Podcasts about expert witnesses

E103 The Lucy Letby Case and the role of 'expert witnesses'Mark Tottenham BL and Peter Leonard BL discuss some complex legal issues around this difficult case that has made international headlines.The Lucy Letby legal case involved a neonatal nurse convicted of the murder of seven infants and the attempted murder of six others at a UK hospital between 2015 and 2016. The case raised significant issues about patient safety, workplace accountability, and the failure of hospital management to act on early warnings from medical staff. Concerns were reportedly dismissed or ignored, allowing Letby to continue working. The trial highlighted the need for stronger systems to address whistleblower concerns and improve oversight in healthcare settings, as well as the psychological and procedural challenges in prosecuting complex cases of this nature.Mark recommends the book, 'Unmasking Lucy Letby: The Untold Story of the Killer Nurse by Judith Moritz, Jonathan CoffeyWith thanks to The Expert Witness Site - The Independent Source of Expert Witnesses https://expertwitnesssite.com Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

E101 The Fifth CourtThe second part of an informative and highly entertaining chat with former Mr. Justice Peter Kelly - President of the High Court of Ireland from 2015 to 2020 who was widely recognised for his work in complex commercial and public interest cases. He is reluctantly retired and would have loved to have continued on the bench.His cultural recommendation is the book, A Very English Scandal by John Preston, about the Jeremy Thorpe court case.With thanks to The Expert Witness Site - The Independent Source of Expert Witnesses https://expertwitnesssite.com Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

E100 The Fifth CourtFor its 100th episode, The Fifth Court hosts, Peter Leonard BL and Mark Tottenham BL, had a lengthy, informative and highly entertaining chat with former Mr. Justice Peter Kelly - President of the High Court of Ireland from 2015 to 2020 who was widely recognised for his work in complex commercial and public interest cases.He is credited with establishing Ireland's Commercial Court in 2004. Under his leadership, the court became internationally renowned for its efficient handling of high-value and complex commercial disputes, boosting Ireland's reputation as a hub for commercial litigation. Justice Kelly earned a reputation for his no-nonsense, efficient, and direct approach in court. He handled high-profile cases, including insolvency matters and cases involving corporate misconduct.Before becoming President of the High Court, he served on the Court of Appeal following its establishment in 2014, contributing to key appellate decisions in Irish law.Born in 1950, he was educated at O'Connell's School and then at University College Dublin (UCD) (via a career in the Civil Service) and later qualified as a barrister from King's Inns. He was appointed a Senior Counsel (SC) in 1986 and a judge of the High Court in 1996.Part II on episode 101.With thanks to The Expert Witness Site - The Independent Source of Expert Witnesses https://expertwitnesssite.com Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Mastering Evidence Law: Comprehensive Insights with Celebration Bar Review In this enriching episode, the hosts delve into critical aspects of evidence law as featured on the Multistate Bar Examination (MBE). They cover essential topics such as relevancy, materiality, competency, hearsay, privileges, impeachment, and authentication. Highlighting the importance of understanding how rules apply in real-world scenarios, they emphasize the effectiveness of Celebration Bar Review's materials in simplifying complex legal principles. The discussion includes expert witness qualifications, judicial notice distinctions, chain of custody for physical evidence, and strategic use of evidence, with a focus on making legal concepts accessible for both students and practitioners. Listeners are provided a comprehensive toolkit for navigating evidence law, underscoring the importance of strategic application and thorough preparation for the bar exam. 00:00 Introduction to the Bar Exam 00:10 Understanding Evidence for the MBE 01:15 Relevancy, Materiality, and Competency 01:49 Mastering Objections and the Plain Error Rule 02:09 Hearsay and Its Exceptions 0 2:59 Admissions by a Party Opponent 03:24 The Art of Impeachment 03:44 Character Evidence and Its Nuances 04:20 Real and Demonstrative Evidence 05:12 Privileges in Evidence Law 05:49 Expert Witnesses and Their Qualifications 07:16 Judicial Notice and Its Implications 08:53 Prior Inconsistent Statements 10:00 Impeachment with Prior Convictions 11:34 Authentication of Evidence 12:23 Understanding Chain of Custody 13:16 Exploring Legal Privileges 16:29 Diving into Evidence Rules 20:33 Character Evidence in Legal Cases 22:39 Real and Demonstrative Evidence 25:22 Strategic Use of Evidence 27:23 Final Thoughts and Encouragement Want to discover the right bar prep course for you? Take this FREE, No-Obligation Quiz to find out! [QUIZ] What's the Best Bar Review Course For You? For more information, visit us at https://www.celebrationbarreview.com    

In this episode of Risk! Engineers Talk Governance, due diligence engineers Richard Robinson and Gaye Francis discuss the differences between the "laws of man" and the "laws of nature" in the context of due diligence engineering. Drawing on their experiences as Expert Witnesses in the Australian and NZ judicial systems, the conversation covers the following key points:A brief history of Common Law.The adversarial system in common law, where lawyers argue different sides of a case before a judge or jury, differs from the inquisitorial system in civil law jurisdictions.The principle of "innocent until proven guilty" is a logical consequence of the adversarial system, rather than a fundamental legal principle.The Scottish legal system has a third verdict of "not proven" in addition to "guilty" and "not guilty", which the speakers suggest is a more pragmatic approach.Expert witnesses in court proceedings have a duty to the court rather than the party who hired them, which can lead to challenges when presenting evidence.Engineers need to manage the laws of nature first and then satisfy the laws of man in the courts. Find out more about Richard and Gaye's consulting work at https://www.r2a.com.au.  

Send us a textIn this episode of Faithful Politics, Will Wright and Pastor Josh Burtram are joined by two legal experts, Professor Corinna Lain from the University of Richmond School of Law and Professor Danielle Wingfield, to discuss the Supreme Court's recent ruling on presidential immunity. The conversation explores how the 2024 SCOTUS decision in Trump v. United States builds on earlier cases like Nixon v. Fitzgerald and Clinton v. Jones, granting former presidents greater immunity from prosecution, even for potentially criminal acts performed in office. The professors delve into the broader implications of the ruling, the balance of powers between the executive branch and other government bodies, and the unsettling possibilities for future presidents to push the boundaries of their authority without legal consequence. They also touch on the potential long-term effects on public trust and accountability in American democracy.Tune in to learn more about this critical case, how it shifts the boundaries of presidential power, and why it's crucial to pay attention as the future of democracy hangs in the balance.Guests Bio:Danielle Wingfield: Professor Wingfield joined Richmond Law from Gonzaga University School of Law where she served as a fellow and visiting assistant professor. Her primary areas of teaching and scholarship include legal history, constitutional law, family law, race and the law, family law, and education law and policy. She earned her Ph.D. in education from the University of Virginia, her J.D. from the University of Richmond, and her B.A. in sociology and philosophy from the College of William & Mary. Professor Wingfield served as Of Counsel for The Child Advocate Law Firm, PLLC in Charlottesville, Virginia prior to returning to academia.Corinna Lain: Professor Corinna Lain is the S. D. Roberts & Sandra Moore Professor of Law at the University of Richmond School of Law. Professor Lain's scholarship focuses on two areas—Supreme Court decision-making and the death penalty—and she has published numerous articles and essays about lethal injection over the last decade. Her work has appeared in the nation's top law journals, including the Stanford Law Review, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Duke Law Journal, UCLA Law Review, and Georgetown Law Journal, among other venues. Professor Lain is a frequent presenter at both national and international conferences, and is co-author (with Ron Bacigal) of the Virginia Practice Series on criminal law, a four-volume treatise for the bench and practicing "The Faith Roundtable" is a captivating spinoff from the Faithful Politics podcast, dedicated to exploring the crucial issues facing the church in America today. Hosted by Josh Burtram, this podcast brings together faith leaders, theologians, and scholars for deep, respectful discussions on topics at the heart of American Christianity. From the intersection of faith and public life to urgent matters such as social justice and community engagement, each episode offers insightful conversations Support the showTo learn more about the show, contact our hosts, or recommend future guests, click on the links below: Website: https://www.faithfulpoliticspodcast.com/ Faithful Host: Josh@faithfulpoliticspodcast.com Political Host: Will@faithfulpoliticspodcast.com Twitter: @FaithfulPolitik Instagram: faithful_politics Facebook: FaithfulPoliticsPodcast LinkedIn: faithfulpolitics Subscribe to our Substack: https://faithfulpolitics.substack.com/

Join us again this month on the Defense Never Rests with our guest host Caitlyn Corey along with Morgan Akins & Jackson attorneys Barak Kassutto and Abinandhan Pandhi as we discuss effective use of expert witnesses. Learn what attorneys look for in selecting an effective expert witness and some tips and tricks in handling common issues.  

E88 The Fifth Court - The Vacation SittingsThis is the second of four vacation sittings of the Fifth Court. On this episode we hear our Fifth Court co-presenter turned guest, Mark Tottenham BL and an 'expert witness' expert (!) (he's written the books - plural) talk all about the importance of the 'expert witness', but we start with 'expert witnesses' gone bad. It's a long list. We also ask if it's possible to make a living by being an expert witness. This comes from an interview Mark did with the Fifth Court producer Conall O Morain, on Conall's own business podcast, That Great Business Show (find it on Spotify etc). Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Dr Louise Newbury, a paediatrician and expert witness in child protection, shares her journey from medicine to an expert witness. She discusses the importance of being in court and the adrenaline rush it provides. Dr Newbury explains the role of a paediatrician and the challenges of assessing and communicating with young patients. She also talks about the process of becoming an expert witness and the critical role they play in court cases. Barrister Elizabeth Bowden joins the conversation to discuss the relationship between barristers and expert witnesses and the importance of their collaboration. In this conversation, Louise discusses her role as an expert witness in court cases involving child protection. She emphasizes the importance of being polite and respectful in court and highlights the need for barristers to avoid demeaning the expert. Louise also shares insights into her workload and the challenges of managing multiple cases simultaneously. She discusses the meticulous process of reviewing medical records and preparing reports and the importance of supervision and peer review in her profession. The conversation concludes with a discussion of potential improvements to the court system, including establishing specialist centres for child protection cases. ***Warning: this episode contains references to child sexual abuse*** Keywords expert witness, court, paediatrician, child protection, medicine, assessment, communication, opinion, evidence, expert witness, court cases, child protection, barristers, workload, medical records, supervision, peer review, court system Takeaways Expert witnesses are a crucial tool in winning court cases as they are the only ones who can provide evidence of opinions. Being in court as an expert witness can be an adrenaline rush and a fascinating experience. Paediatricians play a vital role in assessing and treating children, relying on body language and other signs to understand their condition. Becoming an expert witness requires additional qualifications and training in the specific area of expertise.Barristers'interactionsExpert witnesses and barristers work together as a team to present the best possible case in court. Being polite and respectful in court is crucial for barristers when interacting with expert witnesses are crucial. Expert witnesses have a heavy workload and must carefully manage their time and cases. Reviewing medical records and preparing reports requires meticulous attention to detail. Supervision and peer review are important for maintaining the quality and independence of expert opinions. Specialist centres for child protection cases could improve the efficiency and quality of expert reports in the court system. Time stamps 00:00 Introduction and the Role of Expert Witnesses 02:49 The Fascination of Being in Court 08:12 Assessing and Treating Children as a Pediatrician 13:13 Becoming an Expert Witness 22:53 The Collaboration Between Expert Witnesses and Barristers 33:59 The Importance of Politeness and Respect in Court 35:25 Managing a Heavy Workload as an Expert Witness 36:17 The Meticulous Process of Reviewing Medical Records 39:39 The Role of Supervision and Peer Review in Expert Work 45:13 The Financial Aspects of Being a Court Expert 50:49 The Challenges of Scheduling and Timelines 56:19 Improving the Court System with Specialist Centers for Child Protection Cases 01:02:00 What Makes a Good Barrister and Expert

Are you certain that the experts you hire are helping build a rock-solid case, or could they be the weak link that dismantles your arguments in court?   In this episode, you'll discover the intricacies behind finding and vetting legal experts, learn about the proprietary technology revolutionizing this process, and understand how to leverage these resources to gain a litigation edge.   With the increasing complexity and specialization in legal cases, the demand for high-quality, well-vetted experts has never been higher. Whether it's personal injury, commercial litigation, or intellectual property disputes, the right expert can make or break a case.   That's why we've invited Dr. Ross Green, Executive Vice President of Sales at Expert Institute, to share his wisdom. An ENT specialist who has transitioned into the legal-medical world, Ross brings a unique blend of medical and legal expertise that is invaluable for law firms seeking the best experts for their cases. We brought him on the show to dive into the nuances of hiring top-tier experts and to learn about the innovative approaches his company employs.   In this episode of the Cut to the Chase: Podcast, Gregg and Ross discuss:  The Importance of Expert Witnesses in Legal Cases Services Offered by Expert Institute that include, Expert Searches, Record Reviews, Literature Provision, and Due Diligence on Opposing Experts Custom Recruiting Process for Experts Subscription vs. One-Off Services Tech and Human Elements in Expert Vetting Family, Probate, and Business Law Applications Reviewing Opposing Experts with Expert Radar Litigation Guides and Newsletters Medical Chronologies and the Role of AI   Key Actionable Takeaways for Law Firms: Custom recruitment of experts ensures a tailored match for your specific case requirements. Utilize proprietary technology and human vetting to find and validate expert credentials. Leverage subscription models for consistent and cost-effective expert sourcing. Use expert record reviews and literature to solidify case foundations before filing. Monitor opposing experts using Expert Radar to anticipate and counter their arguments.   Enhancing your legal strategy with the best experts can significantly impact the outcome of your cases. As you navigate the complexities of today's legal landscape, remember that thorough vetting and informed choices are your best allies. Tune in and let Ross Green's insights elevate your approach to hiring legal experts.   Subscribe, rate, review, and share this episode of the Cut to the Chase: Podcast to stay ahead in your legal practice!   Connect with Dr. Ross Green on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ross-green-md/  

An expert witness can make the difference between success and failure in business litigation. Join us to explore the role of experts throughout the business litigation process and how proper management of the attorney-expert relationship can create admissible and effective testimony. Three experienced trial attorneys will provide their insight and strategies on engaging and working with experts, expert-related discovery issues, and the admission and exclusion of expert testimony, in light of recent changes to FRE Rule 702. Questions? Inquiries about program materials? Contact Trenon Browne at tbrowne@bostonbar.org

Holly Howanitz, Managing Partner, Tyson & Mendes joins Bill Kanasky, Jr., Ph.D. to talk about cross-examination of expert witnesses. Holly highlights that you need think about your goals when cross-examining expert witnesses especially since experts often have more experience testifying than a fact witness. Bill and Holly talk about strategic decisions such as when to bring up "bombs" for the expert either at deposition or at trial and how to approach preparing for cross-examining an expert. Holly shares how she prepares for an arrogant expert or an expert that does primarily work for the plaintiff's side. Bill and Holly also talk about preparing experts for the defense and what that process is like. Watch the video of this episode: https://www.courtroomsciences.com/r/fO6

Welcome to episode 229 of the Grow Your Law Firm podcast, hosted by Ken Hardison. In this episode, Ken sits down with John M. Cooper, Founding partner at Cooper Hurley Injury Lawyers and a veteran of Virginia personal injury law practice, to delve into the complexities of railroad worker injury cases governed by FELA and the challenges of dealing with railroad companies like Norfolk Southern and CSX. They highlight the importance of expert witnesses, early legal representation, and understanding the specific rules of railroad injury law to secure fair compensation for injured workers.   John M. Cooper is one of the founding partners at Cooper Hurley Injury Lawyers and a veteran of Virginia personal injury law practice. A native Virginian, he was raised in Norfolk and Virginia Beach by parents who practiced law. After graduating from the University of Virginia School of Law in 1988, John returned home to work for a federal judge in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Norfolk Division, which launched his passion for and career in personal injury law.   What you'll learn about in this episode:   1. Filings claims under the Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA): - Railroad worker injury cases governed by the Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA) offer unique challenges due to the complex laws involved. - FELA allows employees of major railroads like Norfolk Southern and CSX to sue for damages, requiring specialized legal expertise for fair compensation.   2. Expert Witnesses and Railroad Injury Law: - Expert witnesses are crucial in proving liability and dealing with railroad companies' claims departments. - It is essential in these cases to deal with slow responses from Amtrak and understand the specific rules and procedures of railroad injury law.   3. Legal Representation Crucial for Injured Workers: - The adversarial relationship between railroad companies and injured workers necessitates early and robust legal representation. - Amtrak's high duty of care to passengers and potential obstacles posed by mandatory arbitration clauses make legal representation crucial.   4. Legal Complexities and Nationwide Practices in Railroad Crossing Accidents: - Visibility issues at railroad crossings leading to accidents often place responsibility on the driver, creating further legal complexities. - Navigating the nationwide practice of railroad injury cases is facilitated by remote communication options and in-house investigators.   5. Strategic Venue Selection in Amtrak Injury Cases for Optimal Jurisdiction: - Venue options in railroad injury cases can be creative and strategic, allowing for flexibility in choosing the most advantageous jurisdiction. - Amtrak cases present additional complexities in venue selection, where representing clients across different states can be managed effectively for their best interests.   Resources:  refertocooperhurley.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/john-m-cooper-a70a3a44/   Additional Resources:    https://www.pilmma.org/aiworkshop https://www.pilmma.org/the-mastermind-effect https://www.pilmma.org/resources https://www.pilmma.org/mastermind New boost

In this podcast episode we discuss day 28 of the Chad Daybell Trial including 2 expert witnesses for the defense

On this week's episode Bob sits with Paul and Duol from the Expert Institute to talk about how their software can help you win your trials. With Expert Witness Search, Medical Record Review and Analysis, plus many more features for attorneys and experts alike, the Expert Institute can help you prepare for your next case. 

Dr. Jordan Romano joins Bill Kanasky, Jr., Ph.D. to discuss expert witness testimony in medical malpractice cases. Dr. Romano has served as an expert witness on numerous medical malpractice cases and talks about how he got started as an expert witness, how he got up to speed on the litigation process, and what he does as a hospitalist. Bill asks Dr. Romano about the differences between working as an expert for the plaintiff's side and the defense side and what advice he would give attorneys on what they can do better when working with experts. Dr. Romano also addresses the questions that he gets at deposition or trial about his compensation to serve as an expert witness. Lastly, Dr. Romano shares how he manages his testimony at trial when in teaching mode and when being attacked by opposing counsel. Watch the video of this episode: https://www.courtroomsciences.com/r/emk

In this episode of Risk! Engineers Talk Governance, Richard Robinson and Gaye Francis discuss their recent success (as Expert Witnesses) at VCAT (Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal) and how design trumps risk assessment. They discuss their case involving an application for a building permit in the outer safety zone of a major hazard facility. WorkCover advised against building two new dwellings due to increased population and societal risk. However, Richard and Gaye, as expert witnesses, argued that proper safety and design measures, such as laminated windows and steel roofs, could mitigate the risks.  The VCAT decision supports R2A's position, and emphasises the importance of, working out the credible worst-case scenarios and then designing for it.  You can listen further about this VCAT hearing in Season 2 episodes 1 & 2 of our podcast. If you'd like to learn more about Richard & Gaye, visit www.r2a.com.au.  Please submit any feedback or topic ideas to admin@r2a.com.au.

Does the thought of paying off student loans or retirement planning make you more anxious than you ever felt in the emergency room? Managing your money is infinitely easier than becoming a doctor, but it doesn't always feel that way. Joining us for the first episode of 2024 is returning guest, Dr. Jordan Grumet. Dr Grumet is here to help us reframe our perspectives around money and debt, empowering us to take control of our finances, confidently.  You can find the show notes for this episode and more information by clicking here: www.doctorscrossing.com/episode163    In this episode we're talking about:  Dr. Grumet's journey to financial literacy and expertise Viewing our money anxieties through a new lens Navigating student loan debt effectively The power in seeing money not as a goal, but as a tool Transferable skills as a physician How to calculate realistic retirement goals Simple tips to begin investing    Links for this episode:  Dr. Jordan Grumet's website Dr. Jordan Grumet's Earn and Invest Podcast Taking Stock – A Hospice Doctor's Advice on Financial Independence, Building Wealth, and Living a Regret-Free Life Private 1:1 Consultations - If you would like some confidential help with your career situation, Dr. Heather Fork offers one-hour Zoom consultations. This one-hour coaching session may be all that you need to gain clarity and have some concrete steps for moving forward. Dr. Fork also has a 5-month coaching program for those physicians wanting additional assistance (subject to availability). For more information please reach out to Kati at team@doctorscrosing.com.  Dr. Gretchen Green's Expert Witness Start-Up School will take you from ‘curious' to courtroom ready. This comprehensive program has empowered countless physicians, guiding them to establish a fulfilling side business as Expert Witnesses. Discover the satisfaction of this impactful work while cultivating a secondary income stream and enjoying a flexible work schedule. Enrollment for this opportunity opens from January 19th to 30th, but why wait? Secure your spot on the waitlist today and be among the first to unlock the door to a fulfilling and rewarding new career.  

Genesis Women's Shelter & Support is often called upon to provide expert witness testimony in domestic violence cases. To better understand the role of the expert witness and how they can help facilitate an understanding of domestic violence for legal teams, judges, and jurors, Ruth Guerreiro, LCSW and Genesis' Chief Clinical Officer, and Jordyn Lawson, LPC and Genesis' Chief Residential Officer, join the conversation in an episode that is both educational and enlightening. In this episode, our guests explain how they navigate the labyrinth of legal proceedings, illuminating the cornerstones of domestic violence dynamics and the significant role the expert witness plays in providing context and education to the courtroom. They also prepare us for the complexities of this process - from the questions attorneys may pose to the delicate task of determining which testimony bears relevance. We also dive into the impacts of domestic violence on children and the disheartening reasons why victims often refrain from participating in court hearings. We dig into the contrasting roles of fact and expert witnesses, learn how they can support victims by providing crucial insights to the court, and how their consultation can guide attorneys through the murky waters of domestic violence cases. We expose the tactics used by defendants and the strategies that can empower victims to have their voices heard in the courtroom. Lastly, we delve into how the expert testimony of our guests is used by juries, how it influences the sentencing hearing, and how it can help untangle the manipulative narratives spun by defense attorneys. Join us, as we unravel the intricacies of domestic violence cases and understand the true context and dynamics of abuse with expert insight that brings to light the importance of educating the court on the often misunderstood dynamics of domestic violence.

Welcome back to the UON criminology podcast, episode 3 of season 6! I am your host Estelle Cutler. Have you ever wondered what it means to call upon an expert witness in court? Also, how do they help the jury make a final decision?! Today, we will be talking to Professor Jane Goodman-Delahunty, a leading expert on human memory and jury behaviour. We will discuss about what it means to be an expert witness in a criminal case and how it might cause challenges in court proceedings. Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/uonccjs/?hl=en Charity Ball: https://clubs.getqpay.com/?eid=20717  

Join Anastasia Mazzella and Shant Karnikian as they discuss how attorneys can best utilize expert witnesses in their cases. They are joined by a highly respected expert witness in the field of neuropsychology, Dr. Dominique Kinney. In this episode, Dr. Kinney gives attorneys 6 tips on how to make the attorney-expert relationship more productive, including the importance of choosing the right expert early in the litigation and providing them with ample time to review records, why attorneys need to listen more and talk less when they meet with experts, the best way to prepare experts for depositions, and more. She also discusses why an expert witness is not meant to be a “team player” but rather an impartial authority who can be trusted to tell the truth. If you want a copy of Dr. Kinney's Tips for Maximizing the Attorney-Expert Relationship, please reach out to Anastasia at am@kbklawyers.com.   To contact Dr. Kinney about her services: 888-888-5902 Email: experts@arrowheadeval.com Website: California Independent Medical Evaluation Services | AES (arrowheadeval.com)   For other questions reach out to:  Brian Kabateck: bsk@kbklawyers.com Shant Karnikian: sk@kbklawyers.com For more information about Kabateck LLP, visit www.kbklawyers.com   

Expert witnesses can make or break your case. Not only do they need to understand the facts of the case and the subject matter, but they must also clearly communicate their position to the jury. But you can't always count on credentials alone. In this encore presentation, Trial attorney Erica Slater of The Simon Law Firm joins John and Erich to discuss expert evaluation strategies that can help avoid surprises in the depo, trial, and invoice.

Playing an expert witness in mock trial can be challenging, but it's super important to do it well. So, in this episode, we'll go over my three best tips for expert witnesses and how you can rock out the next time you take the witness stand. BUY MY BOOK HERE: ⁠bit.ly/MTMBook⁠  SCHEDULE COACHING WITH ME HERE: ⁠bit.ly/MTMCoach⁠ Welcome into Mock Trial Masterclass: Your Guide to Controlling the Courtroom. My name is Luke Worsham, and I want YOU to be a mock trial master. I've competed in and coached mock trial for a while, and I want to pass along everything I've learned to you. Whether you're an attorney or a witness, my channel is dedicated to helping you take your craft to the next level. It's game on! The information contained in this podcast is intended for mock trial students and coaches, and it is provided for informational purposes only. It should not be construed as legal advice on any subject matter or real-life litigation advice.

Expert witnesses can make or break your case. Not only do they need to understand the facts of the case and the subject matter, but they must also clearly communicate their position to the jury. But you can't always count on credentials alone. In this encore presentation, Trial attorney Erica Slater of The Simon Law Firm joins John and Erich to discuss expert evaluation strategies that can help avoid surprises in the depo, trial, and invoice.

Today we will cover: Expert Witnesses Defined: Expert witnesses are individuals with specialized knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education in a particular field relevant to the legal case at hand. Their role in legal proceedings is to provide expert opinions and insights based on their expertise. They assist the trier of fact, such as a judge or jury, in understanding complex issues beyond the scope of common knowledge. Qualifying as an Expert: The process of establishing a witness as an expert involves several steps. Courts use different standards to admit expert testimony, with two prominent ones being the Daubert standard and the Frye standard: Daubert Standard: The Daubert standard, derived from the U.S. Supreme Court case Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals (1993), emphasizes the reliability and relevance of expert testimony. To qualify as an expert under this standard, the court considers factors such as whether the expert's methods and techniques have been tested, whether they have been peer-reviewed, and the known error rate of their methods. The judge serves as the gatekeeper, ensuring that the expert's testimony meets these criteria. Frye Standard: The Frye standard, originating from the case Frye v. United States (1923), focuses on whether the expert's methods and principles have gained general acceptance within the relevant scientific community. Under this standard, the expert's testimony is admissible if it is based on methods and principles that are generally accepted by experts in the field. Expert Opinion Admissibility: Admissibility of expert opinions depends on several factors, including relevance and the potential for prejudice. To be admissible, expert opinions must be pertinent to the issues in the case and helpful to the trier of fact. Courts carefully weigh the probative value of expert testimony against any potential prejudicial impact on the jury. Lay Opinion vs Expert Opinion: Distinguishing between lay opinions and expert opinions is crucial in the legal context: Lay Opinion: Lay witnesses provide testimony based on their personal experiences or common knowledge. They can testify about things they have personally observed or experienced. For example, a witness can testify that they saw a car run a red light. Expert Opinion: Expert witnesses, on the other hand, offer opinions based on their specialized knowledge and expertise in a particular field. They can provide insights, interpretations, and conclusions that go beyond what a layperson could provide. For instance, a forensic expert can offer an opinion on the cause of death based on scientific analysis. Now for a Case Study: Medical Malpractice Case: In a medical malpractice case, an expert witness, often a renowned surgeon or medical specialist, may be called to testify about the standard of care. To be admitted as an expert, this witness must demonstrate their qualifications, which typically include board certification in their medical specialty, extensive experience in similar cases, and a strong reputation within their field. Forensic Expert Testimony: In a murder trial, a forensic expert may be called to provide an opinion on the cause of death. The admissibility of the expert's opinion depends on factors such as their qualifications, the reliability of their analysis methods, and whether their conclusions are based on generally accepted principles in the field of forensic science. Now for some Questions: Expert Witnesses v Lay Witnesses: The primary difference between expert witnesses and lay witnesses lies in their basis for testimony. Expert witnesses provide opinions based on their specialized knowledge, while lay witnesses offer testimony based on personal experiences or common knowledge. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, Tony Brueski and retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke discussed the importance of expert witnesses in cases like that of the Kohberger trial. Dreeke emphasizes that in a case where the defendant, Kohberger, does not have any witnesses to support his timeline, the credibility of the prosecution's expert witnesses is paramount.    Brueski and Dreeke delved into the complexities of determining an expert witness's credibility, discussing the case of Gabriela Vargas, a self-taught genetic genealogist who began working on cases in 2018. She was recently visited by the FBI, raising questions about her testimony's accuracy and credibility. Dreeke explains that an expert witness must demonstrate "reps" or repetitions in their given field, and the prosecution and defense must agree on their expertise, as must the judge.    Dreeke suggests that Vargas's lack of a professional background and possible issues with her testimony may be reasons for the FBI's visit. He further elaborates that a judge, prosecution, and defense should meticulously assess an expert witness's qualifications, repetitions, and presentation skills before they testify.    Additionally, the defense filed a motion claiming that the press's failure to follow court directives regarding photography and recording interferes with Kohberger's right to a fair trial. Dreeke agrees with the defense, as Kohberger's appearance does not exude openness or agreeableness, which could negatively influence the jury. He suggests that the defense could negate this impact by explaining Kohberger's contemplative nature to the jury.    Dreeke concludes by conjecturing that Kohberger, whether guilty or not, is likely contemplating ways to defend his life as if it were a science experiment. This analysis highlights the importance of carefully selecting expert witnesses and the potential implications of their credibility on a defendant's right to a fair trial. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, Tony Brueski and retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke discussed the importance of expert witnesses in cases like that of the Kohberger trial. Dreeke emphasizes that in a case where the defendant, Kohberger, does not have any witnesses to support his timeline, the credibility of the prosecution's expert witnesses is paramount.    Brueski and Dreeke delved into the complexities of determining an expert witness's credibility, discussing the case of Gabriela Vargas, a self-taught genetic genealogist who began working on cases in 2018. She was recently visited by the FBI, raising questions about her testimony's accuracy and credibility. Dreeke explains that an expert witness must demonstrate "reps" or repetitions in their given field, and the prosecution and defense must agree on their expertise, as must the judge.    Dreeke suggests that Vargas's lack of a professional background and possible issues with her testimony may be reasons for the FBI's visit. He further elaborates that a judge, prosecution, and defense should meticulously assess an expert witness's qualifications, repetitions, and presentation skills before they testify.    Additionally, the defense filed a motion claiming that the press's failure to follow court directives regarding photography and recording interferes with Kohberger's right to a fair trial. Dreeke agrees with the defense, as Kohberger's appearance does not exude openness or agreeableness, which could negatively influence the jury. He suggests that the defense could negate this impact by explaining Kohberger's contemplative nature to the jury.    Dreeke concludes by conjecturing that Kohberger, whether guilty or not, is likely contemplating ways to defend his life as if it were a science experiment. This analysis highlights the importance of carefully selecting expert witnesses and the potential implications of their credibility on a defendant's right to a fair trial. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, Tony Brueski and retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke discussed the importance of expert witnesses in cases like that of the Kohberger trial. Dreeke emphasizes that in a case where the defendant, Kohberger, does not have any witnesses to support his timeline, the credibility of the prosecution's expert witnesses is paramount.    Brueski and Dreeke delved into the complexities of determining an expert witness's credibility, discussing the case of Gabriela Vargas, a self-taught genetic genealogist who began working on cases in 2018. She was recently visited by the FBI, raising questions about her testimony's accuracy and credibility. Dreeke explains that an expert witness must demonstrate "reps" or repetitions in their given field, and the prosecution and defense must agree on their expertise, as must the judge.    Dreeke suggests that Vargas's lack of a professional background and possible issues with her testimony may be reasons for the FBI's visit. He further elaborates that a judge, prosecution, and defense should meticulously assess an expert witness's qualifications, repetitions, and presentation skills before they testify.    Additionally, the defense filed a motion claiming that the press's failure to follow court directives regarding photography and recording interferes with Kohberger's right to a fair trial. Dreeke agrees with the defense, as Kohberger's appearance does not exude openness or agreeableness, which could negatively influence the jury. He suggests that the defense could negate this impact by explaining Kohberger's contemplative nature to the jury.    Dreeke concludes by conjecturing that Kohberger, whether guilty or not, is likely contemplating ways to defend his life as if it were a science experiment. This analysis highlights the importance of carefully selecting expert witnesses and the potential implications of their credibility on a defendant's right to a fair trial. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

VLOG Aug 29: Bankman-Fried's pricey expert witnesses, pay to say - #CryptoCreeps book: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CFCJ68PS Trump docket: now DDC Jan 6 trial March 4, 2024, NY Bragg March 25- and Georgia October? #UNGA Sept Biden only wants #Nigeria Tinabu, @USUN won't answer

Hour 2 - Larry and Marty break down the closing statements of the Pittsburgh Synagogue Shooting Trial, discuss PFAs for pets, and talk to an AHN doctor about a diversity initiative. 

Giving a solid expert witness direct examination is a key to success in many mock trial rounds. So, in this video, I'll give you my best tips for directing experts and giving them plenty of room to shine. BUY MY BOOK HERE: bit.ly/MTMBook  SCHEDULE COACHING WITH ME HERE: bit.ly/MTMCoach Welcome into Mock Trial Masterclass: Your Guide to Controlling the Courtroom. My name is Luke Worsham, and I want YOU to be a mock trial master. I've competed in and coached mock trial for a while, and I want to pass along everything I've learned to you. Whether you're an attorney or a witness, my channel is dedicated to helping you take your craft to the next level. It's game on! The information contained in this podcast is intended for mock trial students and coaches, and it is provided for informational purposes only. It should not be construed as legal advice on any subject matter or real-life litigation advice.

In this episode Dr. Yoon-Schwartz welcomes back Dr. Nirav Patel to discuss issues within medical malpractice and the evolving nature of  expert witness work.

Today you'll have an opportunity to learn from a cardiologist, pharmacologist, and author, who has brought his expertise into the world of expert witnesses. Dr. Michael Zema shares what he has learned to sharpen his expert witness abilities. Dr. Zema has a routine of breaking up case analysis with research, which not only relieves the tedium of endless pages of documentation but gives him new insights into the case. He describes some of the pitfalls in electronic medical records with a warning that the copy-and-paste function can propagate a medical error for years. As an example, he describes meeting a patient whose chart incorrectly stated that he'd recently had bypass surgery. When Dr. Zema discovered this error, he found that the man's medical records had perpetuated it for two years. Because of the frequency of pharmaceutical errors, Dr. Zema urges expert witnesses to familiarize themselves as much as possible with pharmacology. He describes a case of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome in which an incorrectly prescribed drug played a big role. Of special value to expert witnesses and attorneys is his approach to cross-examination. He always tries to think like the opposing attorney, an approach he also uses in analyzing the medical information. Be prepared for some top-level information and guidance in this podcast. Join me in this episode of Decoding Medical Records - Tips and Techniques for Expert Witnesses - Dr. Michael Zema What's a good way to effectively navigate through volumes of electronic records? Why can copying and pasting electronic records create problems? How does the copy-and-paste repetition of an error in diagnosis inhibit correct perpetuate continued misdiagnosis and incorrect treatment? How does a strong knowledge of pharmacology assist an expert witness? Why is it essential to refer to the standard of care and other documentation extant at the time of an alleged malpractice incident? How can you, under cross-examination, anticipate and derail an attorney's line of questioning? Listen to our podcasts or watch them using our app, Expert.edu, available at legalnursebusiness.com/expertedu. https://youtu.be/jFTS9USMMI4 You can still order the recordings for our 7th Virtual Conference! LNC Success™ is a Virtual Conference 3-day event designed for legal nurse consultants just like you! Pat Iyer and Barbara Levin put together THE first Legal Nurse Consulting Virtual Conference in July 2020. They are back with their 7th all-new conference based on what attendees said they'd find most valuable. This new implementation and networking event is designed for LNCs at any stage in their career. Build your expertise, attract higher-paying attorney clients, and take your business to the next level. After the LNC Success™ Virtual Conference, you will leave with clarity, confidence, and an effective step-by-step action plan that you can immediately implement in your business. Your Presenter of Decoding Medical Records - Tips and Techniques for Expert Witnesses - Dr. Michael Zema Dr. Zema received his Medical Degree from Cornell University Medical College. He completed his post-graduate Internal Medicine training at the North Shore University Hospital in Manhasset, Long Island, with subsequent Fellowships in Cardiology there and at the New York Hospital Cornell Medical Center. He is a distinguished Fellow in the American College of Physicians, American College of Cardiology, American College of Chest Physicians and the American College of Clinical Pharmacology among others. Dr. Zema is a Certified Physician Executive of the American Association of Physician Leadership and a Six Sigma Green Belt in Healthcare. Dr. Zema has penned numerous publications in professional medical journals and most recently has authored the book "Modern Healthcare Delivery, Deliverance or Debacle - A Glimpse From the Inside Out." Connect with Micheal http://www.

In the Lucy Letby murder trial, startling medical mistakes have come to light, raising questions about the cause of Baby H's cardiac arrests. Pediatric experts testified about the difficulties in treating Baby H, defending the emergency procedures and the medical staff's actions. The jury must now determine whether Letby is responsible for the tragic events or if the medical mistakes were the primary cause of Baby H's collapses. Want to listen to ALL of our Podcasts Ad-Free? Subscribe through Apple Podcasts, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases:   Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski (All Cases) - https://audioboom.com/channels/5040505-hidden-killers-with-tony-brueski-breaking-news-commentary Chad & Lori Daybell - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098105-demise-of-the-daybells-the-lori-chad-daybell-story The Murder of Ana Walshe - https://audioboom.com/channels/5093967-finding-ana-this-disappearance-of-ana-walshe Alex Murdaugh - https://audioboom.com/channels/5097527-the-trial-of-alex-murdaugh The Idaho Murders, The Case Against Bryan Kohberger - https://audioboom.com/channels/5098223-the-idaho-murders-the-case-against-bryan-kohberger Lucy Letby - https://audioboom.com/channels/5099406-nurse-of-death-the-lucy-letby-story Follow Tony Brueski On Twitter https://twitter.com/tonybpod Join our Facebook Discussion Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/834636321133

On today's episode, I talked with my fellow forensic psychologist colleagues, Drs. Collins, Delatorre, and Haji about their careers as expert witnesses and forensic evaluators. Listener questions that were briefly addressed on the episode include: How did you find yourself working in the field?  Are there things you wish you did differently in route to becoming a psychologist?How do you obtain work as an expert witness?What is a dilemma or hurdle you have come across when working as an expert witness?How do you prepare for court as an expert witness? What is the process like?What is the difference between forensic evaluations done in private practice versus evaluations done by psychologists working in a prison?What is your day like as a forensic evaluator?Where can you get hired if you want to do forensic evaluation work?How many hours does one case typically take?If forensic psychology is a field of interest, what is the first thing someone should do after undergrad?Any current forensic psych hot topics you are particularly interested in right now? About the Guests: Dr. John Delatorre is a licensed psychologist in Texas, Arizona, and New York State. He has a private practice focused on forensic psychology, primarily doing criminal work. Dr. Delatorre has a Master's degree in Jurisprudence from St. Mary's University School of Law and is often retained as a trial consultant and mediator. He provides expert analysis to the media as well as commentary on live trials for Court TV and the Law & Crime Trial Network. He is the co-host of the Without Consent Podcast. You can find him on social media @drjohndelatorre and through his website www.resolutionfcs.comDr. Lina Haji is a licensed clinical and forensic psychologist and licensed mental health counselor practicing in the Miami, Florida area.Her clinical experience over the last 20 years includes working with mentally ill and dually diagnosed adults in inpatient and outpatient settings including correctional facilities, substance abuse rehabilitation centers, outpatient clinics, psychiatric hospitals and private practice in four states, NY, NJ, CA, and FL. She currently works in private practice conducting clinical and forensic evaluations. She can be found at www.risepsychological.com and IG Rise_psychological_com.Dr. Michael Collins is the owner and Chief Neuropsychologist/Mental Health Expert of the Clinical Neuropsychology Center. Dr. Collins has testified over 100 times as an expert witness and has been court appointed or retained for over 1000 psychological evaluations. Prior to forming the Clinical Neuropsychology Center, Dr. Collins was the director of Psychology at South University and has since that time developed the Broward County Diversion program and become a national expert for his work in forensic neuropsychology, mental health assessment and risk management. Dr. Collins earned his PHD in Clinical Neuropsychology from Nova Southeastern University and completed residencies in forensic and neuropsychology. Dr. Collins is a vendor with the state of Florida and performs expert witness evaluations throughout the state.Contact Dr. Michael Collins:  Office: (754) 202-4443 | Email: mjcollinsphd@thecncenter.com https://thecncenter.com/Thanks for listening! See you again in two weeks for another amazing episode unraveling psychology and the law. Please Note: The podcast shows, guests, and all linked content is for educational and informational purposes only. It does not constitute medical, psychiatric, or legal advice. Nor is it intended to replace professional advice from your healthcare or legal professional. Last, it is not a substitute for supervision. Please continue to seek the appropriate guidance form your clinical supervisor. The show content is to be used at listeners' own risk. I invite you to show your support for the show by: Telling your friends and colleagues about the showSubscribing (free) and leaving a rating/reviewFind and connect with Dr. Vienna on Twitter, TT, Fb, or IG to continue the discussion Connect with Dr. Vienna:LinkedIn: Dr. Nicole M. ViennaIG: @drnicoleviennaFacebook: Vienna Psychological Group, Inc.Are you an attorney looking for a forensic evaluation? Book a FREE 20-minute consultation with Dr. Vienna here.  

 Douglas K. Sheff, Esq., of Sheff Law Offices, in Boston  breaks down the hierarchy of the credibility pyramid in this podcast, excerpted from MCLE's 7/14/22 live webcast: Presenting Lay & Expert Witnesses. The full program is available as an on demand webcast or an MP3 here.  Get 24/7 instant access to hundreds of related eLectures like this one—and more—with a subscription to the MCLE OnlinePass. Learn more at www.mcle.org/onlinepass.

Expert witnesses can make or break a case: judges and juries look to their authority to explain all manner of technical subjects. But it turns out that hidden biases may be at work in who gets selected to testify as an expert. In this episode, Becky digs into why this disparity exists and how it might be solved with her guests Isabel Kunsman and Kathryn Britten. Isabel and Kathryn are partners at consulting firm AlixPartners and co-founders of Equal Representation for Expert Witnesses (ERE), an organisation working to bring gender equality to this important function of the law. To find out more about the ERE pledge, go to: https://www.expertwitnesspledge.com/

Today in 1912, New Mexico became the 47th state in the Union. And so far, it's the only one where a state lawmaker tried to make expert witnesses dress like wizards in court. Plus: tomorrow in Yuma, Arizona, the Yuma Medjool Date Festival! Odd Law Alert: New Mexico Expert Wizard Amendment (University of Cincinnati Law Review) Yuma Medjool Date Festival Our Patreon backers are magical --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/coolweirdawesome/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/coolweirdawesome/support

Whether you're an experienced LNC, a new practitioner, or someone who's considering this field, Joe Flores will give you invaluable advice about working as an expert witness. An attorney and nurse practitioner, he has a unique perspective on working with expert witnesses.

In this episode Collin Callahan of Flannery Georgalis joins Sean to discuss what a prosecutor / defense counsel looks for in an expert, why expert reports are so critical, the dos and don'ts of SMEs and their reports, Daubert Motions vs Motion in Limine, and more... There are even some tributes to Runaway Jury and a Few Good Men! Don't miss this outstanding episode with one of Sean's favorite guests!

Dr. Vernon Burton tells us about his experiences as an expert witness in civil rights and voting legal cases. It's a fascinating look into how the work of historians can appear in all sorts of places, and can do some direct good for the rights of the people! Episode 485.

On this week's podcast we discuss Maine's legislature suing its child welfare agency over fatality records, the Angola transfer begins in Louisiana, and what low-income families used the enhanced child tax credit for. Tara Reynon, a member of the Puyallup Tribe of Indians and child welfare director for the National Indian Child Welfare Association, joins to discuss the role of qualified expert witnesses when Native children face family separation or termination of parental rights. Reading RoomHow a Chippewa Grandmother's Adoption Fight Ended Up in the U.S. Supreme Courthttps://bit.ly/3VLeS6kMaine Lawmakers Vote to Sue DHHS in Bid to See Child Protective Recordshttps://bit.ly/3CZWKgLL.A. County Reaches $32 Million Settlement in Anthony Avalos Casehttps://bit.ly/3MGk8nTNew York Officials, Advocates Debate Youth Justice Reform Amid Crime Fearshttps://bit.ly/3TK8UkHLouisiana Begins Moving Child Inmates to Notorious Angola Prison's Former Death Row Unithttps://yhoo.it/3CYR1I2Freedom to Dream: A World Without Family Policinghttps://upendmovement.org/event/virtual-convening2022/Evidence from the 2021 Expanded Child Tax Credithttps://bit.ly/3z6opvi

The Old Dogs Ramble about THE HEAT... Driving for Two... A note from Sandra Cavallo Miller...  Breaking in the Royal Shoes...  Old Doggerel #13 – Password Purgatory...  A Really Cold Case Murder...  A big Payday for Expert Witnesses. The Old Dogs Conversation is with Michael Hernan of Inishmore Island, County Galway, Republic of Ireland.

Determining the value of an estate during divorce proceedings is incredibly complex, requiring experts to effectively and fairly evaluate such aspects. In the context of divorce, calculating interest from a trust can be particularly challenging. Today's expert is Gerard Deffenbaugh, whose practice focuses on estate planning/administration, and trust administration. He often serves as the consulting expert in divorce cases where one of the parties has interest in a trust. Gerard has also co-authored various articles on estate planning and trust interest for divorce proceedings in the Colorado Lawyer and is also involved in different legal education programs. Outside the office, he enjoys hiking, cooking, reading, and spending quality time with family and friends. In today's show, we learn about the role of an estate planning attorney in divorce proceedings, how the opinion of an estate planner can impact a valuation, the different types of trusts that exists, the different contingencies that be can be triggered, how a revocable trust can change, how a discretionary trust works, and much more. Key Points From This Episode:The role of an estate planning attorney in divorce proceedings and why it is important.Aspects that need to be considered when determining interest from a trust.How the professional opinion of an estate planner impacts the valuation.What contingencies can affect an evaluation at different points in time.The basics of how a revocable trust works and how it can change.Whether or not a trust is regarded as property within estate planning.Some examples of how a power of appointment can be used for trusts.How power of appointment decisions can impact divorce agreements.We learn how a discretionary trust works and how this impacts divorce agreements.Other aspects of a discretionary trust concerning property interest.The economic circumstance with powers of appointment and discretionary interest in a trust.Trust income in the context of divorce.Gerard shares his professional opinion on the legal definition of economic circumstance.The different triggers and/or contingencies that exist to cater to different estate scenarios.Some scenarios where valuations can become challenging and uncertain to determine.What is Divorce at Altitude? Ryan Kalamaya and Amy Goscha provide tips and recommendations on issues related to divorce, separation, and co-parenting in Colorado. Ryan and Amy are the founding partners of an innovative and ambitious law firm, Kalamaya | Goscha, that pushes the boundaries to discover new frontiers in family law, personal injury, and criminal defense in Colorado. To subscribe to Divorce at Altitude, click here and select your favorite podcast player. To subscribe to Kalamaya | Goscha's YouTube channel where many of the episodes will be posted as videos, click here. If you have additional questions or would like to speak to one of our attorneys, give us a call at 970-429-5784 or email us at info@kalamaya.law.************************************************************************DISCLAIMER: THE COMMENTARY AND OPINIONS ON THIS PODCAST IS FOR ENTERTAINMENT AND INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES AND NOT FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING LEGAL ADVICE. CONTACT AN ATTORNEY IN YOUR STATE OR AREA TO OBTAIN LEGAL ADVICE ON ANY OF THESE ISSUES.

This week, as we passed the fifth anniversary of the Grenfell Tower fire, two expert witnesses levelled a series of fierce criticisms at the building safety regime. José Torero, head of the civil engineering department at a London university, described the competence levels among fire safety professionals as “extremely poor” and called for the Stay Put strategy to be abandoned. And Luke Bisby, professor of fire and structures at Edinburgh University, told the Inquiry, that he was “incredulous” at the misuse of fire tests by a cladding firm, and said there was a “significant problem” with the level of competence of fire safety professionals. Presenter: Kate Lamble Producers: Sharon Hemans and Kristiina Cooper Researcher: Marcia Veiga Sound Engineer: Gareth Jones Editor: Hugh Levinson