POPULARITY
9 episodes with gauger
3 episodes with gauger
5 episodes with gauger
8 episodes with gauger
2 episodes with gauger
3 episodes with gauger
2 episodes with gauger
3 episodes with gauger
4 episodes with gauger
On this episode of ID the Future out of the archive, biologist Ann Gauger walks listeners through the triumphs, flaws, and tragedies of Louis Pasteur, the French scientist whose scientific breakthroughs have saved millions of lives, and whose work on microbes sounded the death knell of the idea of spontaneous generation. Dr. Gauger also discusses his pioneering and life-saving work on vaccines, the Christian faith that saw him through the death of his three of his children, and more. Source
This year’s theme for the annual free conference at the Moody Bible Institute, known as Founder’s Week, is Transformed by the Gospel. On Thursday’s Mornings with Eric and Brigitte, Jon Gauger joins us to preview this year’s event. He’ll share how you can be a part of this annual tradition, no matter where you are on the globe. www.FoundersWeek.orgSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Ambers joins us once again, with an armful of quizzes and her special type of positivity. Topics include: generic candy; proper bong usage; dong ia a funny word; a shitty Willy Wonka exhibit; Ben Schwartz's improv tour; fake news vs real news; a quiz about fried foods; a quiz about Pride month #podcast #funny #comedy #comedypodcast #genericcandy #bong #dong #WillyWonka #WillyWonkaExhibit #BenSchwartz #fakenews #friedfood #summer #pride Cartoon avatars of Tom & Mike created by Gary Bacon: https://twitter.com/pixelbud ***************************************************** VISIT OUR OFFICIAL SITE! https://www.tomandmike.com ***************************************************** Check out our let's play channel, Gaming with Tom & Mike: https://www.youtube.com/@gamingwithtommike
Fr. Mitch and biologist, Dr. Ann Gauger, discuss intelligent design, scientific disciplines revealing the purpose and theology behind creation and its reflection of God?s glory.
Gary brings you an eclectic mix of top drawer music drawn from his collection of all things bagpipe.PlaylistThe Iron Horse with The Goatherd, The Major's Maggot, James MacLellan's Favourite, Duncan the Gauger and The Piper's Bonnet from Thro' Water, Earth and Stone St Lawrence O'Toole Pipe Band with Joe Cooley's Hornpipe, Joe Cooley's Jig, The Donegal Lass, Eddie's Lamentation, The Strathspey King, Sergeant Murphy's, Stranded in Scotland, The Ballintore Fancy, the Lismurrane Lamps from The Dawning of the Day. Going to go with James Thomson for now – with Lucy Farr's Barn Dance, Bill Malley's Barn Dance and Hugh's Tune from Borders Young Pipers Craig Sutherland with MacLean of Pennycross, Dora MacLeod and John MacEchnie's Big Reel from The Wheel of Fortune 2024 Donald MacLeod with the Company's Lament (excerpt) from the Classic Collection of Piobaireachd Tutorials Vol 19. Urachadh with MacKay's March, Iain MacEachainn and Am Boc Liath from Urachadh Royal Ulster Constabulary Pipe Band with The Bind, Redford Cottage and Angus MacKinnon from Pipe Bands of Distinction Homebound with Prince of Persia from Adroneline Support the Show.
Jon Gauger, Moody Radio host and producer joins Mornings with Eric and Brigitte on Friday to talk about a new 54-minute special, Inside Israel--The War and What's Next, just released from Moody Radio, airing on WRMB 89.3, Sat. April 6 and Sun. April 7 at 4 p.m. ET. The Moody Radio team's microphones take you inside homes shot at and burned by Hamas. You'll meet families of hostages and hear perspectives from Jewish and Arab pastors. Plus, you'll encounter stories of help and hope--as the body of Christ witnesses to a nation that is more open to the gospel than ever before.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Experience the wonder of Christmas with your friends and family as you enjoy some classic holiday specials from Moody Radio! It's our gift to you this Christmas season. Friday on Mornings with Eric and Brigitte, radio host and producer, Jon Gauger shares some details about this year's Moody Radio Christmas specials!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
The Mike Vilardi Show. Where Religion meets Politics, and how they will impact our world.
Is the world a good place? Is truth relative? Can beauty be defined? On this episode of ID the Future from the archive, host David Klinghoffer speaks with Dr. Ann Gauger, Director of Science Communication and a Senior Fellow at Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture, about her article “The Transcendental Treasury of Truth, Beauty, and Goodness” at EvolutionNews.org. These abstract concepts don't derive from the material world, yet we feel impoverished without them; they're foundations of a life worth living. Materialistic evolutionary explanations for truth, beauty, and goodness are out there, but they fall flat upon closer inspection. Some of them even reduce these qualities to mere illusion. Gauger holds that truth, beauty, and goodness are hallmarks of a designed world. Meditating on them can promote a spirit of gratitude, an important part of a healthy, happy life. Source
Former host of Music Thru the Night, Mike Kellogg, has passed away. Mike was a trusted voice of Moody Radio for decades and impacted eternity for so many. Today, he is in the presence of His Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. Psalm 16:11, "You make known to me the path of life; in your presence there is fullness of joy; at your right hand are pleasures forevermore." Moody Radio producer, Jon Gauger pays a tribute to the impact of Mike Kellogg's gifts, talent and heart on so many lives.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
I... well... you see... you know what? I'm just gonna let Amber handle this one. Topics include: what if Story Time with Tom & Mike were a theme restaurant?; the wrong hole at the wrong time (butt stuff); tiny rave; more butt stuff; Quiz: what do these lyrics from queer bands say about us?; #podcast #funny #comedy #comedypodcast #themerestaurant #sexinjury Tom's Twitter: https://twitter.com/StoryTimeTom1 Mike's Twitter: https://twitter.com/StoryTimeMike1 Cartoon avatars of Tom & Mike created by Gary Bacon: https://twitter.com/pixelbud ***************************************************** VISIT OUR OFFICIAL SITE! https://www.tomandmike.com ***************************************************** Check out our let's play channel, Gaming with Tom & Mike: https://www.youtube.com/@gamingwithtommike
Put yo' hands in the air, if your internet connection drops and you just don't care! Topics include: Emperor Norton I; rat kings; aggressive drivers; leaving the toilet seat up; xenon headlights; weaponized children; Battle Tapes; Scissor Sisters; Mother Mother #EmperorNortonI #ratking #aggressivedrivers #toiletseat #xenonheadlights #weaponizedchildren #BattleTapes #ScissorSisters #MotherMother Tom's Twitter: https://twitter.com/StoryTimeTom1 Mike's Twitter: https://twitter.com/StoryTimeMike1 Cartoon avatars of Tom & Mike created by Gary Bacon: https://twitter.com/pixelbud ***************************************************** VISIT OUR OFFICIAL SITE! https://www.tomandmike.com ***************************************************** Check out our let's play channel, Gaming with Tom & Mike: https://www.youtube.com/@gamingwithtommike
On this ID The Future, host Eric Anderson gets an update on the recent work of Dr. Ann Gauger, Senior Fellow at Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture. Dr. Gauger explains her continuing research into the limits of protein evolution, efforts that are challenging the prevailing assumptions of the role of proteins and mutations in a Darwinian account of life. She also discusses her work on the related waiting times problem, demonstrating the difficulty of Darwinian processes to account for the diversity we see in biology. In addition, Ann shares her journey into researching human origins. After being asked to evaluate the scientific case against Adam and Eve, Ann dove into population genetics to see if monogenesis - the hypothesis that all humans are descended from two first parents - was even a possibility. What she discovered may surprise you. Don't miss this review of Dr. Gauger's fascinating and important research. Source
On this episode of ID The Future, host Jay Richards concludes a two-part conversation with Ann Gauger about her newly edited volume God's Grandeur: The Catholic Case for Intelligent Design. Part 1 of their discussion focuses on the philosophical and theological arguments for intelligent design presented in the book. Gauger holds that Darwinism has no adequate explanation for natural beauty or the ability of human beings to appreciate beauty for its own sake. She also argues that we have no reason to expect human uniqueness or intelligibility in the universe outside a design paradigm. This is Part 2 of a conversation. Visit GodsGrandeur.org to learn more and download a free chapter! Source
On this episode of ID The Future, host Jay Richards begins a two-part conversation with Ann Gauger about her newly edited volume God’s Grandeur: The Catholic Case for Intelligent Design. Part 1 of their discussion focuses on the scientific case presented in the book. Gauger reviews compelling biological evidence for design in the DNA code, […]
On this episode of ID The Future, host Jay Richards begins a two-part conversation with Ann Gauger about her newly edited volume God's Grandeur: The Catholic Case for Intelligent Design. Part 1 of their discussion focuses on the scientific case presented in the book. Gauger reviews compelling biological evidence for design in the DNA code, molecular machines, the differences between humans and animals, and even the intriguing possibility that the entire human race came from two original parents. This is Part 1 of a conversation. Visit GodsGrandeur.org to learn more and download a free chapter! Source
On this episode of ID The Future, host Jay Richards begins a two-part conversation with Ann Gauger about her newly edited volume God's Grandeur: The Catholic Case for Intelligent Design. Part 1 of their discussion focuses on the scientific case presented in the book. Gauger reviews compelling biological evidence for design in the DNA code, molecular machines, the differences between humans and animals, and even the intriguing possibility that the entire human race came from two original parents. This is Part 1 of a conversation. Visit GodsGrandeur.org to learn more and download a free chapter! Source
Today's ID the Future spotlights the richly stimulating new book, God's Grandeur: The Catholic Case for Intelligent Design. Edited by biologist Ann Gauger, the anthology explores the evidence for intelligent design from a Catholic perspective, with contributions from an impressive range of Catholic scientists, philosophers, and theologians, including Gauger; internationally renowned paleontologist Günter Bechly; philosopher Jay Richards; molecular biologist Michael Behe; Rector of the European University in Rome Fr. Pedro Barrajón, LC; Aquinas and Evolution author Michael Chaberek; philosopher J. Budziszewski; professor of neurosurgery Michael Egnor; and noted Dante scholar Anthony Esolen. Listen in as Gauger gives a quick flyover of the book's content, tells how she found her way into the intelligent design fold, and explains why Catholics should Read More › Source
Randall Gauger, a pastor at the Bruderhof, lost his son to cancer. He writes about his search for answers to the problem of pain.
Recorded live at NAHB's International Builders Show in Las Vegas, this episode features Howard Gauger, director of engineering services for Carpenter Contractors of America, a division of Kodiak Building Partners. Howard shares his observations on the benefits of being engaged with NAHB on building codes and technical issues, as well as working through NAHB to promote how structural components solve builders' current pain points.
On Thursday’s Mornings with Eric and Brigitte, Moody Radio producer, writer, and host joins us to talk about MBI’s Founder’s Day, February 3, 2023. The theme of Founder’s Day is Resolve: Standing Firm Under Pressure, which is based on the life of Daniel and his steadfast determination to boldly follow God while living and working in a society that blatantly rejected Him. This one-time all-day celebration will commemorate the life and ministry of Moody Bible Institute Founder D. L. Moody through powerful teaching and preaching sessions, exclusive activities, and a performance by contemporary worship band Shane and Shane.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Kaltes Wasser | Anfangen, Ausbrechen aus der Komfortzone und Startup-Stories
Jonathan hat bereits ein paar Start-Ups erfolgreich gestartet, dabei allerdings nie inhaltlich den Sinn gefunden. Dann hat er nach einer Pause nun mit der HeyHo Academy gefunden und hilft Menschen, bei den ersten Schritten in die Selbstständigkeit. Wir haben über seine persönliche Reise, und seine Tipps beim Anfangen gesprochen.Links zu Jonathan:LinkedIn: Jonathan Gauger HeyHo Academy:Webseite: www.heyho-academy.comInstagram: @heyho_academy LinkedIn: HeyHo Academy Youtube: HeyHo Academy TikTok: @heyho_academyKostenloses Kurztraining: LINK Jonathans Fundstück:Ablenkungs-Tools, z.B. Freedom oder Forest Fragen bzw. Bewusstseins-Übung für Morgen-Routine: - Wann in der Vergangenheit, habe ich etwas scheinbar unmögliches gemeistert?- Warum mache ich XYZ?- Was habe ich schon geschafft?- Wieso werde ich das diesmal auch schaffen?Hier geht es zur Playlist zum Podcast bei Spotify: Heiße Songs für das kalte WasserIch freue mich immer sehr über Feedback, um mich und den Podcast weiterzuentwickeln. Am besten könnt ihr das über Instagram bei @kalteswasserpodcast oder LinkedIn tun, wo es regelmäßig auch Trailer und Ausschnitte sowie Zitate aus den Gesprächen geben wird.Ganz unkompliziert geht es auch per Sprachnachricht über Speakpipe, wo ihr auch Fragen an kommende Gäste hinterlassen könnt, die ich meistens bei Instagram ankündige.Ganz besonders könnt ihr den Podcast auch mit einer Bewertung bei Apple Podcasts unterstützen. Support the show
On today's ID the Future, biologist and intelligent design researcher Ann Gauger tells host Eric Anderson the rest of her story about how she was drawn into the intelligent design movement. The two discuss everything from the challenges she faced making it in a male-dominated field to the evidential power of beauty in the natural world. But how did she end up in the ID movement? After stepping out of a promising career as a research scientist to focus on her family and meeting the needs of an autistic child, she assumed that her life as a scientist was behind her. But then several years later she began reading the work of Darwin skeptics and intelligent design trailblazers—Phillip Johnson, Jonathan Read More › Source
On this ID the Future, host Eric Anderson sits down with biologist and intelligent design proponent Ann Gauger to hear her story of how she got into the intelligent design movement and how the evidence for design has shaped her life. It begins with a lonely girl on a Kansas military base who at one point loses her Christian faith but also discovers the wonders of nature, and friendship, when she is given a horse and begins taking it for long rides in the countryside. Her intellectual journey takes her to MIT, the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, the University of Washington, and eventually into the Catholic church, where she explores becoming a nun until a conversation with echoes from the Read More › Source
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheGreenWayOutdoors/Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thegreenwayoutdoors/Twitter: https://twitter.com/thegreenwayout?lang=enYoutube: https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCjR5r6WwXcPKK0xVldNT5_gMerch: www.thegreenwayoutdoors.storeWebsite: www.thegreenwayoutdoors.com
Randall Gauger, a Bruderhof pastor, discusses how lifelong vows make mutual faithfulness possible. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
On this ID the Future from the vault, biologist Ann Gauger discuss panspermia, the topic of a peer-reviewed paper published recently by several very serious scientists. Panspermia tries to sidestep problems in origins biology by suggesting that, to quote the title of an old science fiction movie, “it came from outer space.” And yes, according to this explanation, maybe aliens even sent it our way. Maybe (honest — this is a real theory) the first octopuses came here special delivery, as encapsulated embryos falling from the sky. Anything but intelligent design, for these very serious scientists. Tune in to learn from Dr. Gauger what precisely drove these scientists to such an explanation. Source
Keil Gauger is the founder of Caprock Family Farms in Lubbock, Texas. His longtime farming operation spans over 5,000 acres of cotton, peanuts, peppers and wheat grown in Gaines and Dickens counties. The addition of Caprock Family Farms has allowed him to add hemp to his already extensive list of crops. Having farmed on the South Plains for 27 years, Keil is a seasoned agripreneur and understands the importance of making diverse crop choices like hemp . Caprock Family Farms is a true family affair which finds Keil working alongside his wife Ann, his two sons Zach and Brett, and his nephew Logan. He and his hardworking family operate a commercial indoor hemp grow and manufacturing facility in Lubbock. Growing indoors in climate controlled rooms allows them to keep quality control as their top priority. Caprock Family Farms is passionate about educating the public about hemp and working to develop a strong hemp industry in Texas.Check out Caprock Family Farms.
You are invited to take a unique journey to Israel this Easter to explore the Mysteries of Easter in the Old Testament! Jon Gauger is your tour guide on this radio adventure where flights are never delayed! Through this Easter special, recorded and filmed in the Holy Land, you'll hear from on-location special guests that will walk us through the stories and symbolism of the Old Testament and how these foreshadow and have their fulfillment in Jesus Christ. It's a radio experience that is sure to strengthen your faith and joy this Easter weekend! See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
On this ID The Future from the vault, host Sarah Chaffee interviews biologist Ann Gauger about a Crossway Books anthology that Gauger contributed to and helped edit, Theistic Evolution: A Scientific, Philosophical, and Theological Critique. Among the tenets of theistic evolution is the idea that humans evolved from a large population of ape-like creatures. But is that idea scientifically plausible? Today's episode delves into the fossil evidence. Listen in as Gauger describes not a mere gap in the fossil record, but a great gulf between australopithecines (an ancient ape-like creature) and humans. Source
On this ID The Future from the vault, host Sarah Chaffee interviews biologist Ann Gauger about a Crossway Books anthology that Gauger contributed to and helped edit, Theistic Evolution: A Scientific, Philosophical, and Theological Critique. Source
Paul Gauger, senior vice president of the Americas for VisitBritain, talks with Alan Fine of Insider Travel Report about how easy it is to travel to Britain now. With no testing requirements inbound (travelers still need to be aware of the rules to return to their own countries), and with mask wearing at the discretion of the traveler, all energy can again be focused on the visit and the experience, not the entry requirements. Gauger details VisitBritain's new campaigns, including "Meanwhile in Britain” in partnership with British Airways. For more information, visit www.visitbritain.com. If interested, the original video of this podcast -- with supplemental pictures and video -- can be found on the Insider Travel Report Youtube channel or by searching for the podcast's title on Youtube.
We discuss the progress of the Spring Housing Market, debate HOAs (Homeowners Associations), living next to weird things, new building materials, and play a game of "This or That" with our two HomeTeam4u special guests, Gracie Gauger and Brendan Grabowski.
Welcome back to another exciting season of following the Iditarod with our students. I Kid a Pod is a podcast that is about the Iditarod brought to you by kids! In this episode I Kid a Pod has a teacher take over. Mrs. Treptow (founder of I Kid a Pod) and Miss Thompson share their experience with running a podcast in the classroom with the newest I Kid a Pod teachers, Mrs. Gauger and Mr. Podeweltz. Feel free to reach out to us at ikidapod@gmail.com if you have any questions! Tune in Monday for our classes and their first episode covering the 50th season of the Iditarod.
Wenn den Gästen der Mund offen stehen bleibt und viele Fragezeichen in den Augen zu sehen sind, dann hat Zauberkünstler Felix Gauger alles richtig gemacht. Allerdings gelingt ihm das IMMER wenn er an Bord der AIDA Schiffe als Gastkünstler unterwegs ist. In der Prime Time Show hat er Moderator Thorsten Jost viel verraten. Wie ging es bei ihm los. Was hat es mit dem magischen Zirkel auf sich. Was können die Gäste erleben. Aber wie er was macht, das hat er nicht verraten. Oder? Zu hören ist es in dieser Folge.
"Hop on that plane. Get on that train." says Paul Gauger, Senior Vice President/Deputy Regional Director for Visit Britain. Join host, Stephen Ekstrom, for The Tourism Academy's Business Class talk about following one's passion, being a part of major events, history, culture, heritage and intercontinental travel.RELATED: Online Destination Training for Agents & OperatorsRELATED: Meet our Advisory PanelBusiness Class is supported by Group Travel OdysseySupport the show (https://patreon.com/tourismbusinessclass)
Po wakacyjnej przerwie zapraszamy Was na wakacyjny dziennik czytelniczy! Na wyjazd zabrałyśmy naprawdę różne książki, zarówno nowości jak i pozycje, które zostały wydane jakiś czas temu. Są więc opowiadania i powieści, eseje i poezja, literatura polska i zagraniczna, autorzy i autorki, lektury łatwiejsze i trudniejsze, słowem jest naprawdę różnorodnie. W nagrywaniu towarzyszył nam chór żab, piękne ptasie trele i inne odgłosy przyrody – a może komuś uda się wysłyszeć przejeżdżający w oddali traktor? Książki, o których rozmawiamy w podkaście, to: Didier Eribon, „Powrót do Reims”, tłum. Martyna Ochab, Karakter; Roxane Gay, „Głód. Pamiętnik (mojego) ciała”, tłum. Anna Dzierzgowska, wydawnictwo Cyranka; Mariana Enriquez, „Nasza część nocy”, tłum. Marta Jordan i Katarzyna Okrasko, wydawnictwo Echa; Leigh Bardugo, „Szóstka Wron”, tłum. Małgorzata Strzelec i Wojciech Szypuła, wydawnictwo M.A.G.; Dorota Kotas, „Cukry”, wydawnictwo Cyranka; Natalia Ginzburg, „Słownik rodzinny”, tłum. Anna Wasilewska, wydawnictwo Filtry; Marta Bijan, „Domy i inne duchy”, eufobia; Katarzyna Michalczak, „Mam na imię nie mam”, wydawnictwo Cyranka; Aleksandra Łojek, „Belfast. 99 ścian pokoju”, wydawnictwo Czarne; Søren Gauger, „Rzeczy niewysłowione”, polska wersja we współpracy z Pawłem Rogalą, wydawnictwo Nisza; Barbara Sadurska, „Mapa”, wydawnictwo Nisza; Julia Fiedorczuk, „Psalmy”, Fundacja na rzecz Kultury i Edukacji im. Tymoteusza Karpowicza; Swietłana Aleksijewicz, „Czarnobylska modlitwa. Kronika przyszłości”, tłum. Jerzy Czech, wydawnictwo Czarne. Dziękujemy Katarzynie Michalczak i wydawnictwu Cyranka za książkę „Mam na imię nie mam”.
Offsite construction holds a lot of promise for builders looking to do more with less. In this episode, Carpenter Contractors of America's Howard Gauger continues this discussion by providing some examples on how his company, which controls the whole process, from building design, through manufacturing, to the onsite labor, overcomes some common criticisms and onsite challenges of offsite construction.
Welcome back to Ready Set Flow! Hope everyone is doing well, and had a good week! Today, we sat outside and spoke with a good friend, Max Gauger, and had a good time talking about climbing on to school roofs, how high flamingos can fly, and parenting and technology. So sit back, relax, and always remember to go with the Flow! PS: We're aware about the audio glitching out randomly. Sorry about that! There was an error while uploading the audio. This shouldn't happen again. - Micah & Asher Watch this episode, or all of our other episodes here: https://anchor.fm/readysetflow If you want to support us, it would mean the world! Go to https://anchor.fm/readysetflow to learn more. We both do this for free, putting hours in every week to make sure we can always give y'all new content each and every week. Supporting us is the best way to make sure we keep the content coming! (plus early access to new items and so much more!) Make sure to follow our Discord to make sure you never miss a new release! We are planning on posting more often and building a better community around the podcast, and the Discord is the best way to stay connected! Also, please go follow on Instagram and Youtube! We post regularly on there and it would be the best way to stay updated and never miss a new episode! --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/readysetflow/support
Offsite construction holds a lot of promise for the construction industry and who better to give perspective on this topic than Carpenter Contractors of America, a company that controls the whole process, from building design, through manufacturing, to the onsite labor. In this episode, CCA's Howard Gauger provides some perspective on how his company approaches offsite and how it benefits their builder customers.
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHANNEL Racer to Racer Podcast Presented by Race 92 - In this episode we recap the 2021 Indy 500 with special guest Scott Gauger from Helio Castroneves' Indy 500 winning team. Buy Race 92 and Podcast merch at www.race92.com! https://anchor.fm/racer-to-racer AUDIO TRACK: Into The Twilight - AMG
Als Gruppe sind sie noch neu im Tanzlmusi-Sektor, jeder einzelne von ihnen ist aber bereits ein alter Hase in dem Geschäft. Mike Gauger und Harry Eitzinger erzählen von ihren ersten Spielereien, die durchaus als interessant, ausgiebig und einzigartig beschrieben werden können. Schließlich kann nicht jeder behaupten, dass er schon mit Florian Silbereisen gespielt hat. Generell haben die Burschen ein Händchen für Stars – denn was Anna Netrebko mit den Rossbrondmusikanten zu tun hat, hören wir im Podcast.
Als Gruppe sind sie noch neu im Tanzlmusi-Sektor, jeder einzelne von ihnen ist aber bereits ein alter Hase in dem Geschäft. Mike Gauger und Harry Eitzinger erzählen von ihren ersten Spielereien, die durchaus als interessant, ausgiebig und einzigartig beschrieben werden können. Schließlich kann nicht jeder behaupten, dass er schon mit Florian Silbereisen gespielt hat. Generell haben die Burschen ein Händchen für Stars – denn was Anna Netrebko mit den Rossbrondmusikanten zu tun hat, hören wir im Podcast.
For nearly a year, we've been sharing interviews with CSC alumni on our Carmel Swim Academy channels to celebrate the unique experiences and foundation swimming can provide your life. Now, we're adding these interviews to the Off the Deck podcast stream for more people to get to hear these stories. This week, hear from Tylor Gauger.
Dziś mamy dla Was trzy wyjątkowe książki. Pierwsza to reportaż o Irlandii Północnej – to dogłębna analiza konfliktu i jednocześnie bardzo ludzka opowieść o uczestnikach walk i o zmieniającej się przez lata perspektywie. Dwie kolejne to eseje o szerokiej tematyce, pięknym języku i intrygujących tytułach. Książki, o których rozmawiamy w podkaście, to: Patrick Radden Keefe, „Cokolwiek powiesz, nic nie mów. Zbrodnia i pamięć w Irlandii Północnej”, tłum. Jan Dzierzgowski, wydawnictwo Czarne; Eliot Weinberger, „Z rzeczy pierwszych”, tłum. Mikołaj Denderski, wydawnictwo Karakter; Eliot Weinberger, „Wodospady”, tłum. Søren Gauger i Stefan Klemczak, wydawnictwo Austeria. W odcinku mówimy też o artykule, który pojawił się w miesięczniku Znak, w wydaniu 2/2021, autorstwa Stefana Klemczaka „Czy należy zburzyć pomnik Davisa Hume’a” Zachęcamy do odwiedzin na naszym profilu na Instagramie: https://www.instagram.com/juz_tlumacze i na Facebooku https://www.facebook.com/juz.tlumacze Intro: http://bit.ly/jennush
We chat with Hope about her Hallelujah, talking about rooting yourself where God has you even if it's not where you expected to be. Spotify Playlist :: https://open.spotify.com/playlist/1VseVHzhaEcRu1QHknNKxL?si=ctLFJ2Q1TPKW7QaguScGKQ Apple Playlist :: https://music.apple.com/us/playlist/songs-of-the-month-thesehallelujahs-podcast/pl.u-XkzNLhaKp88
In today's episode we welcome Natalie Gauger and Molly Chheath, to discuss some tips for how to stay engaged during your undergraduate years, finding mentorships, expanding your potential to network during college and how it will carry you further in your career. We hope you enjoy their insight. As always, if you have any nominations for podcast guests please email development@akdphialum.org. Till next time! Love and Friendship! --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/akdphi-naa/message
Paul Gauger comes from a land down under, where women glow and men plunder! What the hell does that mean? We unravel the antipodean world that is all things Australian. Find out more about Rob Goldstone: https://isanenglishmanin.com
Listen in Friday as Ken and Deb introduce you to two brothers who work at Moody Bible Institute and bring you the great stories and music of Candlelight Carols. Jon and David Gauger will talk about this year’s production and how it will be the same and different because of COVID-19. We’ll hear how the production is being put together and how you’ll be able to enjoy the pageantry from your sofa this year!
Als sich der junge Klaus Gauger von seiner langjährigen Freundin trennt, wird zunächst vermutet, dass er lediglich eine spätpubertäre Krise habe. Doch dann fühlt er sich verfolgt und abgehört, zerstört sein Zimmer im Haus seiner Eltern. Nach einer Zwangseinweisung und Behandlung mit starken Medikamenten ist seine schizophrene Erkrankung zwar nicht weg, aber wesentlich weniger stark. Wie er viel später doch noch Vertrauen zu einem Psychiater finden und selbst zu einem Mitarbeiter in einer psychiatrischen Klinik werden konnte, erzählt er Jakob Hein.
Influenza A virus in swine (IAV-S) is one of the primary respiratory pathogens challenging swine production systems in the US and around the world, said Phil Gauger, DVM, PhD, an associate professor at Iowa State University. The virus is transmitted from pig to pig quite easily, and the movement of pigs over long distances has contributed to IAV-S problems within swine production systems, Gauger told Pig Health Today.
Jewel, Singer, Stennel & Dimble continue their traipse through the dungeon of Lumitech, Fighting more kua-toa, looking for Survivors and equipment. Plugs: BUY STAMPS! https://store.usps.com/store/results/stamps/_/N-9y93lv ACLU- https://www.aclu.org/ ---------------------------------------- Website: https://totalpartyguild.com/ Twitter & IG: @totalpartyguild Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TotalPartyGuild/ Email: totalpartyguild@gmail.com ---------------------------------------- Dungeons And Dragons, DnD, RPG, TTRPG, retrowave, live play, actual play
Link to bioRxiv paper: http://biorxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2020.09.28.310474v1?rss=1 Authors: Leurs, U., Klein, A. B., McSpadden, E. D., Griem-Krey, N., Solbak, S. M., Houlton, J., Villumsen, I. S., Vogensen, S. B., Hamborg, L., Gauger, S. J., Palmelund, L. B., Larsen, A. S. G., Shehata, M. A., Kelstrup, C. D., Olsen, J. V., Bach, A., Burnie, R. O., Kerr, D. S., Gowing, E. K., Teurlings, S. M. W., Chi, C. C., Gee, C. L., Frolund, B., Kornum, B. R., van Woerden, G. M., Clausen, R. P., Kuriyan, J., Clarkson, A. N., Wellendorph, P. Abstract: Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II alpha (CaMKII) is an abundant neuronal signaling protein involved in synaptic plasticity and memory formation1,2. The central hub domain regulates the activity of CaMKII by organizing the holoenzyme complex into functional oligomers3-6. Recent findings have suggested that the hub is also an allosteric determinant of kinase activity7, and is thus an emerging target for therapies to correct CaMKII dysregulation8,9. However, pharmacological modulation of the hub domain has never been demonstrated. Here we show that stabilization of the CaMKII hub domain confers neuroprotection. By combining photoaffinity labeling and chemical proteomics using small molecule analogs of the natural metabolite {gamma}-hydroxybutyrate (GHB)10, we reveal that CaMKII is the selective target for GHB. We further find that these GHB analogs bind to the hub interior by solving a 2.2 [A] crystal structure of CaMKII with bound ligand. Using differential scanning fluorimetry, we show that binding of ligands to the hub interior increases the thermal stability of hub oligomers in a concentration-dependent manner. Moreover, we demonstrate the functional significance of this hub stabilization by showing substantial neuroprotective effects in cellular excitotoxicity assays and in a mouse model of cerebral ischemia. Together, our results reveal that CaMKII hub stabilization is the mechanism by which GHB provides endogenous neuroprotection and that small-molecule CaMKII-selective ligands have therapeutic potential. Copy rights belong to original authors. Visit the link for more info
Link to bioRxiv paper: http://biorxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2020.08.07.238279v1?rss=1 Authors: Zeller, M. A., Gauger, P. C., Arendsee, Z. W., Souza, C. K., Vincent, A. L., Anderson, T. K. Abstract: The antigenic diversity of influenza A virus (IAV) circulating in swine challenges the development of effective vaccines, increasing zoonotic threat and pandemic potential. High throughput sequencing technologies are able to quantify IAV genetic diversity, but there are no accurate approaches to adequately describe antigenic phenotypes. This study evaluated an ensemble of non-linear regression models to estimate virus phenotype from genotype. Regression models were trained with a phenotypic dataset of pairwise hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assays, using genetic sequence identity and pairwise amino acid mutations as predictor features. The model identified amino acid identity, ranked the relative importance of mutations in the hemagglutinin (HA) protein, and demonstrated good prediction accuracy. Four previously untested IAV strains were selected to experimentally validate model predictions by HI assays. Error between predicted and measured distances of uncharacterized strains were 0.34, 0.70, 2.19, and 0.17 antigenic units. These empirically trained regression models can be used to estimate antigenic distances between different strains of IAV in swine using sequence data. By ranking the importance of mutations in the HA, we provide criteria for identifying antigenically advanced IAV strains that may not be controlled by existing vaccines and can inform strain updates to vaccines to better control this pathogen. Copy rights belong to original authors. Visit the link for more info
In this episode of CUBIST, Betsy and Don discuss the article, “The Influence of Chronic Cigarette Smoking on Neurocognitive Recovery after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.” Reference Citation: Durazzo, T. C., Abadjian, L., Kincaid, A., Bilovsky-Muniz, T., Boreta, L., & Gauger, G. E. (2013). The influence of chronic cigarette smoking on neurocognitive recovery after mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of neurotrauma, 30(11), 1013-1022. CUBIST is a podcast for health care providers discussing the latest research on traumatic brain injury (TBI) most relevant to patient care. Topics for each episode will be developed in close coordination with the hosts and based on current and trending TBI research getting attention in the mainstream press. Episodes are organized around a schedule of one episode per month ranging in total run time of 10-to-15 minutes each. For more about TBI, including clinical tools, go to dvbic.dcoe.mil or email us at dha.DVBICinfo@mail.mil The views, opinions and/or findings contained in this podcast are those of the host and subject matter experts. They should not be construed as an official Department of Defense position, policy or decision unless so designated by other official documentation. Our theme song is “Upbeat-Corporate' by WhiteCat available and was used according to Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 licensing.
In the age of technology, convenience reigns king. In the quick-service restaurant (QSR) industry, where convenience and speed are part of the product, technology is a natural business partner. “Around the Table,” explores how automation has made its way into franchises all over the country, with the full extent of its capabilities still untapped. Antunes guests Steve Gauger, Senior Vice President of Advanced Development & Automation, and Dan Hartlein, President, speak decisively about automation’s potential to improve quick-service system, customer satisfaction, and profits. The term “automation,” often brings to mind visions of intricate machines roving around autonomously. But Hartlein and Gauger assure that automation doesn’t have to be that complicated, or wildly futuristic. In fact, Antunes designs automated programs that integrate into a QSR’s already established kitchen space, resulting in little disruption to established processes. Whatsmore, automating need not be a giant change. In fact, small, granular changes can have major ripple effects in efficiency and profits. From cutting slices of cheese, to fishing out pickle spears, automating these small tasks in the assembly line can produce drastic changes in QSR performance. As the COVID-19 sits heavy in everyone’s thoughts, Hartlein and Gauger point out the hygienic benefits of automated processes, emphasizing the consumer’s growing habits of ordering-in or delivery. But will automation steal jobs from people? Gauger and Hartlein assure that’s not the case. With automation still breaking ground in the quick-service industry, the possibilities are endless and processes are ripe for improvement.
In this episode of CUBIST, Betsy and Don discuss the article, “The Influence of Chronic Cigarette Smoking on Neurocognitive Recovery after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury” Reference Citation: Durazzo, T. C., Abadjian, L., Kincaid, A., Bilovsky-Muniz, T., Boreta, L., & Gauger, G. E. (2013). The influence of chronic cigarette smoking on neurocognitive recovery after mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of neurotrauma, 30(11), 1013-1022. CUBIST is a podcast for health care providers produced by the Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center. We discuss the latest research on traumatic brain injury (TBI) most relevant to patient care. For more about TBI, including clinical tools, go to dvbic.dcoe.mil or email us at dha.DVBICinfo@mail.mil The views, opinions and/or findings contained in this podcast are those of the host and subject matter experts. They should not be construed as an official Department of Defense position, policy or decision unless so designated by other official documentation. Our theme song is “Upbeat-Corporate’ by WhiteCat available and was used according to Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 licensing.
An oft-repeated claim by skeptics is that geneticists have disproved the possibility of Adam and Eve. Because existing human genetic diversity is so great, there can be no original couple from whom all people are descended. Or, that's what we're told. Biology professor and author Dennis Venema summarizes this argument up in his book, “Adam and the Genome.” In it, he claims that “every genetic analysis estimating ancestral population sizes has agreed that we descend from a population of thousands, not a single ancestral couple.” Some Christian authors have reacted to this apparent consensus by proposing new ways of reading Genesis that make Adam and Eve either mythological or not really our first parents. The goal has been to accommodate theology and the Bible to what we're told is “settled science.” But what if the science on Adam and Eve isn't so settled? That's the argument of a new paper by Discovery Institute senior fellow and developmental biologist Ann Gauger and Swedish mathematician Ola Hössjer, recently published in the journal, “BIO-Complexity.” In order to test whether it really is impossible to account for modern variation in human beings by starting with just two people, these researchers did something that, incredibly, no one had tried before: They started with just two people, and ran the numbers. Using accepted population growth and mutation rates, Gauger and Hössjer programmed a computer to start with a genetic Adam and Eve and replicate the known distribution of diversity in today's human population. Their results, to put it simply, fly in the face of the much-touted consensus. According to their model, a couple who shared some genetic markers could generate all the diversity we see today within about 2 million years—which Venema and others claim is impossible. However, given two people who share no genetic markers—in other words, two people who weren't born but were created with four unique sets of chromosomes—that time frame drops to a few hundred thousand, not millions, of years. Writing at Evolution News, Gauger points out that further tweaks in the rates of population growth, structure, mortality, birth, and mutation could place that theoretical first couple even more recently in history. In any case, the authors are careful to note that the point of their paper was not to date Adam and Eve, or even to prove from a genetic standpoint that they existed. Rather, they just wanted to demonstrate—contrary to the oft-repeated claim—that it is possible for all human beings to have descended from an original pair. Of course, much more work remains to be done, but the paper has served to clarify two things. First, scientists' assumptions about the past can change their results. Gauger explains that once hurdles in computing power were overcome, this experiment was an obvious way to test existing dogma on human origins. But in her words, no one bothered because “They believed that starting from two was useless.” In fact, many researchers failed to use standard methods for modeling population genetics because of their baked-in evolutionary assumptions. For instance, one popular tool relies on comparisons between human and chimpanzee DNA to track mutations—something Gauger points out is useless if we don't share a common ancestor with chimps. Second, and more importantly, this paper hints at how tentative so-called “settled science” can be. Christians who rush to revise their understanding of characters like Adam and Eve to make way for the latest consensus should think more about the theological consensus they're tinkering with, like the fall, the image of God, original sin, and creation. They should also consider all the un-tinkering they may have to do one day when that scientific consensus changes.
What silly thing has your child or grandchild said lately? Kids are famous for their unfiltered and sometimes embarrassing commentary, yet they can also be profound. Rediscover wonder and look for the gold in your kids with author Jon Gauger. Learn more about Jon Gauger and his book Kids Say the Wisest Things: 26 Lessons You Didn't Know Children Could Teach You.
Kim, Brim, Zambo and Mr. Greer are back at it again. Apart from all the usual shenanigans, the gang chats about everything pop culture with all the trimmings and the cast is joined in studio by Will 'The Philly Chef' Gauger of Chopped and The Chew to give us the low-down on the perfect burgers and wings. Legendary Met's player, Ron Swoboda joins Mr. Greer on PNG to chat Baseball. Then, close friend of GHR, Malcolm J. Goodwin who is best known for his work on iZombie joins the fray. The GHR Crew chats him up about iZombie coming to an end, and the new projects that's he's been working hard on. Enjoy!
Kim, Brim, Zambo and Mr. Greer are back at it again. Apart from all the usual shenanigans, the gang chats about everything pop culture with all the trimmings and the cast is joined in studio by Will 'The Philly Chef' Gauger of Chopped and The Chew to give us the low-down on the perfect burgers and wings. Legendary Met's player, Ron Swoboda joins Mr. Greer on PNG to chat Baseball. Then, close friend of GHR, Malcolm J. Goodwin who is best known for his work on iZombie joins the fray. The GHR Crew chats him up about iZombie coming to an end, and the new projects that's he's been working hard on. Enjoy!
Jesus listened to his Apostles, Jon Gauger listens to kids...with pretty much the same results
On today's show, Tim has author Jon Gauger, who wrote Kids Say the Wisest Things: 26 Lessons You Didn't Know Children Could Teach You. Jon discusses his journey with fatherhood, and shares important lessons he learned about God by observing kidsSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
The United States system of government depends on the Legislative, Executive, and Judicial branches keeping each other accountable, but what happens when two of the branches refuse to police the third? We might soon find out. In this episode, by examining the Attorney General William Barr's response to the release of the Mueller report, learn about recent events which foreshadow our system of government being tested in ways it hasn't been tested before. _________________________________________________ Please Support Congressional Dish – Quick Links Click here to contribute monthly or a lump sum via PayPal Click here to support Congressional Dish for each episode via Patreon Send Zelle payments to: Donation@congressionaldish.com Send Venmo payments to: @Jennifer-Briney Send Cash App payments to: $CongressionalDish or Donation@congressionaldish.com Use your bank's online bill pay function to mail contributions to: 5753 Hwy 85 North, Number 4576, Crestview, FL 32536 Please make checks payable to Congressional Dish Thank you for supporting truly independent media! ____________________________________________________ Recommended Congressional Dish Episodes CD191: The "Democracies" of Elliott Abrams CD143: Trumps Law Enforcers _____________________________________________________ Additional Reading Article: Barr Serving as Powerful Ally for Trump by Tom Hamburger, Washington Post, May 16, 2019. Article: Is this the Official Trump Constitutional Crisis? by Susan B. Glasser, The New Yorker, May 9, 2019. Podcast Episode: Mueller Report Audio, Timberlane Media, May 4, 2019. Article: Trump Finds in Barr the Attorney General — and shield — he long sought by Matt Zapotosky,Josh Dawsey,Tom Hamburger and Ashley Parker, Washington Post, May 2, 2019. Letter: Erik Prince Criminal Referal Letter, by Adam Schiff, Chairman, Select Committee on Intelligence U.S. House of Representatives, April 30, 2019. Article: Mueller Complained that Barr's Letter did not Capture Context of Trump's Probe by Devlin Barrett and Matt Zapotsky, The Washington Post, April 30, 2019. Article: Barr's Playbook: He Misled Congress by Ryan Goodman, Just Security, April 15, 2019. Article: Joe Biden's 2020 Ukranian Nightmare: A Closed Probe is Revived by John Solomon, The Hill, April 1, 2019. Article: Justice Under AG Barr Began Vast Surveillance Program Without Legal Review by Brad Heath, USA Today, March 28, 2019. Report: Mueller Letter to Barr on Russian Interference of 2016 Presidential Election by U.S. Department of Justice, Special Counsel's Office, March 27, 2019. Document: AG Barr’s 4 Page Summary by William Barr Attorney General of the United States, March 24, 2019. Document: Jen Briney Highlighted Mueller Report by Jen Briney, March 2019. Article: Attorney General Nominee Wrote Memo Critizing Mueller Obstruction Probe by Devlin Barrett, Washington Post, December 20, 2018. Article: Trump is compromised by Russia by by Michelle Goldberg, The New York Times, November 29, 2018. Memo: Memo from Bill Barr to Attorney General Rod Rosenstein Meullers "Obstruction" Theory by Bill Barr, June 8, 2018. Article: Paul Manafort's complicated ties to Ukraine explained by Amber Phillips, Washington Post, August 19, 2016. Article: Donald Trump Aide Paul Manafort Scrutinized for Russian Business Ties by Tom Winter and Ken Dilanian, NBC News, August 18, 2016. Document: Manafort/Gates Indictment by United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Article: U.S. Secretly Tracked Billions of Calls for Decades by Brad Heath, USA Today, April 7, 2015. Article: Obama, Holder Catch Heat for Close Ties by Carrie Johnson, NPR, July 9, 2010. Article: William P. Barr Oral History UVA Miller Center, April 5, 2001. Article: Bush Pardons 6 in Iran Affair by David Johnston, The New York Times, December 25, 1992. Article: Nominee Barr an Unusual Path to Attorney Generals Office by Sharon LaFraniere, The Washington Post, November 12, 1991. Article: U.S. "Power" on Abductions Detailed by Michael Isikoff, Washington Post, August 14, 1991 Article: In Panama, An Illegal and Unwarranted Invasion by Matthew Rothschild, The Chicago Tribune, December 21, 1989. Letter: Crawford's Reply to Edwards by Honorable Don Edwards, The U.S. Department of Justice, November 7, 1989. Article: FBI Gets OK for Overseas Arrests by Ronald J. Ostrow, LA Times, October 13, 1989. _____________________________________________________ Sound Clip Sources Press Conference: Speical Counsel Robert Mueller Statement on Russian Investigation, May 29, 2019. 4:10 Special Counsel Robert Mueller: The order appointing me special counsel authorized us to investigate actions that could obstruct the investigation. We conducted that investigation, and we kept the office of the acting attorney general apprised of the progress of our work. And as set forth in the report, after that investigation if we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime we would have said so. We did not, however, make a determination as to whether the president did commit a crime. The introduction to the Volume II of our report explains that decision. It explains that under long-standing department policy, a president can not be charged with a federal crime while he is in office. That is unconstitutional. Even if the charge is kept under seal and hidden from public view, that too is prohibited. The Special Counsel’s Office is part of the Department of Justice, and by regulation it was bound by that department policy. Charging the president with a crime was, therefore, not an option we could consider. 5:40 Special Counsel Robert Mueller: First, the opinion explicitly explicitly permits the investigation of a sitting president because it is important to preserve evidence while memories are fresh and documents available. 6:10 Special Counsel Robert Mueller: And second, the opinion says that the Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing. And beyond department policy, we were guided by principles of fairness. It would be unfair to potentially — it would be unfair to potentially accuse somebody of a crime when there can be no court resolution of the actual charge. Hearing: Attorney General William Barr Contempt Resolution, House Judiciary Committee, May 8, 2019. 14:40 Rep. Jerrold Nadler (NY): I urge my colleagues to think about how the department’s latest position and their insistence on ignoring our subpoena effects our committee, over time. Our fight is not just about the Mueller report, although we must have access to the Mueller report. Our fight is about defending the rights of Congress as an independent branch to hold the president, any president, accountable. 15:20 Rep. Jerrold Nadler (NY): The chairman of the oversight and Reform Committee has been sued in his personal capacity to prevent them from acquiring certain financial records from the Trump organization. 15:30 Rep. Jerrold Nadler (NY): The president has stated that his administration will oppose all subpoenas, and in fact, virtually all document requests are going unsatisfied. Witnesses are refusing to show up at hearings. This is unprecedented. If allowed to go unchecked, this obstruction means the end of congressional oversight. As a coequal branch of government, we should not and cannot allow this to continue, or we will not be a coequal branch of government. Hearing: William Barr Testifies on Mueller Report, Senate Judiciary Committee, May 1, 2019. 7:50 Sen. Lindsay Graham (SC): I would like to do more to harden our infrastructure because the Russians did it. It wasn’t some 400 pound guy sitting on a bed somewhere. It was the Russians, and they’re still doing it. And it can be the Chinese, it could be somebody next. So my takeaway from this report is that we’ve got a lot of work to do to defend democracy against the Russians and other bad actors. And I promise the committee we will get on. Would that work? Hopefully in a bipartisan fashion. 9:20 Sen. Lindsay Graham (SC): This is what Strzok said on February 12th, 2016 “Now he’s in charge of the Clinton email investigation”. 11:25 Sen. Lindsay Graham (SC): “Trump is a fucking idiot”. 17:05 Sen. Diane Feinstein (CA: First Special Counsel Mueller’s report confirms that the Russian government implemented a social media campaign to mislead millions of Americans. 32:50 Attorney General William Barr: The special counsel investigated whether anyone affiliated with president Trump’s campaign conspired or coordinated with these criminal schemes. They concluded that there was not sufficient evidence to establish that there had been any conspiracy or coordination with the Russian government or the IRA. 33:40 Attorney General William Barr: Now we first heard that the special council’s decision not to decide the obstruction issue at at the March 5th meeting when he came over to the department and we were frankly surprised that they were not going to reach a decision on obstruction. We asked them a lot about the reasoning behind this and the basis for Special Council Mueller stated three times to us in that meeting in response to our questioning that he emphatically was not saying that, but for the OLC’s opinion, he would have found obstruction. 34:40 Attorney General William Barr: Once we heard that the special counsel was not reaching a conclusion on obstruction, the deputy and I discussed and agreed that the department had to reach a decision. We had the responsibility to assess the evidence as set forth in the report and to make the judgment. I say this because the special counsel was appointed to carry out the investigative and prosecutorial functions of the department and to do it as part of the Department of Justice. The powers he was using, including the power of using a grand jury and using compulsory process exists for that purpose. The function of the Department of Justice in this arena (which is to determine whether or not there has been criminal conduct). It’s a binary decision. Is there enough evidence to show a crime and do we believe a crime has been committed? 35:30 Attorney General William Barr: We don’t conduct criminal investigations just to collect information and put it out to the public, we do so to make a decision. 35:40 Attorney General William Barr: And here we thought there was an additional reason, which is this was a very public investigation and we had made clear that the results of the investigation we’re going to be made public, and the deputy and I felt that the evidence developed by the special counsel was not sufficient to establish that the president committed a crime, and therefore it would be irresponsible and unfair for the department to release a report without stating the department’s conclusions and thus leave it hanging as to whether the department considered there had been criminal conduct. 38:13 Attorney General William Barr: We prepared the letter for that purpose. To state the bottom line conclusions. We use the language from the report to state those bottom line conclusions. I analogize it to announcing after an extended trial what the verdict of the trial is, pending release of the full transcript. 38:40 Attorney General William Barr: We were not trying to summarize the 410 page report. 44:05 Sen. Lindsay Graham (SC): Very quickly, give us your reasoning why you think it would be inappropriate to proceed forward on obstruction of justice in this case. Attorney General William Barr: Well, um, generally speaking, an obstruction case, uh, typically has two aspects to it. One, there’s usually an underlying criminality that… Sen. Lindsay Graham (SC): Let’s stop right here. Attorney General William Barr: Yeah Sen. Lindsay Graham (SC): Was there an underlying crime here? Attorney General William Barr: No. 48:00 Sen. Lindsay Graham (SC): Do you think the President’s campaign in 2016 was thoroughly looked at in terms of whether or not they colluded with the Russians? Attorney General William Barr: Yes. Sen. Lindsay Graham (SC): And the answer is no according to Bob Mahler. Attorney General William Barr: That’s right. Sen. Lindsay Graham (SC): He couldn’t decide about obstruction, you did. Is that correct? Attorney General William Barr: That’s right. 1:02:08 Sen. Chuck Grassley (IA): In volume two of the report, the special council declined to make a traditional prosecutorial decision. Instead, the special council laid out 200 or so pages relating to a potential obstruction analysis and then dumped that on your desk. In your press conference you said that you asked the special council whether he would have made a charging decision or recommended charges on obstruction, but for the office of legal console’s opinion on charging sitting presidents, and that the special counsel made clear that was not the case. So Mr. Barr, is that an accurate description of your conversation with the special council? Attorney General William Barr: Yes, he, he reiterated several times in a group meeting that he was not saying that, but for the OLC opinion he would have found obstruction. Sen. Chuck Grassley (IA): Yeah. If the special console found facts as sufficient to constitute obstruction of justice, would he have stated that finding? Attorney General William Barr: If he had found that, then I think he would state it. Yes. Sen. Chuck Grassley (IA): Yeah. 1:03:45 Sen. Chuck Grassley (IA): Do you agree with the reasons that he offered for not making a decision and Volume II of his report and why or why not? Attorney General William Barr: Well, I’m not really sure of his reasoning. I really could not recapitulate his analysis, which is one of the reasons in my March 24th letter. I simply stated the fact that he did not reach a conclusion and didn’t try to put words in his mouth. Um, I think that if he felt that he shouldn’t have gone down the path of making a traditional prosecuted decision, then he shouldn’t have investigated. That was the time to, uh, pull up. Sen. Chuck Grassley (IA): Okay. 1:37:53 Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (RI): When did you first learn of the New York Times and Washington Post stories that would make the existence of this letter public? The ones that came out last night? Attorney General William Barr: I think it could have been yesterday, but I’m not sure. Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (RI): When they contacted you to ask for any comment? Attorney General William Barr: They didn’t contact me. Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (RI)*: Contact to DOJ and ask for any comment? Attorney General William Barr: I can’t actually remember how it came up, but someone mentioned it. Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (RI): So you…at some point you knew that the Mueller letter was going to become public and that was probably yesterday? Attorney General William Barr: I think so. Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (RI): Okay. When did you decide to make that letter available to us in Congress Attorney General William Barr: This morning. 1:37:53 Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (RI): When did you first learn of the New York Times and Washington Post stories that would make the existence of this letter public? The ones that came out last night? Attorney General William Barr: I think it could have been yesterday, but I’m not sure. Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (RI): When they contacted you to ask for any comment? Attorney General William Barr: They didn’t contact me. Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (RI)*: Contact to DOJ and ask for any comment? Attorney General William Barr: I can’t actually remember how it came up, but someone mentioned it. Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (RI): So you…at some point you knew that the Mueller letter was going to become public and that was probably yesterday? Attorney General William Barr: I think so. Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (RI): Okay. When did you decide to make that letter available to us in Congress Attorney General William Barr: This morning. 1:40:30 Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (RI): The… Attorney General William Barr: As I said, I wasn’t interested in putting out summaries. Period. Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (RI): Well, you know, we can… Attorney General William Barr: Frankly… Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (RI): This is another hairsplitting exercise because Bob Mueller, (who I think we all agree is fairly credible) actually described your letter as a summary. So you can say it wasn’t a summary, but Mueller said it was a summary and I don’t think… Attorney General William Barr: I wasn’t interested in summarizing the whole report. As I say, I was stating that the bottom line conclusions of the report… Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (RI): Your letter said it’s intended to describe the report, I quote your words… Attorney General William Barr: Yeah, describe the report meaning volume one [inaudible] Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (RI): When you describe the report in four pages and it’s a 400 page report, I don’t know why you’re cowboying about whether it’s a summary or not. Attorney General William Barr: Because I state in the letter that I’m stating that the principle conclusions. 1:41:13 Attorney General William Barr: You know, Bob Mueller is the equivalent of a US attorney. He was exercising the powers of the attorney general subject to the supervision of the attorney general. He’s part of the Department of Justice. His work concluded when he sent his report to the attorney general. At that point, it was my baby. 1:42:59 Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (RI): Um, the interesting thing to me is that it goes on to say that because of the OLC opinion, we have to give the president an extra benefit of the doubt because he is denied his day in court where he could exonerate himself. That seems like a fallacy to me because if you are the president of the United States, you can either waive or readily override the OLC opinion and say, “I’m ready to go to trial.” “I want to exonerate myself.” “Let’s go.” Could you not? Attorney General William Barr: How is this relevant to my decisions? Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (RI): It’s relevant… Attorney General William Barr: Because I assumed that there was no OLC opinion. Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (RI): Well, we have a report in front of us that says that this influenced the outcome. And in particular it says it influenced the outcome because it deprived the president of his ability to have his day in court. And my point to you is that the president could easily have his day in court by simply waving or overriding this OLC opinion that has no judicial basis. Correct? Attorney General William Barr: Well, I don’t…I don’t think that there was anything to have a day in court on. I think that the government did not have a prosecutable case, Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (RI): but part…well Mueller obviously didn’t agree because he left that up to you. Attorney General William Barr: Well… Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (RI): He said that he could neither confirm nor deny that there was a prosecutable case here. He left that to you and when he did, he said, and you apparently have agreed that this OLC opinion bears on it, and then it would be unfair to the president to put them to the burden of being indicted and not having the ability to be charged himself… Attorney General William Barr: I don’t want to characterize…have Bob’s thought process on this. Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (RI): I’m not asking you to characterize it. It’s in his report. He’s put it in writing. Attorney General William Barr: I’m not sure what he means by that in the report. 1:54:13 Sen. John Kennedy (LA): Tell me again briefly why Mr. Mueller told you he reached no conclusion…or he couldn’t make up his mind or whatever. I’m not trying to put words in your mouth. Attorney General William Barr: I really couldn’t recapitulate it. I… it was unclear to us. 2:31:25 Sen. Richard Blumenthal (CT): The special council specifically said (at the same time I’m quoting), "If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the president clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. He said it again at page 182, and yet in your summary and in the press room conference that you did, you in effect cleared the president on both so-called collusion. Attorney General William Barr: Yeah. The difference is that I use the proper standard. Um, that statement you just read is actually a very strange statement. Sen. Richard Blumenthal (CT): For four of the specific obstruction episodes, Robert Mueller concluded that it was substantial evidence on four on the three necessary elements of obstruction. Attorney General William Barr: Well, you’re…you’re on. You’re a prospect… Sen. Richard Blumenthal (CT): I have to finish my question with all… Attorney General William Barr: You haven’t let me finish my answer. Sen. Richard Blumenthal (CT): Well, uh, let me just finish the… Chairman Lindsay Graham (SC): We can do both. Attorney General William Barr: Alright, good. Sen. Richard Blumenthal (CT): Uh, you ignored in that press conference and in the summary that Robert Mueller found substantial evidence and it’s in the report, and we have a chart that shows the elements of that crime. Intent, interference with an ongoing investigation and the obstructive act. 2:38:35 Sen. Richard Blumenthal (CT): You started by citing this thing in Volume II about how the report says that they could not be sure that they could clearly say that he did not violate the law. As you know, that’s not the standard we use in the criminal justice system. It’s presumed that if someone is innocent and the government has to prove that they clearly violated the law. We’re not in the business of exoneration. We’re not in the business of proving they didn’t violate law. Attorney General William Barr: I found that whole act very… Sen. Richard Blumenthal (CT): …exonerated him in your press conference and in your four page summary Attorney General William Barr: How did that start? I didn’t hear the beginning of the question? Sen. Richard Blumenthal (CT): You in effect exonerated or cleared the president? Attorney General William Barr: No, I didn’t exonerate. I said that we did not believe that there was sufficient evidence to establish an obstruction offense, which is the job of the Justice Department and the job of the Justice Department is now over. That determines whether or not there’s a crime. The report is now in the hands of the American people. Everyone can decide for themselves. There’s an election in 18 months. That’s very democratic process, but we’re out of it and we have to stop using the criminal justice process as a political weapon. 2:50:30 Sen. Mazie Hirono (HI): You lied to Congress. You told Representative Charlie Krist that you didn’t know what objections Mueller’s team might have to your March 24th so-called summary. You told Senator Chris Van Hollen that you didn’t know if Bob Mueller supported your conclusions, but you knew you lied, and now we know. 2:51:10 Sen. Mazie Hirono (HI): I expected you would try to protect the president, and indeed you did. In 1989…this isn’t something you hadn’t done before. In 1989, when you refuse to show Congress and OLC opinion that led to the arrest of Manual Noriega. In 1992, when you recommended partners for the subjects of the Iran Contra scandal and last year when you wrote the 19 page memo, telling “Donald Trump as president”, can’t be guilty of obstruction of justice, and then didn’t recuse yourself from the matter. From the beginning, you are addressing an audience of one. That person being Donald Trump. 3:00:40 Attorney General William Barr: How did we get to the point here where the evidence is now that the president was falsely accused of colluding with the Russians and accused of being treasonous and accused of being a Russian agent. And the evidence now is that was without a basis and two years of his administration, uh, have been dominated by the allegations that have now been proven false. And you know, to listen to some of the rhetoric, you would think that the Mueller report and found the opposite. 3:18:14 Sen. Kamala Harris (CA): In your March 24th summary, you wrote: “After reviewing the special council’s final report, deputy Attorney General Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence is not sufficient to establish that the president committed an obstruction of justice offense.” Now the special council’s investigation produced a great deal of evidence. Um, I’ve led to believe it included witnesses, notes and emails, witnesses, congressional testimony, witnesses, interviews, um, which were summarized in the FBI 302 forms, former FBI Director Columbia’s memos and the president’s public statements. My question is, in reaching your conclusion, did you personally review all of the underlying evidence? Attorney General William Barr: Uh, no. We took a… we excepted… Sen. Kamala Harris (CA): Did…Did Mr Rosenstein…? Attorney General William Barr: No, we accepted the statements in the report as the factual record. We did not go underneath it to see whether or not they were accurate. We accepted it as accurate and made our… Sen. Kamala Harris (CA): So you accepted the report as the evidence? Attorney General William Barr: Yes. Sen. Kamala Harris (CA): You did not question or look at the underlying evidence that supports the conclusions in the report? Attorney General William Barr: No. Sen. Kamala Harris (CA): Did, uh, Mr Rosenstein review the evidence that underlines and supports the conclusions in the report…to your knowledge? Attorney General William Barr: Not to my knowledge. We accepted the statements in the report. Sen. Kamala Harris (CA): Did anyone in your… Attorney General William Barr: The characterization of the evidence is true. Sen. Kamala Harris (CA): Did anyone in your executive office review the evidence supporting the report? Attorney General William Barr: No. Sen. Kamala Harris (CA): No. 3:20:17 Sen. Kamala Harris (CA): As the Attorney General of the United States, you run the United States Department of Justice. If in any US attorney’s office around the country, the head of that office, when being asked to make a critical decision about in this case the person who holds the highest office in the land and whether or not that person committed a crime. Would you accept them recommending a charging decision to you if they’d had not reviewed the evidence? Attorney General William Barr: Well, that’s a question for Bob Mueller. He’s the U.S. Attorney. He’s the one who presents the report. Sen. Kamala Harris (CA): But it was you who made the charging decisions there. You made the decision not to charge the president Attorney General William Barr: No, in the pross memo and in the declination memo… Sen. Kamala Harris (CA): You said it was your baby. What did you mean by that? Attorney General William Barr: It was my baby to let, to decide whether or not to disclose it to the public. Sen. Kamala Harris (CA): And whose decision was it,? Who had the power to make the decision about whether or not the evidence was sufficient to make a determination of whether there had been an obstruction of justice? Attorney General William Barr: Prosecution memos go up to the supervisor. In this case, it was the…you know, the Attorney General, the Deputy Attorney General, who… who decide on the final decision, and that is based on the memo as presented by the US Attorney’s office. Sen. Kamala Harris (CA): I think you’ve made it clear that you’ve not looked at…we can move on. I think you’ve made it clear Sir that you’ve not looked at the evidence and we can move on. 3:22:25 Attorney General William Barr: You know I haven’t been the only decision maker here. Now let’s take the Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein who was approved by the Senate 94 to 6 with specific discussion on the floor that he would be responsible for supervising the Russian investing. Sen. Kamala Harris (CA): I’m glad you brought up that. That’s a great topic. Attorney General William Barr: He has 30 years experience and we had a number of senior prosecutors in the department involved in this process, both career and non-career. Sen. Kamala Harris (CA): Yes, I’ve, I’ve, I’ve, I’ve read a lot . I have another question and I’m glad you brought that subject up because I have a question about that. Earlier today in response to Senator Graham, you said quote “that you consulted with Rosenstein constantly” With respect to the special council’s investigation report, but Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein is also a key witness and the firing of FBI Director Comey. Did you consult with…? I’m not finished. Attorney General William Barr: Yeah? Sen. Kamala Harris (CA): Did you consult with DOJ Ethics officials before you enlisted Rod Rosenstein to participate in a charging decision for an investigation? The subject, of which; he is also a witness. Attorney General William Barr: My understanding was that he had been cleared already to participate in it. Sen. Kamala Harris (CA): So you had consulted with them and they cleared it? Attorney General William Barr: No, I think they cleared it when he took over the investigation. Did you consider?.. Attorney General William Barr: That’s my understanding? I am…I Sen. Kamala Harris (CA): You don’t know whether he’s been cleared of a conflict of interest? Attorney General William Barr: You would be participating if there was a conflict of interest. Sen. Kamala Harris (CA): So you’re saying that it did not need to be reviewed by the career ethics officials in your office? Attorney General William Barr: I believe, well I believe it was reviewed and I… Sen. Kamala Harris (CA): and what role should find…? Attorney General William Barr: I would also point out that this seems to be a bit of a flip flop because when the president’s supporters were challenging Rosenstein Sen. Kamala Harris (CA): I think in this case that you’re not answering the question directly. Attorney General William Barr: What? Sen. Kamala Harris (CA): Did the ethics officials in your office, in the Department of Justice, review the appropriateness of Rod Rosenstein being a part of making a charging decision on an investigation, which he is also a witness in? Attorney General William Barr: Yeah. So as I said, my understanding was he had been cleared and he had been cleared before I arrived. Sen. Kamala Harris (CA): In making a decision on the Mueller report? Attorney General William Barr: Yes. Sen. Kamala Harris (CA): And, and the findings of whether or not the case would be charged on obstruction of justice? Had he been cleared on that? Attorney General William Barr: He was, he was the acting Attorney General on the Mueller investigation. Sen. Kamala Harris (CA): Had he been cleared? Attorney General William Barr: He had been, I am… Sen. Kamala Harris (CA): By your side recommendation? Attorney General William Barr: I am informed before I arrived, he had been cleared by the ethics officials. Sen. Kamala Harris (CA): Of what? Attorney General William Barr: Serving as acting Attorney General on the Mueller case. Sen. Kamala Harris (CA): How about making a charging decision on obstruction of justice? Attorney General William Barr: That is what the acting… Sen. Kamala Harris (CA): With the lack of offenses, which include him as a witness? Attorney General William Barr: Yeah. He, that’s what the acting Attorney General’s job is. Sen. Kamala Harris (CA): To be a witness and to make the decision about being a prosecutor? Attorney General William Barr: Well. No. But the big charging decisions. Sen. Kamala Harris (CA): I have nothing else. My time has run out. 3:45:15 Sen. Patrick Leahy (VT): And President Trump. I am correcting my earlier statement, never allowed anybody to interview him directly under oath. Is that correct? Attorney General William Barr: I think that’s correct. Sen. Patrick Leahy (VT): Even though he said he’s ready to testify. Thank you. 3:45:42 Attorney General William Barr: The absence of an underlying crime doesn’t necessarily mean that there would be other motives for obstruction. Although, it gets a little bit harder to prove and more speculative as to what those motives might be. But the point I was trying to make earlier, is that in this situation of the president, (who has constitutional authority to supervise proceedings), if in fact a proceeding was not well founded. If it was a groundless proceeding, if it was based on false allegations, the president does not have to sit there constitutionally and allow it to run its course. The president could terminate that proceeding and it would not be a corrupt intent because he was being falsely accused and he would be worried about the impact on his administration. That’s important, because most of the obstruction claims that are being made here or, episodes, do involve the exercise of the president’s constitutional authority. And we now know that he was being falsely accused. 3:52:05 Attorney General William Barr: Right after March 5th, we started discussing what the implications of this were and how we would… Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (RI): And you made the decision when? Attorney General William Barr: Uh, probably on Sunday the 24th. Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (RI): That’s the day the letter came out? Attorney General William Barr: Yes. We made the decision… Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (RI): And make the decision until the letter came out? Attorney General William Barr: No. No. Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (RI): You must have told somebody how to write the letter, you couldn’t… Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (RI): When did you actually decide that there was no obstruction? Attorney General William Barr: The 24th. Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (RI): Okay. 3:52:35 Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (RI): When did you get the first draft of the Mueller report? Attorney General William Barr: The, the first?.. It wasn’t a draft. We got the final. Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (RI): The first version of it that you saw? Attorney General William Barr: Well, the only version of it I saw. Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (RI): Okay, the only version for you Sir. When you do first? Attorney General William Barr: The 22nd Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (RI): The 22nd 3:52:50 Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (RI): Now you told Senator Harris that you made your decision on the obstruction charge, you and Rosenstein, based on the Mueller report. Did I correctly infer that you made that decision then between the 22nd and the 24th? Attorney General William Barr: Well, we had had a lot of discussions about it before the 22nd but then the final decision was made on the 24th Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (RI): and you didn’t… Attorney General William Barr: We had more than two and a half days to consider this. LLC had already done a lot of thinking about some of these issues even before, uh, the…we got the report. 4:03:30 Sen. Richard Blumenthal (CT): This letter was an extraordinary act. A career prosecutor would rebuking the Attorney General of the United States memorializing in writing. Right? I know of no other incidents of that happening. Do you? Attorney General William Barr: Uh, I don’t consider Bob at this stage, a career prosecutor. He’s had a career as a prosecutor. Sen. Richard Blumenthal (CT): Well, he was a very eminent… Attorney General William Barr: Who was the head of the FBI for 12 years? Um… Sen. Richard Blumenthal (CT): He’s a career…He’s had a, he’s… law enforcement professional? Attorney General William Barr: Right? Yup. Sen. Richard Blumenthal (CT): I know of no other instances of… Attorney General William Barr: But he was also political appointee and he was a political appointee with me at the Department of Justice. I don’t, I, you know, the letters a bit snitty and I think it was probably written by one of his staff people. Sen. Richard Blumenthal (CT): Did you make a memorandum of your conversation? Attorney General William Barr: Huh? Sen. Richard Blumenthal (CT): Did you make a memory? Attorney General William Barr: No, I didn’t need anyone else around them. What? Sen. Richard Blumenthal (CT): Did anyone, either you or anyone on your staff memorialize your conversation with Robert Mueller? Attorney General William Barr: Yes. Sen. Richard Blumenthal (CT):Who did that? Attorney General William Barr: Uh, there were notes taken of the call. Sen. Richard Blumenthal (CT): May We have those notes? Attorney General William Barr: No. Sen. Richard Blumenthal (CT):Why not? Attorney General William Barr: Why should you have them? Hearing: Attorney General Barr News Conference on Mueller Report Release, Department of Justice, April 18, 2019. 4:00 Attorney General William Barr: As the Special Counsel’s report makes clear, the Russian government sought to interfere in our election. But thanks to the Special Counsel’s thorough investigation, we now know that the Russian operatives who perpetrated these schemes did not have the cooperation of President Trump or the Trump campaign – or the knowing assistance of any other Americans for that matter. 9:30 Attorney General William Barr: Special Counsel did not make a traditional prosecutorial judgment regarding this allegation. Instead, the report recounts ten episodes involving the President and discusses potential legal theories for connecting these actions to elements of an obstruction offense. After carefully reviewing the facts and legal theories outlined in the report, and in consultation with the Office of Legal Counsel and other Department lawyers, the Deputy Attorney General and I concluded that the evidence developed by the Special Counsel is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense. 10:30 Attorney General William Barr: In assessing the President’s actions discussed in the report, it is important to bear in mind the context. President Trump faced an unprecedented situation. As he entered into office, and sought to perform his responsibilities as President, federal agents and prosecutors were scrutinizing his conduct before and after taking office, and the conduct of some of his associates. At the same time, there was relentless speculation in the news media about the President’s personal culpability. Yet, as he said from the beginning, there was in fact no collusion. And as the Special Counsel’s report acknowledges, there is substantial evidence to show that the President was frustrated and angered by a sincere belief that the investigation was undermining his presidency, propelled by his political opponents, and fueled by illegal leaks. Nonetheless, the White House fully cooperated with the Special Counsel’s investigation, providing unfettered access to campaign and White House documents, directing senior aides to testify freely, and asserting no privilege claims. And at the same time, the President took no act that in fact deprived the Special Counsel of the documents and witnesses necessary to complete his investigation. Apart from whether the acts were obstructive, this evidence of non-corrupt motives weighs heavily against any allegation that the President had a corrupt intent to obstruct the investigation. 18:00 Attorney General William Barr: But I will say that when we met with him, Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein and I met with him, along with Ed o’Callaghan, who is the principal associate deputy, on March 5th. We specifically asked him about the OLC opinion and whether or not he was taking a position that he would have found a crime but for the existence of the OLC opinion. And he made it very clear several times that that was not his position. He was not saying that but for the OLC opinion, he would have found a crime. He made it clear that he had not made the determination that there was a crime.” 19:30 Attorney General William Barr: And we don’t go through this process just to collect information and throw it out to the public. We collect this information. We use that compulsory process for the purpose of making that decision. And because the special counsel did not make that decision, we felt the department had to. That was a decision by me and the deputy attorney general. 20:15 Attorney General William Barr: Well, special counsel Mueller did not indicate that his purpose was to leave the decision to Congress. I hope that was not his view, since we don’t convene grand juries and conduct criminal investigations for that purpose. He did not – I didn’t talk to him directly about the fact that we were making the decision, but I am told that his reaction to that was that it was my prerogative as attorney general to make that decision. Hearing: Justice Department Fiscal Year 2020 Budget Request, House Appropriations Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies, April 9, 2019. 1:07:10 Rep. Charlie Crist (FL): Reports have emerged recently, General, that members of the Special Council’s team are frustrated at some level with the limited information included in your March 24th letter, that it does not adequately or accurately necessarily portray the report’s findings. Do you know what they’re referencing with that? Attorney General William Barr: No, I don’t. I suspect that they probably wanted more put out. Hearing: Michael Cohen Testimony, House Oversight Committee, February 27, 2019. 4:01:34 Rep. Mark DeSaulnier (CA): On January 17 of this year, the Wall Street Journal published a story stating that you hired John Gauger, the owner of a consulting company who works for Liberty University in Virginia, to rig at least two online polls related to Donald Trump. Did you hire him? Michael Cohen: Those were back in I believe 2015? Rep. Mark DeSaulnier (CA): 2014. Michael Cohen: 2014. Rep. Mark DeSaulnier (CA): 2014. So you did hire him? Michael Cohen: Yes. I spoke with Mr. Gauger about manipulating these online polls. Rep. Mark DeSaulnier (CA): And did he use bots to manipulate the poll? Michael Cohen: He used algorithms and if that includes bots then the answer’s yes. Rep. Mark DeSaulnier (CA): Yes. That’s accurate. Did the president have any involvement Michael Cohen: Yes. Rep. Mark DeSaulnier (CA): In directing you to do this? Michael Cohen: Yes. Rep. Mark DeSaulnier (CA): What were the results of the poll Michael Cohen: Exactly where we wanted them to be. In the CNBC poll, we came in at number nine. And the Drudge Report, he was top of the Drudge Report as well. 4:50:20 Michael Cohen: So there was a contract that I ended up creating Mr Trump’s behalf for a Ukrainian oligarch by the name of Victor Pinchuk. And it was that Mr. Trump was asked to come into participate in what was the Ukrainian American Economic Forum. Unfortunately, he wasn’t able to go, but I was able to negotiate 15 minutes by Skype where they would have a camera, very much like a television camera, very much like that one. And they would translate Mr. Trump to the questionnaire and then he would respond back. And I negotiated a fee of $150,000 for 15 minutes. I was directed by Mr. Trump to have the contract done in the name of the Donald J. Trump foundation as opposed to Donald J. Trump or services rendered. Hearing: FBI Oversight, Senate Judicary Committee, May 3, 2017. Witnesses: James Comey: FBI Director Sound Clips: *2:27:00: Sen. Richard Blumenthal (CT): So potentially the President of the United States could be a target of your ongoing investigation into the Trump campaign’s involvement with Russian interference in our election. Correct? FBI Director James Comey: I just worry… I don’t want to answer that because it seems to be unfair speculation. We will follow the evidence. We’ll try and find as much as we can and we’ll follow the evidence where it leads. Cover Art Design by Only Child Imaginations Music Presented in This Episode Intro & Exit: Tired of Being Lied To by David Ippolito (found on Music Alley by mevio)
On today's show, Tim welcomes Associated Press's Rob Maaddi, who is live from Citizens Bank Park, giving live updates of the Phillies game today. Then, Tim has author Jon Gauger, who wrote Kids Say the Wisest Things: 26 Lessons You Didn't Know Children Could Teach You. Jon discusses his journey with fatherhood, and shares important lessons he learned about God by observing kidsSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
00:00 - Intro 00:28 - Tim and Drew discuss collaborative songwriting02:55 - Interview with Laurie Gauger25:54 - Wrap-upselahhymnary.comlauriegauger.compatreon.com/heartsandhandspodcastSupport the show (https://www.patreon.com/heartsandhandspodcast)
This is Part 2 of our sit down with Kelsey, In Part I of this interview she described what the Smart Lab is and talked about the various forms of technology that Suffolk is implementing on their projects. In this episode we move deeper into the tech and the process Suffolk uses to adopt, implement and potentially standardize technology on their projects. We also talk about AI, standardization of data, and Suffolk’s use of Virtual Reality. Enjoy the show! --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/joekelly/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/joekelly/support
In Part I of this interview Kelsey describes what the Smart Lab is and talks about the various forms of technology that Suffolk is implementing on their projects. She also discusses field or project generated discovery of technology versus Smart Lab generated technology and how that plays out in the adoption of new tech. If you go to @Mass.Construction on Instagram or Joseph Kelly on Linkedin I’ve posted photos from the lab so you can see some of the tech we are referring to. It’s quite impressive what Suffolk is doing, not only adopting new tech and methods of innovation but having data analyst in house is taking things to the next level. If you want a glimpse into how are future looks, listen up. Enjoy the show! --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/joekelly/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/joekelly/support
Gospel Meeting AM sermon for April 8, 2018
Gospel Meeting PM sermon for April 10, 2018
Gospel Meeting PM sermon for April 8, 2018
Gospel Meeting Bible Class for April 8, 2018
Gospel Meeting PM sermon for April 11, 2018
Gospel Meeting PM sermon for April 9, 2018
Michael Scott, Jon Erwin, Thomas Purifoy, Tom Holladay, Nina Roesner, Rachel Busick, Ann Gauger
Michael Scott, Jon Erwin, Thomas Purifoy, Tom Holladay, Nina Roesner, Rachel Busick, Ann Gauger
There are too many Star Trek dads to fit into one month, so special guest Eliza Gauger is back for a wide-ranging bonus episode packed with all the Trek dad content you can handle.
Eliza Gauger guests to talk the many fraught fatherly relationships of Peep Show.
PM sermon for January 22, 2017
AM sermon for January 22, 2017
When you are at a cross roads in life and an opportunity presents itself, what do you do? Deborah Gauger was aware that a choice needed to be made that would change the course of her life, both professionally and personally. She was asking for change and without knowing what the outcome would be, she jumped all in from a corporate career into a successful, thriving home based business. Deborah Gauger, has had an extremely active life, with moving over 47 times, went to 13 different schools, obtained a degree in history and business which led her to a career of corporate management in the media network industry for the past 18 years and a volunteer in crisis services. Today her ability to be a chameleon in her life has led her in the wake of a recent upheaval to once again go through another move in her physical life as well as her business life and begin a whole new career in network marketing. This has been a fast learning curve that has led her to be a leader in an industry that she knew nothing of 23 months ago. Lisa Benitz embodies kindness and caring for unlocking the self-imposed prison we create with our debris. She shows us an easier way to create the life we have always known was possible. By removing emotional and physical baggage, she assists clients in clarifying and bringing about an ease with yourself and relationships with others. lisabenitz@icloud.com ~ https://www.facebook.com/infinitenergies ~ http://www.infiniteenergies.ca/
There's plenty of talk on radio, but with 20twenty you'll find Life, Culture & Current events from a Biblical perspective. Interviews, stories and insight you definately won't hear in the mainstream media. This feed contains selected content from 20twenty, heard every weekday morning. See www.vision.org.au for more details Help Vision to keep 'Connecting Faith to Life': https://vision.org.au/donate See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Orange County's French Vietnamese filmmaker Stephane Gauger on his new hip hop film set in contemporary Saigon, "Saigon Electric". This is a special online edition of KUCI's Subversity program hosted by Daniel C. Tsang.
Frog Design Chief Development Officer Mark Gauger discusses the impact of innovation and strategic design plus his work in consulting with leading executives, plus his background as a product designer and his career work on the creation of competitive advantage through product development.
Last September, Ian Buxton gave us a preview of his "Classic Expressions" series of vintage whisky books, lovingly re-printed under the guidance of Ian and publisher Neil Wilson. Back then, Ian was looking for founding subscribers to support the printing of the first two books in the series. Now, "Reminiscenses of a Gauger" by Joseph Pacy and Ian MacDonald's "Smuggling in the Highlands" are available for a new generation of whisky lovers to enjoy. Ian and Neil have three more classics in the pipeline, and we'll get an update from Ian in this episode. In the news, Talisker gets a new manager, Canadian Club celebrates Dario Franchitti's Indy 500 victory, and the Indian spirits tariff dispute may have a resolution soon.
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
