Podcasts about antiplatelet

Social determinants of health, including housing, food access, insurance status, and structural inequities, significantly influence stroke prevention, recovery, and long term outcomes. These factors affect biological risk, treatment adherence, and disparities in care, even when traditional clinical measures are addressed. This episode highlights practical strategies for integrating screening, leveraging multidisciplinary teams, and identifying opportunities for advocacy to improve patient outcomes. In this episode, Teshamae Monteith, MD, FAAN, speaks with Nneka L. Ifejika, MD, MPH, author of the article "Social Determinants of Health and Their Impacts on Stroke Prevention and Outcomes" in the Continuum® June 2026 Cerebrovascular Disease issue. Dr. Monteith is the associate editor of Continuum® Audio and an associate professor of clinical neurology at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine in Miami, Florida. Dr. Ifejika is an adjunct professor of physical medicine and rehabilitation at UT Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas, Texas, and the chief scientific officer of the Division of Academics at Ochsner Health System in New Orleans, Louisiana. Additional Resources Read the article: Social Determinants of Health and Their Impacts on Stroke Prevention and Outcomes Subscribe to Continuum®: shop.lww.com/Continuum Earn CME (available only to AAN members): continpub.com/AudioCME Continuum® Aloud (verbatim audio-book style recordings of articles available only to Continuum® subscribers): continpub.com/Aloud More about the American Academy of Neurology: aan.com Social Media facebook.com/continuumcme @ContinuumAAN Host: @headacheMD Full episode transcript available here Dr Monteith: Two patients have the same stroke, but when they return, they have very different outcomes. We can look into some of their comorbidities, but something we don't spend enough time talking about is the social determinants of health. Stay tuned to this discussion. I promise you, you'll become a better neurologist. Dr Jones: This is Dr. Lyell Jones, Editor-in-Chief of Continuum. Thank you for listening to Continuum Audio. Be sure to visit the links in the episode notes for information about earning CME, subscribing to the journal, and exclusive access to interviews not featured on the podcast. Dr Monteith: This is Dr. Teshamae Monteith. Today I'm interviewing Dr. Nneka Ifejika about her article on social determinants of health and their impacts on stroke prevention and outcomes. This article appears in the June 2026 Continuum issue on cerebrovascular disease. How are you? Welcome to our podcast. Dr Ifejika: Thanks for having me. I'm doing great. Dr Monteith: Great. So, can you introduce yourself to our audience? Dr Ifejika: Sure. I'm Dr. Nneka Ifejika. I am the Chief Scientific Officer of Ochsner Health System in New Orleans, Louisiana. But I'm also a cerebrovascular rehabilitation doctor. I've been practicing for about nineteen years, and am happy and honored to be a contributor to this Continuum Neurology article. It's a really important topic. Dr Monteith: Great. So, what got you into this field, first of all? Dr Ifejika: Well, I was deciding between PM&R and neurology, and I was putting in both match lists. And I thought about it and I leaned toward PM&R, but stroke still had a grasp on my heart and my mind. And so, after I finished my residency, I joined the UT Houston stroke team, and I did a, thankfully did a two-year fellowship and became cross-trained in stroke as well as physical medicine rehab. So, I am a jack of both trades. Dr Monteith: So, you got your way in a way. Dr Ifejika: I did. Dr Monteith: You know, we have a lot of learners that are listening, so it's always, uh, nice for them to be inspired, I think, by people's career paths. So why don't we talk about the objectives of your article? Dr Ifejika: Sure. So, one of the most important things that we wanted to do was make sure that medical students, residents, faculty, and fellows understood the impact of social determinants of health on stroke recovery and stroke rehabilitation. It's not as simple as you have hypertension, hyperlipidemia, we're going to manage your stroke risk factors. Oh, you had an ischemic stroke. You presented in time for the window. We're going to give you endovascular therapy and then modified Rankin scale at hospital discharge in ninety days. No, no, no. The stroke survivor and their caregivers and their family have a lot more to deal with outside of what we look at during the acute stroke hospitalization and post-acute rehabilitation. Things like, can they afford the medication that we're prescribing? Antiplatelet agents or anticoagulation can be extremely expensive. Do they have housing insecurity? Is there food insecurity? What's going on behind the scenes that we are not addressing that can directly impact the admission rate and the readmission rate after we take care of a stroke survivor? Dr Monteith: I love the article because you took a real deep dive into social determinants of health, what they are, why they matter, and what we can do about them. And so why don't we talk a little bit about the NINDS framework for social determinants of health? I think many of us might not be familiar with the framework per se. Dr Ifejika: So, the framework consists of multiple domains specifically that relate to social determinants of health that were published in Neurology a couple of years ago. So, I do hope that people who are hearing this recording actually read them. There are interpersonal domains, there are classic medical domains, there are indeterminate domains, and there are six total domains. And health domains are the last domain. So, things like when it comes to housing insecurity, food insecurity, that's a domain of social determinants of health. When it comes to chronic racism, when it comes to biases that patients experience, those actually impact outcomes. So, there are six separate indices that we're going to get into in detail and how we address them as clinicians, whether it be at the medical student level, resident level, faculty level, to integrate the social determinants of health in our care plans, because we could be doing a much better job. And I think it'll be really important from the interpersonal perspective when we really relate to our patients and their families that we ask these questions. For example, if we're prescribing someone to have treatment for their diabetes mellitus and ha- and, and be taking insulin, if they have housing insecurity and they're in a homeless shelter, they have to leave the homeless shelter during the day. So, what happens to the insulin that we prescribe? These are variables that we are not considering on a regular basis, but they directly relate to compliance. Dr Monteith: Great. So that was one thing I wanted to bring up. We're very good at measuring blood pressure and trying to determine, uh, the association between stroke outcomes and things that we can measure, glucose, lipids, blood pressure. What is the evidence for social determinants of health and stroke outcome? Dr Ifejika: The evidence is growing, and there have been many publications that have come out that are, are going to be highlighted in this article related to structural determinants of health inequities, like structural racism, as well as disparities related to ethnicity and race. There's geographical disparities. For example, a lot of patients are, are primarily concerned about rural versus urban, whether you have access to different post-acute rehabilitation, whether you have access to secondary stroke prevention because you simply don't have the transportation from a, a rural area to get to a drugstore to get things available to you. Social status. There are actually publication related to socioeconomic status and the concerns when it comes to air pollution. So particulate matter 2.5, we know that that has a direct impact on stroke outcomes and health overall, but we don't really think about it as a structural determinant of health inequity. There's several multiple layers of research that have gone on specifically that have been cited in the literature that relate directly to social determinants of health and how we can address them moving forward. Dr Monteith: And what I found interesting in your article in that you gave at least a few examples where social factors like income, education were controlled for, and maybe in large part it is, but even when you control for some of these very obvious social risk factors, you still have inequities. Dr Ifejika: Absolutely. And I think it was really important to show that we had strong peer review evidence behind this, as it wasn't just something that we were creating or hypothesizing about. There have been studies that have been done over this over decades of time, showing the impacts of social determinants of health on outcomes. But the question and concern that we have is we know this growing body of literature continues to expand. What are we doing about it when it comes to education of the future generations of providers who will be caring for this population? Dr Monteith: Before we get into how, you know, what we're going to do about that, let's just kind of put that link, cause the evidence is there. How does it drive biology? Dr Ifejika: It's a great question. So, for example, particulate matter 2.5 in air pollution has been shown to have an existing impact on hypertension, raising your blood pressure. So that's a direct effect of a social determinant of health related to socioeconomic status because people who live in areas with higher air pollution are... They're not green spaces. They live near highways. Those are areas that unfortunately are also impacted by food deserts. Food deserts, if you're not able to get fresh fruits, vegetables, whole foods, increases your risk of developing diabetes, hyperlipidemia, also increases your sodium intake, again, increasing hypertension. These things are all connected to biological determinants. It's just that we're not asking about them necessarily within the social history when we're taking people into the hospital, but they have direct effects. Dr Monteith: Great. Neurologists tend to be busy and, you know, we're... have all of these things that we're being asked to do and chart and click and all of that stuff. And so how can we more readily integrate screening for social determinants of health and that conversation into the work we do? We recognize it's important. We recognize it's an important risk factor. There's a lot of these determinants. So, what is a good way to do so? And I, I know that in the paper you've, you've given different roles to different team players, so I want you to talk about that too, but just kind of even a regular routine office visit. Walk us through a way we can more easily integrate that kind of conversation. Dr Ifejika: It's an excellent question, and what I've recommended that we do in a standard office visit is utilize the time before the visit to send out screeners. So, for example, usually with an electronic medical record, you can send documents before the visit even starts, where people can check off whether they have any concerns regarding housing, food insecurity. They can check out their location of where they live, whether they live near a highway or not near a highway. It's specifically related to socioeconomic status. We can ask about insurance status, whether they have insurance, insured versus uninsured, but then also types of insurance, whether they have Medicaid insurance versus Medicare insurance. Then even drilling even further, type of Medicare insurance, Medicare Advantage versus traditional Medicare, cause all of those things actually play a role in this. Dr Ifejika: And evaluate these things and don't take time during your office visit. Send these screeners out beforehand. Have them be assimilated by your medical staff. Make sure you're utilizing every resource that you have at your disposal to help streamline things, so by the time the person comes in for the visit, you've primed the pump. You have this information already in your hands at your fingertips cause it was sent out in advance, and you have your medical staff already have an understanding of. If they didn't fill it out electronically, give it to them in the lobby. Make sure they have a handwritten copy in the lobby so that when they come into the office visit, you have the information at your fingertips. Dr Monteith: Are there any particular resources that you recommend for those types of screeners? Dr Ifejika: What I've used in the past, if you have patient-reported outcomes, so the PROMIS instruments, that's a good start. It doesn't get into the details of housing insecurity, food insecurity, but it's a good start to help prime questions and to start the conversation during your office visit. In my clinics, I do a PROMIS 27 on every patient, as well as a PHQ-9 for depression on everyone. And then I collect data longitudinally, and I can always drill down on factors that I noticed that could become a problem moving forward. Dr Monteith: Yeah. And then also in your article, you spoke a bit about this impact from the acute presentation in the hospital to rehab. Dr Ifejika: Yeah. Dr Monteith: So why don't you talk about these different entry points where we can really engage our patients and try and help reduce their burden? Dr Ifejika: Sure. So, healthcare can be quite fragmented, and the stroke patient, stroke survivor, and their family member have no grasp of that. They've had a stroke, and they may be going from the ER to the ICU to the stroke unit to the floor to the rehab unit, and we see it as multiple levels of care, multiple types of providers. They see it as one hospital. And the concern that we have is, at those branch points, things get dropped, and we have the opportunity to pick things up at those branch points. So, during the acute care hospitalization-Primarily, that's the establishment of what has happened, how we're gonna treat it, what are the variables that we can control for right now to address those determinants of health moving forward, and to specifically looking at whether they were taking medications before, whether they could afford medications before, what that looks like at hospital discharge. Is there any duplication of medications? If a person is taking Coreg and you prescribe metoprolol, but they still have the Coreg at home, should we have really prescribed the metoprolol? We're just spending money that they may have concerns when it comes to access to care and the cost of these prescriptions. So, it's the responsibility of the acute care physician to kind of look at that. Those are subtle things that we think are subtle, but they add up quickly for the family when it comes to having one group of medications that's the same class and having to buy another type. When it comes to post-acute rehabilitation, it's really an important time to screen for whether the caregiver can handle what's occurring. So specifically, if the caregiver is already burning out and the average length of stay for a stroke patient is five days and they've come to rehab for two weeks, what's gonna happen in the next two years or the next four years? So, during the post-acute rehabilitation phase, it's time to kind of look at that and drill down on those kind of questions. Also, the levels of care, Dr Ifejika: it's really important to look at other levels of rehabilitation, so skilled nursing facilities, making sure people have access to that if they need to, if the caregiver is burned out and they don't have the ability to go straight home. Because acute inpatient rehab, the goal of it afterwards, is to go straight home. It's not to go to another facility. So, you need to have that screener in place when it comes to whether the family can take care of this person, and whether the family can do it in an effective way to prevent them being readmitted. Dr Monteith: Great. I also like that you spoke about kind of the team approach and different roles, both for screening and for intervention, both being very important, especially the intervention. And so why don't you give us a few examples how the team could break up the responsibility and how also for the intervention component that can be done. Dr Ifejika: Sure. So, I broke up the team into several levels. So, the team medically is the medical student, resident, and faculty physician. However, the team also includes the support staff, so your case manager, your social worker, the therapist, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy, the pastoral services, all these members of the team. You know, sometimes as physicians, we don't read those notes. There's a lot of information in the notes from social work, care coordination, and the therapist. They get down to subtleties cause they're asking questions, for example, "What kind of equipment do you have at home? How many stairs do you have at home? What level of house do you have, one story, two story? If you live in an apartment, do you have an elevator access?" That's important for someone with hemiparesis. When it comes to medications, when it comes to insurance status, when it comes to your ability to have the mechanisms to pay for care as an outpatient, social workers are required to ask these questions cause they have to figure out resources for the patient and their family to help facilitate improved outcomes. So, they have to ask questions regarding these tasks. The concerns are, do we read what they're saying? So, it's really important to interact with them, and if it's not something that you're looking at in the chart, cause we're all so tied to our computers, find where they are in the hospital. Walk by their office and have a chat. Run your list with them, especially for people who you're concerned have vulnerabilities, and make sure that you're setting an example for your medical students with your faculty doing so. If you're looking at it from the medical student, resident, faculty perspective, medical students, listen. This is your opportunity to really contribute to the team as well as learn about social determinants of health and research in their fields. You are the boots on the ground for the medical team. You are the ones who should be priming the pump and asking these questions of the family members. We're sending you into the rooms to do a history and physical. Social determinants of health should be a part of your history and physical, and you should be taking what we're saying in this article and asking these questions and tying it into your resident. Now, the resident is the work person of the hospital. We all know this. Things run through the resident. Things run through the fellow. It's really important that they have this information in a manner that is negotiable. The list keeps getting longer, and a resident doesn't need to be overburdened. It needs to be synthesized in a manner that can help facilitate the resident being able to act as well as communicate any concerns to the faculty. And at the faculty level, we are the voices that can affect change. So, if there's any concerns when it comes to advocacy, research, making sure that people are accessing care in a way that makes sense, particularly when it comes to the ability for us to galvanize change on a national level, that's kind of our job. Dr Monteith: Great, and so let's talk about intervention. What are things that, let's say, the neurologist can do to deal with some of these social factors? Dr Ifejika: From the neurology perspective, I think it's really important to identify missed opportunities and making sure that we address them. For example, the conversations around the ability to have access to care related to insurance versus no insurance. There are many, many ways that neurologists are able to advocate for a person being able to get to Medicare insurance, particularly in the outpatient setting. When we see patients in clinic, it takes two years, them, to qualify for Medicare, two years at a minimum. But there's a gap there that can be filled by us making sure that we document what's happened, contact their providers, facilitate communication with their employers, if they're employees, they can get some short-term disability benefits to help bridge that gap prior to receiving Medicare insurance. It behooves us to do this because if we do not, they fall into the gap and they get readmitted and they're back on service anyway. So, what's important is the outpatient that we really kind of focus on things that we can impact and things like insurance and getting people transitioned from having employer-based insurance versus getting to Medicare is a really important way that we can effect change in a, in a way that's viable and, and replicable. So, in the outpatient setting, neurologists have a wonderful opportunity to effect change in social determinants of health. When it comes to employed persons, who had a stroke transitioning to Medicare, it takes two years to do so. So, in the outpatient clinic, if you have an employed person, make sure that you fill out their short-term disability benefits forms, their long-term disability benefits form. Bridge the gap. Get that information to their employer so they can maintain constant coverage. Because if they do not, if they have to choose between refilling medications and putting food on the table, they're going to choose putting food on the table, and that's going to directly impact their outcomes if they're not taking the medication that we recommend. Dr Monteith: I think that's a great point. I mean, there's a lot that we can do, and in some ways, it may not take that much to document and to be able to ask the questions and to include some of that information into the assessment and plan is really a, a great idea. Dr Ifejika: And you know, if we don't bring these things up and have these conversations, it doesn't get addressed. And that's why I'm very, very thankful that I had the opportunity to do so, cause this is a part of what I do all day. I think that if I wasn't integrating these kind of conversations into my practice, I wouldn't have the ability to share these tips and these abilities to move things forward in a manner that will be constructive for our field overall and for our patients. Dr Monteith: And towards the end of the article, you brought up something I think we don't see in many articles, and that's the role of advocacy and getting involved in health policy. So, can you talk a little bit about that? Dr Ifejika: You know, it's really important to facilitate change when you see that there are things that need to be changed. And the best way to do that is through advocacy at the local or state or federal level. A lot of these variables that we're dealing with can be addressed through legal changes. I'll give you an example. End-stage renal disease, if you have immediate hemodialysis and you have that requirement upon hospital discharge, you qualify for Medicare immediately. Immediately. Before you even leave the hospital. Why wouldn't something be similar for a stroke? Well, the reason why is because there was a level of advocacy that came around end-stage renal disease and a member of Congress's wife had hemodialysis requirements. And so, a law was passed to make sure Medicare covered it immediately after hospital discharge. So, it requires advocacy in some significant ways to get things done, but we have the bandwidth to do this. We take care of a population that has some of the highest rates of preventable disability. That's not going away. We need to make sure that we're effecting change for this group to make sure that they have the best possible outcomes they can experience. Dr Monteith: So, any final messages for our listeners? Dr Ifejika: I look forward to hearing everyone's feedback about our issue. I am thankful for the opportunity to talk about, address, and write about this important topic, and look forward to everyone's feedback. Dr Monteith: Well, thank you so much for being on our podcast. It was a really wonderful summary and we had a very thorough conversation, but you didn't give away too much, so I think they're going to have to read the article. Dr Ifejika: You're going to have to read the article. And we want medical students, residents, fellows, faculty, all of our ancillary staff within the hospitals, please read this article. We really appreciate it. Dr Monteith: Again today, I've been interviewing Dr. Nneka Ifejika about her article on social determinants of health and their impacts on stroke prevention and outcomes. This article appears in the June 2026 Continuum issue on cerebrovascular disease. Be sure to check out Continuum Audio episodes from this and other issues. And thank you to our listeners for joining today. Dr Monteith: This is Dr. Teshamae Monteith, Associate Editor of Continuum Audio. If you've enjoyed this episode, you'll love the journal, which is full of in-depth and clinically relevant information important for neurology practitioners. Use the link in the episode notes to learn more and subscribe. AAN members, you can get CME for listening to this interview by completing the evaluation at continpub.com/audioCME. Thank you for listening to Continuum Audio.

This week, primary care doctors Mark Ebell, Kate Rowland, Henry Barry and Gary Ferenchick discuss four new studies: whether water is better than diet drinks in diabetes, a new RCT of Paxlovid for COVID in contemporary patients, to switch or not to switch antiplatelet agents after a stroke, and the latest AHA 2026 dietary advice for heart health.Drinks for diabetes: ttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41369640/ Antiplatelet agents after stroke on aspirin: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41347302/ New Paxlovid trial: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42019019/ AHA 2026 dietary guidance: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41914202/

P2Y12 inhibitors are a cornerstone of antiplatelet therapy in cardiovascular disease. These agents block the P2Y12 receptor on platelets, preventing ADP-mediated activation and reducing platelet aggregation. By inhibiting this amplification pathway, they help prevent arterial thrombosis in conditions such as acute coronary syndrome, percutaneous coronary intervention, stroke, and peripheral artery disease. The most commonly used oral agents include clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor, each with important pharmacokinetic and clinical differences that influence agent selection. From a pharmacist's perspective, choosing the right P2Y12 inhibitor requires balancing ischemic benefit with bleeding risk. Clopidogrel requires CYP2C19 activation and is subject to drug interactions and genetic variability. Prasugrel provides more potent inhibition but carries a higher bleeding risk and is contraindicated in patients with prior stroke or TIA. Ticagrelor offers reversible inhibition but comes with unique considerations such as dyspnea and drug interactions via CYP3A4. Understanding these nuances allows pharmacists to optimize dual antiplatelet therapy and improve patient outcomes. Be sure to check out our free Top 200 study guide – a 31 page PDF that is yours for FREE! Support The Podcast and Check Out These Amazing Resources! NAPLEX Study Materials BCPS Study Materials BCACP Study Materials BCGP Study Materials BCMTMS Study Materials Meded101 Guide to Nursing Pharmacology (Amazon Highly Rated) Guide to Drug Food Interactions (Amazon Best Seller) Pharmacy Technician Study Guide by Meded101

Antiplatelet medications play a critical role in preventing heart attacks and strokes, and nurses are often on the front lines of monitoring their safety and effectiveness. In this episode, we break down key agents like aspirin, P2Y12 inhibitors such as clopidogrel, and other commonly used therapies in a clear, practical way. You'll learn how these medications work, when they're indicated, and the most important bleeding risks to watch for. We'll also review monitoring parameters, perioperative considerations, and patient education pearls that can help prevent complications. By the end of this episode, you'll feel more confident recognizing adverse effects, educating patients, and safely supporting antiplatelet therapy in everyday practice. Your support helps me provide more free resources like this! Consider supporting and getting more amazing pharmacology content! Head on over to meded101.com/nurse

Host: Emer Joyce Guest: Steffen Massberg Want to watch that extended interview on https://esc365.escardio.org/event/2178?resource=interview Go to: Want to watch that episode? Go to: https://esc365.escardio.org/event/2178   Disclaimer  ESC TV Today is supported by Bristol Myers Squibb and Novartis through an independent funding. The programme has not been influenced in any way by its funding partners. This programme is intended for health care professionals only and is to be used for educational purposes. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) does not aim to promote medicinal products nor devices. Any views or opinions expressed are the presenters' own and do not reflect the views of the ESC. The ESC is not liable for any translated content of this video. The English language always prevails.   Declarations of interests Emer Joyce and Steffen Massberg have declared to have no potential conflicts of interest to report.

Host: Emer Joyce Guest: Steffen Massberg Want to watch that extended interview on https://esc365.escardio.org/event/2178?resource=interview Go to: Want to watch that episode? Go to: https://esc365.escardio.org/event/2178   Disclaimer  ESC TV Today is supported by Bristol Myers Squibb and Novartis through an independent funding. The programme has not been influenced in any way by its funding partners. This programme is intended for health care professionals only and is to be used for educational purposes. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) does not aim to promote medicinal products nor devices. Any views or opinions expressed are the presenters' own and do not reflect the views of the ESC. The ESC is not liable for any translated content of this video. The English language always prevails.    Declarations of interests Emer Joyce and Steffen Massberg have declared to have no potential conflicts of interest to report.

Short-Term Anticoagulation Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for Preventing Device Thrombosis Following Left Atrial Appendage Closure

TACSI: Dual or Single Antiplatelet Therapy After CABG in ACS Patients

This podcast explores the important aspects of healthcare professionals' practices in percutaneous coronary intervention treatment. It includes the role of adjunct therapies, a review of the updated guidelines, and real-world challenges in the treatment and management of acute coronary syndrome. The discussion focuses on expert opinions and real-world experiences, focusing on the current evidence and guidelines surrounding the efficacy and safety of antiplatelet agents, as well as the timing of their administration. Disclaimers: This podcast discusses prescription-only medicines and is intended for healthcare professionals only. Please refer to prescribing information and adverse event reporting requirements in your country of practice. The views and opinions expressed in this podcast are those of the individual speakers and do not necessarily reflect those of Chiesi Farmaceutici or EMJ. 

TAILORED-CHIP: Tailored Antiplatelet Therapy for Complex High-Risk PCI

Commentary by Dr. Jian'an Wang.

Dr. Dan Ackerman and Dr. James Ernest Siegler discuss the complexities of treating ESUS and emphasize the importance of personalized treatment approaches based on individual patient factors.  Show reference: https://www.neurology.org/doi/10.1212/WNL.0000000000213876 

Dr. Dan Ackerman talks with Dr. James Ernest Siegler about the complexities of treating ESUS and emphasizes the importance of personalized treatment approaches based on individual patient factors.  Read the related article in Neurology®. Disclosures can be found at Neurology.org. 

Commentary by Dr. Jian'an Wang.

Commentary by Dr. Jian'an Wang.

Stratified Randomization Study to Compare Different Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Coronary Stenting in Either High or Low Bleeding Risk Population

In this episode, Dr. Valentin Fuster summarizes the March 25, 2025, issue of the JACC, which focuses on advancements in electrophysiology. Highlights include groundbreaking studies on leadless pacemakers, atrial fibrillation treatments, and appropriate use criteria for cardiac devices, with key papers exploring the safety of pacemaker retrieval, the role of electrograms in ablation procedures, and long-term outcomes for left atrial appendage occlusion devices.

N Engl J Med 2013;368:1379-1387Background In 2013, it had been established that primary PCI for STEMI was the preferred strategy. Yet many patients did not have prompt access to primary-PCI capable hospitals and transfer delays could impact outcomes. The vast majority of patients with STEMI who present to non-PCI facilities do not subsequently get primary PCI within recommended times.Cardiology Trial's Substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support our work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.Delays led to the development of prehospital care, such as ECGs in the ambulance, and pre-hospital delivery of fibrinolysis. The Strategic Reperfusion Early after Myocardial Infarction (STREAM) study evaluated whether a fibrinolytic-therapy approach consisting of prehospital or early fibrinolysis with contemporary antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy, coupled with timely coronary angiography, provides a clinical outcome similar to that with primary PCI in patients with STEMI who present early after symptom onset.Patients Eligible patients had a) STEMI within three hours, b) could not have primary PCI within one hour of first medical contact. No formal exclusion criteria were listed in the main manuscript.Baseline Characteristics A total of 1892 patients underwent randomization in 1:1 fashion. The mean age of patients was 59 years. Less than 15% of both groups were older than 75 years. Females were 20%. More than 90% of patients were Killip class 1. Less than 10% of enrolled patients had had prior CHF, MI, or PCI.Procedures Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to fibrinolysis followed by timely coronary angiography or primary PCI. All patients were transferred to a PCI-capable hospital; for all non-PCI community hospitals participating in the study, a well-developed hub-and-spoke relationship with a PCI-capable site was required.The fibrinolytic strategy included early use of concomitant antiplatelet and anticoagulant medications, as well as additional discretionary glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists. Tenecteplase was administered in a weight-based dose and was combined with low-molecular-weight enoxaparin, weight and age adjusted.Antiplatelet therapy consisted of clopidogrel in a 300-mg loading dose (omitted for patients ≥75 years of age) followed by 75 mg daily and aspirin (150 to 325 mg) immediately followed by 75 to 325 mg daily. Urgent coronary angiography in the fibrinolysis group was permitted at any time in the presence of hemodynamic or electrical instability, worsening ischemia, or progressive or sustained ST-segment elevation requiring immediate coronary intervention, according to the investigator's judgment.Endpoints The primary end point of the trial was a 30-day composite of death from any cause, shock, congestive heart failure, or reinfarction. Single efficacy end points as well as safety end points consisting of ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, nonintracranial bleeding, and other serious clinical events were recorded.The statistical analysis plan was complicated. A sample size of 1000 patients per study group was planned, and the rate of the primary end point in the primary PCI group was projected to be 15.0%. After one-fifth of patients had been enrolled, trialists amended the protocol to reduce the dose of tenecteplase by 50% in patients older than 75 years because of excess ICH. ECG criteria for inferior MI was also changed to require at least 3 mm (up from 2) of ST elevation in two contiguous leads.This trial was designed as a proof-of-concept study. All statistical tests were of an exploratory nature.Results The median time delay from the onset of symptoms to first medical contact and randomization was similar in the two groups ( 61-62 minutes). The median times between symptom onset and start of reperfusion therapy (bolus tenecteplase or arterial sheath insertion) were 100 minutes and 178 minutes, respectively (P

This episode covers: Cardiology This Week: A concise summary of recent studies Dual antiplatelet therapy in 2025 Optimal communication with patients Snapshots Host: Emer Joyce  Guests: Carlos Aguiar, Michelle Kittleson, Gilles Montalescot Want to watch that episode? Go to: https://esc365.escardio.org/event/1798   Disclaimer ESC TV Today is supported by Bristol Myers Squibb. This scientific content and opinions expressed in the programme have not been influenced in any way by its sponsor. This programme is intended for health care professionals only and is to be used for educational purposes. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) does not aim to promote medicinal products nor devices. Any views or opinions expressed are the presenters' own and do not reflect the views of the ESC.   Declarations of interests Stephan Achenbach, Emer Joyce, Michelle Kittleson and Nicolle Kraenkel have declared to have no potential conflicts of interest to report. Carlos Aguiar has declared to have potential conflicts of interest to report: personal fees for consultancy and/or speaker fees from Abbott, AbbVie, Alnylam, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BiAL, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Ferrer, Gilead, GSK, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Servier, Takeda, Tecnimede. Davide Capodanno has declared to have potential conflicts of interest to report: Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi Aventis, Novo Nordisk, Terumo. Gilles Montalescot has declared to have potential conflicts of interest to report: research funds for Action Groupe or honoraria from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celecor, CSL Behring, Hexacath, Idorsia, Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, SMT, Terumo. Steffen Petersen has declared to have potential conflicts of interest to report: consultancy for Circle Cardiovascular Imaging Inc. Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Emma Svennberg has declared to have potential conflicts of interest to report: Abbott, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers, Squibb-Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson.

Host: Emer Joyce Guest: Gilles Montalescot Want to watch that extended interview? Go to: https://esc365.escardio.org/event/1798?resource=interview   Disclaimer ESC TV Today is supported by Bristol Myers Squibb. This scientific content and opinions expressed in the programme have not been influenced in any way by its sponsor. This programme is intended for health care professionals only and is to be used for educational purposes. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) does not aim to promote medicinal products nor devices. Any views or opinions expressed are the presenters' own and do not reflect the views of the ESC. Declarations of interests Stephan Achenbach, Emer Joyce and Nicolle Kraenkel have declared to have no potential conflicts of interest to report. Carlos Aguiar has declared to have potential conflicts of interest to report: personal fees for consultancy and/or speaker fees from Abbott, AbbVie, Alnylam, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BiAL, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Ferrer, Gilead, GSK, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Servier, Takeda, Tecnimede. Davide Capodanno has declared to have potential conflicts of interest to report: Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi Aventis, Novo Nordisk, Terumo. Gilles Montalescot has declared to have potential conflicts of interest to report: research funds for Action Groupe or honoraria from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celecor, CSL Behring, Hexacath, Idorsia, Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, SMT, Terumo. Steffen Petersen has declared to have potential conflicts of interest to report: consultancy for Circle Cardiovascular Imaging Inc. Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Emma Svennberg has declared to have potential conflicts of interest to report: Abbott, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers, Squibb-Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson.

In this episode, Dr. Valentin Fuster discusses the ASSURE DES trial, which compared aspirin monotherapy to withholding antiplatelet therapy in stable patients with drug-eluting stents undergoing non-cardiac surgery. The trial found no significant difference in major adverse outcomes between the two strategies, though minor bleeding was more common in the aspirin group, leading to a recommendation to continue aspirin therapy for most patients undergoing low-to-intermediate risk surgery, with exceptions for those at high bleeding risk.

What if the future of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) could be shorter, safer, and more effective? Uncover the latest insights into drug-eluting stents and how they are transforming how we think about dual-antiplatelet therapy. Join us as we examine the game-changing recommendations from top cardiology societies, which suggest that newer-generation stents can significantly reduce the duration of DAPT, particularly for patients with a high bleeding risk. Listen in as we dissect the innovative tools like the PRECISE-DAPT score and ARC-HBR criteria used to determine bleeding risk, ensuring patient safety without compromising on the efficacy of treatment. We delve into pivotal studies, including the Global Leader Study and the STOP-DAPT trial, that back these groundbreaking changes.Our conversation takes an intriguing turn as we explore the intersection of cardiology advancements with anesthesia practices. Discover how these developments are influencing preoperative settings, potentially altering surgical timing and decision-making in anesthesia care. We bring you exclusive insights from contributor, Janak Chandrasoma, featured in the October 2024 APSF newsletter. We urge you to explore further resources, share the knowledge with your peers, and join us in promoting patient safety in perioperative environments. Don't forget to rate, review, and share the episode with colleagues keen on staying at the forefront of anesthesia patient safety advancements.For show notes & transcript, visit our episode page at apsf.org: https://www.apsf.org/podcast/229-revolutionizing-anesthesia-care-for-cardiac-patients/© 2024, The Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation

34th ESC 2024: Ticagrelor monotherapy vs. dual antiplatelet therapy

In this episode of Medmastery's Cardiology Digest, we dive into three groundbreaking studies that are set to reshape our understanding and approach to cardiology. STUDY #1: First, we discuss a landmark piece of research that sheds new light on the benefits of percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with significant coronary artery disease who need a transcatheter aortic valve replacement. This study addresses important questions about patient selection for this intervention.   Lønborg, J, Jabbari, R, Sabbah, M, et al. 2024. PCI in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic-valve implantation. N Engl J Med. Published online. (https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2401513) STUDY #2: Next, we examine an insightful meta-analysis that evaluates patient-level data to inform the future of dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention. Discover the factors influencing the transition to ticagrelor monotherapy post-PCI and why this could change current guideline recommendations.  Valgimigli, M, Hong, S, Gragnano, F, et al. 2024. De-escalation to ticagrelor monotherapy versus 12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with and without acute coronary syndromes: A systematic review and individual patient-level meta-analysis of randomized trials. Lancet. 10456: 937–948. (https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01616-7) STUDY #3: Lastly, we take a closer look at the EPIC-CAD study, which aligns with previous findings from the AFIRE trial. Learn why anticoagulant monotherapy is now being considered for the majority of patients with atrial fibrillation who require anticoagulation and have stable coronary artery disease, and what this means for your clinical practice. Cho, MS, Kang, D-Y, Ahn, J-M, et al. 2024. Edoxaban antithrombotic therapy for atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. Published online. (https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2407362) Tune in to this episode for an engaging in-depth discussion of these studies and stay ahead in the ever-evolving field of cardiology!  Learn more with Medmastery's courses: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Essentials (6 CME) Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Essentials Workshop (6 CME) Get a Basic or Pro account, or, get a Trial account. Show notes: Visit us at  https://www.medmastery.com/podcasts/cardiology-podcast.

In this episode of JACC, Valentin Fuster examines genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy, emphasizing its potential to tailor treatments based on genetic variants for improved patient outcomes. While promising, the approach faces challenges like testing delays and variable patient responses that need addressing for broader implementation.

Following an emergency c-section due to HELLP syndrome in her first pregnancy, Jolene Brink was determined to have a different birthing experience with her second child. Through the support of a knowledgeable medical team and insights gained from her EBB Childbirth Class, she successfully achieved her goal of an unmedicated VBAC with the birth of her son, Guthrie, in 2022. Jolene's journey towards a VBAC was a transformative process of healing, empowerment, and reclaiming her birthing experience, showcasing the importance of advocacy and informed decision-making in maternal healthcare. Resources: Check out Doulas of Duluth to learn from her instructors Cooper Orth and Dana Morrison, and follow them on Instagram! Learn about Jolene's work here! Read The Preeclampsia Foundation's article on HELLP Syndrome Follow the Preeclampsia Foundation on Instagram van Oostwaard, M. F. et al. (2015). "Recurrence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: An individual patient data meta-analysis." Am J Obstet Gynecol 212(5): 624.e1-17. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25582098/ Duley, L., et al. (2019). "Antiplatelet agents for preventing pre-eclampsia and its complications." Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6820858/ Listen to the Evidence on VBAC - EBB 113 EBB Childbirth Class now includes a module all about planning a VBAC! Learn more about the EBB Childbirth class here. For more information about Evidence Based Birth and a crash course on evidence based care, visit www.ebbirth.com. Follow us on Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok! Ready to learn more? Grab an EBB Podcast Listening Guide or read Dr. Dekker's book, "Babies Are Not Pizzas: They're Born, Not Delivered!" If you want to get involved at EBB, join our Professional membership (scholarship options available) and get on the wait list for our EBB Instructor program. Find an EBB Instructor here, and click here to learn more about the EBB Childbirth Class.

Case Discussion 111 Answer: Antiplatelet therapy before CABG in CCS patients

Case Discussion 109 Answer: GI protection in SAPT

Special guest Dave L. Dixon, PharmD, FACC, FAHA, FCCP, FNLA, BCACP, CDCES, CLS, the Nancy L. and Ronald H. McFarlane Professor of Pharmacy and Chair of the Department of Pharmacotherapy & Outcomes Science at the Virginia Commonwealth University School of Pharmacy, joins us to talk about chronic coronary disease.Listen in as he discusses the management of chronic coronary disease with a focus on the new American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines.You'll also hear practical advice from panelists on TRC's Editorial Advisory Board:Anthony A. Donato, Jr., MD, MHPE, Associate Program Director, Tower Health System Internal Medicine Residency Program and Professor of Medicine at the Drexel University College of MedicineSteven E. Nissen, MD, MACC, the Chief Academic Officer at the Heart and Vascular Institute and the Lewis and Patricia Dickey Chair in Cardiovascular Medicine Professor of Medicine at the Cleveland Clinic Lerner School of Medicine at Case Western Reserve UniversityCraig D. Williams, PharmD, FNLA, BCPS, Clinical Professor of Pharmacy Practice at the Oregon Health and Science UniversityFor the purposes of disclosure, Dr. Dixon reports a relevant financial relationship [GLP-1 agonists, SGLT2 inhibitors] with Boehringer Ingelheim (grants/research support). Dr. Steven Nissen reports relevant financial relationships [cardiology] with AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Esperion, Medtronic, MyoKardia, New Amsterdam Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Silence Therapeutics (grants/research support).The other speakers have nothing to disclose. All relevant financial relationships have been mitigated.TRC Healthcare offers CE credit for this podcast. Log in to your Pharmacist's Letter or Prescriber's Letter account and look for the title of this podcast in the list of available CE courses.The clinical resources mentioned during the podcast are part of a subscription to Pharmacist's Letter and Prescriber's Letter: Toolbox: Optimizing Care of Patients with Coronary Artery DiseaseChart:  Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for Coronary Artery DiseaseChart:  Treatment of HypertensionIf you're not yet a Pharmacist's Letter or Prescriber's Letter subscriber, find out more about our product offerings at trchealthcare.com. Follow or subscribe, rate, and review this show in your favorite podcast app. You can also reach out to provide feedback or make suggestions by emailing us at ContactUs@trchealthcare.com.

Welcome back Rounds Table Listeners! In this throwback episode, Mike and John discuss two papers exploring pharmacotherapy-based interventions for agitation experienced by individuals with dementia and when to start or restart antiplatelet therapy after stroke caused by intracerebral hemorrhage. Check it out below! Effects of Antiplatelet Therapy After Stroke Caused by Intracerebral Hemorrhage (0:00 – 7:14). ...The post TBT – Agitation in Dementia and Antiplatelet Therapy after Intracerebral Hemorrhage appeared first on Healthy Debate.

Welcome back Rounds Table Listeners! In this throwback episode, Mike and John discuss two papers exploring pharmacotherapy-based interventions for agitation experienced by individuals with dementia and when to start or restart antiplatelet therapy after stroke caused by intracerebral hemorrhage. Check it out below! Effects of Antiplatelet Therapy After Stroke Caused by Intracerebral Hemorrhage (0:00 – 7:14). ... The post TBT – Agitation in Dementia and Antiplatelet Therapy after Intracerebral Hemorrhage first appeared on Healthy Debate. The post TBT – Agitation in Dementia and Antiplatelet Therapy after Intracerebral Hemorrhage appeared first on Healthy Debate.

Host: Peter Buch, MD, FACG, AGAF, FACP Guest: Naga Chalasani, MD, FAASLD With the increasing incidence and prevalence of cirrhosis in patients, healthcare professionals have to routinely consider giving anticoagulants to these patients. Understanding how we can safely administer these types of medications to cirrhosis patients is important. To learn more, tune in with Dr. Peter Buch as he speaks with Dr. Naga Chalasani, Co-Author of the article, titled “The Safety of Anticoagulants and Antiplatelet Agents in Patients with Cirrhosis,” which was published in Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics in November 2022, and the David W. Crabb Professor of Gastroenterology and Hepatology at Indiana University School of Medicine in Indianapolis.

Host: Peter Buch, MD, FACG, AGAF, FACP Guest: Naga Chalasani, MD With the increasing incidence and prevalence of cirrhosis in patients, healthcare professionals have to routinely consider giving anticoagulants to these patients. Understanding how we can safely administer these types of medications to cirrhosis patients is important. To learn more, tune in with Dr. Peter Buch as he speaks with Dr. Naga Chalasani, Co-Author of the article, titled “The Safety of Anticoagulants and Antiplatelet Agents in Patients with Cirrhosis,” which was published in Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics in November 2022, and the David W. Crabb Professor of Gastroenterology and Hepatology at Indiana University School of Medicine in Indianapolis.

Commentary by Dr. Valentin Fuster

Applying guidelines-directed therapies for antiplatelets and antithrombotics requires balancing the risks of cardiovascular events and the risk of bleeding. Guest Erin Michos, MD, MHS, FACC, FAHA, FASE, FASCP, describes the use shared decision-making with patients who are at higher risk for thrombotic events, and discusses pharmacotherapies recommended for use with particular patient groups.2019 AHA/ACC Primary Prevention Guidelines: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000678US Preventive Service Task Force 2022 Aspirin Recommendations: https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/aspirin-to-prevent-cardiovascular-disease-preventive-medicationCURE Trial 2022: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/01.cir.0000029926.71825.e2DAPT risk calculator: https://tools.acc.org/daptriskapp/#!/content/calculator/PRECISE-DAPT score: http://www.precisedaptscore.com/predapt/TWILIGHT trial: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa19084192021 AHA/ACC/SCAI guidelines for acute coronary disease: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001038COMPASS trial: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046048See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this episode of the Spine & Nerve podcast, Dr. Jason Kung and Dr. Brian Joves delve into a comprehensive discussion surrounding anticoagulation guidelines and their implications in interventional pain procedures. With over a hundred thousand downloads and over 1,000 YouTube subscribers, we would like to express our sincere gratitude to all the listeners for your engagement and support. Please continue to share and subscribe to help more people discover the podcast. Today's episode focuses on the safety of epidural steroid injections and the critical role of anticoagulation management.Understanding the rationale behind a patient's anticoagulation therapy is vital for interventional pain physicians. This approach empowers clinicians to make informed decisions about whether to continue or withhold anticoagulation medications prior to procedures. There is a delicate balance between patient-specific risks and the benefits of these interventions. One of the things that must be known and emphasized is the remarkable safety profile of epidural steroid injections. Approximately nine million epidural steroid injections are administered annually, resulting in an adverse event rate of about one in 780,000. This reassuring statistic is attributed to the collaborative efforts of medical societies and the implementation of strict anticoagulation guidelines. The hosts emphasize the role of fluoroscopic guidance, non-particulate steroids, and avoidance of deep sedation in enhancing the safety of these procedures. The episode further delves into the nuances of assessing bleeding risks in patients undergoing interventional pain procedures. As always, we must underscore the importance of a comprehensive physical examination, with a specific focus on identifying signs of easy bruising and mucosal bleeding. The hosts discuss the relevance of specific medications, including aspirin and NSAIDs, and their implications for procedural safety. The hosts engage in an insightful exploration of the guidelines for managing anticoagulation medications pre- and post-procedure. They stress the need for pain physicians to consider the anatomical location of the intervention and evaluate the potential risks versus benefits. The doctors conclude the episode by highlighting the crucial role of shared decision-making and patient education. By fostering collaboration between patients and physicians, the hosts emphasize the creation of a safe and informed healthcare environment.In this thought-provoking episode, the doctors try to help you navigate the complexities of anticoagulation management in interventional pain procedures, and offer some insights for practitioners seeking to provide the highest level of care to their patients. References: Anesthesia Quality Institute Closed Claims Database Review 2011 through 2021 for Epidural Steroid Complications. Naeem Haider. Pain Physician 26 (3), E251, 2023 Stephen Endres, MD and others, The Risks of Continuing or Discontinuing Anticoagulants for Patients Undergoing Common Interventional Pain Procedures, Pain Medicine, Volume 18, Issue 3, March 2017, Pages 403–409, https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnw108 Narouze S, Benzon HT, Provenzano D, et alInterventional Spine and Pain Procedures in Patients on Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Medications (Second Edition): Guidelines From the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy, the American Academy of Pain Medicine, the International Neuromodulation Society, the North American Neuromodulation Society, and the World Institute of PainRegional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2018; 43:225-262. The ASRA App: https://www.asra.com/the-asra-family/asra-app

Thrombolytics are the standard of care for acute stroke yet are not without risk. Join host, Geoff Wall, with guest, Jake Galdo, as they discuss combination aspirin and clopidogrel versus thrombolytics in mild stroke. The GameChangerThrombolytic use in mild stroke is common due to the time factor of administration, but data is mixed. New research has shown DAPT to be non-inferior to TPA. HostGeoff Wall, PharmD, BCPS, FCCP, BCGPProfessor of Pharmacy Practice, Drake UniversityInternal Medicine/Critical Care, UnityPoint HealthJake Galdo, PharmD, MBA, BCPS, BCGPCourse Content and Developer, CEimpactManaging Network Facilitator, CPESN Health EquityCEO, Seguridad ReferenceChen H, Cui Y, Zhou Z, et al. Dual Antiplatelet Therapy vs Alteplase for Patients With Minor Nondisabling Acute Ischemic Stroke: The ARAMIS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2023;329(24):2135–2144. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.7827https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2806532 Pharmacist Members, REDEEM YOUR CPE HERE! Not a member? Get a Pharmacist Membership & earn CE for GameChangers Podcast episodes! (30 mins/episode)CPE Information Learning ObjectivesUpon successful completion of this knowledge-based activity, participants should be able to:1. Discuss how the inclusion and exclusion criteria impact the interpretation of the ARIMIS study 2. Describe the potential benefits of DAPT therapy compared to thrombolytic therapy in mild stroke0.05 CEU/0.5 HrUAN: 0107-0000-23-249-H01-PInitial release date: 7/31/2023Expiration date: 7/31/2024Additional CPE details can be found here.Follow CEimpact on Social Media:LinkedInInstagramDownload the CEimpact App for Free Continuing Education + so much more!

Dr. Thanh Nguyen discusses his paper, "Dual Antiplatelet Therapy vs Alteplase for Patients With Minor Nondisabling Acute Ischemic Stroke". Show references: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2806532 This episode was sponsored by the ExTINGUISH Trial for NMDAR Encephalitis: Call 844-4BRAIN5 to refer patients.

Dr. Dan Ackerman talks with Dr. Thanh Nguyen about whether dual antiplatelet therapy is noninferior to intravenous thrombolysis among patients with minor nondisabling acute ischemic stroke. Read the related article in JAMA. Visit NPUb.org/Podcast for associated article links. This episode was sponsored by the ExTINGUISH Trial for NMDAR Encephalitis: Call 844-4BRAIN5 to refer patients.

Host/Editor: Dr. Alla Turshudzhyan, Chief Medical Resident at UCONN. Majority of peripheral disease (PAD) cases are asymptomatic with only about 25% of patients presenting with claudication, rest pain, gangrene, and limb ulcerations. Ankle-brachial index (ABI) is a first-line diagnostic test. ABI of less than 0.9 is consistent with PAD. ABI greater than 1.3 is a sign of noncompressible calcified vessels. If patient's story and exam are highly concerning for PAD, but ABI is normal, consider post-exercise ABI or a toe-brachial index. Use duplex US to help you identify location and severity of PAD. More advanced imaging may be warranted if non-invasive modalities are non-diagnostic or if patient needs an intervention. For symptomatic PAD patients, it is reasonable to consider clopidogrel over aspirin or low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin (while keeping in mind that rivaroxaban + ASA carries an increased risk of bleeding when compared to ASA alone). Antiplatelet therapy use in asymptomatic PAD is not routinely recommended. Treat claudication with supervised exercise program, followed by cilostazol or naftidrofuryl. If your patient progressed to the point that their symptoms are constant, disabling, and no longer responsive to lifestyle modification and pharmacotherapy, revascularization may be indicated. There are two options for revascularization – percutaneous and surgical. Most cases can be done percutaneously. Surgery is reserved for patient with long segment stenosis, multifocal stenosis, eccentric, calcified stenosis, or long segment occlusions. We hope you enjoy this episode! Thank you for listening.

In this episode of the PRS Global Open Keynotes Podcast, Dr. Karen Evans and Dr. Christopher Attinger discuss the safety of continuing antiplatelet and anticoagulant medications in patients undergoing split skin graft procedures. This episode discusses the following PRS Global Open article: Neither Antiplatelet nor Anticoagulant Therapy Increases Graft Failure after Split-thickness Skin Grafting by Elliot T. Walters, Kevin G. Kim, Paige K. Dekker, Gregory P. Stimac, Shyamin Mehra, Tammer Elmarsafi, John S. Steinberg, Christopher E. Attinger, Paul J. Kim and Karen K. Evans. Read the articles for free on PRSGlobalOpen.com:https://bit.ly/AntiplateletnorAnticoagulant Drs. Evans and Attinger are both Professors in the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery at Medstar Georgetown University Hospital in Washington, DC. Your host, Dr. Damian Marucci, is a board-certified plastic surgeon and Associate Professor of Surgery at the University of Sydney in Australia. #PRSGlobalOpen #KeynotesPodcast #PlasticSurgery

Commentary by Dr. Valentin Fuster

This week, Rob and Zach will be talking about Anticoagulants, Thrombolytics, and Antiplatelet AgentsWe will be discussing the following topics within this episode on Anticoagulants, Thrombolytics, and Antiplatelet Agents!Hemostasis: Coagulation Cascade, Extrinsic + Intrinsic PathwayAnticoagulants:HeparinUFHLMWHFondaparinux Direct Factor InhibitorsXa Inhibitors:RivaroxabanApixabanEdoxabanThrombin Inhibitors:DabigatranArgatrobanBivalirudinVitamin K Antagonists:Warfarin (Coumadin)Thrombolytics (tPA):AlteplaseReteplaseTenecteplaseStreptokinaseUrokinaseAntiplatelets:AspirinP2y12 Receptor Blockers:ClopidogrelTicagrelorPrasugrelTiclopidineGP2b/3a Inhibitors:AbciximabEptifibatideTirofibanPDE-3 Inhibitors:CilostazolAnticoagulants, Thrombolytics, Antiplatelet Agents MOATherapeutic IndicationsAdverse Drug Reactions (ADR's)Drug ComplicationsTo follow along with Notes & Illustrations for our podcasts please become a member on our website! https://www.ninjanerd.org/podcast/anticoagulants-thrombolytics-and-antiplatelet-agentsFollow us on:YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/ninjanerdscienceInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/ninjanerdlecturesFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/NinjaNerdLecturesTwitter: https://twitter.com/ninjanerdsciDiscord: https://discord.com/invite/3srTG4dngWTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@ninjanerdlecturesThe Foundation of Daily Health, AG1 by Athletic GreensUnlock Your Free One Year Supply of Vitamin D3+K2 and 5 free Travel Packs Support the show

Dual antiplatelet Tx. with Ticagrelor and graft failure after CABG

Kyle A. Hess, PharmD (Twitter: @KyleHessPharmD ) describes current guideline recommendations for duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following percutaneous coronary intervention, compares and contrasts strategies for antiplatelet regimens for reduced duration DAPT and selects an appropriate duration of therapy when utilizing shortened DAPT. For more pharmacy content, follow Mayo Clinic Pharmacy Residency Programs @MayoPharmRes or the host, Garrett E. Schramm, Pharm.D., @garrett_schramm on Twitter! You can also connect with the Mayo Clinic's School of Continuous Professional Development online at https://ce.mayo.edu/ or on Twitter @MayoMedEd. 

Commentary by Dr. Valentin Fuster

Commentary by Dr. Valentin Fuster

Dear friends, in this episode we summarized recent data on potent antiplatelet therapy and Kimiara company provided us the data on Brelor. You can also download the slides via this link:http://ecardiocast.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/antiplatelet-therapy.pdf

Dear friends, in this episode we summarized recent data on potent antiplatelet therapy. You can also download the slides via this link:http://ecardiocast.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/antiplatelet-therapy.pdf

Emergencies happen in hematology and oncology. This is a fact. But how do we manage these emergencies? Look no further. In this episode, we talk all about our second oncologic emergency: new brain mets. Brain mets:Strongly consider steroids, particularly with the presence of vasogenic edema associated with brain mets Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS): use of high dose radiation delivered in a single treatment (“fraction”) that is delivered focally to the area of disease seen on imaging (typically MRI); great option for brain mets; can be performed by radiation oncology What to do to expedite Rad Onc planning: Thin-cut MRIStart patient on steroids Interpreting MRI imaging: T1 post-contrast sequence: to look for brain massT2 sequence: looking for vasogenic edema surrounding brain massMidline shift is an issue more so when it is acute; this is very different than slow changes over timeWho to operate on? Functional status prior to surgery; not in an area that can cause other harm; no other good alternative treatment optionsWhat to tell your NSGY colleague during a consult: A quick neuro exam (consciousness, strength, sensation, focal neurologic issues)Brief cancer historyUnderlying organ dysfunction Antiplatelet/anticoagulants A HUGE thank you to our special guests:Ryan Miller, MD, MS: PGY5 in Radiation Oncology at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PAJoshua Lowenstein, MD, MBA: Neurosurgery Attending, REX Neurosurgery and Spine Specialists, Raleigh, NC Please visit our website (TheFellowOnCall.com) for more information Twitter: @TheFellowOnCallInstagram: @TheFellowOnCallListen in on: Apple Podcast, Spotify, and Google Podcast