The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast

On this podcast there aren't necessarily debates, more often they are off the cuff conversations. You, the listeners, set the questions that your, co-hosts don't see until they start recording. This episode is not an exception to that as there's talk about Stuart's recent appearance on the ProGRESS Podcast, and a thought-provoking reflection questioning whether humanity's progress is driven by rare geniuses, while the rest of us cling to their achievements and grapple with uncomfortable truths about our nature, and opinions.The first of the two listener questions comes from Lucas in Punta Arenas, Chile - “Stuart heard your interview on The ProGRESS Podcast. Where does your drive to be genuine and honest in business come from, do you think? Where do you think your internal drive comes from that you spoke about separately at the end?”From this question, Stuart talks about how his drive to be genuine and honest in business comes from the same place as where the drive to be genuine and honest in personal life. He grew up in a family full of bullshit, distortion, lies, suppression, oppression and belittlement. He doesn't want to be like them.He goes onto spin the question to an environmental slant:  what drives you to care about the environment? And maybe put yourself in the shoes of somebody who is having a negative impact on the environment, and what drives them to do that and to maybe not even care.If you would like to listen to the episodes, here are the links:Part 1Part 2The second question today comes from Bronwen in Atlanta, Georgia, USA - “Are humans really that advanced, or do we rely on the occasional genius to make our species jump, leaving the rest of us merely hanging on to their coattails, and just narcissistic apes? I know some people will deny that we are apes, and they are entitled to their opinion, as am I. It doesn't mean their or my opinion overthrows a point of fact, it's still just their opinion. Are we really advanced if we fool ourselves into thinking we are offended by someone's opinions that differ from ours, when they are really offended by points of fact?”Off the back of Bronwen's question, William feels that we have more geniuses around us, he cites the progress humans have made over the past 200 years.  There's always people out there with interesting minds, and they come up with really interesting ideas.Stuart asks the question: are our evolutionary jumps driven by these geniuses?  When those geniuses make their discoveries, a large volume of the rest of us then jump on that bandwagon. Is that mass movement what makes us have an evolutionary jump, not the genius's actions?Stuart picks up that there are two sides to Bronwen's question, and the core to the second part is that opinion is not fact.  There are facts out there that as far as we understand them to be facts, and people can be offended by someone's unfounded opinion or founded facts, but it's just how you deal with that offense.  You're offended. Deal with it. Process it. Feedback on it, try and improve the situation. Just because you are offended, doesn't mean someone is always being offensive.What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.comThis podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice. Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/PeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/peoplescountrysideSign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilitiesFundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheels

This episode was recorded in Stuart's garden, so expect in the background,  people shouting, horns, sirens, Harley's revving, all sorts. If you're struggling to filter out the background noise and not focus in on the question, that's something you need to practice, because when your co-hosts are out having a conversation in this garden space, they don't even notice the background sounds very often. So that's the thing, life is a noisy place and you get presented with these big questions at inconvenient times, so we all need to learn to filter at any given moment.Ray, from Sauk Centre, Minnesota, USA is the lucky listener asking the first question - “Do you think countries that benefited from the slave trade should pay compensation to the descendants of slaves. Is it fair to pay for wrong doings of ancestors, and is it wrong to accept compensations for things your ancestors experienced? Are all white people racist if they are living off privileges afforded them by their forefathers? For balance, are modern day slave descendants, victims? Is it potentially better though to work towards a fairer society, instead of compensation? It can maybe be argued that compensations won't make a difference in a society that remains inherently unfair?”Stuart and William discuss reparations, fairness, and historical context. Stuart emphasizes the importance of understanding history to build a better future. William examines unconscious biases and how ancestral privilege shapes opportunities. Rather than financial compensation, Stuart argues for acknowledgment and proactive change. William stresses that achieving a fair society requires recognizing existing privilege. They both highlight the need for balanced historical perspectives and thoughtful action beyond monetary solutions.Mateusz, from Rzeszow, Poland sets the second question for discussion today and as it is quite lengthy, we have put it in a separate document which you can find here - Mateusz's QuestionWilliam and Stuart dive into pronouns, identity, and how labels can matter—or not. William, a self-described "CIS white male (but don't call him that)," sees pronouns mostly in emails and social media but acknowledges that openly sharing them can help others feel comfortable. Stuart recounts an awkward business meeting where he avoided stating his pronoun and paid the price. They agree that inclusion means normalizing differences without making a spectacle of them. William sees identity as secondary to kindness and competence, while Stuart laments society's slow progress in LGBTQ+ acceptance since the 1970s. They conclude with a universal truth—offending someone is inevitable, so keep messaging clear, direct, and free of unnecessary complexity.What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.comWe like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers.This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice. Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountrysideSign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilitiesFundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheels

Floss, in Gimli, Manitoba, Canada is the listener who set the first question today - “What are your objectives, personally and with your work?”William aspires to live a fulfilling life by practicing kindness, spending time with loved ones, and embracing diverse experiences. Both personally and professionally, he seeks growth through challenges and stepping out of his comfort zone.Stuart, on the other hand, values enjoying life's journey. His professional focus is on establishing the Disabled Countryside Access CIC to enhance accessibility, with the long-term aim of transitioning to part-time work to prioritize health and well-being.These perspectives highlight different approaches to personal and professional fulfillment.James, from Ecclefechan, Scotland is the listener setting the next question - “In the little known mountainous areas of Greece, down toward Albania I think, the government are issuing sheep farmers with huge sheep dogs, to help keep bears and wolves away that roam the area. We need to find ways like this to live alongside larger animals and not shoot on sight. What do you think?”Stuart and William feel farmers are now adopting non-lethal strategies to manage bear encounters, choosing to deter rather than eliminate these animals. This approach not only promotes more humane interactions but also influences local decision-making towards sustainable practices.Understanding that bears view farms as extensions of their territory emphasizes the importance of educating communities about animal behavior—a key step in reducing conflicts.Moreover, drawing an analogy to coastal sea defenses, one can question whether such interventions might shift bear activity in unforeseen ways, much like how sea defenses alter the natural energy flow of the ocean. Investigating these hidden dynamics could lead to more effective and balanced wildlife management strategies.Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilitiesFundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheelsWhat do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.comWe like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers.This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice. Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

The first question that Stuart and William wade into in today's episode, comes from Ray in Sauk Centre, Minnesota, USA - “None of us are getting out of this alive. We're all heading in the same direction. Don't you think there's something profound in that?”Right off the bat, William agrees with Ray, that none of us are getting out of this alive. He goes on to make the point that we like to avoid the subject of our own mortality. Stuart feels there is a profundity to the fact that we all eventually die, and how it is the one shared experience that we all will have.Stuart then tries to bring the conversation around to the environment:  if we have very few shared experiences, how can we hope to live sustainably? Both he and William find this a tough question to even begin to answer, it is a big question.There are always two listener questions per episode, and the second one comes from another Ray, this time from Newmilns, Scotland - “I hear people talking about the Cocaine trade, and the submarines arriving in Spain, smuggling the drugs from Latin America. I'm also hearing the drug trade in UK prisons is worth a reported 1 billion pounds a year, which is interesting when set aside something like the UK carpet industry, which I know is worth just 900 million pounds a year. It's reported that some prison wardens themselves are smuggling drug packages into prisons as they know how to bypass checks, and that they are paid £400 per package. Now, what I want you to explore on this podcast is, corruption amongst those tasked with administering positive change, in the prison system and also in the climate change world, is seriously damaging. How can the rest of us manage the impact of these disruptors?”Stuart starts off the conversation, talking about how some prison wardens are good, some are bad, but these drugs are getting into the prisons somehow. He likes how Ray has spun this question towards the environment.Stuart recognises the corruption among those people who are tasked with making a change. He  knows people who have been through the prison system, are going through the prison system, will go through the prison system, and their families think they'll be rehabilitated. And if the people who are meant to be rehabilitating the prison prisoners are corrupt in themselves, the point's been missed. He feels that you can't avoid corruption, but it just needs to be flagged up, and the boil lanced.Stuart carries on the point that we need to openly talk about this issue, and instead of getting annoyed, we need to be proactive, remove the disruptors, and get better people in.William follows on this point, how we as humans can be easily motivated, particularly by money. This is sometimes because we need the money, or it could be that we are bullied into it. It is part of a system which the prison officers are quite literally locked into.Stuart and William conclude the conversation about vetting processes, and how they can be used to weed out the disruptors.What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.comSign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilitiesFundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheelsThis podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice. Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

On this podcast, the questions are set by you, the listeners. Even though the questions are often detached from the environment, we always try and bring back the discussion to it in some way.In today's episode, Stuart and William, your co-hosts, chew the fat over two intriguing questions, the first of which comes from Bartek in Abingdon, Oxfordshire, England - “I have not asked any question since 2020 I don't think, but always listen whilst I work. I see some of the UK royal family are pushing forward anti homelessness and anti domestic abuse projects. Should they abstain from such things or should they use their status in these ways?”Stuart feels an undercurrent from the question, that Bartek  is possibly an anti monarchist. He sees the question being more “should they exist and should they be sticking their nose in if they do?” His conclusion though, is that the royal family do have a status in society, and they should be doing something good, however he often feels they do more bad than good.Throughout this discussion, both Stuart and William in some way, express anti-monarchy sentiment, which deviates from Bartek's question a bit, but that is how they rock on this podcast, they often allow the conversation to weave and meander, like a shopping trolly with a dodgy wheel, as you never know where the conversation might lead?The second question comes from a listener that William is, for no reason at all, particularly afraid of, that person being Debs in Didcot, Oxfordshire, England - “1 in ten (if not more) of 4 year olds in the UK are considered obese. Yet when parents are advised how to help their children lose wait, they often close their ears. Is that because as a nation we're not emotionally mature enough to take this feedback on board?”William starts the conversation by bringing up how people don't like to be told when they are doing something wrong in their lives. Off the back of this bold statement, Stuart relates a story from his time in Manchester, how a group of kids were seen as feral, and their parents weren't bothered as it was how they were brought up, and it hadn't harmed them in their opinion.Stuart and William then steer the conversation towards how we need to consider the impact of cheap processed foods. Stuart sees it as an  indication of the lifestyle, the processes we live by. That it isn't all down to telling parents how to bring up their children better. He feels that we need to look at the whole way we live.Stuart's conclusion for this question: we need to  put systems in place to allow people to make better decisions.William concludes that a good community can also make a positive impact. The difference between a person in power like a teacher, and a member of your own community advising you, can make a big difference.What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.comWe like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers.This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice. Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountrysideSign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilitiesFundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheels

This podcast is  not really a debate. It's more of a conversation. Listeners send in questions for discussion and we've got up to 50 questions still to get through. Some aren't about the countryside or the environment, but co-hosts Stuart and William try and bring them beck to the environment in some way, with the actions they come up with. Ched, sets the first question from Port-Au-Prince, Haiti - “Who or what is the world's super power?”William initially suggests the USA as an answer to Ched's question but quickly shifts to a broader perspective. He identifies the real superpower as the ability to create an inclusive and effective community—a dynamic where people from diverse backgrounds connect, exchange ideas, and spark transformative progress. Stuart views Earth's superpower as its innate ability to foster and sustain life, a universal and extraordinary quality beyond the confines of planet Earth.William quotes physicist Brian Cox, emphasizing humanity's unique capacity to marvel at the universe and suggesting that losing this trait would be a profound loss. Their discussion diverges into intriguing tangents: William explores the concept of large numbers by converting them into relatable measures like time, while Stuart delves into the mysteries of black holes, pondering what happens to the matter within if a black hole ceases to exist.Fendy, from Dajabon, Haiti offers up the next question - “Is it good to be busy?”William begins by asserting that busyness for its own sake is counterproductive, though it may serve as a useful distraction in difficult times. He cites gardening and housework as examples of purposeful activity. Drawing on his business experience, Stuart observes that many people appear busy while accomplishing little, which he describes as a form of self-sabotage. They further note that some individuals maintain an image of busyness without engaging in substantively meaningful work. Stuart then shifts the focus to consider how one might achieve effectiveness without unnecessary preoccupation, prompting William to recall a U.S. podcast on activism that stressed the importance of balancing dedicated efforts with periods of disengagement to avoid missing critical opportunities.What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.comWe like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers.This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice. Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountrysideSign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilitiesFundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheels

Debs, in Didcot, Oxfordshire, England is the listener who sets the first question for discussion -  “You often say we are part of nature and not separate from it. To that end, with balance, it's ok for humans to alter land. So restoring it back to how it was before man even walked the Earth may be a red herring. I've heard you say when we are trying to look after a section of land, are we aiming to turn it into what it was, what it is or what we want it to be? So planting trees everywhere, maybe even where trees wouldn't normally be found, may be destroying rare biodiversity. It may also become a monoculture, with some things dieing out as we are only thinking of the canopy, not the understory and other kinds of habitats. Maybe with the correct management from humans biodiversity could increase more than if we died out and left nature to do its own thing?”Stuart kicks off the chat by pointing out that humans have really done a number on the landscape. Apparently, habitats are all over the place, literally. You get the driftwood from the destruction and a lovely patch of what might eventually be woodland if we keep our fingers crossed. The countryside's current look? Yeah, that's courtesy of 10,000 years of human tinkering. And to keep biodiversity afloat, we can't just sit back and do nothing—we need to roll up our sleeves and get involved.Stuart reckons Debs hits the nail on the head about tree planting. Unfortunately, we seem to have mastered the art of doing it all wrong. He then goes on to clarify that rewilding isn't just a fancy term for sitting on our hands.William chimes in, pointing out the environmental wreckage visible from aerial images. His book, featuring aerial maps of the UK, seems to suggest fields dominate the view—fields and more fields.Stuart raises the important point that, pre-humans, biodiversity was thriving. If we don't give nature a helping hand, that biodiversity might just wave us goodbye.Finally, Stuart pops the big question: What's the endgame when we meddle in nature? He reckons we ought to aim for greater biodiversity and, yes, it's perfectly fine for us to step in.William throws in the idea of thinking long-term about biodiversity. He mentions Capability Brown, the landscape gardener who never actually saw the fruits of his labor mature. But he had a long-term vision, and that's something we should all aspire to.Ray, Sauk Centre, Minnesota, USA - “Here's a challenge! What 3 words would you use to describe each other?”Stuart sums up William in three delightful words: Unguided, as if he missed the memo from the wisdom club; Doubtful, because a healthy dose of skepticism is apparently his thing; and Creative, which could be either a compliment or a polite way of saying "a bit out there."On the flip side, William describes Stuart with: Contradictive (yes, he just invented this gem), Focused, like a dog with a bone, and Ridiculous, because why not add a splash of absurdity?If they ever revisit this exercise, they'd probably choose completely different words.Stuart quips to Ray, “Please, spare us from such questions in the future—it was sheer torture!”What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.comSign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilitiesExtreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair Fundraiser: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheelsThis podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice. Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

Before we get into the meat and bones of this episode, an announcement. This podcast will be ending in 2030 and by our calculations, if we carry on the same rate of listens for the next five years, we'll reach 800,000 in total. So dear listener, here is where you come in. Share this podcast with 5 of your friends today and help us reach the 1 million listen mark before we bring this podcast to a close. Simples!Now on with the show, and in today's episode Stuart and William discuss two of those listener questions, beginning with this corker from Jess in Bishop's Tatchbrook, Warwickshire, England - “Random question for you today. Whats the most memorable live musical performance you've seen?”For Stuart, the most memorable performance was Jimi Hendrix at Woodstock in 1969. He goes on to elaborate about the timing of the performance and what he gained from the experience, particularly highlighting Hendrix's improvisational skills.When William interpreted this question, he saw it as being about performances actually witnessed in person, and since he has seen many memorable performances, he finds it difficult to select just one. However after a little internal deliberation he settles on two particular performances. One recent, and one from around 20 years ago. The first was a performance of Beethoven's 5th piano concerto at Oxford's Sheldonian Theatre, where he was amazed by a virtuoso pianist playing entirely from memory. His second pick was seeing The White Stripes at the Shepherd's Bush Empire, where he was impressed by Jack White's stage presence and the duo's chemistry. He also concludes with an action: to see The Flaming Lips live, you won't regret it!After all that musical waffle, Stuart and William then go onto talk through the following question from Brenda in Northumberland, England - “I notice you don't have too many promotional platforms, or try to do too many things. Is this because of time constraints or do you feel doing too many things and having too many offerings for your audience could be a distraction and divide your audience?”Stuart initiates the discussion by explaining that time constraints limit their promotional efforts. He notes that expanding to new platforms can divide audience attention and potentially serve as an excuse for failure.William goes on to describe their recording process, which ensures the podcast is consistently released on time. He emphasises that word of mouth remains their most effective form of promotion.Stuart expands the conversation by expressing his frustration with creatives who constantly launch new channels or ideas rather than committing to one project and seeing it through.Stuart points out for this podcast their listener numbers remain stable even without active promotion, which he sees as a testament to the podcast's success. He prefers maintaining a consistent audience rather than pursuing a boom-and-bust approach that chases listener numbers.William concludes by questioning whether creatives truly understand the implications of having a large audience, suggesting many pursue big numbers without considering the consequences.What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.comSign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilitiesFundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheelsThis podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice. Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast, support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

Welcome to The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, where your co-hosts Stuart ‘The Wildman' Mabbutt  and William Mankelow discuss questions sent in by listeners. In today's episode both questions come from the country of Scotland, with Teasag in Moffat posing the following - “How do we know what any word means?”Stuart begins the discussion around Teasag's question by challenging categorical thinking, emphasizing the contextual nature of understanding. William expands on this theme, focusing on language development. He argues; that language is fundamentally conceptual, with words evolving dynamically; over time.Stuart goes on to delve into the process of inquiry, with Stuart emphasizing the importance of repeated questioning and verification. This approach suggests a methodical and critical thinking process, where initial assumptions are constantly challenged and re-examined.The second listener question from Scotland was sent in by Brice in Crieff, Scotland - “Have you ever been discriminated against?”Stuart offers a profound personal account of experiencing discrimination within a professional networking context. During an encounter with the owner of a networking group in Oxfordshire, he was confronted about his bandages, with the suggestion that his appearance and behaviour was making others feel obligated to help him. This pivotal moment crystallized an important realization for Stuart: the critical importance of surrounding yourself with the right people.Off the back of this story, both Stuart and William offer up actions for you to ponder on.With regards to discrimination, Stuart offers this advice, that  it's what you do with the discrimination, how you confront it, how you break it down. You're never gonna stop it, but you shouldn't just let it go unchallenged either. Also he suggests trying to see where the line between your own discriminations and assumptions are. Because an assumption can quickly evolve into discrimination if you don't back away from it.William's action is that when you look at somebody who is just different to you. Maybe they wear different clothes to you. Maybe they just look different to you in whatever way that is. Maybe they have a different religion to you. He encourages you to try to see through that discrimination and to see that person standing in front of you.What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.comSign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilitiesFundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheelsWe like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers.This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice. Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

Brenda, from Northumberland, England, sets your two co-hosts the first of today's listeners' questions - “Some people feel meteorites seeded Earth with chemicals and substances that helped the soup of life evolve. Could DNA have been seeded too? Some feel other life forms have been sending meteors to seed our planet and direct the course of our evolution too. Should we rule anything out as much of science is based on hunches etc”.William kicks off the chat with his earth-shattering revelation that comets are apparently the unsung heroes of life's origin story on our planet. He then meanders into a bizarre discussion with Stuart about the idea that meteorites might be sentient beings. Stuart, in his infinite wisdom, muses that these space rocks could be life's catalysts, but with the brilliant insight that there's an assumption of life beyond Earth.William, in a dazzling display of ignorance, poses the existential question: How did DNA come to be? Shockingly, he admits he doesn't have a clue.He then passionately rails against Brenda's so-called "hunches," declaring that science is based on observing reality instead of flights of fancy. Stuart, ever the skeptic, dismisses the notion that other species sent these meteorites to seed the planet as mere science fiction, teetering on the edge of paranoia.William heroically attempts to explain that theories in science aren't mere guesswork but are meticulously documented and reviewed. He spins this into an environmental rant, highlighting that every scientific discipline is screaming about the havoc we're wreaking on the planet.Stuart wraps up with his groundbreaking advice: If a door closes in your face, open it again. Because, surprise, that's what doors are supposed to do.The second listener question comes in from Paula, Norfolk, England - “Do you feel the freedom to say whatever you want on your podcast?”William starts this riveting discussion with the ever-ambiguous “yes, but…” because who doesn't love a good contradiction right off the bat?Stuart chimes in with the groundbreaking observation that they have freedom, with some responsibility—an astonishing revelation. He then drops the bombshell that no matter what, someone's going to get offended. Not that they're being offensive, of course, but people are just so sensitive these days.Stuart then proceeds to challenge the notion that you need to be an academic to voice your opinion, because who needs expertise when you have a platform and an opinion?When William speaks on the podcast, he actually thinks about what he's saying, which is a refreshing change in today's world of mindless chatter. He prides himself on voicing his own truths—because the world definitely needs more personal truths.William then tackles the delicate subject of causing offense, suggesting that the best way forward is communication. Stuart wraps up this episode with some profound advice: in your own life, think about should it be said, not could it be said. A nugget of wisdom that's sure to leave listeners pondering the mysteries of the universe.What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.comThis podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice. Help us to spread the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support us work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountrysideSign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilitiesFundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheels

Yenifer, from Provincia De Panamá, Panama sets the first listener question today -  “Any advice on how to manage stress?”William discusses the benefits of meditation as an effective tool for stress management. He emphasizes that regular practice can help individuals cultivate a habit, which is essential for reaping the long-term benefits. He has been engaging in guided meditation sessions for six months and finds that it helps him organize his thoughts and detach from stress.Stuart introduces the idea of not being influenced by others' experiences and stresses. He asserts that while you cannot control external stressors, you can manage your response to them. He elaborates that stress may never be entirely eliminated, but the key lies in how you react to it.William concludes that stress management involves handling both personal and external stressors effectively.Stuart emphasizes the importance of taking proactive steps to manage stress. He shares a thought-provoking analogy: if faced with a dire situation, such as standing before a firing squad, a person might choose to remain calm and accept the situation, understanding that it is temporary with you inner voice saying “I'm not going to wish these people any harm, they're acting out their role, my job is to experience this as calmly as I can”. Stuart and William continue discussing meditation, highlighting its similarity to maintaining a regular exercise routine. William notes that consistent practice is crucial, while Stuart emphasizes the importance of understanding what meditation entails to benefit fully from it.Debs, from Didcot, Oxfordshire, England asks today second question - “Is gardening a cure or just a help, or both?”What's the deal with this 'cure'? A cure for what, exactly? Is what Stuart wonders initially. He doesn't think of it as a cure-all but admits it can help with various things.William claims gardening can be the ultimate stress buster, answering Yenifer's question. He shares his personal experience. It gets you outside, surrounded by greenery, and gives you a good physical workout. Still though, he isn't sure if it's a cure. Maybe it helps, but it's got to be part of a bigger plan he muses.Stuart chimes in, pointing out the different schools of thought on the benefits of getting your hands dirty. He's always hesitant to use the word "cure". You can also pop a pill, but it just helps you get by, he says. There are rarely permanent cures.He then shares a story about a neighbor who couldn't understand growing a tomato plant that only yielded three tomatoes a year. For Stuart, it's all about the simple joy of being out there.Stuart wraps it up with a practical tip: Try gardening, even if it's just some guerrilla gardening in your local area.What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.comSign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilitiesFundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheelsWe like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers.This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice. Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

This is a chatcast style podcast, that is our genre. Every episode, we discuss two listener questions, and we always try to draw the conversation back to nature or the environment in some way where possible, always aiming to stop the big issues, slipping into the shadows.In today's episode, we begin with a question sent in by Sekelaga, Zanzibar Urban West, Tanzania - “Are life long allegiances to political parties a balanced way to really be?”William starts the conversation by reflecting how much the two major political parties in the UK (Conservatives and Labour) have changed throughout his own lifetime.Stuart feels that we don't need to spin this discussion to the environment as it immediately strikes a chord with environmentalism. He goes on to say that to blindly follow one thing, one person, one entity, one school of thought or doctrine, you are just a sheep. And if the people leading the parties know you're going to follow them whatever they do, they're not necessarily going to decide to do the right things.Stuart and William then lead the conversation into the field of ‘footballification' in politics, that whatever the party you follow says or does, you follow it blindly. William in particular sees a danger in that. Stuart agrees, and recounts a story of overhearing two football fans from opposing sides, with one fan admiring the other's team, only to be shouted down that they should pick a side.Stuart and William conclude, taking the conversation into the realm of political coalitions, and how they can be more powerful than a two party state.The second question for your co-hosts to deliberate comes from Clodagh in Larne, County Antrim, Northern Ireland - “Reality seems to be fractured these days, with many feeling nothing is as it seems as everything is part of a greater conspiracy theory. What are the pro's and con's here?”Right off the bat Stuart nails his colours to the mast:  he feels that there's no such thing as reality. There are different perceptions, could be multi universes. So what is reality for us, It might not be a reality for somebody in another universe.Stuart goes onto posit the idea that social media drives a lot of it, this move towards alternative facts, because it overwhelms us with possibilities. William echoes Stuart's idea, that social media is a big influence here, that there are so many voices in our heads, there are also the algorithms that push us towards more confusion, more information overload. William goes on to say that you can spend a lot of time and energy thinking about these things. And he thinks that's the con. You end up in this rabbit hole, you can end up in quite a bad place because you believe in these conspiracy theories, whether they're true or not. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.comSign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilitiesFundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheelsWe like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers.This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice. Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

This is the podcast where questions sent in by listeners are discussed by your co-hosts Stuart ‘The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow. Send yours today by emailing thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com.In today's episode the first question to be explored comes from Brenda in Northumberland, England - “How much of human life is lost, waiting?”Off the back of Brenda's question William observes that a significant portion of life is spent waiting. However, he distinguishes between different types of waiting, such as waiting for a train, waiting for a kettle to boil, and waiting for the right moment.Stuart expands on this idea by exploring the difference between procrastination and strategic thinking. He continues William's argument by highlighting how waiting can be purposeful, such as in chess, where one must wait for the right opportunity to make a move.The second question was sent in by Gary from Hull, England - “Is the pursuit of diversity putting at risk excellence? Are the best people getting the key jobs, if we are playing the diversity card too readily?”.Inspired by this question, Stuart begins by expressing concern that some appointments are made for the wrong reasons, feeling that, regardless of skin color, a more suitable candidate potentially could have been chosen. He sees some appointments as mere token gestures, rather than genuine selections based on merit.Stuart then leads the discussion towards interconnectedness, referencing ‘The Hidden Life of Trees', which suggests that a woodland functions as a single organism, where the strong support the weak. He argues that even if the best person isn't always chosen for a role, diversity in culture, viewpoints, and perspectives, can ultimately strengthen the whole. He acknowledges both sides of this debate.William shares an example from his wife's workplace, where application information was removed to reduce unconscious bias in hiring. He also notes that hiring someone solely based on their minority status can, in some ways, be insulting.Stuart concludes with a call to action: reconsider what defines the "best" candidate for a role. He is particularly ardent about representation, emphasizing that if it is to be done, it should come from a place of sincerity rather than obligation.What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.comWe like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers.This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice. Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountrysideSign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilitiesFundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheels

This is a podcast where we try and persuade or entertain, inspire, and basically inform ourselves and you through conversation.Paula, a listener from Norfolk, England asks the first question for Stuart and William to mull over. It's a long question so we have put it in a separate document:Paula's QuestionStuart and William kick things off with a spirited debate on why folks are moving in the first place. Stuart suggests it might be because of the perception that the UK offers more than other safe countries. William chimes in with something more fundamental - English is a widely spoken language (plus, who doesn't love tea and crumpets?).William then points to the right-wing rhetoric that claims people coming to the UK are just here to drain resources like an uninvited guest who eats all your snacks and leaves the toilet seat up.Stuart goes on to talk about how the states these people pass through could act like a human sponge, absorbing everyone in transit (although that sounds like a superhero gone wrong). France wants the UK to do its part but Stuart wonders if France is pulling its weight.Stuart feels we need to get practicing at absorbing and channeling migration. Let's see this as a practice run for what's to come. Practice makes perfect, right?William points out that France has taken in more migrants than the UK and highlights the lack of legal routes for asylum seekers to enter the country. He believes the real issue isn't that they're all coming here but rather that it's the only route they can take, leaving them at the mercy of gangs (like a bad road trip with a shady GPS).William explains the difference between an asylum seeker and an illegal immigrant and says the issue of small boats crossing the Channel has been blown out of proportion. The number of people crossing the Channel in a year could fit into a football stadium.Stuart's action plan? Spend a bit of time thinking about this openly and remember, the media from all angles is trying to convince you of their way of thinking. Just like those salesmen who insist you need a vacuum that also makes smoothies.Samantha, another listener, this time from Cumbria, England puts forward the second question: “Is there always an alternative explanation?”Stuart kicks things off with, there's always an alternative. It doesn't mean it's correct, but hey, it's like trying on funky hats—worth exploring! Because stepping outside our perspective is like upgrading from fuzzy logic to sharp clarity.Stuart then explores the barriers to accepting alternative explanations. It could be ego or the fear of being wrong, or maybe just the dread of finding out pineapple does belong on pizza.William's action plan? Check out other sources. It's like a treasure hunt, except the treasure is the truth and not a dusty old map.Stuart recommends reading a Maeve Binchy book. She writes from the perspective of people's shared challenges. Think of it as a literary group therapy session with a dash of charm.What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.comSign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities:change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilitiesFundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair:justgiving.com/wildmanonwheelsWe like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers.This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice. Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friendspodfollow.com/thepeoplescountrysideenvironmentaldebatepodcast , support our work through Patreonpatreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link:linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

This podcast does not focus on substandard humor, notwithstanding Stuart's belief in the quality of his joke. Rather, it is dedicated to discussions revolving around inquiries submitted by the audience. Wayne from Bangor, Maine, USA sets the first question - “Any thoughts about recharging and regen in environmental campaigning and in life?”. Stuart initiates by asserting that maintaining consistent energy levels is more manageable if one avoids allowing the 'battery' to deplete entirely, advocating for sustained replenishment.  William extends this notion, emphasizing the importance of keeping one's 'battery' recharged and exploring diverse methodologies for narrating one's story, rather than presenting it monotonously. Stuart further elaborates on the significance of not overburdening oneself, particularly with social media engagement. He observes that many individuals incessantly produce content, yet he subscribes to the 'less is more' philosophy. The second question today comes from Ray, in Sauk Centre, Minnesota, USA - “Many people are looking to get the big questions answered. Many reject mainstream media for alternative media outlets, as they feel the mainstream don't tell the truth. Why, I ask, should it be assumed that alternative media tells the truth in comparison? I feel unregulated alternative media and narratives can infiltrate and exploit us, and nudge us towards thinking and acting how they want. The far right and the far left twist stories to fire us up. If any of us then get in trouble by being swept along in a tide of emotional reactions, we're considered collateral damage for someone else's agenda. All forms of media can be vailed recruitment drives, to spread any given perspective”. William commences by positing that this podcast itself could be considered part of the alternative media, emphasizing that it fosters authentic conversations rather than prescribing beliefs or emotions. Stuart advocates for engaging with a wide array of sources, especially those with which one may profoundly disagree. He argues that such exploration facilitates a deeper understanding of differing viewpoints and one's own beliefs, thereby promoting intellectual diversity. William compares news to advertising, suggesting both exert a significant influence on public perception. He poses a fundamental question regarding one's moral compass and intrinsic identity, querying whether individuals rely excessively on external influences to shape their opinions. Stuart highlights the importance of critically assessing media statements and their potential effects on individuals. William underscores the media's manipulation of emotions, irrespective of political alignment. In this episode Ed Yong's book An Immense World is mentioned, here's a link: edyong.me/an-immense-world What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast , support our work through Patreonpatreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link:linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

In this episode of The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, hosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow tackle two thought-provoking listener questions. The first question, and it is quite a long one, comes from Cedric in Central Region, Malawi - ”Business has a part to play in the ecological and climate crisis, its part of the problem and thus, part of the solution, don't you think? Think on this, the climate crisis is a once in a generation opportunity for big business to make money, not lose it. If you frame it like that to the CEO's etc, they will buy into doing the right thing, even if they don't give a shit. The top brass are often just motivated by profit, so this brings them along with us. What's coming down the track is every business is going to have to reduce its carbon output, and clients and supply chains could bypass them for more sustainable businesses if they don't shape up. Some try and avoid putting value on nature, but maybe the idea of value needs reframing too? When it's done for the right reasons or not, as long as everything is more sustainable, surely that's a good thing? 60% of us say we want to do something to be sustainable, yet barely 20% actually do. Maybe that's to do with people wanting to feel safe in the just transition that has to happen, or scared to do the wrong things. We shouldn't be scared as that teaches us how to do the right things. We're all part of the same system, none of us outside of it, so we shouldn't use energy thinking whether we should exert our influence from the inside or from the outside. We need to bring our influence to bear in all areas of the system. The system isn't broken, it's doing exactly what it was originally set up to do, make money. The system just needs recodeing as it were, and guess what? There would still be room to make money, though maybe it would be done more fairly? We are bearing witness to a period of huge change. Is it quick enough though? Who knows, but what I do know, the approach of LESS - BETTER - LOCAL is a clear way forward. We need to differentiate between need and want. 25% of the value of what we buy is the production costs, 75% of its value is what they spend convincing us that we need this crap. The marketeers drive want and don't always solve a need. Just saying”. In this discussion, sparked by Cedric's question, Stuart and William explore how businesses can simultaneously contribute to, and solve, environmental challenges, examining companies' motivations for sustainability, consumers' environmental concerns, and the pivotal role of supply chains in driving sustainable practices. The second question for this episode comes from Aytama in Harjumaa, Estonia - “What's the true meaning of freedom? Not sure if you've talked about this before?” With this shorter, philosophical question, Stuart and William reflect on whether true freedom exists, and discuss how freedom might better be understood as moments of release or escape, rather than an absolute state. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friendspodfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast , support our work through Patreonpatreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link:linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

Welcome to The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, this is how we roll here. Your co-hosts Stuart ‘The Wildman' Mabbut and William Mankelow discuss questions sent in by listeners all around the world. They don't see the questions before they press record, making their conversations unique and off the cuff. You dear listener, hear that question at the same time as them. In today's episode we find the daring duo (one more daring than the other) discussing questions from the Northern and Southern hemispheres. The first comes from Bronwen in Atlanta, Georgia, USA: “Physiologically if humans colonise space, our bodies will alter, meaning we won't be able to live back on Earth unless there are support systems in place. That evolution could see a new species evolve, and guess what, another opportunity for war. Colonising space could divide humans yet more instead of bringing us together, for the common good”. Off the back of Bronwen's question, Stuart and William discuss the physical challenges humans face in space exploration and colonization. William points out how space travel affects human physiology, even during short stays on the International Space Station, and reminds us that humans are still evolving as a species. Stuart highlights the significant threat posed by germs and viruses during space colonization, with William adding a parallel to historical continental colonization where diseases spread to new populations. The second question for this episode comes from the very south of South America where Lucas in Punta Arenas, Chile provides the following question: “Chile is the second biggest producer of Salmon in the world, after Norway I think. We have huge farms off the coast, with fish crammed together, cover in Lice and spreading infection. Do we really want to be eating that stuff? Once things take on an uncontrolled industrial scale, lots is lost?” William right from the beginning of the discussion agrees entirely with Lucas's point of view. Stuart then broadens the discussion by comparing it to how some free-range chickens are still kept in crowded conditions. He describes how farmed salmon are packed into underwater crates and suffer from lice infestations, with William adding that such overcrowding would cause similar problems even in humans. Stuart ends the conversation with two important points: First, he advises people not to blindly trust food labels and instead research the claims made on packaging. Second, he concludes that people need to stop eating and consuming mindlessly, and should put more thought into their choices rather than taking the easy route. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friendspodfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast , support our work through Patreonpatreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link:linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels

In our podcast, we engage in thoughtful discussions based on questions submitted by our listeners. Our aim is to explore these enquiries and steer the conversation towards environmental issues and solutions. Vinroy, from Linstead, Jamaica asks the initial question - “The global majority are people of colour, so where was the tipping point that saw the white man dominate?” Stuart initiates the discussion by examining various historical empires, including the French, German, English, Dutch, and Roman empires, noting their use of slavery. He suggests that technological advancements may have contributed to the dominance of white men in history.  William builds on this by pointing out geographical advantages, such as Great Britain's island location. Stuart proposes inviting an academic expert, such as a historian from Oxford University, to delve deeper into the topic. He highlights several tipping points that have led to this dominance.  William brings up the early history of colonization, while Stuart emphasizes the deep historical roots of these developments. Stuart concludes by encouraging listeners to research this topic further. The next question comes from Felix, in Novi Sad, Serbia - “The installation of disabled access shouldn't be just about disabled people. It should be about all of us, as when we all get older we all might need these facilities. Thats how to market it. It's not for ‘them' it's for ‘us all'”. Stuart kicks off by suggesting, Felix, you've practically answered your own question. Why are we even here?  He then mentions chatting with a bloke from the local council. Apparently, investing in accessibility is like future-proofing yourself. Let's face it, we're all gonna need it when we're old and creaky, right? William chimes in with, if you show those decision-makers that making things accessible is for everyone, they might actually get off their backsides and do it properly for once. Stuart suggests an action: Go check out the new disabled access around town. Spoiler alert: it's for all of us. William's action is a bit of an adventure: Take a stroll with a mate in a wheelchair. See what hurdles they face. If you can't find a friend in a wheelchair, just imagine the fun you'd have navigating your neighborhood with one. It's like an obstacle course—but without the prize. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice. Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friendspodfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast , support our work through Patreonpatreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link:linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

Thanks for stopping by and wasting your precious time with us. This is the first full episode of 2025, and we're kicking off the New Year with an explicit bang. Consider yourself warned: Enjoy! Simon, from Chiselhampton, Oxfordshire, England sets question one - “What do you think of all the banks closing their branches and forcing customers online, and do you think that reflects anything about our approach to living sustainably?” William's having a bit of a meltdown because his bank decided that actual branches are a bit too 20th century. Everything's got to be done online now. He goes on a rant about how some things are just better face to face rather than through a screen. It's all very dehumanizing, you know. Stuart, being his usual observant self, tells a story about being in his bank branch and overhearing the manager say, “You can do all this from your bed on your phone. Why even bother getting up and coming here?” Stuart's pretty sure this is just the bank's way of making branch closures sound like a brilliant idea. William tries to argue that closing branches reduces unnecessary journeys to the bank. Stuart isn't buying it; he thinks people actually want to get out and be part of the community.  The conversation then shifts to the idea of the 15-minute city. Stuart highlights the irony in people thinking it's both a way to trap us and a reason for local shops to close. Stuart wraps up with the idea that forcing everything online is just a way to make more money for shareholders by cutting out branches and overheads. Ashton, in Whitfield, Kent asks the next question - “Having just watched the closing ceremony of the 2024 ParaOlympics, do you really think it will make a difference to society? Is it representation or honest integration we need now? How do you think the competitors dealt with the media, getting the word out there? Do you think merging para events with mainstream ones like at Glasgow 2026 Commonwealth Games is a good idea?” Stuart watched the Paralympics but feels a bit guilty about not enjoying it. His boredom stemmed from the sheer number of events and categories, all crammed together for TV. It was over in a flash, leaving no time to turn the athletes into recognizable personalities. Stuart goes on about the impact the Paralympics have on people's perceptions. He mentions a chat between a Paralympian and a member of the public, who naively thought, “If someone in a wheelchair can go 26 miles, why can't you get to the shops?” Of course, the obvious answer is that they're elite athletes, not your average Joe. Stuart brings up the organization Every Body Moves, which he heard about during the Paralympics. Here's the link to them: everybodymoves.org.uk/ Stuart wraps up by saying he'd love to hear the athletes' genuine thoughts, not just their media-trained responses. He acknowledges that some athletes shared personal stories that did help push the narrative forward. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheels We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

It's the 1st of January 2025, and by some miracle of the calendar, Stuart and William have survived another year to wish you a Happy New Year! Whether you are nursing a hangover or just trying to remember where you put your resolutions, may your year be filled with more laughter and fewer questionable decisions. Cheers for sticking with us in 2024, and here's to a 2025 that's hopefully just as entertaining, if not slightly less chaotic. Slàinte Mhath! What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friendspodfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast , support our work through Patreonpatreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link:linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

Stuart and William, your co-hosts, are  that friendly voice in your ear.  They guarantee they will be here every week, with a new release every Sunday, at 10am, plus extra material outside of this schedule too. There are no scripts, just genuine conversation between middle aged men. In today's episode, the last for 2024, Stuart and William mull over two questions sent in by listeners, with the first coming from Anne in Turlock, California, USA - “When making your podcast, how aware are you that someone will always say you are offensive if they don't agree with you?” The discussion off the back of this question begins with William's assertion that both he and Stuart are aware that they could be offensive with every episode they record together. Stuart comes at it from a different angle though, noting the difference between being offensive and someone taking offence. A person taking offence doesn't mean he and William are being offensive. William brings up that often offense is felt when a person has an opposing opinion to you. Stuart follows on from this saying that he always tries to be respectful, but he gets frustrated not hearing certain topics being openly and honestly talked about, which he feels is the contribution that this podcast tries to make. William goes on to talk about how the conversations Stuart and he have on this podcast is like a stream of consciousness, but he always has in his mind the potential impact of his words, and the motive behind them too. He concludes by giving you an action: Where in your life are you easily offended and why? They next move onto the second question for this episode which comes from listener Dusan in Lahinch, Ireland - “Do we need to have a strong faith to give a damn and have a sense of identity?” From this question, both Stuart and William assume that when Dusan refers to faith, they are talking about God, and for William he is categorical that we don't need faith to have a sense of identity. He states that you are your physical being, nothing more, nothing less. Stuart pulls him up on this statement. He goes on to talk about how during workshops he leads, he gets participants around a campfire to write down sixteen things about them. He gets them to cross off anything to do with work, anything to do with their physical body, anything to do with their hobbies, and then generally what you're left with is values. He sees that as being their identity. Stuart and William then go onto discuss whether you need faith to have an identity? William feels that faith can bring structure to your life. He cites a close friend who is an evangelical Christian, and he sees how important their faith is to them, and how big a part it is of their identity.  Stuart's conclusion: he thinks some people do need a faith to give a damn, but he also thinks it's worth exploring giving a damn without a faith too. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friendspodfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast , support our work through Patreonpatreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link:linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

Another Christmas is upon us, so here's another Christmas Day message from your favourite podcast co-hosts. Wherever you are in the world Stuart and William hope you find a little peace. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friendspodfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast , support our work through Patreonpatreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link:linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

It's the 22nd of December! Ready for Christmas, if you celebrate it? If you don't, hopefully you'll have a good day on the 25th, whatever you do. Your co-hosts don't see the questions before they press record. They approach it cold. There are enough experts out there. Stuart and William are just two guys willing to explore the unknown. The first listener question today is set by Payton, in Philadelphia , USA - “Does pursuing ‘Once In A Lifetime Experiences' in our individual lives really help counteract the collective impacts of climate change, or is it better to align our collective focuses for the collective good, as we hunt out the opportunities for change?” Stuart begins by questioning the sustainability of once-in-a-lifetime experiences, suggesting that if they involve high energy consumption, they do little to contribute positively.  William responds by highlighting a scenario where someone flies thousands of miles to witness a unique event, consuming vast resources for a single occasion, which undeniably impacts the environment. Stuart argues that every moment is technically a once-in-a-lifetime experience, thus reducing the significance of labeling certain events as such. William adds that these experiences are exclusive and personal, like weddings who most see as being unique when they are not. Stuart emphasizes that genuine once-in-a-lifetime experiences are those that profoundly open one's eyes and are difficult to orchestrate artificially. He expresses a preference for focusing on collective benefits rather than individual, fleeting moments. Ultimately, Stuart suggests prioritizing actions for the collective good over indulging in once-in-a-lifetime experiences, as this aligns better with addressing the collective impacts of climate change. Hobbs, from Florida, in the USA offers up today's second question  - “I'm sending this question just as the Paris Olympics is ending. What were your takes on it?” William reported minimal engagement with the 2024 Olympics from him, being only marginally aware of the event's occurrence. In contrast, Stuart shared his experience of viewing the 2024 Olympics, acknowledging a personal perception of the event as contrived and less authentic compared to past games. Stuart conveyed significant annoyance with the event, expressing relief upon its conclusion. The discussion between Stuart and William then shifted to the environmental implications of hosting the Olympics. William highlighted the environmental impact resulting from the influx of spectators and participants traveling long distances. Stuart posed a critical question regarding the sustainability of hosting the Olympic Games, does the environmental cost justify the event? William echoed this sentiment by questioning the overall worth of the Games in light of their environmental footprint. Stuart further questioned the motivations behind hosting such large-scale events, probing the authenticity of audience reactions and considering whether they are genuinely individual responses or influenced by societal pressures. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: Petition Link Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: Just Giving Link We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends Podcast Link , support our work through Patreon Patreon Link. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link:linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice. Welcome to The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, where your co-hosts Stuart ‘The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow, over the last few years have been discussing questions sent in by listeners. No scripts, no prep, just genuine opinions. In today's episode we have two questions, both originating from Central America. The first question up for discussion is from Yenifer in Provincia De Panamá, Panama:  “The illusion of wealth seems to be fooling many of us.  Big houses, fancy cars, designers, a fancy lifestyle isn't wealth in my view, it's debt. Wealth to me is time, freedom, options and health”. The conversation kicks off with William and Stuart reflecting on Yenifer's question about the deceptive nature of material wealth, challenging the common association between luxury possessions and true prosperity. The discussion takes an intriguing philosophical turn as Stuart explores the concept of freedom as a state of mind, independent of physical circumstances. William builds on this by examining how society's fixation on financial success often overshadows other crucial forms of wealth, such as time and personal freedom. Together, the hosts dissect the subtle difference between illusion and delusion when it comes to wealth, with Stuart posing the thought-provoking question of whether our collective belief in money as a measure of success is more than just an illusion.  The second question for this episode comes from Xiomara in Managua Department, Nicaragua: “What is the true consequence of humans destroying themselves and making themselves extinct?” This conversation begins with William's stark observation about the planets indifference to human existence, setting the tone for a fascinating discussion about mortality on a species-wide scale. Stuart offers a thought-provoking perspective on human extinction, pointing out that we won't be around to witness its consequences, though he acknowledges the potential trauma for those who might experience humanity's final chapter. Building on this, William explores the evolutionary timeline, explaining that even if humanity survives far into the future, we would inevitably evolve into something entirely different within a billion years. The hosts contemplate how nature would ultimately fill the void left by humanity's departure, leading to Stuart's memorably colorful conclusion that humanity's legacy might be little more than "a skid mark on the arse of life". What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice. Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friendspodfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast , support our work through Patreonpatreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link:linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

Welcome to another insightful episode of The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, your hosts Stuart ‘The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow guarantee the following: no plan, no prep, no research, no scripts, just off the cuff explorations. There are enough experts out there, Stuart and William don't try to add to their ranks. Once again they discuss two questions sent by listeners. The first comes in from Rithipol from Phnom Penh, Cambodia, their question is as follows:  “Hi guys. You both say neither of you have a uni education, yet you often say the education system isn't as good as we think it is. Those who have been through higher education, going through it, or going to be going through it, will likely largely argue with you, as they may feel they have more knowledge and experience than you. What qualifications do you have to argue and criticise, or is it based on life experience or solid research on your part?” During the discussion of Rithipol's question, Stuart argues that the education system functions as a conveyor belt, designed to prepare and potentially indoctrinate people for the work place. While he acknowledges that education has some value, he believes many university courses exist primarily to generate revenue, and challenges the notion that formal qualifications are necessary to critique the system. William shares his personal experience of being overlooked in school, falling between the categories of high achievers and troublemakers. Despite this, he recognizes education's power to help people make sense of the world. Both discuss how self-education doesn't fit conventional structures, with Stuart questioning academic standards for things like essay writing. They acknowledge they're speaking from different perspectives, with Stuart suggesting that those invested in traditional education might struggle to question its value, as doing so would force them to confront potentially uncomfortable truths about their choices. The second question arrives on the X2 bus from the town of Didcot, Oxfordshire, England, from long time question provider Debs: “As co hosts you often say the rich are made rich through the poor working hard for them. Why shouldn't business owners get rich off the backs of the workers? The owners are the ones taking the risk after all”. While chewing over Debs's question, William opens the conversation by noting that risk in business isn't solely on owners - workers also take risks.  Stuart believes making a real difference requires leading your own projects, but William counters that there's value in simply living a good, non-exploitative life, without grand ambitions. William also advocates for better wage equality, and acknowledges employee risks. Stuart concludes that truly impactful work requires independence, as working under others inevitably comes with limitations that restrict one's ability to create meaningful change. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friendspodfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast , support our work through Patreonpatreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link:linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

Welcome to our podcast, where we tackle life's inconvenient truths and remind you that, like it or not, we're all part of nature's mess. Think of it as a therapy session with no preparation, no forewarning, and no escape. Stuart and William don't see the questions before we hit record, so they approach them as clueless as you are when you press play. Get comfortable—or uncomfortable—and join us in this delightful chaos. Rithipol, a listener from Phnom Penh, Cambodia has set the first question for Stuart and William to explore - See Rithipol's question here. William kicks things off with a cheery note about evolution—basically, we're not going to be around in a billion years. We're constantly evolving, and let's not forget those regular other cataclysmic events that keep life interesting. Stuart jumps in, suggesting that to ensure our species' survival, we'll need to be sprinting around the universe anyway, dodging the ever-changing cosmic chaos. So we shouldn't worry too much about the Andromeda galaxy crashing into the Milky Way and messing up planetary orbits. William, ever the optimist, points out that there's plenty of room in space. He even throws in a fun fact: if you lined up all the planets in our solar system, they'd fit neatly between the Earth and the Moon. Comforting, right? Then Stuart, the realist, mentions that even if we do manage to colonise space, we'll probably just end up with the same old tribalism. History repeating itself on a cosmic scale. William finishes by looping back to evolution, speculating that if we settled on Mars, in a few thousand years we'd have a whole new species. And of course, more tribal squabbles, but this time between different species. Hortencia, Humacao, Puerto Rico set the second question. See Hortencia's question here. Stuart and William kick off by moaning about why it's so hard for people to change their diets. William reckons it's because we're not exposed to different foods when we're young, and as we get older, we get more fussy—like some sort of culinary agoraphobia. Stuart jumps in, banging on about how expensive it is to eat sustainably. And let's not forget the peer pressure—because heaven forbid you eat a salad while your mates are munching on burgers. William points out how vegans are stereotyped, as if they're all part of some tofu cult. Stuart's got the idea that it'll take a lot of different tactics to get people to change their eating habits on a large scale. Then they have a natter about how people often mistake thirst for hunger, and how some folks they know wouldn't touch “foreign rubbish” with a ten-foot pole. William's advice? Just give something new a try and see if you don't hate it. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

Ready to swap your Netflix binge for a breath of fresh air? Then grab a cup of tea and settle in as Stuart and William chat about their workshops, guided walks, and all sorts of nature-based shenanigans. Whether it's just you and your mate, a group of pals, or you're planning a stag or hen do that's a bit more country stroll than city crawl, they've got you covered. Even the corporate lot trying to swap stress for a bit of team-building in the great outdoors—you're welcome too. Full-day, half-day, and even quick two-hour jaunts. Perfect for those who've been living life like a hermit crab in a car, home, or office. Get out there, reconnect with nature, and remember what it's like to have grass under your feet instead of carpet. So, give yourself permission to enjoy nature, have a giggle, and maybe learn a thing or two.  Now, who's bringing the sandwiches and blindfolds? What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels

Welcome back, dear listener, to yet another episode where we break away from what we usually do. Of course, if you can tell us what our style actually is, we'd be forever grateful—and frankly, a little astonished. In this delightfully short episode, we plead with you, our dearest listener, to spread the word about this podcast to five of your closest companions. The ones who'd still hug you even if you've been sick down the front of your shirt. Your efforts in spreading the word will earn our undying gratitude and possibly a new set of friends. What do you say, ready to embark on this charade with us? Remember, your support is the peanut butter to our jelly, the Groucho to our Marx. Thanks for listening, and spreading the nonsense! What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

Welcome to the crazy train that's the People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast. There are no scripts here, Stuart and William are not experts either, they're just two people willing to discuss the big issues, in an open and honest way. In today's episode they explore two listener questions. One is from Xiomara, Managua Department, Nicaragua and the second from Maidali, Nacional, Dominican Republic. Xiomara's question is as follows: “What can we do to address the discrimination faced by people with disabilities?” William, straight off the bat, encourages everyone to stop seeing the individual as a person with disabilities, and actually just see them as the person that's there in front of you. Stuart takes this a step further, saying that you are only as disabled as society enables you to be. They both go on to the discuss the positives of combining the Olympics and Paralympics into one event, that it may mean less competitors, but it would potentially be more inclusive. They also delve into the subject of where discrimination comes from? Is it unconscious patronization, or unnecessary sympathy for a person with a disability? William concludes this discussion by pointing out when you see somebody in a wheelchair, you see somebody with a white stick, or you see somebody who obviously has some form of disability. Don't automatically assume that this person is going to fit into a neat pigeonhole box for you. Instead, have genuine interest and empathy for the people around you. Stuart concludes: keep talking about this stuff. If it's uncomfortable, then you're actually talking about something with substance. If the conversation is nice and comfortable, you're maybe not pushing the boundaries enough.  Onto the second question, which comes from Maidali: “Pilotless Aircraft seem to be where you are heading. Would you guys feel safe not having a manual override?” William has only heard of the idea of pilotless aircraft as a concept, and even though a lot of flying is handled by the computer, autopilot, he sees that a pilot as a human element will always be needed in the cockpit. Stuart brings up the idea of driverless cars, buses, trains, so why not aircraft too? William counters this question as he himself sees driverless cars as being purely science fiction, and the only place they would work is in closed areas. Stuart concludes this episode with two actions, one for both questions, the first is: have an internal conversation with yourself to see if you recognize you're discriminating. The second action encourages you to ask yourself the question: would you feel unsafe having driverless services, transport or otherwise?  William's action: ask yourself what do you habitually do in your life and ask yourself the question. Does that really serve your needs and your life? What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

What we can promise you with this podcast is a complete lack of planning, zero preparation, and absolutely no research. Scripts? Never heard of them. Everything is straight from the hip. Stuart is a full-time ninja of environmental social justice. He doesn't parade around with signs, but he stealthily champions the cause from the shadows. He alongside William your other co-host are just two dudes ready to dive into the big topics set by listeners with no forethought whatsoever. Sigurdur, from the Capital Region, Iceland sets the initial question - “What can we do to address the lack of representation and diversity in the arts?” Stuart kicks things off with “Is there a lack of representation and diversity in the arts?” He then muses about how art naturally attracts what society calls the “eccentric bunch.” Stuart, ever the diplomat, sees both sides of the representation coin. It can be a mighty force, but sometimes it feels as genuine as a three-pound note. William, not to be outdone, chimes in about trailblazers – those rare gems who are unapologetically themselves, inspiring others without even trying. He's a firm believer in the mantra: “You've got to see it to be it.” William then reminisces about the good old days, noting that there's more diversity in the arts now than in the 1990s, when music was as diverse as a beige wallpaper. He also points out that people often gravitate towards the familiar and comforting, rather than the challenging and new. But then, with a flourish, William suggests an action plan: “Go out and find something a bit off the beaten track. It might just change your life and make you see the world – and your walk down the street – in a whole new light.” Hortencia, from Humacao, Puerto Rico then asks the second question- “How can we challenge beauty standards and promote body positivity?” William kicks things off by saying, “Love your body, folks! It's what you live in every day”. You wouldn't slag off your house, would you? He then dives into the topic of fat shaming, pointing out that everyone's got an opinion on how someone else looks. “It's like, ‘Oh, she's too thin,' or ‘He's too fat.' Just let people be!” Stuart jumps in, questioning why people are so bothered about others' appearances. He reckons it ties back to Sigurdur's earlier point: people should just get on with their own lives. Stuart then suggests a bold approach: More people should adopt a bit of ‘sod it' and just get out there! William talks about how communities can support everyone by accepting differences. It's like a big family – we all have that one weird uncle, but we still love him. The conversation then shifts to ideals about hair colour, body size, and more. Stuart and William agree that we often focus on differences, but what really matters is the connection between you and the person you're chatting with. It's not about age or ethnicity; it's about the distance between you and the person you're having a natter with. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheelsHelp us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends , support our work through Patreon . Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link.

Once again breaking from the more usual style of output for this podcast, today Stuart and William, your co-hosts, discuss how their collaborative talks away from this podcast have evolved. More details here  https://speakernet.co.uk/speaker/149/stuart-mabbutt  What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

In this thought-provoking episode of The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, your co-hosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow tackle two pressing questions from listeners, about food labelling and the cost of helping combat the climate and ecological emergencies. Whether you're curious about the future of food labelling, or seeking budget-friendly ways to combat climate change, this episode promises to inform, inspire, and perhaps even challenge your thinking about our role in preserving the planet. Join us then, for an unscripted, relatable conversation that reminds us we're all part of the natural world, not separate from it. Today's journey begins with a question from Milica in Podgorica, Montenegro, who asks: "Why has so much changed in food labelling for personal health but not planet health?"  Stuart and William unpack this thought-provoking query, examining the current state of food labelling and its effectiveness in influencing consumer behaviour. They draw parallels with cigarette warning labels and discuss the potential impact of similar approaches for environmental concerns. The hosts also explore the challenges of standardising planet health labels and propose innovative solutions, including a utopian vision where suppliers take the lead in sustainable practices. The conversation then shifts to a question from Senna in Kidlington, Oxford:  "What if I can't afford to change my way of life but still want to help combat the climate and ecological emergencies?"  Stuart and William offer practical, cost-free strategies for making a positive environmental impact. They emphasise the power of mindful decision-making and challenge listeners to reconsider their assumptions about the cost of eco-friendly living. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

Stuart and William are today marking the International Day for Rural Women 2024, with this bonus episode of The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast. Rural women account for about 22% of the global population. They play an important role in the health and wellbeing of their communities. Rural women can face challenges like higher rates of poverty (as both extreme and multidimensional poverty are higher in rural areas globally), as well as unequal access to education, health and other social services, and employment opportunities. Rural women can also experience gender inequality resulting from discriminatory social institutions, formal and informal laws, social norms and practices. Challenges can be even greater for rural Indigenous women and girls. You can find out more about this day with the following link: https://www.who.int/news-room/events/detail/2024/10/15/default-calendar/international-day-for-rural-women What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheelsHelp us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

Once again breaking from the more usual style of output for this podcast, today Stuart and William, your co-hosts, discuss the benefits to you the listeners for supporting us on our Patreon page, that can be found here: https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside  Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels  Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities

Breaking from the more usual style of output for this podcast, if there is one, as its always evolving. We draw your attention to a fundraiser and a petition that's currently running. Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all- disabilities-and-abilities What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

In this thought-provoking episode of The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, co-hosts Stuart ‘The Wildman' Mabbutt and William, dive into two compelling listener questions, that challenge societal norms and perceptions. Today's questions both come from the UK, with Senna in Kidlington, Oxfordshire, and Ashton in Whitfield in Kent contributing. First, they tackle Senna's inquiry, about the paradox of racism, and that question is as follows: “The world is still full of racism, often directed at the colour of someone's skin. Yet as it got warmer this summer, I was seeing more and more white people sunbathing, trying to get a tan, and darkening their skins, maybe even trying to look more like those that have racism thrown at them. Doesn't this show the shallowness of our collective society and that racism doesn't have solid foundations?” Stuart and William explore the motivations behind this trend, discussing the societal pressures that lead people to desire what they do not naturally possess. They reflect on the implications of tanning salons, and the contrasting practices of skin bleaching across cultures, ultimately advocating for self-acceptance, and the importance of open dialogue with those who hold prejudiced views. Stuart and William then go onto to discuss the following question from Ashton: “Can we adapt to climate change instead of fighting it?” This question prompts a discussion between the co-hosts on climate change adaptation versus resistance. Stuart suggests that we are already adapting to climate realities, while William critiques our short-term mindset, and lack of intergenerational thinking. Together, they question why collective action remains elusive in the face of such pressing challenges. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels

Welcome to the People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, where you'll hear questions sent in from listeners from all around the globe. The main themes that run through each of them are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice. Join Stuart and Willam, your co-hosts, who are like two men sitting in a pub, given an envelope with the question in, which they open up and explore, cold, without having prepared, very much like you, more likely than not, sitting there listening to this episode. The unprepared nature of this podcast ensures genuine thoughts and reactions for you to ponder. The first question today comes from Milica in Podgorica, Montenegro. It's quite lengthy, so we've copied it into a Google Doc for reference: Milicia's Question William views self-discipline as an internal process. He believes it's largely self-taught and starts from within your own mind before considering external factors. Stuart adds that a Buddhist perspective would suggest that by looking within, you can find the answers. From this viewpoint, there are no inherently good or bad environments; it's all about your mindset. William points out that many people spend their time working, or mindlessly scrolling through social media. This is a passive activity that merely provides a dopamine hit, while reading actively engages the brain and can even help combat Alzheimer's and Dementia. William's action: If you're sitting there thinking, I've not read, I've never picked up a book, and I'm not going to sit and read, for example, ‘War and Peace'. Don't! Read what you want to read, look for something that really interests you. Stuart and William then discuss how we handle stressful situations as indicators of personal growth. Certain situations that once caused stress may no longer affect us, while some still do. Staying calm in stressful circumstances is a sign of progress. Stuart brings up an action: be aware of any conditioning you've had in your life. Be aware of it, and then you can act, if you wish to. He thinks the word acceptance comes into his mind here. If you learn to accept, not just maintaining the status quo, just accepting how things are. And then saying, okay, now I've got that awareness, how can I change things? The second question of today's episode has been set by Ashton from Whitfield, Kent, England. Their question is as follows: “Do you ever see a time when fuel will be the universal currency?” Stuart asserts right away, that he believes fuel is already functioning as a currency in many ways. William counters that while fuel may not be a currency per se, it certainly plays a significant role in driving the world forward. Stuart's action for this topic: Seek out new opportunities, related to alternative fuels—there's much to explore in this evolving landscape!  Thank you for joining us today! We hope these discussions inspire you to reflect on your own experiences and actions. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers. Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels

In this podcast, we strive to uncover and discuss pressing issues, and today's episode is no exception. As we conclude this series, we once again deviate from our usual format to address the final question posed during the 2023 Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted, held at The Bothy Vineyard, which was a live incarnation of this podcast in front of a real life audience.  That day Lyn asked - “What can you do to help stop the 100 million gallon/4 and a half mile diameter reservoir that is being proposed here on our doorstep? (South Oxfordshire, England) The destruction to the environment will be irreversible. Water transfer is a far better way, cheaper and less destructive.” Recently, during a talk they gave in Wroughton, Wiltshire, Stuart and William were informed by an audience member that permission had already been granted for the construction of a new reservoir. This news was unexpected for both Stuart and William, despite discussions about this reservoir spanning over three decades. The proposed reservoir aims to supply water to London. They took this news as hearsay. Stuart elaborates on the potential physical impact of this reservoir, drawing parallels with the Audenshaw Reservoir in Manchester. William adds that the reservoirs near Heathrow are comparable. In addressing the question of how to oppose such a proposal, Stuart emphasises the importance of a cohesive strategy, community engagement, and persistent advocacy. He notes that water companies often adopt long-term strategies, but encourages continued resistance and the exploration of alternative solutions to meet water needs. He highlights significant changes in water availability in Oxfordshire. Stuart stresses the need to improve our water consumption habits, pointing out that the construction of reservoirs is more complex than simply damming a river. He advises creative and informed disruptive actions, such as thoroughly understanding the plan and its potential impacts. William revisits the concept of NIMBYism, linking it to our resistance to change and the necessity of reconsidering our water consumption and wastage habits. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

Another question today from an audience member at the live iteration of this podcast, at Bothy Vineyard, back in May 2023. Someone who handed in a slip as anonymous, asked “Many of our global problems stem from out-of-control population growth. What can we do about this? Discuss!” Stuart, one of the cohosts of this podcast, raises that there is an assumption within the question, and argues that we grow enough food already to feed us all, but there are many issues stopping that food being fairly distributed to everyone. He also feels that there currently isn't much we can do to change our course with overconsumption and wastage. One solution he does offer though, is that we can try and get away from the rights of passage habits in life, and that we should all try and get away from, for example having children, if we don't really want them. Stuart also brings up that a major virus could also put a stop to our population getting out of hand, and comes up with an action: Question what you are doing, and why you are doing it, how you are doing it, and who you are doing it for?. William, your other co-host, brings up rampant consumerism again. That we can get what we want, when we want it, is another of the big issues. We need to stop craving bigger and bigger things. The population doesn't make a difference, we just need to live better, more sustainably. William's action is to slow down and stop buying new things for the sake of it. In this episode William's other podcast that he costs is mentioned, Have You Ever Considered? Link https://zencastr.com/Have-You-Ever-Considered On the 15th September, William alongside Tommy Serafinski will be co-hosting an online salon with Interinterlect where they will be asking the question: Should we consume less news & media? You can book your ticket today with the following link: https://interintellect.com/salon/reclaiming-your-time-and-sanity-the-case-for-minimal-media-consumption/ What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheelsHelp us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

With insights on the inevitability of change, and the importance of finding joy in our surroundings, this episode encourages listeners to rethink their connection to the countryside. Why should those who rarely venture outdoors care about environmental issues?  Welcome to The People's Countryside Environmental Debate podcast, where your co-hosts Stuart ‘The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow are often discussing questions sent in by listeners. However in a break from the norm, and to give you an opportunity to get your question in for them to discuss, they instead are exploring one of the unused questions that was set during the Environmental Live & Unscripted (the live iteration of this podcast) that was in May 2023 in the setting of the Bothy Vineyard, Oxfordshire. The question set by Julian, a member of the audience, is as follows: “If we have effective policies that result in less meat & dairy - the Great British heritage lobby will say that we'll be throwing away the British countryside - how it looks. How do we involve the public thinking about the future countryside that they want and also helps save the planet?” During this discussion Stuart explores the notion of maintaining protected nature reserves—should we preserve them, as they were, as they are, or as we envision them to be in the future? He emphasises the importance of a balanced approach, and the power of a strong, supported transition in environmental stewardship. William adds to the conversation by reminding us that the British landscape is largely a human creation, prompting us to consider how we might reshape it once more. As the duo navigate the challenges of changing public habits and perceptions, they delve into the deeper question of, our resistance to change. Could our reluctance to embrace new ideas be tied to our fear of mortality? Stuart and William reflect on how our life spans influence our views, and how we can cultivate a clearer vision for the future of our environment. Join us for an engaging discussion that challenges your perceptions and inspires action in these challenging times. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheelsHelp us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

In this episode of The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, co-hosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow tackle a thought-provoking question from the 2023 live incarnation of this podcast, Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted, which was set at the Bothy Vineyard in Oxfordshire, England. Sylvia, an audience member, raised the following question: “This is a question about diversity - human diversity - I notice all the speakers today are men and all the audience are white. How can we get the environment discussed by a wider audience?” Stuart and William dive deep into this crucial topic, exploring ways to make environmental conversations more inclusive and accessible to a wider audience. The hosts reflect on the challenges they faced in diversifying their panel and audience for the live event. They discuss the importance of bringing environmental debates to spaces where a diverse range of people and underrepresented groups feel comfortable, rather than expecting them to come to unfamiliar settings. Stuart and William examine various barriers that prevent people from attending environmental events and offer insights on how to overcome these obstacles. They emphasise their role as facilitators and the need to actively reach out to diverse communities. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

In a break from our normal output, we're tackling an unanswered question set by an audience member at a live incarnation of this podcast back in May 2023, Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted. Back then the in-person audience at The Bothy Vineyard event set us a range of questions to discuss. This one was left anonymously and read  - “Animal welfare in meat production is a good concern but Jacque Cousteau said “who cares about the death throes of a fish?” William broaches the broader implications of trawler fishing, emphasising the discourse encompasses the entirety of animal welfare, extending beyond the act of fishing itself. Stuart reveals the grim realities of trawler fishing, where countless fish meet their demise through suffocation within the nets or endure a chilling fate upon the deck. Such practices cast a shadow of inhumanity over the industry. In a reflective chat, Stuart and William reminisce about William's childhood angling experiences. They deliberate on the optimal methods to acquaint oneself with the aquatic inhabitants of rivers. William conveys a retrospective wish for a more compassionate approach to learning about fish, a realisation that eluded him in his youth. He affirms his family's longstanding commitment to minimising their ecological footprint. Stuart contemplates the paradox of nature's predation, often shunned on television screens, yet an intrinsic element of life. He advocates for a conscious acknowledgment of our predatory role in fishing and urges a thorough consideration of the welfare of the animals we consume, aspiring to the pinnacle of quality in our dietary choices. Expanding upon this, William points out the prevalent focus on mass production in the meat industry, often at the expense of quality. Stuart contends that a holistic understanding is imperative, one that encompasses the entire spectrum of our food production and consumption practices. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheel Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

In the context of the podcast medium, it is noteworthy that the co-hosts, Stuart and William, do not preview listener-submitted inquiries prior to the commencement of recording. This practice ensures that their responses remain unpremeditated and genuine, thereby preserving the spontaneity and authenticity of their commentary. So the first listener question is from Teresita, Montevideo, Uruguay - “The Internet isn't good here sometimes but listen to your new releases on the day you go live when I can. When were the “good old days,” and what were they like for minorities in your country?” The notion of “good old days” is often subject to critical analysis. William suggests that this concept typically aligns with one's childhood, a period characterised by a lack of awareness of global events. Conversely, Stuart immediately contests the existence of any universally “good old days,” highlighting the historical marginalisation of minority groups. He articulates that the journey towards amplifying marginalised voices is ongoing and fraught with challenges. Stuart and William also touch upon the emergence of new identity categories, reflecting a societal trend towards valuing individuality and uniqueness. They ultimately advocate for an individual-centric approach to identity. Regarding the query posed by Teresita, both Stuart and William acknowledge their limitations in providing a comprehensive response, given that neither identifies as part of a minority group. Bea, from Cornwall, England sets the second question today - “House's are now seen as assets, not as homes, which is contributing to our unequal society in the UK, especially here in the far south west. Left unchecked this would run and run and really undermine us. The poor are partly kept poor as they seem to work to keep the rich rich. Any thoughts?” Stuart, ever the real estate romantic, believes houses are more than just assets—they're the stage for our personal soap operas. He's spotted a trend in the South West: it's not just the pasties that are hot, but the property prices too, thanks to the ‘seasonal seasoning' of the area.  Meanwhile, William is all for a population shuffle. He's convinced that if we all just moved around a bit more, we'd find the perfect balance—like a game of musical chairs, but with postcodes. Stuart's having an existential moment, pondering how to stop treating houses like giant piggy banks. He's asking deep questions, like ‘Do you see your home as a sanctuary or a stock option?' He's also reminding us that in the grand game of Monopoly, sometimes life flips the board. William's expanding the asset universe, suggesting we gaze at our dwellings as homes first, investment portfolios second. He's also musing on society's pecking order, hinting that breaking free from the family fortune—or misfortune—requires a zen-like approach to life. Just live, he says, and maybe don't count the bedrooms. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheelsHelp us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon https://bit.ly/3UmtDyr⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

Stuart and William are today marking the International Day of the World's Indigenous Peoples 2024, with this bonus episode of The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast. They ask you to think about what an indigenous person is to you, and whether or not you see yourself as indigenous. Also, they encourage you to always see the person in front of you for who they are, and to keep away from lazy stereotyping, which can easily form barriers. It's hard to demonise someone whom you've taken a step towards, whom you've gotten to know, and now see as a more complete person whom you are more connected to. You can find out more about this day though the following website: International Day of the World's Indigenous Peoples What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

Join your co-hosts of The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow, as they delve into two thought-provoking discussions on stereotypes and superiority, which as always were sparked by questions that listeners have sent in. The first question they delve into is from Yahya, Casablanca-Settat, Morocco - “How do society's stereotypes influence you personally?” During their discussions they explore the pervasive influence of stereotypes in our daily lives. Stuart emphasises the constant effort required to overcome these preconceived notions, while acknowledging their role in providing predictability, in certain situations. William examines character stereotypes in politics, particularly focusing on right-wing portrayals of immigrants, and discusses how easily anyone can fall into stereotyping people. The hosts then engage in a candid conversation about the most damaging stereotypes in the United Kingdom. The second question they discuss is from Milica, Podgorica, Montenegro - “As you don't have too many more listener questions lined up, I thought I'd send one in. Who are you superior to yourselves do you think?” Stuart kicks off the second part of the discussion by playfully claiming superiority over William, while William shares his focus on bettering himself, and only uses the comparison of his past self. Stuart elaborates on feeling superior in specific contexts and activities, without considering himself generally superior to others. As the episode concludes, Stuart and William pose a thought-provoking question that ties the discussion back to environmental concerns: "Do you see yourself as being superior to nature?" What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels

Gaby, from Departamento De Santa Cruz, in Bolivia is the lucky listener to set the first of today's questions for your co-host Stuart and William to discuss - “Does the industrial revolution show humanity is punching above its own weight within its own evolution, and causing its own demise?” William's there, right on this one, and he's banging on about how the Industrial Revolution's still going strong. “We're basically the same as we were 20,000 years ago,” he says, but now we've got light bulbs and Wi-Fi. He reckons though we're all headed for a big ol' disaster eventually. So, Stuart and William get into it about when this Industrial Revolution malarkey actually kicked off. Stuart feels it's like someone hit fast-forward on the world. We're zooming ahead quicker than we can evolve! No wonder we don't have a clue what we're doing half the time. Then Stuart gets all deep and meaningful. “Look at your life,” he says. See where you're punching above your weight, where you're losing the plot, and where you're actually on top of things. Once you clock onto that, you can start sorting yourself out. The real trick is knowing that you know, you know? The ultimate awareness is being aware that you are aware. Simon, from Chiselhampton, in Oxfordshire, England, sets the second listener question - “We hear in Oxford there's a shortage of allotments sites and space for individuals to grow their own crops, especially as new houses are built with smaller gardens. Do you think this is the case or is there plenty of space to grow?”  William notes that the concept of allotments, which gained fresh prominence during the Second World War, remains relevant today. Stuart highlights the potential for guerrilla gardening, also emphasising the plight of elderly community members who, due to physical limitations, can no longer tend to their overgrown gardens. This neglect often leads to feelings of depression and isolation. Conversely, the younger generation frequently faces challenges such as limited garden space or poor soil quality, as modern construction often disregards the importance of fertile soil. Builders often see soil as ‘dirt' not a living ecosystem. Some youngsters may not have access to a garden at all. Stuart advocates for a community-oriented approach, suggesting that individuals reach out to their neighbours. By offering to cultivate vegetables in their gardens, which can help maintain the space and provide companionship to the garden owners. While there is a shortage of official allotment spaces, there is no lack of potential gardening areas within most communities if we reimagine the whole concept. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers. Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

Yenifer, from Provincia De Panamá, Panama is the lucky listener setting out the first question for discussion today -  “Are we brainwashed into thinking working hard gets us wherever we want? Is that just a form of enslavement? If we were taught to have a mindset of working smarter, would that impact those trying to keep us in our seats? We're told to get educated, get better jobs, work harder, yet the hours get longer for little reward”. William posits that the essence of productivity lies in working smarter—an approach that inherently encapsulates working harder by virtue of focused and efficient energy utilisation. Stuart, on the other hand, scrutinises the very notion of hard work, likening it to a form of modern servitude. He argues that the affluent are not the ones toiling; rather, they orchestrate the labour of others. Stuart advocates for self-employment as the epitome of working smartly, challenging the conventional wisdom that equates hard work with success. He contends that employment can sometimes stifle one's creative vitality. In their dialogue, Stuart and William explore the dynamics of labour and intellect. They deliberate on the distribution of one's vigour throughout the day and confront the prevailing workplace culture that often expects employees to render uncompensated overtime. William's resolution is a commitment to discovering methods to enhance efficiency without necessarily increasing effort. Stuart's resolution is a call to break free from habitual conformity, urging a re-evaluation of one's work patterns. Abid, Jendouba Governorate, Tunisia sets the second question today - “Should we be focusing on making the world seas and oceans drinkable as a way of counteracting the climate crisis? Empires have been built of lesser concepts. Will that be the next of Earth's assets humanity fights over?” William expresses that the desalination of seawater, while a technological marvel, is an endeavour marked by high energy consumption. He advocates for a more judicious use of existing freshwater reserves as an alternative. Stuart expands by suggesting the extensive use of water in industrial processes such as the production of cement and concrete, as well as in agricultural practices like cattle rearing, locks water away in the processes. He posits that water is poised to become a contentious asset, a catalyst for conflict among human societies. Stuart suggests that the oceans and seas may hold the keys to addressing the climate crisis. However, he cautions that even with advancements rendering desalination more sustainable, the presence of microplastics remains a significant concern. The conversation between William and Stuart underscores the complexity of water management in the context of environmental sustainability and industrial demands. It reflects a broader conversation about the balance between technological progress and ecological stewardship. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers. Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

Today, we're again taking a break from our usual format, to give more time and to encourage you, our valued listeners, to send in more questions, for us to explore in future episodes. In this episode, we discuss a question set by an attendee of last year's iteration of Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted, the live incarnation of this podcast. This was a ticketed event, unrecorded, and held in front of a live audience. During the interval of this event we asked attendees to set questions for the panel to discuss in the second half. However, due to the number submitted, we didn't get around to discussing them all, so we are now slowly working our way through those questions. The question discussed in today's episode was set by Daryl, and is as follows: “Given human population growth and consumerism is so impactful, should we think about a 1 child policy, like China did, and build our population through immigration?” William discusses the significant environmental impact of having children, due to the resources required to raise them. Stuart notes that only dictatorships can enforce a one-child policy and points out that some places prefer male children. Stuart believes we produce enough food to feed the world, but much of it is used to feed livestock instead of humans, and this livestock feeds a small percentage of us. The conversation then shifts to immigration and the barriers that are often put up. William then brings up advancements in medical science and crop production as drivers of population growth and questions the practicality of enforcing a one-child policy. Stuart brings up the subject of the societal belief of the right to have children and suggests questioning these traditional rites of passage activities. William raises the societal expectation of marriage and children, and Stuart responds by saying it's okay to choose a different path. The discussion touches on the movement of people and the idea that all humans can trace their ancestry back to two women, highlighting our common heritage. Stuart suggests an action: reflect on your own behaviour, views, and habits regarding family building and rites of passage. William's action is to see yourself as the sum of your parts and consider the many people we have all descended from. We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

Today, we're taking a break from our usual format, to give more time and to encourage you, our valued listeners, to send in more questions for us to explore in future episodes. In this special episode, we revisit a thought-provoking question posed by Peter T. during our Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted event in May 2023. This was the ticketed second live iteration of this podcast, in front of an audience. Peter T. asked, "If any human activity is practiced by the majority of people, doesn't it automatically become unsustainable?" Join Stuart and William as they dive deep into this complex question, examining it from various angles. Stuart begins by asserting that the question is rooted in environmental concerns, specifically focusing on sustainability. He believes that the answer isn't a straightforward yes or no. For instance, if everyone chose to walk instead of drive, this wouldn't necessarily be environmentally sustainable. Stuart also emphasises that not all widespread activities are inherently detrimental to the environment either. William adds another layer to the discussion, pondering whether the question implies that the sheer volume of participants in any activity could lead to negative environmental impacts. Both hosts agree that rarely is anything categorical in our world, and nuances are crucial. Stuart also reflects on the origin of Peter's question, suggesting it might stem from a perception that environmentalists want everyone to conform to a single way of living. Listen in for a compelling conversation that challenges the way we think about our everyday actions and their environmental implications. Don't forget to send in your questions for future episodes! What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not just after numbers. Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

Join your co-hosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow as they tackle two thought-provoking questions sent in by listeners in this engaging episode of The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast. Recorded in Stuart's garden, the duo dive into two intriguing queries that challenge perceptions of nature, society, and personal growth. The first question they tackle is an epic one from Debs in Didcot, Oxfordshire, England, which is as follows: “Humans, at the core, are selfish beings, as proved by many of us willingly locking down during the Covid pandemic, because we wanted to protect ourselves, our loved ones, and our communities. Was nature considered in that? Biodiversity is often lost in many societies and cultures. How on earth do we put it back, or insert it afresh? At the Oxfordshire RSPB Otmoor nature reserve, Marsh Harriers bred for the first time four years ago, and I note there is a pub of the same name in Oxford. The RSPB could have purchased everyone in there a drink to celebrate, but they didn't. These opportunities are almost always missed. 5000 road names in Oxfordshire, especially in Bicester and Oxford are named after aspects of nature, why isn't that leveraged to raise awareness? We need to stand in the shoes of nature to really understand the thread. I know of a farmer who stood in the shoes of a dung beetle during an event, and that really helped develop her perspective. We really are a cancer on planet earth, and we really need to add nature's voice to governance. We really need to add more groups including cultural groups to this debate. Yet has anyone asked what aspect of nature these groups care about the most, as a way of understanding how to motivate them to get involved? If a CEO of a business didn't know this about their client base, they would be sacked. When trying to engage a wider demographic, and broaden it out from white middle aged people, should we be trying to attract them to our events, or getting involved with their events?” In response to Debs' question Stuart and William offer a nuanced perspective on human behaviour and our relationship with nature. Stuart observes that the COVID-19 lockdowns demonstrate our tendency to follow rules and conform, at least initially, while William adds that this behaviour also reveals our inherent selfishness. Stuart points out that nature was largely overlooked during this period, highlighting our disconnect from the natural world. This prompts William to question whether selfishness is uniquely human or a trait shared by other species. The second question they dive into in this episode is from Yenifer from which is as follows: “Can we really be whatever we want to be?” In response to Yenifer's question about personal potential, Stuart and William offer a balanced view on individual aspirations and societal constraints. Stuart cynically notes that our choices are limited by societal structures, mentioning the "old boy's network". William agrees but suggests using positive self-talk to shape our identity and goals. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice. Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠ https://bit.ly/45vuCPP, , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://shorturl.at/lsuZM Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://shorturl.at/2Iald --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message

Why do we do this podcast?  We do it to stop the big issues slipping into the shadows. We talk about listener questions as that's what's important to them, and always try to bring it back to the natural world in some way. We have the conversations that need having. It's not the usual ambience in this episode, as we are back out in Stuart's courtyard garden again. So expect some interesting background sounds. Shreenika, Western Province, Sri Lanka is the listener tasked with asking the first question.  “How often does ego permeate human consciousness on an individual basis and how damaging is it?” Your co-hosts Stuart and William feel ego is like that one song that gets stuck in your head—permanently permeating human consciousness. But if it's left uncontrolled, it's like an annoying earworm that just won't quit! Removing ego would be like stripping a pizza of its toppings—you're left with a bland nothing. Ego's a good tool, but a terrible master. It's like having a pet tiger: assertive when needed, but you better know when to back off!” Ego's always there, lurking in the shadows. Like that neighbour who insists on borrowing your lawnmower every weekend.” So, let's treat ego like a Swiss Army knife—useful, but not the boss. Be aware of its role, wield it wisely, and don't let it take over the show! Yusuf, Kocaeli, Turkey asks the second listener question  “Are we overly obsessed with what day of the week it is, or is that another example of how we categorise things. This time, time itself?” William believes we're overly obsessed with what day of the week it is. He particularly likes the saying “it does feel like a Monday today”, yet,  what is a Monday actually meant to feel like? Stuart has worked a lot on his own over the years, and he always mixed up his working week schedule as he didn't want to feel that he was on a treadmill. When he had staff, he found they struggled with that unpredictability. Stuart feels we are obsessed with categorising. This can be damaging. This can be a barrier to quick adaptation. William feels that the week comes from the structure of schooling, and on the topic of working hours, there are times we are extremely productive, and times we aren't, but we still need to sit at our desk till our allotted time is done. For what conceivable reason would any employer or employee want to engage in such an activity when looking at the bigger picture? What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we're not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message