Podcasts about ladyman

Welcome back to 'It's All Kicking Off!' Fresh from Manchester United's home humiliation at the hands of Liverpool, we hear Ian Ladyman take on Erik ten Hag in a fiery post-match presser. Our esteemed host challenges the Dutch manager on where the blame lies, after another stuttering start to a season was underlined by a terrible performance against their arch rivals. Chris Sutton gives his account of the Old Firm, in which Celtic, once again, got the better of Rangers. AND we question whether Declan Rice could've avoid a crucial red card, in Arsenal's home draw with Brighton. Presenters: Ian Ladyman and Chris Sutton Producer: Henry Williams Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Welcome back to 'It's All Kicking Off: Euros Daily' It's Ian squared for this one as Herbert joins Ladyman for England's latest day of reckoning. Why just 'one good performance' could turn the tide for the Three Lions and how the 'lid would be blown off' if such an event was to happen. The lads also look back on Cristiano Ronaldo' Euros farewell, Toni Kroos' nightmare in Stuttgart and preview Turkey's quarter final tie versus the Netherlands. Presenters: Ian Ladyman and Ian Herbert Producer: Henry Williams Featured in this podcast: https://x.com/itvfootball/status/1809294735439180181 https://x.com/itvfootball/status/1809348437499867243 https://x.com/BBCSport/status/1809342700644147687 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIxgaA1lyB8 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

In this episode we welcome the king of cashback Luke Ladyman to the show. As Co-Founder of the rapidly growing app Cheddar we dive into the story behind the business, how it came to be and why it's different to other offerings out there. Download Cheddar for FREE here >> https://upthegains.co.uk/cheddar/I'm a big fan of Cheddars business and love the user experience of the app so it was very cool listening to how important that is to them. In this episode:

Welcome to Angela's Symposium, your trusted source for scholarly discussions on magic, esotericism, Paganism, and the occult. In today's episode, we are honoured to host Peter J. Carroll, a pioneering figure in Chaos Magick. From the evolution of Chaos Magick to its relationship with technology and empirical science, this interview covers it all. Peter J. Carroll is a key figure in the development of Chaos Magick, and he has authored several books that have become foundational texts in the field. Here is a list of some of his notable works: 1. "Liber Null & Psychonaut" (1987) - https://amzn.to/3LYrvb9 2. "Liber Kaos" (1992) - https://amzn.to/3PVXyK2 3. "PsyberMagick: Advanced Ideas in Chaos Magick" (1995) - https://amzn.to/3S0QBKe 4. "The Apophenion: A Chaos Magick Paradigm" (2008) - https://amzn.to/3QiJR9g 5. "The Octavo: A Sorcerer-Scientist's Grimoire" (2010) - https://amzn.to/45xpwRV 6. "EPOCH: The Esotericon & Portals of Chaos" (2014) - https://amzn.to/3S5ZouB Peter J. Carroll's official website is Specularium (https://www.specularium.org/), where you can find more information about his works, theories, and other contributions to the field of Chaos Magick and esoteric studies. Please note that the years mentioned are for the original publications. CONNECT & SUPPORT

Tina Eliassi-Rad is a network science pioneer, and an intrepid explorer of where network science shows up in our world and how we understand that. Her work, as her life, falls across network science, complexity, artificial intelligence, and commitments to democracy and equality, itself a constellation of experiences and literacies befitting our increasingly complex world. Origins Podcast WebsiteFlourishing Commons NewsletterShow Notes:Jon Kleinberg (09:20)Northeastern Network Science Institute (12:20)Bruch and Newman Aspirational pursuit of mates in online dating markets (13:40) What is a complex system?  Ladyman and Wiesner (14:45)What science can do for democracy: a complexity science approach (15:10)Faloutsos (19:00)Ron Burt (24:10)"Examining Responsibility and Deliberation in AI Impact Statements and Ethics Reviews" Liu et al. (27:30)Research group of the future (37:20)The ground truth about metadata and community detection in networks (43:30)Fariba Karimi (44:00)Lightning Round (51:00)Book: Jane EyrePassion: PhilosophyHeart sing: AI systems as part of complex systemsScrewed up: CookingTina online:http://eliassi.org/'Five-Cut Fridays' five-song music playlist series  Tina's playlistMusic swelo

A blast from the past and a look at the present! Danie and Theo are joined by former General Strike captain Kyle Parker and current captain Mathew Ladyman as they talk about the growth of the General Strike program, the finals victory, and spirit. In the news and notes, hear about upcoming events on the ultimate calendar, a recap of Pro Champs, and a mini-preview of the upcoming USAU postseason.

Can we be sure there is a physical reality? Our philosophers and scientists debate.Looking for a link we mentioned? It's here: https://linktr.ee/philosophyforourtimes No-one who has ever stepped on a Lego brick could doubt the reality of physical objects. Yet from Heraclitus to George Berkeley, many philosophers claimed to have disproven the existence of things. Now even high-energy particle physicists are inclined to agree and describe material stuff as energy, or even as mathematical constructs. Could the world truly be made up of fields and processes, rather than physical stuff? Or is science trapped in a philosophical fantasy from which it needs to escape?Chemist and Fellow of Lincoln College Peter Atkins, Philosopher of Science at the University of Bristol James Ladyman and author of A Field Guide to Reality Joanna Kavenna debate whether the everyday objects that surround us are an illusion. Julian Baggini hosts.There are thousands of big ideas to discover at IAI.tv – videos, articles, and courses waiting for you to explore. Find out more: https://iai.tv/podcast-offers?utm_source=podcast&utm_medium=shownotes&utm_campaign=a-world-of-illusionsSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Support the show on Patreon to gain instant access to searchable, comment-on-able PDF scripts of all solo episodes! Your support will help to defray hosting and equipment costs and is very much appreciated. For this episode, I'm joined by Professor James Ladyman to discuss his paper "An Apology for Naturalized Metaphysics", published in 2017 by Oxford University Press in Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science edited by Matthew Slater and Zanja Yudell. James is professor of philosophy at the University of Bristol. We discuss the nature of truth, disagreement in metaphysics and in science, conceptual conservatism and innovation, breaking free from the manifest image and much more. Link to the paper: https://philpapers.org/rec/LADAAFMore about James: https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/en/persons/james-a-c-ladymanIf you enjoyed the show, please rate and review it on your favourite app so more people can find it. You can carry on the discussion on Twitter and there's even an Instagram page. Thanks for listening!   Support the show (https://www.patreon.com/CondensedMatter)

Jeff Brightwell talks with the children of Coach Billy Murphy, Libby Ladyman and Mike Murphy, about growing up with coach, who he was, and the journey to the College Football Hall of Fame. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

While i find it pretty easy to recognize when i'm reading articles in complexity science, i've never been satisfied by definitions of complexity and related concepts. I'm not alone! Researchers' own attempts to define complex systems incorporate a mix of folk wisdom and fraught assumptions anchored to a menagerie of contested examples. The field was ripe for a 2013 article proposing a unified account of complexity, and it's no less ripe today for this book-length expansion. In What Is a Complex System? (Yale UP, 2020), philosopher of science James Ladyman and physicist and mathematician Karoline Wiesner systematically interrogate popular definitions. They break the most commonly cited features into three bins: truisms on which there is universal agreement, the conditions necessary for complexity to arise, and various emergent products of complexity. A key insight of their account, for me, was to understand emergence as a relation between features rather than one feature among many. The book is compact, accessible, and at times profound. Indeed, James and Karoline bring the lessons of their account to some of the most consequential complex systems of our time, including Earth's climate and biosphere as well as our global social media ecosystem. I was honored to host them in conversation on this episode, and i encourage listeners to pick up the book itself for deeper dives into the topics we discussed. James Ladyman is professor of philosophy at the University of Bristol and works mainly in the philosophy of science. Karoline Wiesner is professor of physics at the University of Potsdam and uses information theory to understand complex systems. Cory Brunson is a Research Assistant Professor at the Laboratory for Systems Medicine at the University of Florida. His research focuses on geometric and topological approaches to the analysis of medical and healthcare data. He welcomes book suggestions, listener feedback, and transparent supply chains. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/technology

While i find it pretty easy to recognize when i'm reading articles in complexity science, i've never been satisfied by definitions of complexity and related concepts. I'm not alone! Researchers' own attempts to define complex systems incorporate a mix of folk wisdom and fraught assumptions anchored to a menagerie of contested examples. The field was ripe for a 2013 article proposing a unified account of complexity, and it's no less ripe today for this book-length expansion. In What Is a Complex System? (Yale UP, 2020), philosopher of science James Ladyman and physicist and mathematician Karoline Wiesner systematically interrogate popular definitions. They break the most commonly cited features into three bins: truisms on which there is universal agreement, the conditions necessary for complexity to arise, and various emergent products of complexity. A key insight of their account, for me, was to understand emergence as a relation between features rather than one feature among many. The book is compact, accessible, and at times profound. Indeed, James and Karoline bring the lessons of their account to some of the most consequential complex systems of our time, including Earth's climate and biosphere as well as our global social media ecosystem. I was honored to host them in conversation on this episode, and i encourage listeners to pick up the book itself for deeper dives into the topics we discussed. James Ladyman is professor of philosophy at the University of Bristol and works mainly in the philosophy of science. Karoline Wiesner is professor of physics at the University of Potsdam and uses information theory to understand complex systems. Cory Brunson is a Research Assistant Professor at the Laboratory for Systems Medicine at the University of Florida. His research focuses on geometric and topological approaches to the analysis of medical and healthcare data. He welcomes book suggestions, listener feedback, and transparent supply chains. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

While i find it pretty easy to recognize when i'm reading articles in complexity science, i've never been satisfied by definitions of complexity and related concepts. I'm not alone! Researchers' own attempts to define complex systems incorporate a mix of folk wisdom and fraught assumptions anchored to a menagerie of contested examples. The field was ripe for a 2013 article proposing a unified account of complexity, and it's no less ripe today for this book-length expansion. In What Is a Complex System? (Yale UP, 2020), philosopher of science James Ladyman and physicist and mathematician Karoline Wiesner systematically interrogate popular definitions. They break the most commonly cited features into three bins: truisms on which there is universal agreement, the conditions necessary for complexity to arise, and various emergent products of complexity. A key insight of their account, for me, was to understand emergence as a relation between features rather than one feature among many. The book is compact, accessible, and at times profound. Indeed, James and Karoline bring the lessons of their account to some of the most consequential complex systems of our time, including Earth's climate and biosphere as well as our global social media ecosystem. I was honored to host them in conversation on this episode, and i encourage listeners to pick up the book itself for deeper dives into the topics we discussed. James Ladyman is professor of philosophy at the University of Bristol and works mainly in the philosophy of science. Karoline Wiesner is professor of physics at the University of Potsdam and uses information theory to understand complex systems. Cory Brunson is a Research Assistant Professor at the Laboratory for Systems Medicine at the University of Florida. His research focuses on geometric and topological approaches to the analysis of medical and healthcare data. He welcomes book suggestions, listener feedback, and transparent supply chains. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/systems-and-cybernetics

While i find it pretty easy to recognize when i'm reading articles in complexity science, i've never been satisfied by definitions of complexity and related concepts. I'm not alone! Researchers' own attempts to define complex systems incorporate a mix of folk wisdom and fraught assumptions anchored to a menagerie of contested examples. The field was ripe for a 2013 article proposing a unified account of complexity, and it's no less ripe today for this book-length expansion. In What Is a Complex System? (Yale UP, 2020), philosopher of science James Ladyman and physicist and mathematician Karoline Wiesner systematically interrogate popular definitions. They break the most commonly cited features into three bins: truisms on which there is universal agreement, the conditions necessary for complexity to arise, and various emergent products of complexity. A key insight of their account, for me, was to understand emergence as a relation between features rather than one feature among many. The book is compact, accessible, and at times profound. Indeed, James and Karoline bring the lessons of their account to some of the most consequential complex systems of our time, including Earth's climate and biosphere as well as our global social media ecosystem. I was honored to host them in conversation on this episode, and i encourage listeners to pick up the book itself for deeper dives into the topics we discussed. James Ladyman is professor of philosophy at the University of Bristol and works mainly in the philosophy of science. Karoline Wiesner is professor of physics at the University of Potsdam and uses information theory to understand complex systems. Cory Brunson is a Research Assistant Professor at the Laboratory for Systems Medicine at the University of Florida. His research focuses on geometric and topological approaches to the analysis of medical and healthcare data. He welcomes book suggestions, listener feedback, and transparent supply chains. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/book-of-the-day

While i find it pretty easy to recognize when i'm reading articles in complexity science, i've never been satisfied by definitions of complexity and related concepts. I'm not alone! Researchers' own attempts to define complex systems incorporate a mix of folk wisdom and fraught assumptions anchored to a menagerie of contested examples. The field was ripe for a 2013 article proposing a unified account of complexity, and it's no less ripe today for this book-length expansion. In What Is a Complex System? (Yale UP, 2020), philosopher of science James Ladyman and physicist and mathematician Karoline Wiesner systematically interrogate popular definitions. They break the most commonly cited features into three bins: truisms on which there is universal agreement, the conditions necessary for complexity to arise, and various emergent products of complexity. A key insight of their account, for me, was to understand emergence as a relation between features rather than one feature among many. The book is compact, accessible, and at times profound. Indeed, James and Karoline bring the lessons of their account to some of the most consequential complex systems of our time, including Earth's climate and biosphere as well as our global social media ecosystem. I was honored to host them in conversation on this episode, and i encourage listeners to pick up the book itself for deeper dives into the topics we discussed. James Ladyman is professor of philosophy at the University of Bristol and works mainly in the philosophy of science. Karoline Wiesner is professor of physics at the University of Potsdam and uses information theory to understand complex systems. Cory Brunson is a Research Assistant Professor at the Laboratory for Systems Medicine at the University of Florida. His research focuses on geometric and topological approaches to the analysis of medical and healthcare data. He welcomes book suggestions, listener feedback, and transparent supply chains. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/sociology

While i find it pretty easy to recognize when i'm reading articles in complexity science, i've never been satisfied by definitions of complexity and related concepts. I'm not alone! Researchers' own attempts to define complex systems incorporate a mix of folk wisdom and fraught assumptions anchored to a menagerie of contested examples. The field was ripe for a 2013 article proposing a unified account of complexity, and it's no less ripe today for this book-length expansion. In What Is a Complex System? (Yale UP, 2020), philosopher of science James Ladyman and physicist and mathematician Karoline Wiesner systematically interrogate popular definitions. They break the most commonly cited features into three bins: truisms on which there is universal agreement, the conditions necessary for complexity to arise, and various emergent products of complexity. A key insight of their account, for me, was to understand emergence as a relation between features rather than one feature among many. The book is compact, accessible, and at times profound. Indeed, James and Karoline bring the lessons of their account to some of the most consequential complex systems of our time, including Earth's climate and biosphere as well as our global social media ecosystem. I was honored to host them in conversation on this episode, and i encourage listeners to pick up the book itself for deeper dives into the topics we discussed. James Ladyman is professor of philosophy at the University of Bristol and works mainly in the philosophy of science. Karoline Wiesner is professor of physics at the University of Potsdam and uses information theory to understand complex systems. Cory Brunson is a Research Assistant Professor at the Laboratory for Systems Medicine at the University of Florida. His research focuses on geometric and topological approaches to the analysis of medical and healthcare data. He welcomes book suggestions, listener feedback, and transparent supply chains. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/science-technology-and-society

While i find it pretty easy to recognize when i'm reading articles in complexity science, i've never been satisfied by definitions of complexity and related concepts. I'm not alone! Researchers' own attempts to define complex systems incorporate a mix of folk wisdom and fraught assumptions anchored to a menagerie of contested examples. The field was ripe for a 2013 article proposing a unified account of complexity, and it's no less ripe today for this book-length expansion. In What Is a Complex System? (Yale UP, 2020), philosopher of science James Ladyman and physicist and mathematician Karoline Wiesner systematically interrogate popular definitions. They break the most commonly cited features into three bins: truisms on which there is universal agreement, the conditions necessary for complexity to arise, and various emergent products of complexity. A key insight of their account, for me, was to understand emergence as a relation between features rather than one feature among many. The book is compact, accessible, and at times profound. Indeed, James and Karoline bring the lessons of their account to some of the most consequential complex systems of our time, including Earth's climate and biosphere as well as our global social media ecosystem. I was honored to host them in conversation on this episode, and i encourage listeners to pick up the book itself for deeper dives into the topics we discussed. James Ladyman is professor of philosophy at the University of Bristol and works mainly in the philosophy of science. Karoline Wiesner is professor of physics at the University of Potsdam and uses information theory to understand complex systems. Cory Brunson is a Research Assistant Professor at the Laboratory for Systems Medicine at the University of Florida. His research focuses on geometric and topological approaches to the analysis of medical and healthcare data. He welcomes book suggestions, listener feedback, and transparent supply chains. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/mathematics

While i find it pretty easy to recognize when i'm reading articles in complexity science, i've never been satisfied by definitions of complexity and related concepts. I'm not alone! Researchers' own attempts to define complex systems incorporate a mix of folk wisdom and fraught assumptions anchored to a menagerie of contested examples. The field was ripe for a 2013 article proposing a unified account of complexity, and it's no less ripe today for this book-length expansion. In What Is a Complex System? (Yale UP, 2020), philosopher of science James Ladyman and physicist and mathematician Karoline Wiesner systematically interrogate popular definitions. They break the most commonly cited features into three bins: truisms on which there is universal agreement, the conditions necessary for complexity to arise, and various emergent products of complexity. A key insight of their account, for me, was to understand emergence as a relation between features rather than one feature among many. The book is compact, accessible, and at times profound. Indeed, James and Karoline bring the lessons of their account to some of the most consequential complex systems of our time, including Earth's climate and biosphere as well as our global social media ecosystem. I was honored to host them in conversation on this episode, and i encourage listeners to pick up the book itself for deeper dives into the topics we discussed. James Ladyman is professor of philosophy at the University of Bristol and works mainly in the philosophy of science. Karoline Wiesner is professor of physics at the University of Potsdam and uses information theory to understand complex systems. Cory Brunson is a Research Assistant Professor at the Laboratory for Systems Medicine at the University of Florida. His research focuses on geometric and topological approaches to the analysis of medical and healthcare data. He welcomes book suggestions, listener feedback, and transparent supply chains. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/science

"I loved being a Minister, but not being an MP". That's the admission from two former transport ministers in this week's Highways Voices podcast, which hears from Conservative Steve Norris, who served in the John Major government in the 90s, and Labour's Stephen Ladyman, a minister under Tony Blair a decade later. In the podcast they discuss how they are proud they made a difference. "One of the things you get as a transport minister in your weekend box are reports of fatalities on the motorways. One of the first ones that I opened up after I became the minister was referring to to roads workers who had been killed because of somebody speeding through road works at night in the rain and lost their way gone through the cones and hit these two poor people," said Ladyman. "So I immediately said, we have got to do something about about speeding through motorway roadworks, and we came up with with average speed cameras and they've worked brilliantly." Norris, who coincidentally worked on the average speed camera scheme after he left government, talked about legacy too discussing the Jubilee Line Extension he oversaw and also the role of a minister, "In some ways, having too much expert knowledge is quite dangerous, because it means you've got a very fixed idea of what you think should happen, and it may not be actually what the rest of the world thinks," he explained. The entertaining chat also features discussions about appearing on Top Gear, used cars, news management and even meeting Highways Voices host Paul Hutton in the mid-2000s. The podcast has a very special "Adrian's Accolade" this week and a summary of the latest news.

In this episode, Freddy explores the deep and philosophical question of what is the arrow of time. Links and Sources Below!!! https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow_of_time https://www.trin.cam.ac.uk https://www.trin.cam.ac.uk/about/historical-overview/ http://www.history.com/.amp/topics/british-history/henry-viii https://www.britannica.com/biography/Arthur-Eddington Weinert, Friedel (2005). The scientist as philosopher: philosophical consequences of great scientific discoveries. Springer. p. 143. ISBN 978-3-540-21374-1., Chapter 4, p. 143 David Albert on Time and Chance Tuisku, P.; Pernu, T.K.; Annila, A. (2009). "In the light of time". Proceedings of the Royal Society A. 465 (2104): 1173–1198. A. B. Pippard, Elements of Chemical Thermodynamics for Advanced Students of Physics (1966), p.100. Blum, Harold F. (1951). Time's Arrow and Evolution (First ed.). ISBN 978-0-691-02354-0. Morowitz, Harold J. (September 1969). "Book review: Time's arrow and evolution: Third Edition". Icarus. 11 (2): 278–279. McN., W. P. (November 1951). "Book reviews: Time's Arrow and Evolution". Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine. 24 (2): 164. Susskind, Leonard. "Boltzmann and the Arrow of Time: A Recent Perspective". Cornell University. Cornell University. Retrieved June 1, 2016. Mathias Fink (30 November 1999). "Time-Reversed Acoustic" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 31 December 2005. Retrieved 27 May 2016. Esposito, M., Lindenberg, K., & Van den Broeck, C. (2010). Entropy production as correlation between system and reservoir. New Journal of Physics, 12(1), 013013. Physical Origins of Time Asymmetry, pp. 109–111. Physical Origins of Time Asymmetry, chapter 6 "Home". Physics World. Vaccaro, Joan (2016). "Quantum asymmetry between time and space". Proceedings of the Royal Society A. 472 (2185): 20150670. Schlosshauer, M. (2005). Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics. Reviews of Modern physics, 76(4), 1267. Wolchover, Natalie (25 April 2014). "New Quantum Theory Could Explain the Flow of Time" – via www.wired.com. G. B. Lesovik, I. A. Sadovskyy, M. V. Suslov, A. V. Lebedev, V. M. Vinokur (13 March 2019). "Arrow of time and its reversal on the IBM quantum computer". Nature. 9 (1): 4396. "Physicists reverse time using quantum computer". Phys.org. 13 March 2019. Retrieved 13 March 2019. Ladyman, J.; Lambert, J.; Weisner, K.B. What is a Complex System? Eur. J. Philos. Sci. 2013, 3, 33–67. Ulrich, Rolf; Eikmeier, Verena; de la Vega, Irmgard; Ruiz Fernández, Susana; Alex-Ruf, Simone; Maienborn, Claudia (2012-04-01). "With the past behind and the future ahead: Back-to-front representation of past and future sentences". Memory & Cognition. 40 (3): 483–495. For Andes tribe, it's back to the future — accessed 2006-09-26 Núñez Rafael E., Sweetser Eve. "With the Future Behind Them: Convergent Evidence From Aymara Language and Gesture in the Crosslinguistic Comparison of Spatial Construals of Time" (PDF). Department of Cognitive Science, University of California at San Diego. Retrieved 22 February 2021. Gu, Yan; Zheng, Yeqiu; Swerts, Marc (2019). "Which Is in Front of Chinese People, Past or Future? The Effect of Language and Culture on Temporal Gestures and Spatial Conceptions of Time". Cognitive Science. 43 (12): e12804. doi:10.1111/cogs.12804. mbdg.net Chinese-English Dictionary Bahri, Hardev (1989). Learners' Hindi-English Dictionary. Delhi: Rajpal & Sons. p. 95. ISBN 978-81-7028-002-6. Alexiadou, Artemis (1997). Adverb placement : a case study in antisymmetric syntax. Amsterdam [u.a.]: Benjamins. p. 108. ISBN 978-90-272-2739-3. Hindi-English.org Hindi English Dictionary परसों Shabdkosk.Raftaar.in Hindi English Dictionary नरसों --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app

Compared to other fields of philosophy, "metaphysics" doesn't get a great rap -- it's both dauntingly obtuse and often derided as nonsense. In this episode of Rationally Speaking, Massimo and Julia chat with James Ladyman, Professor of philosophy at the University of Bristol and the author of Every Thing Must Go. The conversation covers: what is metaphysics, exactly, and where (in Ladyman's opinion) has it gone off the rails? Where does traditional science err in its classification of the "building blocks" of physics? What would a new, improved, metaphysics look like -- and what implications does that have for age-old questions like "What is causality?" and "Is the world real?" Sped up the speakers by [1.0, 1.0]

This was an awesome episode to film I chatted with a good high school friend Morgan Ladyman who is so sweet and she shared so much truth and great advice and life experiences. I hope you all loved it as much as I did.  --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/sidney-wightman/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/sidney-wightman/support

In this episode of #ExpertAnswers join Sharon Ladyman, PhD and Victoria Vieira-Potter, PhD as they answer questions from a recent webinar where they present applications of rodent metabolic phenotyping with a focus on the effects of hormones and pregnancy on daily activity in mice. For more information, to watch the webinar, or to download a copy of the full Q&A Report, click here.

In this episode of #ExpertAnswers join Sharon Ladyman, PhD and Victoria Vieira-Potter, PhD as they answer questions from a recent webinar where they present applications of rodent metabolic phenotyping with a focus on the effects of hormones and pregnancy on daily activity in mice. For more information, to watch the webinar, or to download a copy of the full Q&A Report, click here.

Mark Ladyman is the Assitant Director of Economic Growth at the Darlington Borough Council. In this episode, he shares great insights about Darlington's regeneration, his career, his thoughts on the recent crisis and how public and private partnerships can work more closely together.

Link to bioRxiv paper: http://biorxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2020.05.10.087650v1?rss=1 Authors: Georgescu, T., Ladyman, S. R., Brown, R. S. E., Grattan, D. R. Abstract: The anterior pituitary hormone, prolactin, is a fundamental regulator of lactation, and also plays a role in many other physiological processes including maternal behaviour, reproduction, immune response and even energy balance. Indeed, prolactin receptors (Prlr) are widely distributed throughout the body, including a number of different brain regions, further attesting to its pleiotropic nature. Within the brain, previous research has identified key areas upon which prolactin exerts effects on gene transcription through the canonical JAK2/STAT5 pathway downstream of the Prlr. In some neurones, however, such as the tuberoinfundibular dopamine neurones that control prolactin secretion, prolactin can also exert rapid actions to stimulate neuronal activity. While prolactin-induced activation of STAT5 has been described in a wide variety of brain regions, its capacity for acute modulation of electrical properties of many Prlr-expressing neurones remains to be elucidated. To investigate how widespread these rapid actions of prolactin are in various Prlr-expressing neurones, we utilised a transgenic mouse line in which Cre recombinase is specifically expressed in the coding region of the prolactin long form receptor gene (Prlr-iCre). This mouse line was crossed with a Cre-dependent calcium indicator (GCaMP6f) transgenic mouse, allowing us to visually monitor the electrical activity of Prlr-expressing neurones in ex vivo brain slice preparations. Here, we survey hypothalamic regions implicated in prolactin's diverse physiological functions such as: the arcuate (ARC) and paraventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus (PVN), and the medial preoptic area (MPOA). We observe that in both males and virgin and lactating females, bath application of prolactin is able to induce electrical changes in a subset of Prlr-expressing cells in all of these brain regions. The effects we detected ranged from rapid or sustained increases in intracellular calcium to inhibitory effects, indicating a heterogeneous nature of these Prlr-expressing populations. These results enhance our understanding of mechanisms by which prolactin acts on hypothalamic neurones and provide insights into how prolactin might influence neuronal circuits in the mouse brain. Copy rights belong to original authors. Visit the link for more info

Part 2 of the Food Revue! We welcome back Chronic, Mark, Glass, Jason and Chris as we delve into a subject near and dear to our hearts, which is breakfast in B-town. We recount some of our favorite old breakfast spots, many of which are no longer active on the Bloomington scene unfortunately. We reminisce about pieces of Bloomington history like Ladyman's, Wee Willie's, and the Waffle House at 10th and College. We also chat about the lack of breakfast spots on the east side, the mid-2000s brunch renaissance, and the places that have survived and thrived during the past 20 years.

Interview with AR State Rep. Jack Ladyman: 9/23/19, Hr. 2 by Conduit Media

State Reps. Jack Ladyman and Brandt Smith's Impression of the Session: 5/31/19, Hr. 2 by Conduit Media

Otávio Bueno (Miami) gives a talk at the Conference on Paraconsistent Reasoning in Science and Mathematics (11-13 June, 2014) titled "Inconsistent scientific Theories: A Framework". Abstract: Four important issues need to be considered when inconsistent scientific theories are under discussion: (1) To begin with, are there–and can there be–such things as inconsistent scientific theories? On standard conceptions of the structure of scientific theories, such as the semantic and the syntactic approaches (Suppe [1989], and van Fraassen [1980]), there is simply no room for such theories, given the classical underpinnings of these views. In fact, both the syntactic and the semantic approaches assume that the underlying logic is classical, and as is well known, in classical logic everything follows from an inconsistent theory. Despite this fact, it seems undeniable that inconsistent scientific theories have been entertained–or, at least, stumbled upon–throughout the history of science. So, it looks as though we need to make room for them. (2) But once some room is made for inconsistent scientific theories, how exactly should they be accommodated? In particular, it seems crucial that we are able to understand the styles of reasoning that involve inconsistencies; that is, the various ways in which scientists and mathematicians reason from inconsistent assumptions without deriving everything from them. It is tempting, of course, to adopt a paraconsistent logic to model some of the reasoning styles in question (see da Costa and French [2003], da Costa, Krause, and Bueno [2007], and da Costa, Bueno, and French [1998]). This is certainly a possibility. However, actual scientific practice is not typically done using paraconsistent logic. And if our goal is to understand that practice in its own terms, rather than to produce a parallel discourse about that practice that somehow justifies the adequacy of the latter by invoking tools that are foreign to it, an entirely different strategy is called for. (3) What are the sources of the inconsistencies in scientific theories? Do such inconsistencies emerge from empirical reasons, from conceptual reasons, from both, or by sheer mistake? By identifying the various sources in question, we can handle and assess the significance of the inconsistencies in a better way. Perhaps some inconsistencies are more important, troublesome, or heuristically fruitful than others—and this should be part of their assessment. (4) Several scientific theories become inconsistent due to the mathematical framework they assume. For example, the theories may refer to infinitesimals, as the latter were originally formulated in the early versions of the calculus (see Robinson [1974] and Bell [2005]), the theories may invoke Dirac’s delta function (Dirac [1958]), or some other arguably inconsistent mathematical framework. The issue then arises as to how we should deal with inconsistent applied mathematical theories. What is the status of these theories? Which commitments do they bring? Are we committed to the existence of inconsistent objects if we use such theories in explaining the phenomena? Can an inconsistent scientific theory ever be indispensable? Questions of this sort need to be answered so that we can make sense of the role of inconsistent theories in applications. (For an insightful discussion, see Colyvan [2009].) In this paper, I examine these four issues, and develop a framework–in terms of partial mappings (Bueno, French and Ladyman [2002], and Bueno [2006]), and the inferential conception of the application of mathematics (Bueno and Colyvan [forthcoming])–to represent and interpret inconsistent theories in science. Along the way, I illustrate how the framework can be used to make sense of various allegedly inconsistent theories, from the early formulations of the calculus through Dirac’s delta function and Bohr’s atomic model (Bohr [1913]).

Reality is a tricky thing. Is love real? What about the number 5? This is clearly a job for a philosopher, and James Ladyman is one of the world’s acknowledged experts. He and his collaborators have been championing a view known as “structural realism,” in which real things are those that reflect true, useful patterns in the underlying reality. We talk about that, but also about a couple of other subjects in the broad area of philosophy of science: the history and current status of materialism/physicalism, and the nature of complex systems. This is a deep one.            Support Mindscape on Patreon or Paypal. James Ladyman obtained his Ph.D. from the University of Leeds, and is currently a Professor of Philosophy at the University of Bristol. He has worked broadly within the philosophy of science, including issues of realism, empiricism, physicalism, complexity, and information. His book Everything Must Go (co-authored with Don Ross) has become an influential work on the relationship between metaphysics and science. Web page Everything Must Go Academia.edu page PhilPeople profile Conversation with Raymond Tallis Structural Realism at the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

André W. Carus (LMU) gives a talk at the Workshop on Five Years MCMP: Quo Vadis, Mathematical Philosophy? (2-4 June, 2016) titled "Mathematical Philosophy and Leitgeb’s Carnapian Big Tent: Past, Present, Future". Abstract: Hannes Leitgeb’s conception of mathematical philosophy, reflected in the success of the MCMP, is characterized by a pluralism — a Big Tent program — that shows remarkable continuity with the Vienna Circle, as now understood. But logical empiricism was notoriously opposed to metaphysics, which Leitgeb and other recent scientifically-oriented philosophers, such as Ladyman and Ross, embrace to varying degrees. So what, if anything, do these new, post-Vienna scientific philosophies exclude? Ladyman and Ross explicitly exclude much of recent analytic metaphysics, decrying it — very much in the logical empiricist spirit of critical Enlightenment — as vernacular “domestication” of counter-intuitive science. But it turns out, in the light of recent research on Carnap’s later thought, that Leitgeb’s Big Tent conception, though it excludes less than Ladyman and Ross, adheres more closely to Carnap’s Enlightenment ideal.

Christopher Menzel (Texas A&M University) gives a talk at the MCMP Colloquium (18 June, 2014) titled "Haecceities and Mathematical Structuralism". Abstract: It is well-known that some earlier versions of mathematical structuralism (notably from Resnik and Shapiro) appeared to be committed to a rather strong form of the Identity of Indiscernibles (II) that is falsified by the existence of structures like the complex field that admit of non-trivial automorphisms, or symmetries. In light of more recent work (notably, by MacBride, Ketland, Shapiro, Ladyman, and Leitgeb and Ladyman), it is widely accepted that the mathematical structuralist is not committed to II and that, in fact, the principle can be rejected outright on robustly structuralist grounds. I accept a qualified form of this view but I don't think the issue is as cut and dried as it might appear. In a 2007 Analysis article, José Bermúdez suggests that a strong version of II is still in play for the structuralist that can meet the challenge of non-trivial symmetries. The key to the proposal (as I will interpret it) lies in allowing identity properties, or haecceities, like being identical to c (for an arbitrary complex number c, say) to count as structural properties. Typically, structuralists dismiss such properties as obviously non-structural. I will argue to the contrary that haecceities can be viewed as properly structural and, in some circumstances, can serve as legitimate properties for discerning otherwise indiscernible “positions” in structures. Drawing on the model theoretic concept of an expansion, I base my argument on a notion of discernibility rooted intuitively in “underlying structure”. This notion turns out to be equivalent to a notion of discernibility identified in some previous studies but proves useful in focusing when haecceities can legitimately be invoked and why Bermúdez's proposed version of II falls short of a fully satisfactory structuralist principle.

Greetings Citizens and Civilians, and welcome to episode 15 of Guard Frequency, the universe’s premier Star Citizen podcast recorded on Saturday 29th March 2014 and released for streaming and download on Tuesday 1st April Wednesday 2nd April 2014 at GuardFrequency.com [Download this episode] Geoff, Lennon and Tony are back with another double dev dosage of […]

Compared to other fields of philosophy, "metaphysics" doesn't get a great rap -- it's both dauntingly obtuse and often derided as nonsense. In this episode of Rationally Speaking, Massimo and Julia chat with James Ladyman, Professor of philosophy at the University of Bristol and the author of Every Thing Must Go. The conversation covers: what is metaphysics, exactly, and where (in Ladyman's opinion) has it gone off the rails? Where does traditional science err in its classification of the "building blocks" of physics? What would a new, improved, metaphysics look like -- and what implications does that have for age-old questions like "What is causality?" and "Is the world real?"

Episode 6 of the Products of Monkey Love podcast sends Andy & Alex through the multi-dimentional gates to the edge of the so called Multiverse. Wikipedia blinds us with Multiple Universe theory, while we learn a little more about where Darwyn is and how we can communicate with him. Prepare for some crazy. Complete with more original improvised music and vocals as per usual. Please email info@poml.euFeaturing the songs :[insert title here],The Jellyfish Conspiracy,Kinky Biscuit,The Manlady and the Ladyman,Put the Boot In,Magic Fingers,The Oldest Woman in the World,Caught ProcrastinatingGo to poml.eu to see how you can get hold of these tracks and more!All songs copyright Pizz Productions Ltd 2008 My Podcast Alley feed!