Podcasts about yale journal

A fatal 1869 shooting at the New York Tribune led to a contentious debate about love, divorce, and women's rights in America. Sources:Cazauran, A. R. The Trial of Daniel McFarland for the Shooting of Albert D. Richardson (New York: W. E. Hilton, 1870).Cooper, George. Lost Love: A True Story of Passion, Murder, and Justice in Old New York (Pantheon Books: New York, 1994). Ganz, Melissa J. “Wicked Women and Veiled Ladies: Gendered Narratives of the McFarland-Richardson Tragedy.” Yale Journal of Law and Feminism. Vol. 9. 1997.McAvey, Marion. “Abby Sage Richardson.” EBSCO. 2023. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/abby-sage-richardsonRichardson, Abby Sage. Old Love Letters (Boston: James R. Osgood & Co., 1883).The Richardson-McFarland Tragedy: Containing all the letters and other interesting facts and documents not before published. (Barclay & Co. Publishers: Philadelphia, 1870).Stanton, Elizabeth Cady. “Speech on the McFarland Trial, Apollo Hall,” Speeches & Writings File. May 17, 1870Wilhelm, Robert. “The Richardson-McFarland Tragedy.” Murder By Gaslight. 10 July, 2010. https://www.murderbygaslight.com/2010/07/richardson-mcfarland-tragedy.htmlNewspapers:Buffalo ExpressNew York TimesNew York TribuneMusic: Credits to Holizna, Fesilyan Studios & Virginia ListonFor more information, visit www.oldbloodpodcast.com

Dans cet épisode : expériences de pensées et aventures réflexives hautement «trippatives» autour des enjeux philosophiques, éthiques et socioéconomiques de l'intelligence artificielle.Au programme: Idéaux et imaginaires socio-techniques - Les rêves éveillés de Sam Altman et de la Silicone Valley.L'intégration de l'IA dans le monde académique et de la recherche en science: ChatGPT, le processus de révision par les pairs, et ses maladresses! L' «homme diminué» et la décharge cognitive – Les origines et le futur de la lecture, de l'individualité, de l'empathie et la pensée réflexive à l'ère de l'IA.Bonne écoute! Production et animation: Jean-François Sénéchal, Ph.DCollaborateurs et collaboratrices (BaristIAs):  Frédérick Plamondon et Sylvain Munger Ph.D.Collaborateurs et collaboratrices:  Véronique Tremblay, Stéphane Minéo, Frédérick Plamondon, Shirley Plumerand, Sylvain Munger Ph.D, Ève Gaumond, Benjamin Leblanc.Textes et sources mentionnés: Cavalié, A. (2016). Maryanne Wolf, Proust et le calamar : Éd. Abeille et castor, 2015 [2007, trad. de l'anglais par Lisa Stupar], 412 p., 22€. Revue Projet, (5), 92-92.Karen Hao (2025). Empire of AI : Dreams and Nightmares in Sam Altman's OpenAI, Penguin Press. Livre audio disponible sur Spotify.Podcast, This IS research, avec Nick Berente et Jan Recker. (« IS » pour Information Systems)Biswas, S., Dobaria, D., & Cohen, H. L. (2023). ChatGPT and the Future of Journal Reviews : A FeasibilityStudy. The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 96(3), 415‑420. https://doi.org/10.59249/SKDH9286Ebadi, S., Nejadghanbar, H., Salman, A. R., & Khosravi, H. (2025). Exploring the Impact of Generative AI on Peer Review : Insights from Journal Reviewers. Journal of Academic Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-025-09604-4Hosseini, M., & Horbach, S. P. J. M. (2023). Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 8(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-023-00133-5Spinellis, D. (2025). False authorship : An explorative case study around an AI-generated article published under my name. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 10(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-025-00165-zOBVIA Observatoire international sur les impacts sociétaux de l'intelligence artificielleDisclaimer: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase, I may receive a commission at no extra cost to you.Support the show

The 1898 supreme court case called United States vs. Wong Kim Ark had affected enforcement of the Chinese Exclusion Act, because the court found that people born in the U.S. to Chinese parents were U.S. citizens. Research: Graber, Mark A. "United States v. Wong Kim Ark." American Governance, edited by Stephen Schechter, et al., vol. 5, Macmillan Reference USA, 2016, pp. 228-230. Gale In Context: U.S. History, link.gale.com/apps/doc/CX3629100710/GPS?u=mlin_n_melpub&sid=bookmark-GPS&xid=73795502. Accessed 22 Jan. 2025. "United States v. Wong Kim Ark." Gale U.S. History Online Collection, Gale, 2024. Gale In Context: U.S. History, link.gale.com/apps/doc/EXXRWP999307394/GPS?u=mlin_n_melpub&sid=bookmark-GPS&xid=c225358c. Accessed 22 Jan. 2025. "United States v. Wong Kim Ark." Great American Court Cases, edited by Mark Mikula and L. Mpho Mabunda, vol. 3: Equal Protection and Family Law, Gale, 1999. Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints, link.gale.com/apps/doc/EJ2303200443/GPS?u=mlin_n_melpub&sid=bookmark-GPS&xid=01ef8726. Accessed 22 Jan. 2025. Zietlow, Rebecca E. "Fourteenth Amendment: Citizenship Clause." American Governance, edited by Stephen Schechter, et al., vol. 2, Macmillan Reference USA, 2016, pp. 248-251. Gale In Context: U.S. History, link.gale.com/apps/doc/CX3629100269/GPS?u=mlin_n_melpub&sid=bookmark-GPS&xid=5c43018e. Accessed 22 Jan. 2025. Rosenbloom, Rachel E. “Birthright Citizenship Has Been Challenged Before.” Time. 1/15/2025. https://time.com/7204970/birthright-citizenship-test-cases/ Bomboy, Scott. “Updated: The birthright citizenship question and the Constitution.” National Constitution Center. 1/21/2025. https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/revisiting-the-birthright-citizenship-question-and-the-constitution Cabrera-Lomelí, Carlos. “A 129-Year-Old San Francisco Lawsuit Could Stop Trump From Ending Birthright Citizenship.” KQED. 1/21/2025. https://www.kqed.org/news/12015449/a-129-year-old-san-francisco-lawsuit-could-stop-trump-from-ending-birthright-citizenship Abdelfatah, Rund et al. “By Accident of Birth.” Throughline. NPR. 6/9/2022. https://www.npr.org/2022/06/06/1103291268/by-accident-of-birth Dhillon, Hardeep. “How the Fight for Birthright Citizenship Shaped the History of Asian American Families.” Smithsonian. 3/27/2023. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/how-the-fight-for-birthright-citizenship-reshaped-asian-american-families-180981866/ Frost, Amanda. “Birthright Citizens and Paper Sons.” The American Scholar. 1/18/2021. https://theamericanscholar.org/birthright-citizens-and-paper-sons/ Moore, Robert. “He won a landmark citizenship case at the US Supreme Court. El Paso tried to deport him anyway.” El Paso Matters. 7/4/2022. https://elpasomatters.org/2022/07/04/wong-kim-ark-vs-united-states-history-immigration-supreme-court/ Frost, Amanda. “’By Accident of Birth’: The Battle over Birthright Citizenship After United States v. Wong Kim Ark.” Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities. https://openyls.law.yale.edu/handle/20.500.13051/7583 Berger, Bethany. “Birthright Citizenship on Trial: Elk v. Wilkins and United States v. Wong Kim Ark.” Articles and Papers. 378. 2016. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/law_papers/378 National Archives Catalog. “In the matter of Wong Kim Ark for a writ of habeas corpus.” https://catalog.archives.gov/id/296026 See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

My guest today is Aziza Ahmed, a Professor of Law and N. Neal Pike Scholar at the Boston University School of Law. She is also a Co-Director of BU Law's Program on Reproductive Justice. She joins me and UVA Law 3L, Nia Saunders, to discuss her new book Risk and Resistance: How Feminists Transformed the Law and Science of AIDS, forthcoming from Cambridge University Press in 2025. Prior to teaching, Professor Ahmed was a research associate at the Harvard School of Public Health Program on International Health and Human Rights. She came to that position after a Women's Law and Public Policy Fellowship where she worked with the International Community of Women Living with HIV/AIDS. Professor Ahmed was a member of the Technical Advisory Group on HIV and the Law convened by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and has been an expert for many institutions, including the American Bar Association and UNDP.Reading ListAhmed BioLinda C. McClain & Aziza Ahmed, The Routledge Companion to Gender and Covid-19 (2024)SCHOLARLY COMMONSNicole Huberfeld, Linda C. McClain & Aziza Ahmed,Rethinking Foundations and Analyzing New Conflicts: Teaching Law after Dobbs 17 Saint Louis University Journal of Health Law & Policy (2024). SCHOLARLY COMMONSAziza Ahmed, Dabney P. Evans, Jason Jackson, Benjamin Mason Meier & Cecília Tomori, Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health: Undermining Public Health, Facilitating Reproductive Coercion 51 Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics (2023)SCHOLARLY COMMONSAziza Ahmed, Feminist Legal Theory and Praxis after Dobbs: Science, Politics, and Expertise 34 Yale Journal of Law and Feminism (2023)SCHOLARLY COMMONSKrawiec Bio

We interview William Clayton on the SEC's private funds rulemaking and related litigation.  Professor Clayton lays out his views on agency conflicts in the high-end private funds securities contracting market, discusses the Fifth Circuit's recent decision in National Association of Private Fund Managers v. SEC (5th Cir. 2024), and offers some thoughts looking forward beyond the presidential election. A bit about William Clayton: William W. Clayton is Professor of Law at The J. Reuben Clark Law School of Brigham Young University, where he co-directs the Global Business Law Program and teaches courses on contracts, business organizations, and corporate finance.  He is a leading researcher on private markets and private equity funds contracting and governance, whose work has been cited extensively in agency rulemaking and litigation amicus briefs, as well as published in other journals such as the Yale Journal on Regulation and Vanderbilt Law Review.  Before joining the BYU Law faculty, Professor Clayton worked as a corporate lawyer at Wachtell-Lipton, and as a private funds lawyer at Simpson-Thacher in New York, and was Executive Director of the Yale Law School center for the study of Corporate Law.  Professor Clayton holds a J.D. from Yale Law School, and an M.B.A. and B.A. from Stanford University.  We were pleased to publish Professor Clayton's article High-End Securities Regulation: Reflections on the SEC's 2022-23 Private Funds Rulemaking in the Harvard Business Law Review last fall.  Now, given subsequent litigation and regulatory updates including National Association of Private Fund Managers v. SEC (5th Cir. 2024), we are thrilled to welcome him to the Harvard Business Law Review Podcast to discuss current events. 

Episode Notes Books Beardsley, John. Earthworks and Beyond: Contemporary Art in the Landscape. New York: Abbeville Press, 1998. https://archive.org/details/earthworksbeyond0000bear Smithson, Robert. The Collected Writings of Robert Smithson. Edited by Jack Flam. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996. https://www.ucpress.edu/book/9780520203853/the-collected-writings Holt, Nancy. The Writings of Robert Smithson: Essays with Illustrations. New York University Press, 1979. https://archive.org/details/writingsofrobert0000smit Tufnell, Ben. Land Art. London: Tate Publishing, 2006. https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artists/robert-smithson-1979 Kwon, Miwon. One Place After Another: Site-Specific Art and Locational Identity. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2002. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262612029/one-place-after-another Shapiro, Gary. Earthwards: Robert Smithson and Art After Babel. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997. https://www.ucpress.edu/book/9780520214132/earthwards Journal Articles Boettger, Suzaan. “Global Warnings: Robert Smithson's Spiral Jetty in the Era of Climate Change.” Art Journal 67, no. 2 (2008): 24-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043249.2008.10791327 Krauss, Rosalind. "Sculpture in the Expanded Field." October 8 (Spring 1979): 30–44. https://doi.org/10.2307/778224 Roberts, Jennifer L. "The Mirror Displaced: Robert Smithson's 'Spiral Jetty' and the Mirror Travel Works." October 100 (Spring 2002): 21-50. https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/10.1162/016228702753711781 Foster, Hal. “The Crux of Minimalism.” October 30 (Fall 1984): 31-46. https://doi.org/10.2307/778357 Strain, Ellen. "Desert Sites: 'Spiral Jetty' and the Cultural Construction of an American Wilderness." The Yale Journal of Criticism 12, no. 2 (1999): 257-281. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/13137 Documentary Films and Multimedia Spiral Jetty: The First 50 Years. Directed by George Trimmer. Documentary Educational Resources, 2020. https://www.der.org/spiral-jetty-the-first-50-years/ Holt, Nancy, and Robert Smithson. Spiral Jetty: A Film by Robert Smithson. Electronic Arts Intermix, 1970. https://www.eai.org/titles/spiral-jetty PBS. “Land Art: Robert Smithson and Spiral Jetty.” Art21: Art in the 21st Century. PBS, 2001. https://art21.org/watch/spiral-jetty/ Exhibition Catalogs Whitney Museum of American Art. Robert Smithson: Retrospective Works 1955-1973. New York: Whitney Museum, 1985. https://whitney.org/exhibitions/robert-smithson Dia Art Foundation. Robert Smithson: Spiral Jetty and Other Works. New York: Dia Art Foundation, 2004. https://www.diaart.org/exhibition/exhibitions-projects/robert-smithson Online Resources and Archives Dia Art Foundation. "Spiral Jetty." Accessed October 25, 2024. https://www.diaart.org/visit/visit/robert-smithson-spiral-jetty Utah Museum of Fine Arts. “Robert Smithson's Spiral Jetty: A Guide.” Last modified 2020. https://umfa.utah.edu/spiral-jetty Holt/Smithson Foundation. “Spiral Jetty: A Legacy.” Accessed October 25, 2024. https://holtsmithsonfoundation.org/spiral-jetty Find out more at https://three-minute-modernist.pinecast.co

“Citizens to Aid Police in New Program,” reported the Los Angeles Times in 1975. “Community Policing: Law Enforcement Returns to Its Roots,” declared the Chicago Tribune in 1994. “Obama Calls for Changes in Policing After Task Force Report,” announced The New York Times in 2015. Periodically, US officials propose some type of police “reform,” usually after a period of widespread protest against ongoing racist police violence. Police, we're told, will improve their own performance and relationships with the public with a few tweaks: better training on use-of-force and equipment, upgraded technology like body cameras and shooting simulators, and deeper integration into the “community.” But, every time a new “reform” is introduced, it almost always serves as justification for bigger police-department budgets and fawning media coverage over police, painting the image of a scrappy force for public safety that just doesn't have the right training and resources. Meanwhile, levels of police harassment and police violence remain the same, and, in many cases, even increase. Indeed, 2023 was the worst year for fatal police shootings in decades despite – or perhaps because of – all the post-Ferguson “reforms." On this episode, the Season 8 Premiere of Citations Needed, we'll discuss the media-enabled phenomenon of how pro-police narratives, programs and budget bloating busy work are spun as “reform,” how they are used to stem public anger and placate squishy politicians and nonprofits, and look at the decades-old practice of turning public opposition to, and victimization from, US policing into an opportunity to expand and enrich the security state. Our guest is civil rights attorney Alec Karakatsanis. ** Alec Karakatsanis (@equalityAlec) is a civil rights attorney and the founder of Civil Rights Corps. He is the author of Alec's Copaganda Newsletter, the book Usual Cruelty: The Complicity of Lawyers in the Criminal Injustice System (The New Press, 2019), the Yale Journal of Law & Liberation study “The Body Camera: The Language of our Dreams,” and the forthcoming book, Copaganda: How Police and the Media Manipulate Our News, which will be published early next year by The New Press.

We would like to acknowledge the contributions of the following:Historical Society of Pottawattamie CountyJim McMullen and Kandis Kole-Skank of the Pottawattamie County Genealogical SocietyDr. David Holcomb Dr. James KnottThe reference department at the Council Bluffs Public Library References for more information:"Hospital No. 1 Won War Cross," Council Bluffs Daily Nonpareil, July 26, 1936"Glimpsing Modernity: Military Medicine in WWI," Chapter Five, by WIlliam Montgomery, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2016"Unit K the First MASH Unit," Council Bluffs Daily Nonpareil, May 20, 2016"Iowa Hospital Corps Moved with WWI," Omaha World Herald, July 2, 2017"Brief Hospital of Mobile Hospital No. 1," Journal of the Iowa State Medical Association, April 1920"One Hundred Years of Iowa Medicine," Iowa State Medical Association, 1950"The Great War: One Medic's Diary," Bob Reilly, Creighton University Magazine, Summer, 2001"Joseph Marshall Flint," Samuel Clark Harvey, Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine , March, 1945

Let's look at two recent Supreme Court cases impacting the role and powers of federal regulators. After decades of accepted areas of law that deferred to federal regulators, we are witnessing a shakeup through rulings on the so-called Chevron Deference and the Corner Post decision. How will these landmark rulings change the power held by agencies?  The modern regulatory state of the federal governments evolved after the Great Depression during the New Deal to tighten lax oversight blamed for many elements that led to the Depression. As new agencies were created, regulators came to enforce developing legislation, such as the Securities Exchange Act and labor rules. Seventy plus years later, we have our alphabet soup of federal agencies. Expect a slew of new challenges and litigation to follow. “It is impossible to overstate what a complete wreck this is going to make of everything,” says guest and associate professor of administrative law Gwendolyn Savitz, calling the effect of the rulings “calamitous.” How can legislators put the toothpaste back in the tube? “Chevron's a big deal, it's reversal's a big deal,” adds guest and regulatory law veteran Paul Weiland. If you're involved in regulatory law, you can't miss this episode. Resources: “Reassessing Administrative Finality: The Importance of New Evidence and Changed Circumstances,” by Gwendolyn Savitz Administrative Procedures Act, Cornell Law School “Loper Bright, Skidmore, and the Gravitational Pull of Past Agency Interpretations,” Yale Journal of Regulation  Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, via Justia Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, SCOTUSblog Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, SCOTUSblog Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, NOAA “The Supreme Court Ends Chevron Deference – What Now?” NRDC American Bar Association American Bar Association Litigation Section

Let's look at two recent Supreme Court cases impacting the role and powers of federal regulators. After decades of accepted areas of law that deferred to federal regulators, we are witnessing a shakeup through rulings on the so-called Chevron Deference and the Corner Post decision. How will these landmark rulings change the power held by agencies?  The modern regulatory state of the federal governments evolved after the Great Depression during the New Deal to tighten lax oversight blamed for many elements that led to the Depression. As new agencies were created, regulators came to enforce developing legislation, such as the Securities Exchange Act and labor rules. Seventy plus years later, we have our alphabet soup of federal agencies. Expect a slew of new challenges and litigation to follow. “It is impossible to overstate what a complete wreck this is going to make of everything,” says guest and associate professor of administrative law Gwendolyn Savitz, calling the effect of the rulings “calamitous.” How can legislators put the toothpaste back in the tube? “Chevron's a big deal, it's reversal's a big deal,” adds guest and regulatory law veteran Paul Weiland. If you're involved in regulatory law, you can't miss this episode. Resources: “Reassessing Administrative Finality: The Importance of New Evidence and Changed Circumstances,” by Gwendolyn Savitz Administrative Procedures Act, Cornell Law School “Loper Bright, Skidmore, and the Gravitational Pull of Past Agency Interpretations,” Yale Journal of Regulation  Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, via Justia Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, SCOTUSblog Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, SCOTUSblog Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, NOAA “The Supreme Court Ends Chevron Deference – What Now?” NRDC American Bar Association American Bar Association Litigation Section

Speaker: Professor Mark Roe (Harvard Law School)Chair: Felix Steffek (University of Cambridge)Abstract: The notion of stock-market-driven short-termism relentlessly whittling away at the American economy's foundations is widely accepted and highly salient. Presidential candidates state as much. Senators introduce bills assuming as much. Corporate interests argue as much to the Securities and Exchange Commission and the corporate law courts. Yet the academic evidence as to the problem's severity is no more than mixed. What explains this gap between widespread belief and weak evidence?Bio: Mark J. Roe is a professor at Harvard Law School, where he teaches corporate law and corporate bankruptcy. His research interests cover bankruptcy (corporate bankruptcy and reorganization), corporate law and corporate finance. He wrote Strong Managers, Weak Owners: The Political Roots of American Corporate Finance (Princeton, 1994), Political Determinants of Corporate Governance (Oxford, 2003), and Bankruptcy and Corporate Reorganization (Foundation, 2014). Academic articles include: Stock-Market Short-Termism's Economy-Wide Impact (forthcoming); Containing Systemic Risk by Taxing Banks Properly, 35 Yale Journal on Regulation 181 (2018), Financial Markets and the Political Center of Gravity, 2 J. Law, Finance, and Accounting 125 (2017) (with Travis Coan); Bankruptcy's Three Ages, 7 Harvard Business Law Review 187 (2017); Corporate Structural Degradation Due to Too-Big-to-Fail Finance, 162 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1419 (2014); Corporate Short-Termism — In the Boardroom and in the Courtroom, 68 Business Lawyer 977 (2013); and Breaking Bankruptcy Priority: How Rent-Seeking Upends the Creditors' Bargain, 99 Virginia Law Review 1235 (2013) (with Frederick Tung).3CL runs the 3CL Travers Smith Lunchtime Seminar Series, featuring leading academics from the Faculty, and high-profile practitioners.For more information see the Centre for Corporate and Commercial Law website:http://www.3cl.law.cam.ac.uk/

Speaker: Professor Mark Roe (Harvard Law School)Chair: Felix Steffek (University of Cambridge)Abstract: The notion of stock-market-driven short-termism relentlessly whittling away at the American economy's foundations is widely accepted and highly salient. Presidential candidates state as much. Senators introduce bills assuming as much. Corporate interests argue as much to the Securities and Exchange Commission and the corporate law courts. Yet the academic evidence as to the problem's severity is no more than mixed. What explains this gap between widespread belief and weak evidence?Bio: Mark J. Roe is a professor at Harvard Law School, where he teaches corporate law and corporate bankruptcy. His research interests cover bankruptcy (corporate bankruptcy and reorganization), corporate law and corporate finance. He wrote Strong Managers, Weak Owners: The Political Roots of American Corporate Finance (Princeton, 1994), Political Determinants of Corporate Governance (Oxford, 2003), and Bankruptcy and Corporate Reorganization (Foundation, 2014). Academic articles include: Stock-Market Short-Termism's Economy-Wide Impact (forthcoming); Containing Systemic Risk by Taxing Banks Properly, 35 Yale Journal on Regulation 181 (2018), Financial Markets and the Political Center of Gravity, 2 J. Law, Finance, and Accounting 125 (2017) (with Travis Coan); Bankruptcy's Three Ages, 7 Harvard Business Law Review 187 (2017); Corporate Structural Degradation Due to Too-Big-to-Fail Finance, 162 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1419 (2014); Corporate Short-Termism — In the Boardroom and in the Courtroom, 68 Business Lawyer 977 (2013); and Breaking Bankruptcy Priority: How Rent-Seeking Upends the Creditors' Bargain, 99 Virginia Law Review 1235 (2013) (with Frederick Tung).3CL runs the 3CL Travers Smith Lunchtime Seminar Series, featuring leading academics from the Faculty, and high-profile practitioners.For more information see the Centre for Corporate and Commercial Law website:http://www.3cl.law.cam.ac.uk/

In this episode with Dr. Anna Nekola, we discuss her recent article "Congregational Music as 'Phatic Communication': Affect, Atmosphere, and Relational Ways of Listening" (Yale Journal of Music & Religion, 2022). We explore some of the social functions of music and how it does more than open of spiritual pathways between us and God but also social pathways to connect with one another. This form of communication is more than information but about enabling and maintaining social connections. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/the-worship-nerds/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/the-worship-nerds/support

In 2022, I was asked to contribute to a symposium at Yale Law School on the question, "How can the humanities inform tech policy and design to promote 'healthier' discourse and democracy online?" The ultimate result was this article, published in the 2023 symposium issue of the Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities. A scanned pdf of the article can be found as an attachment here: https://www.patreon.com/posts/100047377 I also gave a short presentation at the symposium in 2022; since visual evidence is important to the argument of this article, I hope to expand upon the slides that I used in that presentation in order to produce a video with a full-length visual track to accompany the article. Film of Sumi Jo performing second half of Olympia's aria, "Les Oiseaux dans la Charmille," in Offenbach's "Tales of Hoffmann," at Opera de Lille, 1997: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lW2iiZ8MyGI Thank you to the editors and staff of the Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities and the Justice Collaboratory.

In keeping with a Historiansplaining holiday tradition, we try to make sense of the various struggles and conflicts of this yearby uncovering their deeper historical contexts, including: --the roots of the Israel/Palestine conflict in the breakdown of the Ottoman Empire; --the precedents for the bitter House Speakership struggle; --the gradual realignment in the international balance of power, instantiated in the expansion of BRICS; --the geopolitical stakes of the fight over Nagorno-Karabakh; and --the histories of labor militancy that lie behind the strikes in Hollywood and Detroit See my appearance on the Katie Halper show to discuss the travails of Zionism and Palestine: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VL_EzoyY17A Corrections: I wrote my article for Yale Journal of Law and Humanities (“In the American Tempest”) in 2022, not 2021; The Screen Writers Guild, the precursor of the WGA, was founded in 1920, not the 1930s. Image: Palestinians harvesting wheat, Khan Younis, Gaza Strip, 2020, by Rizek Abdeljawad / Xinhua Please sign on as a patron to hear all patron-only lectures and to help keep this podcast coming: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=5530632

This conversation is not your average discussion about testosterone; it's a journey into the physiological pathways, the intricacies of testosterone replacement therapy, and the crucial question of who should and shouldn't explore this avenue. Scott Howell, Ph.D., is the research director and primary investigator of Tier 1 Center for Clinical Research. He is an epidemiologist and exercise physiologist with research interests in the long-term safety of therapeutic androgen use, endocrine disrupting chemicals exposure, and preventative medicine. His work has been frequently published in notable peer-review journals including the American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism and the Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine. Our discussion touches on making informed decisions about aromatase inhibitors and finasteride – the estrogen and DHT blockers, respectively. Dr. Howell also sheds light on the potential negative pathways of testosterone and offers valuable insights into navigating these aspects. Plus… we reveal some shocking facts about endocrine disruptors and their impact on the hormonal health of our species. – About Muscle Intelligence – We are raising the standard of men in their prime by helping aspirational men optimize their health so they can live longer, lead from the front and perform at their best everyday. Learn more: muscleintelligence.com/mipapply Support our Sponsors: Get a 10% discount on all BiOptimizers products at bioptimizers.com/muscle - use code MUSCLE10 Learn more from Dr. Scott Howell https://optimizeucenters.com/ https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Scott-Howell-2 Join the Mission: Private Email List: muscleintelligence.com/viplist Private Community: muscleintelligence.com/community Instagram: instagram.com/muscleintelligencecoaching YouTube: muscleintelligence.com/youtube

In this episode, Jordana R. Goodman, Assistant Professor of Law at Chicago-Kent College of Law, discusses her article "Ms. Attribution: How Authorship Credit Contributes to the Gender Gap," which is published in the Yale Journal of Law & Technology. Goodman begin by describing the "gender gap" and how it affects the practice of law. She explains how the "Matthew" and "Matilda" effects under-recognize the contributions of women in legal practice, and how lack of attribution helps perpetuate the gender gap. She describe her empirical study of attribution in patent practice. And she makes suggestions for how to increase attribution to women. Goodman is on Twitter at @Jordi_Goodman.This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode, Amanda Levendowski, Associate Professor of Law and Founding Director of the Intellectual Property and Information Policy Clinic at Georgetown Law, discusses her articles "Just Citation," which will be published in the Berkeley Journal of Gender, Law & Justice, and "Disrupting Data Cartels by Editing Wikipedia," which she co-authored with Eun Hee Han and Jonah Perlin, and which is published in the Yale Journal of Law & Technology. Levendowski explains how to think intersectionally about citation practices, and why who and what you cite matters. And she describes how editing Wikipedia can be a valuable pedagogical practice, with normative benefits. Levendowski is on Twitter at @levendowski.This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The world is getting smaller and smaller.  As estate planners, we need to be aware of cross-border issues when it comes to estate planning and taxation.  In this episode, our guest Chris Nason will be discussing a basic and practical overview of international estate planning and tax planning issues.   About Our Guest:Chris Nason is a partner at McDermott, Will & Emery based in their San Francisco office. Chris focuses his practice on private client matters.  He is the managing editor of International Estate Planning, a multi-volume guide to US estate and income taxation of foreign nationals published annually by LexisNexis/Matthew Bender Elite. Chris teaches classes on Trusts and Estate Planning at Stanford Law School.While in law school, Chris served as an editor for the Yale Journal of International Law and was a fellow at the China Law Center and was also a co-president of the Law and Africa Society. Prior to law school, he attended Peking University as a CSC Scholar, where he studied Chinese language and law. Chris can be reached at: Cnason@mwe.comAbout Our Host: Host Anna Soliman is Trust Counsel and Chief Fiduciary Officer for Fiduciary Trust International of California out of the Los Angeles Office. Prior to joining Fiduciary Trust International, Anna was an estate tax attorney for the Internal Revenue Service and also worked in private practice, specializing in estate planning and trust administration for ultrahigh net worth individuals.  She is also a TEXCOM member and is a Vice-Chair of the Fiduciary Income Tax Section of the American Bar Association. Thank you for listening to Trust Me!Trust Me is Produced by Foley Marra StudiosEdited by Todd Gajdusek

Square dancing has very old roots and has endured as a pastime to present day. Its history, though, comes with some thorns, and scholars don't even agree on its exact origin.  Research:         Anderson, Virginia C. “It All Began Anew: The Revival of Folk Dancing.” Western Folklore , Apr., 1948, Vol. 7, No. 2 (Apr., 1948). Via JSTOR. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1497379         Blakemore, Erin. “The Slave Roots of Square Dancing.” JSTOR Daily. 6/16/2017. https://daily.jstor.org/the-slave-roots-of-square-dancing/         Burger, Hans, complier. “History and Heritage of Modern American Square Dancing.” Phantom Promenaders Munich. European Association of American Square Dance. Via archive.org. https://web.archive.org/web/20040409113940/http://eaasdc.de/history/shehisto.pdf         Dallal, Jenine Abboushi. "French Cultural Imperialism and the Aesthetics of Extinction." The Yale Journal of Criticism, vol. 13 no. 2, 2000, p. 229-265. Project MUSE, doi:10.1353/yale.2000.0016.         Damon, S. Foster. “History of Square Dancing.” Barre, Mass. 1957.         Gifford, Paul M. “Henry Ford's Dance Revival and Fiddle Contests: Myth and Reality.” Journal of the Society for American Music (2010) Volume 4, Number 3, pp. 307–338.         Hunt, Tracie. “Birdie in the Cage.” Produced by Annie McEwen, Tracie Hunte, and Matt Kielty. Radiolab. 10/23/2019. https://radiolab.org/podcast/birdie-cage         Jamison, Philip A. “Square Dance Calling: The African-American Connection.” Journal of Appalachian Studies , Fall 2003, Vol. 9, No. 2 (Fall 2003). Via JSTOR. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41446577         Lovett, Benjamin B. and Henry Ford. “'Good Morning': After a Sleep of Twenty-five Years, Old-fashioned Dancing is Being Revived by Mr. and Mrs. Henry Ford.” Dearborn Publishing Company. January 1926.         Mangin, Julianne. “The State Folk Dance Conspiracy: Fabricating a National Folk Dance.” Originally published in the Old-Time Herald, v.4(7) p.9-12, Spring 1995. http://juliannemangin.com/the-state-folk-dance-conspiracy/         MasterClass. “All About Square Dance: A Brief History of Square Dance.” https://www.masterclass.com/articles/square-dance-explained         Miller, Rebecca S. "Creolizing Contradance in the Caribbean." American Music, vol. 28, no. 4, winter 2010, pp. 501+. Gale In Context: U.S. History, link.gale.com/apps/doc/A401215265/GPS?u=mlin_n_melpub&sid=bookmark-GPS&xid=5ce2f07f. Accessed 1 June 2023.         Nelson, Kevin. "Square Dancing." Encyclopedia of Recreation and Leisure in America, edited by Gary S. Cross, vol. 2, Charles Scribner's Sons, 2004, pp. 305-307. Gale In Context: U.S. History, link.gale.com/apps/doc/CX3434800241/GPS?u=mlin_n_melpub&sid=bookmark-GPS&xid=eed3a8c4. Accessed 1 June 2023.         Optimist Daily. “The history of square dancing in America—part I of True American.” 8/12/2022. https://www.optimistdaily.com/2022/08/the-history-of-square-dancing-in-america-part-i-of-true-american/         Optimist Daily. “The square dancers of today—part II of True American, a mini-series.” 8/19/2022. https://www.optimistdaily.com/2022/08/the-square-dancers-of-today-part-ii-of-true-american-a-mini-series/         Quigley, Colin. “Reflections on the Hearing to "Designate the Square Dance as the American Folk Dance of the United States": Cultural Politics and an American Vernacular Dance Form.” Yearbook for Traditional Music , 2001, Vol. 33 (2001). Via JSTOR. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1519639         Sabatella, Matthew. “Southern Appalachian Square Dance: A Brief History.” Ballad of America. https://balladofamerica.org/southern-square-dance/         Szwed, John F. and Morton Marks. “The Afro-American Transformation of European Set Dances and Dance Suites.” Dance Research Journal , Summer, 1988, Vol. 20, No. 1 (Summer, 1988). Via JSTOR. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1478814         U.S. House of Representatives. “Can I have This Dance?” Whereas: Stories from the People's House. 4/29/2020. https://history.house.gov/Blog/2020/April/4-29-squaredance/         Warnock, Emery C. “The Anti-Semitic Origins of Henry Ford's Arts Education Patronage.” Journal of Historical Research in Music Education , Apr., 2009, Vol. 30, No. 2. Via JSTOR. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40215355  See omny.fm/listener for privacy information.

lovethylawyer.comA transcript of this podcast is available at lovethylawyer.com.  Megan Wachspress is a Staff Attorney with the Sierra Club's Beyond Coal Campaign, where she utilizes a combination of litigation and policy advocacy strategies to accelerate the closure and prevent the construction of coal- and gas-fired power plants. She has appeared on behalf of the Club in numerous state utility commission proceedings including as lead counsel in administrative trial proceedings as well as representing the Club and its members in federal and state litigation as well as EPA notice-and-comment proceedings. Prior to joining the Sierra Club, Megan represented employees, unions, and non-profit organizations at a boutique public interest firm in San Francisco. As a PhD student Megan taught numerous courses in the Legal Studies Department as well as in San Quentin Prison as part of what is now Mount Tamalpais College. Megan is the author or co-author of articles published in the Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities, Yale Law Journal, and International Journal of Law in Context, and clerked with Justice Goodwin Liu of the California Supreme Court and Judge William Fletcher of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. She currently serves on the boards of the Homeless Action Center of Alameda County and the Bay Area Lawyers' Chapter of the American Constitution Society.J.D. Yale Law SchoolPh.D University of California, BerkeleyM.Phil University of CambridgeBA/BS University of ChicagoPauli Murrayhttps://www.paulimurraycenter.com/  Louis Goodman www.louisgoodman.comhttps://www.lovethylawyer.com/ 510.582.9090  Musical theme by Joel Katz, Seaside Recording, Maui Technical support: Bryan Matheson, Skyline Studios, OaklandAudiograms & Transcripts: Paul Roberts    We'd love to hear from you.  Send me an email at louis@lovethylawyer.com. Please subscribe and listen. Then tell us who you want to hear and what areas of interest you'd like us to cover.  Please rate us and review us on Apple Podcasts.     Louis Goodman www.louisgoodman.comhttps://www.lovethylawyer.com/510.582.9090Music: Joel Katz, Seaside Recording, MauiTech: Bryan Matheson, Skyline Studios, OaklandAudiograms: Paul Roberts louis@lovethylawyer.com

I update listeners about my recent work, including for the upcoming symposium issue of Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, about my hope of beginning a collaboration with a producer to work on videos and on lectures about music, and about the crisis created by banks and credit cards declining patrons' pledges to the podcast. Please go to Patreon to see whether your pledges have been processed, or to sign up as a patron if you have not already: https://www.patreon.com/posts/history-of-in-20-74790682 The recently launched podcast website: www.historiansplaining.com

Andrew Granato, executive editor and empirical scholarship editor of the Yale Journal on Regulation; John Bowers, empirical scholarship editor of the Yale Law Journal; and Arisa Herman, senior articles editor of the Cornell Law Review, join the Business Scholarship Podcast to discuss the state of empirical legal scholarship and the recently announced Joint Law Review Statement on Data and Code Transparency. This episode is hosted by Andrew Jennings, assistant professor at Brooklyn Law School.

Claudia and Bev discuss PDMP's (Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs) and NarxCare with Atty. Jennifer Oliva. "Professor Oliva's research and teaching interests include health law and policy, privacy law, evidence, torts, and complex litigation. She has served as an invited peer reviewer for the American Journal of Public Health, Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics, American Journal of Law & Medicine, Journal of Law and the Biosciences, and Big Data & Society and her scholarship has been published by or is forthcoming in, among other publications, the California Law Review, Duke Law Journal, Northwestern University Law Review, UCLA Law Review, North Carolina Law Review, Ohio State Law Journal, George Mason Law Review, and online companions to the University of Chicago Law Review and New York University Law Review." Jenn is also on Jenn is on the Science and Policy Advisory Council for NPAC (National Pain Advocacy Center) Excerpts were played on this podcast that can be found in their entirety in the following links: NPR show 1A - "Against the Pain: The Opioid Crisis and Medication Access" "Patients, Privacy, and PDMP's" - Cato with Dr. Jeffrey Singer and Kate Nicholson Duke Margolis - "Strategies for Promoting the Safe Use of Prescription Opioids" NPR - "To End Addiction Epidemic" - Kolodny quote Cover 2 Resources - Gary Mendell Jennifer Oliva can be contacted on Twitter @jenndoliva Learn more about Jennifer on her website at uchastings Jennifer D. Oliva's paper: "Dosing Discrimination: Regulating PDMP Risk Scores" Disclaimer: The information provided to you in this podcast is not to be considered medical or legal advice --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/the-doctor-patient-forum/message

On today's show we discuss how Colleges are becoming like Cults and the effects of 'woke culture' on education. GUEST OVERVIEW: Dr Lyell Asher is an Associate Professor of English at Lewis and Clark College. His critical essays and opinions have appeared in The Yale Journal of Criticism, The Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Publication of the Modern Language Association, Clio, English Literary History plus others.

Vascular Origin Stories is a podcast series that explores the fun and engaging stories that shaped vascular surgery. Today's episode will be the first part of a multi-episode series exploring how the young battalion surgeons serving in MASH units in the Korean war pioneered wartime vascular repair. This episode introduces the Mobile Army Surgical Hospital (MASH), as well as some of the real-life stories from the surgeons unknowingly changing the field of medicine, which inspired the hit movie and TV series M*A*S*H.  We'll look at what caused arterial repair to be removed from the army surgical handbook after WWI and how changing medical education helped create the environment for ingenuity in the MASH units. In part 2, we'll explore in detail the individual stories of adversity, courage, and perseverance that led to the re-introduction of arterial repair in the military. Major sources for the episode are linked below, and a full reference list can be found at the bottom of the page. Articles In Ukraine, Gruesome Injuries and Not Enough Doctors to Treat Them, by Michael Schwirtz and Lynsey Addari Korea, M*A*S*H, and the accidental pioneers of vascular surgery by Dr. Steven Friedman, MD Books Of Life and Limb: Surgical Repair of the Arteries in War and Peace, 1880-1960 by Dr. Justin Barr, MD, PhD MASH: An Army Surgeon in Korea by Dr. Otto Apel, MD and Pat Apel MASH: A Novel About Three Army Doctors  by Richard Hooker References  Robinson, A. Galen: Life Lessons from Gladiatorial Contests. The Lancet Perspective. Vol 382, Is. 9904. November 2013. Friedman, S.G. A History of Vascular Surgery. Futura Publishing. 1989. Van Way, C. War and Trauma: A History of Military Medicine. Mo Med. 2016 Jul-Aug;113(40:260-263 Hernigou, P. Ambroise Pare II: Pare's contributions to amputation and ligature. Int Orthop. 2013 Apr; 37(4): 769-772  Van Way, C. War and Trauma: A History of Military Medicine- PArt II. Mo Med. 2016 Sep-Oct; 113 950:336-340 Apel, O. Apel, P. MASH: An Army Surgeon in Korea. The University Press of Kentucky. 1998.  King, B. Jatoi, I. The Mobile Army Surgical Hospital (MASH): A Military and Surgical Legacy. Journal of the National Medical Association. Vol. 97, No 5. May 2005. Friedman, S.  Korea, MASH and the Accidental Pioneers of Vascular Surgery. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2007.  Wesselingh, R. From Milites Medici to Army Medics- A two Thousand Year Tradition of Military Medicine. Journal of Military and Veterans' Health. Vol 16, No 4 Gabriel, R. Between Flesh and Steel: A History of Military Medicine from the Middle Ages to the War in Afghanistan. Potomac Books. 2016 Jorgensen,T.J. How Marie Curie Brought X-Ray Machines To the Battlefield. Smithsonian Magazine. Oct 11. 2017 Of Life and Limb: Surgical Repair of the Arteries in War and Peace, 1880-1960. Joseph Barr. University of Rochester Press; 1st edition. November 1, 2019.  Duffy, T.P. The Flexner Report- 100 Years Later.  Yale Journal of Biological Medicine. 2011 Sep;84(3): 269-276  Andrew Dale. Band of Brother: Creators of Modern Vascular Surgery. Deweese. 1996 John Kobler. The Reluctant Surgeon, a Biography of John Hunter. Doubleday and Company. 1960 Eugene Custers, Ollen ten Cate.The History of Medical Education in Europe and the United States, With Respect to Time and Proficiency. Academic Medicine. March 2018-Vol. 93 Is. 3S Kapp, K. Talbot, G. John Hunter, The Father of Scientific Surgery. The American College of Surgeons. Poster CC2017  “Alpha Omega Alpha' History”. Website Kenneth M. Ludmerer. Learning to Heal: The Development of American Medical Education. Basic Books, Inc., Publishers. New York. 1985 Richard Hooker and WC Heinz.  MASH: A Novel About Three Army Surgeons. Pocket Books. 1968.  Jahnke Jr., E.J., Seeley S.F. Acute vascular injuries in the Korean War: an analysis of 77 consecutive cases. Ann Surg. 1953; 138: 158-177 Author + Host: Marlene Garcia-Neuer (@GarciaNeuer) is a PGY1 General Surgery Resident at Mayo Clinic Arizona. Calling all medical students! Submit your questions for the mailbag episode! Ask us any question related to vascular surgery, and have it answered on the podcast. Include the following: Your name, school, year, and to whom you want to address the question (resident, fellow, attending, or someone specific). Send them in writing or voice-recorded format.  Send them to audiblebleeding@vascularsociety.org. Follow us on Twitter @audiblebleeding Learn more about us at https://www.audiblebleeding.com/about-1/ and #jointheconversation. Credits: Author: Marlene Garcia-Neuer Editor: Sharif Ellozy Reviewer: Eilidh Gunn Music and Sound Effects from Pixabay, special thanks to ZakharValaha and BlenderTimer.

La sociedad humana avanza hacia el colapso, evento que podría suceder en apenas dos décadas, a no ser que viremos el rumbo y cambiemos seriamente nuestras prioridades a escala global.Siento haber comenzado así, a lo bruto, sin filtro, pero la idea que acabo de exponer se basa en un trabajo realizado por el MIT en la década de 1970. Durante bastante tiempo se supo bastante poco de aquel viejo trabajo, denostado en su época, pero ahora una analista llamada Gaya Herrington (que actualmente trabaja para una de las cuatro grandes a nivel mundial en el sector de las consultoras, la firma KPGM) acaba de “revisitar” aquel trabajo, solo para descubrir que algunas de sus lúgubres predicciones se están cumpliendo punto por punto.Los resultados de su actualización se publicaron en la edición de noviembre de 2020 de la revista Yale Journal of Industrial Ecology, en la que básicamente, Herrington amplió la tesis doctoral que había realizado sobre este campo, durante su posgrado en la Universidad de Harvard.¡De esto hablamos hoy en el podcast!jc

What does it mean to be Ukrainian? Struggles within Ukraine about the answer to that question create an opening for other states to intervene, argues our guest, with some (primarily in Ukraine's north and west) favoring a more ethnic nationalism and others (primarily in Ukraine's east and south) favoring a more civic nationalism. In World War I, World War II, and the present day, outside powers have backed one vision or another to advance their interests. Only a process of truth and reconciliation - of catharsis leading to understanding - can heal Ukraine. Nicolai N. Petro is a Professor of Political Science at the University of Rhode Island. He was a U.S. Fulbright Scholar in Ukraine 2013-2014 and the author of the forthcoming book The Tragedy of Ukraine: What Classical Greek Tragedy Can Teach Us About Conflict Resolution. The Yale Journal of International Affairs article Dr. Petro references is "The Gospel According to Poroshenko: Politics, Religion, and the New Church of Ukraine," available at https://www.yalejournal.org/publications/the-gospel-according-to-poroshenko-politics-religion-and-the-new-church-of-ukraine The next event we have on Ukraine is with George Beebe - on dangers of escalation and paths to peace. Learn more and register here: https://standtogether.zoom.us/webinar/register/4716529676857/WN_aIiw1IiySneDWzfFfKmXqQ

In this episode, Jordana Goodman, Visiting Clinical Assistant Professor at the Boston University School of Law, discusses her new article Ms. Attribution: How Authorship Credit Contributes to the Gender Gap. She argues that misattribution in the authorship of legal work disparately impacts underrepresented members of the legal profession, with a focus on women in patent law. In her article, Professor Goodman reports empirical findings from a large novel dataset of agency actions and responses during the patent examination process in the United States Patent and Trademark Office. She also addresses the larger professional and cultural implications of these findings and proposes reforms. Professor Goodman's article is forthcoming in the Yale Journal of Law & Technology and is available on SSRN. She is on Twitter at @Jordi_Goodman.This episode was hosted by Saurabh Vishnubhakat, Professor in the School of Law and Professor in the Dwight Look College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. Professor Vishnubhakat is on Twitter at @emptydoors.Disclosure: Professors Goodman and Vishnubhakat are now collaborating on a follow-up paper that explores the gender gap among attorneys in administrative patent litigation before the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

In this special episode of "37th and the World," GJIA hosted a panel on April 6th with the Yale Journal of International Affairs (YJIA) titled "Contemporary Threats to the Global Supply Chain." We were joined by three guests: Sarah Morgan (Senior Government Relations Officer at the International Labor Organization), Levent Altinoglu (Senior Economist at the Federal Reserve Board of Governors), and Jared Webber (Associate Partner at McKinsey & Company Manufacturing and Supply Chain).

The One Take Show is honoured to host Mr Aradhya Sethia. Aradhya Sethia is a PhD Candidate and Cambridge International Scholar at the University of Cambridge, where he is studying the role and regulation of political parties and party systems in modern constitutional states. Aradhya is a supervisor in constitutional law and Human Rights Law at Cambridge and an Executive Director of the Cambridge Pro Bono Project. He has previously taught at the National Law School of India University, Bangalore. Before joining Cambridge, Aradhya was a Bonavero Institute Summer Fellow at the British Institute of International and Comparative Law and read for MPhil at the University of Oxford. In 2018, Aradhya completed LL.M. at Yale Law School as an Inlaks Scholar served as a resident fellow at Yale Information Society Project, an articles editor of the Yale Journal of International Law, and a member of the Lowenstein International Human Rights Project. Subsequently, he was a visiting scholar and Yale Fox International Fellow at the Centre for Comparative Constitutional Studies, Melbourne Law School. He received the 2019 Indian Law Review Best Article Prize for his article 'Where's the Party?: Towards a Constitutional Biography of Political Parties'. He has previously assisted Justice D.Y. Chandrachud (the Supreme Court of India), Justice S. Ravindra Bhat (High Court of Delhi), and the Attorney General for India. He has also assisted with the drafting of the Law Commission of India reports on electoral reforms. He received his BA LLB from the National Law School of India University, India (NLSIU) as the Best Outgoing Student (2017), and won three gold medals including H.M. Seervai Medal in Constitutional Law. At NLSIU, Aradhya served as the Joint Convener of the Legal Services Clinic, editor-in-chief of the Indian Journal of Law and Technology, and editor of the National Law School of India Review. Aradhya has authored columns for Dainik Bhaskar, Dainik Jagaran, Indian Express, and The Hindu, and has appeared on various public forums to discuss his research and insights on political and constitutional developments in India. The One Take Show Podcast, Law, Logic and life, where we discuss the various developments in the field of Law and Policy, discuss the success stories and mentorship, take career advice, talk logic and ethics, discuss cinema and art, and have a lot of fun!

Sharona Hoffman is the author of Aging with a Plan: How a Little Thought Today Can Vastly Improve Your Tomorrow. She is a Professor of Law and Bioethics at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio and is Co-Director of the Law School's Law-Medicine Center. Prior to becoming an academic, Ms. Hoffman was a Senior Trial Attorney at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in Houston, a litigation associate at O'Melveny & Myers in Los Angeles, and a judicial clerk for U.S. District Judge Douglas W. Hillman (Western District of Michigan). Professor Hoffman has published over seventy articles and book chapters on health law and civil rights issues as well as two books. Her work has appeared in the Georgetown Law Journal, Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law and Ethics, and many other publications. In 2021 Professor Hoffman won the Case Western Reserve University Faculty Distinguished Research Award, and in 2016 she won the Case Western Reserve University School of Law Distinguished Research Award. Professor Hoffman has lectured throughout the United States and internationally and has very frequent appearances in local, national, and international media. For more information see her website http://sharonahoffman.com/. Sponsor: https://www.seniorcareauthority.com/

Sharona Hoffman is the author of Aging with a Plan: How a Little Thought Today Can Vastly Improve Your Tomorrow. She is a Professor of Law and Bioethics at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio and is Co-Director of the Law School's Law-Medicine Center. Prior to becoming an academic, Ms. Hoffman was a Senior Trial Attorney at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in Houston, a litigation associate at O'Melveny & Myers in Los Angeles, and a judicial clerk for U.S. District Judge Douglas W. Hillman (Western District of Michigan). Professor Hoffman has published over seventy articles and book chapters on health law and civil rights issues as well as two books. Her work has appeared in the Georgetown Law Journal, Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law and Ethics, and many other publications. In 2021 Professor Hoffman won the Case Western Reserve University Faculty Distinguished Research Award, and in 2016 she won the Case Western Reserve University School of Law Distinguished Research Award. Professor Hoffman has lectured throughout the United States and internationally and has very frequent appearances in local, national, and international media. For more information see her website http://sharonahoffman.com/.Sponsor: https://www.seniorcareauthority.com/

Why is it so hard to let go? It is an enduring puzzle of U.S. foreign relations. It is hardly original to point out the sprawling collection of U.S. military installations and personnel abroad, but why is it so hard to reduce that military footprint, especially when so many presidents come into power wanting to do so? Today, I'd like to discuss U.S. President William McKinley's annexation of the Philippines in 1898 which sheds light on one important cause of "stickiness": a common psychological bias called the Endowment Effect. In exploring this concept, it enriches our understanding of why it can be so hard to let go. ​Aroop Mukharji is a postdoctoral fellow at the Center for Strategic Studies at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University. He received his PhD in Public Policy from Harvard University, where he studied American foreign policy and presidential decision-making in the William McKinley (1897-1901) and Teddy Roosevelt (1901-1909) administrations. He has hosted several podcasts, including Snack Break, the Belfer Center's foreign policy podcast at the Harvard Kennedy School (called Office Hours), and another podcast for the NGO Sense and Sustainability. He published a book on education and diplomacy in 2016 with Palgrave Macmillan, and has published foreign policy opinion pieces in War on the Rocks, The Atlantic, The Washington Post, The Yale Journal of International Affairs, and The New Republic. His academic research has been published by Negotiation Journal and The Journal of Applied History.

John Wesley's bestselling book was not a work of theology, but a book of medical remedies titled Primitive Physick, or an easy and natural Method of Curing Most Diseases. In a time when medical care by doctors was primarily the privilege of the wealthy, Wesley offered medical advice and free pills and elixirs to the poor as a way of upholding the Methodist General Rule of doing all the good you can to the souls and bodies of people. While Wesley's remedies may seem quaint and misguided by modern medical standards, they do reveal the heart of the Methodist movement as being concerned for the salvation of the whole person. In this episode, host Bob Kaylor offers a glimpse into this fascinating (and quirky) work of Wesley.Grab a copy of Primitive Physick.Read Samuel Rogal's interesting article in The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine. Send your questions and comments to the host at pastorbk@tlumc.org and follow Bob Kaylor on Twitter @revbkaylor.  This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit bobkaylor.substack.com

Misogynist misinterpretations of the mythic fall of humankind in Genesis 3 led to the vilification of Ḥavvā (Eve), which fit with the disparaging of Adam's first wife, Lilith, in the rabbinical tradition. The ensuing denigration of women throughout Christian history climaxed with the Inquisition's torture and murder of thousands of women accused of witchcraft. Dr. Pamela Milne writes, “The story of Eve in the book of Genesis has had a more profoundly negative impact on women throughout history than any other biblical story.”In this episode, Father Jayme explores contemporary reinterpretations of the heroic Ḥavvā, with the hope that she might experience the same vindication as Lilith. Drawing largely from the defense of Ḥavvā in an article in the Yale Journal of Law & Feminism by Jewish feminist lawyer Sally Frank, he concurs with Dr. Phyllis Trible that Ḥavvā might be better viewed as “an intelligent, informed, perceptive…theologian, ethicist, hermeneut and rabbi.” Father Jayme concludes that extraordinary Catholics, understanding human nature and seeking not to use the Hebrew scriptures to perpetuate centuries-old systems of sexism and misogyny in the Church, might esteem Ḥavvā as a model of courage who took seriously her call to be a coworker of God and to help complete God's good creation! Have you seen the latest issue of Extraordinary Catholics magazine? Check out other podcasts by and for Inclusive Catholics!Support Extraordinary Catholics podcast!

In this episode of Life Lessons, Gin and Sheri dig into topics from Gin's new book, Clean(ish). What does it mean to be clean(ish)? Why does it matter? Resources used for today's podcast can be found here: Clean(ish) by Gin Stephens: https://amzn.to/3dK5DPc Essential Oils and Health, from Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine (2020): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7309671/ Today's podcast was made possible through our affiliation with the following companies. When you shop with us, you help us bring you further Life Lessons. Branch Basics: www.ginstephens.com/branchbasics Promo code: CLEANISH Sunlighten Sauna: www.lifelessonscommunity.com/sunlighten PromoCode: LIFELESSONS You can also visit https://www.lifelessonscommunity.com/shop-with-us.html and shop with us at any time. Or you can make a monetary contribution directly at www.paypal.com/paypalme/lifelessonspodcast or in PayPal by searching our email address: connect@lifelessonscommunity.com. Do you have a good news story, a listener-led lesson, or a special quote to share? Email us at connect@lifelessonscommunity.com and listen each week to see if we share your submission. Join our Facebook community! Go to https://www.facebook.com/groups/LifeLessonsWithGinAndSheri and become a member today. You'll be glad you did. Thank you for listening!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode of Life Lessons, Gin and Sheri dig into topics from Gin's new book, Clean(ish). What does it mean to be clean(ish)? Why does it matter? Resources used for today's podcast can be found here: Clean(ish) by Gin Stephens: https://amzn.to/3dK5DPc Essential Oils and Health, from Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine (2020): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7309671/ Today's podcast was made possible through our affiliation with the following companies. When you shop with us, you help us bring you further Life Lessons. Branch Basics: www.ginstephens.com/branchbasics Promo code: CLEANISH Sunlighten Sauna: www.lifelessonscommunity.com/sunlighten PromoCode: LIFELESSONS You can also visit https://www.lifelessonscommunity.com/shop-with-us.html and shop with us at any time. Or you can make a monetary contribution directly at www.paypal.com/paypalme/lifelessonspodcast or in PayPal by searching our email address: connect@lifelessonscommunity.com. Do you have a good news story, a listener-led lesson, or a special quote to share? Email us at connect@lifelessonscommunity.com and listen each week to see if we share your submission. Join our Facebook community! Go to https://www.facebook.com/groups/LifeLessonsWithGinAndSheri and become a member today. You'll be glad you did. Thank you for listening!

Welcome back to America's leading higher education law podcast, EdUp Legal - part of the EdUp Experience Podcast Network! In this episode, we hear from Marcilynn A. Burke, Dean, and Dave Frohnmayer Chair in Leadership and Law at the University of Oregon School of Law, a position she has held since 2017. Dean Burke is a graduate of Yale Law School, where she served as editor of both the Yale Journal of Law and Feminism and the Yale Journal of International Law. Following a clerkship with the Honorable Raymond A. Jackson, E.D.V.A., she practiced at Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton, focusing on environmental law, antitrust, and civil and criminal litigation. Her experience in environmental law and natural resources led to positions in the U.S. Department of the Interior's Bureau of Land Management, including Deputy Director for Programs and Policy, and Acting Assistant Secretary for the U.S. Department of the Interior. Dean Burke taught as a visitor at Rutgers School of Law and as Associate Dean and Associate Professor of Law at the University of Houston Law Center, a journey ultimately leading her to the Oregon Law deanship and her green and yellow attire every day! According to U.S. News & World Report, Oregon Law includes 3 top-ranked programs: Legal Writing, Environmental Law, and Dispute Resolution. Under Dean Burke's leadership, Oregon Law is focusing on four areas of strategic emphasis. They include increased opportunities in Business Law, moved forward by a recent million-dollar alumni gift; diversity and leadership, including the creation of a new position in Diversity, Inclusion and Leadership, increased leadership curricular opportunities, and a course requirement that explores patterns of power and inequity; experiential learning opportunities, like the third-year in Portland program; and robust undergraduate and graduate programs that range from legal studies minors to M.Jur. and LL.M. degrees. Hear from Dean Burke about her views on the future of legal education, and what diversity, inclusion and leadership should mean in the profession. Thank you so much for tuning in. Join us on the next episode for your EdUp time! Connect with your host - Patty Roberts ● If you want to get involved, leave us a comment or rate us! ● Join the EdUp community at The EdUp Experience! ● Follow EdUp on Facebook | Instagram | LinkedIn | Twitter | YouTube Thanks for listening!

Welcome back to America's leading higher education law podcast, EdUp Legal - part of the EdUp Experience Podcast Network! In this episode, we hear from Marcilynn A. Burke, Dean, and Dave Frohnmayer Chair in Leadership and Law at the University of Oregon School of Law, a position she has held since 2017. Dean Burke is a graduate of Yale Law School, where she served as editor of both the Yale Journal of Law and Feminism and the Yale Journal of International Law. Following a clerkship with the Honorable Raymond A. Jackson, E.D.V.A., she practiced at Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton, focusing on environmental law, antitrust, and civil and criminal litigation. Her experience in environmental law and natural resources led to positions in the U.S. Department of the Interior's Bureau of Land Management, including Deputy Director for Programs and Policy, and Acting Assistant Secretary for the U.S. Department of the Interior. Dean Burke taught as a visitor at Rutgers School of Law and as Associate Dean and Associate Professor of Law at the University of Houston Law Center, a journey ultimately leading her to the Oregon Law deanship and her green and yellow attire every day! According to U.S. News & World Report, Oregon Law includes 3 top-ranked programs: Legal Writing, Environmental Law, and Dispute Resolution. Under Dean Burke's leadership, Oregon Law is focusing on four areas of strategic emphasis. They include increased opportunities in Business Law, moved forward by a recent million-dollar alumni gift; diversity and leadership, including the creation of a new position in Diversity, Inclusion and Leadership, increased leadership curricular opportunities, and a course requirement that explores patterns of power and inequity; experiential learning opportunities, like the third-year in Portland program; and robust undergraduate and graduate programs that range from legal studies minors to M.Jur. and LL.M. degrees. Hear from Dean Burke about her views on the future of legal education, and what diversity, inclusion and leadership should mean in the profession. Thank you so much for tuning in. Join us on the next episode for your EdUp time! Connect with your host - Patty Roberts ● If you want to get involved, leave us a comment or rate us! ● Join the EdUp community at The EdUp Experience! ● Follow EdUp on Facebook | Instagram | LinkedIn | Twitter | YouTube Thanks for listening!

Faith Crittenden, MD MPH is a recently-graduated pediatric resident with her Doctorate of Medicine from the University of Connecticut School of Medicine. While a student, she was an active member of the Student National Medical Association (SNMA) and the American Medical Association (AMA). In 2016, she was appointed as the national liaison for SNMA to AMA — Medical Student Section. She has helped the progression of organized medicine in many ways — most recently is a co-author on several historic policies passed through the AMA House of Delegates, such as: Racism is a Public Health Threat, Racial Essentialism, and Combating Police Brutality. This year, she also added Combating Natural Hair and Cultural Headwear Discrimination in Medical Professionalism to this list. Faith was also the Deputy Editor for the Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine March 2021 preventative medicine issue. This TedX alumna has also landed coverage around the country through op-eds and articles featured in Health Affairs, Hartford Courant, CT Mirror, Yale Daily, and In-training.org. Faith knows that in order to change the culture of medicine, we must evaluate and critique the health policies of the past, present, and future. In April 2020, she launched a podcast called Coloring Health Policy which focuses on how health policy impacts minority communities, both domestically and internationally. Faith holds a Bachelor of Science degree in chemistry, Minor in molecular cell biology with Honors from the University of Connecticut, and Masters of Public Health in Health Policy from Yale University. Tune in as Faith shares: how she has confronted trauma-informed services in healthcare, and how her early experience shaped her interest in medicine the importance of prioritizing mental health care about her historic role in having racism declared a public health crisis by the AMA how hard she and her team worked to have this policy passed by the AMA her hope that more BIPOC train as physicians in the future — and that these recent policy declarations can help pave the way how to get involved in activism locally, to support ongoing work in racial justice and healing the role of Black men in healthcare reform in America where her advocacy work is headed next: to addressing natural hair and cultural headwear discrimination 

In this episode, Dr Lauren Sanders talks with Dr Joshua Andresen about drones and aerial strikes, exploring whether they make armed conflict safer for civilians. Some claim that by allowing for the more precise use of force, drone strikes cause less harm to nearby civilian populations. Conversely, some point to the impact that making force more accessible in urban areas actually increases the likelihood that force will be used in and around civilians. Lauren and Joshua also consider whether IHL needs to adapt for the use of these technologies. Dr Joshua Andresen is a Reader in National Security and Foreign Relations Law at the University of Surrey who has written extensively on the problems posed by the use of drone strikes in armed conflict and their regulation.  His research focuses on the legal regulation of armed conflict in light of advanced weapons technology and the predominance of non-international armed conflicts. He has held positions as a senior policy advisor in the Office of Terrorist Financing and Financial Crimes at the U.S. Department of the Treasury, an attorney-adviser in the Office of the Legal Adviser at the U.S. Department of State, and has worked at the Court of Justice of the European Union and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees as well as Associate Professor of Philosophy at the American University of Beirut. Further reading:Joshua Andresen ‘Putting Lethal Force on the Table: How Drones Change the Alternative Space of War and Counterterrorism' (2017) 8(2) Harvard National Security Journal 426-472. Joshua Andresen, ‘Due Process of War in the Age of Drones',  (2016) 41(1) Yale Journal of International Law 155-188. Joshua Andresen 'The Paradox of Precision and the Weapons Review Regime',  The Philosophical Journal of Conflict and Violence (2020). John E. Jackson (ed) One Nation under Drones: Legality, Morality, and Utility of Unmanned Combat Systems (2018: Naval Institute Press.)Jason Lyall, Bombing to Lose? Airpower, Civilian Casualties, and the Dynamics of Violence in Counterinsurgency Wars (2017). Chris Kolenda and Chris Rogers, The Strategic Costs of Civilian Harm: Applying Lessons from Afghanistan to Current and Future Conflicts, (2016: The Open Society Foundation). 

Global persecution against religious minorities is rising to ‘pandemic' levels. How should we think about this global rise of hostility against biblical Christianity? Should American Christians count themselves among those numbers? K.A. Ellis sits down with field and policy expert Knox Thames to discuss religious freedom at home and abroad. Knox Thames is a visiting expert at the U.S. Institute of Peace with the Middle East and Religion and Inclusive Societies teams. Thames joined USIP after 20 years of government service, including at the State Department and two different U.S. government foreign policy commissions. Most recently, Thames served across two administrations as the special advisor for religious minorities in the Near East and South and Central Asia at the U.S. Department of State. The first to serve in this capacity, he received a civil service appointment in September 2015 to lead State Department efforts to address the situation of religious minorities in these regions. Thames previously served on the U.S. Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe—also known as the Helsinki Commission—as well as with the U.S. Commission for International Religious Freedom, AmeriCorps, and the U.S. Army War College as an adjunct research professor. In addition to USIP, he is currently a senior fellow with the Institute for Global Engagement, with both positions made possible thanks to the Templeton Religion Trust. Reflecting his expertise on religion and global affairs, Thames' articles have appeared in the Yale Journal of International Affairs, the Small Wars Journal, and the Georgetown Journal for International Affairs. He was the initiator and lead author of “International Religious Freedom Advocacy: A Guide to Organizations, Law and NGOs” published by Baylor University Press. He has spoken before the U.S. Congress, the United Nations, the European Parliament, the OSCE, and the U.S. military war colleges.

Dr Howell's most recent consulting work was for the US Power Lifting Association in helping them look into the science of trans athletes competing and helping them formulate their position based on science. Dr. Howell is a former Professor and Ph.D. faculty member in the School of Health and Human Services at Trident University. Dr. Howell holds a Ph.D. in Health Sciences from Trident University, a Medical Degree from BMU School of Medicine, a Master of Science in Sport and Health Science from American Military University, a Bachelor of Science in Sport and Health Science from American Military University, and a Mechanical Engineering degree from Forsyth Technical College. He is an epidemiologist, exercise physiologist, and mechanical engineer with current research interests in the long-term effects of therapeutic androgen use and endocrine disrupting chemicals exposure. He is a recipient of the prestigious AMU Academic Scholar Award (2016) and has worked on two major NIH and DoD funded studies at Wake Forest University: Strength Training for Arthritis Trial (START) and The Runners and Injury Longitudinal Study (TRAILS).    Questions discussed: Do men who have transitioned to women have an advantage in sports over biological females. If so can it be quantified? Laurel Hubbard transitioned at age 35 now she is 43 in competing in the Olympics as a trans athlete in the superheavyweight women's division. Prior to that Laurel competed as a man. While being an elite athlete as a man Laurel was never a world-class athlete. Based on your knowledge does Laurell have a significant advantage over her female competitors. Does this advantage cover a whole range of sports? Is the testosterone produced in men and women naturally the same or different? Based on XX or XY chroma zones chromosomes how is testosterone processed in the body, especially at lower levels? What are the effects of giving men estrogen? Does it impede the effects of testosterone? Is there any difference in terms of putting on in maintaining muscle mass? Especially if the testosterone levels are the same.  Can you talk about routine benefits retained benefits of steroids after they have been no longer after they have no longer used? Generational levels of testosterone are going down. The labs have just dropped their reference range from mid-1100 to 964.  This is a drop of around 12%. The lower reference ranges have also been dropped to 264. According to Dr Keith Nichols those ranges were in the 1500s  15 years ago.  He also stated that men in their 20 and 30 are showing up in his clinic with lower baseline levels than those in their 50 and 60s.  What are you seeing developmentally in boys and young men these days? What is their prognosis? Do you see this lower testosterone level as a factor in gender dysphoria? Many people with gender dysphoria report depression. Do you believe this could be related to low T? Levine and others report testicular developmental issues in some young men now. Is there a qualitative difference in naturally produced T?    Important Links: ORDER YOUR ADDITIVE FREE, ORGANIC, KETO FRIENDLY WINES HERE With your Initial Order Get a Bottle For 1 PENNY- www.oldguytalks.com/dryfarms   Exogenous Ketones Developed By Dom D'Agostino PhD https://www.oldguytalks.com/keto   Expand her orgasm tonight!    https://expandherorgasmtonight.com/Free/?a_aid=REPLACED_WITH_YOUR_REVSHARENOW_ID   Contact Orest: Website: https://www.oldguytalks.com/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/orest.kman https://www.facebook.com/oldguytalks Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/oldguytalks/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/oldguytalks Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=orest+k-man LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/orestkomarnyckyj?lipi=urn%3Ali%3Apage%3Ad_flagship3_profile_view_base_contact_details%3Baip2cJZmSwC4cjkwclnYGg%3D%3D   Publications Peer-Reviewed Howell et al. (in preparation). Hematologic outcomes among inpatients with diagnosed androgen toxicity. American Journal of Public Health. Howell et al. (in preparation). Risk of liver disease among inpatients with diagnosed androgen toxicity. American Journal of Epidemiology. Howell et al. (in preparation). Burden of disease among inpatients with diagnosed androgen toxicity. International Journal of Epidemiology. Howell et al. (in preparation). A comparison of propensity score methods in the analysis of inpatient risk. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. Soares, J. D. P., Howell, S., Teixeira, F. J., Pimentel, G. D. (2020). Dietary amino acids and immunonutrition supplementation in cancer-induced skeletal muscle mass depletion: A mini-review. Current Pharmaceutical Design. 26(9), 970-978. Santos, H. O., Howell, S., Nichols, K., & Teixeira, F. J. (2020). Reviewing the evidence on vitamin D supplementation in the management of testosterone status and its effects on male reproductive system (testis and prostate): Mechanistically dazzling but clinically disappointing. Clinical Therapeutics, 42(6), e101–e114. Santos, H. O., Howell, S., Teixeira, F. J. (2019). Coconut oil as a vehicle for lipophilic drug administration. Journal of Diabetes and Obesity, 6(1), 8-12. Santos, H. O., Howell, S., Earnest, C.P., Teixeira, F. J. (2019). Coconut oil intake and its effects on cardiometabolic profile – a structured literature review. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 1-30. Teixeira, F. J., Santos, H. O., Howell, S., Pimentel, G.D. (2019). Whey protein in cancer therapy: A narrative review. Journal of Pharmacological Research, 144, 245-256. Santos, H. O., Howell, S., Teixeira, F. J. (2019). Beyond tribulus (Tribulus terrestris L.): The effects of phytotherapics on testosterone, sperm and prostate parameters. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 1-30. Teixeira, F. J., Matias, C. N., Monteiro, C. P.,  Howell, S. L., Kones, R. J. (2018). Effects of alpha-hydroxy-isocaproic acid upon body composition in a type I diabetic patient with muscle atrophy – a case study. Yale Journal of Biology. Kones, R., Howell, S., Rumana, U., & Shaw, M. (2017). n-3 Polyunsaturated fatty acids and cardiovascular disease: Principles, practices, pitfalls, and promises; A Contemporary Review. Medical Principles and Practice. Howell, S., Kones, R. (2017). "Calories in, calories out" and macronutrient intake: The hope, hype, and science of calories. American Journal of Physiology – Endocrinology & Metabolism, 313(5), E608-E612. Howell, S., Kones, R. (2017). A calorie is still a calorie, according to rigorous new evidence. Journal of Diabetes and Obesity, 4(3), 1-2. Howell, S. (2013). Biomotor abilities: The importance of developing maximal strength and conversion to power. Sports Speed Digest. Howell, S. (2013). A modern periodization model. Sports Speed Digest. Books and Publications Howell, S. L. (2019). The epidemiology of androgen toxicity: A six-year retrospective cohort study of the risk of primary health outcomes among inpatients with androgen toxicity in the united states (Order No. 27543963). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (2309521928). Bompa, T., Howell, S. (2021). The evolution of periodization. Howell, S. (Ed.). Meyer and Meyer. Aachen, Germany. Bompa, T., Howell, S., Hoffman, J., Blumenstein, B., Orbach I. (2019). Integrated periodization in sports training and athletic development: Combining training methodology, sports psychology, and nutrition to optimize performance. Howell, S. (Ed.). Meyer and Meyer. Aachen, Germany. Dintiman, G., Ward, B., Oddi, B., Howell, S. (2020). NASE Essentials of Next-Generation Sports Speed Training. Howell, S. (Ed.). Sports Science Network. The National Association of Speed and Explosion.

In this episode, Freddy explores the deep and philosophical question of what is the arrow of time. Links and Sources Below!!! https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow_of_time https://www.trin.cam.ac.uk https://www.trin.cam.ac.uk/about/historical-overview/ http://www.history.com/.amp/topics/british-history/henry-viii https://www.britannica.com/biography/Arthur-Eddington Weinert, Friedel (2005). The scientist as philosopher: philosophical consequences of great scientific discoveries. Springer. p. 143. ISBN 978-3-540-21374-1., Chapter 4, p. 143 David Albert on Time and Chance Tuisku, P.; Pernu, T.K.; Annila, A. (2009). "In the light of time". Proceedings of the Royal Society A. 465 (2104): 1173–1198. A. B. Pippard, Elements of Chemical Thermodynamics for Advanced Students of Physics (1966), p.100. Blum, Harold F. (1951). Time's Arrow and Evolution (First ed.). ISBN 978-0-691-02354-0. Morowitz, Harold J. (September 1969). "Book review: Time's arrow and evolution: Third Edition". Icarus. 11 (2): 278–279. McN., W. P. (November 1951). "Book reviews: Time's Arrow and Evolution". Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine. 24 (2): 164. Susskind, Leonard. "Boltzmann and the Arrow of Time: A Recent Perspective". Cornell University. Cornell University. Retrieved June 1, 2016. Mathias Fink (30 November 1999). "Time-Reversed Acoustic" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 31 December 2005. Retrieved 27 May 2016. Esposito, M., Lindenberg, K., & Van den Broeck, C. (2010). Entropy production as correlation between system and reservoir. New Journal of Physics, 12(1), 013013. Physical Origins of Time Asymmetry, pp. 109–111. Physical Origins of Time Asymmetry, chapter 6 "Home". Physics World. Vaccaro, Joan (2016). "Quantum asymmetry between time and space". Proceedings of the Royal Society A. 472 (2185): 20150670. Schlosshauer, M. (2005). Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics. Reviews of Modern physics, 76(4), 1267. Wolchover, Natalie (25 April 2014). "New Quantum Theory Could Explain the Flow of Time" – via www.wired.com. G. B. Lesovik, I. A. Sadovskyy, M. V. Suslov, A. V. Lebedev, V. M. Vinokur (13 March 2019). "Arrow of time and its reversal on the IBM quantum computer". Nature. 9 (1): 4396. "Physicists reverse time using quantum computer". Phys.org. 13 March 2019. Retrieved 13 March 2019. Ladyman, J.; Lambert, J.; Weisner, K.B. What is a Complex System? Eur. J. Philos. Sci. 2013, 3, 33–67. Ulrich, Rolf; Eikmeier, Verena; de la Vega, Irmgard; Ruiz Fernández, Susana; Alex-Ruf, Simone; Maienborn, Claudia (2012-04-01). "With the past behind and the future ahead: Back-to-front representation of past and future sentences". Memory & Cognition. 40 (3): 483–495. For Andes tribe, it's back to the future — accessed 2006-09-26 Núñez Rafael E., Sweetser Eve. "With the Future Behind Them: Convergent Evidence From Aymara Language and Gesture in the Crosslinguistic Comparison of Spatial Construals of Time" (PDF). Department of Cognitive Science, University of California at San Diego. Retrieved 22 February 2021. Gu, Yan; Zheng, Yeqiu; Swerts, Marc (2019). "Which Is in Front of Chinese People, Past or Future? The Effect of Language and Culture on Temporal Gestures and Spatial Conceptions of Time". Cognitive Science. 43 (12): e12804. doi:10.1111/cogs.12804. mbdg.net Chinese-English Dictionary Bahri, Hardev (1989). Learners' Hindi-English Dictionary. Delhi: Rajpal & Sons. p. 95. ISBN 978-81-7028-002-6. Alexiadou, Artemis (1997). Adverb placement : a case study in antisymmetric syntax. Amsterdam [u.a.]: Benjamins. p. 108. ISBN 978-90-272-2739-3. Hindi-English.org Hindi English Dictionary परसों Shabdkosk.Raftaar.in Hindi English Dictionary नरसों --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app

Brian Kim, class of 2012, is a student at Yale Law School, where he is an editor of the Yale Law Journal and Yale Journal of International Law and on the board of the Paul Tsai China Center and Yale Law & Business Society. He earned his undergraduate degree from Princeton University, graduating summa cum laude and Phi Beta Kappa in the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs. Prior to law school, he received a Master's in China Studies from Peking University where he studied as a Yenching Scholar. He has previously interned with the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), State Department's Japan Desk, and Choson Exchange in Singapore, working on policy challenges involving China, Japan, and the Koreas.

Staff from the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom sit down with ERLC policy director Matt Hawkins to discuss their work and the most recent annual report from the Commission. Dwight Bashir serves as Director of Research and Policy; Elizabeth Cassidy serves as Director of International Law and Policy at the Commission. USCIRF.gov What is the U.S. Commission on IRF? – Matt Hawkins 2018 USCIRF Report Other special reports from USCIRF including on women and religious freedom Follow via @USCIRF Current commissioners and staff Guest bios Dwight Bashir is Director of Research and Policy at the Commission. For more than 20 years, he has worked in the areas of international human rights, freedom of religion or belief, and conflict resolution. While at USCIRF, Mr. Bashir has led or participated in numerous fact-finding missions internationally and has traveled widely throughout the Middle East, Africa, and Europe. Mr. Bashir has been interviewed and his articles featured in major media outlets, blogs, and academic journals, including BBC, CNN, The Washington Post, Foreign Policy, PBS NewsHour, National Public Radio, Al Jazeera, the Yale Journal of International Affairs, and the Cairo Review of Global Affairs, among others, and he lectures in the United States and globally on various topics in international affairs, including countering violent extremism, ethnic and sectarian conflict, and global peace and security. Mr. Bashir pursued his Bachelor's degree in political science and international relations at the University of Richmond and his Master's and Doctoral degrees in international conflict analysis and resolution at George Mason University. Elizabeth K. Cassidy is Director of International Law and Policy at the Commission. She manages USCIRF's annual report process, supervises policy and research staff, and is responsible for a substantive portfolio that includes United Nations issues, international and comparative law issues, and U.S. refugee and asylum policy. Ms. Cassidy has taught courses at the University of Namibia, Princeton University, and Seton Hall University School of Law, and conducted training sessions for U.S. State Department and Department of Homeland Security officials. She has authored and co-authored several book chapters and numerous journal and online articles, including in the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, the Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, OnFaith, and Opinio Juris. In 2014-2015, she served on the U.S. State Department's Religion and Foreign Policy Working Group. She holds a B.A. in international politics from Wesleyan University, a J.D. from American University's Washington College of Law, and a LL.M in comparative constitutional law from the University of Stellenbosch. iTunes | Google Play | Stitcher | Tune in

The Supreme Court's federalism battleground has recently shifted from the Commerce Clause to two textually marginal but substantively important domains: the Necessary and Proper Clause and, to a lesser extent, the General Welfare Clause. For nearly a decade, these quieter, more structurally ambiguous federal powers – the “shadow powers” – have steadily increased in prominence. Paradoxically, the growth of shadow powers analysis has tended to narrow the permissible scope of congressional regulatory power. The invocation of the shadow powers has helped the Court find room to maneuver within its federalism analysis, while also appearing to maintain its commitment to an apparently unmoving baseline of a narrow commerce power. This maneuvering might be productive if it were carried out explicitly, with some discussion by the Court of the reasons for preferring to adjudicate federalism at its doctrinal and textual periphery rather than at its center. But the result of the growth of shadow powers analysis has in fact been to obscure the outlines of federalism's map. Alison LaCroix is Professor of Law and Ludwig and Hilde Wolf Teaching Scholar at the Law School. She is also an associate member of the University of Chicago Department of History. LaCroix received her BA summa cum laude in history from Yale University in 1996 and her JD from Yale Law School in 1999. She received her PhD in history from Harvard University in 2007 after earning an AM in history from Harvard in 2003. While in law school, LaCroix served as essays editor of the Yale Law Journal and managing editor of the Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities. From 1999 to 2001, she practiced in the litigation department at Debevoise & Plimpton in New York. Before joining the Law School faculty in 2006, she was a Samuel I. Golieb Fellow in Legal History at New York University School of Law. This talk was recorded on January 28, 2015, as part of the Chicago's Best Ideas lecture series.

The Supreme Court's federalism battleground has recently shifted from the Commerce Clause to two textually marginal but substantively important domains: the Necessary and Proper Clause and, to a lesser extent, the General Welfare Clause. For nearly a decade, these quieter, more structurally ambiguous federal powers – the “shadow powers” – have steadily increased in prominence. Paradoxically, the growth of shadow powers analysis has tended to narrow the permissible scope of congressional regulatory power. The invocation of the shadow powers has helped the Court find room to maneuver within its federalism analysis, while also appearing to maintain its commitment to an apparently unmoving baseline of a narrow commerce power. This maneuvering might be productive if it were carried out explicitly, with some discussion by the Court of the reasons for preferring to adjudicate federalism at its doctrinal and textual periphery rather than at its center. But the result of the growth of shadow powers analysis has in fact been to obscure the outlines of federalism's map. Alison LaCroix is Professor of Law and Ludwig and Hilde Wolf Teaching Scholar at the Law School. She is also an associate member of the University of Chicago Department of History. LaCroix received her BA summa cum laude in history from Yale University in 1996 and her JD from Yale Law School in 1999. She received her PhD in history from Harvard University in 2007 after earning an AM in history from Harvard in 2003. While in law school, LaCroix served as essays editor of the Yale Law Journal and managing editor of the Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities. From 1999 to 2001, she practiced in the litigation department at Debevoise & Plimpton in New York. Before joining the Law School faculty in 2006, she was a Samuel I. Golieb Fellow in Legal History at New York University School of Law. This talk was recorded on January 28, 2015, as part of the Chicago's Best Ideas lecture series.