Podcasts about dirac

The Time Riders: Part 16 To further the science. Based on a post by BiscuitHammer, in 16 parts. Listen to the Podcast at Explicit Novels. There was a knock at the door and Valentina came in, pushing a silver cart in front of herself. "Thought it might be time for refreshments," she chirped, her cheerful brown eyes not at all fazed by the scene in front of her. She looked at Becky. "I figured you might find some electrolytes handy, so I have green smoothies, strawberry-banana smoothies, coconut water, and OJ. That should fit the bill, right?" "Thank you so much, Val," Becky said, not at all bothered by being naked in front of this girl. Clearly it wasn't out of the ordinary, so she didn't care. Not to mention she'd referred to Mike and Karen as 'Master' and 'Mistress', so there was more to her employment than met the eye. Nanu was staring at Val's outfit again, making Val giggle. She left the cart and approached the tiny Egyptian girl now, smiling. "Watch this, Nanu," she said before pulling her arms into her chest and doing on spin, her short skirt flaring out and twirling around her, revealing her tiny black panties. Nanu clapped excitedly, her eyes wide with delight. "Great, now she'll want to own one of those outfits," Becky sighed, shaking her head. "I'm sorry for the fib I'm about to tell about you, Val." She looked at Nanu. "It's a pretty outfit, yes, but it's a slave's outfit, darling." The Egyptian girl blinked. "She is a slave?" "Can't you see the collar she's wearing?" Becky pointed out, indicating Val's black lace choker, with the glittering white stone on the front. "She; is a slave to the gods?" Nanu murmured, lapsing into thought about that before looking back at Becky. "Well, that doesn't sound so bad, does it? We should become their slaves." Karen broke down giggling, hiding her face in her husband's massive arm and kicking her feet cutely. Mike just smirked while Becky sighed and rolled her eyes. Valentina had no idea what had just been said, but based on her employers' reactions, whatever it was hadn't panned out as Becky intended. She decided to make herself scarce. "scuse me, servant stuff to do," she chimed, doing a curtsy before leaving and closing the door behind her. Nanu sat up, straddling Mike's waist and trying to figure out why the goddess was laughing. "Really?" Becky groused, giving Nanu a sour look. "I rescue you from slavery, and you decide to volunteer for it because it's these two?" "Do you blame me?" Nanu said with a shrug. "As long as I get fed and fucked, this seems like a good life with pretty clothing." "You do not need to be a slave for us to do that with you, Nanu," Karen pointed out, caressing her arm. "Well, nobody's fucked me yet," Nanu announced, trying to pout rather unsuccessfully. "What good is being a free woman if it doesn't get me cock when I need it?" "I see food and sex are her two primary drivers," Mike mused. "And possibly revenge," Becky added, watching as Nanu reached behind herself and took hold of the currently soft cock and began massaging it. "If you see her whispering into her palm, shit's about to get real. Honey, that might not be a good idea." "They said I don't need to be a slave to fuck them," Nanu replied, still stroking and now fingering herself, as if to get ready. "I want to be fucked." "Let the chips fall where they may, I guess," Becky said, sitting up and moving around the bed to join Karen. Soon, they were in a sapphic tangle, limbs wrapped around one another and kissing deeply. Nanu watched while she stroked the god's cock, slowly bringing him to life. Karen was on top of Becky now, sitting up and straddling with their legs scissored and their wet pussies kissing. She began to squirm her hips, and Becky did the same, groaning in pleasure. "Hmm, missed this too," she murmured. "As did I," Karen sighed, pulling Becky's leg up so that it was braced against her with her toes in the air. They slowly slithered together, nether lips mingling, clits brushing against one another. They were both wet enough that they could hear their lovemaking. The god was hard now, and Nanu was determined to do this right. She moved backward and pushed up as tall as she could on her knees, her cunt directly over the huge cockhead. She pressed against it and moved around, making sure she was good and wet. She felt the tip just push her lips apart slightly, and inched her way down. She bit her lower lip as the pressure increased, feeling a very slow penetration. She gasped and shuddered as the head went inside, stretching her in a way she hadn't felt before, except with a fist. There was an audible, wet and almost gristly 'pop' noise, followed by another from somewhere inside her hips structure as she sank down and sat very still. Becky and the two professors looked at her somewhat curiously. "Nanu?" Becky asked. "You okay, darling?" The tiny girl didn't respond, still staring off into space, her eyes unseeing. Finally, a single tear was trickling down her cheek. "Oh, well done, Ramrod," Karen said rather sarcastically to her husband, still looking at Nanu. "Even if you didn't break her in half, she's still going to have hip dysplasia." "I didn't make her do it," Mike pointed out. "I hope we have a wheelchair around, though." The Egyptian girl finally opened her eyes, slowly, and took several deep breaths, her palms resting on the god's muscular abdomen. She looked up at the ceiling, puckering her lips and making sucking sounds as she tried to center herself. She trembled as she pushed up on her knees, starting to move, and then shook almost violently as she sank back down. She squeaked and then whimpered, going still. Then she repeated the process, taking it slow. "Well, I'll be damned," Becky mused as she watched, still grinding her cunt against Karen's. "She actually did it and didn't kill herself. She'll be trying to sit on fire hydrants next." Nanu didn't make it more than three strokes up and down before she clapped her and over her mouth and screamed into it, her entire body shaking as she came. Once she'd recovered, she began moving up and down again, a little faster, determined to have at least one more orgasm before she died. She straightened her torso and kept moving up and down, her eyes closed and a shameless moaning escaping her lips. She lasted a little longer this time, but still ended up clamping both hands over her mouth and screeching, almost convulsing before she simply wilted, collapsing forward on to the god beneath her, eyes wide open but unseeing, chest heaving as she tried to breathe. "Determined little thing, isn't she?" Karen mused, looking on, even while she made love to Becky. How she'd missed this feeling with her favorite student. "You'd have to be, to survive what she did pretty much her whole life," the blonde replied with a sigh, undulating beneath her teacher. "She's such a sweetheart, but she surprises me sometimes with a brutal mercenary streak. And her morals are; decidedly different from ours." "Noted," Karen said before leaning down and kissing Becky heatedly, squashing their tits together. They were swallowing one another's tongues, grinding and girl-fucking their way to bliss, until Becky wailed into Karen's mouth, cumming hard. Karen followed moments later, bathing Becky's cunt in her sticky essence. They wrapped themselves up in one another, kissing deeply and just enjoying the shared post-orgasm bliss. It had been too long, and Becky would do her damndest to make sure that didn't happen again. She almost giggled through the kiss as she thought about the fact that she had access to a time machine, if she really needed to see to the issue. She and Karen rolled themselves together into Mike's side, snuggling into him while Nanu seemed quite content to simply remain motionless on top of him. Given that she was almost bolted down to his cock, she might not have had much of a choice in the matter, mind. "You okay there, Prof?" Becky asked, smirking up at him while she caressed her other idol. "Might've been a while since I've been in anyone quite this tight," Mike replied, smiling and pretending to wince, as if being clamped inside Nanu was somehow painful. "Excuse you, sir," Karen chimed, trying to sound indignant, but failing as she giggled. "Am I to understand I am not tight enough for you?" "You're the perfect amount of tightness, Gordon, and you know it," the huge blond man said, reaching over and caressing his wife's ass cheeks. Karen purred contentedly at the contact, snuggling into Becky even more. Becky sighed, because she loved watching the profs together. She'd never seen two people more desperately in love, or more perfect for one another. "So is it just you and Nanu in your little arrangement?" Karen asked, looking down at her student and gently poking her nose. "Well," Becky began before offering a weak smile. "It's complicated?" "Given what a hard time you had earlier, perhaps I shouldn't be surprised," mused the older woman, smiling kindly. "Are you hiding another girl from elsewhere in the world?" "No," Becky said, blushing. "I;” If she couldn't tell these two, who could she tell? "There might be an angle with one of my students," she confessed. "Rebecca Nightingale Fischer," Karen said, her smile becoming a smirk. "You and a student? You naughty girl. Not that Michael and I are in any place to judge, of course." "Don't I know it," Becky giggled. "Yeah, there is. Or there will be. I don't know how to explain it." "One of those moments again, clearly," Mike said, his other hand stroking down Nanu's back. She looked positively tiny on top of him, like a kitten gone to sleep. She was stirring and slowly coming back to life. "Don't try too hard, Rebecca." "Yes sir," she said rather reflexively, but she also enjoyed the little tingle she always got from obeying him. "Mark and I, and Nanu, will be a thing by the time summer rolls around." "M-ark?" Nanu mumbled tiredly, almost yawning. Had she fallen asleep? "What about M-ark, Mistress?" "She calls you Mistress, hmm?" Karen observed. "It looks like I'm not the only one with a kitten on my hands." Becky blushed. "She; insists she be allowed. I've tried to break the habit, no dice." She looked at Nanu now. "I was just explaining about waiting until the summer before we will be seeing Mark." "You get to see him all the time at school," Nanu pointed out. "But you say you can't fuck him. I hope they understand, because I sure don't." "Nonlocal measurement," Karen said, listening to the two younger women speak in Latin, although she was talking to her husband. "Low-entropy probability that falls outside the Born System." "And deterministic despite a Dirac constant and equation," Mike said before he chuckled and began sitting Nanu up straight. She shuddered and gasped deeply, seeming to have forgotten that she was speared on him. Her eyes were wide as she stared down at where her cunt was split wide apart by his massive erection. She didn't seem to be able to process anything like that fitting inside her. "Christ," Becky muttered, shaking her head. "I'm supposed to be a physics teacher, and I have no damn clue what you two are talking about." "Ultimately, determinism," Mike replied, letting Nanu try to adjust. "I remember teaching you the concept." "And I remember the lessons," Becky sighed. "Never thought they'd be applied to me personally. I keep forgetting you two are religious." "I think it's pretty much a given that you, my dear, are meant to study quantum crystallography," Karen cooed, stroking the blonde's cheek. "So of course, Michael and I will teach you everything we know, and will help you further on that path. You were, without question, our most gifted student. This is your chance." "What's everyone talking about, Mistress?" Nanu asked, shifting around her hips to make sure they weren't actually fractured. "You're talking in your stupid En-gush." "Nanu, we'll speak Latin so that you're not left out," the goddess said gently, reaching over and stroking the Egyptian girl's thigh. "We were asking Rebecca if she wanted to come and teach with us soon, instead of staying where she is." Nanu considered and then looked at Becky. "Mistress, I think you're very smart, but I'd think you were very stupid if you didn't take this offer. And take M-ark with you, maybe it'll make him less stupid." "I guess that settles it," Becky sighed, shaking her head. "I can't refute those points." "This Mark of yours sounds like a real charmer," Karen teased, finally sitting up and then clambering off Becky. She moved aside while her former student sat upright, rotating her neck and stretching her shoulders. "He must be a demon in the sack if you're willing to put up with his apparent lack of intelligence." "He's not stupid, he's just; he doesn't find applying his brain power all that agreeable, except to get himself out of trouble," Becky explained. "As for him being a demon in the sack, he's not bad, but; well, I'd been going through a dry spell when this all happened." "There is no excuse whatsoever for you to be going through a dry spell, young lady," Mike told her, sitting up and still keeping Nanu in his lap. But she squeaked when he turned her around, still nailed to him by his cock, which felt like it was battering her rib cage from below. Her eyes were wide as she just sat and listened. "You're every bit as attractive as you are intelligent, Rebecca, so if you're experiencing a dearth of sex, that's just you being difficult." "It's hard to find partners who measure up," Becky grumped. "Except for Nanu, of course." Nanu sniffed and nodded righteously, happy to be included in whatever the fuck they were all talking about. She was used to being ignored as a slave, she had no intention of being ignored now that she was a free woman. "You'll come to the housewarmings, yes?" Karen asked. "The third and the fourth weekends of this month." "You're having two housewarmings?" Becky asked. "Why two?" "One is the official housewarming, where I take over as head of the Blackwell elder line and its operations," Karen replied. "The one the following weekend is of a more fun and; well, risqué nature. The invite list for that is much more select. You and Nanu simply must come to both." Becky turned her head to look at Nanu. "Did you understand all that, my love?" Nanu thought about it. "Karen is becoming Mistress of this palace and there are two celebrations, one official, and one that is; naughty. She wants us to come to both." She leaned forward toward Becky now, her look an imploring one. "Can we please, Mistress?" "Of course we can!" Becky laughed gaily. "I wouldn't miss this for all the gold on earth!" More joyous laughter, and they all embraced one another, finding partners and beginning the lovemaking again. Another hour later, the Byron Lounge. "I'm really hoping you like this," Becky said as she poured the wine into her host's glasses. Mike and Karen were sitting on a large chesterfield together while Becky and Nanu were in a smaller loveseat across from them. The table the glasses were on was in the center. "You'll probably find it very unique." "It's potent, I can already tell," Karen remarked, watching her student pour. "The nose is quite powerful from here." "Interesting color for a white wine, too," Mike added, noting the distinct amber tint to the liquid. His wife was right, it was strong. It almost stung the olfactory senses and poured like a syrup. Even Madeira wines were lighter than this. The maderizing process must have been unusually acute. Becky handed each of her companions a glass and then sat down next to Nanu. The three women all looked at Mike, expecting him to lead the toast. He nodded and held up his glass. "Dignitas amicorum pie zeses vivas." Karen nodded and repeated the toast, but in English, the only time Nanu ever considered the language divine and lovely. "Worthy among your friends! Drink that you may live. May you live." The bouquet was sharp, certainly, and Mike guessed the alcohol content was well north of fifteen percent. The wine was clearly meant to be sweet, but the robust body was definitive. This wine must have been aged longer than Becky had been alive. Where had she gotten it from? He glanced over at his wife, who had an even more acute nose and sense of taste than he did, and she was examining her glass quietly. Karen was rolling it around inside her mouth quietly, letting it play over her refined palate. Her eyes caught his, and they knew what the other was thinking. Becky and Nanu watched quietly. It was always fascinating to Becky how these two operated. "That's an Aglianico grape, I'm sure of it, even though I have never had one quite like that," Karen mused. "It's been aged in clay," Mike agreed, nodding. "For a long time. The hangovers must be murder." They both looked at Becky, who smiled hopefully. She wanted them to like it, but also hoped they wouldn't ask more questions she couldn't answer. She was doing her best. "Rebecca, I'd like to have Jordan and Tatyana try this, may I call them in?" Mike asked. She nodded and he bipped his smartwatch, asking the former seneschal of Blackwell Manor and its current one to join them. They came in together some minutes later, while Mike and Karen were still discussing the wine. "You rang, my friend?" Jordan asked, while Tatyana nodded her head respectfully. Jordan saw the bottles on the table, noting the amber color. "Is that a Malvazia wine? Very strong, I can feel it tickling my nose from here." "With Rebecca's permission, we would like for you two to try this," Karen suggested, standing and walking over to a small cupboard from which she retrieved two more glasses. "It's quite unlike anything either Michael or I have tried, and I thought we had a very broad palate by this point." Karen poured two small glasses and brought them over to the pair. Jordan, who had been the Blackwell estate sommelier for decades, and Tatyana, its current sommelier, both examined the amber libation curiously. Jordan put the cup to his lips and sipped it. Tatyana did as well, the only reaction from her being her eyes narrowing slightly. "That is very unique, I must say," the older man said finally. "It reminds me a Sangiovese in some ways, but; more primal somehow?" "It is an Italian wine, I think," Tatyana added. "But unlike any I have tried before." "It's what I imagine a Falernian wine would be like, if the genuine article thing still existed," Karen posited. "But those methods are lost. We only know them from poetry and accounts of Roman historians, such as Galen and Pliny. This is; wondrous to try." Becky sighed slightly, relaxing. She was so worried about running into time lock that it was a relief she'd managed to let them actually taste the wine. The profs knew something was up, that she couldn't help them, and they would just have to figure out as much as they could on their own. Was she meant to have done this? Was it Fating? She banished the thought from her head, she would drive herself crazy. She was here to have fun with the two people who had made her who she was, and to share that joy with Nanu. To her delight, Nanu seemed to be acclimating well, even if she was in awe and fear of these 'gods'. Mike looked at Becky now. "This must have cost you a pretty penny, something this unique." Becky smiled. "I can manage more, if you want. As many bottles as you like. Just don't ask how or why." "Fair enough," Karen said, looking over at her husband. "And we just found our drink of choice for that toga party we discussed." Mike laughed and Becky giggled. Poor Nanu. She escapes slavery from Imperial Rome, only to end up in a time period where dressing like the patricians who enslaved her was the height of chic at a party. Rome was clearly the eternal city in more ways than one. And this one time, wining about it was a good thing. Later that afternoon. "Mistress, look at all these men," Nanu said quietly, as if the portraits and busts they were walking by could hear her. She could've sworn some of them were staring right at her, their eyes following her movements. "They are all rather frightening to me." Becky nodded as she walked hand-in-hand with Nanu down the Hall of Ancestors. "I remember the first time I saw them, my love, and they intimidated me as well. They are the ancestors of my professor, going back almost a thousand years." Nanu seemed rather surprised, and a little wary. "They're all gods?" Shit, how do I explain this without breaking her mind? Becky wondered rather wearily. "They all have the same hair like the god, maybe lighter, and the eyes," Nanu observed, still speaking quietly, so that the numerous men didn't hear her. "I can't tell if they're as big as he is." Okay, extra complication there as well. "No, my love, they are the ancestors of Karen," Becky explained, knowing this wasn't going to get easier. That revelation gave Nanu paused. She stopped and looked up at Becky now, almost frowning. "But they look like him, not her. They have the same straw hair and the eyes the color of the sea." She looked down at the ground now as she tried to parse out what her Mistress was telling her. "But her eyes are the color of his hair; maybe they are brother and sister?" Now Becky's eyes widened. "Well, if Iupiter and Iuno were brother and sister but also husband and wife, why can't these two be?" the Egyptian girl reasoned. "They gave birth to all the gods. But; where are these gods now?" She gestured broadly at the hallway and the gallery of busts and portraits. "Nanu, I; I don't know," Becky confessed, trying not to falter in explaining. "I've never met them, honestly. I met the father of Karen, that was it." She pointed to an imposing portrait of Jonathon Blackwell, Karen's father, which hung on the wall not far from them. "And where is that god now?" Nanu asked. Becky hadn't done herself any favors by mentioning she'd met other 'gods'. She tried distraction now, pointing at a large open space nearby on the wall. "Look, that is where the portrait of Karen will go, once she is officially head of her fa; of the pantheon." Well done, Fischer. Nanu looked at the empty space. "So the goddess will be the supreme ruler? What of the god? She seems to obey him, why will he not be up there?" This was getting harder and harder. Becky squeezed her eyes shut, trying to think of a remotely plausible answer. What a rotten moment for time lock to not interfere. "He is from a different family of gods, my love," she said finally, giving up. She didn't have the mental strength to overcome Nanu's fantasies. "A line of mighty ones, but that doesn't mean that she won't rule her own family. She may obey him, but she is their leader." It was true, just massively out of context. "So we are invited to the festival that sees her become ruler?" Nanu asked in wonder. "We are very important, aren't we?" It was finally a question Becky could answer honestly. She smiled and caressed the younger girl's cheek. "Yes, my love. We are very important to them. That's why they want us there." "What does the goddess' name means, Mistress?" queried Nanu. "Karen. It is so unusual to me." Another smile. Becky knew this tidbit, because she had laughed with her mentor about it so many times over the years they'd known one another. "Her names means 'Purity', my dear." Another wry face from Nanu. "But she fucks like Venus, Mistress. I'm not sure 'pure' is the best way to describe her." Becky restrained a giggle. "And the god? What does his name mean?" Becky happened to know that one as well, since the name was common enough. "His name means 'godlike', or 'like unto a god'." "Well at least that one makes sense," Nanu admitted. They continued walking, with Nanu gaping at just about everything. Mike and Karen were seeing to a small matter, and had suggested that Becky take Nanu for a stroll around the estate. Becky had to think about what might catch her attention, and what she'd even be able to understand. She'd already shown Nanu the service elevator, and the young woman was stunned how the tiny room could bring her to different places at the simple push of a button. Food always interested Nanu, but if they were staying for dinner, she could keep the little glutton out of the chef's way for a few hours. Glenda showed them the garage, with all the exotic and rare cars. Nanu seemed especially taken with the huge jeep and the bright red Countach. They found Ari in what was apparently an arcade (rich people, go figure!), and they watched while he played Street Fighter IV. Nanu looked on in fascination as Ari controlled the little man inside the box, making him beat up another little person. Before she got overstimulated and bloodthirsty (Becky was beginning to suspect that violence and sexual arousal were quite mated in Nanu's psyche), they went to find something else to look at. Soon, they found themselves in the compassion greenhouse. The rather pungent odor hit them the moment they opened the door. Nanu wrinkled her nose and pinched it shut with her fingers. "They grow asterion, Mistress?" she asked, her voice sounding funny before she was keeping her nose pinched shut. "I remember it from the house of my Flavian masters. We made ropes and rugs with it. They would bake the seeds into cakes. The cakes made me feel tired." Becky nodded. "It's a recreational substance in my time. They grow all sorts of things here, some of which will be very new to you." "I will get tired if we stay in here," Nanu said. "Just from the smell of the plants." Tempting, Becky thought, but ultimately decided against it. There was still lots to do, after all. They toured some of the other greenhouses before heading back into the Manor. In the foyer, they ran into two young women. Becky stepped up to greet them. "Hi, I'm Becky, this is Nanu," she said, shaking their hands. The rather buxom brunette seemed very pleasant, although Becky could already tell she was a bit of a space cadet. The other one, a shorter girl with honey-blonde hair in a pixie cut, was lean and athletic, her hazel eyes observing everything. "Hi, I'm Jeanie," the brunette said cheerfully before looking at Nanu. "Oh, wow, look how pretty you are! I'll bet you're a big hit with all the boys, aren't you?" She bent her knees slightly, resting her hands on them so she was closer to Nanu's eye level. "And what grade are you in?" Becky restrained a giggle-snort, declining to translate for Nanu. The Egyptian girl looked up at her, a rather confused expression on her face. "What's the stupid girl asking me?" she wondered. "She just said you're very pretty and all the boys must love you," Becky selectively answered. "Well, she's right about that, at least, so maybe she's not completely stupid," Nanu sniffed. "Sorry, Jeanie," Becky said, turning her attention back to her new associate. "Nanu doesn't speak English, we speak Latin to one another. So unless you speak it too, I'll have to translate for you." "Oh, yeah, no," Jeanie replied, shaking her head. "Fre'n' me barely speak English, so I guess you're on duty for us with the Latin stuff." "Hey now," the pixie-haired girl said, giving Jeanie a look before also stepping forward. She was wearing some chinos and a tank top, her jacket thrown over her shoulder. She shook Becky's hand. "Hello, I am Freja. We have been hearing about you both, I am honored." She smiled at Nanu now. "I am happy to meet you, Nanu." Becky translated, but Nanu didn't seem to hear what she was saying, since she was focused on Freja. The Danish girl was not much taller than her, but also had tiny tits, barely worth mentioning. She was smirking as Freja put out her hand, and instead of shaking it, she simply put her hands on her hips and pushed her chest forward slightly, thrusting out her tits. Freja faltered somewhat at the sight of them on display like that. "Anyhows," Freja said, turning her attention back to Becky, even if her wife was still staring at Nanu's chest. For a tiny girl, she had a huge rack. "Jeanette is my wife, we are pleased to be making your acquaintances. You ams staying for dinner?" Becky nodded, ignoring the fact that Nanu was turning slowly left and right, showing off her bust in profile. "The profs convinced me to come work as a Physics teacher at the uni. Do you two go there?" "Yes," Freja confirmed. "Jeanette is in Health and Nutrition Sciences, and I ams at the Skule." "Ooh, an engineer," Becky breathed, smiling. "Love it! You'll probs end up building a lot of the equipment I need in order to; Nanu, stop that, you brat!" She nudged the smaller woman with her hip since Nanu was cupping her tits and squishing them together. Either one of her tits was much bigger than both of Freja's, and clearly the girl was self-conscious about it. This was no doubt some leftover competition and survival trait in Nanu, finding advantage in whatever form it came. Given how she'd been mocked the other night at the bar, maybe she shouldn't be surprised. Still, she couldn't let her behave that way. "Jeanie, honey," she said, smiling at the other half of the married couple. "Would you mind taking Nanu and finding her a bathroom? I want to pick your wife's brain about something with engineering." "Oh, a hundred p," the brunette said, nodding and taking Nanu by the hand. "How'd you say 'Let's go pee' in Latin?" Becky couldn't believe she was saying this, but obliged. "Eamus mingere." "C'mon, Nanu," Jeanie said to the confused Egyptian girl, leading her off. "Eat a moose lingerie." "Even for her, that was nowhere near the close," Freja sighed as she walked along with Becky now. "I just wanted to get Nanu away from you, she gets competitive," Becky said. "Sorry about that. She was raised as a slave, so she has a survival mode about not being the smallest and weakest." "And my tits, they are smallest and weakest," the Danish girl muttered. "Oh, I think they suit you just fine," Becky said helpfully, taking Freja's hand and giving it a squeeze. "'sides, I kinda want to get a look at the rest of you without Nanu around, you look pretty muscular." Freja smiled. "I works out a lot, I guess. I played fodbold, your soccer, and also field hockey. I do some martial arts as well." "Ooh, tell me!" Becky said, pulling Freja into an unused lounge. "Tell me what you take and I'll tell you what I practice." Freja put down her coat and stood there, letting Becky see her body, although she still had her clothes on. Her shoulder muscles were obvious, but she lifted her tank top enough to show up her segmented and rock-hard abs. "I ams having a black belt in Grace Jujutsu, as well as Kenpo, and I also know Fujian White Crane. What do you practice?" "Krav Maga," Becky replied, lifting her own shirt enough to show off her smooth, firm midsection to her new friend. "Started quite a few years ago, mostly to blow off any sexual frustration, and to deal with guys who get too handsy, you know?" Freja smiled and nodded. "I believe you, for you are very well sexy-built. But we should spar, I would love to try myself against your Krav Maga." "I would love that too, Freja," Becky purred, her smile becoming sensual. "Win or lose, gonna love it. But haven't you tried sparring with the big man before?" "Once," Freja said, shaking her head. "He literally squashed me like a bug. I lasted three seconds and he just squashed me." Becky giggled. "He was the one who began teaching me Krav Maga, and every time I spar with him, I get squashed too. I think of them as sex injuries, you know?" Freja laughed. "Jeanette and I, we fuck the profs occasionally, so yes, I understand. We are lovers to them, and to their son and his wife, Karen's younger sister, Alexandra." "They were telling me about that whole arrangement, but I'm gonna need time to sort it out," Becky admitted. "It sounds like it was a helluva year." "I met my wife and married her because of Alex and Alexandra," Freja said, shucking her tank top now and just leaving her tits exposed. She didn't mind. "And what I can guarantee you, Rebecca, is that when you see Alex and Alexandra together, it will make you very happy." "Honey, I don't doubt that one bit," Becky said, pulling her own shirt off and then unhooking her bra. In a bathroom down the way. "See, this is pretty nice, right?" Jeanie said, sitting on the ornate but comfy chair, her chin on her hand while she looked at Nanu, who was simply sitting on the toilet with her pants around her ankles. She'd already managed to go pee, but apparently this stupid girl hadn't noticed and was still talking to her. "Li'l bit of girl bonding time, right?" "You really are dumb, aren't you?" Nanu said, trying to keep the snide tone out of her voice, in case the stupid girl tattled on her to Mistress. "I'm done going piss, now what?" "Oh, I've got an idea," Jeanie said rather eagerly. She pulled her shirt over her head, and then quickly undid her bra, letting her tits fall out. Nanu's eyes widened for a moment as she stared. They weren't the largest she'd ever seen, the goddess' were certainly bigger, and her Mistress' probably were too. But this dumb girl wore them well, and she clearly didn't mind showing them off at a moment's notice. "Now show me yours," Jeanie said, pointing at Nanu's shirt. The Egyptian girl shrugged and peeled off her shirt, and the stupid bra thing underneath, leaving her as exposed as her companion. Jeanie nodded approvingly as she assessed Nanu's tits. "Nice, we can have a lot of fun with those," Jeanie said, getting up and coming to kneel in front of Nanu now. She put her hands on Nanu's tits and fondled them, feeling around and giving them a good squeeze. "Yeah, these're primo, babe. Well done." Nanu didn't have a damn clue what the dunce was saying, but her tone indicated she liked Nanu's tits, and as a result, Nanu was getting groped. She didn't object at all. "Mind if I?" Jeanie asked, not waiting for an answer before leaning in and starting to swirl her tongue around one of her new friend's nipples. Nanu shivered and gasped, decidedly not objecting to this treatment. She hadn't been fucked in over an hour, so this was a good start. She reached forward and groped the brunette's big tits, liking how heavy they felt in her hand. She could feel herself getting wet, and wanted to do things with this girl now. "Hmm, new and better idea;” Jeanie said, pulling back and standing up long enough to go over to a closet and pulling out a large, plush towel. She remembered they were in there after her unfortunate encounter a few weeks earlier with the neighbor kid, who turned out to be necrotic, or narcosomic, or something. She laid the towel out on the marble floor, and then smiled at Nanu, patting the towel and indicating she should lie down. Nanu got off the toilet and laid down on her back as instructed, looking up at the dumb girl. Jeanie smiled and crawled partially over the smaller girl, her tits now hovering over Nanu's face, the nipples touching her nose. She eased down some more until Nanu could get one of the nipples in her mouth easily. Nanu began licking, tonguing and sucking readily. "Hmm, Jeanie for the win with the good ideas," the larger girl sighed, now craning down and beginning to suck and lick on Nanu's ample tits, the two of them losing themselves in the moment. Neither would feel the need to come up for air any time soon. Back in the other room. Becky grunted and strained, lying on her back and hands flexing against the floor. She was pushing with her hamstrings and her ass muscles, sweat streaming now from her nearly naked form. All she was wearing were her thong panties, and it still felt like she had too much on. Freja was lying opposite her, also just in her thong. They both had one leg in the air, locked against each near the ankle, and they were pushing hard, trying to overpower one another. It had been some time since Becky had engaged in a good bout of (the unfortunately named) Indian leg wrestling. Becky gasped and groaned, wondering if Freja was in as much discomfort as she was. She had the height advantage, a longer leg, so presumably more leverage, but Freja was very strong, her body a little bundle of muscle, which Becky had not appreciated until they'd decided on this little contest and they both stripped down. Whatever she lacked in the tits department, Freja made up for in the powerful ass department. Becky wouldn't be surprised if the little Danish girl could crack walnuts open between those cheeks. She heard Freja moan, taking heart that her opponent was working as hard as she was, although they remained in a deadlock at this point. If she couldn't overpower Freja, she'd simply have to hope to outlast her, until Freja's muscles were jelly and she gave up. They hadn't really decided on what the prize was for whoever won, but she held no doubt they'd both enjoy it. "Uh, fuck;” Freja rasped, her leg trembling every bit as much as Becky's. "You ams strong, like Alexandra or Andrea." "I'll take that; as a compliment;” Becky panted, her warm skin slick against the floor. She hoped she didn't stain the marble, she'd have a hard time explaining that to the profs. "You're really damn strong too, babe;” After almost two more minutes of straining and groaning, the strength of both women gave out at the exact same moment. Their legs bent and collapsed down, both of them breathing heavily, supremely tired from the contest. They slowly rolled onto their sides, almost going fetal as they tried to catch their breath. "That was; very difficult;” Freja managed to say. "I'm not gonna like walking on that leg for a week," Becky replied, thinking about the amount of grapefruit juice she was going to be drinking to deal with the lactic acid buildup in her leg and ass muscles. She hoped she wouldn't have to chase Nanu anywhere. "I guess it was a tie?" "Next time, we will make it a sexfight," Freja breathed, thinking she'd need a forklift to get her upright. "That will be easier on my body." "You have a deal, Fre;” Becky said wearily, hoping the profs didn't find her like this. Thankfully, the muscle pains subsided relatively quickly and easily, even if she knew she was going to be sore tomorrow. She found Nanu with Jeanie, and they both seemed much more refreshed and cheerful than her and Freja. She had a sneaking suspicion as to why. Nanu hadn't been in Freja's presence more than three seconds before she thrust her chest forward again, making sure the Danish girl knew who the mayor of Titty-Town was, even if she wasn't quite so blatant about it this time. They'd all gone to the kitchen so that Becky and Freja could rehydrate themselves a little. Freja was just drinking bicarbonate in water, whereas Theresa supplied Becky with her grapefruit juice. Nanu and Jeanie were drinking milk, and the two girls giggled at one another while they downed their glasses. Jeanie and Freja excused themselves, needing to get back to their condo. Jeanie hugged Nanu, making sure they squished their tits together, then did the same with Becky, although perhaps not quite as familiarly. Freja hugged Becky and then took a chance on hugging Nanu to say goodbye. Nanu accepted the hug, but made sure she pressed her tits right into Freja's reminding her who was in charge. Freja sighed, and they made their exit. "Miss Fischer, Mr. and Mrs. DeBourne will meet you in the Spencer Study now," Tatyana said, entering the room and nodding. "They apologize for the delay, things are just rather busy right now." "Well, what with finals coming, and the big ol' housewarmings, I'm not surprised," Becky said cheerfully, taking Nanu's hand and allowing Tatyana to take them to the aforementioned Spencer Study. Inside, Mike and Karen were sitting on a long, ornate chesterfield. Becky strolled in and sat down on a loveseat just across from them, joined by Nanu. Once again, the Egyptian girl seemed to be keeping her eyes averted. "I hope you don't mind, Rebecca, I thought we might continue having more of your delightful wine," Karen said, pouring some glasses. "I'm glad you like it, and especially glad that you aren't asking questions," Becky answered, relieved that her mentors seemed to genuinely understand her predicament, even if they couldn't understand her predicament. "I promise, I'll scare up some more for you." They were happily discussing Becky's future employment at the university, with Mike and Karen almost teasing her with tempting tidbits about all the latest research into quantum crystallography. Nanu listened quietly, understanding nothing, but knowing that whatever was being discussed was important. It was about making her Mistress happy, and nothing was more important to her than that. Well, getting fucked was as important, but clearly she could have both, so why quibble? Soon enough, they were joined by another person, whom Becky and Nanu turned to meet. A tall, young, and incredibly handsome blond man strolled in casually, wearing an infectious grin that Becky would recognize anywhere, even if she hadn't met him some years ago. He was so very obviously a DeBourne. Nanu's eyes went wide again, and she trembled in fear. "There you are, child-mine," Karen said as Alex walked into the study. "You remember Miss Fischer, yes?" "Of course," he said, smiling genially as he walked over to where the guest was sitting with another, smaller and exotic-looking girl. She stood up and he shook her hand, which was firm, friendly, and warm. A definite turn-on. "It's good to see you again, Ms. Fischer." "Oh, God, call me Becky, please," she said, trying to not blatantly ogle her professors' son. He was so much like Mike, only distilled into a more human-sized form, with enchanting electric blue eyes that radiated humor. But there was also a cool aloofness beneath, if he cared to let it be seen, and that was something he got from his regal mother. "You've grown up, Alex, and you were a lady-killer when you were just thirteen, I recall." "Well, everyone kept sayin' you were too old for me, so I had a wait a few years," he quipped, making her laugh. "Who's your friend, Becks?" Becky shook her head, since his new name for her reminded her of Mark. Still, it gave her a tingle when Alex said it, so she didn't exactly mind. He was more than free to keep calling her that. "Alex, this is Nanu. She's staying with me for the foreseeable future." Alex was going to shake Nanu's hand, but instead she slipped down to her knees, staring up at him in reverent awe before dropping her head to look at the floor. She began speaking quietly, her voice little more than a mumble. Alex raised an eyebrow before glancing over at his mother and father, who were still sitting on the large chesterfield. "Is she speaking Coptic? That's Coptic, isn't it? I don't speak that one yet." "Maybe if you were an elder of the church and showed a little more liturgical piety," Karen sniffed, holding her wine glass as she watched and assessed her son and his reactions. "Nanu is from very small-town Egypt, but she speaks Imperial Latin." Becky watched on, intrigued as he looked down at her again. "Please get up;” he instructed in the language of Imperial Rome. Nanu stood, but kept her eyes averted, even while he was addressing her. He smiled at her. "Nanu, I'm Alex. My full name is Alexander." She dared to look up at him again. He was a head, shoulders, and half a chest taller than her. She barely cleared his dad's abdomen. But she was certainly stacked for such a small girl. She had the build of a dancer, except with big tits. "The conqueror is named after you," she said in a hushed tone. "Alexander;” Alex looked back at his parents and Becky. "Does she think I'm a god? She's clearly not Muslim or Syriac Christian." "We haven't quite figured out what she makes of us," Mike replied, his deep voice from behind her making Nanu almost shiver and squeeze her eyes shut. This had been quite the day for her, and she'd met three gods now. How many people could say that? "Well, better you guys spend time thinkin' about it than me," Alex concluded, kneeling down so that he was eye-level with Nanu, taking her hands and smiling. She trembled at the touch. "Welcome to my home, Nanu;” he said cheerfully. She looked like she might faint. Her heart was thundering in her chest again, and she felt dizzy. "I hear you're due to get married, Alex," Becky mentioned, taking the pressure off Nanu before she just expired right there on the Persian rug. "Your aunt?" "Yep," Alex said, rising while gesturing for Becky and Nanu to sit again, which they did, Nanu somewhat unsteadily. Becky gave her some water while Alex eased himself onto the chesterfield next to Becky. Half a second later, Valentina brought in more drinks. Becky smirked at the steaming blue beverage waiting for Alex. Apparently it was some nerdy thing called a 'Romulan Ale'. "Mom's sister that I'm named after. "I take it you've heard the whole crazy story?" "Crazy stories seem to be the theme of this past year," Becky agreed. "Damned if I can get into mine, though. I am looking forward to meeting her as well, though. Your mom and dad have mentioned her over the years, the fact that she was missing from your lives. She and your grandmother were gone by the time I knew them." "Speaking of my baby sister, would you happen to know her whereabouts?" Karen asked, looking at her son. "She went with Aunt Jen to the pub while I was in class," he replied, nodding to Val in approval as he tried his drink. "Aunt Jen had a bunch a followers, so she took them all for a drink." "Meaning it'll somehow magically happen on my tab," Karen muttered while Mike patted her shoulder. "When was that?" "Alexa only had a half day, so they're probably almost home by now," he replied. "Aunt Jen really likes Theresa's coq au vin." He looked at Becky and Nanu now. "You two staying for dinner? Theresa makes killer food." "Well, your chef's bologna hasn't had any disastrous effects on Nanu's digestive tract, so I assume fresh poultry ought to be fine," Becky mused. "Nitrates and preservatives are the enemy, eh?" the young man laughed, once again reminding Becky of his father and giving her a tingle. They finished their drinks and Mike and Karen agreed to take them on a small tour. Becky was rather interested in the energy-saving measures, like the solar panels and the thermochromic windows. They were all touring the temperate produce greenhouse (called the 'Orangerie') some while later when two people joined them. "We're back, and we're not even hammered," the tall, gorgeous blonde chimed musically, the air of the room lightening with her presence. Even the resident butterflies of the Orangerie seemed to dance about when she was near them. She walked right up to Becky and hugged her. "You must be Becky! I've heard a lot about you." "I've heard a lot about you too, but I never would've believed anyone could be as stacked as your older sister," Becky replied, happily returning the squishy hug. "Let me introduce Nanu. Unless you speak Coptic, you'll need to speak Latin to her." "Hi, Nanu!" Alex almost sang as she knelt and hugged the shorter girl. Nanu's eyes looked like they might just spring out of her head before she swooned, not even having a chance to get on her knees and avert her eyes. "I'm Alexa!" "A; leks...a;” the Egyptian girl murmured as the tall, blonde goddess finally released her. She didn't go to her knees, she simply gazed at Alexa in quiet awe. This had been quite a day for her, even by her standards recently. "And I'm Jenny, lovey," the countess said, walking over and giving Becky a hug. "Chuffed to have you around. Have the lord and lady of the manor made their proposal to you yet?" "They have, and I've accepted, countess," Becky replied, enjoying yet another squishy, sexy hug. She had no doubt she'd end up fucking these two women eventually, if not Alex. She'd never had sex with a countess before, just a French noblewoman that she was reasonably certain was her own ancestor. "I could use the pay upgrade, certainly. Gotta pay for the classes to keep this bod toned somehow." "Delighted to hear it," Jenny said cheerfully, the two women still holding one another by the waist as they smiled at each other. Mike and Karen looked on, trying not to smirk. "And you're quite lovely, my dear. Certainly it won't hurt to' "Oh my gosh;” Alexa breathed, looking at the floor as an epiphany shivered through her. She looked up at Becky and Jenny. "We've gotta do that." "Do what, darling?" Jenny asked, looking at her but still holding Becky, their hips touching. "Well, look at us," Alexa said, coming over and inserting herself into the small hug, which was now a three-way. "Three tall, gorgeous blondes; we need to form a clique, or a union or something." "I've never belonged to a union," Jenny mused. "I've never not belonged to a union," Becky added. "Don't think I've been in a clique, though." "Yeah, but where's this ever happen?" Alexa said, pointing at each of them in turn. "Three natural blonde goddesses all together, none of us made of plastic or silicone; we're the world's most awesome and exclusive clique." "A Trinity," Alex added rather unhelpfully. "Yes!" Alexa said loudly, turning and pointing at Alex in excitement while Karen favored her son with a sour look for encouraging this. "The Trinity! That's it exactly!" She took Becky and Jenny by the hands and began pulling them out of the Orangerie, confusing the butterflies. "C'mon! We've gotta go take pics to celebrate our formation;” "Take care of Nanu for me," Becky called back, getting pulled along in Alexa's wake, as was the countess. The girl was frighteningly strong when she was exited; Becky would be amazed if even Andrea was stronger than Alexa. "Feed her or something', that'll keep her occupied." Nanu watched her Mistress disappear with the golden-haired goddess with the giant tits, along with the other woman. Seconds later, the three gods she was left with all turned to look down at her. She stared back at them awkwardly for a moment before opening her mouth and pointing at her gullet, then licking her lips and rubbing her belly. She looks like Nibbles the Mouse from those old Tom and Jerry cartoons when she does that," Alex observed. "Well, let's go see if Theresa can scare up some more bologna for her," the golden-eyed goddess named Karen mused, holding out her hand for the Nanu to take. "Ba-lo;” Nanu said eagerly as she followed Karen out of the Orangerie. "Ba-lo;” Soon enough she'd be eating again, and hopefully someone would fuck her. She hadn't anticipated anything like this happening to her, and she owed it all to her Mistress and the god-machine. It was a good day to be Nanu Tehemet. A study on the third floor. "Okay, so," Alexa began, herding the two women into the room and then closing the door for privacy. "This is gonna be awesome, the world's most elite clique." "It would be nice to belong to something Kat cannot dominate," Jenny mused, nodding. "What does our clique do?" "Just exist to show off how wonderful it is to be a blonde goddess," Alexa reasoned, rubbing her hands together and then assessing them both for a moment. "I mean, we're gotta spread the truth, right?" "Good enough for me," Becky declared readily, watching Alexa go over to a closet and pull out an expensive-looking camera and tripod. "Lotsa pics in various states of dress and undress?" &l

At the 2025 ASSEMBLY Show, we sat down with Ben Brakenwagen, Account Executive, to explore how Dirac's BuildOS automated work instruction platform transforms complex CAD models into clear, repeatable, and scalable work instructions, creating the digital thread that connects design, production, and quality. By automating and standardizing this critical step, manufacturers can accelerate digital transformation, reduce documentation time by up to 95%, and enable agile production across facilities. Learn why work instructions, “the blueprints of the modern industrial base,” could be the key to reindustrialization across the West.Sponsored By:

Neste episódio, a Isabel fala sobre o grande físico britânico Paul A.M. Dirac, considerado por muitos o segundo mais importante físico teórico do século XX, depois de Einstein. Dirac foi um dos pioneiros da mecânica quântica, tendo recebido o Prémio Nobel da Física em 1933 em conjunto com Schrödinger. Esta distinção foi-lhe dada após ele ter desenvolvido a equação de Dirac, que permitiu conciliar a mecânica quântica com a relatividade e levou à previsão da existência de antimatéria, detetada experimentalmente pela primeira vez em 1932.

L'info du matin - Ce matin, Grégory Ascher et Justine Salmon ont parlé de Taylor Swift : selon une étude scientifique, ses chansons rendraient l'attente plus supportable ! Le winner du jour - À Ajaccio, un contrôleur aérien s'endort et laisse un avion tourner en rond dans le ciel. - En Écosse, sur l'île d'Easdale, un concurrent triche aux championnats du monde de ricochets. Le flashback du jour - Avril 2006 : sortie en salles du tout premier "OSS 117 : Le Caire, nid d'espions" avec Jean Dujardin. Côté musique, "La boulette" de Diam's cartonne en tête des classements. Les savoirs inutiles - Salvador Dalí ne payait jamais l'addition au restaurant... il signait la nappe ! Une technique plutôt rentable, quand on est Dalí. La chanson du jour - Alphaville "Big in Japan" Les 3 choses à savoir sur Nile Rodgers Qu'est-ce qu'on fait ? - Ce week-end, ce sont les Journées européennes du patrimoine. Si vous êtes en région parisienne, RTL2 vous ouvre les portes de ses studios ! - A Grandvilliers (entre Amiens et Beauvais), ne manquez pas l'"Arthur's Day Festival" avec Ko Ko Mo - gratuit si vous vous appelez Arthur ! - Le jeu surprise (le petit bac) : - Alexandra de Mégange remporte un bon d'achat de 100 € sur le site Le Vent à la Française. - La banque RTL2 - Stéphanie de Grenoble gagne 1 000 €. - Céline de Dirac remporte un séjour Thalazur à Port Camargue (6 jours / 6 nuits, 24 soins pour 2 personnes). Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Im Jahr 1937 hatte Paul Dirac eigentlich so alles erreicht, was man als theoretischer Physiker erreichen konnte: Der Brite hatte die Quantenphysik mit begründet und sie mit Einsteins Spezieller Relativitätstheorie vereint. Fast aus Versehen hatte er erstmals eine neue Form von Materie beschrieben, die wir heute als Antimaterie kennen. Paul Dirac hatte nicht nur eine Professur an der angesehen Universität von Cambridge bekommen, sondern bekam auch im Alter von nur 31 Jahren den Nobelpreis für Physik zugesprochen. Doch nun wandte sich Dirac größeren Dingen zu: der Kosmologie. Quelle: https://astrogeo.de/expandierende-erde-zu-grosse-zahlen-und-zu-kleine-schwerkraft/ / Bitte abonniert den Original-Podcastfeed: https://astrogeo.de/feed/m4a/

Dirac has been making a push, recently, to get their room correction technology out into the market and improving more consumers' audio experience in a more streamlined and simpler way. Ahead of the official launch of the Dirac ART tech in Marantz and Denon product later this year, we sat down with Rikard Hellerfelt, VP of Consumer and E-commerce for the brand, to learn more about the push, the strategy around it, and more. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSK1kfVwS0Q

As a listener of TOE you can get a special 20% off discount to The Economist and all it has to offer! Visit https://www.economist.com/toe In this episode, I speak with Professor Felix Finster, a radical thinker reimagining the foundations of physics. We explore his theory of causal fermion systems, where reality emerges from quantum correlations—without assuming spacetime or geometry. From the Dirac sea to quantum gravity, this conversation challenges familiar concepts and offers a glimpse into where the next physics revolution might begin. Join My New Substack (Personal Writings): https://curtjaimungal.substack.com Listen on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4gL14b92xAErofYQA7bU4e Timestamps: 00:00 Introduction 03:12 The Origins of Causal Fermion Systems 06:55 Engaging with Alternative Theories in Physics 15:22 The Standard View of Causation 18:21 Classical, Quantum, and Pre-Quantum 23:06 How Spacetime Emerges from Disconnected Points 29:49 Recovering Lorentz Signature Without Assumptions 31:48 Recovering the Born Rule from First Principles 39:39 The Measurement Problem 46:20 Bounds on CSL Parameters 49:45 The Dynamics of Spacetime 57:47 Collaboration with Yao and Reflections on the Theory 1:03:13 A Quantum Gravity Theory Without Supersymmetry 1:05:28 The Dirac Sea 1:11:40 Addressing Infinite Energy in Semi-Classical Gravity 1:13:09 Octonions in the Vacuum Structure 1:17:32 Chirality and the Action Principle 1:20:33 Baryogenesis and Why Matter Exists 1:35:10 Rethinking the Strong CP and Hierarchy Problems 1:38:43 Recognition, Collaboration, and Growing Attention 1:54:00 Mathematical Criteria vs. Experimental Tests 2:01:02 Advice for Young Researchers Links Mentioned: - Felix's Papers: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=F7ppNroAAAAJ - Felix's Bio: https://www.uni-regensburg.de/mathematik/mathematik-1/startseite/index.html - Causal Fermion Systems [Paper]: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2405.19254 - Linear Dynamics of Wave Functions [Paper]: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2101.08673 - The Principle of the Fermionic Projector [Book]: https://www.amazon.com/Principle-Fermionic-Projector-Advanced-Mathematics/dp/0821839748 - Baryogensis for Causal Fermion Systems [Paper]: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2111.05556 - Holographic Mixing [Paper]: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.18045 - Standard Model Physics from an Algebra? [Paper]: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1611.09182 - Barry Loewer & Eddy Chen [TOE]: https://youtu.be/xZnafO__IZ0 - Fay Dowker [TOE]: https://youtu.be/PgYHEPCLVas - String Theory Iceberg [TOE]: https://youtu.be/X4PdPnQuwjY - David Kaiser [TOE]: https://youtu.be/_yebLXsIdwo - Ruth Kastner [TOE]: https://youtu.be/-BsHh3_vCMQ - Amanda Gefter [TOE]: https://youtu.be/yABPvDJ6Zgs - Jacob Barandes [TOE]: https://youtu.be/7oWip00iXbo - Eva Miranda [TOE]: https://youtu.be/6XyMepn-AZo - Emily Adlam [TOE]: https://youtu.be/6I2OhmVWLMs - Scott Aaronson & Jacob Barandes [TOE]: https://youtu.be/5rbC3XZr9-c SUPPORT: - Become a YouTube Member (Early Access Videos): https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdWIQh9DGG6uhJk8eyIFl1w/join - Support me on Patreon: https://patreon.com/curtjaimungal - Support me on Crypto: https://commerce.coinbase.com/checkout/de803625-87d3-4300-ab6d-85d4258834a9 - Support me on PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=XUBHNMFXUX5S4 SOCIALS: - Twitter: https://twitter.com/TOEwithCurt - Discord Invite: https://discord.com/invite/kBcnfNVwqs Guests do not pay to appear. Theories of Everything receives revenue solely from viewer donations, platform ads, and clearly labelled sponsors; no guest or associated entity has ever given compensation, directly or through intermediaries. #science Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Waar is alle materie uit opgebouwd, en welke wetten volgen die deeltjes om alles op aarde en de rest van het heelal vorm te geven? Wat is antimaterie, en wat heeft quantumtheorie daarmee te maken? In Reis naar de kern neemt Ivo van Vulpen, deeltjesonderzoeker bij CERN in Genève en verbonden aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam, je mee langs al deze grote vragen. Je denkt misschien dat dat ver van je normale belevingswereld afstaat, maar al deze inzichten worden dagelijks gebruikt. Van de GPS op je telefoon, tot de scanners in ziekenhuizen.. Over Reis naar de Kern Na Terug naar de Oerknal met Govert Schilling en Baan door het Brein met Iris Sommer is het nu tijd voor een nieuw avontuur: Reis naar de kern. Een fascinerende duik in de wereld van de allerkleinste deeltjes, waar de allergrootste vragen worden beantwoord. In vijf afleveringen zoomen we in op de wereld van het atoom, de quantummechanica, antimaterie en de ontdekking van het Higgs Boson. Reis naar de Kern is een podcast van BNR. Tekst en presentatie: Ivo van Vulpen. Concept: Connor Clerx. Eindredactie: Annick van der Leeuw. Montage: Gijs Friesen en Connor Clerx. Sounddesign en mixage: Gijs Friesen. Over Ivo Ivo van Vulpen is als deeltjesfysicus werkzaam aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam, het Nationaal Instituut voor subatomaire fysica (Nikhef) en hij doet onderzoek bij de deeltjesversneller (Large Hadron Collider) bij CERN in Genève. Hij is hoogleraar Wetenschapscommunicatie, in het bijzonder betreffende de natuurkunde, aan de Universiteit Leiden. In 2018 verscheen zijn eerste boek: De melodie van de natuur. Transcript aflevering Tot de jaren dertig was eigenlijk niks aan de hand. De natuurkunde was vrij overzichtelijk. Weer overzichtelijk moet ik natuurlijk zeggen. In de vorige aflevering hadden we het over de atoomrevolutie in die eerste decennia van de 20e eeuw waarin het ons eindelijk lukte om door te dringen tot de wereld van het atoom zelf, die kleinste bouwstenen van alle elementen. Tot de verbazing van wetenschappers bleken alle atomen uit dezelfde drie basisbouwstenen opgebouwd te zijn: protonen en neutronen (die samen de atoomkernen vormden) en de elektronen. Van negentig elementen terug naar drie bouwstenen dus. Heerlijk simpel en overzichtelijk! Alles op orde dus zou je denken. Maar toen gebeurde er iets waardoor we in één klap wisten dat we nog niet op de diepste laag van de kennis waren aangekomen en dat nog een onbekende wereld verborgen lag. In deze aflevering vertel ik jullie over deze verrassing en hoe het ons door ontwikkelingen in de techniek uiteindelijk wél lukte om het fundament van de natuur te bereiken. De neutronen en protonen bleken toen opgebouwd te zijn uit nog kleinere deeltjes, we leerden zelf deeltjes te maken in het laboratorium met behulp van deeltjesversnellers en ze te bestuderen met detectoren. Alles samen noemen we dat het Standaard Model en dat is tot op de dag van vandaag het beste beeld dat we hebben van de wereld op de allerkleinste schaal. En daar zitten gekke dingen bij hoor: deeltjes die dwars door de aarde kunnen vliegen bijvoorbeeld en magische dingen als anti-materie. Om deze stappen te begrijpen is het handig om je voor te stellen dat de ontdekking van het atoom net zoiets is aanspoelen op een onbekend eiland, waarna je, uit nieuwsgierigheid, gaat proberen dat eiland verder in kaart te brengen. Op het eiland bevindt zich een dicht oerwoud en terwijl je er steeds dieper en dieper in probeert door te dringen, bijvoorbeeld langs een rivier weet je niet of dat bos zich nog tientallen kilometers zo uit zal strekken en of er überhaupt nog wel iets anders te vinden zal zijn dan dezelfde bomen, vruchten en dieren die je van thuis kent. Maar als er dan ineens een bootje de rivier af komt zakken of als je een dier ziet dat je nooit eerder hebt gezien dan weet je gelijk dat je niet alleen bent en dat er meer dingen verborgen zijn. Precies zo'n situatie hadden we in de deeltjesfysica. Tijdens het onderzoek naar atoomkernen en radioactiviteit bleek gek genoeg dat er ook een bron van straling aanwezig was in een ruimte als er helemaal geen radioactieve stoffen in de buurt waren. Het idee was dat dat veroorzaakt werd door radioactieve stoffen in de aarde zelf. Best logisch en dus ‘case closed’ zou je denken, maar dan heb je net even buiten de koppigheid van de natuurkundigen gerekend. Er is er namelijk altijd eentje die het zeker wil weten en die naar de top van de Eiffeltoren gaat om te kijken of daar inderdaad minder straling is of in een luchtballon stapt om nog hoger te meten. Dat is allebei echt gebeurd! En maar goed ook, want het bleek dat de straling helemaal niet afnam hoe hoger je kwam. het werd juist sterker. De straling kwam dus niet uit de aarde, maar uit de ruimte! Blijkbaar worden we op aarde blijkbaar dus gebombardeerd door deeltjes uit het universum. Die botsen hoog in de lucht op zuurstofatomen en produceren daar een soort lawine van deeltjes waarvan sommigen lang genoeg leven om het aardoppervlak te halen. Die deeltjes waren dus de bron van die mysterieuze straling waar we naar op zoek waren. Dat onderzoek naar deze zogenaamde kosmische stralen is nog steeds een belangrijk onderzoeksgebied, maar daar gaat het nu even niet om. Mensen onderzochten om welke deeltjes het nou precies ging door de sporen van de deeltjes zichtbaar te maken, net zoals de sporen die vliegtuigen hoog in de lucht produceren, en door te kijken hoe ze reageerden als ze op andere materialen botsten. Zoveel mogelijkheden waren er niet, want we kenden immers maar drie verschillende deeltjes. Tot hun verbazing zagen ze dat het deeltjes waren die wel elektrisch geladen waren, maar geen proton waren …. en ook geen elektron. Een nieuw deeltje dus dat ongeveer tweehonderd keer zo zwaar bleek te zijn als een elektron. Het kreeg een eigen naam: het muon. Een onverwachte gast. Niet echt nodig, maar dat maakt niet uit. Het is net als gekleurde hagelslag en dure sportwagens. Niet echt nodig, maar het maakt de wereld wel een stuk leuker. Als kosmische stralen op dunne materialen vallen, blijken er nog veel meer nieuwe deeltjes te ontstaan. Sterker nog, een hele dierentuin vol nieuwe deeltjes. Fascinerend, maar het onderzoek was erg onhandig, want je was volledig overgeleverd aan wat de ruimte je gaf. Gelukkig lukte het ons dankzij twee technieken om zelf de regie in handen te krijgen: 1) de deeltjesversneller (om zelf deeltjes te kunnen maken in deeltjesbotsingen) en 2) de deeltjesdetector om alle deeltjes zichtbaar te maken die in die botsingen werden gemaakt. Dit zijn de twee elementen die we tot op de dag van vandaag nog steeds gebruiken om de natuur op de kleinste schaal te bestuderen. Alleen steeds een stukje geavanceerder. Eerst de deeltjesversneller. Dat we zelf deeltjes kunnen maken is een cruciale ontdekking geweest. De bekende formule van Albert Einstein E=mc2 betekent namelijk niet alleen dat je massa kan omzetten in energie (dat was de basis van de kernenergie en het branden van de zon uit de vorige aflevering), maar het werkt ook de andere kant op; als je maar genoeg energie bij elkaar brengt kan je daarmee ook zelf massa creëren: nieuwe deeltjes dus. In een deeltjesversneller geven we deeltjes, bijvoorbeeld protonen, energie door ze een klein zetje te geven. Daarna gebruiken we magneten om ze af te buigen en ze door een holle buis in een heel grote cirkel weer terug te leiden naar de plek waar we ze een zetje gaven … om ze vervolgens opnieuw een duwtje te geven. Als je dat heel vaak herhaalt krijgen deeltjes een enorm hoge snelheid en energie en als je ze daarna op elkaar laat botsen kun je al die bewegingsenergie gebruiken om nieuwe deeltjes te maken. Het voordeel is dat we zo deeltjes in een gecontroleerde omgeving kunnen maken. De ontwikkeling van de deeltjesversnellers ging heel snel: steeds meer energie en steeds meer botsingen. Op dit moment is de krachtigste deeltjesversneller op aarde de Large Hadron Collider op CERN, het Europees centrum voor de deeltjesfysica. Dan de deeltjesdetector. Om te begrijpen wat er in een botsing gebeurt is het cruciaal dat je de botsing kunt ‘fotograferen’. Dat is niet zo makkelijk, want ik zeg wel fotograferen, omdat we dat allemaal kennen uit onze eigen belevingswereld, maar een normale fotocamera kan alleen maar licht zien en helemaal geen andere deeltjes. De meeste deeltjes in de botsing leven trouwens ook veel te kort om te zien. We hebben een manier bedacht die je kunt vergelijken met die van het bestuderen van voetstappen in de sneeuw. Als ik je een foto laat zien van een spoor van voetstappen in de sneeuw dan vind je het vast gek als ik je vraag of het een auto, een konijn of een mens is geweest die deze sporen heeft achtergelaten. ‘Een mens natuurlijk’ zeg je dan. En als je de foto in meer detail bekijkt kun je vast nog veel meer achterhalen. Je ziet bijvoorbeeld of het één persoon was of twee, of het een kind was of een volwassene en nog veel meer. In een deeltjesdetector doen we eigenlijk precies hetzelfde. Als een deeltje door een detector heen beweegt laat het daar ook een karakteristieke afdruk achter, net als die voetstappen in de sneeuw. Het gaat hier te ver om de details te bespreken, maar door deeltjes door verschillende detectielagen te laten bewegen, die elk een specifieke eigenschap vastleggen, kun je van alle deeltjes hun type, richting en energie vastleggen. En hoewel het strikt genomen niet klopt is het prima om er over na te denken als een ‘foto’ van de botsing. Dat doe ik zelf ook. Maar het is wel echt ingewikkeld. Er zijn een miljard botsingen per seconde en in elke botsing zijn vaak wel honderd(en) deeltjes. Ontzettend moeilijk dus, … maar niet onmogelijk als je samenwerkt met slimme en creatieve mensen van over de hele wereld. Veel van de nieuwe deeltjes die gemaakt worden in de botsing leven veel en veel te kort om onze detector te bereiken. Het einde van het leven klinkt dramatischer dan het is, maar deeltjes kunnen uit elkaar vallen in een mix van andere deeltjes. Om toch iets te leren over die wereld die al lang verdwenen is, gebruiken we dezelfde truc die paleontologen gebruiken. De wereld die zij bestuderen, die van dinosauriërs, is ook al 65 miljoen jaar geleden verdwenen en toch verschijnen er wekelijks boeken over verschillende soorten dino’s en hun eigenschappen. Dat kan omdat er dingen bewaard zijn gebleven, hun botten, en door die weer in elkaar te zetten kunnen ze die wereld reconstrueren. Een super slim idee en wij deeltjesfysici doen hetzelfde. Wij gebruiken de ‘stabiele’ deeltjes (de deeltjes die lang genoeg leven om ze te zien in onze detectoren) om te herleiden wat er in de botsing gebeurd is. Hebben we nou wat aan die deeltjesversnellers en detectoren of zijn het speeltjes van jullie wetenschappers? Zeker! Er zijn zelfs duizenden deeltjesversnellers in de wereld. Bijvoorbeeld in ziekenhuizen. Helaas kent bijna iedereen wel iemand die kanker heeft en bestraald wordt, maar bijna niemand weet waarmee mensen dan eigenlijk bestraald worden. Meestal zijn röntgenstralen met heel veel energie het meest geschikt en om die te maken heb je een deeltjesversneller nodig. Net als bij de productie van ‘gewone’ röntgenstralen komt de straling vrij als deeltjes versneld worden en op een plaatje worden geschoten. Zonder deeltjesversneller geen kanker-bestraling dus, en daarom heeft elk groot ziekenhuis deeltjesversnellers. En de detectoren zelf dan? Laat ik ook daar weer een toepassing in het ziekenhuis pakken. We kennen allemaal de röntgenfoto. De straling zelf zie je niet, maar die gaat wel dwars door je spieren en vet heen, maar niet door je botten. Als je het licht opvangt aan de andere kant van je lijf kun je op de foto daarom heel goed de botten zien. En dus zien of er een breuk is. Of niet. Als je een scherpere foto wil kun je meer licht gebruiken, maar dat is niet zonder gevaar. Het is niet voor niks dat iedereen de kamer uitgaat in het ziekenhuis of bij de tandarts als er een röntgenfoto gemaakt wordt. De straling richt namelijk veel schade aan op zijn weg door je lichaam. Een andere oplossing om een betere foto te maken is door de fotografische plaat zelf beter te maken. Dit is net zoiets als het vergroten van het aantal pixels bij een digitale camera. En elke verbetering in de gevoeligheid zorgt ervoor dat met dezelfde hoeveelheid straling een betere foto gemaakt kan worden. Voor een enkele foto zal dat niet veel uitmaken, maar voor een zogenaamde ct-scan (dat is ongeveer het equivalent van tweehonderd foto’s tegelijk) betekent zou zoiets een enorme gezondheidswinst voor patiënten kunnen betekenen. Net als aan het begin van de twintigste eeuw toen men alle atomen rangschikte en in detail onderzocht om uiteindelijk te ontdekken dat ze allemaal opgebouwd waren uit dezelfde drie bouwstenen gebeurde hier eigenlijk weer hetzelfde. In deeltjesbotsingen was er een hele dierentuin aan deeltjes tevoorschijn gekomen, maar toen het stof neerdaalde bleken al die deeltjes ook weer combinaties te zijn van maar aan handvol elementaire bouwstenen. Het proton en neutron bleken bijvoorbeeld opgebouwd te zijn uit zogenaamde up-quarks en down-quarks. Samen met het elektron waren dat de bouwstenen van alle stabiele materie. Ze vormen samen de zogenaamde eerste familie, maar er hoort nog een vierde familielid bij: het neutrino. Een deeltje waar ik verder niet veel over zal zeggen, maar dat geproduceerd wordt in radioactieve processen en dat bekend staat als ‘spookdeeltje’ omdat het zonder probleem dwars door de aarde heen kan vliegen. Belangrijker is om te vertellen dat er van elk van deze vier deeltjes twee kopieën bestonden, twee kopieën met meer massa’s en die bovendien maar kort leefden. Dat gekke muon bijvoorbeeld, het zwaardere zusje van het elektron waar de hele zoektocht mee begon, heeft in tegenstelling tot het elektron niet het eeuwige leven, maar leeft maar een miljoenste seconde. Uiteindelijk bleken er 12 elementaire deeltjes te zijn, netjes gerangschikt in drie families van elk vier deeltjes. Deze deeltjes, samen met de regels over de manier waarop ze met elkaar communiceren (elkaar aantrekken, afstoten of in elkaar versmelten) vormen samen het beroemde Standaard Model. Dit Standaard Model vormt op dit moment het fundament van onze kennis over de opbouw van alle materie. Er is géén diepere laag. Dit is het. Het is een fantastisch en complex wiskundig bouwwerk waarmee we bijna alle deeltjes-fenomenen die we zien kunnen verklaren, maar tegelijkertijd zijn er ook frustrerende open vragen en mysteries. Waarom zijn er bijvoorbeeld drie families en niet gewoon één en waarom hebben de deeltjes zulke enorm verschillende massa en lukt het niet om de zwaartekracht een plekje te geven in de theorie? Dat allemaal in de volgende afleveringen. We wandelen nu in grote stappen door het bos heen recht op het doel af, maar voor we afsluiten wil ik nog even een klein zijpaadje inslaan en iets zeggen over iets is dat als totale science-fiction en magie bekend staat onder het brede publiek terwijl het voor deeltjesfysici de gewoonste zaak is van de wereld is: anti-materie. Komt ie! Toen de quantummechanica nog in de kinderschoenen stond bleek het lastig om de nieuwe theorie te combineren met de relativiteitstheorie. Enorm frustrerend, maar uiteindelijk lukte het de Engelsman Paul Dirac. Hij vond een formule die hem in staat stelde de bewegingen van het elektron in die rare quantumwereld te voorspellen. Het werkte allemaal fantastisch, maar zijn nieuwe theorie voorspelde dat er ook zoiets als een anti-elektron zou moeten bestaan (een positron voor de liefhebbers). Een deeltje dat even zwaar zou moeten zijn als een elektron, maar dan positief geladen. Hoewel er op zich niks mis is met het voorspellen van een nieuw deeltje (doe wat je niet laten kan), maar het leek naïef, omdat er geen en-kel experiment was dat zo’n anti-elektron had gezien. Gelukkig voor Dirac werd het positron vrij snel na zijn voorspelling ontdekt in het onderzoek naar kosmische stralen. En weer door Carl Anderson, de man die ook het muon deeltje had ontdekt. ‘Some guys have all the luck’. Later zou blijken dat inderdaad elk deeltje zijn eigen anti-deeltje heeft en het vormt daarmee ‘gewoon’ de helft van de bouwstenen van het Standaard Model. Rondom antimaterie hangt een zweem van mysterie. Er is op aarde namelijk alleen materie en geen antimaterie en ook in de rest van het heelal lijkt het niet voor te komen. HOE kan dat nou? Een van de bijzondere aspecten van deeltjes en antideeltjes is ook dat ze kunnen samensmelten als ze elkaar tegenkomen, maar dat geeft gelijk de vraag waarom er dan überhaupt nog materie over is in het heelal als ze bij de oerknal in even grote hoeveelheden gemaakt zijn? Het mechanisme dat deze asymmetrie veroorzaakt is nog steeds een van de grootste raadsels van de deeltjesfysica. Voor jou als luisteraar is het vast krankzinnig om te beseffen dat iets zo exotisch als anti-materie, iets waar je misschien tot 5 minuten geleden nog nooit van had gehoord, toch een toepassing heeft gevonden. Dat is zo namelijk. Het is niet in de vorm van een bom zoals in het boek het Bernini-mysterie van Dan Brown, maar juist om levens te redden in het ziekenhuis. Daar worden de twee lichtflitsen die gemaakt worden als een positron een elektron elkaar tegenkomen gebruikt om tumoren te lokaliseren. Laat me uitleggen hoe we dat doen. Bij patiënten wordt eerst een radioactieve stof geïnjecteerd die heel slim aan een (suiker)molecuul wordt gehangen zodat het zich via het bloed naar de tumor toe beweegt. Er wordt een speciaal atoom gebruikt dat positronen uitstraalt als straling, antimaterie dus. En dat positron zal, zodra het vrijkomt, vrijwel gelijk met een elektron samensmelten omdat die immers overal in het lichaam zitten. Daarbij worden dan twee lichtdeeltjes gemaakt die in tegenovergestelde richtingen dwars door het lichaam naar buiten schieten. En die kun je zien met een fotocamera. Als je dus ongeveer tegelijkertijd twee lichtdeeltjes ziet die in tegengestelde richting uit het lichaam komen, dan weet je dat er op de lijn tussen de twee camera’s een positron en een elektron zijn samengesmolten .. en dat zich op die lijn dus de tumor bevond. Als je ook nog nauwkeurig de aankomsttijd van de flitsen meet dan weet je ook waar de tumor precies zit. Omdat er bij de injectie een groot aantal radioactieve atomen wordt gebruikt en de lichtdeeltjes steeds in een willekeurige richting uitgezonden worden dan kunnen we zo een driedimensionaal beeld van de tumor maken. Antimaterie in ziekenhuizen om tumoren op te sporen; wie had dat ooit gedacht! En sterker nog, ik heb vandaag ook verteld dat als je een tumor blijkt te hebben we daarna weer een deeltjesversnellers nodig hebben om de tumoren te bestralen en te vernietigen. Deeltjesfysica redt levens! Met alle elementaire deeltjes en de krachten die vertellen hoe ze bewegen en met elkaar communiceren hebben we het fundament van de natuur gevonden: het Standaard Model. Tegelijk zijn er nog grote open vragen. Een van de grootste tekortkomingen was dat deeltjes in de theorie geen massa konden hebben. En dat is jammer, want a) deeltjes hebben wel massa en b) als deeltjes geen massa hebben zullen ze niet samenklonteren tot sterren en planeten en waren wij er dus ook nooit geweest. Een mogelijke oplossing, bedacht door een jonge Britse theoretisch natuurkundige, was de start van een zoektocht die 50 jaar zou duren. Daarover meer in de volgende aflevering.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

My second interview with Fil Aronshtein, co-founder of Dirac.

Please note that both the video and the audio of this program are archived on our Substack page, doctorspace.substack.com. I strongly recommend you watch the video version.We introduced Dr. Ersilia Vaudo, an astrophysicist and author from Paris with a 30-year career at ESA, including roles overseeing relations with NASA. He mentions her book and asks about her background in space and her motivation for writing her book, “The Story of Astrophysics in Five Revolutions.” Our guest started us of by sharing her journey into physics and astrophysics, describing how her early interest in science was nurtured by her family and experiences in nature. She explained that her decision to study physics was motivated by a desire to understand the universe and feel empowered by knowledge. Vaudo emphasizes the transformative nature of studying physics, as it challenges one's preconceptions and experiences. When asked if she saw the Moon landings live on TV, she expressed more interest in the scientific aspects of space exploration rather than the adventure itself. Vaudo also discussed her book on astrophysics, which aims to share the wonder of the field with a general audience by connecting historical events and scientific revolutions.Our discussion covered several key developments in cosmology and physics. Vaudo outlines five major revolutions (her book title) in our understanding of the universe: Newton's unification of terrestrial and celestial physics through gravity, Einstein's special and general relativity theories, Hubble's discovery of the expanding universe, and Dirac's contributions to quantum mechanics. I mentioned a recent theory challenge on a current Hotel Mars program to the Big Bang model, suggesting we might be inside a black hole. Vaudo emphasizes the importance of keeping an open mind to new theories while maintaining a focus on experimental evidence.Vaudo discussed the five revolutions covered in his book, ending with the discovery of antimatter. She explained that modern scientific revolutions often involve teams rather than individual scientists, making storytelling today more challenging. John Jossy asked why dark matter and dark energy weren't included as a sixth revolution. Vaudo said that these topics were addressed in the book's final chapter, describing them as mysteries still being explored. She emphasized that dark energy, in particular, remains a fascinating enigma in our understanding of the universe.Vaudo discussed the challenges in science education and research, highlighting the growing impatience for quick answers and the increasing difficulty in generating new ideas. She emphasized the importance of mathematics as a critical thinking tool and suggests starting math education early to reduce anxiety. Vaudo shares his experience with an association that brings hands-on science experiments to disadvantaged areas, noting how this approach sparks curiosity and engagement in children. She also stressed the need for more experiential learning in primary schools to foster interest in science and mathematics.Dr. Vaudo discussed the influence of Galileo on the history of science and astronomy. She highlighted Galileo's contributions, including his use of the telescope, his intuition about the speed of light, and his pioneering work on relativity. Vaudo emphasized Galileo's bravery in challenging consensus and risking resistance to bring new ideas forward. The conversation touched on topics such as inflation theory, dark energy, and the role of funding in scientific exploration. Vaudo mentioned the importance of investing in science, noting that even basic research can lead to significant practical benefits in the future.Special thanks to our sponsors:Northrup Grumman, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Helix Space in Luxembourg, Celestis Memorial Spaceflights, Astrox Corporation, Dr. Haym Benaroya of Rutgers University, The Space Settlement Progress Blog by John Jossy, The Atlantis Project, and Artless EntertainmentOur Toll Free Line for Live Broadcasts: 1-866-687-7223For real time program participation, email Dr. Space at: drspace@thespaceshow.comThe Space Show is a non-profit 501C3 through its parent, One Giant Leap Foundation, Inc. To donate via Pay Pal, use:To donate with Zelle, use the email address: david@onegiantleapfoundation.org.If you prefer donating with a check, please make the check payable to One Giant Leap Foundation and mail to:One Giant Leap Foundation, 11035 Lavender Hill Drive Ste. 160-306 Las Vegas, NV 89135Upcoming Programs:Broadcast 4388: Sunday, June 22: 12 PM PDT; Dr. Karen Lloyd re her book “Intra-terrestrials: Discovering the Strangest Life on Earth”Broadcast 4389: Dr. Karen Lloyd | Sunday 22 Jun 2025 1200PM PTGuests: Dr. Karen LloydDr. Lloyd talks about her new book, "intra-Terrestrials: Discovering the strangest life on Earth."Broadcast 4390: Dr. Saralyn Mark | Tuesday 24 Jun 2025 700PM PTGuests: Dr. Saralyn MarkDr. Mark on advancing human spaceflight and health here on Earth and in space.Broadcast 4391: Hotel Mars with Doug Messier | Wednesday 25 Jun 2025 930AM PTGuests: John Batchelor, Dr. David Livingston, Douglas MessierDoug plans on addressing all things SpaceX, Starship and Elon Musk.Broadcast 4392: BY ZOOM: Dr. Ersilia Vaudo from France | Thursday 26 Jun 2025 930AM PTGuests: Dr. Ersilia VaudoDr. Vaudo will highlight her new book, The Story of Astrophysics in Five Revolutions.Broadcast 4393: Casey Dreier of The Planetary Society | Friday 27 Jun 2025 930AM PTGuests: Casey DreierCasey address the skinny budget for NASA science and space project cutbacksBroadcast 4394: Dr. Young Bay | Sunday 29 Jun 2025 1200PM PTGuests: Dr. Young K. BaeDr. Bay addresses the development of fusion energyLive Streaming is at https://www.thespaceshow.com/content/listen-live with the following live streaming sites:Stream Guys https://player.streamguys.com/thespaceshow/sgplayer3/player.php#FastServhttps://ic2646c302.fastserv.com/stream Get full access to The Space Show-One Giant Leap Foundation at doctorspace.substack.com/subscribe

Gabriella Greison"Dove tutto può accadere"Dirac, la fisica quantistica, l'arte, i sogni impossibili e altre cose cosìMondadori Editorewww.mondadori.itCircolo dei LettoriVenerdì 4 luglio 2025, ore 18:00Salotto Letterario, Via Principessa Clotilde 10, MoncalieriC'è un filo invisibile che unisce tutto?Dove l'acqua è più blu | nell'ambito di Moncalieri d'estate, con il sostegno di Smat | Con Gabriella Greison“Con il principio di indeterminazione di Heisenberg diciamo che non tutto si può misurare, con l'equazione di Schrödinger possiamo affermare che non c'è nulla di definitivo nelle cose che non vediamo, con il principio di esclusione di Pauli possiamo sostenere che tutto è fatto di vuoto, con l'equazione di Dirac riempiamo quel vuoto e diciamo che il mondo è tutto ciò che accade e anche tutto ciò che può accadere. L'insegnamento ultimo che mi hanno lasciato è uno solo: non voglio niente di meno del massimo della luce.” Prendendo a prestito la voce della figlia Monica, Gabriella Greison racconta la bizzarra esistenza e le ancor più straordinarie intuizioni di uno dei padri della fisica quantistica, Paul Dirac, fisico premio Nobel 1933. Dirac è stato un fisico geniale e un uomo strambo e meticoloso, costantemente impegnato a elaborare formule, fra cui quella meraviglia grazie alla quale è entrato nella storia della scienza e che lo indica sulla lapide nell'Abbazia di Westminster a fianco di Isaac Newton: i? + ?? = m?. Nel suo contributo fondamentale al progresso dell'umanità, Dirac ha messo in connessione la meccanica quantistica con la relatività ristretta, scrivendo la formula che spiega l'Universo e che predice l'esistenza dell'antimateria, quindi l'esistenza in natura di coppie, come l'elettrone e il positrone, che fanno tandem fisso in ogni mondo e in ogni pianeta, stupefacente metafora dell'unione degli opposti. Dove tutto può accadere intreccia l'esistenza e il lavoro scientifico di Dirac con l'adesione alla rivoluzione culturale della scena inglese degli anni Sessanta della figlia Monica, che ha “lasciato l'Università per andare a scoprire i Beatles”, mescolando fisica quantistica, musica, bellezza e Kandinskij. Un viaggio originale e sorprendente in cui Greison riesce da par suo a unire scienza e arte, invitandoci a capire che ogni sogno, anche il più impossibile, è realizzabile: lo certifica l'equazione di Dirac.Gabriella Greison è fisica, scrittrice, attrice, divulgatrice scientifica e soprattutto narratrice di meccanica quantistica. Laureata in Fisica nucleare all'Università Statale di Milano, ha lavorato, tra l'altro, all'École Polytechnique di Parigi. Definita dal “Corriere della Sera” e dalla stampa americana “la rockstar della fisica”, è autrice di tredici libri di divulgazione sulla fisica quantistica e per Mondadori ha pubblicato Ucciderò il gatto di Schrödinger, Guida quantistica per anticonformisti, La donna della bomba atomica. Da ogni libro ha tratto un monologo o uno spettacolo teatrale. Ha ideato e condotto podcast, programmi radio e tv, tra cui “Pillole di fisica” sulla Rai, “Il favoloso mondo della fisica quantistica” su Mediaset, “La teoria di tutte” su Sky Italia.IL POSTO DELLE PAROLE ascoltare fa pensarewww.ilpostodelleparole.itDiventa un supporter di questo podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/il-posto-delle-parole--1487855/support.

Home Theater News Review Podcast Season 3, Episode 10 links and notes:Join our home theater community at AVNirvana.com. Build relationships with other Home Theater Enthusiasts and talk shop about speakers, processors, projectors, TVs, and more. We look forward to having you join our community!00:01 Intro01:23 Show Sponsor: madVR Labs02:13 Show Sponsor: SVS02:59 Time Machine Segment: First Streaming Movie05:48 Klipsch Giveaway Announcement07:38 Begin Lightning News: Sony Projectors Now Selling EU/UK08:32 Netflix Tudum Announcement - Stranger Things 509:39 Dirac, Denon Home Amp Marantz M110:24 Skullcandy Aviator 900 ANC 11:31 AVPro Acquires RTI13:30 Samsung OLED Sales14:19 Ascendo Elephant Conservation, Infrasonic Bass15:38 Harman Sues Klipsch, Party Speaker, Gig XXL18:21 Check in with Michael Scott, AV Nirvana Disc Reviews20:09 New to Disc this Week21:11 Kaleidescape Content Update22:20 What's Hot and What's Cold25:57 Disc and Gear DealsThis episode is sponsored by SVS: Visit them SVSound.comThis episode is also sponsored by madVR Labs: Visit them at https://madvrenvy.com/Enter Klipsch/Jurassic World Rebirth Giveaway: https://www.avnirvana.com/threads/klipsch-unveils-jurassic-world-sweepstakes-featuring-limited-edition-speakers-you-can-enter-and-win.15187/Strata-gee.com article about JBL and Klipsch: https://www.strata-gee.com/harman-hits-voxx-intl-klipsch-group-with-major-13-count-lawsuit/*DISC DEALS* 2 for $16 Blu-ray and 2 for $22 4K Disc - www.gruv.com*Gear Deal of the Week*Apple AirPods Pro 2 (Amazon): https://amzn.to/43HgdRWApple AirPods Pro 2 (Best Buy): https://fave.co/4dXKLSJ*Forum Links*-For the latest disc reviews, go to: https://www.avnirvana.com/forums/blu-ray-media-reviews.12/-For the latest news, including stories covered in this episode:https://www.avnirvana.com/forums/av-industry-news.6/*PODCAST LINKS*-Subscribe to the podcast on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/2XZc1WVL7gGazxGLiURw0ESubscribe to the podcast on Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/av-nirvanas-home-theater-news-review-htnr/id1715862636On this episode of HTNR, we have big stories to dig through from the likes of Sony, Denon, Marantz, Netflix, Skullcandy, AVPro, Hisense, Samsung, Harman, and Ascendo. We also discuss a notable lawsuit between two big players in the industry – Harman/JBL and Voxx/Klipsch – and I'll tell you how you can win a pair of limited edition Klipsch The Sevens powered speakers.We talk disc news - checkout what Michael Scott has been up to in the world of disc reviews… and if you're a collector, I've got a lead on a disc sale at GRUV.Please Note: AV Nirvana may make a small commission from affiliate links... thanks for your support!Keywords: iOS 18.5, energy, PS5, XBOX news, Disney Plus, Game of Thrones, Starlink, Black Mirror, Disney Movies, home theater tv, home cinema tv, home audio, surround sound, home theater, surround sound system, home theater system, home theater seat, home sound system, home audio systems, best tv soundbars, surround system for home, home cinemas, inflatable cinema screen, best surround sound system, best projector for home theater, best home cinema projector, good surround sound system, wireless surround sound, bose home theater system, home projector, wireless surround sound system, bose home theater, home cinema projector, bose home cinema, home theater news, SVS Ultra Evolution, SVS 4000 series subwoofers, madVR Envy Core, madVR Envy Extreme, HDR tone mapping, Kaleidescape 4K player, Dolby Vision home theater, DTS:X support, Dirac Live ART, Dirac Active Room Treatment, Denon Dirac upgrade, Marantz AV 20, Marantz AMP 20, HDMI 2.1 receiver, Trinnov headquarters, THX home audio, Apple TV Dolby Atmos sync, Dune Prophecy 4K, A Knight's Tale Dolby Atmos, Bass Hunters Trinnov, best war movies Blu-ray, JVC NZ9 projector deal, JVC Frame Adapt HDR, AV Nirvana podcast, multi channel home theatre, bose surround sound system,

Welcome to a special episode of Workforce 4.0 as your host, Ann Wyatt shares conversations from behind the scenes of the 2025 Automate Show in Detroit, MI. This conversation explores the critical themes of workforce development in manufacturing, the impact of technology and automation, gender dynamics in STEM fields, and the future of work. Ann Wyatt meets this week's special guests to discuss the importance of training and education in bridging the skills gap, the role of technological innovations in enhancing manufacturing processes, and the need for greater female representation in engineering and technical roles. The dialogue emphasizes the shift towards a more human-centric approach in manufacturing, where robots handle dangerous and tedious tasks, allowing humans to focus on creativity and problem-solving.In This Episode:00:00: Introduction to This Week's Episode01:43: Dirac's New Partnerships and Industry Focus03:11: Empowering the Frontline Workforce with Technology07:20: Introduction to Light Guide AR/VR Solution07:46: Demonstration of AR/VR in Manufacturing11:56: Benefits of AR/VR for Operators12:16: Introduction to Fanuc's Workforce Development Initiatives14:19: Opportunities in Manufacturing Careers16:39: The Importance of Hands-On Learning19:38: Gender Dynamics in STEM Fields20:48: The Future of Work and Automation26:00: Wrap-Up of Automate Show Interviews26:51: Looking Ahead to Season NineMore About This Week's Guests:Filip Aronshtein, Dirac: A previous Workforce 4.0 alum, Filip Aronshtein is an avid believer that the foundation of the West was forged upon its capacity to build. And as the Founder of Dirac, Fil is a firm believer that empowering engineers with digital tools and combining digital work instructions with CAD will get us closer to building. To learn more about Fil and his mission, connect with him here.Marina Fietsam, LightGuide: Marina is currently serving as an Account Executive for LightGuide. LightGuide's CEO, Paul Ryznar was also featured on the podcast as part of Season 5 Episode 5. You can revisit Paul's full episode on his passion for people and technology here. Joe Baldiga, Fanuc: Joe currently serves as the National Account Manager for CNC Education and Workforce Development with FANUC. To learn more about Joe and the educational solutions provided by Fanuc, connect with Joe here. The Future of Work (and this Episode) Is Brought To You By Secchi:Secchi is a revolutionary workforce engagement tool created for organizations to make data-driven frontline decisions in real-time. By measuring and combining multiple people-related lead indicators, Secchi provides in-the-moment visibility into individual frontline employee performance, team performance, engagement/turnover risks, and positive employee behaviors all while removing the traditional barriers of administrative burden on leaders. To learn more about Secchi, check them out here.

Durante tres días, entre el 28 y el 30 de mayo de 2025, se reunió parte importante del Ecosistema del Libro y la Lectura de Chile en el Centro Cultural Estación Mapocho para escuchar a especialistas de alto nivel sobre los desafíos que implica ser el País Invitado de Honor en la Feria del Libro de Frankfurt 2027. Marifé Boix-García, vicepresidenta de la Feria del Libro de Frankfurt, junto a las autoridades culturales chilenas organizaron CONTEC, por segunda vez en suelo nacional. Se trata de una marca de la Frankfurter Buchmesse que persigue crear un espacio de reflexión sobre los retos y oportunidades de la industria de contenidos. CONTEC es un punto de encuentro para los profesionales de la edición y de las industrias culturales y creativas, un espacio para intercambiar experiencias y generar sinergias entre los actores y un centro para explorar nuevas oportunidades de negocio. Con invitados internacionales de la talla de Ricardo Costa de MVB quien expuso sobre Metadatos para la inteligencia empresarial y Rob Clements de INGRAM, uno de los mayores editores de impresión a demanda en el mundo, fueron parte de esta gran posibilidad de dialogar sobre los desafíos actuales y últimas tendencias del sector, frente una audiencia especializada Desde el plano nacional, la Secretaria Ejecutiva del Consejo Nacional del Libro y la lectura, Aracelly Rojas, presentó una caracterización del ecosistema editorial chileno y expuso alguno de los desafíos que se avecinan a nivel institucional y de industria. Su presentación permitió contextualizar y relevar las diversas iniciativas que se desarrollarán en el encuentro. Asimismo, la encargada de Literatura y Patrimonio de DIRAC, Alejandra Chacoff conversó con la periodista y presidenta de SADEL, Vivian Lavín sobre el Programa de Traducción a cargo del Ministerio de RREE. Frente a la pregunta de si este programa de traducción ha logrado ser conocido y aprovechado por los agentes literarios y editores internacionales, Alejandra Chacoff respondió: “El Programa se ha dado a conocer de manera paulatina, lo que se ha visto reflejado en el aumento de las postulaciones y las consultas de editoriales y traductores/as extranjeros. DIRAC considera fundamental la difusión de las obras traducidas y su inserción en espacios estratégicos de la escena literaria internacional, por lo cual muchas editoriales extranjeras se han beneficiado también con el apoyo para la promoción de los libros. Esto ha permitido la organización de giras literarias y la participación de los autores en diferentes instancias, como ferias del libro y festivales de poesía, por ejemplo. Dichas acciones son organizadas por DIRAC y cuentan con el apoyo del Ministerio de las Culturas, las Artes y el Patrimonio (MINCAP), en coordinación con las editoriales internacionales, los traductores y nuestras misiones en el exterior”. ¿Qué balance pueden hacer de este programa hasta el momento? “El balance es positivo y aunque tenemos muchos desafíos pendientes, el principal es lograr que el Programa tenga una asignación presupuestaria propia. Esto permitiría a este Programa de Traducción proyectarse mediante estrategias de difusión en áreas geográficas prioritarias o menos exploradas, así como incorporación de nuevas líneas, entre otras. Nuestra participación en Frankfurt 2027 es una oportunidad para lograr dicho objetivo. Aquí los agentes literarios, editores, traductores y nuestras misiones en el exterior, cumplen un papel importante en la difusión del Programa. Este puede ser crucial a la hora de negociar la venta de derechos”. ¿Qué cambios e innovaciones se han ido incorporando a esta instancia para preparar a Chile como País Invitado de Honor en Frankfurt 2027? ¿ Habrá más fondos disponibles y otros cambios que permitan consolidarlo más? Más allá de Frankfurt 2027, hemos ido incorporando diversos cambios e innovaciones que tienen como objetivo hacer más accesible la postulación de las editoriales extranjeras. Este trabajo ha surgido a partir de nuestra propia experiencia, así como de la observación de los programas de otros países, y también por sugerencias de los propios editores y/o agentes literarios. Algunos cambios significativos que podemos mencionar son que, desde hace un par de años, la subvención se extendió a la impresión con el fin de impulsar la publicación de libros ilustrados y novela gráfica. Y en esa misma línea, ahora es posible postular al programa un libro en el que comparten autoría un chileno y un extranjero. Esto es especialmente importante, pues en el libro ilustrado y la novela gráfica observamos que es habitual este tipo de colaboración.Con el objetivo de reducir la cantidad de proyectos que no superan la etapa de admisibilidad hemos implementado que la documentación obligatoria pueda presentarse en español o inglés. Del mismo modo, y con miras a Frankfurt 2027, a la convocatoria habitual se sumó una especial para lengua alemana, para proyectos a ejecutarse en 2026. La novedad además es que esta convocatoria viene con el nuevo nombre del Programa, Translating Chile, y la imagen gráfica diseñada por la Fundación Imagen de Chile. Asimismo, está en preparación un catálogo digital, bilingüe español-inglés, con todos los libros publicados con el Programa, en el período 2024-2025, que estará alojado en el sitio web de DIRAC. Estimamos que este catálogo puede ser de gran utilidad como material de consulta para las editoriales internacionales. Asimismo, se está diseñando el sitio del Programa, de manera tal de sistematizar la información con el uso de un buscadores que distinga idiomas, títulos, autores, etc. Este sitio incluirá toda la información asociada al programa, como noticias, lanzamientos de libros, entrevistas y premios. Una gran noticia es que la convocatoria 2025 tuvo un aumento de un 100% de su presupuesto, y confiamos en un importante incremento en los próximos dos años”. ¿Qué objetivos se han planteado como DIRAC para Frankfurt 2025 en el camino hacia 2027? “Uno de los objetivos principales es difundir el Programa Translating Chile con el propósito de incrementar el número de traducciones, especialmente en idioma alemán. Esta instancia será clave para la convocatoria 2026 y, como señalé antes, los traductores, agentes literarios y editoriales chilenas presentes en Frankfurt tendrán un papel crucial para lograr este objetivo. En Frankfurt 2025, presentaremos dos actividades en el International Stage. Destacaremos uno de los últimos libros publicados gracias a la Convocatoria 2025 y otra con el ganador del Premio Anna Seghers 2025 y el Presidente de la Fundación del mismo nombre, que en los últimos años ha destacado a varios autores nacionales, como Alia Trabucco y Lina Meruane, entre otros. También Chile tendrá una participación destacada en el Frankfurt Kids Conference, cuyo lema este año es “Children's Books in a Fragile World”. "Proyecto financiado por el Fondo Nacional de Fomento del Libro y la Lectura, CONVOCATORIA 2025 del Ministerio de las Culturas, las Artes y el Patrimonio"

Durante tres días, entre el 28 y el 30 de mayo de 2025, se reunió parte importante del Ecosistema del Libro y la Lectura de Chile en el Centro Cultural Estación Mapocho para escuchar a especialistas de alto nivel sobre los desafíos que implica ser el País Invitado de Honor en la Feria del Libro de Frankfurt 2027. Marifé Boix-García, vicepresidenta de la Feria del Libro de Frankfurt, junto a las autoridades culturales chilenas organizaron CONTEC, por segunda vez en suelo nacional. Se trata de una marca de la Frankfurter Buchmesse que persigue crear un espacio de reflexión sobre los retos y oportunidades de la industria de contenidos. CONTEC es un punto de encuentro para los profesionales de la edición y de las industrias culturales y creativas, un espacio para intercambiar experiencias y generar sinergias entre los actores y un centro para explorar nuevas oportunidades de negocio. Con invitados internacionales de la talla de Ricardo Costa de MVB quien expuso sobre Metadatos para la inteligencia empresarial y Rob Clements de INGRAM, uno de los mayores editores de impresión a demanda en el mundo, fueron parte de esta gran posibilidad de dialogar sobre los desafíos actuales y últimas tendencias del sector, frente una audiencia especializada Desde el plano nacional, la Secretaria Ejecutiva del Consejo Nacional del Libro y la lectura, Aracelly Rojas, presentó una caracterización del ecosistema editorial chileno y expuso alguno de los desafíos que se avecinan a nivel institucional y de industria. Su presentación permitió contextualizar y relevar las diversas iniciativas que se desarrollarán en el encuentro. Asimismo, la encargada de Literatura y Patrimonio de DIRAC, Alejandra Chacoff conversó con la periodista y presidenta de SADEL, Vivian Lavín sobre el Programa de Traducción a cargo del Ministerio de RREE. Frente a la pregunta de si este programa de traducción ha logrado ser conocido y aprovechado por los agentes literarios y editores internacionales, Alejandra Chacoff respondió: “El Programa se ha dado a conocer de manera paulatina, lo que se ha visto reflejado en el aumento de las postulaciones y las consultas de editoriales y traductores/as extranjeros. DIRAC considera fundamental la difusión de las obras traducidas y su inserción en espacios estratégicos de la escena literaria internacional, por lo cual muchas editoriales extranjeras se han beneficiado también con el apoyo para la promoción de los libros. Esto ha permitido la organización de giras literarias y la participación de los autores en diferentes instancias, como ferias del libro y festivales de poesía, por ejemplo. Dichas acciones son organizadas por DIRAC y cuentan con el apoyo del Ministerio de las Culturas, las Artes y el Patrimonio (MINCAP), en coordinación con las editoriales internacionales, los traductores y nuestras misiones en el exterior”. ¿Qué balance pueden hacer de este programa hasta el momento? “El balance es positivo y aunque tenemos muchos desafíos pendientes, el principal es lograr que el Programa tenga una asignación presupuestaria propia. Esto permitiría a este Programa de Traducción proyectarse mediante estrategias de difusión en áreas geográficas prioritarias o menos exploradas, así como incorporación de nuevas líneas, entre otras. Nuestra participación en Frankfurt 2027 es una oportunidad para lograr dicho objetivo. Aquí los agentes literarios, editores, traductores y nuestras misiones en el exterior, cumplen un papel importante en la difusión del Programa. Este puede ser crucial a la hora de negociar la venta de derechos”. ¿Qué cambios e innovaciones se han ido incorporando a esta instancia para preparar a Chile como País Invitado de Honor en Frankfurt 2027? ¿ Habrá más fondos disponibles y otros cambios que permitan consolidarlo más? Más allá de Frankfurt 2027, hemos ido incorporando diversos cambios e innovaciones que tienen como objetivo hacer más accesible la postulación de las editoriales extranjeras. Este trabajo ha surgido a partir de nuestra propia experiencia, así como de la observación de los programas de otros países, y también por sugerencias de los propios editores y/o agentes literarios. Algunos cambios significativos que podemos mencionar son que, desde hace un par de años, la subvención se extendió a la impresión con el fin de impulsar la publicación de libros ilustrados y novela gráfica. Y en esa misma línea, ahora es posible postular al programa un libro en el que comparten autoría un chileno y un extranjero. Esto es especialmente importante, pues en el libro ilustrado y la novela gráfica observamos que es habitual este tipo de colaboración.Con el objetivo de reducir la cantidad de proyectos que no superan la etapa de admisibilidad hemos implementado que la documentación obligatoria pueda presentarse en español o inglés. Del mismo modo, y con miras a Frankfurt 2027, a la convocatoria habitual se sumó una especial para lengua alemana, para proyectos a ejecutarse en 2026. La novedad además es que esta convocatoria viene con el nuevo nombre del Programa, Translating Chile, y la imagen gráfica diseñada por la Fundación Imagen de Chile. Asimismo, está en preparación un catálogo digital, bilingüe español-inglés, con todos los libros publicados con el Programa, en el período 2024-2025, que estará alojado en el sitio web de DIRAC. Estimamos que este catálogo puede ser de gran utilidad como material de consulta para las editoriales internacionales. Asimismo, se está diseñando el sitio del Programa, de manera tal de sistematizar la información con el uso de un buscadores que distinga idiomas, títulos, autores, etc. Este sitio incluirá toda la información asociada al programa, como noticias, lanzamientos de libros, entrevistas y premios. Una gran noticia es que la convocatoria 2025 tuvo un aumento de un 100% de su presupuesto, y confiamos en un importante incremento en los próximos dos años”. ¿Qué objetivos se han planteado como DIRAC para Frankfurt 2025 en el camino hacia 2027? “Uno de los objetivos principales es difundir el Programa Translating Chile con el propósito de incrementar el número de traducciones, especialmente en idioma alemán. Esta instancia será clave para la convocatoria 2026 y, como señalé antes, los traductores, agentes literarios y editoriales chilenas presentes en Frankfurt tendrán un papel crucial para lograr este objetivo. En Frankfurt 2025, presentaremos dos actividades en el International Stage. Destacaremos uno de los últimos libros publicados gracias a la Convocatoria 2025 y otra con el ganador del Premio Anna Seghers 2025 y el Presidente de la Fundación del mismo nombre, que en los últimos años ha destacado a varios autores nacionales, como Alia Trabucco y Lina Meruane, entre otros. También Chile tendrá una participación destacada en el Frankfurt Kids Conference, cuyo lema este año es “Children's Books in a Fragile World”. "Proyecto financiado por el Fondo Nacional de Fomento del Libro y la Lectura, CONVOCATORIA 2025 del Ministerio de las Culturas, las Artes y el Patrimonio"

Home Theater News Review Podcast Season 3, Episode 9 links and notes:Join our home theater community at AVNirvana.com. Build relationships with other Home Theater Enthusiasts and talk shop about speakers, processors, projectors, TVs, and more. We look forward to having you join our community!00:01 Intro01:31 Show Sponsor: SVS02:31 Show Sponsor: madVR Labs03:40 Time Machine Segment: First Streaming Movie05:48 Begin Lightning News Round06:51 IMAX, Christopher Nolan, Matt Damon Odyssey08:12 Kaleidescape Strato E09:29 Dirac, Denon, Marantz, Active Room Treatment ART11:04 Trinnov Audio Paris Headquarters Update11:53 JBL Summit Series Speakers12:57 Mark Levinson 600 Series14:00 Apple TV 4K Atmos Fix OS 18.517:12 Headline News Story: Marantz AV 20, AMP 2019:32 Check in with Michael Scott, AV Nirvana Disc Reviews20:54 New to Disc this Week21:50 Kaleidescape Content Update23:33 What's Hot and What's Cold25:32 Disc and Gear DealsSVS 5% Codes: Two or more subs: "GoDual," or buy 5+ speakers and/or subs: "System"This episode of HTNR is sponsored by SVS: Visit them at: https://fave.co/4bCbL9rThis episode is also sponsored by madVR Labs: Visit them at https://madvrenvy.com/*DISC DEALS on AMAZON* -Kelly's Heros and Where Eagles Dare (BD): https://amzn.to/4mna70p-The Dirty Dozen (BD): https://amzn.to/3SMYl1y-Guns of Navarone (BD):https://amzn.to/4dyKk1g*Gear Deal of the Week*JVC DLA-NZ9 (Best Buy): https://fave.co/45mKtCB*TopTes TS-501B SPL Meter Giveaway Link*https://www.avnirvana.com/threads/win-a-toptes-ts-501b-handheld-sound-level-meter.15047/*Forum Links*-For the latest disc reviews, go to: https://www.avnirvana.com/forums/blu-ray-media-reviews.12/-For the latest news, including stories covered in this episode:https://www.avnirvana.com/forums/av-industry-news.6/*PODCAST LINKS*-Subscribe to the podcast on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/2XZc1WVL7gGazxGLiURw0ESubscribe to the podcast on Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/av-nirvanas-home-theater-news-review-htnr/id1715862636On this episode of HTNR, we have stories from the likes of JBL, IMAX, Mark Levinson, Trinnov, Dirac, Kaleidescape, and Denon. And our feature story spotlights two new gorgeous separates from Marantz and an update on tariff-related pricing from their camp… which is interesting because we haven't heard much from big manufacturers on that front. We also take a look at disc news and pay a visit to what's hot and what's not in the world of content. Plus disc and gear deals of the week!Please Note: AV Nirvana may make a small commission from affiliate links... thanks for your support!Keywords: iOS 18.5, energy, PS5, XBOX news, Disney Plus, Game of Thrones, Starlink, Black Mirror, Disney Movies, home theater tv, home cinema tv, home audio, surround sound, home theater, surround sound system, home theater system, home theater seat, home sound system, home audio systems, best tv soundbars, surround system for home, home cinemas, inflatable cinema screen, best surround sound system, best projector for home theater, best home cinema projector, good surround sound system, wireless surround sound, bose home theater system, home projector, wireless surround sound system, bose home theater, home cinema projector, bose home cinema, home theater news, SVS Ultra Evolution, SVS 4000 series subwoofers, madVR Envy Core, madVR Envy Extreme, HDR tone mapping, IMAX The Odyssey, Nolan IMAX film, Kaleidescape Strato E, Kaleidescape 4K player, Dolby Vision home theater, DTS:X support, Dirac Live ART, Dirac Active Room Treatment, Denon Dirac upgrade, SHARC+ DSP, Mark Levinson 600 Series, JBL Summit Series, JBL Makalu speaker, JBL Pumori speaker, JBL Ama standmount, Trinnov headquarters, THX home audio, Apple TV Dolby Atmos sync, Dune Prophecy 4K, A Knight's Tale Dolby Atmos, Bass Hunters Trinnov, best war movies Blu-ray, JVC NZ9 projector deal, JVC Frame Adapt HDR, AV Nirvana podcast, multi channel home theatre

Η 10η σεζόν είναι αφιερωμένη στις πιο βαθιές ιδέες της κβαντικής φυσικής.UNESCO: International Year of Quantum Science and TechnologyΣτο σημερινό επεισόδιο: Η εξίσωση του Paul DiracPre-show: Dubai ChocolateΕισαγωγή στην εξίσωση Dirac (1928): γιατί χρειαζόμασταν σχετικιστική κβαντική θεωρίαPaul Dirac: σπουδές, οικογενειακή τραγωδία και πορεία στην επιστήμηΠροβλήματα της προϋπάρχουσας κβαντομηχανικής (Heisenberg, Schrödinger) με την ειδική σχετικότητα και το spinΚαινοτομίες της εξίσωσης Dirac: τετραστοιχεία, spinors, αρνητικές λύσειςΠρόβλεψη της αντιύληςPost-show: ChatGPT όπως λέγαμε Google στα 2000sΕπικοινωνίαemail: hello@notatop10.fmInstagram: @notatop10Threads: @notatop10Bluesky: @notatop10.fmWeb: notatop10.fm (00:00:00) Pre show: Dubai Chocolate(00:04:38) Intro(00:04:52) Εισαγωγή στην εξίσωση Dirac(00:07:20) Βιογραφία του Paul Dirac(00:10:17) Προβλήματα QM & ειδικής σχετικότητας(00:19:00) Τεχνικά χαρακτ ηριστικά (spinors & “αρνητικές” λύσεις)(00:23:28) Πρόβλεψη αντιύλης & συνέπειες(00:26:27) Outro(00:26:39) Post-show: ChatGPT όπως λέγαμε Google

Para comemorar que 2025 é, segundo a UNESCO, o Ano Internacional da Quântica, remasterizamos um episódio de 2013 sobre um dos mais importantes físicos do século XX, Paul Dirac. Paul Adrien Maurice Dirac foi um notável matemático e físico britânico cujo papel foi essencial na construção da moderna mecânica quântica. Entre suas tantas contribuições, formulou a chamada equação de Dirac, a generalização relativística da equação de Schrödinger – com quem dividiu o Nobel em 1933. Em uma conferência dada em Moscou, em 1956, alguém lhe perguntou qual seria sua filosofia da física e respondeu escrevendo no quadro “Leis físicas devem sempre ser matematicamente belas” – apesar da lenda de que este quadro esteja preservado até hoje, a imagem certamente não desapareceu do imaginário acerca de tào estranha personalidade. Neste episódio sobre o físico e esquisitão inglês, Marco Aurélio Idiart (IF-UFRGS), Jorge Quillfeldt (Biofísica-UFRGS), Jeferson J. Arenzon (IF-UFRGS) conversam com Fernanda Steffens (atualmente ligada à Universidade de Bonn na Alemanha). Produção: Jeferson Arenzon Edição: Francisco Guazzelli Créditos da Imagem:  ChatGPT e equipe do FdC

Im Jahr 1937 hatte Paul Dirac eigentlich so alles erreicht, was man als theoretischer Physiker erreichen konnte: Der Brite hatte die Quantenphysik mit begründet und sie mit Einsteins Spezieller Relativitätstheorie vereint. Fast aus Versehen hatte er erstmals eine neue Form von Materie beschrieben, die wir heute als Antimaterie kennen. Paul Dirac hatte nicht nur eine Professur an der angesehen Universität von Cambridge bekommen, sondern bekam auch im Alter von nur 31 Jahren den Nobelpreis für Physik zugesprochen. Doch nun wandte sich Dirac größeren Dingen zu: der Kosmologie. Paul Dirac entwarf die „Large Numbers Hypothesis“, die Hypothese der großen Zahlen. Seine Vermutung besagte, dass das Verhältnis der Zahlenwerte von Naturkonstanten sich merkwürdigerweise immer wieder eine ziemlich große Zahl ergibt, nämlich zehn hoch 39. Was für die Meisten ein nicht besonders seltsamer Zufall sein mag, hatte für Dirac tiefere Bedeutung: Er schloss daraus, dass die Naturgesetze im Universum nicht immer und überall gleich waren – und dass die Naturkonstanten entgegen ihrem Namen nicht konstant, sondern variabel seien. Dabei hatte es Dirac vor allem auf eine Naturkonstante abgesehen: die Gravitationskonstante. Diese sei vor Jahrmilliarden viel größer gewesen. Und das würde bedeuten: Was wir als Schwerkraft kennen, nimmt mit zunehmendem Alter des Universums ab. Während Paul Diracs Ausflug in die Kosmologie – oder in die Zahlenmystik – von seinen Kolleginnen und Kollegen größtenteils ignoriert wurde, gab es einen deutschen Physiker, der die Hypothese der Großen Zahlen ernst nahm: Pascual Jordan beschäftigte sich vor allem damit, welche messbaren Auswirkungen so eine geringer werdende Schwerkraft auf unsere Erde haben könnte. Demnach sollte mit einer abnehmenden Gravitationskonstante unsere Erde selbst expandieren. In dieser Folge des AstroGeo-Podcasts erzählt Franzi die Geschichte hinter der sogenannten Expansionstheorie – und damit ist nicht das Universum selbst gemeint!

I'm back, baby. I've been away traveling for podcasts and am excited to bring you new ones with Michael Levin, William Hahn, Robin Hanson, and Emily Riehl, coming up shortly. They're already recorded. I've been recovering from a terrible flu but pushed through it to bring you today's episode with Urs Schreiber. This one is quite mind-blowing. It's quite hairy mathematics, something called higher category theory, and how using this math (which examines the structure of structure) allows one manner of finding "something" from "nothing." Here, "nothing" means the empty set, and "something" is defined as fermions and even 11D supergravity. It's the first time this material has been presented in this manner. Enjoy. NOTE: Link to technical details are here from Urs Schreiber: https://ncatlab.org/schreiber/show/Peri+Pantheorias As a listener of TOE you can get a special 20% off discount to The Economist and all it has to offer! Visit https://www.economist.com/toe Join My New Substack (Personal Writings): https://curtjaimungal.substack.com Listen on Spotify: https://tinyurl.com/SpotifyTOE Become a YouTube Member (Early Access Videos): https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdWIQh9DGG6uhJk8eyIFl1w/join Links Mentioned: - nLab website: https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/HomePage - Paper on category theory: https://people.math.osu.edu/cogdell.1/6112-Eilenberg&MacLane-www.pdf - “Higher Topos Theory for Physics” (Urs's talk): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GD20W6vxMI4 - “Higher Topos Theory for Physics” (Urs's paper): https://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.11026 - Stephen Wolfram on TOE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YRlQQw0d-4 - Feynman's thesis: https://faculty.washington.edu/seattle/physics541/2012-path-integrals/thesis.pdf - Differential cohomology in a cohesive ∞-topos (Urs's paper): https://arxiv.org/pdf/1310.7930 - M-Theory from the Superpoint (paper): https://arxiv.org/pdf/1702.01774 - Character Map in Non-Abelian Cohomology, The: Twisted, Differential, and Generalized (textbook): https://amzn.to/4bFuz7H - TOE's String Theory Iceberg: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X4PdPnQuwjY Timestamps: 00:00 Introduction 01:27 The Creation of nLab 04:36 Philosophy Meets Physics 07:55 The Role of Mathematical Language 09:32 Emergence from Nothing 16:25 Towards a Theory of Everything 22:21 The Problem with Modern Physics 25:31 Diving into Category Theory 35:30 Understanding Adjunctions 41:46 The Significance of Duality 52:54 Exploring Toposes 1:14:20 The UNEDA Lemma and Generalized Spaces 1:16:37 Charts in Physics 1:20:55 Introduction to Infinitesimal Disks 1:23:56 The Emergence of Supergeometry 1:27:33 Transitioning to Gauge Theories 1:28:11 Exploring Singularities in Physics 1:32:50 The Role of Superformal Spaces 1:36:44 Functors and Their Implications 1:40:51 From Nothing to Emergent Structures 1:43:04 Hegel's Influence on Modern Physics 1:54:07 Discovering Higher-Dimensional Structures 1:56:30 The Path to 11-Dimensional Supergravity 1:57:21 Universal Central Extensions 2:03:21 The Journey to M-Theory 2:11:19 Globalizing the Structure of Supergravity 2:15:36 Understanding Global Charges in Physics 2:23:31 Dirac's Insights into Gauge Potentials 2:30:21 The Quest for Non-Perturbative Physics 2:39:04 Conclusion Support TOE on Patreon: https://patreon.com/curtjaimungal Twitter: https://twitter.com/TOEwithCurt Discord Invite: https://discord.com/invite/kBcnfNVwqs #science #theoreticalphysics Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Manufacturing is back and according to this week's podcast guest, Filip Aronshtein, CoFounder of Dirac, it's time to get back to building great things. On this season finale of Workforce 4.0, host Ann Wyatt sits down with Fil to discuss the future of American manufacturing and Fil's mission to revolutionize the way that we leverage CAD. Fil shares his journey from electrical engineering and robotics at Northrop Grumman to founding Dirac, a company that automates assembly work instructions for manufacturing with the help of AI. The conversation delves into the importance of preserving tribal knowledge, the role of technology in augmenting human labor, and the cultural shift needed to make manufacturing appealing to younger generations. Fil provides actionable steps to close the skills gap and emphasizes the need to change the public perception of manufacturing jobs.-00:35: Special Guest: Fil from Dirac-01:07: Fil's Background and Dirac's Mission-02:36: Challenges and Evolution in Manufacturing-04:42: The Empire State Building: A Symbol of American Greatness-06:36: Karaoke and Company Culture-07:52: The Future of Work and Technology's Role-15:10: Automation and Tribal Knowledge in Manufacturing-28:34: The Challenge of Training Others-29:38: The Potential For Partnerships Between Guilds and Labor Unions-31:59: The Stigma Around Skilled Trades-32:45: Personal Anecdotes and Career Paths-38:28: The Importance of Tribal Knowledge-43:08: Actionable Steps to Close the Skill Gap-47:48: The Bus Factor Concept-51:03: Making Manufacturing Cool Again-54:51: Contact Information and ConclusionMore About Filip:Filip Aronshtein is an avid believer that the foundation of the West was forged upon its capacity to build. And as the Founder and CEO of Dirac, Fil is a firm believer that empowering engineers with digital tools and combining digital work instructions with CAD will get us closer to building. To learn more about Fil and his mission, connect with him here. The Future of Work (and this Episode) Is Brought To You By Secchi:Secchi is a revolutionary workforce engagement tool created for organizations to make data-driven frontline decisions in real-time. By measuring and combining multiple people-related lead indicators, Secchi provides in-the-moment visibility into individual frontline employee performance, team performance, engagement/turnover risks, and positive employee behaviors all while removing the traditional barriers of administrative burden on leaders. To learn more about Secchi, check them out here.

Stephen Wolfram answers questions from his viewers about the history of science and technology as part of an unscripted livestream series, also available on YouTube here: https://wolfr.am/youtube-sw-qaQuestions include: When was complexity science invented? Was there a further back history than digital? - They always forget Aristarchus. - What role did category and type theory play for mathematics? - How would you think about approaching alchemical literature, knowing that it mostly employed coded language rather than being about literal transmutation into gold? - Was Newton not an alchemist? - The real secret is it's tungsten that can be turned into gold, hence the name "Wolfram Research." - Dirac, Einstein, Turing and Feynman are sitting in a room. What is the single word they all immediately agree on? - So... Dirac answered in Dirac delta function style?

As a listener of TOE you can get a special 20% off discount to The Economist and all it has to offer! Visit https://www.economist.com/toe In this captivating of Theories of Everything, Jacob Barandes and I delve into the intricate world of Indivisible Stochastic Processes and their profound impact on quantum mechanics. We explore how these non-Markovian systems introduce quantum phenomena like superposition and interference without the traditional wave function collapse. Join My New Substack (Personal Writings): https://curtjaimungal.substack.com Listen on Spotify: https://tinyurl.com/SpotifyTOE Timestamps: 00:00 – Introduction 01:29 – Philosophy of Physics 07:04 – Philosophical Physics 10:55 – Understanding Symmetry Breaking in Physics 15:03 – Historical Contributions of Philosophers to Quantum Theory 25:03 – Real-World Examples of Symmetry Breaking 32:03 – Philosophical Contributions and Funding in Physics 38:00 – The Wigner's Friend Thought Experiment 55:24 – Eternalism vs. Presentism: The Flow of Time 1:05:31 – Connection to Cosmology and FLRW Models 1:12:07 – Spontaneous vs. Explicit Symmetry Breaking 1:15:37 – Indivisible Stochastic Processes and Future Directions 01:40:06 - Markovianity in Quantum Mechanics 01:42:12 - Linearity and Unitarity in Quantum Evolution 01:43:23 - Unistochastic Processes and Quantum Channels 01:45:20 - Quantum Channels and Steinspring Dilation 01:46:18 - Hamiltonian Formulation Analogy 01:49:05 - Double-Slit Experiment with Indivisible Processes 01:52:08 - Measurement Devices and Emergibles 02:00:04 - Seminar Culture and Philosophy in Physics 02:02:38 - Coarse-Grained Double-Slit Example 02:05:03 - No Wave Function Collapse in Indivisible Processes 02:12:16 - Philosophical Insights and Importance in Physics 02:18:08 - Critique of David Griffiths' Quantum Mechanics Textbook 02:35:07 - Closing Remarks and Future Topics Links Mentioned (additional links in comments): - Jacob's website: https://www.jacobbarandes.com/ - Jacob's first appearance on TOE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7oWip00iXbo&ab_channel=CurtJaimungal - Jacob's talk on “A New Formulation of Quantum Theory”: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sshJyD0aWXg - The Stochastic-Quantum Correspondence (Jacob's paper): https://arxiv.org/pdf/2302.10778 - McTaggart's paper on time: https://philpapers.org/archive/MCTTUO.pdf - Putnam's paper on time and geometry: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2024493?origin=JSTOR-pdf - Neil deGrasse Tyson on TOE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhWWlJFwTqs - Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paper: https://cds.cern.ch/record/405662/files/PhysRev.47.777.pdf - Greta Hermann's paper on quantum mechanics in the philosophy of nature: https://cqi.inf.usi.ch/qic/grete_en.pdf - John Bell's paper on the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox: https://journals.aps.org/ppf/pdf/10.1103/PhysicsPhysiqueFizika.1.195 - Bell's theorem without inequalities (paper): https://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0409190 - Quantum mysteries revisited (paper): https://www.physics.smu.edu/scalise/P5382fa15/Mermin1990a.pdf - Quantum Theory by David Bohm (book): https://www.amazon.com/Quantum-Theory-Dover-Books-Physics/dp/0486659690 - Bohm's second paper on quantum theory: https://journals.aps.org/pr/abstract/10.1103/PhysRev.85.180 - Dirac's textbook on quantum mechanics: https://www.amazon.com/Principles-Quantum-Mechanics-International-Monographs/dp/0198520115 - Wigner's paper on the mind-body question: https://www.scribd.com/doc/240712078/Eugen-Wigner-Remarks-on-the-Mind-body-Question #science #physics #theoreticalphysics #quantumphysics Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The classical and quantum worlds are not as apart as we thought. Eva Miranda, a renowned researcher in symplectic and Poisson geometry, explains how “hidden” geometric structures can unite classical and quantum frameworks. Eva dives into integrable systems, Bohr–Sommerfeld leaves, and the art of geometric quantization, revealing a promising path to bridging longstanding gaps in theoretical physics. As a listener of TOE you can get a special 20% off discount to The Economist and all it has to offer! Visit https://www.economist.com/toe Links Mentioned: •⁠ ⁠Eva Miranda's website: https://web.mat.upc.edu/eva.miranda/nova/ •⁠ ⁠Roger Penrose on TOE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGm505TFMbU •⁠ ⁠Curt's post on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7284265597671034880/ Timestamps: 00:00 – Introduction 06:12 – Classical vs. Quantum Mechanics 15:32 – Poisson Brackets & Symplectic Forms 24:14 – Integrable Systems 32:01 – Dirac's Dream & No‐Go Results 39:04 – Action‐Angle Coordinates 47:05 – Toric Manifolds & Polytopes 54:55 – Geometric Quantization Basics 1:03:46 – Bohr–Sommerfeld Leaves 1:12:03 – Handling Singularities 1:20:23 – Poisson Manifolds Beyond Symplectic 1:28:50 – Turing Completeness & Fluid Mechanics Tie‐In 1:35:06 – Topological QFT Overview 1:45:53 – Open Questions in Quantization 1:53:20 – Conclusion Join My New Substack (Personal Writings): https://curtjaimungal.substack.com Listen on Spotify: https://tinyurl.com/SpotifyTOE Become a YouTube Member (Early Access Videos): https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdWIQh9DGG6uhJk8eyIFl1w/join Support TOE on Patreon: https://patreon.com/curtjaimungal Twitter: https://twitter.com/TOEwithCurt Discord Invite: https://discord.com/invite/kBcnfNVwqs #science #physics #theoreticalphysics Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In his second Sophia Lecture, Dr Iain McGilchrist gives a bracing, counterintuitive account of the fundamental categories of our experience of the world. McGilchrist shows how fundamental binaries—such as stasis and motion, simplicity and complexity, order and randomness, and even straight lines and curves—do not occur in nature in ways that conform to our assumptions about an inert, independent, and predictable universe. Drawing from disciplines as disparate as physics, mathematics, biology and art, McGilchrist shows that asymmetry is not simply a principle of vitality, harmony, and beauty. McGilchrist argues that asymmetry is primary, a reality that is prior to symmetry and which forms the basis of the very symmetries in nature and the arts to which it gives rise. The dynamism which results from the drive to balance and to resist balance is at the root of the vigor of natural systems, the beauty that they embody, and which the arts then reflect. With examples ranging from the elegance of the golden ratio to the structure of the human brain, McGilchrist's lecture offers a fresh perspective on the nature of patterns in complex systems and human creations. His work invites us to search for wholeness, harmony, and connection from a set of starting points which are as surprising as they are fruitful; as always, he challenges us to see our world in new—and newly unified—ways. Authors and Works Mentioned in this Episode: Johann Sebastian Bach John Donne - “Holy Sonnet 7: At the round earth's imagin'd corners” Gerard Manley Hopkins - “Carrion Comfort” Werner Heisenberg - Physics and Beyond: Encounters and Conversations with Einstein, Planck, Dirac, Bohr, and Other Physicists of Our Time Alexander Pope - “The Rape of the Lock” Iain McGilchrist - The Master and his Emissary Pierre Curie Chien-Shiung Wu Nassim Nicholas Taleb - Antifragile: Things That Gain from Disorder Aesop Heraclitus Democritus Leonardo da Vinci Louis Pasteur Rong Li & Bruce Bowerman - “Symmetry breaking in biology” Arthur Koestler Aristotle Oliver Sacks Thomas Holstein Tim Crow Onur Güntürkün Jane Clark & Daniel Simons (Christopher Chabris) - Gorillas in Our Midst Jonathan Rowson Alastair McIntosh Richard Dawkins Nikolaj Nikolaenko Luciano Laurana Giorgio Martini - Ideal City Raphael - The School of Athens Andrea Palladio William Blake - “The Tyger” Theodosius II Christ Pantocrator Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel John P. McGovern William Osler William Alwyn Lishman William Shakespeare - King Lear John Cleese Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart Sir Roger Scruton

Check out our recap and breakdown of Season 4 Episode 3 of the Big Bang Theory! We found 5 IQ Points!00:00:00 - Intro00:02:23 - Recap Begins00:16:40 - Importance of water in beer00:37:08 - Clarke Maxwell? Dirac, Babinski, and Frege00:54:51 - Can't aren't supposed to have milk! 00:59:32 - Animal groupings01:12:12 - Guess what? your dog will eat you too! No one's safe! Find us everywhere at: https://linktr.ee/theoreticalnonsense~~*CLICK THE LINK TO SEE OUR IQ POINT HISTORY TOO! *~~-------------------------------------------------Welcome to Theoretical Nonsense! If you're looking for a Big Bang Theory rewatch podcast blended with How Stuff Works, this is the podcast for you!  Hang out with Rob and Ryan where they watch each episode of The Big Bang Theory and break it down scene by scene, and fact by fact, and no spoilers! Ever wonder if the random information Sheldon says is true? We do the research and find out! Is curry a natural laxative, what's the story behind going postal, are fish night lights real? Watch the show with us every other week and join in on the discussion! Email us at theoreticalnonsensepod@gmail.com and we'll read your letter to us on the show! Even if it's bad! :) Music by Alex Grohl. Find official podcast on Apple and Spotify https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/theoretical-nonsense-the-big-bang-theory-watch-a/id1623079414

Dirac, la ecuacion del amor 27 NoviembreSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In today's episode, Jacob, a physicist specializing in quantum mechanics, explores groundbreaking ideas on measurement, the role of probabilistic laws, and the foundational principles of quantum theory. With a focus on interdisciplinary approaches, Jacob offers unique insights into the nature of particles, fields, and the evolution of quantum mechanics. New Substack! Follow my personal writings and EARLY ACCESS episodes here: https://curtjaimungal.substack.com SPONSOR (THE ECONOMIST): As a listener of TOE you can get a special 20% off discount to The Economist and all it has to offer! Visit https://www.economist.com/toe LINKS MENTIONED: - Wigner's paper ‘Remarks on the Mind-Body Question': https://www.informationphilosopher.com/solutions/scientists/wigner/Wigner_Remarks.pdf - Jacob's lecture on Hilbert Spaces: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmaSAG4J6nw&ab_channel=OxfordPhilosophyofPhysics - John von Neumann's book on ‘Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics': https://amzn.to/48OkeVj - The 1905 Papers (Albert Einstein): https://guides.loc.gov/einstein-annus-mirabilis/1905-papers - Dividing Quantum Channels (paper): https://arxiv.org/pdf/math-ph/0611057 - Sean Carroll on TOE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9AoRxtYZrZo - Scott Aaronson and Leonard Susskind's paper on ‘Quantum Necromancy': https://arxiv.org/pdf/2009.07450 - Scott Aaronson on TOE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ZpGCQoL2Rk - Leonard Susskind on TOE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2p_Hlm6aCok - Ekkolapto's website: https://www.ekkolapto.org/ TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 - Introduction 01:26 - Jacob's Background 07:32 - Pursuing Theoretical Physics 10:28 - Is Consciousness Linked to Quantum Mechanics? 16:07 - Why the Wave Function Might Not Be Real 20:12 - The Schrödinger Equation Explained 23:04 - Higher Dimensions in Quantum Physics 30:11 - Heisenberg's Matrix Mechanics 35:08 - Schrödinger's Wave Function and Its Implications 39:57 - Dirac and von Neumann's Quantum Axioms 45:09 - The Problem with Hilbert Spaces 50:02 - Wigner's Friend Paradox 55:06 - Challenges in Defining Measurement in Quantum Mechanics 01:00:17 - Trying to Simplify Quantum for Students 01:03:35 - Bridging Quantum Mechanics with Stochastic Processes 01:05:05 - Discovering Indivisible Stochastic Processes 01:12:03 - Interference and Coherence Explained 01:16:06 - Redefining Measurement and Decoherence 01:18:01 - The Future of Quantum Theory 1:24:09 - Foundationalism and Quantum Theory 1:25:04 - Why Use Indivisible Stochastic Laws? 1:26:10 - The Quantum-Classical Transition 1:27:30 - Classical vs Quantum Probabilities 1:28:36 - Hilbert Space and the Convenience of Amplitudes 1:30:01 - No Special Role for Observers 1:33:40 - Emergence of the Wave Function 1:38:27 - Physicists' Reluctance to Change Foundations 1:43:04 - Resolving Quantum Mechanics' Inconsistencies 1:50:46 - Practical Applications of Indivisible Stochastic Processes 1:57:53 - Understanding Particles in the Indivisible Stochastic Model 2:00:48 - Is There a Fundamental Ontology? 2:07:02 - Advice for Students Entering Physics 2:09:32 - Encouragement for Interdisciplinary Research 2:12:22 - Outro TOE'S TOP LINKS: - Support TOE on Patreon: https://patreon.com/curtjaimungal (early access to ad-free audio episodes!) - Listen to TOE on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4gL14b92xAErofYQA7bU4e - Become a YouTube Member Here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdWIQh9DGG6uhJk8eyIFl1w/join - Join TOE's Newsletter 'TOEmail' at https://www.curtjaimungal.org Other Links: - Twitter: https://twitter.com/TOEwithCurt - Discord Invite: https://discord.com/invite/kBcnfNVwqs - iTunes: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/better-left-unsaid-with-curt-jaimungal/id1521758802 - Subreddit r/TheoriesOfEverything: https://reddit.com/r/theoriesofeverything #science #sciencepodcast #physics Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Edição de 13 Novembro 2024

Chris Lehto explores groundbreaking ideas in physics that suggest a deep connection between everything in the universe. From Einstein's forgotten theories to Dirac's Large Number Hypothesis, he breaks down complex concepts like the Schwarzschild metric, Hubble's law, and Mach's principle to argue that the universe is a unified system. Discover how these "coincidences" in physics reveal that we are all connected through fundamental forces, offering new insights into the nature of consciousness and the cosmos.Podcast published on 17 Sept 2024.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/lehto-files-investigating-uaps--5990774/support.

We talk the hottest show in all the land! CEDIA 2024! Trinnov, Storm, JBL, etc. etc! Klipsch has Dirac in a soundbar! Grimani systems showed a less expensive system than last year. And so much more! --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/dailyhifi/support

La física matemática es compleja, hablan de objetos matemáticos y se comunican en lo que, para el resto de mortales, parece clave. ¿Por qué no hacer una breve incursión en lo profundo de su mente, aclarar conceptos y poner sobre la mesa esa sopa de términos? ¿Qué es el operador de Dirac? ¿Qué relación hay entre físicos y matemáticos?Para ello tenemos con nosotros a Miguel Camarasa se graduó en Matemáticas por la Universitat de València y seguidamente en Ingeniería Aeroespacial, Aeronáutica y Astronáutica por la Universitat Politècnica de València. Tras un máster en la UPV, actualmente realiza su doctorado en Basque Center for Applied Mathematics en Análisis de Ecuaciones en Derivadas Parciales. Desde 2020 es conocido en redes como Mates Mike por su canal de YouTube, que ya suma más de 320 000 suscriptores.

rWotD Episode 2673: Bispinor Welcome to Random Wiki of the Day, your journey through Wikipedia’s vast and varied content, one random article at a time.The random article for Wednesday, 28 August 2024 is Bispinor.In physics, and specifically in quantum field theory, a bispinor is a mathematical construction that is used to describe some of the fundamental particles of nature, including quarks and electrons. It is a specific embodiment of a spinor, specifically constructed so that it is consistent with the requirements of special relativity. Bispinors transform in a certain "spinorial" fashion under the action of the Lorentz group, which describes the symmetries of Minkowski spacetime. They occur in the relativistic spin-⁠1/2⁠ wave function solutions to the Dirac equation.Bispinors are so called because they are constructed out of two simpler component spinors, the Weyl spinors. Each of the two component spinors transform differently under the two distinct complex-conjugate spin-1/2 representations of the Lorentz group. This pairing is of fundamental importance, as it allows the represented particle to have a mass, carry a charge, and represent the flow of charge as a current, and perhaps most importantly, to carry angular momentum. More precisely, the mass is a Casimir invariant of the Lorentz group (an eigenstate of the energy), while the vector combination carries momentum and current, being covariant under the action of the Lorentz group. The angular momentum is carried by the Poynting vector, suitably constructed for the spin field.A bispinor is more or less "the same thing" as a Dirac spinor. The convention used here is that the article on the Dirac spinor presents plane-wave solutions to the Dirac equation using the Dirac convention for the gamma matrices. That is, the Dirac spinor is a bispinor in the Dirac convention. By contrast, the article below concentrates primarily on the Weyl, or chiral representation, is less focused on the Dirac equation, and more focused on the geometric structure, including the geometry of the Lorentz group. Thus, much of what is said below can be applied to the Majorana equation.This recording reflects the Wikipedia text as of 00:29 UTC on Wednesday, 28 August 2024.For the full current version of the article, see Bispinor on Wikipedia.This podcast uses content from Wikipedia under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License.Visit our archives at wikioftheday.com and subscribe to stay updated on new episodes.Follow us on Mastodon at @wikioftheday@masto.ai.Also check out Curmudgeon's Corner, a current events podcast.Until next time, I'm standard Joanna.

Home Theater News 7.8.24 links and notes: Join our home theater community at AVNirvana.com. Build relationships with other Home Theater Enthusiasts, talk shop about speakers, processors, projectors, TVs and more.  We look forward to having you join our community. *DISC DEALS on AMAZON*  Shazam 4K: https://amzn.to/4cyLc4t Sonic the Hedgehog 4K: https://amzn.to/4bzDN3y The Boss Baby: Family Business 4K: https://amzn.to/3zvGAgV *PRODUCT LINKS* Sony 98” X90L 4K Ultra HD TV: https://amzn.to/4cPXkxD *THX Review Link* -HDMI TEST BENCH: Full Review of THX's New Series of Interconnect Ultra High Speed HDMI 2.1 Cables: https://www.avnirvana.com/threads/hdmi-test-bench-full-review-of-thxs-new-series-of-interconnect-ultra-high-speed-hdmi-2-1-cables.13822/ *Get Notified: Dirac and BlueSound* Register to learn when Dirac launches on BlueSound products: https://www.dirac.com/live/bluesound/ *FORUM LINKS* -For the latest disc reviews, go to: https://www.avnirvana.com/forums/blu-ray-media-reviews.12/ -For the latest news, including stories covered in this episode: https://www.avnirvana.com/forums/av-industry-news.6/ -To see the Top 20 Disc Releases of 2023, go to: https://www.avnirvana.com/threads/holiday-gift-guide-top-20-movie-discs-of-the-year.12847/ *PODCAST LINKS* -Subscribe to the podcast on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/2XZc1WVL7gGazxGLiURw0E Subscribe to the podcast on Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/av-nirvanas-home-theater-news-review-htnr/id1715862636 Please Note: AV Nirvana may make a small commission from affiliate links... thanks for your support!

Chris Lehto dives deep into Terrence Howard's revolutionary scalar fractal theory, which has recently gone viral. Howard discussed his groundbreaking ideas on the Joe Rogan Experience, where Eric Weinstein provided an elite review. Weinstein critiqued some aspects but acknowledged a critical lynchpin in Howard's theory that could be a significant discovery. Chris explores how this lynchpin could validate Howard's entire framework and discusses the striking similarities to his own scalar fractal multiverse theory. Join Chris as he breaks down these complex concepts and reveals the potential implications for our understanding of the universe.00:00 Fractals based on the Lynchpin8:54 Rebuilding Saturn and Larger Scales13:52 Similarities to my Scalar Theory July 2326:21 Howard showed 3d fractal pattern, not doubling33:02 mass is photon pressure42:32 Dirac's large number hypothesis49:35 Huygens principle-no straight linesPublished on 05 july 2024.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/lehto-files-investigating-uaps--5990774/support.

Fil Aronshtein's journey is one of boundless curiosity, from his childhood dreams of becoming an inventor, architect, and astronaut, to his present-day mission of shaping the future of manufacturing. As the founder of Dirac, a company revolutionizing the manufacturing industry, he faced persistent rejection before finding his breakthrough. This week, Barrett talks with Fil about his vision for transforming manufacturing processes, and how that fits into a wider vision for a more expansive version of humanity. They dive into the intricacies of launching a new company and overcoming persistent rejection, as well as the larger implications of Fil's work for industries such as aerospace and defense. They also discuss the importance of personal agency and the power of community, exploring how Fil's early influences and passion for creating things fuels his vision for a more integrated and self-reliant future. In this episode: 00:00 - Intro 03:21 - Overcoming rejection 14:52 - Fil's transition to software 19:55 - Why Fil believes nothing is impossible  24:05 - Fil's go-to-market strategy 25:58 - The problem Dirac is solving 30:22 - How manufacturing affects everyone 41:48 - Why preserving the ability to manufacture is so critical 49:14 - Emotional vs logical reactions to nuclear energy: empathy, education, and exposure 56:19 - Fil's early interest in science and engineering 01:09:37 - Fil's role models and inspirations 01:15:51 - The compounding effect of community 01:27:30 - Fil's unbearably beautiful future 01:30:42 - Who Fil is becoming Get full show notes and links at https://GoodWorkShow.com. Watch the episode on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@barrettabrooks.

This week we are joined by Dirac's Mathias Johansson to talk about bass response and the best ways to deal with multiple subwoofers in your cinema room and using room EQ.

If you've ever wondered how self-perception can influence your journey to personal success, this conversation on the HIListically Speaking Podcast with guest Dr. John Demartini is for you. A world-renowned luminary in human behavior and emotional intelligence, Dr. Demartini will have you asking yourself, “How do I elevate my self-awareness?” But also inspire authentic living through balance and embracing both the inner hero and the bully within. Dr. Demartini shares his trauma-to-triumph stories that will leave you in awe. Including two powerful lessons he learned as a high school dropout from one of the world's most successful entrepreneurs of his time, to the words he lives by that have been the blueprint for humanity, wisdom, and love. ⁣   ⁣ ⁣CHAPTERS/KEY MOMENTS⁣ 0:00   Intro ⁣ 0:10    Human Potential Through Emotional Intelligence⁣ 03:38  Imposter Syndrome, the Ego for Authenticity⁣ 07:17   Self-Judgment and Behavior ⁣ 16:08  Lesson in Wisdom and Courage⁣ 21:54  Creating Original Ideas for Humanity⁣ 29:09  Free Masterclasses with Dr. Demartini⁣ 31:00  Essentials of Emotional Intelligence Book⁣ 32:50  Unlocking Your Inner Genius  ⁣ 38:47  Self-Talk for Success⁣ 42:48  Authenticity and Self-Acceptance  ⁣ 46:25  The Power of Gratitude and Love⁣ 56:28 Life's Balance and Self-Confidence⁣ ⁣ CONNECT WITH DR. DEMARTINI ⁣ https://drdemartini.com/ or @drjohndemartini⁣ ⁣ Essentials of Emotional Intelligence Book (available on Amazon May 2024⁣   CONNECT WITH HILARY⁣ https://www.instagram.com/hilaryrusso⁣ ⁣https://www.youtube.com/hilaryrusso⁣ https://www.facebook.com/hilisticallyspeaking⁣ https://www.tiktok.com/@hilisticallyspeaking⁣ https://www.hilaryrusso.com/podcast⁣ ⁣Music by Lipbone Redding https://lipbone.com/⁣ ⁣ Never miss an episode or info on upcoming workshops and events. Subscribe to the Brain Candy Newsletter.⁣ EPISODE TRANSCRIPT ⁣ (Full Transcript https://www.hilaryrusso.com/podcast⁣)⁣  ⁣ ⁣ 00:00 - Dr. John Demartini (Guest)⁣ Every symptom in our physiology, every symptom in our psychology, every symptom in our sociological connections, in our relationships, even in our business transactions. Our feedback mechanisms trying to get us back to authenticity, where we have equanimity within ourselves and equity between ourselves and others, so we can create a transaction that has a sustainable, fair exchange, where we maximize our potential. So we understand that, no matter what's going on, it's on the way for that objective, not in the way. ⁣ ⁣ 00:30 - Hilary Russo (Host)⁣ Am I unlocking my greatest human potential? Think about that question just for a moment, because that's where we're going today. Sit with it for a moment and then think about that, because you're about to meet somebody who can challenge you with that question and help you find the answer. He is not your typical expert. He has a unique blend of wisdom and wit and insight, and he's dedicated his life to unraveling the mysteries of human behavior and helping people, including himself, discover that human potential. Thank you so much for joining us here. As I mentioned, you are a world leading human behavior specialist. You're a philosopher and international speaker, multi bestselling author and founder of the Demartini Method, which is a revolutionary tool in modern psychology, and it is just such a pleasure and a joy to have you here to share more about what you do and how you hold space in this world. So thank you. ⁣ ⁣ 01:32 - Dr. John Demartini (Guest)⁣ Thank you. What a great intro. Thank you. ⁣ ⁣ 01:35 - Hilary Russo (Host)⁣ Well, I've been really tapping into everything you're sharing and you talk a lot about, most recently the emotional intelligence side of things with your most recent book, and I want to touch on that because you really have made such a significant difference in how people are truly transforming their own lives. So let's go there first. What is making this book, this most recent book, the Essentials of Emotional Intelligence, different from all these other amazing pieces of literature you've written in the past? ⁣ ⁣ 02:28 - Dr. John Demartini (Guest)⁣ not always appreciate themselves, not love themselves, because of the emotional vicissitudes and volatilities that they allow themselves to participate in. I'll give an example. You see somebody walking down the street. You meet them and you think, wow, they're more intelligent than me, or maybe they're more achieving, successful than me, or maybe wealthier, or maybe they're more, have a stable relationship, or maybe they're more of a leader or more they're physically fit or more inspired. ⁣ ⁣ 02:59⁣ And then you put them a bit on a pedestal because you're conscious of the upsides and blind and subjectively biased and unconscious of the downsides. And then you beat yourself up and minimize yourself and then you're not honoring your magnificence Because you're comparing yourself to others instead of comparing your daily actions to your own values. Or you might meet somebody and you look down on them and think I'm superior to them, I'm too proud to admit what I see in them, inside me, and you'll now put them down intellectually or in business or finance or family or social or physical or spiritual. And then you now put them in the pit and exaggerate yourself. Anytime we put some in a pedestal and minimize ourselves or put people in a pit and exaggerate ourselves, we're not being ourselves. We've got an imposter syndrome. We've got a facade, a persona, a mask that we're wearing the superiority complex, the inferiority complex, the puffed up, the beat up. ⁣ ⁣ 04:03 - Hilary Russo (Host)⁣ And as long as we do that, we're in a state of becoming, not our authentic state of being. I love that you touch on that state of the becoming versus the being, because a lot of times I'll say are you being, are you in a state of being or a state of doing? But using the word becoming is is something that is really resonating with me. And going back to the idea of the imposter syndrome, I think we're hearing a lot more about that now and I imagine that's because we live in this global village where everything is right at the touch of our fingertips, you know. So we're infiltrated with so much information and comparison game that it could be very detrimental, whether you're a child or an adult. ⁣ ⁣ 04:40 - Dr. John Demartini (Guest)⁣ Well, we're not here to compare ourselves to others. We're here to compare our own daily actions to what's most meaningful to us, and how congruent are we with what's really priority? But the second we put people on pedestals or pits, we distorted our views, subjectively, of them and we simultaneously created the symptoms in ourselves to let us know that simultaneously created the symptoms in ourselves to let us know that All of the physiological symptoms that we generate genetically, epigenetically or autonomically are feedback mechanisms to guide us back to authenticity. And when we puff ourselves up, we tend to activate our narcissistic side, because we feel superior and we tend to project our values and expect others to live in our values, which creates futility to humble us. Period, we tend to project our values and expect others to live in our values, which creates futility to humble us. And anytime we minimize ourselves and exaggerate them, we tend to go into our altruistic persona and we try to sacrifice for them, which is futile because we can't sustain it. So both of those are feedback mechanisms that are futility, that allow us to go back to who we are. ⁣ ⁣ 05:42⁣ Every symptom in our physiology, every symptom in our psychology, every symptom in our sociological connections, in our relationships, even in our business transactions, our feedback mechanisms, trying to get us back to authenticity, where we have equanimity within ourselves and equity between ourselves and others, so we can create a transaction that has a sustainable, fair exchange, where we maximize our potential. So we understand that, no matter what's going on, it's on the way for that objective, not in the way, and we transcend our fantasies of our amygdala of avoiding pain and seeking pleasure and only going to one-sided realities. As the Buddha says, the desire for that which is unobtainable and the desire to avoid that which is unavoidable is a source of human suffering. But when we finally realize that there's a balance of life and there's nothing to get rid of in yourself and there's nothing to try to go and find in yourself, it's already present and you embrace it in yourself and not compare it to somebody else, because you won't honor it in yourself when you're comparing what you think it needs to be in you with somebody else, what? ⁣ ⁣ 06:43 - Hilary Russo (Host)⁣ you think it needs to be in you with somebody else, For those out there that are hearing you and want so desperately I don't even want to say desperately, but are really open to the possibility of the neuroplasticity of the brain right, being able to really truly change your thoughts, change your life, kind of thing. How are there easy steps to go about that approach? If they're stuck in the imposter syndrome, if they are on the pedestal or the pit, there must be a simple step to take first. ⁣ ⁣ 07:17 - Dr. John Demartini (Guest)⁣ Yes, well, I've been fascinated by this, for I've been teaching 51 years, so I've been doing it a bit. And you know, there's a statement in Romans 2.1 of the New Testament not that that is the ultimate source by any means, it's just a source but it says that beware of judging other people, for whatever you see in them, you do the same thing. So I was 40-something years ago. I found myself when I was saying something about other people. I found myself talking to myself Whatever I was saying to them and being adamant about. I was thinking I'm really talking to myself, trying to convince myself of what I'm saying to them. Isn't it interesting. So, instead of waiting for people to push my buttons, I decided to go to the Oxford English Dictionary and underline every possible human behavioral trait that could be found. Now Gordon Halport did the same thing years earlier. I didn't know about that at the time, but he must have been as neurotic as I was, because I went through every one and underlined every one of them. ⁣ ⁣ 08:19⁣ In the book I found 4,628 character traits of human beings. Then what I did is I put an initial of the individual out to the side of the margin of the dictionary. Who is it that I know that displays this trait to the furthest degree. So if I saw somebody that was generous, who is the most generous? If I saw somebody that was inconsiderate, who is the most inconsiderate In my perception? These are my distortions, but I put the names out there. Once I put the name next to each of those, I then asked myself John, go to a moment where and when you perceive yourself displaying or demonstrating this particular trait. And I had to be honest with myself because I knew that I did because you only react to things on the outside that represent parts of yourself you haven't loved. So if you're resentful to somebody, they're reminding you that you're too proud to admit you've done it. They're reminding you of something you're feeling ashamed of and they're bringing it out. The reason you want to avoid them is because you don't want to dissociate away from what you're judging in yourself. So I went through there and I found every one of those traits inside myself to the same degree, quantitatively and qualitatively, as I saw in them. And I didn't stop until I saw it which was waking up intuition and unconscious information about me and took out the subjective bias and allowed me to see myself objectively and I realized I was hero and villain, and saint and sinner, and I had every one of those traits. I had all pairs of opposites. ⁣ ⁣ 09:53⁣ Heraclitus, 5th century BC, said there's a unity of opposites in all of us. And it was Wilhelm Watt, in the 1895 Father Experimental Psychology, that said that there's a simultaneous contrast in all people. When they become aware of it, they're fully self-actualized. So nothing's missing At the level of the soul, nothing's missing At the level of the senses. Things appear to be missing. The things that appear to be missing are the things you're too proud or too humble to admit that you see in others, inside yourself, and pure, reflective awareness, which allows true loving intimacy, allows you to realize that whatever you see is you. So the first thing to help you transcend the vicissitudes and the volatilities of the incomplete awareness is to take the time to go and look at where you do the same thing. That's just one of many steps, and when I did that I found all 4,628 traits. I sat and I documented where I had them all. So that means that no matter what anybody said about me, it was true, but maybe not in the context they were projecting, but I owned it and I found out that any trait you don't own is a trait that people push your buttons with, but when you own it, you go. ⁣ ⁣ 11:08⁣ Yes, sometimes I'm this way, sometimes I'm that If I walked up to somebody and I said you're always nice, you're never mean, you're always kind, you're never cruel, you're always positive, never negative, they would go. Not exactly, their intuition would point out the times when they've been the other and they'd immediately be thinking about the time when they're the opposite of that. If I said you're always mean, you're never nice, you're always cruel, you're never kind, always stingy, never generous, they'd go. No, that's not true either. But if I said sometimes you're nice, sometimes you're mean, sometimes you're kind, sometimes you're cruel, they'd go. That's me, because we know innately, with certainty, that we have a unity of pairs of opposites and when you can embrace both sides of those and don't try to get rid of half of yourself, you finally can love yourself. But the futility of trying to get rid of half of yourself is going to undermine it. ⁣ ⁣ 11:52⁣ So the first step in transcending, because anything you infatuate with or resent occupies space and time in your mind and runs your life, and you can't even sleep at night when you're highly infatuated or resentful, because your mind is intruded by these incomplete awarenesses and it's creating symptoms to let you know you're not loving and not whole. You're playing part in the posture and your symptoms are giving you feedback to let you know that to help you. So when I went through and I owned all those traits, I noticed that there was more poise, more presence, more productivity. Noticed that there was more poise, more presence, more productivity, more able to be prioritized and not influenced by other people's opinions, and able to. You know, I'd rather have the whole world against me than my own soul. I was able to listen to my soul, the state of unconditional love, not the imposter syndrome, because if you put people in pedestals you'll minimize. If you put people in pitch, you can exaggerate, and those are becoming, instead of being so you get to be being when you own all your traits. So that's the first little step. ⁣ ⁣ 13:05⁣ 1947, he said it's not that we don't know so much, we know so much. That isn't so. We've been taught moral hypocrisies. Alistair McIntyre, in his book on the history of ethics, shows that we've been given a bunch of ideals that nobody lives by, but everybody thinks they're supposed to, and then they beat themselves up and because they do. They brain offload decisions to outer authorities, and the outer authorities set up the moral hypocrisies for ability to control people as a strategy. So I realized that it's not that we don't know so much. We know so much. That isn't so. So it's time to confront the fantasies and idealisms and the unrealistic expectations and to look at things in a broader perspective. In a broad mind, it's neither positive or negative. In a narrow mind, it's neither positive or negative. In a narrow mind, it's either positive or negative. ⁣ ⁣ 13:48⁣ So I started to go and ask the trait that I listed on the encyclopedia did I interpret it as a positive trait or a negative trait? And if I interpret it as a positive trait, I then asked what are the downsides of the trait? Until I found enough drawbacks to see both sides? And if I saw it as a negative trait, what are the upsides to it? Until I saw both sides? Because I realized that you may infatuate with a guy. You may meet this guy. He's highly intelligent, ooh. He's an aphrodisiac. He turns me on, he's so intelligent, ooh. But then you go. But he's argumentative, he thinks he's right, he knows it all, he doesn't want to listen, he wants to always win in a fight of argument. And then you go oh, there's downsides to that. ⁣ ⁣ 14:27⁣ But because I was infatuated and fantasizing about how good it was, I was blind, I minimized myself, I sacrificed to get with this guy. I feared his loss and I disempowered myself until I saw both sides. And when I saw both sides, he didn't control me. I gave myself power, my power back. In the process of doing it, I went through the 4,628 traits and looked for the upsides to what I thought was down, the down to what was up, until I saw that it was neither positive nor negative. And then I transcended the moral hypocrisies that I'd been indoctrinated by, which was the dogma, and I got to see that there was nothing but love. All else was illusion, because love is the synthesis and synchronicity of complementary opposites, which is the state of being, which is our spiritual path, as Hagel says oh, fascinating. ⁣ ⁣ 15:18 - Hilary Russo (Host)⁣ I love this conversation so much. I'm just sitting here and I'm thinking with such wisdom that you have, with over 50 years of studying, which everything that you're sharing here on the show in just a small period of time. I'd love to know who is your inspiration Like, who helped you come to this place, because I know you share personally that you had your own story even as a high school dropout, as someone who had his own challenges in his youth. Who truly was your inspiration to move you into the space of becoming and being? ⁣ ⁣ 15:58 - Dr. John Demartini (Guest)⁣ Well, I don't know if there's one, there's probably 30,000. ⁣ ⁣ 16:03 - Hilary Russo (Host)⁣ Maybe a couple of your favorites. ⁣ ⁣ 16:08 - Dr. John Demartini (Guest)⁣ When I was a young boy, I left home and I left home at 13. At 14, I hitchhiked from Houston, texas, to California. On that hitchhike I was confronted by three cowboys. In El Paso, texas, I had a headband, a Hawaiian shirt on, some shorts, some sandals and I had a surfboard. And I was hitchhiking to California. I got confronted by three cowboys. Cowboys and surfers didn't get along in those days, 1968. ⁣ ⁣ 16:39⁣ I was walking through downtown because the freeway wasn't in those days. You had to go through the downtown and three cowboys lined up across the front of me and they were going to not let me through. They didn't like long-haired hippie kids. I didn't know what to do. I couldn't outrun them, I couldn't go in the store, I couldn't go in the street. I had to confront them and somehow a great ingenious idea came to me. I looked like a wild animal and barked like some wild wolf and dog. Okay, now that that's talking about genius. Now that was that low level genius. So I did and the guys moved aside. They moved aside and they let me through the sidewalk and I'm growling at him with my and they let me through. ⁣ ⁣ 17:26⁣ As I came on the other side there was a guy on the street corner leaning on a lamppost, trying to compose himself from laughing so hard, because he just saw what I did. And he comes up behind me and he puts his arm on top of my shoulder and he said, sonny, that's the funniest dang thing I've ever seen. You took them cowpokes like a pro. Can I buy you a cup of coffee? And I said, sir, I don't drink coffee. Can I get you a Coca-Cola? And I said yes, sir. ⁣ ⁣ 17:53⁣ So he took me to a little malt shop and we're swiveling on these things and I had a little Coke with this guy. He was 62 years old at the time but he seemed older, because when you're 14, that seems old. Now it seems young. I'm 70 almost. So I listened to him and he said you finished with your Coke? I said yes, sir. He said then follow me, I have something to teach you. ⁣ ⁣ 18:16⁣ So he took me two blocks, another two blocks up these steps to the downtown El Paso library. We asked the lady at the information booth if she could keep my surfboard and my little duffel bag there watched while we went too library. We asked the lady at the information booth if she could keep my surfboard and my little duffel bag there, watched while we went to the library. We go down these steps, walk a ways up these little steps and sat there in front of a table and he said just sit here, young man. ⁣ ⁣ 18:36⁣ He went off into the bookshelves, he came back with two big books, put them on the table and sat catty corner to me and he said, son, there's two things I want to teach you. You have to promise me that you will remember these things and never forget them. I said yes, sir. He said number one don't ever judge a book by its cover. I said yes, sir. And he says let me tell you why. ⁣ ⁣ 19:02⁣ Young man, you probably think I'm some old guy on the street, some old bum, but, young man, I'm one of the wealthiest men in the world. I have everything that money can buy. I've got planes and boats and businesses and homes and companies, everything that money can buy. He says so don't ever judge a book by its cover, because he can fool you. I said yes, sir. Then he grabbed my hand and he stuck them on top of the two books, and it was Plato and Aristotle. And he said to me young man, you learn how to read. You learn how to read, boy. I said, yes, sir, and he said and here's why they can take away your possessions. People can die, but there's only two things they can never take away from you, and that is your love and your wisdom. So you gain the wisdom of love and you gain the love of wisdom, because that's something that nobody can ever take away from you and that will accumulate through your life. You promise me you'll never, forget that young man. ⁣ ⁣ 20:10⁣ My cufflinks today say love and wisdom. It turned out it was Howard Hughes. ⁣ ⁣ 20:16 - Hilary Russo (Host)⁣ Oh wow, how many times have you told that story and had that response? That's pretty. ⁣ ⁣ 20:26 - Dr. John Demartini (Guest)⁣ Not that many times, but oh, I feel honored. He was doing an El Paso natural gas deal with El Paso Natural Gas for a brewery he was building in Austin, Texas. This is right before he went to Las Vegas with his germaphobic outcome. ⁣ ⁣ 20:46 - Hilary Russo (Host)⁣ I mean, that's incredible. ⁣ ⁣ 20:48 - Dr. John Demartini (Guest)⁣ At 17, I met a guy named Paul Bragg. He told me that he says we have a body, we have a mind and we have a soul, and the body must be directed by the mind and the mind must be guided by the soul to maximize who we are. And he says you want to set goals for yourself, your family, your community, your city, your state, your nation, your world and beyond for 100 to 120 years, because by the time you grow up you'll be living to 100 years. This is a 1972. And he said what you see, what you say, what you see, what you say, what you think, what you feel and the actions you take determine your destiny. So if you take command of your life and don't let others take command of your life, you can create a life by design, not duty, and you give yourself permission to shine, not shrink, and you can live in a sense ontologically as a state of being, instead of deontologically as a state of becoming. So he had an impact on me when I was 17. Then I made it to age 23. ⁣ ⁣ 21:54⁣ I made a guy named Lakishwaram. He had six PhDs at 35 years old PhDs at 35 years old already six PhDs and I got to mentor under this guy and learn from this guy, and it was just an amazing breadth of knowledge this man had. And he asked me one day to a question. He asked a question, he answered it and then he said are you certain about your answer? And I said, well, no, is that an answer that's accurate? He says yes, it is. You know inside, trust yourself. Whenever you minimize yourself to others, you'll offload the decision and think they know better than you. Find your core competency where you have highest on your values, where you have the greatest epistemological pursuit, and honor that and stick to your core competence and then do something in your life that fulfills what's core competent and you will excel and do something great with your life. So I have had, I've been blessed to study all of the great classics, both Eastern and Western mysticism, from the Vedanta to Buddhist teachings to all the Greek philosophers. I've slayed all the Nobel Prize winners, anybody who has had any global influence that's done anything amazing I've devoured, and one thing that I'm certain about, that the originators of the various disciplines of life are the people I've learned the most from, the people who gave themselves permission to be an unborrowed visionary, and not somebody that's borrowing and copying, but somebody who is actually an originator. See, I've said since I was about 20, I create original ideas that serve humanity. I create original ideas that serve humanity. ⁣ ⁣ 23:38⁣ I also said I learned something from Albert Einstein. Albert Einstein said I'm not a man of my family or my community or my city or my state or even my nation. I'm a citizen of the world. So I've since I was 18 years old I want to be a citizen of the world. Pictet has said that. ⁣ ⁣ 23:54⁣ Socrates said that I could go down the list of people that understood that they didn't want to be localized, they wanted to be non-locally entangled with the universe. So I live on a ship called the world. It goes to every country around the world. I've said since I was 20 to 21 years old the universe is my playground, the world is my home. Every country is a room in the house, every city is a platform to share my heart and soul. My life is dedicated to love and wisdom and doing whatever I can to expand awareness and potential and the involvement of human consciousness, which has already evolved. It's just us waking up to it and do whatever I can to do that, and I do that seven days a week because I can't think of anything else I'd rather be doing. ⁣ ⁣ 24:34 - Hilary Russo (Host)⁣ Like what is the idea of true originality. ⁣ ⁣ 24:37 - Dr. John Demartini (Guest)⁣ Well, you distill and then you integrate into oneness the information, you link it to what you value most. Aristotle had a thing he called the telos, which is the study of which is teleology was the study of meaning and purpose. When I was 23 years old, I realized I asked the question what is it that makes a difference between people that walk their talk and limp their life, people that do what they say and not? And I was fascinated by what the distinction is, and I found that people who set goals and objectives true objectives, not fantasies that are aligned and congruent with what they truly value most, what their life demonstrates is truly most important to them, they increase the probability of original thinking, and original thinking comes when you're willing to pursue challenges that inspire you. The moment you pursue challenges that inspire you, and the greatest challenge to inspire you, are the ones that serve the greatest number of people, the problems that serve the greatest number of people. You know it's interesting. Elon Musk is a good example of this. He finds what's the biggest problems on the planet and he goes and finds a way of solving them. ⁣ ⁣ 25:50⁣ I have a girlfriend that I dated for a while. My wife passed away and she was at Harvard and Oxford and Cornell. She went to four major universities. A very bright lady and she went to the professor at Harvard Her name is Trish Went to the professor at Harvard and this is a time when there was still a little bit of discrepancy between males and females right, it's starting to get a little bit more even but at the time it was still polarized. And she said I want to be able to create a massive business. And he said well, if you do, you need to find the biggest challenge that the society is facing and find a more efficient solution. She said, okay. ⁣ ⁣ 26:35⁣ So she went back to her country, which was South Africa, and she saw that the energy crisis was the biggest one, because ESCOM in South Africa was constantly rationing energy and had a bit of corruption and it wasn't really serving the people to the fullest. So she says I'm going to find a solution to the energy crisis. When she did, she concluded that nuclear was probably the most efficient probably the most efficient. So she, as an individual, raised the funds and borrowed the money to build a private nuclear power plant. Now no one can say that she's the only one that I know in the world that's pulled that off. Most of these are governments that do so. She ended up building a nuclear power plant, selling it back to the government and doing quite well. Now her husband at the time disowned her and divorced her because he didn't want to have the debt, because this is billions. ⁣ ⁣ 27:28⁣ So she took on the risk to solve the problems at the time. When she solved that, she said what's the next issue in the country? Transportation. People are walking everywhere. They can't afford transportation. So she decided to build commuter trains. ⁣ ⁣ 27:45⁣ But the other thing was unemployment and uneducation. So what she did is she did an aerial view of South Africa. She looked at all the problems where the most poverty was, where jobs were needed and these kind of things. She looked at where the rail was and she rerouted rails into the areas that had the most poverty. She set up educational systems to educate them for engineering and hired these people to build trains and commuter trains and put thousands of people to work and created a computer train manufacturing system in three major locations to transform the education, the economics, job opportunities which reduce crime issues and solve the problem. ⁣ ⁣ 28:29⁣ So people who care about humanity, that are dedicated to finding major problems, the greater the problem they get, the more fulfillment they get in life and the more ingenious and original creative thinking comes out of them to solve it. But if you don't have a big enough problem that inspires you to solve, don't expect genius to emerge. It's there in all of us, but we sometimes want to live in our amygdala, avoiding pain and seeking pleasure and avoiding challenge and seeking ease, that we don't go after. The challenges that inspire us, that make a difference, and those are the ones that wake up the genius and creativity of original thinking. ⁣ ⁣ 29:09 - Hilary Russo (Host)⁣ Before we go any further, I do want to mention if you're just overwhelmed with this unbelievable conversation we're having, please know that he has been so gracious to offer a number of free masterclasses and I'm going to put those links in the listen notes of this podcast episode of HIListically Speaking so that you can pick what look. I would say, download them all, because we're talking about the law of attraction. We're talking about how to increase and deserve that level of finally getting what you want in your life. All of these free gifts, the power of your full advantage and potential. The list goes on and on. ⁣ ⁣ 29:42⁣ I'm not going to run down them all. You're going to, just you're going to go to the list of notes, you're going to see what's up, what is there for you, and take your time. You know I say it all the time on this podcast Every guest I have is like a masterclass, and here you are offering additional master classes in addition to this conversation. So let me just say thank you so much, so grateful, for everything that you are sharing. It is just a wealth of information, from your own experiences and your own growth to how you are serving others in this world from that original, authentic self that you present here today. ⁣ ⁣ 30:22 - Dr. John Demartini (Guest)⁣ so thank you for that uh, thank you for having give me the opportunity to share with people, because without the people, what good am I? ⁣ ⁣ 30:31 - Hilary Russo (Host)⁣ absolutely. We need each other in this world, right? So your book, the ascent the essentials of emotional intelligence, is your latest book. Where are you hoping this book will go that perhaps other books haven't, from somebody who has released what close to 50 books, if not more? ⁣ ⁣ 30:48 - Dr. John Demartini (Guest)⁣ Yeah, I've written about 300, but there's about 50 that are paperbacks. Okay, the mission of this book was to give some practical tools on how to stabilize the emotional vicissitudes, the impulsive and instinctual seeking and avoidings that distract us from being present, and how to awaken the four brains executive center, the medial prefrontal cortex, which, according to Scientific American in the October edition of 2022, was called the seat of the self. It's a neural correlate for the seat of the self. It's not our self, but it's the neural correlate. And when we allow that to occur, when we live by priority, that blood glucose and oxygen goes into that forebrain, activates that area. That area has nerve fibers down into the amygdala, nucleus, acumens and palladium, and it uses glutamate and GABA to neutralize the impulses and instincts and dampens the volatility that distract us into the imposter syndrome, so we can be our magnificent self. ⁣ ⁣ 31:58⁣ So that's why, if we don't fill our day with high priority actions that inspire us, that integrate us, our day is designed to fill up with low priority distractions that don't to create chaos in our life, to get us guided back to what is authentic. All the symptoms are trying to get us back to authenticity and a lot of people think there's something wrong with them, but actually they're misinterpreting what this feedback is offering them. Their body and mind is doing what it's designed to do to get them back to authenticity. And when you actually go back and prioritize your life, dedicate to what's highest in priority, delegate what's lowest in priority and delegate to those people that would be inspired to do what you want to delegate, so you give job opportunities and help the economy and help people fulfill their lives. You liberate yourself from the distractions of impulses and instincts and the imposter syndrome. That's what the book's for. ⁣ ⁣ 32:50 - Hilary Russo (Host)⁣ And is this a book that is relatively easy to read for those who might be approaching this kind of mindset, maybe taking a deep dive and making some changes in their own lives? Is this the first book that they should look at, or are there other books? ⁣ ⁣ 33:07 - Dr. John Demartini (Guest)⁣ There's many books. Everybody when you go to the bookstore you find the one that resonates at that time and 10 weeks later you got another one. I have many books that you could go through and scan and see which ones resonate with you. But I believe that because I have an editor to help me with it, because he would, you know, bring it to where it's. I don't understand that. Clarify it, kind of thing. I think between us we've tried to make the book as understandable as we can. ⁣ ⁣ 33:34⁣ But at the same time I learned many years ago I've been teaching speed learning programs and how to wake up. You know photographic memories and genius and all kinds of stuff in people for many years now. And what people do is they have a conscious self and an unconscious self, right the explicit and implicit, and most people read verbally, not visually, and they're used to phonemes and they're used to you know what they say and only reading and learning as fast as they can speak and as a result of it, anytime they go beyond that speech speed, which is two to 300 words for most people. They go. I didn't get it, but what I've learned is that it's all there in your visual system. Your thalamus filters out certain information, but it's still there. And then when you need it and the information is needed and it helps you fulfill a purpose, it comes from the unconscious up to the conscious level. So I teach people to just take in the information and don't question whether you got it, just take it in, look at it, see it, because then all of a sudden, when you're in a conversation and somebody asks you a question, where that information is needed out, it will come, but you won't need it, you won't even hear it, didn't even know, you knew it until that moment. When you do, then you realize that we're so we limit ourselves to our conscious awareness, which is a small portion of what we are capable of taking in, and then we don't honor the other part of our life that knows. And so I'm a firm believer just delivering the information and letting people trust what they learn, to trust both sides of themselves and to embrace it, because we have a capacity to learn way farther than even most people ever imagined. I mean, I'm absolutely certain I read 11,000 pages in one day and absorbed it, and people start asking questions on it and they go. ⁣ ⁣ 35:33⁣ I don't think I didn't know how you could do that and I said because I didn't question it. I stopped questioning what I learned and believing that it's only what I got consciously. And then, when you asked me the question, whatever was unconscious was there for me. So a lot of people don't realize that they have a genius. There's no uniqueness. Everyone has a genius and it can be awakened and I've been working on that. The first statement that I ever got from Paul Bragg is because I told him I didn't know how to read. I didn't read until I was 18. I didn't know. I was learned and disabled and I was told I would never be able to read. He told me say every single day, say to yourself I'm a genius and I apply my wisdom. ⁣ ⁣ 36:17 - Hilary Russo (Host)⁣ So I did. ⁣ ⁣ 36:19 - Dr. John Demartini (Guest)⁣ I didn't know what that even meant. I asked my mom. When I saw my mom, I said what the heck is a genius? She says people like Albert Einstein and Da Vinci. I said well then, get me everything you can about those guys. ⁣ ⁣ 36:28⁣ I later learned that a genius is one who listens to their inner voice and follows their inner vision and obeys and lets the voice and vision on the inside be louder than all opinions on the outside, and then they master the path of their life. They're on their dharmic path, not their karmic wheel, and they liberate themselves from the bondage of all the infatuations, resentments, all the exaggerations of pride and shame that stop them from being authentic when they exaggerate and minimize other people through judgment. So we have a genius inside and it's spontaneously ready to come out, but we don't give it permission to come out because we're too preoccupied with what others think and how we're positioned. And there was two Nobel Prize winners that got their Nobel Prize in 2016 on the place in grid cells and in January February of 2020. ⁣ ⁣ 37:23⁣ Fantastic article on that in the Scientific American showing how we socially put ourselves in pecking orders and hierarchies in society because we disown parts and if we went and we go and take the most powerful people on the planet and go find what do I admire in them, what do I dislike in them, and own them all, we reposition ourselves and we awaken the same playing field that they're playing on and I've proven that in thousands of cases. We have people that have now Grammy award-winning, people that we're just barely seeing, and we got people that are doing amazing things economically, because there's nothing missing in us and fulfillment is the realization. There's nothing missing, never was missing, but we were too busy, preoccupied with being too proud or too humble to admit what we see in others, inside us. And when we finally embrace our hero and villain in all parts of ourselves and not try to get rid of half of ourselves, we finally awaken that magnificent genius that's sitting there dormant, ready to emerge spontaneously into inspired action of creativity and origination. The second we be authentic. ⁣ ⁣ 38:30 - Hilary Russo (Host)⁣ It so comes back to balance Everything you're saying, like the yin, the yang. It's so balanced and I think you're opening my mind to think of things more than just like work-life balance, and I think you're opening my mind to think of things more than just like work-life balance, and it's so much more. And what you just said about the inner voice because truly this is the loudest voice in the room is our own right. And how are we speaking to ourselves? What is that inner bully doing? That's stepping up on the playground constantly. It's truly embodying the beauty that exists within each and every one of us. The genius remark you said. I would love for you to reiterate that statement, that conversation you had with your mom, because, if anything, that is something that should be up on everyone's wall, your mirror, that thing you see every day, a reminder to yourself of what follows those words. I am. I am a genius. And you said something else. Could you share that Cause? That was brilliant. ⁣ ⁣ 39:29 - Dr. John Demartini (Guest)⁣ Well, that that that came from Paul Bragg. He gave it to me when I was 17. Well, I just turned 18. At the time he said cause? I told him I didn't know how to read, how am I going to be a teacher? I wanted to travel the world and teach. And he said and I thought that's what I saw in my dream. And he says just say to yourself every single day. I'm a genius and I apply my wisdom. Said every single day, until the cells of your body tingle with it, and so with the world. I didn't know how to read at the time. I learned how to read after I started saying that every day. ⁣ ⁣ 40:01 - Hilary Russo (Host)⁣ Well, I'm sure there was an inner dialogue you were having where the words on paper didn't matter as much as the words that you were telling yourself. ⁣ ⁣ 40:08 - Dr. John Demartini (Guest)⁣ Well, the thing is, as many times many people have this internal dialogue, self-depreciation, but they don't realize that they're addicted to praise is the source of it. The addicted to fantasy is the source of it. There's a thing called a moral licensing effect and I hope everybody looks that up. And when everybody's done it without knowing it, most people have gone out and they've worked out. They went to the gym, they worked out, they really did a workout and they kind of got their abs looking good and they got their butt looking good and then all of a sudden they go. Well, I gave myself permission, I can eat more chocolate, I can eat more food and I can drink some more wine tonight. That's the licensing effect. The moment you do something you're proud of, you give yourself permission to do something you're ashamed of. Now that same truth. ⁣ ⁣ 40:54⁣ This is a homeostatic mechanism. I've been studying interceptive homeostatic mechanisms in biological systems for decades and what is interesting is the second you go above equilibrium, like the temperature goes up, you create sweating to bring it back, and the second you go below and it's cold, you create shivering to bring it back. We have a built-in homeostatic interceptive feedback inside our consciousness and anytime we get a neurochemistry that's imbalanced. The pre and post-synaptic brain will automatically rebalance it and attempt to balance it. And so we create for every memory an anti-memory and we create it and we'll dissociate. If it's a traumatic memory, we'll dissociate and create a fantasy, and if it's a fantasy thing, we'll create a paranoia to get a balance, to keep the homeostasis balanced. So the second we're beating ourselves up. Most people go, oh, get rid of that, get rid of that, get rid of that. And they can't get rid of it as long as they're building themselves up with fantasies. And so the second they compare themselves to others and put people on pedestals and go, oh, I want to be like that and set up a fantasy. And then they say only these positive things about themselves. They automatically have to self-depreciate to counterbalance it. So a balanced orientation you don't have that polarity, You've integrated the polarity. ⁣ ⁣ 42:08⁣ So I don't try to be positive all the time, or nice all the time, or peaceful all the time. I'm a human being and I have a set of values. When I live by my highest values, I'm most objective and neutral. When I'm living by lower values, I become more volatile. That's why anybody that does something that's really high priority during the day, they're resilient and adaptable. Because they're neutral, because they don't feel the loss of things they infatuate with, they don't feel the gain of things. They resent the moment they balance themselves and bring themselves up and live by priority, they're more neutral. But if not, they're more polarized. When they get polarized and they end up fearing the loss of the things they infatuate with and fearing the gain of that, they're now distracted. ⁣ ⁣ 42:48⁣ So I basically learned many years ago to ask questions. That rebalanced it and I realized that the second I got addicted to praise, criticism hurt, and the second I puffed myself up. I attract challenge, criticism, distractions. ⁣ ⁣ 43:06⁣ There's a thing called depurposing and repurposing. The second, you get proud and think you're successful. You depurpose, you give yourself permission to do low priority things and the purpose of that is to get you back into authenticity because you're puffed up and then, if you go down, you go okay, now I overate. So now the next morning I'm now going to get up and jog. I haven't been jogging for weeks, but now I overate, I'm going jogging. ⁣ ⁣ 43:28⁣ So you give yourself to repurpose, so you have a built-in homeostatic mechanism to guide you to authenticity. But you're constantly being taught what isn't so, as Dirac said, about how you're supposed to be one-sided. Get rid of half of yourself, Be nice, don't mean, be kind, don't be cruel, be positive, don't be negative. And so you're set up like I got to get rid of half of myself and the whole personal development journey out. There is misleading people into thinking they have to get rid of themselves to love themselves, and the truth is integrating and embracing both sides of yourself is what liberates you and makes you realize the magnificence of who you are and the contributions you're making. ⁣ ⁣ 44:07 - Hilary Russo (Host)⁣ Now you don't build yourself up. ⁣ ⁣ 44:08 - Dr. John Demartini (Guest)⁣ You don't build yourself up. You don't beat yourself up. People come up to me, and sometimes in interview, and they say, dr Demartini, how did you become successful? And I go I'm not successful. And they go what it says? ⁣ ⁣ 44:22⁣ I have no desire for success because my addiction to success is the very thing that creates the fear of failure. I'm a man on a mission and I see success and failure as feedback mechanisms to help me stay focused and authentic. And if I get successful, I'm proud and I do low priority things to get me back down and if I feel like I'm a failure, I go back to high priority things to get me back up. When I'm in the center, I don't even think of success or failure. I think of my mission. ⁣ ⁣ 44:48⁣ And that is always a perfect blend between myself and other people, because if I'm thinking of success, I think about myself and I forgot my people, and if I think of a failure, I'm thinking about myself, I forgot my people. But when I'm in perfect balance, I'm thinking of perfect balance, reflective awareness of the people, humanity and myself. As Schopenhauer says, we become our true self to the degree that we make everyone else ourself. It's all us out there, and when we get there, we don't think of success or fair. We think of we're working as a team on the planet. And when we get there, we don't think of success or failure, we think of we're working as a team on the planet period. ⁣ ⁣ 45:20 - Hilary Russo (Host)⁣ Thank you so much for that. Thank you for the reminder moment of just a new piece of information for folks to ingest and think about and process and think how they can be both sides and find that center. Find that center Really, it's not even being both sides, it's becoming right. I have some work to do myself, so I really appreciate you and all that you're sharing and just becoming and being, and what I would love to do with you in this moment. I know we have a few seconds left. If you hang with me for just a few seconds, I would love to do a quick game with you and throw out some words that you've shared during this episode and see what the first word is that comes back. A little word association. I love to do with my guests. Do you have a moment? ⁣ ⁣ 46:22 - Dr. John Demartini (Guest)⁣ Sure. ⁣ ⁣ 46:23 - Hilary Russo (Host)⁣ All right, great. So I'm just going to just go with. The first word that comes to mind is wisdom. Just one word, come back. ⁣ ⁣ 46:32 - Dr. John Demartini (Guest)⁣ In my case, it's what I feel is my mission. ⁣ ⁣ 46:36 - Hilary Russo (Host)⁣ Mission Okay, and love Same thing Okay, and love Same thing Okay. Venous Same thing World. ⁣ ⁣ 46:50 - Dr. John Demartini (Guest)⁣ Destined. ⁣ ⁣ 46:52 - Hilary Russo (Host)⁣ Emotions. ⁣ ⁣ 46:55 - Dr. John Demartini (Guest)⁣ Feedback systems to the truth of love. ⁣ ⁣ 46:58 - Hilary Russo (Host)⁣ Authenticity. Being feedback systems to the truth of love, authenticity being becoming feedback systems to being you're good, I'm going to leave it with this last word, because it is my word of the year and I want to know what your word for balance would be. ⁣ ⁣ 47:21 - Dr. John Demartini (Guest)⁣ Equanimity of both mind and body. ⁣ ⁣ 47:26 - Hilary Russo (Host)⁣ I want to sit with that one for a moment and I appreciate everything you're sharing, your personal story, your wisdom, your wit and everything you're putting out there into the world while you, while you sail along on the world and I hope at some point I am at a port where you are speaking in person, cause I, I would just really love to be in your personal, your space to really feel that energy, because this is, this is, I'm feeling it right here across the airwaves, that energy, because this is, this is I'm feeling it right here across the airwaves. But I have a feeling it's even more, it's even greater in to be in person with you, where are you next? ⁣ ⁣ 48:09 - Dr. John Demartini (Guest)⁣ What's what's on? Where's the ship sailing? Next I go from here. I'm here for till tomorrow. Then I go to La Habla, Brazil, and then I'm off to Rio de Janeiro the carnival starts there, so I'm passing through there and then I quickly run over to Chennai and Mumbai to do three presentations at a Change makers conference Thousands of people will be there and then I run back down to Cape Town to do some filming and also presentations there. And then we sail up to Maputo, Mozambique, and then I quickly run to London to do presentations there. ⁣ ⁣ 48:46⁣ And then I get back on a French island and my girlfriend's meeting me in the Seychelles Islands and the Maldives for a little romance Lovely. And then off to India, then Lovely, and then off to India then. And then we go to Sri Lanka and off to Indonesia and Malaysia and Cambodia and Vietnam and those areas. So we circumnavigate the planet and I get off and on, if I have to do live speaking, otherwise I do presentations. But tomorrow I'm in Japan and the next two days I'll be in Australia from the ship here. So I say the universe is my playground, the world is home. ⁣ ⁣ 49:22 - Hilary Russo (Host)⁣ On that note, would you have anything you would like to close and share with listeners of the HIListically Speaking podcast? ⁣ ⁣ 49:32 - Dr. John Demartini (Guest)⁣ Yeah, can I share a story? I know I go a couple of seconds over, but I think this is. ⁣ ⁣ 49:38⁣ Doctor, it is your time and I graciously accept your stories 34 years ago almost 35, I was speaking in San Francisco and I was doing a seven-day program on self-mastery and leadership and one of the ladies there asked if I could, at lunch, go over to the hospital there and meet with a particular patient. And I said, if you get me a bagel to eat on the way there and back because I have to start, I only got an hour. If you can get me there and back in an hour and give me a bagel or something to eat, I'll be glad to. We went over there and there was a. We went into this hospital room and there was a guy that was kind of leaning up in the bed and was sort of half asleep and a motion covered with sores and he was dying of AIDS. And he was didn't look like he had much farther to go. His immune deficiency is pretty collapsed. ⁣ ⁣ 50:38⁣ And I sat on the edge of the bed, grabbed his hands. He didn't know who I was and I just looked at him and I said to him please repeat with me what I say no matter what I've done or not done, I'm worthy of love. No matter what I've done or not done, I'm worthy of love. No matter what I've done or not done, I'm worthy of love. And I made him say that and at first he just said the words and about five repetitions he started to cry Because he had accumulated and stored a whole lot of judgments on himself and when we judge ourselves and condemn ourselves, our immune system responds. And so I made him say that until he cried, until he literally leaned over and fell literally onto me. I'm twisted on the bed holding him now on to me. I'm twisted on the bed holding him. Now. There was a nurse there, there was another lady I don't know who, she was administration lady and there was a lady that asked me to come. We're all in tears, we're all just in a moment of grace and authenticity. When you have a tear of gratitude, you have a gamma wave in the brain, you get a moment of authenticity. It's a confirmation. In that moment. He did that and he looked up at me and he said I've never in my life ever felt that or believed or ever said that Thank you. And I said Thank you and we hugged each other and I left, went back to do my prose presentation and didn't know anything about it for a few weeks and finally I got a letter from the lady who asked me to come and a picture. Somehow the man changed his perceptions and rallied. ⁣ ⁣ 52:43⁣ I really don't know the limitations of our ability to heal. I've seen things that would be considered less than probable but all I know is that this man rallied. They thought he was going to die. Didn't die Now, I don't know. Maybe he later. I'm sure somewhere down the line he did, but he didn't die in that recent weeks for sure. ⁣ ⁣ 53:10⁣ So I wrote a book called Count your Blessings the Healing Power of Gratitude and Love. ⁣ ⁣ 53:14⁣ I still believe that that's still one of the great healers on the planet. ⁣ ⁣ 53:17⁣ When we're graced by seeing the hidden order of life and we really, truly realize that there's nothing but love, all else was illusion and we've stopped judging ourselves for just a moment and get a glimpse of our real self, that the power of our physiology to normalize and to homeostasis  are stored, subconsciously stored imbalances, epigenetic lock-ins, you might say are freed. ⁣ ⁣ 53:45⁣ So I just want to end on a story that, in case you've ever judged yourself, just know that no matter what you've done or not done, you're worthy of love and the only reason you're judging yourself is because you're comparing yourself to somebody else's value system Because the decisions you made was based on what you believed at that time were more advantage and disadvantage to you and yours. But if you try to compare it to somebody else, you'll think you're making mistakes, just like if you try to expect others to live in your values. You think they're making mistakes. But maybe there's no mistakes after a while and maybe it's wise to look back a different way and ask how is whatever I've experienced and whatever I've done, how is it helping me fulfill my mission in life? And don't stop until you get a tear of gratitude for whatever you've done or not done. And that is definitely liberating and empowering for any human being, regardless of the situation. It can help relationships, it can help healing, it can help your body, it can help your business. ⁣ ⁣ 54:43 - Hilary Russo (Host)⁣ Gratitude and love is still one of the great healers on the planet. I am so in a place of gratitude right now. So thank you, and I can only imagine that those who are tuning in are going to feel that as well. Thank you for leaving those words with people to sit with and think about and remember that we're all geniuses and we're all the gift. Thank you, dr Demartini. Appreciate it. ⁣ ⁣ 55:09 - Dr. John Demartini (Guest)⁣ Thank you. Thank you, thank you. ⁣ ⁣ 55:12 - Hilary Russo (Host)⁣ I know we have covered a lot of territory during this conversation, but the beauty is you have so many possibilities to connect with Dr Demartini and learn from him yourself, and I'm going to help you with that. I've shared a number of links in the notes of this podcast episode to his free webinars and, of course, to his latest book, essentials of Emotional Intelligence. And once you've had some time to process this, once you've had some time to listen to the show this week, I'm going to suggest that you come back and do it again, because when you give things a listen more than once, you'd be surprised what you unpack the second or the third time or even the fourth. Then, once you have a little time to sit there with it, go ahead and leave a rating or review, or just let me know what you think about this episode, this show on HIListically Speaking and how it has been serving and supporting you, because that's really what this show is about. ⁣ ⁣ 56:14⁣ HIListically Speaking is edited by 2MarketMedia with music by Lipone Redding and, of course, listened to by you time and time again. So thank you so much for taking time to tune in and remember this, and you know this is my word of the year. This year. Life is about balance, and you heard Dr Demartini talk about it himself, and you, my, are already the perfect genius in your own right, so embrace that and always remember to be kind to your mind. I love you, I believe in you and I will see you next week.

La Asamblea Nacional de Nicaragua, controlada por el Frente Sandinista, aprobó el traslado de la Dirección de Resolución Alterna de Conflictos, también conocida como Dirac. Esta Dirección estaba adscrita a la Corte Suprema de Justicia y fue trasladada a la Procuraduría General de la República, bajo dominio del Poder Ejecutivo, que controlan Daniel Ortega y Rosario Murillo. En otras noticias: - CIDH pide propiciar un diálogo para superar la crisis de Derechos Humanos. - Nicaragua compra energía eléctrica a Costa Rica y Guatemala.

Some of Dirac's notable works on Amazon: Lectures on Quantum Mechanics – ⁠https://amzn.to/3Q7ojMm The Principles of Quantum Mechanics – ⁠⁠https://amzn.to/443HUTu All of Paul Dirac's books – https://amzn.to/3xziZLd Disclaimer: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase, I may receive a commission at no extra cost to you. __________________________________________________ Paul Adrien Maurice Dirac (8 August 1902 – 20 October 1984) was an English mathematical and theoretical physicist who is considered to be one of the founders of quantum mechanics and quantum electrodynamics. He is credited with laying the foundations of quantum field theory. He was the Lucasian Professor of Mathematics at the University of Cambridge, a professor of physics at Florida State University and the University of Miami, and a 1933 Nobel Prize in Physics recipient. Dirac made fundamental contributions to the early development of both quantum mechanics and quantum electrodynamics, coining the latter term. Among other discoveries, he formulated the Dirac equation in 1928, which describes the behaviour of fermions and predicted the existence of antimatter, and is considered one of the most important equations in physics, with it being considered by some to be the "real seed of modern physics". He wrote a famous paper in 1931, which further predicted the existence of antimatter. Dirac shared the 1933 Nobel Prize in Physics with Erwin Schrödinger "for the discovery of new productive forms of atomic theory". He also made significant contributions to the reconciliation of general relativity with quantum mechanics. His 1930 monograph, The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, is considered to be one of the most influential texts on quantum mechanics. Dirac's contributions were not only restricted to quantum mechanics. He contributed to the Tube Alloys project, the British programme to research and construct atomic bombs during World War II. Furthermore, Dirac made fundamental contributions to the process of uranium enrichment and the gas centrifuge, and whose work was deemed to be "probably the most important theoretical result in centrifuge technology". He also contributed to cosmology, putting forth his large numbers hypothesis. Dirac is also seen as having anticipated string theory well before its inception, with his work on the Dirac membrane and Dirac–Born–Infeld action, amongst other contributions. Dirac was regarded by his friends and colleagues as unusual in character. In a 1926 letter to Paul Ehrenfest, Albert Einstein wrote of a Dirac paper, "I am toiling over Dirac. This balancing on the dizzying path between genius and madness is awful." In another letter concerning the Compton effect he wrote, "I don't understand the details of Dirac at all." In 1987, Abdus Salam stated that "Dirac was undoubtedly one of the greatest physicists of this or any century . . . No man except Einstein has had such a decisive influence, in so short a time, on the course of physics in this century." Audio source Buy me a coffee Chapters: (00:00) Lecture 1: Quantum Mechanics (59:32) Lecture 2: Quantum Electrodynamics (2:04:06) Lecture 3: Magnetic Monopoles (2:54:58) Lecture 4: Does 'G' Vary? (Large Numbers Hypothesis) --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/theunadulteratedintellect/support

Here's my conversation with Filip Aronshtein the founder of Dirac

Filip Aronshtein, Founder and CEO of Dirac, a startup improving the industrialization process. Right now they are particularly focused on bridging the gap between CAD files and manufacturing work instruction creation. Fil holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering and a M.S. in Robotics from Johns Hopkins. ➡️ Follow Filip on Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/fila/ ➡️ Learn more about Dirac: https://diracinc.com ➡️ See more from Seraph: https://seraph.com/insights ➡️ Follow us on Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/company/seraph-consulting-inc 00:00 Introduction, What is Dirac? Why does it matter? 02:15 CEO Fil Aronshtein's background and inspiration 09:13 Where Dirac is at in product development 12:24 How Dirac works 15:57 Driving interactions on the shop floor and the 80/20 philosophy 17:24 Accumulating tribal knowledge 22:45 Dirac's progress so far 27:05 Current use cases Other places to listen ➡️ Manufacturing Excellence podcast on Apple: ⁠https://apple.co/3FURGfO⁠ ➡️ Manufacturing Excellence podcast on Spotify: ⁠https://spoti.fi/3FTZgXW⁠ ➡️ Manufacturing Excellence podcast on Amazon Music: ⁠https://amzn.to/40BlTIO⁠

Joe and Channa talk headphone ugliness. Phase and time aligned speakers leads to awesome imagining! What is impulse response? Channa complains about Dirac Art and his mixes! Exporting Magic Beans to various products. Using Pink Noise vs Sweeps. Mike Dean, great bass demo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evi12DFoPrc --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/dailyhifi/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/dailyhifi/support

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Sam Altman returning as OpenAI CEO "in principle", published by Fermi-Dirac Distribution on November 22, 2023 on The Effective Altruism Forum. This was just announced by the OpenAI Twitter account: Implicitly, the previous board members associated with EA, Helen Toner and Tasha McCauley, are ("in principle") no longer going to be part of the board. I think it would be useful to have, in the future, a postmortem of what happened, from an EA perspective. EA had two members on the board of arguably the most important company of the century, and it has just lost them after several days of embarrassment. I think it would be useful for the community if we could get a better idea of what led to this sequence of events. [update: Larry Summers said in 2017 that he likes EA.] Thanks for listening. To help us out with The Nonlinear Library or to learn more, please visit nonlinear.org

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: SBF found guilty on all counts, published by Fermi-Dirac Distribution on November 3, 2023 on The Effective Altruism Forum. Sam Bankman-Fried has been found guilty of all seven charges in his recent trial. The jury deliberated for three and a half hours. Here are the counts, listed by CNN: Count one: Wire fraud on customers of FTX Count two: Conspiracy to commit wire fraud on customers of FTX Count three: Wire fraud on Alameda Research lenders Count four: Conspiracy to commit wire fraud on lenders to Alameda Research Count five: Conspiracy to commit securities fraud on investors in FTX Count six: Conspiracy to commit commodities fraud on customers of FTX Count seven: Conspiracy to commit money laundering There are still a few other charges against him that will be addressed in a March 2024 trial. He (and I think also his convicted co-conspirators Caroline Ellison, Gary Wang, Ryan Salame and Nishad Singh) will be sentenced next March . Thanks for listening. To help us out with The Nonlinear Library or to learn more, please visit nonlinear.org

This week Samsung is bringing an 89” Micro LED TV to market and it will only cost you $102,000USD. We also take a look at AV receivers that we don't typically talk about.  And as usual we read your emails and look at the week's news stories. News: How DIY Is Blurring The Lines In Smart Home Security LG's most popular OLED TVs just fixed a big brightness problem with a new update LG's ‘wireless' and wildly expensive 97-inch OLED TV sees first global release Sony's 2023 A95L QD-OLED TV up for preorder in August starting at $2,800 Other: LEICA CINE 1 THE ART OF HOME CINEMA. Samsung's Stunning 89-Inch MicroLED TV Could Be What's Next After OLED When it comes to the best TVs, one of the biggest challenges is figuring out which display technology is truly the best. One of the contenders? MicroLED, which promises a serious upgrade over existing MiniLED technologies. Full article here… Receivers We Don't Typically Talk About We get questions about receiver recommendations and we typically stay with brands we have experience with. We have never had someone come back at us to complain about a Denon, Yamaha, or Marantz receiver. We run these in our homes everyday so we feel confident recommending them to you. But there are other brands that have loyal followings that you may want to consider. These brands are typically more expensive and full featured. Below are the lowest cost receivers from brands we don't typically talk about. Arcam AVR10 7.2-channel home theater receiver with Bluetooth® and Apple AirPlay® 2 The AVR10 is a high-performance audio/visual receiver that delivers stunning realism for the ultimate home cinema experience. With an impressive 12-channel surround solution and featuring all the latest CODECs from Dolby, DTS, Auro-3D and IMAX Enhanced, the AVR10 exemplifies sound quality and engineering excellence. Audiophile listening experiences are optimised with full 12-channel Dirac calibration on board as well as simple streaming with a mobile device using the native app of choice via Apple AirPlay2 or Google Chromecast. You can find the Arcam AVR10 at Crutchfield for $2200 NAD T 758 V3i A/V Surround Sound Receiver A performance update to our award-winning T 758 A/V Surround Sound Receiver, the T 758 V3i continues NAD's ‘simple is better' design philosophy by delivering a fluid user-friendly experience. From lifelike surround sound performance to heart thumping power, the T 758 V3i is a true treat for the senses. Employing NAD's proprietary MDC technology, the T 758 V3i is ready for future upgrades and features. With 4K UltraHD video, the T 758 V3i offers a vivid and engaging presentation when it comes to the latest in digital video technology. Complete with AV presets that are yours to customise, the T 758 V3i gives you total control of what you hear and how you see it. The NAD AV Remote iOS app to make your smartphone a remote control is available as a free download. Available at NAD's website for $1699. Emotiva BasX MR1L 9.2 Channel Dolby Atmos® & DTS:X™ Cinema Receiver How long have you been waiting for a receiver that can actually deliver the superb uncompromising performance of separate components? The BasX MR1L cinema receiver combines a high performance 13.2 channel immersive surround sound processor, and an audiophile quality 9 channel amplifier, in a single chassis. The processor section of the MR1L supports 4k UHD video, including HDR and Dolby Vision, enhanced ARC (eARC), and the latest Dolby Atmos® and DTS:X™ immersive surround sound formats. The MR1L features six HDMI 2.0b video inputs, all of which support 4k UHD HDR video, and includes support for enhanced ARC (eARC). Included with the MR1L is a measurement microphone and the latest version of EmoQ, our well-regarded automatic room correction system. The MR1L also offers multiple analog and digital audio inputs, and an integrated Bluetooth receiver with aptX. Available at Emotiva's website for $1599. Anthem MRX 540 8K 5.2-channel home theater receiver with Dolby Atmos®, Wi-Fi®, Bluetooth®, and Apple AirPlay® 2 Anthem's MRX 540 8K receiver is an excellent option for creating a high-performance home theater in a smaller room. It has everything you need — fantastic A/V processing, robust amplification, and exceptional room calibration — without extra channels of power that would go unused. This upscale receiver is an especially good choice if you plan to play premium content through it — like 4K Blu-ray discs or uncompressed music files from a high-resolution library. It even has the latest HDMI technology for 8K video sources, including premium gaming consoles. The MRX 540 8K is engineered to squeeze every drop of detail out of these high-res formats, and that's why it's worth considering over more modestly priced 5.1-channel receivers. Available at Anthem's website for $1900.

AVexcel - Episode 199 Recorded on March 25, 2023 Hosts: Patrick Norton and Robert Heron  The rundown: - RTINGS TV aging update - LG OLED firmware fix - Andrew Jones MoFi SourcePoint 10 speakers - Samsung S95C QD-OLED TV review - LG's "missing" TV service menu features - Sony's new ES 8K AV receivers - USB ATSC 3.0/NextGen TV tuner - Calculate speaker performance - UST projector screen comparison - ASUS ProArt Calman-Verified LED projector - HDMI cable testing follow-up - Blue Jeans Cable on HDMI - Apple Music's Classical app - 4:4:4 vs 4:2:2 vs 4:2:0 - Kaleidescape movie store - Audyssey calibration mic - Dirac arrives on Denon - Your excellent feedback & questions - Email us at ask@avexcel.com - What we're watching AVexcel is 100% powered by our excellent crew of Patreon supporters - thank you!  Visit www.AVexcel.com for links, show notes, contact info, and more!