Podcasts about myth it

Kristen and Mike kick off their new Buzzword Breakdown series by tackling psychological safety, a term often referenced in leadership discussions without clear explanation. Created by Harvard professor Amy Edmondson, psychological safety is the belief that you won't be punished for speaking up with ideas, questions, or concerns. Research shows it's the #1 predictor of high-performing teams - more important than who's on the team. Despite its importance, many misconceptions exist around what psychological safety actually means and how to create it. Whether you lead a team or are part of one, understanding this concept can transform your workplace relationships and help everyone do their best work.Highlights:Introduction of the new Buzzword Breakdown series formatAmy Edmondson coined "psychological safety" in 1999 while researching hospital teamsPsychological safety is a team concept that predicts high performance (Google's Project Aristotle)Myth: It's about being nice (Reality: It's about candor with respect)Myth: You can declare a space "safe" (Reality: Actions create it)Myth: It's a luxury (Reality: It's essential for effective teams)Signs of low safety: silence in meetings, blame culture, fear of failureSigns of high safety: challenging ideas without fear, open discussion of mistakesLeaders create it through: admitting uncertainty, sharing lessons from mistakes, thanking people for speaking upLinks & Resources Mentioned:The Fearless Organization by Amy EdmondsonAmy Edmondson on LinkedInHBR: What Is Psychological Safety?HBR: What People Get Wrong About Psychological SafetyMcKinsey: What is Psychological Safety?Previous Love and Leadership episodes:#37 Workplace Buzzwords #31 Motivating Employees#38 How to Win Friends and Influence People#17 Interview with Rebecca YangPodcast Website: www.loveandleadershippod.comInstagram: @loveleaderpodFollow us on LinkedIn!Kristen: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kristenbsharkey/ Mike: https://www.linkedin.com/in/michael-s-364970111/Learn more about Kristen's leadership coaching and facilitation services: http://www.emboldify.com

I want to be very clear: I am NOT endorsing or opposing any politician or candidate. But this is an incredibly important topic and I am hoping that I can break it down fairly and dispassionately. I am also going to try my best to keep my personal views out of it. I look forward to hearing your thoughts, comments, corrections and questions. Here goes…Year Of The Opposite - Travis Stoliker's Substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.In plain English, what exactly is going on and why is the concept of taxing unrealized capital gains in the news?The concept of taxing unrealized capital gains has become a hot topic, especially as the Biden-Harris administration pushes forward their unique tax policies. In essence, unrealized capital gains are the increases in value of assets like stocks or property that haven't been sold yet. Under a new proposal, the idea is to tax these paper profits annually as if they were actual income.This topic is making headlines because it's a major shift in how we think about wealth and taxation. Traditionally, taxes are levied on income you actually receive—like your salary—or on profits you make when you sell an asset. (Note: When I say “Asset” just think: your real estate, your stock, or maybe a business you own that you sell.) But now, the discussion has pivoted to taxing potential income before it's even realized. (Note: When I say “realized” in a financial concept it means selling an asset like a stock and converting the stock certificate into cash.) The stated goal behind this new and novel approach is supposed to ensure that the wealthiest individuals pay a fair share, addressing concerns over wealth inequality. However, as with any significant policy shift, it brings along a flurry of debates and concerns.The Biden-Harris administration has said: "Preferential treatment for unrealized gains disproportionately benefits high-wealth taxpayers and provides many high-wealth taxpayers with a lower effective tax rate than many low- and middle-income taxpayers."What has been proposed and what is the history of the proposal to tax unrealized capital gains?The proposal isn't just a fleeting idea; it's embedded in the Biden administration's fiscal plans. Officially introduced in March 2023, the proposal suggests a minimum tax of 25% on total income, including unrealized gains, for those with a net worth exceeding $100 million. This isn't a new debate, though. The concept of taxing wealth rather than just income has been discussed for years, but it's only now being seriously considered as a part of fiscal policy.The reason this is coming up this week is that the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget reported on the Harris campaign's stance. They stated: 'The campaign specifically told us that they support all of the tax increases on the high earners and corporations that are in the Biden budget." Here is the full policy and some important excerpts: But doesn't this policy only apply to super rich people?Yes, but the concern is that this is exactly how the income tax originally started. The idea of taxing only the super-rich isn't new; it mirrors the initial U.S. income tax in 1861, which taxed just 3% of the population making over $800. However, this tax was temporary, repealed in 1872, but its concept evolved, leading to the 16th Amendment in 1913, allowing for a broader income tax.Critics worry that what starts as a tax on the ultra-wealthy could expand, much like the income tax did. Initially targeting the rich, the income tax eventually reached the middle class, with rates as high as 94% for top earners by 1944, showing how tax policies can broaden over time.Even though this policy doesn't yet apply to everyday people, can you give me an example that a common person can relate to?Sure, imagine you own a house. Over the years, the value of your house increases significantly, but you don't sell it. Under a policy that taxes unrealized gains, you'd have to pay taxes each year on the increased value of your home—even though you haven't actually received any cash from that increase. This could create a financial burden, especially if you're cash-poor but asset-rich. Let's try to use an example. Say you bought a house in East Lansing for $100,000 but due to some crazy economic events like the lead up we saw to 2007, the house in theory is worth $200,000. But you have no intention of selling your house because you just want to live in it. Under this proposal, you'd have to pay a 25% tax on the gain of $100,000. Meaning you'd have to come up with $25,000 in cash to pay your taxes on the house. Where would you come up with that cash? Would you have to sell the house in order to pay the taxes? Maybe you did have $25,000 in cash, which you had intended to use to replace the roof on your house or remodel it. Now you would have to use that money to pay taxes. And what if that $200,000 increased value was not real. What if we saw what happened in 2008 happen all over again and there is a market crash and now your house is again worth $100,000? As you can see, this gets very complicated and very confusing, very quickly. To be very clear: This current proposal does NOT apply to your house or mine. I'm just using this example because it's something we can all relate to.Do other countries do this?While some countries have experimented with taxing wealth, including unrealized gains, it remains far from a global standard. For instance, Norway's wealth tax indirectly affects unrealized gains as part of the overall wealth calculation, but it has sparked debates over unintended consequences like capital flight. Similarly, France's former wealth tax (ISF) faced criticism for driving wealthy individuals out of the country, leading to its repeal in 2017 and replacement with a tax focused solely on real estate. These cases illustrate the challenges and potential downsides of taxing unrealized gains, making the U.S. proposal a relatively novel and significant departure from how most countries handle capital gains taxation.What would this mean for innovation and invention in America? What would this do to startups?Innovation thrives on risk-taking and long-term investment. A tax on unrealized gains could potentially dampen the entrepreneurial spirit by imposing financial burdens on profits that exist only on paper. Entrepreneurs might become more cautious, fearing the tax implications of holding onto high-risk, high-reward ventures. This policy could stifle innovation by deterring the very risk-taking that drives breakthroughs.Let's be more specific about how this policy might impact startups. Many startups don't generate profits in their early years. Take Amazon, FedEx, Snapchat, TBS, Netflix, Adobe, and Airbnb as examples—none of these companies made a single dime of profit for more than five years after they launched. Yet, during this period, the paper valuation of these companies soared like a rocket.What does this mean in practice? It means that while these companies appeared successful on paper, they weren't generating cash profits. The founders and investors were reinvesting every penny back into the company's growth—hiring more people, building infrastructure, and ramping up advertising. Often, this reinvestment happens alongside rounds of fundraising at ever-higher valuations, based on the company's potential rather than its current profitability.In plain English, the "value" of these companies on paper kept climbing, but there was no cash flow to match it. If this proposal were enacted, founders and investors wouldn't just need to pour their personal cash into growing the business and paying employees—they'd also need to invest additional cash solely to pay taxes on unrealized gains. Would you sign up for that?I think an example might be useful here: We all know that restaurants are notoriously difficult and often unprofitable businesses. Now, imagine you've opened the dream café you've always wanted. You invest $100,000 from your 401(k) to build out your first location. Things are going well in your first year, so you decide it's time to expand and open a second location. Like many entrepreneurs, instead of paying yourself, you choose to reinvest the business's earnings into hiring the best employees possible. Then, you get an opportunity to launch that second location across town, but it's going to take another $100,000 to make it happen.After working an entire year without paying yourself, and having already invested your 401(k) savings into the business, you need to bring in a new investor to raise the additional $100,000. When the new investor comes on board, they value the company higher, so on paper, the value of your café increases. However, despite this increase in paper valuation, you, the founder, still haven't earned a single dime from the company.Now, because the valuation on paper has gone up (the unrealized gain), you and the new investor not only need to come up with the $100,000 to build the second location—you also need an additional $25,000 just to cover the taxes on that unrealized gain.And let's not forget, startups are incredibly risky. What happens if the company fails? What if the founders are working on something as monumental as a cure for cancer? Would they, and their investors, continue to risk their money, time, and resources, knowing that a portion of it is being siphoned off for taxes on non-existent profits? Would you? Is this really what we want as a society—discouraging the very risks that lead to life-changing innovations?Again, to be very clear: This current proposal does NOT apply to your Cafe or mine. I'm just using this example because it's something we can all relate to.Since people can move, if this happened, wouldn't all the rich people just move and leave the United States?Maybe. That is the problem with policies like this—they tend to have unintended consequences. Wealthy individuals have the resources to relocate to countries with more favorable tax laws. If implemented, we might see a migration of wealth out of the U.S., similar to what has happened in other countries with aggressive tax policies. This exodus could lead to a decrease in investment and philanthropy within the U.S., ultimately hurting the economy. And most importantly, this could ultimately reduce total tax income for the government which would completely defeat the intended goal of this policy.Addressing some common misconceptions about taxes in the United States: “The rich need to pay their fair share” There are some common misconceptions that are often stated that need to be cleared up. It surprises many people to learn that every year, between 40-55% of U.S. households pay $0 in federal income taxes. None. Now let's look at the top 1% of earners that are often talked about. The top 1% of earners bring in around 20-21% of all income in the U.S., but they pay nearly half of all federal income taxes​. This isn't to say that the system is perfect, but it's a reminder that tax policy is already incredibly complex and there are many misconceptions. Can you explain in a bit more detail how this would exactly work?Here's where it gets technical. The unrealized gains tax would function as a prepayment on future realized gains taxes, meaning you wouldn't pay taxes twice on the same gain. If you eventually sell the asset for less than its taxed value or incur a loss, you could get a refund. This system aims to prevent people from being taxed on income they never actually receive, but it also adds layers of complexity.For example, if you're illiquid—meaning most of your wealth is tied up in non-tradable assets—you might only have to pay taxes on liquid assets, but there's a catch: you'd face a deferral charge of up to 10% on the gain of your illiquid assets. And if you pass away, your estate pays the death tax, with any overpaid unrealized taxes refunded to the estate.Can this policy actually be implemented by the President?No, not directly. While the President can propose tax policies, it's ultimately up to Congress to pass them. Given the contentious nature of this proposal and the significant legal and logistical hurdles, its implementation is far from guaranteed. It's a complex policy that would require broad support and careful crafting to become law.How would this tax interact with state-level taxes?State tax systems often mirror federal rules, so if a federal tax on unrealized gains were implemented, states might consider adopting similar measures. However, this could lead to conflicts between federal and state tax policies, particularly in states with lower or no income tax. Additionally, the combined burden of federal and state taxes on unrealized gains could increase the overall tax rate on affected individuals.How would this policy affect retirement accounts and other tax-advantaged savings vehicles?At this point, the proposal does not specifically target retirement accounts like 401(k)s or IRAs, which traditionally benefit from tax deferral until funds are withdrawn. However, if the policy were to extend to such accounts, it could complicate the tax treatment of these savings vehicles and potentially undermine their tax-advantaged status. Clarifications would be needed to determine how, if at all, these accounts would be affected.How do you determine how much tax to be paid? Who determines the value of an unrealized capital gain? For example: how do you know how much a business is worth for sure if you haven't yet sold it? The tax on unrealized capital gains is based on the value of your assets at the end of each year. For stocks, it's easy to figure out because their market value is clear. But when it comes to assets like a small business or real estate that haven't been sold, it gets tricky.For these types of assets, the value would have to be estimated, often through appraisals. This is where things can get complicated and subjective. For example, valuing a business that hasn't been sold yet involves guessing what someone might pay for it based on current market conditions and future earnings.To illustrate how hard it is to value something accurately, just think about how often you've seen wildly different "Zestimates" on Zillow for houses, including your own. This same kind of uncertainty can apply to other assets, making it difficult to determine an exact tax amount.The policy might include safeguards to adjust for big swings in value, allowing for tax credits or refunds if an asset's value drops after you've already paid tax on it. But the details on how this would work aren't clear yet, and it's something that would need to be carefully handled to avoid unfair taxes based on inaccurate valuations.Addressing some of the myths that are being said about this policy:There are several myths or misconceptions often cited which might not hold up under scrutiny:Myth: Taxing Unrealized Gains is Fair Because Wealthy Individuals Use Unrealized Gains for Borrowing:Reality: While it's true that wealthy individuals can use the value of their assets as collateral for loans, this doesn't mean they've realized income. (IE: sold their asset for cash.) The value of the underlying assets can still fluctuate, and if the asset's value drops below the loan amount, the individual might still owe on the loan despite having no income from the asset. Taxing unrealized gains could lead to situations where individuals owe taxes on "income" they never actually received.Myth: It's Just Like Taxing Income or Profits:Reality: Taxing unrealized gains is fundamentally different from taxing income or realized profits because it's based on potential wealth, not actual wealth. This could lead to scenarios where individuals or entities are taxed on wealth that might never materialize if the asset's value decreases.Myth: This Will Only Affect the Ultra-Wealthy:Reality: While the proposal might target the ultra-wealthy, there are always unintended consequences when imposing any tax policy. This may result in an increase in sales of businesses, or a decrease. It could lead to people moving their money out of the country, or potentially people completely migrating out of the country. The consequences could be far-reaching and unintended, as seen in France and Norway. As always, please remember, these are never lectures. They are reminders to myself and I want to hear and learn from you. What do you think? Is this proposed policy a good idea? What did I get wrong? Please let me know so that I can improve. If you got value out of this, please do me a favor by sharing or subscribing. It means a lot to me. Year Of The Opposite - Travis Stoliker's Substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Get full access to Year Of The Opposite - Travis Stoliker's Substack at www.yearoftheopposite.com/subscribe

Welcome back to America's #1 Daily Podcast,  featuring America's #1 Real Estate Coaches and Top EXP Realty Sponsors in the World, Tim and Julie Harris. Ready to become an EXP Realty Agent and join Tim and Julie Harris?  Visit: https://whylibertas.com/harris or text Tim directly at 512-758-0206. IMPORTANT: Join #1 Real Estate Coaches Tim and Julie Harris's Premier Coaching now for FREE. Included is a DAILY Coaching Session with a HARRIS Certified Coach. Proven and tested lead generation, systems, and scripts designed for this market. Instant FREE Access Now: YES, Enroll Me NOW In Premier Coaching https://premiercoaching.com So You Didn't Get the Listing - WHY NOT?  Fact: Of all activities in real estate, listings require the highest skill level.  Working with buyers is physical labor; working with listings is mental labor.   Myth: It's okay and you can expect to list only 50% of what you go on, in terms of listing appointments versus listings taken. Yet you wouldn't accept a grade of 50% from your kids, so why do you think it's acceptable for you? Let's take a look at the top ten reasons agents don't walk away with signed paperwork on a listing appointment. Fact: Listing agents make more money and have more solid businesses and more free time than buyer's agents. The more listings you have, the more security you'll have mentally, emotionally, and financially. Fact: Becoming a successful listing agent is the most challenging, most skill-based, and highest-paid part of your job. Not becoming great at this is a liability to your career. Make the commitment to learn the most important part of your job as a real estate professional. HUGE Announcement: You will love this! Looking for the full outline from today's presentation? Our DAILY Newsletter featured lead generation systems, real estate scripts, daily success plans and (YES) the notes or today's show. Best part? The newsletter is free! https://harrisrealestatedaily.com/  

Are parents really responsible for their kids' happiness? Doing things purely to make our children happy often results in disappointment—for them and for us. Instead of trying to satisfy our children's insatiable craving for happiness, we share four things to teach them that will help build happiness as a by-product rather than an end in and of itself. (R) This episode originally aired 1/8/22. In this episode: Myth – It's our job to make our kids happy Things that could go wrong if you think it's your job to make your kids happy Setting our kids up to fail What ARE we responsible for? Emotion coaching Do hard things Building positive relationships . Related links:  Hopeful Kids Are Happy Kids Helping Our Kids Feel Good By Doing Good Purchase Better Together on the Happy Families website – Because a happy family doesn't just happen. . Find us on Facebook or TikTok Subscribe to the Happy Families newsletter Leave a voice memo here or email your questions/comments to podcasts@happyfamilies.com.au Find out more about joining THE QUEST at our websiteSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Are you planning to start a real estate business but don't know where to start? Is the thought of where to get funding holding you back? Well, we've got this special episode for you.In this episode, Jay Conner himself talks about private money and how it became a game-changer for his real estate deals. If you are one of those wanting to enter the realty business or a seasoned real estate investor, join us and take down notes because Jay has outlined everything you need to know about raising private money. He talks about the nature of funding your deals through private money, the benefits, and how you can actually start attracting private money lenders.Key Takeaways:What is private money?Self-directed IRAs and how they can help fund your dealsPrivate money is not hard money.Myth: It is impossible to buy properties without taking money out of your pocketReasons to love private moneyWhen borrowing private money, you are the one setting the rules.Money comes first. The worst time to look for private money is when you actually need the funding.When to use private moneyReasons why a private lender would be interested in lending private moneyWhere is the private money, and how can you actually get started?Resources:www.questtrust.comCheck out my book: 7 Reasons Why Private Money Will Skyrocket Your Real Estate Business and Help You Build Incredible Wealth!Get it here for FREE: www.jayconner.com/moneyguide

Please donate to the show!Today we cover 13 myths that many people believe about politics.  Any of these sound familiar?Myth: Massachusetts state government is in good hands.Myth: It's better to spend time and money organizing in red or purple states. Myth: My state rep votes the way they tell me they are voting. Myth: If a candidate says during a campaign they will support certain policies, they will support them after the election. Myth: If my state rep officially cosponsors legislation, they will vote for it. Myth: If I want national policies passed, I should focus on Congress, not on Massachusetts state politics. Myth: Taxachusetts - we have a high tax rate on the wealthy.  Myth: If my state rep proposes an amendment, they intend for it to be voted on. Myth: Lobbying is an effective strategy for changing policy. Myth: Voting rights are only a problem in red and purple states, not in Massachusetts. Myth: Democracy is in crisis in other states, but not here in Massachusetts. Myth: You have democracy in your city in Massachusetts. Myth: Massachusetts leads the country in donations to progressive candidates and causes.Jordan Berg Powers, Jonathan Cohn, and Anna Callahan chat about Massachusetts politics. This is the audio version of the Incorruptible Mass podcast, season 5 episode 5. You can watch the video version on our YouTube channel. You're listening to Incorruptible Mass. Our goal is to help people transform state politics: we investigate why it's so broken, imagine what we could have here in MA if we fixed it, and report on how you can get involved. To stay informed:* Subscribe to our YouTube channel* Subscribe to the podcast (https://incorruptible-mass.buzzsprout.com)* Sign up to get updates at https://www.incorruptiblemass.org/podcast* Donate to the show at https://secure.actblue.com/donate/impodcast

One of the questions we hear a lot from buyers is whether they should look for an existing home or new construction. It's an ongoing debate that is often up to personal preference, but there are some myths out there about buying a new home that need to be cleared up.   Here's some of what you'll learn in this episode: The one homebuyer mistake people are making today is trying to time the market. (0:33) Myth – New homes are more expensive than existing homes. (4:02) Myth – You'll have to wait a long time to move in. (5:30) Myth – It's hard to finance a new home. (6:44) Myth – You can't inspect a new home. (8:10) Myth – Do new homes lack character? (9:19) Myth – New construction homes are poorer quality. (12:09)   Get in touch with Benson Broker Group: https://bensonbrokergroup.com/ Find out how much your home is worth: https://bensonbrokergroup.com/home_value 

Welcome to The Balanced Dietitian Podcast! I hope that you are doing so wonderful. Happy February! Today is February 1st! How are we feeling entering the second month of 2023? Oftentimes, as we come to the second month of the year, the high of January, has ended and it can be a really hard time. February can be one of the tricky months.    Today I want to talk about eating disorders because from February 1st-7th it is Eating Disorders Awareness Week here in Canada. Today I am going to talk about certain myths and facts that are not known about eating disorders.   In this episode, we discuss:    [05:59] Myth: Eating disorders do not have a body size [08:01] Myth: Eating disorders are not really serious   [15:55] Myth: It is easy to tell if someone has an eating disorder  [18:31] Fact: There is no one cause for an eating disorder [21:34] Fact: Different types of eating disorders [27:37] Fact: You can recover   Ready to heal your relationship with food FOR GOOD? Join the waitlist for The Balanced Program.  Connect with Marie-Pier: On Instagram: @The.Balanced.Dietitian The Balanced Practice on Facebook The Balanced Practice on Instagram The Balanced Practice Workshop

Have you ever heard advice that sounded too good to be true? You're not alone! In this episode, I'm sharing the real truth behind some of the most common online business myths.I asked people on Instagram what was the biggest myth they believed about starting an online business and the answers were enlightening. From people who believed starting an online business would be easy to those who thought starting a business would be hard, the range of responses was fascinating. I'm also discussing legal myths such as LLCs, business insurance, scope of practice, and contracts. We'll be taking a look at why people believe myths, the truth behind them, and how to protect yourself and your online business.In this episode, you'll hear…The danger of believing and spreading online business mythsMyth: You don't need business insurance AND an LLCMyth: You NEED a website for your online business (or you don't)Myth: It's best to register your business in another state for tax purposes… and more!If you'd like a shoutout (and a chance to win a $20 gift card), just leave a review on Apple Podcasts and send a screenshot of it to me on Instagram via DMs!Click here to find the full show notes and transcript for this episode.RESOURCES:Webinar Registration Sign-UpWhat's inside the Bundle video walkthrough: https://www.loom.com/embed/ad4bbbb112ec48f49a013e269f565230 Episode 81. Do You Really Believe In Your Business? (You're Not Alone)Episode 83. Legally Protect Your Online Biz: The Bare Minimum that Produces ResultsEasy Email List Sign-Up: https://www.samvanderwielen.com/easy-emails/Episode 2. Scope of Practice for Coaches (What You're Legally Allowed to Do)Episode 69. What Coaches Can Legally Do (Scope of Practice Part 2)Resources & Links:If you'd like a shoutout (and a chance to win a $20 gift card), just leave a review on Apple Podcasts and send a screenshot of it to me on Instagram via DMs!Read Sam's Blog for the latest legal tips, podcast episodes & behind the scenes of building her seven-figure business.Listen to our customer stories to see how getting legally legit has helped 1,000s of entrepreneurs grow their own businesses.Follow us on social media: Sam on Instagram, Facebook, On Your Terms on Instagram Subscribe and follow on all podcast platforms and activate notifications for new...

Justin & Kylie debunk the myth that parents are responsible for their kid's happiness Topics discussed in today's podcast: Myth - It's our job to make our kids happy Things that could go wrong if you think it's your job to make your kids happy - You're going to make short sighted decisions It's impossible to satisy their craving for happiness It's a heavy burden to carry We set them up to fail Nobody can make you feel good What ARE we responsible for? Teaching them to find their own happiness Happiness isn't in the search for it How to understand their emotions Teach them how to have positive relationships Teach them how to do hard things Teach them to be responsible for their own emotions Purchase Better Together or find it in your Happy Families Membership - Because a happy family doesn't just happen. Find us on Facebook at Dr Justin Coulson's Happy Families Email us your questions and comments at podcasts@happyfamilies.com.au Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Justin & Kylie debunk the myth that parents are responsible for their kid's happinessTopics discussed in today's podcast: Myth - It's our job to make our kids happy Things that could go wrong if you think it's your job to make your kids happy - You're going to make short sighted decisions It's impossible to satisy their craving for happiness It's a heavy burden to carry We set them up to fail Nobody can make you feel good What ARE we responsible for? Teaching them to find their own happiness Happiness isn't in the search for it How to understand their emotions Teach them how to have positive relationships Teach them how to do hard things Teach them to be responsible for their own emotions Purchase Better Together or find it in your Happy Families Membership - Because a happy family doesn't just happen.Find us on Facebook at Dr Justin Coulson's Happy FamiliesEmail us your questions and comments at podcasts@happyfamilies.com.auSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode, Lydia Tay, Vice President of Human Resources speaks passionately about the role HR plays in shaping engaging and inclusive workspaces. _________________________________ Over 1.5 million people live in strata housing in the Province of British Columbia.  Let's face it, you'd rather watch reruns of the nightly news than read the Strata Property Act (And we can't blame you) Still, most people are at a loss when it comes to understanding such an important framework for how many of us live our lives in proximity with one another. 

The Operation Tears of the 22 Mission Critical Retreat. Storytime - home town alma mater is giving away free school supplies and I raised the question of why this seems like it will end badly? I got a lot of parents from that area chimed in saying it was a good thing. I really don't think it is, for many different reasons. I have several thoughts as to why not having the parents provide the supplies Well this is when you really need to have that debate. Just leave it alone? why? Because it's easier? It's with good intentions? Remember what the road to hell is paved with. I agree it sounds good on paper but the devil is in the details. What are you showing the kids about life? That they don't need to worry? The system will take care of you? Just accept that free lunch with out looking to see if there is a hook on it? I'm leery of free stuff with it being an altruistic motive. Altruism is one of the most evil things a man can do for another man. Because everything has a cost and altruistic motives cost the victim his ability to care. So is it worth talking about yeah I think it is. This is where my thoughts on altruism come into play. Men have been taught that their first concern is to relieve the suffering of others. … To make that the highest test of virtue is to make suffering the most important part of life. Then man must wish to see others suffer in order that he may be virtuous. Such is the nature of altruism. Ayn Rand What you are getting when you're altruistic is that you have to hope for people to suffer so that you are able to give more of yourself. This is often why caretakers sabotage their wards. They have to be able to swoop in to rescue that person so that they feel needed. You are sacrificing yourself You are not taking care of yourself. You are putting yourself in harm's way You are causing that other person to be dependent upon you and your actions You are taking risks that are not needed You are not actually helping that person You are not allowing the other person to figure it out. You are making them dependent on you you are creating two victims at the same time. Miss conceptions of Altruism There are many different factors of altruism that many people get wrong. There are many myths Myth It makes you happy? Clears your concionce Makes the world better? Allows you to find new friends/partners Helps you get further in corporations More trust Truth No, it cants make you happy. Your thoughts can. Till you have to let the person live their own life Except that it takes care out of the world If you like codependent friends if not it makes them codependent Except that it erodes trust in the long run [Altruism] is a moral system which holds that man has no right to exist for his own sake, that service to others is the sole justification of his existence, and that self-sacrifice is his highest moral duty, value, and virtue. This is the moral base of collectivism, of all dictatorships. Ayn Rand this is one of the big things that Nice guys do. They have an altruistic sense of morality. They do it and expect others to go along with their thoughts and when they don't they get upset and resentful. If you would like help stepping into the real you. You can set up a consultation call

Top 11 Listing Agent Mistakes and how to avoid them. Today's show is part 1 of 3.  Fact: Of all activities in real estate, listings require the highest skill level. Working with buyers is physical labor; working with listings is mental labor.   Myth: It's okay and you can expect to list only 50% of what you go on, in terms of listing appointments versus listings taken. You wouldn't accept a grade of 50% from your kids, so why do you think it's acceptable for you? Let's take a look at the top ten reasons agents don't walk away with signed paperwork on a listing appointment. Fact: Listing agents make more money and have more solid businesses and more free time than buyer's agents. The more listings you have, the more security you'll have mentally, emotionally, and financially. Fact: Becoming a successful listing agent is the most challenging, most skill-based, highest-paid part of your job. Not becoming great at this is a liability to your career. Make the commitment to learn the most important part of your job as a real estate professional. Reminder, you promised yourself you would become a HARRIS Coaching client. You are done wasting time and ready to follow a proven path. Now, while you are here make the next natural step and join the 1000s of other agents as a HARRIS Real Estate University coaching member. No more waiting or procrastinating. Join now. Here is the quick and simple enrollment.—-> YES, Enroll Me Now In Premier Coaching. I WILL make NOW my best year ever!  The Top Ten Reasons Agents Don't Walk Away With Signed Paperwork 1 - You assumed it was yours and were lazy in your presentation. You took the business for granted. This manifests in several major mistakes. You showed up late or you did not give a real presentation. Or maybe it was a lack of prequalifying questions, or not being careful with the price. Some other mistakes are things like rescheduling and not looking and sounding your best. 2 - You didn't know you were competing for the listing. This is a result of not using a prequalification script. If you don't know whether you're competing or not, you're at a disadvantage. You should almost always go last in the line-up because that's the closing position. 3 - You didn't know what price the seller had in mind before you showed up. This doesn't mean they're right about the price, but you should know what's going on in their pricing brain before you present your CMA. Sometimes sellers know about private sales that may affect pricing. They may have a home in probate, a relocation, or any number of reasons. If you don't ask, you're at a huge disadvantage.   Secret: Don't ever allow the seller to know more about the comparable sales than you do. POP QUIZ: Please choose one answer: 1) I am ready to join EXP Realty.  2) I am interested in EXP Realty and need more info.  3) I am not interested in EXP Realty.  Key: * If you answered “#1” congratulations. You are about to join the fastest-growing real estate company in the world. Tim and Julie Harris are inviting you to join them at EXP Realty. Text Tim directly for the next steps: 512-758-0206. (text only please) * If you answered “#2” please watch the videos and check out the other intel on this site. http://whylibertas.com/harris .  * If you answered ‘#3' no worries. You will want to check out whylibertas.com/harris so you can at least know what EXP Realty is and why so many agents are moving to EXP Realty. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode, Jake and Gino talk about the pros and cons of renting assets versus owning assets, and how this analogy compares to Term Life Insurance versus Whole Life Insurance. Below is one of the top misconceptions about Term Life vs. Whole Life. MYTH: It's better to buy term life insurance and invest the difference. BUSTED: Real Estate Investors know better than anyone that it is better to OWN than to RENT. Why rent your insurance when you can own it and benefit from the equity built inside your policy? You may have heard people suggest “buying term and investing the difference”, but investing in the market involves risk. As a Real Estate Investor, you're already taking a lot of risk. Does it really make sense to take risk with your safe money as well?   With the specially-design of our Whole Life Insurance policies, you know the minimum, guaranteed value of your policy at any given year, as well as the minimum cash value you could borrow. There is no guessing game! Something that is simply not a luxury with “investing the difference”. Key Insights: 00:00 Owning property versus Renting property 01:25 Developing a 100 Year Investor Mindset 02:20 The Honey Bee: Creating Multiple Streams of Revenue 04:56 How to optimize your personal finances 07:09 Benefits of long-term personal financial engineering 09:08 Creating a legacy and generational wealth for your family 11:44 Your mindset matters and directly relates to your financial success Email gino@jakeandgino.com to get the PDF copy of The Honey Bee. Download our eBook on how you can leverage our Dual Asset Strategy to secure your financial future: https://100yearrei.com/ebook-download/   Let our Team run the numbers for you and see how we can help protect your financial future for generations to come. Schedule your consultation now: https://100yearrei.com/callnow/

Get the full transcript and closed caption video here. How to get control of your phone's camera roll(+ 3 myths that hold you back & how to get past them) A note from Leslie.... Learn how I went from overwhelmed mom of 2 drowning in photos to mom of (soon to be) 4 with a clear phone and printed photo books every year Here are 3 myths I hear from people ALL the time about clearing their phone's camera roll #1 Myth: “I just wait until my phone storage is full to upload”Truth: Set up a regular routine to preserve your memories #2 Myth: It will take hours, and I don't have the timeTruth: Start sooner rather than later, just 5-10 minute blocks at a time-your future self will thank you! #3. Myth: More is better when it comes to taking and keeping photosTruth: Photos + videos that live in your phone can never be fully enjoyed The Museum MethodResearch Study: Positive Outcomes of kids who have a strong family narrative How do I get started? (link to free declutter your phone roadmap https://lesliealder.com/signup/roadmap/)

You Didn't Get the Listing - WHY NOT? Fact: Of all activities in real estate, listings require the highest skill level.  Myth: It's okay and you can expect to list only 50% of what you go on, in terms of listing appointments versus listings taken. You wouldn't accept a grade of 50% from your kids, so why do you think it's acceptable for you? Let's take a look at the top ten reasons agents don't walk away with signed paperwork on a listing appointment.  Fact: Listing agents make more money and have more solid businesses and more free time than buyer's agents. The more listings you have, the more security you'll have mentally, emotionally, and financially. Fact: Becoming a successful listing agent is the most challenging, most skill-based, highest-paid part of your job. Not becoming great at this is a liability to your career. Make the commitment to learn the most important part of your job as a real estate professional.  The Top Ten Reasons Agents Don't Walk Away With Signed Paperwork  1. You assumed it was yours and were lazy in your presentation. You took the business for granted. This manifests in several major mistakes. You showed up late or you did not give a real presentation. Or maybe it was a lack of prequalifying questions, or not being careful with price. Some other mistakes are things like rescheduling and not looking and sounding your best. Schedule A Free Coaching Call Listen on iTunes Listen on Spotify Listen on Stitcher Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Thank you for choosing the Deep Sounds podcast. Today we celebrate South African deep house (and some other global artists). Hope it' s to your liking. Follow ushttps://www.instagram.com/manunaykene/https://www.instagram.com/deepsounds___/TracklistBongani Zulu - Room to Breathe (Lazy Luke Remix)Nelo HD - Substantial Thoughts (Mazimba Remix)Enosoul & Rhey Osbourne - Melodic Attraction (Instrumental Remix)SGVO - You dont need to understandKVRVBO - Polaroid MaschineEvren Furtuna - EnceladusFrederick Alonso - Dub LoveChanwill Maconi - ChaoticEvren Furtuna - AuroraRadic the Myth - It's a Zulu Love

~~~~You need to examine your beliefs, search the truths, and abandon your myths... .... ~~~~ People are succeeding at high levels, and so can you....... ~~~~Just because it has never been done in your market doesn't mean it is impossible to achieve. Get a big plan that matches your market, and go for it!!!!!!!!!! ~~~There is only so much time and effort you can give. A big dream doesn't necessitate more time and effort; you just have to focus and apply yourself differently....... ~~~~growing your sales business is not inherently more risky than staying where you are. The risk of inaction is often greater than the risk of action. You must understand your costs, hold them accountable for results, and keep moving forward........ ~~~~~if you have Define standards and can teach them to others, you can delegate work and gain The Leverage you need to grow. Remember, customers are actually loyal to the service standards you represent not just you.......... ~~~~~failure is nothing to be feared. The very best of us have used failures as stepping stones on the path to Ultimate success. The only true failure is in quitting we're not trying at all........... 6 MythUnderstandings Between You & High Achievement ~~~Myth: I can't do it. Truth: Until you try, you can't possibly know what you can or can't do. ~~~~Myth: It can't be done in my market. Truth: Yes it can, but you may need a new approach. ~~~~Myth: It would take too much time and effort. I would lose my freedom. Truth: Time and effort are not the deciding factors in success. ~~~~Myth: It's too risky. I'd lose money. Truth: Risk is in direct proportion to how well you hold your incremental costs accountable to producing incremental results. ~~~~~Myth: My clients will only work with me. Only I can deliver quality service. Truth: You clients aren't loyal to you. They are loyal to the standards you represent. ~~~~ Myth: Having a goal and not fully realizing it is a negative thing. Truth: Having a goal and not trying to achieve it is a negative thing. #dnarealtygroup #kellerwilliams #garykeller #davejenks #jaypapasan #davemartiroso --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/dnarealtygroup/support

To celebrate another milestone, we embark on a two-hour journey navigating through some of the best sounds from the past month. Turn your speakers up.Tracklist:Hats & Klaps - Leaving no whereSonic Jay - GasaRadic the Myth - It's a Zulu LoveDJ Sadie - PulseTienezo - AzurTibi Dabo - KomorebiLaTique - Night to RememberRodney SA - MbeyaLyric Shoxen, Da Africa Deep - PromisesCaiiro - KwipiriCaiiro - Dark SpacesBoys be kko - TapisiJazzuelle - CosmogyralLito La PregoLee - Sad Son SomZito Mowa - Dilo S'tfongUgly Drums, Chesney - Optimal SandalsLea, Muzikman Edition, Tweety, Atjazz - Songbird (Atjazz Galaxy Aart Dub)Fred Everything, Atjazz - Back TogetherHagan - TropicsCaiiro - Dark SpacesInstagram:https://www.instagram.com/manunaykene/https://www.instagram.com/deepsounds___/

Podcasts are becoming more and more popular week after week. Their range of content covers a variety of genres.  As more people become interested in podcasting, the myths and misconceptions about the industry easily come to light. Especially from a Google search on podcasting while researching how to podcast.  And these myths continue to plague those who are creating podcast content as well. This is day 22 of my 31 Day Podcast Challenge. Some of the common podcasting myths you need to scroll right past in your research and podcast preparation are: Myth: It is a version of radioPodcasts and radio are very different, though both are based in audio. Radio is a traditional broadcast medium of mass communication, with a pre-set, fixed schedule. Podcasts on the other hand, generally have no set schedule. Podcasts are in the form of digital audio files that listeners can download or stream. This makes them closer to OTT platforms (think Netflix or Hulu) with content when and where you want to consume it. Radio content is generally live. Once it's broadcast, you can't listen to it again. Podcast content has a much longer life, as there is no time constraint on when people can listen to podcast episodes. Myth: Podcasts compete with radioMany podcast listeners, podcasters, and those who work in the radio industry, believe podcasts are in competition with radio. The only competition is for the share of ear time, where both are vying for the economics of our time as audio consumers.  But podcasts are their own category and appeal to a specific audience. These listeners subscribe to these podcasts because of genuine interest in the content. Radio and podcasts can work together to bring quality audio content, and continue the audio listening growth that podcasting has spurred on in the last decade. Myth: Podcasts are for geeks or nerdsThere are many podcast listeners who use podcasts as a way of learning. And during podcasting's early days, most of the podcast content generated was around computers, software, and apps, today there is something for everyone. Podcasts cover a wide variety of genres that include education, news, humor, audio drama and much more. Myth: Voice acting is the most important thing in a podcastVoice acting is not the most important thing in a podcast, contrary to popular opinion. A genuine voice, and clear, thought out presentation will beat out a polished, over-the-top, un-relatable voice every time. A single podcast is made up of efforts put forth by sound engineers and audio designers, podcast producers, content curators, marketing managers, distributors and voice actors. Each role has its own place in the industry, with their own levels of importance. In the case of podcasts, it is actually the sound engineer/audio designer that has the greatest responsibility. They are responsible for refining the quality of sound in the podcast. Myth: The guest is more important than the host of the podcastThis myth continues due to the broadcast industry, for the most part, in my opinion. As many podcasts continue to grow in popularity due to an unknown host but big name guests, the broadcast industry cannot come to recognize that their on-air talent isn't the only pool of talented people that can interview big name guests.  But the true star of a podcast is the host, as they are THE content curators of the podcast. They have the most responsibility to create an interview podcast that generates enough interest in podcast listeners to share that podcast episode, talk about the episode with friends, and tune in for future episodes. A guest can help surge that listenership for a short duration, but the host keeps the listenership coming back constant. Myth: Podcasts are just for entertainmentThe variety of podcasts genres includes entertainment, but also delves into sectors like finance, investments, news, sports and more. Many podcasts are hosted by personalities that are...

In this episode, Steve Lowisz, Best-Selling Author, Keynote Speaker, Human Capital Expert joins me on the podcast to share why recruiting sucks and why it doesn't have to.Special thanks to our friends at Oracle for supporting the show!Visit www.oracle.com/HCM to Discover how HR Leaders are using Analytics to optimize the workforce.Episode Highlights[01:01] - How did you end up in the world of recruiting?[01:36] - What did recruitment look like 20+ years ago?[03:10] - What inspired you to write Recruitment Sucks?[04:46] - Myths of recruitment[06:01] - "You can light a fire under someone but can you light a fire inside of them"[06:37] - 4 Cores of recruitment[08:19] - Myth: The idea that LinkedIn is the only solution for recruiters[10:26] - Myth: It's not how you use mediums but the message and content you share[11:17] - How can recruiters create value?[12:43] - What types of content is working for you?[14:04] - What have been the key takeaways and feedback from your readers[14:31] - Myth: Recruiters being replaced by technology[16:12] - Myth: Recruiters should be responsible for the quality of hire[18:21] - How have your practices shifted in this new world of work?[20:10] - How to overcome the disconnect between HR and the C-Suite?[22:23] - How have you adapted to the changes in technology in your own business?[26:37 - Actionable steps and advice for youEnjoying our content? Access the shows resources and get access to future episodes first by Subscribing to HR Leaders: www.hrdleaders.com/podcast

Myth: The only way that speakers get paid is by getting paid to speak Truth: Speakers have multiple ways to get paid if they know how to create products and services Myth: It's hard to create a product or service for in the speaker industry Truth: The hardest part of creating a product or service as a speaker is time management to get it done. Myth: The only type of product a speaker can create is a bookTruth: Even if that were true, the book that a speaker creates can be repurposed in multiple waysIn this special episode of the #SpeakEasy Podcast, my team and I debunk several myths that we have heard from those in the speaking industry about creating products and services. Those who are just coming into the speaking industry often believe that the on;y way that speakers are paid is by an event host. They end up disappointed when someone tells them that they have to pay for a speaking spot or become offended when someone asks them to speak for free. There are many ways to get paid but you will have to determine which way will work best for you. Don't forget that you have to factor in things like time, energy, travel and a few other expenses when thinking of the price you will charge. It is a process but one that will benefit you in the long run. I promise you, these ladies hold nothing back when it came to the myths and truths of creating products and services. TandeeTandee SalterTandee A. Salter, Master Business Success Coach, and Consultant helps you to get marketing strategies and copy that helps you make more money in your business Currently working on her doctorate, Tandee has been helping small business owners to be able to navigate email marketing, copywriting, and editing so that they can get the maximum exposure and conversion. Not willing to stand down to seeing entrepreneurs being overworked and overpriced, she stands on the foundation of being impact-driven. That being said, she works hard to correct mistakes and educate those who have become frustrated with low or no results. Dorothea RobinsonDorothea Thea Robinson is the founder of Life After Domestic Violence. Also known as the X. It Strategist, She has is on a mission to assist women who are ready to be free of their domestic violent relationship. In her bio, the statement “If I had a gun, I would kill you” pierces through stigmas and misconceptions about intimate partner abuse. After getting free from her own 30 years of Domestic Violent marriage she has been on a consistent mission to eradicate the fears women have about leaving their partner. There is Life After Domestic Violence!

When buying a home, you might hear a lot of rumors or myths about what you need for the down payment. Believe it or not, home buying could be easier than you thought, especially when considering down payment programs or financing options. Angie will dispel a few common myths when it comes to your down payment. Here's a full rundown of what's on this episode: 0:38 – Introduction to home-buying myths Setting expectations helps with the home buying process. New study shows millennials spend $100,000 in rent by age 30.  4:15 – MYTH: You need at least 10-20% for a down payment. How much Americans put down on average is lower than you might think. There are even 100% financing options that exist. A higher down payment has benefits that could save you money. What's the difference between 5% down versus 10% down? 7:02 – MYTH: Down payment programs are only for first-time homebuyers. Explaining the Down Payment Assistance program and how it can be used. Although you are getting down payment assistance, you do have to pay it back. 10:01 – MYTH: It's difficult to qualify for down payment assistance. These restrictions do apply. Some require a certain credit score, a max income limit, and a particular debt-to-income ratio. 11:02 – MYTH: You can't use gifts, grants, or loans for your down payment. Find out which gifts can be used and what's needed if you do. City of Raleigh has up to $20,000 of down payment assistance money to give but does have stricter guidelines.

“You are a mother. That is a choice you get to make, don't let anyone convince you otherwise, especially that a-hole living in your head.”Tasha Blasi The FU Project   Motherhood is an identity, and you have the power to choose your identity.   In the babymaking journey, it's so common for women to get caught up in unrealistic expectations about the IVF process, or to fall prey to common myths. Let me tell you, I have heard it all. It can be easy to get discouraged when this process doesn't go as planned, and people are hitting you in the face with the BS they truly believe is fact. One of the best ways to combat this is to dispell the inaccuracies and be prepared with the truth.   “When doctors say it's a numbers game, it's extremely beneficial to the doctor who can't figure it out. It's nature and science. If anyone tells you it's a numbers game, that just means they don't know what the f*** they are doing and they're just going to keep guessing with your money, time, and embryos.” - Tasha Blasi (9:12 - 10:15)   Let's take some time to talk through the most common myths that I have had the “pleasure” of hearing over the years:   Myth - IVF works the first or second time. Truth - I wish this was always the case. If you were like me, I knew that I was going to do IVF one time and have an abundance of viable embryos that I could pop in every time I wanted a kid, until my house was full. As you probably know, I had to complete ten rounds. Ten. There are so many different variables that come into play when trying to get or stay pregnant. While it may happen for you the first or second time, so often this is not the case.   Myth - All labs are created equal. Truth - We can be so quick to assume that a lab is a lab, and the lab techs are basically robots, but they aren't. There are so many variables in labs that can affect the viability of your embryo and the success of your pregnancy. Embryologists are humans. Fallible, finite humans. Saying that all embryologists are equal is like saying all doctors are equal. Also, it's important not to get sucked into the “fame” of certain clinics. There are clinics who have established a reputation, but have not stayed current with ever-advancing technology. They are no longer achieving the results, but they are still claiming their renown, and taking your money.   Myth - It's a numbers game. Truth - If I had a dollar for every time a woman told me about a doctor that told them to, “just keep trying,” I could cover your next round of IVF. Of course, they tell you to just keep trying, you are paying them!   Myth - There's nothing you can do on your end to help an egg retrieval or transfer. Truth -  When I ask women what their doctor has suggested they do to help with the retrieval process, 95% of them say, “nothing.” Spoiler alert: There are so many factors, so. many. factors. that you can influence to increase your chances of getting and staying pregnant.   Myth - You need an egg donor. Truth - As mentioned before, there are so many variables that affect this process. Just because one doctor can't figure it out, doesn't mean that your own eggs aren't viable. I wish doctors would just be honest when they aren't successful, and refer. Doctors will keep working with you as long as you are paying. When you move on to donor eggs, they get to start over with a new revenue source. Your eggs might not be the problem.   Myth - My stress is keeping me from getting pregnant. Truth - Stress doesn't help us and it doesn't feel good, and we totally need to get rid of it. Yes, stress affects our mental and physical health. However, stress is not a major variable in the success or failure of IVF.   “Figure out how stress is showing up physically and emotionally. Not so much to help you get pregnant, but to help you get through this process, through this pregnancy, and especially through motherhood with your sanity intact.”  (18:26 - 18:56)   Myth - You should never do a fresh, day 3 transfer. Truth -  Some women just can't get to day 5. If you have eliminated all other variables, and you are unable to get to day five, consider stopping at day 3.   Myth - There is no evidence that you need to check for different tests. Truth - Your first transfer is very much trial and error. There are so many variables that could be in play. However, after that first transfer, I recommend asking your doctor which tests they would recommend after a third failed attempt. Often, in the first few rounds, doctors are comfortable with the numbers game and will discourage additional tests without evidence to suggest their necessity. However, it can be so helpful to rule out as many variables as possible, as soon as possible. I would rather understand the risks and have every variable moved out of the way before moving forward with that extremely precious embryo.   “I want the doctors in the clinics to start treating those embryos as precious as they really are.” - Tasha Blasi (24:21 - 24:44)   Myth - Maybe you weren't meant to be a mom. Truth - Don't let anyone, especially that a-hole in your head, convince you that you weren't meant to be a mother! Being a mom is an identity, and you get to choose that identity. I know what it feels like to have that aching desire deep in my heart and to just “know” that I was meant to be a mother.   You don't get to choose when you become a mom, but you do get to choose to keep moving forward, clearing every variable out of the way until that precious little one is nestled in your arms. Don't stop fighting, mama.   How to get involvedIf you would like more information about Tasha Blasi and the incredible work she does with The FU Project, please visit her website. If you liked this episode, be sure to subscribe and leave a quick review on iTunes. It would mean the world to hear your feedback and we'd love for you to help us spread the word!

Karl Kapp is a gamification analyst, elearning consultant and proffessor at Bloomsberg university. We collected some common assumptions about games and gamification and asked Karl whether the myths stood up to the research in the field. For more expertise on learning games you can follow Karl Kapp on twitter: @kkapp, and keep up with his latest research and speaking engagements through his blog: Kapp Notes. This interview was originally recorded as part of the Big Sponge Hangout in July 2016. The possible myths and questions that Karl talks through and their times are provided so you can skip back and forth to learn more on a specific subject: 00:39 – Myth: Gamification and learning games are the same thing. 01:48 – What can happen if people get gamification and learning games confused? 02:35 – Myth: Games are just about adding fun to learning. 04:43 – Myth: We’re a serious company so games or gamification isn’t going to suit us. 07:25 – Myth: There’s no hard evidence that games or gamification work for instruction. 09:16 – Myth: Games are just too expensive. 11:15 – Myth: Games suit younger people better. 14:17 – Myth: It’s harder to evaluate the impact of a game. 17:24 – Myth: You have to be a game designer to do games or gamification properly. 19:26 – Myth: Games and gamification in elearning are a fad.

This episode of The Amazing Seller has been brewing for some time. It’s a response to some of the most frequent myths Scott hears during the Q&A of his private label workshops (they’re free, by the way). Today Scott is not only going to tell you what these common myths are, but also WHY they are myths and what you can do to make sure that none of them happen to you. It’s a practical episode with lots of great resources you can use today to make your private label business more successful. MYTH: Amazon is too saturated to get new products to take off. It’s true that there are more products appearing on Amazon every single day. But it’s also true that more people are shopping on Amazon every day. The ratios of each are not the same by any stretch, but it’s clear that Amazon is still a vibrant place for businesses to be built and profit to be made. Scott’s got some very strong opinions on why people think Amazon is too saturated, and it has a lot to do with what they’re expecting as they begin to build their business. Hear the entire response to this myth, on this episode. MYTH: It takes a lot of money to start an Amazon business? If you had a lot of money to get started on an Amazon private label business, sure, you’d be in much better shape from the beginning. But that’s the case with any business venture. This myth is actually very foolish because it’s very easy to get started on Amazon with little to no money. In fact, Scott’s going to put you onto a case study that demonstrates that to be true. Be sure you listen to hear how Scott blows this myth right out of the water! MYTH: The flop of a first product means Amazon private label doesn’t work. Any product idea can flop the first time and there are a number of reasons for it. Sometimes the person didn’t follow the best practices for getting a product launched. In other words, they tried to shortcut the process. Other times the person didn’t research the depth of the market well enough to ensure that their attempts had a good chance of success. As a result, they moved into a market that was too crowded for them to get a foothold. And there are more reasons products flop on the first try, but none of that means that Amazon doesn’t work. Be sure to listen to Scott’s product launching advice so you don’t become one of the statistics. MYTH: Amazon PPC (pay per click) is too complicated and ineffective. It’s true that Amazon PPC is a bit complicated. But it’s not so terrible that you can’t learn it. It only takes time and experimentation to figure it out, and Scott’s confident that anyone can do it. Once you understand the system and are able to begin using it, you’ll find it to be extremely effective in helping you gain sales, which translate into a higher ranking for your product, and in turn, more organic sales coming to your listing. Find out how Scott destroys this myth, on this episode of the podcast. OUTLINE OF THIS EPISODE OF THE AMAZING SELLER [0:25] Scott’s introduction to this podcast episode! [0:50] How you can register for one of Scott’s free workshops to get a product up and running. [1:50] Amazon is too saturated. When is it true and when is it not? [6:27] It takes a lot of money to start an Amazon business. True or not? [10:31] Are review groups against the Amazon terms of service? [14:01] Does a first product launch flop mean that Amazon doesn’t work? [17:01] Is Amazon Pay Per Click too complicated and not profitable. [22:33] Summary of these myths. [24:55] Some helpful reminders about going back to the basics.  

Leadership Myth: It’s Lonely at the Top Actually, if you are doing it right, you … Myth: It’s Lonely at the Top Read More »

Guest:David Desamour- Dealing with Grief and Loss during the holidays.Desired outcome for the program- Provide listeners with a blueprint to understand, cope, and overcome grief when dealing with the loss of a love one during the holidays.Myth and Fact about grief MYTH: The pain will go away faster if you ignore it.Fact: Trying to ignore your pain or keep it from surfacing will only make it worse in the long run. For real healing it is necessary to face your grief and actively deal with it. Myth It's important to be “be strong” in the face of loss.Fact: Feeling sad, frightened, or lonely is a normal reaction to loss. Crying doesn't mean you are weak. You don't need to “protect” your family or friends by putting on a brave front. Showing your true feelings can help them and you.MYTH: If you don't cry, it means you aren't sorry about the loss. Fact: Crying is a normal response to sadness, but it's not the only one. Those who don't cry may feel the pain just as deeply as others. They may simply have other ways of showing it.MYTH: Grief should last about a year.Fact: There is no right or wrong time frame for grieving. How long it takes can differ from person to person.Source: Center for Grief and Healing :Understanding and coping Stages of Grief:In 1969, psychiatrist Elisabeth Kübler-Ross introduced what became known as the “five stages of grief.”The five stages of grief:Denial: “This can't be happening to me.”Anger: “Why is this happening? Who is to blame?”Bargaining: “Make this not happen, and in return I will .”Depression: “I'm too sad to do anything.”Acceptance: “I'm at peace with what happened.”Steps in overcoming grief! Take care of yourself Celebrate life by doing good deeds, because you can.Confine in someone.Find a New Hobby.    

Myth :: It's just physical.

Myth :: It's just physical.