Podcasts about preferential

Election misinformation! I saw my fair share of it while making episodes about the 2025 federal election and oh boy, there are some classic repeat claims as well as some new and bizarre ones that are making the rounds. Here's a handy explainer of some of the false, misleading and outdated claims I saw and how they're wrong.The myths/episode chapters are:0:00 Intro2:04 Voting machines switched votes7:47 Pencils are used so votes can be erased10:53 Immigrants were "imported" to rig the election14:52 Preferential voting ensures major parties win21:03 Parties choose preferences25:56 OutroSide note: I point out in the immigration myth that to vote you need to be an Australian citizen. This is technically not strictly true, as British subjects enrolled to vote before 25th January 1984 who are still enrolled to vote also can/must vote. (https://www.aec.gov.au/Enrolling_to_vote/British_subjects.htm) That is a small group of people though. It also is not relevant to the myth about immigration that I was busting because the myth clearly is about new immigrants (who can't vote and thus can't have any impact on the election outcome) and has nothing to do with that quirk of history from over 40 years ago.Support the channel on patreon here: https://www.patreon.com/AuspolExplainedFollow me on Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/auspolexplained.bsky.social Follow me on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/auspolexplained/ Like Auspol Explained on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Auspol-Explained-107892180702388Auspol Explained would like to acknowledge the Whadjuk Nyoongar people and their Elders as the owners and custodians of the Land that the episode was recorded and edited on. This Land was stolen and never ceded. It always was and always will be Aboriginal Land.

Tom Elliott has called for preferential voting to be scrapped, stating a 'first-past-the-post' system would be much simpler for voters.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Political strategist Glenn Druery, known as the 'Preference Whisperer', spoke to Tom Elliott on the topic of preferential voting.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Australia uses preferential voting for its elections, but how does it work? Well here's an explanation how it's used for the House of Representatives to find which candidate has a majority. Preferential voting requires you to rank the candidates by numbering them 1, 2, 3, etc in order of your favourite candidate to least. But then how is a winner determined? I've got a few different scenarios to demonstrate when preferences are counted and how the count flows from one candidate to the next.For the sake of simplicity, I am just explaining how single-member electorates are decided through preferential voting. For proportional systems like the Senate the count is a bit more complicated (the same fundamental premise of preferences still applies) but if you want to know more about how that works here's an explanation from the AEC: https://www.aec.gov.au/voting/counting/senate_count.htm Support the channel on patreon here: https://www.patreon.com/AuspolExplainedLike Auspol Explained on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Auspol-Explained-107892180702388Auspol Explained would like to acknowledge the Whadjuk Nyoongar people and their Elders as the owners and custodians of the Land that the episode was recorded and edited on. This Land was stolen and never ceded. It always was and always will be Aboriginal Land.

ஆஸ்திரேலியாவில் மே மாதம் 3 ஆம் தேதி சனிக்கிழமை நாடாளுமன்றத் தேர்தல் நடைபெறுகிறது. தேர்தலில் Preferential Voting என்ற விருப்ப வரிசை வாக்களிப்பு முறை எப்படி பின்பற்றப்படுகிறது என்று விளக்குகிறார் ஊடகத்துறையில் பல ஆண்டுகளாக பணியாற்றும் இரா.சத்தியநாதன் அவர்கள். அவரோடு உரையாடுகிறார்: றைசெல்.

Welcome to the first Election 101 episode where Abbie will be answering some election-specific questions for all the non-political chookies and the extra nerdy ones who want to brush up on their political knowledge. First one up is all about preferential voting and our beautiful voting system. LINKS Check out @itsalotpod on IG at https://bit.ly/itsalot-instagram . Review the podcast on Apple Podcasts https://bit.ly/ial-review Follow LiSTNR Entertainment on IG @listnrentertainment Follow LiSTNR Entertainment on TikTok @listnrentertainment Get instructions on how to access transcripts on Apple podcasts https://bit.ly/3VQbKXY CREDITS Host: Abbie Chatfield @abbiechatfield Executive Producer: Lem Zakharia @lemzakhariaDigital and Social Producer: Oscar Gordon @oscargordon Recording Engineer & Editor: Amy Kimball @amy.kimballSocial and Video Producer: Zoe Panaretos @zoepanaretosIt's A Lot Social Media Manager: Julia ToomeyManaging Producer: Sam Cavanagh Find more great podcasts like this at www.listnr.com/See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Preferential voting allows voters to order the election candidates in order of preference. But, which is the best way to allocate preferences? Gary Hardgrave explains how to maximise your vote using preferential voting. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Australia's system of preferential voting is praised for making sure people can't waste their vote - but how does it work and how does it compare with other electoral systems? This episode compares preferential voting with first-past-the-post, which is used by the UK, US, and over a dozen other countries. What is first-past-the-post and why did Australia get rid of it over a century ago? The answer: because it changes who gets elected by using a different method of counting.Support the channel on patreon here: https://www.patreon.com/AuspolExplainedLike Auspol Explained on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Auspol-Explained-107892180702388Get a copy of the script with citations here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/13uZm0qFxnxztjw1F10K9azkBkSEqxZij/edit?usp=drive_link&ouid=102352521871694219008&rtpof=true&sd=true Auspol Explained would like to acknowledge the Whadjuk Nyoongar people and their Elders as the owners and custodians of the Land that the episode was recorded and edited on. This Land was stolen and never ceded. It always was and always will be Aboriginal Land.

In this thought-provoking episode of The Catholic Money Show, host Jonathan Teixeira sits down with Blake Brouillette for an engaging discussion on the Preferential Option for the Poor. Rooted in the teachings of Jesus Christ, this concept challenges Christians to prioritize serving the poor in their daily lives. Blake shares great insights from their work with Christ in the City, an organization dedicated to forming young adult missionaries and serving the chronically homeless. Jonathan and Blake unpack the spiritual, societal, and personal dimensions of poverty, exploring the barriers to alleviating it and the transformative power of living out this Gospel call. This episode invites listeners to reflect on their own responsibility to serve the poor and provides actionable ways to begin making a difference.

Today my guest is Pravin Krishna is the Chung Ju Yung Distinguished Professor of International Economics and Business at Johns Hopkins University, at the School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) and Department of Economics. We talked about history of preferential trade agreements, India's approach to trade liberalization, whether such agreements are trade creating or diverting, and much more.  Recorded November 12th, 2024. Read a full transcript enhanced with helpful links. Connect with Ideas of India Follow us on X Follow Shruti on X Follow Pravin on X Click here for the latest Ideas of India episodes sent straight to your inbox. Timestamps (00:00:00) - Intro (00:00:59) - Essential Components of the Postwar Multilateral Trade System (00:04:38) - India's Role in the GATT and the Special Status of Developing Countries (00:06:31) - India in the Global Trade System After 1991 (00:09:10) - The Decline of the WTO and New Trade Dynamics (00:17:45) - Understanding the Small Percentages of Preferential Trade (00:20:19) - Indian Trade Liberalization and Alliances from 2010–2020 (00:26:18) - Viner: Trade Creation and Trade Diversion (00:33:35) - More Optimistic View of Equilibrium (00:38:46) - Foreign Lobbies in Domestic Markets (00:49:3) - Just pick a number (00:55:21) - The Impact of Trade Liberalization (01:04:05) - Labor Elasticity in Relation to Trade Openness (01:11:17) - Predicting the Near Future Impact of U.S. Trade Tariffs (01:19:52) - How the New Administration's Plans Might Impact India (01:25:58) - Future Trade Relations Between India and China (01:30:52) - Outro

Today we pick back up considerations of Catholic Social Teaching, but with a liturgically appropriate twist: in this month of November dedicated to praying for the dead, what can the dead teach us about civic life and Catholic Social Teaching? Ruminating on a wide array of commentators, we explore how the ultimate poverty of death should make us treat the living better and understand how Christ's Death and Resurrection shows His preferential option for us even in the grave. Iowa Catholic Radio Network Shows: - Be Not Afraid with Fr. PJ McManus - Catholic Women Now with Chris Magruder and Julie Nelson - Faith of Trial with Deacon Mike Manno and Gina Noll - Making It Personal with Bishop William Joensen - Man Up! with Joe Stopulus - The Catholic Morning Show - The Uncommon Good with Bo Bonner and Dr. Bud Marr - Faith and Family Finance with Gregory Waddle    

In the US, elections are decided through an electoral college system, in the Philippines through a popular vote, while Australia uses a preferential voting system. Let's explore the process and differences among these systems. - Kung electoral college sa US, popular vote sa Pilipinas, preferential voting naman ang sistema sa Australia. Alamin ang proseso at pagkakaiba.

We keep rolling along with our Reconsideration of the first series of shows we started with 8 years ago when the UnCommon Good began! Today we explore the Preferential Option for the Poor, hopefully dispel the flat or of base understandings of the concept, and try to shine a light on the brilliance of this distinct principle in the consideration of Catholic Social Principles. Iowa Catholic Radio Network Shows: - Be Not Afraid with Fr. PJ McManus - Catholic Women Now with Chris Magruder and Julie Nelson - Faith of Trial with Deacon Mike Manno and Gina Noll - Making It Personal with Bishop William Joensen - Man Up! with Joe Stopulus - The Catholic Morning Show - The Uncommon Good with Bo Bonner and Dr. Bud Marr - Faith and Family Finance with Gregory Waddle    

Support the podcasts you enjoy, check out Lenny.fm Politics can feel like a rabbit hole?   Thinking Music YouTube (Authorised by the Australian Labor Party)   Link to the Answer Wikipedia   More about the show - www.nearly.com.au/somehow-related-podcast-with-glenn-robbins-and-dave-oneil/   Somehow Related is produced by Nearly Media. Original theme music by Kit Warhurst. Artwork created by Stacy Gougoulis.   Looking for another podcast? The Debrief with Dave O'Neil - Dave's other podcasts with comedians after gigs. The Junkees with Dave O'Neil & Kitty Flanagan - The sweet and salty roundabout! Junk food abounds! Confessions - laugh along with Sam Petersen and friends as he reads outrageous confessions from people you'll never meet.Support on Lenny.fm: https://www.lenny.fmSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Join Rachel, Sarah and Lucy for Part One of our conversation with the absolutely amazing Daisy, Ocean and Tom, the super siblings who ‘belong to' Sarah and Lucy. In addition to reflecting on how blooming awesome their kids are, (because they really are) the team also share more about the usual drama free lives they lead. From visits to documentary-meriting Accident and Emergency departments to dashes across Europe to breaking your foot when you are dancing in your bedroom. We'd love to hear from you – we love sharing stories, we love hearing how things are going, the good, the bad, the snotty-crying ugly. You can leave a message with us in a number of ways: Firstly you can leave a message using speakpipe here: SpeakpipeTSWU  (Please note calls need to be limited to 90 seconds) You can send us a voice note from your phone to our email address at tswupodcast@gmail.com Or, if the thought of hearing your own voice gives you ‘the ick', then send us an email to tswupodcast@gmail.com Whatever way you choose to get in touch, we really want to hear your thoughts, views, musings, rants and confessions (we love a confession!) . Thanks for listening and being a part of our podcast community -It would make our day if you could like, follow and review the podcast wherever you listen.  Follow us on Instagram @BornatRightTime. Head to www.bornattherighttime.com to find a parent workshop or CPD-certified training for practitioners in communication, collaboration and personalised care with parents/carers.  

In this episode, Alex and Wade introduce a new arc on tax-efficient retirement distributions. They discuss the importance of tax planning and how it can add value to your bottom line. They explain the concept of marginal tax rates and how they differ from average tax rates. They also touch on state income taxes, filing options, and the different federal income tax brackets. Additionally, they mention other types of taxes, such as social security and Medicare payroll taxes. In this conversation, Wade Pfau and Alex Murguia discuss various aspects of income taxation and deductions. They cover topics such as ordinary income, non-qualified annuities, qualified dividends, long-term capital gains, above-the-line deductions, adjusted gross income (AGI), below-the-line deductions, standard deductions, itemized deductions, and preferential income stacking. They also touch on strategies like deduction bunching and gains harvesting. The conversation provides valuable insights into the complexities of the tax code and the importance of tax planning in retirement. Listen now to learn more!   Takeaways Tax planning can add value to your bottom line and is an important aspect of retirement planning. Understanding the difference between marginal tax rates and average tax rates is crucial for making informed decisions. State income taxes, filing options, and federal income tax brackets all play a role in tax planning. Other types of taxes, such as social security and Medicare payroll taxes, should also be considered in retirement planning. Understanding the different types of income and how they are taxed is crucial for effective tax planning in retirement. Above-the-line deductions, such as contributions to retirement plans and health savings accounts, can lower your adjusted gross income (AGI). Below-the-line deductions, such as mortgage interest and charitable donations, can reduce your taxable income. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 increased the standard deduction, making it less likely for many people to itemize deductions. Preferential income, such as qualified dividends and long-term capital gains, have their own tax brackets and can be taxed at lower rates. Strategies like deduction bunching and gains harvesting can help optimize your tax situation. Understanding the nuances of the tax code and working with a tax professional can help you make the most of your retirement income. Chapters 00:00 Introduction to Tax-Efficient Retirement Distributions 04:28 The Basics of Marginal Tax Rates 15:44 State Income Taxes, Filing Options, and Federal Income Tax Brackets 23:38 Considering Other Types of Taxes in Retirement 27:11 Understanding Different Types of Income and Their Taxation 29:42 Exploring Above-the-Line Deductions and Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) 36:10 Utilizing Below-the-Line Deductions to Reduce Taxable Income 43:02 The Impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act on Itemized Deductions 47:13 The Importance of Tax Planning in Retirement   Links Join the waitlist for the next Retirement Income Challenge by visiting http://www.risaprofile.com/podcast The Retirement Planning Guidebook: 2nd Edition has just been updated for 2024! Visit your preferred book retailer or simply click here to order your copy today: https://www.wadepfau.com/books/  This episode is sponsored by Retirement Researcher https://retirementresearcher.com/. Download their free eBook, 8 Tips to Becoming A Retirement Income Investor at retirementresearcher.com/8tips

I want to be very clear: I am NOT endorsing or opposing any politician or candidate. But this is an incredibly important topic and I am hoping that I can break it down fairly and dispassionately. I am also going to try my best to keep my personal views out of it. I look forward to hearing your thoughts, comments, corrections and questions. Here goes…Year Of The Opposite - Travis Stoliker's Substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.In plain English, what exactly is going on and why is the concept of taxing unrealized capital gains in the news?The concept of taxing unrealized capital gains has become a hot topic, especially as the Biden-Harris administration pushes forward their unique tax policies. In essence, unrealized capital gains are the increases in value of assets like stocks or property that haven't been sold yet. Under a new proposal, the idea is to tax these paper profits annually as if they were actual income.This topic is making headlines because it's a major shift in how we think about wealth and taxation. Traditionally, taxes are levied on income you actually receive—like your salary—or on profits you make when you sell an asset. (Note: When I say “Asset” just think: your real estate, your stock, or maybe a business you own that you sell.) But now, the discussion has pivoted to taxing potential income before it's even realized. (Note: When I say “realized” in a financial concept it means selling an asset like a stock and converting the stock certificate into cash.) The stated goal behind this new and novel approach is supposed to ensure that the wealthiest individuals pay a fair share, addressing concerns over wealth inequality. However, as with any significant policy shift, it brings along a flurry of debates and concerns.The Biden-Harris administration has said: "Preferential treatment for unrealized gains disproportionately benefits high-wealth taxpayers and provides many high-wealth taxpayers with a lower effective tax rate than many low- and middle-income taxpayers."What has been proposed and what is the history of the proposal to tax unrealized capital gains?The proposal isn't just a fleeting idea; it's embedded in the Biden administration's fiscal plans. Officially introduced in March 2023, the proposal suggests a minimum tax of 25% on total income, including unrealized gains, for those with a net worth exceeding $100 million. This isn't a new debate, though. The concept of taxing wealth rather than just income has been discussed for years, but it's only now being seriously considered as a part of fiscal policy.The reason this is coming up this week is that the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget reported on the Harris campaign's stance. They stated: 'The campaign specifically told us that they support all of the tax increases on the high earners and corporations that are in the Biden budget." Here is the full policy and some important excerpts: But doesn't this policy only apply to super rich people?Yes, but the concern is that this is exactly how the income tax originally started. The idea of taxing only the super-rich isn't new; it mirrors the initial U.S. income tax in 1861, which taxed just 3% of the population making over $800. However, this tax was temporary, repealed in 1872, but its concept evolved, leading to the 16th Amendment in 1913, allowing for a broader income tax.Critics worry that what starts as a tax on the ultra-wealthy could expand, much like the income tax did. Initially targeting the rich, the income tax eventually reached the middle class, with rates as high as 94% for top earners by 1944, showing how tax policies can broaden over time.Even though this policy doesn't yet apply to everyday people, can you give me an example that a common person can relate to?Sure, imagine you own a house. Over the years, the value of your house increases significantly, but you don't sell it. Under a policy that taxes unrealized gains, you'd have to pay taxes each year on the increased value of your home—even though you haven't actually received any cash from that increase. This could create a financial burden, especially if you're cash-poor but asset-rich. Let's try to use an example. Say you bought a house in East Lansing for $100,000 but due to some crazy economic events like the lead up we saw to 2007, the house in theory is worth $200,000. But you have no intention of selling your house because you just want to live in it. Under this proposal, you'd have to pay a 25% tax on the gain of $100,000. Meaning you'd have to come up with $25,000 in cash to pay your taxes on the house. Where would you come up with that cash? Would you have to sell the house in order to pay the taxes? Maybe you did have $25,000 in cash, which you had intended to use to replace the roof on your house or remodel it. Now you would have to use that money to pay taxes. And what if that $200,000 increased value was not real. What if we saw what happened in 2008 happen all over again and there is a market crash and now your house is again worth $100,000? As you can see, this gets very complicated and very confusing, very quickly. To be very clear: This current proposal does NOT apply to your house or mine. I'm just using this example because it's something we can all relate to.Do other countries do this?While some countries have experimented with taxing wealth, including unrealized gains, it remains far from a global standard. For instance, Norway's wealth tax indirectly affects unrealized gains as part of the overall wealth calculation, but it has sparked debates over unintended consequences like capital flight. Similarly, France's former wealth tax (ISF) faced criticism for driving wealthy individuals out of the country, leading to its repeal in 2017 and replacement with a tax focused solely on real estate. These cases illustrate the challenges and potential downsides of taxing unrealized gains, making the U.S. proposal a relatively novel and significant departure from how most countries handle capital gains taxation.What would this mean for innovation and invention in America? What would this do to startups?Innovation thrives on risk-taking and long-term investment. A tax on unrealized gains could potentially dampen the entrepreneurial spirit by imposing financial burdens on profits that exist only on paper. Entrepreneurs might become more cautious, fearing the tax implications of holding onto high-risk, high-reward ventures. This policy could stifle innovation by deterring the very risk-taking that drives breakthroughs.Let's be more specific about how this policy might impact startups. Many startups don't generate profits in their early years. Take Amazon, FedEx, Snapchat, TBS, Netflix, Adobe, and Airbnb as examples—none of these companies made a single dime of profit for more than five years after they launched. Yet, during this period, the paper valuation of these companies soared like a rocket.What does this mean in practice? It means that while these companies appeared successful on paper, they weren't generating cash profits. The founders and investors were reinvesting every penny back into the company's growth—hiring more people, building infrastructure, and ramping up advertising. Often, this reinvestment happens alongside rounds of fundraising at ever-higher valuations, based on the company's potential rather than its current profitability.In plain English, the "value" of these companies on paper kept climbing, but there was no cash flow to match it. If this proposal were enacted, founders and investors wouldn't just need to pour their personal cash into growing the business and paying employees—they'd also need to invest additional cash solely to pay taxes on unrealized gains. Would you sign up for that?I think an example might be useful here: We all know that restaurants are notoriously difficult and often unprofitable businesses. Now, imagine you've opened the dream café you've always wanted. You invest $100,000 from your 401(k) to build out your first location. Things are going well in your first year, so you decide it's time to expand and open a second location. Like many entrepreneurs, instead of paying yourself, you choose to reinvest the business's earnings into hiring the best employees possible. Then, you get an opportunity to launch that second location across town, but it's going to take another $100,000 to make it happen.After working an entire year without paying yourself, and having already invested your 401(k) savings into the business, you need to bring in a new investor to raise the additional $100,000. When the new investor comes on board, they value the company higher, so on paper, the value of your café increases. However, despite this increase in paper valuation, you, the founder, still haven't earned a single dime from the company.Now, because the valuation on paper has gone up (the unrealized gain), you and the new investor not only need to come up with the $100,000 to build the second location—you also need an additional $25,000 just to cover the taxes on that unrealized gain.And let's not forget, startups are incredibly risky. What happens if the company fails? What if the founders are working on something as monumental as a cure for cancer? Would they, and their investors, continue to risk their money, time, and resources, knowing that a portion of it is being siphoned off for taxes on non-existent profits? Would you? Is this really what we want as a society—discouraging the very risks that lead to life-changing innovations?Again, to be very clear: This current proposal does NOT apply to your Cafe or mine. I'm just using this example because it's something we can all relate to.Since people can move, if this happened, wouldn't all the rich people just move and leave the United States?Maybe. That is the problem with policies like this—they tend to have unintended consequences. Wealthy individuals have the resources to relocate to countries with more favorable tax laws. If implemented, we might see a migration of wealth out of the U.S., similar to what has happened in other countries with aggressive tax policies. This exodus could lead to a decrease in investment and philanthropy within the U.S., ultimately hurting the economy. And most importantly, this could ultimately reduce total tax income for the government which would completely defeat the intended goal of this policy.Addressing some common misconceptions about taxes in the United States: “The rich need to pay their fair share” There are some common misconceptions that are often stated that need to be cleared up. It surprises many people to learn that every year, between 40-55% of U.S. households pay $0 in federal income taxes. None. Now let's look at the top 1% of earners that are often talked about. The top 1% of earners bring in around 20-21% of all income in the U.S., but they pay nearly half of all federal income taxes​. This isn't to say that the system is perfect, but it's a reminder that tax policy is already incredibly complex and there are many misconceptions. Can you explain in a bit more detail how this would exactly work?Here's where it gets technical. The unrealized gains tax would function as a prepayment on future realized gains taxes, meaning you wouldn't pay taxes twice on the same gain. If you eventually sell the asset for less than its taxed value or incur a loss, you could get a refund. This system aims to prevent people from being taxed on income they never actually receive, but it also adds layers of complexity.For example, if you're illiquid—meaning most of your wealth is tied up in non-tradable assets—you might only have to pay taxes on liquid assets, but there's a catch: you'd face a deferral charge of up to 10% on the gain of your illiquid assets. And if you pass away, your estate pays the death tax, with any overpaid unrealized taxes refunded to the estate.Can this policy actually be implemented by the President?No, not directly. While the President can propose tax policies, it's ultimately up to Congress to pass them. Given the contentious nature of this proposal and the significant legal and logistical hurdles, its implementation is far from guaranteed. It's a complex policy that would require broad support and careful crafting to become law.How would this tax interact with state-level taxes?State tax systems often mirror federal rules, so if a federal tax on unrealized gains were implemented, states might consider adopting similar measures. However, this could lead to conflicts between federal and state tax policies, particularly in states with lower or no income tax. Additionally, the combined burden of federal and state taxes on unrealized gains could increase the overall tax rate on affected individuals.How would this policy affect retirement accounts and other tax-advantaged savings vehicles?At this point, the proposal does not specifically target retirement accounts like 401(k)s or IRAs, which traditionally benefit from tax deferral until funds are withdrawn. However, if the policy were to extend to such accounts, it could complicate the tax treatment of these savings vehicles and potentially undermine their tax-advantaged status. Clarifications would be needed to determine how, if at all, these accounts would be affected.How do you determine how much tax to be paid? Who determines the value of an unrealized capital gain? For example: how do you know how much a business is worth for sure if you haven't yet sold it? The tax on unrealized capital gains is based on the value of your assets at the end of each year. For stocks, it's easy to figure out because their market value is clear. But when it comes to assets like a small business or real estate that haven't been sold, it gets tricky.For these types of assets, the value would have to be estimated, often through appraisals. This is where things can get complicated and subjective. For example, valuing a business that hasn't been sold yet involves guessing what someone might pay for it based on current market conditions and future earnings.To illustrate how hard it is to value something accurately, just think about how often you've seen wildly different "Zestimates" on Zillow for houses, including your own. This same kind of uncertainty can apply to other assets, making it difficult to determine an exact tax amount.The policy might include safeguards to adjust for big swings in value, allowing for tax credits or refunds if an asset's value drops after you've already paid tax on it. But the details on how this would work aren't clear yet, and it's something that would need to be carefully handled to avoid unfair taxes based on inaccurate valuations.Addressing some of the myths that are being said about this policy:There are several myths or misconceptions often cited which might not hold up under scrutiny:Myth: Taxing Unrealized Gains is Fair Because Wealthy Individuals Use Unrealized Gains for Borrowing:Reality: While it's true that wealthy individuals can use the value of their assets as collateral for loans, this doesn't mean they've realized income. (IE: sold their asset for cash.) The value of the underlying assets can still fluctuate, and if the asset's value drops below the loan amount, the individual might still owe on the loan despite having no income from the asset. Taxing unrealized gains could lead to situations where individuals owe taxes on "income" they never actually received.Myth: It's Just Like Taxing Income or Profits:Reality: Taxing unrealized gains is fundamentally different from taxing income or realized profits because it's based on potential wealth, not actual wealth. This could lead to scenarios where individuals or entities are taxed on wealth that might never materialize if the asset's value decreases.Myth: This Will Only Affect the Ultra-Wealthy:Reality: While the proposal might target the ultra-wealthy, there are always unintended consequences when imposing any tax policy. This may result in an increase in sales of businesses, or a decrease. It could lead to people moving their money out of the country, or potentially people completely migrating out of the country. The consequences could be far-reaching and unintended, as seen in France and Norway. As always, please remember, these are never lectures. They are reminders to myself and I want to hear and learn from you. What do you think? Is this proposed policy a good idea? What did I get wrong? Please let me know so that I can improve. If you got value out of this, please do me a favor by sharing or subscribing. It means a lot to me. Year Of The Opposite - Travis Stoliker's Substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Get full access to Year Of The Opposite - Travis Stoliker's Substack at www.yearoftheopposite.com/subscribe

MINA SMALLMAN: ON MISOGYNOIR, SURVIVAL AND A BETTER TOMORROW“Race is always seen as Black men's issue, gender is always seen as white women's issue. So Black women always fall through the cracks.”Preferential acceptance rates for White women applying to UK police forces have given a false impression of gender equality, hiding acute discrimination against Black women, Media Storm data shows. This reveals the importance of understanding intersectional discrimination - and one version in particular. ‘Misogynoir': the ingrained prejudice against Black women. This episode heroes Black women speaking about the particular prejudices they face. In a long-form interview, Mina Smallman - teacher, pastor and mother of Bibaa Henry and Nicole Smallman, whose murders exposed racist police neglect and abuse - shares the pain, passion and learnings that went into her new book, A Better Tomorrow: Life Lessons in Hope and Strength. The episode is hosted by Mathilda Mallinson (@mathildamall) and Helena Wadia (@helenawadia). The music is by Safire (@soundofsamfire). Resources:Order Mina Smallman's book, A Better Tomorrow https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/451970/a-better-tomorrow-by-smallman-mina/9781529199710Request Media Storm's policing data from mediastormpodcast@gmail.comSupport Media Storm on Patreon https://www.patreon.com/MediaStormPodcast You can also get an ad-free version of the podcast via Apple Podcasts or Acast+ https://plus.acast.com/s/guiltyfeminist. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

No one should get preferential treatment for who they sleep with. (Of course, when we're talking about low-income seniors, who knows if they even HAVE a sex life anymore, but I digress….). A recent op-ed in the Las Vegas sun by a UNLV professor made the case that low-income housing should “prioritize” members of certain […] The post #387 Preferential housing for LGBTQ+ seniors? appeared first on Heidi Harris Show.

Carol Paton, a renowned writer on politics, economics, government finance, and state-owned enterprises, joins John Maytham on the Afternoon Drive show. She will discuss the implications of this new legislation, its potential benefits for social transformation, and the challenges it may pose for SOEs.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Warning: Strong language “Race is always seen as Black men's issue, gender is always seen as white women's issue. So Black women always fall through the cracks.” Preferential acceptance rates for White women applying to UK police forces have given a false impression of gender equality, hiding acute discrimination against Black women, Media Storm data shows. This reveals the importance of understanding intersectional discrimination - and one version in particular. ‘Misogynoir': the ingrained prejudice against Black women. This episode heroes Black women speaking about the particular prejudices they face. In a long-form interview, Mina Smallman - teacher, pastor and mother of Bibaa Henry and Nicole Smallman, whose murders exposed racist police neglect and abuse - shares the pain, passion and learnings that went into her new book, A Better Tomorrow: Life Lessons in Hope and Strength. The episode is hosted by Mathilda Mallinson (@mathildamall) and Helena Wadia (@helenawadia). The music is by Samfire (@soundofsamfire). Speakers: Dr Marina Hasan, criminologist Marcia Ore, Diversity, Equality and Inclusion consultant & former West Midlands Police Officer Mina Smallman, pastor & author Resources: Order Mina Smallman's book, A Better Tomorrow Request Media Storm's policing data  Support Media Storm on Patreon Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

We spoke last month about how the way a topic is introduced makes you understand it differently [https://adc.bmj.com/content/109/3/248.2], but this month we might have a practical example of how seeking preferences can be tricky [https://adc.bmj.com/content/109/7/598.1]   This links to how to rehydrate kids who've failed an oral rehydration challenge; NG or IV? [https://adc.bmj.com/content/109/6/515.1]   We would love for you to be involved in Archi [https://adc.bmj.com/pages/authors/#archimedes] - just ask the questions that your patients are offering you - and tell us how you're finding the podcast offerings.   Please listen to our regular podcasts and subscribe in your preferred platform to get episodes automatically every month. And if you enjoy our podcast, please leave us a review at https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/adc-podcast/id333278832.

Two in three cars sold globally will be electric by 2035, says the International Energy Agency. And in Europe - South Africa's largest automobile export market, one in four cars sold are already EVs. SA is way behind this adoption curve, but it's quickly picked up pace in the last two years. In episode 8 of The Current, we look at what needs to be amped up for SA drivers to shift their mindsets and benefit from the cost and carbon savings of electric vehicles. Host, Iman Rappetti, is joined by Mark Raine, co-CEO of Mercedes-Benz South Africa; Ndia Magadagela, CEO of Everlectric and Investec's head of Sustainable Solutions, Melanie Humphries. 00:00: Intro 01:54: Meet the guests 03:03: Overview of electric vehicle landscape in South Africa 03:38: SA destined to be an electric vehicle market 05:17: Preferential financing of EVs 05:44: Bringing prices tags on EVs down 08:07: “Range anxiety” and number of charging stations in SA 10:43: Are EV's really greener than ICE vehicles? 13:36: Recycling of EV's batteries 15:48: B2B businesses – Leasing of electric vehicles 17:13: Leased EVs and their ESG credentials 18:12: The larger the electric vehicle, the more the cost saving 20:38: Evolution of EVs in public transport, like SA taxis 20:38: EV's in public transport like SA taxis 21:35: Incorporating your EV battery into a home energy solution 22:27: Automotive manufacturing sector in SA must change to survive 23:47: Stimulating EV manufacturing in SA 25:30: The electric vehicles white paper lays out SA's roadmap 26:18: Mercedes-Benz's CEO predicts 10,000 EVs to be sold in 2027 27:35: Closing comments – The EVolution is here Investec Focus Radio SA

The dedicated team of the New York Police Department is seen demonstrating an exemplary level of respect for former President Donald Trump as they shield him from excessive media intrusions upon his daily trips to and from the courthouse in Manhattan. The New York Times inadvertently brought attention to the NYPD's 'preferential' treatment of Trump in their coverage. It's evident that Trump still holds a sense of regard in the books of the New York City Police Department. For the past week, there has been the unusual sight of a large police truck lodged at the meeting point of Hogan Place and Centre Street, staffed with a uniformed officer stationed inside. Coinciding with Trump's nearing arrival each day, the truck makes a slight progression closer to the courthouse, effectively obstructing the lens of news photographers attempting to capture his entry through the side door of the building. This particular activity, although seemingly mundane, by the NYPD is enacted not just in the mornings but also performed strategically during Trump's afternoon departures, around 2:37 p.m. This consistent treatment of Trump by NYPD doesn't seem to be just a random act of courtesy but rather a routine formed with a certain intent. The synchronistic relationship between the NYPD and Trump could be analyzed better in the light of recent events, especially Trump's attendance at a commemorative event in March. This memorial service was dedicated to an NYPD officer who tragically lost his life in the line of duty. Trump's appearance at this meaningful event was a symbolic act of respect and solidarity with the law enforcement community. This commemorative assembly coincided with the date of Joe Biden's indulgence in a lucrative fundraising event, attended by Barack Obama. The stark contrast in their agendas speaks volumes about their choices and priorities. While Trump honored police sacrifice, Biden and Obama pursued political funding, demonstrating potentially contrasting leadership styles. During Biden's leadership term, the country has been grappling with an ever-increasing crime rate along with the concerning phenomenon of 'migrant crime'. Trump, in a conversation with Breitbart News in March, drew attention to this new wave of crime plaguing the country. 'We're facing a new genre of crime in the United States, we can term it 'migrant crime', as he pointed out. 'Biden migrant crime' would be a more fitting terminology, but the phrase could be too tedious and frenzied for the masses. The increasing crime and the emergence of this new category of migrant crime are matters of real concern. Trump shed light on the intensity of these criminal acts, describing them as 'ferocious' and 'horrific'. The criminals are often perceived to be hardcore individuals, causing an atmosphere of fear and uncertainty. Trump has also highlighted that among the migrants coming into the country, many hold an unsavory reputation. The scales tilt heavily with a major share of these migrants being individuals with significant health issues, particularly mental health problems. Trump's straightforward statements reveal, without sugar-coating, the gravity of the situation. Contrary to popular discourse, Trump made 'law and order' a central tenet of his presidential terms in response to the nationwide upheaval witnessed in 2020. This was a bold move towards realigning the country's stance towards maintaining peace and order, signaling a shift towards a more organized and safer America. Trump's stance towards law and order didn't go unnoticed or unappreciated, as evidenced by the support he received from a sizeable extent of police and law enforcement groups. This backing was not merely in words but was also reflected in official endorsements Trump received throughout his presidential campaign over Biden. The Trump campaign reported an approximate figure of 900,000 officers offering their official endorsement to him during the 2020 election period. This number certainly points towards a significant inclination of the law enforcement community towards Trump, further reinforcing his image as a 'law and order' president. All in all, Trump's relationship with the law enforcement community, particularly the NYPD, and his stance on the pivotal issues facing the nation reflect his commitment towards reinforcing a safer, orderly America. Such visible displays of respect from the NYPD often go beyond mere courtesy and may reflect deeper bonds nurtured by shared values and mutual respect. While stories of 'preferential treatment' might foster intrigue amidst some quarters, it is essential to focus on the broader picture. The protection and respect accorded to Trump, as per this narrative, are presumably reflective not just of personal regard but also of the respect for the values he espoused. At a time of increasing pressing concerns like crime rates and migrant issues, it is such strong collaborative relationships between law enforcement and leaders which have the potential to instigate real change. With Trump's approach as an example, future leadership can take cues on the importance of maintaining strong, respectful ties with law enforcement bodies, advocating for law and order, and addressing nation-wide problems head-on. Real News Now Website Connect with Real News Now on Social Media Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/RealNewsNowApp/ X Twitter: https://twitter.com/realnewsapp Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/realnews/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@realnewsnowapp Threads: https://www.threads.net/@realnews/ Tumblr: https://www.tumblr.com/realnewsnow Truth Social: https://truthsocial.com/@RealNews YouTube:https://www.youtube.com/@realnewsnowapp End Wokeness: https://endthewokeness.com #realnewsnowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This week we do our best to avoid semantic games and talk about the difference between being picky and having preferences. What hills are worth dying on? Join us! The post Picky or Preferential? appeared first on Sheologians.

We're finally diving into alpha submissive romance novels during this deep dive of Heather Guerre's Preferential Treatment, one of Sarah's best books of 2022. We're talking about the way some romances do such immense work today—this one really digging into something that romance usually steers clear of…money. We know money and power are inexorably intertwined, but what does that really mean when relationships are budding, and when sex is on the line? How do power dynamics shift and move, how does money impact our ability to be honest in a relationship, and most importantly, should billionaires exist? All that and we finally get to the bottom of the Alpha submissive kink, why Sarah thinks it's great, and why it just doesn't move Jen.Oh, and for those of you who've been asking for years, Sarah's doing a mini interstitial in here about books that feature alpha submissives — enjoy! Read Preferential Treatment at Amazon, or with your monthly subscription to Kindle Unlimited.Show NotesPreferential Treatment was on our Best of 2022 list.Preferential treatment is a word used to describe unfair labor practices.Here are some of the most common financial problems in relationships and marriages. Mackenzie Scott's strategy for getting rid of money through her foundation, Yield Giving.

     This week I had the unbelievable  pleasure of sitting down with Monty Bynum, The Wealthy Servant! Monty has a background whose foundation is cemented in service. Monty has dedicated his life to educating, mentoring, and  providing the first responder community with the skill sets and knowledge needed to enter the world of becoming an entrepreneur.  Sit back and give this episode a listen and come away energized to explore the possibilities of developing that second or third income stream!!!!     https://www.linkedin.com/in/monty-bynum-%F0%9F%94%B1-28426433/www.thewealthyservant.com32 years serving as a USCM Officer, LEO, DEA, and Special Agent as an International EXPERT in Money Laundering & Complex Intelligence. I loved it, I just hated the pay. So, I did something about it. I became an entrepreneur and investor WHILE SERVING. We now actively ACQUIRE existing businesses and cash-flowing assets as well as partnership interest in recession-proof business models aligned with our values. BRING US OPPORTUNITIES TO REVIEW: small to mid-size businesses, residential properties, and commercial properties. Message me to receive our criteria / buy box. ACTIVELY HIRING: B2B and B2C sales professionals, capital raisers and investor relations specialists, acquisitions agents, business brokers, marketing managers, and onsite operators. *Preferential review of First Responders & Veterans for all roles. Are you a First Responder READY to build, acquire, and grow your own BUSINESS & INVESTMENT INCOME? Do you WANT to be at 6-7 figures a year in additional income? Are you ready to do the work?If that's you, JOIN The Wealthy Servant™ NATION! The Fastest Growing, Most Powerful Network In Existence Created Exclusively for First Responder Business Owners, Entrepreneurs, Investors, & Influencers.                                              SHOW SPONSOR - ON TARGET CLAIMSThis episode is being brought to you by "On Target Claims" - From Setback to Settlement On Target Claims is a team of certified and experienced Public Adjusters in Florida who have helped thousands of insured get the maximum amount for their residential, commercial, wind, water, fire, hurricane, mold, yacht and marine claims.We have the knowledge and experience to properly investigate all potential damages including all of the hidden damages that may not be obvious to the untrained eye. Since insurance companies are notorious for conducting haphazard damage investigations using preferred contractors to determine your loss our claims adjusters will create an accurate inventory of every item that was damaged so that we can prepare a detailed computer generated estimate to substantiate the true value of your loss and get you the settlement you deserve.https://www.ontargetclaims.com561-208-1775954-329-0399Thank you for taking the time to give this podcast a listen. If you would like more information on other Law enforcement Life Coach initiatives, our "Sometimes Heroes Need Help" wellness seminar or our One-On-One life coaching please visit :www.lawenforcementlifecoach.comJohn@lawenforcementlifecoach.comAnd if you would like to watch the interview you can view it in it's entirety on the Law Enforcement Life Coach YouTube Channel : https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCib6HRqAFO08gAkZQ-B9Ajw/videos/upload?filter=%5B%5D&sort=%7B%22columnType%22%3A%22date%22%2C%22sortOrder%22%3A%22DESCENDING%22%7D

The Building 4th Community was led by Demarcus and Victor who responded to our questions.  This was a lively and fruitful discussion.

There seems to be another wicked virus going around and I seemed to find (or, more accurately, it found me) during my trip to Seattle. Luckily, I had packed my BioBlue Leuco! So while it was a miserable experience consisting of intense full-body aches, zero appetite, extremely low energy and the inability to sleep because of those aforementioned symptoms, it provided me with an amazing methylene blue, or in this case leucomethylene blue, anecdote. Compared to the typical recovery time of 4 - 7 days or more, getting back to my normal self in 48 hours was nothing short of astounding. So I felt compelled to share that story with you guys today.For quite some time now, I have been working on a concept that is predicated on all of the information I have been absorbing for the past 5+ years about optimizing health, wellness and longevity. And based on my synthesis of all of this information, and information I continue to learn on a daily basis, it has become abundantly clear that the lowest hanging fruit and the ultimate root source of our health and vitality is (surprise, surpirse): mitochondrial function.With that being said, in today's episode I reveal my conceptualization: The Mitochondrial Triad. As the name implies, there are three pillars to this triad​. Listen to find out what they are!​​ I hope you enjoy the information in today's solosode. Please share this episode with family, friends and colleagues if you find the content especially interesting and/or impactful.As always, light up your health! - Introduction and Sickness Onset 00:00:00 - 00:01:19:20: Introduction to Red Light Report podcast and Dr. Michael Koski. Teaser on mitochondrial triad concept. Sudden sickness during Seattle trip. Exposure to crowded places, detailed symptoms, and use of methylene blue. Seattle Trip Details 00:01:19:27 - 00:05:23:24: Seattle trip background and crowded places visited. Onset of sickness on Saturday night. Exposure points including airplane, dinner, Pike Market, coffee shop, and Discovery Park. Reflection on crowdedness at Discovery Park. Sickness and Methylene Blue Dosage 00:05:42:11 - 00:12:24:12: Overview of getting sick. Exposure points and crowded environments. Decision to use methylene blue. Dosage adjustment during sickness, disclaimer not medical advice. Recovery Protocol and Dosage Adjustments 00:18:25:21 - 00:13:31:07: Dosage protocol initiation and sleep difficulties. Symptoms' progression, protocol adherence, and activities. Gradual recovery, challenges, and improvements. Methylene Blue and Mitochondrial Triad 00:28:19:21 - 00:34:37:22: Emphasis on methylene blue's prophylactic and therapeutic uses. Introduction to Mitochondrial Control Triad (red light therapy, methylene blue, and upcoming pillar). Importance of mitochondria and targeting them for health. Detailed Exploration of Methylene Blue 00:34:37:24 - 00:42:25:03: Discussion on red light therapy. Introduction to methylene blue and its benefits. Preferential accumulation in the central nervous system. Synergies with red light therapy, neurodegenerative potential. Teasers on upcoming research and third pillar reveal. Future Expectations and Closing 00:43:47:24 - 00:52:44:24: Discussion on methylene blue's electron-donating property and photodynamic activity. Teasers on the third pillar, efficient supplement choices, and the foundation of health. Excitement for the future, request for reviews, and sign-off. - For the next week, get 15% off your order of BioBlue or BioBlue Leuco! Use coupon code: solosode15Valid through 2/29 (yes, it's leap year!) - Kindle version of Red Light Therapy Treatment Protocols eBook, 4th Edition - To learn more about red light therapy and shop for the highest-quality red light therapy products, visit https://www.biolight.shop - Dr. Mike's #1 recommendations: Grounding products: Earthing.com EMF-mitigating products: Somavedic Blue light-blocking glasses: Ra Optics - Stay up-to-date on social media: Dr. Mike Belkowski: Instagram LinkedIn   BioLight: Instagram YouTube Facebook

Preferential bidding will go live on April 1 for the May bid period. Now is the time for Alaska pilots to become familiar with the new system so that they may achieve the best possible outcome in the bid award. A great number of resources have been created to facilitate this learning including three rounds of mock-bidding beginning on Monday, February 12. In this episode, Scheduling Committee Chair Captain Scott Rubin and other members of the Joint Preferential Bidding System Working Group (JPWG) including  Captains Ben Brooks, John Owens, and Jake Woods explain how and where to find these training materials and discuss the details of the final implementation timeline. Pilots may find additional support by using one of the contact methods below. Send a DART – Use the PBS topic Call the PBS Hotline 833-252-7271 – Rings all ALPA members of the PWG. If no answer leave a message for a callback. For company support, e-mail Pilot_PBS_Support@Alaskaair.com (search PBS and it will pop up) Additional information on PBS is available on prior Podcast Episode #58 PBS and Trip Construction.

Today's episode on China Business Pain Points is 'Are there preferential tax policies for companies in China'---------------------------Connect with Kristina Koehler-Coluccia, Head of Business Advisory at Woodburn Accountants & Advisors on LinkedIn here.---------------------------Thrive in China RoundtableGeared towards international companies selling to China who want to systemize & scale their China business. Each week Kristina Koehler-Coluccia hosts a complimentary deep dive into a market entry strategy or implementation guideline that will help you protect and grow your China business.If you are looking to create a solid foundation for your China business and learn how to grow and scale quickly then you can register here. ---------------------------Can Woodburn help you? I am offering a free 30mins call where we discuss the obstacles you are encountering on your China business journey and how we can help accelerate your success. Book a call here.

Carol Paton joins John from News 24 to evaluate the burdens that are imposed by the use of government procurement as the central vehicle to drive black economic empowerment in South Africa.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Hearts on Fire Feet on the Move–Mark Raue–The Preferential Option for The Poor (One of the most consistent themes in the scriptures is the priority that must be given to the poor and needy. It was a hallmark of Jesus's words and actions. We read of the Last judgement where Jesus clearly emphasised that we will one day be judged, not for how dedicated we were to religious practise or ritual, but to how we treated the poor and outcast. Over the last 50 years or so this has become known as the preferential option for the poor. It is not a political option, nor is it an ideological option, no, the preferential option for the poor is at the centre of the Gospel. The ongoing debates in Australia about the cost of living, minimum wages, welfare payments and rent affordability affect everyone. However, those at the lowest end of the food chain are impacted most dramatically and in a truly Christian world would be prioritised before those who are well off are thought about. If we are genuinely trying to live a Christian life consistent with the teachings of Jesus in the Gospels, then preferencing the poor in our daily thinking and decision making is the only option, the only choice and the ultimate criteria upon which our lives will one day be judged.)

Today's episode on China Business Pain Points is 'China's IIT Preferential Policy for Expatriates Extended to End of 2027'---------------------------Connect with Kristina Koehler-Coluccia, Head of Business Advisory at Woodburn Accountants & Advisors on LinkedIn here.---------------------------Thrive in China RoundtableGeared towards international companies selling to China who want to systemize & scale their China business. Each week Kristina Koehler-Coluccia hosts a complimentary deep dive into a market entry strategy or implementation guideline that will help you protect and grow your China business.If you are looking to create a solid foundation for your China business and learn how to grow and scale quickly then you can register here. ---------------------------Can Woodburn help you? I am offering a free 30mins call where we discuss the obstacles you are encountering on your China business journey and how we can help accelerate your success. Book a call here.

At the 2023 Southwest Believers' Convention Jerry Savelle teaches how the favor of God makes you a barrier breaker! You weren't made to live a limited, inferior lifestyle. You are marked with a difference and God has placed greatness in you. The favor of God gives you advantage and preferential treatment!

7 Day FREE CONVERSATION CLUB TRIAL - https://www.patreon.com/thinkinginenglish ⁠ JOIN THE CONVERSATION CLUB  -- https://www.patreon.com/thinkinginenglish  Take a Class (Use code TRIAL50 for 50% off) - https://thinkinginenglish.link/ Last week, the US Supreme Court decided to end affirmative action – a policy that has helped millions of people from underrepresented communities enter top universities and get better jobs. Let's discuss what affirmative action is, why the supreme court ruled it unconstitutional, and what could happen next! TRANSCRIPT - https://thinkinginenglish.blog/2023/07/03/247-what-is-affirmative-action-and-why-did-the-supreme-court-end-it/ My Links ENGLISH CLASSES - https://thinkinginenglish.link/  ⁠Buy Me a Coffee - https://www.buymeacoffee.com/dashboard⁠ NEW YOUTUBE Channel!!! - https://www.youtube.com/@thinkinginenglishpodcast  INSTAGRAM - thinkinginenglishpodcast (https://www.instagram.com/thinkinginenglishpodcast/)   Blog - thinkinginenglish.blog Vocabulary Race (n) - the idea that people can be divided into different groups based on physical characteristics that they are perceived to share such as skin colour, eye shape, etc. Diversity (n) - the fact of many different types of things or people being included in something, a range of different things or people. Discrimination (n) - treating a person or particular group of people differently, especially in a worse way from the way in which you treat other people, because of their race, gender, sexuality, etc. To marginalise (v) - to treat someone or something as if they are not important. Underrepresented (adj) - If a type of person or thing is underrepresented in a group or organization, there are not enough of them in it. Preferential (adj) - used to say that something that someone is given is better than what other people receive. Representation (n) - the fact of including different types of people, for example in films, politics, or sport, so that all different groups are represented. A level playing field (idiom) - a situation in which everyone has the same chance of succeeding. Extended Vocabulary List available --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thinking-english/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thinking-english/support

Last updated : 2023.06.27 The latest news from home and abroad, with a close eye on Northeast Asia and the Korean Peninsula in particular

• This Series: The Church at Corinth is very similar to the Church in America. We will walk through 1 Corinthians and apply the major themes of this book to our church today.   • This Week: Different believers draw boundaries in different places than other believers. If it is not in direct conflict with scripture, it is fine. While we need to be sensitive to other preferences, we are still free since we don't live under the law. Preferences in churches has caused more people to leave a church than sin issues.   Key Phrase: “Knowledge puffs up while love builds up.” 1 Corinthians 8:1

Propaganda and conspiracy theories; Rearranging truth; Tree of Knowledge; Sensory manipulation; Divine spark; Logic; "Intelligence"; God-given tools; Drawing near to God; "Corban"; Caring for parents; Jahovah-nissi?; Distinction of Christ's way; Choosing good and evil; Cultivating Holy Spirit; Evil cultivating evil; Freedom is the right to choose; Censorship; Repentance; Fasting from pride and vanity; Walking in the Holy Spirit; Possessing freedom to choose; Love requires sacrifice; Excuse making; Agreeing to go into bondage; Despising dominion; "idiotes" = "unregistered"; Waiving your rights; Forced offerings now allowed; Preferential treatment to Pharisees; Calling no man "father"; Lk 21:1; Jacob and altars of Bethel?; Gen 34; Strange fire; Sanhedrin; Right to freedom of religion; Amos 3:13; Getting closer to the Tree of Life; Sacrificing for neighbor; Daily ministration; John 5:1; Bethesda pool; 38-year infirmity; Will you be made whole?; On the sabbath?; v11 serious miracle; "Sin no more"; Sabbath not a day; Burnt up in fire?; Masculinity; Turning the world upside-down; John 5:17; Sons of God; Honoring father and mother; Why they set up altars; Anonymous giving; Watching for abuse; Quickening; "The" son of God; Doers of the word; Relying on Holy Spirit; Learning from John the Baptist and Jesus; Pharisee neglect of 38-year infirm man; Seeing God; Conversing with God; Eternal life?; Is the love of God in you?; Sin?; Actions evidence of sin; Studying?; Where's your sacrifice for others?; Silly women?; Be still and know.

In this episode, you will meet Amanda Montez. Amanda Montez Cobian is the director of diversity, equity, and inclusion at Jesuit High School in Portland, OR. She recently finished her graduate degree at the University of San Francisco in international and multicultural education. Her research centers alumni of Nativity schools and how they transition to predominantly white high schools. As a bi-racial educator, she aims to create the classroom environment she wished she could have had as a student and works to create systems of racial equity at work, in research, and as a co-author of Jesuit West's Community Organizing for Racial Equity (CORE). Snippet from the interview: "When I look at the seven principles of [Catholic Social Teaching], I think being able to name all humans have inherent dignity. To me, it's like that is the black lives matter movement; when I think about like preferential option for the poor and vulnerable that is saying by BIPOC right? It's not just saying people of color right. It's centering black and Indigenous and then people of color. I think that there's a lot of overlap actually." Themes from the interview that connect to the themes of Catholic Social Teaching: Family, Community, and Participation: She trains staff, parents, and students on the many different ways to practice advocacy and participate in shaping a more just society. Preferential option for the poor and vulnerable: Amanda's work centers on black, indigenous, and people of color. She constantly finds herself at the margins of society. She has personal experience, for example accompanying and building relationships with migrant indigenous women, gang members, people at the border, and BIPOC middle school students transitioning to predominately white high schools. Solidarity: She's been on an immersion experience to El Salvador, where she went not on a service trip to fix problems but rather simply to listen and learn. Care for God's creation: The social justice she helps coordinate at her school focused on the climate and she brought in a climate organizer as a guest speaker Resource mentioned in the interview ⁠Are Critical Race Theory and Catholicism compatible? | Think Like a Jesuit, Episode 3⁠ Word of the day: Encounter conversations/One-on-one relational meetings Want to connect with me? ReclaimingSJ@gmail.com Have feedback? Send your thoughts and recommendations here: https://bit.ly/reclaimingsjfeedback --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/reclaimingsj/message

In this podcast, I review the evidence for 6 different hypotheses: 1) Welfare payments to single mothers 2) Incarceration 3) Globalisation, automation and the loss of manufacturing jobs 4) The liberal elite's destruction of nuclear family ideals 5) Preferential investment in gangs, given lack of police protection from inner city violence. 6) Rap music celebrating 'brotherly love' Let me know what you think! Blog with rap lyrics: https://www.draliceevans.com/post/why-have-black-american-marriages-fallen-from-the-1960s

The Tampa Bay Buccaneers finished with a SUPER impressive 8-9 record. The Dallas Cowboys were four games ahead of them, ending the season at 12-5. So why in the world does Tampa Bay get to host a playoff game? Simple, because division winners get an automatic home game, regardless of their record. And that's pretty dumb, don't you think?We saw the same thing happen with the MLB playoffs in 2022. What makes this even more baffling is that (some) other leagues have corrected this. We cover an occasion in the NBA where something similar happened. And wouldn't you know it, the league fixed the issue!Plus, our top sports moments from last year—here's Sean's favorite. By the way, here's Joey's book! Give it a read. Or don't, but you'll only be hurting yourself.This episode is presented by the Morning Blitz newsletter. Get the latest updates from the sports world in five minutes or less, delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up here.

Clement is joined by CEO of Sakeliga Piet Le Roux and Black Business Council CEO Kganki Matabane to share their organization's views respectively on the recent decision by government to repeal the Preferential Procurement Regulations of 2017, doing away with some BEE requirements for SOE'sSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Welcome back to the Love Is Black podcast! Join us this week as we delve into preference in dating. On this episode we discuss: -Love is Blind Season 3, -Is Harvey prettier than Karese, -If we were single what would our preferences be, -and more! --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/loveisblack/message

On this week's episode, Christine and Shannon discuss the myth that you can "choose" to be one sexuality or another. Instead, they unpack ideas around sexual identity, outdated terminology, and the ongoing debate of whether or not "bicurious" and "heteroflexible" are appropriate terms. 

The first "pilot" roundtable in collaboration with the Western Standard. Sat down with three political nerds: Mike Dalke, David Parker & Vitor Marciano to discuss the month ahead in the UCP election. We discussed: - Key dates - The oddities of the current race - Preferential ballot & whether to vote one or seven - How can Danielle Smith run while not being a sitting MLA - The tactic of limiting in person voting. November 5th SNP Presents: QDM & 2's. Get your tickets here: snp.ticketleap.com/snp-presents-qdm--222-minutes/ Let me know what you think Text me 587-217-8500

Matthew 5.10-12

‘Preferences' are a pretty big part of our voting system, sometimes the deciding factor in who wins a seat in the election. So how do they actually work? We've got quick 101 on why it matters how you number your ballot, and some myth-busting about how much power parties have to decide where your preferences go (spoiler: none). Also, more than 30 retired judges have written an open letter calling for a federal corruption watchdog. Some parties and independents are keen on the idea - but others, not so much. And climate change is one of the most important issues for voters this election. So how does everyone's policies stack up? Guests: Claudia Long, Hack political reporter Han Aulby, executive director Centre for Public Integrity Richie Merzian, the Australia Institute

Preferential voting, proportional voting, 2-party preferred, and voting above or below the line are just some of the features of our electoral system that we've talked about during this series. So in this episode of Squiz the Election, we talk to the Australian Electoral Commission's Director of Media and Digital Engagement Evan Ekin-Smyth about the nuts and bolts of voting and exactly how the system works to decide who will be in power for the next 3 years.Got a question for Ask The Squiz? Send it through to hello@thesquiz.com.au See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.