05: Wrapping it upImportant links:Rachel's RuminationsWorld Heritage TravelThe Netherlands Tourism Boat Bike ToursWander Your Way AdventuresWander Your WayOofosWander Your Way ResourcesWander Your Way Podcast ★ Support this podcast ★

Welcome to The Times of Israel's Lazar Focus. Each Friday, join host diplomatic correspondent Lazar Berman for a deep dive into what's behind the news that spins the globe. The shorthand term "Gulf states" doesn't describe a monolith. The Arab states along the Persian Gulf -- Saudi Arabia, Oman, the UAE, Qatar, Kuwait, and Bahrain -- all have unique internal dynamics, and approach their relationships with both Israel and Iran in different ways. Yet they do share a common threat -- the Shiite regional heavyweight just across the water, Iran. Placing a priority on stability and prosperity, the Gulf states have sought to prevent a war between the US and Iran. And if that war did break out, they hoped to secure immunity from Iranian attacks by maintaining diplomatic channels with the Islamic Republic and by showing that they were working for a ceasefire. That effort failed spectacularly. All the Gulf states were targeted by Iran, and the UAE was the country hardest hit by Iran in the war that began on February 28. The war made the countries look weak, as none of them hit back, nor were they able to put together a unified diplomatic initiative to end the war. Moran Zaga, expert on the Gulf states at the University of Haifa and at MIND Israel, explains how each of the countries is rethinking its approach to the Iran threat, and whether they are open to deeper ties with Israel. For now, she says, they are facing new and pressing challenges that threaten their economic well-being -- the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, the possibility that the Houthis will shut down the approaches to the Red Sea, and Iran's insistence that it should decide who gets to enter the Persian Gulf. Lazar Focus can be found on all podcast platforms. This episode was produced by Gabriella Jacobs and video edited by Ari Schlacht.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Some Wisconsin farm workers are already active! Stephanie Hoff finds out how the honeybee population has mobilized from Brooke Nikkila-Sommerfeldt, WI State Apiarist and Apiary Program Coordinator. During mid-to-late February, nearly every migratory commercial bee colony in the U.S. is located in California for almond pollination. Beyond the risk of "bee spills" (truck accidents), moving bees long distances can lead to hive suffocation or overheating due to improper ventilation. Placing bees in single-crop environments, like almond groves, can lead to nutritional deficiencies because the bees lack a diverse range of pollen and nectar. Much like wood ticks carry Lyme disease to humans, Varroa mites can vector over 20 different viruses to honeybees, including the virulent deformed wing virus. Exposure to pesticides—common near agriculture or golf courses—can lower a bee's immune system, making them more susceptible to viruses and mites. While small flowers are great, "big blooms" from trees and shrubs are particularly beneficial for honeybees because they provide a large amount of resources in one location. Wisconsin weather woes continue with more rain in the forecast, and cooling temperatures. Stu Muck explains that there's even a chance of snow for the weekend in some areas of the state. Gardeners are just as frustrated as farmers about the weather delay's we're working through. Kiley Allan talks with Scott Trudell who staffs the Plant Desk for The Bruce Company. While spring bulbs like tulips and daffodils are hardy enough to survive fluctuating temperatures, deciduous shrubs (such as lilacs and crab apples) are more vulnerable. If temperatures drop below the mid-20s, these should be covered with blankets or row covers to prevent damage. Trudell says greenhouse inventory is arriving earlier than usual this year, featuring cold-tolerant flowers like pansies, sweet alyssum, and the increasingly popular hellebores. Be patient. That's the advice Dr. Shawn Conley, UW-Madison Extension Soybean Specialist is sharing with farmers. Conley tells Pam Jahnke that with the high input costs operators are facing this year, the last thing you'll want to do is "mud in" the crop.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This show has been flagged as Clean by the host. Basic-Filtering 01 Introduction This is the second episode in a four part series on a simple way to create your own HPR podcast episode. 02 This episode will cover the following topics: Basic filtering.. De-essing to improve voice quality. And normalizing to adjust audio levels for easier reviewing. 03 Filtering is removing unwanted noise from an audio signal. There are several ways of doing this. It is possible to do this with Audacity, but I don't know how so I won't try to describe that method. It is possible however to filter using command line tools such as FFMPEG and Sox. When assembled into shell scripts, these tools can become part of an automated process that you can use over and over again for each HPR episode that you record. 04 In a later episode I will discuss how to analyze audio signals to find the sources of noise that can be reduced or eliminated with filters. In this episode however I will discuss basic filtering that you can apply routinely without doing any analysis beforehand. 05 Sources of Noise A question that you may have is "why is there noise in the recording?" There are many sources of undesirable noise. 06 A very common one that you may not be aware of is electrical noise that works its way into the electronic recording circuits and is imperceptible to you until you play back the recorded audio. The most common noise signal is what is commonly called "line noise" and is a low frequency hum at 50 or 60 Hz from the electric power lines and reflects the 50 or 60 Hz frequency of the AC power lines feeding your recording hardware. 07 You may be familiar with this low frequency hum from when it emanates from large electrical hardware such as transformers as it makes the laminations vibrate. However, it can also work its way indirectly into electronic equipment as well. Good quality audio hardware may filter all or most of this out, but it is present in a lot of consumer grade hardware. 08 Other sources of electrical noise may reflect specific problems in your recording hardware. I will discuss one such problem with my microphone that I had to address. Still other sources of noise may reflect actual physical audio noise around you, such as fans. Placing the microphone close to your face will help in dealing with a lot of these problems, but you may find filtering to be of some help here as well. 09 Audio Frequency Range Let's start with some basics. A good quality stereo of the type you may have at home is typically rated to perform between 20 Hz and 20 kHz. This is the widest possible range that we need to consider. In reality, this is a far wider range than is needed for a voice oriented podcast. It is also well beyond the range of the hardware that many of your listeners will be using to listen to the podcast. 10 For example, the speakers that I have connected to my PC and a number of headphones and earphones that I have tested drop off drastically below 80 Hz or above 8 kHz, or even above 6 kHz in many cases. This is not audiophile quality hardware, but it is representative of the sort of hardware that a lot of your listeners will be using when listening to podcasts. And to be honest here, a lot of people will have difficulty hearing anything above 8 kHz even with the best quality audio hardware due to hearing loss from environmental noise exposure or age. 11 You can get a good idea of what different frequencies sound like by generating sine waves using either FFMPEG or Sox. Here's an example of generating a 1 kHz sine wave using FFMPEG. A copy of this will be in the show notes. ffmpeg -f lavfi -i "sine=frequency=1000:sample_rate=44100:duration=3" 01000hz.flac This creates a sine wave at 1 kHz and at a sample rate of 44.1 kHz for a duration of 3 seconds and saves it to a flac file named 01000hz.flac 12 Here's the same using Sox. sox -n -r 44100 -b 16 01000hz.flac synth 3 sine 1000 The -b 16 specifies using 16 bit audio to encode it, and the "sine 1000" element specifies the frequency in hertz. 13 You can test this out at different frequencies to get a feel for how your hardware responds. What the effective limits on typical hardware audio range means is that we can quite safely filter out a large part of what is considered to be the "audio range" without any noticeable loss of quality. For the purposes of our discussion here then I will limit the frequency range to between 80 Hz and 12 kHz, and that is being generous. You can probably narrow that, particularly at the top end, without any problems. 14 At the low end, the typical rule of thumb recommended by most people seems to be that for the average male voice you can set the lower threshold at 80 Hz, and for the average female you can set it at 160 Hz. Note that you don't *have* to set the threshold higher for a female. Rather, it is just that you typically *can* set it higher if you wish. Note also that these are averages, and may not reflect an actual individual. 15 Simple Filters We will now create some simple filters using the same command line software mentioned in a previous episode in this series. These are FFMPEG and Sox. 16 First let's define some terminology. A high pass filter passes through frequencies which fall above a certain threshold and blocks frequencies which are below that frequency. A low pass filter passes through frequencies which fall below a certain threshold and blocks frequencies which are above that frequency. 17 In reality there isn't an abrupt cut-off in the filters. Instead there is a gradual roll off or sloping off of amplitude below or above the specified filter frequency. This is for two reasons. One is that if there was an abrupt cut off then it would risk introducing audible distortion in the signal for frequencies on the margin. 18 The other reason is that this is how hardware filters traditionally inherently worked when they were made out of electronic components such as resistors, capacitors, and inductors. The sharpness of this cut off can be adjusted, but we won't be fiddling with it in that sort of detail. You will sometimes see filters specified in terms of "poles". This has to do with describing how filters were constructed using electronic components. Don't worry about it, it doesn't really matter. 19 Here is a typical high pass filter using ffmpeg which filters out frequencies below 80 hertz. # High pass filter. ffmpeg -i inputfile.flac -af "highpass=f=80" outputfile.flac Here is a typical low pass filter using ffmpeg which filters out frequencies above 12 kHz. # Low pass filter. ffmpeg -i inputfile.flac -af "lowpass=f=12000" outputfile.flac 20 Here is a filter which combines the two. # Combined filters. ffmpeg -i inputfile.flac -af "highpass=f=80, lowpass=f=12000" outputfile.flac And here is the same thing using Sox. sox inputfile.flac outputfile.flac highpass 80 lowpass 12000 21 Filtering Out Specific Frequencies Recall that I mentioned that a common source of noise is the 50 or 60 Hz AC power line frequency working its way through the electronics of your recording device. Because filters operate gradually and the 80 Hz lower filter threshold is close to 60 Hz, the high pass filter may not deal with this adequately. 22 Now it happens that your listeners may not be able to hear this 50 or 60 Hz noise anyway because their audio hardware won't reproduce it. That by the way includes you not being able to hear it either when you review your recording before uploading it. However, there may be some HPR listeners who are sitting back sipping a glass of wine and listening to your episode on their stereo and who can hear it. That suggests that we ought to do something about it just in case. 23 I will get into how to analyze audio signals in a later episode, but for now just accept that I looked at the frequency spectrum of a sample recording using my hardware and found a large 60 Hz noise spike which I wanted to address. 24 Experimenting with additional high pass frequencies up to 120 Hz did not improve things much with respect to the 60 Hz problem. There are other parameters which could be tweaked, but at this point it would seem most promising to attack the 60 Hz spike problem directly using a different filter method. To deal with the this 60 Hz spike we can use a "band reject" filter, which removes a specific band of frequencies. We will use this in combination with the filtering that we have already done above. 25 After a small amount of experimenting I came up with the following. I also added in a 50 Hz filter while I was at it, for the benefit of those living in areas with 50 Hz electrical supply. These filters will be included in the show notes, so don't worry if you can't quite understand all the details from a verbal description. 26 Here's the FFMPEG version. # Using ffmpeg ffmpeg -i input.flac -af "highpass=f=80, lowpass=f=12000, bandreject=f=60:width_type=h:w=20, bandreject=f=50:width_type=h:w=20" output.flac 27 This as the following elements A high pass filter at 80 Hz, A low pass filter at 12 kHz, A band reject filter centred at 60 Hz and with a width of 20 hertz. A similar band reject filter centred at 50 Hz. 28 Here's the Sox version. # Sox version. sox input.flac output.flac highpass 80 lowpass 12000 bandreject 60 20 bandreject 50 20 Note that with sox, don't quote the filter definition strings or else it will result in an error as sox doesn't see enough parameters. This is not a problem with ffmpeg. 29 The band reject filter knocks the stuffing out of the 60 Hz line noise, and the 50 Hz parameter should do the same for that frequency as well. This basic filter should be able to be applied to any podcast audio recording without causing any problems. You can probably reduce the low pass frequency from 12 kHz down to 8 kHz without any problems, but I would suggest that you test it with your voice before making that decision. 30 I will come back to filtering out specific frequencies again later when I discuss how I solved a specific problem with the hardware that I am using. However, we have to discuss how to analyze audio signals before we can do that sort of technical troubleshooting, and I will cover that in a later episode. -------------------- 31 De-Essing An additional type of filtering is "de-essing". When recording audio, the microphone or environment may result in "s", "sh", "ch" and possibly other sounds to be exaggerated. These are all higher frequency elements of voice recordings. "De-essing" attempts to soften these sounds by selectively reducing the volume on the frequency band which contains these sounds. 32 Software Filters De-essing is accomplished via software filters. FFMPEG and Sox both have de-essing filters. For FFMPEG, the de-essing filter is built in. For Sox however, we must install an optional plug-in. I will cover this is more detail when I discuss using Sox for de-essing. 33 Do You Need De-Essing? The first thing to make clear however, is that you may not need to worry about this. If you think the audio sounds just fine the way it is, you don't need to do any de-essing to it. De-essing is a very subtle change, and you would probably need to do some careful before and after comparisons of audio samples to tell the difference. I didn't know that a thing called de-essing even existed before I started doing the research to make this podcast episode. However, at this point we are doing things more for fun than out of necessity, so I'll describe it anyway. 34 De-Essing with FFMPEG De-essing with FFMPEG is relatively simple. The filter is built in, and there are just three values to adjust. On the other hand, it is not really obvious what these values mean in practical terms. 35 I will however warn you to not rely on the AI search results from Google to understand this feature. The AI, in my experience, just makes stuff up about it and tells you to use options that don't exist and values that are not valid. I found that the only useful information came from FFMPEG's own web site, and from examples written by actual humans. 36 I then experimented with different values to see what effects they had. Since the results are rather subtle, fine tuning isn't really that necessary and I found that I could arrive at some reasonable values fairly quickly. I will provide the parameters that I found useful for me, and I suspect they would probably work for you as well. 37 Here is a typical de-essing command. ffmpeg -i inputfile.flac -filter_complex "deesser=i=0.5:m=0.5:f=0.5:s=o" -b:a 336k -sample_fmt s16 outputfile.flac 38 The important arguments are i, m, and f. i is intensity for triggering de-essing. The allowed range is 0 to 1. The default is 0. By experimentation I found that "0" means no de-essing, and "1" is maximum de-essing. I found that setting it to "0.5" gave satisfactory results. 39 m is the amount of "ducking on the treble part of sound". The allowed range is 0 to 1. The default is 0.5. By experimentation I found that "1" means no de-essing, and "0" is maximum de-essing. I found that setting it to "0.5" gave satisfactory results. 40 f is how much of the original frequency content to keep when de-essing. The allowed range is 0 to 1. The default is 0.5. By experimentation I found that "1" means no de-essing, and "0" is maximum de-essing. I found that setting it to "0.5" gave satisfactory results. 41 Setting "m" or "f" too high can result in a distorted output as too much of the original sound is cut out. The defaults of 0.5 in both cases gave audible improvements without noticeable distortion. 42 There is an additional parameter called "s". This controls whether the de-essing filter does anything. Setting it to "o" is the normal and default mode. Setting it to "e" causes it to output just the components that it would normally have filtered out. This is useful for testing purposes so you can see what and how much is being filtered. You only use this when experimenting with different values. Setting it to "i" causes the input to be passed through without de-essing. This would be useful in scripts where you want to use a variable to control whether or not to use the de-esser while still creating the expected output file. 43 There are two other elements of the command which were included but are not strictly speaking part of the de-essing filter itself . These are " -b:a 336k" and "-sample_fmt s16". " -b:a 336k" sets the audio bit rate to 336k. "-sample_fmt s16" sets the audio sample format to 16 bit. I found it necessary to specify these in order to prevent the de-essing filter from changing formats. They are not part of de-essing however. 44 De-Essing with Sox You can also de-ess with Sox. However, this is more complex for several reasons. One reason is that Sox does not have its own de-essing filters. Instead it uses optional plug-ins, and you must find and install these. The actual plug in may vary depending on what operating system you are using. The other reason is that it deals with the issue in fairly low level parameters, and so is a bit more complex to describe. Because of this I will skip over describing this in detail and just give a very brief overview. If anyone would like me to describe in more detail how to de-ess with Sox, then send in a comment and I will do a short episode on it later. 45 Sox De-Essing Overview To de-ess with Sox, you first need to install the plug-ins. On Linux, these will be the TAP ladspa plug-ins. TAP stands for "Tom's Audio Processing" plugins. ladspa stands for "Linux Audio Developer's Simple Plugin API" To install the TAP plugins on Ubuntu, using the following command. sudo apt install tap-plugins The plug-in we need is called "tap_deesser.so". 46 In order to use the plug-ins, you need to set the path as a variable. On Ubuntu this is. export LADSPA_PATH="/usr/lib/ladspa:" I put the above in the shell script which calls the Sox de-esser. 47 To use the Sox de-esser, you do the following: sox inputfile.flac outputfile.flac ladspa tap_deesser tap_deesser -30 4500 48 tap_deesser tap_deesser tells it which plugin to use. We need to state tap_deesser twice because the first is the name of the ".so" file and the second is the name of the plugin. A single "so" file can contain multiple filters, although in this case there is only one. -30 is the threshold in dB at which to start to apply the filter. 4500 is the frequency in Hz that the filter centres around. 49 The TAP web page has a table of recommended frequencies. These are: Male 'ess' 4500 Hz Male 'ssh' 3400 Hz Female 'ess' 6800 Hz Female 'ssh' 5100 Hz You will need to do some trial and error to find what works best for you. 50 De-Essing Summary De-essing can be used to make minor improvements to voice quality by reducing certain harsh sounds which may be exaggerated by a microphone. If it sounds like a lot of work you can probably simply not bother with it and not really miss it. -------------------- 51 Normalizing Normalizing a signal means adjusting it to meet a specified level. For audio it means adjusting the volume or sound level. You may wish to normalize the audio of your recording to make it easier to listen to when reviewing it. The copy that you send to HPR however should be the original un-normalized version. 52 Sound level is measured in two ways, dB and LUFS. The latter is a more sophisticated way of measuring things which takes into account how the human ear perceives loudness. I won't go into a lot of detail in that regards, other than to say that just accept LUFS as a unit of perceived loudness that is the international standard. LUFS stands for "Loudness Units referenced to Full Scale", and is part of the EBU R128 standard, where EBU stands for European Broadcast Union. In both cases the measured value is a negative number, with numbers smaller in magnitude being louder. Smaller in magnitude means closer to zero. 53 HPR will adjust the sound level for publication, but if you wish to check the audio before uploading it can help to adjust it to something close to what HPR will do so that you can listen to it at a volume which most listeners will hear. In my case full volume on the audio system input produced a sound level which was much lower than a typical HPR episode. However, the volume level in the flac file itself can be adjusted using ffmpeg. 54 Measuring Volume Level First we need to see what the volume level is for a typical HPR podcast. To do this we use ffmpeg. In this example we are using an episode named "hprpodcast.mp3". Pick an episode which you think is suitable and copy the file to the working directory. 55 In the following script we use a volumedetect filter. The text we want normally outputs to standard error, so we have to do a bit of bashery to redirect this to standard output so it will go through a pipe. We then grep for the string "I:". This will have the average volume level in "loudness units" (LUFS). Then we extract the number, giving us a target LUFS level. 56 ffmpeg -i hprpodcast.mp3 -filter:a ebur128=framelog=quiet -f null /dev/null 2>&1 | grep "I:" | cut -d: -f2 57 Unfortunately I can't find a Sox feature which handles EBU loudness, so we need to work in dB instead. Here is the sox version. However, note that this may not work on mp3s if sox mp3 handing is not installed. 58 sox hprpodcast.mp3 -n stats 2>&1 | grep "RMS lev dB" | rev | cut -d" " -f1 | rev 59 You can use either of these for measuring the volume or sound level of an audio file. However, note that individual episodes from HPR may vary a bit in terms of loudness. In the samples that I looked at, this however was less than 1 LUFS or dB while my own recording was roughly 5 LUFS lower in volume than a typical HPR episode. -------------------- 60 If you Google for the EBU R128 standard the AI result will confidently tell you to use a target of -23 LUFS. However, this is wrong, which shouldn't be of any surprise if you are familiar with using AI. 61 The -23 LUFS figure is for broadcast television. There is in fact no standard level for podcasts. However, there is apparently a general industry convention of using somewhere around -17 LUFS. If I look at the first two HPR episodes that I did, HPR normalized them to -16.8 LUFS and -17.8 LUFS, while the original FLAC files that I submitted were -21.6 LUFS and -22.3 LUFS respectively. 62 So HRP appear to be targeting somewhere around -17 LUFS as well. We will therefore use -17 LUFS as our target for our own copy for review. -------------------- 63 The nice thing about using the EBU filter in FFMPEG is that this is very simple. Here is the FFMPEG version. 64 ffmpeg -i inputfile.flac -af loudnorm=I=-17:TP=-2.0:LRA=7.0 -ar 44.1k outputfile.flac 65 "I" is the LUFS target. LRA is the loudness range target. The default value is 7.0 so I used that. TP sets the maximum true peak. The default value is -2.0. so I used that. -------------------- 66 With Sox things are a bit more difficult. There is no direct method of setting the loudness that I am aware of, so we need to measure the current sound level in dB, do some calculations, and then apply that as a gain factor to the output. 67 First we need to subtract the measured db level from our flac file from the target db level from the HPR episode we decided to use as a sample. Bash by itself normally just does integer math. However, we would like to have at least one decimal point of resolution to work with. The simple solution is to do this calculation using bc, the shell arbitrary precision calculator. 68 Then take this new value and use it in a "volume" filter. The number which we give sox is the amount to increase or decrease the volume by. Sox will then output a new file with the new volume level. You can now listen to this file under conditions more closely approximating what it will be like after HPR have done their own audio adjustments and normalizaton on it This helps when listening to the file for any problems before you upload it. 69 Rather than reading 5 lines of complex shell script to you, I will put a copy of it in the show notes. level=$( sox $inputfile -n stats 2>&1 | grep "RMS lev dB" ) leveldb=$( echo "$level" | rev | cut -d" " -f1 | rev ) targetdb="-18.9" volumechange=$(echo "scale=2 ; $targetdb - $leveldb" | bc ) sox $inputfile $outputname gain "$volumechange" -------------------- 70 Normalization should be the last thing you do to the file. It should be done after any noise filtering, such as low pass, high pass, bandreject, etc. If you normalize first, you will be amplifying the noise as well as the desired signal. 71 The exact normalization level used for review purposes doesn't matter, as HPR will apply their own later. All we are doing at this point is adjusting the volume to something which approximates a normal episode so you can listen to it for final review. 72 When you send your file to HPR, send the original *unnormalized* version, not the normalized version. When you normalize an audio signal, if you are not careful you may introduce things which cause problems with later additional processing. HPR probably do more things to the audio than just normalizing and so they need the unnormalized file so that they can do their own normalizing last. -------------------- 73 If at this point you are happy with the recording as is, you are ready to send the *unnormalized* version to HPR. The scripts to implement the features discussed in this episode will be in the show notes. 74 Conclusion In this episode we covered basic filtering using ffmpeg and sox. We discussed what noise was and some of the origins of noise. We talked about the audio frequency range and the limitations of common hardware used to record and listen to podcasts. We covered basic high and low pass filters used to limit the audio frequency range in order to remove possible low and high frequency noise. 75 We discussed specific filters to eliminate 50 and 60 Hz electrical power noise. We talked about de-essing, what it was, why you may wish to use it, and some basic de-essing filter implementation details. We discussed normalizing, what it is, why you may wish to use it, and how it relates to podcasting conventions. 76 In the next episode we will discuss analyzing audio signals to help find the sources of noise problems. We will also discuss creating filters to eliminate any problems that we found. In my case I had a problem with the microphone that I use, and I describe how I used filters to deal with that problem. 77 This has been the second episode in a four part series on simple podcasting. -------------------- EBU R128 Loudness Measurement using FFMPEG #!/bin/bash echo "EBU r128 loudness measurement using FFMPEG" for inputfile in *.flac *.mp3 ; do level=$( ffmpeg -i $inputfile -filter:a ebur128=framelog=quiet -f null /dev/null 2>&1 | grep "I:" | cut -d: -f2 ) echo $inputfile $level done -------------------- DB Sound Level Measurement using Sox #!/bin/bash # Sox version. May not work for mp3 if an mp3 format handling is not installed. echo "dB sound level measurement using Sox." for inputfile in *.flac *.mp3 ; do level=$( sox $inputfile -n stats 2>&1 | grep "RMS lev dB" ) leveldb=$( echo "$level" | rev | cut -d" " -f1 | rev ) echo $inputfile $leveldb done -------------------- EBU R128 Loudness Normalization using FFMPEG #!/bin/bash # Adjust the volume to a desired level. for inputfile in *.flac ; do j=$( basename $inputfile ".flac" ) outputname="$j""-normff.flac" ffmpeg -i $inputfile -af loudnorm=I=-17:TP=-2.0:LRA=4.0 -ar 44.1k $outputname echo $outputname done -------------------- DB Sound Level Normalization using Sox #!/bin/bash # Adjust the volume to a desired level. for inputfile in *.flac ; do j=$( basename $inputfile ".flac" ) outputname="$j""-normff.flac" # Measure the volume level and extract the mean volume. level=$( sox $inputfile -n stats 2>&1 | grep "RMS lev dB" ) leveldb=$( echo "$level" | rev | cut -d" " -f1 | rev ) # Calculate the difference in dB desired. Scale specifies the number of decimal places. # Target db is the volume measured on hpr4506 (UCSD-P-System). targetdb="-18.9" volumechange=$(echo "scale=2 ; $targetdb - $leveldb" | bc ) echo "Using sox: File: $inputfile Original level: $leveldb Change by: $volumechange" # Adjust the volume. sox $inputfile $outputname gain "$volumechange" done -------------------- Full processing pipeline for making simple podcasts using FFMPEG #!/bin/bash #!/bin/bash # Full processing pipeline for making simple podcasts. # ====================================================================== # Concatenate multiple flac files into a single flac file. # This is used to combine podcast recorded segments into a single # flac file for uploading to HPR. concataudio () { outputname="$1" # First create the list file. printf "file '%s'n" [0-9][0-9].flac > podseglist.txt # Now concatenate them ffmpeg -f concat -safe 0 -i podseglist.txt "$outputname" rm podseglist.txt } # ====================================================================== # Basic filters. filter () { inputfile=$1 outputname=$2 # Using ffmpeg. # The high and low pass filters. hlpfil="highpass=f=80, lowpass=f=12000" # Band reject filters filter for 60Hz and another for 50Hz. linefil="bandreject=f=60:width_type=h:w=20, bandreject=f=50:width_type=h:w=20" # Using ffmpeg ffmpeg -i $inputfile -af "$hlpfil, $linefil" $outputname } # ====================================================================== # De-Essing. deessing () { inputfile=$1 outputname=$2 option=$3 # De-essing filter. ffmpeg -i $inputfile -filter_complex "deesser=i=0.5:m=0.5:f=0.5:s=$option" -b:a 336k -sample_fmt s16 $outputname } # ====================================================================== # Normalizing the audio to EBU R128 standard for review using ffmpeg. normffmpeg () { inputfile=$1 outputname=$2 # Normalize to EBU R128 standard. ffmpeg -i $inputfile -af loudnorm=I=-17:TP=-2.0:LRA=4.0 -ar 44.1k $outputname } # ====================================================================== # Output an MP3 version to help with reviewing. mp3convert () { inputfile=$1 # Get the name of the file and then create the output file name. j=$( basename $inputfile ".flac" ) outputname="$j"".mp3" # Convert to MP3. ffmpeg -i $inputfile $outputname } # ====================================================================== # Concatenate the separate audio files. concataudio fullpod-unfiltered.flac # Basic filtering. filter fullpod-unfiltered.flac filtered.flac # De-essing. This is the version to send for publishing. # The third argument should be "o" for de-essing, or "i" for pass through without de-essing. deessing filtered.flac fullpod.flac o # Normalized for review. normffmpeg fullpod.flac fullpod-norm.flac # Output an MP3 copy for review. mp3convert fullpod-norm.flac -------------------- -------------------- Provide feedback on this episode.

How do you know if a prophetic word is truly from God? 2 Peter 1:21 reminds us that prophecy comes from the Holy Spirit—not human will—which means it must be tested, discerned, and handled with humility. While spiritual gifts like prophecy can be powerful and encouraging, they also require wisdom. Not every impression is perfectly interpreted, and not every word is immediately understood. That’s why Scripture calls us to weigh prophetic words carefully. Sometimes God reveals only a small piece of a bigger picture, and our role is not just to receive or deliver a word, but to discern it in community and align it with God’s truth. When approached with humility, patience, and accountability, prophecy becomes a tool that builds up the church, strengthens faith, and deepens our relationship with God. Highlights Prophecy originates from the Holy Spirit, not human effort Misinterpretation doesn’t always mean the message is false God often reveals only part of the full picture Prophetic words should be tested and discerned in community Not all words are fulfilled immediately—timing matters Humility is essential when giving or receiving prophecy Properly handled, prophecy strengthens and encourages the church Do you want to listen ad-free? When you join Crosswalk Plus, you gain access to exclusive, in-depth Bible study guides, devotionals, sound biblical advice, and daily encouragement from trusted pastors and authors—resources designed to strengthen your faith and equip you to live it out boldly. PLUS ad free podcasts! Sign Up Today! Full Transcript Below: Test Prophetic Words CarefullyBy: Michelle Lazurek Bible Reading:“For prophecy never had its origin in the human will, but prophets, though human, spoke from God as the Holy Spirit carried them along.” - 2 Peter 1:21 During a recent retreat for mothers and daughters to connect, learn about God's attributes, and hear his voice, we had a time of prayer in which we blessed the mothers and daughters and commissioned them to go out and spread the gospel. At one point during prayer, the mother and daughter sat before me. Placing my hand on her left shoulder, I immediately got a word for the daughter. It was a picture of a violin. I had no other words or explanation as to its meaning. I told her that I didn't understand what the picture was, but that it had appeared. After everyone had prayed, I went to get a tissue for the mother and daughter. Upon my return, the daughter explained that she had played violin but then stopped. We laughed because we realized that that was what the Holy Spirit was saying. He was telling her to pick up her violin and make music for him. In the church body, we are wired with spiritual gifts. Some of those gifts are considered miraculous gifts, including the gift of prophecy. Prophecy is a message delivered to someone by God. Although it is exciting to deliver a prophetic word to another person, we often misinterpret it. This is where errors and other issues become a problem. Although we are quick to call someone a false prophet simply because they made an error in delivering their message, that doesn't mean the message itself was wrong. It simply means the person delivering it misinterpreted it. The difficult part of prophecy is that we only get small snippets of a bigger picture. When I got that picture of the violin, I had no idea the daughter had played the violin before. Whether he wants her to resume playing the violin remains to be seen. However, he clearly had a message for her regarding her music with that instrument. If a person does not know how to interpret prophetic words for their lives, they can often be dismissed or ignored completely. Scripture tells us to test prophecy and to allow two or three people to weigh what is being said. Although those kinds of things can get tricky at times because many people are not trained in the prophetic, it is important that, even in community, we explore the miraculous gifts together. The above verse tells us that prophecy comes from the Holy Spirit, not from human will. However, because we have difficulty distinguishing between our own human emotions, thought processes, and prophecy, it can be difficult to discern whether a word is truly from God. However, that does not mean you should not deliver a word. Rather, it is important to test that word with two or three people who have discernment or wisdom to be able to know whether that word is truly from God or not. It is also important for an individual to test and weigh that word for themselves. Because prophecy is not often practiced in churches today, it is difficult for people to interpret prophetic words or to wait for them to come to fruition. In Scripture, people gave prophetic words that didn't come to pass until generations later. In our instant-gratification world, we want prophetic words to come to pass now. If they don't come to pass, we assume that means they are untrue. However, that's a misinterpretation of scripture. Receiving and giving prophetic words can be an exciting spiritual experience for any person. It is part of a person's spiritual growth and can completely transform them, helping them go deeper in their relationship with the Lord. Ask the Holy Spirit to give you words to edify your brothers and sisters in Christ. You (and your church) will be better for it. Father, let us be people who do not treat prophecy with contempt. Rather, let us weigh the words that we receive and deliver them accordingly. Let us, in humility, help discern and dissect prophetic words together. Let the body of Christ be edified through the gift of prophecy. Amen. Intersecting Faith & Life: Have you ever had a gift of prophecy? In what way can you deliver a prophetic word to someone today? Further Reading:1 Corinthians 12 Discover more Christian podcasts at lifeaudio.com and inquire about advertising opportunities at lifeaudio.com/contact-us.

It's the return of the Spooky Bestie Series on MTP! This week, MTP co-host (and President of Charleston's Absent Friends) Jules is back on the show for an episode of The Spooky Bestie Series alongside Kevin! And the Spooky Besties are making a grand return with the selection/discussion of the Scary Movie franchise via the original movie that started it all! With Scary Movie 6 coming out very soon, your co-hosts sit down to discuss the movie that started it all and give their thoughts on where the franchise may be heading next!Placing a quick Trigger Warning here as this movie is from 2000 and contains some very extreme/offensive humor.Tune in to episode 162 of The Midnight Terrors Podcast as Kevin and Jules discuss 2000's Scary Movie!Check out Charleston's Absent Friends' production of "5 Lesbians Eating a Quiche" at Piccolo Spoletto: PS 26 - 5 Lesbians Eating a Quiche

Sunday, 5 April 2026   Jesus said to him, “I do not say to you, up to seven times, but up to seventy times seven. Matthew 18:22   “‘He says to him, Jesus, ‘Not, I say to you until sevenfold, but until seventy-fold, sevenfold!'” (CG)   In the previous verse, Peter came to Jesus and asked how many times he should forgive his brother sinning against him. Should it be up to seven times? In response, “He says to him, Jesus, ‘Not, I say to you until sevenfold.'”   Peter's suggestion seemed magnanimous. He would demonstrate a careful, patient, and seemingly longsuffering attitude towards the person who was offending him.   However, despite this proposition, Jesus finds the number deficient. Peter's assumption was that there was a termination of such forgiveness based upon human wear and tear on patience. It is a common mistake people make concerning theological and doctrinal matters, where we align our thoughts about God based on our emotions, mental constraints, etc.   God, however, is Spirit. His patience, for example, is unlimited. Having said that, this is only so when certain conditions are met. Again, as noted in the analysis of the previous verse, Peter's question was incomplete in its scope. However, Jesus is answering it as it stands and will clarify the scope in His continued response. For now, He continues, saying, “but until seventy-fold, sevenfold!”   It is a new word, hebdomékontakis, seventy-fold. This is the only time it is seen in the New Testament. The meaning of the words is debated. Grammatically, the number could be interpreted in two ways. Some translations say seventy times seven (meaning 70 x 7). Some say seventy-seven times (77).   The latter is contextually what is intended. The word “times” is normally used. In this case, our minds think of multiplication of the next number. Thus, we think seventy... times... seven. But the Greek reads seventy times (70), seven times (7). Placing a comma between the two helps get the point. However, if one changes the word “times” to the ending “fold,” it clears things up: seventy-fold, sevenfold.   The number is used in the Greek translation of Genesis 4 –   And he said, Lamech, to his wives, Adah and Zillah, “You must hear my voice, wives Lamech. You must cause to enear my saying. For man, I killed to my wound, and child, to my stripe. 24For sevenfold [hebdomékontakis] he will be ‘caused to avenge Cain', and Lamech, seventy and seven.” Genesis 4:23, 24 (CG)   There, the context is clear. The meaning is seventy-seven. The biblical precedent was set, and Jesus was certainly using that verse as a reference for his words to Peter. It was understood from the earliest writings that seventy-seven was the intent. However, later scholars expanded the meaning to 70x7 = 490. This was done to emphasize the magnanimity of the forgiveness. Later preachers picked this up and included it in their sermons.   The number seventy-seven is simply a way of saying the same thing Lamech was conveying, meaning an unlimited number. Repeating and/or doubling things in such a manner is intended to give such an idea to the mind of the hearers, and this is just what Peter would have understood.   Life application: As noted above, God's patience is unlimited. And yet, God judged and destroyed His people at times. So how do those thoughts reconcile? Examples permeate Scripture. For example –   “And the children of Israel said to the Lord, ‘We have sinned! Do to us whatever seems best to You; only deliver us this day, we pray.' 16 So they put away the foreign gods from among them and served the Lord. And His soul could no longer endure the misery of Israel.” Judges 10:15, 16   Reading all of Judges 10:6-16 will give a better sense, but this portion is sufficient to see what is necessary for God's “unlimited patience” to come about. The people turned, humbled themselves, and petitioned for deliverance. God did not automatically forgive them. Such a thing is not found in Scripture.   Sin causes a wall between God and man. It cannot simply be overlooked. It is something that must be dealt with. When the appropriate means of dealing with it have been effected, the forgiveness is granted. God does not expect more of us than He metes out upon us.   Again, Peter's question is incomplete in and of itself, even if the intent behind it was implied. Any reasonable Jew would have known that God does not arbitrarily forgive. There are conditions to His forgiveness, and the same is true with us. Believers are not punching bags.   When an offense is brought to bear against another, there can be no true forgiveness without the offender acknowledging his wrongdoing. We can “let it go,” but that is all we can do until the matter is resolved by both parties. The utterly inane concept of forgiving everyone of every offense all the time, which is taught in Christian circles, is unbiblical and damaging to proper doctrine and theology.   Lord God, thank You for the cross of Jesus. Its potential for forgiveness is unlimited. But it actually only forgives those who come to You by faith in what it signifies. Help us, O God, to always remember the cost of our sin. To Your glory. Amen.

The official narrative surrounding Nicholas Tartaglione's placement in the same housing unit as Jeffrey Epstein has always strained credibility, especially when viewed against the broader backdrop of Epstein's status as one of the most high-profile detainees in federal custody. Tartaglione wasn't some low-risk, white-collar offender—he was a former police officer accused of committing multiple brutal murders, a man already associated with extreme violence. Placing someone with that profile anywhere near Epstein, who had already been the target of an alleged assault just weeks earlier, raises immediate and obvious questions about judgment, protocol, and intent. Federal detention standards are built around risk classification, separation, and protective measures for vulnerable inmates, yet in this case, those safeguards appear either ignored or deliberately bypassed. The explanation that this was a routine or acceptable placement doesn't hold up under scrutiny, particularly given the attention Epstein's case was receiving at the highest levels of government and media. When layered on top of documented irregularities inside the facility—staffing shortages, broken cameras, and procedural lapses—the decision to house Tartaglione in proximity to Epstein feels less like an oversight and more like a glaring contradiction to established correctional practices.Tartaglione's denial that he assaulted Epstein only deepens the skepticism rather than resolving it. While he has publicly rejected claims of involvement, the mere fact that he was in a position where such an allegation could even arise underscores how compromised the situation already was. In a properly managed facility, especially one holding a detainee as sensitive as Epstein, there shouldn't be ambiguity about who had access, who posed a threat, or how interactions were monitored. The denial doesn't answer the core issue—it sidesteps it. It doesn't explain why a detainee with a documented history of violence was placed in proximity to Epstein in the first place, nor does it address the institutional failures that made such a scenario possible. Given the pattern of inconsistencies surrounding Epstein's detention—from unexplained movements to lapses in surveillance—the Tartaglione episode fits into a larger mosaic of questionable decisions that collectively erode confidence in the official account. Whether or not Tartaglione physically attacked Epstein becomes almost secondary to the more troubling reality: the system created conditions where that possibility existed at all, and then failed to provide clear, credible answers afterward.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The official narrative surrounding Nicholas Tartaglione's placement in the same housing unit as Jeffrey Epstein has always strained credibility, especially when viewed against the broader backdrop of Epstein's status as one of the most high-profile detainees in federal custody. Tartaglione wasn't some low-risk, white-collar offender—he was a former police officer accused of committing multiple brutal murders, a man already associated with extreme violence. Placing someone with that profile anywhere near Epstein, who had already been the target of an alleged assault just weeks earlier, raises immediate and obvious questions about judgment, protocol, and intent. Federal detention standards are built around risk classification, separation, and protective measures for vulnerable inmates, yet in this case, those safeguards appear either ignored or deliberately bypassed. The explanation that this was a routine or acceptable placement doesn't hold up under scrutiny, particularly given the attention Epstein's case was receiving at the highest levels of government and media. When layered on top of documented irregularities inside the facility—staffing shortages, broken cameras, and procedural lapses—the decision to house Tartaglione in proximity to Epstein feels less like an oversight and more like a glaring contradiction to established correctional practices.Tartaglione's denial that he assaulted Epstein only deepens the skepticism rather than resolving it. While he has publicly rejected claims of involvement, the mere fact that he was in a position where such an allegation could even arise underscores how compromised the situation already was. In a properly managed facility, especially one holding a detainee as sensitive as Epstein, there shouldn't be ambiguity about who had access, who posed a threat, or how interactions were monitored. The denial doesn't answer the core issue—it sidesteps it. It doesn't explain why a detainee with a documented history of violence was placed in proximity to Epstein in the first place, nor does it address the institutional failures that made such a scenario possible. Given the pattern of inconsistencies surrounding Epstein's detention—from unexplained movements to lapses in surveillance—the Tartaglione episode fits into a larger mosaic of questionable decisions that collectively erode confidence in the official account. Whether or not Tartaglione physically attacked Epstein becomes almost secondary to the more troubling reality: the system created conditions where that possibility existed at all, and then failed to provide clear, credible answers afterward.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Director of the Royal Irish Academy of Music Deborah Kelleher.

In the final hour, Marshall Harris and Mark Grote discussed Bears quarterback Caleb Williams' standing among his counterparts in the NFL. After that, Score baseball insider Bruce Levine joined the show to discuss the Cubs' decision to place slugger Seiya Suzuki on the 10-day injured list to start the season due to his knee ailment.

The central part of Revelation reveals the central characters in the central conflict in God's story. We encounter the Woman and her Son, the Dragon and his Beasts, and their ultimate collision at Armageddon. Making this battle about some far-off, abstract ‘end of the world' cataclysm removes the urgency with which the original audience felt this story playing out literally in front of them. Placing us into that story we realize that our ‘judgment day' is also near (and already here).

Years ago I heard a friend tell about a scene from his childhood that he never forgot. My friend was around on that black day in 1929 that marked the beginning of the Great Depression. One of the great traumas of America's financial collapse, of course, was that many banks just went under almost overnight. Well, my friend literally remembered seeing a neighbor at the locked gates of his bank, and he was literally pounding his fists bloody on those gates, screaming at the top of his lungs, "Give me my money! Give me my money!" There was no money to give. I'm Ron Hutchcraft and I want to have A Word With You today about "The Danger of Being Religious." That desperate man, and millions like him, placed their security in an institution. An institution that sure seemed safe but that ultimately and suddenly failed them. A lot of church folks are making that mistake today. Did you know that? Placing their eternal security in their church; in believing its beliefs, attending its meetings, even taking church leadership. Sadly, none of that's enough to get your sins forgiven or to get you into God's heaven. Sometimes religious folks argue over which church is the right church. Well, in Jeremiah's time there was no argument. God's people were the Jews and their temple was God's self-declared house on earth. But even that wasn't enough. In our word for today from the Word of God, in Jeremiah 7, beginning with verse 10, God says, "You come and stand before Me in this house, which bears my Name, and you say 'We are safe'...'But I have been watching,' declares the Lord." God goes on to point out the sin in their lives - sin that no amount of "church" can make right. He goes on to describe His pending destruction of what God calls (listen to these words) "the temple you trust in." Boy, that's the danger of being religious. You tend to trust in your religiousness instead of in Christ. Christianity will never get anyone to heaven. Only Christ can get you there. Only Christ died to pay for the sin that disqualifies every one of us from going to heaven. Jesus established the Church to represent Him on earth, to do His work on earth. But church can be the most dangerous place in the world if that's where your trust is. Christianity is all about Jesus, but it can actually cause you to miss Jesus. It's called false security; feeling like you're okay with God because you speak the language, you agree with the teachings, and you've been around it all these years. Why, no one would even question that you have a relationship with Jesus - except Jesus. And He's the only One who matters. Could it be that somehow in the midst of a religion all about Jesus you've missed a personal relationship with Jesus even while you've been a good church person for a long time? Jesus described some active church folks to whom He will say on Judgment Day, "I never knew you" (Matthew 7:21-23). Somehow, they have never actually given themselves in total faith to the One who died to pay for their sins. There has to be that time when you say, "Jesus, some of those sins You died for were mine, and I have no hope of heaven except You and what You did on the cross for me. So beginning right now, Jesus, I'm yours." Have you taken that step? I would say that if you don't know, you probably haven't. If you've missed it, don't go another day without moving Christ from your head to your heart... from being a belief to being your own personal Savior. Tell Him today, "Jesus, I'm yours." Look, let me invite you to go to our website today. It's ANewStory.com. You can have the information there to nail down and be sure once and for all that you do belong to Him. The church you've trusted in, the religion you've trusted in, the goodness you've trusted in are inadequate substitutes for the real thing - putting your total trust in Jesus. Because, my friend, it's all about Jesus!

Years ago I heard a friend tell about a scene from his childhood that he never forgot. My friend was around on that black day in 1929 that marked the beginning of the Great Depression. One of the great traumas of America's financial collapse, of course, was that many banks just went under almost overnight. Well, my friend literally remembered seeing a neighbor at the locked gates of his bank, and he was literally pounding his fists bloody on those gates, screaming at the top of his lungs, "Give me my money! Give me my money!" There was no money to give. I'm Ron Hutchcraft and I want to have A Word With You today about "The Danger of Being Religious." That desperate man, and millions like him, placed their security in an institution. An institution that sure seemed safe but that ultimately and suddenly failed them. A lot of church folks are making that mistake today. Did you know that? Placing their eternal security in their church; in believing its beliefs, attending its meetings, even taking church leadership. Sadly, none of that's enough to get your sins forgiven or to get you into God's heaven. Sometimes religious folks argue over which church is the right church. Well, in Jeremiah's time there was no argument. God's people were the Jews and their temple was God's self-declared house on earth. But even that wasn't enough. In our word for today from the Word of God, in Jeremiah 7, beginning with verse 10, God says, "You come and stand before Me in this house, which bears my Name, and you say 'We are safe'...'But I have been watching,' declares the Lord." God goes on to point out the sin in their lives - sin that no amount of "church" can make right. He goes on to describe His pending destruction of what God calls (listen to these words) "the temple you trust in." Boy, that's the danger of being religious. You tend to trust in your religiousness instead of in Christ. Christianity will never get anyone to heaven. Only Christ can get you there. Only Christ died to pay for the sin that disqualifies every one of us from going to heaven. Jesus established the Church to represent Him on earth, to do His work on earth. But church can be the most dangerous place in the world if that's where your trust is. Christianity is all about Jesus, but it can actually cause you to miss Jesus. It's called false security; feeling like you're okay with God because you speak the language, you agree with the teachings, and you've been around it all these years. Why, no one would even question that you have a relationship with Jesus - except Jesus. And He's the only One who matters. Could it be that somehow in the midst of a religion all about Jesus you've missed a personal relationship with Jesus even while you've been a good church person for a long time? Jesus described some active church folks to whom He will say on Judgment Day, "I never knew you" (Matthew 7:21-23). Somehow, they have never actually given themselves in total faith to the One who died to pay for their sins. There has to be that time when you say, "Jesus, some of those sins You died for were mine, and I have no hope of heaven except You and what You did on the cross for me. So beginning right now, Jesus, I'm yours." Have you taken that step? I would say that if you don't know, you probably haven't. If you've missed it, don't go another day without moving Christ from your head to your heart... from being a belief to being your own personal Savior. Tell Him today, "Jesus, I'm yours." Look, let me invite you to go to our website today. It's ANewStory.com. You can have the information there to nail down and be sure once and for all that you do belong to Him. The church you've trusted in, the religion you've trusted in, the goodness you've trusted in are inadequate substitutes for the real thing - putting your total trust in Jesus. Because, my friend, it's all about Jesus!

Hello everyoneI'm interrupting your day for a small announcement about the podcast. If you have listened to any episodes recently you will have noticed that advertisements are now playing at the start, middle and end each episode. Placing advertisements in the podcast is a way of helping to recoup the costs of putting the podcast out for free, which is why I took the plunge and decided to go down this path. For those of you who support the podcast on Patreon on either of the paid levels of membership from next Monday's episode I will be adding all new episodes without adverts to your Patreon feed, so that you can listen to them there. The episode that comes out on a Monday morning UK time will be released on Patreon on the Sunday before. For those of you on the top tier membership on Patreon these episodes will come on the same feed from which you currently get the extra episodes, so no need for you to make any changes.If you are currently not a supporter on Patreon and you like the uninterrupted podcast experience, then now would be a great time to join us there and it will only cost you £1 a month. If you want to investigate that, or joining at the higher membership level and receiving two additional theatre related audio podcasts a month for an even deeper dive into theatre history then follow the link in the show notes or just go to patreon.com and search for ‘the history of European theatre'.A bit thank-you to everyone who already supports the podcast on Patreon and also thanks to all of you who listen every week as we make our way through the long history of theatre.As ever if you want to contact me about this change, or anything to do with the podcast you can reach me by email at thoetp@gmail.com, or through the website where you can leave me a voice message by clicking on the microphone icon or you can write to me on the contact page. That's all at www.thehistoryofeuropeantheatre.comLink: www.patreon.com/thoetp Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The war in Iran has economic consequences in terms of the region's oil exports. But how could prediction markets change the picture? On Today's Show: John Cassidy, staff writer at The New Yorker and the author of Capitalism and Its Critics: A History: From the Industrial Revolution to AI (Macmillan, 2025), talks about his recent story, "How to Prevent Insider Trading on Trump's Wars" and other news related to the economic repercussions of the Iran war.

Placing the hand under the thigh revisited. Esau takes a wife. Jacob's ladder. A dreadful place. Jacob get's bamboozled. Breeding …

Who are you really following—your favorite pastor, preacher, or platform? Or the Word of God? In today's episode of the MY Devotional Podcast, Dr. Michael Youssef takes us to the spiritually troubled church in Corinth, where believers were dividing into camps: “I follow Paul… I follow Apollos… I follow Cephas…” (1 Corinthians 1:12). These were godly leaders—yet the “cult of personality” was producing division instead of unity. Dr. Youssef offers a simple heart-check that still applies today: If your confidence starts with “My pastor says…” you may be leaning on a human leader. If your confidence starts with “The Word of God says…” you're anchored to the infallible source of Truth. You'll be reminded that: No human leader is flawless—only Scripture is fully trustworthy. Cults don't make converts to Christ; they make converts to a personality. A church submitted to the authority and inerrancy of the Bible is a church positioned for humility, unity, and spiritual health. Placing yourself under God's Word is the first step toward living holy in a desperately sick culture. If you've felt pulled by competing voices—even Christian ones—this devotional will help you reset your confidence where it belongs: on Jesus Christ and His unchanging Word. Scripture Focus: 1 Corinthians 1:10, 1 Corinthians 1:12Key Truth: One Savior. One Way. One Truth—Jesus Christ. Go deeper: Dr. Youssef's sermon Healthy Living in a Sick World, Saints in a Sinful Culture (Watch Now | Listen Now) The voice you hear on the MY Devotional podcast is digitally generated with Dr. Youssef's permission. If today's devotional stirred a question, burden, or need for prayer, you don't have to walk through it alone.

In this episode, we sit down with Tom Hardin, also known as "Tipper X," the former hedge fund analyst who became one of the most prolific informants in the largest insider trading crackdown in U.S. history. Tom walks us through his journey from rule-following soccer referee in Georgia to Ivy League graduate and rising Wall Street analyst—before crossing the line into insider trading at age 29. What makes this conversation so compelling is not just the crime, but how ordinary it felt at the time. Tom explains how small rationalizations, cultural pressures, ambition, and the normalization of questionable behavior gradually eroded his ethical boundaries. After being arrested and recruited by the FBI, he wore a wire 48 times and helped build over 20 cases in Operation Perfect Hedge, exposing widespread misconduct across the hedge fund industry. We explore the psychology of ethical failure, the "fraud triangle," moral licensing, and the difference between ethics in the classroom and ethics in the real world. Tom also reflects on redemption, forgiveness, mentorship, and how he now defines success after losing his finance career.   Key Points From This Episode: (0:04) Introduction to Tom Hardin, former hedge fund analyst turned FBI informant. (5:15) Tom's conviction: One count of securities fraud and one count of conspiracy after four illegal trades netting $46,000. (6:11) Early life as a rule-following soccer referee and how ambition shaped his identity. (8:07) The hedge fund world as a meritocracy—high pressure, high stakes, and performance-driven culture. (9:13) How insider trading networks operated openly in certain hedge fund circles. (12:21) The legal definition of insider trading: material non-public information and breach of fiduciary duty. (15:25) How difficult it is to consistently generate returns without some form of edge. (16:26) The first insider tip—and the rationalizations that followed. (19:03) The "fraud triangle": pressure, opportunity, and rationalization. (22:16) Placing the first illegal trade—and feeling almost nothing. (24:39) Peer validation and the normalization of wrongdoing. (28:38) The 6:30 a.m. arrest and being approached by the FBI. (31:43) Deciding to cooperate—and becoming "Tipper X." (36:24) Learning to wear a wire and extract incriminating statements over multiple meetings. (38:26) Inside Operation Perfect Hedge: 81 individuals charged, 32 cooperators. (39:28) The chilling effect on hedge funds and the possible decline of illicit "edge." (42:12) Being publicly unmasked as Tipper X and the personal cost to his family. (44:02) Why ethical failures are incremental—not sudden transformations. (45:11) The gap between academic ethics and real-world psychological pressure. (46:57) The role mentorship could have played—and how culture shapes behavior. (50:29) Tom's view on hedge funds for retail investors: high fees, limited liquidity, and questionable value. (52:04) Ethical drift, rationalization, and warning signs to watch for. (52:35) Redemption: Owning mistakes fully and learning to forgive yourself. (55:02) Redefining success—relationships, honesty, and meaningful contribution.   Links From Today's Episode: Meet with PWL Capital: https://calendly.com/d/3vm-t2j-h3p Rational Reminder on iTunes — https://itunes.apple.com/ca/podcast/the-rational-reminder-podcast/id1426530582. Rational Reminder on Instagram — https://www.instagram.com/rationalreminder/ Rational Reminder on YouTube — https://www.youtube.com/channel/ Benjamin Felix — https://pwlcapital.com/our-team/ Benjamin on X — https://x.com/benjaminwfelix Benjamin on LinkedIn — https://www.linkedin.com/in/benjaminwfelix/ Dan Bortolotti — https://pwlcapital.com/our-team/ Dan Bortolotti on LinkedIn — dan-bortolotti-8a482310  Editing and post-production work for this episode was provided by The Podcast Consultant (https://thepodcastconsultant.com)

Send a textThis week on Impact Without Limits, we're sharing a powerful Coffee Talk session from the 2026 ForeverLawn Dealer Conference featuring Ted Lawver of ForeverLawn Chicago and our Director of Dealer Operations,  Josh Van Riper. In this candid conversation, Ted unpacks what it really takes to build a business that doesn't revolve around the owner — and why trust is the key to unlocking growth, scalability, and freedom.From extending responsibility in stages, to creating structure that empowers teams to thrive, Ted shares hard-earned lessons about delegation, culture, and getting out of your own way. If you've ever felt like you're the lid on your business, this episode offers both practical insight and a compelling challenge: trust your people, build the right systems, and create something bigger than yourself.Episode Highlights: Building from the ground up.Placing trust in your team.Hiring people of character.Links Mentioned in Episode/Find More on ForeverLawn:www.foreverlawn.comImpact Without Limits Instagram: @impact_withoutlimitsForeverLawn's Instagram: @foreverlawnincGet Grass Without Limits HereVisit our show notes page HERESubscribe to Our Newsletter HEREDale's Instagram: @dalekarmieBrian's Instagram: @bkarmieFind Our Shorts on the ForeverLawn YouTube ChannelThis show has been produced by Adkins Media Co.

Joe Saul-Sehy, OG, and Neighbor Doug pull up a rickety basement chair and unpack a growing trend: people treating investing like a series of high stakes bets instead of a long term plan. Sparked by a recent Wall Street Journal piece on aggressive investing, the gang digs into where the line is between smart risk taking and straight up gambling with your future. Using plenty of real world examples and a few basement metaphors, the crew breaks down how stocks, businesses, options, and even so-called innovative products can fall into very different categories depending on why you're using them. The key theme? Good investing isn't about being bold. It's about understanding probabilities, controlling what you can, and stacking the odds in your favor over time. Along the way, the team also tackles listener questions, including some strong feelings about Costco (because of course), and shines a flashlight into the dark corners of complex products like Indexed Universal Life insurance, explaining why "sounds sophisticated" doesn't always mean "fits your plan." If markets feel noisy, confusing, or a little unhinged right now, this episode is your reminder that boring, disciplined strategies still win, and that you don't need to bet the farm to build one. What You'll Learn: • Why so many investors are confusing betting with investing right now • How to tell the difference between calculated risk and speculation • Why understanding probability matters more than chasing big wins • Where options, businesses, and alternative investments can fit and where they often don't • The hidden risks behind complex products like Indexed Universal Life (IUL) policies • Why compounding beats hype even when headlines say otherwise • How small, consistent decisions quietly outperform flashy moves • Yes, what Costco has to do with smart money choices This Episode Is For You If: • Markets feel confusing and you're not sure if you're investing or just guessing • You've been tempted by strategies that sound sophisticated but feel risky • You want to understand the line between smart risk and gambling • You're tired of flashy investment advice and want clarity on what actually works • You need reassurance that boring, disciplined strategies still win Question for You: What's the riskiest financial move you've ever considered, and what stopped you (or didn't)? Share your answer in the Spotify comments or the Stacking Benjamins Facebook group. Bonus points if hindsight made you laugh or wince. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoicesSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Joe Saul-Sehy, OG, and Neighbor Doug pull up a rickety basement chair and unpack a growing trend: people treating investing like a series of high stakes bets instead of a long term plan. Sparked by a recent Wall Street Journal piece on aggressive investing, the gang digs into where the line is between smart risk taking and straight up gambling with your future. Using plenty of real world examples and a few basement metaphors, the crew breaks down how stocks, businesses, options, and even so-called innovative products can fall into very different categories depending on why you're using them. The key theme? Good investing isn't about being bold. It's about understanding probabilities, controlling what you can, and stacking the odds in your favor over time. Along the way, the team also tackles listener questions, including some strong feelings about Costco (because of course), and shines a flashlight into the dark corners of complex products like Indexed Universal Life insurance, explaining why "sounds sophisticated" doesn't always mean "fits your plan." If markets feel noisy, confusing, or a little unhinged right now, this episode is your reminder that boring, disciplined strategies still win, and that you don't need to bet the farm to build one. What You'll Learn: • Why so many investors are confusing betting with investing right now • How to tell the difference between calculated risk and speculation • Why understanding probability matters more than chasing big wins • Where options, businesses, and alternative investments can fit and where they often don't • The hidden risks behind complex products like Indexed Universal Life (IUL) policies • Why compounding beats hype even when headlines say otherwise • How small, consistent decisions quietly outperform flashy moves • Yes, what Costco has to do with smart money choices This Episode Is For You If: • Markets feel confusing and you're not sure if you're investing or just guessing • You've been tempted by strategies that sound sophisticated but feel risky • You want to understand the line between smart risk and gambling • You're tired of flashy investment advice and want clarity on what actually works • You need reassurance that boring, disciplined strategies still win Question for You: What's the riskiest financial move you've ever considered, and what stopped you (or didn't)? Share your answer in the Spotify comments or the Stacking Benjamins Facebook group. Bonus points if hindsight made you laugh or wince. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices